ML20058Q221

Forwards Performance Improvement Plan Implementation Program Schedule Status as of 900807.Synopsis of Activities Since Last Update & Updated List of Key Action Plan Info Also Encl

ML20058Q221
Person / Time
Site:	Calvert Cliffs
Issue date:	08/14/1990
From:	Russell L BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NUDOCS 9008210173
Download: ML20058Q221 (15)

Text

. _ . . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ . _ _. __ _ _

2

• BALTIMORE l

,. GAS AND '

ELECTRIC 1

f; CHARLES CENTER 'e P.0, BOX 1475 e BALTIMORE. MARYLAND '2'1 2031475 -  ;

, LEON D. RUSSELL l ,,ucua7 d 8v . et. ~o ore m u m Augu9t 14,1990 ,

j. i I

[

i-

- US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC1 20555 Attn: Mr. Bruce R. Boger  !

Mall Stop 14A2

] -

L

Enclosed please find a copy of the Performance improvement Plan Implementation  ;

e j r been verif(ied,' one (1) has been completed but remains to be verified, and 27 rema

active.

p Attached is a brief synopsis of our activities since our last update. Also attached is an l updated list of key Action Plan information, including verification status.

L Please contact me (200-6680) or Rich Olson (260 3771) hhould you have'any questions.

i 1 3. j

. Sincerely,:  ;

N sr . ,

l .

i Attachments I t

6 l

n ,, . - ,

U s .l. -

0 9 .

L 9008210173 900814 M

PDR .ADOCK 03000317 'i

.P.- PDC '

Mr. Bruce R. Boger August 1,- 1990 Page 2.-

bec: Messrs. G. C. Creel synopsis & list C. H. Cruse ynopsis & list 1 R. E. Denton synopsis & list  ;

R. P. Heibel synopsis & list .!

J. R. Lemons . synopsis & list  ;

G. L; Detter  !

B. S. Montogomery 1 R. C. L. Olson synops  !

R. F. Lewis ynops  !

J. S. Fuoto synops '

.i i

l 4

CALVERT CLIFFS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT PERFORMANCEIMPROVEMENT PLAN SCHEDULE STATUS

~

AS OF AUGUST 7,1990 s-BALTIMORE GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY-I

d W- .

L .: .

}

l 1

APPENDIX A EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

REPORT  ;

-l

LEGEND:

X COMPLETE PIP - SASED'ON HANNOURS- ASSIBNED TO ALL ACTIVITIES DIRECTLY RELATED TO COMPLETION <:

OF THE ACTION PLAN OR MILESTONES.

, p

-X COMPLETE ALL --BASED ON MANN00RS ASSIGNED TO ALL ACTIVITIES INCLUDING' ON-GOING AS1A RESULT,0F PIP ACTIVITIES OR MILESTONES.

1 TOTAL. FLOAT - THE DIFFERENCE IN WORKDAYS BETWEEN ACTIVITY DATES- 1 REQUERED TO' SUPPORT THE MILESTONE DATES AND CURRENT, j STATUS. .

NEGATIVE VALUES -= INDICATE ONE OR MORE-OF-THE MILESTONE ' >

IS LATE BY THE INDICATED NUMBER OF ',

'WORXDAYS. i POSITIVE VALUES - INDICATE THAT-A CERTAIN ANOUNT OF-SLACK (FLOAT) EXISTS SETWEEN THE END-0F THE' ACTIVITIES AND TMP.. MILESTONE.

MILESTONES.

ZERO VALUE - INDICATES THE MILESTONES ARE' EXACTLY'  ;

y (Mt SCHEDULE AND ACTIVITIES MUST BE COMPLETED-ON TIME {TO KEEP ON. SCHEDULE.- 1 IMPLE.VERIF COMPLETE - .i'

, ^"YES" INDICATES SATISFACTORYICOMPLETION OF'THE .

IMPLEMENTATION VERIFICATION AND THE ACTION PLAN. -j

" REVERIFY" INDICATES UNSATISFACTORY RESULTS OF:THE~

IMPLEMENTATION VERIFICATION AND WILL REQUIRE ADDITIONAL NORK TO BE PERFORMED ON THE ACTION PLAN AND ANOTHER '

IMPLEMENTATION VERIFICATION. ,

"N/A" INDICATES NOT APPLICABLE AS NO IMPLEMENTATION VERIFICATION IS_ REQUIRED..

e 9

e k

M DATA DATE 7AUG99 PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PLAN

• EMECUTIVE

SUMMARY

REPORT ALL ..

RUN DATE 88AUG98 1722MRS TOTAL  % COMPLETE START FINISH TOTAL CoretITNENT IMPLEMENT.

MANNOURS PIP / ALL DATE BATE FLOAT. MILESTONES VERIFICT*'N .

ACT PLAN R / TITLE PLA98 MANAGER COPFLETE COMPLETE MANAGEMENT PROCESS IMPROVEMENTS N/A RUSSELL, LEE N/A Id/A N/A SAUG90 2SOEC9e e 2.1.0 MANAGEMENT OVERVIEN 2.2.1 PERFORMANCE STANDAROS MARK 0WSKI, MIKE 1958 97 97 13JUL89 218EC99 0 BONONDE, ASIN lesse les 100 12 JANE 9 -30 MAR 99 e YES 2.2.2 COMMUNICATIONS PLAN BNOW94, 0 YES TIETJEN, KEN 775 199 97 5 JUNE 9 2.3.s NPP ISSUES BASED PLANNING 8 YES MARROWSKI, MIKE N/A N/A N/A SJAN90 12APR99 YES 2.5.0 ACCOUNTABILITY IMPROVEMENTS 0 YES YES 2.5.1 COMMITMENT TRACKING SYSTEM MARK 0WSKI, MIKE 27M 100 100 21APR89 5.A5990 2.5.2 REGULATORY COMMITMENT 990GrefT PROCESS MANN, BRIAN 84899 1 1- IMAR99 SJtRt92 -Se ORGANIZATIONAL DY90AMICS 19tPROWEMENTS assassasssssssssssssssssssssmanssasssssssssssssssssssssssses==sesssssssssss=msss===sssssssss===

3.2.0 MANAGING ORGANIZATIONAL 8 PGM CNANGE MARK 0WSKI, MIKE 1129 79 79 MJUMe9 310EC98 e MARK 0WSKI, MIKE 516 100 100 12.ARee9 29NOWO9 0 YES YES-3.3.0 LEADERSHI!' CONFERENCES e 3.4.0 TEA 99tf0RK S INTERFACES MARK 0NSKI, MIKE 1936 63 63 29JUL89 28 MAR 91 3.5.e PROJECT MANAGEMENT ZUMWALT, ERIC 2618 99 99 leJUL89 29AUG90 -42 THORP, JOHN 4822 100 100 22 JUNE 9 26FEB90 0 N/A N/A 3.6.0 DAILY S OUTAGE NORK CONTROL 3.6.1 SITE INTEGRATED SC90E8ULI9IS KEtgPER, SILL 12108 41 41 leJULB9 2eFES91 -53 90AYSEN,- J00st 4290 77 77 1FE309 L31DEC99 6 3.6.2 MAINTENAleCE WORK CONTROL TIGORP, ' Joest 12314 19 15 1FEB89 7APR93 0 3.6.3 OPERATIcee$ IMPROVE 9 TENT PLAN MARI90ARI, DAN 5568 100 les 3 Jefe 89 29JAft90 e YES YES 3.7.8 E90GINEERIles PLANNING e VES POLAK,IIIKE 4099 les 100 28MOWe8 900AR96 YES 3.Q.0 SYSTEM CIRCLES e 3.9,0 P ALITY CIRCLES PROGRAM E9tfARDS, Aset 13950 99 38 14 MARS 9 318EC91 ~

ASSESSittllT CAPABILITY IMPROWEIENTS = = = = = = = = = ==== = = = = === == == = = ==== = === = == === = = = = = = == ============s=ssessssssssssss mannassa ,ssues seess a PIERIIIGER, PAUL 90/A N/A N/A 31JULS9. 31JULS9 e YES YES 4.1.0 POEAC 0 PIERp5cR, PAUL 8424 61 61'~15JA8998 3SEP91

. 4.1.1 OPERAT198G EXPERIE90CE REVIEN 4.2.0 SC 19tPROVEMENTS .

RepetEY, EEN M200 -76 69 1Julte9 219EC90 0-4.2.1 ISSUES MAsaGEttEltT SYSTEM Refe8EY, KE98 8110 27 27 1MAY99 310EC9e' -44 4.3.8 04 INTERetAL ASSESSMEltT IMPROVEMENTS A80pJE, A80A . _

11496 lee 100 ReftAY89 2JAft90 0 YES YES PIERI98GER,' PAUL : 27852 63: 65 15JUIIe8 29JAII91 'S 4.4.0 INDEPE880ENT SAFETY EVALUATIO98 UNIT 4.5.8 SAFETY ASSESSMENT RATZ, PETE 2485  % 96 8 MAYS 9 318EC9e- 0 4.6.9 ROOT CAUSE A80ALYSIS IMPROWEMENTS DAVIS, STEWE 25600 ' 96 96 ' IJUBIOS 11FEB91 e CARROLL, J0006 '1578 .les .les- 1.28009 30AUG99 0 YES 4.7.8 POSRC YES 4.0.0 OSSRC - MIES9 tiff, MIKE 1229 Me les 2a -9 25JA8090 0 YES

'4.9.0 VISITIIeG OTHER PLANTS CASIPO,. GENE 13  % les let . 3JUL89 29JtR898 e VES YES -

ACTIVITY CostTROL IMPROVEfqEftTS seassasssssmanssu msssssssss==ssasussssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss===ssssssss==ssessassesse T98'sIlfff006, AL -N/A 90/A N/A SJUL89. 5JUL89 0 YES YES , ~

5.1.0 AUNILIARY SYSTElts E98 git 0EERIIe8 t20!T 5.2.1 PROCEDURE UPGRADE PROGRAM. 1ATitA98, DAlf .

M8333 96 32 IFE909 319EC92 -48 L 5.2.2 $UltVEILLA90CE TEST PROGRAlt DUNKERLY, CetARLIE 62497 . 11 11 IJUIIe9 230EC92 0 90AYBEN, J0000 3988 lee lee . 1FE989 130CT09 0 YES YES 5.2.3 POST MAINTE90AIGCE TESTIOGG 5.3.1 PROCURE 9sENT PROGRAM PROJECT 90 SWELL, JOE 132982 89 89 SSEP89 3ONOW90 -e 5.3.2 EQUIP YECN BATABASE/ttAtteT PLIOG SYS . BROWIf,- LARetY -74388- ~5? 42 198A209 21JtRe91 - e 5.3.3 TECHNICAL MAleUAL IfgPROWEMENTS ' ROY, T006 Mle 85 85 29 FESS 8 40CT90 0 5.3.4 DESIG98 BASIS CONSOLIDATION PERKS, PAUL' 179352 91 le 2004118 8 . 2SEP94 -27 5.3.5' RECORDS MANAGEMENT /B0CtRIENT CoffTROL WOGEL, AleN 5742 68 60 SFES90 -200EC99 e 5.3.6 If0 FORMAT 3000 RESOURCE MNEfeti PROJECT SART90, AL 13346 58 50~ IFE890 26APR91 0 5.4.1 SYSTEM E90GIIIEER TRAINIl0S YOE, JIM 13092 100 199 5884Ye9 4JAff90 0- YES- YES 5.Q.2 MIBe0R 99001FICATIONS . MIRA80BA, TostY 5368 ' - - 21AUGe9 30185W98 0 LIEESOURCES tRSER REVIEN 5.4.3 RELIA 8ILITY CENTtRES MAINTE90AseCE GREEteE, KEN - 14M9 -M M' 3eSEPO6: 1ARIG91 0 PIP WERIFICATION PROCESSES =============================== sss========: ssessssssssssssssssssss=====ses==sssssssssssssssssssssssssse 6.1.6 PIP IMPLEftENTATICO8 WERIFICATICBI ~ P9tIFER, JERRY 890 21- 23 7JUL89 18JA8095 '412 6.3.s PIP EFFECTIVENESS VERIFICATION P9tIFER, JERRY . M4', 23 23 SFED99 38AlfG91 758

................................................................................................. =------- .=__ .___ ._

TETALS' 1403099 65 ~ 36 29FE888 2SEP94 -53

....................._............................................................==- - =_--- _ _ _,=___ . ...........

- == -- ---- - - -

l ~- $

.r I,

r l

I 4

l y .

MHFSTONE  :

OVERVIEW ,

I I

I

. i i

i.

.4 l

1

-1 1

i 4

i i,

l 1

5 i

i y

:  : I'  :  :

:  : l l l  :-

• I- l-  : :

z e e  :.. :

lm.:" .: . w . e. r. z !. e.1gfgg.

g... -g...ggg e

.g..w...n.

r r. a r,,, - e.

gu g-......g..: l.eg g.

e a

• • !! 8888 l8 E

'~

38 !8  :

8 -

888.8 l

8 8  ! ~ !-

l l a

E i

: -1  :  : -: E 8  :  :  :  : : -. 1 8~- ,

!  : :. W 1

:  :  : :: -x gg  :  :  :  : :

,sL..ss mg

i . .i. .....

sI,s sssss

.i s.

sss sss-i

..........i.igh:

ss- ssssss ss.s. ~-

n?

1 ge;;

s -

1 o

g

=t x o

B  :  :  :  :  :

t

:  :  :- au  :

>.=:

:  :  : :n:I

n

. ..  : =.w..:ww-s,u--,.*

t .

• g. :w  :

l

..u -.... : wesen.e--.es.:g:g  :

e l ..

• .ll l

l

': :BR ;

:  : " ~:  :.

a .  :  :  :  : h:

• g ; ;-  :  :-  :."J

gg.

, j ": < u 4 = e . j . w in e . . . . . . j e e e e e s . . . . . j u sg e e . g . < < < . . jWgh:ge a e::  :  : {

=::  :  :  :  : :sW:!*  : M  :..

=

l l .: 2 .:

l = *WW lW:n-  : g n :-  : ll .

.:ng.sr:ssmamIg -

g I.  : EE jiia,iaali[aaainlalg:gg

-lqll8: (( ss -g g,i[ssiig,a=,g al -

3 g ,,, yin:

-5i -j

,s-:: sI g :. Ic

, ww t

,::: i .a-gsigs,,g - -

1 e.::

, E a Il .8ll :a -

1:

gl_af.::=.=.

a- ..

=. a. 5a o: =. la IrlafaB::

a 8 - -

==

tz i

3: .  : l l 5

: ': R tt. . D-

.:- g  ;

U:  : :B E -: - ::

a: - E. R E  :- : - -Eg.

i

:.  : t --

a-lg  !

tlE.

I

. g,Ra 5 RE. Wye n 5 n

g. - ng s :8, s

.-8agge e-ig Ig: 1::=a:::

ig 3m

-s 8

= -~!! mea 5un8-E  :. I  ! Em 4 -- 5: : -

ar

- ~: a

-guglell :-Bla g n 1 e. m.5 c en8 l e a- m.t .!Ie-leg-

= u ., R g l E

. I e-5 ,E ng!am::.

.ca:.

ss-se : misg x-

x e 5 n..

aL m- s!g!-g

!- :~!ag 52-EE a

l1ls. a t  : e-

! gI- afg[ea!5.,g e-le:: : ^:g latn e:

la:en-lasug':llsgg

.*. s:-

e:=

a !lg gs - mus,:so: seel-m- --

ao-

- -ya at:: .:

a:

.: g_

=x et E,:llrotsg-lIla=E!al5EEssge-Negll om

.-~..- =....-~

e nE

...R.-.-..al aaas2 as l.....e.-~.-

arkas::::

....- .:s:

sEle.gg8  : 2::ng r aa :5..: aa g gllaaaaggasassa;;;ageg;s;ssssss;agen;aaagegeaasss:::;

asaggesseesses a seg;;;;;;;;;;;;;:s::

g j p;

1 i

i CRITICAL PATH l ANALYSES ;' i

- . .i i

c i

-i

, PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PLAN CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS JULY 26, 1990 A CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS IS PERFORMED FOR ALL ACTION PLANS THAT HAVE TOTAL FLOAT VALUES LESS THAN ZERO ON THEIR COMMITMENTS. I WHERE ACTION PLANS ARE TIED TOGETHER CAUSING MULTIPLE ACTION PLAN l NEGATIVITY, IT WILL BE So IDENTIFIED IN THE TEXT OF THE ANALYSIS.

i ,

l

• 3.6.1 SITE INTEGRATED SCHEDULING NEGATIVE -53 DAYS

• 2.5.2 REG. COMMITMENT MNGMT PROCESS NEGATIVE -50 DAYS

• 5.2.1 PROCEDURES UPGRADE PROGRAM NEGATIVE -48 DAYS

• 4.2.1 ISSUES MANAGEMENT PROCESS NEGATIVE -44 DAYS

• 3.5.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT NEGATIVE -42 DAYS

• 5.3.4 DESIGN BASIS CONSOL!DATION NEGATIVE -22 DAYS THE FOLI4 WING ARE THT: ANALYSES FOR THE AUGUST 7, 1990 DATA DATE:

• 3.6.1 SITE INTEGRATED SCHEDULING KEMPER, BILL -53 DAYS l THIS ACTION PLAN HAS BEEN REVISED AND A CHANGE REQUEST HAS BE,EN INITAT- j ED THAT INCLUDES THE FULL IMPLEMENTATION OF SIS INTO THE PIP ' SCHEDULE.

THE CURRENT SCHEDULE WILL CONTINUE TO SHOW NEGATIVITY UNTIL THE CHANGE REQUEST HAS BEEN APPROVED.

• • RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION **

EXPEDITE CHANGE REQUEST

• 2.5.2 REG. COMMITMENT MNGMT PROCESS MANN, BRIAN -50 DAYS CHANGE REQUEST WAS APPROVED ON AUGUST 8, 1990 TO RETARGET THIS ACTION PLAN.

• • RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION **

REVISE SCHEDULE TO REFLECT APPROVED CHANGES BY THE NEXT UPDATE.

5.2.1 PROCEDURES UPGRADE PROJECT LATHAM, DAN -48 DAYS THIS ACTION PLAN REMAINS -48 DAYS NEGATIVE: THIS NEGATIVITY IS t ATTRIBUTED TO A DECISION BY PUP MANAGEMENT TO REVISE THEIR CURRENT i PROGRAM. THE FORECAST DATE FOR HAVING AN APPROVED SCHEDULE IN PLACE IS l AUGUST 31, 1990.

i l

l "*"

INDICATES ACTION PLANS THAT HAVE BEEN ON CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS REPORT MORE THAN ONE UPDATE CYCLE. -

l 1

l 1

9

• • RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION **

THIS PROJECT IS PRESENTLY ON SCHEDULE FOR MEETING THE FOLIDWING DATES.

(A) DEVEI4P A DETAILED SCHEDULE FOR AUGUST 1, 1990 COMPLETE ACTION PLAN MANAGER APPROVAL (B) INITIATE A CHANGE REQUEST AUGUST 10, 1990 FOR PIP MANAGEMENT APPROVAL 4.2.1 ISSUES MANAGEMENT PROCESS ROMNEY, KEN -44 DAYS

---_--__.---__-________ ----__. -~~__-_---- -_ --___

REDEFINING THE SCOPE OF THIS ACTION PLAN TO AVOID TASK DUPLICATION BETWEEN ISSUES MANAGEMENT AND SITE INTEGRATED SCHEDULING IS THE CONTRIBUTING FACTOR TO THE SCHEDULE NEGATIVITITY.

• • RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION **

EXPEDITE CHANGE REQUEST "

A CHANGE REQUEST HAS BEEN INITIATED BY THE ACTION PLAN MANAGEl, AND IT WILL BE PLACED IN THE PIP MANAGEMENT APPROVAL CYCLE ON AUGUST 14, 1990.

• 3'.'5.0 PROJECT MANAGFMENT ZUMWALT, ERIC -42 DAYS CHANGE REQUEST WAS APPROVED ON AUGUST 8, 1990 TO RETARGET THIS ACTION PLAN.

• • RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION **

REVISE SCHEDULE TO REFLECT APPROVED CHANGES BY THE NEX'I' UPDATE.

5.3.4 DESIGN. BASIS CONSOLIDATION PERKS, PAUL -27 DAYS TASK 4, DESIGN BASIS PROCEDURES, IS CURRENTLY -27 DAYS NEGATIVE. THIS NEGATIVITY IS ATTRIBUTED TO THE' FINAL RESOLUTION OF COMMENTS FOR ISSU-ING THE FOUR REMAINING ESSENTIAL PROCEDURES. ALL FOUR PROCEDURE WERE APPROVED BY THE GENERAL SUPERVISO

R. PROCEDURE

CMP-1 " DESIGN WRITERS GUIDE " AND CMP-5 " TRAINING" NEED NO FURTHUR APPROVAL; CMP-2 ' DEFICIENCY REPORTING " AND CMP-3 " QUALITY GUIDELINES FOR THE DESIGN BASIS CONSOLI-ATION PROJECT" REQUIRE THE ADDITIONAL APPROVAL OF THE NESD MANAGER.

• • RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION **

ALL EFFORTS SHOULD BE MADE TO EXPEDITE THE APPROVAL PROCESS.

3.6.2 MAINTENANCE WORK COMTROL HAYDEN, JOHN -16 DAYS THIS ACTION PLAN IS -16 DAYS NEGATIVE: THIS NEGATIVITY IS ATTRIBUTED TO MILESTONE #1, " DEVELOP A LONG-RANGE MAINTENANCE STRATEGY WITH GOALS,"

BEING EXTENDED FOR A COMPREHENSIVE STRATEGY PROGRAM.

'00 RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION'**

ALL EFFORTS-SHOULDBE MADE TO MAINTAIN THE REVISE FORECAST COMPLETION DATE OF AUGUST' 22,1990.

)

l en l

l J,

k l

c

-I I

'l

<e E

t CHANGE CONFROL OVERVIEW i i

l i

-l i

i l

j

e.-

., . m .

sc i STATUS AS OF AUGUST 7,'1999 CHANGE C0NTR0L 0VERVIEW .

I TOTAL CHANGE CNANGE REGUESTS- CMafIGE REGUESTS DISAPPROVES -

ACTION PLAN R / D E S C R I P T I O N PLA98 MAIIAGER RESUESTS WRITTEN AWAITING APPROWAL APPv/IIICSAPORATED C9tAIISE RESUESTS I

l -

MANAGEMENT PROCESS IMPROWE9ENTS

- 2.1.s MANA=9ENT OVERVIEN RUS$ n t, TEE e . ..

. 1

,. 2.2.1 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS. MARK 0WSKI, MIKE 3 e 3 e 2.2.2 COMMUNICATIONS PLAN ' BONONDE, Afst - - 3 0 3 e l 2.3.0 MPP ISSUES BASED PLAfWtING TIETJEN, KE9t ' 3 e 3 e i 2.5.0 ACCOUNTASILITY IMPROWEMENTS MARKONSKI, MIKE 1 e 1 e-

, 2.5.1 COMMITMENT TRACKING SYSTEM - MARKONSKI, MIKE 1 e 1 e j

. 2.5.2 REGULATORY COMMITMENT MNGl9ff PROCESS MAfst, SRIAN 2 e 2 e j ORGAftIZATIONAf DYNAftICS IMPROWE9ENTS == ===== = = = = = = == == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = === = = === = = = = = = === ===== =============== == == === ======== === =====

i. 3.2.0 MANAGING ORGANIZATIcel S PGft CSIAflGE - MARKONSKI, MIKE e e e 8: - ~

} 3.3.0 LEADER $ NIP CONFERE90CES 9tARK0NSKI, MIKE 1 e 1 0 ..

3.4.8 TEAMWORK 3 INTERFACES- MARK 0WSKI, MIKE 2 e 2 e 3.5.8 PROJECT MAIIAGEMEtti ZulefALT, ERIC 3 0 3 e 3.6.9 DAILY S OUTASE NORK C000 TROL. T910RP, J0let 1 e 1 0 3.6.1 SITE INTEGRATED SC9EDULIIIS KEMPER, SILL 4 e 4 e "j 3.6.2 MAINTE90AIICE NORK CENITROL II4YSEN, J0let 1 e 1 e 4 3.6.3 OPERATIONS IMPROWE9ENT PLAft 79tORP, joist 1 e 1 e 3.7.0 E9ISIIIEERISIS PLAISSI9IS - IIARISIARI, BAH 1 e 1 e .!

!.. 3.e.9 SYSTEM CIRCLES POLAK,9 TIKE e 0 e e 3.9.9 QUALITY CIRCLES P900RAll E m m , A888 1 'e 1 -0 ASSESSeIEtti CAPABILITY 19rROVE9E9ETS = == ============ ==== = === == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = ======= === ====================== = =-==-=========

> 4.1.8 POEAC ' PIERISIDER, PAUL e- e e e

[ 4.1.1 OPERATIIIS EXPERIE01CE REVIEN FIERI9IeER, PAUL 2 9 2 e 4.2.0 SC IMPROVEMENTS . RefeIEV, REN 4 e 4 e 4.2.1 ISSUES 9tANAGEff9ff SYSTEM 2 e 2 e 4.3.0 SA INTERDIAL ASSESSfESIT 19FROWE9ENTS, AIRLIE, AllA RelWEY, KEN e e e e

! 4.4.0 INDEPE9EDEtti SAFETV EVALIIATIcel PIERI900ER, PAUL' 1 e 1 e ,!

, 4.5.e SAFETY ASSESSMEltf: MATZ, PETE 1- 0 1 e l 4.6.0 ROOT CAUSE ASIALYSIS DAVIS, STEVE- 1 e 1 e 4.7.9 POSRC CARROLL, Jeest 2 0 2 e l- 4.0.9 OSSRC MIERISICKI, MIKE e e e e t

4.9.0 VISITIIIS OT91ER PLAleTS CAfre, SE90E 3 0- 3. e

ACTIVITY C00tTROL IMPROWEMENTS ================================================================================================= - = :l l: 5.1.e AUMILIARY SYSTEMS EgIGIfEERISIS IstIT TIIORISTOIt, ALE e e .e e 5.2.1 PROCEDURE UPGRADE PROGRAM ' LAT90att, 3400 5 I 4 e l- 5.2.2 SURVEILLA90CE TEST PROSRAN .3125tERLY, CNARLIE 4' S- 4 e l- 5.2.3 POST MAINTENA90CE TESTIIIG- II4YBEN, Jelet ' e: - 6 -- e e l 5.3.1 PROCUPEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT- ' BOSIIELL, JOE 3 e 2 e e-

~

! 5.5.2 EQUIPMENT DATABASE /flAINT PLIIS SYS. BROINI, LARRY 5 e 5

( 5.3.3 TEC99tICAL MAflUAL IMPROWE9EEISTS ROY, 7001 e e e e 5.3.4 DESIG00 SASIS CODISOLIDATICIS - PERKS, PAUL 2- 0 1 1 5.3.5 NECOROS MAf1AGEMENT/80CUMENT CONTROL WOSEL, AISO 1 :. e 1 e l 5.3.6 IIIFORMATICIS RESOURCE IWIGIGtT PROJECT BARTH, AL~ . 1- 0 1 e I' 5.4.1 SYSTEft EDIGIIIEER TRAI9tISIS ' YOE, JIM 2 e 2 e-5.4.2 MIf00R MOSIFICATIONS . MIRAGE 4,'TOISY .3 .e .3- e

' GREEf1E, KEII '2- e 5.4.5 RELIABILITY CENTER 904IIITE90Af1CE 2? ' e.

6.1.8 IMPLE9EENTATIOpt VERIFICATI0ft- PftIFER, JERRY '2 e1 2 e j n==============sssssssss==se=============ss=========================================================================. ..= - =.....

T3TALS' .

73 1 71 1 msss===========================uss ...... s smanssammassassassassasussss ........ss s . ..as ........ ...... ...... ..

e m

1

-%.- a , . - . --,..l"1~. ..i e c., L . e_  ;----.v.,, -  %,_ . - . _ _ ,._,m ,. . . . . . . _ _ _ , ,

j 9

l SYNOPSIS OF PIP PROGRESS ,

L JULY 25 TO AUGUST 9,1990 L

Performance Standard Topical Meeting: - A Topical Meeting was held on August 9 to l discuss Performance Standards and Performance Objectives. We are still in a pilot i

! evaluation phase for the use of performance standards, and further expansion site-wide

was slowed pending demonstration of meaningful results.

l Summer Planning Conference: Our Summer Planning Conference was held on L August 7. This was the second major step toward the covelopment of our 1991 Nuclear!

! Program Plan (NPP), as discussed in Action Plan 2.3, NPP issues-Based Planning.

~

Change Management Training: Change Management Training continued, with the l final session scheduled for next month, in our last update, we im alied that our May 24, '

. 1990 Topical Meeting on Change Management was the reason change management techniques were being applied to the Procedure Upgrade Program (PUP) and SIS. In - t fact, they were already be ng applied.

SIS /IMS Coordination: Due to some overlapping scopes, Action Plan 3.6.1, Site l Integrated Scheduling (SIS), and Action Plan 4.2.1, issues Management System (IMS ,'  ;

will be coordinated under one Action Plan Manager, beginning on or about Septemb[

i -1, for better integration of activities.

Master Equipment Ust: Work began August 6 on the development of a Master - ,

Equipment Ust under Action Plan 5.3.2, Equipment Technical Database / Maintenance l Planning System, l

implementation Verification: Action Plan 2.2.2, Communications P!bn,'is still . g undergoing verification. Action Plan 4.7, POSRC, is also complete and awaiting - 4 verification.

Effectiveness Verification: The Assessment Team arrived on-site and attended training during the week of August 6th. Assessment activities are scheduled to begin 4 )

the week of August 13th. ~The Team will be assessing those Action Plans indicated in y column 2 of Table 6.1 of the PIP IP.

i

}

f I

.% ..' m,.w-~* mw ,,-c- .w,-- e ww. - . ,v..v,--y.-. n-y , ,,w,,

'=

4 HMIR LIRI DI ACTION ZMHS MD g MANAGERS 8/14/90 STATUS M1 g HR PHONE IIILE

• 2.1- Mgat overview

• -2,2 Mgat Expectations 2.2.1 M. Markowski 4479 Performance Standards a 2.2.2 A Donohoe 4733 Communications Plan ,

2.3 K. Tietjen 4120 NPP-Issues Based Planning

• 2.4 Resource Allocation. '

v 2.5(text) M. Markowski 4479 Accountability Improvements v '2.5.1 M. Markowski 4479 Catat Tracking System 2.5.2 B. Mann 6517 Reg Catet Mgmt Process

• 3.1 .

Organizational Improvements 3.2 M. Markowski 4470 Managing Org & Pgm Changs v 3.3 M. Markowski 4479 Leadership Conferences 3.4~ M. Markowski 4479 Teamwork & Interfaces -

3.5 E. Zumwalt 4952 Project Management Improvements . >

3.6.1 B. Kemper 4000 Site Integrated' Scheduling '

3. 6.2 J. Hayden 4359 Maintenance Work Control 3.6.3 J. Thorp 4454 Operations Improvement Plan v- 3.7 D. Marinari 3942 Engineering Planning y 3.8 M. Polak . 4402 System Circles i 3.9 A. Edwards -6611 Quality Circles Program-v 4.1(text) P. Pieringer 4060 POEAC .

4.1.1 P. Pieringer 4060 Operating Experience Review 4.2 K. Romney 4900 QC Improvements 4.2.1 K. Romney 4900 Issue Mgmt System-y 4.3 .A. Anuje 4919 QA Internal Assess Improvements 4.4- P. Pieringer 4060 Ir.dep Safety Eval' 4.5 P. Katz 4160 ' Safety Assessment' 4.6 S. Davis 4612 Root Cause Analysis a 4.7 J. Carroll 4103 POSRC y 4.8 T. Pritchett 5111- OSSRC

)- v 4.9 C. Campo 4360 . Visiting Other Plants l

v 5.1(text) L. Tucker 4853 Aux Sys Eng Unit .

5.2.1 D. Latham 4968 Procedures Upgrade: Program 5.2.2 C. Dunkerly 4854 Surveillance Test Program- ,

L v. 5.2.3 J. Hayden 4359 Post; Maintenance Testing '

5.3.1 J. Doswell 3802 Procurement . Program . coject 1 5.3.2 L. Brown 4387 ETD/MPS 5.3.3 C. Roy 3612 Technical Manual Improvements-5.3.4 P. Perks 3611 Design Basis Consolidation 5.3.5 A. Vogel 4481 Records Management / Document Control' 5.3;6 A. Barth 3702 Information Resources:Mgmt Project j v 5.4.1 J. Yoe 4499 System Engineer. Training' I 5.4.2 T. Miranda- 4709 Minor Modifications 5.4.3 K. Greene 4385 Reliability Center Maint a= Action Plan Manager reports all activities complete, but not verified.

• - Not a verifiable " Action Plan" v- Implementation Verification done.

- - - .