ML17262A775: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML17262A775
| number = ML17262A775
| issue date = 03/23/1992
| issue date = 03/23/1992
| title = Interim Part 21 Rept Re Deficiencies W/Movs V826B,V738B & V871A & Two Two Inch Velan Manual 1500 ASME Class Ii Valves. Further Investigation Being Conducted by Noncompliance Repts Processing Group
| title = Interim Part 21 Rept Re Deficiencies W/Movs V826B,V738B & V871A & Two Two Inch Velan Manual 1500 ASME Class II Valves. Further Investigation Being Conducted by Noncompliance Repts Processing Group
| author name = MECREDY R C
| author name = Mecredy R
| author affiliation = ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP.
| author affiliation = ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP.
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:'ACCELERATED DISTRIBUTION DEMONS TION SYSTEM REGULA.Y INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)ACCESSION NBR:9203300092 DOC.DATE: 92/03/23 NOTARIZED:
{{#Wiki_filter:'ACCELERATED DISTRIBUTION DEMONS                                   TION SYSTEM REGULA     . Y INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)
NO FACIL:50-244 Robert Emmet Ginna Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, Rochester G ARITH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION MECREDY,R.C.
ACCESSION NBR:9203300092             DOC.DATE: 92/03/23     NOTARIZED: NO         DOCKET FACIL:50-244 Robert Emmet Ginna Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, Rochester                 G 05000244 ARITH.NAME           AUTHOR AFFILIATION MECREDY,R.C.       Rochester Gas & Electric Corp.
Rochester Gas&Electric Corp.RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)DOCKET 05000244
RECIP.NAME           RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document     Control Branch (Document Control Desk)


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
Interim Part 21 rept re deficiencies w/MOVs V826B,V738B S V871A 6 two two inch Velan manual 1500 ASME Class II valves.Further investigation being conducted by noncompliance repts processing group.DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE19D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR I ENCL J SIZE: TITLE: Part 21 Rept (50 DKT)D NOTES:License Exp date in accordance with 10CFR2,2.109(9/19/72).
Interim Part 21 rept re deficiencies w/MOVs V826B,V738B               S V871A   6 two two inch Velan manual         1500 ASME Class II valves.
05000244/RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD1-3 LA JOHNSONFA INTERNAL: AEOD/DSP/ROAB NRR/DRIS/RVIB9D RES/DSIR/EIB RGN2 RGN4 SECY VANDERMEL EXTERNAL: INPO RECORD CTR NSIC SILVERFE COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD1-3 PD NR+RDOEA/OGCB 1 1 lREG'=.FILE
Further investigation being conducted by noncompliance repts processing group.
+BI F~RGNZ" RGN3 RGN5 NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 D D D NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS:
DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE19D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR TITLE: Part 21 Rept (50 DKT)
D D PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE!CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT.20079)TO ELIMINATE YOUR NAME FROM DISIRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 18 ENCL 17  
I ENCL J  SIZE:
>'s jf/BIEN)l ii~K'/ir 4iJil/IZ IIIIIIIIIIIII ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION o 89 EAST AVENUE, ROCHESTER N.Y.14649-0001 ROBERT C MECREDY Vice President Cinna Nuclear Production TELEPHONE AstErt cooE 7 re 546.2700 March 23, 1992 U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555'ubject:
D NOTES:License Exp date       in accordance with 10CFR2,2.109(9/19/72).             05000244 /
10 CFR Part 21 Interim Report R.E.Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Docket No.50-244 The revision to 10 CFR Part 21, Section 21(a)made effective on 10/29/91, requires an.interim report;of any deviation for which an evaluation to determine reportahility impact is.unable to be completed.
RECIPIENT              COPIES            RECIPIENT         COPIES ID CODE/NAME             LTTR ENCL      ID CODE/NAME      LTTR ENCL            D PD1-3 LA                   1    0      PD1-3 PD              1    1 JOHNSONFA                   1    1                                                D INTERNAL: AEOD/DSP/ROAB               1    1      NR+RDOEA/OGCB 1 1      2    2 NRR/DRIS/RVIB9D RES/DSIR/EIB 1
within 60 days of discovery.
1 1
A recent RG&E audit found that.evaluations for several deviations were not timely and.that the need for interim reports had not yet been considered.
1 lREG'=.FILE F~RGNZ"
It further, determined the cause of the problem to be implementation deficiencies corresponding'to'he rule change.The magnitude of the problem was 28 evaluations exceeding the 60 day duration.This total was derived from an audit sample, from the nearly 200 open Nonconformance Reports (NCR), and further investigation by.the NCR processing group.During the past four weeks a concerted effort was undertaken to complete the 28 evaluations.
                                                                  +BI      1 1
The following, tabulation presents the current status:~Evaluation Completed--No Reportable Defect--25~Evaluation In Progress--Included in Interim Report--2~Evaluation Completed;
1 1
--Reportable Defect--1**Notice dated February 24 sent by facsimile The two deviations requiring additional evaluation time are described in Attachment A.The actual discovery date for'ach preceded the rule change that became effective 10/29/91.For these deviations, the 10/29/91 date which augments the actual discovery'ate was used to initiate the 60 day evaluation requirement..Although these deviations were discovered prior to the rule change date, interim reports became necessary prior to 12/28/91 for evaluations continuing into 1992.9203300092 920323~d'DR ADOCK 05000244 ritirigtr'S PDR yjgS'f/
RGN2                        1     1     RGN3                  1   1 RGN4                        1     1     RGN5                  1   1 SECY VANDERMEL              1     1 EXTERNAL: INPO RECORD CTR              1     1     NRC PDR               1     1 NSIC SILVERFE              1     1 D
C'~~
D D
(2)In addition to the review of NCRs, other corrective action systems which involve evaluations under.10 CFR Part 21 have also been reviewed and found to be free of timeliness problems..
NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS:
The following actions have been undertaken to ensure timely evaluation and interim reporting in, the future.1.Assigned responsibilities and methods.for.processing an/statusing deviations have been'larified in all applicable procedures, including Ginna Station and.Quality Performance.
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE! CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT. 20079) TO ELIMINATEYOUR NAME FROM DISIRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!
2.Assigned responsibilities and instructions for performing 10 CFR 21 evaluations and.related interim reports have been clarified in existing Ginna.Station', Quality Performance and Nuclear Engineering Services procedures.
TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR             18   ENCL     17
These clarifications include.utilization of 10CFR 50.72 and, 50.73 criteria for performing evaluations of installed.
basic components.
3.Responsibilities and requirements for 10 CFR 21, evaluations and related interim reports have been clarified.
in relevant portions of Quality Assurance Manual Sections 15 and 16.4.Target completion dates are assigned and tracked, for potential deviations to'ssure timely evaluations.
5.Training has been scheduled.
for appropriate groups.In the interim, closer monitoring of the evaluation timeliness will be provided by the Quality Performance department.
In summary, corrective actions are sufficiently implemented, to assure timely evaluation of 10 CFR 21 deviations.
Interim actions will remain until required.training is completed.
Further correspondence on the 2 items described in Attachment A will not be issued unless the evaluations are not completed as scheduled or the deviations require reporting per 10 CFR Part 21.Very Truly Yours, RCMNcem%005 Robert C.Mecredy zc: Regional Administrator U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region 1 475 A'llendale Road.King of Prussia, PA Ginna USNRC Senior Resident: Inspector
~'~1 I P
~~vS~'1 l Attachment A 10 CFR 21 Deviation Evaluation Extensions Deviation Discovery Date: 5/10/91 (10/29/91)


==
>'s jf/BIEN)  l    ii~K'/ir 4iJil/IZ    IIIIIIIIIIIII ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION                              o 89 EAST AVENUE, ROCHESTER N.Y. 14649-0001 ROBERT C MECREDY                                                                                        TELEPHONE Vice President                                                                                  AstErt cooE 7 re 546.2700 Cinna Nuclear Production March 23, 1992 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington,                    DC 10 CFR Part 21 Interim Report 20555'ubject:
Description:==
R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Docket No. 50-244 The        revision to 10 CFR Part 21, Section 21(a) made effective on 10/29/91, requires an. interim report; of any deviation for which an evaluation to determine reportahility impact is. unable to be completed. within 60 days of discovery.
A    recent              RG&E    audit found that. evaluations for several deviations the need for interim reports had not yet were not timely and.
been considered.
to be implementation Itthat further, determined the cause of the problem deficiencies corresponding'to'he rule change.
The magnitude                      of the problem was 28 evaluations exceeding the 60 day        duration. This total was derived from an audit sample, from the nearly 200 open Nonconformance Reports (NCR), and further investigation by. the NCR processing group. During the past four weeks a concerted effort was undertaken to complete the 28 evaluations. The following, tabulation presents the current status:
Evaluation Completed -- No Reportable Defect -- 25 Evaluation In Progress -- Included in Interim Report -- 2
                  ~
                  ~
                  ~
Evaluation Completed; -- Reportable Defect -- 1 *
* Notice dated February 24 sent by facsimile The two deviations requiring additional evaluation time are described in Attachment A. The actual discovery date for'ach preceded the rule change that became effective 10/29/91. For these deviations, the 10/29/91 date which augments the actual discovery'ate was used to initiate the 60 day evaluation requirement. .Although these deviations were discovered prior to the rule change date, interim reports became necessary prior to 12/28/91 for evaluations continuing into 1992.
    'S 9203300092 920323 ADOCK 05000244 PDR
                                                                                            ~    ritirigtr d'DR yjgS'f /


C'
  ~ ~
(2)
In addition to the review of NCRs, other corrective action systems which involve evaluations under. 10 CFR Part 21 have also been reviewed and found to be free of timeliness problems..
The following actions have been undertaken to ensure timely evaluation and interim reporting in, the future.
: 1. Assigned responsibilities and methods. for. processing an/
statusing deviations have been'larified in all applicable procedures, including Ginna Station and. Quality Performance.
: 2. Assigned responsibilities and instructions for performing 10 CFR 21 evaluations and. related interim reports have been clarified in existing Ginna. Station', Quality Performance and Nuclear Engineering Services procedures. These clarifications include. utilization of 10CFR 50.72 and, 50.73 criteria for performing evaluations of installed. basic components.
: 3. Responsibilities and requirements for 10 CFR 21, evaluations and related interim reports have been clarified. in relevant portions of Quality Assurance Manual Sections 15 and 16.
: 4. Target completion dates are assigned and tracked, for potential deviations to'ssure timely evaluations.
: 5. Training has been scheduled. for appropriate groups. In the interim, closer monitoring of the evaluation timeliness will be provided by the Quality Performance department.
In summary, corrective actions are sufficiently implemented, to assure timely evaluation of 10 CFR 21 deviations. Interim actions will remain until required. training is completed.
Further correspondence on the 2 items described in Attachment A will not be issued unless the evaluations are not completed as 21.
scheduled or the deviations require reporting per 10 CFR Part Very Truly Yours, Robert C. Mecredy RCMNcem%005 zc:  Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region 1 475 A'llendale Road.
King of Prussia, PA Ginna  USNRC Senior Resident: Inspector
      ~ '
          ~
1 I
P
  ~ ~
vS
          ~'
l1 Attachment  A 10 CFR 21  Deviation Evaluation Extensions Deviation Discovery Date:    5/10/91    (10/29/91)
== Description:==
Several deficiencies with motor operated valves were noted as follows when test data was compared with calculations:
Several deficiencies with motor operated valves were noted as follows when test data was compared with calculations:
*V826B-Measured thrust exceeded calculated weak link'hrust.*V738B-Calculated dp thrust exceeds thrust measured.by a static test.*V871A-Measured thrust in differential pressure test exceeds calculated motor stall thrust.Valves have been found to be acceptable for interim use until further testing or repair is performed.(NCR 91-362)Scheduled Evaluation Completion Date: 7/15/92 Deviation Discovery Date 8/21/91 (10/29/91)
* V826B Measured     thrust exceeded   calculated weak link
                'hrust.
* V738B   - Calculated dp thrust exceeds thrust measured. by a static test.
* V871A Measured     thrust in differential pressure test exceeds   calculated motor stall thrust.
Valves have been found to be acceptable for interim use until further testing or repair is performed. (NCR 91-362)
Scheduled Evaluation Completion Date: 7/15/92 Deviation Discovery Date 8/21/91 (10/29/91)


==
== Description:==
Description:==
During receipt inspection, two two inch Velan manual 1500 5 ASNE Class II valves were identified with gouges. Valves are not installed in the plant. Depth and significance of gouges are being evaluated. ,(NCR 91-481)
Scheduled Evaluation Completion Date: 7/15/92 m006


During receipt inspection, two two inch Velan manual 1500 5 ASNE Class II valves were identified with gouges.Valves are not installed in the plant.Depth and significance of gouges are being evaluated.
i f'
,(NCR 91-481)Scheduled Evaluation Completion Date: 7/15/92 m006 i f'~i aC~~e C 4,, r I C}}
            ~
aC ~
i~ e C
4,,
r I C}}

Latest revision as of 18:36, 29 October 2019

Interim Part 21 Rept Re Deficiencies W/Movs V826B,V738B & V871A & Two Two Inch Velan Manual 1500 ASME Class II Valves. Further Investigation Being Conducted by Noncompliance Repts Processing Group
ML17262A775
Person / Time
Site: Ginna Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 03/23/1992
From: Mecredy R
ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
REF-PT21-92 NUDOCS 9203300092
Download: ML17262A775 (7)


Text

'ACCELERATED DISTRIBUTION DEMONS TION SYSTEM REGULA . Y INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

ACCESSION NBR:9203300092 DOC.DATE: 92/03/23 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET FACIL:50-244 Robert Emmet Ginna Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, Rochester G 05000244 ARITH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION MECREDY,R.C. Rochester Gas & Electric Corp.

RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)

SUBJECT:

Interim Part 21 rept re deficiencies w/MOVs V826B,V738B S V871A 6 two two inch Velan manual 1500 ASME Class II valves.

Further investigation being conducted by noncompliance repts processing group.

DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE19D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR TITLE: Part 21 Rept (50 DKT)

I ENCL J SIZE:

D NOTES:License Exp date in accordance with 10CFR2,2.109(9/19/72). 05000244 /

RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL D PD1-3 LA 1 0 PD1-3 PD 1 1 JOHNSONFA 1 1 D INTERNAL: AEOD/DSP/ROAB 1 1 NR+RDOEA/OGCB 1 1 2 2 NRR/DRIS/RVIB9D RES/DSIR/EIB 1

1 1

1 lREG'=.FILE F~RGNZ"

+BI 1 1

1 1

RGN2 1 1 RGN3 1 1 RGN4 1 1 RGN5 1 1 SECY VANDERMEL 1 1 EXTERNAL: INPO RECORD CTR 1 1 NRC PDR 1 1 NSIC SILVERFE 1 1 D

D D

NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE! CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT. 20079) TO ELIMINATEYOUR NAME FROM DISIRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 18 ENCL 17

>'s jf/BIEN) l ii~K'/ir 4iJil/IZ IIIIIIIIIIIII ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION o 89 EAST AVENUE, ROCHESTER N.Y. 14649-0001 ROBERT C MECREDY TELEPHONE Vice President AstErt cooE 7 re 546.2700 Cinna Nuclear Production March 23, 1992 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 10 CFR Part 21 Interim Report 20555'ubject:

R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Docket No. 50-244 The revision to 10 CFR Part 21, Section 21(a) made effective on 10/29/91, requires an. interim report; of any deviation for which an evaluation to determine reportahility impact is. unable to be completed. within 60 days of discovery.

A recent RG&E audit found that. evaluations for several deviations the need for interim reports had not yet were not timely and.

been considered.

to be implementation Itthat further, determined the cause of the problem deficiencies corresponding'to'he rule change.

The magnitude of the problem was 28 evaluations exceeding the 60 day duration. This total was derived from an audit sample, from the nearly 200 open Nonconformance Reports (NCR), and further investigation by. the NCR processing group. During the past four weeks a concerted effort was undertaken to complete the 28 evaluations. The following, tabulation presents the current status:

Evaluation Completed -- No Reportable Defect -- 25 Evaluation In Progress -- Included in Interim Report -- 2

~

~

~

Evaluation Completed; -- Reportable Defect -- 1 *

  • Notice dated February 24 sent by facsimile The two deviations requiring additional evaluation time are described in Attachment A. The actual discovery date for'ach preceded the rule change that became effective 10/29/91. For these deviations, the 10/29/91 date which augments the actual discovery'ate was used to initiate the 60 day evaluation requirement. .Although these deviations were discovered prior to the rule change date, interim reports became necessary prior to 12/28/91 for evaluations continuing into 1992.

'S 9203300092 920323 ADOCK 05000244 PDR

~ ritirigtr d'DR yjgS'f /

C'

~ ~

(2)

In addition to the review of NCRs, other corrective action systems which involve evaluations under. 10 CFR Part 21 have also been reviewed and found to be free of timeliness problems..

The following actions have been undertaken to ensure timely evaluation and interim reporting in, the future.

1. Assigned responsibilities and methods. for. processing an/

statusing deviations have been'larified in all applicable procedures, including Ginna Station and. Quality Performance.

2. Assigned responsibilities and instructions for performing 10 CFR 21 evaluations and. related interim reports have been clarified in existing Ginna. Station', Quality Performance and Nuclear Engineering Services procedures. These clarifications include. utilization of 10CFR 50.72 and, 50.73 criteria for performing evaluations of installed. basic components.
3. Responsibilities and requirements for 10 CFR 21, evaluations and related interim reports have been clarified. in relevant portions of Quality Assurance Manual Sections 15 and 16.
4. Target completion dates are assigned and tracked, for potential deviations to'ssure timely evaluations.
5. Training has been scheduled. for appropriate groups. In the interim, closer monitoring of the evaluation timeliness will be provided by the Quality Performance department.

In summary, corrective actions are sufficiently implemented, to assure timely evaluation of 10 CFR 21 deviations. Interim actions will remain until required. training is completed.

Further correspondence on the 2 items described in Attachment A will not be issued unless the evaluations are not completed as 21.

scheduled or the deviations require reporting per 10 CFR Part Very Truly Yours, Robert C. Mecredy RCMNcem%005 zc: Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region 1 475 A'llendale Road.

King of Prussia, PA Ginna USNRC Senior Resident: Inspector

~ '

~

1 I

P

~ ~

vS

~'

l1 Attachment A 10 CFR 21 Deviation Evaluation Extensions Deviation Discovery Date: 5/10/91 (10/29/91)

Description:

Several deficiencies with motor operated valves were noted as follows when test data was compared with calculations:

  • V826B Measured thrust exceeded calculated weak link

'hrust.

  • V738B - Calculated dp thrust exceeds thrust measured. by a static test.
  • V871A Measured thrust in differential pressure test exceeds calculated motor stall thrust.

Valves have been found to be acceptable for interim use until further testing or repair is performed. (NCR 91-362)

Scheduled Evaluation Completion Date: 7/15/92 Deviation Discovery Date 8/21/91 (10/29/91)

Description:

During receipt inspection, two two inch Velan manual 1500 5 ASNE Class II valves were identified with gouges. Valves are not installed in the plant. Depth and significance of gouges are being evaluated. ,(NCR 91-481)

Scheduled Evaluation Completion Date: 7/15/92 m006

i f'

~

aC ~

i~ e C

4,,

r I C