|
---|
Category:Letter
MONTHYEARIR 05000237/20230042024-02-0202 February 2024 Integrated Inspection Report 05000237/2023004 and 05000249/2023004 IR 05000010/20230012024-01-17017 January 2024 NRC Inspection Report 05000010/2023001 (Drss) ML23354A2812024-01-0404 January 2024 Exemption from Select Requirements of 10 CFR Part 73 (EPID L-2023-LLE-0031 (Security Notifications, Reports, and Recordkeeping and Suspicious Activity Reporting)) ML23305A1402023-12-13013 December 2023 Units 1 & 2; Nine Mile Point, Unit 2; Peach Bottom, Units 2 & 3; and Quad Cities, Units 1 and 2 - Issuance of Amendments to Adopt Traveler TSTF-580 RS-23-121, Sixth Ten-Year Interval Inservice Testing Program2023-11-30030 November 2023 Sixth Ten-Year Interval Inservice Testing Program SVPLTR 23-0037, Core Operating Limits Report for Cycle 292023-11-29029 November 2023 Core Operating Limits Report for Cycle 29 RS-23-119, Supplemental Information Letter for Part 73 Exemption Request - Responses to Request for Confirmatory Information2023-11-10010 November 2023 Supplemental Information Letter for Part 73 Exemption Request - Responses to Request for Confirmatory Information ML23317A1192023-11-10010 November 2023 Constellation Energy Generation, LLC - 2023 Annual Report - Guarantees of Payment of Deferred Premiums RS-23-107, Relief Request I5R-22, Inservice Inspection Program Relief Request Regarding Examination Coverage for the Fifth Inservice Inspection Interval2023-11-0808 November 2023 Relief Request I5R-22, Inservice Inspection Program Relief Request Regarding Examination Coverage for the Fifth Inservice Inspection Interval RS-23-102, Request for Exemption from Enhanced Weapons, Firearms Background Checks, and Security Event Notifications Implementation2023-10-16016 October 2023 Request for Exemption from Enhanced Weapons, Firearms Background Checks, and Security Event Notifications Implementation ML23285A2342023-10-13013 October 2023 Confirmation of Initial License Examination RS-23-097, Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, Advisement of Leadership Changes and Submittal of Updated Standard Practice Procedures Plans2023-10-12012 October 2023 Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, Advisement of Leadership Changes and Submittal of Updated Standard Practice Procedures Plans ML23279A0712023-10-0606 October 2023 Response to NRC Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3 - Comprehensive Engineering Team Inspection Report 05000237/2023011 and 05000249/2023011 ML23269A0662023-09-28028 September 2023 Proposed Alternative Request RV-23H Associated with the Sixth 10-Year Inservice Testing Interval ML23265A1322023-09-27027 September 2023 Proposed Alternative Request RV-03 Associated with the Sixth 10-Year Inservice Testing Interval ML23205A1362023-09-20020 September 2023 Proposed Alternative Request RV-02D Associated with the Sixth IST Interval IR 05000237/20230112023-09-0606 September 2023 Comprehensive Engineering Team Inspection Report 05000237/2023011 and 05000249/2023011 RS-23-071, Application to Adopt TSTF-564, Safety Limit MCPR2023-08-30030 August 2023 Application to Adopt TSTF-564, Safety Limit MCPR RS-23-080, Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-264-A, Revision 0, 3.3.9 and 3.3.10 - Delete Flux Monitors Specific Overlap Requirement SRs2023-08-30030 August 2023 Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-264-A, Revision 0, 3.3.9 and 3.3.10 - Delete Flux Monitors Specific Overlap Requirement SRs IR 05000237/20234022023-08-29029 August 2023 Security Baseline Inspection Report 05000237/2023402 and 05000249/2023402 IR 05000237/20230022023-08-0808 August 2023 Integrated Inspection Report 05000237/2023002 and 05000249/2023002 ML23212A9892023-08-0303 August 2023 Subsequent License Renewal Application Public Meeting Summary of Pre-Submittal Meeting ML23174A1502023-08-0303 August 2023 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 282 and 275 Control Rod Scram Times ML23193A0052023-07-28028 July 2023 Subsequent License Renewal Application Public Meeting Summary of Pre-Submittal Meeting ML23192A6292023-07-11011 July 2023 Correction Letter - Issuance of Amendment Nos. 281 and 274 Regarding Transition to GNF3 Fuel (EPID L-2022-LLA-0121) (Non-Proprietary) ML23144A3142023-07-0606 July 2023 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 281 and 274 Transition to GNF3 Fuel (EPID L-2022-LLA-0121) - Nonproprietary ML23187A0462023-07-0606 July 2023 Notification of NRC Baseline Inspection and Request for Information; Inspection Report 05000237/2023004 ML23178A2422023-06-28028 June 2023 Reassignment of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Branch Chief in the Division of Operating Reactor Licensing for Plant Licensing Branch III SVPLTR 23-0021, Registration of Use of Casks to Store Spent Fuel2023-06-20020 June 2023 Registration of Use of Casks to Store Spent Fuel RS-23-078, Supplement to License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.1.4, Control Rod Scram Times2023-06-16016 June 2023 Supplement to License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.1.4, Control Rod Scram Times RS-23-077, Response to NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2023-01, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations2023-06-16016 June 2023 Response to NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2023-01, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations IR 05000237/20233012023-05-30030 May 2023 NRC Initial License Examination Report 05000237/2023301; 05000249/2023301 RS-23-042, Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-580, Provide Exception from Entering Mode 4 with No Operable RHR Shutdown Cooling2023-05-25025 May 2023 Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-580, Provide Exception from Entering Mode 4 with No Operable RHR Shutdown Cooling ML23132A0932023-05-17017 May 2023 Information Meeting (Public Open House) with a Question and Answer Session to Discuss NRC 2022 End-Of-Cycle Plant Performance Assessment of Dresden Power Station, Units 2 and 3 RS-23-070, Supplement to License Amendment Request Regarding Transition to GNF3 Fuel2023-05-16016 May 2023 Supplement to License Amendment Request Regarding Transition to GNF3 Fuel SVPLTR 23-0018, Submittal of 2022 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report2023-05-15015 May 2023 Submittal of 2022 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report IR 05000237/20230012023-05-0404 May 2023 Integrated Inspection Report 05000237/2023001 and 05000249/2023001 SVPLTR 23-0019, ILT 22-1 (2023-301) Svpltr 23-0019 Post-Exam Submittal Letter (1)2023-05-0101 May 2023 ILT 22-1 (2023-301) Svpltr 23-0019 Post-Exam Submittal Letter (1) ML23118A3472023-05-0101 May 2023 County, 1 & 2; Nine Mile Point, 2; and Quad Cities, 1 & 2 - Correction of Amendment No. 193 Adoption of TSTF-306, Revision 2, Add Action to LCO 3.3.6.1 to Give Option to Isolate the Penetration EPID L-2022-LLA-0143 ML23114A2522023-04-28028 April 2023 Request to Use a Provision of a Later Edition of the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI IR 05000237/20234012023-04-26026 April 2023 Cyber Security Inspection Report 05000237/2023401 and 05000249/2023401 ML23081A0382023-04-25025 April 2023 County, 1 & 2; Nine Mile Point, 2; and Quad Cities, 1 & 2 - Issuance of Amendments to Adopt TSTF-306, Rev. 2, Add Action to LCO 3.3.6.1 to Give Option to Isolate the Penetration IR 05000237/20235012023-04-21021 April 2023 Emergency Preparedness Biennial Exercise Inspection Report 05000237/2023501 and 05000249/2023501 ML23110A3202023-04-21021 April 2023 Information Request to Support the NRC Annual Baseline Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan Changes Inspection RS-23-057, Supplement to License Amendment Request Regarding Transition to GNF3 Fuel2023-04-17017 April 2023 Supplement to License Amendment Request Regarding Transition to GNF3 Fuel SVPLTR 23-0014, Annual Dose Report for 20222023-04-15015 April 2023 Annual Dose Report for 2022 ML23088A2242023-04-0505 April 2023 Regulatory Audit Report Regarding License Amendment Request to Transition to GNF3 Fuel ML23087A0482023-03-28028 March 2023 Operator Licensing Examination Approval - Dresden Nuclear Power Station, April 2023 2024-02-02
[Table view] Category:Report
MONTHYEARNMP1L3469, Constellation Energy Company, LLC, Request for Use of Honeywell Mururoa V4F1 R Supplied Air Suits2022-06-30030 June 2022 Constellation Energy Company, LLC, Request for Use of Honeywell Mururoa V4F1 R Supplied Air Suits RS-22-082, Defueled Safety Analysis Report Update, Revision 112022-06-22022 June 2022 Defueled Safety Analysis Report Update, Revision 11 ML22047A1322022-02-15015 February 2022 Owner'S Activity Report Submittal Fifth 10-Year Interval 2021 Refueling Outage Activities RS-21-086, Supplement to Request for Exemptions from Portions of 10 CFR 50.47 and 10 CFR 50, Appendix E2021-08-23023 August 2021 Supplement to Request for Exemptions from Portions of 10 CFR 50.47 and 10 CFR 50, Appendix E RS-21-001, Revised Proposed Alternative to Utilize Code Cases N-878 and N-880 for Carbon Steel Piping2021-01-0404 January 2021 Revised Proposed Alternative to Utilize Code Cases N-878 and N-880 for Carbon Steel Piping ML20300A2352020-11-17017 November 2020 Documentation of the Completion of Required Actions Taken in Response to the Lessons Learned from the Fukushima Dai Ichi Accident ML20303A1752020-10-23023 October 2020 Proposed Relief Request from Section XI Repair/Replacement Documentation for Bolting Replacement of Pressure Retaining Bolting RS-20-070, Defueled Safety Analysis Report Update, Revision 102020-06-22022 June 2020 Defueled Safety Analysis Report Update, Revision 10 RS-19-093, Secondary Containment Drawdown Analysis2019-10-17017 October 2019 Secondary Containment Drawdown Analysis ML18138A3852019-03-0606 March 2019 Staff Assessment of Flood Hazard Integrated Assessment (CAC Nos. MG0221 and MG0222; EPID L-2017-JLD-0050) SVPLTR 19-0005, Owner'S Activity Report Submittal Fifth 10-Year Interval 2018 Refueling Outage Activities2019-02-0808 February 2019 Owner'S Activity Report Submittal Fifth 10-Year Interval 2018 Refueling Outage Activities RS-18-077, Defueled Safety Analysis Report Update, Revision 92018-06-20020 June 2018 Defueled Safety Analysis Report Update, Revision 9 ML18082A0812018-03-13013 March 2018 Request to Extend Enforcement Discretion Provided in Enforcement Guidance Memorandum 15-002 for Tornado-Generated Missile Protection Non-conformances Identified in Response to Regulatory Issues Summary 2015-06, Tornado Missile... RS-18-003, Report of Full Compliance with Phase 1 and Phase 2 of June 6, 2013 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation Under Severe Accident Conditions2018-01-12012 January 2018 Report of Full Compliance with Phase 1 and Phase 2 of June 6, 2013 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation Under Severe Accident Conditions ML18052A4862017-02-12012 February 2017 Owner'S Activity Report Submittal; Fifth 10-Year Interval 2017 Refueling Outage Activities ML16291A0212016-11-0808 November 2016 Staff Review of Spent Fuel Pool Evaluation Associated with Reevaluated Seismic Hazard Implementing Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1 RS-16-124, Spent Fuel Pool Evaluation Supplemental Report, Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident2016-08-31031 August 2016 Spent Fuel Pool Evaluation Supplemental Report, Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident ML16190A1162016-07-0606 July 2016 2015 Regulatory Commitment Change Summary Report RS-16-100, Mitigating Strategies Flood Hazard Assessment (Msfha) Submittal2016-06-30030 June 2016 Mitigating Strategies Flood Hazard Assessment (Msfha) Submittal SVPLTR 16-0017, Submittal of Post Accident Monitoring Report Instrumentation2016-04-0808 April 2016 Submittal of Post Accident Monitoring Report Instrumentation ML15307A0562015-11-0404 November 2015 Supplement to Staff Assessment of Response to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Information Request - Flood Causing Mechanisms Reevaluation RS-15-265, Annual Report of Emergency Core Cooling System Evaluation Model Changes and Errors2015-10-23023 October 2015 Annual Report of Emergency Core Cooling System Evaluation Model Changes and Errors ML15251A3842015-08-31031 August 2015 Attachment 9 - NP-3305NP, Revision 1, Mechanical Design Report for Quad Cities and Dresden Atrium 10XN Fuel Assemblies - Licensing Report. (Non-Proprietary) ML15215A3372015-07-30030 July 2015 Holtec International Report No. HI-2146153, Revision 2, Licensing Report for the Criticality Analysis of the Dresden Unit 2 and 3 SEP for Atrium 10XM Fuel Design ML15097A5192015-04-27027 April 2015 Staff Assessment of Information Provided Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Relating to Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-Ichi ML15007A4912015-02-11011 February 2015 Interim Staff Evaluation Relating to Overall Integrated Plan in Response to Order EA-13-109 (Severe Accident Capable Hardened Vents) SVPLTR 15-0014, Owner'S Activity Report Submittal Fifth 10-Year Interval 2014 Refueling Outage Activities2015-02-11011 February 2015 Owner'S Activity Report Submittal Fifth 10-Year Interval 2014 Refueling Outage Activities RS-14-310, License Amendment Request Regarding Spent Fuel Storage Pool Criticality Methodology and Proposed Change to Technical Specification 4.3.1, Criticality2014-12-30030 December 2014 License Amendment Request Regarding Spent Fuel Storage Pool Criticality Methodology and Proposed Change to Technical Specification 4.3.1, Criticality RS-14-277, Proposed Alternative to Utilize Code Case N-513-4, Evaluation Criteria for Temporary Acceptance of Flaws in Moderate Energy Class 2 or 3 Piping Section XI, Division 12014-09-24024 September 2014 Proposed Alternative to Utilize Code Case N-513-4, Evaluation Criteria for Temporary Acceptance of Flaws in Moderate Energy Class 2 or 3 Piping Section XI, Division 1 RS-14-208, Third Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events (Order Number EA-12-049)2014-08-28028 August 2014 Third Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events (Order Number EA-12-049) ML14176A9612014-06-24024 June 2014 Submittal of Non-Proprietary BWROG Technical Product, BWROGTP-11-006 - ECCS Containment Walkdown Procedure, Rev 1 (January 2011), as Formally Requested During the Public Meeting Held on April 30, 2014 ML14115A2692014-05-30030 May 2014 Staff Assessment of the Seismic Walkdown Report Supporting Implementation of Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Related to the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident RS-14-122, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Fukushima Lessons Learned - Flooding Hazard Reevaluation Report - Redacted2014-05-19019 May 2014 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Fukushima Lessons Learned - Flooding Hazard Reevaluation Report - Redacted ML14153A0062014-04-29029 April 2014 Revision 4 to Local Intense Precipitation Evaluation Report RS-14-067, Seismic Hazard and Screening Report (Central and Eastern United States (CEUS Sites), Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Re Recommendation 2.1 of The..2014-03-31031 March 2014 Seismic Hazard and Screening Report (Central and Eastern United States (CEUS Sites), Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Re Recommendation 2.1 of The.. SVPLTR 14-0013, Owner'S Activity Report Submittal Fifth 10-Year Interval 2013 Refueling Outage Activities2014-02-28028 February 2014 Owner'S Activity Report Submittal Fifth 10-Year Interval 2013 Refueling Outage Activities RS-13-288, Request for License Amendment to Technical Specifications Section 5.6.5. Core Operating Limits Report.2013-12-19019 December 2013 Request for License Amendment to Technical Specifications Section 5.6.5. Core Operating Limits Report. ML13220A2382013-11-22022 November 2013 Interim Staff Evaluation Relating to Overall Integrated Plan in Response to Order EA-12-049 - Mitigation Strategies ML13317A8292013-11-20020 November 2013 Mega-Tech Services, LLC Technical Evaluation Report Regarding the Overall Integrated Plan for Dresden Nuclear Power Station Units 2 and 3, TAC Nos.: MF1046 and MF1047 ML13126A1792013-03-28028 March 2013 Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to 50.54(f) Information Request Re Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Updated Transmittal #1 (Annex a) for Dresden, Unit 3, Report No. RS-13-06, Part 1 of 13 ML13126A1802013-03-28028 March 2013 Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to 50.54(f) Information Request Re Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Updated Transmittal #1 (Annex a) for Dresden, Unit 3, Report No. RS-13-06, Part 13 of 13 ML13126A1812013-03-28028 March 2013 Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to 50.54(f) Information Request Re Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Updated Transmittal #1 (Annex a) for Dresden, Unit 3, Report No. RS-13-06, Part 2 of 13 ML13126A1832013-03-28028 March 2013 Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to 50.54(f) Information Request Re Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Updated Transmittal #1 (Annex a) for Dresden, Unit 3, Report No. RS-13-06, Part 3 of 13 ML13126A1842013-03-28028 March 2013 Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to 50.54(f) Information Request Re Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Updated Transmittal #1 (Annex a) for Dresden, Unit 3, Report No. RS-13-06, Part 4 of 13 ML13126A1852013-03-28028 March 2013 Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to 50.54(f) Information Request Re Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Updated Transmittal #1 (Annex a) for Dresden, Unit 3, Report No. RS-13-06, Part 5 of 13 ML13126A1862013-03-28028 March 2013 Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to 50.54(f) Information Request Re Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Updated Transmittal #1 (Annex a) for Dresden, Unit 3, Report No. RS-13-06, Part 6 of 13 ML13126A1872013-03-28028 March 2013 Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to 50.54(f) Information Request Re Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Updated Transmittal #1 (Annex a) for Dresden, Unit 3, Report No. RS-13-06, Part 7 of 13 ML13126A1882013-03-28028 March 2013 Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to 50.54(f) Information Request Re Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Updated Transmittal #1 (Annex a) for Dresden, Unit 3, Report No. RS-13-06, Part 8 of 13 ML13126A1892013-03-28028 March 2013 Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to 50.54(f) Information Request Re Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Updated Transmittal #1 (Annex a) for Dresden, Unit 3, Report No. RS-13-06, Part 9 of 13 ML13126A1902013-03-28028 March 2013 Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to 50.54(f) Information Request Re Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Updated Transmittal #1 (Annex a) for Dresden, Unit 3, Report No. RS-13-06, Part 10 of 13 2022-06-30
[Table view] Category:Miscellaneous
MONTHYEARML22047A1322022-02-15015 February 2022 Owner'S Activity Report Submittal Fifth 10-Year Interval 2021 Refueling Outage Activities ML20303A1752020-10-23023 October 2020 Proposed Relief Request from Section XI Repair/Replacement Documentation for Bolting Replacement of Pressure Retaining Bolting ML18138A3852019-03-0606 March 2019 Staff Assessment of Flood Hazard Integrated Assessment (CAC Nos. MG0221 and MG0222; EPID L-2017-JLD-0050) SVPLTR 19-0005, Owner'S Activity Report Submittal Fifth 10-Year Interval 2018 Refueling Outage Activities2019-02-0808 February 2019 Owner'S Activity Report Submittal Fifth 10-Year Interval 2018 Refueling Outage Activities ML18082A0812018-03-13013 March 2018 Request to Extend Enforcement Discretion Provided in Enforcement Guidance Memorandum 15-002 for Tornado-Generated Missile Protection Non-conformances Identified in Response to Regulatory Issues Summary 2015-06, Tornado Missile... ML18052A4862017-02-12012 February 2017 Owner'S Activity Report Submittal; Fifth 10-Year Interval 2017 Refueling Outage Activities ML16291A0212016-11-0808 November 2016 Staff Review of Spent Fuel Pool Evaluation Associated with Reevaluated Seismic Hazard Implementing Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1 RS-16-124, Spent Fuel Pool Evaluation Supplemental Report, Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident2016-08-31031 August 2016 Spent Fuel Pool Evaluation Supplemental Report, Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident ML16190A1162016-07-0606 July 2016 2015 Regulatory Commitment Change Summary Report RS-16-100, Mitigating Strategies Flood Hazard Assessment (Msfha) Submittal2016-06-30030 June 2016 Mitigating Strategies Flood Hazard Assessment (Msfha) Submittal SVPLTR 16-0017, Submittal of Post Accident Monitoring Report Instrumentation2016-04-0808 April 2016 Submittal of Post Accident Monitoring Report Instrumentation ML15307A0562015-11-0404 November 2015 Supplement to Staff Assessment of Response to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Information Request - Flood Causing Mechanisms Reevaluation RS-15-265, Annual Report of Emergency Core Cooling System Evaluation Model Changes and Errors2015-10-23023 October 2015 Annual Report of Emergency Core Cooling System Evaluation Model Changes and Errors ML15097A5192015-04-27027 April 2015 Staff Assessment of Information Provided Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Relating to Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-Ichi ML15007A4912015-02-11011 February 2015 Interim Staff Evaluation Relating to Overall Integrated Plan in Response to Order EA-13-109 (Severe Accident Capable Hardened Vents) SVPLTR 15-0014, Owner'S Activity Report Submittal Fifth 10-Year Interval 2014 Refueling Outage Activities2015-02-11011 February 2015 Owner'S Activity Report Submittal Fifth 10-Year Interval 2014 Refueling Outage Activities RS-14-208, Third Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events (Order Number EA-12-049)2014-08-28028 August 2014 Third Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events (Order Number EA-12-049) RS-14-122, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Fukushima Lessons Learned - Flooding Hazard Reevaluation Report - Redacted2014-05-19019 May 2014 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Fukushima Lessons Learned - Flooding Hazard Reevaluation Report - Redacted ML14153A0062014-04-29029 April 2014 Revision 4 to Local Intense Precipitation Evaluation Report RS-14-067, Seismic Hazard and Screening Report (Central and Eastern United States (CEUS Sites), Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Re Recommendation 2.1 of The..2014-03-31031 March 2014 Seismic Hazard and Screening Report (Central and Eastern United States (CEUS Sites), Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Re Recommendation 2.1 of The.. SVPLTR 14-0013, Owner'S Activity Report Submittal Fifth 10-Year Interval 2013 Refueling Outage Activities2014-02-28028 February 2014 Owner'S Activity Report Submittal Fifth 10-Year Interval 2013 Refueling Outage Activities IR 05000272/20132012013-01-31031 January 2013 Exelon Generation Co., LLC, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee IR 05000456/20132022013-01-31031 January 2013 Exelon Generation Co., LLC, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee ML13008A2192013-01-31031 January 2013 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee IR 05000454/20132022013-01-31031 January 2013 Exelon Generation Co., LLC, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee IR 05000461/20132012013-01-31031 January 2013 Exelon Generation Co., LLC, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee IR 05000237/20132022013-01-31031 January 2013 Exelon Generation Co., LLC, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee IR 05000289/20132012013-01-31031 January 2013 Exelon Generation Co., LLC, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee IR 05000254/20132012013-01-31031 January 2013 Exelon Generation Co., LLC, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee IR 05000277/20132012013-01-31031 January 2013 Exelon Generation Co., LLC, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee IR 05000219/20132012013-01-31031 January 2013 Exelon Generation Co., LLC, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee IR 05000352/20132012013-01-31031 January 2013 Exelon Generation Co., LLC, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee IR 05000373/20132012013-01-31031 January 2013 Exelon Generation Co., LLC, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee ML12348A2602012-11-15015 November 2012 12Q0106.30-R-002, Rev. 2, Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to the 50.54(f) Information Request Regarding Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic for the Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Unit 3, Part 6 of 11 ML12348A2562012-11-15015 November 2012 12Q0106.30-R-002, Rev. 2, Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to the 50.54(f) Information Request Regarding Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic for the Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Unit 3, Part 2 of 11 ML12348A2572012-11-15015 November 2012 12Q0106.30-R-002, Rev. 2, Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to the 50.54(f) Information Request Regarding Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic for the Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Unit 3, Part 3 of 11 ML12348A2582012-11-15015 November 2012 12Q0106.30-R-002, Rev. 2, Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to the 50.54(f) Information Request Regarding Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic for the Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Unit 3, Part 4 of 11 ML12348A2592012-11-15015 November 2012 12Q0106.30-R-002, Rev. 2, Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to the 50.54(f) Information Request Regarding Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic for the Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Unit 3, Part 5 of 11 ML12348A2612012-11-15015 November 2012 12Q0106.30-R-002, Rev. 2, Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to the 50.54(f) Information Request Regarding Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic for the Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Unit 3, Part 7 of 11 ML12348A2632012-11-15015 November 2012 12Q0106.30-R-002, Rev. 2, Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to the 50.54(f) Information Request Regarding Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic for the Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Unit 3, Part 9 of 11 ML12348A2642012-11-15015 November 2012 12Q0106.30-R-002, Rev. 2, Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to the 50.54(f) Information Request Regarding Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic for the Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Unit 3, Part 10 of 11 ML12348A2662012-11-15015 November 2012 12Q0108.30-R-001, Rev. 1, Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to the 50.54(f) Information Request Regarding Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic for the Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Unit 2, Part 1 of 7 ML12348A2672012-11-15015 November 2012 12Q0108.30-R-001, Rev. 1, Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to the 50.54(f) Information Request Regarding Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic for the Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Unit 2, Part 2 of 7 ML12348A2682012-11-15015 November 2012 12Q0108.30-R-001, Rev. 1, Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to the 50.54(f) Information Request Regarding Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic for the Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Unit 2, Part 3 of 7 ML12348A2692012-11-15015 November 2012 12Q0108.30-R-001, Rev. 1, Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to the 50.54(f) Information Request Regarding Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic for the Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Unit 2, Part 4 of 7 ML12348A2622012-11-15015 November 2012 12Q0106.30-R-002, Rev. 2, Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to the 50.54(f) Information Request Regarding Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic for the Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Unit 3, Part 8 of 11 ML12348A2732012-11-15015 November 2012 12Q0106.30-R-002, Rev. 2, Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to the 50.54(f) Information Request Regarding Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic for the Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Unit 3, Part 1 of 11 ML12348A2722012-11-15015 November 2012 12Q0108.30-R-001, Rev. 1, Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to the 50.54(f) Information Request Regarding Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic for the Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Unit 2, Part 7 of 7 ML12348A2712012-11-15015 November 2012 12Q0108.30-R-001, Rev. 1, Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to the 50.54(f) Information Request Regarding Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic for the Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Unit 2, Part 6 of 7 ML12348A2702012-11-15015 November 2012 12Q0108.30-R-001, Rev. 1, Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to the 50.54(f) Information Request Regarding Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic for the Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Unit 2, Part 5 of 7 2022-02-15
[Table view] |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 November 08, 2016 Mr. Bryan C. Hanson Senior Vice President Exelon Generation Company, LLC President and Chief Nuclear Officer Exelon Nuclear 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 605
SUBJECT:
DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 - STAFF REVIEW OF SPENT FUEL POOL EVALUATION ASSOCIATED WITH REEVALUATED SEISMIC HAZARD IMPLEMENTING NEAR-TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.1 (CAC NOS. MF3877 AND MF3878)
Dear Mr. Hanson:
The purpose of this letter is to inform Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon, the licensee) of the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's review of the spent fuel pool (SFP) evaluation for Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3 (Dresden), which was submitted in response to Item 9 of Enclosure 1 of the NRC's March 12, 2012, request for information (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML12053A340), issued under Title 1O of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 50, Section 50.54(f) (hereafter referred to as the 50.54(f) letter). The NRC staff concludes that the licensee's assessment was performed consistent with the NRC endorsed SFP Evaluation Guidance Report and that the licensee has provided sufficient information to complete the response to Item 9 of the 50.54(f) letter.
BACKGROUND On March 12, 2012, the NRC issued a 50.54(f) letter as part of implementing lessons learned from the accident at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant. Enclosure 1 to the 50.54(f) letter requested that licensees reevaluate seismic hazards at their sites using present-day methodologies and guidance. Enclosure 1, Item 4, of the 50.54(f) letter requested that licensees perform a comparison of the ground motion response spectrum (GMRS) and the safe shutdown earthquake (SSE). The staff's assessment of the information provided in response to Items 1-3 and 5-7 of the 50.54(f) letter is provided by letter dated April 27, 2015 (ADAMS Accession No. ML15097A519). Enclosure 1, Item 9, of the 50.54(f) letter requested that, when the GMRS exceeds the SSE in the 1 to 1O Hertz frequency range, a seismic evaluation be made of the SFP. More specifically, plants were asked to consider " .. .all seismically induced failures that can lead to draining of the SFP."
B.Hanson By letter dated February 23, 2016 (ADAMS Accession No. ML16055A021 ), the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) staff submitted Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) Report No. 3002007148 entitled , "Seismic Evaluation Guidance: Spent Fuel Pool Integrity Evaluation" (SFP Evaluation Guidance Report) . The SFP Evaluation Guidance Report provides criteria for evaluating the seismic adequacy of an SFP to the reevaluated GMRS hazard levels. This report supplements the guidance in EPRI Report 1025287, "Seismic Evaluation Guidance: Screening, Prioritization and Implementation Details (SPID)" (ADAMS Accession No. ML12333A170) for plants where the GMRS peak spectral acceleration is less than or equal to 0.8g (low GMRS sites). The NRC endorsed the SFP Evaluation Guidance Report by letter dated March 17, 2016 (ADAMS Accession No. ML15350A158), as an acceptable method for licensees to use when responding to Item 9 in Enclosure 1 of the 50.54(f) letter.
By letter dated October 27, 2015 (ADAMS Accession No. ML15194A015), the NRC staff stated that SFP evaluation submittals for low GMRS sites are expected by December 31 , 2016.
REVIEW OF LICENSEE SPENT FUEL POOL EVALUATION By letter dated August 31 , 2016 (ADAMS Accession No. ML16244A801 ), Exelon submitted its SFP evaluation for Dresden for NRC review. The NRC staff assessed the licensee's implementation of the SFP Evaluation Guidance Report through the completion of a reviewer checklist, which is included as an enclosure to this letter.
TECHNICAL EVALUATION Section 3.0 of the SFP Evaluation Guidance Report develops SFP evaluation criteria for plants with GMRS peak spectral acceleration less than or equal to 0.8g. These criteria address SFP structural elements (e.g., floors, walls, and supports); non-structural elements (e.g. ,
penetrations); seismically-induced SFP sloshing; and water losses due to heat-up and boil-off.
Section 3 also provides applicability criteria , which will enable licensees to determine if their site-specific conditions are within the bounds considered in developing the evaluation criteria for this report. The staff's review consists of confirming that these SFP site-specific conditions are within the bounds considered for the evaluation criteria specified in the SFP Evaluation Guidance Report.
1.1 Spent Fuel Pool Structural Evaluation Section 3.1 of the SFP Evaluation Guidance Report provides a SFP structural evaluation approach used to demonstrate that the SFP structure is sufficiently robust against the reevaluated seismic hazard. This approach supplements the guidance in Section 7 of the SPID and followed acceptable methods used to assess the seismic capacity of structures, systems, and components (SSCs) for nuclear power plants as documented in EPRI NP-6041 "A Methodology for Assessment of Nuclear Plant Seismic Margin, Revision 1". Table 3-2 of the SFP Evaluation Guidance Report (reproduced from Table 2.3 of EPRI NP-6041) provides the structural screening criteria to assess the SFPs and their supporting structures.
The licensee stated that it followed the SFP structural evaluation approach presented in the SFP Evaluation Guidance Report and provided site-specific data to confirm its applicability.
The NRC staff reviewed the structural information provided, which included the requested site-specific data in Section 3.3 of the SFP Evaluation Guidance Report, and confirmed that the
B.Hanson evaluation criteria are applicable to the Dresden site. The staff concludes that SFP SSCs were appropriately evaluated and screened based on the seismic capacity criteria in EPRI NP-6041 ,
and that the licensee has demonstrated that the SFP structure is sufficiently robust and can withstand ground motions with peak spectral acceleration less than or equal to 0.8g.
1.2 Spent Fuel Pool Non-Structural Evaluation Section 3.2 of the SFP Evaluation Guidance Report provides criteria for evaluating the non-structural aspects of the SFP, such as piping connections, fuel gates, and anti-siphoning devices, as well as SFP sloshing and heat up and boil-off of SFP water inventory. Specifically, Table 3-4 of the SFP Evaluation Guidance Report provides a summary of the SFP non-structural evaluation criteria derived in Section 3.2, along with applicability criteria to demonstrate that site-specific conditions are suitable for applying the evaluation criteria.
The licensee stated that it followed the SFP non-structural evaluation approach presented in the guidance report and provided site-specific data to confirm its applicability. The staff reviewed the non-structural information provided , which included the requested site-specific data in Table 3-4 of the SFP Evaluation Guidance Report, and confirmed that the evaluation criteria are applicable to the Dresden site. Therefore, the staff concludes that the licensee acceptably evaluated the non-structural considerations for SSCs whose failure could lead to potential drain-down of the SFP due to a seismic event.
CONCLUSION The NRC staff reviewed Exelon 's SFP evaluation report. Based on its review, the NRC staff concludes that the licensee's implementation of the SFP integrity evaluation met the criteria of the SFP Evaluation Guidance Report for Dresden and therefore, Exelon responded appropriately to Item 9 in Enclosure 1 of the NRC's 50.54(f) letter.
B.Hanson If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1617 or via e-mail at Frankie.Vega@nrc.gov.
Sincerely, Franki Vega.Z:-:anager Hazards Management Branch Japan Lessons-Learned Division Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-237 and 50-249
Enclosure:
Technical Review Checklist cc w/encl : Distribution via Listserv
TECHNICAL REVIEW CHECKLIST BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO SPENT FUEL POOL EVALUATIONS FOR LOW GROUND MOTION RESPONSE SPECTRUM SITES IMPLEMENTING NEAR-TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.1 SEISMIC DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION. UNITS 2 AND 3 DOCKET NOS. 50-237 AND 50-249 BACKGROUND By letter dated March 12, 2012 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML12053A340), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued a request for information to all power reactor licensees and holders of construction permits in active or deferred status, pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) , Section 50.54(f), "Conditions of License" (hereafter referred to as the "50.54(f) letter"). of the 50.54(f) letter requests addressees to reevaluate the seismic hazard at their site using present-day methods and guidance for licensing new nuclear power plants, and identify actions to address or modify, as necessary, plant components affected by the reevaluated seismic hazards. Enclosure 1, Item 4, of the 50.54(f) letter requested that licensees perform a comparison of the ground motion response spectrum (GMRS) with the safe shutdown earthquake (SSE) . Enclosure 1, Item 9, requests that, when the GMRS exceeds the SSE in the 1 to 1O Hertz (Hz) frequency range, a seismic evaluation be made of the spent fuel pool (SFP) .
More specifically, plants were asked to consider " ... all seismically induced failures that can lead to draining of the SFP."
Additionally, by letter dated February 23, 2016 (ADAMS Accession No. ML16055A021), the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) submitted Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) Report No.
3002007148 entitled, "Seismic Evaluation Guidance: Spent Fuel Pool Integrity Evaluation" (SFP Evaluation Guidance Report) . The SFP Evaluation Guidance Report supports the completion of SFP evaluations for sites with reevaluated seismic hazard exceedance in the 1 to 1O Hz frequency range. Specifically, the SFP Evaluation Guidance Report addressed those sites where the GMRS peak spectral acceleration (Sa) is less than or equal to 0.8g (low GMRS sites). The NRC endorsed the SFP Evaluation Guidance Report by letter dated March 17, 2016 (ADAMS Accession No. ML15350A158), as an acceptable method for licensees to use when responding to Item 9 in Enclosure 1 of the 50.54(f) letter. Licensee deviations from the SFP Evaluation Guidance should be discussed in their SFP evaluation submittal.
By letter dated August 31 , 2016 (ADAMS Accession No. ML16244A801), Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon , the licensee) provided an SFP report in a response to Enclosure 1, Item 9, of the 50.54(f) letter, for the Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3 (Dresden).
The NRC staff performed its review of the licensee's submittal to assess whether the licensee responded appropriately to Item 9 in Enclosure 1 of the 50.54(f) letter. A multidisciplinary team checked whether the site-specific parameters are within the bounds of the criteria considered in the SFP Evaluation Guidance Report, verified the SFP's seismic adequacy to withstand the Enclosure
reevaluated GMRS hazard levels, and confirmed that the requested information in response to Item 9 of the 50.54(f) letter was provided.
A review checklist was used for consistency and scope. The application of this staff review is limited to the SFP evaluation as part of the seismic review of low GMRS sites as part of the Near-Term Task Force (NTTF) Recommendation 2.1 .
NTTF Recommendation 2.1 Spent Fuel Pool Evaluations Technical Review Checklist for Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3 (Dresden)
Site Parameters:
I. Site-Specific GMRS The licensee:
- Provided the site-specific GMRS consistent with the information Yes provided in the Seismic Hazard and Screening Report (SHSR) , or its update, and evaluated by the staff in its staff assessment.
- Stated that the GMRS peak Sa is less than or equal to 0.8g for any Yes frequency.
Notes from the reviewer:
- 1. The NRC staff confirmed that the site-specific peak Sa= 0.59g (ADAMS Accession No. ML14091A012).
Deviation(s) or Deficiency(ies), and Resolution:
No deviations or deficiencies were identified.
The NRC staff concludes :
- The site-specific GMRS peak Sa at any frequency is less than 0.8g . Yes
- The licensee's GMRS used in this evaluation is consistent with the Yes information provided in the SHSR.
Structural Parameters:
II. Seismic Design of the SFP Structure The licensee:
- Specified the building housing the SFP. Yes
- Specified the plant's peak ground acceleration (PGA). Yes
- Stated that the building housing the SFP was designed using an SSE with a PGA of at least 0.1g. Yes
Notes from the reviewer:
- 1. The NRC staff confirmed that the SFP is housed in the reactor building which was designed to the SSE with PGA of 0.20g (SHSR, Section 3.1 and Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) , Section 9.1 .2.2).
Deviation(s) or Deficiency(ies), and Resolution:
No deviations or deficiencies were identified.
The NRC staff concludes that:
- The structure housing the SFP was designed using an SSE with a Yes PGA of at least 0.1g.
Ill. Structural Load Path to the SFP The licensee:
- Provided a description of the structural load path from the Yes foundation to the SFP.
- Performed screening based on EPRI NP-6041 Table 2-3 screening Yes criteria .
Notes from the reviewer:
- 2. The staff verified the structural load path to the SFP.
- 3. The staff confirmed that the structural load path from the foundation to the SFP consists of reinforced concrete shear walls, slabs, and framing members (UFSAR Section 9.1 .2.2.3)
Deviation(s) or Deficiency(ies), and Resolution:
No deviations or deficiencies were identified.
The NRC staff concludes that:
- Licensee appropriately described the structural load path to the Yes SFP.
Yes
- Structures were appropriately screened based on the screening criteria in EPRI NP-6041 .
IV. SFP Structure Included in the Civil Inspection Program Perlormed in Accordance with Maintenance Rule The licensee:
- Stated that the SFP structure is included in the Civil Inspection Yes Program performed in accordance with Maintenance Rule (1 O CFR 50.65).
Notes from the reviewer:
None Deviation(s) or Deficiency(ies), and Resolution:
No deviations or deficiencies were identified.
The NRC staff concludes that:
- The SFP structure is included in the Civil Inspection Program Yes performed in accordance with Maintenance Rule (10 CFR 50.65) .
Non-Structural Parameters:
V. Applicability of Piping Evaluation The licensee:
- Stated that piping attached to the SFP is evaluated to the SSE. Yes Notes from the reviewer:
- 1. The licensee stated that following piping are attached to the SFP: fuel pool gates drain line and the fuel pool cooling system. The fuel pool gates drain line was classified as safety related up to the first isolation valve and was evaluated to the SSE. The fuel pool cooling system was classified as non-safety related and its seismic design was reviewed to NRC's Systematic Evaluation Program (SEP) - "Seismic Design Consideration" and meet the requirements of Regulatory Guide 1.29 "Seismic Design Classification for Nuclear Power Plants".
- 2. Even though it was not explicitly stated that the SFP cooling system was evaluated to the SSE, it was reviewed under NRC's SEP and met RG 1.29 which assessed the seismic capabilities of the piping system. NRC staff concludes that the information provided was sufficient to confirm applicability of the piping evaluation in Section 3.2 of the SFP evaluation guidance.
Deviation(s) or Deficiency(ies), and Resolution:
No deviations or deficiencies were identified.
The NRC staff concludes that:
- Applicability criteria specified in Table 3-4 of SFP evaluation Yes guidance have been met.
VI. Siphoning Evaluation The licensee:
- Stated that anti-siphoning devices are installed on piping systems Yes that could lead to siphoning inventory from the SFP.
- In cases where anti-siphoning devices were not included on the applicable piping, a description documenting the evaluation N/A performed to determine the seismic adequacy of the piping is provided.
- Stated that the piping of the SFP cooling system cannot lead to rapid No drain down due to siphoning.
- Provided a seismic adequacy evaluation, in accordance with NP-6041, for cases where active siphoning devices are attached to 2" or No smaller piping with extremely large extended operators.
- Stated that no anti-siphoning devices are attached to 2" or smaller Yes piping with extremely large extended operators.
Notes from the reviewer:
- 1. The licensee stated that anti-siphoning devices are installed on all SFP piping that could lead to siphoning. In addition, the licensee stated that all penetrations into the SFP are located above a fixed height from the bottom such that there must always be a safe level of water above the fuel.
- 2. UFSAR Section 9.1.3.3 confirms that openings in the two spent fuel pool cooling system return lines were designed to act as anti-syphon devices.
- 3. Licensee stated that no active anti-siphoning devices are attached to 2" or smaller piping with extremely large extended operator.
Deviation(s) or Deficiency(ies), and Resolution:
No deviations or deficiencies were identified .
The NRC staff concludes :
- Anti-siphoning devices exist in applicable piping systems that could Yes lead to siphoning water from the SFP.
- No active anti-siphoning devices are attached to 2" or smaller piping Yes with extremely large extended operators.
- Applicability criteria specified in Table 3-4 of SFP evaluation Yes guidance have been met.
VII. Sloshing Evaluation The licensee:
- Specified the SFP dimensions (length, width, and depth). Yes
- Specified that the SFP dimensions are bounded by the dimensions Yes specified in the report (i.e. SFP length and width <125ft. ; SFP depth > 36ft.).
- Stated that the peak Sa in the frequency range less than 0.3 Hz is Yes less than 0.1g.
Notes from the reviewer:
- 1. Verified the SFP dimensions (UFSAR Section 9.1 .2.2.3):
- SFP Length - 41 ft.
- SFP Width - 33 ft.
- SFP Depth - 39 ft.
- 2. The staff confirmed in the SHSR that the peak Sa in the frequency range less than 0.3 Hz is less than 0.1g (SHSR).
Deviation(s) or Deficiency(ies), and Resolution:
No deviations or deficiencies were identified.
The NRC staff concludes:
- SFP dimensions are bounded by the dimensions specified in the Yes report (i.e. SFP length and width <125ft.; SFP depth >36ft.).
- The peak Sa in the frequency range less than 0.3 Hz is less than Yes 0.1g.
- Applicability criteria specified in Table 3-4 of SFP evaluation Yes guidance have been met.
VIII. Evaporation Evaluation The licensee:
- Provided the surface area of the plant's SFP. Yes
- Stated that the surface area of the plant's SFP is greater than Yes 500 ft 2
- Provided the licensed reactor core thermal power. Yes
- Stated that the reactor core thermal power is less than 4,000 Yes MW1per unit.
Notes from the reviewer:
- 1. Surface area of pool = 1,353 ft 2
- 2. Reactor thermal power= 2,957 MW1(Unit 2 and 3, UFSAR Section 1.1.1);
Deviation(s) or Deficiency(ies), and Resolution:
No deviations or deficiencies were identified.
The NRC staff concludes:
- The surface area of the plant's SFP is greater than 500 ft 2 Yes
- The reactor core thermal power is less than 4,000 MW1 per unit. Yes
- Applicability criteria specified in Table 3-4 of SFP evaluation Yes guidance have been met.
==
Conclusions:==
The NRC staff reviewed Exelon 's SFP evaluation report. Based on its review, the NRC staff concludes that the licensee's implementation of the SFP integrity evaluation met the criteria of the SFP Evaluation Guidance Report for Dresden and therefore Exelon responded appropriately to Item 9 in Enclosure 1 of the 50.54(f) letter.
ML16291A021 *via e-mail OFFICE NRR/JLD/JHMB/PM NRR/JLD/LA NRR/JLD/JHMB/BC(A)
NAME FVega SLent GBowman (BTitus for)
DATE 11/03/2016 10/18/2016 11/08/2016 OFFICE NRR/JLD/JHMB/PM NAME FVega DATE 11/08/2016