ML20128F145
| ML20128F145 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 06/02/1983 |
| From: | Hoyt H Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20127A137 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-84-415 NUDOCS 8505290568 | |
| Download: ML20128F145 (1) | |
Text
.-
.....:a
.:J:
?. ;
ss..:.-'.- 7'. ;y %l, ~ e o n f %,%. sate.p W.
_z.j* ;,7, c+.
.'-,..'.Iv. 3,.,. - i.
,,..:.s......s. #:
q
... -, r m. s.:.
y
.. g. :,.
s.%e
&2/.
. s '.s...
.s : a
), g?.s l '. 9..,j -
- p. *
- m.../
..aes......,a. w. n. s..
s....
a
- 9,'"..
~
June 2, 1983 s
Me o.@ lFi1e-FROM:
Helen F. Hoy-I ra t u r ne...=.~.=. '. s s.5....s...=. ' l. i...=...s
+,-.". r.
.=...s - C.. i. r. " s-2.
.':. =...... P. 4..
s m
3
-da:e.
I reached."c. C.:mmir.;s at 9:20 a.m.
Mr.L Cum.ings wanted to have us censider in ervie..s with Jircks, Stello,
-Kappler, Palladino, Ahearce, and Gilinsky.
He suggested that we ask two questions of these peccle:
(1)
Did you read CIA's report ar.d in its entirety? and.(2).Co -you based on the reper: :cnsider it a fair rescet ar.d a good. faith effort ;and did we touch all bases?
If r.ot, why?
~ Mr. Cummings said be felt we should go t these pe ple who had icoked atithe report at the time.
They should be asked whether it was not an
- independent and impartial lock at the facts and that GIA had turned over the
. rocks.
.The question, he said, was to ask these pecple if the report was a ;;od
' faith effort.
1 did not advise Mr. Cu.mings that <:e had interviewec a:'least cro at the persons he had suggested but-did advise hin : hat nis sug;esticr. <.culd te taker.
He said he unders cd but.,that he ha d :?oug".n,.about this
.under consideration.
3 i,.4 1.,
,.,.... 2..a..,,.
- 4. e, u.
. o g. 3....na...
.w3 en n i s.< a. y.o
,.k. e o :. : 4....
a s
a.r.a...,..,, e u 3
e Ka. n. p. a. r p..a. s
- . 2 'l
.+., j..= c
.2. %c. -.
- b.n., s,. o.r. i. j. j : 't 'e y.
,3 r., d.
- s. 2, *
- r. a.
h a. d...s i.'. W
.a.d..'.
7 r
w.
- j. ge ".
.(s s,3 } s. g*
2 %.,, 0,. j....s..) j
- b. a. s.
U..s ' f. o. ] ( V.m. 3 ] u. ' s
.s.. 4 *. /..s
. A. d. '.- b..s..e. : c. d a
s.....,,.
.n J.... s..Wa.re.
a;
--42
'r
- he, c.,~, v 3.
.2...
- h.. 2. A. s s-f + 4 r..a j d-4 7., j n j a,, re..a. p
- w. a.
..s
. s J
.s si s.
had been iss'e:.
I.' d C,,.=. i.n '.2. n- - ' .'e d, P,, u"...i n : s-
'. h a '. '.". s "...s"."
C ^s.. d
- d. s t'
'. b. s..(. ",.'m's - '. #..- " '.. '. '. ' '. ". #.
s rot-wish to go any further into the ma: er 3* this time.
He then asked '<. bat was new and I replied notning but the s:or s re.ss and the. e was an exchaa;e cf re-' arks about that.
The call was ter-i iated =f;ar abr 5 :-inu es.
- Present in my office at the time :? the call.vas Rutharre." filar a r.d David Lewis--law clerks en the panel-..hc h d enteras Ty office at the be;i nim; of the call.