ML19325D468: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 71: Line 71:
Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station o s ololo 2l9l 3      8;9  --
Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station o s ololo 2l9l 3      8;9  --
0l2l9          0l0 oja or o l7 l
0l2l9          0l0 oja or o l7 l
;
EVENT DESCRIPTION                                                                                          ,
EVENT DESCRIPTION                                                                                          ,
l On 9/14/89, a locked high radiation area (LHRA) access door was found to have been unsecured from about 1120 houis to '235 hours. The door latching mechanism was locked, but the latch did not extend into the doorjamb. The unsecured door provides one of three access points to the Condenser Bay (see i                figure I, Pg. 7). While unsecured, the door was accessed by twn individuals i              who had not been authorized entry. The dose received was below allowable
l On 9/14/89, a locked high radiation area (LHRA) access door was found to have been unsecured from about 1120 houis to '235 hours. The door latching mechanism was locked, but the latch did not extend into the doorjamb. The unsecured door provides one of three access points to the Condenser Bay (see i                figure I, Pg. 7). While unsecured, the door was accessed by twn individuals i              who had not been authorized entry. The dose received was below allowable
Line 77: Line 76:
The event was contrary to Technical Specification (T.S.) 6.13.2 which requires                              l that locked doors be provided for an area with a radiation dose rate greater                              '
The event was contrary to Technical Specification (T.S.) 6.13.2 which requires                              l that locked doors be provided for an area with a radiation dose rate greater                              '
than 1000 milli-rem / hour. Additionally, the two individuals who entered the unsecured docr were not equipped with a radiation dose rate indicating device
than 1000 milli-rem / hour. Additionally, the two individuals who entered the unsecured docr were not equipped with a radiation dose rate indicating device
:              or a dose integrating device with preset alarms, nor were they accocpanied by an individual qualified in radiation protection procedures equipped with a
:              or a dose integrating device with preset alarms, nor were they accocpanied by an individual qualified in radiation protection procedures equipped with a radiation dose rate monitoring device, as required by T.S. 6.13.2 for entry to                            4 a LHRA.
;
radiation dose rate monitoring device, as required by T.S. 6.13.2 for entry to                            4 a LHRA.
REPORTABILITY 3
REPORTABILITY 3
An unsecured LHRA door and unauthorized access to a LHRA are conditions prohibited by the T.S. and are reportable per 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1)(B).
An unsecured LHRA door and unauthorized access to a LHRA are conditions prohibited by the T.S. and are reportable per 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1)(B).
Line 128: Line 125:
0l 0    0l4  0F    0l7
0l 0    0l4  0F    0l7
                           .    ,,,.4        w -.am o      Pocket docimeter readings for September 14, 1989, were reviewed to verify other personnel had not received unauthorized radiation exposures in the CB. The review determined no additional unauthorized exposures had occurred as a result of the event.
                           .    ,,,.4        w -.am o      Pocket docimeter readings for September 14, 1989, were reviewed to verify other personnel had not received unauthorized radiation exposures in the CB. The review determined no additional unauthorized exposures had occurred as a result of the event.
CAUSE
CAUSE Unauthorized P.ccess was caused by a failure to adhere to approved procedures.
;                                                                                                                                            ,
Unauthorized P.ccess was caused by a failure to adhere to approved procedures.
Procedure 6.1-012 " Access Control to High Padiation Areas'-requires the RPT who has responsibility for tha issued LHRA key to assure all accessible doors are secure (locked and latched) upon exiting a LHRA. Investigations revealed                                              l RPT #1 did not properly verify door 'B' to be secure when exiting the CB at 1130 hours. Additionally, on three seoarate occasions (including the exit at 1130 hours) on September 14, 1989, RPT #1 only checked the doors that were accessed as opposed to all accessible doors (door 'C' was not checked). The I&C personnel who exited door 'B' without checking that the door was secured, also failed to meet the requirements of Procedure 6.1-012.
Procedure 6.1-012 " Access Control to High Padiation Areas'-requires the RPT who has responsibility for tha issued LHRA key to assure all accessible doors are secure (locked and latched) upon exiting a LHRA. Investigations revealed                                              l RPT #1 did not properly verify door 'B' to be secure when exiting the CB at 1130 hours. Additionally, on three seoarate occasions (including the exit at 1130 hours) on September 14, 1989, RPT #1 only checked the doors that were accessed as opposed to all accessible doors (door 'C' was not checked). The I&C personnel who exited door 'B' without checking that the door was secured, also failed to meet the requirements of Procedure 6.1-012.
s The failure to check all accessible doors upon exiting a LHRA was a human performance problem. The RPT # 1 had been trained and was generally knowledgeable of the requirements. However, on September 14, 1989, he was focused on properly defin'ng and posting the contaminated area while providing                                          !
s The failure to check all accessible doors upon exiting a LHRA was a human performance problem. The RPT # 1 had been trained and was generally knowledgeable of the requirements. However, on September 14, 1989, he was focused on properly defin'ng and posting the contaminated area while providing                                          !
Line 149: Line 144:
c".'            -
c".'            -
LICENSEE EVENT REPOPT (LER) TEXT CONTINUATION                          A*paovio ous no am-eio.
LICENSEE EVENT REPOPT (LER) TEXT CONTINUATION                          A*paovio ous no am-eio.
1
1 LkPIRES. 6/31/m P.'.Ceuf v NAMk til                                          pocnti Nuwsen up LER NUutf R (6)                    PAGE tal vtAn    : Igt      '4    -
                                                                                                                                                  ;
LkPIRES. 6/31/m P.'.Ceuf v NAMk til                                          pocnti Nuwsen up LER NUutf R (6)                    PAGE tal vtAn    : Igt      '4    -
Qi48,g'*
Qi48,g'*
Pilgrim Nuclesr Power 9'stion                            o is lo lo lo p l9 l3 8l9  --
Pilgrim Nuclesr Power 9'stion                            o is lo lo lo p l9 l3 8l9  --
Line 227: Line 220:
                                                                                                                                                                     ~
                                                                                                                                                                     ~
MAIN                                                                                                                                              r CONDENSER                                                                                              -
MAIN                                                                                                                                              r CONDENSER                                                                                              -
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                ;
r i
r i
MAIN
MAIN

Latest revision as of 19:12, 18 February 2020

LER 89-029-00:on 890914,locked High Radiation Area Door Found to Have Been Unsecured Contrary to Tech Spec 6.13.2. Caused by Failure to Adhere to Approved Procedures. Training on Access Requirements initiated.W/891016 Ltr
ML19325D468
Person / Time
Site: Pilgrim
Issue date: 10/16/1989
From: Bird R, Lunn B
BOSTON EDISON CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
BECO-89-152, LER-89-029, LER-89-29, NUDOCS 8910240207
Download: ML19325D468 (8)


Text

e ,

10CFR50.73 O,

- 80570W EDf5CN Pilgrim Nuclear Power station Rocky Hill Road Plymouth, Massachusetts o2360 t

( Ralph G. aird October 16, 1989 .

senior Vice President - Nuclear BECo Ltr. 89- 152 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

! Attn: Document Control Desk l

Hashington, D.C. 20555 Docket No. 50-293 License No. DPR-35 l Dest Sir:

l The enclosed Licensee Event Report (LER) 89-029-00, " Locked High Radiation Area Door to the Condenser Bay Found Unsecured", is submitted in accordance with 10 CFR Part 50.73.

! Please do not hesitate to contact me'if you have any questions regarding this I subject.

l I

. i. hf ,

l l BPL/b1

Enclosure:

LER 89-029-00 l

cc: Mr. Hilliam Russell Regional Administrator, Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Rd.

King of Prussia, PA 19406 Sr. Resident inspector - P 6 grim Station l

Standate BECo LER Distribution 8910240207 891016

.PDR ADOCK 05000293

%2A S PDC iT A '

F*' i l

l RC Perm 3ee U $ NUCLEta E.11ULATOAY COaWISSION

. APPROYED OMB RO. 3150 01o4 ,

  • '**'a'S'*

. LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)  !

F ACetlTY NAME m COC E R T NUMDE R (31 PAGE G Pilcrim Nuclear Power Station 01510 l o l 012 I ()l 9 1 lorl 0 l7 TITLE tal Innked Hirh Radiation Area Door to the Condenser Flay Found Unsecured 9 YE ET DATE (6) LER NUMBE R ISI fiEPORT DATE (7) OTHER F ACILITIES INVOLVED (Si YEAR 'A L m MONTH DAY YEAR

  • ACILl'Y N AMts DOCAE T NUMBERt38 MONTH DAY YEAR 8 '(U ,

~~

N/A oi5IoIo;oi l l

- ~

Ol 9 1l4 0 9 8l9 0l 2lc 0l0.1l0 1l6 8l9 N/A o1 5 1 0 1 0 tog l l THIS REPORT 18 SUDMIT'TED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF to CFR 5- (Cn.ca e.e e, neo,e of ,he reste rmal (111 OPE R ATING M*E m y nem u .oem .o nmmi _

num so.n - m m nmm g _

n .osmmni n mm so.m m m mamm no, oi y _ _

uni.im ..,

_ = ,,,P,gjg o .asmo a.> so n-mtvuO(A) #$A)

_ L eenmmoi _

66.73(eH2HetuHel to 6leH1 Hew) So.73teH2Hal 2o..o61sH1Hvl So.734sH20040 l So.73ssH2Hal LICENBE4 CONT ACT FOR THl3 LER (13)

NAME TELEPHONE NUMSER Brian P. Lunn - Senior Plant Engineer 51018 71417 h 18121411 COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR E ACH COMPONENT FM4URE DESCRIBED IN THl3 REP 3RT H3) 0" CAUSE Sv8 TEM COMPONENT "$[ "fp%,'n"$3' CAUSE sv8 TEM COMPONENT Rf0 NPR k I I I l l 1 1 I I I I I I I I I l i I i l l I l ! I I I SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT E XPECTED 11 1 MONTH DAY Y'AR SV8 Mis 8 TON DATE n6)

YES (ifPes, roep,.m EDfCTfD 3U848/33/04 OATil No Aem AC, ro-,, , a ,,-, , . . ,P a.,, ,,, ,,,, n, ,, , v.,

On September 14, 1989, a locked high radiation area (LHRA) access door was found to have been unsecured from about 1120 hours0.013 days <br />0.311 hours <br />0.00185 weeks <br />4.2616e-4 months <br /> to 1235 hours0.0143 days <br />0.343 hours <br />0.00204 weeks <br />4.699175e-4 months <br />. The door latching mechanism was locked but the latch did not extend into tha doorjamb.

The unsecured door provides one of three access points to the Condenser Bay (CB). While unsecured, the door was accessed by two individuals who had not been authorized entry. The dose received was below allowable limits. Pocket dosimeter readings for the entries were logged at 15 milli-rem and'5 milli-rem.

The event was contrary to the requirements of Technical Specification 6.13.2 which required the door to be locked. Also, entry was made without the required dose rate indicating de'tice or dose integrating device with preset alarm, and the two individuals were not accompanied by an individual qualified in radiation protection procedures.

Initial actions taken verified that only two individuals had gained unauthorized access, and that LHRA doors were secure and LHRA door keys were accounted for.

. actions include specialized training on access requirements to high A ni: eas, and the development of a job aid to assure that accessible J , vor- re properly checked upon exiting the applicable area.

n p r . was at 75% power at the time of the event. The reactor mode selector switch was i'i the RUN position, reactor vessel pressure was 995 psig.

and the reactor coohnt temperature was approximately 540 degrees Fahrenheit.

g,, . n.

I LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) TEXT CONTINUATION Arraovio ous =o. aiso-oio4 i

, exmnsxwas l

F ACILITY HAMS 11) DOCK 41 NUMSth (2) LEh NUMetR ISI Pact (3)

'I"" ht v e 'Ive$

Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station o s ololo 2l9l 3 8;9 --

0l2l9 0l0 oja or o l7 l

EVENT DESCRIPTION ,

l On 9/14/89, a locked high radiation area (LHRA) access door was found to have been unsecured from about 1120 houis to '235 hours0.00272 days <br />0.0653 hours <br />3.885582e-4 weeks <br />8.94175e-5 months <br />. The door latching mechanism was locked, but the latch did not extend into the doorjamb. The unsecured door provides one of three access points to the Condenser Bay (see i figure I, Pg. 7). While unsecured, the door was accessed by twn individuals i who had not been authorized entry. The dose received was below allowable

, limits. Pocket dosimeter readings for the unauthorized entries were logged at 15 milli-rem and 5 milli-rem. The highest whole bc'j dose rate measured in the Condenser Bay was 1600 milli-rem / hour.

The event was contrary to Technical Specification (T.S.) 6.13.2 which requires l that locked doors be provided for an area with a radiation dose rate greater '

than 1000 milli-rem / hour. Additionally, the two individuals who entered the unsecured docr were not equipped with a radiation dose rate indicating device

or a dose integrating device with preset alarms, nor were they accocpanied by an individual qualified in radiation protection procedures equipped with a radiation dose rate monitoring device, as required by T.S. 6.13.2 for entry to 4 a LHRA.

REPORTABILITY 3

An unsecured LHRA door and unauthorized access to a LHRA are conditions prohibited by the T.S. and are reportable per 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1)(B).

l Failure and Malfunction Report No.89-351 was written on 9/14/89 to document j the event. i PLANT CONDITI0tl i The event occurred with reactor power at 751.. The reactor mode selector l

switch was in the RUN position, reactor vessel pressure was 995 psig, and the reactor coolant temperature was approximately 540 degrees Fahrenheit.

CIRCUMSTANCES LEADING To THE EyfRI On September 14,1989, mu'1tiple Condenser Bay (CB) entries occurred for instrument and Control (I&C) work and to define and post a contaminated area.

Access to the CB was being controlled through door 'A' (see Figure I, Pg. 7). )

When the I&C work was completed at approximately 1120 hours0.013 days <br />0.311 hours <br />0.00185 weeks <br />4.2616e-4 months <br />, the I&C Technicians were directed by the Radiological Protection Technician (RPT) #1 l to exit /ia door 'B' to prevent crossing a contaminated area. A contaminated area was created when a floor drain backed up after the I&C Technicians had entered the CB. Upon exiting door 'B', the I&C Technicians failed to check ,

that the door was locked and secured. After the I&C Technicians left, RPT #1 '

checked the door by pulling the door from inside the CB. The door did not open. It wat later determined that although the door latching mechanism was locked, the latch did not extend into the doorjamb.. ,

3

NRC Form 306A U S %UCLEMI F.EEUt&TO2Y CDMM19510N

. LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LEl'.! TEXT CONTINUATION Arriitoveo ous wo iso 4to.

Exeints: eraum f ACittiv hAME IH DOCKti NUMSER (2l ggg gygggg ggg pggg ggy

'IA" vNa NvsN Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station o p j o l o l o l 2l913 8l9 --

o p l9 --

0l0 013 or 01 7 TPT (2 more space a soured sea eslanesma N#C #een JNL4 s1117)

Meanwhile, preparations were being made to clean the contaminated area (approximately a 30 ft. by 30 ft. area around the floor drain) in the CB.

Three Nuclear Plant Attendents (NPAs) were briefed on Radiation Hork Permit No. 89-14. Two N?As were to provide decontamination support from outside the CB and a third NPA was to perform the decontamination inside the CB. The two support NPAs needed to get additional supplies and were told to meet the RPT at the CB. The RPT #2 and the third NPA prepared for entry to the CB.

At 1235 hours0.0143 days <br />0.343 hours <br />0.00204 weeks <br />4.699175e-4 months <br />, the two NPAs who wer3 to provide outside support went to door

'B' expecting to .neet the RPT #2 and the third NPA. When the two NPAs arrived at door 'B', the RPT #2 was not present. They assumed the RPT was already in the CB and they should enter. One NPA then pushed on door 'B' with his shoulder and it opened. The two NPAs then entered the CB looking for RPT #2. i A few minutes later, the RPT #2 and the third NPA entered the CB through door

'A' finding the other two NPAs already in the CB.

INITIAL ACTIONS TAKEN l

  • RPT #2 questioned the two NPAs and determined that they had accessed door 'B' to the CB.
  • The NPAs were directed to leave the CB.
  • RPT #2 checked door 'B' and determined that it was locked but not  !
latched and then secured door 'B'. RPT #2 also toured the CB and i determined that no other personnel were in the CE.

l l

  • The two NPAs pocket dosimeters were read and indicated doses of 15 milli-rem and 5 milli-rem. '
  • Door 'B' was verified locked and secured and appropriate management personnel were informed of the event.
  • A guard was posted outside of the CB at door 'B' until its l

i operability was verified.

I e The CB was toured by a second individual to reverify no personnel were in the CB. No personnel were found.

  • The three doors to the CB were reverified and all other LHRA doors
were verified to be secured. ,
  • A LHRA key inventory was performed. The inventory revealed all keys to be present and properly controlled.

f

__Iel"* "" _

i

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) TEXT CONTINUATION Anaovao ows wo mo-om EXNRES: Of31/88

' ACeLITY hatet til DOCKlf NUM$th Q) LER NUtit$$ R (6) PAGE DI

%s" "m,W l 2'23:

" nxw ,

Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station o ls j o lo lo l2 l 913 89 1

0l2 l 9 -

0l 0 0l4 0F 0l7

. ,,,.4 w -.am o Pocket docimeter readings for September 14, 1989, were reviewed to verify other personnel had not received unauthorized radiation exposures in the CB. The review determined no additional unauthorized exposures had occurred as a result of the event.

CAUSE Unauthorized P.ccess was caused by a failure to adhere to approved procedures.

Procedure 6.1-012 " Access Control to High Padiation Areas'-requires the RPT who has responsibility for tha issued LHRA key to assure all accessible doors are secure (locked and latched) upon exiting a LHRA. Investigations revealed l RPT #1 did not properly verify door 'B' to be secure when exiting the CB at 1130 hours0.0131 days <br />0.314 hours <br />0.00187 weeks <br />4.29965e-4 months <br />. Additionally, on three seoarate occasions (including the exit at 1130 hours0.0131 days <br />0.314 hours <br />0.00187 weeks <br />4.29965e-4 months <br />) on September 14, 1989, RPT #1 only checked the doors that were accessed as opposed to all accessible doors (door 'C' was not checked). The I&C personnel who exited door 'B' without checking that the door was secured, also failed to meet the requirements of Procedure 6.1-012.

s The failure to check all accessible doors upon exiting a LHRA was a human performance problem. The RPT # 1 had been trained and was generally knowledgeable of the requirements. However, on September 14, 1989, he was focused on properly defin'ng and posting the contaminated area while providing  !

health physic; support to wroing s work.

Similarly, the I&C personnel did not fully meet their responsibility to assure door 'B' was properly secured upon egress.

They assumed the door had closed behind them.

Attachment 5 to Procedure 5.1-012 " Standard Requirements for Entry to Locked High Radiation Areas" is attached to each issued RHP for LHRAs. This attachment is intended to be reviewed during the RHP briefing. Hhen interviewed, the two I&C technicians involved in the event, stated they were i not familiar with the requirements of Attachment 5, and could not recall being '

briefed on those requirements on the day of September 14, 1989.

The functioning of the door also contributed to the event. The door was sticking against the doorjamb and would not self close. The door could be opened / closed without using excessive force, but did require greater than ,

normal force I.a strong push / pull). RPT #1 has a small thin build, making it i plausible that the door would have appeared secured when pulled. However, '

because LHRA doors are designed to open from inside an area, it would not be possible to determine if a door was locked from inside the area. '

Entry was made into the CB by the two NPAs without meeting the requirements of T.S. 6.13.2 and Procedure 6.1-022, " Issue Use and Termination of Radiation Hork Permits". Investigations found that the NPAs were not generally knowledgeable of the requirements for entry to high radiation areas. Further  ;

investigation revealed that General Employee Training (GET) did not fully '

address '.he requirements for entry to high radiation areas (i.e., dose rate meter, dose integrating device, or coverage by a RPT with a dose rate meter).

l

. "d*[ "" ** '!

c".' -

LICENSEE EVENT REPOPT (LER) TEXT CONTINUATION A*paovio ous no am-eio.

1 LkPIRES. 6/31/m P.'.Ceuf v NAMk til pocnti Nuwsen up LER NUutf R (6) PAGE tal vtAn  : Igt '4 -

Qi48,g'*

Pilgrim Nuclesr Power 9'stion o is lo lo lo p l9 l3 8l9 --

O p 19

~

010 015 0F 0 l7 TEXT (J more apose e mouwwet use esenaquer Avec Fed M w (17)

CORRECT"LE ACTIONS TAKEN

  • Radiological Operations personnel were required to read Procedure 6.1-012 " Access Control to High Radiation Areas" and to discuss any

, questions with their supervisors.

  • Radiological Section Standing Order No. 89-09 was issued allowing only radiological supervisors to exercise LHRA door and key control,  ;

and requiring c radiological supervisor to observe and supervise each HRA entry briefing.

  • High radiation area (HRA) access was restricted to allow entrier, only for required operator tours and emergencies until the above two actiens were completed.
  • Procedure 6.1-012 was revised (Revision 29, approved 9/21/89) to require a job aid that prompts'the person responsible for a LHRA key to check all accessible doors upon exiting an area. A job aid was I prepared identifing the accessible dcors for each LHRA and has a j signature block to be signed for each door that is verified and  !

locked.

l

  • Radiological Operations personnel were trained on Revision 29 to Procedure 6.1-012 (complete 9/21/89) and Standing Order No. 89-09 was ,

recinded. j

,i e A "For Your Information" (FYI) notice was issued on September 16 -

! 1989, to reemphasize and clarify HRA entry requirements for PHPS personnel.

l l

  • The two NPAs who entered the LHRA improperly were restricted from l further HRA entries until retrained and tested in HRA controls. j

! l

  • The other NPAs were also retrained and tested in HRA controls.
  • Appropriate maintenance personnel received special training in HRA )

controls, i i l l

  • Station supervisors and managers are receiving a special briefing in HRA controls from the Radiological Protection Manager.
  • CET was revised on September 22, 1989 to present and emphasize the l requirements for entry to HRAs. '

I

  • Maintenance Request No. 89-33-236 has been initiated to repair door  ;

'B' to the CB.  :

  • The radiological technician qualification training prograa was  :

reviewed and determined that HRA controle were adequately covered. '

3, _ _

l j

ac e a see2 u s wuctsan natukafony commissios d UCENSEE EVENT REr' ORT (LER) TEXT CONTINUATION oPxovio ove =o. 3,so-oio.

(KPIRES 4 T e 7 ACiLITY 8eAME (14 DOCKtt NUuttal 428 Lgp NUMeta (el PA0t an venn " M . ' NJ*u: l l- P11rrim Nuclear Power Station o Is lo lo lo l 21913 8l9 -

q 219 -

0l0 0l6 0F 0 l '/ '

no w- .w w we % a w.nm CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TO BE TAKEN d

I

  • A Quality Assurance Surveillance on HRA controls will be performed. I
  • A Horker Information Program (HIP) presentation is being developed to reemphasize ar.3 clarify HRA and LHRA entry and exit requirements for i all site personnel.
  • A review of HRA controls will be incorporated to radiological technician cycle training, at quarterly intervals.
  • Procedure 6.1-012 " Access Control for HRAs" will be reviewed to determine if further, improvements and si:nplifications can be made.

The following items are being corsidered.

  • Posting the T.S. requireme.its for HRA entry at the entrance to HRAs.

~

  • Posting LHRAs in a way that will distinguish them from HRAs.

SAFETY CONSE00ENCES The personnel who had unauthorized access to the CB received 15 milli-rem and 5 milli-rem. Had door 'B' not been accessed, the unlatched condition of the door would have been identified during the routine LHRA door check that is conducted every 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br />, minimizing ;he potential for unauthorized entry. A LHRA area door audit was in progress at the time of the event and the auditor arrived at CB door 'B' only minutes after t's event was identified. The event had no potential to adversely impac: the public health and safety.

DREVIOUS SIMILAR REPORTABLE EVENTS A review of Licensee Event Reports (LERs) since 1984 identified a previous similar event recorted in LER 89-005-00. On February 3, 1989, a LHRA access door to the Radwaste Trucklock was found unsecured during the routine (every 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br />) LHRA door audit. Investigations :hohad that the door was unknowingly >

opened from inside the trucklock and the door lock striker was stuck in the open position. No unauthorized entry was identified. Procedure No. 6.1-012

" Access Control to High Radiation Areas" was revised to require that all accessible doors to a LHRA be checked upon leaving the area.

ENERGY I"DUSTRY IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM (EIIS) CODES ,

1 COMPONENT CODE 1

Door DR Vessel, Reactor RPV E

NEC PQMM 346A .

,- _ . . _ _ _ _ _ . . . . _ _ . - , _ . . . _ m s ,

i A d

. . r e e.

= .

NIC Perm as4A U.$. NUCLEA% PEOULATORY COMMISSeON  !

- LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) TEXT CONTINUATION arraoveo u a No. mo-coa (KPIRES: 8/31/88 P ACILeiv NAME (t) DOCKET N4%9ER (21 LtR NUMSER ($1 PAGE(3) s vtAm 58 $8,N,j'g b -"y8Jy'#,Q Pile:rtn !bclear Power Stetion \o 015 l o l o j o l 219 l9 819 -

012 l 3 010 017 t _F 0d TEKT ## more anece 4 seveed, ese odebeww NRC Fonn JaGrs/ tt7)

FIGURE 1 CONDENSER BAY ACCESS DOOR LOCATIONS

~

l <

\

l l l

,e FEEDWATER HEATERS k DRAIN COOLERS

& 5?Q $

T 'N '

~

MAIN r CONDENSER -

r i

MAIN

  1. Ag W: - - -

i l_. CONDENSER pE;[WlSpg NN_ .

we ',gp?;.sg
>+^< tpgypqgp

[ 00NTAM!NATED AREA  ? AbE 4

f' i.

f -

DOOR 'B' DOOR 'A' 4

t I j.

NRC FORM 366A 4

.- (3 33) '

. . . , . - - - _ . . . . , . . _ . . _ . . . - _ . . , _ . . . . . . , , , . . _ . . . . _ . . . _ , . _ _ . . . _ . _ . _ - _ _ , _ . _ , . _ _ , . _ _ . _ _ _ . _ , . . .