ML20128F458

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses 830509 Arrangements for Interview W/A Schnebelen on 830512 Re Applegate Investigation.Listed Info Should Be Developed During Interview
ML20128F458
Person / Time
Site: Zimmer
Issue date: 05/10/1983
From: Aloot C
NRC
To:
NRC
Shared Package
ML20127A137 List:
References
FOIA-84-415 NUDOCS 8505290646
Download: ML20128F458 (5)


Text

E

(%

-4

>f hv SCHNEBELEN INTERVIEW MEMOSA May 10, 1983 g

MEMORANDUM FOR:

Files FROM:

C. Sebastian Alcot

SUBJECT:

SCHNEBELEN INTERVIEW On May 9, 1983i I contacted Arthur Schnebelen (3'36-1493) and arranged an interview for 1:30 p.m. on May 12, 1983.

Mr.

Schnebelen participated in the Applegate investigation apparently as a representative of Mr. Cummings.

During his interview, the following informtion should be developed:

OIAfaveanywrittenpoliciesontheini-1.

D tiation, conduct or disposition of investigations?

If so, identify and M.6 @Q.

2.

D OIA/aveanyunwrittenpoliciesontheini-tiation, conduct or disposition of investigations?

Ifso,describeAMJOwksh-3.

If no written on unwritten policies existeel, how 2 es.

Jakd w p OIA investigations initiated?

Conclu ed?

d Disposed?

4.

As a general matter, how w the scope of an investigation determined?

Whoparticipatefin these decisions?

Who ma e a final determination?

8505290646 841227 PDR FOIA BAUSERB4-415 PDR p..

e

, 'b J

2 Howmanyinvestigatorswhhegenerallyassignedto 5.

an investigation?

b it common for Cummings,er-l es a. A 0 spa-':1:n to participate?

6.

Generally, who w e responsible for writing the draft report?

Whatwhsthechainofreview?

Is 7.

Wpe it common to permit the subject of an inves-tigation an opportunity to review the OIA report J

prior to its official release to the Commission?

l 8.

Turning to the Applegate matter, when was the l

first time you learned of allegations relating to Zimmer or the Region III investigation?

(Probe for 2/80 knowledge) 9.

How/Why were you assigned to Applegate matter?

i-10.

Describe how the investigation was "scoped?"

Who participated?

What was decided?

11.

How were potential interviewees identified?

12.

How were interviews conducted?

Notice?

Prepared questions (if so, who prepared?)?

Free-form interview?

Recall nature of questions?

... ~...

7,

  • ir -

3 13.

Were: interviewees scheduled in any particular order?

If so,:why?

214.

Who wrote interview summaries?

Was interviewee 1

permitted to review summaries?

15.

When were first round'of interviews completed?

16.

How were re-interviews or additional interviews determined?

Who so determined?-

17.

What was

's role / input during inter-i views?

18.

Was-Cummings involved in any way in'the interview stage?

If so, describe.

4 19.

Describe how the draft report was prepared.

By

'[

whom?

Who reviewed?

20.

Describe any significant modifications to the draft report during this review stage.

Who modified?

Why?

i 21.

Why was Harpster interviewed?

Why deleted?

When?

--.- L - -. -

e e

4 22.

When was final draft completed?

23.

Why was Region III provided with final draft?

o

~~

l:

..(L 29..

..1

., ~

YA<

d',,W,.-. - {.

, y.,

4 w

2, e

f._ h.;?,pj i.l9 J$

d.i.m Y}^j'#5' -

r;-:.~,j,...,t..

a~

(

' t.,< n :.... t

,1,

u.., :,,

..,.;. s.,s, s ;*

.. v. - +

- 3

y.. >,. p,

3 g l

r. ;.: a.:-

~ 0]IS - b('77 - llp'

- Si'. k:dd' sl L.

l H/T1 ~

.lid t} D, Ir w.'l l-4 l

[A (7?p T D 4

Lki.L itliia

,, jw, k i

D b

dd~

0/4

~

j w

ui e

[

~

6

'*/ si e lN'r l'

i i

f 4

O 8

b 4*

~

'.'. 5.

x-

C.

q3U.

A.

~..:

~-.

..'s.. J L ~.... >..,.. 3.

. > is. ~

j

-:raev7

f.,, ' ' -

-jy

.r.f

=

m

.* A.

c.

8

.s.

. ~." * *

.g,

_y;

.g.--~...-..e..

Q.t, ',.,....

y y.....; _

o r s.. ;.+~; - _.. ~.* * "

,4 e-S, 4

  • ** 6.

f