ML082470316: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 09/02/2008
| issue date = 09/02/2008
| title = Mid-Cycle Performance Review and Inspection Plan, Indian Point, Units 2 and 3
| title = Mid-Cycle Performance Review and Inspection Plan, Indian Point, Units 2 and 3
| author name = Collins S J
| author name = Collins S
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-I/ORA
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-I/ORA
| addressee name = Pollock J E
| addressee name = Pollock J
| addressee affiliation = Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc
| addressee affiliation = Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc
| docket = 05000247, 05000286
| docket = 05000247, 05000286
| license number =  
| license number =  
| contact person = Gray M K, RI/DRP/BR2/610-337-5209
| contact person = Gray M, RI/DRP/BR2/610-337-5209
| document type = Inspection Plan, Letter
| document type = Inspection Plan, Letter
| page count = 9
| page count = 9
Line 26: Line 26:
Plant performance for the most recent quarter at Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3 was within the Licensee Response column of the NRC's Action Matrix based on all inspection findings being classified as having very low safety significance (Green) and all performance indicators indicating performance at a level requiring no additional oversight (Green). Therefore, we plan to conduct reactor oversight process (ROP) baseline inspections at Units 2  
Plant performance for the most recent quarter at Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3 was within the Licensee Response column of the NRC's Action Matrix based on all inspection findings being classified as having very low safety significance (Green) and all performance indicators indicating performance at a level requiring no additional oversight (Green). Therefore, we plan to conduct reactor oversight process (ROP) baseline inspections at Units 2  


and 3. In our annual assessment letter dated March 3, 2008 [ADAMS Ref. ML080610015], we advised you of continuing the substantive cross-cutting issue in the area of Human Performance at Unit  
and 3. In our annual assessment letter dated March 3, 2008 [ADAMS Ref. ML080610015], we advised you of continuing the substantive cross-cutting issue in the area of Human Performance at Unit
: 2. At that time, we informed you of our conclusion that you did not satisfy the criteria for clearing the cross-cutting issue as initially established in the March 2, 2007, annual assessment letter [ADAMS Ref. ML070610603] and reiterated in the August 31, 2007, mid-cycle performance review letter [ADAMS Ref. ML072430942]. Specifically, Entergy had not effectively implemented a corrective action plan for operations procedures; and, Entergy had not achieved a notable reduction in the number of findings with cross-cutting aspects in procedure adequacy. Additionally, we informed you that the substantive cross-cutting issue applied to both Units 2 and 3.
: 2. At that time, we informed you of our conclusion that you did not satisfy the criteria for clearing the cross-cutting issue as initially established in the March 2, 2007, annual assessment letter [ADAMS Ref. ML070610603] and reiterated in the August 31, 2007, mid-cycle performance review letter [ADAMS Ref. ML072430942]. Specifically, Entergy had not effectively implemented a corrective action plan for operations procedures; and, Entergy had not achieved a notable reduction in the number of findings with cross-cutting aspects in procedure adequacy. Additionally, we informed you that the substantive cross-cutting issue applied to both Units 2 and 3.
During this current assessment period there were two inspection findings at Unit 2 and three inspection findings at Unit 3 associated with multiple reactor safety cornerstones that were attributable to the Human Performance cross-cutting aspect of procedure adequacy, H.2(c).
During this current assessment period there were two inspection findings at Unit 2 and three inspection findings at Unit 3 associated with multiple reactor safety cornerstones that were attributable to the Human Performance cross-cutting aspect of procedure adequacy, H.2(c).
J. Pollock 2 These inspection findings involved procedures primarily associated with the Operations department. We recognize that in the last si x months you have reassessed your approach to resolving the substantive cross-cutting issue in procedure adequacy. You concluded that your corrective action plans, prior to March 2008, were not sufficiently focused on the specific procedures and actions that would resolve the cross-cutting issue and improve performance. You described your revised corrective action plans to the NRC in a letter dated May 16, 2008  
J. Pollock 2 These inspection findings involved procedures primarily associated with the Operations department. We recognize that in the last si x months you have reassessed your approach to resolving the substantive cross-cutting issue in procedure adequacy. You concluded that your corrective action plans, prior to March 2008, were not sufficiently focused on the specific procedures and actions that would resolve the cross-cutting issue and improve performance. You described your revised corrective action plans to the NRC in a letter dated May 16, 2008
[ADAMS Ref. ML081490337].
[ADAMS Ref. ML081490337].
An NRC team of inspectors reviewed your revis ed corrective action plans as part of a Problem Identification and Resolution inspection conducted in May 2008 [ADAMS Ref. ML082060612].
An NRC team of inspectors reviewed your revis ed corrective action plans as part of a Problem Identification and Resolution inspection conducted in May 2008 [ADAMS Ref. ML082060612].

Revision as of 08:27, 12 July 2019

Mid-Cycle Performance Review and Inspection Plan, Indian Point, Units 2 and 3
ML082470316
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 09/02/2008
From: Collins S
Region 1 Administrator
To: Joseph E Pollock
Entergy Nuclear Operations
Gray M, RI/DRP/BR2/610-337-5209
References
Download: ML082470316 (9)


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION I 475 ALLENDALE ROAD KING OF PRUSSIA, PA 19406-1415 September 2, 2008 Mr. Joseph E. Pollock Site Vice President Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. Indian Point Energy Center 450 Broadway, GSB Buchanan, NY 10511-0249

SUBJECT:

MID-CYCLE PERFORMANCE REVIEW AND INSPECTION PLAN - INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNITS 2 AND 3

Dear Mr. Pollock:

On August 11, 2008, the NRC staff completed its performance reviews of Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3 for the first half of the calendar year 2008 assessment cycle. Our technical staff reviewed performance indicators (PIs) for the most recent quarter and inspection results from the previous twelve months. The purpose of this letter is to inform you of our assessment of your safety performance during this period and our plans for future inspections at your facility.

This performance review and enclosed inspection plan do not include security information. A separate letter designated and marked as, "Official Use Only--Security Information," will include the security cornerstone review and resultant inspection plan.

Plant performance for the most recent quarter at Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3 was within the Licensee Response column of the NRC's Action Matrix based on all inspection findings being classified as having very low safety significance (Green) and all performance indicators indicating performance at a level requiring no additional oversight (Green). Therefore, we plan to conduct reactor oversight process (ROP) baseline inspections at Units 2

and 3. In our annual assessment letter dated March 3, 2008 [ADAMS Ref. ML080610015], we advised you of continuing the substantive cross-cutting issue in the area of Human Performance at Unit

2. At that time, we informed you of our conclusion that you did not satisfy the criteria for clearing the cross-cutting issue as initially established in the March 2, 2007, annual assessment letter [ADAMS Ref. ML070610603] and reiterated in the August 31, 2007, mid-cycle performance review letter [ADAMS Ref. ML072430942]. Specifically, Entergy had not effectively implemented a corrective action plan for operations procedures; and, Entergy had not achieved a notable reduction in the number of findings with cross-cutting aspects in procedure adequacy. Additionally, we informed you that the substantive cross-cutting issue applied to both Units 2 and 3.

During this current assessment period there were two inspection findings at Unit 2 and three inspection findings at Unit 3 associated with multiple reactor safety cornerstones that were attributable to the Human Performance cross-cutting aspect of procedure adequacy, H.2(c).

J. Pollock 2 These inspection findings involved procedures primarily associated with the Operations department. We recognize that in the last si x months you have reassessed your approach to resolving the substantive cross-cutting issue in procedure adequacy. You concluded that your corrective action plans, prior to March 2008, were not sufficiently focused on the specific procedures and actions that would resolve the cross-cutting issue and improve performance. You described your revised corrective action plans to the NRC in a letter dated May 16, 2008

[ADAMS Ref. ML081490337].

An NRC team of inspectors reviewed your revis ed corrective action plans as part of a Problem Identification and Resolution inspection conducted in May 2008 [ADAMS Ref. ML082060612].

Based on the results of this inspection and the results of other baseline inspections and insights gained through NRC management visits to the site, we concluded that the scope and definition of some corrective actions were still being formulated by Entergy and other actions were in the early stages of implementation. Specifically, at the end of this mid-year assessment period, your reviews of high priority operating procedures were in the initial stages of implementation, you were finalizing your actions to provide for enhanced review of procedures via your normal procedure review process, and you were developing the scope of corrective actions to provide for improved human performance error reduction tools and improved change management for procedure revisions.

Additionally, at the end of this mid-year assessment period, Entergy was completing a review of the safety culture at Indian Point Units 2 and 3. This review was requested by the NRC in our annual assessment letter dated March 3, 2008, to be conducted by individuals independent from the corporate and site organizations being assessed. We understand that the results of the safety culture review are being finalized and will be available in the near future. Completion of the safety culture review and consideration of the results in your corrective action plans will provide the NRC additional insights regarding your performance improvement efforts to address the substantive cross-cutting issue in procedure adequacy.

We will monitor your progress through the baseline inspection program, specifically, through the completion of focused problem identification and resolution inspection samples in accordance with Inspection Procedure 71152, "Identification and Resolution of Problems," during the fourth quarter of 2008. Upon completion of the scope and definition of your corrective actions and following a period of implementation, including internal effectiveness reviews, the NRC will clear this substantive cross-cutting issue when Entergy has demonstrated sustainable performance improvement as evidenced by effective implementation of your corrective action plans that results in no safety significant inspection findings and a notable reduction in the overall number of inspection findings with the same causal factor. Additionally, we request that you provide a written response to the NRC by September 30, 2008, that describes the scope and progress of your corrective action plans, future milestones, and a summary of performance monitoring metrics that indicate your progress in completing your corrective action plans. We also request that your letter provide a summary of the safety culture assessment results and your actions to address the assessment results.

The NRC also identified a substantive cross-cutting issue in the area of Problem Identification and Resolution at Unit 2 in the annual assessment letter dated March 3, 2008 [ADAMS Ref. ML080610015]. At that time, we notified you of our concern with the scope of your efforts and progress in addressing the cross-cutting theme of implementation of corrective actions because Entergy had not demonstrated recognition that the cross-cutting theme affected multiple areas and had not initiated appropriate action to address it. Additionally, we noted Entergy had not implemented effective corrective actions to ensure the replacement Alert and Notification J. Pollock 3 System (ANS) was installed in accordance with NRC Orders and had not implemented corrective actions for the long-standing substantive cross-cutting issue in procedure adequacy. We documented in our annual assessment letter that we would clear the cross-cutting issue associated with implementation of corrective actions when Entergy has demonstrated sustainable performance improvement as evidenced by effective implementation of an appropriate corrective action plan that results in no safety significant inspection findings and a notable reduction in the overall number of inspection findings with the same causal factor.

During this current assessment period there was one inspection finding on Unit 2 that was attributable to the problem identification and resolution cross-cutting aspect of implementation of corrective actions, P.1(d). An NRC team of ins pectors reviewed your corrective action plans as part of a Problem Identification and Resolution inspection conducted in May 2008. Based on the results of this inspection and the results of other baseline inspections and insights gained through NRC management visits to the site, we concluded that Entergy was in the early stages of implementation of your plans to resolve the substantive cross-cutting issue in corrective action effectiveness. We noted that key actions identified by you regarding staffing and training of departmental performance improvement coordinators and expanding the scope of your corrective action review board oversight were recently implemented in late May and early June 2008. Additionally, based on NRC questions during the Problem Identification and Resolution inspection, you reopened your causal evaluation for further review and identified additional actions to be implemented for the substantive cross-cutting issue. Because these actions were either in the early stages of implementation or remained to be implemented, their effectiveness to ensure sustained improvement in corrective action effectiveness has not been demonstrated.

As a result, we have concluded Entergy has not met the criteria described in the annual assessment letter dated March 3, 2008, for clearing the cross-cutting issue. We recognize that Entergy had no safety significant inspection findings and that there has been a notable reduction in findings with the cross-cutting aspect of implementation of corrective actions this assessment period.

We will monitor your progress in this area through the baseline inspection program, specifically, through the completion of a problem identification and resolution inspection sample during the fourth quarter of 2008 that focuses on your progress in implementing your corrective actions and the results. Following a period of implementation, including internal effectiveness reviews, the NRC will clear the cross-cutting issue when Entergy has demonstrated sustainable performance improvement as evidenced by effect ive implementation of your corrective action plans that results in no safety significant inspection findings and a notable reduction in the overall number of inspection findings with the same causal factor.

In addition to the baseline inspection program at both Units 2 and 3, we plan to conduct independent spent fuel storage installation inspections. The NRC will also continue enhanced oversight of Entergy's actions to address issues associated with on-site groundwater contamination characterization and mitigation, and the performance of the ANS, including implementation and reliability testing of the replacement ANS that Entergy is installing in response to the Energy Policy Act of 2005. With regard to our oversight of the replacement ANS, the NRC plans to perform an inspection of your performance in evaluating the causes of

the delay in implementing the replacement ANS and your corrective actions. The inspection is reflected in the attachment to this letter. The inspection will be conducted after you complete reliability testing required by the NRC Orders. Additionally, the NRC will inspect your implementation of commitments you made regarding the use of tone alert radios. These commitments were documented by the NRC in a Confirmatory Action Letter to you dated August 22, 2008 [ADAMS Ref. ML082350676]. We will continue enhanced oversight J. Pollock 4 associated with on-site groundwater contamination and installation of the replacement ANS as described in the ROP Deviation Memorandum, approved on December 19, 2007 [ADAMS Ref.

ML073480290].

The enclosed inspection plan details the baseline and deviation memorandum inspections, less those related to physical protection, scheduled through December 31, 2009. The inspection plan is provided to allow for the resolution of any scheduling conflicts and personnel availability issues well in advance of inspector arrival onsite. Routine resident inspections are not listed due to their ongoing and continuous nature. The inspections in the last nine months of the inspection plan are tentative and may be revised based on our end-of-cycle safety performance review. In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its

enclosure will be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Please contact Mel Gray at 610-337-5209 with any questions you may have regarding this letter or the inspection plan.

Sincerely, /RA Original Signed by:/

Samuel J. Collins Regional Administrator

Enclosure:

Indian Point 2 & 3 Inspection / Activity Plan cc w/encl: Senior Vice President, Entergy Nuclear Operations Vice President, Operations, Entergy Nuclear Operations Vice President, Oversight, Entergy Nuclear Operations Senior Manager, Nuclear Safety and Licensing, Entergy Nuclear Operations Senior Vice President and COO, Entergy Nuclear Operations Assistant General Counsel, Entergy Nuclear Operations Manager, Licensing, Entergy Nuclear Operations P. Tonko, President and CEO, New York State Energy Research and Development Authority C. Donaldson, Esquire, Assistant Attorney General, New York Department of Law A. Donahue, Mayor, Village of Buchanan J. G. Testa, Mayor, City of Peekskill R. Albanese, Four County Coordinator S. Lousteau, Treasury Department, Entergy Services, Inc. Chairman, Standing Committee on Energy, NYS Assembly Chairman, Standing Committee on Environmental Conservation, NYS Assembly Chairman, Committee on Corporations, Authorities, and Commissions M. Slobodien, Director, Emergency Planning J. Pollock 5 P. Eddy, NYS Department of Public Service Assemblywoman Sandra Galef, NYS Assembly T. Seckerson, County Clerk, Westchester County Board of Legislators A. Spano, Westchester County Executive R. Bondi, Putnam County Executive C. Vanderhoef, Rockland County Executive E. A. Diana, Orange County Executive T. Judson, Central NY Citizens Awareness Network M. Elie, Citizens Awareness Network D. Lochbaum, Nuclear Safety Engineer, Union of Concerned Scientists Public Citizen's Critical Mass Energy Project M. Mariotte, Nuclear Information & Resources Service F. Zalcman, Pace Law School, Energy Project L. Puglisi, Supervisor, Town of Cortlandt Congressman John Hall Congresswoman Nita Lowey Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton Senator Charles Schumer G. Shapiro, Senator Clinton's Staff J. Riccio, Greenpeace P. Musegaas, Riverkeeper, Inc. M. Kaplowitz, Chairman of County Environment & Health Committee A. Reynolds, Environmental Advocates D. Katz, Executive Director, Citizens Awareness Network K. Coplan, Pace Environmental Litigation Clinic M. Jacobs, IPSEC W. Little, Associate Attorney, NYSDEC M. J. Greene, Clearwater, Inc. R. Christman, Manager Training and Development J. Spath, New York State Energy Research, SLO Designee A. J. Kremer, New York Affordable Reliable Electricity Alliance (NY AREA)

Indian Point Inspection / Activity Plan 07/01/2008

-12/31/2009 Inspection Type Inspection Activity Planned Dates Start End No. of Staff on Site Title Unit Number Page 1 of 2 08/29/2008 08:39:45 Report 22 1 ISFSI-ISFSI INSPECTIONS Other Routine Preoperational Testing of Independent Spent Fuel Storage Facility Installation at Operating Plants 01/28/2008 10/31/2008 2 60854.1 IP Other Routine Operation of an Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation at Operating Plants 01/28/2008 10/31/2008 2 60855.1 IP 3 7111111B-REQUAL INSPECTION +P/F REVIEW Baseline Inspections Licensed Operator Requalification Program 09/29/2008 10/03/2008 2 7111111B IP 3 MODS-PERMANENT PLANT MODIFICATIONS Baseline Inspections Evaluations of Changes, Tests, or Experiments and Permanent Plant Modifications 07/28/2008 08/01/2008 2 7111117T IP Baseline Inspections Evaluations of Changes, Tests, or Experiments and Permanent Plant Modifications 08/11/2008 08/15/2008 2 7111117T IP 1 71121-OCC RAD SAFETY Baseline Inspections A ccess Control to Radiologically Significant Areas 08/04/2008 08/08/2008 2 7112101 IP Baseline Inspections A LARA Planning and Controls 08/04/2008 08/08/2008 2 7112102 IP 2 7112203-PUB RAD SAFETY - REMP Generic Safety Inspecti o Review of the Implementation of the Industry Ground Water Protection Voluntary Initiative 08/11/2008 08/15/2008 2 2515/173 IP Baseline Inspections Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) And Radioactive Material Control Program 08/11/2008 08/15/2008 2 7112203 IP 2 DEV MEMO-DEVIATION MEMO - GROUNDWATER MONITORING Other Routine Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) And Radioactive Material Control Program 08/12/2008 08/13/2008 2 7112203 IP 1 DEV MEMO-DEVIATION MEMO - NEW ANS PERFORMANCE EP Baseline Inspection A lert and Notification System Testing 08/13/2008 08/14/2008 2 7111402 IP EP Baseline Inspection A lert and Notification System Testing 09/23/2008 09/25/2008 2 7111402 IP EP Baseline Inspection A lert and Notification System Testing 10/28/2008 10/30/2008 2 7111402 IP EP Baseline Inspection A lert and Notification System Testing 11/17/2008 11/19/2008 2 7111402 IP 3 TI 171-TI 171 Generic Safety Inspecti o Verification of Site Specific Implementation Of B.5.b Phase 2 & 3 Mitigating Strategies 09/29/2008 10/03/2008 2 2515/171 IP 3 ANS-FOLLOW-UP (WEEK TO BE DETERMINED)

Other Routine Followup On Corrective Actions For Violations And Deviations 10/01/2008 12/31/2008 2 92702 IP 2 TI 176-TI 176 Generic Safety Inspecti o Emergency Diesel Generator Tech Spec Surveillance Requirements Re: Endurance & Margin Testing 11/10/2008 11/14/2008 2 2515/176 IP 1 71122.02-PUB RAD SAFETY - RADWASTE Baseline Inspections Radioactive Material Processing and Transportation 11/17/2008 11/21/2008 2 7112202 IP 1 EP-EP EXERCISE EVALUATION EP Baseline Inspection Exercise Evaluation 12/01/2008 12/05/2008 2 7111401 IP EP Baseline Inspection Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan Changes 12/01/2008 12/05/2008 2 7111404 IP Baseline Inspections Drill/Exercise Performance 12/01/2008 12/05/2008 2 71151-EP01 IP Baseline Inspections ERO Drill Participation 12/01/2008 12/05/2008 2 71151-EP02 IP Baseline Inspections A lert & Notification System 12/01/2008 12/05/2008 2 71151-EP03 IP This report does not include INPO and OUTAGE activities.

This report shows only on-site and announced inspection procedures.

Indian Point Inspection / Activity Plan 07/01/2008

-12/31/2009 Inspection Type Inspection Activity Planned Dates Start End No. of Staff on Site Title Unit Number Page 2 of 2 08/29/2008 08:39:45 Report 22 1 71121-OCC RAD SAFETY Baseline Inspections Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation and Protective Equipment 12/15/2008 12/19/2008 2 7112103 IP Baseline Inspections Occupational Exposure Control Effectiveness 12/15/2008 12/19/2008 2 71151-OR01 IP Baseline Inspections RETS/ODCM Radiological Effluent 12/15/2008 12/19/2008 2 71151-PR01 IP 1 ISFSI-ANNUAL SAMPLE - ISFSI Other Routine Operation Of An ISFSI 01/01/2009 12/31/2009 2 60855 IP 1 7112201-PUB RAD SAFETY - RETS Baseline Inspections Radioactive Gaseous and Liquid Effluent Treatment and Monitoring Systems 02/16/2009 02/20/2009 2 7112201 IP 1 71121-OCC RAD SAFETY Baseline Inspections A ccess Control to Radiologically Significant Areas 03/23/2009 03/27/2009 2 7112101 IP Baseline Inspections A LARA Planning and Controls 03/23/2009 03/27/2009 2 7112102 IP 1 7111107T-HEAT SINK INSP Baseline Inspections Heat Sink Performance 05/11/2009 05/15/2009 2 7111107T IP 6 7111121-CDBI Baseline Inspections Component Design Bases Inspection 07/20/2009 07/24/2009 2 7111121 IP Baseline Inspections Component Design Bases Inspection 08/03/2009 08/07/2009 2 7111121 IP Baseline Inspections Component Design Bases Inspection 08/10/2009 08/14/2009 2 7111121 IP 2 EP PROGR-EP PROGRAM INSPECTION EP Baseline Inspection A lert and Notification System Testing 11/01/2009 11/07/2009 2 7111402 IP EP Baseline Inspection Emergency Response Organization Augmentation Testing 11/01/2009 11/07/2009 2 7111403 IP EP Baseline Inspection Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan Changes 11/01/2009 11/07/2009 2 7111404 IP EP Baseline Inspection Correction of Emergency Preparedness Weaknesses and Deficiencies 11/01/2009 11/07/2009 2 7111405 IP Baseline Inspections Drill/Exercise Performance 11/01/2009 11/07/2009 2 71151-EP01 IP Baseline Inspections ERO Drill Participation 11/01/2009 11/07/2009 2 71151-EP02 IP Baseline Inspections A lert & Notification System 11/01/2009 11/07/2009 2 71151-EP03 IP This report does not include INPO and OUTAGE activities.

This report shows only on-site and announced inspection procedures.

Indian Point 3 Inspection / Activity Plan 07/01/2008

-12/31/2009 Inspection Type Inspection Activity Planned Dates Start End No. of Staff on Site Title Unit Number Page 1 of 2 08/29/2008 08:41:30 Report 22 1 71121-OCC RAD SAFETY Baseline Inspections A ccess Control to Radiologically Significant Areas 08/04/2008 08/08/2008 3 7112101 IP Baseline Inspections A LARA Planning and Controls 08/04/2008 08/08/2008 3 7112102 IP 2 7112203-PUB RAD SAFETY - REMP Generic Safety Inspecti o Review of the Implementation of the Industry Ground Water Protection Voluntary Initiative 08/11/2008 08/15/2008 3 2515/173 IP Baseline Inspections Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) And Radioactive Material Control Program 08/11/2008 08/15/2008 3 7112203 IP 2 DEV MEMO-DEVIATION MEMO - GROUNDWATER MONITORING Other Routine Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) And Radioactive Material Control Program 08/12/2008 08/13/2008 3 7112203 IP 1 DEV MEMO-DEVIATION MEMO - NEW ANS PERFORMANCE EP Baseline Inspection A lert and Notification System Testing 08/13/2008 08/14/2008 3 7111402 IP EP Baseline Inspection A lert and Notification System Testing 09/23/2008 09/25/2008 3 7111402 IP EP Baseline Inspection A lert and Notification System Testing 10/28/2008 10/30/2008 3 7111402 IP EP Baseline Inspection A lert and Notification System Testing 11/17/2008 11/19/2008 3 7111402 IP 3 TI 171-TI 171 Generic Safety Inspecti o Verification of Site Specific Implementation Of B.5.b Phase 2 & 3 Mitigating Strategies 09/29/2008 10/03/2008 3 2515/171 IP 3 ANS-FOLLOW-UP (WEEK TO BE DETERMINED)

Other Routine Followup On Corrective Actions For Violations And Deviations 10/01/2008 12/31/2008 3 92702 IP 2 TI 176-TI 176 Generic Safety Inspecti o Emergency Diesel Generator Tech Spec Surveillance Requirements Re: Endurance & Margin Testing 11/10/2008 11/14/2008 3 2515/176 IP 1 71122.02-PUB RAD SAFETY - RADWASTE Baseline Inspections Radioactive Material Processing and Transportation 11/17/2008 11/21/2008 3 7112202 IP 1 EP-EP EXERCISE EVALUATION EP Baseline Inspection Exercise Evaluation 12/01/2008 12/05/2008 3 7111401 IP EP Baseline Inspection Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan Changes 12/01/2008 12/05/2008 3 7111404 IP Baseline Inspections Drill/Exercise Performance 12/01/2008 12/05/2008 3 71151-EP01 IP Baseline Inspections ERO Drill Participation 12/01/2008 12/05/2008 3 71151-EP02 IP Baseline Inspections A lert & Notification System 12/01/2008 12/05/2008 3 71151-EP03 IP 1 71121-OCC RAD SAFETY Baseline Inspections Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation and Protective Equipment 12/15/2008 12/19/2008 3 7112103 IP Baseline Inspections Occupational Exposure Control Effectiveness 12/15/2008 12/19/2008 3 71151-OR01 IP Baseline Inspections RETS/ODCM Radiological Effluent 12/15/2008 12/19/2008 3 71151-PR01 IP 1 7112201-PUB RAD SAFETY - RETS Baseline Inspections Radioactive Gaseous and Liquid Effluent Treatment and Monitoring Systems 02/16/2009 02/20/2009 3 7112201 IP 1 7111108P-U3 INSERVICE INSPECTION Baseline Inspections Inservice Inspection Activities - PWR 03/16/2009 03/27/2009 3 7111108P IP This report does not include INPO and OUTAGE activities.

This report shows only on-site and announced inspection procedures.

Indian Point 3 Inspection / Activity Plan 07/01/2008

-12/31/2009 Inspection Type Inspection Activity Planned Dates Start End No. of Staff on Site Title Unit Number Page 2 of 2 08/29/2008 08:41:30 Report 22 1 71121-OCC RAD SAFETY Baseline Inspections A ccess Control to Radiologically Significant Areas 03/23/2009 03/27/2009 3 7112101 IP Baseline Inspections A LARA Planning and Controls 03/23/2009 03/27/2009 3 7112102 IP 1 7111107T-HEAT SINK INSP Baseline Inspections Heat Sink Performance 05/11/2009 05/15/2009 3 7111107T IP 4 71152B-PI&R BIENNIAL TEAM Baseline Inspections Identification and Resolution of Problems 05/18/2009 05/22/2009 3 71152B IP Baseline Inspections Identification and Resolution of Problems 06/08/2009 06/12/2009 3 71152B IP 3 7111111B-BIENNIAL REQUAL INSP (U3)W/ P/F RESULTS Baseline Inspections Licensed Operator Requalification Program 10/05/2009 10/09/2009 3 7111111B IP 5 MODS-PERMANENT PLANT MODIFICATIONS Baseline Inspections Evaluations of Changes, Tests, or Experiments and Permanent Plant Modifications 10/19/2009 10/23/2009 3 7111117T IP Baseline Inspections Evaluations of Changes, Tests, or Experiments and Permanent Plant Modifications 11/02/2009 11/06/2009 3 7111117T IP 2 EP PROGR-EP PROGRAM INSPECTION EP Baseline Inspection A lert and Notification System Testing 11/01/2009 11/07/2009 3 7111402 IP EP Baseline Inspection Emergency Response Organization Augmentation Testing 11/01/2009 11/07/2009 3 7111403 IP EP Baseline Inspection Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan Changes 11/01/2009 11/07/2009 3 7111404 IP EP Baseline Inspection Correction of Emergency Preparedness Weaknesses and Deficiencies 11/01/2009 11/07/2009 3 7111405 IP Baseline Inspections Drill/Exercise Performance 11/01/2009 11/07/2009 3 71151-EP01 IP Baseline Inspections ERO Drill Participation 11/01/2009 11/07/2009 3 71151-EP02 IP Baseline Inspections A lert & Notification System 11/01/2009 11/07/2009 3 71151-EP03 IP This report does not include INPO and OUTAGE activities.

This report shows only on-site and announced inspection procedures.