ML20058L727

Forwards Plant Performance Improvement Plan Implementation Program Schedule Status as of 900724

ML20058L727
Person / Time
Site:	Calvert Cliffs
Issue date:	08/01/1990
From:	Russell L BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NUDOCS 9008080054
Download: ML20058L727 (15)

Text

f L --- c,

4 ,

BALTIMORE

.- GAS AND s---- .

. ELECTRIC -

L CHARLES CENTER e P.O. BOX 1475' O BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21203 1475 e

4 LEON 8 RUSSELL'

.nucuIsY,UIapu,sooiraweur August 1, 1990 1

.c US' Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC .20555

-Attn:'Mr. Bruce R.' Boger Mail' Stop 14A2 h

Enclosed please' find aicopy of the Performance Improvement Plan Implementation. Program '(PIP-IP) Schedule Status as of July 24, 1990.-;To date, 12 ! ; Action Plans have. been: verified as implemented ,

-and 27 remain active. Revision'3 to'the PIP-IP (submitted July

'13,:. 1990) provided our' status as of-June 30th. Attached is a ',

-brief= synopsis of_our activities since-then.- Also attached is an updated list of key-Action Plan <information, including verifica-tion.' status. ,

o Please:: contact me : (260-6680) or Rich Olson (260-3771) should you-have any-questions. g 4 i

l _ Sincerely, i

Leon'B. Russell M -

L l

~

i.

/ Attachments s r' I y

pi 9008080054 ADOCK900G01 0500031,/

PDR PDC p l 1

i w i

fl e l

b ,

Mr. Bruce R.cBoger August 1, 1990 Page two:

bec: Messrs._G.C.. Creel (w/ synopsis & list)'

C.H. Cruse (w/ synopsis & list)

R.E. Denton (w/ synopsis & list) ,

R.P. Heibel (w/ synopsis & list)  !

J.R. Lemons- (w/ synopsis & list)'

G.L. Detter (w/all)'

B.S. Montgomery (w/all) ,

R.C.L. Olson (w/ synopsis)  ;

R.F. . Lewis (w/ synopsis)  !

-I J.S. Fuoto (w/ synopsis)

J

)

l ii l

l L

i i

di

U ALVE RT CLIFFS

=

N U C L E A R: P O W E R.-? L A N T 4

O (N#)1 PERFORMAN'CE IMPROVEMENT

• PLAN SCHEDULE' STATUS AS OF JULY 24, 1990 L'

L 3 A LTI M O R E G A S A.N D E L.E C T RI C C O M P A N Y l l

l 1

1 9

b i A

,1 m \

.-'%,' g t

8  %

9 4

.'.e 4

s' e

i e

e

, e ,

f

• e e

e a

I 4 e

k CRITICAL PATH ANALYSES e

i 0

0

'l

l n

l l

l

'l J

l l

1 i

l i

1 l

1

PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PLAN CRITICAL-PATH ANALYSIS JULY 26, 1990

.A CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS IS PERFORMED FOR ALL ACTION PLANS THAT HAVE TOTAL FLOAT VALUES LESS TEAN ZERO ON THEIR COMMITMENTS.

WHERE ACTION PLANS: ARE TIED TOGETHER CAUSING MULTIPLE ACTION PLAN NEGATIVITY, IT WILL BE'SO IDENTIFIED-IN THE TEXT OF THE ANALYSIS.

5.3.1 PROCUREMENT PROGRAM PROJECT NEGATIVE -67 DAYS

• 3. 6.1 SITE INTEGRATED SCHEDULING NEGATIVE -53 DAYS

• 2,5.2 REG. COMMITMENT MNGMT PROCESS NEGATIVE -50 DAYS

• 5.2.1 PROCEDURES UPGRADE PROGRAM NEGATIVE -48 DAYS

• 4.2.1 ISSUES MANAGEMENT PROCESS NEGATIVE -44 DAYS

• 3.5.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT NEGATIVE -42 DAYS

• 5.3.4 DESIGN-BASIS CONSOLIDATION NEGATIVE -22 DAYS

~THE FOLLOWING ARE THE ANALYSES FOR THE JULY 24, 1990 DATA DATE:

I 5.3.1 PROCUREMENT PROGRAM PROJECT DOSWELL, JOE -67 DAYS DUE To INCREASED SCOPE IN MODIFYING EXISTING PROCEDURES-TO REFLECT'THE NEW PROCUREMENT PROGRAM, THE TRAINING PROGRAM HAS BEEN EXTENDED TO NO-VEMBER 30, 1990 FROM AUGUST 24, 1990 RESULTING IN THE TRAINING MILESTONE

(#6) SLIPPING TO -67 DAYS NEGATIVE. IN ADDITION, THE CHANGE MANAGEMENT MILESTONE (09) HAS BEEN EXTENDED TO NOVEMBER 30, 1990 TO CONCIDE WITH THE TRAINING PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION.

• • RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION **

JL CHANGE REQUEST IS BEING INITIATED TO REFLECT THE ABOVE' CHANGES AND THE REQUIRED RESOURCES.-

• 3.6.1 SITE INTEGRATED SCHEDULING KEMPER, BILL -53 DAYS CURRENTLY THE SIS ACTION PLAN IS BEING EVALUATED TO ASSURE THAT

- ACTIVITIES ' LEADING TO FULL IMPLEMENTATION ARE INCLUDED IN THE PIP SCHEDULE. THE CURRENT SCHEDULE WILL SHOW NEGATIVITY IN CERTAIN 1 AREAS UNTIL THE EVALUATION PROCESS IS COMPLETE AT WHICH TIME AN APPROPIATE CHANGE REQUEST WILL BE SUBMITTED.

• • RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION **

EXPEDITE CHANGE REQUEST.

A PRELIMINARY SIS SCHEDULE WAS PROVIDED TO THE PIP PLANNERS ON JUNE 28, 1990. AT THIS TIME THE CHANGE REQUEST WHICH INCORPORATES THE ACTIVITIES

' LEADING TO THE FULL IMPLEMENTATION OF SIS IS BEING REVIEWED BY THE SITE INTEGRATED SCHEDULING STAFF.

INDICATES. ACTION PLANS THAT HAVE BEEN r" CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS REPORT MORE THAN ONE UPDATE CYCLE.

i .

,012.5.2 REG. COMMITMENT MNGMT-PROCESS MANN, BRIAN

-50 DAYS-TASK 1, REGULATORY COMMITMENT MANAGEMENT PROCESS, WAS DELAYED TO ALI4W

' INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF THE PROJECT PLAN AND THE BID SPECIFICATIONS.

TAS K . 2 ', SOURCE DOCUMENT STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL SYSTEM WAS DELAYED TO ALLOW COORDINATION WITH NIPS AND TO ADDRESS ISD CONCERNS. TASK 3,

~~ HISTORICAL COMMITMENT IDENTIFICATION , HAS EXPERIENCED SOME DELAY DUE TO' THE PROBLEMS EXPERIENCED WITH TASKS 1 AND 2.

C* RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION **

i A CHANGE REQUEST MAS BEEN INITIATED BY THE ACTION PLAN MANAGER AND j IT WILL BE PLACED IN THE-PIP MANAGEMENT APPROVAL CYCLE ON AUGUST 1, 1990.

5.2.1 PROCEDURES UPGRADE PROJECT LATHAM, DAN -48 DAYS

_ ___....................____. . ___........ ... __ _ i

-THIS ACTION PLAN REMAINS -48 DAYS NEGATIVE: THIS NEGATIVITY IS

' ATTRIBUTED TO A DECISION BY PUP MANAGEMENT TO REVISE THEIR CURRENT PROGRAM.

AUGUST THE 31, FORECAST DATE.FOR HAVING AN APPROVED SCHEDULE-IN PLACE IS 1990.

l

• • RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION **

'TO ENSURE SUCCESS IN MEETING THE AUGUST 31,1990 DATE FOR.HAVING A FINAL DETAIL SCHEDULE IN PLACE:FOR PLYIP REVISION #4. THE RECOMMENED

' COURSE OF ACTION WAS TO ESTABLISH WEEKLY SCHEDULE REVIEW MEETINGS BET-t WEEN PROCEDURE UP-GRADE AND PIP PLANNING STAFF.

' WEEKLY SCHEDULE' REVIEW MEETINGS HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED, AND THE.NEXT l MEETING: IS SCHEDULED FOR JULY 30,1990. THE PROJECT IS PRESENTLY ON SCHEDULED-FOR' MEETING THE FOLLOWING' DATES.

-(B) DEVELOP A DETAILED SCHEDULE FOR AUGUST 1, 1990  ;

ACTION = PLAN MANAGER APPROVAL t

-(C) INITIATE A CHANGE REQUEST AUGUST 10, 1990

'FOR; PIP MANAGEMENT APPROVAL

-4.2.1 ISSUES MANAGEMENT PROCESS ROMNEY, KEN -44 DAYS E

REDEFINING THE SCOPE OF.THIS ACTION PLAN TO AVOID TASK DUPLICATION 1

-BETWEEN ISSUES MANAGEMENT AND SITE INTEGRATED SCiiEDULING IS THE CONTRIBUTING FACTOR TO:THE SCHEDULE NEGATIVITITY.

• • RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION **

A' PROPOSED RECOVERY PLAN HAS-BEEN INITIATED:

i THE= CURRENT SCHEDULE IS BEING' REVISED TO INCLUDE CURRENT AND FUTURE

= STAFFING REQUIREMENTS, DOCUMENT REVIEW AND APPROVAL TIME, AND SITE INTEGRATED SCHEDULING INTERFACES; CONSEQUENTLY, THE ACTION PLAN END LDATE WILL BE EXTENDED.

1 .

~

. e 1 l

1

.,

• 3.5.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT ZUMWALT, ERIC -42 I

_____ .______.....______ _______. ..-- DA'_.* S Q A.. COMPLETED THEIR REVIEW OF THE PMPM MANUAL. AT THIS TIME THE PMPM

'IS AWAITING THE APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE OF THE VP-NED. COMMENTS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED FROM THE MGR-NESD AND O&PM ON THE PROCL'DURES. THE FORECAST COMPLETION DATE 00 THE PROJECT MANAGEMENT SLIPPED TO AUGUST 15 1990.

6* RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION **

THERE IS NO PROPOSED CORRECTIVE ACTION FOR THIS ACTION PLAN.

- 5.3.4 DESIGN BASIS CONSOLIDATION PERKS, PAUL -I2 DAYS

-TASK 4, DESIGN BASIS PROCEDURES, IS CURRENTLY -22 DAYS NEGATIVE. THIS NEGATIVITY IS ATTRIBUTED TO THE FINAL RESOLUTION OF COMMENTS FOR ISSU-ING THE REMAINING ESSENTIAL PROCEDURES (M/S #3). SYSTEM / ISSUE PRIORIT-ZATION IS ALSO AFFECTED PENDING APPROVAL OF THE PROCEDURES.

• • RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION **

THE ACTION PLAN MANAGER HAS INDICATED THAT THE COMPLETION OF THE AP-FROVAL CYCLE IS FORECASTED FOR AUGUST 03, 1990.

g. 3 J , .- 1 f

s .

o ,

I APPENDIX A EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

REPORT i

l L

' LEGEND:

g ...... l q

% COMPLETE PIP - BASED ON MANNOURS ASSIGNED TO ALL ACTIVITIt'S DIRECTLY j

- RELATED TO COMPLETION " OF THE ACTION PLAN OR MILESTONES.-

% COMPLETE ALL - BASED ON MANHOURS ASSIGNED TO ALL ACTIVITIES INCLUDING '

i

~ ON-GOING AS A RESULT OF PIP ACTIVITIES OR MILESTONES.

TOTAL FLDAT -

THE DIFFERENCE IN WORKDAYS BETWEEN ACTIVITY DATES L ,

l REQUIRED To SUPPORT THE MILESTONE DATES AND CURRENT l STATUS.

NEGATIVE VALUES - INDICATE ONE OR MORE OF THE MILESTONE.

- ' .IS LATE BY THE INDICATED NUMBER OF ,

WORKDAYS.

. POSITIVE VALUES - INDICATE THAT A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF SLACK (FLOAT) EXISTS BETWEEN THE END OF THE ACTIVITIES AND THE MILESTONE MILESTONES.

ZERO VALUE - INDICATES THE MILESTONES ARE EXACTLY

'ON SCHEDULE AND ACTIVITIES MUST BE COMPLETED ON TIME TO KEEP ON SCHEDULE.

IMPLE.VERIF COMPLETE -

"YES" INDICATES SATISFACTORY COMPLETION OF THE IMPLEMENTATION VERIFICATION AND THE ACTION PLAN.  !

" REVERIFY" INDICATES UNSATISFACTORY RESULTS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION VERIFICATION AND WILL REQUIRE ADDITIONAL WORK TO BE PERFORMED ON THE ACTION PLAN AND ANOTHER IMPLEMENTATION VERIFICATION. 1 "N/A" INDICATES NOT APPLICABLE A'S NO IMPLEMENTATION VERIFICATION ~IS REQUIRED. ,

e

T -

90A1A DATE 24JUL90 PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PLAN ORUN DATE 26JUL98 1111 HRS EMECUTIVE

SUMMARY

REPORT '

ALL ~~

TOTAL  % COMPLETE START FINISM TOTAL' COpetITMENT IMPLEMENT.

ACT PLAN # / TITLE PLAN MANAGER MAN #400RS PIP / ALL DATE DATE FLOAT MILESTONES VERIFICT*'N a

MANAGEMENT PROCESS IMPRCtEMENTS' COMPLETE COMPLETE 2.1.0 MANAGEMENT OVERVIEW . RUSSELL, LEE N/A N/A N/A 3AUG99 2eOEC99 8 N/A 2.2.1 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS MARK 0WSKI, MIKE 1958 97 2.2.2 COMMUNICATIONS PLAN 97 13JUL89 21DEC99 8 DONONDE, ANN 10050' _ 180 2.3.0 MPP ISSUES BASED PLApetING 199 12JAN09 30 MAR 99 0 YES TIETJEN, KEN 775 95 95 EJUN89 SNOV99 . 9 2.5.0 ACCOUNTABILITY IMPROVEMENTS MARK 0WSKI, MIKE N/A N/A N/A SJAN99 12APR99 18 YES VES 2.5.1 COMMITMENT TRACKING SYSTEM' MARK 0WSKI, MIKE 2766 ISS 104 21APR89 SJUN99 9 YES YESe.

2.5.2 REGl*LATORY COMMITMENT MNGretT PROCESS MANN, 8RIAN 84090 1 1 IMAR 3JUN92 -47 ORG ANIZ ATIONAL DYNAMICS IMPR0VEMENTS======== ===== ============= = == ===== = = === === ====== =====90

===============================

3.2.0 MANAGING ORGANIZATIONAL S PGM CitANCE MARK 0WSKI, MIKE 1120 77 3.3.s LEADERSHIP CONFERENCES 77 .26JUN89 31DEC9e - 0 MARK 0WSKI, MIKE 516 ISS 3.4.0 TEAM WORK & INTERFACES ISO 12JUN89 20NOV89 0 YES YES MARK 0WSKI, MIKE 1936 36 3.5.s PROJECT MANAGEMENT 56 28JUL89 28 MAR 91 e ZUMWALT, ERIC 2618 99 3.6.0 DAILY S OUTAGE WORK CostTROL 99 10JUL89 15AUG90 -50 THORP, J0000 4822 3.6.1 SITE.INTECRATED SCHEDULING KEMPER, SILL let 199 22JUN89 26FE899 0 N/A N/A 12108 41 41 10JUL89 19FE891 -53 3.6.2 MAINTENANCE WORK CONTROL NAYDEN, J0099 4290 75 75 _r 3.6.3 OPERATIONS IMPROVEftENT PLAN 1FEB89 31DEC99 8 Tie 0RP , JO900 12314 16 14 1FEB89 7APR93 8 3.7.0 ENGINEERING PLANNING MARINARI, DAN 5360 109 199 3.8.8 SYSTEM CIRC $ES 3JAN89 29JAN99 9 YES YES POLAKi MIKE 4099 100 let 2eNove8 9 MAR 94 5 3.9.8 QUALITY CIRCLES PROGRAN EDWARDS, Ates YES YES 13950 99 -

14 MAR 89 31DEC91 0 ASSESSMENT CAPASILITY IMPR0VEMENTSm=============================================29 4.1.8 POEAC ==================================3==,==============

PIERIteGER, PAUL N/A N/A 4.1.1 OPERATING EXPERIENCE REVIEW PIERIseGER, PAUL N/A 31JUL89 31JUL89 9 YES. VES l 8424 57 57 15JAft99 3SEP91 0 4.2.8 QC IMPROVEMENTS ROMNEY, KEN 66288 74

' 66 IJUN89 21DEC99 8 4.2.1 ISSUES MANAGEMENT SYSTEM R0fteEY, KEN 8110 17 17 4.3.9 QA INTERNAL ASSESSMENT IMPROVEMENTS ANUJE, AMA 1MAY99 31DEC99 -44 11496 1st les leMAYS9 2 JAM 99 8 YES 4.4.0 INDEPENDENT SAFETY EVALUATIces Upt!T FIERINGER, PAUL 27832 VES 56 6e Is m== 28DEC99 8 4.5.9 SAFETY ASSESSMENT KATZ, PETE 2485 95 95 8MAY89 31DFC99 8 4.6.0 ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS ItePROVEMENTS DAVIS, STEVE 25600 93 93 4.7.9 POSRC CARROLL, J000s IJUN88 11FEB91 0 1578 95 95 IJUN89 6SEP90 0 4.8.0 OSSRC MIEtt4IKI MIKE 1229 100 les 2eJAtee9 25Jast9e e YES 4.9.0 VISITING OTHER FiANTS CAMPO, CENE '1366 100 YES 3JUL89 29Juft90 9 YES

===== == = = = = = = == = = = = ====I SO YES ACTIVITY CONT ROL IMPR0VEffENTS== = == = ==== = == = === = == = == = = = ====================================================

5.1.0 AUXILIARY SYSTEMS ENCIteEERIIeG UptIT THORNTON, AL N/A N/A N/A SJUL89 SJUL89 9 YES 5.2.1 PROCEDURE UPGRADE PROGRAM LATHAM, DAN VES 668333 95 31 IFE989 31DEC92 -48 5.2.2 SURVEILLANCE TEST PROGRAM DUNKERLY, CHARLIE 62497 5.2.3 POST MAINTENAteCE TESTIleG HAYDEN, JOMM le le IJUfest 290EC92 0 3988 300 198 1FE889 130CT89 8 YES 5.3.1 PROCUREttENT PROGRAM PROJECT DOSWELL, JOE VES 32002 89 89 5SEP89 30eIOV99 -67 5.3.2 EQUIP TECH DATABASE /MAINT PL9eC SYS BROest, LARRY 74388 49 39 5.3.3 YECMMICAL MANUAL IMPROVEMENTS ROY, TOM 1 MAR 89 21JUN91 e 5.3.4 DESIGN BASIS COplSOLIDATION 6618 81 81 29FES83 40CT99 e PERKS, PAUL 179352 91 le 1 MAR 88 31AUG94 -22 5.3.5 RECORDS MANAGEMENT / DOCUMENT CONTROL t'0 GEL, AteN 5742 55 55 5.3.6 INFORttATION RESOURCE leeGreaf PROJECT SARTN, AL 5FEtte 29BEC99 0.

13346 . 49 49 1FE999 12APR91 9 5.4.1 SYSTEtt ENGINEER TRAINIteG YOE, JIM 13002 100 19e 5.4.2 MINOR MODIFICATIONS SMAYS9 4JAft99 8 YES YES MIRAleDA, TONY 5368 5.4.5 RELIABILITY CENTERED MAINTEMApeCE

- 21AUG89 30NOV99 e RESOURCES UNDER REVIEW GREENE, KEN 14669 64 30SEP88 1AUG91 e PIP VERIFICATION PR0 CESSES ================================================64 6.1.0 PIP IttPLEMENTATION VERIFICATI0pt PHIFER, JERRY ==========================================================

i 890 20 22 7JULS9 2eJAtt93 408 6.3.0 PIP EFFECTIVENESS VERIFICATION PHIFER, JERRt 6648 23

! 5FE998 30AUG91 756

.-................ -_.-.......... --.-.----. -..............-..... ..-_-_.23 TOTALS ..._. ......--...........- ..........-..... .. _...--.....

1403099 35 29FEB88 31AUG94

---

........--...........---------..---...------.....--.....----.....64 ......--..............--........-....... -.- .. ..._- ....

-67

~- -

, c - -

L. __ _ , . _ _ _ ~ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _

" #3 Y

iG , O

=

E e

L. 4 e

.a i i

I e

f e

E e

t 4

.e 4 g

• ** o;

'l 1

V ,

, e o MILESTONE OVERVIEW L

.I

(

f f

5

!  :. j e

v I

1 i

i P

I

-, v

} *M$ '-m

, ; . r

. 4 STATUS AS OF JULY 24, 1998 M I L.E'S T 0 N E OVERV'IEW '*

TOTAL' NUMBER SCMEDULED VS ACTUAL e SCNEDULED'-

. ACTION PLAN 9 / O E S C R I P T I O N PLAN MANAGER HILESTONES. COMPLETE COMPLETE (PREVIOUS 2 WKS) NEXT 2 WKS

• MANAGEMENT PROCESS IMPROVEff=NTS =====================================================================================================

2.1.5 MANAGENENT OVERVIEW RUSSELL, LEE '4 8 9/e e

' 2.2.1 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS MARK 0WSKI,ftIKE 2 1 0/e e 2.2.2 COMMUNICATIONS PLAN DONONOE, ANN 11- 11 COMPLETE 2.3.0 MPP ISSUES BASED PLAMMING TIETJEN, KEN 6 Y G/9 1 2.5.8 ACCOUNTABILITY IMPROVEMENTS Mt.RK0WSKI, MIKE 2 .2 COMPLETE-2.5.1 COMPtITMENT TRACKING SYSTEM MARK 0WSKI, MIKE 4 4- COMPLETE 2.5.2 REGULATORY COMPlITMENT MNGMNT PROCESS MANN, BRIAN '6 0 9/9 ORGANIZA TIONA L DYNAMICS IMPROVEMENTS = = = = = = = = = == = = == = = = = = = = = == = == = = = = = = = = = = = = == ==========v== = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = == = = =

5.2.0 MANACING ORGANIZATION 8 PGM CHANGE . MARK 0WSKI, MIKE 3 2 e/e e 3.3.0 LEADERSHIP CONFERENCES MARK 0WSKI, MIKE 2 2 COMPLETE 3.4.0 1EAMWORK E INTERFACES MARKOWSKI, MIKE S 1. 8/8 e:

3.5.0 PROJECT ftANAGEMENT ZUMWALT, ERIC 9 7 1/9 1 3.6.1 SITE INTEGRATED SCNEDULING KEMPER, SILL le 2 2/8 2 3.6.2 MAINTENANCE WORK CONTROL CAMILLERI, T.J. 5 1 0/0 1 3.6.3 OPERATIONS IMPROVEMENT PLAN THORP, Jolet 5 1 8/0 e .

3.7.0 ENGINEERING PLA99 TING MARIMARI, DAM 4 4 COMPLETE 3.8.0 SYSTEM CIRCLES POLAli, MIKE 6 6 COMPLETE 3.9.0 QUALITY CIRCLES PROGRAM EDWARDS, Afst 8 7 e/e -

f.SSESSMENT CAPABILITY IMPROVEMENTS 4.1.0 POEAC

========================================================================== =======

.PIERI90GER, PAUL 4 4 COMPLETE 4.1.1 OPERATING EMPERIENCE REVIEW PIERI9dGER, PAUL 4 0 0/8 4 4.2.0 QC IMPROVEMENTS ROMNEY, KEN 8 5 1/1 8 4.2.1 ISSUES MANAGEMENT SYSTEM R0feeEY, KEN 8 2 0/8 4 4.3.0 QA INTERNAL ASSESSMEftT IMPROVEMENTS ANUJE, AMA 9 9 COMPLETE 4.4.0 INDEPENDENT SAFETY EVALUATION PIERINGER, PAUL 7 1 0/9 e 4.5.0 SAFETY ASSESSMENT KATZ, PETE 8 2 1/1 1 4.6.0 ROOT CAUSE ASALYSIS DAVIS, STEVE 5 3 0/9 4.7.8 POSRC 8 CARROLL, JOHN 6- 4 9/0 e

'4.8.8 OSSRC MIERNICKI, MIFE 6 6 COMPLETE 4.9.0 VISITING OTNER PLANTS CAMPO, gelee 5 5 ACTIVITY CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS ======================================================================================= ================ COMPLET 5.1.0 AUXILIARY SYSTEtts EleGINEEPIf0G UNIT THORNTON, AL 2 2 COMPLETE 5.2.1 PROCEDURE UPGRADE PROGRAM LATMAN, DAN' 9 4 2/8 e

5.2.2 SURVEILLAleCE TEST PROGRAM DUNKERLY, CHARLIE 11 7 8/e e 5.2.3 POST MAINTENANCE TESTIteG MAYDEN, JOHN 4 4 COMPLETE 5.3.1 PROCUREMENT PROGRAM PROJECT DOSWELL, JOE 9 2 8/8 1

) 5.3.2 EQUIPttENT DATABASE /MAINT PL98G SYS BROWef, LARRY le 6 8/8 e 5.3.3 TECHNICAL MANUAL IMPROVEMENTS ROY, TOM 'le 9 0/8 0 5.3.4 DESIGN BASIS CONSOLIDATIcet PERKS, PAUL 5 1 0/9 1 5.3.5 RECORDS MANAGEMENT / DOCUMENT CONTROL V0 GEL, A998 4 1 1/1 e 5.3.6 INFORMATION RESOURCE MNGI9tT PROJECT BARTM, AL 4 0 0/8 e 5.4.1 SYSTErt ENGINEER TRAINING YOE, JIM 4 4 5.4.2 ffINOR MODIFICATIONS COMPLETE MIRANDA, TONY 18 7^ 0/2 3 5.4.5 RELIABILITY CENTER MAINTENAleCE GREEleE, KEN 8 3 8/9

=====================================================================================

TOTALS ============

256 147 E57%) 7/ 8

========================================================================================s=========5 ===========================,

TOTAL VERIF. 98UPSER DUE . NUPSER ACTION PLAN a / D E S C R I P T I O N SCHEDULED 'TO START IN COMPLETE IIIeCL.REVERIF) . AUG (ACTION PLANS) l PIP VERIFICATION PROCESSES -------------- ----------- --------------

4.1.0 IMPLEftENTATION VERIFICATI006 OVERVIEW PMIFER, JERRY 41' 3 12 6.3.0 PIP EFFECTIVENESS VERIFICATION P9 FIFER, JERRY 4 e 1 OF 4 SLICE VERIF. COMPLETE l

. i

'y lg - - . . ;

i 1

1 j',

1 J

J 1

1 e

,1 5

f a

r t.c

,i

u. s 9.9.

. i e ,

i; t

.t 4

1 CHANGE CONTROL OVERVIEW ,

l. 4  : i l 1 t

4 1 ', 1 i

9 1

1.

7:

l I

l:

[t-

\%

i

~;

,. =,

.q -

r 3 9, . 4

. e< e e

s'

l. N

- a' H u.

H H

W l

....... ........... ........... . . . . . . . . . . . . . ll ,., :l

- L  :' "

'O ' :N ll u! "

H

o. u" ' ' a"

, #2: a.  :

N:

H. 1 g g i. ll ll -

1 P* g 1 a

. .nme g.

. uu < . .nou. . u.m .or.um. .<umun0.=,#l 1 M '

N N N N

.W'

a.  :.  : :H "

N H g g j

M . .8

~*E WW l ll l l

M N u l .:g w8 ;  :.  :

n

~

>W* L '.......:......v....: ...........ll...............:.

.- o R" ll -

l )

O'.  ::  :

ll  : 1 0;  :  :. -

ll l ll 1

""!l-  :

": ll ll ll '

• g::' ll ll ll ll ll '

• • 5<g:l .mmm

- :: . u n < - - . ll - ll l . u a u . . u . m :l . a a . n m . n , - n n u u ll . l:

ll l l

u ag.  : ,

.<=

"*I":-: ll .: - ll ' ll  !

l ll ll w 1

wm : www ll .

=

==

w 5 mm "Emmu

===

f ' 8 m

• E

~

E

• ll

• !I II ll l

i

=

.: a - =er:la,:1.4gg:,

sa 5.mg :: c"e =. . '2 r = :s 5 E. :  : .

zags l-

.:= dB WEE==,:aaame-lE"0':II-g!t*J5 JM'dNNE:MNNJ

BEEW 8:E

• J1.j :ll~5$*-J"E'g . l

E J .

w:  :" u

e **f s d "

E 5:

a :n i:aaanl'"3-l':Eg::trllIr:ll20El':-[s!1El'trh:E2If:Ef  !* eu*JJi'gr5: == ::

t IE  :: E E E : 2112 - 2 E i u  : 3  :

i'

.n:  :- a ': l 8:  : E

~ c Ut ll o t" E :E o ol c"  ::

" g ., ::. :.

O E lt ta .

. t=s r"g g

_g ,5 e ,!

:E

3 ,

bt E mE:> :

en  :

n ~ * ,:atl. "g**i- =5 .I

-l a se tr!E* v E  :-v

. C=2 frtha!s_rgf*n an

11 me:: :

e5.y- a .5 f cl:' : :: l L

=c:r'gIl3:e!=Cn_=lj!g*!l=W

En: u: s aen- g -

-X, neen n-ensn. l1=gu:

= -  : :

e s:2:-E.il W><j-jg E

u 5,EIus*mI 2ln' cr8agi a an$, an " =2Wa W t*

u rs"g:

• v nd  :

g:d s riepslc[.uE05:5 !l ll D"Egi m

L -

3" HW "ta. B~a WWEa G 5 5 2 0 Q ll

=sa r 38 eVic - M[,

-= !l L

e ,g: :nuss== -

L

,e<:WEl-r=

B3

.l l'** "I*

Eve,sje-ssee":

• % E E,0 ""W :Ig.,s gus 5't WW:Ed

- len* g! I3

=nm!8::m 88:

r:

.yl$'0IgESE

.o

< . .a  : E ut<u=gss ~50 - 1!3::W*HC*E.E.*8 onzh By h o-. <E*[

oog [ # 2 " os.-ar=

= .=gd l p,:.l. 8 0 0 3  ::

8 5:stnatt1"gi-9991Na==tn91 19999-99991a91N9'**1Na : #:

2 :: :

g y : ,11 N u na na u

• *n*u* nNg1 m *. e* *n*n* e* N a tm g1m-:mNmNy"ta*.r "!e *<N< ' <*.<~<1 <" "<N< ay am"lma m a m m* m *m* m 1.ll mtn l:

nm .

. .- m m m m.

l.

SYNOPSIS 0F PIP' PROGRESS Period of Julv 01-24

. Action Plan 4.9 Visiting Other Plants was verified as implemented July ' '2 3 rd. Action Plan 2.2.2 Communications Plan is still undergoing verification.

Implementation of CCI-10lN, which was reported as approved in the ,

la s t update, has been deferred until August 13 to allow completion of training activities.

As a result of our May 24th Topical meeting on Change Management, we are integrating cr.snge management techniques into a number of ,

- key Action Plans (PUP, Issues Management System, Site Integrated Schedule, etc. ) to facilitate program improvements.

Based on discussions between BC&E and NRC, the PIP Effectiveness Verification Report will not be formally submitted but will be retained for : viewing at Calvert Cliffs. We have selected a con-sultant to perform the second Effectiveness Verification "verti- 1 cal slice" (ref section 6.0 PIP-IP) and have scheduled it to be-  !

gin about August 13th. The-principal focus will be Assessment capabilities.

We have completed a summary document entitled " PIP Feedback Sum- .

mary" and are using it to measure progress in resolving PIP Root Causes. This document is updated periodically and is available '

for viewing at Calvert Cliffs.

}f

7-__-.---- ,

L i e i EE25A M82 92 Action Zung gn g mAuAcus s/1/90 l

STATUS Mt M BGE ZRQEE TITLE j i

• 2.1 Mgat Overview I

• 2.2 Mgat Expectations '

2.2.1 M. Markowski 4479 Performance Standards

i. a 2.2.2 A. Donohoe 4733 Communications Plan i 2.3 K. Tietjen 4120 NPP Issues Based Planning

• 2.4 Resource Allocation v 2.5(text) M. Markowski 4479 Accountability Improvements L v 2.5.1 M. Markowski 4479 Catet Tracking System  :

2.5.2 B. Mann 6517 Reg Catst Mgat Process

• 3.1 Organizational Improvements  ;

i 3.2 M. Markowski 4479 Managing Org & Pgm Change v 3.3' M. Markowski 4479 Leadership Conferences 3.4 M. Markowski 4479 Teamwork & Interfaces 3.5 E. Zumwalt 4952 Project Management Improvements 3.6.1 B. Kemper 4000 Site Integrated Scheduling 3.6.2 J. Hayden 4359 Maintenance Work Control 3.6.3 J. Thorp 4454 Operations Improvement Plan v 3.7 D. Marinari 3942 Engineering Planning v 3.8 M. Polak 4402 System Circles 6611 Quality Circles Program 3.9 A. Edwards v 4.1(text) P. Pieringer 4060 POEAC 4.1.1 P. Pieringer 4060 Operating Experience Review 4.2 K. Romney 4900 QC Improvements 4.2.1 K. Romney 4900 Issue Mgat System v 4.3 A. Anuj e 4919 QA Internal Assess Improvements 4.4 P. Pieringer 4060 Indep Safety Eval 4.5 P. Katz 4160 Safety Assessment 4.6 S. Davis 4612 Root Cause Analysis 4.7 J. Carroll 4103 POSRC v 4.8 T. Pritchett $111 OSSRC i y 4.9 G. Campo 4360 Visiting other Plants v 5.1(text) L. Tucker 4853 Aux Sys Eng Unit 5.2.1 D. Latham 4968 Procedures Upgrade Program 5.2.2 C. Dunkerly 4854 Surveillance Test Program v 5.2.3 J. Hayden 4359 ?ost Maintenance Testing 5.3.1 J. Doswell 3802 Procurement Program Project 5.3.2 L. Brown 4387 ETD/MPS 5.3.3 G. Roy 3612 Technical Manual Improvements 5.3.4 P. Perks 3611 Design Basis Consolidation 5.3.5 A. Vogel 4481 Records Management / Document Control

• 5.3.6 A. Barth 3702 Information Resources Mgmt Project l-y 5.4.1 J. Yoe 4499 System Engineer Training l 5.4.2 T. Miranda 4709 Minor Modifications 5.4.3 K. Greene 4385 Reliability Center Maint a- Action Plan Manager reports all activities complete, but not verified.

• - hot a verifiable " Action Plan" v- Implementation Verification done.

l l~

1