ML20217B873

Notice of Violation from Insp on 910106-0202.Violation Noted:Measures Not Adequate to Assure Prompt Corrective Action Taken in Correction of Generic Fuse Installation Problems Originally Identified in March 1989

ML20217B873
Person / Time
Site:	Mcguire, McGuire
Issue date:	02/19/1991
From:	Herdt A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20217B870	List: IR 05000369/1991001 ML20217B863 ML20217B873
References
50-369-91-01, 50-369-91-1, 50-370-91-01, 50-370-91-1, NUDOCS 9103120261
Download: ML20217B873 (1)

Text

_ _

ENCLOSURE 1 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Duke Power Company Docket Nos. 50-369 and 50-370 McGuire Units 1 and 2 License Nos. NPF-9 and NPF-17 During the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection conducted on January 6 - February 2,1991, a violation of NRC requirements was identified, in accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2 Appendix C (1990), the violation is identified below:

10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, states, in part, that measures shall be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality, such as failures, malfunctions, deficiencies, deviations, defective material and equipment, and nonconformances are promptly ideatified and corrected.

Contrary to the above, measures were not adequate to assure prompt corrective action was taken in the correction of generic fuse installation problems originally ident1fied in March 1989. Other cases of incorrectly installed fuses had been identified by the licensee since March 1989, but corrective action had not been initiated for any generic cases as of February 2, 1991.

This is a Severity Level IV (Supplement I) violation.

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Duke Power Company is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region 11, and if applicable, a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice). This reply c,hould be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation: (1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) tha corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order may be issued to show cause why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time. Under the authority of Section 182 of the Act, 42 U.S.C. 2232, this response shall be submitted under oath or affirmation.

FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

-[ n L E!

I i Alan R. Herdt, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 3 Division of Reactor Projects Dated at Atlanta, Leorgia this 19th day of Feb. 1991 9103120261 910219 i

gDR ADOCK 050 g 9

- . -_ ,_ _ _- -