ML20128F398

Discusses Author 830509 Telcon W/R Fortuna Re Ofc of Inspector & Auditor Investigation of Facility Inquiry.Info Listed That Should Be Developed Prior to Jan 1981.Interview W/Fortuna Scheduled for 830511

ML20128F398
Person / Time
Site:	Zimmer
Issue date:	05/10/1983
From:	Aloot C NRC
To:	NRC
Shared Package
ML20127A137	List: ML20127A132 ML20128E416 ML20128E447 ML20128E477 ML20128E500 ML20128E509 ML20128E531 ML20128E556 ML20128E573 ML20128E593 ML20128E653 ML20128E666 ML20128E696 ML20128E734 ML20128E756 ML20128E785 ML20128E804 ML20128E826 ML20128E836 ML20128E863 ML20128E914 ML20128F145 ML20128F319 ML20128F335 ML20128F352 ML20128F368 ML20128F398 ML20128F424 ML20128F458 ML20128F488 ML20128F506 ML20128F522 ML20128F540 ML20128F559 ML20128G051 ML20128G061 ML20128G074 ML20128G099 ML20128G171
References
FOIA-84-415 NUDOCS 8505290634
Download: ML20128F398 (3)

Text

~

. ..L d '

FORTUNA INTERVIEW MEMOSA May 10, 1983 72 MEMORANDUM FOR:' To File

-FROM: C. Sebastian Alcot

SUBJECT:

FORTUNA INTERVIEW On May 9, 1983, I called Roger Fortuna, (Ex. 27426) Office of Inspections, to arrange an interview. Mr. Fortuna agreed to make himself available for an interview during the morning of May 11, 1983. He did request that we permit him to review relevant documents before the interview so that he could refresh his recollection.

Based on information presently available to me, Mr. Fortuna was the Acting Assistant Director for Investigations, CIA, between 1979 and early 1981. He participated in the early

" scoping" discussions regarding OIA's investigation of the Zimm'er inquiry. Also, he participated in the recent devel-opment of OI's investigative policies and procedures.

During his interview, the following information for the period prior to January, 1981 should be developed:

1., Did OIA ' ave any written policies on the ini-tiation, conduct or disposition of investigations?

If so, identify.

8505290634 841227 PDR FOIA BAUSER84-415 PDR

t. _

-- -_._ ._ _ .~

T y. . . . .

. o N 2

2. DidOIA[aveanyunwrittenpoliciesontheini-tiation, conduct or disposition of investigations?

If so, describe.

3. .If no written on unwritten policies existed, how were OIA investigations' initiated? Concluded?

Disposed?

. 4. As a general matter, how was the scope of an investigation determined? Who participated in these decisions? Who made a final determination?

5. How many investigators were generally assigned to an investigation? Was it common for Cummings or Schnebelen to participate?

6. Generally, who was responsible for writing the draft report? What was the chain of review?

7. Was it common to permit the subject of an inves-tigation an opportunity to review the OIA report prior to its official release to the Commission?

8. Turning to the Applegate matter, when was the first time you learned of a'llegations relating to

e A, 1

\

3 1 l

l 1

Zimmer or the Region III investigation? (Probe j for 2/80 knowledge)

9. Describe the events that took place in OIA from this'"first" knowledge to January 1981.

10. How were investigators chosen to be assigned to Applegate matter? Who decided?

11. Who participated in initial " scoping" meetings?

What was said? What was decided?

12. Why was Schnebelen assigned to this investigation?

4 f

~ '

II . v~ ~_ _-. .,_._,,_t_,___ ' '._. _.