ML19329A752
| ML19329A752 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 01/14/1972 |
| From: | Galler S COMMERCE, DEPT. OF |
| To: | Rogers L US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8001090748 | |
| Download: ML19329A752 (11) | |
Text
,
e exn er noevurxr exn arenvro so. >
m snsresary of Cammerse Jan. 14. 1972I
.> s 19. 1972
'i weekinstem D.C.
20230 u,,
,,xo,
,,,c,,,
,13,,,
l
$14mmy R. Sailer g
casca ec,
- orata, ro, 1
Mr. Lester nosers Acucu nzerssany O
c acuaaracz O 8^" ^"S * **
- D '
f' _
no x.new necessxnv O couwrur O
sr.
PC5r Crr:CE nLE CODES i C1.A 441TJ W 269 (ENTIRO FILE) u arc.no,
" ^ " '
"'C***
" ^ " '
Lfr" r"e #E'*dfiT-DT ler...trmas the e
J.G. Esppler 1-Z0-72
}
l g;gggg, a k w/2 cys for ACTICW UTEIBUTION:
e Cy j
t N 'Mmme's from EJC Asst secretary for Ecomenic Affairs & ND&A furnishing c.
R
[
on Draft Detailed Enviro Statement for UcuP f " = (2) j aio;~ix.tr au(Ltr
- 1 N. Fitzpatrick Only) i,
f 1
- ' i' DeYoung m s ;..;
1;{l]r, (3 cys enci ree'd)
,, % (gg, %gg
"****T**'r' 30KiOW. EDGED Earas 1
DiNunno A-173 DL
^
a i
u.s. Atoxic taracy coxxtsst " MAIL CONTROL FORM ronx are.m (s44 1h V. 5. Government Printing Offices 1968 - 296 - di4 c
)
80010907%
D
m
,.s* %,,
3 THE A'ZSISTANT CECZETAGY CF C:MME~E Washington, D.C.
20230
.,, /
So-a69 January 14, 1972 m
+
s 0
Mr. Lester Rogers, Director g g I 9f97g u 3
Division of Radiological and J
"$$* an Environmental Protection f
U. S. Atomic Energy Commission S
8m gg Washington, D. C.
20545
Dear Mr. Rogers:
This is in response to your le tter of December 13, 1971.
We have reviewed the draft detailed.atatement on the environmen-tal considerations for the Ocenee Nuclear Station, Unit #1 of the Duke Power Company.
In order to give you the full benefit of the Department's analysis. I am anclosing the review comments from the Bureau of Domestic Commerce, the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Economic Affairs and the National Oceanic mid Atmospheric Administration.
We hope this information will be helpful.
Sin erely, Sidney R.
aller Deputy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Affairs j
1 Enclosures (10 pages), 3 sets i
4 6
m
.s
,[
=w v.c.
a.
..2...
._n bnu bl zu. ::u :: ::= :::: &==..~=..
s bgy was.sinscn. o.c. 202:a i
Oecember 29, 1971 22MORAXDUM FOR Sidney Galler From: Zdwin B. Shykind N O J.l4-72
Subject:
Comments on Draft Detailed Statement on Environ-mental Considerations for Oconee Nuclear Station, Unit #1 of Duke Power Company The need for the electric power to be furnished to this arca by the Oconee 21 ant is corroborated by 72C reporta entered in previous statements (p. 45, detailed statement).
The re-serve power margins for the power pool of which che applican is a member would be less than 9a in 1973 if the proposed units were not built and operated as planned.
nsview of the economic data in this draft detailed =tatement indicates coverage of the major areas.
The economic benefits accruing as a result of the_ nuclear plant are the electric energy itself with a market value in excess of $100 million, and an annual income benefit of approximately $3 million fcr the present efte.
There appears to be a question with regard to the commodity value (benefit) of the energy available from peak power generation, item 32 of Table X-4.
The applicant's supplement indicates (in Table 10) that the annual costs of peaking capacity and energy for the alternative closed-cycle pumped-storage is approximately $17 million.
The Cable X-4 figure is $26 million with an asterisk indicating that expansion capacity is included.
This asterisk is also applied to the Xeowee-Coxaway project (subsystem #1) where the approximarcly S26 million in both Tables X-4 and Table 10 is identical.
Zither the asterisk does not apply to the pumped storage hydro _ peaking (subsystem #1), or perhaps the $17 million figure applies for the pumped-storage-at-separate-location subsystem.
The $3 million annual income is composed of approximately
$1.7 million for direct operating employee payroll and ac.croximatelv'$1.28 million of secondary income contributions due to tourist-industry generated local increases.
The $1.7 illion income is stated.by the AEC draft detailed statement
.m 320
.p,
t
+=,
2 (p. 116) to be for 210 operating employees while the figurc stated in iten 42, Table X-4 is 450 employees.
This 450 employee f,igure appears to be estimated construction empicyces on the Keowee-Toxaway project in July of.1974 according to the applicants supplement, p. 33.
Table X-4 also contains some approximations for Federal, state and. local tax benef'.ts.
These figures may or may not include amounts-for the real property tax (the text indica:cs these amounts have not yet been reported).
If available, the amounts for these' taxes should be included.
Environmental effects have been quantified to a larger d' gree than has e
historically becn true resulting in a better data base frc=
}
which to form a balanced judgement during review.
There are at least two areas which may deserve future con-sideration.
The areas of concern are those of gaseous radic-active waste treatment and thermal effects (on both fish life
~
and heat capacity)'of the facility.
The problems relative to gaseous radioactive waste treatment and release can best be resolved by the AEC and EPA.
The uncertainties associated with the thermal' effects on aquatic biota (especially fish life)
- and.the future heat capacity losses of the water resources possibly could be given some additional consideration as further information becomesavailable from the applicant.
In general, the benefits stated by the applicant appear to considerably outweigh the undesirable environmental asoccts for this particular nuclear station._
The areas cited above
~
votid'not bo considered particularly major in their impact and conceivably should be adequately resolved without ex-tended effort.-
4 -
0 w
W 4
4 9
w a.....;.
c s_..,.
2 a.
\\',)Q.% J,)<
Janua"1 11, 1972' l-N 72
.u.o
.RIMOMNDUX TO Dr. Sidney R.. Galler Deputy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Affairs FRC.V. :
Robert T. Miki, Senior Economis:
'S Office of the Assistant Secreta:.mf for Economic Affairs SUEJECT:
Duke Power Company:
Oconee Nuclear Station, Uni: 1 I havo reviewed the environmental report relating to the proposed issuance of an operating license to the Duke Power Compr.y for the Oconee Nuclear Station, Unit 1,and focused particularly on the-cost-benefit analysis contained in the report.
I have no major substantive comments on the analysis that was made.
It is inappropriate in Table X-4, column 4 to include "530,000 to University Southern California for archeological. study" as a benefit.
i t
.-v
.., y.
5
..... ; :.:n': :.n:- a,,.. - -" p,;.
1
-. ~ -
')
..---.,0'...,
h;;4y14.=-
is:..
January 12, 1972 e
2r. S. R. Galler Dr.k'1111a= Aron [,,.\\
/-/Y
- 7d ec ?
Cc::,ents on Draf t Detailed Environmental Statement
- .:a:.
1 Oconec Euclear Station
'.tcla is pleased to trans=lt the attached co=nents from the National 1:ecther Service,.the Environmental Research Laboratories and the yational Xarine Fisheries Service.
In sr--nry:
1.
Increased incidence of stec= fog arising from plant operation should be limited to creas within a few miles of the reservoir receiving the heat load.
2 Our computation of average annual relative concentration of radionuclides at the site boundary is a factor of 2 higher than that of the applicant (we were obliged to consult the Final Safety Analysis Report in order to make this co=parison).
3.
"he use of an average annual diffusion rate for co=puting
. site. boundary doses is inappropriate, since the vaste gas decay tanks and other storage tanks are only intermittently, not continuously purged.
4.
In order to round out the radiological monitoring progra=,
we reco==end that benthic specimens such as insect larvae and fish egge be included.
Inclosure n \\j, -
-,. c. (~, M,,
t
,s Q,.
c.>
h%h
((
- q. 4
- ,_ ;,~, ; ;
y-
=*
.s
~-*
.e.
- ,. ; fs/;f.
M, -,'5 ? j.-
,...........-....w
.....4..
..,. -. _.......3.
..c.........
cd.<s7
.e t
.=.2..*
.%.. w
- 2. ". \\.s t
...w ss..
.. w.
t ce*
w. W.
C p. 8.,
N".
. ". 4 S
- O? A g
. w....
.).6....
- w
- -- ~.,
,.[,
\\.
......m.
q.y
- tj
/g N.
. N.
. ' s.
.v.?.%. w.P.
p..
a.... c=
..K/ *
<.,/
- (
- g a...a...
v..w p.....,
w.
..=w.ca c. ew..O.
...a,.......
.e..C t%
6 y
s.=
s*$
w
.r
..c
- e. !'
- o. g 1-
.e.
\\.%
\\
~..
- s...n a.
~.-.
t.w s,,
a..
,r
..s N,*
- ?. a g 4.O..*
- v. c.....s.. w
. b..,.. ;
.s c. 3.&w 4 L..e.O
@v. i
- 4..N w., rV_e e. %.
e
.e sc
.e..y w.
.e_O o/
l:. ; \\
w.,
...s..
w w. a. 1.. i..,..,.,
-.... w m.
e.,,
.c
.w.
%... w.
v...y
- w. V4,.O
_e_
.e cv-.w._7Oe.e 9
pO.
O.
f
.u a
r w-
..a...,
< e..u..e.
s.n fw...
.u.
n...
. S C
.a S..._...
v3 L,u.a
%.. L,w.. 1 -C
.w, S. 9 v-s
.4.
.e
.s.. w.L..
.,.. rt.. e
- m. J
..e V 3, L..
3 by
%..w,
'u..t.,
.r.. e. a
... s...uw
... w.a s w..
y.
- (..e u.,s.a,.G s
e.,
64 3. c. r.. e...r _ uys,.
- 6. - - a.
w.
.w
_.Wu.Vw
, L.C a+.fw..
6.w w..
L.s
=r. h n,.
....~.
sw O a s.
,..w..
u..s.e s.>v,C.
.a....z. k*.*.n.9 u. m
.w c..;
L%s..r..s.
2 CL' o.n, $ w t.
~.%.. w.c. S w., rV w. a.
.w
.. w
- w
..a.
-,..%.4..
- 9. C
.g. s w.w
.6 f.
., 6 C.c,., s.,
e.g s..w, -
3..
m..a.
.e
.. w..a
..w w
.v s 3
, %.. w. 2.,
L..w
... c,s
- w.... ;.... e.... C,
.e.s..O.
1 *.C w 6..aw6 0. %.. w t
w.a s.
w.w
..a
.wo o
- .s 2. VD w,.. G O.,...%.a. hm m. t p G
g,0. 9 w
\\,.
2
-.. w
,e.
.,.%.. c. a.a.. 3 t..Vs.
m,,
w.
6
.. g
/
'm y v.
e.nwc 9
e
- )
OwweO..
.J
. 9 m
wg w..
s""* J.. O
%?...e J..
9
%v.
% w, Q.,3rv.J,.
.w.
..w...
- a
- u.. s..................... 1. I tt.n
- g. %
_T 89 e:, g
.j
. $. f
,,. ;y g}
uc
m
.s
.e
.C, r
. rd.,.., ' ' 4 \\...
4.
....,...". a.'. 0.. 4 w.~. e...,....m. w. a.k l
...w....
.m.
.C, e *....
a.
..e 9*.
,i.,.2 eaa*4.W,1 w e
6
- t W..
j. -..,,, p
.j..==
.[
4 ww W..
w..
.- I-I4-Tk w...
1
~,.s...s e.* d. w, w w 6..,..
w
....a....,s.e,.
w w e f......e. w...
A c
~,
w...
.w....
.....w e.
ww..s.
o d %.w
.w gwa
. a.
w.A....C.,4...,
T *. e
- g.,
wi
. w dC,. A..
g.
-)..
Vw.. vm..,,
3
.sw g
.w.
.b w..p w..- w T*
O a w e.
- e,..
A.
w'.
ee..
3
.. u.
.--w ws v w.
~..?
7,%,,
ww. 6 %.,.m ~w w
]y
..O...
\\,.,.
...,N,..
e..=. -..l.,-
NS e.
/* A.
. ~.w. ~, e.,,
, s,.e..
.w f
p
- 4
- 9..s, *.
u.
g.p
- <~
.r 4
.n., C..
., e.
.V.e.
.... :... w..,.f, a
w..
.. v.
r
~
m.e...-
e,... e
- .. c
.. a.
.,,.4 z
e,
.~
c.-
- e.... 4.
,.Q' '
'*. A.
-w-w. _.-
.w w
Y
-ar e.e,.>
- s. e.
c;s;
..s;;
/.s.
i., %,/
o a
4
/fw,e--
- ... A -,-
w -
l,.'. x s
.... 3
. e.. s.,,y.,.,.. C
,w,, e,..-...,,.,......e.
.e
...w:
e s.
w g.%-w w
.../
0 (' /,..,sVw...
,._..c
.c.,
. %w C.; r e..e,..
e e \\..
..w
..o.
w
. ww
.w.
- r..
s
. w....
,,... ; \\%-j j
.. s.w m :: -..,,...
.. w.,.,...e,,
.2
.w..
.w
.w.
- v. w...
w
.*,w.-
6....,._...e,..
.e w..
.. s.
i w.
u.. w..,.w aww. v.
..e
..w c,
.s.. w w.
j
..j-
....,......s.,
44C
- w. em..: -p,.,w..,
......u,;.
e, m.
be;.~..e
=~ <-
w a 3
w.
f.*-
.s i. e.,.,
.e ~,.... e -. a,,,. 4.c..a.wjw A.
(.u s.. ',
/-
. c._...,. :
.s.
A.s.w.,. _. _ -
m sa.
,.j..
w
..a.
.., 3.. e w..
w e, e.
..,w jf w
.w...
w.
.. 4, w o. :a t,.,
...,e
.m w
.w
.. n.
.... n y
.. hsy s u..w e,m
,; V~.., ~..;...... o
.. ~.,
p.
s vw.
.we.
w,,.... a. w g
..~
w.
.c r....
b
.a
,. A,.e. 6..
u.. <., e..r.. e w,.,.,,
o...,
.r-,
v.e.e e w.
w.
.%...w.
y..
. w.
.....w w,
e.. v,.%
s C..:. m......
% 4
..,e.
- c.~,
V w, m..
w.
w uy c.,., y s
j {w
.w
.._w.
.w
. ww....
._w
..f,.....,.,.4.,....s, p.....,,..,,...
.cw s..
~....r....e.... _..
. wj.
- a es.....,..,,
fw o,;
4.
w.
v.
...w w.
w. y
%> y..
C.
ww....,,,
w~....
. c, c,,
...s
.,.,,., c gw..
...... s,
..,a...
~.
.w g
.v e.
.- m
.,,,...,.p w we w.w,...
.w._..,.,,.,y
.j:..m.
w
,, n.,. s...
s s
v,,,
g-w - -w-
...w..
.........: w
.s. w..n !.d.,,.
...r v e...:
~
w us..
,...,...a.,,.:
..e..
..ww.g
,~
j;..wy.
% w
~_
-.a e
.S : - s.v
.s.-
p....;.., a
< w.,wj.. i
.. a.
.a j g _.
s.
.,. e,..
.. j.,,
....w w...
w
.... s.
.. i..,, O w
,a m
.e.. VC.
,,s.%.,.,,
..o,.
...w.f.._.
. ww w..
w.,
w..sw
......,....cw O.
..e. w,.,-..s. e..- e...... v.,.s.
.%. C w...... s w.
w.
j$..
s...s
.. ~
u...,,
.y w
w
.. s t.
,,,. e..,.
s.O..
<3.
,.e w.f..., c
.n......
-.,,,w w...
.v...
ww
.w.,,
..s m..A....., u..a.e. %.
w.
. - w s.w.
+.
.a
.. s w-.
~..,. ~
W.,.,a,...
- s,,s i
hr w.
...n. w, v
.w-w.
w w..
w..is
.*.n./.e:c,// r.
.: s.w..w....
m. - $...m r
-...s..N. w...%, _. *. },
e w
., e w.. e \\.,
.s.i.*._..
3,,
/- -
e m,.
. e,........ v i a.. 3
.e.....>';
i -
w.
w..
w w,
w mv....,
.a 4.,.
- u..
..........sn
.,,.,. ~
- e o.
-. >..,. e w. n.
.w e
.e \\....,.w. % w
..w w.
w.
wy,-
w w s.
.........,....sC,
. - u.
e,..c.. s O s.... m...e.r., e.w...n. w. -.. r.o s a.w,.e...
s.
a
.w w-w
. n.. w_.
sy.
.. w -
- _.... s... % s
,.. Ik.,
..,4.
.o wJ u..L.,.u,,....,,
..a.
4,.
....r, 4
. C - r,. s. vow w.
.v 13..
s.. w yw..
..w.
w
.s.--..,3 e
..,-.......ww 9
s,
,,.-a
.e.,
,.3...,,,
...c..
.....a.
w..u i,.
. w.
.u uv.,4../
u
. a
%.w g,-,
--.s
..s m.,...
.w -
... ~.,,.
.r.s m.
w
.). - w.
..w.... w w n.
L,.,,.
u...,..
).- ef wa w - w.w
.ww.i
.. w o.....
.aa ; : C.r.., *.. jw.-..
r.
a,., a.s.w......_.. J:
.,L;. y.,.., :
v.
s..w -s....,
..... - ww
,.x,,o.,.'..,,,,-
.r.,,.,...
(.a....4 g.,. e.e, n,.i.,.
....s
.v
- w...
.w...,v..-
...w
... w w t,.
u..
...>.m.-.J..
a s. L, *.*,.,.1,,.
C w,.,, ), o.s,....e 2
. w - w y
..,. a.,... e
.y,,,,s e,=wC..,..,*
. wv. -
.6
.v.w s
.v.
.w...
s.
o
.i 2
- i"
,. =....v.....
p.
s
-. s
..__.m..,
.,s.,.., _.......
.v. -
-..s-..?...,
2
.s
.4.
w
.....c.
~
a.
..,s.,.
d f,.
e..,...<...
.- -...s.
. ~..
w-
..p e.,.
..
- g y A.g.
.m.
p.
, 8.g.
p*
p.
mI.
wa
.-.e.m...
. E.
9 2.g
.,f -.. v _ j
- 8.........,.....
ed O l
D
'=6 J
1 J Ll
.i 6
g4 e
1 9
~
b
.i.
e
.=
.w.
.... "..,...,.w.........."..1t...,...,..
s....
w f.
r,, g..
q, g -..y 5.
g s,......
g.....3 c... :.
\\......
..rt.
. wS w.
....u.e.,...,.....
w.
e
.e 3
.?
w
.a
.I
- t.*,*4,,.
c.m. w
== e
- s. s
.s.
www.
.w..
. v us. w,,.
w.o...... w. :..s..s
. a w w
...,/, ~..,..
a 6.
ww w 6
-...w w
.w w.
R.,g A.'.
,,,.** \\.-.,. s. +
- - ?.. w.*, y, ;. '..ar.tww
...w..
. w w w..
- e..,.w.....oC. -..,,w....,e.**e,.
- e..r.e,c -
.4e,
.,www s.o ww.
~w v
at v.u.. s.s c c...
.c.,
e.w
?,. e. 2.eb., 61 o
3,.. o.
o.
w w.
9 w w
s./..e
?,c..,
,,e se.,.c.
..e.......s.
-- _ 2.w.
wwc.S..c.
o..
.. c v.w w.
....w y
w w
..., u
.s c w.c a.'*V C.s.
~>
e
. e w
w C e,.., e. ; S e,,
n.
s w.. o 6,,.,.,,.....,.v,w.s,,......,.
c.u. i. C
. %..,/.
C.w r w...
w.
w
-wa.w w w.
...c...,,,L, s.s. s)
.y s.
A... c *.....
s.w 3
w.
.w
.w C>. D.aw.a u,
m7p - cer.~.
,0,i... C0 i;. a,.6 s...6 c.,. e.2.
r... - 6.
e :
s
~%......
..a
. s.
.sSw
..c
.w
,, w w
ww.
s.
C S.o.
yC..
,zc..
.e. -
.e w.v. w
, e.
cw v.
w
..v.
v-w a %
w I
/
'-\\
.-.i.
ww c..e-w e.
8%,a.., !,
.4.
- o.. - o.,
( Cw.m..,
.w y.
.wm
. c.
'g f
e,
. c
%., c... - a
.; y j.3 '.
4
-~
- w.... O %.
./ G
)
Vp
(}S~
f.* g vww.... c.. S,..
.#..e w,., J
.!.e w
".t.., i
/
o
- .g C.v.
a
)
y.
,s%*.,
,.,s.*.
w c..
p w..
w,,,.
.p
,,a. 6%$c. 9,/ s e.J.O w v,,A w
.. J. w.,.
..p '. e,
.[ w,c. w y.
6.. v..
w..
w.
w.
w.
..v w v.
v j. w w. my w
C. ;. 6 a.. s e e..
b 2.
... e W,.m a w ec..w 4
,..s..
b....,...e.
W e,
..wp
. ww.wy b.
.w w6 wp
.www
.g w
v.
g w %.
g
- . =. *i. '.o.". w
.. J..e.w..Gw.
3. 1. w... e w
y d w G.2. -. w.4.C p..
w. w.
=
f * '.
f.'L f.
A J w. *. Jsd. w e
.,._. J
.J.w.g, 6,
L w c= s...,.
S.,,..,.
.g oc jj c c.. c.
ww ww w w...
y. w,g,,.
m
.e, ww. * /. % e a,
s.*.c.*
. e. w
- ..e. #J.;.C.
% G. #.%.
G t
e..*
'.i.,.#
w
,. J
.**w
- c.. %.'.w Gj w w.
.w
.7y
.w w
. w.
w..
wg..
- 6. 4. c......s.".!.,/.
G.2 G
J..,
c,, e.,,g e.
..s...%...,G
,e.
..g
.w.
wC wb w.
w e.
.~.S8.*e*s,. h.h.
..8."
w.
e
.#.I l
\\r c.
.,,,.. c..
.... m _..
- ). w w ~ n w. 1.~ ~;.:.. a... ; :.s. y....
u c >.-..
t h \\ >a
.h*
.e
'),
- y
y.g :,
MCE L'.S.' DEPACMENT OF COMMENatica d in!nteccier, p~ s'-
'[.;
i W g-r i f 7-QP'.
Eational R.rine Fisheries Se nice
?
f
.,a.'W j 144 Pirst Avenue South
'~ " #
d 33*701 i
23, 1971 ESt. Petersburg, Elcri :
L Ncyc=ber i
project Statements Oconee Euclear Stat cn e
l'5221
- /C Eviro=cntal Impact for Resource Manage:cnt F34
~W"" W h:a l ~ lb
~
Actin ~,; Associate Director h
ve hcVe
-17.GS 15, 1971,
- Y;chington, D. C.
d November ted in ycur memorandum datecet hvironmenta Statetent.
%h rec.ucc reviewed' sub a It appears that the applicant has g envircn=ent.
There is no t of the enitoring programs.
i logical protcetion tni even enhancemen endations fcr a minimum rad c have reservations regarding the =
heries the ICES Atlantic Coastal Pisassurance sh specific mention that the recc=
Tnis monitoring program, drawn up byattachment), vill be adhere d to.
5 1971 Center (see applicant.
d by ESFER in their October 2,
to provided by the ance that applicant provide adequate assurnt cnd otherw He also share the concern expresse datage cc=onts, namely, (1) thefacilitics to c' _ the project eff ue that vill not cause significcntin Keo l
- River, pollutional effects to 1cvelsto fish and other aquatic li h
and vill be incorperated in t e) faciliti f
r entrai=ent in and Eartwell Reservoir candemonstrable need occurs; (2 fcet uatic organisms by entrap ent o d vill be incorporated in the pro t ction d (3) the locaticn,, design, cons ru
.of fish and other aq the cooling water system can an on aquatic resources be if the need is demonstrated;.an i sion linescorrect any resultant da age.
ethods, and impact of transm sidentified, and mean t operation that which tcy arise during projeci e measures Should an another problem should be considered and correct v of plant operations occur dur n) organisms that have There is Extensive dc=3c aquatic (including benthic warmer temperaturcs?artifically var = envirc
crersency shutdown vill b'e-the effects onbeen cone.itioned to unseasonab y l
tion of an could result with abrupt disrup cepr.me t d Ccn:='. i-l t
n
\\
. T. ~~ \\ ~
KOM '
l C'.'lY53 t
-(
MX.e.6MC,%. D{'.g i
s M. L 5 ~ '
R0!! 2 01971
\\
- t. ::!g,#.:-);.
K.. f:
Y
. e kg gc.w.ad3 w m;
{
^ R. T. tM. ITEL?ATMER ;.s*
V.*~?
Regional Dirisctor i w
y f
.g;,g:.c.y:. q,-
- \\.
.s
.Atedhment Dy.p.\\ ;,..-
D
'il y
m,
,O rhi _
7 -.-.
ae D
3
~
9
- . :a 0 :cScr,1L.
J
..ia-wa.a..: a ^. a:.: L.
.w.c:: c... a.:..
..,; c:
5,rth Cr.rolins 28516
- Eccuiort, df t-
".c h..A $U
. J. s
'Envirc= ental l Impact - 19 Nuciccr Power Plants v :c.:
t u
Division of River Basin Studics I
Lurcau of Sper: Pisheries and Wildlife U shington, DC
.s240 4Q U.S. Department of the Interior 1.ttn:
Paul Ecrg This' confirms th'c infor=ction related to you in our phene conversction of October 12, 1971.-
The f ollowing recc==cndations for a minimum radioicsical environ =cn:cl conitoring program applics to all nuclear power plants Ms /
g f 0= M
.M
--rs % u xn4 z
(
rrcquency o., surveys 2
A.
Pre-operational-- c: 1 cast one
~
3.
Post ster:-up-- one every six mon:hs during operation II.
Sc=pling stations (minimum-5)
A.
Within 500 feet of affluent discharge poin:
5.
Down-current, within 1 mile from discharge point C.
Up-current frc= discharge point (control)
III.
Type of sc=ples, each s:cti~on
/.. Water ~
Sediment C.
Scn: hic animals (exampics:
chirwst.cwodl-1-ep s,
,arvsc, cr.sy-fs..-se,
. m u,4-r-ab ;, c*pepeds, ins ect t
fish eggs)
D.
P1cnts (cxc=plcs-:--kch-.r.cr.Jw %--nar-sh=geesses)
E., Fish, including herbivores and carnivores F.. Waterfowl, if applicable-G.
Other animals f eeding upon aquatic lif e, as dec=ed necessary Typc-of analyses IV.
A.
Grosc beta B.
Gr os s ga=.a C.
Identify nuclides when either of chove is significent D.
Ga=sa scan E., Report results'as radioactivity per gram wet weight A
b 3gr
&q
-O-pw q s
(b JOIN P. BA?7IST oo o.
Fisher tologist dg
^
I 3.
A~ Century of Fish Conservation ac72 y
.~.