ML20210H584
| ML20210H584 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 11/10/1986 |
| From: | Alley R TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20210F162 | List:
|
| References | |
| DI-C-S-003, DI-C-S-3, NUDOCS 8702110447 | |
| Download: ML20210H584 (22) | |
Text
_
i
)
ATTACHMENT D PROCEDURE / INSTRUCTION COVER SEET TITLE: ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW OF DAP CIVIL / STRUCTURAL CliECKLISTS NUMBER: DI-C/S-003 Revision Prepared Date Reviewed Date Approved Date O WW JI- : ll- 4 -St.
W%f \\ ' 'Oh% & ")lsg Ga.A%
O r '
.c . . . . _ -
. q,p g'7t. !'
, i i
1
'"h0.' '7d s .
, }
~~~
O Form DAP-10-2
-- - ~
TN-85-4262/10 '~~~ .-
D-l
%$21kD R m --
TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Eggs Cover Sheet ..................................... 1 Table of Contents ............................... 11 1.0 PURPOSE .................................... 1 2.0 SCOPE ...................................... 1 3.O DEFINITIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES ........... 2 7 4.0 INSTRUCTION ................................ 3 5.0 DOCUMENTATION .............................. 6 ATTACHMENTS A. INSTRUCTIONS FOR REVIEW OF COMPLETE CHECKLIST USING FORM A-1 .... A A-8 B. INSTRUCTIONS FOR RECORDING g CHECKLIST DATA BASE INFORMATION ...... B B-5 i TN-86-7216C/S 11 DI-C/S-003
!* COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DAP DISCIPLlrE INSTRUCTION Number: DI C/S-003
Title:
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW OF DAP Revision: 0 CIVIL / STRUCTURAL CIECKLISTS T
1.0 PURPOSE .
t This instruction defines the methodology and requirements to be utilized for performing administrative reviews of completed DAP Type C checklist packages, (Ref. DAP-4, Design Review Evaluation Checklist, Attachment C). The purpose is to ensure that the approved checklist packages have been completed in accordance with other DAP procedural requirements and provide the mechanism for documenting any necessary corrective action. It provides guidance for entering information into a data base which will be i
utilized to cross-reference pertinent data (i.e., HDA number (s), DIR numbers, criterion, etc.) in order to comply l with a commitment made to the NRC.
2.0 SCOPE i
,i This instruction addresses the review of Type C checklist packages in the Civil / structural self-initiated review area that were completed and approved prior to 10/1/86. This instruction addresses the format and documentation of information contained in the checklist package and does not address technical review.
< O T -..->21.C,. Pa e 1 ef .
i s
---..--n.., . . - , -
, ,--,,,,n_ . , _ ,,__w, ,.___n__.__,_ _ - , , ., --
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DAP DISCIPLIE INSTRUCTION Number: Dl-C/5-003
Title:
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW OF DAP Revision: 0 CIVIL /5TRUCTURAL CKCKLISTS i
i 3.0 DEFINITIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 Definitions 3.1.1 Design checklists checklists prepared and used to determine the adequacy of plant design which have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of DAP 4, 5, and 6.
j 3.1.2 Administrative Checklists (Form A-1) .
Checklists prepared in accordance with this instruction that are used to r verify that design checklists meet the '
requirements of the DAP procedures.
3.1.3 Checklist Reviewer The reviewer who is assigned to perform this administrative review.
TN-86-7216C/S Page 2 of 6
' + - ,
,,vn-- --_ , - , . . _ ,
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DAP DISCIPLIE INSTRUCTION Number: DI-C/S-003
Title:
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW OF DAP Revision: 0 0 CIVIL / STRUCTURAL CECKLISTS 3.2 Resoonsibilities 3.2.1 Checklist Reviewer The Checklist Reviewer is responsible for the following:
o completing reading assignments for the current revision of procedures DAP-4, -5, -6, and -14 bcfore performing these reviews, o Performing administrative check-list reviews in accordance with instruction.
3.2.2 Discipline Coordinator Evaluating reviewers' comments and i
I T issuing design checklist revisions as '
necessary.
4.0 INSTRUCTION 4.1 General DAP review of. design input and output information is performed in accordance with procedures DAP-5 and DAP-6, using checklists prepared in accor-dance with DAP-4. In addition, DAP-14 identifies the requirements which must be met for the design review to become a record which meets the
' requirements of the CPRT Program Plan.
TN-86-7216C/S Page 3 of 6 l
l
l l
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DAP DISCIPLIE INSTRUCTION Number: Dl-C/5-003
Title:
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW OF DAP Revision: O CIVIL / STRUCTURAL CECKLISTS i
The activities described in the following sections shall be performed
- to review the compliance of completed Type C checklist packages with DAP requirements for all checklists that were completed and approved prior to 10/1/86. l l
4.2 Performance of Administrative checklist Review Attachment A or a checklist containing equivalent information shall be used to document the admini-strative review discussed in Section 4.1. Step-by-step instructions for completion of this i
checklist are included in the attachment.
All items on the A-1 Form should be designated as
" Sat," "Unsat," or "N/A." If the reviewer consi-T ders any item to be "not applicable" (N/A) for a i particular design checklist, a brief explanation should be documented on or filed with the A-1 i
checklist Form.
i Upon completion of the A-1 Review Form,
! the reviewer shall submit the A-1 Form to the Discip-line coordinator for resolution of "Unsat."
items. Whenever possible, the reviewer should provide all input necessary to resolve the
' "Unsat." items at the same time.
l TN-86-7216C/S Page 4 of 6
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DAP DISCIPLIE INSTRUCTION Number: Dl-C5-003
Title:
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW OF DAP Revision: 0 CIVIL / STRUCTURAL CECKLISTS 4.3 Revisions If revisions 'to completed Type 'C checklist packages are required, they shall be processed in accordance with DAP-4. The Discipline Coordi-nator or his designee shall approve the resolu-tion of "Unsat." items by signing the A-1 Form and filing it in accordance with the requirements i -
of DAP-14.
4.4 Recordincr Review Results Information fAttachment B)
The reviewer shall record specific information
! from the checklists reviewed to allow a matrix of I
results to be developed that meets NRC commit- g ments.
The information to be collected, and instructions for collection are defined in Attachment B.
i Attachment B also includes sample forms that can be used for this purpose. This information will then be input into a data base for subsequent summarization.
TN-86-7216C/S Page 5 of 6 i
O
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DAP DISCIPLitE INSTRUCTION Number: Dl-C/5-003
Title:
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW OF DAP Revision: 0 CIVIL / STRUCTURAL CtECKLISTS 5.0 DOCUMENTATION Each completed checklist (Form A-1) shall be forwarded to the DAP Manager in accordance with DAP-14.
Completed input entained from implementing Attachment B should be forwarded to the Disciplina Coordinator for entry into the data base.
O
~.
l TN-86-7216C/S Page 6 of 6 i
O i
- - - , . _ ~ . _ . - . _ , _ , _ _ . . - , . - _ . - . - - - - - - _ - - . . . . . . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ , . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . ~ , _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ - __f
l ATTACHMENT A INSTRUCTIONS FOR REVIEW OF COMPLETED CHECKLIST USING FORM A-1 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
- 1. Review the completed Type C checklist package using the following Detailed Instructions and the Adminis-trative Review form (Form A-1) . Each UNSAT or N/A listed on the form must be explained.
- 2. If UNSAT items are found, a revision to the Type C checklist package will be prepared to correct these items. This will be done in accordance with procedure DAP-4, Section 5 and this instruction. The revised and added pages with a Revision Approval Cover Sheet will form the revision package. Do not alter the record copy of the previous revision of the checklist package in any way as it will be retained for perma-nont record.
- 3. The completed revision package along with the completed Administrative Review form (Form A-1) shall be given to the Discipline Coordinator for review and approval.
O INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM A-1 " RECORD VERIFICATION CHECKLIST" Item 1. Use of Approved Checklist Form: (DAP-4, Sec-r tion 5.1)
Approved Type C checklist forms must be used in the reviews. Check if the form number (includes date and revision) corresponds to the list of approved checklist forms. If an unapproved checklist form was used, obtain approval of the form following DAP-4, Section 4.4 or initiate other action to resolve the UNSAT as instructed by the Discipline coordinator.
Item 2. Checklist Control No.: (DAP-4, Section 5.3)
All DAP-generated pages in the Type C checklist package must be identified with the checklist control number (DAP-CLS-C/S-YYY). The first page of source or reference documents that are included in the package must also be identified with the same control number.
TN-86-7216A/CS A-1 DI-C/S-003
Item 3. Checklist / Criteria The Type C checklist package must contain a correlation of criteria numbers (from the C/S criteria list) to the checklist attributes.
(Note: This information, if missing, will be collected in accordance with Attachment B and included in a revision to the Type C checklist package.)
Item 4. Checklist /HDA correlation (DAPs-5 and -6, Section 4.3)
The Type C checklist package must contain a correlation of HDA numbers to the checklist attributes. ,
~
(Note: This information, if missing, will be collected in accordance with Attachment B and included in a revision to the Type C checklist package.)
- Item 5. Reviewers, Checkers and Approver Qualification
) (DAPs -5 and -6, Section 4.1)
For the production of Type C checklist packages, O adequate qualification means completed reading assignments for procedures DAP-2, -4, -5, and -6.
Check dated signatures on the cover sheet against list of qualified personnel with dates.
Reviewers performing supporting calculations y shall also have completed the reading assignment i for DAP-13.
i (Note: For any UNSAT findings for this item, you must provide the reviewer or checkers name, and the date they signed the package on the " Comments /Explana-tien" column of Form A-1. The Disci-pline Coordinator will use this information to determine appropriate corrective action. Resolution will probably be a memorandum from the Discipline Coordinator to the Training files. Reference this resolution in the " Resolved By" column of the form.)
Item 6. DIR Numbers correlated to UNSAT Attributes '
(DAP-5 and -6, Section 4.5)
The Type C checklist package must contain ax.
TN-86-7216A/CS A-2 DI-C/S-003 !
l l
2 identification of official D-XXXX DIR numbers O correlated to each "UNSAT" item on a checklist.
Because DIRs will not be kept up-to-date within review packages, they will be deleted in a l
revision for DIRs.
and a reference added to DAP file 4.0 (Note: The correlation of D-XXXX DIR numbers to attributes with "UNSAT" will be handled in two ways. First, the correlation will be shown by the addition of D-XXXX numbers in the Attach-ment B data base information. In this process, each UNSAT Attribute should be compared to the D-XXX DIR wording to - make sure the correct D number is used. The second step involves crossing out (do not obliterate) the interim DIR numbers contained on the UNSAT Checklist Summary Sheet within the review package and writing the D-XXX DIR number immediately adjacent to the interim number. (See Instruction 10 on revi-
, sions.) During this second step, any updates on the UNSAT Checklist Summary can be made to
- reflect mergers or other changes in DIRs if these changes are not reflected on the Summary Sheet.
1 Item 7. Quality Requirements (DAP-14)
- a. The record copy of the Type C checklist
(
, packages must be reproducible, includ-ing notations that are important to the review. No white-out, highlighting, r correction tape, pencil or color coding '
j is allowed on the record copy.
l'
- b. If the record copy contains changes, enhancements or corrections, they must be annotated, initialed and dated.
(Note: This does not apply to revisions that are being assembled to correct UNSAT items found in this review.
Such revisions will denote the revised items with a revision bar or circle and an appropriate revision symbol.
See Item 10 below.)
- c. The review package is properly bound (e.g.,
placed in a file folder or binder)
O TN-86-7216A/CS A-3 DI-C/S-003
l
- l l
- d. Type C checklist packages must be properly signed. Reviewer, checker, and approver signatures on the Calculation Review Cover Sheet are sufficient.
Notes: (1) Where signatures need to be obtained, they will be obtained for the revision on the " Calculation Review Cover Sheet" and a note will be added to clearly state that " signatures on this page constitute approval of the entire checklist package." (2) Where DAP review comments have been made directly on the source calculations that are part of the Type C checklist package a note should be added to the front page of the calcula-tion. The note should indicate "This copy contains DAP review comments." A revision symbol (See Iten 10) shall be placed next to the note on the front page.
Item 8. Design Checklists Are complete
- l a. References are identified by calculation T number or other document identification
' sufficient that the reviewed items corres-ponding to each Sat /Unsat attribute can be identified (column 2).
- b. The method of verification is identified for each attribute (e.g., "line-by-line,"
" scanned") (column 3)
- c. Each attribute must be designated " SAT,"
"UNSAT," "N/A," OR "N/C" (column 4)
- d. Each "UNSAT" must be explained by comments.
In addition, any item statused as "N/C" on a checklist requires a comment indicating why it was not checked.
Notes (1) An attribute that references another checklist does not require status l
O definition in column 4-if the checklist is used in the l
TN-86-7216A/CS A-4 DI-C/S-003
review O i package.
referenced checklist is not used in the review package, a If a ,
status definition is required and the referenced checklist should be crossed out on the design checklist and on the i data entry form B-2. The reason for not using the supplemental checklist should either be apparent or 1
explained. (2) Comments for "N/A" are not required as it ,
will be obvious to a quali-fled reviewer why this is l true.
- Item 9. DAP Calculations Are in Accordance with DAP-13 (Note
- Reviewers' calculations are
" Supporting Calculations" per DAP-13.
No verification of these calculations other than sign-off of the review package is required which indicates agreement with the conclusions of the supporting calculation (s) . Supporting l
, O calculations should have statements of the purpose, approach assumptions and references per DAP-13, (methodology),
i item 4.1.1.)
l T
Item 10. Table of Contents Identifies Items in Package .
l '
[ All items contained in' the Type C checklist package (including all revisions) must be identifiable from the cover sheet or attached pages in sufficient detail to determine that they' are part of the package. Any item which consists of an excerpt from a document shall be identified using the identification sheet shown in Attach-ment A to DAP-14.
Note: If this is found to be UNSAT, use the attached form A-2'or equivalent in preparing the required revision.
Item 11. Preparation of Revisions 1
A revision package is to be prepared to correct any UNSAT items noted in this review. This j package shall consist of the following:
- a. A Revision Approval Cover Sheet (DAP-4, Attachment H) that describes the items TN-86-7216A/CS A-5 DI-C/S-003
l revised.
i
- b. Revised pages, j
- c. Added pages such as the completed Contents Log Sheet (Form A-2) and the Summary of Information from Type C Checklists (computer output from input of form B-2).
Revisions can be noted by crossing out (do not obliterate) the incorrect item and by4 drawing a ,
cloud (i.e., Q ) around the revised item or '
by placing a revision bar on the edge of the page. The appropriate revision number shall be placed beside the cloud or revision bar in a square (i.e. ) symbol. Add the revision number and date@after the DAP-CLC-CS-YYY number on each page of the package that is revised. The Revision Approval Cover Sheet shall be signed in ink.
O T ,
l i
P O
TN-86-7216A/CS A-6 DI-C/S-003
FIra No. A 1 cf DI C/S 003 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW FORM FOR DAP CLC C/S- , Rev.
e Check performed: Date:
Signature
- f Resolution of LMSATS verified:
Date:
Signature l Item l l$AT/UNSATj l Resolved l lNo.l Item Description l W/A l Comments /Explanetton* l By** l l l 'l I I I l1. l Approved checktist form l l l l-i i is used l l l l 1 l l I I I l 2. l Control No. is on l l l l l l checklist pages. l l l l l ! ! I I I l 3. l Attributes / criteria l l l l l l are correlated. l l l [
l I I I I I l 4. l Attributes /MDAs l l l l l l are correlated. l l l l l l l l l 1 l 5. l Reviewers / checkers / l l l l l l approver are quellfled. l l l l 1 l l l I I l 6. l Uneats/DIRs l l l l l l corretated. l l l l l 1 1 I I I l7.al The checklist package l l l l 4
I I is reproducible. I I I I I I hL ll 7.b niner l changes are noted/ l I
l I
l l I
l l Initiated / dated. l l l [
l l I I I I l7.cl Review packages are l l l l g l l property bound. l l l Al l l l l 1 l l7.dl Required signature on l l l l l l cover sheet. l l l l l ! I I I I l8.al References identified. l l l l l l l l l t l8.bl Veelfication method l l l l l l Identified. l l l l
. I I I I I I l8.cl Status defined for l l l l
'l l'attattributes. l l l l l l l l l l l8.dl Conuents made where l l l l l l required. l l l l l l l l l 1 l9. l DAP cates in accordance l l l l l l With DAP 13" l l l l l l l l l l l10.l Table of Contents l l l l l l Identifies Att items OI l l
l I l
- Explain "UNSAT" and "N/A" items. S q ly sufficient Information to define the scope of the UNSAT.
l l
l I
- List means of resolving the UNSAfs: generally a revision of the package except for Item 5.
A7
\
\-
FORM,A-3 'l CONTENTS LOG SHEET' Checklist Package No. DAP-CLC-CS- ' ~
'N Rev, s
Item Included No. Pacea (yes/no) N
- 1. Cover sheet
- 2. Approach to review form <
- 3. . Summary sheets
- 4. UNSAT checklist summary
- 5. Completed checklists Form Rev.
t
- 6. Summary of Information from Type C Checklists l (computer output from '
form B-2) ,
s;
- 7 '
^
- 7. DAP Calculations ,
I
- 8. Source Calculations Reviewed Calcula- Documen-I.D. tion tation
- 9. Other Misc. References I.D. No./ Description O
TN-86-7216A/CS A-8 DI-C/S-oos
(
ATTACHMENT B INSTRUCTIONS FOR RECORDING CHECKLIST i
DATA BASE INFORMATION 4
A. From Checklist Forma
. Review all checklist forms that have been used and record the
.following information:
Item Description
- 1. Form No. Checklist Form Number i
- 2. Form Rev. Revision Number for Checklist Form
- 3. Attribute Number Checklist Attribute Number for all attributes
- 4. Criteria Number Criteria Number associated with each 1 1 through 5 attribute, if any (3-digit number; O fill)
- 5. HDA Number 1 HDA Number associated with each attri-through 5 bute, if any (4 digit CXXX). This should only be type 2 or 1/2 HDA that C) remains the same whenev6r the checklist form is used.
This information should be recorded on a form similar to that shown as Form B-1 (attached). The information will then be put r into a data base, printed out, and proofed.
- B. From Counlated Checklists l Review all completed Type C Checklist Packages and record I
information as directed below:
I133 Descrintion I 1. Discipline Topic being reviewed.
Topic (Format XX.XX). Record only once at the top of the form.
- 2. Checklist No. Completed checklist number (Format XXX; i.e., CLC the unique number 0 tilled that follows the DAP-CLC-C/S prefix). In'dicate latest revision number of checklist package. Record only once at the top of the form.
O TN-86-7216B/CS B-1 '
DI-C/S-003 u-___.____..-. _ _ ... _ _ . _ __ . _ . _ _ _ _ ..__ _ _ _ _ . _ _ .. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
l
- 3. Checklist Revi- The Revision number of the checklist.
sion Number (Format X). Record only once at the top of the form.
- 4. Form No. Proprinted from step A above.
5 .' Form Rev. Preprinted from step A above.
3 ,
- 6. Attribute Number Preprinted from step A above. If Criteria Number additional attributes were added to the References to standard checklist form used, they other Checklist should be recorded at the bottom of the ,
B-2 from with appropriate criteria / l HDA/ status /DIR information entered. If ;
these additions occurred under earlier '
attributes (i.e., not at the end of the form) draw an arrow or specify by inserting notation where the attributes should be added. -
l
- 7. Status The status of each attribute for each t checklist from the review (i.e., S =
SAT; U = UNSAT, N = N/A; C = NC.
- 8. HDA 1 through X Record the HDA numbers that apply to all checklist attributes at the top of the form provided (generally Type 1-principal HDA for the Area being investigated)
If the HDA cnly applies to some attri-l T butes, the HDA should be noted next to i
the ~ appropriate attribute (s) on the form (s).
If the HDA numbers shown on the Form (collected during Step A) indicate that a choice needs to be made, circle the appropriate HDA based on the description provided.
(Format: XXXX; the part of the HDA number that follows the "C" prefix) .
- 9. DIR 1 through X DIR numbers for each UNSAT checklist item (Format XXXX, O fill). Only enter the number' portion of the D-XXXX of-ficial DAPTS number.
This information should be recorded on proprinted forms of the format shown on Form B-2 (attached).
O TN-86-7216B/CS B-2 DI-C/S-003
O These forms have bean prepared for the latest approved revision of each Type C checklist form. For the review of Type C check-list packages, the reviewer should obtain one form for each checklist form number that is contained in that package.
If reviewers encounter checklist forms for an earlier revision level, they should first mark up a copy of the B-2 form for the latest revision to reflect differences in attribute, criteria, and/or constant HDA structure. This markup will then be input to the data base, in the same manner as Step A above and pre-printed forms fer that revision will be produced for use in the review of the Type C checklist package.
Final information for each Type C checklist package review will be input into the data base, printed out, and proofed by the _
reviewer.
C. Final Outnut/ Checks After all data is input into the computer, a printout similar to the format of Form B-2 will be prepared. This will be spot-checked by an independent reviewer (checker). Any corrections will be noted and made. The final output will then be printed for inclusion in the revision to the Type C checklist package.
(See Attachment A)
O T .
O T -..-221..,cs DI-C/S-003 l..-______-____--_._.----- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
d '
x 3
0 0 1 S B
/
C- m r
I o C F
_ 5 ,
. 4 .
_ 3
. 2 .
_S
_A.
_D.
]' _N..
. _ 4
_ . B
_ 5 . .
M . P
. 4 .
. 3 .
S_2.
N O __
I _
T A ._ I L.
E .
R _E t
s ._R_ I. A ._
C_IO_T_ _
E ._ R ..
T.C.
U B.
N ._
T_T_
T_T_
A_A_
M_ _
N_X _
_E _
2345678901 23456789012 O_D._I2345E1a90I2345#789012345678901 F
_N 1I111 1 !11 1222222222233333333334444444444555 T_I S_
_V M_E _
C_/_
E N_
H ._ N . _
C . *a _
.F. _ .
c ES . _ . _ . ._ . _ _ _ _ _ ._ .
LL . R _ ._ _ _ . _ . ._ _ _ _ _
BT . . E . _ . . . . . . _ _ _ _ _
B2_. .
AU -
._ M CBC . U _ . . _ .
I I L R - N _ . _ . _ ._ _ _ _ _ . _ . ._ _
P1 - . - . ._ _ . _ _ . _ _ . _
PT - R R . - - _ . _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _
0
- AA - O I . . ._ - _ = . . - _ . ._ . . _ _ _
- B C N D1 . . . _ . . - _ . _ . . _ _ _
) L . _ _ . . . _ . _ . - _ . _
S SL - C ._ . . _ . . _ . _ . . - _ _ .
/a( A - I _= . . . .
= _ .
C r A - P __ . . = _ . _ _ . _ _
o DO - O . . . . = . . _ . . _ . . =_ _
I HTC T . . . . . _ . . _ . . _ - ._ ._
E F ) . ._ _ . . . _ . _ . . ._ ._ _ - _ _
A ._ . _ . . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _
N_ . . _ _ . ._ _ . _ _ _ _ _
S/.
UC. .
TN.
A/.
TU. . ._
E6 . . .. . . . _ ._ . _ _ .
T 8 S / ._ . . _ ._ . . _ _ _ . _ _ .
A/ S_
( . .
D2 . . _ _ _ _
0 . - _ . ._ . . _ ._ . . _ . .
V/ . ._ - _ . . _ . _ . _ . . _ .
E5 ._ _ ._ . . _ _ _ ._ _ . _ _
R0 __ ._ _ _ . _ _ . ._ _ - _ _
NV 5_ _C_C.-. C_ C._C_ C._C... C._C_C_
_ C._ C.C C.. C. C.
RE _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
OR3 ._ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ ._ . . _ _ .
F __ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ . _ . _ ._
T __ _ . _ . . _ _ . - _ _ _ . . _ .
S I
LR1 5
2 4_ _C_C
. C_C._C.C.C.C._C
- C._C_C_C_C.C.C_
KE5 __ _ . _ . _ . _ ._ . . . _ . _ _
CB - __ _ _ . _ ._ . _ - . . _ . . .
EM5 . - _ ._ _ . _ _ . . . . . ._ . . .
HU/ . . _ _ . . _ _ . . . . . . . ._ . .
C._C.C CNC 3 . _ _ . _ _ _ _
C.C._C.
C_C_
C._C.C_C._C.C
.C._C
. _ . _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 ._ _ . . _
._ . _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ 4 _ _ ._ . . _
2_. _C.C._C_
C.. C._C_ _ .
C._C.C_C.1CC_C._C . - .
C.C__
) . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
. . S . . _ . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _
- c. . ( ._ . _ . . _ _ . 8_ _
0_ _ _ . . .
. ._ A _ . _ ._ . _ _ . _2 _ 4 _ . .
_ D ._ . _ _ _
. _O _ 1 _ _ _ . .
NK H1 _ .
.C .. C._C.C._C.C_C_C C.C_C_C_C_C_C_C.
RC . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . _ _ . _ _ _ 5 OE ._ -_ _ . _ _ _ _ . . . . .
FH _ _ - . _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _
B
_ NC . T ._ _ . 7 - . _ . _ _ _ -
_ . _ . . 1.
I ._ . S _. . l . .
C L2_ . . O _ _ _ _ _ _
T
) ) K _ . _ . _ ._ . ._ _ _ . _ _ .
2 4 C _ _ G ._ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ .
" IYYE P _ . _ . . ._ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _
- . . 1 . 4 ._! . . _ . _ . _ . _ _ _ _ ._
R1 . F ._ . 3 . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
A N
_ E _ _. O_1 0_O.
_ O. ._
NM O _ R1 _ - _ _
NO .
UR GF I)
TS A(
_ G_G_G.
LR _ __ _ . . _ . _ . . _ _ . _ _
UE ._ _ __ _ . ._ ._ . . _ . . . _ _ . _ .
CB _ . __ _ ._ _ _ . . . . _ _ . . .
_ LM _ . __ _ ._ _ _ _ ._ . _ . . _ _ . . .
AU _ - 5 ._ _ .. _ _ _ _ . _
CN . - _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ - _ . _ .
) ) _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
1 3 ._ ._ .
4 . _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ ._ _ _
1 E _ . . _ _ ._ _ . _ _ ._ ._
T
_ 3_ .
A / _ . _ _ ._ _ _ _ _ _
D _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ E*
_ _ - _ 0_ . . _ _ _ . _ ._ _ _ - _ G V / A - . . 0_ . . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ AE E - I ._ _ _ . _ _ - _ _ _ . _ _ PG R . R 2 .- _ _ 2 __ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . . _ A E . . _ _ . ._ . _ . _ _ _ .
_ P V T . 1 _ _ _ - . . _ ._ _ _ ._ . _
E . I . _. 9 _ _ . - .2_ 0_2 _ _ _ . _ _ _ T R _ R . . _ _.1 _ . . _ 4 _ _ _
_ _ _ S C1 _ _ - _ _ _ _3 _ 5 ._ _ . _ _ _ . A
/ __ . _ _ ._ . _ _ 0 ._ 0 _ 2 _ . _ _ _ _ L
__ . . _ _ . _ . _ _ _ . _ . _ _ 5
. ._ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ 2E
. . _ _ - _ _ ._ _ ._ _ _ . . _ . . _ _ 1 H
. ._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . - _ _ . _ . 0T hi#- R O GG
-[g L E C E
/I C
B - T __ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ G M C U . _ _ _ . _ . _ - _ ._ . _ _ _. _ _ I U L BR ._ . _ _ _ . _ _ . - _ _ - . _ _ _ _ RH N C . MT
__2_3_
I E _ _ . _ _ _ _ 4 . - _ _ _ _ _ _ _
- RB _ . _ . N
._ ._._ O. -._5._O. .6_7
_ .O .. _O _ .
C P A
T M_ O ._._O _._O._
. _ .1.. _
. L*
K*
T U_
L C D AN. .
. 1
- 2 ._ 3_3_3 .3_3_4 _
_ C*
e i
l 7
Rev. 2: January 9, 1984 MECHANICAL DISCIPLINE INSTRUCTIONS Table of Contents Instruction No. Title Revision Date ;
DI-M-001 Mechanical Discipline Walkdown 0 10/31/86 Instruction DI-M-002 Mechanical Administrative Review 1 1/6/87 Instruction DI-M-003 Technical Adequacy Review of NCRs 0 1/7/87 O
I i
i F
..y,y,-.7 ,.n;;
n 7
-., y p f ')
TN-86-6262 $ li.e!
~
' t
! .. COI260LL2DC0F/ ._ _ _ c, i gg; . 0 3o '
f .. ;
- - - - - - - . . ,,-,-.--.,,,,--,-,,w-. -
a --.,,-,-,-,,,.,,-,..,,.n,,,,--,--.- e,---,-, . , - - . . . . . - , - , , , , - - - - - , . , . - - , - - . - - - - , - , .
-