ML20062D356

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
/03L-0 on 781031:surveillance of Fire Protec Equip & Circuitry(Procedures HNP-1-3356 & HNP-1-3360)had Been Neglected Due to Personnel Oversight.Importance of Fire Detector Surveillance Reemphasized to Personnel
ML20062D356
Person / Time
Site: Hatch Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 11/14/1978
From: Nix R
GEORGIA POWER CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20062D354 List:
References
LER-78-091-03L, LER-78-91-3L, NUDOCS 7811220028
Download: ML20062D356 (1)


Text

~

1 l

l CON 1nOL OLOCK: [ l ,

l l l lh o

(PLCASE sinsfjT On TYPE ALL nEOUtn[D If1FOllMATIONI O lil3 3I cl n! r h I nl Pl@! o f o f o f o f o l a l o f o f o f o i D01@!

LICLt. ,L E CO!JL 34 th LICLfd;*L f*UP1dLII ib t L4LLret I i l l iTYr0l l lJul@lbd LAi B klIg

< CON'T 1

Ml a 1CEE l Ll@l al Sl of oI ol 3l2l1w @l110l3l1l7l8l@l1l1l1I4I7l8l@

io 4. i uo.r.E r r.U. oei4

. ..i tvtm uArE e4 is HtPOm uAir. i.o

EVENT DESCntPTION AND PROOARLE C0tJSECUCNCES h
O I21 lDurino nnmal operation while making a review of the Technical Scecification I 0131 lRecoire' ents for the Fire Protection Systems, it was discovered that the surveillance l

, n 141 Ifor tha fire detection instruments and circuitry listed in Table 3.13-1 had not been [

O Isl l cerf omed . (Technical Soecifications 4.1.3.1.1 and 4.1.3.1.2) .Public het.lth and g 1 O is I lsafety were not affected by this incident.

l 0171I l 4

f 0181 l l 4 i es so SYSTEu CAUSE CAtnE i

- - - CODE CONIP. VALVE CODE SUSCOCE COMPONENT COOE SUSCODE SUPCOCE Ott 8 l A l Bl@ lA [@ l Cl@ l II til S l T l R } U l@ [E l@ IZ e to 11 12 13 18 19 20 l@

. _ SEOUENTtAL OCCURRENCE- REPOHT REVISION I EVENT YEAR REPORT NO. CODE TYPE NO. l uE

@ ,,a'E RiRO

_ 21 l'I 27 I I-I 2J I0l9III 24 26 I/j 27 1013 I 23 C3 It I 30 l-l 31 Loj 22 l

T N A T Gi C FL NT Mk 4 HOURS SE I 50 FCR t 3. SU LIE MA FA 1 nER I3J Higiz l@ [_zj@

J4 h l.oz i@

loloioi01 37 Lilj@ I42 ti l@ lAl@ lPl41315l@

40 48 43 44 47 CAUSE DESCRIPTION AND CCnRECTIVE ACTIOfJS h t i t o l lThe failure to cerfor i the recuired sHrveillance was due to corsernel oversinht I ,

i i

m IProcedi' ras Hf:P-1-3156 and P5!P-1-3360. f- the survaillan-a of fira da w +are and I i ij I v i Itheir circuitrv. were nerfomod and fourd acceotable. Tha im netanca sf fire I i 13 l ldotector surveillance was recmohasized to the nersencel involvad. I

(

TTUu le e

I ao

CE ST i l s l [_Ej@ l 019 l'2 l@l sPCwER OTHEn STATUS flA h 5iEl[vSOY OiSCOvERv OESCRiPTiON g

l

, l lAl@l Review of Recuired Surveillar.ce I  !

ACTivlTY CO TENT fitLEASED CF HELEASE AMOUNT OF ACTlvlTY LOCATION OF RELEASE

.ijfcJ f

LZJ @ ! 7!@l rin i i riA I 8 9 10 tt 44 45 PEnSCNNEL EXPOSUHES 80 NOV0f f1 TYPE CESCntPTION -

i I 7 I I ci of cl@lI l@l lA l PE RSONNE L iNJU 'ES NuurtLH utScritPitON iinIl0Iclel@l

. , ii ,,

tlA I LOSS OF OH DAMACF YO FActLITY .o OD 4 -

,g p%

TvrE tiL '. CHIP f TON i i >a I9l z !@liu r4A I ,

80 g ISP.Ut n L CniPTION 2iei l1;8! rA I I i I i ! I i i i i i i ! ;,

3 3 Bu LS L'J CJ 7.

NAML OF PHCPAHEn R. T. flix pnoyc; (912) ?67-77P,1  ?

SuperintelatenL 01 :;a in tenarice

  • v ,,