ML19340A184: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 34: Line 34:
l . ,                                  The concerned operating administrations of the Department of Transportation s  have reviewed the environmental considerations for the Oconee Nuclear Station.            It is the determination of this Department that the impact of this project upon transportation in minimal. Other than to recommend issuance of the license and early construction of this project, no addi-tional comments are offered.
l . ,                                  The concerned operating administrations of the Department of Transportation s  have reviewed the environmental considerations for the Oconee Nuclear Station.            It is the determination of this Department that the impact of this project upon transportation in minimal. Other than to recommend issuance of the license and early construction of this project, no addi-tional comments are offered.
l l
l l
The opportunity for the Department of Tra,h.iportation to review and
The opportunity for the Department of Tra,h.iportation to review and comment on this report is appreciated.                                      t I
;
comment on this report is appreciated.                                      t I
x        Sincerely,        -
x        Sincerely,        -
                                                                                                     %        r      ! ?.
                                                                                                     %        r      ! ?.
Line 70: Line 68:
   . . . . . , r . ,          ' ;;. . i.v .                                          n:      a,.,
   . . . . . , r . ,          ' ;;. . i.v .                                          n:      a,.,
_~.-,,.,    , ,. .            .
_~.-,,.,    , ,. .            .
                                                                                                                                                          .                ,.,.;,,.
                                                               .                        ,.      p. ,                          . _j,,y.
                                                               .                        ,.      p. ,                          . _j,,y.


Line 79: Line 76:
                             ;              UNITED STATES COAST GUARD                $,8; cf^o*d0.Tc ussi
                             ;              UNITED STATES COAST GUARD                $,8; cf^o*d0.Tc ussi
                                                                                     .SA 0306 34, MR 1971 Mr. Harold L. Price
                                                                                     .SA 0306 34, MR 1971 Mr. Harold L. Price
                   . Director of Regulation
                   . Director of Regulation U. S. Atomic Energy Commission Washington, D. c.      20545                                        50-269/2M /287
;
U. S. Atomic Energy Commission Washington, D. c.      20545                                        50-269/2M /287


==Dear Mr. Price:==
==Dear Mr. Price:==


Thia is in response to your letter of 12 February 1971 addressed to Mr.
Thia is in response to your letter of 12 February 1971 addressed to Mr.
Michael S. Cafferty, Acting Assistant Secretary for Environment and Urban
Michael S. Cafferty, Acting Assistant Secretary for Environment and Urban Systems, concerning the environmental considerations for The Duke Power Company's Oconee Nuclear Station, South Carolina.
;
Systems, concerning the environmental considerations for The Duke Power Company's Oconee Nuclear Station, South Carolina.
!                  The concerned operating administrations of the Department of Transportation have. reviewed the environmental considerations for the Oconee Nuclear Station.
!                  The concerned operating administrations of the Department of Transportation have. reviewed the environmental considerations for the Oconee Nuclear Station.
It is the determination of this Department that the impact of this project upon transportation in minimal. Other than to recommend issuance of the license and early construction of this project, no addi-tional comments are offered.
It is the determination of this Department that the impact of this project upon transportation in minimal. Other than to recommend issuance of the license and early construction of this project, no addi-tional comments are offered.
Line 95: Line 88:
                                                             /
                                                             /
                                                         ,dincer  y,
                                                         ,dincer  y,
                                                       / i    /l H A.1. O  ec' f C ptTa n. d. Cea_ Guar 3
                                                       / i    /l H A.1. O  ec' f C ptTa n. d. Cea_ Guar 3 i                                                      A ting Chief, Ofilca ci ?til: tr.d laternaticnal Affairs
;
i                                                      A ting Chief, Ofilca ci ?til: tr.d laternaticnal Affairs
     ~
     ~
t I
t I
Line 103: Line 94:
l l
l l
1457 t
1457 t
                                                                                                                ;
i}}
i}}

Latest revision as of 09:50, 18 February 2020

Submits Comments on Des Transportation Impact Minimal. Recommends Issuance of CP
ML19340A184
Person / Time
Site: Oconee  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 03/24/1971
From: Solberg H
U.S. COAST GUARD, TRANSPORTATION, DEPT. OF
To: Price H
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
References
NUDOCS 8001140782
Download: ML19340A184 (2)


Text

,

'; . ,s

' Address enly fr DEPARTMENT CF TRANSPORTATION cowuANou ! (AWL) 4 O, '" c ^5' * ^ *

, UNITED STATES COAST GUARD WASHtNGToN. D.C. 2C591 g l

, , .a 1

4

.SA 0306

. 24 MAR 1971 Mr. Harold L. Price g m

  • Director of Regulation ( .$'d- 8 6 U. S. Atomic Energy Commission g o ;/ // 6 Washington, D. C. .20545 ( 0 - 8 c~# Y

Dear Mr. Price:

This is in response to your letter of 12 February 1971 addressed to Mr.

Michael S. Cafferty, Acting Assistant Secretary for Environment and Urban

' ~

Systems, concerning the environmental considerations for The Duke Power Company's Oconen Nuclear Station, South Carolina.

l . , The concerned operating administrations of the Department of Transportation s have reviewed the environmental considerations for the Oconee Nuclear Station. It is the determination of this Department that the impact of this project upon transportation in minimal. Other than to recommend issuance of the license and early construction of this project, no addi-tional comments are offered.

l l

The opportunity for the Department of Tra,h.iportation to review and comment on this report is appreciated. t I

x Sincerely, -

% r  ! ?.

s il

\

l N l, //

l

  • H C A.t pt'aTn,O W' S'V' '

Cmt. Guafd Acting Chief, Oiilce ci .' blic and International Affairs i

-l

/* \ I g I//~ /\

I

, sy h e t- c} 000KETED ussC \

i v S c l"gr ij p.s h f - e ~

' e1 y LU  !!; 4

- i

.. a ' .'dkQi, *9 43.,/ f 5 f

  • J

_3 MAR '261971 REGULATORY

~/

/

' 1 I , I- >

k II15's[9'#

Ce ;

q g Mall SECTION

'6, / A 't J l c-D  %.uf DOCKET C S K NQ

. C  % \1

'  ; ~,

l% .. _ ,

.s.e n'_ b

,.y..w. m' q.- ,,. w s.v. m .mt m:2. ; v +~:~..

7 0 o F W ]W2- y M S P ' m 7 ' .s

. . . . . , r . , ' ;;. . i.v . n: a,.,

_~.-,,., , ,. . .

. ,. p. , . _j,,y.

~~

O -

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Addan no'r *

' couu4Noani (AWL)

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD $,8; cf^o*d0.Tc ussi

.SA 0306 34, MR 1971 Mr. Harold L. Price

. Director of Regulation U. S. Atomic Energy Commission Washington, D. c. 20545 50-269/2M /287

Dear Mr. Price:

Thia is in response to your letter of 12 February 1971 addressed to Mr.

Michael S. Cafferty, Acting Assistant Secretary for Environment and Urban Systems, concerning the environmental considerations for The Duke Power Company's Oconee Nuclear Station, South Carolina.

! The concerned operating administrations of the Department of Transportation have. reviewed the environmental considerations for the Oconee Nuclear Station.

It is the determination of this Department that the impact of this project upon transportation in minimal. Other than to recommend issuance of the license and early construction of this project, no addi-tional comments are offered.

The opportunity for the Department of Tra,nsportation to review and i

l comment on this report is appreciated. /I

/

,dincer y,

/ i /l H A.1. O ec' f C ptTa n. d. Cea_ Guar 3 i A ting Chief, Ofilca ci ?til: tr.d laternaticnal Affairs

~

t I

I l'

l l

1457 t

i