ML20216J362

Forwards Summary of 870615 Meeting Re V English 2.206 Petition

ML20216J362
Person / Time
Site:	07001113
Issue date:	07/23/1987
From:	Thompson H NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
To:	Roisman A AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
Shared Package
ML20216J368	List: ML20216J362 ML20216J376
References
NUDOCS 8707020367
Download: ML20216J362 (1)

Text

.

A ')

,e o

. ?D V---

ROISMAN/1 July 23, 1987 i DISTRIBUTI0fl Mr. Anthony Z. Roisman NMSS R/F focketNo.70-JHolonich 1113I 1

1401 New York Ave., N.W. Directors R/F Richard J.

HLThompson Goddard Suite 600 Washington, D.C. 20005 R. E. Cunningham J. Taylor Glen J. Sjoblom PDR- 1

Dear Mr. Roisman:

Eugene J. Holler l Susan S. Chidakel j Enclosed is a copy of the summary I have prepared to document our June 15, i 1987, meeting on the Vera English 2.206 petition. The purpose of this letter is to provide you with a copy of this summary.

1 In addition, during the meeting, you indicated that you intended to file a reply to the General Electric (GE) response to the 2.206 petition. It would help the staff in reaching resolution of this matter if you would address in your reply the following issues raised in the GE response:

(1) GE's contention that the Department of Labor Adjudicatory Law Judge's " pretext" conclusion regarding the removal of Ms. English from the Chemet Lab is based on errors of fact and a faulty legal conclusion. GE Response at 17-22. In particular, your comments would be helpful regarding'GE's position that action against Ms.

English was different than that taken against other employees who violated safety requirements because'Ms. English's actions were deliberate. GE Response at 21.

(2) GE's position that Subsection 210(g) precludes the application of Section 210 of the Energy Reorganization Act to Ms. English's discharge because of her deliberate failure to clean up a-radioactive spill. GE Response at 23-30.

(3) GE's arguments that the NRC is without authority' to provide a remedy to an employee. GE Response at 32 and at 46-48.

(4) GE's position that there was no continuing violation in this case.

GE Response at 37-41.

Sincerely, 8707020367 070623 PDR c ADDCK 07001113 PDR Hugh L. Thompson, Jr., Director Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards

Enclosure:

As stated 0FC :NMS  :  :  :  :  :  :

NAME :HLT ompson :  :  :  :  :  :

DATE :06/22/87  :  :  :  :  :  :.

.