ML20059D471

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Fitness for Duty Performance Data for Jan-June 1990
ML20059D471
Person / Time
Site: Farley  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 08/22/1990
From: Hairston W
ALABAMA POWER CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NUDOCS 9009070053
Download: ML20059D471 (4)


Text

- _ _

P

, e, <

?

Al:bama Power Company 40 inverness CInta Parktr.y

. Post Office Box 1295 Birmingham, Alabama 35201 i

Telephone 205 B68-5581 W. G. Hairston, Ill Senior %ce President Nuclear Operations ggg g, August 22, 1990 the sourtem voctre system 10CFR26.71-4 Docket Nos. 50-348 50-364 i

U. S; Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555 1

Gentlemen:

J. M. Farley Nuclear Plant - Units 1 and 2 ,

Fitness For Duty Performance Data i

Alabama Power Company hereby submits Fitness For Duty Performance Data for the first six month reporting period as required by 10CFR26.71(d). This data is summarized on the attached enclosure.

If there are any questions, please advise.

Respectfully submitted, ALABAMA POWER COMPANY u).) UM V. G. Hairston, III VGH,III/RSF/sej8-2939 Enclosures ,

cc Mr. S. D. Ebneter Mr. S. T. Hoffman Mr. G. F. Maxwell 1 kgIS N0b 001 0 l 1 o,gA i

o Ib t i 9009070053 900822 PDR ADOCK 05000348-R PNU.; ,

\

==.. -.-.

Perfonnance Data Personnel Subject to CFR 26 1

1 Alabama Power Company 06-30-90 i COMPANY 6 MONTH $ ENDING i Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant LOCGON l R. S. Fucich (205) 868-5051 CONTACT WC PHONE UNCLUDE AREA CODE)

CUTOFFS: SCREEN /CONFlRMATION (ng/ml) b APPENDIX A TO 10CFR 26 -

MARUVANA AMPHETAMINES Barbiturates 300j 300

/ /

Benz diazepines 300j 150 COCAINE / PHENCYCLIDINE /

OPIATES / ALCOHOL (% BAC) /

u LONG-TERM SHORT TERM CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR TESTING RESULTS LICENSEE EMPLOYEES PERSONNEL PERSONNEL AVERAGE NUMBER

  • 977 380 127 WITH UNESCORTED ACCESS X
  1. # REFERRED ACCESS # # # #

CATEGORIES TESTED POSITIVE TO EAP RESTORED TESTED POSITIVE TESTED POSITIVE PRE EMPLOYMENT -

, I PRE-BADGING 63 0

^

N k 66 0 135 1 PERIODIC ..c il FOR CAUSE 5 1 0 0 0 0 POST ACCIDENT ,

RANDOM 516 1 255 1 17 0 FOLLOW-UP 4 1 0 0 0 0 l OTHER

- [%:[ Ok '

TOTAL -588 3 2 1 321 1 152 1

, 6/7/89 i

l- _

. . . ~.

ItANDOM TESTINS PIIOGRAM RESULTS INDIVIDUALS TESTED - 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993

  1. POSmVE 2
  1. NEGATIVE 788

% POSITIVE 0.25 GRAPH OF 5  !

% POSITIVE 4

3-2 ,

i e

i CONPORIAED POSmVE TESTS POR SPECIFlc SUBSTANCES MARUVANA 2 i COCAINE 2 OPIATES AMPHETAMINES PHENCYCLIDINE ALCOHOL 1

(

6/7/89 i

I 4

I

. , 1..

J. H. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM The data generated under the Fitness For Duty program from January, 1990 through June, 1990 has been reviewed and analyzed and no weaknesses vere identified.

No events reportable undar 10CFR26.73 occurred during this period; however, a letter was submitted to the Commission on May 25, 1990 reporting a false negative, as required by Appendix A - paragraph 2.8.

The random pool contains not only those badged for unescorted access, but  ;

also those employees who may, in an emergency condition, be called upon to i vork at the site and may require unescorted access.. Contractors without approved programs are included in the pool while on site. Testing is performed on a nominal weekly basis at a rate which vill equal 100% of the total population.

In summarizing management actions associated with the Fitness For Duty program, it should be emphasized that the incidence of confirmed positive tests has been extremely lov. Consequently, manag" ment actions relative to l determination of fitness for duty have been limited to the few confirmed positive test results-identified by the prograt si regular full-time employees. Contractor employees screened as pc 15 ve are denied access and no further action is taken by Alabama Power Company in these cases. '

Management actions during the reporting period have involved three personnel, none of which was a supervisor or an ind.vidual licensed to operate the reactor. Ops employee, who tested positive for drugs on a random test was suspended for fourteen days and referred to the EAP. -This l employee tested negative for drugs during follow-up testing; however, he tested positive for alcohol during that same follov-up test. This individual has had access restored and is in a follow-up testing program.

A second employee, who tested positive during a "for cause" test (resulting from an allegation) vas still off work in rehabilitation at the end of this period. The long term contractor who tested positive for drugs on a random test was not badged for unescorted access, but was in the pool as "may be called upon in an energency condition." This contractor employee resigned.

During July, NRC Region li personnel performed a fitness for duty (nspection and the results, which are being reviewed by the Region (no report has been issued), vill be discussed in the second period report.

9

% n .y _