ML19329A202
| ML19329A202 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 02/18/1972 |
| From: | Byerly T AGRICULTURE, DEPT. OF, FOREST SERVICE, EUSDOBFS |
| To: | Rogers L US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7912300234 | |
| Download: ML19329A202 (3) | |
Text
.i paamm
.h care or occumeur-cars neciavan e.oa
- )
Departmans of Agriculture Feb. 18,1972 Feb.,22 1972 N ' *?
3 N3 C.C.
20230 sm o u,,o
,,,Q,,.
o,..
T.C. Byeely I
ya C a*G.e CG-O Y H L"-
Mr. Lester Bessrs 1
actio= =ccessaar O
coacuaac~ce O
oars aas*<aro-I wo actio= = ctssaar O ce===~r O
er:
CLAS SIF; PQhT OFF6CE FeLE CQQE.
U 50-269 (IEVIRO FILM) coca., r.Qu: i 4 Ltrrethg.is 1.7pItr...transthe
,,,...co ro oare
..ccuco.,
o ru r
m, g.u_; g followingt j x w/2 cys for AC1105 (ISP)
DISTRIBIFYIDW:
auctosv.u.
Comments from DQA on Oconee Station
%"ABC FDR File Cy Unit 1 Envire Statamment.....
g% g)
Paulus (Ltr only) l E. Fitzpatrick (Lar Only) cy m 'd)
~
' h h j h,5:b gjf (Ltz only)
Morris /Schreeder
~ ~ ~ '
i L*""*"
ACKNOW. EDGED
{
DiNumme t
FEEEE EastasE BL 5
L r
u.s. Arouic zucacy commission Mall CONTROL FORM roau^<c-nas
@ U.S. GO VC RNMEN T PRIN rlN G O F FIC E e 1971424 eet 791280023y D
3 Rebtery e:'e "y.
Qs.. -
.o q.y gJ'
' aw..\\
,s
- M..
'd O E F A A'v E N T C F AG RICUi,'U c E T: '
/ \\
y'
+
1 d* '.'
- r= c: :r - s ::.: u <
's
.'.s.
- 5 /
- . n a, r a n. : c 2c2so
.?
.r L:L-!^
} ' - T,.h Il l FEB 181M A
.. y q' ' -
Mr. Lester Rogers Director, Radiological and Environmental Protection U. S. Atomic Energy Co::: mission Washington, DC 205k5
Dear Mr. Rogers:
This refers to our letter of January 19, 1972, transmitting the U. S. Department of Agriculture com::lents on the Duke Power Co=pany's Oconee Nuclear Station, Unit 1.
Co==ents on this station from the Forest Service are enclosed.
Sincerely,
,f:. w:':- u,
l
,i i
T. C. BYERLY Coordinator, Environ =e'ntal Quality Activities Attach =ent
\\
Ob/S
.. o
/-
h4,e -
n U. S. IEPARECT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE
,.s
.,3 - [ *,, /, N The major impact on the forest resources discussed in this project has already occurred, e.g., clearing and innundation of 26,000 acres. The statement is very complete and thorough concerning most resources affected. Although benefits are shown for hunting, fishing, and other forms of recreation, costs or losses are not shown (unless they are. included in the T.8 million under land use). To be truly objective, expected future returns for timber, hunting, fishing, and other land and water uses on land to be innundated should be shown as " costs".
We are happy to see that some of the Duke Power Company land vill be converted to forestry. As you know, change in land use often results in sedimentation, so adequate plans to control erosion should be considered.
903