ML20058Q221
| ML20058Q221 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Calvert Cliffs  |
| Issue date: | 08/14/1990 |
| From: | Russell L BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9008210173 | |
| Download: ML20058Q221 (15) | |
Text
. _.. _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _
BALTIMORE 2
GAS AND ELECTRIC 1
f; CHARLES CENTER 'e P.0, BOX 1475 e BALTIMORE. MARYLAND '2' 2031475 -
1 LEON D. RUSSELL l
,,ucua7 d 8v. et.
~o ore m u m Augu9t 14,1990 j.
i I
[
i-
- US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC1 20555 Attn: Mr. Bruce R. Boger Mall Stop 14A2
]
Enclosed please find a copy of the Performance improvement Plan Implementation L
been verif(ied,' one (1) has been completed but remains to be verified, and 27 remaj e
r
- active.
p Attached is a brief synopsis of our activities since our last update. Also attached is an l
updated list of key Action Plan information, including verification status.
L Please contact me (200-6680) or Rich Olson (260 3771) hhould you have'any questions.
i j
1 3.
. Sincerely,:
N sr l
i Attachments I
t 6
l n,,. -,
U s.l. -
0 9
L 9008210173 900814 M
- PDR.ADOCK 03000317
.P.-
'i
Mr. Bruce R. Boger August 1,- 1990 Page 2.-
bec: Messrs.
G. C. Creel synopsis & list C. H. Cruse ynopsis & list 1
R. E. Denton synopsis & list R. P. Heibel synopsis & list J. R. Lemons.
synopsis & list G. L; Detter B. S. Montogomery 1
R. C. L. Olson synops R. F. Lewis ynops J. S. Fuoto synops
.i i
l 4
CALVERT CLIFFS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT PERFORMANCEIMPROVEMENT PLAN SCHEDULE STATUS AS OF
~
AUGUST 7,1990 s-BALTIMORE GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY-I
d W-L
}
l 1
APPENDIX A EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
REPORT
-l
LEGEND:
X COMPLETE PIP - SASED'ON HANNOURS-ASSIBNED TO ALL ACTIVITIES DIRECTLY RELATED TO COMPLETION OF THE ACTION PLAN OR MILESTONES.
p
-X COMPLETE ALL --BASED ON MANN00RS ASSIGNED TO ALL ACTIVITIES INCLUDING' ON-GOING AS1A RESULT,0F PIP ACTIVITIES OR MILESTONES.
1 TOTAL. FLOAT
- THE DIFFERENCE IN WORKDAYS BETWEEN ACTIVITY DATES-1 REQUERED TO' SUPPORT THE MILESTONE DATES AND CURRENT, j
STATUS.
NEGATIVE VALUES -= INDICATE ONE OR MORE-OF-THE MILESTONE '
IS LATE BY THE INDICATED NUMBER OF
'WORXDAYS.
i POSITIVE VALUES - INDICATE THAT-A CERTAIN ANOUNT OF-SLACK (FLOAT) EXISTS SETWEEN THE END-0F THE' ACTIVITIES AND TMP.. MILESTONE.
MILESTONES.
ZERO VALUE
- INDICATES THE MILESTONES ARE' EXACTLY' y
(Mt SCHEDULE AND ACTIVITIES MUST BE COMPLETED-ON TIME {TO KEEP ON. SCHEDULE.-
1 IMPLE.VERIF COMPLETE -
.i'
^"YES" INDICATES SATISFACTORYICOMPLETION OF'THE.
IMPLEMENTATION VERIFICATION AND THE ACTION PLAN.
" REVERIFY" INDICATES UNSATISFACTORY RESULTS OF:THE~
- j IMPLEMENTATION VERIFICATION AND WILL REQUIRE ADDITIONAL NORK TO BE PERFORMED ON THE ACTION PLAN AND ANOTHER IMPLEMENTATION VERIFICATION.
"N/A" INDICATES NOT APPLICABLE AS NO IMPLEMENTATION VERIFICATION IS_ REQUIRED..
e 9
e k
M DATA DATE 7AUG99 PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PLAN RUN DATE 88AUG98 1722MRS EMECUTIVE
SUMMARY
REPORT ALL TOTAL
% COMPLETE START FINISH TOTAL CoretITNENT IMPLEMENT.
ACT PLAN R
/
TITLE PLA98 MANAGER MANNOURS PIP / ALL DATE BATE FLOAT.
MILESTONES VERIFICT*'N COPFLETE COMPLETE MANAGEMENT PROCESS IMPROVEMENTS 2.1.0 MANAGEMENT OVERVIEN RUSSELL, LEE N/A Id/A N/A SAUG90 2SOEC9e e
N/A 2.2.1 PERFORMANCE STANDAROS MARK 0WSKI, MIKE 1958 97 97 13JUL89 218EC99 0
2.2.2 COMMUNICATIONS PLAN BONONDE, ASIN lesse les 100 12 JANE 9 -30 MAR 99 e
YES 2.3.s NPP ISSUES BASED PLANNING TIETJEN, KEN 775 199 97 5 JUNE 9
- BNOW94, 0
YES 2.5.0 ACCOUNTABILITY IMPROVEMENTS MARROWSKI, MIKE N/A N/A N/A SJAN90 12APR99 8
YES YES 2.5.1 COMMITMENT TRACKING SYSTEM MARK 0WSKI, MIKE 27M 100 100 21APR89 5.A5990 0
YES YES 2.5.2 REGULATORY COMMITMENT 990GrefT PROCESS MANN, BRIAN 84899 1
1-IMAR99 SJtRt92
-Se ORGANIZATIONAL DY90AMICS 19tPROWEMENTS assassasssssssssssssssssssssmanssasssssssssssssssssssssssses==sesssssssssss=msss===sssssssss===
3.2.0 MANAGING ORGANIZATIONAL 8 PGM CNANGE MARK 0WSKI, MIKE 1129 79 79 MJUMe9 310EC98 e
3.3.0 LEADERSHI!' CONFERENCES MARK 0WSKI, MIKE 516 100 100 12.ARee9 29NOWO9 0
YES YES-3.4.0 TEA 99tf0RK S INTERFACES MARK 0NSKI, MIKE 1936 63 63 29JUL89 28 MAR 91 e
3.5.e PROJECT MANAGEMENT ZUMWALT, ERIC 2618 99 99 leJUL89 29AUG90
-42 3.6.0 DAILY S OUTAGE NORK CONTROL THORP, JOHN 4822 100 100 22 JUNE 9 26FEB90 0
N/A N/A 3.6.1 SITE INTEGRATED SC90E8ULI9IS KEtgPER, SILL 12108 41 41 leJULB9 2eFES91
-53 3.6.2 MAINTENAleCE WORK CONTROL 90AYSEN,- J00st 4290 77 77 1FE309 L31DEC99 6
3.6.3 OPERATIcee$ IMPROVE 9 TENT PLAN TIGORP, ' Joest 12314 19 15 1FEB89 7APR93 0
3.7.8 E90GINEERIles PLANNING MARI90ARI, DAN 5568 100 les 3 Jefe 89 29JAft90 e
YES YES 3.Q.0 SYSTEM CIRCLES POLAK,IIIKE 4099 les 100 28MOWe8 900AR96 e
YES VES 3.9,0 P ALITY CIRCLES PROGRAM E9tfARDS, Aset 13950 99 38 14 MARS 9 318EC91 e
~
ASSESSittllT CAPABILITY IMPROWEIENTS = = = = = = = = ===== = = = ======== = ===== ==== ====== = = = = = ===============s=ssessssssssssss mannassa,ssues seess a 4.1.0 POEAC PIERIIIGER, PAUL 90/A N/A N/A 31JULS9. 31JULS9 e
YES YES
. 4.1.1 OPERAT198G EXPERIE90CE REVIEN PIERp5cR, PAUL 8424 61 61'~15JA8998 3SEP91 0
4.2.0 SC 19tPROVEMENTS RepetEY, EEN M200
-76 69 1Julte9 219EC90 0-4.2.1 ISSUES MAsaGEttEltT SYSTEM Refe8EY, KE98 8110 27 27 1MAY99 310EC9e'
-44 4.3.8 04 INTERetAL ASSESSMEltT IMPROVEMENTS A80pJE, A80A.
11496 lee 100 ReftAY89 2JAft90 0
YES YES 4.4.0 INDEPE880ENT SAFETY EVALUATIO98 UNIT PIERI98GER,' PAUL :
27852 63:
65 15JUIIe8 29JAII91
'S 4.5.8 SAFETY ASSESSMENT RATZ, PETE 2485 96 8 MAYS 9 318EC9e-0 4.6.9 ROOT CAUSE A80ALYSIS IMPROWEMENTS DAVIS, STEWE 25600
' 96 96 ' IJUBIOS 11FEB91 e
4.7.8 POSRC CARROLL, J0006
'1578.les
.les-1.28009 30AUG99 0
YES 4.0.0 OSSRC -
MIES9 tiff, MIKE 1229 Me les 2a -9 25JA8090 0
YES YES
'4.9.0 VISITIIeG OTHER PLANTS CASIPO,. GENE 13 %
les let. 3JUL89 29JtR898 e
VES YES ACTIVITY CostTROL IMPROVEfqEftTS seassasssssmanssu msssssssss==ssasussssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss===ssssssss==ssessassesse 5.1.0 AUNILIARY SYSTElts E98 git 0EERIIe8 t20!T T98'sIlfff006, AL
-N/A 90/A N/A SJUL89. 5JUL89 0
YES YES, ~
5.2.1 PROCEDURE UPGRADE PROGRAM.
1ATitA98, DAlf M8333 96 32 IFE909 319EC92
-48 L 5.2.2 $UltVEILLA90CE TEST PROGRAlt DUNKERLY, CetARLIE 62497. 11 11 IJUIIe9 230EC92 0
5.2.3 POST MAINTE90AIGCE TESTIOGG 90AYBEN, J0000 3988 lee lee. 1FE989 130CT09 0
YES YES 5.3.1 PROCURE 9sENT PROGRAM PROJECT 90 SWELL, JOE 132982 89 89 SSEP89 3ONOW90
-e 5.3.2 EQUIP YECN BATABASE/ttAtteT PLIOG SYS.
BROWIf,- LARetY
-74388- ~5?
42 198A209 21JtRe91 -
e 5.3.3 TECHNICAL MAleUAL IfgPROWEMENTS
' ROY, T006 Mle 85 85 29 FESS 8 40CT90 0
5.3.4 DESIG98 BASIS CONSOLIDATION PERKS, PAUL' 179352 91 le 2004118 8. 2SEP94
-27 5.3.5' RECORDS MANAGEMENT /B0CtRIENT CoffTROL WOGEL, AleN 5742 68 60 SFES90 -200EC99 e
5.3.6 If0 FORMAT 3000 RESOURCE MNEfeti PROJECT SART90, AL 13346 58 50~
IFE890 26APR91 0
5.4.1 SYSTEM E90GIIIEER TRAINIl0S YOE, JIM 13092 100 199 5884Ye9 4JAff90 0-YES-YES 5.Q.2 MIBe0R 99001FICATIONS
. MIRA80BA, TostY 5368
- 21AUGe9 30185W98 0 LIEESOURCES tRSER REVIEN 5.4.3 RELIA 8ILITY CENTtRES MAINTE90AseCE GREEteE, KEN
- 14M9
-M M' 3eSEPO6: 1ARIG91 0
PIP WERIFICATION PROCESSES===============================
sss========: ssessssssssssssssssssss=====ses==sssssssssssssssssssssssssse 6.1.6 PIP IMPLEftENTATICO8 WERIFICATICBI
~ P9tIFER, JERRY 890 21-23 7JUL89 18JA8095
'412 6.3.s PIP EFFECTIVENESS VERIFICATION P9tIFER, JERRY
. M4',
23 23 SFED99 38AlfG91 758
................................................................................................. =-------.=__.___._
TETALS' 1403099 65 ~ 36 29FE888 2SEP94
-53
....................._............................................................==-
- =_--- _
_,=___
== --
l ~-
.r I,
r l
I 4
l y
MHFSTONE OVERVIEW I
I I
i i
i.
.4 l
1
-1 1
i 4
i i,
- l 1
5 i
i y
I' l-l l
l I
".:. w. e. r. z !. e.1gfgg..g..w...n. l.eg g.
g... -g...ggg gu g-......g..:
lm.:
z e
e e r r. a r,,, - e.
e a
E**!!
8888 l8 38 !8 8
888.8 8
8
! ~ !-
a i
'~
l l
l E
-1 E
8 1
8~-
W 1
-x gg :i.
.i......
.i
..........i.igh:
i
,sL..ss n?
mg sI,s 1
sssss s.
sss sss-ss-ssssss ss.s.
~-
ge;;.
s 1
g o
o
=t x
B, ::
t
- au
- n:I
>.=: :
- n
... ::w =.w..:ww-s,u--,.*
..u -.... : wesen.e--.es.:g:g l e
g.
t
.ll l
l l
- BR
" ~:
- ."J h:
a g ; ;-
gg.
j " < u 4 = e. j. w in e...... j e e e e e s..... j u sg e e. g. < < <..
jWgh:ge
{
a e::
- sW:!* M :..
=::
l l
2
=
l = *WW lW:n-g n :-
jiia,iaali[aaainlalg:gg g
I.
ll.
.:ng.sr:ssmamIg
(( ss -g g,i[ssiig,a=,g,s : sI g :. Ic EE al
-5i -j ww t
- -lqll8:
g,,, yin: -:
.a-gsigs,,g 3
1
, E i
a Il.8ll gl_af.::=.=.
1:
la IrlafaB::
==
i
=. a. 5a o =.
8 -
e.:
- a
- a a-tz 3:
R tt.
D-l l
5 g
U:
- B R
E
- -Eg.
i a: -
E.
- t --
tlE.
E 1::=a::: 3m a-lg g,Ra n
- 8, s ig 8
.-8agge Ig:
5 RE. Wye n
5
- g. - ng s
- I g n e. l e m. -. 5,E ig e-
! Em 4
-- 5:
-s
-~! mea 5un8-E leg-I
!Ie-I ng!am::. :
ar
- =
- -guglell :-Bla x-1 m.5 a-
= u., R l E
.t
~:
a
.ca:. : x e 5 n..
c en8 g
EEl1ls. a ss-se
- misg e-a L la:en-lasug':ll g sg s!g!-g t
latn e:
e-m- !-
!a 52-m- --
seel-afg[ea!5.,g e-l :
- ~ g gI-a
- a: et
!lg
- mus,
^:g e:
- .: g_
E,:llrotsg-lIla=E!al5EEssge-Negll Ele.gg8
- so:
-ya gs at::
s:- a ao-
.: =x om e
nE arkas::::
2::ng
.-~..- =....-~...R.-.-..al as l.....e.-~.-....-.:s:
e:=
s r
g gllaaaaggasassa;;;ageg;s;ssssss;agen;aaagegeaasss:::; seg;;;;;;;;;;;;;:s::
- 5..: aa aaas2 aa asaggesseesses a g j p;
1 i
i l
CRITICAL PATH ANALYSES i
. i i
c i
- i
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PLAN CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS JULY 26, 1990 A CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS IS PERFORMED FOR ALL ACTION PLANS THAT HAVE TOTAL FLOAT VALUES LESS THAN ZERO ON THEIR COMMITMENTS.
WHERE ACTION PLANS ARE TIED TOGETHER CAUSING MULTIPLE ACTION PLAN NEGATIVITY, IT WILL BE So IDENTIFIED IN THE TEXT OF THE ANALYSIS.
i
- 3.6.1 SITE INTEGRATED SCHEDULING NEGATIVE
-53 DAYS
- 2.5.2 REG. COMMITMENT MNGMT PROCESS NEGATIVE
-50 DAYS
- 5.2.1 PROCEDURES UPGRADE PROGRAM NEGATIVE
-48 DAYS
- 4.2.1 ISSUES MANAGEMENT PROCESS NEGATIVE
-44 DAYS
- 3.5.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT NEGATIVE
-42 DAYS
- 5.3.4 DESIGN BASIS CONSOL!DATION NEGATIVE
-22 DAYS THE FOLI4 WING ARE THT: ANALYSES FOR THE AUGUST 7, 1990 DATA DATE:
- 3.6.1 SITE INTEGRATED SCHEDULING KEMPER, BILL
-53 DAYS THIS ACTION PLAN HAS BEEN REVISED AND A CHANGE REQUEST HAS BE,EN INITAT-j ED THAT INCLUDES THE FULL IMPLEMENTATION OF SIS INTO THE PIP ' SCHEDULE.
THE CURRENT SCHEDULE WILL CONTINUE TO SHOW NEGATIVITY UNTIL THE CHANGE REQUEST HAS BEEN APPROVED.
- RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION **
EXPEDITE CHANGE REQUEST
- 2.5.2 REG. COMMITMENT MNGMT PROCESS MANN, BRIAN
-50 DAYS CHANGE REQUEST WAS APPROVED ON AUGUST 8, 1990 TO RETARGET THIS ACTION PLAN.
- RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION **
REVISE SCHEDULE TO REFLECT APPROVED CHANGES BY THE NEXT UPDATE.
5.2.1 PROCEDURES UPGRADE PROJECT LATHAM, DAN
-48 DAYS THIS ACTION PLAN REMAINS -48 DAYS NEGATIVE: THIS NEGATIVITY IS ATTRIBUTED TO A DECISION BY PUP MANAGEMENT TO REVISE THEIR CURRENT t
i PROGRAM. THE FORECAST DATE FOR HAVING AN APPROVED SCHEDULE IN PLACE IS l
AUGUST 31, 1990.
i l
l INDICATES ACTION PLANS THAT HAVE BEEN ON CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS REPORT MORE THAN ONE UPDATE CYCLE.
1
9
- RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION **
THIS PROJECT IS PRESENTLY ON SCHEDULE FOR MEETING THE FOLIDWING DATES.
(A) DEVEI4P A DETAILED SCHEDULE FOR AUGUST 1, 1990 COMPLETE ACTION PLAN MANAGER APPROVAL (B) INITIATE A CHANGE REQUEST AUGUST 10, 1990 FOR PIP MANAGEMENT APPROVAL 4.2.1 ISSUES MANAGEMENT PROCESS ROMNEY, KEN
-44 DAYS
-~~__-_----
REDEFINING THE SCOPE OF THIS ACTION PLAN TO AVOID TASK DUPLICATION BETWEEN ISSUES MANAGEMENT AND SITE INTEGRATED SCHEDULING IS THE CONTRIBUTING FACTOR TO THE SCHEDULE NEGATIVITITY.
- RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION **
EXPEDITE CHANGE REQUEST A CHANGE REQUEST HAS BEEN INITIATED BY THE ACTION PLAN MANAGEl, AND IT WILL BE PLACED IN THE PIP MANAGEMENT APPROVAL CYCLE ON AUGUST 14, 1990.
- 3'.'5.0 PROJECT MANAGFMENT ZUMWALT, ERIC
-42 DAYS CHANGE REQUEST WAS APPROVED ON AUGUST 8, 1990 TO RETARGET THIS ACTION PLAN.
- RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION **
REVISE SCHEDULE TO REFLECT APPROVED CHANGES BY THE NEX'I' UPDATE.
5.3.4 DESIGN. BASIS CONSOLIDATION PERKS, PAUL
-27 DAYS TASK 4, DESIGN BASIS PROCEDURES, IS CURRENTLY -27 DAYS NEGATIVE. THIS NEGATIVITY IS ATTRIBUTED TO THE' FINAL RESOLUTION OF COMMENTS FOR ISSU-ING THE FOUR REMAINING ESSENTIAL PROCEDURES. ALL FOUR PROCEDURE WERE APPROVED BY THE GENERAL SUPERVISO
R. PROCEDURE
CMP-1 " DESIGN WRITERS GUIDE " AND CMP-5 " TRAINING" NEED NO FURTHUR APPROVAL; CMP-2 ' DEFICIENCY REPORTING " AND CMP-3 " QUALITY GUIDELINES FOR THE DESIGN BASIS CONSOLI-ATION PROJECT" REQUIRE THE ADDITIONAL APPROVAL OF THE NESD MANAGER.
- RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION **
ALL EFFORTS SHOULD BE MADE TO EXPEDITE THE APPROVAL PROCESS.
3.6.2 MAINTENANCE WORK COMTROL HAYDEN, JOHN
-16 DAYS THIS ACTION PLAN IS -16 DAYS NEGATIVE: THIS NEGATIVITY IS ATTRIBUTED TO MILESTONE #1, " DEVELOP A LONG-RANGE MAINTENANCE STRATEGY WITH GOALS,"
BEING EXTENDED FOR A COMPREHENSIVE STRATEGY PROGRAM.
'00 RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION'**
ALL EFFORTS-SHOULDBE MADE TO MAINTAIN THE REVISE FORECAST COMPLETION DATE OF AUGUST' 22,1990.
)
l en l
l J,
k l
c
- I I
'l
< e E
t CHANGE CONFROL OVERVIEW i
i l
i
-l i
i l
j
e.-
h m.
sc l
i STATUS AS OF AUGUST 7,'1999 CHANGE C0NTR0L 0VERVIEW f
I TOTAL CHANGE CNANGE REGUESTS-CMafIGE REGUESTS DISAPPROVES ACTION PLAN R / D E S C R I P T I O N PLA98 MAIIAGER RESUESTS WRITTEN AWAITING APPROWAL APPv/IIICSAPORATED C9tAIISE RESUESTS I
t l
MANAGEMENT PROCESS IMPROWE9ENTS 1
- 2.1.s MANA=9ENT OVERVIEN RUS$ n t, TEE e
2.2.1 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS.
MARK 0WSKI, MIKE 3
e 3
e l
2.3.0 MPP ISSUES BASED PLAfWtING TIETJEN, KE9t '
3 0
3 e
2.2.2 COMMUNICATIONS PLAN '
BONONDE, Afst - -
3 e
3 e
i 2.5.0 ACCOUNTASILITY IMPROWEMENTS MARKONSKI, MIKE 1
e 1
e-2.5.1 COMMITMENT TRACKING SYSTEM
- MARKONSKI, MIKE 1
e 1
e j
2.5.2 REGULATORY COMMITMENT MNGl9ff PROCESS MAfst, SRIAN 2
e 2
e j
ORGAftIZATIONAf DYNAftICS IMPROWE9ENTS======= = = = = = ===== = = = = = = = = = = = = = = ==== = ==== = = = = = ===============================================
i.
3.2.0 MANAGING ORGANIZATIcel S PGft CSIAflGE - MARKONSKI, MIKE e
e e
8: -
~
}
3.3.0 LEADER $ NIP CONFERE90CES 9tARK0NSKI, MIKE 1
e 1
0..
f 3.4.8 TEAMWORK 3 INTERFACES-MARK 0WSKI, MIKE 2
e 2
e i
3.5.8 PROJECT MAIIAGEMEtti ZulefALT, ERIC 3
0 3
e 3.6.9 DAILY S OUTASE NORK C000 TROL.
T910RP, J0let 1
e 1
0 3.6.1 SITE INTEGRATED SC9EDULIIIS KEMPER, SILL 4
e 4
e
" j 3.6.2 MAINTE90AIICE NORK CENITROL II4YSEN, J0let 1
e 1
e 3.6.3 OPERATIONS IMPROWE9ENT PLAft 79tORP, joist 1
e 1
e 4
3.7.0 E9ISIIIEERISIS PLAISSI9IS
- IIARISIARI, BAH 1
e 1
e 3.e.9 SYSTEM CIRCLES POLAK,9 TIKE e
0 e
e i
3.9.9 QUALITY CIRCLES P900RAll E m m, A888 1
'e 1
- 0 ASSESSeIEtti CAPABILITY 19rROVE9E9ETS =================== ====== = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = === = ================================= = =-==-=========
4.1.8 POEAC
' PIERISIDER, PAUL e-e e
e
[
4.1.1 OPERATIIIS EXPERIE01CE REVIEN FIERI9IeER, PAUL 2
9 2
e 4.2.0 SC IMPROVEMENTS.
RefeIEV, REN 4
e 4
e l
4.3.0 SA INTERDIAL ASSESSfESIT 19FROWE9ENTS, RelWEY, KEN 2
e 2
e i
4.2.1 ISSUES 9tANAGEff9ff SYSTEM AIRLIE, AllA e
e e
e l
4.4.0 INDEPE9EDEtti SAFETV EVALIIATIcel PIERI900ER, PAUL' 1
e 1
e 4.5.e SAFETY ASSESSMEltf:
MATZ, PETE 1-0 1
e f
l 4.6.0 ROOT CAUSE ASIALYSIS DAVIS, STEVE-1 e
1 e
{
4.7.9 POSRC CARROLL, Jeest 2
0 2
e l-4.0.9 OSSRC MIERISICKI, MIKE e
e e
e l
t 4.9.0 VISITIIIS OT91ER PLAleTS CAfre, SE90E 3
0-3.
e
- ACTIVITY C00tTROL IMPROWEMENTS================================================================================================= - =
- l l:
5.1.e AUMILIARY SYSTEMS EgIGIfEERISIS IstIT TIIORISTOIt, ALE e
e
.e e
5.2.1 PROCEDURE UPGRADE PROGRAM
' LAT90att, 3400 5
I 4
e l
l-5.2.2 SURVEILLA90CE TEST PROSRAN
.3125tERLY, CNARLIE 4'
r l -
5.2.3 POST MAINTENA90CE TESTIIIG-II4YBEN, Jelet '
e: -
6
-- e e
l 5.3.1 PROCUPEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT-
~
BROINI, LARRY 5
e 5
e-
' BOSIIELL, JOE 3
e 2
e 5.5.2 EQUIPMENT DATABASE /flAINT PLIIS SYS.
6
(
5.3.3 TEC99tICAL MAflUAL IMPROWE9EEISTS ROY, 7001 e
e e
e 5.3.4 DESIG00 SASIS CODISOLIDATICIS -
PERKS, PAUL 2-0 1
1 5.3.5 NECOROS MAf1AGEMENT/80CUMENT CONTROL WOSEL, AISO 1 :.
e 1
e l
5.3.6 IIIFORMATICIS RESOURCE IWIGIGtT PROJECT BARTH, AL~
. 1-0 1
e I'
5.4.1 SYSTEft EDIGIIIEER TRAI9tISIS
' YOE, JIM 2
e 2
e-1 5.4.2 MIf00R MOSIFICATIONS
. MIRAGE 4,'TOISY
.3
.e
.3-e
[
5.4.5 RELIABILITY CENTER 904IIITE90Af1CE
' GREEf1E, KEII
'2-e 2?
' e.
t 6.1.8 IMPLE9EENTATIOpt VERIFICATI0ft-PftIFER, JERRY
'2 e1 2
e i
{
j n==============sssssssss==se=============ss=========================================================================...= - =.....
73 1
71 1
j T3TALS' i
msss===========================uss
...... s smanssammassassassassasussss
........ss s.
..as e
4 m
1 a
--,..l"1~.
..i L. e_
e c.,
- ----.v.,,
,._,m
j 9
l L
SYNOPSIS OF PIP PROGRESS JULY 25 TO AUGUST 9,1990 L
Performance Standard Topical Meeting: - A Topical Meeting was held on August 9 to discuss Performance Standards and Performance Objectives. We are still in a pilot i
evaluation phase for the use of performance standards, and further expansion site-wide was slowed pending demonstration of meaningful results.
l Summer Planning Conference: Our Summer Planning Conference was held on August 7. This was the second major step toward the covelopment of our 1991 Nuclear!
L Program Plan (NPP), as discussed in Action Plan 2.3, NPP issues-Based Planning.
Change Management Training: Change Management Training continued, with the
~
final session scheduled for next month, in our last update, we imalied that our May 24, 1990 Topical Meeting on Change Management was the reason change management techniques were being applied to the Procedure Upgrade Program (PUP) and SIS. In -
t fact, they were already beng applied.
SIS /IMS Coordination: Due to some overlapping scopes, Action Plan 3.6.1, Site l
Integrated Scheduling (SIS), and Action Plan 4.2.1, issues Management System (IMS,'
will be coordinated under one Action Plan Manager, beginning on or about Septemb[
i
-1, for better integration of activities.
Master Equipment Ust: Work began August 6 on the development of a Master -
Equipment Ust under Action Plan 5.3.2, Equipment Technical Database / Maintenance l
Planning System, l
implementation Verification: Action Plan 2.2.2, Communications P!bn,'is still.
g undergoing verification. Action Plan 4.7, POSRC, is also complete and awaiting -
4 verification.
Effectiveness Verification: The Assessment Team arrived on-site and attended training during the week of August 6th. Assessment activities are scheduled to begin 4
)
the week of August 13th. ~The Team will be assessing those Action Plans indicated in y
column 2 of Table 6.1 of the PIP IP.
i
}
f I
m
.i,%,...
m,.w-~*
-w m-w m...
mw
,,-c-
.w,--
e ww. -.
,v..v,--y.-.
n-y
,,w,,
'=
4 HMIR LIRI DI ACTION ZMHS MD g MANAGERS 8/14/90 STATUS M1 g HR PHONE IIILE 2.1-Mgat overview
-2,2 Mgat Expectations 2.2.1 M. Markowski 4479 Performance Standards a
2.2.2 A Donohoe 4733 Communications Plan 2.3 K. Tietjen 4120 NPP-Issues Based Planning 2.4 Resource Allocation.
v 2.5(text)
M. Markowski 4479 Accountability Improvements v
'2.5.1 M. Markowski 4479 Catat Tracking System 2.5.2 B. Mann 6517 Reg Catet Mgmt Process Organizational Improvements 3.1 4470 Managing Org & Pgm Changs 3.2 M. Markowski v
3.3 M. Markowski 4479 Leadership Conferences 3.4~
M. Markowski 4479 Teamwork & Interfaces 3.5 E. Zumwalt 4952 Project Management Improvements.
3.6.1 B. Kemper 4000 Site Integrated' Scheduling 3 6.2 J. Hayden 4359 Maintenance Work Control 3.6.3 J. Thorp 4454 Operations Improvement Plan v-3.7 D. Marinari 3942 Engineering Planning y
3.8 M. Polak.
4402 System Circles i
3.9 A. Edwards
-6611 Quality Circles Program-v 4.1(text)
P. Pieringer 4060 POEAC 4.1.1 P. Pieringer 4060 Operating Experience Review 4.2 K. Romney 4900 QC Improvements 4.2.1 K. Romney 4900 Issue Mgmt System-y 4.3
.A. Anuje 4919 QA Internal Assess Improvements 4.4-P. Pieringer 4060 Ir.dep Safety Eval' 4.5 P. Katz 4160 ' Safety Assessment' 4.6 S. Davis 4612 Root Cause Analysis a
4.7 J. Carroll 4103 POSRC y
4.8 T. Pritchett 5111-OSSRC
)-
v 4.9 C. Campo 4360. Visiting Other Plants l
v 5.1(text)
L. Tucker 4853 Aux Sys Eng Unit 5.2.1 D. Latham 4968 Procedures Upgrade: Program 5.2.2 C. Dunkerly 4854 Surveillance Test Program-L v.
5.2.3 J. Hayden 4359 Post; Maintenance Testing 5.3.1 J. Doswell 3802 Procurement. Program. coject 1
5.3.2 L. Brown 4387 ETD/MPS 5.3.3 C. Roy 3612 Technical Manual Improvements-5.3.4 P. Perks 3611 Design Basis Consolidation 5.3.5 A. Vogel 4481 Records Management / Document Control' 5.3;6 A. Barth 3702 Information Resources:Mgmt Project j
v 5.4.1 J. Yoe 4499 System Engineer. Training' 5.4.2 T. Miranda-4709 Minor Modifications 5.4.3 K. Greene 4385 Reliability Center Maint a= Action Plan Manager reports all activities complete, but not verified.
- - Not a verifiable " Action Plan" v-Implementation Verification done.
-