IR 05000424/1987027
| ML20236G641 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vogtle  |
| Issue date: | 10/07/1987 |
| From: | Brownlee V NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | James O'Reilly GEORGIA POWER CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8711030182 | |
| Download: ML20236G641 (4) | |
Text
khhldo
'
L
,
,
/t
,
-
.
OCT 0 71987 Docket Nos. 50-424, 50-425 License Nos. NPF-68, c.PPR-109 Ccorgia Power Company ATTN:
Mr. James P. O'Reilly Senior Vice President-Nuclear Operations P. O. Box 4545 Atlanta, GA 30302 Gentlemen:
SUBJECT:
CORRECTION OF ERROR IN V0GTLE INSPECTION REPORT NO. 50-425/87-27 AND 50-425/87-14 AND ASSOCIATED NOTICE OF VIOLATION This letter refers to the subject inspection report transmitted to you via our letter of May 19, 1987. Due to an administrative error, it was necessary to make a correction to the title page of the referenced report and to the cover page of the May 19, 1987 letter.
The report number was shown as 50-424/87-27 and 50-425/87-12 in lieu of 50-424/87-27 and 50-425/87-14.
Consequently, we request that you replace the existing report title page and the cover page of the May 19, 1987 letter with the enclosed corrected pages.
Additionally, the four items opened in this report were incorrectly numbered as 50-424/87-12-01, 02, 03, and 04 in lieu of the correct numbers 50-424/87-27-01, 02, 03 and 04.
Please note these changes to ensure proper tracking of the items.
)
i Should you have any questions concerning this letter we will be glad to discuss them with you.
Sincerely, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY VIRG!L L. DROWNLEE Virgil L. Brownlee, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 2 i
Division of Reactor Projects
'
Enclosures 1.
Inspection Report Title Page 2.
Cover Sheet of May 19, 1987 letter cc w/encis:
(See page 2)
i i
)
$l{ O g2 871007 O
M 050004p4
,
!
.
_ - _ - _ - _ __ _
'.
.
.-
Georgia Power Company
OCT 0 71937 cc w/encls:
P. D. Rice, Vice President, Project Director C. W. Hayes, Vogtle Quality-Assurance Manager
,
G. Bockhold, Jr., General Manager, i
Nuclear Operations L. Gucwa, Manager, Nuclear Safety and Licensing J. A. Bailey, Project Licensing Manager B. W. Churchill, Esq., Shaw, i
Pittman, Potts and Trowbridge J. E. Joiner, Troutman, Sanders,
!
Lockerman and Ashmore D. Kirkland, III, Counsel, Office of the Consumer's Utility
'
Council D. Feig, Georgians Against Nuclear Energy M. B. Margulies, Esq., Chairman, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Dr. O. H. Paris, Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel G. A. Linenberger, Jr., Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel i
bcc w/encis:
E. Reis, OGC M. Miller, NRR M. Sinkule, RII NRC Resident Inspector Document Control Desk State of Georgia RII RII P& yin a RMusser:
MSinkule P'Cr10/6/87 10/ /87
<
_-_____ __
-
- - - - _ _ _ - _ - - _ _ - - - _ _ _ - _. _
-.
s.
UNITED STATES AB RE00
,
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
'o,^
.
d? / ~
REGION 11 h
d 101 MARIETTA STREET, N.W.
's ATLANTA, GEOnSI A 30323
.....
l Docket Nos.
50-424 and 50-425 I
License Nos. NPF-68 and CPPR-109 j
Georgia Power Company ATTN:
Mr. James P. O' Reilly j
Senior Vice President-Nuclear l
Operations j
P. O. Box 4545 Atlanta, GA 30302-i Gentlemen:
SUBJECT:
(NRC INSPECTION REPORT NOS. 50-424/87-27 AND 50-425/87-14)
)
This refers to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection conducted by
,
Messrs. H. H. Livermore,.1 F. Rogge, and R. J. Schepens on March 10 thru j
April 17, 1987. The inspection included a review of activities authorized for j
your Vogtle facility. At the conclusion of the inspection, the findings were j
discussed with those members of your staff identified in the enclosed j
inspection report.
Areas examined during the inspection are identified in the report. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of selective examinations of procedures
and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observation of activities in progress.
The inspection findings indicate that certain activities violated NRC
j requirement.
The violations, references to pertinent requirements, and elements to be included in your response are presented in the enclosed Notice
of Violation.
-]
'
Another violation described in the enclosed Inspection Report is under.
consideration for escalated enforcement action.
Accordingly, no Notice of Violation for this violation is being issued at this time, and no response is required.
However, please be advised that the characterization of the i
l violations describec in the enclosed Inspection Report may change as a result of further NRC review. You will be advised by separate correspondence of the results of our deliberation on this matter.
Additionally, an enforcement
,
conference has been scheduled for May 19, 1987, in Atlanta.
l l
Your attention is invited to an unresolved item identified in the inspection l
report. This matter will be pursued during future inspections.
.
In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2,
'
Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and the enclosure
l will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
l T.
l
)
~
,
_
[pRicoq'o UNITED STATES
.,
e NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION yI
' ',
REGION 81
,
g
,y 101 MARIETTA STREET,N.W.
- ATLANTA, G EoRGI A 30323
.....,/
%
Report Nos.: 50-424/87-27 and 50-425/87-14
.
Licensee:
Georgia Power Company P, O. Box 4545 Atlanta, Georgi 30302 Docket Nos.: 50-424 and 50-425 License Nos.: NPF-68 and CPPR-109 Facility Name: Vogtle 1 and 2
,
i Inspection Conducted: March 10 - April 17, 1987 Inspectors:
H. H. Livermore, Senior Resident Inspector, Date Signed Construction J. F. Rogge, Senior Resident Inspector, Date Signed Operations R. J. Schepens, Resident Inspector, Dated Signed
Operations
Accompanying Personnel:
C. Burger, Resident Inspector, Operations Approved By:
M. V. Sinkule, Section Chief Oated Signed Division of Reactor Projects SUMMARY Scope:
This routine, unannounced inspection entailed Resident Insbection in the following areas:
plant operations, radiological controls maintenance, surveillance, fire protection, security, outage activities, containment and safety related structures, piping systems and supports, safety related conipone n t s, auxiliary systems, electrical equipment-and cables, instru-mentation, startup test program, and quality programs. and administrative controls effecting quality.
Results:
Two violations were identified in the area of Plant Operations.. A failure to implement the procedure for placing. the AFW System in standby readiness and a failure to establish an appropriate procedure to determine ~and
evaluate unidentified leakage'.
-
i
)
.