IR 05000424/1987059
| ML20236Q617 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vogtle  |
| Issue date: | 11/10/1987 |
| From: | Jape F, Lenahan J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20236Q614 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-424-87-59, 50-425-87-44, NUDOCS 8711200173 | |
| Download: ML20236Q617 (3) | |
Text
7
.,:
.s
,:
pn nea g u
g'
-..
UNITED STATES
~
l.)
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION j
o, REGION 11 l
101 MARIETTA ST., N.W.
.l g
-
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30323
,,g, l
'
'
Report Nos.: 50-424/87-59 and 50-.425/87-44 l Licensee: Georgia Power Company P. 0. Box 4545 j
Atlanta, GA 30302
_J Docket Nos.: 50-424 and 50-425 License Nos.: NPF-68 and CPPR-109-Fasility Name: Vogtle 1 and 2 f
Inspection Conducted: October 27-3 1987
Inspector:
.45 A'
o J. J. Lenahan Date Signed
'
Approved by:'
wa'
a ~
e/g,Z'
'
F. Jape, Ctiier.
~
'
/
D6te S1gned
'
Test Program Section Division of Reactor Safety SUMMARY Scope:
This routine, unannounced inspection was in the areas of the Unit 1 Containment Building Tendon Surveillance Program and repairs' to coatings in the I
Unit 2 containmerit building.
l
,
Results: No violations or deviations were identified.
1
'
!
B711200173 871115 P
PDR ADOCK 05000424 l
l
'
G-PDR
"
1.
!
l
.--- -____..._- _. _ _ _ w
'
,,
,
,
l REPORT DETAILS, I
i 1.
Persons Contacted.
Licensee Employees'
j i
' *R. M. Bellamy, Plant Manager i
L. Bishop, Civil-QC Supervisor, Coatings l
- G. Bockhold, General Manager
- C. L. Cross, Senior Regulatory Specialist ud
- J. A. Davis, Maintenance Engineer.
- G. R. Frederick,-QA Site Manager, Operations
- T. Greene, Plant Support Manager
- E. D. Groover, QA Site Manager, Construction i
Other Organizations J. Hall, Structural Engineer, Southern Services Company NRC Resident Inspectors
!
- J. Rogge, Senior Resident Inspector.
.q R. J. Schepens, Resident Inspector
'
H. Livermore, Senior Resident Inspector, Construction
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized' on ' October 30, 1987,
'
with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above.- ' The inspector -
described the areas. inspected and discussed in detail the inspection findings.
No dissenting ~ comments were received from the: licensee.
The licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the materials provided to or reviewed by the inspectors during this inspection.-
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters This subject was not addressed in the inspection.
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
j 5.
Containment Building Teridon Surveillance. Program - Unit 1(61701)
The inspector examined procedures and work activities _ relating to the Unit I containment building tendon surveillance program. _ Acceptance criteria utilized by the inspector appears in Technical Specification
]
,
-.
-
.
_
__
D e
2
.
3/4.6.1.6.
The inspector reviewed Precision Surveillance Corporation (PSC, the tendon surveillance contractor) procedure titled ISI Tendon Surveillance Program.
This procedure specifies the requirements for inspection, testing,. analysis and data reporting for the containment building post-tensioning system.
The inspector witnessed stressing operations for verification of the lift-off forces in vertical tendon 58-128, and the 144 end of vertical tendon 42-144.
These operations were performed in accordance with the requirements stated in the PSC procedure, with the exception of the lift-off force measurement determined for the 58 end of tendon 58-128.
Due to equipment problems, it was not possible to measure the lift-off force in this tendon using the procedural method.
The licensee used an alternate " hammer sounding" method to determine the lift-off.
Past experience at other facilities has shown this method to be compatible with the procedural method of lift-off measurement, however, the PSC QC inspector documented the departure from the approved procedure lift-off measurement method on a nonconformance report.
The recorded lift-off forces met the procedure requirements.
During stressing operations to -
measure the lift-off force in tendon 58-128, the permanent wedge anchors unseated at the 58 end.
This problem was also documented on a noncomformance report.
The inspector examined the anchorage assemblies on tendon number 58-128 and 42-144 and verified that inspection of the anchorage assemblies was conducted in accordance with procedure requirements, The inspector also witnessed sampling of the tendon void filler material (grease) from the ends of tendon 58-128.
Within the area inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
l 6.
Containment Building Protective Coatings - Unit 2 i
The inspector examined protective coatings which have been applied to the
>
Unit 2 containment building dome between azimuth 160 and 180.
This l
inspection was performed to followup on employee concerns discussed in
!
paragraph 6.i.
of Region II Inspection Report Nos. 50-424/87-25 and 50-425/87-17.
The deficiencies reported in the concern had been previously identified by the licensee and documented on Deviation Report SQ-007.
The inspector examined DR SQ-007 and discussed the corrective actions with licensee and Williams Contractor's QC personnel.
These discussions disclosed that the licensee was also performing coating repairs required to disposition DR number WC-85013 and CD-5941.
The inspection examined these DP.s and the proposed corrective actions for
,
repair of the deficiencies to the coating documented on the DRs.
The inspector examined the coating which had been applied to the dome and to pipe hangers supporting the containment spray system piping attached to
,
dome. With the exception of some minor touchup work, the repairs required
~
by DR SQ-007, CD-5941 and WC-85013 were completed in the area examined by the inspectors.
Examination of the completed work by the inspector showed i
l that the coatings were being properly applied and inspected.
Within the area inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
-_-____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _.
_