ML19340A184: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:, | {{#Wiki_filter:, | ||
'; . ,s | '; . ,s | ||
' Address enly fr DEPARTMENT CF TRANSPORTATION cowuANou ! (AWL) 4 O, '" c ^5' * ^ * | ' Address enly fr DEPARTMENT CF TRANSPORTATION cowuANou ! (AWL) 4 O, '" c ^5' * ^ * | ||
, UNITED STATES COAST GUARD WASHtNGToN. D.C. 2C591 g l | , UNITED STATES COAST GUARD WASHtNGToN. D.C. 2C591 g l | ||
, , .a 1 | , , .a 1 | ||
Line 35: | Line 31: | ||
Michael S. Cafferty, Acting Assistant Secretary for Environment and Urban | Michael S. Cafferty, Acting Assistant Secretary for Environment and Urban | ||
' ~ | ' ~ | ||
Systems, concerning the environmental considerations for The Duke Power | Systems, concerning the environmental considerations for The Duke Power Company's Oconen Nuclear Station, South Carolina. | ||
l . , The concerned operating administrations of the Department of Transportation s have reviewed the environmental considerations for the Oconee Nuclear Station. It is the determination of this Department that the impact of this project upon transportation in minimal. Other than to recommend issuance of the license and early construction of this project, no addi-tional comments are offered. | |||
Company's Oconen Nuclear Station, South Carolina | |||
l . , The concerned operating administrations of the Department of Transportation s have reviewed the environmental considerations for the Oconee Nuclear | |||
Station. It is the determination of this Department that the impact of | |||
this project upon transportation in minimal. Other than to recommend issuance of the license and early construction of this project, no addi-tional comments are offered. | |||
l l | l l | ||
The opportunity for the Department of Tra,h.iportation to review and | The opportunity for the Department of Tra,h.iportation to review and | ||
; | ; | ||
comment on this report is appreciated. t | comment on this report is appreciated. t I | ||
x Sincerely, - | |||
% r ! ?. | % r ! ?. | ||
s il | s il | ||
\ | \ | ||
l N l, // | l N l, // | ||
l | l | ||
*H C A.t pt'aTn,O W' S'V' ' | *H C A.t pt'aTn,O W' S'V' ' | ||
Cmt. Guafd Acting Chief, Oiilce ci .' blic and International Affairs | Cmt. Guafd Acting Chief, Oiilce ci .' blic and International Affairs i | ||
i | |||
-l | -l | ||
/* \ I g I//~ /\ | |||
/* \ I | |||
g I//~ /\ | |||
I | I | ||
, sy h e t- c} 000KETED ussC \ | , sy h e t- c} 000KETED ussC \ | ||
i | i v S c l"gr ij p.s h f - e ~ | ||
v S c l"gr ij p.s h f - e ~ | |||
' e1 y LU !!; 4 | ' e1 y LU !!; 4 | ||
- i | - i | ||
.. a ' .'dkQi, *9 '' 43.,/ f 5 f | .. a ' .'dkQi, *9 '' 43.,/ f 5 f | ||
*J | *J | ||
_3 MAR '261971 REGULATORY | |||
_3 | |||
MAR '261971 REGULATORY | |||
~/ | ~/ | ||
/ | / | ||
' 1 I , I- > | ' 1 I , I- > | ||
k II15's[9'# | k II15's[9'# | ||
Ce ; | Ce ; | ||
q g Mall SECTION | q g Mall SECTION | ||
'6, / A 't J l c- | '6, / A 't J l c-D %.uf DOCKET C S K NQ | ||
D %.uf DOCKET C S K NQ | |||
. C % \1 | . C % \1 | ||
' ; ~, | ' ; ~, | ||
l% .. _ , | l% .. _ , | ||
.s.e n'_ b | .s.e n'_ b | ||
,.y..w. m' q.- ,,. w s.v. m .mt m:2. ; v +~:~.. | ,.y..w. m' q.- ,,. w s.v. m .mt m:2. ; v +~:~.. | ||
7 0 o F W ]W2- y M S P ' m 7 ' .s | 7 0 o F W ]W2- y M S P ' m 7 ' .s | ||
. . . . . , r . , ' ;;. . i.v . n: a,., | . . . . . , r . , ' ;;. . i.v . n: a,., | ||
_~.-,,., , ,. . . | _~.-,,., , ,. . . | ||
. ,.,.;,,. | . ,.,.;,,. | ||
. ,. p. , . _j,,y. | . ,. p. , . _j,,y. | ||
~~ | ~~ | ||
O - | O - | ||
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Addan no'r * | DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Addan no'r * | ||
' couu4Noani (AWL) | ' couu4Noani (AWL) | ||
; UNITED STATES COAST GUARD $,8; cf^o*d0.Tc ussi | ; UNITED STATES COAST GUARD $,8; cf^o*d0.Tc ussi | ||
.SA 0306 | .SA 0306 34, MR 1971 Mr. Harold L. Price | ||
34, MR 1971 Mr. Harold L. Price | |||
. Director of Regulation | . Director of Regulation | ||
; | ; | ||
U. S. Atomic Energy Commission Washington, D. c. 20545 50-269/2M /287 | U. S. Atomic Energy Commission Washington, D. c. 20545 50-269/2M /287 | ||
==Dear Mr. Price:== | ==Dear Mr. Price:== | ||
Thia is in response to your letter of 12 February 1971 addressed to Mr. | Thia is in response to your letter of 12 February 1971 addressed to Mr. | ||
Michael S. Cafferty, Acting Assistant Secretary for Environment and Urban | Michael S. Cafferty, Acting Assistant Secretary for Environment and Urban | ||
; | ; | ||
Systems, concerning the environmental considerations for The Duke Power Company's Oconee Nuclear Station, South Carolina. | Systems, concerning the environmental considerations for The Duke Power Company's Oconee Nuclear Station, South Carolina. | ||
! The concerned operating administrations of the Department of Transportation have. reviewed the environmental considerations for the Oconee Nuclear Station. | ! The concerned operating administrations of the Department of Transportation have. reviewed the environmental considerations for the Oconee Nuclear Station. | ||
Line 148: | Line 95: | ||
/ | / | ||
,dincer y, | ,dincer y, | ||
/ i /l H A.1. O ec' f C ptTa n. d. Cea_ Guar 3 | |||
/ i /l H A.1. O ec' | |||
f C ptTa n. d. Cea_ Guar 3 | |||
; | ; | ||
i A ting Chief, Ofilca ci ?til: tr.d laternaticnal Affairs | i A ting Chief, Ofilca ci ?til: tr.d laternaticnal Affairs | ||
~ | ~ | ||
t I | |||
t | I l' | ||
l l | |||
1457 t | |||
l' | |||
l | |||
; | ; | ||
i}} | i}} |
Revision as of 11:33, 31 January 2020
ML19340A184 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Oconee |
Issue date: | 03/24/1971 |
From: | Solberg H U.S. COAST GUARD, TRANSPORTATION, DEPT. OF |
To: | Price H US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
References | |
NUDOCS 8001140782 | |
Download: ML19340A184 (2) | |
Text
,
'; . ,s
' Address enly fr DEPARTMENT CF TRANSPORTATION cowuANou ! (AWL) 4 O, '" c ^5' * ^ *
, UNITED STATES COAST GUARD WASHtNGToN. D.C. 2C591 g l
, , .a 1
4
.SA 0306
. 24 MAR 1971 Mr. Harold L. Price g m
- Director of Regulation ( .$'d- 8 6 U. S. Atomic Energy Commission g o ;/ // 6 Washington, D. C. .20545 ( 0 - 8 c~# Y
Dear Mr. Price:
This is in response to your letter of 12 February 1971 addressed to Mr.
Michael S. Cafferty, Acting Assistant Secretary for Environment and Urban
' ~
Systems, concerning the environmental considerations for The Duke Power Company's Oconen Nuclear Station, South Carolina.
l . , The concerned operating administrations of the Department of Transportation s have reviewed the environmental considerations for the Oconee Nuclear Station. It is the determination of this Department that the impact of this project upon transportation in minimal. Other than to recommend issuance of the license and early construction of this project, no addi-tional comments are offered.
l l
The opportunity for the Department of Tra,h.iportation to review and
comment on this report is appreciated. t I
x Sincerely, -
% r ! ?.
s il
\
l N l, //
l
- H C A.t pt'aTn,O W' S'V' '
Cmt. Guafd Acting Chief, Oiilce ci .' blic and International Affairs i
-l
/* \ I g I//~ /\
I
, sy h e t- c} 000KETED ussC \
i v S c l"gr ij p.s h f - e ~
' e1 y LU !!; 4
- i
.. a ' .'dkQi, *9 43.,/ f 5 f
- J
_3 MAR '261971 REGULATORY
~/
/
' 1 I , I- >
k II15's[9'#
Ce ;
q g Mall SECTION
'6, / A 't J l c-D %.uf DOCKET C S K NQ
. C % \1
' ; ~,
l% .. _ ,
.s.e n'_ b
,.y..w. m' q.- ,,. w s.v. m .mt m:2. ; v +~:~..
7 0 o F W ]W2- y M S P ' m 7 ' .s
. . . . . , r . , ' ;;. . i.v . n: a,.,
_~.-,,., , ,. . .
. ,.,.;,,.
. ,. p. , . _j,,y.
~~
O -
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Addan no'r *
' couu4Noani (AWL)
- UNITED STATES COAST GUARD $,8; cf^o*d0.Tc ussi
.SA 0306 34, MR 1971 Mr. Harold L. Price
. Director of Regulation
U. S. Atomic Energy Commission Washington, D. c. 20545 50-269/2M /287
Dear Mr. Price:
Thia is in response to your letter of 12 February 1971 addressed to Mr.
Michael S. Cafferty, Acting Assistant Secretary for Environment and Urban
Systems, concerning the environmental considerations for The Duke Power Company's Oconee Nuclear Station, South Carolina.
! The concerned operating administrations of the Department of Transportation have. reviewed the environmental considerations for the Oconee Nuclear Station.
It is the determination of this Department that the impact of this project upon transportation in minimal. Other than to recommend issuance of the license and early construction of this project, no addi-tional comments are offered.
The opportunity for the Department of Tra,nsportation to review and i
l comment on this report is appreciated. /I
/
,dincer y,
/ i /l H A.1. O ec' f C ptTa n. d. Cea_ Guar 3
i A ting Chief, Ofilca ci ?til: tr.d laternaticnal Affairs
~
t I
I l'
l l
1457 t
i