ML20042E827

Forwards Rev 2 to Calvert Cliffs Performance Improvement Plan Implementation Program. Accountability Improvements, Engineering Planning & Sys Circles Action Plans Completed. New Sections to Rev Listed

ML20042E827
Person / Time
Site:	Calvert Cliffs
Issue date:	04/30/1990
From:	Russell L BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML20042E828	List: ML20042E827 ML20042E829
References
NUDOCS 9005030182
Download: ML20042E827 (3)

Text

_

BALTIMORE  ;

OAS AND -

ELECTPHC '

I CHARLES CENTER e P.O. BOX 1475

• BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21203 1475 '

LEON B. nusstLL nuca asun, n =,mn waawna t

April 30, 1990 i l  !

l U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission .

Washington, DC 20555 l ATTENTION: Document Control Desk >

i SUBJECT Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant  !

Units No. 1 & 2; Dockets No. 50-317 and 50-318 Performance Imorovement Plan - Revision 2

REFERENCES:

(a) Baltimore Gas & Electric Company letter dated July 31, 1989, from Mr. G. V. McGowan -

to Mr. James M. Taylor (NRC), Performance  ;

Improvement Plan Implementation Program (b) Baltimore Gas & Electric Company letter  ;

dated March 8, 1990, from Mr. G. O. Creel  ;

to Document < Control Desk (P9C), Performance }

~

l Improvement Plan - Revision 1 i  !

i (c) Baltimore Gas'& Electric Company letter dated March.7, 1990, from Mr. G. C. Creel to Document Control Desk (NRC), Readiness Assessment Team Inspection, Attachment (2),

Corrective Action Programs  :

l (d) Baltimore-Gas &~ Electric Company letter  ;

dated February 19, 1990, from Mr. G. C. Creel l to US NRC Region 1, Commitment Implementation  ;

Assessment Project -

Gentlement  !

. Enclosed please find Revision 2 to the Calvert Cliffs 1

Performance Improvement Plan Implementation Program (PIP-IP) ,

which was originally submitted by Reference (a) and revised as I submitted by Reference (b). This revision is in a page- '

substitution format as shown in the attached instruction. Change bars have been placed in the right margin to indicate revised  :

sections except for Appendices A, B, and C, which are completely l revised.

j 9005030182 voo439  ;

gDR ADOCK 05000317 i LI g PDC

• Document Control Desk April 30, 1980 Page.2 Reference (b) listed seven Action Plans which were reported as complete as of the end of February 1990. Three additional Action Plans have been completed since that time, bringing the total to

10. These plans aret 1

2.5 Accountability Improvements 3.7 Engineering Planning 4 3.8 System Circles l Implementation verifications were performed on the above three .

Action Plans plus Action Plan 5.1, Auxiliary Systems Engineering Unit, bringing to 10 the total of Action Plans which have been )

verified as implemented.

Please refer to Appendix C, PIP Action Plan Progress, for more information on the status of all Action Plans through the end of the first quarter of 1990.

The following sections have undergone significant changes in this i revisions j 2.5.2 Regulatory Commitment Management Process 4.2.1 Issues Management System 6.1 Implementation Verification  !

6.2 Management Feedback Verification  !

6.3 Effectiveness Verification Appendix A PIP Action Plan Schedules Appendix B PIP Action Plan Resources Appendix C PIP Action Plan Progress l The following new sections have been added by this revision:

1 1.4 PIP Implementation Program Management Controls 5.3.6 Information Resources Management Project Appendices A & B have been updated to reflect progress and f current schedules and resources for all Action Plans. Appendix C provides a summary of progress of all active Action Plans during during the first quarter of 1990 as well as a summary status of all completed Action Plans.

As committed to by References (b), (c) and (d) PIP-IP Revision 2 includes further details and resources allocated schedules for ,

Action Plans 2.5.2, Regulatory Commitment Management Process and  ?

4.2.1, Issues Management Process. Section 6.0, PIP Verification Processes has.been updated to reflect the current status of the ,*

j PIP three-phase verification program.

l c l

w

Document Control Desk April 30, 1980 Page 3 Implementation Verification, Section 6.1, have been conducted '

since October 1989 using a controlled procedure. Section 6.1 has been revised to summarized the implementation verification -

process used. Management Feedback Verification, Section 6.2, also has been revised to reflect our supervisory weekly job  ;

observation process, which is proving to be a valuable tool for '

assessing performance and for providing feedback on Action Plan effectiveness. We have just completed the first Effectiveness ,

Verification " vertical slice" and the overall results are discussed in Section 6.3. The results of all of these verification methods are being used to confirm our performance, to modify our Action Plans or to provide input to our planning cycle.

Section 1.4, PIP Implementation Program Management Controls, has been added to summarize the management controls that are applied

-to the PIP. These methods include Manager and General Supervisor ,

involvement in the regular bi-weekly meetings of the PIP Action Plan managers, bi-weekly progress reporting, PIP status reports

! at the daily 8 AM meeting, rolling two-week "lookahead" reports, j regular updates on PIP status and key issues at Management Review l

Board meetings, and the verification activities mentioned above. i Section 5.3.6, Information Resource Management Project, has been I added to assure that end-user computer applications developed under each PIP-Action Plan can be readily accommodated by the "

long-term computerization upgrades being implemented under the t NED Electronic Data Processing 5 Year Plan. '

1 Should you have any questions regarding the enclosed revision or our future plans, please don't hesitate to call me.

Very truly yours, ,

LBR/RCLO/cld Enclosures cc: D. A. Brune, Esquire T. T. Martin, NRC -

J. E. Silberg, Esquire L. E. Nicholson, NRC R. A. Capra, NRC D. G. Mcdonald, Jr., NRC '

W. J. Lazarus, NRC B. A. Boger, NRC R. I. McLean, DNR

.