ML20128F458

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses 830509 Arrangements for Interview W/A Schnebelen on 830512 Re Applegate Investigation.Listed Info Should Be Developed During Interview
ML20128F458
Person / Time
Site: Zimmer
Issue date: 05/10/1983
From: Aloot C
NRC
To:
NRC
Shared Package
ML20127A137 List:
References
FOIA-84-415 NUDOCS 8505290646
Download: ML20128F458 (5)


Text

E

(% -4

, >f

. hv SCHNEBELEN INTERVIEW MEMOSA May 10, 1983 g MEMORANDUM FOR: Files FROM: C. Sebastian Alcot

SUBJECT:

SCHNEBELEN INTERVIEW On May 9, 1983i I contacted Arthur Schnebelen (3'36-1493) and arranged an interview for 1:30 p.m. on May 12, 1983. Mr.

Schnebelen participated in the Applegate investigation apparently as a representative of Mr. Cummings. During his interview, the following informtion should be developed:

1. D OIAfaveanywrittenpoliciesontheini-tiation, conduct or disposition of investigations?

If so, identify and M .6 @Q .

2. D OIA/aveanyunwrittenpoliciesontheini-tiation, conduct or disposition of investigations?

Ifso,describeAMJOwksh-

3. If no written on unwritten policies existeel, how 2 es. Jakd w p OIA investigations initiated? Conclu d ed?

Disposed?

4. As a general matter, how w the scope of an investigation determined? Whoparticipatefin these decisions? Who ma e a final determination?

8505290646 841227 PDR FOIA BAUSERB4-415 PDR p .. ....-..- - . .__

e _.

, 'b J 2

5. Howmanyinvestigatorswhhegenerallyassignedto an investigation? b it common for Cummings,er-l es a. A 0 spa-':1:n to participate?
6. Generally, who w e responsible for writing the draft report? Whatwhsthechainofreview?

Is

7. Wpe it common to permit the subject of an inves- ,

tigation an opportunity to review the OIA report J prior to its official release to the Commission?

l 8. Turning to the Applegate matter, when was the l first time you learned of allegations relating to Zimmer or the Region III investigation? (Probe for 2/80 knowledge)

9. How/Why were you assigned to Applegate matter?

i-

10. Describe how the investigation was "scoped?" Who participated? What was decided?
11. How were potential interviewees identified?
12. How were interviews conducted? Notice? Prepared questions (if so, who prepared?)? Free-form interview? Recall nature of questions?

. . . ~ . . . _ _ . . . . . _ . . . _ _ , _ _ . . . . _ . _ . .

7, ,

  • ir - ,

3

13. Were: interviewees scheduled in any particular order? If so,:why?

214. Who wrote interview summaries? Was interviewee 1 permitted to review summaries?

15. When were first round'of interviews completed?
16. How were re-interviews or additional interviews determined? Who so determined?-
17. What was

's role / input during inter-i views?

18. Was-Cummings involved in any way in'the interview stage? If so, describe.

4

19. Describe how the draft report was prepared. By

'[ whom? Who reviewed?

20. Describe any significant modifications to the draft report during this review stage. Who modified? Why?

i

21. Why was Harpster interviewed? Why deleted? When?

.... . . . . . . . - --.- L - -. - - ..

e e

4

22. When was final draft completed?
23. Why was Region III provided with final draft?

o

" ~~

l:

..(L

..129..

, y. ,

., ~

4 w

YA<

2, .-

d',,W,.-. e

- {.

f ._ h .;? ,pj i.l9 J$

r;- #

d.i

.~,j , . ..,t . .. , , a~ .m Y}^j'#5' -

(,1 ,

t.,<

n :.. . . t u.. ,:,, . . , .;. s.,s,

. . s ;* *

.. v . - + - 3 y. . > , . p,., ..:,

3 g .......

l , , _.

- . r. ;.: a .:-

~ 0]IS - b('77 - llp' H/T1 ~ .lid

- Si'. k:dd' sl L.

t} D , Ir w.'l l

l-

@ 4 l .

[A (7?p T D 4 Lki.L itliia , , jw, k -

i D

~

dd~ b 0/4 j w e ui

~ [

6

'*/ si e lN'r l'

i i f 4

O 8 b 4* * ~

' .'. 5.

x- .>

C.

A.

~. .:

q3U.

~-.

..'s.. J ".

.. L ~ . . .. >. ., .. 3 . .. .

. > is. ~

, j

-:raev7

=

f. , , ' ' - , -jy .r.f

.. m , .* A.

. ~." *

  • c.

.. .g, 8 .s .

_y; .g.--~...-..e.. -

- , , ' . '- .. Q -

.t, ' ,. , .. . . , , . . . .

- , y y .. . ..; _

,4 . _ .

S, .-; , " ' ,',' o r s . . ; .+~; - _ . . ~ .* *e-"

, f 4 ,. * ** 6 . ' '

,