ML20197K191

Forwards marked-up Pages to FSAR Chapter 14,deleting Prerequisite of Test Descriptions for Completing of Phase I Tests.Change Does Not Introduce Unreviewed Safety Question. License Condition 2.C.(5) Cited

ML20197K191
Person / Time
Site:	Palo Verde
Issue date:	05/02/1986
From:	Van Brunt E ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. (FORMERLY ARIZONA NUCLEAR
To:	Martin J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
References
ANPP-36456-EEVB, NUDOCS 8605200288
Download: ML20197K191 (11)

Text

"

l i

Arizona Nuclear Power Project P.O. box $2034 e PHOENIX. ARIZONA 85072-2034ff) Y N May 2, 1986 Mr. John B. Martin, Regional Administrator ANPP-36456-E g g 8.05 Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission R:gion V .

1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 Walnut Creek, CA 94596-5368

Subject:

Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (PVNGS)

Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. STN 50-528 (License NPF-41)

STN 50-529 (License NPF-51)

Change to the Initial Test Program File: 86-056-026 Daar Mr. Martin:

In accordance with License NPF-41 condition 2.C.(5) and License NPF-51 condition 2.C.(5), ANPP is submitting a change to Chapter 14 of the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR). Attached are marked-up FSAR pages of the change.

This change deletes a prerequisite of the Test Descriptions for the completion of Phase I tests. The test descriptions being changed are for Phase I tests. Therefore, it is contradictory for them to be prerequisites to themselves. In a previous amendment to the FSAR, the definition of Phase I tests was changed. Previously, it had included prerequiste testing. Amendment 8 changed Phase I testing to mean only preoperational testing and prerequisite testing to be considered part of construction activities to assure that construction was completed. (See page 14.2-1 of the FSAR)

After completion of a Safety Review and Evaluation, according to 10 CFR 50.59, ANPP has determined that this change does not introduce an unreviewed safety question. The change is editorial in nature. It does not affect the amount or type of testing. No equipment important to safety will be affected. Tlie margin of safety as discussed in the Technical Specifications will not be reduced since this prerequisite is not discussed as a basis.

If you have any further questions concerning this matter, please contact Mr. William F. Quinn of my staff.

Very truly y 1 OL.A t nu N P E. E. Van Brunt, Jr.

Executive Vice President Project Director EEVB/JK0/rw Attachments cc: E. A. Licitra A. C. Gehr R. P. Zimmerman Director of Inspection and Enforcement

\

[6 8/

q.

PVNGS FSAR APPENDIX 14B

( 14B.2. CONTAINMENT SPRAY SYSTEM l.0 OBJECTIVE 2

To functionally check the operation of the containment spray system including the performance of th,e contain-ment spray pumps, and to provide verification of an unobstructed flow path from the spray pumps to the g spray nozzles by using water and air with overlapping flow paths.

2.0 PREREQUISITES

• 2.1 Construction activities are complete on the items to be tested.

2.2 Refueling water tank available.

2.3 Appl-icable-Phase--I-teste-compl-eted, DdeAcd.

2.h3 System will be filled, vented and lined up per

( g station operation procedures for normal operation.

2.Y Instruments are calibrated. 2 3.0 TEST METHOD 3.1 Flow will be established with each spray pump by recirculating water from the refueling water tank.

3.2 Pump performance will be checked.

3.3 Alarms will be checked.

3.4 Air will be used to establish air flow in each spray header and flow shall be verified from each nozzle. The air flow will be established to ensure an unobstructed flow path at a point g

which overlaps the flow path verification utilizing water.

April 1983 14B-3 Amendment 11 l2

.;,L., s L t.c PVNGS FSAR i

APPENDIX 14B 4B.12 CONTAINMENT ISOLATTON ACTUATION SYSTEM _

7 ,.s_,._ .

1.0 OBJECTIVE

- To verify the proper functional performance of the Containment Isolation Actuation System.

2.0 PREREQUISITES ~. . - . .. .

2.1 Construction is complete on the items to be 2_

tested.

2 2.2 Associated instrumentation is calibrated.

r

- 2.3 -Phase-I-test-comp-leted- be\(Acd 3.0 TEST METHOD 3.1 -Using the built-in test panel- of Engineered

, , Safety. Features Actuation System (ESFAS), test each group relay for a Containment Isolation Activation System actuation and verify valve actuation to be correct. 6 -

3.2 Using an input signal to the Plant Protection System, verify that a CIAS signal is initiated by the PPS to the ESFAS and the associated containment isolation valves function by taking their designated containment isolation position.

4.0 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA Containment Isolation Actuation System operates as described in section 6.2.4 when using above test 2 methods.

L i

October 1981 14B-21 Amendment 6 l2

P,VN,GS.FSAR.,

APPENDIXc1GB:-

.. - . . . - . . . . . . . . - . . . - . - . . . - . . - - ~ . ~ . . . - k 14B.26 RADIATION MONITORING SYSTEM i

j .. . . , . . . ~ .,

• 1.0 (--OBJECTIVE T ' 'm'-' ~ n r n m '- o "formanc- or tne i to verit'fy tih, e pro. per&nm ?".01 .,,,e,. function,al oper,ation of the

,~ ' ~ .

-radihtion" monitoring system. ~ i 2.0 -PREREQUISITES I .

2'.1 ' Construction activities comp eted on the Radiation Monitoring System.

. .. . . . 2

~. , , .

~2.2 'The' radiation monitor has been calibrated. -

'2.3 External test instrumentation has been calibrated. .

74 2 Check sources are available.

2. 5 .-Phase-I--tests--completed, he.\chd ru e- 1 *

.' . : .. - . 2-  :' - :. .:: '

(

3.0 TEST METHOD 3.1 Utilizing a check source, verify respon'se of

-detector to a radiation field to verify proper 13 monitor operation. ,

3.2 Verify the self-testing feature of each

' monitor, where applicable.

3.3 Verify control actuation by each monitor and record the response time where applicable.

3.4 Verify proper local and remote alarm actuation 2

where applicable.

4.0 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA The radiation monitoring system operates as described in section 12.3.4 when using the above test methods.

August 1984 14B-39 Amen:'nent 13 l2

I '

F.PVNGS JSAR n A.PPENDIX,'

m. _ ---

14B 14B.27

f. IODINE REMOVAL SUBSYSTEM f

-*w n = * * ~

1.0 OBJECTIVE To functionally test the Iodine Removal Subsystem

~ ,

.j including pumps, ilow paths, alarms.and interlocks. ,

rs:_ tin. c.anrrrino cyncea '

2.0 PREREQUISITES 2

'2.Ilc: Construction activities on the Iodine Removal Sub- ~

system have been completed. - -- - - - -- - - a

~

2.2 Asso'ciated ins'tiumentation has been calibrated. .

~

,, 2.3 Support systems required for op'erations of'the

_ . Iodine Removal Subsystem are completed and- - --- -- -

operational. '

2.4 -Phas& tests-completedr

.. .. a ~

h \e b cl 2.5A System filled, vented, and lined up for normal .

operation per station operating procedures.

(

3.0 TEST METHOD P

3.1 Verify unobstructed flows from spray chemical storage tanks to the suction of containment spray pumps.,

3.2 Demonstrate proper operation of remotely operated valves.

3.3 Verify pump start and stop interlocks.

3.4 Check all pump flow paths.

4.0 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA The Iodine Removal subsystem operates as described in subsection 6.5.2 when using the above test methods.

l 21 Amendment 2 14B-40 September 1980

PVNGS FS'AR-

- .. . ..a r s a.o

, y,n ,-

,,,...,,c , . . . , , . . . . , , , , , _ .

14B.29 POST' ACCIDENT- MONITORING - SYSTEM j - ,

1. 0 ' OBJECTIVE 1.1 ' To'

.; . . a

~

.w. verify'.that' &ll ~1ntftrunierits ' df ' th'e'"pos'ti'acci-dent monitoring system arb-broperly ins ~t'allel.

3 1.2 .To; ensure that all instruments in the post acci-

~~

der>

s monitoring, . >system have appropriate ranges

> '- and^are calibrated.

~ ' -

~ '

. .n :. . - .'. : . ..

2.0 PREREQUI S ITES _.. -- .. a. v..<.< 1 . o u .-s  ;) e < - - .' ,1 = v 2 ,i 2.1 Construction activities on the post accident

"^

monitoring system.have.been completed.

2.2 Appropriate' test equipment is available and has been calibrated.

3 2.3 Appropriate ir.strument power sources are....._

,' 4 gy available.

2.4 -Phase-I-tests completed, DbMd o gs t. .; - g > n S g** : r. ; rs ,

(

3.0 TEST METHOD 3.1 Verify that the range of each instrument is as 12 specified in CESSAR Section 7.5.2.5 and CESSAR -

Table 7.5-3.

3.2 Verify proper calibration of each instrument in the post accident monitoring system.

4.0 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA 2

Instrument rafiges and accuracies shall be as specified in section 7.5.1.1.5.

2( Amendment 12 14B-42 February 1984

JVNGSJSAR APPENDIX 14B

{r , l 4.4.B..,31

_ _iLOOSE PARTS MONITORING SYSTEM -

f

,1. 0 OBJECTIVE

.T.o. de. mon.s.tr.a.t,e

- . .t.h..at t.he .l.oose. Ea.r..t,s

... . . .. u monit.orin..E mo g s1.s.s.em t -

9 is properly J.nstall,ed,,an,d , operate,s,as, ,d,esigned.,,. ,

l

' , q. s. _ . y~ - ,

<,~,~ , .

~ ' ~ "

2.0 ~ PREREQUISITES

- - ~

y ., . , _ . . , .

I 2.1 .All construction activities on the loose parts

monitoring system are complete.

2- ;2x2. fall _-associated instrumentation have been

_r

.cali. brated. .

2.3 Appropriate. test instrumentation,.is available

- and cali.brated. _

i 2.4 -Phase-I-test--completedr beke.W e s'. . s n -s r . . . . u- As. .w- .Vr t' '

w' ' ' *-

3.0 TEST METHOD .

3.1 Verify system response to simulated loose parts.

. 3.2 Verify the proper operation and installation of all recording devices.

3.3 Verify and calibrate all system alarms and

' indicators. -

4.0 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA The loose parts monitoring system operates as described in section 7.7C when using above test methods.

. . n.

t s

September 1980 14B-45 Amendment 2

J PVNGS FSAR ,

APPENDIX 14B r

t 14B.32 PLANT ANNUNCIATOR' 7 4 '. ' .; : , _

F 1.0 OBJECTIVE -

_1.1....To. verify that the annunciators system.is properly p

1- g installed and will . respond .to a.' change. of state of anysfield contact. )

- x To ver5fy that the annunciator system will trans-3 1.2 i

2. fer to tlle redundant power source.upon receipt of I-

a. supply. voltage reduction._ l P

. - .u .+ ..n ' .

. , c \ ,r .<. e . w .=

2.0 PREREQUISITES '

2.1 All construction and installation acti'sities are

_ . . . - .. .. .. .. .. . _ . . .. ,, m .m...-

completed on the annunciators and associated

.o. . .- ,

systems.

2.2 Support systems required for the cperation of the {

2 -_ annunciators have been tested and are operating.  !

~

-

:.-~

2.3 Appropri. ate tes.t. equipment is. available ,and .

calibrated. i

, , ., - .. . 4 , , - - ,

2.4 Appropriate ac and de power sources are operable.

g 2.5 -Phase-I-testsbmp! l eted- hk4cJ 3.0 TEST METHOD 3.1 Self test features of the system shall be tested and verified to be operational.

3.2 "First out", feature shall be tested and verified operational.

3.3 Each field contact shall be actuated and appro-priate annunciatod response verified.

2l Amendment 2 14B-46 September 1980

m ..

PVNGS" F5AR -

APPs~ N DIX"14B' l 14Bl3'23 SE'ISN5CUI'STR N MENTATION

~ -

5 1.1 0'? OBJECTIV5S To demonstrate proper-operation of the' seismic: monitor-

~

g

ing instrumentation. - ' - 4 - " " ' ' '

) of any f.ielo contact.

r i 2.0 PREREQUISITES- -

1 -

F 2.1 Constfuction" activities on the seismic' monitoring '

instrumentation'have been' completed.

i

, 2. 2 All associated instrumentation has been

,. calibrated.

2'. 3 ~ Approprihte' test instrumentation is available and

[

e calibrated.

. 2.4 -P lase-I-test-s-completed; le.\ehcCl

=,

. -r .

-;- cc : -

c  :  :- - -- - _ -n

's ; L t .'si'3 i l R 'I ** *% ) ? t ! rt * ** > \ l)" f .4 *? , }

~

+ <rs a l).~*' (t*~ t. Mff

. 3.0 TEST METHOD 3 '. i' Verify opdrhbilihy'of Unt'ernal dalibration "

2

• dEvib5s'%[recordingcalibrationrecordsonall applicable sensors.

3.2 Verify system response to simulated seismic events by actuating the appropriate trigger units, recording accelerograph outputs and playing back all records for analysis.

l 3.3 Verify and calibrate all systems alarms and indicators.

3.4 Verify the proper operation and installation of all peak recording accelerographs.

~

l 4.0 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA l

The seismic instrumentation system operates as l

described in system 3.7.4 when using the above test , _ ,

methods. ,

{

2l Amendment 2 14B-48 September 1980

p.VNGS FSAR -

A_PPENDIX 14B s e C j il4_B.)4 . GAS ANALYZER _,g: ._ g ,

1. 0 , OBJECTIVE

, ,To,yerify.the. gas analyzer,p_ackage will; automatically.,_

moni_ tor. hydrogen and oxygen concentrations.

2. 0 : PREREQUISITES 2.1 Construction activities on all systems connected

,to gas analyzer package are. complete.

,2. 2 . Sample points.are hooked up to the gas analyzer

-package.

2. 3 Associated instrumentation,has been calibrated.,, .

l 2.4 -Phasc I tests-completed, h\eAccL 2

' 2.hs System lined up for normal operation per station operating procedures.

. 3 . _ , , ,

3.O TEST METHOD - -

l 3.1 Check proper operation of the sequence selector for autoraatic monitoring of . inputs.

-3.2 Check ability to correctly measure and record known oxygen and hydrogen concentrations.

3.3 Check alarm setpoints.

4.0 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA The automatic gas analyzer operates as described in subsection 9.3.2 when using the above test methods.

September 1980 14B-49 Amendment 2 l2

( , .

)

rPVNGSrFSAR .

/ APPENDIX'14B

.t.4Be39 l gTURBINE~ ELECTRO-HYDRAULIC CONTROL i t

1,0 OBJECTIVE

~

,To, verify, proper performance.of,the. turbine electro-

,. hydraulic . control, system. . . . ~ _.<2

2 (0 PREREQUISITES

2.1 Construction activities on the turbine electro-hydraulic control system are complete. ,

2. 2 _ Associated instrumentation has been calibrated.

. 2.3 i Appropriate test equipment is available and has '

'I '

.been_ calibrated. . .. .: _ a. c --

'2 . 4 . Proper fluid levels throughout the system have '

been verified.

_. > -.;- , ... u.. . ., - - - - - -

2.5 Appropriatetacaand de power sources are avail- I able and operable. '

3 "

E6 pflase-I-tests-completedr h k W

.. . .,. -... a , -, . . - .- -

3.0 TEST METHOD 3.1 Using external instrumentation simulate input signals and record the response of the electro-hydraulic control system.

3.2 Verify proper outputs in all modes of operation.

3.3 Verify all system interlocks, overrides, annunci-ators, and indicators are operational.

4.0 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA The turbine electro-hydraulic control system operates as described in section 10.2.2.3 when using above test methods.

September 1980 14B-55 Amendment 2 12