ML20128F368
| ML20128F368 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 05/10/1983 |
| From: | Aloot C NRC |
| To: | NRC |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20127A137 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-84-415 NUDOCS 8505290628 | |
| Download: ML20128F368 (4) | |
Text
w 49
.b~ V
' s.
s GAMBLE INTERVIEW MEMOSA May-10, 1983 7Y MEMORANDUM FOR:
The File FROM:
C. Sebastian Alcot
SUBJECT:
GAMBLE INTERVIEW i-On Ma~y 9, 1983, I contacted-Richard Gamble (274-5373) concerning an interview.
Mr. Gamble has left the NRC~and is currently a criminal investigator for the Department of Defense.
His local duty station is Room 8D490, Building 8, Cameron Station, Duke Street, Alexandria.
Due to the.
difficulty in his getting to Bethesda, I agree to an interview in Alexandria at 1:30 p.m. May 11, 1983.
Mr. Gamble, along with John Sinclair, was.the principal OIA Investigator assigned to the Applegate matter.
He also appears to be the principal drafter of the OIA draft report.
During his interview, the following information should be developed:
1.
Does OIA y' ave any written policies on the ini-
~
[
tiation, conduct or disposition of investigations?
i If so, identify and state when adopted.
2.
Does OIA pave'any unwritten policies on the ini-tiation, conduct or disposition of investigations?
If so, describe and state when adopted.
8505290628 841227 FDIA PDR PDR BAUSERB4-415 i
-eme.gm euse w-..ua-6 s.
.a m...
===== %e eu.
.,mm..
u 2
3.
If no written on unwritten policies existed, how are OIA investigations initiated?
Conducted?
Disposed?
f
~.
4.
As a general matter, how is the scope of an investigation determined?
Who participates in these decisions?
Who ma es.a final determination as to scope?
5.
How many investigators are generally assigned to an investigation?
Was it common for Cummings or Schnebelen to participate?
If so, to what extent.
6.
Generally, who is responsible for writing the draft report?
What is the chain of review?
7.
Is it common to permit the subject of an inves-tigation an opportunity to review the OIA report
. prior to its official release to-the Commission?
8.
Turning to the Applegate matter, when was the first time you learned of allegations relating to Zimmer or the Region III investigation?
(Probe for 2/80 knowledge) 9.
How/Why were you assigned to Applegate matter?
'\\
3 10.
Describe how the investigation was "scoped?"
Who participated?
What was decided?
~
11.
How were potential interviewees identified?
F s
12.
How were interviews conducted?
Notice?
Prepared questions (if so, who prepared)?
Free-form interview?
Recall nature of questions?
L 13.
Were interviewees scheduled in any particular order?
If so, why?
14.
Who wrote interview summaries?
Was interviewee r
permitted to review summaries?
15.
When were first round of interviews completed?
16.
How were re-interviews or additional interviews determined?
Who so determined?
17.
What was Schnebelen's role / input during inter-views?
18.
Was Cummings involved in any way in the !.nterview stage?
If so, describe.
II'
T:.
54~
a 3
~
4 19.
Describe how the draft report was prepared.
By whom?
Who reviewed?
~
- 20.. Describe any significant modifications to the draft report during this review stage.
Who modified?
Why?
- 21. - Why was Harpster interviewed?
Why deleted?
When?
22.
When was final draft completed?
23.
Why was Region III provided with final draft?
e b
o 9
[
l 4
-e