ML18092A689: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:.a i
{{#Wiki_filter:.a i
* Public Service Electric and Gas Company P.O. Box E Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038 Salem Generating Station *
* Public Service Electric and Gas Company P.O. Box E Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038 Salem Generating Station July 15, 1985 Ellen Radow - Chief Bureau of Permits Admin.
* Ellen Radow -Chief Bureau of Permits Admin. Division of Water Resources CN-029 Trenton, NJ 08625 July 15, 1985
Division of Water Resources CN-029 Trenton, NJ 08625


==Dear Ms:==
==Dear Ms:==
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORTS SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION PERMIT NO. NJ0005622 Attached are the Discharge Monitoring Report forms for Salem Nuclear Generating Station containing the information as quired in Permit No. NJ0005622 for the month of June 1985 . The information contained in this report presents the observed results required by the Environmental Protection Agency and the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, obtained in accordance with approved methods with respect to sampling, sis, monitoring and methods of reporting.
 
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORTS SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION PERMIT NO. NJ0005622 Attached are the Discharge Monitoring Report forms for Salem Nuclear Generating Station containing the information as re-
* quired in Permit No. NJ0005622 for the month of June 1985 .
The information contained in this report presents the observed results required by the Environmental Protection Agency and the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, obtained in accordance with approved methods with respect to sampling, analy-sis, monitoring and methods of reporting.
The reporting of the data and the accuracy of the results reflect the working environment, design capabilities and reliability of the instrumentation.
The reporting of the data and the accuracy of the results reflect the working environment, design capabilities and reliability of the instrumentation.
Discharge sampling locations 482 and 485 are set up and used for ongoing entrainment studies. This precludes any sampling activities.
Discharge sampling locations 482 and 485 are set up and used for ongoing entrainment studies. This precludes any sampling activities.
Since all chemical treatments of or discharges to the circulating water system are common with at least one other discharge, those values are assumed to be identical.
Since all chemical treatments of or discharges to the circulating water system are common with at least one other discharge, those values are assumed to be identical. This assumption is made for all identified parameters.
This assumption is made for all identified parameters.
The columns labeled, "No, Ex.", in the enclosed Discharge.Monitoring Report forms tabulate the number of observed results that were above or below, as appropriate, the limits contained in the permit; the limits are reflected on the enclosed forms .
The columns labeled, "No, Ex.", in the enclosed Discharge.Monitoring Report forms tabulate the number of observed results that were above or below, as appropriate, the limits contained in the permit; the limits are reflected on the enclosed forms . B5os14os7oa-5o7 15 PDR 05000272 R PDR The Energy People l 95-2189 (11 M) 12-84   
* B5os14os7oa-5o7 15 PDR R
ADOC~
The Energy People 05000272 PDR          l 95-2189 (11 M) 12-84
 
r * *~ ,!, NJPDES Discharge Monitoring e                                7/15/85 Reports
* Pursuant to Consent Order EPA-CWA-II-82-77 (May 27, 1983), entered by EPA and NJDEP, the following limits apply to the discharge from DSN 48C until July l, 1985.
Discharge Limitation - Gross Average Monthly  Maximum Daily Effluent Characteristics              mg/l            mg/l TSS                                  40              100 Total Iron                            1.5            1.5 Total Copper                          0.2              0.2 Ammonia as NH                        35              70 4
Exclusion explanations are includ~d on an additional sheet.
Very truly yours,
                                            ~
* PDB:slg Attachment Radiation Prot./Chem. Manager -
Salem Operations CC:  Executive Director, DRBC                                /
Director, USNRC Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulatioil.I/
Dr. Richard Baker Vice President - Nuclear
*


r * ,!, NJPDES e Discharge Monitoring Reports 7/15/85 * *
        , NJPDES Report        A                            7/15/85
* Pursuant to Consent Order EPA-CWA-II-82-77 (May 27, 1983), entered by EPA and NJDEP, the following limits apply to the discharge from DSN 48C until July l, 1985. Effluent Characteristics TSS Total Iron Total Copper Ammonia as NH 4 Discharge Limitation
* * ~. ''
-Gross Average Monthly Maximum Daily mg/l 40 1.5 0.2 35 mg/l 100 1.5 0.2 70 Exclusion explanations are on an additional sheet. PDB:slg Attachment CC: Executive Director, DRBC Director, USNRC Office of Dr. Richard Baker Vice President
1
-Nuclear Very truly yours, Radiation Prot./Chem.
:Explanation of exclus91s June The following exclusions are included in the attached report and
Manager -Salem Operations
* explained below. Exclusions have not endangered nor significantly impacted health or the environment.
/ Nuclear Reactor Regulatioil.I/  7/15/85 , NJPDES Report A * * ''1 :Explanation of exclus91s  
DMR NO.                     EXPLANATION 483                         TSS - Cause of high average value unknown.
* *
BOD - Suspected cause of exclusion is the failure of aeration blower on the treatment system.
* June The following exclusions are included in the attached report and explained below. Exclusions have not endangered nor significantly impacted health or the environment.
483                        DIFFERENTIAL TEMPERATURE - Programatic errors have been identified as the possible cause of some high ~T values.
DMR NO. 483 483 481-483 FAC 489 EXPLANATION TSS -Cause of high average value unknown. BOD -Suspected cause of exclusion is the failure of aeration blower on the treatment system. DIFFERENTIAL TEMPERATURE  
These are being investigated.
-Programatic errors have been identified as the possible cause of some high values. These are being investigated.
481-483                    FRC - Chlorination was terminated on first indication of chlorine detection.
FRC -Chlorination was terminated on first indication of chlorine detection.
FAC                          NET HEAT RELEASE - This is a calculated value based on assumed pump flow rates for two Unit operation and is subject to programatic errors.
NET HEAT RELEASE -This is a calculated value based on assumed pump flow rates for two Unit operation and is subject to programatic errors. Oil and Grease -Cause of high value appears to be run off from paved parking area .}}
Oil and Grease - Cause of high value
* 489 appears to be run off from paved parking area .
  *}}

Revision as of 12:10, 21 October 2019

Forwards Discharge Monitoring Rept for June 1985.Rept Presents Observed Results Required by EPA & State of Nj Dept of Environ Protection
ML18092A689
Person / Time
Site: Salem  PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 07/15/1985
From: Trejo J
Public Service Enterprise Group
To: Radow E
NEW JERSEY, STATE OF
Shared Package
ML18092A690 List:
References
NUDOCS 8508140570
Download: ML18092A689 (3)
v • d • e


Text

.a i

  • Public Service Electric and Gas Company P.O. Box E Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038 Salem Generating Station July 15, 1985 Ellen Radow - Chief Bureau of Permits Admin.

Division of Water Resources CN-029 Trenton, NJ 08625

Dear Ms:

NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORTS SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION PERMIT NO. NJ0005622 Attached are the Discharge Monitoring Report forms for Salem Nuclear Generating Station containing the information as re-

  • quired in Permit No. NJ0005622 for the month of June 1985 .

The information contained in this report presents the observed results required by the Environmental Protection Agency and the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, obtained in accordance with approved methods with respect to sampling, analy-sis, monitoring and methods of reporting.

The reporting of the data and the accuracy of the results reflect the working environment, design capabilities and reliability of the instrumentation.

Discharge sampling locations 482 and 485 are set up and used for ongoing entrainment studies. This precludes any sampling activities.

Since all chemical treatments of or discharges to the circulating water system are common with at least one other discharge, those values are assumed to be identical. This assumption is made for all identified parameters.

The columns labeled, "No, Ex.", in the enclosed Discharge.Monitoring Report forms tabulate the number of observed results that were above or below, as appropriate, the limits contained in the permit; the limits are reflected on the enclosed forms .

  • B5os14os7oa-5o7 15 PDR R

ADOC~

The Energy People 05000272 PDR l 95-2189 (11 M) 12-84

r * *~ ,!, NJPDES Discharge Monitoring e 7/15/85 Reports

  • Pursuant to Consent Order EPA-CWA-II-82-77 (May 27, 1983), entered by EPA and NJDEP, the following limits apply to the discharge from DSN 48C until July l, 1985.

Discharge Limitation - Gross Average Monthly Maximum Daily Effluent Characteristics mg/l mg/l TSS 40 100 Total Iron 1.5 1.5 Total Copper 0.2 0.2 Ammonia as NH 35 70 4

Exclusion explanations are includ~d on an additional sheet.

Very truly yours,

~

  • PDB:slg Attachment Radiation Prot./Chem. Manager -

Salem Operations CC: Executive Director, DRBC /

Director, USNRC Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulatioil.I/

Dr. Richard Baker Vice President - Nuclear

, NJPDES Report A 7/15/85

  • * ~.

1

Explanation of exclus91s June The following exclusions are included in the attached report and
  • explained below. Exclusions have not endangered nor significantly impacted health or the environment.

DMR NO. EXPLANATION 483 TSS - Cause of high average value unknown.

BOD - Suspected cause of exclusion is the failure of aeration blower on the treatment system.

483 DIFFERENTIAL TEMPERATURE - Programatic errors have been identified as the possible cause of some high ~T values.

These are being investigated.

481-483 FRC - Chlorination was terminated on first indication of chlorine detection.

FAC NET HEAT RELEASE - This is a calculated value based on assumed pump flow rates for two Unit operation and is subject to programatic errors.

Oil and Grease - Cause of high value

  • 489 appears to be run off from paved parking area .
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML18092A689&oldid=1941689"