ML20023D520

Rev 2 to Engineering Program Plan Project Instruction PI-3201-009 Midland Independent Design & Const Verification Program,Project 3201.

ML20023D520
Person / Time
Site:	Midland
Issue date:	05/18/1983
From:	TERA CORP.
To:
Shared Package
ML20023D504	List: ML20023D503 ML20023D520 ML20023D528
References
PI-3201-009, PI-3201-9, NUDOCS 8305200567
Download: ML20023D520 (158)

Text

.

O l

l ENGINEERING PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI-3201-009 MIDLAND INDEPENDENT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM I

PROJECT 3201 l

O l

l l

l l

l MAY 18,1983 6 / f/

REVISION: 2 COPY NO.

O 8305200567 830518 DR ADOCK 05000329 PDR

1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE I.0 GENERAL I l.1 BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE I

~

1.2 OVERVIEW OF IDCV SCOPE 3 1.3 SYSTEMS SELECTION CRITERIA 14 1.4 INDEPENDENCE REQUIREMENTS IS l

2.0 ORGANIZATION AND CONTROL 17 2.1 PROJECT ORGANIZATION 17 2.2 AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY 19 2.3 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL 21 3.0 ENGINEERING PROGRAM PLAN METHODOLOGY 21 3.1 INDEPENDENT DESIGN VERIFICATION 22 pd METHODOLOGY 3.1.1 CATEGORIES OF REVIEW: THE DESIGN 24 CHAIN 3.1.1.1 Review of Design Criteria and 2S Commitments 3.1.1.2 Review of implementing 2S Documents 3.1.l.3 Check of Calculations and 26 Evaluations 3.I.I.4 Confirmatory Calculations or 27 Evaluations 3.1.1.S Check of Drawings and 28 Specifications 3.1.2 BASES FOR SAMPLE SELECTION 28 3.l.3 DEFINITION OF REVIEW SCOPE FOR THE 30 AFW SYSTEM 3.1.3.1 AFW System Performance Criteria 33 3.1.3.1.1 System Operating 33 Limits - Topic l.1-1 .

3.l.3.1.2 Accident Analysis 33 Considerations -

Topic l.2-1 fT V

3.1.3.l.3 Single Failure -

Topic l.3-1 34 3.l.3.1.4 Technical Specifica- 34 tions - Topic 1.4-1 DC-82-13 i

TABLE OF CONTENTS O ccontineea)

SECTION PAGE 3.1.3.1.S System Alignment / 3S

. Switchover - Topic 1.5-1 3.1.3.1.6 Remote Operation and 3S Shutdown - Topic 1.6-1 3.l.3.1.7 System isolation / 3S Interlocks - Topic l.7-1 3.1.3.l.8 Overpressure Protec- 36 tion -Topic 1.8-1 3.l.3.1.9 Component Functional 36 Requirements -

Topic i.9-1 3.1.3.1.10 System Hydraulic 37 Design -Topic l.10-1

3. l .3.1.1 i System Heat Removal 37 Capability - Topic 1.1 l-l 3.l.3.1.12 Cooling Requirements - 37 Topic l.12-1 O 3.i.3.i.is weter Sunnites -

Topic l.13-1 37 3.l.3.1.14 Preservice Testing 38 and Capability for Operational Testing -

Topic i.14-1 3.l.3.1.lS Power Supplies - 38 Topic 1.15-1 3.1.3.1.16 Electrical Character-38 istics - Topic I.16-1 3.1.3.1.17 Protective Devices / 39 Settings - Topic 1.17-1 3.l.3.1.18 Instrumentation - 39 Topic l.18-1 3.l.3.1.19 Control Systems - 40 Topic l.19-1 3.1.3.1.20 Actuation Systems - 40 Topic 1.20-1 3.l.3.1.21 Nondestructive Exam- 41 ination Commitments -

Topic l.21-1 l

3.1.3.1.22 Materials Selection - 41 l p Topic I.22-1 l \/ 3.1.3.1.23 Failure Modes and 41 l Effects - Topic 1.23-1 DC-82-13 ii i .

TABLE OF CONTENTS O cceatineed)

SECTION PAGE 3.l.3.2 AFW System Protection Features 42-3.l.3.2.1 Seismic Design - 42 Topic II.1-1 3.l.3.2.2 Seismic Design / Pressure 43 Boundary Integrity -

Topic 11.2-1 3.l.3.2.3 Seismic Design / Pipe and 43 Equipment Support -

Topic 11.3-1 3.l.3.2.4 Seismic Design / Equip- 44 ment Qualification -

i Topic 11.4-1 3.l.3.2.5 High Energy Line Break 44 Accidents -Topic 11.5-1 3.l.3.2.6 HELBA/ Pipe Whip - 45 Topic 11.6-1 O 3.i.3.2.7 HeLBA/3et impinsement -

Topic 11.7-1 as 3.1.3.2.8 Environmental Protec- 45 l tion - Topic 11.8-1 3.l.3.2.9 Environmental Enve- 46 lopes - Topic 11.9-1 3.1.3.2.10 Environmental / Equip- 46 ment Qualification -

Topic 11.10-1 l

3.l.3.2.11 HVAC Design - 47 Topic 11.11-1 3.l.3.2.12 Fire Protection - 47 i Topic II.12-1 3.l.3.2.13 Missile Protection - 48

, Topic 11.13-1 l 3.l.3.2.14 Systems Interaction - 48 Topic 11.14-1 3.l.3.3 Structures that House the AFW 48 System

. 3.l.3.3.1 Seismic Design / Input to 49 Equipment - Topic 111.1-1 3.l.3.3.2 Wind and Tornado 49 O oes'9"/"'est'e Protection - Topic i

Ill.2-1 l

DC-82-13 iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS O ccoeti eea)

SECTION PAGE 3.l.3.3.3 Flood Protection - 50 Topic 111.3-1 .

3.1.3.3.4 HELBA Loads - 50 Topic 111.4-1 3.l.3.3.5 Civil / Structural Design 50 Considerations -

Topic 111.5-1 3.1.3.3.6 Foundations - 51 Topic 111.6-1 3.l.3.3.7 Concrete / Steel Design - 51 Topic 111.7-l 3.1.4 DEFINITION OF REVIEW SCOPE FOR THE 52 STANDBY ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM 3.1.4.1 SEP System Performance Requirements 54 3.1.4.1.1 System Operating Limits 55 (DG) - Topic l.1-2 3.1.4.1.2 Accident Analysis 55 O ceesiaerations(DG.

AC, DC) - Topic 1.2-2 3.1.4.1.3 Single Failure (DG, PDS, 56 AC, DC) - Topic 1.3-2 3.1.4.1.4 Technical Specifications 56 (DG, DC) - Topic 1.4-2 3.1.4.1.5 Load Operation (DG)- 56 Topic l.6-2 3.1.4.1.6 System Interlocks (DG) - 56 Topic 1.7-2 3.1.4.1.7 Component Functional Re- 57 quirements (DG, PDS, AC, DC) - Topic 1.9-2 3.1.4.1.8 Cooling / Heating Require- 57 ments (DG) - Topic 1.12-2 3.1.4.1.9 Preservice Testing and 58 Capability for Operational Testing (DG) - Topic l.14-2 l 3.1.4.1.10 Electrical Characteristics 58

! (DG, PDS, AC, DC) -

Topic l.I6-2 3.1.4.1.11 Protective Devices / Settings 58 (DG, PDS) - Topic l.17-2 1

DC-82-13 iv

TABLE OF CONTENTS O (contineed)

SECTION PAGE 3.1.4.1.12 Instrumentation (DG, AC, 59 DC) - Topic 1.18-2 .

3.1.4.1.13 Control Systems (DG) - 59 Topic l.19-2 3.1.4.1.14 Actuation Systems (DG)- 60 Topic 1.20-2 3.1.4.1.1S Failure Modes and Effects 60 (DG, PDS, AC, DC) -

Topic l.23-2 3.l.4.1.16 Electrical Load Capacity 61 (DG, PDS, AC, DC) -

Topic 1.24-2 3.1.4.1.17 Electrical Load Sequencing 61 (DG, PDS) - Topic l.2S-2 3.1.4.1.18 Electrical Load Shedding 61 (DG, PDS) - Topic 1.26-2 3.1.4.1.19 Fuel Oil System (DG) - 62 O 3.1.4.1.20 Topici.27-2 Lube Oil System (DG) - 62 Topic 1.28-2 3.1.4.1.21 Starting Mechanism and Air 62 Stpply System (DG)-

Topic l.29-2 3.1.4.1.22 Combustion Air Supply 63 (DG) - Topic l.30-2 3.1.4.1.23 independence (DG, PDS, AC, 63 DC) - Topic 1.31-2 3.1.4.1.24 Cable Sizing / Routing / 64 Separation (PDS) -

Topic 1.32-2 3.1.4.2 SEP System Protection Features 64 3.1.4.2.1 Seismic Design - 64 Topic 11.1-2 3.l.4.2.2 Seismic Design - Pressure 65 Boundary (DG) - Topic 11.2-2 3.1.4.2.3 Seismic Design - Pipe / 65 i Equipment Support (DG, PDS) -

Topic 11.3-2 l

3.1.4.2.4 Seismic Design - Equipment 66 p

v Qualification (DG, PDS) -

Topic 11.4-2

/

DC-82-13 v

i TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)

SECTION PAGE 3.l.4.2.S High Energy Line Break 66 Accidents - Topic 11.5-2 l

3. l.4.2.6 HELBA/ Pipe Whip (PDS, AC, 66 t

DC) - Topic 11.6-2

! 3.1.4.2.7 HELBA/ Jet Impingement (PDS, 66 AC, DC) - Topic II.7-2 3.1.4.2.8 Environmental Protection - 67 Topic 11.8-2 3.1.4.2.9 Environmental Envelopes 67 (DG, PDS) - Topic II.9-2 3.1.6.2.10 Environmenta!/ Equipment 67 Qualification (DG, PDS) -

Topic 11.10-2 3.l.4.2.li HVAC Design (DG) - 67 Topic II.ll-2 3.1.4.2.12 Fire Protection (DG) - 68 Topic 11.12-2 d 3.1.4.2.13 Missile Protection (DG) - 68 Topic 11.13-2 3.1.4.2.14 Systems Interaction (DG, 68 PDS, AC, DC) - Topic 11.14-2 3.1.4.3 Structures that House the SEP Systems 69 3.1.4.3.1 Seismic Design / Input to 69 Equipment (DGB) - Topic lll.1-2 3.1.4.3.2 Wind and Tornado Design / Missile 70 Protection (DGB) - Topic 111. 2 - 2 3.1.4.3.3 Flood Protection (DGB) - 70 Topic 111.3-2 3.1.4.3.4 HELBA Loads (DGB) - 71 Topic 111.4-2 3.1.4.3.S Civil / Structural Design 71 Considerations - Topic lil.5-2 3.1.4.3.6 Foundations (DGB) - 71 Topic 111.6-2 3.1.4.3.7 Concrete and Steel Design 72 (DGB) - Topic 111.7-2 3.l.4.3.8 Tanks - Topic ll1.8-2 g) m 72 DC-82-13 vi

TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)

SECTION PAGE 3.l.5 DEFINITION IF REVIEW SCOPE FOR THE 73 CONTROL ROOM HVAC SYSTEM 3.1.5.1 CR-HVAC System Performance 75 Requirements 3.1.5.1.1 System Operating Limits - 75 Topic l.1-13 3.1.5.l.2 Accident Analysis Consi- 75 derations - Topic 1.2-3 3.1.5.l.3 Single Failure - 76 Topic 1.3-3 3.1.5.l.4 Technical Specifications - 76 Topic l.4-3 3.l.5.l.5 System Alignment /Switchover - 76 Topic l.5-3 3.1.5.I.6 System Isolation / Interlocks - 76 Topic 1.7-3

O 3. l.5.l.7 Component Functional Require- 77 V ments - Topic 1.9-3 3.l.5.1.8 System Pneumatic Design - 77 Topic II.10-3 3.1.5.l.9 Cooling / Heating Requirements - 77 Topic 1.12-3 3.1.5.1.10 Preservice Testing and 78 Capability for Operational l Testing - Topic l.14-3 3 .1. 5 .1.11 Power Supplies - 78 Topic l.15-3 3.1.5.1.12 Instrumentation / Detection - 78 Topic I.18-3 l 3.1.5.1.13 Control Systems - 78 l Topic l.19-3 l 3.1.5.1.14 Actuation Systems - 79 Topic l.20-3 3.1.5.1.15 Nondestructive Examination 79 Commitments - Topics 1.21-3 3.1.5.1.16 Materials Selection - 80 Topic 1.22-3 3.1.5.1.17 Failure Modes and Effects - 80 Topic l.23-3 O 2.i.5.i.is Fiitretien - Topic i.32-3 80 DC-82-13 vii

TABLE OF CONTENTS O (coatineea)

SECTION PAGE 3.1.5.1.19 Pressurization - Topic l.34-3 80 3.1.5.l.20 Ventilation - Topic l.35-3 81 3.l.5.2 CR-HVAC System Protection Features 81 3.l.5.2.1 Seismic Design - Topic 11.1-3 82 3.l.5.2.2 Seismic Design - Pressure 82 Boundary - Topic 11.2-3 #

3.1.5.2.3 Seismic Design - Duct / Pipe / 82 Equipment Support -

Topic 11.3-3 3.1.5.2.4 Seismic Design - Equipment 83 Qualification - Topic 11.4-3 3.1.5.2.5 High Energy Lir.e Break 83 Accidents - Topic 11.5-3 3.1.5.2.6 HELBA/ Pipe Whip - 83 Topic 11.6-3 3.1.5.2.7 HELBA/ Jet Impingement 84 f) 3.1.5.2.8 Environmental Protection - 84 v Topic 11.8-3 3.1.5.2.9 Environmental Envelopes - 84 Topic 11.9-3 3.1.5.2.10 Environmental Equipment 85 Qualification - Topic 11.10-3 3.l. 5 .2 .11 Fire Protection - 85 Topic 11.12-3 3.l.5.2.12 Missile Protection - 85 Topic 11.13-3 3.1.5.2.13 Systems Interaction - 86 Topic II.14-3 3.1.5.3 Structures that House the CR-HVAC System 86 3.1.5.3.1 Seismic Design / Input to 86 I

Equipment - Topic 111.1-3 3.1.5.3.2 Civil / Structural Design 87 Considerations-Topic lll.5-3 3.1.5.3.3 Concrete and Steel Design 87 Topic 111.7-3 l 3.1.5.3.4 Leck Tightness - 88 Topic 111.9-3 O

DC-82-13 viii

F TABLE OF CONTENTS

_O cceatiaued)

SECTION PAGE 3.1.6 DEVELOPMENT OF IDV PROGRAM 88 CHECKLISTS 3.1.6.1 Development of Checklists for Review 89 of Design Criteria and Commitments 3.l.6.2 Development of Checklists for Reviews 90 l

of lmplementing Documents 3.1.6.3 Development of Checklists for Checks 91 of Calculations and Evaluations 3.1.6.4 Development of Checklists for Checks 92 of Drawings and Specifications 3.1.7 PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL SAMPLING AND 93 VERIFICATION 3.2 INDEPENDENT CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION 93 METHDOLOGY 3.2.1 CATEGORIES OF REVIEW: THE CON- 9S STRUCTION CHAIN 3.2.1.1 Review of Fabrication Documenta- 96 O tien 3.2.1.2 Review of Storage and Maintenance 96 Documentation 3.2.l.3 Review of Construction / 97 Installation Documentation 3.2.1.4 Review of Selected Verification 97 Activities 3.2.1.S Verification of Physical 98 Configuration 3.2.2 BASES FOR SAMPLE SELECTION 98 3.2.3 DEFINITION OF REVIEW SCOPE FOR THE 99 AFW SYSTEM 3.2.3.1 Mechanical Systems and Components 100 3.2.3.1.1 Mechanical Equipment - 100 Topic 1.1-Ic 3.2.3.1.2 Piping - 101 Topic l.2-Ic 3.2.3.l.3 Pipe Supports - 101 Topic 1.3-Ic 3.2.3.2 Electrical Systems and Components 102 3.2.3.2.1 Electrical Equipment - 102 O Tepic ii.i-ic DC-82-13 ix

TABLE OF CONTENTS O (co ti# a)

SECTION PAGE 3.2.3.2.2 Cable Trays and Supports - 103 Topic II.2-Ic 3.2.3.2.3 Conduits and Supports - 104 Topic II.3-Ic 3.2.3.2.4 Cable - 104 Topic li.4-Ic 3.2.3.3 Instrumentation and Control Systems 10S and Components 3.2.3.3.1 Instruments - 10S Topic ill.1-Ic 3.2.3.3.2 Piping / Tubing - 10 5 Topic ill.2-Ic 3.2.3.3.3 Cable - 106 Topic ill.3-Ic '

3.2.3.4 HVAC Systems and Components 106 l 3.2.3.4.1 HVAC Equipment - 107 Topic IV.1-lc 3.2.3.4.2 HVAC Ducts and Supports - 107 Topic IV.2-Ic 3.2.3.S Structural Components 108 3.2.3.S.! Foundations - 108 Topic V.1-Ic 3.2.3.S.2 Concrete Components 108 Topic V.2-Ic 3.2.3.S.3 Structural Steel 10 9 Components -

Topic V.3-Ic 3.2.3.6 NDE/ Materials Testing Program - 109 Topic VI.1-Ic 3.2.4 DEFINITION OF REVIEW SCOPE FOR THE Ill STANDBY ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM 3.2.4.1 Mechanical Systems and Components 11 2 3.2.4.1.1 Mechanical Equipment - 11 2 Topic l.1-2c 3.2.4.1.2 Piping - Topic l.2-2c 11 2 3.2.4.1.3 Pipe Supports - Topic 11 3 Q, l.3-2c 3.2.4.2 Electrical Systems and Components 11 3 3.2.4.2.1 Electrical Equipment - 11 3 Topic II.1-2c DC-82-13 x

TABLE OF CONTENTS O ccontineed>

SECTION PAGE 3.2.4.2.2 Cable Trays / Conduits and 11 4 Supports - Topics li.2-2c and li.3-2c 3.2.4.2.3 Cable - Topic II.4-2c 11 4 3.2.4.3 Instrumentation and Control Systems  !!4 and Components 3.2.4.3.1 Instruments - Topic lil.1-2c 11 5 3.2.4.3.2 Piping / Tubing - Topic ill.2-2c 11 5 3.2.4.3.3 Cable - Topic ill.3-2c 11 6 3.2.4.4 HVAC Systems and Components 11 6 3.2.4.4.1 HVAC Equipment - Topic IV.1-2c 11 6 3.2.4.4.2 HVAC Ducts and Supports - 11 7 Topic IV.2-2c 3.2.4.5 Structural Components ll7 3.2.4.5.1 Foundations - Topic V.1-2c ll7 m 3.2.4.5.2 Concrete Components - 11 8 V Topic V.2-2c 3.2.4.5.3 Structural Steel Components - 11 8 Topic V.3-2c 3.2.5 DEFINITION OF REVIEW SCOPE FOR THE 11 8 CONTROL ROOM HVAC SYSTEM 3.2.5.1 Mechanical Systems and Components 11 9 3.2.5.1.1 Mechanical Equipment - 11 9 l Topic l.1-3c 3.2.5.1.2 Piping - Topic I.2-3c 12 0 3.2.5.i.3 Pipe Supports - 120 Topic l.3-3c 3.2.5.2 Electrical Systems and Components 120 3.2.5.2.1 Electrical Equipment - 121 Topic II.1-3c 3.2.5.2.2 Trays / Conduit and Supports - 121 Topics ll.2-3c and ll.3-3c 3.2.5.2.3 Cable - Topic II.4-3c 122 3.2.5.3 Instrumentation and Contr)! Systems and 122 Components 3.2.5.3.1 Instruments - Topic ill.1-3c 12 3 3.2.5.3.2 Piping and Tubing - 123

/] Topic ill.2-3c

3.2.5.3.3 Cable - Topic lil.3-3c 123 DC-82-13 xi

TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)

SECTION PAGE 3.2.5.4 HVAC 124 3.2.5.4.1 HVAC Ducts and Supports - 124 Topic IV.2-3c 3.2.5.5 Structural Components 124 3.2.5.5.1 Concrete Components - 125 Topic V.2-3c 3.2.5.5.2 Structural Steel 125 Components - Topic V.3-3c 3.2.5.6 NDE/ Material Testing Program - 125 Topic VI.1-3c 3.2.6 DEVELOPMENT OF ICV PROGRAM 125 CHECKLISTS 3.2.6.1 Development of Checklists for Review 12 7 of Supplier Documentation 3.2.6.2 Development of Checklists for Review 128 of Storage and Maintenance Documen-tation C' 3.2.6.3 Deveiegment ef Checkiists for Review of Construction and Installation i29 Documentation 3.2.6.4 Development of Checklists for Review 13 0 of Selected Verification Activities 3.2.6.5 Development of Checklists for Review 131 of Verification of Physical Configuration 3.2.7 PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL SAMPLING, 13 2 VERIFICATION, AND TESTING 4.0 DOCUMENTATION AND PROTOCOL 134 4.1 DOCUMENTATION OF ENGINEERING EVALUA- 134 TIONS, CALCULATIONS, AND FIELD VERIFICA- ,

TION RESULTS 4.2 DOCUMENTATION AND PROTOCOL FOR EXTERNAL 13 5 COMMUNICATIONS DC-82-13 xii

TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)

SECTION PAGE 5.0 PROGRAM REPORTING 136 S.I TYPES OF REPORTS 13 6 5.2 REPORT!NG PROCESS 13 8 5.2.1 REPORTING SYSTEM 138 5.2.2 REPORT PREPARATION AND DISTRIBUTION 14 2 5.2.3 INTERCHANGE OF INFORMATION 143

, 5.3 IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION OF DESIGN 14 3 OR CONSTRUCTION DEFICIENCIES 6.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE 144 6.1 APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS 144 6.2 VERIFICATION OF COMPUTER CODES 144 6.3 AUDITS 145 O

l l

O DC-82-13 xiii

I PROJECT INSTRUCTION -

I PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland independent Design and

] REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Progrom APPROVED B lPAGEI of 145 PREPARED BY: p ggy ,

1.0 GENERAL I.I BACKCROUND AND PURPOSE The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued a letter on July 9,1982 which requested that Consumers Power Company (CPC) provide for an independent assessment of the design adequacy of the Midland plant. CPC responded to this request on October 5,1982 by submitting an outline of the scope of a proposed independent review program. A public meeting was held on October 25,1982 at the NRC's Bethesda, Maryland offices to discuss details of the proposed program, the scope of which included on evaluation of the Midland Unit 2 Auxiliary

() Feedwater (AFW)' system. During this meeting, the NRC requested that the scope of the independent design assessment program be expanded, including on assessment of the quality of construction. The NRC requested that CPC identify three candidate systems for scope expansion based upon their contribution to plant risk, from which one system would be selected.

CPC responded to NRC by a letter dated December 3,1982 which identified the l Standby Electric Power system (diesel generator), Safeguards Chilled Water system and Containment Isolation system as candidate systems. A public meeting was held on February 8,1983 at Midland, Michigan to discuss details of the program related to the evaluation of the AFW system and to provide status.

l On March 22, 1983 the NRC selected the Standby Electric Power system and the Control Room HVAC system for scope expension. Proposed elements of the scope of evoluotion for these systems as well as the APN system were discussed at another public meeting held on April 13, 1983 at the NRC's Bethesda, Maryland p offices.

%./

DC-82-13

m PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland Independent Design and '

REV.: 2 DATE: S/18/83 Construction Verification Program APPROVED BY:

PAGE 2 of 145 PREPARED BY: j l df[L ._

mh j TERA Corporation has been selected by CPC to scope, manage, and implement l the Midland Independent Design and Construction Verification (IDCV) Program.

By a letter dated May 3,1983, the NRC approved the selection of TERA. The selection is based upon the firm's technical qualifications, experience, and independence from the Midiond project. Such independence includes all individuals who may contribute to the IDCV Program.

This project instruction, or Engineering Program Plan (the Plan), has been established to outline the scope, philosophy of review, methodology Independence requirements, organizction, control, documentation, reporting, cnd quality assurance requirements for the Midland IDCV Program, t

(3 q.)

The IDCV approach selected is a review and evaluation of a detailed " vertical slice" of the Midland project with a focus on providing an overall assessment of the quality of the design and the constructed plant. Therefore, the primary emphasis of the IDCV evaluation is on the end results of the design and construction process and not on on evaluation of the process itself which is typical of the more common quality assurance audit. The " vertical slice" constitutes a carefully selected sample of three safety systems from which the results of the IDCV may be extrapolated to other similarly designed and l constructed systems. Thus, the IDCV is intended to provide the necessary assurance to CPC, NRC, and the pblic that the Midland Plant is designed and constructed such that it is capable of functioning in accordance with its safcty design bases and that applicable licensing commitments have been properly implemented.

b) m DC-82-13

l i

I PROJECT INSTRUCTION l J pt 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland independent Design and

-l REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program 1 (PAGE 3 of 145 Pf:EPARED BY: g APPROVED BY I.2 OVERVIEW OF IDCV SCOPE The Midland IDCV consists of two major components: the Independent Design Verification (IDV) Program and the Independent Construction Verification (ICV)

Program. The Unit 2 Auxiliary Feedwater (AFW) system, the Standby Electric Power (SEP) system and the Control Room Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning (CR-HVAC) system related to control room habitability have been selected as applicable samples of the design engineering and construction efforts I at the Midland plant. The AFW system was selected by TERA based upon the system selection criteria discussed. in Section 1.3 of this Plan. The SEP and control room HVAC systems selected by the CPC and NRC have a sufficiently  :

V high profile for each of these criteria to justify their selection.

The scope of review corresponds directly to the design and construction chains,  ;

addressing major activities and outputs of the various contributing engineering and construction disciplines. Accordingly, the products of the design and j construction process, from concept to installation, hydros, functional and I preoperational testing and turnover will be evaluated. Interfaces between CPC, )

Babcock and Wilcox (B&W), the nuclear steam system supplier (NSSS) vendor, Bechtel, the architect-engineer (A-E), and other contractors will be identified and evaluated relative to such items as the proper transfer and interpretation of l design or construction information. l l

Figure 1.2-1 shows the inter-relationship between the Midland design and construction process and the Midland IDCV program. The following figures present the IDCV scope for the AFW, SEP and CR-HVAC systems in the form vf matrices which identify the initial level of review and evaluation in each design l

( or construction area respectively:

'v]'

l DC-82-13 l 1

l

INTER-RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE MIDLAND DESIGN AND O CONSTRUCTION PROCESS AtO THE MIDLAFO IDCV PROGRAM l 40 CFR 50. APPENDIX A l d6 1f eSRP o Reg Guides FSAR Ato OTER REVIEW OF DESIGN e Industry  ; UTILITY CRITERIA Ato Stedards COMMITMENTS COMMITMENTS e N555Criterio 1I l DEsiCN INPUTS l o qr REVIEW OF A-E. N555 VEFOOR IMPLEMENTING ENGINEERlNC -

IMPLEMENTING DOCUMENTS STAPCARDS. OOCUMENTS 1, PROCEDURES ,, ,,

DESIGN PROCESS e DesleCentrol - o Engineering j e QA/QC Evolustians CMCK OF CONFIRMATORY l e Calculations CALCULATIONS APC CALCULATIONS OR EVALUATIONS EVALUATIONS 1f l DESIGN CHANCES l 1r goy o o DESIGN OUTRJT5

CMCK OF e Drowings ORAWINGS APC e Specificotles , , SPECFICATIONS I o FABRICATION ,5 g, iV CHE g

DOCUMENTATION I I 1P ,,

SITE CONaNION

ACTIVITIES e Carstruction

• W "**' N Cetrol y e5  % REVIEW OF e QA/QC R V EW & STOM CONSTRUCTION /

l e Efectie lrutel. APO MANTENANCE an. etc. DOCUMENTATION A'bA 6TT 1P l FIELD CHANCES l 1r , o VERIFICATION / INSTALLED STRUCTURES, ' 'b OVER.NSPECTION  ? Sf5TEMS AND VERFICATION OF ACTivlTIES COMPOPENTS PHYSICAL COPFIGURATION 1r g REVIEW Olr VERIFICATION TURNOVER FOR ACTivlTIES U RJNCTIONAL TESTNG lf <,

7l OPERATlONS l DESIGN Ato CONSTRUCTION PROCESS MIDLAtO IDCV PROGRAM O

FIGURE I.2-1

IN!TIAL SAMPLE REVIEW MATRIX FOR THE AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM MIDLAND INDEPENDENT DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM I SCOPE OF REVIEW L L  !

y!

8% v6 58 DESIGN AREA k N Eg e E ~5" og l

f si sf l'!l'/"illx,A it s l l O .

AFW SYSTEM PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS l.13 SYSTEM OPERATING LIMITS X X X l.2-1 ACCIDENT ANALYSIS CONSIDERATIONS X

• 1.3-1 SINGLE FAILURE X X X e 1.4-1 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS X X l.5-1 SYSTEM ALIGNMENT /SWITCHOVER X X I.6-1 REMOTE OPERATION AND SHLsTDOWN X s 1.7-1 SYSTEM ISOLATION / INTERLOCKS X X l.8-1 OVERPRESSURE PROTECTION X e e e 1.9-1 COMPONENT FUNCTIONAL REGUIREMENTS X X X X

!.10-1 SYSTEM HYDRAULIC DESIGN X X X

• 1.11-1 SYSTEM HEAT REMOVAL CAPABILITY X X X e 1.I2-1 COOLING REGUIREMENTS X l.13-1 WATER SUPPLIES X X

[,g4.[ PRESERVICE TESTINC/ CAPABILITY FOR OPERATIONAL TESTING X e e 1.15-1 POWER SUPPLIES X X e I.I6-1 ELECTRICAL CHARACTERISTICS X e e l.I7-1 PROTECTIVE DEVICES / SETTINGS X X X l

1.181, INSTRUMENTATION X X X X l.19 d CONTROL SYSTEMS X X X e 1.20-1 ACTUATION SYSTEMS X e 1.21-1 NDE COMMITMENTS X e e 1.22-1 MATERIALS SELECTION X X l.23-1 FAILURE MODES AND EFFECTS * *

• KEY NOTE X . INITIAL SCOPE OF REVIEW l. INITIAL SAMPLE DOCUMENTED IN REV. O AND I OF THIS PLAN HAS BEEN MODIFIED EFFECTIVE

@. DELETED SCOPE OF REVIEW 4/13/83

• - ADDED SCOPE OF REVIEW FIGURE I.2-2a

INITIAL SAMPLE REVIEW MATRIX FOR THE AUXILIARY FEEDWATER' SYSTEM MIDLAND INDEPENDENT DESIGN VERIFICATl9N PROGRAM (CONTINUED)I SCOPE OF REVIEW J x 't  !

DESIGN AREA

$ p"

.af xg t

' g ;. ga g i

g s 83 15 y }$ l f? l# l ~

AFW SYSTEM PROTECTION FEATURES . . .

11. 1 - 1 SEISMIC DESIGN X -

II.2 1 e PRESSURE BOUNDARY X X X X 'X '

11. 3 - 1 e PIPE / EQUIPMENT SUPPORT X X X X X -

11. 4 - 1 e EQUIPMENT GUALIFICATION X X -

X X .

s

11. 5 - 1 HIGH ENERGY LINE BREAK ACCIDENTS X '

11.6-1 e PIPE WHIP X X 'X X

11. 7 1 e JET IMP!NGEMENT X 11.8-l ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION X N~  ! ,.

il.;-I e ENVIRONMENTAL ENVELOPES X X X X. X -

11. 1 0 - 1 e EGUlPMENT GUALIFICATION X X X X

11. 1 1 - 1 e HVAC DESIGN 'X' l

11. 1 2 - 1 FIRE PROTECTION X X X , ,. , , , ,

E 11.1 3 - 1 MISSILE PROTECTION X , .,

11. 1 4 - 1 SYSTEMS INTERACTION X X X ,

STRUCTURES THAT HOUSE THE AFW SYSTEM x

[

111. 1 - 1 SEISMIC DESIGN / INPUT TO ECUIPMENT X X X X 111. 2 - 1 WIND & TORNADO DESIGN / MISSILE PROTECTION X 111. 3 - 1 FLOOD PROTECTION < X ,

111. 4 - 1 HELBA LOADS ,

X 111. 5 - 1 CIVIL / STRUCTURAL DESIGN CON 2DERATIONS X

~

111.6 1 e FOUNDATIONS X X X 111. 7 - 1 e CONCRETE / STEEL DESIGN .X X X X _' ~

lll.8-1 e TAtKS @ @ @ .

>[

s ,

x I

KEY N E X - NITIAL SCM & EIEW l. INITIAL SAMPLE DOCUMENTED IN REV. O AND I OF THIS PLAN HAS BEEN MODIFIED EFFECTIVE

@. DELETED SCOPE OF REVIEW /t 83 ,

• - ADDED SCOPE OF REVIEW ,, ,

.s N ..

FIGURE I.2-2b J.

M , e

.g% O

m

_ INITIAL SAMPLE REVIEW MATRIX FOR THE AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM I

' MIDL.AND INDEPENDENT CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM

~

q SCOPE OF REVIEW a

$A xs / s -oy V g .

S z

&y g

f O 4 SYSTEM /COMi'ONENT

-[af A

s 5 y , b ,R 5

& o by bl *bh Q

1 y

$Q g$5 g &

k k

$w Q

o,

'& x2 ts l

~ - . . I R

[<

MECHANIC _A_L X X X X X l.1-le e EQUIPMENT X X X X

\- 1.2-Ic e PlPING e PIPE SUPPORTS X X X X l.3-Ic

{

l ELECTRICAL  ;

%  !!.1-Ic e EGUIPMENT X X X X X e TRAYS AND SUPPORTS X *

• X li.2-Ic e CONDUlT AND SUPPORTS X *

• X II.3-Ic e CABLE -

X X X X X ll.4-Ic INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL lil.l-Ic e INSTRUMENTS .X X X X X s lil.2-Ic e PIP!NG/ TUBING X X III.3-Ic e CABLE X *

• X l

HVAC l X X IV.1-Ic e EQUIPMENT X X X l

IV.2-le e DUCTS AND SLPPORTS X X STRUCTURAL V.1-I c e FOUNDATIONS \ X X

', V.2-I c a' CONCRETE __ . X X X

~

\5 e STRUCTURAC5 FEEL X X X l

. .v.3-I c I .

i vl.1-ic[, s!2g[YATERIAL TESTfNG PRCORAM -

~~#-

KEY ',

$3 l n X -lNITIAL SCO%f REVIEW l. !NITIAL SAMPLE DOCUMENTED IN REV. O AND 1 V @. DE!ETED SCOPE OF RE\lEW OF THIS PLAN HAS BEEN MODIFIED EFFECTIVE 4 /13/8 3 l * - ADDED SCOPS OF REVIEW

~

\, FIGURE I.2-3

, , -,,--k , - - ,- - , , , - - - , , - - - - , ,

INITIAL SAMPLE REVIEW MATRIX FOR TI-E STAtOBY ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM MIDLAND INDEPENDENT DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM O f SCOPE OF REVIEW 5 9 i

e, n a1 b Auis vA DESIGN AREA C' A 4f , gdiig 1

/

j' I l'f I STANDBY ELECTRfC POWER SYSTEM PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS l.1-2 SYSTEM OPERATING LIMITS - DG X X X 1.2-2 ACCIDENT ANALYSIS CONSIDERATIONS X X l

- DG, AC, DC l 1.3-2 SINGLE FAILURE - DC, PDS, AC, DC X X X X l.b2 TECmlCAL SPECIFICATIONS - DG, DC X X I.(,-2 LOCAL OPERATION - DG X l.7-2 SYSTEM INTERLOCKS - DG X X l.9-2 X X X X COMPONENT FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS

~ ''^"

(J 1.12-2 COOLING / HEATING REQUIREMENTS - DG l.142 PRESERVICE TESTING /CAPAB!LITY FOR X

X X

X X

X X :j:;;j:j OPERATIONAL TESTING - DG l.16-2 ELECTRICAL CHARACTERISTICS - DG, X X X X PDS, AC, DC .

c l.17-2 PROTECTIVE DEVICES / SETTINGS - DG, PDS X X X l.18 2 INSTRUMENTATION - DC, AC, DC X X X X l.19-2 CONTROL SYSTEMS - DG X X X X I.20-2 ACTUATION SYSTEMS - DG X X X X 1.23-2 FAILURE MODES AND EFFECTS - DC, X X X l

PDS, AC, DC X X X X I.2b2 ELECTRICAL LOAD CAPACITY - DC, PDS, AC, DC l.25-2 ELECTRICAL LOADS SEQUENCING - DC, PDS X X X X l.26-2 ELECTRICAL LOAD SHEDDING - DC, PDS X X X l.27 2 FUEL OIL SYSTEM - DG X X X l.28-2 LUBE OIL SYSTEM - DG X X I.29-2 STARTING MECHANISM AND AIR SUPPLY X X X X SYSTEM - DG l.30-2 COMBUSTION AIR SUPPLY -DG X X X l.31 2 INDEPENDENCE - DG, PDS, AC, DC X X X X X X X X I.32-2 CABLE SIZ1NG/ ROUTING / SEPARATION- PDS KEY i DG - DIESEL GENERATOR l DGB- DIESEL GENERATOR BUILDING PDS - POWER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AC - PREFERRED 120V AC POWER SYSTEM SERVICING AFW SYSTEM DC - 12SV DC POWER SYSTEM SERVICING AFW SYSTEM FIGURE I.2-4a

INITIAL SAMPLE REVIEW MATRIX FOR TI-E STANDBY ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM MIDLAiO INDEPENDENT DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM (CONTINUED)

O f SCOPE OF REVIEW i #

i I y!

e ,

DESIGN AREA

- 1 y s"ssg "U-l si sf sf $5 sj.g-=-

p je j prje j ,

STANDBY ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM PROTECTION FEATURES II.1-2 SEISMIC DESIGN X

11. 2 2 e PRESSURE BOUPOARY - DG X X X 11.3 - 2 e PIPE /EQUlPMENT SUPPORT - DC, PDS X X X X X l1.4-2 e EQUIPMENT GUALIFICATION - DC, PDS X X X X t

11.5 2 HIGH ENERGY LINE BREAK ACCIDENTS X l

11.6 2 e P!PE WHIP - PDS, AC, DC X l  !!.7-2 e JET IMPINCEMENT - PDS, AC, DC X

!!.8-2 ENVIRONMENTAL FHOTECTION X

! 11. 9 - 2 e ENVIRONMENTAL ENVELOPES - DG, FDS X l

l1.10-2 o EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION - DC, PDS X X X X j l1. l l-2 e HVAC DESIGN - DG X

!!.12-2 FIRE PROTECTION - DG X X X 11.1 3 - 2 MISSILE PROTECTION - DG X 11.14-2 SYSTEMS INTERACTION - DC, PDS, AC, DC X X STRUCTURES THAT HGUSE THE STANDBY ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM lit.l-2 SEISMIC DESlCN/lNPUT TO EQUIPMENT - DG8 X X X X lll.2-2 WIND & TORNADO DESIGN / MISSILE PROTECTION X X X X

-DG8 111.3 - 2 FLOOD PROTECTION - DGB X X X ,

111.4-2 HEL8A LOADS - DG8 X

!!!.5-2 CIVIL / STRUCTURAL DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS 111. 6 - 2 e FOUCATIONS - DGB X X X 111. 7 - 2 o CONCRETE / STEEL DESIGN - DG8 X X X X .'

111. 8 - 2 e TANKS X X X X X KEY DG - DIESEL GENERATOR DGB - DIESEL CENERATOP. BUILDING PDS - POWER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM O(/ AC . PREFERRED 120V AC POWER SYSTEM SERVICING AFW SYSTEM DC - 125V DC POWER SYSTEM SERVICING AFW SYSTEM FIGURE I.2-4b i I 1

INITIAL SAMPLE REVIEW MATRIX FOR THE STANDBY ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM MIDLAND INDEPENDENT CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM O / SCOPE OF REVIEW fI1 h w.8 g as / .. j-SYSTEM /COMPOtENT l

I tr hn 4M M9 lL 2 I 2 MECHANICAL l.l-2c e EQUIPMENT - DG X X X X X 1.2-2e e PIPING - DG X X X l.3 2c e PIPE SUPPORTS - DC X X X ELECTRICAL ll.l-2c e EQUIPMENT - DG, PDS, AC, DC X X X X X ll.2-2e e TRAYS AND SUPPORTS - PDS X X X X ll,3-2c e CONDUIT AND SUPPORTS - PDS X X X X li.4-2c e CABLE PDS X X X X X INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL lli.l-2c e INSTRUMENTS - DG X X X X X ll!.2 2c e PIPING / TUBING - DG X X X

?!I.3-2c e CABLE - DG, PDS X X X X X l

HVAC IV.I-2c e EQUIPMENT - DG X X IV.2-2c e DUCTS AW SUPPORTS - DG X X STRUCTURAL V.1-2c e FOUtOATIONS - DG X X V.2-2c e CONCRETE - DC X X '

V.3 2c e STRUCTURAL STEEL - DG X X KEY DG - DIESEL GENERATOR q DGB - DIESEL GENERATOR BUILDING PDS - POWER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AC - PREFERRED 120V AC POWER SYSTEM SERVICING AFW SYSTEM DC - 125V DC POWER SYSTEM SERVICING AFW SYSTEM FIGURE I.2-5

INITIAL SAMPLE REVIEW MATRIX FOR TI-E CONTROL ROOM HVAC SYSTEM O MIDLAND INDEPENDENT DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM f SCOPE OF REVIEW 1

ial 4 l DESIGN AREA A 1

x l 1 l'flI$1dl q l

CONTROr. ROOM HVAC SYSTEM PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS 1.I-3 SYSTEM OPERATING LIMITS X X X l.2-3 ACCIDENT ANALYSIS CONSIDERATIONS X X L3-3 SINGLE FAILURE X X X i i 1.43 TECWICAL SPECIFICATIONS X X l.5-3 SYSTEM ALIGNMENT /SWITCHOVER X X l

I.7-3 SYSTEM ISOLATION / INTERLOCKS X X X X l 1.9-3 COMPONENT FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS X X X X l.10-3 SYSTEM PNEUMATIC DESIGN X X X X X l.12-3 . COOLING / HEATING REQUIREMENTS X X X l.14-3 PRESERVICE TESTING / CAPABILITY FOR X X OPERATIONAL TESTING l 1.15-3 POWER SUPPLIES X X -

1.18-3 INSTRUMENTATION / DETECTION X X X X l.19-3 CONTROL SYSTEMS X X X ,

l.20-3 ACTUATION SYSTEMS X X X X ,

1.21-3 NDE COMMITMENTS X X X l.22 3 MATERIALS SELECTION X X X X l 1.23 3 FAILURE MODES Ato EFFECTS X X X l.33-3 FILTRATION X X X X I.343 PRESSURIZATION X X X X l

1.35-3 VENTILATION X X X X X 1 l

l l

l FIGURE I.2-6a i l

INITIAL SAMPLE REVIEW MATRIX FOR THE CONTROL ROOM HVAC SYSTEM MIDLAto INDEPENDENT DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM (CONTINUED) f SCOPE OF REVIEW i 1  !!

DESIGN AREA I i d a g&i:-

1 ll'll'fl

. CONTROL ROOM HVAC SYSTEM PROTECTION FEATURES

!!.1-3 SEISMIC DESIGN X

!!.2-3 e PRESSURE BOUPOARY X X X .

11.3-3 o DUCT / PIPE / EQUIPMENT SUPPORT X X X X 11.4-3 e EQUlPMENT QUALIFICATION X X X X 11.5 3 HIGH EFERGY LINE BREAK ACCIDENTS X ll.6 3 e PIPE WHIP X

!!.7-3 o ET IMP!NGEMENT X 11.8-3 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION X

!!.9-3 e ENVIRCNMENTAL ENVELOPES X X X X X

!!.10-3 e EQUIPMENT GUALIFICATION X X X X 11.1 2 - 3 FIRE PROTECTION X X 11.13-3 MISS!LE PROTECTION X ILle-3 SYSTEMS INTERACTIONS X STRUCTURES THAT HOUSE THE CONTROL ROOM HVAC SYSTEM 111.1-3 SEISMIC DESIGN /lNPUT TO EQUIPMENT X X X -

lil.5-3 CIVIL / STRUCTURAL DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS X

!!!.7-3 e CONCRETE / STEEL DESIGN X X 111. 9 - 3 e LEAK TIGHTPESS X X X i

O FIGURE I.2-6b

INITIAL SAMPLE REVIEW MATRIX FOR TFE CONTROL ROOM HVAC SYSTEM O

MIDLAbO INDEPENDENT CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM SCOPE OF REVIEW SYSTEM /COMPOPENT 56 o!'!bel! s1 a!fl w I I MECHANICAL kud. 1 i l.1-3c e EQUIPMENT X X X X X l.2-3c e PIPING X X X l.3 3c e P!PE SUPPORTS X X X ELECTRICAL ll.1-3c e EQUIPMENT X X X X ,

j ll.2-3c e TRAYS AND SUPPORTS X X X l ll.3-3c e CONDUIT Ato SUPPORTS X X X

!!.4-3e o CABLE X X X I

j INSTRUMENTATION Ato CCNTROL lli.1-3c e INSTRUMENTS / DETECTORS X X X X X

!!!.2-3c e PIPING / TUBING X X X 58

!!!.3-3e e CABLE X X X HVAC IV.2-3c e DUCTS APO SUPPORTS X X X X STRUCTURAL V.2-3c e CONCRETE X X X V.3-3c e STRUCTURAL STEEL X X X ,

l VI.1-3c NDE/ MATERIALS TESTING PROGRAM X O

! FIGURE I.2-7 1

l PROJECT INSTRUCTION d PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland Independent Design and

] REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE 14 'of 145 PREPARED BY:

pj APPROVED B Figures Design Construction System Verification Verification AFW l.2-2a, 2b I.2-3 SEP l.2-4o, 4b I.2-S CR-HVAC l.2-6a, 6b I.2-7 It should be noted that the scope of technical review is dynamic and subject to change as more emphasis will be given to specific review creas that meet prescribed criteria. These criteria are documented in Section 3.1.2 of this Plan.

Accordingly, the review matrices generally represent the initial IDCV " sample".

On April 13,1983, a change of the AFW system initial sample was effected. This (a') change is noted on Figures 1.2-2a,1.2-2b and 1.2-3.

l.3 SYSTEMS SELECTION CRITERIA The selection of the auxiliary feedwater system was based upon the following six criteria:

e importance to Safety - The system should have a rela-tively high level of importance to the overall safety of l the Midland Plant.

1 inclusion of Design and Construction Interfaces - The e

system should be one which involves multiple interfaces among engineering and construction disciplines as well as design and construction organizations, such as the NSSS vendor, architect engineer, constructor, and subtier con-tractors. The system should also be one where design or construction changes have occurred and thus provide the ability to test the effectiveness of the design and con-struction process exercised by principal internal and

(-)/

t external organizations or disciplines in creas of design or construction change.

DC-82-13 t

PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland Independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/B3 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY:

FAGE 15 of 145 p l i (,,, .- m L;_

W e Ability to Extrapolate Results - The system should be sufficiently representative of other safety systems such that the design criteria, design and construction control and change processes are similar so that extrapolation of findings to other systems con be undertaken with confi-dence.

. Diverse in Content - The major engineering and con-struction disciplines should all have input to the design of the system.

e Sensitive to Previous Experience - The system should be one which includes design or construction disciplines or interfaces which have previously exhibited problems and thus a test of the system should be indicative of any generic condition, o

i I ( e Ability to Test As-Built Installation - The system con-figuration should be sufficiently completed that the as-built configuration can be verified against design.

i

! The AFW system was selected after consideration of a number of other candidate systems. The Midland Plant probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) was utilized as a tool to assess the relative importance to safety of plant systems on the basis of their contribution to overall plant risk. The profile for this criterion as well as each of the other five criteria is sufficiently high for the AFW, SEP and CR-HVAC systems to justify their selection.

l.4 INDEPENDENCE REQUIREMENTS The Midland IDCV program will be conducted in accordance with the

" independence" criteria documented in a letter from Nunzio J. Palladino, Chairman, NRC, to the Honorable John D. Dingell, Chairman, Committee on Energy and Commerce, United States House of Representatives, dated O

t/

February 1,1982. This letter was originally written as applicable to Pccific Gas DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION p;_ 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan O Midland Independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY PAGE 16 of 145  ;{

and Electric Company's Diablo Canyon project; however, it is being applied to the l Midland IDCV program and the reader should interpret the words PG&E or Diablo i Canyon to mean CPC or Midland, respectively. The following criteria are excerpted from Enclosure 3 of this letter:

"The competence of the individuals or companies is the most important factor in the selection of an auditor. Also, the companies or individuals may not have had any direct previous involvement with the cctivities at Diablo Canyon (Midland) that they will be reviewing.

In addition, the following factors will be considered in evaluating the question of independence:

l in

() 1) Whether the individuals or companies involved had been previously hired by PG&E (CPC) to do similar seismic (delete seismic) design work.

2) Whether any individual involved had been previously employed by PG&E (CPC) (and the nature of the employment).

1

3) Whether the individual owns or controls significant amounts of PG&E (CPC) stock.

4) Whether members of the present household of individuals involved are employed by PG&E (CPC).

5) Whether any relatives are employed by PG&E (CPC) in a management capacity.

i In addition to the above considerations, the following l procedural guidelines will be used to assure independence:

l l) An auditable record will be provided of all comments on draft or final reports, any changes made as a result of such comments, and the reasons for such changes; orr the consultant will issue only a final report (without prior licensee comment).

v l 2) NRC will assume and exercise the responsibility for I

serving the report on all parties."

l DC-82-13 1

l PROJECT INSTRUCTION l I PI 3201.,009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan i

Midland Independent Design and lREV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY:

l PAGE17 of 145 gi [ APPROVED- B{

1 l

The individuals taking part in the Midland IDCV program meet the preceding i criteria and have signed a statement attesting to this fact. I TERA Corporation is under contract to CPC to provide the engineering services necessary to complete the Midland IDCV program. Prior to this contract, TERA has never been under contract to CPC.

1 The contract requires TERA to maintain an auditable record to document the l process leading to Findings as well as meetings to discuss Findings. Section 4.0 of this Plan addresses documentation and protocol requirements governing l external communications which have been developed to meet obligations of the l

() contract and NRC requirements. The protocol will be conducted in accordance l with the requirements documented in a letter from James G. Keppler, l Administrator, NRC Region Ill to James W. Cook, Vice President, CPC dated l

March 28,1983, as interpreted by TERA.

1 Section S.0 of this Plan addresses the report generation process, during the IDCV program to report Findings and at its conclusion as a final report. TERA will maintain an auditable record of all comments on the draft final report.

2.0 ORGANIZATION AND CONTROL 2.1 PROJECT ORGANIZATION The project organization is addressed in Section 2.1 of the Project Quality Assurance Plan (PGAP), Midland Independent Design and Construction Verifica-tion Program, Project 3201. Figure 2.1-1 provides the project organization chart.

,S Technical and administrative personnel (not shown) receive assignments directly V from the Project Manager (PM). The PM serves as the principal point of contact DC-82-13

NUCLEAR REGULATORY CONSUMERS POWER COMMISSION COMPANY I I I I I I n------------.2 1

1 SENIOR REVIEW TEAM

~~- 'gF koj T " T PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE Donald Davis, im.

• • • • • • E0E!EITo@$f57b^eyf4 John Beck William Hall or mo;Ecn Robert Wilson PROJECT OA PROJECT MANAGER Chuck Lemon Howard Levin lO l

l l

l STRUCTURAL REVIEW SYSTEMS REVIEW ELECTRICAL REVIEW Howard Levin, Acting Richard Snaider Lionel Bates CONSTRUCTION MECHANICAL REVIEW VERIFICATION Frank Dougherty Donald Tulodieski i

SITE ACTIVITIES i

Martin Jones O

FIGURE 2.1-1 PROJECT ORGANIZATION MIDLAND INDEPENDENT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION

PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY PAGE 19 of 145  ; g, with CPC. The Project Quality Assurance Engineers report directly to the Executive Vice President, TERA. They will identify internal quality assurance deficiencies, work with the PM in providing clarification relative to ihntified deficiencies and any recommendations made by them for resolution.

2.2 AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY The project authority and responsibility is addressed in Section 2.2 o! the PGAP, Project 3201, as augmented by various project instructions and engineering control procedures which are referenced in the PQAP.

The Principal-in-Charge (PIC) is responsible for helping establish the general philosophy of review, setting forth guidance to the Project Manager and the Lead Technical Reviewers (LTR), assisting as an interface with the Senior Review l Team (SRT), NRC and CPC and reviewing / concurring in reports issued to CPC, NRC and other outside parties.

The Project Manager is responsible for overall planning and direct supervision of all in-house activities undertaken to fulfill the contract requirements. All documentation, correspondence, reports, calculations, etc., issued to CPC, NRC and other outside parties are to be issued under his s;gnature or otherwise receive his approval as required by the applicable Engineering Control Procedure

! or Projet Instruction.

1 l

l The Project Manager is responsible for overall planning and management of all l outside activities performed by subcontractors or Associates, but may delegate 1

l responsibility for supervision to other individuals within the project.

y DC-82-13 1

PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201 . 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan O REV.:

Midland Independent Design and 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY: APPROVED B PAGE 20 of 145 g ;g ,

Documentation may be issued to the subcontractor or Associate under the signature of the designated individual.

The Senior Review Team (SRT) is responsible for the review of Open, Confirmed or Resolved (OCR) Item Reports, as requested by the PIC, Finding Reports, Finding Resolution Reports, as well as Interim Technical Reports and Final Reports. The SRT may at any time recommend to the PIC that the PM expand the scope of review, provide clarification or reassess elements of the review to assess the technical validity and significance of project team conclusions and the proper classification of OCRs and Findings. (These reports are defined in Section S.0 of this Plan). The SRT is also responsible for the review of Monthly O sietes senorts, ocas es airectea 8x ise sar chcirme", coa eev orcri imterim Technical Reports to maintain current awareness and assure a high level of technical quality. They will also provide recommendations to resolve differing technical views which may crise among project team membes. The SRT Chairman is responsible for coordination and direction of SRT activities.

The Lead Technical Reviewers (LTR) are responsible for management and implementation of all review activities within their discipline of review, including supervision of individuals on the project and outside activities performed by Associates. The LTRs report to the Project Manager. The LTRs are responsible for the classification of OCRs and Findings, the preparation of Finding Reports and Finding Resolution Reports.

The Project Quality Assurance Engineer is responsible for verification of the implementation of the PGAP and will perform audits evaluating the implementation of applicable procedures and instructions in accordance with Section 6.3 and ECP-S 6.

l DC-82-13 l

l

I PROJECT INSTRUCTION l

)

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan g~F1 3201. 009 Midland independent Design and REY.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY: APPROVED BYg PAGE 21 or 115 }

v -

e l 2.3 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL  ;

l l

The project administrative control is addressed in Section 4.0 of the PGAP, Project 3201, as augmented by various project instructions and engineering control procedures which are referenced in the PGAP.

Procedures and instructions are addressed which will be implemented to control l

documentation generated on the Midland IDCV project which is subject to quality assurance and control measures or is required to provide an auditable record of ,

the IDCV review process leading to Findings. The following documents are l controlled: engineering evaluations, documents such as Monthly Status Reports, V Draft and Final Interim Technical Reports and Draft and Final Reports, '

calculations, analyses, computer analyses, PGAP, quality assurance documents, personnel qualifications, correspondence, Open, Confirmed and Resolved item l Reports, Observations, Finding Reports, Finding Resolution Reports, the j Engineering Program Plan and records documenting external communications and meetings.

3.0 ENGINEERING PROGRAM PLAN METHODOLOGY This section provides the overall method of approach for the IDV and ICV portions of the IDCV with particular emphasis on those features of the l

l methodology which are common to both. Specific details of the methodology for the IDV and ICV are addressed below in Sections 3.1 and 3.2, respectively.

The initial review step includes ihe identification and review of pertinent

[

documents to permit an understanding of the design and construction chains 1

DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI_ 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland Independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY: APPROVED B PAGE 22 of 145 {}

including the interrelationships between the organizations and suborganizations l participating in the Midland project. Next, the design bases in the form of l

regulatory requirements and design criteria are identified and reviewed in parallel with a review of project design and construction related experience.

The design bases review provides an overall understanding of the plant and system design. The project design and construction experience review ensures that the IDCV program encompasses previously identified problem creas to verify that these have been adequately addressed and that they do not exist elsewhere in the same or similar form.

For the systems, components, and structures identified in Sections 3.l.3 through O 3.1.5 and 3.2.3 through 3.2.5, detailed information which documents the implementation of the design and construction commitments will be identified, reviewed, and evaluated. The IDCV review and evaluation process will be documented in accordance with the procedures addressed in Section 4.0 of this Plan. The reporting of Findings including the disposition of items potentially leading to Findings will be reported in accordance with the precedures addressed in Section 5.0 of this Plan. The IDCV will be conducted in accordance with applicable provisions of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, which are addressed in Section 6.0 of this Plan.

l 3.1 INDEPENDENT DESIGN VERIFICATION METHODOLOGY ANSI N45.2.11 defines design verification as the " process of reviewing, conform-ing, or substantiating the design by one or more methods to provide assurance that the design meets specified inputs." Design inputs include design bases or criteria, regulatory requirements, codes and standardstand other design commit-g l LJ DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION pg_ 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan h REV.:

Midland Independent Design and 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY:

PAGe- 23 .of 145 I h p j, . _ %Q 9 ~

ments. The IDV includes a determination of the design inputs; an evaluation of their accuracy, consistency, and adequacy; and an evaluation of the implementa-tion of these commitments. The emphasis will be on making a determination of the overall quality of the design and an assessment of its compliance with licensing commitments. The review approach has been designed to be introspective in making this overall quality assessment by integrating the many design inputs and licensing commitments. This integrated assessment will ensure that all parameters have been considered which are important for the system in meeting its functional requirements.

The IDV methodology will utilize the applicable guidelines of ANSI N45.2.11.

O The me>8oaoio9x *iii iocivae aiverse onarocches evca es checktms orisimei calculations, conducting alternative confirmatory calculations, or checking design ouputs including drawings or specifications. Where independent calcula-tions are utilized, they may incorporate methods which are either similar to or different from the original design. In certain instances these independent calculations will be " blind," in that the original design calculations will be I compared to the independent calculations upon their completion, without prior l review by the IDV analyst.

The categories to be reviewed for certain design areas include review of design criteria and commitments, review of implementing documents, checks of calcu-lations and evaluations, confirmatory calculations or evaluations, and checks of drawings and specifications. These categories are defined in Section 3.1.1. As a l

rule, all design areas will not be reviewed in each of the preceding categories.

For example, a design area for the AFW system is " heat removal capability."

This item would not typically have drawings and specifications associated with it l DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION g PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY PAGE 24 of 145 lgj as a direct output. In other instances, it may be the judgment of the review team based upon experience that emphasis is not needed in certain categories for each design area.

The bases for samp!e selection are presented in Section 3.1.2. The definition of the scope of review is provided in the following sections:

System Section AFW 3.l.3 SEP 3.1.4 CR-HVAC 3.1.S The IDV will be conducted utilizing detailed checklists which are described in Section 3.1.6. Additional sampling and verification that may be conducted as a result of the IDV are discussed in Section 3.1.7.

3.1.1 CATEGORIES OF REVIEW: THE DESIGN CHAIN The categories of review selected include the major design activities identified in the design chain. The IDV review categories included are:

e Review of design criteria and commitments e Review of implementing documents e Check of calculations and evaluations ,

e Confirmatory cciculations or evaluations

,r

\,

DC-82-13

l PROJECT INSTRUCTION I PI 3201,,009 SUBJECTi Engineering Program Plan Midland Independent Design and

-l REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Prcgram l PAGE _15___ 'of IM ' l Id L - b. h e Check of drawings cnd specifications Each of these categories is described in detail in sections 3.1.1.1 through 3.1.1.5 respectively. Checklists have been prepared for each of these categories to aid IDCV reviewers in the implementation of their review. These checklists are discussed in section 3.l.6.

3.1.1.1 Review of Design Criteria and Commitments An identification and review of the design criteria and commitments concerning each specific design crea will be performed. This review category provides the (o

)

assurance that all necessary design inputs are considered in the IDV. The results of this review of design criteria and commitments are then used in subsequent stages where appropriate. The review of design criteria and commitments begins

with an identification of appropriate criteria for the system. Such criteria may l

l be determined from sources such as the FSAR, the docket file, 10 CFR 50, i Appendix A, criteria supplied by the NSSS vendor, industry codes and standards, and other documents which provide criteria for system design.

3.1.1.2 Review of implementing Documents l

Implementing documents are those design documents which translate the design inputs into working level documentation. Typically, implementing documents include design criteria documents, project procedures, standard design practices, l specific plant design basis documents, drawings, and calculations. Most fre-quently, implementing documents are intermediate steps in the design process l

m DC-82-13 l

PROJECT INSTRUCTION pl_3201 . 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Pro' gram Plan s Midland independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification P'rogram PAGE 26 g 145 PREPARED BY:

g APPROVED BY which are subsequently used to produce design outputs. It is important that design inputs are properly interpreted and documented in implementing docu-ments. Therefore, the objective of the review is to determine the existence and general reasonableness of the documentation and whether the documentation correctly reflects the design inputs. Design outputs are defined as documents such as drawings, specifications, and similar materials defining technical requirements for the fabrication, installation, or construction of the system.

The design output documents are reviewed for the application of the design criteria and commitments as part of the check of drawings and specifications.

3.1.l.3 Check of Calculations and Evaluations O When specified, a detailed check of calculations and evaluations is made (i.e.

inputs, assumptions, methodology, outputs, etc.). This activity follows the review of design criteria and commitments and the review of implementing documents. The check may take several forms, ranging from a number-by-number detailed mathematical check to a review and evaluation of outputs for reasonableness. The overall presentation of the sampled calculations and evaluations will also be reviewed to verify that all steps are clearly presented and consistent throughout. The IDV reviewer may, at his discretion, choose to conduct an alternative calculation as a means of confirming his judgment on the adequacy of the design calculation or evaluation. Where computer programs were used in the analysis, the reviewer will verify that appropriate inputs have been used in the calculation, and that the appropriate outputs have been identified. Additionally, it will be necessary to determine that the computer programs used have been verified in accordance with appropriate verification procedures.

O 8

DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION

^

PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program APPROVED BY:

PAGE 27 'of a5 PREPARED BY: j ' j,ie,j _

mQ 3.l.l.4 Confirmatory Calculations or Evaluations For selected areus, confirmatory calculations or evaluations will be performed.

Generally, these evaluations will be made to confirm judgements relative to the review of creas which are suspect to the IDCV reviewer; however, " blind" confirmatory calculations will be undertaken in pre-selected areas to independently verify the original design calculations. Such confirmatory calculations will be performed by obtaining the necessary input data and independent specification of calculation or evaluation objective. The reviewer I

will select and apply the appropriate techniques to achieve the end results. Such calculation methods will be performed without benefit of first reviewing the l C) existing design calculational method, in order to preserve the " blind" nature of this approach, it will be necessary that a person other than the reviewer of the implemsting documents perform the confirmatory calculation er evaluation.

The confirmatory calculation or evaluation will be performed under procedures appropriate for the type of caiculation or evaluation being performed. To the extent appropriate, the calculation or evaluation will be equivalent to that initially performed. After completion of the confirmatory calculation or evaluation, a comparison between the original calculation and the confirmatory l methods will be made to determine whether differences exist. If differences occur, a determination will be made to assess whether these differences are due to the inherent nature of the calculation methods chosen or due to errors.

l For example, differences may result due to the selection by the originator of simplifying or conservative assumptions. In the event that the original calcula-tion is more conservative than the confirmatory calculation and meets design basis acceptance criteria, no further action will be necessary. On the other n

DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland Independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY: APPROVED PAGE 28 of 145  ;

V hand, if the confirmatory calculation uses more conservative methods, a check of the original calculation will be made to determine whether the difference in degree of conservatism is appropriate.

3.1.l.5 Check of Drawings and Specifications Where appropriate, design outputs such as drawings and specifications will be reviewed and checked to assure that they accurately and consistently reflect that which has been called for in design documents such as calculations or engineering evaluations. Drawings and specifications will also be reviewed to determine whether design change notices and field change notices have been C incorporated. In cases where several related drawings exist, o cross-comparison among drawings w"' be made. Additioncily, a review will be made of correspondence with vendors to determine the existence of deviations from the specifications and the approval by the design organization of such changes.

3.1.2 BASES FOR SAMPLE SELECTION The systems selection criteria which are documented in Section 1.3 of this Plan also apply to the selection of specific structures or components to be reviewed I

within each design area of the IDV, including the depth of review in each design area. As a rule, the selection is based upon engineering judgment, as statistical l techniques are considered to be largely inappropriate for a design verification program. Senior members of the project team with requisite experience are responsible for selecting the sample and determining its size. This process provides grecter assurance than a random sampling plan since the initial IDV l sample is purposely biased towards typical problem areas. Furthermore, the o

l O DC-82 i3 l

1

l l l PROJECT INSTRUCTION ll pg_ 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland independent Design and t

-l REW 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program i PREPARED BY: a i p,, i. _ APPROVED BY:

of 145  % Lj I PAGE29 l r

initial sample is considered broad enough to ensure that significant deficiencies could not propogote through the systems under evaluation without being detected.

l In the course of designing a nuclear power plant, numerous reviews and evaluations are typically performed. These reviews and evaluations may result in the ldentification of creas requiring additional work. These reviews and evoluotions reflect the project's design experience and are a valuable input to the refinement of the IDV scope and sample selection. In order to make use of

! this information, a review is made of the ongoing CPC inspection programs, 50.55e reports, CPC Safety Concern and Reportability Evaluation (SCRE)

() reports, Bechtel Management Corrective Action Reports (MCAR), NRC l inspection reports, audit reports, and similar documentation. Three principal criteria are used to modify the technical review scope and the initial sample, l

providing more emphasis or a higher frequency of sampling to:

l 1

e Criterion I - Areas experiencing repeated problems within the industry or specifically on the Midland Project, to verify that these do not exist in the some or similar form, e Criterion 2 - Areas previously receiving a lower level of I review to achieve a sufficient level of assurance, and

)

e Criterion 3 - Areas where suspect items or Findings have been identified to provide further confirmation, close out )

outstanding issues and fully assess the extent and root Cause.

l v

DC-82-13 l

c

l PROJECT INSTRUCTION I PI 3201. 009--

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland independent Design and

-l REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program g 145 PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY l PAGE30 3.1.3 DEFINITION OF REVIEW SCOPE FOR THE AFW SYSTEM Section 3.l.1 identified the categories of review which essentially correspond to major activities of the design chain. When combined with a listing of each of the design creas (or topics), a matrix is formed which can be utilized to direct the conduct of the IDV effort for each system in the program. This matrix is shown on Figures 1.2-2a and 1.2-2b for the AFW system. A set of "X" marks are shown which indicate the review scope appliccble to each design area. The criteria discussed in Sections 1.3 and 3.1.2 of this Plan were incorporated to develop the initial matrix. The design creas of the IDV review matrix for the AFW system are divided into three major divisions: AFW System Performance Requirements, Q AFW System Protection Features, and Structures that House the AFW System.

The design areas addressed within each of these major divisions are discussed in Sections 3.1.3.1, 3.1.3.2, and 3.1.3.3 of this Plan, respectively. The initial review scope as documented in Revisions 0 and I of this Plan has been modified based upon meeting one or more of the criteria documented in Section 3.1.2. This change is indicated on Figures 1.2-2a and 1.2-2b by a circled "X" for items deleted from scope and by the symbol "*" for items added to scope.

Because the AFW system sample selection interfaces with other systems, it is

( necessary to define the boundaries for items within the scope of the IDCV. In general for the AFW system, the selection was made to include all components identified as being part of the AFW system on Bechtel P&lD drawing M439 sheets 3A, revision 9, and 3B, revi.sion 10. Specific interface points are as j follows:

f\

b l

DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Progrom Plan Midland independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY: APPROVED B PAGE 31 of 145 r

AFW SYSTEM SAMPLE SELECTION BOUNDARIES Interface Point (component Interfacing System included in AFW)

Main Steam Valves 074 and 077 I NSSS Steam Generator Nozzles Service Water A Valve 283 Service Water B Valve 282 Unit 2 Condensate Tank (from) Valve 008 Condenser Hotwells Valve 006 Unit I Condensate Tank (return) Valve 019 Cooling Pond (return) Valve 017 ac/dc Power System 2 Breaker or fuse interfacing AFW components with power source ESFAS AFW actuation system and FOGG Main FW Loop A Valve 303 (m,) Vents and Drains First Valve HVAC AFW pump room fan coolers and associated ductwork and supports NOTES:

1. P&lD M-432, Sheet IA, Revision S

2. Power supplies dedicated to AFW system are within sample selection boundaries.

l l

(v)

1 DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan O Midland Independent Design cnd REW 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program APPROVED BY PAGE 32 of 145 PREPARED BY: [ g .

In view of the fact that the design process involves a great number of individuals and organizations who may have contributed to the project engineering aciivi-ties, it is necessary to define a reasonable set of limits on the scope of the IDV.

Criteria were established by the project team to define the end points of the design chain applicable to this project. The majority of the design was performed by Bechtel. However, portions of the design mcy have been performed or affected by work performed by other organizations including, but not limited to, Babcock & Wilcox (B&W), engineering contractors, and equipment vendors. For the purposes of the verification program, the following limitations i were applied. The information obtained by Bechtel from B&W does not receive, as part of the IDV program, an independent evaluation of the process by which p

y) B&W developed its data. The verification program verifies that data obtained from B&W are consistent and reasonable based upon engineering judgment. If the B&W data are suspect, additional investigation into the causes may be warranted. Equipment vendors are reviewed to verify that the documents with which they were supplied are accurate and current and that the results of their design efforts conform with the specified requirements given to them by Bechtel or CPC. Vendor documentation will be reviewed to determine that his product does, in fact, meet applicable requirements of the specifications. In the event that deviations are determined to exist, the appropriate IDCV Program reporting procedures will be applied. For engineering contractors, the scopes of work applicable to these contractors will be determined and, in general, they will be treated as if they were part of the Bechtel design organization. That is, they will not be treated like a vendor who is given a specification end is expected to deliver a product in conformance with that specification. They will be treated as part of a design organization which has similar responsibilities to other parts of the Bechtel project organization.

/3 N.]

DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION

- PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan

' Midland Indepcndent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE 33 ~of 145 PREPARED BY:

, y APPROVED BY r

The following sections discuss the initial scope of review for each of the design creas.

3.l.3.1 AFW System Performance Requirements The AFW system will be reviewed to assess its capability to perform as required by the design criteria and commitments. Included in the scope of this portion of review are design areas such as system operating limits, single failure, compo-nent functional requirements, electrical, instrumentation and control, and hydraulic design.

3.l.3.1.1 System Operating Limits - Topic 1.1-1

({])

The specified system operating limits will be reviewed to determine whether they have been appropriately specified in consiceration of functional performance requirements during normal (startup and shutdown), transient and j accident conditions. These performance requirements will be generally based upon NSSS considerations. Specified limits such as heat removal requirements, pressure requirements, time constraints, and system logic will be reviewed. To accomplish the preceding, the review will consist of a design criteria and commitments review, a review of implementing documents, and a check of

, calculations and evaluations.

3.1.3.1.2 Accident Analysis Considerations - Tcpic 1.2-1 The FSAR accident analyses will be reviewed to identify those accidents in which the AFW may be involved either as a contributor or as an engineered v

DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION '

_ pl 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan

' Midland independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program ' N PAGE 34 of 145 PREPARED BY:

qg ; APPROVED BY T I i

safety system which helps mitigate the consequences of .on occident. An evaluation will be made to determine if ~the system has been approgintely considered in these analyses and also to provide feedback into Topic i.l-l to \

assure that system operating limits appiopriately reflect accident analysis , ',

considerations. In addition, CPC/Bechtel actions in response to the 9&W Anticipated Transient Operator Guidelines (ATOG) will be reviewed to assure'

~

that the design and operator guidelines are in compliance.  ;

3.l.3.1.3 Single Foilure - Topic i.3-1 All " active" components (e.g. pumps, motor-operated valves etc.) of the AFW

([] system will be reviewed to determine whether the failure of one component can incapacitate the system or whether the system has sufficient redendancy, including power supplies, to withstand a single failure. (This will include a review of the fl.ow logic "motrix" (FOGG system - Feed Only Good Generator) that is designed to prevent AFW flow to a depressurized steam generator, and provide steam flow to the turbine-driven pump only from the " good" generator).

Automatic and manual initiation of the system will be reviewed. To accomplish the preceding, the review will consist of a des;gn criteria and commitments review, a review of implementing documents, and a check of design evaluations.

3.l.3.1.4 Technical Specificaticas - Topic l.4-1 The technical specifications will be reviewed to assure that important plant operating limits associated with the AFW system are appropriately and accurate-ly specified, consistent with the intent of the NRC's ~ Standard Technical Specifications.

p L]

DC-82-13 m M

4.

~

7 _ _

bOJECT INSTRUCIlON

^ PG03 -Jo9 N

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland Independent Design and REW 2 Construction Verification Program

' {DATE: 5/18/83 PREPARED BY: 1 APPROVED BY:

, ,1 ()-

PAGE 35 , 'c f1145 -, na

.c.' . v g

3.l.3.l.5 System Alignment /Switchover - Topic l.5-1

' System aiicirment criterio and commitments under all modes of operation will be I

i reviewed along with P&lDs and other implementing documents. Additionally, since the AFW system incorporates substantial switchover capoMiity between r

s Urilts I and 2 avbilable; water sources, all switchovers cnd potential alignments

' quill be reviewed against applicable procedures (if available) to determine

whether the sydem can meet design objectives. Any switchovers designed to N 'occu' automatically will be reviewed against single failure criteria os discussed i

previously. . Sveitchovers requiring manual activities will be reviewed by s determinibg time required versus time available to accomplish necessary actions.

V 3.1.3.1.6 Remote Operation and Shutdown - Topic 1.6-1

^

The criteria'and commitments for safe shutdow'n from out:ide the control room 4 ,

will be identified ani reviewed Selected components employed to meet the remote operation requirements will be reviewed as described under Topic l.9-1, Component Functional Requirements. Other design features applicable to remote operation will be reviewed under Topic l.16-1, Electrical Characteristics and Topic 1.18-l, Instrumentation.

3.1.3.1.7 System Isolation / Interlocks - Topic l.7-l 1

3 The AFW system criteria, commitments, and implementing documents will be reviewed to determine the adequacy of all isolation requirements and interlocks which have been designed to implement system performance requirements. The single failure review in Topic l.3-1 will address these items as well.

p

,m / ~

DC-82-13

l PROJECT INSTRUCTION I PI 3201.,009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland independent Design and

-l REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY:

PAGE 36 of 145 4 j dJ .

%h u

3.l.3.1.8 Overpressure Protection - Topic l.8-1 The AFW system criteria and commitments will be reviewed to assess the need for and incorporation of protective devices which may be required to prevent system overpressurization for modes of operation. This review will serve as input into Topic l.10-1, System Hydraulic Design.

3.1.3.l.9 Component Functional Requirements - Topic l.9-1 Selected mechanical, electrical, instrumentation and control (E,1&C) compo-nents specified and used in the AFW system will be reviewed for compliance to

() their functional requirements. The development of the functional requirements will be traced from the AFW system design criteria as dictated by licensing commitments, industry codes and standards, plant environmental conditions, and system performance requirements for the intended operating modes. The design criteria and commitments used for the AFW system will be checked to ensure

! the inclusion of all required design inputs. Component functional requirements design criteria include factors such as flow rate, allowable pressure drops, NPSH, voltage, device settings, and similar characteristics. The design process (calculations or analyses) used to translate the overall system design criteria into specific component specifications will also be reviewed. I inally, the validated component functional requirements will be compared to the component procure-ment specifications. Equipment seismic and environmental qualification will be l considered separately.

l l

l l

i O

V DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION pg_ 3201. 009 Engineering Program Plan 9 REV.:

SUBJECT:

Midland Independent Design and 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY of 145 PAGE 37 3 3.l.3.1.10 System Hydraulic Design - Topic 1.10-1 l

l A review of criteria and commitments and implementing documents will be made for the system hydraulic design. The system hydraulic design review will c!so include a detailed check of calculations and evaluations of the system hydraulic parameters. This activity will incorporate results obtained from the configura-tion verification effort which is part of the ICV. For example, line sizes, lengths of pipe, and numbers of pipe fittings will be checked in the ICV effort. These quantities will then be compared against the basis for calculations of pressure drop in various portions of the AFW system.

O q ,! 3. l .3. l .1 1 System Heat Removal Capability - Topic l.11-1 Calculations and evaluations performed to demt. strate the adequacy of the system's heat removal capability will be checked. The scope includes a comparison between the results of the hydraulic design evaluation and the system requirements for heat removal.

l 3.1.3.1.12 Cooling Requirements - Topic 1.12-1 l

Cooling requirements for AFW mechanical and electrical components will be checked and a determination made that these heat loads have been considered as design criteria for the interfacing systems.

3.1.3.1.13 Water Supplies - Topic l.13-1 The criteria established for water supply, from both safety and nonsafety o! sources, will be identified. A review will be made of implementing documents t

' ( '#

for proper use of these criteria.

DC-82-13 l

l PROJECT INSTRUCTION  ;

- PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan

. Midland Independent Design and REW 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE 38 of 145 PREPARED BY:

lilLL. r ., APPROVED BY:

mh r

3.1.3.1.14 Preser vice Testing and Capability for Operational Testing -

Topic l.14-I A determination will be made of the design criteria and commitments which exist for preservice testing and the capability for operational testing, including a review of implementing documents and associated evaluations that support the testing programs. The results of this review will be used in the ICV portion of the IDCV, which will verify that the system has been constructed such that it can function in accordance with its design criteria and commitments.

{J 3.1.3.1.15 Power Supplies - Topic l.15-1 The applicable design criteria for AFW power supplies will be identified from NSSS vendor, regulatory and industry requirements. The documents implementing the design criteria will be checked to verify the proper consideration of the applicable criteria determined from the criteria review.

The AFW logic system cnd schematic diagrams will be reviewed to ensure that requirements relative to the quality of power supplies (diversity and redundancy) are met. In particular the review will include the assurance that the AFW system will meet design criteria including the loss of offsite power and station blackout.

3.l.3.1.16 Electrical Characteristics - Topic l.16-1 l

l The AFW system electrical characteristics as determined by design criteria and commitments will be reviewed to verify that all required commitments and m

l l

DC-82-13

l PROJECT INSTRUCTION l pl 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland independent Design and

_l REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY: gg APPROVED BY PAGE 39 of 145 criteria have been addressed. The creas of criteria and commitment review shall include cable physical separation, system electrical separation, cable and raceway sizing and terminal voltage on power circuits. Cable sizing calculations will be reviewed and applied to selected power circuits in the AFW system.

3.1.3.1.17 Protective Devices / Settings - Topic l.17-l implementing documents will be reviewed to check for the inclusion of applicable design criteria and commitments for protective devices / settings.

j AFW schematic diagrams and component specifications will be reviewed to ensure that protective device / settings criteria have been properly implemented

(] for motors and penetration assemblies. Protective device bypass features for thermal overload and opening torque sw!ich will be verified for motor operated valves that are safety related.

3 l.3.1.18 Instrumentation - Topic 1.I8-1 The instrumentation and alarms required to operate, monitor and protect the AFW system, as determined by design criteria, commitments and expected plant operations, will be reviewed against that specified for the AFW system to verify the adequacy of the instrumentation. Selected instrument accuracies under applicable plant operating conditions will be reviewed and evaluated. Selected instrument logic diagrams will be reviewed for proper circuit electrical design.

Calculations for alarm set points or time delays for selected representative devices (e.g. steam generator water level trip point) will be reviewed for compliance with design criteria. The implementing specifications or lists documenting the consideration of the applicable design criteria will be reviewed

,.s to verify that the criteria are reflected in the devices shown for review.

\

\ j DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland independent Design cna REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program 40 145 APPROVED B PAGE of PREPARED BY:y j g 3.1.3.1.19 Control Systems - Topic l.19-l Design criteria and commitments governing the steam generator water level and AFW turbine control systems will be checked to verify the inclusion of necessary regulatory, industry, and system performance requirements. Design specifications or other implementing documentation will be reviewed to verify that the necesscry requirements were used as input to the control system design.

This review will include a check of calculations or evaluations relative to control system performance, time response, component characteristics, and separation from actuation systems. Failure Modes Effects Analyses (FMEA) will be

) reviewed in conjunction with Topic l.23-1, Failure Mode and Effects, to verify that system failures are in the safe direction. Control system circuitry design (voltages, currents, polarity) will be reviewed to verify that selected components will function as intended in the control circuit. The circuitry design review will include a review of applicable instrument loop diagrams, logic diagrams, and valve and motor schematic diagrams.

3.l.3.1.20 Actuation Systems - Topic l.20-1 The auxiliary feedwater actuation system (AFWAS - which includes FOGG, feed only good generator) design criteria and commitments will be reviewed to verify the proper consideration of regulatory commitments, industry codes and standards, plant operational requirements and operator actions. AFW system logic diagrams for selected motor operated valves and pump motors will be l

l l

A

/

DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION pg_3201.,009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland Independent Design and REY.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Prograrn PAGE 41 'of i45_ PREPARED BY:

y,y APPROVED B g

v reviewed against design commitments as will the cpplicable schematic diagrams.

I in addition, the AFWAS procurement specification will be reviewed against the design criteria and commitments.

3.l.3.1.21 Nondestructive Examination Commitments - Topic 1.21-1 A determination will be made of the design criteria, commitments and implementing documents (e.g. testing plans, manuals and procedures) which exist for NDE of AFW system piping, components, and structures. The results of this determination will serve as input to the ICV portion of the IDCV which will review NDE records to verify the quality of construction.

. O 3.1.3.1.22 Materials Selection - Topic l.22-1 This activity will include the review of criteria and implementing documents related to establishing the bases for the material specification process of selected structural elements, components, cnd a portion of the AFW piping system. Included will be a review of material selection requirements related to such factors as strength, toughness, hardness, compatobility, electrical insulation properties, protective coatings, corrosion resistance, fire protection, and other chemical and physical requirements cppropriate to the particciar structure, component, or system.

3.l.3.1.23 Failure Modes and Effects - Topic l.23-1 The Midland FSAR contains a synopsis of a failure modes and effects evaluation performed to assess the capability of the AFW system to accomplish its intended O

DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland Independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program 42 145 PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY:

of PAGE L ;3. vL ; -

m,12 safety functions. The IDCV FSAR evaivation will serve os the starting point of the review process for this topic, followed by a review of any implementing evoluotions that support the FSAR FMEA. An independent confirmatory FMEA is under censideration, the scope of which will be based upon results of the initial review efforts. It is contemplated that this analysis will concentrate on electrical, instrumentation, and control systems components and the effects of their failure.

3.l.3.2 AFW System Protection Features In addition to the review of the capability of the AFW system to perform its

( required functions, a review will be made of external factors which could offect the capability of the system to achieve these functions. Included in the scope of this portion of the review cre factors such as seismic design, high energy line break accidents (HELBA), environmental protection, fire protection, missile protection, and systems interaction. The following sections address these and other design areas related to system protection.

3.l.3.2.1 Seismic Desion - Topic 11.1-l Seismic design criteria and associated commitments related to the AFW system will be reviewed, and the establishment of the proper basis for the associated design process will be confirmed. included will be the review of seismic design parameters and methodologies which were utilized in the seismic design process for structures, systems, and components ossociated with the AFW system.

/O O

DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland Independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE 43 of 145 PREPARED BY:

jg APPROVED B 3.1.3.2.2 Seismic Design--Pressure Boundcry - Topic 11.2-1

This cetivity will include a review of the commitments, implementing docu-1 I

ments, calculations, drawings, and specifications associated with the seismic design of a selected portion of the AFW piping system. The utilization of the l proper design input, such as response spectra, piping and component weights, and other piping chorocteristics, will be verified. The ASME code evaluations will be

reviewed to verify that pertinent ccceptance criteria are met. Drawings and specifications will be reviewed for consistency with design calculations.

Included will be on independent confirmatory seismic cnclysis of a selected portion of the piping system based upon independently verified as-built p

Q dimensions utilizing a verified computer program. Pipe stresses and support l loads will be calculated. To preserve the " blind" nature of the confirmatory I calculation, the individuals who perform the calculation will not have prior l

benefit or knowledge of the specific calculational approach followed by the l original analysts. Upon completion, c comparison will be made between the original design and IDV calculated forces and stresses at key locations. Any discrepancies will be identified and their cause determined.

3.l.3.2.3 Seismic Design--Pipe / Equipment Support - Topic II.3-1 A review of a selected portion of the AFW system will be conducted to verify that selected pipe supports have been designed and specified in accordance with l criteria and ccmmitments. Included will be the review of design loads, lond combinations, and the methods of cnolysis utilized. The associated design drawings and specifications will be reviewed for censistency. The support loads calculated during the confirmatory piping analysis of Topic 11.2-1 will be l (3

'J DC-82-13

l PROJECT INSTRUCTION f_ PI_ 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan

. Midland independent Design and

( REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY: p APPROVED B PAGE 44 of 145 compared to the design loods for all supports in the selected portion of the AFW system. Several support types (e.g., snubber, rigid restraint, anchor, spring hanger, etc.) will then be sampled, and an independent confirmatory analysis will be made to verify the capability of the original design organization to properly design and size these supports given the design loads. This analysis will be based upon independently verified as-built dimensions. In addition, the design calculations, drawings and specifications associated with the anchorage and support of selected AFW system equipment will be reviewed for conformance to requirements, l

3.l.3.2.4 Seismic Design--Equipment Qualification - Topic 11.4-1 G(m.

This activity will include the review of commitments, implementing documents, calculations, drawings, and specifications associated with the seismic qualifica-

[

I tion of selected equipment. Qualification requirements including response spectra, load combinations, and equipment functional criteria will be reviewed.

The review will include various types of AFW system equipment of representative complexity such as the following: electrical-motor control center, motor-operated valve, and electrical panel; mechanical-AFW pump, motor-operated valve and heat exchanger.

3.1.3.2.5 High Energy Line Break Accidents - Topic 11.5-1 i

HELBA criteria and associated commitments related to the AFW system will be reviewed, and the establishment of the proper basis for the associated design process will be confirmed. included will be a review of HELBA design parameters and the methodologies which have been utilized in the HELBA f

V)

DC-82-13

l PROJECT INSTRUCTION

- PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan

. Midland independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY: APPROVED PAGE 45 of 145 ,j design process for structures, systems, and components associated with the AFW system.

3.1.3.2.6 HELBA/ Pipe Whip - Topic 11.6-1 Design criteria, implementing documents, calculations, drawings, and specifica-tions associated with pipe whip resulting from postulated high energy line breaks will be reviewed. Included will be the review of the definition of the methodology employed in determining postulated pipe break locations, the magnitude of associated pipe whip loads, and the techniques utilized for pipe restraint design. In addition, calculations for selected AFW system pipe rupture p

restraints will be reviewed, including the associated drawings cnd specifications for consistency with these calculations.

3.l.3.2.7 HELBA--Jet Impingement - Topic ll.7-l l The design criteria and commitments applicable to preventive protective measures taken to assure acceptable consequences due to postulated jets will be reviewed. This topic will be reviewed in conjunction with Topic 11.6-1, Pipe Whip, j and Topic ill.4-I, HELBA Loads, and will be considered in the evaluation of Topic ill.7-l, Concrete / Steel Design.

3.l.3.2.8 Environmental Protection - Topic 11.8-l 1

l l The design criteria and commitments applicable to all issues related to the plant's environmental protection will be reviewed.The environmental protection review will consist of a determination of the appropriate environmental b) v DC-82-13 i

1

1 PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland independent Design and REW 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program 46 PREPARED BY:

p APPROVED B PAGE of 145 envelopes, the qualification requirements for equipment to these envelopes, and the HVAC design criteria which are necesary to assure that the environmental envelopes will not be exceeded.

3.1.3.2.9 Environmental Envelopes - Topic II.9-1 The environmental envelope design criteria will be determined by a review of existing criteria and commitments and a review of the system arrangement.

These environmental envelopes will be verified by a review of implementing documents and a check of calculations and evaluations which were used to determine the environmental parameters. Drawings and specifications for AFW

(] equipment will be checked for consistency with the environmental envelope specified. In addition, a confirmatory calculation or evaluation will be per-formed to verify the environmental envelope specification for one portion of the AFW system.

To preserve the " blind" nature of the confirmatory calculation, the individuals who perform the calculation will not have prior benefit or knowledge of the specific calculational approach followed by the original analysts. Upon comple-tion, a comparison will be made between the original design and IDV environ-mental envelopes at key locations. Any significant discrepancies will be identified and their cause determined.

3.1.3.2.10 Environmental / Equipment Qualification - Topic 11.10-1 Equipment qualification requirements will be reviewed to determine whether the correct environmental envelopes were specified and, given these envelopes, A

V DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION

- PI_3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan

. Midland independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program 4,< of ja5 PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY:

PAGE ii;r.4 .; g Q, W

whether the qualification methods specified were adequate to demonstrate that the component would meet its functional requirements. The review will include various types of AFW system equipment of representative complexity such as electrical cable, connectors, transmitters and motor-operated valves.

3.1.3.2.11 HVAC Design - Topic 11.11-1 Requirements imposed upon the HVAC system design as a result of the need to meet environmental envelope or equipment qualification parameters will be checked. This will be achieved by a verification of the design interface between the AFW system design and the HVAC system design.

(D w/

3.l.3.2.12 Fire Protection - Topic 11.12-1 The applicable fire protection criteria will be determined for the AFW system.

A review will be made of fire protection evaluations to determine whether the fire protection system meets the necessary requirements for the AFW system.

Included in this review will be the designation and location of minimum AFW safe shutdown components, physical separation, designation of fire zones, ratings of fire barriers, construction and qualification of fire barrier penetration seals, associated circuits analysis and protection, fire hazards enolysis, remote shutdown transfer switch design, fire detection and suppression systems, and emergency lighting pertaining to AFW system components. The scope of this i

review includes fires within the AFW pump rooms and fires external to the rooms which would affect redundant safe shutdown AFW components.

l i ,

, ,a I t aj )

l l

i DC-82-13 I

.- E l

l PROJECT INSTRUCTION

_ pl_ 3201. 009 SUBJECh Engineering Program Plan Midland independent Design and  :

REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program 48 PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY:

of 145 PAGE lb'rl._- m, b_ _ ___

3.1.3.2.13 Missile Protection - Topic 11.13-1 A review of criteria and commitments will be made of the potential missiles which could affect the AFW syecn. and the protection provided for system components. The review includes missiles external to the AFW system and those that could be generated within the AFW system and will serve as input to Topic ill.7-l, Concrete / Steel Design.

3.1.3.2.14 Systems interaction - Topic II.14-1 As part of the overall systems review, the potential for systems interaction and

) means of prevention thereof will be reviewed. The review will include an excmination of criteria utilized to analyze potential systems interactions, whether they be physical (electrical, mechanical, hydraulic), or spatial (thermal, fluid, mechanical, radiction). The procedures and results for the Midland systems interaction walkdowns will also be reviewed and, if possible, ongoing walkdowns will be observed. Human factors or inherent failure modes (common manufacturer, similcr technology, equal aging or wear) will not be considered a part of the systems review.

3.l.3.3 Structures that House the AFW System Many safety-related plant structures such as the containment, auxiliary and diesel generator buildings, and IEe intake structure support the functioning of the AFW system or its support systems. The overall criteria and commitments applicable to the design of these safety related structures will be reviewed and evaluated. Selected features and design areas frem one or more of these

,q structures will be isolated for a more in-depth review in the following topics.

V DC-82-13

l 1 l PROJECT INSTRUCTION d PI 3201. 009 SU" JECT: Engineering Program Plan Midland independent Design and

] REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY: APPROVED B PAGE 49 of 145 g '{g 3.l.3.3.1 Seismic Design / Input to Equipment - Topic III.1-1 .

l l This activity will include the review of commitments,. implementing documents, calculations, drawings, and specifications related to the development of seismic design input for a portion of the AF.W system and components in the auxiliary building. Included will be a review of seismic input parameters such as seismic design spectra, damping, material properties, and boundary conditions, including soil-structure interaction. The methodology utilized for the location of the mass points and the computation of masses and equivalent member properties will be reviewed. Parameter variation studies will also be reviewed to verify that the variance of important input parameters and modeling assumptions has been fl appropriately considered. The scope of this activity will include the review of a

the dynamic analysis of the building, the time history analysis and the generation of floor response spectra for both horizontal directions and the vertical l direction. The utilization of proper floor response spectra for the specification of selected AFW system components and the selected portion of the AFW system will be verified.

3.1.3.3.2 Wind and Tornado Design / Missile Protection - Topic 111.2-1 Criteria and commitments for wind loading, tornado effects,- and missile protection will be reviewed to verify the proper basis is established for the design process, included will be the review of the criteria associated with wind pressure loading, tornado wind loading, tornado depressurization effects, tornado missiles, and other related requirements. Loading combinations, methodologies of cnolysis, associated allowable stresses or conditions, and other specified criteria will be included in this review activity. The results of this review will be considered in evaluation of Topic Ill.7-l, Concrete and Steel Design.

(v3 DC-o2-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION pg_ 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan h REW Midland Independent Design and 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE 50 or 145 PREPARED BY: j j j (3 APPROVED B 3.1.3.3.3 Flood Protection - Topic 111.3-1 This activity will include the review of criteria and commitments related to establishing the basis for flood protection from sources both external and internal to the plant. The criteria associated with the specification of the design flood level and the methods to be utilized to provide the necessary flood protection will be reviewed. Included will be the review of the criteria associated with the determination of postulated pipe break locations, the methodologies to be utilized in determining flow rates and resulting water levels, loading combinations, allowable stresses or conditions, and other related criteria.

The results of this review will be censidered in evoluotion of Topic ill.7-l, l

1

(}u Concrete and Steel Design.

3.l.3.3.4 HELBA Loads - Topic 111.4-1 Criteria and commitments for high energy line break accident loads will be l reviewed to verify that the proper basis is established for the design process, included will be the review of the criteria for jet impingement and pipe whip loading on structures and components related to the AFW system. The review will address loading combinations, methodologies of analysis, associated allow-able stresses or conditions, and other related criteria. The results of this review will be considered in evaluation of Topic ill.7-l, Concrete and Steel Design.

3.l.3.3.5 Civil / Structural Design Considerations - Topic 111.5-1 Civil / structural design criteria and associated commitments related to the AFW system will be reviewed, and the establishment of the proper basis for the DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201 . 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland Independent Design and REW 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE 51 ~of 145 PREPARED BY:

Q APPROVED B associated design process will be confirmed. Included will be the review of design parameters and the methodologies utilized in the design process for l

structures and offected systems and components associated with the AFW system.

3. l .3.3.6 Foundations - Topic ill.6-1 Included in this activity will be the review of criteria, implementing documents, and calculations associated with the design of selected foundations associated j with structures housing the AFW system. The review will address design I criteria, methodologies of analysis and calculations associated with each type of (o

g foundation loading including dead, live, tornado and seismic loadings.

3.1.3.3.7 Concrete and Steel Design - Topic 111.7-1 l

l This activity will include the review of criteria, implementing documents, calculations, drawings, and specifications associated with the reinforced con-crete and structural steel design of selected structural elements associated with the AFW system. Structural elements, including a major load bearing shear wall and a floor diaphram will be selected that require consideration of a broad spectrum of loadings such as dead, live, wind, tornado, seismic, flood, and HELBA loads. The review will address design criteria, methodologies of analysis and calculations associated with each type of loading with emphasis on a verification that these items have been considered in a realistic manner.

Loading combinations, allowable stresses or conditions, and other applicable criteria will be reviewed. Drawings and specifications for the selected structural elements will be reviewed against design calculations for consistency.

p.

,/

DC-82-13 l

l

l t

PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201.,009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan (v

REV.: 2 Midland Independent Design and DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE 52 of 145 PREPARED BY:

,gi j/,'

); . _ APPROVED g BY: )g I

3.1.4 DEFINITION OF REVIEW SCOPE FOR THE STANDBY ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM The categories of review identified in section 3.1.1 are also applicable to the review of the Standby Electric Power (SEP) system. Similarly, the criteria discussed in sections 1.3 and 3.1.2 were incorporated to develop the initial design verification matrix shown on Figures 1.2-4a and 1.2-4b. The design areas (or topics) of the IDV review matrix for the SEP system are somewhat different from those for the AFW system, consistent with the differences in the functions and physical configuration of these systems. The review philosophy, matrix concepts and organization remain the same. The design areas for the SEP O sxstem review matrix are divieed rete three major divisioms: SEe Sxstem Performance Requirements, SEP System Protection Features, and Structures -

that House the SEP System. The design areas addressed within each of these major divisions are discussed in sections 3.1.4.1, 3.l.4.2 and 3.l.4.3 of this Plan, respectively. As previously mentioned, the identified initial review scope is subject to change depending upon whether the criteria documented in section 3.1.2 have been met.

Because the SEP system sample selection interfaces with other systems, it is necessary to define boundaries for items within the scope of the IDCV.

The SEP system as defined in the IDCV program includes four major elements:

the diesel generator (DG) and its support systems; the power distribution system (PDS); the preferred 120V ac power system (AC) and the 12SV de power system (DC). Continuity with the AFW system review is emphasized by drawing the boundaries of evaluation for the PDS and the two low voltage AC and DC systems as they service the AFW system. The PDS boundaries are drawn at DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION pl,3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan O REV.: 2 DAT"c 5/18/83 atai maimaenemae"* oesto" e"a Construction Verification Program PAGE _ 53 of 145 PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY:

p iQ i .- m,h f~

breakers interfacing with the 480 V buses. The DG and all of its support systems are included within the sample selection boundaries of the SEP system.

Specific interface points are as follows:

STANDBY ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM SAMPLE SELECTION BOUNDARIES Interfacing System Interfacing Point Station Power and Breakers connecting 4160 V Class IE and non-lE buses:

Offsite Power 23051200A 24051200A Non-Class IE 4160 Volt Breakers at 4160 V Class IE Buses:

Bus Loads 25991200A 2A06121200A Class IE Electrical Includes distribution system from 4160 V buses to Distribution the breaker at the 480 V buses:

27661600A 28661600A and distribution to loads fed directly at 4160 volts.

l l Aux. Feedwater System Include all portions of the Class IE power supply (AFW) which feed essential components in the AFW, includ-ing the 480 Vac,120 Vac, and 125 Vdc loads.

Diesel Generator include all portions of the Class IE power supply

, which feed essential components for the diesel generator and supporting systems discussed below, including the 480 Voc,120 Vac, and 125 Vdc loads.

Control Room HVAC include all portions of the Class IE power supply System (CR-HVAC) which feed essential components for the CR-HVAC includina the 480 Voc,120 Vac and 125 Vdc loads.

l

!O l

DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan O REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 midiondindependeet oesrsn end Construction Verification Program PAGE 54 of 145 PREPARED BY:

i . k',I ;

gq APPROVED BY:

g1A V

. Interfacine System Interfacing Point i

Class IE Loads For loads other than AFW, DG, and CR-HVAC, the review will be limited to confirming that all Class IE loads have been included in establishing the system design electrical loads.

DG Fuel Oil Storage System (FSAR Figure 9.S-2S) is included. Interface and Transfer System with Demineralized Water Supply is at DeLavel interface.

DG Cooling Water System System integral to diesel is included (FSAR Figure 9.S-26). Service Water boundary is at DeLavel interface.

DG Starting System System (FSAR Figure 9.S-27) is included.

O DG Lubrication System System (FSAR Figure 9.S-28) is included.

DG Combustion Air Intake System (FSAR Figure 1.2-27) is included, and Exhaust System Structures DG building and foundations, and foundation for fuel oil storage tank.

The following sections discuss the initial scope of review for each of the design creas.

3.1.4.1 SEP System Performance Requirements The SEP system will be reviewed to assess its capability to perform as required by the design criteria and commitments. Included in the scope of this portion of review are design areas such as system operating requirements, single failure, component functional requirements, diesel electrical load sequencing / shedding, diesel starting mechanism, independence, cable sizing, routing and separation.

O DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland Independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program

,_. APPROVED BY-PREPARED BY:

!I u, 9i, 55 145 llPAGE .of G. ;h 3.l.4.1.1 System Operating Limits (DG) - Topic 1.1-2 The objective of this topic is to assemble and review the salient operating parameters of the total diesel / generator " system". This will include: the fuel system; the cooling system; the building heating, ventilation, and air conditioning system; the starting system; the lubrication system; and the combustion air intake and exhaust system.

Each of the parameters will be " tracked" through the design chain to assure l consistency. Applicable calculations and evaluations will be reviewed to l

l determine whether important parameters can be kept within limits.

f'/

s_

T The key components and applicable parameters determined from this review will in turn be reviewed in greater depth in other topics related to the mechanical and electrical components.

l 3.l.4.1.? Accident Analysis Considerations (DG, AC, DC) - Topic l.2-2 l

FSAR Safety Analyses will be reviewed to determine accident and post-accident operability requirements. This will include such DG features as the various trippping devices and the automatic reset to 4.16 kV on LOCA start. The DG building HVAC system also will be reviewed to determine the effect of its failure on the DG.

As part of the review, the potential for DG, AC, and DC systems' failures to exacerbate accident conditions will be examined.

\.

DC-82-13

l PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan O REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 urdiandindepeneent Desion and Construction Verification Program PAGE 56 or145 PREPARED BY:

{ Lg,

.a APPROVED BY:

mL 3.1.4.1.3 Single Failure (DG, PDS, AC, DC) - Topic I.3-2 A confirmatory evaluation of a portion of the SEP system will be conducted to determine its ability to perform required functions, during both normal and accident conditions, in the event of a single failure. This review will also include, but not necessarily be limited to, an evaluation of the FSAR single failure analyses and supporting documentation.

3.1.4.l.4 Technical Specifications (DG, DC) - Topic l.4-2 The Technical Specifications will be reviewed against existing regulatory O criterie to assere that important eneratine itmits ere appropriateix and accurately specified. An effort will also be made to assess whether additional specifications m'ght be necessary, based upon knowledge gained from the detailed review of the DG and DC systems.

3.l.4.l.S Local Operation (DG) - Topic 1.6-2 l

The local operability of the various DG system components, including the diesel, the generator, the tube oil system, starting mechanism and air supply system,

( and HVAC system, will be reviewed to determine the capability for local l operation and the ability of the system to properly start and operate if controls l

are left in the local or manual position.

3.1.4.1.6 System Interlocks (DG) - Topic l.7-2 The substantial number of interlocks of the DG system will be reviewed to determine their adequacy in implementing system performance requirements.

O DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION pl 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan C REW 2 urdiendindependent Desig,and DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE 57 of 145 PREPARED BY: g APPROVED BY This will include an evaluation of protective devices to prevent placing the DGs in parallel and of several devices associated with system components such as the fuel oil transfer pumps and the jacket water cooler.

3.1.4.1.7 Component Functional Requirements (DG, PDS, AC, DC) -Topic l.9-2 Selected mechanical, electrical, instrumentation, and control (El&C) components specified and used in the SEP system will be reviewed for compliance with their functional requirements. The development of the functional requirements will '

be traced from the system design criteria as dictated by licensing commitments,

industry codes and standards, plant environmental conditions, and system i O 9errorm emce reavire memte ror 18e iotemaea everetim9 m odes The aest 9 ,criterro and commitments used for the system will be checked to ensure the inclusion of all required design inputs. Component functional requirement criteria for support systems include factors such as engine starting time, pump flow rate, allowable pressure drops, NPSH, and similar characteristics. The electricol system functional requirements are both steady state and transient limits on electrical parameters, such as voltage, AC frequency, impedance, etc. In reviewing the development of functional requirements, operating plant j experience will be assessed to evaluate the adequacy of system design criteria.

3.1.4.1.8 Cooling / Heating Requirements (DG) - Topic l.12-2 l Cooling requirements for the diesel-generator will be checked and a determination made that the design interface with the cooling water system is

! adequate to handle the heat load. Heat exchangers in the cooling system will be reviewed for proper sizir.g and other design considerations such as fouling. Any

! O DC-82-13 l

l

l l

PROJECT INSTRUCTION q PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan U Midland Independent Design and REW 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE 58 .d 145 PREPARED BY:

y APPROVED BY l

heating requirements for the engine during its standby mode will be determined and supporting calculations checked. l l

3.1.4.1.9 Preservice Testing and Capability for Operational Testing (DG) -

Topic l.14-2 1

A review will be made of the criteria and commitments and implementing documents which exist for preservice testing and the capability for operational testing for a selected diesel generator. Included will be the review of associated evaluations to ensure adequate provision for preservice and operational testing of the equipment.

3.1.4.1.10 Electrical Characteristics (DG, PDS, AC, DC) - Topic l.16-2 Design criteria and commitments will be surveyed relative to system electrical characteristics including voltage profiles for 4160 V and 48 Vac, and 12S Vdc l

buses, short circuit currents on the same buses and terminal voltage ava!!able to power components from these buses. .oltage profile calculations for the 4160 V and 480 Vac buses will be reviewed. An independent determination will be made of terminal voltage available to power selected components from the 4160 V and

! 480 Vac buses. Short circuit calculations to determine the momentary and

! interrupting currents on the 4160 V system will also be reviewed.

3 .1.4 .1.11 Protective Devices / Settings (DG, PDS) - Topic l.17-2 The design criteria and commitments, and implementing' documentation for protective devices / settings will be reviewed for the diesel generator and power O)

DC-82-13 l

,n-- n - n--.,-- -..- - . , - - - - - -

PROJECT INSTRUCTION Pl-.3201 . 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan O REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 midiendindeneedent Desren and Construction Verification Program PAGE 59 of 145 PREPARED BY: hi O'f/'iAPPROVED 4 @ BY: &c I

distribution system (4160 and 480 Vac buses). The protective devices intended to meet the identified design criteria will be checked on system schematics.

Device setting criteria will be reviewed to ensure coordination of overcurrent devices associated with the 4160V and 480V buses. The interrupting rating of 4i60V and 480V circuit breakers will be reviewed against the short circuit currents reviewed under Topic l.16-2 Electrical Characteristics.

3.l.4.1.12 Instrumentation (DG, AC, DC) - Topic 1.18-2 The adequacy of the instrumentation provided for monitoring and alarm functions associated with the diesel generator,120V ac preferred power system

()

t' and 125 Vdc systems will be evcluoted by reviewing design criteria and commitments, implementing documents, schematic diagrams and one line diagrams. Design input will be taken from industry codes and standards, regulatory requirements and guidance, and NSSS vendor input. Monitoring requirements for operational status information and surveillance instrumentation will be checked. Selected calculations of instrument setpoints will be reviewed l

against regulatory requirements.

1 3.l.4.I.;3 Control Systems (DG) - Topic l.19-2 Design criteria and commitments, implementing documents, check of evaluations and drawings will be made to review the adequacy of the diesel generator control systems for automatic and manual operation. In addition, the controls associated with diesel generator support systems will be reviewed. The support systems include diesel fuel, cooling water and lube oil.

DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION

- Pl 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan

. Midland independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: S/18/83 Construction Verification Program 60 APPROVED PAGE or 145 PREPARED BY: }

The design criteria compilation will include a consideration of codes and standards, regulatory requirements, NSSS vendor input and industry experience.

Control system logic diagrams and schematic diagrams will be reviewed to ensure that design requirements are met in issued design drawings.

3.1.4.1.14 Actuation Systems (DG) - Topic l.20-2 The diesel generator actuation system and hardware is part of the Engineered Safety Feature Actuation System (ESFAS) which is partially reviewed during the AFW Actuation System (AFWAS) review. The actuation system design, including inputs. logic and actuation devices, will be reviewed against IEEE Standard-279 (l and Reguictory Guide 1.9 criteria. Actuation system logic diagrams and v

applicable schematic diagrams will be reviewed against design commitments.

The ESFAS procurement specification will be reviewed for compliance with design commitments.

3. l.4.1.lS Failure Modes and Effects (DG, PDS, AC, DC)- Topic l.23-2 l

l The various modes of failure, and the effects of such failures, will be reviewed, using as a basis the analyses presented in summary form in the FSAR. The basis of this review will be to determine if there is any potential failure that has been previously unanalyzed or that might be common-mode, thus affecting both trains of emergency pows.r. It is presently envisioned that the review will stop at the component level and will not entail a review of failure modes and effects of subcomponents (e.g. resistors, switches, etc. that make up specific electrical devices).

(3

(

DC-82-13

l PROJECT INSTRUCTION

_l PI_ 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland Independent Design and

] REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program I

PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY:

[ PAGE 61 of 145 3 th i_

%92 e

3.1.4.1.16 Electrical Load Capacity (DG, PDS, AC, DC) - Topic l.24-2 Diesel generator, 4160 Vac bus,120 Vac preferred power and 125 vde battery loads will be independently tabulated for design basis conditions to determine steady state and transient SEP system loads. The loads will be reviewed against design criteria and commitments. The diesel generator loading will reflect the load sequence information from Topic 1.25-2. The battery load cycle will be determined for loss of offsite power and station blackout conditions. The resulting battery capacity requirements will be reviewed against regulatory sizing criteria. Diesel generator 4160 and 120 Vac bus loads will be compared to design ratings and preoperational test data (Topic 1.14-2) to determine the f] suitability of the selected hardware.

v l 3.1.4.1.17 Electrical Load Sequencing (DG, PDS) - Topic l.25-2 A review of design criteria and commitments will be performed for electrical load sequencing provisions for the diesel generator and its associated 4160 Vac bus. Sequence logic will be reviewed against design comrnitments as will the schematic diagrams implementing sequencing logic. The verified loading l sequence will be used as input to the load capacity review (Topic l.24-2) and the

! preservice testing review (Topic l.14-2).

3.1.4.1.18 Electrical Load Shedding (DG, PDS) - Topic l.26-2 1

Electrical load shedding design criteria and commitments, implementing documents and logic diagrams will be reviewed against regulatory requirements and industry codes and standards. The review will be performed for the 4160 Vac n

w/

DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION

. pl 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan

. Midland independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE 62 of 145 PREPARED BY: g APPROVED B g

bus and will include those design provisions for load shedding coordination with load sequencing (Topic l.2S-2) and interlocks /permissives (Topic l.7-2) associated with load shedding.

3.1.4. l.l9 Fuel Oil System (DG) - Topic l.27-2 The Fuel Oil System provides storage and transfer for 7 days of Engineered Safety Feature (ESF) Ioad. Criteria for system design will be reviewed against industry standards, FSAR commitments, and sound engineering practice based on operating plant experience. The review will further examine the documents which implement the criteria, including a review of portions of calculations

() which implement the criteria. Technical crecs to be evaluated include: pump performance, fuel consumption vs. tank capacity, control logic, buried tank flooding, piping design (including vibration considerations), and unique fire protection considerations.

3.1.4.1.20 Lube Oil System (DG) - Topic l.28-2 The performance criteria and implementation for lubrication and lubrication oil cooling will be reviewed with particular attention to the interface requirements established by the engine manufacturer. The key issue is to examine the design and maintenance requirements necessitated by engine design, and to review the documents used to implement such requirements.

3.1.4.1.21 Storting Mechanism and Air Supply System (DG)- Topic l.29-2 The starting system includes both the pressurized air supply and distribution

,, system, and the electric automatic start provisions. Criteria for the design will (V \

be reviewed against industry standcrds, FSAR commitments, and typical design DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION

- PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland Independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE 63 .or M S MENED B% , t} MWED B practice in response to operating experience. implementation will be examined by reviewing technical specifications for system components, logic diagrams, piping and instrument drawings, and calculations. Interface with engine design requirements will receive particular attention. Technical areas under review include: diesel engine starting air specifications, pneumatic design and compressor sizing, control logic, moisture entrainment, air fi!ter clogging, and automatic start power supply and field flashing.

3.1.4.1.22 Combustion Air Supply (DC) - Topic I.30-2

, Combustion air supply and engine exhaust for the diesel engine will be reviewed r

{m) from criteria to implementation, including a check of selected design calculations. The criteria will be reviewed against FSAR commitments, e.g.,

seismic criteria and interface reauirements of the engine design. Specific areas of technical rev!ew include: tornado, missile and debris considerations, seismic design, exhaust back pressure, intake flow rate, exhaust recycle, and effets of of fsite gas release.

3.l.4.1.23 Independence (DG, PDS, AC, DC) - Topic 1.31-?

Diesel generator, power distribution system,120 '/cc preferred power and 125 Vdc battery systems will be reviewed for compliance with design criteria governing electrical independence. This review will include a survey of design criteria and l

commitments, implementing documents and a check of plant single-line drawings, selected schematic diagrams end circuit schedules.

l (m) v DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION pg_ 3201 . 009 e REV.:

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland Independent Design and 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE 64 of 145 PREPARED BY:

g APPROVED B 3.1.4.1.24 Cable Sizing / Routing /Seocration (PDS) - Topic l.32-2 This activity will include the review of criteria, implementing documents, calculations, drawings and specificcilons associated with SEP system cable sizing, routing and separation. The review will include a check of the sizing calculations applicable to the 4160 V cable, as sell as other selected cable sizes.

The specified routing of these cables will be reviewed for compliance with requirements, including separction criteria. In addition, an indepenaent calculational check will be made of selected cable sizes ana ,the results reviewed against the output of the des'gn process.

pd 3.1.4.2 SEP System Protection Features in addition to the review of the capability of the SEP system to perform its required functions, a review will be made of external factors which could affect the capability of the system to achieve these functions. Inc!uded in the scope of this portion of the review are factors sucl. as seismic design, high energy line break accidents (HELBA), environmental protection, fire protection, missile protection, and systems interaction. The following sectiov address these and other design areas related to system protection.

l 3.1.4.2.1 Seismic Design - Topic II.1-2 The seismic design criteria and associated commitments related to the SEP system will be re dewed to ensure that an adequate basis for the design process is estal;ished. The rev.m will include seismic design parameters and methodologies specified for the design of structures, systems and components q

U associated with the SEP system.

DC-82-13 l

l l

PROJECT INSTRUCTION

- Pi 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan

. Midland Independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83

~

Construction Verification Program PAGE 65 of 145

..- APPROVED W.

PREPARED BY: ) U_ V-l 6, f) wL 3.1.4.2.2 Seismic Design - Pressure Boundary (DG) - Topic 11.2-2 This activity will include a review of the commitments, implementing documents, calculations, drawings and specifications associated with seismic design of a selected portion of the diesel generator fuel oil piping system. The utilizction of the proper design input, such as response spectra, piping and component weights, and other piping characteristics, will be verified. The ASME code evaluations will be reviewed to verify that pertinent acceptance criteria are met. Drawings and pecifications will be reviewed for consistency with design calculations.

O V

3.1.4.2.3 Seisr..ic Design - Pipe / Equipment Support (DG, PDS) - Topic 11.3-2 A review of a selected portion of the diesel generator fuel oil system will be conducted to verify that selected supports have been designed and specified in accordance with criteria and commitments. included will be the review of design Iaods, load combinations, and the methods of analysis utilized. The associated design drawings and specifications will be reviewed for consistency.

Several support types will then be sampled, and on independent confirmatory anal / sis will be made to verify the capability of the original design organization

to properly design and size these supports given the design loads. In addition, the I

design calculations, drawings and specifications associated with the anchorage and support of a diesel generator and selected other SEP system equipment will be reviewed for conformance to requirements.

3 i (a DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION l pl_3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Prog cm Plan )

Midland independent Design and

-l REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY: 'g APPROVED B l PAGE66 of 145 V

3.1.4.2.4 Seismic Design -- Equipment Qualification (DG, PDS) - Topic l1.4-2 This activity will include the review of commitments, implementing documents, calculations, drawings, and specifications associated with the seismic qualification of selected equipment. Qualification requirements including response spectra, load combinations, and equipment functional criteria will be reviewed. The review will include the following types of equipment of repre<entative complexity such as: diesel generator, motor control center, electrical panel, fuel oil pump, motor-operated valve and heat exchanger.

3.1.4.2.5 High Energy Line Break Accidents - Topic fl.5-2 (v

Criteria for postulation and evaluation of high energy line breaks will be reviewed to the extent that there are aspects unique to the SEP system which were not incorporated in the AFW review.

3.1.4.2.6 HELBA/ Pipe Whip (PDS, AC, DC) - Topic II.6-2 Pipe whip evaluation criteria will be reviewed with an emphasis on interactions with electrical equipment, cable, controls, etc.

3.1.4.?.7 HELBA/ Jet Impingement (PDS, AC, DC)- Topic II.7-2 Jet impingement evaluation criteria will be reviewed to assess the manner in l which an interaction within the SEP system has been addressed.

l n l G DC-82-13 1

l l

PROJECT INSTRUCTION

^

PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland Independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE 67 of 145 PREPARED BY:

gg APPROVED B 3.1.4.2.8 Environmental Protection - Topic 11.8-2 The criteria review conducted for the AFW system will be extended to include considerations unique to the SEP system. Particular emphasis will be given to electrical circuit components, e.g., breakers.

3.1.4.2.9 Environmental Envelopes (DG, PDS) - Topic 11.9-2

, The criteria review conducted for the AFW system will form a basis for the l

l review of the SEP system. Concerns unique to this system will be included in the review. A check will be made to ensure that the system is included in the scope

(. of the criteria.

3.l.4.2.10 Environmental / Equipment Qualification (DG, PDS) - Topic 11.10-2 Equipment qualification requirements will be reviewed to determine whether.the correct environmental envelopes were specified and, given these envelopes, l whether the qualification methods specified were adequate to demonstrate that the component would meet its functional requirements. The review will include the following types of equipment of representative complexity: electrical insulation, connectors, transmitters, and circuit breakers. Documents reviewed include technical specifications which are part of the procurement package, and l vendor qualification reports or test reports.

l 3 .1. 4 . 2 .11 HVAC Design (DG) - Topic 11.11-2 l

Requirements imposed upon specific portions of the HVAC systems that limit t

p

% ./

environmental conditions for the SED system equipment will be reviewed. This DC-82-13 l

l l

PROJECT INSTRUCTION pl. 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan 9 REV.:

Midland Independent Design and 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY: APPROVED PAGE 68 of 145 g4 u

will be achieved by a verification of the design interface between the two 1

systems.

l 3.1.4.2.12 Fire Protection (DG) - Topic 11.12-2 The unique fire protection concerns associated with diesel fuel will be addressed in a review of the Diesel Generator Building and underground storage creo. The extent of that review will include criteria development to a check of calculations. In particular, malfunctions which result in spillage of fuel or lube oil will be reviewed for potential to cause loss of redundant power generation.

l The function of detection and suppression capabilities under most severe

) incidents will be reviewed. Included in the review will be adequacy of fire barriers separating redundant diesel-generator units, potential effects on the l

diesel reliability due to fire protection systems, and potential interactions l between diesel-generator rooms in a fire.

l 3.1.4.2.13 Missile Protection (DG) - Topic 11.13-2 The criteria for postulating events which result in internal missile generation will be reviewed against current licensing practice and operating experience.

Criteria for assessing damage due to postulated missiles will be reviewed as an extension of the AFW review.

3.1.4.2.14 Systems Interaction (DG, PDS, AC, DC) - Topic II.14-2 The potential for systems interaction and means for prevention thereof will be reviewed. The review will include an examination of criteria utilized to analyze k

DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION i

PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland Independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program 69 145 PREPARED BY: APPROVED PAGE of u-potential physical or spatial interactions. The procedures and results for the Midland systems interaction walkdowns will be reviewed and, if possible, ongoing walkdowns will be observed.

3.1.4.3 Structures that House the SEP Systems Many safety-related plant structures support the functioning of the SEP system or its support systems. The overall criteria and commitments applicable to the design of these safety related structures will be reviewed and evaluated.

Selected features and design areas of the diesel generator building structure will be isolated for a more in-depth review in the following topics.

(v,)

3.1.4.3.1 Seismic Design / Input to Equipment (DGB) - Topic ll1.1-2 This activity will include the review of commitments, implementing documents, calculations, drawings, and specifications related to the development of seismic design input for a portion of the SEP system and associated components in the diesel generator building. Included will be a review of seismic input parameters such as seismic design spectra, damping, material properties, and boundary conditions, including soil-structure interaction. The methodology utilized for the l

location of the mass points and the computation of masses and equivalent member properties will be reviewed. Parameter variation studies will also be l reviewed to verify that the variance of important input parameters and modeling assumptions has been appropriately considered. The scope of this activity will include the review of the dynamic analysis of the diesel generator building, the time history analysis and the generation of floor response spectra for both horizontal directions and the vertical direction. The utiliziation of n

?

v DC-82-13

l PROJECT INSTRUCTION I

pl_ 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan

, REV.: Midland Independent Design and l 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY:

70 of 145 Mh I PAGE [ [ 1 J 'A . _

r j proper floor response spectra for the specification of selected SEP system components will be verified.

1

3. l.4.3.2 Wind and Tornaco Design / Missile Protection (DGB)- Topic 111.2-2 Criteria and commitments, implementing documents, and calculations for a portion of the diesel generator building will be reviewed to verify proper incorporation into the design. Inc!uded will be the review of wind pressure loading, tornado wind loading, tornado depressurization effects, tornado missile, and other related requirements. Loading combinations, methodologies of analysis, associated allowable stresses or conditions, and other specified criteria

/^)

U will be included in this review activity, in addition, drawings and specifications associated with the selected portion of the diesel generator building will be reviewed for consistency with criteria and calculations.

3.l.4.3.3 Flood Protection (DGB) - Topic 111.3-2 This activity will include the review of criteria, implementing documents and calculations related to flood protection from sources both external and internal

! to the diesel generator building. The specification of the design flood level and the methods utilized to provide the necessary flood protection will be reviewed.

Included will be the review of the calculations associated with the determination of postulated pipe break locations and the methodologies utilized in determining flow rates and resulting water levels. The results of this review will be considered in the evaluation of Topic 111.7-2, Concrete and Steel Design of the diesel generator building.

I DC-82-13

l PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 009 SUBJECI: Engineering Prcgram Plan Midiond independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY: ~y APPROVED BY:

PAGE 71 of 145 p l u x. __

m, h 3.1.4.3.4 HELBA Loads (DGB) - Topic 111.4-2 Criteria and commitments for high energy line break accident loads in the diesel generator building will be reviewed to verify that the proper basis is established for the design process. Included will be the review of the criteria for jet impingement and pipe whip loading on structures and components related to the SEP system. The review will address loading combinations, methodolegies of analysis, associated allowable stresses or conditions, and other related criteria.

The results of this review will be considered in evaluation of Topic lli.7-2, Concrete and Steel Design.

O 3.i4.3.s Civii/Structurai Desion Consideretions - Topic iii.s-2

Civil / structural design criteria and associated commitments related to the diesel l generator building will be reviewed, and the establishment of the proper basis for the associated design process will be confirmed. Included will be the review of design parameters and the methodologies utilized in the design process for structures and offected systems and components associated with the SEP system.

3. I.4.3.6 Foundations (DGB) - Topic 111.6-2 i

1 Included in this activity will be the review of criteria, implementing documents, I and calculations associated with the design of selected foundations of the diesel l

generator building. The review will address design criteria, methodologies of analysis and calculations associated with each type of foundation loading including dead, live, wind and seismic loadings, n

DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan O =pg_ 3201. 009 Midland Independent Design and REW 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE 72 of a5 PREPARED BY:

[j g, ._ APPROVED BY:

m, Q W

3.1.4.3.7 Concrete and Steel Design (DGB) - Topic 111,7-2 This activity will include the review of criteria, implementing documents, calculations, drawings, and specifications associated with the reinforced concrete and structural steel design of selected structural elements associated with the diesel generator building. Structural elements, including a major load bearing shear wall and a flood diaphragm will be selected that require consideration of a broad spectrum of loadings such as dead, live, wind, tornado, seismic, flood and HELBA loads. The review will address design criteria, methodologies of analysis and calculations associated with each type of loading with emphasis on a verification that these items have been considered in a realistic manner. Loading combinations, allowable stresses or conditions, and other applicable criteric will be reviewed. Drawings and specifications for the selected structural elements will be reviewed against design calculations for consistency.

3. l.4.3.8 Tanks - Topic 111.8-2 l This activity will include the review of criterio, implementing documents, and calculations associated with the design of a selected tank associated with the diesel generator. A review of the calculations for the underground emergency I

diesel oil storage tank and foundation will be made. All applicable loadings will be reviewed, such as dead, live, wind, tornado, seismic (including fluid dynamics effects and flooding, as applicable. The review will address tank design criteria and methodologies of analysis, and will include loading combination:, allowable stresses or conditions, and other applicable criteria. Drawings and specifications will be checked for consistency with calculations. In addition, an independent O

a l DC-82-13 i

i i

4 PROJECT INSTRUCTION g PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midicnd in~ dependent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY: APPROVED B PAGE 73 of 145 3

~

r cc,nfirmatory ano!ysis of the diesel oil storage day tank integrity including its support system will be conducted and the results compared with the output of the design process.

3.1.5 DEFINITION OF REVIEW SCOPE FOR THE CONTROL ROOM HVAC SYSTEM The categories of review identified in section 3.l.1 are also applicable to the review of the Control Room HVAC (CR-HVAC) system. Similarly, the criteria discussed in section 1.3 and 3.1.2 were incorporated to develop the initial design verification matrix shown on Figures 1.2-6a and 1.2-6b. The design areas (or d topics) of the IDV review matrix for the CR-HVAC system are somewhat different from those for the AFW or SEP systems, consistent with the differences in the functions and physical configuration of these systems. The review philosophy, matrix concepts and organization remain the same. The design creas for the CR-HVAC system review matrix are divided into three l major divisions: CR-HVAC System Performance Requirements, CR-HVAC System Protection Features and Structures that House the CR-HVAC System.

l The design creas addressed within each of these major divisions are discussed in

! sections 3.l.5.1, 3.1.5.2 and 3.1.5.3 of this Plan, respectively. As previously mentioned, the identified initial review scope is subject to change depending upon whether the criteria documented in section 3.1.2 have been met.

Because the CR-HVAC system sample selection interfaces with other systems, it is necessary to define boundaries for items within the scope of the IDCV. In general the CR-HVAC system sample selection boundaries include the Control Room Area Ventilation System (CRAVS), its support systems and components I

(] important to control room isolation and habitability during accident conditions; either radiological or chemical.

DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION pl_ 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan O Midland Independent Design and l REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Ccnstruction Verification Program '

PAGE 74 of 145 PREPARED BY:

g APPROVED BY r

Specific interface points are as follows:

CONTROL ROOM HVAC SYSTEM SAMPLE SELECTION BOUNDARIES Interfacing System Interfacing Point ac/dc Power System All portions of Cicss IE electric system serving the CR HVAC are included in the Standby Electric Power (SEP) System review (see Section 3.1.4 for SEP sample selection boundaries).

Plant HVAC Portion of the Control Room Area Ventilation System (CRAVS) (FSAR

(^)

v Figures 9.4-1 and 9.4-2) up to and including:

Vcives OMO 6545A OM 6557 OMO 6545B OM 6549 OMO 6543A 'OM 6547A OMO 65438 OM 6547B OMO 6554

Equip. & Piping Supports includes all supports incorporated in the l seismic qualification of the Control Room portion of the CRAVS as defined above.

ESFAS Includes Control Room isolation System (CRIS) subsystem, FSAR Figure 7.3-5.

Accident Monitoring Inst. Portions essential for isolation of Control Room and operation of CRAVS, e.g.

l -

intake duct radioactivity l -

charcoal filter temperature l

hazardous gas concentration See FSAR Tables 7.5-1 and 7.5-3.

l Plant l&C Portions essential for isolation of Control l Room and CRAVS operation.

t

") Control Room Structure Putions required for pressure boundary includi ng penetrations and doors.

DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

!Ingineering Program P!an Midland Independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE 75 of 145 l PREPARED BY: .j i 1 ) ,x,,_ APPROVED BY:& L; _ _

The following sections discuss the initial scope of review for each of the design

! creas.

3. l.5.1 CR-HVAC System Performance Requirements The CR-HVAC system will be reviewed to assess its capability to perform as required by the design criteria and commitments. Included in the scope of this portion of review are design areas such as system operating requirements, single failure, component functional reauirements, instrumentation, detection, failure modes and effects, filtration, and ventilation.

3.1.5.1.1 System Operating Limits - Topic 1.1-13 l

l This topic will involve review of available documentation to extract various system parameters and their values. These will include temperature to be maintained, assumed leakage rates, system flow rates, required control room j

pressure, etc. Results of this review involving key components and their I parameters will be reviewed further in related mechanical and electrical topics.

1 Ancillary systems such as Safeguards Chilled Water and Essential Service Water will be reviewed' only from the standpoint of ascertaining that parameters dependent on their operability can indeed be met.

l 3.l.5.l.2 Accident Analysis Considerations - Topic l.2-3 FSAR Safety Analyses will be reviewed to determine accident and post-accident operability requirements involving the control room HVAC system (smoke from cn external fire, chemical release, radiological accident, and main stcom line

{

This will include a review of detection systems and assumpticas break).

regarding their capabilities.

DC-82-13

1 1

l 1

l PROJECT INSTRUCTION l I PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland independent Design and

] REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY:

g APPROVED BY lPAGE 76 d i45_

3.l.5.1.3 Single Failure - Topic 1.3-3 ,

Single-failure-proof design aspects of the system will be reviewed, commencing with information in the FSAR cnd proceeding to a check of calculations and evaluations, if available.

3.1.5.1.4 Technical Specifications - Topic 1.4-3 The Technical Specifications will be reviewed against existing regulatory criteria to assure that important operating limits cre appropriately and accurately specified. An effort will also be made to assess whether additional

! O V

specifications might be necessary, based upon knowledge gained from the detailed review of the system.

3. l .5.1.5 System Alignment /Switchover - Topic l.5-3 This review will encompass such diverse topics as the local handswitches for the various fans, the interlocks associated with these switches and fans, the required actions of the Control Room Isolation System (CRIS), the requirements for post-accident operation resulting from the various external initiating events, and any assumptions rega-ding required manual operation of the system.

3.1.5.l.6 System isolation / Interlocks - Topic 1.7-3 The interlocks of the control room HVAC system will be reviewed to determine their adequacy in implementing system performance requirements. This will include any interlocks associated with CRIS, fan and isolation damper interlocks, pressurization system interlocks, etc.

4 )

% ,/

DC-82-13

i l

PROJECT INSTRUCTION pg_ 3201. 009 Engineering Program Plan 4 REV.:

SUBJECT:

Midland independent Design and 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY: iw APPROVED BY-PAGE ,?

of 145_ h!jJ-:; --

%, k--

3.l.5.l.7 Component Functional Requirements - Topic !.9-3 1

Functional requirements for selected components will be reviewed against requirements imposed directly by licensing commitments and industry codes cnd standards. Additionally, system design imposes performance requirements. The development of such requirements will b'e traced from their source to statement in system design criteria, and the validated component functional requirements will be compared to technical specifications in the procurement documents.

Component functional requirements include fan curve data, valve / damper leak rates, load rating, instrument sensor detection threshold, and similar characteristics. Equipment seismic and environmental qualifications will be f) v considered separately.

3.1.5.l.8 System Pneumatic Design - Topic 11.10-3 The calculations of system pressure drop through ducts, dcmpers, filters, etc.,

for safety-related modes will be checked against design criteria. A confirmatory calculation for a critical system alignment will be performed to establish functional requirements which will be compared to those specified.

3. l.5.f.9 Cooling / Heating Requirements - Topic l.12-3 System heating and cooling loads for the control room will be reviewed if thev are safety related. The review will examine stability of control room temperature in an acceptable range under isolated conditions.

/%.

v DC-82-13 i

l PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland Independent Design and l REW 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program I PAGE 78 of 145 PREPARED BY: j y r 1i w .,, ,

. APPROVED BY:

y ,Q 3.1.5.1.10 Preservice Testing and Capability for Operational Testing - Topic 1.14-3 A review will be made of the criteric and commitments and implementing documents which exist for preservice testing and the capability for operational testing of a selected portion of the CR-HVAC system.

3.l.5.l.Il Power Supplies - Topic l.15-3 Design criteria and commitments will be reviewed for control room HVAC power supplies. The aspects to be reviewed include power supply separation,

(] redundancy and diversity. The FSAR commitments regarding power supply design features will be compared to applicable design criteria.

3.1.5.1.12 Instrumentation / Detection - Topic l.18-3 Control Room HVAC instrumentation will be reviewed for its adequacy to monitor the operational status of the system and to detect adverse l environmental conditions. The design basis, drawings and specifications for make-up air radiation and toxic gas detectors will be reviewed. The review will include a review of the basis for selected gas concentration limits and setpoints for the Hazardous Gas Monitoring System (HGMS).

3.1.5.1.13 Control Systems - Topic 1.19-3 l

l Design criteria and commitments will be reviewed against FSAR commitments

( regarding control systems cssociated with CR-HVAC system. The criteria and O

l DC-82-13 l

PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland Independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Prcgram PREPARED BY: ] p,( APPROVED BY PAGE 79 of 145 v

FSAR commitments will be reviewed against system logic diagrams and schematic diagrams or applicable loop diagrams to verify implementation of the design criteria.

3.1.5.1.14 Actuation Systems - Topic !.20-3 The CR-HVAC actuation system will be reviewesi against criteria governing the design of protection systems for nuclear power piants (IEEE Standard-279). The review will cover desig., criteria and commitmerds, a review of implementing l

documents and a check of evaluations and drawings governing or documenting actuation system design and implementation. The review will include a check of 6

(9,, schematic diagrams for actuation system input and a check of the actuation system procurement specification for compliance to the design criteria.

3. l.5.l.15 Nondestructive Excmination Commitments - Topic l.21-3 A determination will be made of the design criteria and commitments which exist for NDE for the CR-HVAC system components, included will be the review of associated evaluations to ensure adequate prevision for NDE. The results of l this determination will be used in the ICV portion of the IDCV, which will verify that the system has been constructed such that it can function in .accordance with its design criteria and commitments.

l l

DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 009-

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE 80 of 145 PREPARED BY: p APPROVED BY 3.1.5.1.16 Materials Selection - Topic l.22-3 This activity will include the review of criteria implementing documents and evaluations related to establishing the bases for the material specification process of selected components and elements of the CR-HVAC system.

Specifications wid be reviewed to verify that these are in compliance with design engineering requirements.

3.l.5.1.17 Failure Modes and Effects - Topic 1.23-3 The various modes of failure, and the effects of such failure will be reviewed, (m) using as a basis any analyses presented in the FSAR. This review will determine if there is any potential failure that has no. Seen prev *ously analyzed.

3.l.5.1.18 Filtration - Topic 1.33-3 Licensing commitments will form the basis for reviewing the filtering capability I for airborne radioactive materials and toxic gases. Calculation of airborne dose l rates will be checked. Specifications of critical filter parameters will be checked, and interface requirements bdween system design and filter performance will be reviewed.

3.1.5.I.19 Pressurization - Topic l.34-3 Control room pressurization to ensure exfiltration under post-accident and offsite hazardous gas releases will be reviewed. The basis for establishing quantitative values for leakage area will be checked. System flow b) v DC-82-13 i

PROJECT INSTRUCTION l

PI 3201. 009 Engineering Program Plan 9 REV.:

SUBJECT:

Midland independent Design and 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY PAGE 81 .og 145

[ j .q characteristics validated in the pneumatic design review and the fan curves will be used to check global pressure differential. Local effects and relevant meteorological assumptions will be reviewed. The calculations for sizing of the bottled air supply will be checked. Analyses considering the capability of the self-contained breathing apparatus will be evaluated.

3.1.5.1.20 Ventilation - Topic l.35-3 The overall HVAC ventilation system design will be reviewed to determine its capability to maintain control room habitability parameters, i.e., temperature, oxygen content, toxic gas levels, and airborne radiation. Criteria for acceptable p) t levels will be checked against licensing commitments and industry standards for both survival and minimal conditions under which reasonable decision making is expected. Calculations to predict equilibrium temperature, oxygen level, and airborne contamination will be checked in critical modes. Synergistic effects of toxic gases will also be considered. A confirmatory calculation of control room habitability parameters will be performed for one critical mode of operation.

3.1.5.2 CR-HVAC System Protection Features in addition to the review of the capability of the CR-HVAC system to perform its required functions, a review will be made of external factors which could affect the capability of the system to achieve these functions. Included in the scope of this portion of the review are factors such as seismic design, high energy line break accidents (HELBA), environmental protection, fire protection, missile protection, and systems interaction. The following sections address these and other design areas related to syste'.i protection.

("h vj DC-82-13 1

PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 009 -

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland independent Design and REW 2 DATF: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program 82 PREPARED BY: p g APPROVED BY:

PAGE of 145 3.1.5.2.1 Seismic Design - Topic 11.1-3 The seismic design criteria and associated commitments related to the CR-HVAC system will be reviewed to ensure that an adequate basis for the design process is established. The review will include seismic design parameters and methodologies specified for the design of ductwork and supports, equipment and components associated with the CR-HVAC system.

3.1.5.2.2 Seismic Design - Pressure Boundary - Topic 11.2-3 This activity will include a review of the commitments, implementing

({} documents, calculations and evaluations associated with seismic design of the pressure boundary of a selected portion of the CR-HVAC system. The utilization of the proper design input, such as response spectra, ductwork and component weights, and other ductwork characteristics, will be verified. The calculations and evaluations will be reviewed to verify that pertinent acceptance criteria are met.

3.1.5.2.3 Seismic Design - Duct / Pipe / Equipment Support - Topic 11.3-3 A review of a selected portion of the CR-HVAC system will be conducted to verify that selected supports have been designed and specified in accordance with criteria and commitments. Included will be the review of design loads, load combinations, and the methods of analysis utilized. The associated design drawings and specifications will be reviewed for consistency. The review will encompass representative duct and pipe supports associates with the selected portion of the system. In addition, the design calculations, drawings l

l 3

\

J l

DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION e pg_3201. 009 REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland Independent Design and I

l 1

Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY:

i!")ilj APPROVED BY:

PAGE __83 or 145 -~~- %Q v-and specifications associated with the anchorage and support of selected CR-HVAC system equipment will be reviewed for conformance to requirements.

3.l.5.2.4 Seismic Design - Equipment Qualification - Topic 11.4-3 This activity will include the review of commitments, implementing documents, calculations, drawings, and specifications associated with the seismic qualification of selected CR-HVAC equipment. Qualification requirements including response spectra, load combinations, and equipment functional criteria will be reviewed. The review will include various types of HVAC equipment of

,_ representative complexity such as: fans, motors, coolers, dampers, filters and associated instrumentation.

3.1.5.2.5 High Energy Line Break Accidents - Topic 11.5-3 Criteria for postulation and evaluation of high energy line breaks will be reviewed to the extent that there are aspects unique to the CR-HVAC system which were not incorporated in the AFW review.

3.1.5.2.6 HELBA/ Pipe Whip - Topic 11.6-3 A review will be made to determine the criteria applicable to high energy lines routed near the control room. To the extent that the CR-HVAC system is subject to criteria for HELBA/ Pipe Whip which differ from those applicable to the AFW system, those criteria will be evaluated.

n N.,]

DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION pg_3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland independent Design and REV.: 2 DATC: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE 84 of 145 PREPARED BY: Q' APPROVED BY:

g

3. l.5.2.7 HELBA/ Jet Impingement A review will be made to determine the criteria applicable to preventive protective measures taken to assure acceptable consequences due to postulated jets that may impact CR-HVAC components important to the functioning of this system. This topic will be reviewed in conjunction with Topic II.6-3, Pipe Whip.

3. l.5.2.8 Environmental Protection - Topic 11.8-3 The criteria review conducted for the AFW and SEP systems wiil be extended to include considerations unique to the CR-HVAC system.

3.1.5.2.9 Environmental Envelopes - Topic 11.9-3 All major equipment and representative electrical components in the system will be reviewed to verify that they can perform their required function under the most severe conditions resulting from the pipe breaks postulated in accordance with the HELBA criteria. Implementation of criteria to select break locations will be reviewed. The calculations to determine sub-compartment tempc !tures and pressures will be reviewed to trace the application of criteria and the validity of the technical approach. Validated conditions will be compared with

! the specifications in procurement documents for the equipment. One environmental envelope applicable to the CR-HVAC system will be subject to a confirmatory calculation, provided that the envelope used to qualify the HVAC equipment is different from that used to qualify AFW components.

O L.)

DC-82-13

I 1

PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY:

PAGE 85 of 145 v

3.1.5.2.10 Environmental Equipment Qualification - Topic 11.10-3 Based on the environmental envelope review, equipment and components will be selected to excmine their qualification for the most severe environment.

Various types of equipment will be reviewed including valva operators, dampers, instrumentation, and fan motors. The review will focus on two separate aspects:

the vendor calculations and testing, and CPC's program for technically confirming vendor compliance to procurement specifications. The depth of review for vendor calculations will be determine based on an assessment of the l comprehensiveness of the CPC's program.

l n

() 3.l.5.2.ll Fire Prot.ection - Topic 11.12-3 The CR-HVAC system will be reviewed to determine its ability to control smoke due to small fires in the control room, smoke from fires outside the building, and smoke from fires in areas adjtcent to the control room. Tnis review includes an evaluation of criteria and impleme'nting documents. The potential for interaction between the control room and the remote shutdown panel area with regard to smoke control and fire suppression will be reviewed.

I I 3.l.5.2.12 Missile Protection - Topic 11.13-3 i The criteria for postulating events which result in internal missile generation l

will be reviewed against current licensing practice and operating experience.

Criteria for assessing damage due to postulated missiles will be reviewed as an j extension of the AFW and SEP review.

O 1

l G

l 1

DC-82-13 l

l

PROJECT INSTRUCTION PW 3201.,009 Engineering Program Plan O

SUBJECT:

Midland independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE 86 of 145 PREPARED BY:

g APPROVED BY 4

3.l.5.2.13 Systems Interaction - Topic 11.14-3 The potential for systems interaction and means for prevention thereof will be reviewed. The review will include an examination of criteria utilized to analyze potential physical or spatial interactions. The procedures for, and results of, the Midland systems interaction walkdowns will be reviewed and, if possible, ongoing walkdowns will be observed.

3.l.5.3 Structures that House the CR-HVAC System The auxiliary / control building structure supports the functioning of the CR-n

() HVAC system. The overall criteria and commitments applicable to the design of this structure will be reviewed and evaluated in conjunction and as an extension of the AFW system evaluation. Selected additional features from this structure will be isolated for more in-depth review in the following topics.

3.1.5.3.1 Seismic Design / Input to Equipment - Topic 111.1-3 This activity will include the review of commitments, implementing documents, calculations and evaluations related to the development of seismic design input for the CR-HVAC system cad associated components in the auxiliary building.

Included will be a review of seismic input parameters such as seismic design spectra, damping, material properties, and boundary conditions, including soil-structure interaction. The methodalogy utilized for the location of the mass points and the computation of masses and equivalent member properties will be reviewed. Parameter variation studies will also be reviewed to verify that the variance of important input parameters and modeling assumptions has been O

V DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION pl 3201. 009 4

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland Independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY: i APPROVED BY:

PAGE 87 of 145 3.y,A ggg W

appropriately considered. The scope of this activity will include the review of l the dynamic analysis of the auxiliary building, the time history analysis and the l generation of floor response spectra for both horizontal directions and the vertical direction. The utilization of proper floor response spectra for the specification of the selected CR-HVAC system components will be verified.

3. l.5.3.2 Civil / Structural Design Considerations - Topic 111.5-3 Civil / structural design criteria and associated commitments related to the CR-HVAC system will be reviewed, and the establishment of the proper basis for the associated design process will be confirmed. Included will be the review of V design parameters and the methodologies utilized in the design process for structures and affected systems and components associated with the system.

3. l.5.3.3 Concrete and Steel Design - Topic 111.7-3 l

1 rhis activity will include the review of criteria and implementing documents l ossociated with the reinforced concrete and structural steel design of selected structural elements associated with the CR-HVAC system. The review will address design criteria and specified methodologies of analysis ossociated with each type of loading with emphasis on a verification that these items are considered in a realistic manner. Loading combinations, allowable stresses or conditions, and other applicable criteria will be reviewed.

O a

DC-82-13

)

PROJECT INSTRUCTION l PI 3201. 009 Engineering Program Plan 9

SUBJECT:

Midland Independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY:

PAGE 88 of IM [ .g '} d, _. m) h I

3.1.5.3.4 Leak Tightness - Topic lll.9-3 This activity will include the review of criteria, implementing documents and calculations associated with the leak tightness of the control room. The review will address the provision for component specifications required to ensure control room leak tightness criteria are met.

3.1.6 DEVELOPMENT OF IDV PROGRAM CHECKLISTS Generic checklists exist for each of the review scope categories discussed in section 3.1.1, utilizing guidance contained in ANSI N45.2.ll. These checklists

(,/ have been developed to assist in documenting engineering evoluotions, and providing uniformity of review from topic to topic and between reviewers. For each of the design areas within the scope shown in Figures 1.2-2a and 2b,1.2-4a cnd 4b and 1.2-6a and 6b, the reviewer may utilize the generic checklists or develop a specific checklist incorporating portions of the generic checklists as appropriate. In most cases, the specific checklist will be derived from the generic checklist by the addition of specific requirements applicable to the design crea being reviewed, in some cases, it may be appropriate to use only a

portion of the generic checklist or to develop a unique checklist. The specific 1

instructions for the use of design verification checklists are contained in Project Instruction PI-3201-006, Use of Design Verification Checklists.

In ecch case that a generic checklist has been modified, the checklist prepared by the reviewer will be checked by the Lead Technical Reviewer (LTR) for the creo. (Note that if the LTR prepares a checklist, it is permissible for him to both originate and check the contents of the checklist). During their review process, the LTRs examine the checklist for interfaces with other IDV areas and p perform a general review of the completeness cnd adequacy of the l

l DC-82-13 l

l

PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan O Midland independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY PAGE 89 of 145 ,j 1

proposed checklist. The LTR's review is to be coordinated with the Project l Manager as necessary to resolve questions which cut across discipline lines, in the event . hot the Project Manager or the LTR has comments on the checklist, 1

the checklist preparer and those having comments will discuss the comments and reach an appropriate resolution. After reaching concurrence in the adequacy of the checklist, the LTR will indicate his approval and the checklist will be available for use by the reviewer.

The reviewer, having on approved checklist, can then proceed into the review

( process for this specified area, in accordance with Project Instruction l

e PI-3201 -001, Engineering Evaluation Preparation and Control. In performing the (m) engineering evaluation, the reviewer will document the information which he used in order to complete the checklist. Such information will include the data or revision number of the document, the document number, on indication of the source of the document (e.g., whether the document was obtained from an individual, a file, or the records center).

l 3.1.6.1 Development of Checklists for Review of Design Criteria and l

Commitments l The generic checklist for review of design criteria and commitments was developed considering questions such as:

e What are the design inputs for the design area under review?

e Do any of these design inputs affect other design areas?

e Do any of these design inputs affect interfacing systems outside the scope of AFW or vice verso?

Oj u

DC-82-13

1 l

l PROJECT INSTRUCTION pg 3 201 ..,309__

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program P!ari O ~

Midland independent Design and REW 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED B : APPROVED BY:

PAGE 90 of 145 h [g.f, .

m_ m @ ,,2 _

T e Are the design inputs for this design crea complete?

e Are the identified design inputs for this design area consistent?

e Are the design inputs adequately defined to allow implementation for the design area?

For each dedgn area the lead technical reviewer will supplement the generic checklist with appropriate additional questions.

3.1.6.2 Development of Checklists for Reviews of implementing Documents The generic checklist for reviews of implementing documents was developed p

() considering questions such ca:

e What is the identity of the implementing document being reviewed? (List document identification such as title, revision number, date, etc.)

e For the design inputs being reviewed, is the document complete and internally ec.1sistent?

e Are design interface requirements specified?

e Have the design inputs been correctly interpreted and i incorporated in this implementing document?

e Is this implementing document consistent with other implementing documents being reviewed for this crea?

e Are assumptions and limitations on the use of the document adequately defined?

e Where appropriate, are quality assurance requirements specified?

(.

DC-82-13 l

l

l _

PROJECT INSTRUCTION d pg 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan 1 Midland Independent Design and l

] REW 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program _

l PAGE91

._ 'of 145 PREPARED BY:

q g,q APPROVED BY l 1

For each design area the lead technical reviewer will supplement the generic checklist with appropriate cdditional questions for each implementing document.

3.l.6.3 Development of Checklists for Checks of Calculctions and Evaluation:

The generic checklist for checks of calculations and evaluations was developed considering questions such as:

e What is the identity of the calculation or evaluation being checked?

e What is the purpose of the calculation or evaluation?

f'i v' e Are the dato sources identified?

e Are the assumptions listed?

e Are the assumptions reasonable and valid?

e Was the calculation or evaluation checked and approved within the originating orgonization?

e Are the equations and methods specified?

e Are the equations and methods appropriate for the intended purpose?

e if computer programs were v ed, were such progranas verified?

e Are the calculatico or evaluation results reasonable?

e Have design outputs been compared to the acceptance criteric to allow verification that design requirements have been satisfactorily accomplished?

l 1 n L)

DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan O Midland Independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE 92 of 145 PREPARED BY:

gg APPROVED BY For each design area the lead technical reviewer will supplement the generic checklist with appropriate questions for each calculation or evolvation checked.

3.1.6.4 pevelopment of Checklists fg? Checks of Drawings and Specifications The generic checklists for cheu<s of drawings and specifications were developed considering questions such as:

e What is the identity of the drawing or specification (e.g.

number, revision number, date)?

e Does the dr. awing or specification reflect the selected Q

b design inputs?

e is the drawing or specification consistent with related cc culations or evaluations?

l e Has this drawing or spec!f; cation been chec'<ed by the originating organization?

v Is the drawing or toecification complete with regard to the selected design inputs?

l l e Where appropriat e, have adequate handling, storage cleaning, and shicping requirements been specified in the specification?

e Where appropriate, has adequate allowance been made for inservice inspection', maintenance, repair, and testing?

I For each design area, the lead technical reviewer will supplement the generic l checklist with appropriate questions for each drawing or specification being 1

! reviewed.

pd l

DC-82-13 1

PROJECT INSTRUCTION m PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland Independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE 93 of 145 PREPARED BY:

jy APPROVED BY

. 3 l.7 PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL SAMPLING AND VERIFICATION Additional sampling or verification within the scope of the IDV or outside the scope into other syster will be conducted if discrepancies are found. The level of additional sampling or verification will be based upon the nature of the discrepancy. In all cases when discrepancies are found, on introspective evaluation will follow to identify the extent and root cause. The root cause may either be random or systematic (generic). The additional review will attempt to verify whether the discrepancy is restricted to the specific system, component, or structure under review; restricted to work by a specific design organization; or if the discrepancy cuts across many interfaces and applies to similarly

( designed systems, components, and structures. As a rule, mathemctical errors l will not precipitate additior,al sampling and verification unless these are found in l significant numbers, leading to significant deficiencies or a compounding of errors. Judgement in making this assessment will be required on case-by-case basis.

As necessary, additional sampling or verification within the scope of the system sample selection boundaries identified in sections 3.1.3, 3.1.4 and 3.l.S of this Plan will be undertaken by TERA and approved internally. All such action; will be documented in the Monthly Status Report. Additional sampling outside this scope is considered a substantive issue and will be discussed between TERA, CPC cnd NRC prior to initiation.

• 3.2 INDEPENDENT CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION METHODOLOGY The Independent Construction Verification (ICV) Program will consist of a review and evaluation of the quality of construction of selected components and (q)

DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland indeper. dent Desien and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification program APPROVED BY PAGE 94 of.145 PREPARED BY:

lg structures associated with the AFW, SEP and CR-HVAC systems. The I

construction activities to be reviewed include the major activities of the construction chain. These include the fabrication, storage, maintenance, installation or construction, and verification activities associated with the acceptance of the system or component, as further defined in Section 3.2.1 herein. The emphasis will be on making a determination of the overall quality of construction end an ossessment of its complicnce with licensing commitments.

The review will be conducted to varying stages of construction completion depending upon the specific system, component, or structure under review. The methodology will include diverse approaches such as checking of records,

. hands-on inspection of hardware, and confirmatory testing. The basis for the O sempie seiection is presented in Sectie,3.2.2. The definition of the scone of review is provided in the following sections: .

System Section AFW 3.2.3 l

1 SEP 3.2.4 1

CR-HVAC 3.2.S In many instances, a complete verification of the as-built configuration against design documents and other applicable requirements will be included. Where possible, systems and components selected for the independent Design Verification Program will be utilized for review in the ICV Program, thereby providing verification of the complete chain from criteria and commitments through to the constructed and verified product.

g O

DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: S/18/83 Construction Verification Program APPROVED BY:

PAGE 95 of 145 PREPARED BY: .j, g' } g(L d

The ICV Program will be, conducted utilizing detailed checklists described in Section 3.2.6. Additional sampling, verification, and testing activities that may be conducted as a result of the ICV Program are discussed in Section 3.2.7.

3.2.1 CATEGORIES OF REVIEW: THE CONSTRUCTION CHAIN The categories of review include the major construction activities identified in the construction chain. The ICV review categories included are:

e Review of supplier documentation e Review of storage and maintenance documentation e Review of construction / installation documentation e Review of selected verification activities e Verification of physical configuration It is necessary to reemphasize that the ICV review will be conducted to varying stages of construction completion depending upon the specific system, component or structure under review. As such, the ICV review categories will, as a minimum, include a detailed review of a static siluction, or one which verifies the results of a completed activity, in addition to observations and reviews of a more dynamic environment where the construction activity being reviewed is actually in progress or has not been completed. The results of these types of reviews will be integrated with an assessment of selected, on-going over-inspection activities and the Construction Completion Program (see section 3.2.I.4). Proceeding in this manner allows an even-handed, objective appraisal of not only the quality of construction for completed items, but also permits an

,im T /

DC 13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland Independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Cons ruction Verification Program PREPARED Bk. i, [g, J, APPROVED BY:

PAGE 96 of 145 -

Ml F

evaluation of the outputs from on-going site activities undertaken to verify and confirm the quality of construction.

Each of these review categories is described in further detail in the following sections.

3.2.1.1 Review of Supplier Documentation For those components requiring fabrication or manufacture, selected supplier documentation and other associated information including shop inspection documentation will be reviewed against design output documents to ensure

() conformance with requirements. Supplier documentation will include such items as drawings, calculations, test reports, certified material property reports, storage and installation requirements, operations und maintenance requirements, and other major supplier documentation and data applicable to the component.

For selected components, the review of supplier seismic and environmental l qualification documentation against reqv:rements defined in the design process will be included.

3.2.1.2 Review of Storage and Maintenance Documentation A review of site documentation will be performed to verify that requirements related to storage, including both in-storage and in-place maintenance have been l met. included will be the review of receipt inspection documentation.

Requirements to be reviewed will include such parameters as temperature and humidity, cleanliness, lubrication, shaft rotation, energization, etc. 'Nhere possible, existing warehousing and maintenance documentation will be reviewed DC-82-13

i l

l PROJECT INSTRUCTION d PI_3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland Independent Design and l REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program IPAGE 97 of g5 i -

PREPARED BY:y J jp .a APPROVED BY:

yQ v

and associated activities (e.g. system layup associated with Construction Completion Program) observed to provide additional verification that compo-nents have been properly stored and maintained during the construction process.

3.2.l.3 Review of Construction / Installation Documentation A major factor in the evaluation of the quality of construction is the review of those items constructed or installed on site. The review of documentation associated with the construction / installation process will be conducted to verify that the applicable requirements have been met (e.g. conformance to construction specifications will be verified). Included in this review will be v) verification of the utilization of proper documents in the process such as design output requirements, construction specifications, erection specifications, installation requirer.1ents, construction procedures and other specified construction codes and standards, as applicable. Design changes, field modifications, and other input related to final as-built drawings will be reviewed. Included will be the review of documentation associated with such items as concrete materials, concrete, the welding process, bolting activities, l NDE, etc. Inspection requirements, including personnel qualification and training, reports, and associated documentation will also be included in the review. Where possible, selected on-going construction / installation activities will be observed to provide additional information for the evaluation of this process.

l 3.2.1.4 Review of Selected Verification Activities l

Verification activities conducted subsequent to the construction / installation /

n inspection activity will be reviewed and evaluated. Included will be over-(U inspection activities associated with cable separation verification, bolt hardness testing verification, the pipe support reinspection program, the Construction DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE 98 .or 145 PREPARED BY:

[g APPROVED BY:

u Completion Program; as well as routine cold hydro testing, functional and preoperational testing, other specified preservice system and component testing programs and system walkdowns associated with turn-over. Associated requirements, plans, test reports, etc. will be reviewed and, where possible, these verification activities will be observed in order to provide additional information and data to support evaluations.

3.2.l.5 Verification of Physical Configuration Field verification of the as-built configuration of selected components of a l portion of the systems under the scope of the ICV will be conducted to ensure V conformance with requirements. Verification will address such aspects as identification, approximate physical dimensions, location, orientation, name plate data, grounding, use of proper materials, insulation, weld quality, and other features of the configuration as applicable to the component or system.

Configuration verification will range from the review of general features for some components or systems to a 100% detailed dimensional verification of other selected components or systems, as defined further in subsequent sections herein.

3.2.2 BASES FOR SAMPLE SELECTION l The selection of a sample for the ICV will generally follow the criteria discussed in Section 3.1.2 of this Plan for the IDV, with the exception that certain ICV activities may util!ze statistical methods. These methods may be applied in establishing sample sizes and statistical levels of confidence for the assessment of repetitive production activities such as concrete and steel properties or Nj 1

DC-82-13

l PROJECT INSTRUCTION

~pg_ 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan O_ REV.: urdiandindependent oesio,cnd 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program of 145 PAGE _ 99 PREPARED BY: }1.p(>, APPROVED BY:

mLA

/

welding records. The efficacy of using these approaches will be determined.

The decision to utilize or not utilize statistical techniques, including the basis for this decision will be appropriately documented.

The primary means of sample selection will be engineering judgment of the ICV reviewers. As with the IDV, the initial sample will be biased towards problems that have previously arisen in the industry. This sample will be refined by incorporating specific Midland project information to verify that the ICV encompasses previous problem creas and, thereby, serve as a verification that

! associated problems have been or are in the process of being adequately l

l addressed and that they do not exist elsewhere in the same or similar form.

O v

The ultimate sample selection program that is utilized, engineering judgement and/or statistics, will be clearly defined and differentiated in the case of a combined program.

l 3.2.3 DEFINITION OF REVIEW SCOPE FOR THE AFW SYSTEM The ICV review categories corresponding to the major activities of the construc-tion chain were defined in Section 3.2.l. Presented in this section is an identification of the selected components and the associated level of construc-tion completion of each to be reviewed. For the AFW system the scope of review is defined in the matrix in Figure 1.2-3, where the "X" designates the review scope applicable to each component. The criteria discussed in Sections 1.2 and 3.2.2 of the Plan were utilized to develop this initial matrix. The review creas (or topics) of the ICV are divided into major divisions by component type:

mechcnical, electrical, instrumentation and control, HVAC and structural.

1 O

DC-82-l 3

• l PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201 . 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland independent Design and

-lREV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY: - -

APPROVED BY:

I PAGE100 of 145 J Q- . L %QA l'

Another major element of the ICV is the NDE/ Materials Testing Program. This program is discussed in section 3.2.3.6. The initial scope of review of each component within these major divisions is discussed in the sections that follow.

The identified iritial review scope as documented in Revisions 0 and I of this Plan has been modified based upon meeting one or more of the criteria documented in section 3.1.2. This change has been indicated on Figure 1.2-3 by the symbol "*" for items added to scope.

3.2.3.1 Mechanical Systems and Components An evaluation of the quality of construction of selected mechanical systems and O c mneoemts wrii se conevctea- incivaea te the scene or this portio" or the review are selected mechanical equipment, piping and pipe supports associated with the AFW system.

3.2.3.1.1 Mechanical Equipment - Topic l.l-Ic l

A review of the complete constructior, chain including verification of the l

physical configuration will be conducten for the major mechanical components selected for detailed review in the IDV. The fabrication documentation review will encompass major supplier documentation. including functional requirement and environmental and seismic qualification documents. included will be the review of the stresses in equipment and supports, including anchorages, as applicable. Storage / maintenance and construction / installation documentation will be reviewed and, where possible, selected associated activities will be observed. Verification documentation associated with major preservice equipment and related system testing programs will be reviewed cnd where

,y DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION

- pl 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland Independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/33 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY: g APPROVED B PAGE 101 of 145 possible verification activities including actual tests will be observed. The physical configuration review will include verification of equipment identity, principal features, name plate data, location, orientation, and support charac-teristics, as applicable. Conformance with design documents (including P&lD's, isometrics and equipment location drawings), supplier documents and associated installation requirements will be verified.

3.2.3.1.2 Piping - Topic l.2-Ic This activity will include the review of major piping fabrication documentation associated with the portion of the AFW piping system selected for review in the O iDv. vender drewinos, meterrei certificetien, shep weidine and "De documentation, as applicable will be reviewed. Major construction / installation documentation will be reviewed including installation specifications, welding and NDE documentation and all associated inspection reports. Verification documentation related to preservice testing programs will be reviewed and where passible associated activities will be observed. A field survey of the physical configuration of the selected portion of the AFW system will be conducted to verify routing, location (to tape measure accuracy), piping diameter, cleanliness and other major piping characteristics. Conformance with the applicable design, supplier and other installation requirements will be l confirmed.

3.2.3.l.3 Pipe Supports - Topic l.3-Ic A review of the quality of construction will be conducted for the pipe supports associated with the portion of the AFW piping system selected for detailed O

DC-82-13

9 PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 009~

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE 102 of 145 PREPARED BY:

g APPROVED BY review in the IDV. Er those supports selected for review in the IDV, fabrication and installation documentation will be reviewed. Verification documentation including that associated with the pipe support reinspection program will be reviewed and where possible these activities will be observed. Verification documentation associated with major preservice system testing will also be reviewed and will be observed where possible. Physical verification will include a 100% verification of the identity, location, and orientation of all pipe supports within the selected portion of the AFW piping system. In addition, complete dimensional verification of design details will be made for those supports selected for detailed review in the IDV. Dimensional verification will encompass weld size, quality and location, base plate size and thickness, anchor bolt size

() and location, and other principal features, as applicable.

3.2.3.2 Electrical Systems and Components An evaluation of the gunlity of construction of selected electrical systems and components will be conducted. Included in the scope of this review are selected electrical equipment, cable trays and supports, conduits and supports, and electrical cable associated with the AFW system.

3.2.3.2.1 Electrical Equipment - Topic II.1-Ic A review of the complete construction chain including verification of the physical configuration will be conducted for the major electrical components (e.g. motor control center, motor operated valve, electrical panel) and cable selected for detailed review in the IDV. The fabrication documentation review will encompass major supplier documentation, including functional requirement O

D0-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland independent Design and REW 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY:

PAGE 103 of 145 g g..

%Q r

i and environmental and seismic qualification documents. Included will be the l review of the stresses in equipment and supports, including anchorages, as applicable. Storage / maintenance and construction / installation documentation will be reviewed and, where possible, selected associated activities will be observed. Verification documentation associated with major preservice equipment and related system testing programs will be reviewed and, where possible, verification activities including actual tests will be observed. The physical configuration review will include verification of equipment identity, principal features, name plate data, location, orientation, and support character-istics, as applicable. Conformance with design documents (including single line I diagrams, P&lD's, and equipment location drawings), supplier documents and

\ ,m t  ; associated installation requirements will be verified.

3.2.3.2.2 Cable Trays and Supports - Topic II.2-Ic This activity will include a review of major fabrication and installation

) documentation, selected overinspection cctivities and physical verification of a selected portion of a cable tray and support system associeted with a major AFW electrical system. Layout and installation drawings, material cerifications, and

) other applicable documentation will be reviewed to verify utilization of the most current and correct design and procedural requirements. A field survey of the selected portion will be conducted to verify location (to tape measure accuracy) routing, tray characteristics, and support location and configuration.

Conformance with applicable design, supplier and other installation requirements will be confirmed. Proper cable assignment to trays, trny cleanliness and tray fill will be selectively verified. This verification will be supplemented with a detailed review of selected outputs and findings resulting from the ongoing cable separation overinspection program.

b,,

00-82-13

l PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201 009 Engineering Program Plan

SUBJECT:

Midland Independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/IS/83 Construction Verification Program of 1g5 PREPARED BY: ;i APPROVED BY-PAGE 104 t hg, j -

%Q 3.2.3.2.3 Conduits and Supports - Topic II.3-Ic This activity will include a review of major fabrication and installation documentation, selected overinspection activities, and a field verification of the physical configuration of a selected portion of a conduit and support system associated with a major AFW electrical system. The scope of review will be similar to that of the electrical tray and support review discussed in the preceding section. The conduit size and fill will be selectively verified.

3.2.3.2.4 Cable - Topic II.4-Ic lj A review will be conducted of major supplier documentation associated with the cable of a selected portion of a major AFW electrical system. Overinspection activities associated witn ccble separation verification of selected cables in AFW electrical systems will be reviewed and evaluated. The supplier documentation review will encompass cable material certifications, insulction certifications, stranding and color coding characteristics and other applicable documentation. The physical configuration of a selected portion of the system will be verified including identification, visual inspection, routing, separation, tiedown, terminations and other principal characteristics as applicable. The enble terminations will be reviewed for proper lugging and lugging tool i documentation. Cable pull documentation will be reviewed to verify compliance with pull tension limits. Cable megger and continuity checks will be reviewed to verify installed cable integrity. Conformance with applicable design, supplier and other installation requirements will be confirmed.

7 L)

DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION pg_3201. 009 Engineering Program Plan O

SUBJECT:

Midland independent Design and I

REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY-of 145 iip /A-PAGE 105 -

MRf U

3.2.3.3 Instrumentation and Control Systems and Components A review of the quality of construction of selected instrumentation and control (1 & C) systems and components will be conducted. This review will include selected instruments, piping and tubing, and wiring associated with the AFW system.

3.2.3.3.1 Instruments - Topic ill.1-Ic A complete review of the construction chain including verification of the g

physical configuration will be conducted for selected instruments of a major

() APN l&C system. Major documentation will be reviewed including that received from the supplier, storage / maintenance (including calibration) and installation instructions. In addition, the verification documentation associated with preservice I&C system testing programs (e.g. calibration, response time, circuit continuity, trip set points, etc.) will be reviewed and activities observed where possiMe. The physical configuration will be "-rified including instrument identity, name plate data, location, mounting e .uitions, and other principcl characteristics, as applicable. Conformance with design documents and specifications, supplier requirements and installation requirements will be verified.

l l

3.2.3.3.2 Piping / Tubing - Topic lil.2-Ic This activity will include a review of inajor fabrication documentation and a physical configuration verification of piping and tubing associated with a selected portion of a major AFW I&C system. Material certifications and other

/m l .

DC-82-13 l

l PROJECT INSTRUCTION pl_ 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan I Midland Independent Design and  :

REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program ,

PAGE 106 of I45 PREPARED BY:

g -

APPROVED B applicable documentation will be reviewed against design requirements. A field survey of the selected portien will be conducted to verify routing, supports, size, slope and valve types. Conformance with applicable design, supplier and other installation requirements will be verified. Pre ervice hydro test results will be reviewed.

3.2.3.3.3 Cable - Topic lll.3-Ic A review will be conducted of major supplier and instcIlotion documentation associated with the cable of a selected portion of a major AFW I&C system.

Overinspection activities associated with cable separation verification of O seiected co8ies in the Arw instrementation sxstems wiii be reviewed and evaluated. The supplier documentation review will encompass cable material certifications, insulation certifications, stranding and color coding l characteristics and other applicable documentation. The physical configuration l

of the selected portion of the system will be verified including routing and terminations (correct tools for lugging, proper crimp and lug size), visual

, inspection, tie down, and cable pull documentation review. Conformance with 1

coplicable design, supplier and other installation requirements will be confirmed.

Continuity test results will be reviewed to verify circuit integrity.

3.2.3.4 HVAC Systems and Components An evaluation of the quality of construction of selected HVAC systems and components will be conducted, included in the scope of this portion of the review are selected HVAC equipment, ducts and supports associated with the AFW system.

O V

l l

l DC-82-13 t

1

PROJECT INSTRUCTION pg_ 3201. 009 Engineering Program Plan h REV.:

SUBJECT:

Midland Independent Design and 2 DATE: 5/)S/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE107 APPROVED B of 145 PREPARED BY: } ,

3.2.3.4.1 HVAC Equipment - Topic IV.1-Ic A review of the complete construction cho:n including verification of the physical configuration will be conducted for a major HVAC component. The fabrication documentation review will encompass maicr supplier documentation, including functional requirement and environmental and seismic qualification documents. Included will be the review of the stresses in equipment and suppcets, including anchorages, as applicable. Storage / maintenance and construction / installation documentation will be reviewed and, where possible, selected associated activities will be observed. Verification documentation associated with major preservice equipment and related system testing programs will be reviewed and, where possible, verification activities including actual tests will be observed. The physical configuration review will include verification of equipment identity, principal features, name plate data, location, orientation, and support characteristics, as applicable. Conformance with design documents (including P&lD's and equipment location drawings), supplier documents and associated installation requirements will be verified.

l l 3.2.3.4.2 HVAC Ducts and Supports - Topic IV.2-Ic This activity will include a review of major fabrication documentation and the physical configuration of a selected portion of a duct and support system associated with a major AFW HVAC system. Vendor drawings, material cerifications, and other applicable documentation will be reviewed. A field survey of the selected portion will be conducted to verify (to tape measure accuracy) routing, duct characteristics, and support location and configuration.

Conformance with applicable design, supp!ier and other installation requirements m will be confirmed.

DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verificction Program PREPARED BY: APPROY5D BY PAGE 108 of 145 3.2.3.5 Structural Components The quality of constructioa of plant structures will be evaluated based upon a review of selected structural components. included in the scope of this portion of the review are selected foundations, concrete structural elements and structural steel components of the structures which house the AF"/ system.

3.2.3.5.1 Foundations - Topic V.!-Ic This activity will include the review of fabrication and construction / installation documentation associated with building foundations selected for detailed review t) y L. the IDV. The fab-ication documentation review will enecmpass major supplier documentation including material certifications, rebar placement drawings, and other applicable documentation. Construction / installation documentation to be reviewed will include concrete materials documentation, concrete cylinder test results, inspection reports and other applicable documentation. Conformance with design documents, st 3 plier requirements and associated construction / installation requirements will be verified.

3.2.3.5.2 Concrete Components - Topic V.2-Ic A review of fabrication cnd construction / installation documentation will be conducted and the as-built configuration will be verified for major concrete structural elements selected for detailed review in the IDV. The docummtation review will encompass major supplier and construction / installation documen-tation associated with reinforcing steel, inserts and penetrations, and concrete documentation of a selected portion of each component. A field survey will be O

V DC-82-13

1 PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland Independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY:

PAGE 109 of 145 g APPROVED BY v

conducted to verify overall element dimensions (ir.cluding thickness), location l and size of major openings and selected penetrations, and principal character-l istics of selected inserts. Conformance with cpplicable design, supplier and other insiollation requirements will be confirmed.

3.2.3.5.3 Structural Steel Components - Topic V.3-Ic This activity will include the review of major fabrication and construction / installation documentation and a physical configuration verification l of the structural steel components selected for detailed review in the IDV. The l fabrication documentation review will encompass shop detail drawings, material l

n C) certifications, welding documentation, and other rnajor *upplier documentation.

Construction / installation documentation will address field welding, bolting (torque) and other applicable documentation. A field survey will be conducted to verify, where possible, major element characteristics including member size, plate thickness, weld size, and bolt pattern and size for a selected connection of each member. Conformance with applicable design, fabricator and other installation requirements will be confirmed.

3.2.3.6 NDE/Moterials Testing Program - Topic VI.1-Ic As part of the review of supplier documentation for AFW system components, a review will be conducted to ascertain and verify conformance of vendor welding, NDE, and materials testing to applicable codes, standards, and procurement specification requirements. The intent of ine NDE/ Material Testing Program is to supplement the review of construction / installation documentation of welding, NDE, and material testing activities by establishing a program for the n

U ,

DC-82-13

l PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201 . 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland indeoendent Design and

] REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program

/ m APPROVED BY:

PAGE 110 of 145 PREPARED BY: [' .;'Q .

_ . _ yh performance of NDE and material testing on selected material, components, and structures of the AFW system. The program will be conducted as an integral part of the ICV and will include over-inspection and testing of selected shop-fabricated / vendor-supplied components in addition to the over-inspection and testing of on-site welding, weld repair, NDE and other site-material related testing and inspection programs. Results of the testing performed as part of the NDE/ Materials Testing Program will be documented, reviewed, and compared against vendor supplied and site-generated material testing and NDE test data and against cpplicable codes and standards.

The direction and degree of testing performed as a part of the NDE/Moterials (c) Testing Program will be initiated and influenced by the results of the construction / installation documentation review as described in sections 3.2.3.1 through 3.2.3.5. The results of the documentation review will be integrated with the consideration of a statistical sampling approach and sound engineering judgment to arrive at the quantity and types of components and structures to be tested and the type of testing to be employed.

An intermediate output of the NDE/ Materials Testing Progrom will be a listing defining the components / structures to be tested and the corresponding test to be performed. Rationale for component / structure selection will also be provided to enable reviewers to easily discern the derivation of the sample and the sample size. The NDE/Moterials Testing Program will be documented in a Project Instruction to be issued prior to intiation of the program.

l l O a

I l

l DC-82-13 1

i PROJECT INSTRUCTION

- PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan

. Midland independent Design and i REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program l PREPARED BY: y APPROVED BY PAGE Ii1 of 145 r-3.2.4 DEFINITION OF REVIEW SCOPE FOR THE STANDBY ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM The scope of ICV review for the SEP system and for the CR-HVAC system (section 3.2.5) has been structured to enable a consistent methodology across all systems, components, and structures subject to ICV review. In other words, the methodology described in the previous sections and applied to the ICV review of the AFW system will also, to the extent practical, be applied to the SEP system and CR-HVAC system.

Consistency in application of the review methodology in the crea of construction

() verification is as important as the scope of the review itself. By providing a consistent reference against which to gauge the construction process, a clear and precise picture of trends, discrepancies, and efficiencies in the Midland I construction process will be made more easily discernible. Thus, to establish the necessary common reference, the ICV review categories (section 3.2.1) and scope of review for the AF'N system (section 3.2.3) will also be applicable to the i review conducted of the SEP system. Modifications to the scope of review have been deemed necessary to. accommodate unique component or structural considerations pertinent to the SEP system. These unique considerations are provided in the following discussions and serve to supplement and modify the scope of activities previously described in sections 3.2.3.1 through 3.2.3.6. The scope of review for the SEP system is defined as follows and in the matrix provided in Figure 1.2-5.

1 r

O v

l DC-82-i 3 l

l PROJECT INSTRUCTION I

PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland Independent Design and

-lREV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program lPAGE 112_ of 145 # bill.3 _ 3M

, 3.2.4.1 Mechanical Systems and Components l

l included in the scope of this portion of the review are the diesel generator and selected mechanical equipment, piping and pipe supports associated with the diesel generator cooling water, starting, lubrication and fuel oil systems.

3.2.4.1.1 Mechanical Equipment - Topic l.l-2c The diese! generator and selected mechanical components of the cdoling water, starting, lubrication and fuel oil systems will be subject to the review

, methodology as defined in section 3.2.3.l.l. Similar to the methodology applied b and described for the AFW system, the selection of the components in the cooling water, starting, lubricatica, and fuel oil systems will be performed to ensure that components subject to IDV review will also be -eviewed os part of l the construction verification review.

3.2.4.1.2 Piping - Topic 1.2-2c l This activity will include the review of fabrication documentation submitted for 1

piping associated with the diesel generator cooling water, starting, lubrication, and fuel oil systems selected for review in the IDV. Vendor drawings, material certification, shop welding and NDE documentation, as applicable, will be reviewed. Major construction / installation documentation will be reviewed, l including installation specifications, welding and NDE documentation and associated inspection reports. A field survey of the physical configuration of the selected piping system will be conducted to verify routing, location, piping diameter, cleanliness and other piping characteristics.

O DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201 .__009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland Independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program 113 145 PREPARED BY: APPROVED B PAGE of ,]

y 3.2.4.1.3 Pipe Supports - Topic l.3-2c A review will be conducted for the pipe supports associated with the piping system selected for detailed review in the SEP system IDV. For those supports selected for review in the IDV, fabrication and installation documentation will be reviewed. The physical configuration of selected pipe supports will also be verified. These activities will include verification of the identity, location, and orientation of selected pipe supports in addition to verification of design details and weld size, base plate size and thickness, anchor bolt size and location and other principal design features.

(.,

y 3.2.4.2 Electrical Systems and Components The sample selection boundary for the SEP system is provided in section 3.1.4 and defines the electrical systems subject to the IDV and ICV review process. Within the boundaries are power distribution systems and control systems of various classifications (IE and non IE) and voltages. The ICV electrical review will address the quality of construction of selected electrical and control systems which comprise the SEP system and, within the systems, selected electrical equipment, cable trays and supports, conduits and supports, and electrical cable.

3.2.4.2.1 Electrical Equipment - Topic II.1-2c A review of the complete construction process, as defined and described in section 3.2.3.2.1 for AFW system electrical components, will be conducted for selected components and ccble of the SEP system. To ensure a consistent application of the review methodology, the components selected for detailed n

1 DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION

- PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan w Midlanci Independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY: j APPROVED PAGE 114 of 145 review as part of the IDV will also comprise the nucleus of items subject to ICV review.

3.2.4.2.2 Cable Trays / Conduits and Supports - Topics li.2-2c & II.3-2c The scope of activities described and defined in Sections 3.2.3.2.2 and 3.2.3.2.3 will be performed for a selected portion of the cable trays / conduits and supports utilized to route power distribution and control cables in the systems within the SEP system sample selection boundaries.

3.2.4.2.3 Cable - Topic il.4-2c The scope of activities described and defined in Section 3.2.3.2.4 will be performed for a selected portion of power distribution cables within the SEP system sample selection boundaries.

3.2.4.3 Instrumentation and Control Systems and Components l Instrumentation and control (l&C) systems associated with the Standby Electric l Power System are segregated into two distinct categories. The first category of I&C systems are comprised of controls, instruments, and alarms associated with the diesel generator cooling water, starting, lubrication and fuel oil systems.

The second category of I&C systems relates to those instruments and controls which monitor and control the loading and disiribution of power within the electrical sample selection boundaries of the SEP system (Section 3.1.4). The classification of instruments into two categories does not alter or affect the ICV review methodology. Rather, the distinction is made to highlight the fact that A

V DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION

_ PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan

- Midland Independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE 115 of 145 PREPARED BY: j 'l p M s _.-

APPROVED h1A W

fluid process systems reside within the sample boundaries of the SEP system and as such the instruments and contro:s associated with the process systems are subject to the same review and selection as instruments and controls which monitor and control the loeding and distribution of standby electric power.

3.2.4.3.1 Instruments - Topic ill.1-2c Selected instruments from each of the previously defined categories of instruments will be subject to a detailed ICV review. The Llection of instruments wi!' be keyed to the IDV sample to enable a consistent and continuous evaluaFon of instruments utilized within the sample selection q

boundaries of the SEP system from design, through and including construction processes. The scope of ICV review activities to be undertaken for SEP system instruments are as indicated on Figure 1.2-S and described in section 3.2.3.3.1.

3.2.4.3.2 Piping / Tubing - Topic Ill.2-2c Category IE instruments, and other instruments which monitor, control and alarm parameters in the diesel generator fluid process systems, comprise the sample boundaries for the selection of piping / tubing to be subject to ICV review.

The scope of activities described and defined in section 3.2.3.3.2 will be performed for a selected portion of the piping and tubing associated with i instruments in the SEP system, specifically including piping and tubing utilized in the diesel generator cooling water, starting, lubrication and/or fuel oil systems.

The activities defined in section 3.2.3.3.2 will be supplemented to verify utilization of the most current and correct design, construction, and installation documentation and to include design changes and field modifications.

O V

DC-82-13 l

PROJECT INSTRUCTION

- PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan

. Midland independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE 116 .og 145 PREPARED BY:

qg APPROVED 3.2.4.3.3 Cable - Topic ill.3-2c i

l The scope of activities described and defined in section 3.2.3.3.3 will be performed for a selected portion of the instrumentation cabling and wiring utilized within the sample selection boundaries of the SEP system. Additionally, a review will be conducted to ascertain ar.d verify that the cabling utilized was properly stored and, once installed, was adequately and correctly handled and maintained.

3.2.4.4 HVAC Systems and Components An evaluation of the quality of construction of selected diesel generator building HVAC systems and components will be conducted. Selected fans, coolers, dampers and HVAC ducts and supports located in, and associated with, the diesel generator building will be subject to ICV review as described and defined as follows.

3.2.4.4.1 HVAC Equipment - Topic IV.1-2c The documentation associated with the manufacture of selected fans, coolers, and dampers located in the diesel generator building will be reviewed. The review will seek to verify that correct and adequate design and documentation requirements are transmitted to vendors for the diesel generator HVAC equipment and to ascertain and verify that the vendor's documentation submittals are complete, correct, and responsive to the procurement documentation requirements.

/m DC-82-13 l

PROJECT INSTRUCTION

- PI 3201.,009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland Independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE 117 of 145 PREPARED BY: j !h .- APPROVED BY:

Mp%e W

Once having characterized and identified selected HVAC equipment by means of the above supplier documentation review, the physical configuration of the installed equipment within the diesel generator building will be verified. The as-built configuration of selected HVAC equipment will be checked and verified cgainst vendor-supplied documentation and against installation requirements as derived from applicable codes, industry standards, and pertinent installation / erection documentation.

3.2.4.4.2 HVAC Ducts and Supports - Topic IV.2-2c The ICV review activities to be undertaken to verify the quality of construction

() for selected HVAC ducts and supports in the diesel generator building are defined and described in section 3.2.3.4.2 and are similar to the scope of review activities to be conducted for HVAC ducts and supports associated with the AFW system.

3.2.4.5 Structural Components l

The quality of construction of the diesel generator building and foundations will 1

! be evaluated based upon a review of selected structural components. Selected foundations, concrete, and structural steel used in the erection of the diesel generator building, and major component foundations within the diesel generator building, will be reviewed.

3.2.4.5.1 Foundations - Topic V.1-2c This activity will include the review of fabrication cnd construction / installation documentation associated with the diesel generator building and major G 1 DC-82-13 -

l 1

l l

PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program 118 PREPARED BY:

7p APPROVED PAGE of 145 equipment foundations selected for detailed review in the ICV. The description

( and definition of activities to be undertaken are provided in Section 3.2.3.5.1.

3.2.4.5.2 Concrete Components - Topic V.2-2e A review of fabrication and construction / installation documentation will be conducted for major concrete structural elements of the diesel generator building selected for detailed review in the IDV. The documentation review will encompass major supplier and construction /instof f ation documentation associated with reinforcing steel, inserts and penetrations, and concrete documentation of a selected portion of each structure subject to ICV review.

,7 O

3.2.4.5.3 Structural Steel Components - Topic V.3-2c The scope of review to be applied to the structural steel components of the l diesel generator building will be similar to the scope of activities to be l

! undertaken in verifying diesel generator building concrete components as defined in the previous section. Emphasis will be placed upon the review of shop detail j drawings, material certifications, shop and field welding documentation, boiting

( and other applicable vendor-supplied and site-generated documentation.

3.2.5 DEFINITION OF REVIEW SCOPE FOR THE CONTROL ROOM HVAC SYSTEM To establish and maintain a common reference against which to gauge the quality of construction, the scope of ICV review for the CR-HVAC system has been developed to be similar to the scope of ICV review previously defined for (3

LJ DC-82-13

l l PROJECT INSTRUCTION Pi 3201., 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan i Midland Independent Design and l REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program 145 PREPARED BY:

g,j APPROVED B l PAGE. I19 of the AFW and SEP systems. Additionally, the ICV review methodology defined and described in previous sections of this program plan (Secticns 3.2.1 through 3.2.3) will be retained and applied t7 components and structures of the CR-HVAC system. Modifications to the scope of review will be made as necessary

, to accommodate unique component cr structural considerations of the CR-HVAC system. These unique considerations are provided in the followir.g discussions and serve to supplement and modify the scope of activities previous ly described in Sections 3.2.3.i through 3.2.3.6. The scope of review for the CR-HVAC system is defined as follows and in the matrix provided in Figure 1.2-7.

3.2.5.1 Mechanical Systems and Components l N]

Included in the scope of this portion of the review are selected mechanical equipment, piping, and pipe supports included within the sample selection boundaries of the CR-HVAC system (see section 3.l.5). Selected components such as fans, coolers, dampers, filters, cooling water piping and pipe suppcrts comprise the items to be subject to the ICV review of CR-HVAC mechanical systems and components.

3.2.5.1.1 Mechanical Equipment - Topic 1.1-3c A review of the complete construction chain including verification of the l

physical configuration will be conducted for fans, coolers, dampers, and filters selected for detailed review in the IDV. The selected CR-HVAC system mechanical equipment will be subject to the review methodology and scope of review activities as previously defined in Section 3.2.3.1.1.

l (3

V l DC-82-13 l

l

PROJECT INSTRUCTION pg_ 3201. 009 O

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland Independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program APPROVED B PAGE 120 cf 145 PREPARED BY: p v

3.2.5.8.2 Piping - Topic 1.2-3c l

Selected piping, exclusive of ductwork, within the CR-HVAC system will be subje.ct to a review of fabrication and instcIlation documentation and a verification of the physical cunfiguration. Vendor drawings, material certification, shop welding and NDE documentation, as applicable, will be reviewed. Major construction / installation dxumentation will bc reviewed including installation spec + fications, welding and NDE documentation and asr :ciated inspection reports. A field survey of the physical configuration of the selected piping system will be conducted to verify routing, location, piping diameter, cleanlinass, and other piping characteristics.

G 3.2.5.l.3 Pipe Supports - Topic l.3-3c A review will be conducted of the pipe supports associated with the piping system selected for review under Topic l.2-3c. For those supports selected fabrication and installc? ion documentation will be reviewed and the physical configuration will be verified. The physical configuration verification of selected pipe supports will include verif! ation of design details, weld, size, base plate size and thickness, anchor bolt size and location, and other principal design l features.

3.2.5.2 Electrical Systems and Components A detailed review to verify the quality of construction will be conducted for selected electrical equipment, trays / conduits and supports and cables within the sample selection boundaries of the CR-HVAC system. In addition to reviews of

/3 Y

DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland Independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY:

PAGE 121 of a5  %' : ),4' ~ gQ vendor supplied documentation and documentation utilizied to record the implementation of installation activities, a verification of the physical configurction will be conducted for selected trays, conduits, equipment and supports.

3.2.5.2.1 Flectrical Equipment - Topic II.1-3c Electrical equipment, such as fan motors, swi+chgear, and motor control centers, selected as part of the IDV review will be subject to a detailed ICV review. The review will comprise a v'rification of fabrication- and installation-related i

documentation and a ver!'ication of the physical configuration of selected electrical equipment. Activities will include review of vendor-supplied drawings,

! (v) 1 calculations, test reports, certified material property reports and other major supplier documentation. Documentation utilizied to record the performance of l construction installation activities will be reviewed in addition to a verification of physical dimensions, location, orientation, name plate data and grounding of the installed and as-built electrical equipment selected for review.

Preoperational and other specified preservice component and system testing and test programs will be reviewed. This review will be conducted to verify that associated test requirements, plans, reports, etc. provide adequate assurance of electrical component operation in accordance with system design requirements.

3.2.5.2.2 Trays / Conduit and Supports - Topics ll.2-3c and ll.3-3c This activity will include a review of major fabrication and installation documentation of cable trays / conduit and supports associated with the electrical l

l ,

U DC-82-13

l PROJECT INSTRUCTION I PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan M diand Independent Design and l REV- 2 DATE: -'/18/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY:

y APPROVED B lPAGE I22 of 145 , i, system selected for IDV review. Layout and installation drawings, material certifications, and other applicable documentation will be reviewed. A field

! survey will also be conducted to verify location, routing and routing characteristics, and support location and configuration. Proper cable assignment to trays and ccnduit will be selectively verified in addition to cleanliness and cable fill.

3.2.5.2.3 Cable - Topic II.4-3c An ICV review will be conducted of major fabrication and installation documentation associated with the CR-HVAC electrical cable selected as part of I

(g the IDV review. Overinspection activities associated with cable separation verification of selected cables in the CR-HVAC electrical system will be reviewed, evaluated and factored into the ICV review. The physical configuration of a selected portion of. the cable network will be verified including identification, visual inspection, routing, tiedown, terminations, and other principal characteristics as appropriate and applicable. Conformance with applicable design, supplier, and other installation requirements will be confirmed.

l l

Instrumentation and Control Systems and Components 3.2.5.3 Selected instrumentation and controls essential for isolation of the control room and operation of the CR-HVAC system will be subject to the ICV review activities described in the following sections. Similar to the review of the AFW and SEP systems, this review will include selected instrument, piping and tubing, and wiring associated with the CR-HVAC system.

q]

R.

DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION

- PI_3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan

. Midland Independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY:g j APPROVED BY:

PAGE 123 of 145 ,

3.2.5.3.1 Instruments - Topic ill.1-3c A complete review of the construction chain including verification of the physical configuration will be conducted for selected instruments essential for isolation and habitability of the control room. The scope of activities which comprise this review will be as defined and described in Section 3.2.3.2.4.

3.2.S.3.2 Piping and Tubing - Topic Ill.2-3c The ICV review to be conducted for selected piping and tubing within the Control Room HVAC instrumentation and control systems will include those activities as I

('] described and defined in Section 3.2.3.3.2. The scope of review activities enumerated in the aforementioned section will be supplemented with a review of documentation utilized to record, document, and control the installation of the instrumentation- cnd control-related piping and tubing. Included in this review will be verification of the utilization of proper documents in the installation process such as design output requirements, erection specifications, installation requirements, and other specified construction codes and standards as applicable.

3.2.5.3.3 Cable - Topic ill.3-3c The activities to be undertaken to verify the quality of construction of

( instrumentation cables will be as described and defined in Section 3.2.5.2.3 for the CR-HVAC electrical system cables.

l l

O b

OC-82-13 l

l l

PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE 124 of 145 PREPARED BY:

p m, n. ,-

APPROVED BY:

wk

~

V 3.2.5.4 HVAC Included in the scope of this portion of the ICV review of the Control Room HVAC system cre selected ducts and supports which channel air to, from, and within the control room under normal and accident conditions.

3.2.5.4.1 HVAC Ducts and Supports - Topic IV.2-3c This activity will include a review of major fabrication and installation documentation and a physical configuration verification of a selected portion of the ducts and supports of the CR-HVAC System. The scope of activities to be O vmdertewen as nort ef t81s revie > cre es described and defined in Sectien 3.2.3.4.2 for the AFW system. The scope of review activities enumerated in the aforementioned section will be supplemented with a review of storage and maintenance documentation and documentation utilized to record and control the installation of selected ducts and supports. These supplemental reviews will be performed to verify that requirements related to storage, including both in-storage and in-place maintenance have been, and are being, met and that design and procedural requirements controlling the installation and erection of the ducts and supports were correctly implemented and utilized.

3.2.5.5 Structural Components The focus of ICV review activities will be upon those portions of the control room structure which form the control room pressure boundary including penetrations and doors. Also included in the scope of this portion of the review are selected concrete structural elements and structural steel components of the structures which form the control room pressure boundary.

(o a

)

DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION

- PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan

. Midland independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE 125 of 144 ED W:}j7p 4 - MN 3.2.5.5.1 Concrete Components - Topic V.2-3c l

l The scope of activities described and defined in Section 3.2.3.5.2 will be performed for a selected portion of the concrete components which comprise the control room pressure boundcry.

3.2.5.5.2 Structura! Steel Components - Topic V.3-3c The scope of cctivities described and defined in Section 3.2.3.5.3 will be performed for a selected portion of the structural steel components, including penetrations and doors, which comprise the control room pressure boundary.

(

v 3.2.5.6 NDE/ Material Testing Program - Topic VI.1-3c The methodology and scope of activities to be undertaken in executing the methodology for the NDE/ Material Testing Program is as described and defined in Section 3.2.3.6. The methodology and activities will be applied to selected I components, structures, and duct work within the sample selection boundaries of the CR-HVAC system. Similarly, the NDE/ Materials Testing Program for the 1

CR-HVAC system will be documented in a Project Instruction which will be issued prior to initiation of the program.

3.2.6 DEVELOPMENT OF ICV PROGRAM CHECKLISTS l

l Generic checklists exist for each of the review scope categories discussed in section 3.2.I, utilizing guidance contained in applicable ANSI documents, the construction review program guidelines published by INPO and other industry

)

DC-82-13 l

PROJECT INSTRUCTION pg 3201., 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan h REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Midland Independent Design and Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY: 4.

APPROVED BV-of 145 1frML ~

PAG.c 126 ShF standards. Similarly to the IDV, these checklists have been developed to assist in documenting engineering evaluations, and providing uniformity of review from topic to topic and between reviewers. For each of the construction review scope creas within the scope shown in Figures i.2-3,1.2-5 and 1.2-7, the reviewer may utilize the generic checklists or develop a specific checklist ,inccrporating portions of the generic checklists as appropriate. In most cases, the specific checklist will be derived from the generic checklist by the addition of specific requirements applicable to the construction crea being reviewed. In some cases, it may be appropriate to use only a portion of the generic checklist or to develop a unique checklist. The specific instructions for the use of construction verification checklists are contained in Project Instruction, PI-3201-007, Use of Im) Construction Verification Checklists.

In each case that a generic checklist has been modified, the checklist prepcred by the reviewer will be checked by the Lead Technical Reviewer for the area.

(Note that if the LTR prepares a checklist, it is permissible for him to both originate and check the contents of the checklist). During their review process, the LTRs examine the checklist for interfaces with other ICV areas and perform l a general review of the completeness and adequacy of the proposed checklist.

, The LTR's review is to be coordinated with the Project Manager as necessary to l

l resolve questions which cut across discipline lines. In the event that the Project l Manager or the LTR has comments on the checklist, the checklist preparer and j those having comments will discuss the comments and reach an appropriate resolution. After reaching concurrence in the adequacy of the checklist, the LTR will indicate his approval and the checklist will be available for use by the reviewer.

l

(^')

s _

DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION

- PI 3201 . 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan

. Midland independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Prog am PAGE 127 of 145 PREPARED BY:

g APPROVED The reviewer, having on approved checklist, can then proceed with the review process for this specified area, in accordance with Project Instruction PI-3201-001, Engineering Evaluation Preparation and Control. In performing the evaluation, the reviewer will document the information which he used in order to complete the checklist. Such information will ir<clude component identification, the date or revision number of the associated documents, the document number, and an indication of the source of the information (i.e., where data and any associated documents were obtained).

3.2.6.1 Development of Checklists for Review of Supplier Documentation n

The generic checklist for review of supplier documentation was developed considering questions such as:

e What is the identity of the supplier documentation being reviewed (including P.O. number, supplier name, component I name and identification number)?

e Has the documentation been reviewed and accepted by the appropriate organization?

e is the documentation complete?

l Does the documentation comply with purchase specification e

l requirements?

e Where appropriate, does seismic and environmental qualifico-l tion documentation comply with purchase specification require-ments?

e Have the necessary shipping, handling, storage, installation, and maintenance requirements been specified by the supplier and are these consistent with purchase specification requirements?

L)

DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION

- PI 3201.,009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan

. Midland Independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Progrcm PAGE 128 of 145 PREPARED BY: g APPROVE Y:

For each type of system, component or structural element the lead technical reviewer will supplement the generic checklist with appropriate additional l quertions, as applicable.

3.2.6.2 Development of Checklists for Review of Storage and Maintenance Documentation The generic checklist for review of storage and maintenance documentation was developed considering questions suc'n as:

e What is the identity of the storage and maintenance documen-

,, tation being reviewed, including document type (receipt

(") inspection, in-storage /in-place maintenance records, etc.) and document identification (document title, revision, date)?

e What is the identity of the component being reviewed (name, identification number)?

e Does the documentation for the receiving process include component review against purchase specification requirements?

l e Are nonconforming items properly identified, processed and closed out?

l e Does the maintenance program meet the necessary require-ments specified for the component relative to humidity, cleanliness, lubrication, shaft rotation, energization, etc., as applicable?

For each type of system, component or structural element the lead technical reviewer will supplement the generic checklist with appropriate additional questions, as applicable.

(h U

DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland Independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE 129 of 145 PREPARED BY:

lQ, APPROVED B 3.2.6.3 Development of Checklists for Review of Construction and Installation Documentation The generic checklist for review of construction and installation documentation was deve'oped considering questions such as:

e What is the identity of the construction / installation documenta-tion being reviewed, including type (concrete, welding, bolting, NDE, etc.) orid identification (title, revision, date)?

e What is the identity of the system, component or element and its physical location in the plant?

e Are all appropriate construction / installation procedures and (g j instruction 3 identified?

e Are the current revisions of drawings, specifications and other requirements utilized in the work including those specified in Field Change Requests?

e Does the documentation include verification that the work has been performed by properly qualified personnel?

e For those activities observed, do the construction / installation activities conform to requirements?

l e Have the necessary inspections been performed?

e Has the work been performed utilizing the proper tools / equip-ment? Have such tools / equipment been properly calibrated in accordance with procedures?

e Have rework cetivities including Field Change Requests been l performed in accordance with requirements and appropriately closed-out?

l e Have deviations from design / supplier requirements been l properly documented, processed and closed out?

l 0 v.;

DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland Independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE 110 of 145 PREPARED BY: g APPROVED B For each type of system, component or structural element the lead technical i reviewer will supplement the generic checklist with appropriate additional 1

l questions, as applicable.

3.2.6.4 Development of Checklists for Review of Selected Verification Activities The generic checklist for review of selected verification activities was developed considering questions such as:

1 l e What is the identity of the verificasion activity being reviewed l / 's (cable separation verification, pipe support reinspection, bolting U study, pre-service test, including type, etc.)?

e What is the identity of the system, component or element (s) included in the verification activity under review?

e What is the identity of the verification activity documentation being reviewed (program plan, procedures, instructions, etc.)?

l e What is the quality-related objective of the verification activity and does the activity as specified/ documented meet the objective?

e 'Nhere verification activities are observed, do the activities comply with requirements and are they properly documented?

e Are nonconformances properly identified, processed and closed out?

l For each type of system, component or structural element the lead technical reviewer will supplement the generic checklist with appropriate additional questions, as applicable.

l v

DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION  :

- PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plor

- Midland independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE 131 of 145 PREPARED BY:

.jg APPROVED BY V

l 3.2.6.5 Development of Checklists for Review of Verification of Physical Configuration The generic checklist for review of verification of physical configuration was developed considering questions such as:

e What is the identity of the system, component or structural element being reviewed (name, identification number, location in plant, reference design documents)?

e Has the system, component cr element been properly tagged / marked for identification in accordance with requirements?

(]'

e On the basis of visual inspection, has the component been properly constructed / installed and has it been maintained and protected during the construction process in accordance with requirements?

e Does the configuration :omply with design requirements, including physical dimensions, location, orientation, name plate data, grounding, use of proper materials, insulation, routing, etc., as applicable?

e Have deviations from design requirements been properly identified, processed and closed out?

l For each type of system, component or structural element the lead technical I reviewer will supplement the generic checklist with appropriate additional questions, as applicable.

q v

DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION

- PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan

. Midland Independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY:

PAGE 132 'of 145 bSl1- -

% 1,j _

a 3.2.7 PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL SAMPLING, VERIFICATION, AND TESTING The initici sampling and verification within the scope of the ICV is primarily based upon an evaluation of project generated documentation and data to verify the quality of both inaccessible (e.g. rebar placement) ced accessible systems, components and structures. The only exception to this is the incorporation of the NDE/ Materials Testing Program (reference sections 3.2.3.6 and 3.2.5.6) into the ICV scope. Under this program, data are collected by TERA as c confirmatory check. The quality of accessible items will be further verified by visual inspection or measurement as appropriate.

m

() Additional sampling or verification within the scope of the ICV systems or outside the scope into other systems will be conducted if discrepancies are found. As indicated in section 3.1.7, additional sampling or verification within the scope of the system sample selection boundaries identified in sections 3.l.3, 3.1.4 and 3.l.5 of this Plan will be undertaken by TERA, approved internally and documented in the Monthly Status Report. Additional sampling outside this scope is considered a substantive issue and will be discussed between TERA, CPC and NRC prior to initiation. Thn level of additional sampling or verification will be based upon the nature of the discrepency. In all cases when discrepancies are l found, on introspective evaluation will follow to identify the extent and root cause. The root cause may either be random or systematic (generic). The additional review will attempt to verify whether the discrepancy is restricted to the specific system, component, or structure under review; restricted to work by a specific construction organization; or if the discrepancy cuts across many interfaces and applies to similarly constructed systems, components, and l structures.

('

DC-82-13

l l

l PROJECT INSTRUCTION l

. PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineer *ng Program Plan

' Midland independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE 133 cf 145 PREPARED BY:

[ t ;),H ~

, i APPROVED BY:

m, L ; ,

At first, the additional sampling and verification will be directed at an evaluation of additional dccumentation; however, if this documentation is incumplete or insufficient to identify the extent and root cause of discrepancies, further inspection or testing will be considered, as appropriate. If required to supplement internal resources, TERA may consider subcontracting a portion of any required inspection or testing services (e.g. non-destructive examination, materials testing, etc.) to o qualified organization that meets the independence requirements of Section 1.4 of this Plan.

[')

v l

l (aD DC-82-I 3

PROJECT INSTRUCTION pg_ 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan bs Midland independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program M APPROVED BY:

m&L PAGE 134 of 145 PREPARED BY:114 / ( ~'

4.0 DOCUMENTATION q Auditable records must be maintained to document substantive elements of the IDCV review and evaluation process, to document technical conclusions including the status of disposition of items associated with the review process leading to Findings, to document the revision of records, and to establish quality assurance measures necesscry to provide adequate confidence and assarance of the quality of services. The following sections establish dccumentation requirements for engineering evaluations, calculations, field verification, and external communications. Section 5.0 of this Plan estchlishes the requirements for reporting documentation. Section 6.0 of this Plan establishes the QA O aecementetioe resvirements-4.1 DOCUMENTATION OF ENGINEERING EVALUATIONS, CALCULATIONS, l AND FIELD VERIFICATION RESULTS I

Engineering evaluations, calculations, and field verification results provide the bases for all substantive conclusions reached in the IDCV. These items provide the " trail" of information which supports IDCV conclusions, both positive and negative, as the case may be. While the reporting mechanism established in Section S.0 of this f 5lan addresses the documentation of reporting requirements which are generally applicable to negative conclusions, it is equally vital that positive conclusions are documented in an auditable form as well.

i The requirements for preparation and control of engineering evaluation docu-mentation required for the Midland IDCV are contained in Project instruction O

v DC-82-13

~

1 I

(

l PROJECT INSTRUCTION l l p;_ 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland Independent Design and

_l REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program IPAGE i35 of a5 PREPARED BY: p y, ie g i APPROVED BY:

g gg U

PI-3201 -001, Engineering Evaluation Preparation and Control. Engineering evaluations are required for tasks such as design criteria evoluotion, commit-ment compliance evaluation, design evaluation. construction records evaluation, and field verification.

The requirements for preperction and control of calculation documentation, including computer analyses documentation, required for the Midland IDCV are contained in Engineering Control Procedure ECP-5.2, Calculation Preparation and Control. Cc!culations are prepared as required to verify designs, design parameters, design criteria, performance parameters, evaluate data, and other-wise provide quantitative information in accordance with accepted analytical and mathematical methods. Calculations are intended to assist IDCV reviewers in reaching necessary conclusions relative to the quality of the Midland plant design.

4.2 DOCUMENTATION AND PROTOCOL FOR EXTERNAL COMMUNICATIONS l

The requirements for the preparation and control of documentation for external l

communications including the protocol for communications are contained in Project Instruction PI-3201-010, External Communicaticris, Protocol and the

' Preparation of Contact Log Sheets. Under prescribed circumstances, oral communications and meetings that include discussiens with parties external to l the IDCV review organization must be documented to provide on auditable l record of information which may have on impact on IDCV conclusions and the i preservation of an independent process in reaching these conclusions.

Accordingly, all oral communications, meetings and exchanges of written G

l i

l DC-82-13 1

l

I PROJECT INSTRUCTION pg_3201. 009 Engineering Program Plan O

SUBJECT:

Midland independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE 136 of 145 PREPARED BY:

.[ g. g APPROVED BY:

M L), l r

documents with parties external to the IDCV review organization that include discussion of any subjects material to the scope of the Midland IDCV Program, Status reporting, Findings and Findings resolution, including recommendations, evaluations, correspondence, interim and final reporting are documented and controlled consistent with the provisions of PI-3201-010.

The protocol governing communications between CPC and TERA is in accordance with the provisions documented in a letter from James G. Keppler, Administrator, NRC Region til to James W. Cook, Vice President, CPC, dated March 28,1983.

i O s.o eROca4M aeeORTisc 5.1 TYPES OF REPORTS The following types of reports will be prepared in the IDCW e Open, Confirmed, and Resolved (OCR) Item Reports l e Observations 1

e Finding Reports l e Finding Resolution Reports e Draft and Final Reports e Interim Technical Reports e Monthly Status Reports OCR reports document the disposition of the IDCV review process leading to l

either Findings or the resolution of items which have surfaced during the review, but have been resolved after considering additional information. Observations O

v DC-82-13 1

PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan O Midland Independent Design and REW 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program APPROViD BY:

PREPARED BY: pt J'M' - mh PAGE 137 of 145 are deficiencies that are not sufficiently serious to warrant classification as OCRs or Findings, /et cannot be Jismissed directly as Resolved items, but should be reviewed and cc.rected by CPC during the completion of the Midland project.

Finding Reports document verified deviations in the implementation of design criteria, design, or construction commitments and design or construction proce-dures in areas such as: quality assurance, design or construction control, analysis, design, engineering evaluation, specification, design or construction implementation or field installation. Findings rnay fall into two cctegories:

those affecting the ability of systems, components, or structures to meet their l

intended safety function and those without an impact on safety functions.

(' _)$

Finding Resolution Reports document the conclusions of the review process which has been undertaken to resolve Findings and completely close out any concern about the Findings. Finding resolution may require additional analysis, design, or construction changes or procedural changes. Full resolution requires the identification of root cause and extent and a plan for corrective action if required.

The !DCV Final Report documents all substantive conclusions reached in the

! IDCV, including the process leading to these conclusions. Both positive and negative conclusions will be identified to provide a balanced perspective and to l document a complete record. While the overall IDCV objective is to verify the j quality of the Midland project design and construction efforts identifying any deficiencies, it is necessary to have a record which documents items that have been dismissed (i.e., positive conclusions) because the bases for these conclusions are equally important.

O v

I DC-82-13 i

PROJECT INSTRUCTION

^

PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland Independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY:

PAGE 138 of 145

~

J ,Jpl ,- t1_ g(g -

Interim Technical Reporis may be written from time to time, as appropriate to document details of review and conclusions reached on specific technical issues (e.g. seismic design) or potentially to document the conclusion of the review for any of the three systems within the IDCV scope. Monthly Status Reports provide outside parties up-to-dat e information relative to progrcm progress and important issues identified during the reporting period. The following iteras are included:

e Tracking System Summary for OCRs, Finding Reports and Finding Resolution Reports e Current Confirmed item Reperts O

v e IDCV Program Status Summary e Financial Report (CPC only)

S.2 REPORTING PROCESS S.2.1 REPORTING SYSTEM l

The system for IDCV reporting is shown graphically in Figure S.2-1. This figure provides a diagram or flow chart of the report generation process and a summary of the sequence.

Upon initial technical review, Potential Open items may be identified by on IDCV reviewer. This determination will be based upon his judgment that a potential deviatien exists in implementation of design criteria, design or construction commitments, and design or construction procedures, thus requiring additional investigation or confirmatory analysis by the IDCV review team.

O DC-82-13 l

TECPNICAL 4 REVIEW BY REVIEW TEAM 1 r O

d 1 P fT ' CLAS CAION POTENTIAL BY LTR'5.

[ PM OPENITEM v 1 r 1 r FINDING REVIEW & REPORT RESOLVED CLASSIFICATlON BY LTR'5. v PM 1r 1r

- DISPOSITION OPEN ITEM 1 r 1 r 1 r 1 r rVRTHER REVIEW ACTION PLAN BY REVIEW TEAM MmY PREP ARATION BY STATUS NRC REPORT ** CPCO/ORICNAL ORC TION REVIEW & 1 r RESOLVED l

ITEM CLASSIFICATION BY LTR'5, l

FOR RESOLUTION 1 P v 1 P CorFinMED ITEM l REVIEW &

RESCLVED l

FIPOING CLASSIFICATION v BY LTR'5, 1 r [ PM MONTH,Y STATUS DISPOSITION REPORT" BY PIC *

• 5 'S FitOING REPORT" v v PREPARATION qp OF RESPONSE BY CPC/ORlCNAL DESIGN ' FNAL REVIEW ORGANIZATION "

BY PIC,5RT 1 r RESPONSE INTERIM TECPNICAL V

r REPORT OR FINAL REPORT **

1 r A

l KEY: PM . PROECT MANACER LTR . LEAD TECPNICAL REVIEWER PIC . PRINCIPAL-MMARCE i O v

NOTES

• Plc TO DETERkNE F SRT REVIEW AFD CONCt.RRENCE 15 REQURED

• • DISTRIBUTED TO DCV SERVICE UST SRT . SENIOR REVIEW TEAM CPC . CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY FIGURE 5.2-1 l

REPORT FLOW CHART MIDLAND INDEPENDENT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM

PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland Independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY: - '

APPROVED BY:

PAGE 140 of 145 l]j[-j.,.,

gg Upon documenting his determination, the IDCV reviewer forwards a preliminary OCR Report er Potential Open item Report to his Lead Technical Reviewer (LTR) who reviews it with the project team (Project Manager and all LTRs). If the project team concurs with the reviewer's determination, the Potential Open item becomes an Open item which is formally controlled. The project team may resolve the Potential Open item, thus requiring reclassification of the item as a Resolved item and modification of the OCR Report reflecting this change. Both the Resolved item Report and superceded Potential Open item Report are then formally controlled. Alternatively, the LTR or project team may judge the identified deficiency as not being sufficiently serious to warrant classification as an OCR, yet it must be documented and corrected by CPC during the completion

( ,/ of the Midland Project. Accordingly, the item will be classified as an Observation and processed in accordance Project Instruction PI-3201-005, Documentation of Observations.

Open items will be reviewed further by the review team until such a point that available information has been depleted. At this time, the IDCV reviewer wil!

prepare a Resolved item Report or a Confirmed item Report which documents his determination af ter further review. A Confirmed item is judged to be on apparent finding by the review team and requires further action to provide

! documentation that may not have been available to the IDCV review team. His recommendation is forwarded to his LTR who reviews the classification and makes a recommendation to the project team. The project team may agree with the LTR's recommendation at which point the Resolved item Report or Con-firmed item Report becomes final. Alternatively, the project team may review the classification and require further work by the IDCV reviewers. All final OCP, Reports are forwarded to the Principal-in-Charge (PIC) for his l

o k

\)

DC-82-13 l

1 l

PROJECT INSTRUCTION pI_ 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan G REV.:

Midland independent Design and 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE 141 of 145 PREPARED BY:

g APPROVED BY concurrence, disposition, and determination whether a formal review is required by the Senior Review Team (SRT). In all cases, the SRT receives a copy of the OCR Report irrespective of whether they are requested to undertake a formal review and at the descretion of the Chairmen of the SRT, the SRT may independently undertake a review.

The PIC may agree with the project team's classification and recommend that the Project Manager forward Confirmed item Reports to CPC, NRC and other outside parties on the IDCV program service list as part of the monthly status report, with copies to the appropriate design or construction organizations; or he may request a review by the SRT to assist him in making his determination.

O V Alternatively, or in parallel, he may request that the project team or review team conduct further review.

Additional information will be solicited from CPC/ original design or construction organization at which point the LTRs and IDCV reviewers will then review any information received and make a determination whether the Confirmed item becomes a Resolved item or a Finding. The LTRs will make the recommendation to the project team who will review the clasification. The project team may agree with the LTP.'s recommendation, at which point the Resolved item Report or Finding Report becomes final. Alternatively, the project team may review the classification and require further work by the IDCV reviewers. Upon completion of this process, the OCR Report or Finding Report is forwarded to the PIC by the Project Manager for a similar review process as has been previously described. After his review and any required review by the SRT, the PIC will direct the Project Manager to forward Finding Reports to CPC, NRC and outside parties on the IDCV program service list as part of the Monthly p Status Report. l V

l l

DC-82-13 l

PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland Independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY: p g APPROVED BY PAGE 142 of 145 CPC/ original design or construction organization will respond with an action plan for resolution of the issues identified. The project team will review the response cnd determine whether the issue has been resolved. If so, a Finding Resolution Report will be issued by the project team for review by the PIC in a similar fashion as has been previously described. Alternatively, the Finding may not be resolved, at which point it will remain open and be documented .in the Final Report. It must be noted that this eventuality is not anticipated since closure must be sought by the involved organizations. Finding Resolution Reports will also be forwarded as part of the Monthly Status Reports. The Final Report will document all IDCV conclusions as discussed previously.

5.2.2 REPORT PREPARATION AND DISTRIBUTION

(]

The preparation and control of OCR Reports, Finding Reports, and Finding Resolution Reports is addressed in Project instruction Pi-3201-008, Preparation and Control of Open, Confirmed, and Resolved item Reports, Finding Reports, and Finding Resolution Reports. Section 3.0 of PI-3201-008 provides instructions i

for report preparation, Section 4.0 identifies the review and approval chain and l Section 6.0 addresses the distribution of these reports.

l The Final Report will include documentation of all conclusions, including refer-ences to applicable documents that support these conclusions. A draft Final Report will be transmitted to CPC and NRC for their review. Resolution of l their comments will be documented in an auditable manner. A copy of the draft 1

Final Report will be sent to outside parties on the IDCV service list. It should be noted that CPC and NRC comments are intended to be of a clarification nature or to correct misinformation. Upon TERA resolution of the comments, the Final l

[ \

!G DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION Pl 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE 143 of 145 PREPARED BY: p, APPROVED BY:

Report will be issued and distributed to CPC, NRC, and outside parties on the IDCV service list.

S.2.3 INTERCHANGE OF INFORMATION The requirements of Section 4.2 are not intended to prohibit the informal interchange of information between IDCV personnel and external parties. These communications are essential to the IDCV review process. However, the items in Section 4.2 require documentation for the reasons cited. Furthermore, to preserve the independence of the IDCV review process, it is important that IDCV personnel maintain discretion in the dissemination of information bearing on n

() findings to outside parties until such a time that this information is final. This l procedure will prevent confusion and foster credibility to the IDCV review process.

5.3 IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION OF DESIGN / CONSTRUCTION PROBLEMS It is the duty of each IDCV team member to identify any deficiency known to him that may be significant to the public health and safety. He shall be permitted to conduct all reasonable evaluations necessary to make o determination of the significance of suspected items. IDCV personnel are l

responsible for presenting their conclusions in a manner that other technically qualified personnel may understand and independently verify. Furthermore, it is the responsibility of IDCV personnel to assess the significance of their conclusions and attempt to understand the extent and root cause of findings.

Any deviation from the above should be brought to the attention of the Project Manager.

l DC-82-I 3

PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan O REV.:

Midland Independent Design and 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program 145 PREFARED BY:]g APPROVED PAGE I44 of i

6.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE l

t 6.1 APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS The Midland IDCV shall be performed in accordance with applicable quality assurance requirements of the NRC's regulation 10 CFR 50, Appendix B.

Furthermore, the IDCV will comply with:

e NRC Regulatory Guide 1.28 (6/7/72) including Sections I, 2,3,5,7,17, and 18 of ANSI N45.2-1971 e NRC Regulatory Guide 1.64 (Revision I, 2/75) including Sections I,2, and 6 of ANSI N45.2.ll-1974 ^

l

-Q l

These requirements are implemented by the TERA Corporate Quality Assurance Plan (QAP), Revision 3 (January 1,1980) and the Midland IDCV Project Quality Assurance Plan (PGAP), Revision 0 (November I I,1982).

i o.2 VERIFICATION OF COMPUTER CODES l All computer codes utilized by IDCV analysts shall be verified as follows:

e Program Verification - The quality of the code should be determined from a comparison of the code generated solutions with known solutions of selected problems.

e Facility Verification - Given that the generic quality of l the code has been determined, the capability to reproduce known results utilizing hardware and software available to TERA must be determined.

l i O DC-82-13 l

s s-PROJECT INSTRUCTION

'g PI 3201. 009 _- ~

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan

'T -

Midland Independent Design and REV.: 2 DATE: 5/18/83 Construction Verification Program APPROVED BY:

PAGE J.AL._ of 145' PRI: PARED BY: }{M'/i

. e Mb

./ ,

t

^ '

Program verification may be completed by external parties; however, facility

~ # */ .

, verification is the responsibility of TERA chd must be so demonstrated.

6.3 AUDITS -

Quality assurance audits of project' operations are conducted in accordance with ECP-[.6, " Quality Assurance Audits". For the Midland IDCV program, audits will be performed at lecst every 90 days of active project work.

~,

s -

~

l (3 .

l I'

l l

DC-82-13

4 A - _ O a-2 _ - - -.,&,a% 4a-4-5 J .$_- s2-s 44 A - A-  % vn*-. m.- e-A-- & n G l 1

'l I

r l

l f

h

, 6

(

f t

I f

k 8

I l

1 I

I r

E l

h 4 6

-~ y..

ii g

-f

\-s  ;- ,

l- /

i

/ tl ,

4 l

A -

w.

9 '"~ ^*

• A. ,"~s m' m .m' -

i, h, y a . 't 't,,< g, a

= - _ - _ -- __._ _-. __ - -- _ .-.-.  %--- _v.-..-_,m_---,-.-%_.. -mm,.,_m,--y__,,,,,,,,,...-r- ,,,--.wm .,-w..e y rww--=---==-T-=-7-r-rer