|
---|
Category:CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS
MONTHYEARTXX-9924, Forwards Responses to Questions by NRC Re Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-87 & NPF-89,by Incorporating Changes Increasing RWST low-level Setpoint from Greater than But Equal to 40% to Greater than But Equal to 45% of Span1999-10-22022 October 1999 Forwards Responses to Questions by NRC Re Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-87 & NPF-89,by Incorporating Changes Increasing RWST low-level Setpoint from Greater than But Equal to 40% to Greater than But Equal to 45% of Span NOC-AE-000675, Forwards Clarification on Items Included in 990531 Response to RAI Re Proposed License Amend Associated with Operator Action for Sbloca,As Requested1999-10-21021 October 1999 Forwards Clarification on Items Included in 990531 Response to RAI Re Proposed License Amend Associated with Operator Action for Sbloca,As Requested NOC-AE-000680, Forwards Rev 5 to 0PGP03-ZV-0001, Severe Weather Plan1999-10-20020 October 1999 Forwards Rev 5 to 0PGP03-ZV-0001, Severe Weather Plan ML20217M5711999-10-20020 October 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-445/99-15 & 50-446/99-15 on 990822- 1002.Two Severity Level IV Violations of NRC Requirements Identified & Being Treated as non-cited Violations Consistent with App C of Enforcement Policy NOC-AE-000683, Forwards 30-day Rept Concerning Significant Changes to Accepted Large Break Loss of Coolant Accident ECCS Evaluation Model for South Tx Project,Units 1 & 2,IAW 10CFR50.46(a)(3)(ii)1999-10-19019 October 1999 Forwards 30-day Rept Concerning Significant Changes to Accepted Large Break Loss of Coolant Accident ECCS Evaluation Model for South Tx Project,Units 1 & 2,IAW 10CFR50.46(a)(3)(ii) ML20217K9341999-10-15015 October 1999 Forwards SER Accepting Util 990609 Relief Request RR-ENG-2-4 for Relief from ASME Code,Section XI, Nondestructive Exam Requirements Applicable to Stp,Units 1 & 2,reactor Vessel Closure Head Nuts ML20217K9091999-10-15015 October 1999 Forwards SER Accepting Util 990609 Relief Request RR-ENG-2-3 from ASME Code,Section Xi,Nondestructive Exam Requirements Applicable to South Texas Project,Units 1 & 2, Pressurizer Support Attachment Welds TXX-9923, Forwards Monthly Operating Repts for Sept 1999 for CPSES, Units 1 & 2,per Plant TS 5.6.4.No Failures of Challenges to PORVs of SV for Units Occurred1999-10-15015 October 1999 Forwards Monthly Operating Repts for Sept 1999 for CPSES, Units 1 & 2,per Plant TS 5.6.4.No Failures of Challenges to PORVs of SV for Units Occurred NOC-AE-000674, Forwards Requested Estimates of Needs for Operator Licensing Exams,Per AL-99-03, Operator Licensing National Exam Schedule1999-10-12012 October 1999 Forwards Requested Estimates of Needs for Operator Licensing Exams,Per AL-99-03, Operator Licensing National Exam Schedule 05000498/LER-1999-008, Forwards LER 99-008-00 Re Turbine Trip That Occurred While Performing Main Turbine Emergency Trip Test.Commitments Made by Licensee Are Listed in Corrective Actions Section of LER1999-10-12012 October 1999 Forwards LER 99-008-00 Re Turbine Trip That Occurred While Performing Main Turbine Emergency Trip Test.Commitments Made by Licensee Are Listed in Corrective Actions Section of LER ML20217E7951999-10-12012 October 1999 Forwards COLR for Unit 1,Cycle 8,per TS 5.6.5 ML20217C3221999-10-0707 October 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-498/99-16 & 50-499/99-16 on 990808-0918.No Violations Noted.Insp Generally Characterized by safety-conscious Operations,Sound Engineering & Maint Practices & Careful Radiological Work Controls NOC-AE-000625, Requests Partial Relief from ASME Section XI Visual Exam Requirements of IWA-5242(a).Relief Request Is Based on Provisions of Draft ASME Section XI Code Case N-616,which Is Expected to Be Published in Near Future1999-10-0707 October 1999 Requests Partial Relief from ASME Section XI Visual Exam Requirements of IWA-5242(a).Relief Request Is Based on Provisions of Draft ASME Section XI Code Case N-616,which Is Expected to Be Published in Near Future NOC-AE-000653, Requests Relief from ASME Section XI Code Requirements of Table IWE-2500-1 for VT-3 Visual Exam of Seals & Gaskets on Airlocks,Hatches & Other Devices Required to Assure Containment leak-tight Integrity,Per 10CFR50.55a(a)(3)(i)1999-10-0707 October 1999 Requests Relief from ASME Section XI Code Requirements of Table IWE-2500-1 for VT-3 Visual Exam of Seals & Gaskets on Airlocks,Hatches & Other Devices Required to Assure Containment leak-tight Integrity,Per 10CFR50.55a(a)(3)(i) NOC-AE-000610, Requests Relief from ASME Section XI Code Nondestructive Exam Requirements of IWA-5250(a)(2) for Second Inservice Insp Interval,Per Provisions of 10CFR50.55a(3)(i)1999-10-0707 October 1999 Requests Relief from ASME Section XI Code Nondestructive Exam Requirements of IWA-5250(a)(2) for Second Inservice Insp Interval,Per Provisions of 10CFR50.55a(3)(i) TXX-9922, Forwards Revised COLR, for Cycle 5 for Unit 21999-10-0101 October 1999 Forwards Revised COLR, for Cycle 5 for Unit 2 ML20212L2891999-10-0101 October 1999 Discusses Closeout of GL 97-06, Degradation of Steam Generator Internals. Purpose of GL Was to Obtain Info That Would Enable NRC to Verify That Condition of Licensee SG Internals Comply with Current Licensing Bases ML20216J5571999-10-0101 October 1999 Provides Final Response to GL 98-01,suppl 1, Y2K Readiness of Computer Sys at Npps NOC-AE-000664, Forwards Rev 1 to STP Electric Generating Station Unit 1 Cycle 9 COLR & Rev 1 to STP Electric Generating Station Unit 2 Cycle 7 Colr1999-09-30030 September 1999 Forwards Rev 1 to STP Electric Generating Station Unit 1 Cycle 9 COLR & Rev 1 to STP Electric Generating Station Unit 2 Cycle 7 Colr ML20212L1651999-09-30030 September 1999 Responds to STP Nuclear Operating Co 981012 & s Which Provided Update to TS Bases Pages B 3/4 8-14 Through B 3/4 8-17.NRC Staff Found Change Consistent with TS 3/4.8.2 DC Sources. Staff Found & Deleted Typographical Error 05000499/LER-1999-006, Forwards LER 99-006-00,re Entry Into TS 3.0.3.Licensee Commitments Listed in Corrective Actions Section of Attachment1999-09-30030 September 1999 Forwards LER 99-006-00,re Entry Into TS 3.0.3.Licensee Commitments Listed in Corrective Actions Section of Attachment ML20212J7141999-09-29029 September 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-498/99-15 & 50-499/99-15 on 990920-24 at South Texas Project Electric Generating Station.No Violations Noted.Insp Covered Requalification Training Program & Observation of Requalification Activities NOC-AE-000646, Informs NRC That STP Nuclear Operating Co Is Y2K Ready IAW Nei/Nusmg 97-07 Guidelines & Also Provides Response to NRC Ltr1999-09-28028 September 1999 Informs NRC That STP Nuclear Operating Co Is Y2K Ready IAW Nei/Nusmg 97-07 Guidelines & Also Provides Response to NRC Ltr ML20212J0651999-09-27027 September 1999 Discusses Licensee 980330 Response to GL 97-06, Degradation of SG Internals. Concludes That Response to GL Provides Reasonable Assurance That Condition of SG Internals in Compliance with Current Licensing Bases for Facility ML20212F1791999-09-24024 September 1999 Discusses 990923 Meeting Conducted in Region IV Ofc Re Status of Activities to Support Confirmatory Order, ,modifying OL & to Introduce New Director,Safety Quality Concerns Program.List of Attendees Encl ML20212F7481999-09-24024 September 1999 Forwards SER Authorizing Relief from Exam Requirement of 1986 Edition ASME Code,Section XI Pursuant to 10CFR50.55a(a)(3)(ii) for Relief Request A-3 & 10CFR50.55a(g)(6)(i) for Relief Requests B15,16,17 & C-4 ML20212G0721999-09-24024 September 1999 Forwards Rev 4 to Augmented Inservice Insp Plan for CPSES, Unit 1. Future Changes & Revs to Unit 1 Augmented Inservice Insp Plan Will Be Available on Site ML20212H0461999-09-24024 September 1999 Forwards Rev 6 to CPSES Glen Rose,Tx ASME Section XI ISI Program Plan for 1st Interval on 990820 ML20212F1041999-09-23023 September 1999 Requests That NRC Be Informed of Any Changes in Scope of Y2K System Deficiencies Listed or Util Projected Completion Schedule for Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station,Units 1 & 2 ML20212E9091999-09-23023 September 1999 Discusses GL 98-01, Year 2000 Readiness of Computer Sys at Npps, Supplement 1 & STP Nuclear Operating Co Response for STP Dtd 990629.Understands That at Least One Sys or Component Listed May Have Potential to Cause Transient ML20212F2111999-09-22022 September 1999 Forwards Review of SG 90-day Rept, South Texas Unit-2 Cycle 7 Voltage-Based Repair Criteria Rept, Submitted by Util on 990119 ML20212E6661999-09-21021 September 1999 Advises That Info Contained in Application & Affidavit, (CAW-99-1342) Re WCAP-15009,Rev 0, Comache Peak Unit 1 Evaluation for Tube Vibration Induced Fatigue, Will Be Withheld from Public Disclosure NOC-AE-000649, Forwards Current Annual Financial Data for STP Electric Generating Station Per 10CFR50.71(b),acting on Behalf of Central Power & Light Co,City of Austin,Tx,City Public Svc Board of San Antonio & Hl&P1999-09-21021 September 1999 Forwards Current Annual Financial Data for STP Electric Generating Station Per 10CFR50.71(b),acting on Behalf of Central Power & Light Co,City of Austin,Tx,City Public Svc Board of San Antonio & Hl&P NOC-AE-000633, Forwards Rev 3 to SG-99-04-005, STP 1RE08 Outage Condition Monitoring Rept & Final Operational Assessment. Rept Satisfies Reporting Requirements of NEI 97-06,dtd Dec 19971999-09-21021 September 1999 Forwards Rev 3 to SG-99-04-005, STP 1RE08 Outage Condition Monitoring Rept & Final Operational Assessment. Rept Satisfies Reporting Requirements of NEI 97-06,dtd Dec 1997 NOC-AE-000634, Forwards Addl Info Re GL 95-07, Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of Safety-Related Povs. MOV design-basis Review Checklist,Encl1999-09-21021 September 1999 Forwards Addl Info Re GL 95-07, Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of Safety-Related Povs. MOV design-basis Review Checklist,Encl 05000499/LER-1999-005, Forwards LER 99-005-00,re Esfa Following Loss of Power to Standby Transformer 2 Due to Electrical Fault.Licensee Commitments Are Listed in Corrective Actions Section of LER1999-09-20020 September 1999 Forwards LER 99-005-00,re Esfa Following Loss of Power to Standby Transformer 2 Due to Electrical Fault.Licensee Commitments Are Listed in Corrective Actions Section of LER ML20212D9171999-09-16016 September 1999 Informs That on 990818,NRC Completed Midcycle PPR of South Texas Project & Identified No Areas in Which Performance Warranted Insp Beyond Core Insp Program.Details of Insp Plan Through Mar 2000 & Historical Listing of Plant Issues,Encl ML20212D9111999-09-16016 September 1999 Informs That on 990818,NRC Completed Midcycle PPR of CPSES & Did Not Identify Any Areas in Which Performance Warranted Insp Beyond Core Insp Program.Core Insp Plan at Facility Over Next 7 Months.Insp Plan Through March 2000 Encl ML20216F5471999-09-15015 September 1999 Discusses 990914 Meeting Conducted at Region Iv.Meeting Was Requested by Staff to Introduce New Management Organization to Region IV & to Discuss General Plant Performance & Mgt Challenges IR 05000498/19990121999-09-14014 September 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-498/99-12 & 50-499/99-12 on 990816-19.Three Violations Occurred & Being Treated as Ncvs. Areas Examined During Insp Included Portions of Access Authorization & Physical Security Programs ML20212A7601999-09-14014 September 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-445/99-14 & 50-446/99-14 on 990707-0821.Four Violations Occurred & Being Treated as Ncvs.Conduct of Activities Was Generally Characterized by safety-conscious Operations & Sound Radiological Controls 05000498/LER-1999-007, Forwards LER 99-007-00 Re Train 'B' CR Makeup & Cleanup Filtration Sys Being Inoperable for Greater than Aot.Util Intends to Append Addl Info Section of LER with Brief Description of Test Results,Rather than Submit Separate LER1999-09-13013 September 1999 Forwards LER 99-007-00 Re Train 'B' CR Makeup & Cleanup Filtration Sys Being Inoperable for Greater than Aot.Util Intends to Append Addl Info Section of LER with Brief Description of Test Results,Rather than Submit Separate LER TXX-9921, Suppls 981221 LAR 98-010 to Licenses NPF-87 & NPF-89, Clarfying Conditions of Use Re Analytical Methods Used to Determine Core Operating Limits,Per Telcon with NRC1999-09-10010 September 1999 Suppls 981221 LAR 98-010 to Licenses NPF-87 & NPF-89, Clarfying Conditions of Use Re Analytical Methods Used to Determine Core Operating Limits,Per Telcon with NRC ML20211P7871999-09-0909 September 1999 Forwards Safety Evaluation Re First 10-yr Interval Inservice Insp Program Plan Request for Relief RR-ENG-31 ML20211P7671999-09-0909 September 1999 Forwards SER Authorizing Licensee 990517 Alternative Proposed in Relief Request RR-ENG-2-8 to Code Case N-491-2 for Second 10-year Insp Interval of South Texas Project, Units 1 & 2,pursuant to 10CFR50.55a(a)(3)(i) ML20211P8201999-09-0909 September 1999 Forwards SE Authorizing 990224 Submittal of First 10-year Interval ISI Program Plan - Relief Request RR-ENG-24,from ASME Section XI Code,Table IWC-2500-1 NOC-AE-000638, Forwards License Renewal Applications & Certifications of Medical Exam for Seven Listed Licensed Operators at Stp,Per 10CFR55.57.Encl Withheld,Per 10CFR2.790(a)(6)1999-09-0909 September 1999 Forwards License Renewal Applications & Certifications of Medical Exam for Seven Listed Licensed Operators at Stp,Per 10CFR55.57.Encl Withheld,Per 10CFR2.790(a)(6) ML20211P3761999-09-0707 September 1999 Ack Receipt of Ltr Dtd 990615,transmitting Rev 30 to Physical Security Plan,Per 10CFR50.54(p).No NRC Approval Is Required ML20211L9871999-09-0303 September 1999 Forwards Rev 31 to Technical Requirements Manual. All Changes Applicable to Plants Have Been Reviewed Under Util 10CFR50.59 Process & Found Not to Include Any USQs IR 05000498/19990141999-09-0303 September 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-498/99-14 & 50-499/99-14 on 990627-0807.Apparent Violations Identified & Being Treated as Noncited Violations Consistent with App C of Enforcement Policy 1999-09-09
[Table view] Category:EXTERNAL CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARTXX-9914, Responds to 990525 RAI Re Renewal of Tpdes Permit Number 01854.Explanation & Response to Each Item,Listed1999-06-16016 June 1999 Responds to 990525 RAI Re Renewal of Tpdes Permit Number 01854.Explanation & Response to Each Item,Listed ML20206E7271999-04-29029 April 1999 Submits Original & Four Complete Copies of Application for Renewal of Permit to Discharge,Deposit or Dispose of Wastes Into or Adjacent to Water in State. with Three Oversize Drawings ML20045D3451992-06-16016 June 1992 Discusses Util Review of 920603 Ltr Outlining Thermal Science,Inc Field Surveillance of Application of Thermo-Lag 330 Fire Barrier Sys on Util Test Assemblies at Omega Poing Labs.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20087G5791992-05-0808 May 1992 Provides Matl Re Complaint Against Stated Utils & Nuclear Support Svc,Inc & Addresses Issues in Detail.Respondents Actions Prevent Complainant Career in Nuclear Industry. Related Info,Including DOL Correspondence Encl.Info Deleted ML20091Q2891992-01-27027 January 1992 Forwards Rev 7 to Quarterly Plant Performance & Other Indicator Data for Fourth Quarter of 1991 & Gross Heat Rate Data Form for 1991 ML20070T7651991-04-0101 April 1991 Forwards 910327 License Amend Request 91-001 Re Addition of Spec 3/4.7.12 & Bases 3/4.7.12 for Safety Chilled Water Sys ML20073D1051991-03-29029 March 1991 Comments on Final Rept Addressing Scaling for Unit 1,dtd Feb 1991 Per Insp Repts 50-445/90-47 & 50-446/90-47.Concerns Raised That Util Selected Criterion XI Re Test Control as Sole Mgt Std to Control safety-related Activities ML20066A5711990-12-19019 December 1990 Forwards Update to ASME Section Iii,Div 1 Code Control Program Documents for Incorporation Into State of Tx Dept of Licensing & Regulation Controlled Manual CCPM-15,authored by Ebasco ML20056B3741990-08-21021 August 1990 Forwards Update to ASME Section Iii,Div 1 Code Control Program Documents for Incorporation Into State of Tx Dept of Licensing & Regulation Controlled Manual CCPM-15 ML20011E1521990-01-27027 January 1990 Forwards Addl Case Concern Repts 89-0025 Re Apparent Substandard Shop Applied Welds Internal to Secondary Side of Steam Generators & 89-0034 on Specific Wiring & Connection Method Damaging safety-related Electrical Wiring ML20248D0661989-09-21021 September 1989 Notifies Util of Case Position on Concerns & Problems in Scaling Calculation Program at Plant.Documentary Info Supporting Util Position on Aspect of Dispute Should Be Provided ML19332E0011989-09-14014 September 1989 Forwards Offsite Portion of Annual Emergency Preparedness Independent Review Per 10CFR50.54(t) ML19332D4781989-09-14014 September 1989 Forwards Offsite Portion of Annual Emergency Preparedness Independent Review to Be Conducted Every 12 Months.Review Must Include Evaluation for Adequacy of Interfaces W/State & Local Govts ML19332C8171989-09-14014 September 1989 Forwards Offsite Portion of Annual Emergency Preparedness Independent Review & Status of Corrective Actions Initiated, Per 10CFR50.54(t) ML19332C7971989-09-14014 September 1989 Forwards Offsite Portion of Annual Emergency Preparedness Independent Review & Status of Corrective Actions Initiated, Per 10CFR50.54(t) ML20246A0421989-08-18018 August 1989 Advises That S&W Notified by Util That Responsibility for Facility Code Control Program Will Be Terminated Effective on 890823.EBASCO Svcs,Inc Selected to Assume Responsibility for Code Control Program Effective on 890824 ML20247R7291989-07-28028 July 1989 Advises That Status of Suspect molded-case Curcuit Breakers, Identified in Initiative Element One Will Be Provided by 890815.Util Estimates That 750 nonsafety-related Breakers in Warehouse Stock Examined as Part of Initiative Element Two ML20247D2491989-07-12012 July 1989 Forwards Communications Repts Associated W/Design Control Review ML20246C6031989-06-28028 June 1989 Notifies of Potential Significant Deficiency That May Be Reportable Under 10CFR21 Re Atmospheric Dump Valves,Per ML20245K0651989-05-18018 May 1989 FOIA Request for Records Re DOL Complaint Filed by Jl Stites Against Util on 880802 ML20247A9261989-05-11011 May 1989 Forwards State of Tx & Local Govt Objectives for Graded Exercise Scheduled for 890725-26 ML20245J3341989-04-0707 April 1989 Forwards Summary of Points of Agreement Reached at 890308 Meeting.Agreements Will Be Subj to Further Discussion Among Parties.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 890427 ML20246H4791989-03-0606 March 1989 Forwards Communications Repts Associated W/Corrective Action Programs for Plant Independent Assessment Program Phases ML20196B5361988-11-23023 November 1988 Forwards Prompt Notification Sys Test Rept Using FEMA Region VI Reporting Form for Apr-Oct 1988 ML20206F7201988-11-14014 November 1988 Forwards Communications Rept Transmittal 47 Re Independent Assessment Program on All Phases of Conduit Support Design Review ML20151X2621988-08-19019 August 1988 Forwards Rev 4 to Independent Assessment Program:Conduit Support Design Review Issues List for Comanche Peak Electric Station - Unit 1 ML20154H6281988-05-21021 May 1988 Requests to Be Advised at Earliest Opportunity Whether Projected Schedule for Issuance of Phase IV Rept Available. Related Correspondence ML20147F8911988-03-0303 March 1988 Forwards Communications Repts Associated W/Piping/Pipe Support Audits ML20147G2261988-03-0303 March 1988 Forwards Communications Repts Associated W/Civil/Structural Audits ML20147G2941988-03-0303 March 1988 Forwards Communication Repts Re Cable Tray Audits,Per Independent Assessment Program ML20147H4891988-03-0303 March 1988 Forwards Communications Repts Associated W/Independent Assessment Program Conduit Audits ML20196F7451988-02-23023 February 1988 Forwards Surveillance Repts Associated W/Phase 4 Independent Assessment Program Obtained During Util Review ML20196D4541988-02-0909 February 1988 Forwards Rev 4 of Mechanical Review Issues List (Ril). Rev Includes Review Issue 10 Re Component Cooling Water Sys Butterfly Valve at Outlet of Residual Heat Removal Hx.Rev of Ril Reflects Info That Cygna Gained Prior to Dec 1987 ML20236X2701987-11-25025 November 1987 Forwards Communications Repts on Independent Assessment Program,Phase 4 Re Cable Tray,Civil/Structural & Conduit Audits ML20236R9361987-11-13013 November 1987 Forwards Communications Repts Associated W/Piping/Pipe Support Audits.Repts Also Listed in Attachment ML20236R9531987-11-13013 November 1987 Forwards Communications Repts Associated W/Cable Tray Audits.List of Communication Repts Encl ML20236S1281987-11-13013 November 1987 Forwards Communications Repts Associated W/Civil/Structural Audits.List of Communications Repts Encl ML20236S3231987-11-13013 November 1987 Forwards Communications Repts Associated W/Conduit Audits. List of Communications Repts Encl ML20236M3131987-11-0909 November 1987 Forwards Communications Repts Associated W/Cable Tray Audits,Per Communication Repts Transmittal 33 for Independent Assessment Program - All Phases.List of Encl Communication Repts Provided on Attachment 1 TXX-6932, Advises That Value of 7.43 Ph Units Reported in Performance Evaluation Rept DMR-QA Study 7 Re 1987 NPDES QA Program Incorrect Due to Clerical Error.Reported Value Should Have Been 8.43 Ph Units,Which Is within Acceptable Range1987-11-0606 November 1987 Advises That Value of 7.43 Ph Units Reported in Performance Evaluation Rept DMR-QA Study 7 Re 1987 NPDES QA Program Incorrect Due to Clerical Error.Reported Value Should Have Been 8.43 Ph Units,Which Is within Acceptable Range ML20235V4691987-10-10010 October 1987 Forwards Communications Repts Re Cable Tray Audits,Per Facility Independent Assessment Program,Phase 4 ML20235W3331987-10-10010 October 1987 Forwards Communications Repts Re Civil/Structural Audits,Per Independent Assessment Program,Phase 4 ML20235R4941987-09-30030 September 1987 Notifies of Confirmation That Util Given Extension Until 871026 to Respond to Case Motion to Compel Applicants to Supply Complete Answers to Consolidated Intervenors Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents ML20235R1961987-09-18018 September 1987 Forwards Rev 4 of Pipe Support Review Issues List. Any Procedural Control Issues Associated W/Author Original Pipe Support Reviews of Gibbs & Hill Being Processed as Part of Ongoing Design Control Assessments ML20235R0571987-09-18018 September 1987 Forwards Communications Repts Re Cable Tray Audits ML20234B1451987-09-16016 September 1987 Forwards Rev 4 to Pipe Stress Review Issues List (Ril).All Technical Issues Associated W/Discipline Closed.Still Waiting for S&W Calculation 15454-NZ(B)-GENX-035,Rev 2 to Verify Completion of Commitments Associated W/Ril 11 TXX-6718, Forwards Listed Outstanding Documents Requested Through Audits of Ebasco Svcs,Inc1987-09-0404 September 1987 Forwards Listed Outstanding Documents Requested Through Audits of Ebasco Svcs,Inc ML20238E5591987-09-0303 September 1987 Confirms That Brazos Understanding of Phrase,As Set Forth in Objections & Responses of 870814,essentially Correct. Related Correspondence ML20237J9981987-09-0101 September 1987 Forwards Communications Rept Transmittal 27,transmitting Conduit Audits Re Independent Assessment Program - Phase 4 for Plant.Delay in Processing Telcons Noted Due to Word Processing Sys Conversion.W/O Encls ML20237K7081987-09-0101 September 1987 Forwards Communications Rept Transmittal 28,transmitting Cable Tray Audits Re Independent Assessment Program - Phase 4 for Plant.Delay in Processing Telcons Noted Due to Word Processing Sys Conversion.W/O Encl 1999-06-16
[Table view] Category:EXTERNAL LETTERS ROUTED TO NRC
MONTHYEARML20056B3741990-08-21021 August 1990 Forwards Update to ASME Section Iii,Div 1 Code Control Program Documents for Incorporation Into State of Tx Dept of Licensing & Regulation Controlled Manual CCPM-15 ML20011E1521990-01-27027 January 1990 Forwards Addl Case Concern Repts 89-0025 Re Apparent Substandard Shop Applied Welds Internal to Secondary Side of Steam Generators & 89-0034 on Specific Wiring & Connection Method Damaging safety-related Electrical Wiring ML20248D0661989-09-21021 September 1989 Notifies Util of Case Position on Concerns & Problems in Scaling Calculation Program at Plant.Documentary Info Supporting Util Position on Aspect of Dispute Should Be Provided ML19332E0011989-09-14014 September 1989 Forwards Offsite Portion of Annual Emergency Preparedness Independent Review Per 10CFR50.54(t) ML19332D4781989-09-14014 September 1989 Forwards Offsite Portion of Annual Emergency Preparedness Independent Review to Be Conducted Every 12 Months.Review Must Include Evaluation for Adequacy of Interfaces W/State & Local Govts ML19332C8171989-09-14014 September 1989 Forwards Offsite Portion of Annual Emergency Preparedness Independent Review & Status of Corrective Actions Initiated, Per 10CFR50.54(t) ML19332C7971989-09-14014 September 1989 Forwards Offsite Portion of Annual Emergency Preparedness Independent Review & Status of Corrective Actions Initiated, Per 10CFR50.54(t) ML20246A0421989-08-18018 August 1989 Advises That S&W Notified by Util That Responsibility for Facility Code Control Program Will Be Terminated Effective on 890823.EBASCO Svcs,Inc Selected to Assume Responsibility for Code Control Program Effective on 890824 ML20247R7291989-07-28028 July 1989 Advises That Status of Suspect molded-case Curcuit Breakers, Identified in Initiative Element One Will Be Provided by 890815.Util Estimates That 750 nonsafety-related Breakers in Warehouse Stock Examined as Part of Initiative Element Two ML20247D2491989-07-12012 July 1989 Forwards Communications Repts Associated W/Design Control Review ML20246C6031989-06-28028 June 1989 Notifies of Potential Significant Deficiency That May Be Reportable Under 10CFR21 Re Atmospheric Dump Valves,Per ML20245K0651989-05-18018 May 1989 FOIA Request for Records Re DOL Complaint Filed by Jl Stites Against Util on 880802 ML20247A9261989-05-11011 May 1989 Forwards State of Tx & Local Govt Objectives for Graded Exercise Scheduled for 890725-26 ML20245J3341989-04-0707 April 1989 Forwards Summary of Points of Agreement Reached at 890308 Meeting.Agreements Will Be Subj to Further Discussion Among Parties.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 890427 ML20246H4791989-03-0606 March 1989 Forwards Communications Repts Associated W/Corrective Action Programs for Plant Independent Assessment Program Phases ML20196B5361988-11-23023 November 1988 Forwards Prompt Notification Sys Test Rept Using FEMA Region VI Reporting Form for Apr-Oct 1988 ML20206F7201988-11-14014 November 1988 Forwards Communications Rept Transmittal 47 Re Independent Assessment Program on All Phases of Conduit Support Design Review ML20151X2621988-08-19019 August 1988 Forwards Rev 4 to Independent Assessment Program:Conduit Support Design Review Issues List for Comanche Peak Electric Station - Unit 1 ML20154H6281988-05-21021 May 1988 Requests to Be Advised at Earliest Opportunity Whether Projected Schedule for Issuance of Phase IV Rept Available. Related Correspondence ML20147F8911988-03-0303 March 1988 Forwards Communications Repts Associated W/Piping/Pipe Support Audits ML20147G2261988-03-0303 March 1988 Forwards Communications Repts Associated W/Civil/Structural Audits ML20147H4891988-03-0303 March 1988 Forwards Communications Repts Associated W/Independent Assessment Program Conduit Audits ML20147G2941988-03-0303 March 1988 Forwards Communication Repts Re Cable Tray Audits,Per Independent Assessment Program ML20196F7451988-02-23023 February 1988 Forwards Surveillance Repts Associated W/Phase 4 Independent Assessment Program Obtained During Util Review ML20196D4541988-02-0909 February 1988 Forwards Rev 4 of Mechanical Review Issues List (Ril). Rev Includes Review Issue 10 Re Component Cooling Water Sys Butterfly Valve at Outlet of Residual Heat Removal Hx.Rev of Ril Reflects Info That Cygna Gained Prior to Dec 1987 ML20236X2701987-11-25025 November 1987 Forwards Communications Repts on Independent Assessment Program,Phase 4 Re Cable Tray,Civil/Structural & Conduit Audits ML20236R9361987-11-13013 November 1987 Forwards Communications Repts Associated W/Piping/Pipe Support Audits.Repts Also Listed in Attachment ML20236R9531987-11-13013 November 1987 Forwards Communications Repts Associated W/Cable Tray Audits.List of Communication Repts Encl ML20236S1281987-11-13013 November 1987 Forwards Communications Repts Associated W/Civil/Structural Audits.List of Communications Repts Encl ML20236S3231987-11-13013 November 1987 Forwards Communications Repts Associated W/Conduit Audits. List of Communications Repts Encl ML20236M3131987-11-0909 November 1987 Forwards Communications Repts Associated W/Cable Tray Audits,Per Communication Repts Transmittal 33 for Independent Assessment Program - All Phases.List of Encl Communication Repts Provided on Attachment 1 TXX-6932, Advises That Value of 7.43 Ph Units Reported in Performance Evaluation Rept DMR-QA Study 7 Re 1987 NPDES QA Program Incorrect Due to Clerical Error.Reported Value Should Have Been 8.43 Ph Units,Which Is within Acceptable Range1987-11-0606 November 1987 Advises That Value of 7.43 Ph Units Reported in Performance Evaluation Rept DMR-QA Study 7 Re 1987 NPDES QA Program Incorrect Due to Clerical Error.Reported Value Should Have Been 8.43 Ph Units,Which Is within Acceptable Range ML20235V4691987-10-10010 October 1987 Forwards Communications Repts Re Cable Tray Audits,Per Facility Independent Assessment Program,Phase 4 ML20235W3331987-10-10010 October 1987 Forwards Communications Repts Re Civil/Structural Audits,Per Independent Assessment Program,Phase 4 ML20235R4941987-09-30030 September 1987 Notifies of Confirmation That Util Given Extension Until 871026 to Respond to Case Motion to Compel Applicants to Supply Complete Answers to Consolidated Intervenors Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents ML20235R0571987-09-18018 September 1987 Forwards Communications Repts Re Cable Tray Audits ML20235R1961987-09-18018 September 1987 Forwards Rev 4 of Pipe Support Review Issues List. Any Procedural Control Issues Associated W/Author Original Pipe Support Reviews of Gibbs & Hill Being Processed as Part of Ongoing Design Control Assessments ML20234B1451987-09-16016 September 1987 Forwards Rev 4 to Pipe Stress Review Issues List (Ril).All Technical Issues Associated W/Discipline Closed.Still Waiting for S&W Calculation 15454-NZ(B)-GENX-035,Rev 2 to Verify Completion of Commitments Associated W/Ril 11 TXX-6718, Forwards Listed Outstanding Documents Requested Through Audits of Ebasco Svcs,Inc1987-09-0404 September 1987 Forwards Listed Outstanding Documents Requested Through Audits of Ebasco Svcs,Inc ML20238E5591987-09-0303 September 1987 Confirms That Brazos Understanding of Phrase,As Set Forth in Objections & Responses of 870814,essentially Correct. Related Correspondence ML20237J9981987-09-0101 September 1987 Forwards Communications Rept Transmittal 27,transmitting Conduit Audits Re Independent Assessment Program - Phase 4 for Plant.Delay in Processing Telcons Noted Due to Word Processing Sys Conversion.W/O Encls ML20237K7081987-09-0101 September 1987 Forwards Communications Rept Transmittal 28,transmitting Cable Tray Audits Re Independent Assessment Program - Phase 4 for Plant.Delay in Processing Telcons Noted Due to Word Processing Sys Conversion.W/O Encl ML20237K7931987-09-0101 September 1987 Forwards Communications Rept Transmittal 29,transmitting Piping/Pipe Support Audits for Independent Assessment Program Phase 4.W/o Encl ML20237K0091987-08-11011 August 1987 Memorializes Recent Conversations & Resulting Agreement Re Extension of Time Until 870908 for Filing Case & M Gregory Response to Applicant 870713 Motion for Reconsideration of Board 870622 Order.Related Correspondence ML20237J1281987-08-10010 August 1987 Forwards Rev 14 of Cable Tray Supports Review Issues List. Rev Based on Info Provided in Util Rev 2 to Generic Issues Rept for Cable Tray Hangers,Transcripts of Public Meetings & Results of Cynga Audits Through 870731 ML20236D3271987-07-22022 July 1987 Forwards Rev 0 to Civil-Structural Review Issues List, Based on Ref Info,Transcripts of Public Meetings,Documents Provided by Util & Results of Cygna Audits Through 870613 ML20216D1721987-06-20020 June 1987 Ack Receipt of .Clarifies Agreement Made During Telcon Re Date for Case to File Initial Supplementary Responses Deferred Until 870706.Necessary Discovery & Response Should Be Completed Also.Related Correspondence ML20215D7141987-06-0303 June 1987 Informs All Concerned W/Facility Independent Assessment Program of Address Correction ML20214S0641987-05-26026 May 1987 Ack Receipt of Applicant 870518 Fifth Progress Rept.Requests That Recipient Notify of When Substantive Matls Will Be Made Available So Case May Decide on Course of Action Re Comanche Peak Response Team Adequacy Issues.Related Correspondence ML20234C4401987-05-0101 May 1987 Forwards Communication Repts Re Cygna Audits of S&W Piping & Pipe Support Verification Activities,Per Phase 4 of Independent Assessment Program.Submittal Constitutes Communications Rept Transmittal 23 1990-08-21
[Table view] |
Text
!
}
~
B005200p p h
} +
y-z -
j,'jhI UNITED STATES del %)rnlENT OF JUSTICE vmh) g ^Q/'v , wrsist.scl o.s, D c. osso C3
'L_s k
. . . . . . . , . . ~
16 APR 1980
.., ..,7l.%. 7 .'::.;-- a mcmm R US.50 5
'1 DAK:SBC -
60-415-105 AFR 311930 ;
p(
", , Gj 'ct' ~
l GN" us '
J. Gregory Copeland, Esquire -
i Baker & Botts j 3000 One Shell Plaza l Houston, Texas 77002 !
Re: In the Matter of Houston Lichting j
~and Power Co., et al. (South Texas Project, Units 1 and 2), Docket Nos. 50-498A, 50-499A; Texas Util-ities Generating Company, et al.
(Comanche Peak Steam Electric Sta-tion, Units 1 and 2), Docket Nos.
50-445A, 50-446A i
Dear Mr. Copeland:
[
Enclosed please find copies of the correspondence between the Department of Justice and the Department of Energy relating to the availability of Mr. William E. Scott, the Department of .
Justice's designated expert engineering witness, for participa-tion in the above-captioned proceedings. As is evident from the correspondence, these time restraints have now been imposed on the Department of Justice by the Department of Energy due to Mr. Scott's other duties and responsibilities as Branch Chief of the Atlanta Office of the Division of Power Supply and Re-liability, Office of Utility Systems. The Department of Jus-tice will, however, continue to cooperate with you to provide the Applicants and other parties with an opportunity to redepose l Mr. Scott at a mutually convenient time and place. In the ,
l event that Mr. Scott's allotted time does not meet your needs t or those of the Board, I suggest we raise that problem with the f l Board if and when a problem arises.
Sincerely, M y
! Susan Braden Cyphert b l Attorney f l Energy Section Enclosures i cc: all Board members all counsel of record William E. Scott
- THIS DOCUMENT C0NTNHS f POOR QUAUTY PAGES Richard Weiner 1
./
A n
"'7 Departrnent of Energy
. Washington, D.C. 20461 APR 0 1 1990 y Mr. Donald L. Flexner -
Deputy Assistant Attorney General Antitrust Division U. S. Department of Justice Washington, D. C. 20530
Dear Fe. Flexner:
I-l
I am in receipt of your letter of March 27, 1980, requesting that Mr. William Scott, Branch Chief of the Atlanta, Georgia, office of the Division of Power Supply and Reliability, Office of Utility Systems, participate in a Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) anti trust hearing. I understand that you are requesting that Mr. Scott appear as an expert witness for the Department of Justice in the NRC proceeding. Personnel from both of our staffs have been discussing this request for the past several days.
Mr. Scott has, for some time, been affording considerable assistance to your staff in both the preparation of expert testimony and the taking of various depositions. Since the Department of Justice's original request for Mr. Scott's service in November of 1978, several changes in your requirements have added significantly to the time required of him in this matter. We have allowed for an extension of his participation well past a time and into areas other than we originally anticipated in our desire to be cooperative. :
Although your staff, earlier this year, informed us that Mr. Scott's service was no longer required as an expert witness, we still offered to make him available on an "ad hoc" basis to help with a few depositions.
I I understand that a health problem with an NRC expert witness, I making his appearance at the hearing questionable, has caused you to make this expanded request for assistance. I am sympathetic ,
with your situation and am willing to provide you this further assistance. However, because of very limited resources, our participation in a similar proceeding, and Mr. Scott's unique l participation in certain legislatively mandated efforts, I must l insist on the following preconditions to making William Scott l available as you request: ,
- 1) Mr. William Scott, in his participation in the NRC proceedings, is representing himself and that any ,
and all opinions, conclusions, or statements made by him are solely his own and in no manner represent any
-a _
r-4 C
2 r'.
policy, conclusions, or statements of the Department of Energy (DOE), the Federal Energy Regulatory Commis-sion (FERC), and its predecessor agency, the Federal .
Power Commission (FPC). Mr. Scott is not authorized , ,
nor is he in a position to draw any conclusion or '
j recommendations on behalf of DOE from any studies or _
analyses in which he participated for DOE, FERC, or FPC.
This is because the Department of Energy has not pre-judged any of the issues in this case.and is awaiting -
the outcome of the ongoing FERC study to determine the feasibility and benefits of interconnection across the Texas border. Mr. Scott's participation in the NRC proceeding is solely to testify for the Department of Justice and not as a representative of the Department
, of Energy.. ,
- 2) The following time commitment presented by your staff for Mr. Scott's participation must be adhered to:
o Two days for continuance of his deposition - between now and May 14, 1980.
o Two days for the further preparation of the presentation of his direct testimony - between now and May 14, 1980.
o Five days for the presentation of his direct testimony, including all voir dire and cross examination - between May 14, 1980, and June 15, 1980.
o Three days for review of oth'er technical testimony presented in this hearing and the presentation of any rebuttal testimony by him. This time commitment includes all cross examinations of Mr. Scott's rebuttal. (After June 15, 1980) -
4 While we are interested in assisting your staff, due to my very limited resources and Mr. Scott's other responsibilities, we will not be able to allow any deviation from the above time commitment.
- 3) The Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB) must formally accept the conditions 1 and 2 above prior to my granting of your request.
- 4) All travel costs incurred by Mr. Scott in this assignment must be paid directly by the Department of Justice. We can no' longer await reimbursement for such expenses.
3 :- -
Please notify me of your acceptance of the above conditions and forward the ASLB's acceptance of conditions 1 and 2. I shall 1
' ~
await hearing from you and receiv'ing'the ASLB acceptance so that;.
l
' ':1.g I may satisfy'your request. .
2
~
Sincerely, -
i Jerry . Pfeffer Assistant Administrator j for Utility Systems Economic Regulatory Administration i d
cc: Richard Weiner ~
r Mike Oldak
William Scott Bob Fabrikant e
l
.1 i
1
- t t .
. a 4..
i e
4 m
~
U.S. Department ofJustice
.dhZ .
l MAR 271980 wan ton.o.c s zono ,
- r. Jerry L. Pfeffer ,
,- Assistant Administrator for Utility Systems Economic Regulatory Administration Department of Energy '
6 0 01 M S t . , N . W .
Washington, D.C. 20485 __
Dear Mr. Pf ef fer:
The purpose of this letter is to formally renew the .,
Department of Justice's request to have Mr. William Scott, an engineer in the Atlanta . regional of fice of the Economic L Regulatory Administration, testify as an expert witness in the upcoming Nuclear Regulatory Commission ("NRC")
Antitrust proceeding relating to the licensing of several nuclear generating plants in Texas. The Department of Justice is participating in this proceeding pur suant to Secion 105c 4 of the Atomic Energy Act. The Department's initial request to the Department of Energy regarding Mr. Scott was set forth in a letter of November 29, 1978 from Assistant Attorney j General John H. Shenef ield (attached) to Mr. David J.
l Ba rdin, Administrator of the Economic Regulatory Administration.
l The Department of Justice believes that Mr. Scott will be essential for the presentation of its case before the NRC. The evidentiary hearing in that proceeding is scheduled to commence May 14, 1980. We would appreciate if the Department of Energy would make Mr. Scott available for a limited period of time in order to prepare and deliver ~
expert testimony on behalf of the Department of Justice in this proceeding. The Department of Justice will make clear to the NRC that Mr. Scott would be testifying as an expert engineer and not as a representative of the Department of Energy.
In view of the very close hearing date of May 14, 1980 we would appreciate receiving a response as soon as possible. I thank you very much for your cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely, -
r .
. W Donald L. Flexner Deputy Assistant Attorney General )
Antitrust Division l Enclosure cc: Richard We iner '
Lawrence Gollom
.~.
t .
o -
2 0 N0Y BN JHS:DAK:RHC -
60-415-105 . _
. L,_ . -
Mr. Da'vid J.'Bardin, Adninistrator -
Econ 0mic' Regulatory Administration Department of Energy 6001 H. St., N.W.
Dear Mr. Bardin:
The Department of Justice would like formall'y to '
request the permission of the Depar,tment of Energy to utilize the services of Mr. William Scott, an engineer in the Fort Worth regional office of the Economic Administration, as an expert witness for the Departnent of Regulatory Justice in an upcoming Nuclear Regulatory Commission proceeding relating to the licensing of several nuclear generating plants in Texas.
All electrical utilities seeking permission to construct and operate nuclear generating plants must,
amended, submit to an antitrust review by the Justice Depar tmen t. On February 21, 1978, the Depar tment of Justice formally advised the Nuclear Regulatory Commission that it recommended the Commission conduct an antitrust hearing pertaining to the granting of an operating license .
for the South Texas Project. In response to that advice, the Commission scheduled, pursuant to S105c(c)(2), a..
hearing to explore the antitrust problems raised by the Department's advice letter. ,
The proceeding at issue, a formal judicial proceeding, will in all probability .
involve, in addition to the South Texas Project, the other, two nuclear plants planned for Texas, Comanche Peak and
e e
t,
". ~
-l Eh..-
~
. ,,T Th'e Departmerit has con'cluded that the present -
.'jq(
agreement among the major Texas electrical utilities -
seeking these NRC licenses to limit their interconnections (%
to utilities operating exclusively within the state of 'f and to enforce that agreement by immediately Texas, disconnecting from any intrastate utility which would attempt interstate interconnection, is inconsistent with the antJtrust laws. He hope to demonstrate the anticora--
petive nature of this artificial restriction at the .
hearing and thereby persuade the Commission to impose a license condition foreclosing this agreement to disconnect I from any utility which engages in interstate commerce. frustrates ~-
might add that the agreement in question also one of the major policy objectives of the Department of Energy, the fostering of ef fective interconnections
. between electrical utilities. .
Both the FERC and the De'partment of Energy have ,-
intervened in a federal court action challenging a 1977 order of the Texas Public Utility Commission diirect,ing ,
Central Power and Light and West Texas Utilities to 1 disconnect from interstate conmerce.- PERC is also current ~ g. . . .
ly challenging this order in Texas state court. 'If this Y
\
order of the state commission is overturned, as seems likely, there would remain no obstacle to Cent.ral Pouer .
and Light and West Texas Utilities reconnecting with their .,
affiliates in Oklahona, other than the intrastate ~ only -
policy which the Department is challenging in the NRC proceeding. .
The current schedule adopted for the South Texas Project proceeding by the NRC's Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, specifies that discovery cust be concluded by .
January 9, 1979. Our best estimate is that the bearing itself will-commence in early riarch and that the entire procecding can be concluded prior to the proposed 1981 operating date for the South Texas Project. .
Iir . Scott's role vould be that of an expert elect ~ric-al engineer assessing enginering data. He vould be a uniquely valuable witness in this matter since he has a
. total coneand of the utility situation in Texas and woeld .
require *very ninimal preparation in order to testify. For :
.- 2 --
. . . . - .-w
.-- . .. ~~
.- .. .. ~;
Q: . [_ ,, .h Gr;.c .c..
- f. : -
~d [ . .
e.-
e
', ~
example, he has . already ' read the major engineering studies . . .
that will be involved in the hearing and could utilize his , , ,
inpressive expertise in analyzing these and other eng ineer- _ .
Ing studies and findings that may come into evidence. -
Consequently, valuable time can be conserved in utilizing Mr. . Scott's expertise that would otherwise have to be -
expended in familiarizing another engineer with the -
pertinent facts , ,
He would not ask Mr. Scott to testify as to economic or other non-engineering factors.- Moreover, it uould be ,
cade clear to the Atomic S'afety and Licensing Board that ,
' Mr. Scott would be testifying as an expert engineer, not as a representative of the Department of Energy. .
I hope I have provided you with sufficient in forma tion as to why the Department believes fir. Scott's participation as our engineering witncss would advance the cxercise of its statutory responsibilities in the South Texas Project MRC -
proceeding. If you or your staf f are in need ofany addition-al information please contact Donald Itaplan, the Chief of the Antitrust ~ Division's Energy Section, (724-6410) who'will be able to assist you. ,
1
. l Sincerely yours, John H. Shenefield -
i Assistant Attorney General l
- bl. Antitrust Division !
4 -
cc: 11r. Gerald Pfeffer '
Mr. William Lane -
% 5 'M - 9 G s*-r~ .
l
. l t
l
-t f
hg UNITED STATES DEPART.TIENT OF JUSTICr3 w^ sin CT
. u.c. runo
- w. e nu , .. .u . . , ,
..-r ;- m i ,,[' - * ; _;'].E
- b * $ . ; y *] g-- , gl D..
- .: f.d; e.d ' ' ,,
, .. mp- -
.-1
- y j,
..n.r .. .:. .u . 4 xw .
.s - . t; . . - v
. ;c
- _ . y..,- .
~
Richahd Weiner. '/ . Nd ?
d ' '- '
Director ,
. YNW '
~
. C. W '
Division of Power Supply ~ -
~~ ~ ~ 3 and Reliability Department of Energy 4002 2000 M Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20461
- A
.-1
Dear Richard:
')
i Pursuant to our telephone conversations of April 4 and
' April 10, 1980, I should like to confirm the terms and conditions under which the Department of Energy will allow Mr.
William Scott to appear as an expert witness for the Depart-ment of Justice in the pending proceedings at the NRC regard-ing the South Texas and Comanche Peak projects.
As agreed, Mr. Scott will be unavailable to participate in the NRC proceeding except as follows: ,
Two days for cantinuance of his deposition - between now and June 14, 1980.
Two days for the further preparation of the presentation of his direct testimony - between now and June 14, 1980.
Five days for the presentation of his direct testimony including all voir dire and cross-examination -
between June 14, 1980, and July 15, 1980.
Three days for review of other technical testimony y presented in this hearing and the presentation of i any rebuttal testimony by him. This time commitment includes all cross-examinations of Mr. Scott's N rebuttal . . ( Af ter July 15, 1980) e e
s I
m
?
l i
- . .u
, ,. 5 :, 4 The Department of Justice will ~ read into the record the - -
following statement, a't-the commencement of this deposition ,' '!h
~
testimony and his-;:;testimony at the hearing itself:.' _ , . ..;/
.,w .s. -
.. p- , , , -
,. -,g
,,y***. . .
~
~
':
~Egy
., Mr. William Scott, in his participation,in the NRC ,,
' o;'j proceedings, is representing himself and any and all -i opinions, conclusions, or statements made by him are solely ,
his own and in no manner represent any policy, conclusions, or statements of the Department of Energy (DOE), the Federal ~j Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), and its predecessor ;
agency, the Federal Power Commission (FPC). Mr. Scott is not j authorized nor is he in a position to draw any conclusions or recommendations on behalf of DOE from any studies or analyses
]
3 in which he participated for DOE, FERC, or FPC. This is 1 because the Department of Energy has not pre-judged any of
- the issues in this case and is awaiting the outcome of the ongoing FERC study to determine the feasibility and benefits of interconnection across the Texas border. Mr. Scott's participation in the NRC proceeding is solely to testify for the Department of Justice and not as a representative of the Department of Energy.
Finally, the Department of Justice will advise the other parties to this proceeding that Mr. Scott will be unavailable for _
a deposition beyond two days, and will notify the NRC that Mr. -
Scott will be available for direct testimony for not more than .
five days and for rebuttal testimony for not more than three '
days. The Department will notify the NRC of these time contraints at the time Mr. Scott commences his trial testimony in this case. J 2
I trust that this letter accurately reflects the substance of our telephone conversations of April 4 and April 10.
Sincerely yours, j Robert Fabrikant -
Assistant Chief - '
Energy Section [
Antitrust Division a
. 4
- f-3 4
t ?