ML20210H457
| ML20210H457 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 11/12/1986 |
| From: | Dougherty F, John Miller TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20210F162 | List:
|
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8702110429 | |
| Download: ML20210H457 (17) | |
Text
- - .
l DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM QUAI lTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM O
Rev Recommended Q A Concurrence j'
- Approval
-~ l I A f .. s ( -
0 9RP Mpnoger~/ '
Review Team Leder Id'/ M SM-TRT issue Monograf mm DAP QA Monoger ahier ' Date i
hbb DAPlMonager
(
h Review ' %o? rCeoder b.od OLCh&L T5M-TRT iss0s.Monager macdA DAP QA Monoger alu/sc Date
/
,I >A i
%b A DAP Manager \
AL OC .~a M iview7 dam Meader
8702110429 070126 S PDR ADOCK 0500 O'^ f 3
m
, i-
^
l (; , i s
~~
~
TN-85-6262 ;
! ~r '% ? . '
>t.. ,, .i t , ,
A l-
- - ~ _ . . . . _ . . _ . _ _ _ _ _
) _ _ _ . _
..f_.'......--..
4 O
TABLE OF CONTENTS Rev. 2 section Pace Cover Sheet.......................................... i Table of Contents.................................... 11 '
1.0 ORGANIZATION.................................... 1
~
2.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM....................... 4 3.0 DESIGN CONTROL.................................. 9 4.O PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT CONTROL.................... 10 5.0 INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES, AND l
DRAWINGS........................................ 11 i
6.0 DOCUMENT CONTROL................................ 11 7.0 CONTROL OF PURCHASED MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT, AND SERVICES......................... 12 b
8.0 NON-CONFORMING MATERIAL, PARTd, OR COMPONENTS...................................... 12
- i 9.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION............................... 13 10 QA RECORDS...................................... 13 l 11 AUDITS.......................................... 14 9
TN-86-6262 11 1
I l
4 COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM OUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM Revision: 2 I
1.0 ORGANIZATION 1.1 Comanche Peak-Resnonse Team (CPRT)
The CPRT organization and its functional responsibilities are described in Section VI of the CPRT Program Plan. The CPRT is led by a Senior Review Team which formulates policy and provides overall direction of CPRT activities. The Design Adequacy Review Team Leader, along with the Review Team Leaders for QA/QC; Civil, Structural, Mechanical; Electrical / Instrumentation; and Testing Programs report to the Senior Review Team. A CPRT Program Director, who also reports' to the Senior Review Team, is responsible for monitoring the Review Team activities on a day-to-day lk -
basis.
O 1.2 Desian Adecuacy Review Team The Design Adequacy Review Team has been assigned the responsibility of implementing the Design Adequacy Program Plan, Appendix A of the CPRT Program Plan, and the asso -
i ciated issue or Discipline Specific Action Plans. TERA Corporation, under the direction of its Design Adequacy Review Team Leader, has been assigned the responsibility for managing and performing the Design Adequacy Program activities.
l 1
O TN-85-6262 Page 1 of 14 i
^
. . _ _ _ _ . . . - . . ,.,-_.----..,,,__.,~.,,,mm___,--__--....,,--
4 COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEOUACY PROGRAM QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM Revision: 2 Assisting the Design Adequacy Review Team Leader is the Design Adequacy Program Manager, Project Management Coordinator, and the Construction Quality Interface Manager. Reporting to the Design Adequacy Program Manager are the Project Quality Engineer and the Discipline Coordinators in the following disciplines:
o Civil / Structural o Piping / Supports
. o Mechanical Systems and Components o Electrical, I&c. Systems and Components ~
o Programmatic / Generic Implications.
The Design Adequacy Review Team ~ organization is shown in
! Figure 1.
'O T.le Design Adequacy organization also includes a Design Adequacy Program Quality Assurance Manager. This position
, is responsible for ensuring the effective implementation of the Design Adequacy Program Quality Assurance Program. The Quality Assurance Manager will verify effective implementa-tion of the program by conducting audits of Design Adequacy Review Team activities. The Quality Assurance Manager will report the results of his activities to the Design Adequacy Review Team Leader. This structure provides access to a level of management sufficient to ensure c' hat the quality assurance function can be performed.
TN-85-6262 Page 2 of 14
P aRE 1 I
CPRT DESIGN ADEGUACY PROGRAM ORGANIZATION 4
i "
g
] DIRECT REPORTINGI COfFORATE CPRT N i --- mEwACEs2 MANAGEMENT REVEW TE.W D. Davis, President
! I I l I Oes.GN AoEOuACY DAP OUALITY PROGRAM, OA/OC FEVEW ASSURANCE == REVIEW TEAM - TEAM LEADER LEADER y, w Q. DM i H. Levin ^
i !
mmmmm-
- . I I i f W PROKCT DE54CN AOEQUACY CONSTRUCTION TUGCO DA.P MANA& MENT PROKCT OUALITY .
COORDINATOR OUALITY - MANAER SITE QUALITY - INTERFACE COORDINATOR o ENGMER MANA&R m C. W M ENGIPEER F. E f _.;r 5.Karprek
- g j, % R. Metten J. Mil 6w , _
- I I
. e I - .
i I I I i i I ENGIPEERING CLRERT/ SYSTEMS - DAP SITE DISCIPLIPE N MMATdt i NANAER ~ .. COMMONWEALTH .. ENGIPEERING MANAER COORDINATOR $ , Eg T.g i DISCIPLINE MANAGER y, giggy DSAP COORDINATOR MANAGEMENT F. $chefer R. lL .. Dep, ll sget E.Blackweed l X i
j _. ~ J. Vance I
XI D.Brosnan
! I _
I I 1 .
ECHANICAL ELECTRICAL, WTEk i
CIVIL /5TRUCTURAL PIPING /5UPPORTS SYSTEMS AND N5TRUMENTATION (SEE 11 0 (SE DSAP X) D15C ST S I* ' IPE PROKCT MANA& MENT DIRECTIOt4 CONTROL.
(SEE DSAP X) COMPOffNTS 2. SEE CPRT PROGRAM PLAN, APP. A Ate DSAPs Vill, DISCIPLIE , IX, X APO XI FOR MORE DETAll.
s (SEE DSAP XO j 6/10/06
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM OUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM ~
Revision: 2 O
i i
The responsibilities of the Design Adequacy Review Team l Leader are delineated in Section VIII of the CPRT Program l Plan. Design Adequacy Review Team Managers and Coordin-ators are responsible for assisting the Review Team Leader as directed by the Review Team Leader and as specified in Section II.E of Appendix A to the CPRT Program Plan and the Design' Adequacy Procedures.
The organization chart (Figure 1) also shows the Engineer-
, - ing Manager, Systems Engineering Manager, and DAP Site
. Manager. All three of these positions have responsibil-
'i ties for cost, schedule, and other project management functions, but do not have quality assurance responsibil-ities defined in this program and the DAP procedures.
The Design Adequacy Review Team may use subcontractors to "
implement its Quality Assurance Program; however, the Design Adequacy Review Team retains responsibility for implementation of the program. '
2.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM
~
I 2.1 Desian Adecuacy Review Team Ouality Assurance Procram Descrintion
~
The CPRT Program Plan, which was developed under the direction of the Senior Review Team, provides overall direction for all CPRT activities. Appendix A of the CPRT Program Plan is the Design Adequacy Program Plan which details the scope of work for Design Adequacy Review Team i
1 O '"--' = " ' * '"
l
_ . _ _ , _ _ . . _ _ , , - _ _ _ . _ _ . ~ . _ . . - . _ _ . _ _ _ . . . - - _ - - -
. 4 s 1 L
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEOUACY PROGRAM OUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM Revision: 2 activities. Appendix C of the CPRT Program Plan contains Discipline specific Action Plans (DSAPs) which specify how external source issues and self-initiated programs are to be investigated, evaluated, and/or performed by the ,CPRT Review Teams. This Quality Assurance Program details the quality assurance requirements which will be applied to the work conducted by the Design Adequacy Review Team. In order to implement the requirements of the CPRT Program Plan and its appendicer and this Quality Assurance Program, s
. Design Adequacy Procedures (DAPs) have been established.
Table 1 lists the Design Adequacy Procedures. -
The Quality Assurance Program elements applicable to Design Adequacy Review Team activities, as defined in this Quality Assurance Program, are Organization, QA Program, Design i Control, Procurement Document Control, Instructions, Procedures and Drawings, Document Control, Control of Purchased Material, Equipment and Services, Nonconforming Materials, Parts or Components, Corrective Action, QA Records, and Audits.
Should activities be necessary in the areas of Inspection, Tacting or Measuring, and Test Equipment, appropriate quality assurance .will be provided through performance of those activities by CPRT Review Teams or subcontractors with applicable ; quality assurance programs. Design Adequacy Review Team interfaces with other CPRT Review Teams and subcontractors are defined in Design Adequacy Procedures.
TN-85-6262 Page'5 of 14
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM OUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM Revision: 2 O
TABLE 1 CPRT DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM PROCEDURES -
Procedure Number Title DAP-1 Preparation and Review of Criteria Lists DAP-2 Documentation and Tracking of Issues ar.d Discrepancies DAP-3 Development and Validation of Self-Initiated Review Scope DAP-4 Preparation of Checklists DAP-5 Review of Calculations, Evaluations, and other Implementing Documents DAP-6 Review of Drawings, Specifications, and Other Design output Documents DAP-7 Trending and Generic Implications Evaluations DAP-8 Preparation of Engineering Evaluations DAP-9 Preparation of Discipline Specific Results Reports and DAP Collective Evaluation
.O DAP-10 Report Development and Use of DAP Procedures and Discipline Instructions >
DAP-ll Document Control DAP-12 DAP Interfaces and Communications i
DAP-13 Preparation of Calculations ~
DAP-14 Design Adequacy Progrg.m Records DAP-15 Training and Qualifications DAP-16 Audits
- DAP-17 Corrective Action DAP-18 DAP-19 Control of Subcontractors Processing and Review of Information between lk the Quality of Construction, QA/QC Adequacy Program and Design Adequacy Program
. DAP-20 overview of DAP Activities Performed by the CCSES Project or Other External Organizations DAP-21 Homogeneous Design Activity Validation and Selection of Specific Items for Review DAP-22 Preparation of Safety Significance Evaluations DAP-23 DAP-24 DAP Quality Assurance Auditor Qualifications Communication of Potential Safety Concerns l /1 lM O
TN-85-6262 Page 6 of 14
--,--.-----ww,--, , ,,,-%-- - - - , , , . - - , --,,,,,,---,...,,-m--..y,--=-yw.~w,,,.m--, . - - - *__ _ _ _ _ _
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM OUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM Revision: 2 O .
Table 2 is a matrix which cross references each of the applicable QA Program elements to sections of this QA ~
Program as well as to the Design Adequacy Procedures that ;
implement the QA Program.
2.2 Indoctrination and Trainina of Desian Adecuacy Personnel overall requirements for CPRT personnel qualifications are
- contained in Section VII of the CPRT Program Plan.
Detailed requirements for the indoctrination and training of Design Adequacy Review Team Personnel are contained in DAP-15, Training and Qualifications. Audit personnel are discussed in Section 11 of this QA Plan. Qualifications of personnel other than auditors (excluding clerical and administrative personnel) are reviewed by the Design Adequacy Review Team Leader to verify that education, experience, and qualifications are adequate.to perform the assigned tasks. .
l 2.3 Review of Adecuacy of the Desian Adecuacy Review Team Quality Assurance Procram As discussed in Section 11 of this QA Program, periodic audits of Design Adequacy Review Team activities will be conducted to verify proper implementation of the QA ,
Program. Additional reviews of the QA Program may be
, conducted by Design Adequacy' Review Team Management or i other CPRT organizations. The results of such reviews shall be considered with respect to their assessment of QA Program status and adequacy.
I TN-85-6262 'Page 7 of 14 O
c
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEOUACY PROGRAM QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM Revision: 2 TABLE 2 DESIGN ADEQUACY REVIEW TEAM QUALITY ASSURANCE MATRIX J
i QA Program QA Program Design Adequacy Elements Section Procedures (DAPs)
Organization 1.0 DAP-12, 19 QA Program 2.0 DAP-15, 19, 24 l[
l Design Control 3.0 DAP-1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 13, 22 O Procurement Document Control 4.0 DAP-18 lh Instructions, Procedure and Drawings 5.0 DAP-4, 10 Document Control 6.0 DAP-ll Control of Purchased Material, Equipment,
- and Services 7.0 DAP-18 Non-Conforming Material, Parts, or Components 8.0 DAP-17 Corrective Action 9.0 DAP-17 QA Records 10.0 DAP-14 Audits 11.0 DAP-16, 23 ld O
. , , i-
, ., ir TN-85-6262 Page 8 of 14
l '
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM OUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM Revision: 2 O .
I 2.4 NRC Recrulations and Industry Standards This QA Program was developed considering the Quality Assurance criteria specified in Appendix B to 10CFR50. In addition, the following industry standards are considered applicable to this QA Program as discussed in the asso-
- ciated QA Program section
. Standard OA Plan i
ANSI N45.2.11, Design Control 3 ANSI N45.2.23, Qualifications of Audit Personnel 11 Other standards, referenced in the standards listed above, i are not endorsed unless stated otherwise in this QA
- Program.
3.0 DESIGN CONTROL The scope of Design Adequacy Review Team activities includes verifying the adequacy of specified elements of
(
l the CPSES design. These elements are specified by Dis' -
I cipline Specific Action Plans (DSAPs) developed to address design concerns identified by, or through CPRT evaluation of, External Sources as well as by CPRT Self-initiated design evaluations.
The Design Adequacy Review Teams design verification activities closely parallel the Design Verification requirements specified in Section 6 of ANSI N45.2.11, 1974. Design verification activities include the prepara-l TN-85-6262 Page 9 of 14 I
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM OUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM Revision: 2 O _
^
tion of criteria lists and checklists, review of l calculations, evaluations and inputs, confirmation of appropriate quality and quality assurance requirements where specified, and alternate calculations. The design verification activities sh'all be conducted in accordance with written procedures, and by personnel other than those who performed the original design or design verification.
Currently, the Review Team does not intend to use qualifi-cation testing as a design verification method. Therefore,
, no DAP has been developed to control qualification testing.
hharesultsofthedesignverificationactivitiesshallbe clearly documented in accordance with procedures. The results will be reviewed by personnel other than those performing the design verification prior to final approval.
4.0 PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT CONTROL The Design Adequacy Review Team will ensure that appro-priate quality assurance requirements are included in procurement documents for services relating to Design l
Adequacy Review Team activities, or that those services are provided subject to the requirements of this QA Program.
1 Procurement documents prepared shall be reviewed by the Design Adequacy Program Quality Assurance Manager. They are also reviewed for proper technical content by the Design Adequacy Review Team Leader or his designated respresentative. The reviews conducted by the Quality Assurance Manager and the Design Adequacy Review Team Leader are appropriately documented. Currently, any TN-85-6262 Page 10 of 14
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM OUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM Revision: 2 O- l contracted services will be performed under the total requirements of this QA Program. Should it become neces-sary to contract services controlled under'other QA requirements, DAP-18 will be used to ensure that appro-priate QA requirements are specified in procurement lk documents.
5.0 INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES, AND DRAWINGS -
Measures have been established to ensure that Design Adequacy Review Team Activities are conducted in accordance
- kith written procedures or instructions. These procedures are developed as needed and, where appropriate, include
- acceptance criteria. The specific procedures controlling the preparation, revision, review, and approval of Design Adequacy procedures, checklists, and instructions are
o DAP-4 -
Preparation of Checklists o DAP Development and Use of DAP Procedures and Discipline Instructions.
6.0 DOCUMENT CONTROL The Design Adequacy Review Team has established controls for the issuance, distribution, and use of Design Adequacy Procedures and instructions. Written procedures specify -
controls to ensure that the latest revisions of these documents are used by Design Adequacy Review Team personnel in the conduct of the work. In addition, procedures controlling revisions to procedures and instructions TN-85-6262 Page 11 of 14
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM Revision: 2 O
(section 5.0 above) require that such revisions receive the same level of review as the originals.
7.0 CONTROL OF PURCHASED MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT, AND SERVICES subcontclacted services employed by the Design Adequacy Review Team will atther be performed subject to the total requirements of this QA Program, or subject to quality assurance program requirements specified in the procurement
, documents. Currently, any contracted services will be performed under the total requirements of'this QA Program.
Bhould it become necessary to contract services controlled under other QA requirements, DAP-18, Control of Subcontrac-tors, will be used with appropriate measures to ensure that contracted services are provided in accordance with ld
. procurement requirements.
8.0 NON-CONFORMING MATERIAL, PARTS, OR COMPONENTS DAP work found not to comply with requirements is identi-fled and controlled under DAP-17. Non-conforming design - l practices or documentation identified by the Design Adequacy Review Team during its design verification ,
activities are documented on Discrepancy Reports as specified in DAP-2, Documentation and Tracking of Issues and Discrepancies Reports. These Discrepancy Reports are used by the Design Adequacy Review Team only for evaluation purposes. Copies of all Discrepancy Reports will be submitted to TUGCO for evaluation and processing under its non-conformance control system.
TN-85-6262 Page 12 of 14
. . . . . - - - , - . - ~ . - . - - - , . - . - _ _ _ --
_-----m---- - . - - - - - . - . . . , . - - .m...,m -. ----.--r. -,-r----,e---,---,,--ww--.,-w.--------,.v-
~
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEOUACY PROGRAM OUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM q Revision: 2 9.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION The Design Adequacy Review Team has developed ' a written procedure, DAP-17, Corrective Action, to control the disposition of identified nonconformances associated with the Review Team's activities. DAP-17 includes requirements for.the resolution of such nonconformances and the notifi-cation of affected organizations. Identified noncon- -
formances as well as corrective action taken are documented
, and reported to appropriate levels of Design Adequacy Review Team management.
4 10.0 QA RECORDS DAP-14, DAP Records, has been established to control the collection, storage, and retention of records developed as a result of Design Adequacy Review Team activities. At the completion of the work, Design Adequacy Review Team records shall be turned over to the CPRT Program Director. Records -
are identifiable and retrievable and include the following:
o Discrepancy Reposts o Discipline Specific Results Reports o DAP Collective Evaluation Report o QA Audit Reports o Personnel Training and Qualification Records o Checklists, Calculations and Engineering Evaluations.
TN-85-6262 Page 13 of 14 l
l l ._. - - - . - . - _ - -
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEOUACY PROGRAM OUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM Revision: 2 11.0 AUDITS -
The Design Adequacy Program Quality Assurance Manager schedules and conducts planned and periodic audits of Design Adequacy Review Team activities.
~
Auditable require-ments include those requirements defined in the CPRT Program Plan and Appendices, this QA Plan, and applicable DAPs and Discipline Instructions.
conducted in accordance with DAP-16, Audits, by the DAP The audits shall be ld ~
, . Quality Assurance Manager or personnel reporting to him.
The person performing the audit, or leading the audit, if litore than one person is on the audit team, shall be qualified to the requiremeris of ANSI N45.2.23, Sections 2.3.i through 2.3.4 for Lead Auditors as specified in DAP-
- 23. The results of audits shall be documented and provided to the Design Adequacy Review Team Leader for his review.
J e
'"~~''
O ' '
l l
_ . _ _ .~
l Rev 1: November 12, 1986 O -
CIVIL / STRUCTURAL DISCIPLINE INSTRUCTIONS Table of Contents Instruction No. Title Revision Date' DI-C/S-001 Homogeneous Design Activity 1 7/3/86 Validation DI-C/S-002 Homogeneous Design Activity 0 6/25/86 i
Review Record DI-C/S-003 Administrative Review of DAP O 11/10/86 Civil / Structural checklists w
I
_____._.--~~----3 TN-85-6262 ~~~~~;;r , , .. ; . r "'i '
I i 7 't si, '
- 1 . i ,
(y. ..Vi' '
x y by
'f ell
. w y;z-Q. l. .:_. s=- .-
1
. _ ._ . - . , _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ .