ML20195J672: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:.t    i
        .s 4
h ENCLOSURE 1 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Tennessee Valley Authority                                                                                                                                                                                    Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50-328 Sequoyah Units 1 and 2                                                                                                                                                                                        License Nos. DPR-77 and DPR-79 During the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection conducted from April 3, 1988 to May 4, 1988, an apparent violation of NRC requirements was identified.                  In accordance with'the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR 2, Appendix C (1988), the violation is listed below:
Technical Specification (TS) 6.8.1 requires that procedures recommended in Appendix "A" of Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2, February 1978, be established, implemented, and maintained, including administrative prociiures. The requirements of TS 6.8.1 are implemented in part by Administrative Instruction AI-37, Independent Verification, Administrative Instruction AI-58, Maintaining Cognizance of Operational Status,- Configuration Status Control, and General Operating Instruction GOI-6, Apparatus Operation.
Contrary to the above, the licensee failed to implement procedural requirements in the following instances:
: 1)    The licensee failed to implement the requirements in AI-58 for maintaining configuration control af ter SOI checklist completion, in that on April 30, 1988, valve 2-62-392A was determined to be out of its normal system alignment position and was not configured in the configuration log as required.
: 2)    The licensee failed to implement the requirements in AI-58 for maintaining configuration control after SOI checklist completion, in that on May 1, 1988, valves 2-87-543 and 2-87-542 were determined to be out of their normal system alignment and were not configured in the configuration log as required.
: 3)    The licensee failed to implement the requirements of GOI-6, AI-37, and AI-58 for proper performance of SOI checklists, in                                                                                                                                                                    !
that on the May 1, 1988 performance of SOI checklist 72.1, two l
i 8806290189 880617 PDR  ADOCK 05000327 Q                                                                    DCD
 
                                                                                  ]
individuals signed that valve 2-72-504 was in the locked closed position, when in fact the valve was not locked.
: 4)  A licensee OA audit conducted on May 4, 1988, found that the CST B supply to the AFW, Valve 0-2-505, was shut rather than locked open as required by the SOI checklist and indicated in the system status log.
: 5)  The licensee failed to implement the requirement of AI-58 to hold open, rather than deviate SOI checklists for items which affect operability, procedure intent, or mode change, in that the April 25 performance of SOI checklist 68.lA had been signed off as complete when, in fact, items had been deviated which affected the operability of mode 4 equipment.
This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement I)
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Tennessee Valley Authority is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555, with a copy to the Director, Office of Special Projects, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector, Sequoyah, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice. This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation: (1) admission or denial of the violation, (2) the reason for the violation if admitted, (3) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved, (4) the corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further          i violations, and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieved.      Where  j good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response      <
time.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
                                                            ,                      l Frank R. Mcc Sequoyah Startup Manager                  l Office of Special Projects                '
Dated at, Atlanta, Georgia this /7 4 day of June, 1988 l
d}}

Latest revision as of 14:28, 13 November 2020

Notice of Violation from Insp on 880403-0504.Violation Noted:Licensee Failed to Implement Procedural Requirements for Maintaining Configuration Controls After Sys Operating Instruction Checklist Completion
ML20195J672
Person / Time
Site: Sequoyah  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 06/17/1988
From: Mccoy F
NRC OFFICE OF SPECIAL PROJECTS
To:
Shared Package
ML20195J655 List:
References
50-327-88-26, 50-328-88-26, NUDOCS 8806290189
Download: ML20195J672 (2)


Text

.t i

.s 4

h ENCLOSURE 1 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Tennessee Valley Authority Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50-328 Sequoyah Units 1 and 2 License Nos. DPR-77 and DPR-79 During the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection conducted from April 3, 1988 to May 4, 1988, an apparent violation of NRC requirements was identified. In accordance with'the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR 2, Appendix C (1988), the violation is listed below:

Technical Specification (TS) 6.8.1 requires that procedures recommended in Appendix "A" of Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2, February 1978, be established, implemented, and maintained, including administrative prociiures. The requirements of TS 6.8.1 are implemented in part by Administrative Instruction AI-37, Independent Verification, Administrative Instruction AI-58, Maintaining Cognizance of Operational Status,- Configuration Status Control, and General Operating Instruction GOI-6, Apparatus Operation.

Contrary to the above, the licensee failed to implement procedural requirements in the following instances:

1) The licensee failed to implement the requirements in AI-58 for maintaining configuration control af ter SOI checklist completion, in that on April 30, 1988, valve 2-62-392A was determined to be out of its normal system alignment position and was not configured in the configuration log as required.
2) The licensee failed to implement the requirements in AI-58 for maintaining configuration control after SOI checklist completion, in that on May 1, 1988, valves 2-87-543 and 2-87-542 were determined to be out of their normal system alignment and were not configured in the configuration log as required.
3) The licensee failed to implement the requirements of GOI-6, AI-37, and AI-58 for proper performance of SOI checklists, in  !

that on the May 1, 1988 performance of SOI checklist 72.1, two l

i 8806290189 880617 PDR ADOCK 05000327 Q DCD

]

individuals signed that valve 2-72-504 was in the locked closed position, when in fact the valve was not locked.

4) A licensee OA audit conducted on May 4, 1988, found that the CST B supply to the AFW, Valve 0-2-505, was shut rather than locked open as required by the SOI checklist and indicated in the system status log.
5) The licensee failed to implement the requirement of AI-58 to hold open, rather than deviate SOI checklists for items which affect operability, procedure intent, or mode change, in that the April 25 performance of SOI checklist 68.lA had been signed off as complete when, in fact, items had been deviated which affected the operability of mode 4 equipment.

This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement I)

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Tennessee Valley Authority is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555, with a copy to the Director, Office of Special Projects, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector, Sequoyah, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice. This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation: (1) admission or denial of the violation, (2) the reason for the violation if admitted, (3) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved, (4) the corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further i violations, and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Where j good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response <

time.

FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

, l Frank R. Mcc Sequoyah Startup Manager l Office of Special Projects '

Dated at, Atlanta, Georgia this /7 4 day of June, 1988 l

d