IR 05000456/2010502: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Adams|number = ML100990411}} | {{Adams | ||
| number = ML100990411 | |||
| issue date = 04/08/2010 | |||
| title = IR 05000456-10-502, 05000457-10-502, on 03/22/2010 - 03/26/2010, Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2, Baseline Emergency Preparedness Biennial Exercise Inspection | |||
| author name = Peterson H | |||
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OB | |||
| addressee name = Pardee C | |||
| addressee affiliation = Exelon Generation Co, LLC, Exelon Nuclear | |||
| docket = 05000456, 05000457 | |||
| license number = NPF-072, NPF-077 | |||
| contact person = | |||
| document report number = IR-10-502 | |||
| document type = Inspection Report, Letter | |||
| page count = 11 | |||
}} | |||
{{IR-Nav| site = 05000456 | year = 2010 | report number = 502 }} | {{IR-Nav| site = 05000456 | year = 2010 | report number = 502 }} | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | ||
Mr. Charles Senior Vice President, Exelon Generation Company, LLC President and Chief Nuclear Officer (CNO), Exelon Nuclear 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville IL 60555 | ==REGION III== | ||
2443 WARRENVILLE ROAD, SUITE 210 LISLE, IL 60532-4352 April 8, 2010 Mr. Charles Senior Vice President, Exelon Generation Company, LLC President and Chief Nuclear Officer (CNO), Exelon Nuclear 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville IL 60555 SUBJECT: BRAIDWOOD STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 BASELINE EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS BIENNIAL EXERCISE INSPECTION REPORT 05000456/2010502(DRS); 05000457/2010502(DRS) | |||
==Dear Mr. Pardee:== | |||
On March 26, 2010, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a Baseline Emergency Preparedness Biennial Exercise inspection at your Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2. The enclosed report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on March 26, 2010, with Mr. A. Shahkarami and other members of your staff. | |||
The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license. | |||
The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel. | |||
Based on the results of this inspection, no NRC-identified and no self-revealed findings of very low safety significance were identified. | |||
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document system (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). | |||
Sincerely,/RA/ | Sincerely, | ||
Hironori Peterson, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 50-456; 50-457 License Nos. NPF-72; NPF-77 | /RA/ | ||
Hironori Peterson, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 50-456; 50-457 License Nos. NPF-72; NPF-77 | |||
===Enclosure:=== | ===Enclosure:=== | ||
Inspection Report 05000456/2010502; 05000457/2010502 | Inspection Report 05000456/2010502; 05000457/2010502 w/Attachment: Supplemental Information | ||
REGION III== | |||
Docket Nos: 50-456; 50-457 License Nos: NPF-72; NPF-77 Report No: 05000456/2010502(DRS) and 05000457/2010502(DRS) | |||
Licensee: Exelon Generation Company, LLC Facility: Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2 Location: Braceville, Illinois Dates: March 22 through 26, 2010 Inspectors: Robert Jickling, Senior Emergency Preparedness Inspector Regina Russell, Emergency Preparedness Inspector Raymond Walton, Senior Operations Engineer Approved by: Hironori Peterson, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety Enclosure | |||
=SUMMARY OF FINDINGS= | =SUMMARY OF FINDINGS= | ||
IR 05000456/2010502, 05000457/2010502; 03/22/2010 - 03/26/2010; Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2; Baseline Emergency Preparedness Biennial Exercise Inspection. This report covers a one week period of announced baseline inspection by two regional inspectors and one operations engineer. The significance of most findings is indicated by their color (Green, White, Yellow, Red) using Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 0609, | IR 05000456/2010502, 05000457/2010502; 03/22/2010 - 03/26/2010; Braidwood Station, | ||
Units 1 and 2; Baseline Emergency Preparedness Biennial Exercise Inspection. | |||
This report covers a one week period of announced baseline inspection by two regional inspectors and one operations engineer. The significance of most findings is indicated by their color (Green, White, Yellow, Red) using Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 0609, Significance Determination Process (SDP). Findings for which the SDP does not apply may be Green or be assigned a severity level after NRC management review. The NRCs program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, | |||
Reactor Oversight Process, Revision 4, dated December 2006. | |||
=== | ===NRC-Identified=== | ||
and Self-Revealed Findings | and Self-Revealed Findings | ||
===Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness=== | ===Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness=== | ||
No findings of significance were identified. | No findings of significance were identified. | ||
=== | ===Licensee-Identified Violations=== | ||
No violations of significance were identified. | No violations of significance were identified. | ||
Line 39: | Line 68: | ||
==REACTOR SAFETY== | ==REACTOR SAFETY== | ||
===Cornerstone:=== | ===Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness=== | ||
{{a|1EP1}} | {{a|1EP1}} | ||
==1EP1 Exercise Evaluation== | ==1EP1 Exercise Evaluation== | ||
Line 47: | Line 75: | ||
====a. Inspection Scope==== | ====a. Inspection Scope==== | ||
The inspectors reviewed the March 24, 2010, biennial emergency preparedness | The inspectors reviewed the March 24, 2010, biennial emergency preparedness exercises objectives and scenario to ensure that the exercise would acceptably test major elements of the licensees emergency plan and to verify that the exercises simulated problems provided an acceptable framework to support demonstration of the licensees capability to implement its plan. The inspectors also reviewed records of other drills and exercises conducted in 2008, 2009, and 2010, to verify that those drills scenarios were sufficiently different from the scenario used in the March 24, 2010, exercise. | ||
The inspectors evaluated the licensees exercise performance, focusing on the risk significant activities of emergency classification, notification, and protective action decision making, implementation of accident mitigation strategies, and correction of past exercise weaknesses in the following emergency response facilities: | |||
* Control Room Simulator (CRS); | |||
* Technical Support Center (TSC); and | |||
* Emergency Operations Facility (EOF). | |||
The inspectors also assessed the licensees recognition of abnormal plant conditions, transfer of responsibilities between facilities, internal communications, interfaces with offsite officials, readiness of emergency facilities and related equipment, and overall implementation of the licensees emergency plan. | |||
The inspectors attended post-exercise critiques in the CRS, TSC, and EOF to evaluate the licensees initial self-assessment of its exercise performance. The inspectors later met with the licensees lead exercise evaluators and managers to obtain the licensees findings and assessments of its exercise participants performances. These self-assessments were then compared with the inspectors independent observations and assessments to assess the licensees ability to adequately critique its exercise performance. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report. | |||
This exercise evaluation inspection constituted one sample as defined in Inspection Procedure (IP) 71114.01-05. | |||
====b. Findings==== | ====b. Findings==== | ||
No findings of significance were identified. | No findings of significance were identified. | ||
==OTHER ACTIVITIES== | ==OTHER ACTIVITIES== | ||
Line 59: | Line 98: | ||
====a. Inspection Scope==== | ====a. Inspection Scope==== | ||
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Drill/Exercise Performance PI for the period from the third quarter 2009 through fourth quarter 2009. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) Document 99-02, | The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Drill/Exercise Performance PI for the period from the third quarter 2009 through fourth quarter 2009. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) Document 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 6, were used. The inspectors reviewed the licensees records associated with the performance indicator to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI; assessments of PI opportunities during pre-designated control room simulator training sessions, and performance during other drills. Documents reviewed are listed in the to this report. | ||
This inspection constituted one drill/exercise performance sample as defined in IP 71151-05. | |||
====b. Findings==== | ====b. Findings==== | ||
Line 67: | Line 108: | ||
====a. Inspection Scope==== | ====a. Inspection Scope==== | ||
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Drill Participation PI for the period from the third quarter 2009 through fourth quarter 2009. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the NEI Document 99-02, | The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Drill Participation PI for the period from the third quarter 2009 through fourth quarter 2009. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the NEI Document 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 6, were used. The inspectors reviewed the licensees records associated with the PI to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI; performance during the 2009 exercises and drills; and revisions of the roster of personnel assigned to key emergency response organization positions. Documents reviewed are listed in the to this report. | ||
This inspection constituted one ERO drill participation sample as defined in IP 71151-05. | |||
====b. Findings==== | ====b. Findings==== | ||
No findings of significance were identified. | No findings of significance were identified. | ||
===.3 Alert and Notification System=== | |||
====a. Inspection Scope==== | ====a. Inspection Scope==== | ||
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Alert and Notification System (ANS) PI for the period from the third quarter 2009 through fourth quarter 2009. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the NEI Document 99-02, | The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Alert and Notification System (ANS) | ||
PI for the period from the third quarter 2009 through fourth quarter 2009. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the NEI Document 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 6, were used. The inspectors reviewed the licensees records associated with the PI to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI and results of periodic scheduled ANS operability tests. | |||
Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report. | |||
This inspection constituted one alert and notification system sample as defined in IP 71151-05. | |||
====b. Findings==== | ====b. Findings==== | ||
No findings of significance were identified. | No findings of significance were identified. | ||
{{a|4OA6}} | {{a|4OA6}} | ||
==4OA6 Management Meetings== | ==4OA6 Management Meetings== | ||
===.1 Exit Meeting Summary On March 26, 2010, the inspectors presented the inspection results to Mr. A. Shahkirami, and other members of the licensee staff. | ===.1 Exit Meeting Summary=== | ||
The licensee acknowledged the issues presented. The inspectors confirmed that none of the potential report input discussed was considered proprietary. ATTACHMENT: | |||
On March 26, 2010, the inspectors presented the inspection results to Mr. A. Shahkirami, and other members of the licensee staff. The licensee acknowledged the issues presented. The inspectors confirmed that none of the potential report input discussed was considered proprietary. | |||
ATTACHMENT: | |||
=SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION= | =SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION= | ||
==KEY POINTS OF CONTACT== | ==KEY POINTS OF CONTACT== | ||
Licensee | |||
: [[contact::A. Shahkarami]], Site Vice President | Licensee | ||
: [[contact::K. Appel]], Corporate Emergency Preparedness Manager | : [[contact::A. Shahkarami]], Site Vice President | ||
: [[contact::S. Butler]], Emergency Preparedness Manager | : [[contact::K. Appel]], Corporate Emergency Preparedness Manager | ||
: [[contact::P. Daly]], Radiation Protection Manager | : [[contact::S. Butler]], Emergency Preparedness Manager | ||
: [[contact::R. Gaston]], Regulatory Assurance Manager | : [[contact::P. Daly]], Radiation Protection Manager | ||
: [[contact::J. Lizalek]], Nuclear Oversight | : [[contact::R. Gaston]], Regulatory Assurance Manager | ||
: [[contact::M. Marchionda]], Operations Director | : [[contact::J. Lizalek]], Nuclear Oversight | ||
: [[contact::T. Mattson]], NRC Coordinator | : [[contact::M. Marchionda]], Operations Director | ||
: [[contact::T. McCool]], Operations Manager | : [[contact::T. Mattson]], NRC Coordinator | ||
: [[contact::S. McKinney]], Emergency Preparedness Coordinator | : [[contact::T. McCool]], Operations Manager | ||
: [[contact::M. Smith]], Engineering Manager | : [[contact::S. McKinney]], Emergency Preparedness Coordinator | ||
: [[contact::W. Waznis]], Nuclear Oversight Nuclear Regulatory Commission | : [[contact::M. Smith]], Engineering Manager | ||
: [[contact::N. Shah]], Acting Senior Resident Inspector | : [[contact::W. Waznis]], Nuclear Oversight | ||
: [[contact::A. Garmoe]], Resident Inspector | Nuclear Regulatory Commission | ||
: [[contact::N. Shah]], Acting Senior Resident Inspector | |||
: [[contact::A. Garmoe]], Resident Inspector | |||
==LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED== | ==LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED== | ||
===Opened, Closed, and Discussed=== | |||
None Attachment | |||
==LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED== | ==LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED== | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 20:23, 21 December 2019
ML100990411 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Braidwood ![]() |
Issue date: | 04/08/2010 |
From: | Hironori Peterson Operations Branch III |
To: | Pardee C Exelon Generation Co, Exelon Nuclear |
References | |
IR-10-502 | |
Download: ML100990411 (11) | |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION III
2443 WARRENVILLE ROAD, SUITE 210 LISLE, IL 60532-4352 April 8, 2010 Mr. Charles Senior Vice President, Exelon Generation Company, LLC President and Chief Nuclear Officer (CNO), Exelon Nuclear 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville IL 60555 SUBJECT: BRAIDWOOD STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 BASELINE EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS BIENNIAL EXERCISE INSPECTION REPORT 05000456/2010502(DRS); 05000457/2010502(DRS)
Dear Mr. Pardee:
On March 26, 2010, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a Baseline Emergency Preparedness Biennial Exercise inspection at your Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2. The enclosed report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on March 26, 2010, with Mr. A. Shahkarami and other members of your staff.
The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.
The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.
Based on the results of this inspection, no NRC-identified and no self-revealed findings of very low safety significance were identified.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document system (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,
/RA/
Hironori Peterson, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 50-456; 50-457 License Nos. NPF-72; NPF-77
Enclosure:
Inspection Report 05000456/2010502; 05000457/2010502 w/Attachment: Supplemental Information
REGION III==
Docket Nos: 50-456; 50-457 License Nos: NPF-72; NPF-77 Report No: 05000456/2010502(DRS) and 05000457/2010502(DRS)
Licensee: Exelon Generation Company, LLC Facility: Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2 Location: Braceville, Illinois Dates: March 22 through 26, 2010 Inspectors: Robert Jickling, Senior Emergency Preparedness Inspector Regina Russell, Emergency Preparedness Inspector Raymond Walton, Senior Operations Engineer Approved by: Hironori Peterson, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety Enclosure
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
IR 05000456/2010502, 05000457/2010502; 03/22/2010 - 03/26/2010; Braidwood Station,
Units 1 and 2; Baseline Emergency Preparedness Biennial Exercise Inspection.
This report covers a one week period of announced baseline inspection by two regional inspectors and one operations engineer. The significance of most findings is indicated by their color (Green, White, Yellow, Red) using Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 0609, Significance Determination Process (SDP). Findings for which the SDP does not apply may be Green or be assigned a severity level after NRC management review. The NRCs program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649,
Reactor Oversight Process, Revision 4, dated December 2006.
NRC-Identified
and Self-Revealed Findings
Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness
No findings of significance were identified.
Licensee-Identified Violations
No violations of significance were identified.
REPORT DETAILS
REACTOR SAFETY
Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness
1EP1 Exercise Evaluation
.1 Exercise Evaluation
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors reviewed the March 24, 2010, biennial emergency preparedness exercises objectives and scenario to ensure that the exercise would acceptably test major elements of the licensees emergency plan and to verify that the exercises simulated problems provided an acceptable framework to support demonstration of the licensees capability to implement its plan. The inspectors also reviewed records of other drills and exercises conducted in 2008, 2009, and 2010, to verify that those drills scenarios were sufficiently different from the scenario used in the March 24, 2010, exercise.
The inspectors evaluated the licensees exercise performance, focusing on the risk significant activities of emergency classification, notification, and protective action decision making, implementation of accident mitigation strategies, and correction of past exercise weaknesses in the following emergency response facilities:
- Control Room Simulator (CRS);
- Technical Support Center (TSC); and
- Emergency Operations Facility (EOF).
The inspectors also assessed the licensees recognition of abnormal plant conditions, transfer of responsibilities between facilities, internal communications, interfaces with offsite officials, readiness of emergency facilities and related equipment, and overall implementation of the licensees emergency plan.
The inspectors attended post-exercise critiques in the CRS, TSC, and EOF to evaluate the licensees initial self-assessment of its exercise performance. The inspectors later met with the licensees lead exercise evaluators and managers to obtain the licensees findings and assessments of its exercise participants performances. These self-assessments were then compared with the inspectors independent observations and assessments to assess the licensees ability to adequately critique its exercise performance. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report.
This exercise evaluation inspection constituted one sample as defined in Inspection Procedure (IP) 71114.01-05.
b. Findings
No findings of significance were identified.
OTHER ACTIVITIES
4OA1 Performance Indicator (PI) Verification
.1 Drill/Exercise Performance
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Drill/Exercise Performance PI for the period from the third quarter 2009 through fourth quarter 2009. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) Document 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 6, were used. The inspectors reviewed the licensees records associated with the performance indicator to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI; assessments of PI opportunities during pre-designated control room simulator training sessions, and performance during other drills. Documents reviewed are listed in the to this report.
This inspection constituted one drill/exercise performance sample as defined in IP 71151-05.
b. Findings
No findings of significance were identified.
.2 Emergency Response Organization Drill Participation
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Drill Participation PI for the period from the third quarter 2009 through fourth quarter 2009. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the NEI Document 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 6, were used. The inspectors reviewed the licensees records associated with the PI to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI; performance during the 2009 exercises and drills; and revisions of the roster of personnel assigned to key emergency response organization positions. Documents reviewed are listed in the to this report.
This inspection constituted one ERO drill participation sample as defined in IP 71151-05.
b. Findings
No findings of significance were identified.
.3 Alert and Notification System
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Alert and Notification System (ANS)
PI for the period from the third quarter 2009 through fourth quarter 2009. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the NEI Document 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 6, were used. The inspectors reviewed the licensees records associated with the PI to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI and results of periodic scheduled ANS operability tests.
Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report.
This inspection constituted one alert and notification system sample as defined in IP 71151-05.
b. Findings
No findings of significance were identified.
4OA6 Management Meetings
.1 Exit Meeting Summary
On March 26, 2010, the inspectors presented the inspection results to Mr. A. Shahkirami, and other members of the licensee staff. The licensee acknowledged the issues presented. The inspectors confirmed that none of the potential report input discussed was considered proprietary.
ATTACHMENT:
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
KEY POINTS OF CONTACT
Licensee
- A. Shahkarami, Site Vice President
- K. Appel, Corporate Emergency Preparedness Manager
- S. Butler, Emergency Preparedness Manager
- P. Daly, Radiation Protection Manager
- R. Gaston, Regulatory Assurance Manager
- J. Lizalek, Nuclear Oversight
- M. Marchionda, Operations Director
- T. Mattson, NRC Coordinator
- T. McCool, Operations Manager
- S. McKinney, Emergency Preparedness Coordinator
- M. Smith, Engineering Manager
- W. Waznis, Nuclear Oversight
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
- N. Shah, Acting Senior Resident Inspector
- A. Garmoe, Resident Inspector
LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED
Opened, Closed, and Discussed
None Attachment