ML20210H787
| ML20210H787 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 11/25/1986 |
| From: | Brosnan D, Dougherty F, Yeager R TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20210F162 | List:
|
| References | |
| DAP-DI-EIC-003, DAP-DI-EIC-3, NUDOCS 8702110476 | |
| Download: ML20210H787 (19) | |
Text
.
e PROCEDLRE/ INSTRUCTION COVER $>EET O
TITLE:
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW OF EIC DESIGN CHECKLISTS NUMElER:
DAP-DI-EIC-003 Revision Propored Date Reviewed Date Approved Date Qf 7.c k 16 f&n //l21)Ti &
R/acl&
o O
l l
l l
Note:
Rev. O of this Discipline Instruction contains 19 sheate inlud hn
\\
i
'~
attachments and cover sheet, g g.
gp,oLLp CDPy p
i
[lkliE5 b b 8702110476 870126 ADOCK 05000445 k
J PDR PDR
- - -.. -.. - ~...
- i='
t 4
TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Cove r Shee t...............................................
I 1
Table of Conten ts..........................................
11 l.0 P U RP O S E.................................................
l 2.0 SCOPE...................................................
l 3.0 DEFINITIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES.......................
2 4.0 I NS T RU CTI O N............................................
3 t
5.0 DOC UMENT ATI O N........................................
6 i,
ATTACHMENTS i.
A INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE IMPLEM.ENTATION OF FORM A-l FOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW OF DESIGN CHECKLISTS...............................
A-1 i
FORMA-l.........................................
A-l to A-6 i
B INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF FORM B-l FOR DATA BASE ENTRY..................
B-1 & B-il t
I F O R M B-l.........................................
B-l & B-2 l
i l
1 GA-86-040 11
O COMANCE PEAK RESPON5E TEAM - DAP DISCPLitE INSTRUCTION Number:DAP-DI-EIC-
Title:
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW OF EIC DESIGN Revisiom 0 003 CHECKLISTS l.0 PURPOSE This discipline instruction defines the methodology and requirements for performing administrative reviews of completed DAP design, checklists. The purpose is to ensure that the opproved DAP design checklists have been completed in occordance with DAP procedural requirements and to provide the mechanism for documenting the necessary corrective action to these check-lists.
Information extracted from DAP documentation will be cross-refe-renced to other pertinent dato in order to comply with a commitment made to the NRC (i.e., HDA number (s), DIR numbers, criterion, etc.). The implemen-l tation of this discipline Instruction identifies those design checklists which do not comply with DAP procedures.
i 2.0 SCOPE This instruction oddresses the administrative review of Design Review Evalu-i ation Checklists, Type "C", for the electrical / instrumentation and control disciplines, referred to as design checklists.
GA-86-40 Page I of.6
O COMANCvE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DAP DISCPLIE INSTRUCTION Number:DAP-DI-EIC-
Title:
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW OF EIC DESIGN Revision: 0 003 CHECKLISTS 3.0 DEFINITIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 Definitions 3.1.1 Design Checklists Type "C" checklists which have been prepared and imple-mented in accordance with the requirements of DAPs-4,
-S, and -6.
3.1.2 Administrative Checklists (Form A-l)
Checklists prepared in accordance with this Discipline Instruction that are used to verify that design checklists meet the requirements of the DAP procedures.
3.2 Responsibilities 3.2.1 Administrative Checklist Reviewer The Administrative Checklist Reviewer is responsible for performing administrative checklist reviews in occordance with the requirements of this instruction.
l l
l GA-86-40 Page 2 of 6 l
.y
--,--,_-.,,,.,_..,-.---_..,.--_.---___.,,,,-.m-.,_,,_-.,,,,.y,-
,--m.-.,._
,.,.,_s_,.,,..
- - + -
9 O
COMANCE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DAP DISCPLIE INSTRUCTION Number:DAP-DI-EIC-
Title:
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW OF EIC DESIGN Revision: 0 003 CHECKLISTS 3.2.2 Discipline Coordinator The Discipline Coordinator is responsible for the following:
Evoluoting reviewers' comments and issuing design o
checklist revisions or supplements os necessary.
o Assigning reviewers who have been trained in this Discipline Instruction and meet the requirements of DAP-IS.
O 4
4.0 INSTRUCTION 4.1 General DAP review of design input and output Information is performed in occordance with DAPs -5, and -6, using design checklists prepored I
in occordance with DAP-4. In addition, DAP-14 Identifies the requirements which must be met for the design checklist to become o record which meets the requirements of the CPRT Program Plan.
l l
The activities described in the following sections shall be per-l formed to review the compliance of issued Type C checklists with DAP requirements.
l GA-86-40 Page 3 of 6 l
t
,,--n,-- -. - - -, - - - -. - - -, -..,. -,,, - - - -. - -...,. - -, - - - - -,
1 OG COMANCPE PEAK RESP 0t4E TEAM - DAP DISCPLitE INETRUCTION Number:DAP-DI-EIC-
Title:
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW OF EIC DESIGN Revision: 0 003 CHECKLISTS O
4.2 Performance of the Administrative Checklist Review Form A-1, or its equivalent as approved by the Discipline Coordi-notor, shall be used to document the administrative review dis-cussed in Section 4.l. Instructions for completion of this checklist i
are included in Attachment A.
All attributes on Form A-l should be designated as " Sat.,"
"Unsat.," or "N/A."
For any attribute designated as "Unsat." or "N/A", the Checklist Reviewer shall document the reasons in the comments column on the administrative checklist.
The reviewer shall assu' e himself of the adequacy of the completed r
administrative checklist and sign in the " Reviewer" space.
4.3 Approval of the Administrative Checklist Package 4.3.1 Upon completion of the Forms A-l and B-l, the reviewer shall submit the forms, along with the applicable Type "C" checklist (s) and attachments to the Discipline Coordinator as an administrative checklist package.
The Discipline Coordinator is responsible for resolution of "Unsat" Items GA-86-40 Page 4 of 6
O COMANCbE PE AK RESP 0t4E TEAM - DAP DISCPLitE INSTRUCTION Number:DAP-DI-EIC-
Title:
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW OF EIC DESIGN Revision: 0 003 CHECKLISTS and review and approval of Form A-1, which he shall Indicate by signing the " Resolution of Unsats.", line on the form. The discipline coordinator is also responsible for supplying Form B-l to the data base entry coordinator.
4.3.2 After entry of the Form B-l Information into the data base, a printout in the format of Form B-l will be prepared. A reviewer shall review the printout Form B-l for correctness and sign in the " Reviewer" space.
The printout form shall be opproved by the Discipline Coordi-notor, who shall sign the " Approved By" line of the printout form.
I 4.4 Deslan Checklist Revisions Revisions or supplements to design checl<llsts that are required to be completed to address "Unsats." on Form A-l that were identi-fled during this administrative review shall be processed in occor-dance with DAP-4.
4.5 Recording Checklist Database Information See Attachment B for guidance on completing the data base entry collection form, Form B-l.
l GA-86-40 Page 5 of 6 V
i i
O COMANC>E PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DAP DISCPLitE INSTRUCTION Number:DAP-DI-EIC-
Title:
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW OF EIC DESIGN Revision: 0 003 CHECKLISTS 5.0 DOCUMENTATION 5.1 Eoch completed administrative checklist (Form A-l) shall be forwarded to the DAP Manager in occordance with DAP-14.
5.2 Each completed computer generated data base entry collection form (Form B-l) shall be forwarded to the DAP Manager in occordance with DAP-14, 5.3 Approved administrative cFecklists and data base entry collection forms shall be submitted to the Project Administrative Assistant for filing, distribution and/or data entry.
~
i l
l l
CA-86 40 j
Page 6 of 6
'O l,-_
ATTACHMENT A lNSTRUCTIONS FOR TFE IMPLEMENTATION OF FORM A-l j
FOR TtE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW OF DESIGN CtECKLISTS ll Obtain the following:
o.
Log of checklist forms.
b.
Memos approving checklist forms.
Log of opproved design checkilsts.
c.
d.
List of qualified reviewers, checkers, and approvers with qualification date supplied by the Training Coordinator.
Approved design checklists.
e.
2.
Review opproved design checklist and complete Attachment A (Form A-1).
The Administrative Checklist Number shall correspond to the design checklist number os follows: DAP-ACL-X-YYY-WWW/Z (Administrative Checklist) corresponds to DAP-CLC-X-YYY-WWW/Z (Design Checklist).
O 3.
"Unsats." on Form A-l shall be resolved by entering the revision number of the design checklist in the appropriate column of Form A-l.
O GA-86-40 A-1
ATTACHMENT A (FORM A-1) i j
COM'LETED CECKLIST REVEW DAP-ACL-1 Design Checklist j
SAT /
Revision F UNSAT/
Which Resolves l
Attribute Reviewed NA UNSAT Comments 1
I J
t 1.
The design checklist form number is pro-l vided on each page of the deskjn checklist j
in a format which includes the DAP Form 4
number, its revision number, and the date of opproval i
l 2.
The design checklist form and revision is i
logged in the Discipline Coordinators' log.
3.
The design checklist form is approved by memo from the Discipline Coordinator.
}
l 4.
The design checklist has a control
)
identifier number on each page in the format of DAP-CLC-X-YYY-WWW j
(optional).
Design checklists approved I
prior to 9/17/86 may have a control I
klentifier number in the format of DAP-CL-X-YYY-WWW (optional).
5.
This identifier number and revision is documented in the discipline log.
I l
l l
GA-86-40 A-1
O (v
tv ATTACHAENT A (FORM A-1)
(continued Deskyn Checklist SAT /
Revision #
UNSAT/
Which Resolves Attribute Reviewed NA UNSAT Comments 6.
The design checklist kjentifies the following:
Criteria List Number and Revision O.
b.
Criterio Numbers c.
Correlation between the checklist attribute / criterion and the Criteria List Criterion Number or for Generic Specification and Generic Calculo-tion checklists, o reference source for the crit::rio;.scifrLuie.
d.
Review Topic Number e.
General Description f.
Primary References (i.-., drawings, calculations, spec!fications) 7.
All identified references, except for design change documents where oli pages were reviewed, within the design check-list contain document number and page.
8.
The correlation between the deskjn checklist attributes marked " Sat." or "Unsot." and HDA is identified. (DAP-S and -6, Section 4.3).
GA-86-40 A-2
O p
']
O J
ATTACHAENT A FORM A-1)
(continued)
Design Checklist SAT /
Revision #
UNSAT/
Which Resolves Attribute Reviewed NA UNSAT Comments 9.
The training in DAPs -2, -4, -5, -6 and
-13 (for calculatior s) for the reviewer, checker, and approver was current when the design checklist was performed. This assessment is based on training reviews and signature dates on the design check-list.
~3 DIR numbers are assigned for each "Unsat."
design checklist item and "Uhsat." items are explained in the
" Comments" column.
(DAP-5 and -6, Section 4.5).
II.
All RFI's in the comments section of the.
desip checklist are closed or converted to a DIR.
12.
The design checklist includes a general description of the checklist topical area.
13.
All revisions / supplements have been pro-2 perly checked and opproved. The follow-ing information (DAP-4, Section 5.0) is required:
a.
Revision number and date are entered on the deskp checklist.
GA-86-40 A-3
O O
O-ATTACFeENT A (FORM A-1)
(continued)
Design Checklist SAT /
Revision #
UNSAT/
Which Resolves Attribute Reviewed NA UNSAT Comments b.
Sections of the design checklist affected by the revision are marked with a vertical line and revision number in margin.
c.
Supplements are identified with a unique supplement number.
d.
Revisions have been
- reviewed, checked, and opproved.
- 14. The design checklists meet the following requirements for Ouolity Records (DAP-I4, Appendix E).
NOTE: If working with an 'briginol" of the checklist that is in the DAP Files as a copy, evaluate these items on the basis of the expected condition of the copy.
The design checklist is an original a.
document, or a copy which, when reproduced, will produce a legible COPY.
b.
Corrections are properly annotated, initialed, and dated.
{
GA-86-40 A-4
O O
O-ATTAOG G G A
~
FORM A-1)
(continued Desk n Checklist 3
SAT /
Revision #
UNSAT/
Which Resolves Attribute Reviewed NA UNSAT Comments c.
No white-out, correction tape, or pencil is used.
d.
Ink colors, other than black er red, are not used.
e.
No highlighter is used.
f.
The desip checklist and attachments are properly bound (e.g., sigled, attached to a file folder, placed in a binder, etc.).
g.
If the design check!ist is supple-mented with att J..aats, then a checklist package cover sheet is pro-ykted which lists each individsol checklist, including checklist number, title revision, and nun 6er of pages.
h.
The desip checklist contents are identified as a campiete package, e.g., total page count is identifM on the check!ist cover sheet and sheet numbers are correctly identified on each page of the design checklist, in the Format Sheet No. XX of YY.
GA-86-40 A-5
O O
O-ATTACteENT A FORAR A-1)
(censiemed Deskyn Checklist SAT /
Revision #
UNSAT/
Which Resolves Attribute Reviewed NA LNSAT Comments i.
All changes, ennotations, enhance-ments to irgrove legibility or comments on Project documents shall be dated and initialed. Highlight on references used for review do not rewire skpoture and dating provided the highlight was not necessary for the review or is not referenced specifically in the design checklist.
- 15. All checklist items reviewed are deskynoted as " SAT.", 'tJNSAT.", H/A",
or N/C".
I6. Where it is not apparent to o polified reviewer, the use of H/A" or H/C" on the desip checklist should be
&ce.g.kJ by on explanation in the
Comments" column or e att&t.a..t to the design checklist.
Reviewer:
/
Signature Date Resoluthm of UNSATs Verified:
/
Signature Date o
GA-86-40 A-6
ATTACHMENT B
/~^
tjl INSTRUCTIONS FOR TFE IMPLEMENTATION OF FORM B-1 FOR DATA BASE ENTRY 1.
The information to be entered on dato base entry Form B-l will be extracted directly from the corresponding design review checklist.
2.
Information should be entered on Form B-l in accordance with the formatting Information provided belows (a)
ITEM numbers 1-10 identified on Form B-l are defined below. Eoch of these descriptions define o data field in which the information must be entered using the format described in the corresponding DESCRIPTION section.
ITEM DESCRIPTION 1.
FORM B-l NO.
Form B-l Number DAP-BCL-X-YYY/Z X
Discipline (E,1)
=
or YYY Design Checklist No.
Os
=
DAP-BCL-X-YYY-WWW/Z (numeric) j WWW
=
i Generic Spec. or Ganeric Cole Checklist No.
(e.g., CSI or GCl)
Revision (0-9)
Z
=
2.
CHECKLIST NO./REV.
Design Checklist Number and Revision DAP-CLC-X-YYY/Z X
=
Discipline (E,1) or YYY Design Checklist No.
=
DAP-CL-X-YYY/Z (numeric) or WWW Generic Spec. or Generic
=
DAP-CLC-X-YYY-WWW/Z Calc Checklist No.
(e.g., GSI or GCI)
Z Revision (0-9)
=
3.
TOPIC NO. XYY Discipline Topic Number l
X
=
Discipline (E,1)
YY Topic No. (numeric)
=
4.
CHECKLIST FORM NO.
Checklist Form Number and Revision l
DAP-X-YYY/Z X
=
Discipline (E,1)
YYY Form No. (numeric)
=
Z Revision (0 9)
=
5.
ATTRIBUTE NO.
Checklist Attribute Number O
AAA AAA
=
Attribute Number os it oppears on Checklist GA.86 40 B-l
ITEM DESCRIPTION 6.
CRITERIA LIST NO./REV.
Criteria List Number and Revision Discipline (EIC)
)
DAP-CR-XXX-YYY/Z XXX
=
Criteria List No. (numeric)
YYY
=
Revision (0 9)
Z
=
7.
CRITERION NO.
Criterion Number Criterion Number os it AAA.A AAA.A
=
appears on Criteria list.
8.
HDA NO.
HDA Number Discipline (E,1)
XYYY.YYZ X
=
YYY.YY = HDA No. (numeric)
HDA No. (alpho)
Z
=
9.
STATUS Checklist Attribute Status Sat.
5, U, N, C S
=
Unsat.
U
=
N/A N
=
N/C C
=
10.
DIR No.
DIR Number /*ssociated with Checklist D-YYYY Attributes Statused "Unsat."
DIR No. (numeric)
YYYY
=
(b)
Checklist information must be entered in the correct space on Form B-l in place of the variable "placeholders,"(i.e., A, W, X, Y, Z).
(c)
Only the spaces " held" by the vorlobles A, W, X, Y, and Z In the DESCRIPTION section must be entered on Form B-l. For example, to enter the design checklist number and revision for Checklist DAP-CLC-E-002, Rev. O, the correct format as described in the DESCRIPTION section for item 2 is E-002/0. NOTE: Unless review of a Generic Speelficotlan or Generic Cole. Checklist is being performed, DO NOT ENTER ANY CHARACTER in the spaces held by WWW.
(d)
Field width is pre-determined to allow for enough chorocters to occomodate the vorlety of input Information required. The reviewer need not be concerned with number or type of chorocters (alpho/
numeric) when entering information on Form B-l.
(e)
Criterion numbers (ITEM 7), HDA numbers (ITEM 8) and DIR numbers (ITEM 10) should be entered on Form B-l for each design checklist attribute as applicable.
It is not necessary that all four sections available for each of these items on Form B-l are filled in. If the checklist attribute hos fewer than four corresponding criterion numbers, HDA numbers, or DlR numbers, then the remaining section or sections will be left blank. If the checklist attribute requires more than four spaces for any of the items listed above, then the attribute number and all corresponding items must be entered on the following line, including the additional Criterion, HDA, and DlR numbers os O
necessary.
GA 86-40 B-Il
O O
O DATA BASE COLLECTION FORM PREPARER (I) DOCUMENT NO.
FORMB-l l
DAP-DCL-
/
SHEET of (2) DESIGN CKLIST NO./REv.
G) TOPIC NO.
G) TOPIC NO.
O) TOPIC NO.
M) CKLIST FORM NO./REV.
DAP-CLC-
_/
DAP-
/
J j
til ATTRBtJfE 80 CRtTL5T UI CRsT 8 (7) CRIT 2 (7) CRsT 3 (7) CRti 4 m)DOAB mitcA2 elHDA3 3)FCA4 (9)
(le DIR I (101 DIR 2 (101 DIR 3 (101 DIR 4 l
FWA NOJHEv.
5TATUS a
i 4
1 1
l l
i l
l i,
1 1
4 F4 I
1 e
n n
ion fo i
is o
n in i
T E
m T
o m
IS o
s iso mo n
e Ta mT S
a c
e m
M i
R a
O c
F e
m N
)
e O
g r
a IT a
C.P c
I n
e EBo m
L i
L Mta 2
ORu s
con a
B Ft c
i E
n e
S o
m A C B
(
e r
A a
T c
AD m
i t
me m
a t
s
/
e m
e r
ac m
tv st tp ij O
m e.
N t
i T
m N-E L M C t
D m
J t -
CP m
OA er,
- i. n a
t
)
U m
ji
- e IllI ij1 4!
1;i
)
i.
I.
I l
1!