IR 05000409/1987011
| ML20236J760 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | La Crosse File:Dairyland Power Cooperative icon.png |
| Issue date: | 10/23/1987 |
| From: | Jackiw I NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20236J751 | List: |
| References | |
| TASK-1.C.1, TASK-1.D.2, TASK-2.B.2, TASK-2.F.1, TASK-TM 50-409-87-11, NUDOCS 8711060270 | |
| Download: ML20236J760 (6) | |
Text
+
wc
- Mm= ;
,..
.,
sv
=
.o 3
'*
,
' s s
r t. -
We
+
.
',' ; l utJ
,
y k:, y 3..'
<
'
'
)
'
'
i
-
<a~--
..
-]g),$])5 b ; 'i
'.
'
'
.
Qtj - :.j
.
<
- ,g
.y L
/-
,
_;.
j. u-ry.
'
~
fjg
- q L
w
.
,
,
,
va
,
p%
cc
!
.U.'S.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY! COMMISSION MI
,x s 3 w
REGION /III-
'
Report No. 50-409/87011(DRP).
.
,
J
~
..
a.
0,.
i
. Docket No. 50-409 License No. DRP-45(
' '.j, Y
Licensee: Dairyland Power Cooperative-
~ l'
%,,.
2615 East' Avenue- South
'
.
La Crosse, WI '54601"
[. !
'$
M,4!,
Facility Name:.La Crosse Bo'iling. Water Reactor
- ,t to a e'
,
mJ.J f-Inspection At:
La-Crosse. Site, Genoa, Wisconsin O1
,
A Inspection Conducted: August 22,1987..through October 16,1987' %'
-. S'?T
'l 7..
T c;g,,
o ry
- [g
,
,
Inspector:
K. Ridgway h
.
3 1
>n
.
..
.
,.
b
@N Approved By:
I VJa w,
qi
Re tor Pro' cts Section 2C X Jate
?tyi
- ljj
'J /..,i.
-
.
7.'
-
U, w -
'
Inspection' Summary T
.m
.
A,
,
'
'(
/-
~ /,
i Inspection from August 22, 1987 throggh October 16,1987jepor(.[
,
g'
@
e No. 50-409/87011(DRp))
O/'
Q[a 4bc d""
Areas Inspected:
Routine, unannounceti inspection by.the'~ resident inspector.
'
I of Licensee Actions.on Previous Inspection Findingsi Operational. Safety -
i Verification; Monthly Maintenance Observation';. Month M
,,
Observation; Licensee. Event ' Reports Forlowup;.TMI Ope)9, Surveillance
,
r! Items;.0 organization-and Administration; and Review and Audits
'
Tj d
,
Results: No violations were identified.
-i i
^
,,
,0, fj
,
l
, J
, -
,.,m
- ,.
';
'
f;
,
a,i
/ (4., -
af i ;,
.d ; a m,,... h
,:1 -
yfy}f
' -
'
-' i '{
1 '..(
..\\-
,
'
j
.
...
.!
k3
- 4..(
~-
'
,
xn
.
n k<
fj
.j
>...)
,
.
,m
,
.
w, n.
.
,
'
r,, ~. )
.
- (K ",
j,:y$,;,f. 41
%,{ z. ' o_;
.
)
,
<
%-
. m., a t-e
,
g w.
,
,-
a..,
.;
.
\\3yy
-
p.[ -
\\
,
')
-
1.
)
'
,1
,
<
\\,
/...
4 i'
_
i
-.
V,
' ;r-
,
{'
. ;
.'I.
-1 g
h
'
-
- g,
,
- .
yy
s+u m.
a e
.
.
,,
.
..
~.
-,
.
,
. :p
-
[>
'l }
Q.l)wn j i ~ ' k ' tl a.
qew n 4a.. - , , , m m .#p . r . y: h:: ' , ? X Qq p> y ,. u -. ..o - DETAILS' G 0 ' h.
VM, I > , . "p :4 Q[/, p;pff.
J
- ij&
~ qy [[h f;j, p' j ,. 1 1.
//4 s a-r
m 1.
.'Fers' ens Contacted? b
- J. Parkyn,: Plant Superintendent.
hl,( # ' -l$ M [jy*
- [
L.Kelley, Assistant,toOperationsSuperv/, Wor."p[ (> ~M,
- G; Boyd.' Operations Supervisor ~
. J'S - < w4 g' O y 4 N) , /F q> L.~. Nelson, Health:and Safety Supervisor J-3< vi q; o.
- #
1 e
- R. Wery, Quality.(Assurance Supervisor.
w.
' ' L Goodmanf Operations?Engin'eer . i, g. y ' q 4jj . y The inspector also interviewedrother.licens;ee perlonne1Vduring the I N n . vb .> > u ' , !of the inspection'. ,t & MfC O g , .
L
- Denotesthoseattendingexitinterviews?d'uring3hainspectioniperiodd:?
lk)/}, ' ~ . ,, . . 4x - V !) 2.
General L ' %yi- " l ..s,z . ,. , .y , m=m.
- On April 24,1987; the Dairyland Power Cooperative (khC,) Boa'rUsuthorizfd c p ";d the permanent shutdown of LACBWR due to econdmic,, reasons.,The; reactor is: W ' y' defueled with the core spray bundle and. vessel. lid.in placeiarAi the, , ' ]M - primary coolant. system filled with water.- - Water flushet TreWisjngimade : . , through.sometanksandequipmentitofreduceradiation766eTrateh . M On August 4, 1987, the Commission-issued Amendmenti Ng.,665t'cLiceYse No..DPR.45 changing.it from an operating license:to atlicense,to n.. " , possess - only. On September 15, 1978,- LicenseAmendmentNo.57jits- - receivedwhichremoves: Inservice-Inspection'requirenenh.}fkr/high*M A Wp; pressure primary system' piping'and equipment;; and' deletes th6 % $ ' // ? 7 requirements'for. nuclear instrumentation.
, 'M).
' s, % The. licensee has submitted further Technical lSpeci catiohr- ) rc ed' -> I amendment applications since the (last inspection report -(409/87 N'4 as follows: M" j{[ f
'/f 3 ) a.
On August 18, 1987, to reduce the: fire brigade membership fred;fiW g7 i to three, reassign fire brigade training responsibi}itiss,jdoWte[k], ' the' Training Suw ro or position and reassign that jositiont- /L.
responsibilities, and to make other organizational. changes 40 reflect the SAFSTOR' plant status.
,y . b.
On August 21, 1987,ias revised.on August'28,Jta delete'the.
l requirements for Type A containment. leak rate Oesting.
c.
On September 24',1987, -to reviselin' entirety the. LACBWR Security ' Plan, Security Guard Force Training'and Qualifications?and-t; . g/ t V Safeguards Contingency. Plan.
., . .7 d.
On September 29, 1987,Lto revise:in entirety he LAC W E eroeNc )'ib Plan.
f O jff y.l f j c f ) p",4 ,,/ - , \\ f _E s .? ,f ' ,.; l ! '2: .' - "' ' . ,c , '.f
y -
___ -
] [ { @; Q ' %ff ' ' + fa ' ' ' ]
,
, ~ ' _
, > ' ci j . , , y' ' 1^ '
, L f l f.
' ,,
- $ h ly n jm 4-
, , , , y , ,L e 'On September'30,--1987, to.. amend the LACBWR TS to remove'. ' .- Conditions 1, 2, 3, and 5:requirementsfand some Condition'.4' J~ ,' d requirements. The requirements: for operational conditions 1of ~ t - l' Power Operation,l2L 'Startup,.3 - Hot. Shutdown, j } 41. Cold Shutdown,~and 5 Refueling.
-1 ' i The licensee's schedule far submittal 'of their? Decommissioning Plan ish
-f still mid December.
i f l' on July 17, 1987 . . .. }'
. and on September 29, 198'7, the' licensee also submitted'ai . request,to the.Commissio'n's Project' Manager to discontinue further review . d-( ' of various licensing actions'since'they wereLno'longertapplicable to'the ^ r /i present shutdown condition of:LACBWR, Many of these items were'TMI-and L
<
Salem ATWS rcviews which are'noilonger pertinent.
On August 25, 1987, Region III management' met withlLACBWR. management to.
O review the. facility. shutdown. status and.to discuss concerns over the: -i rapid los's 'of experienced operational * and ' health. physics personnel.
J , ,
- !
T 3.
Licensee Actions on Previous. Inspections Findings-In light of the facility shutdown, open or unresolved itemsihave been ,t - Ye reviewed to determine whether additional inspection effort is just_ified j l 5' i' or whether they should be administrative 1y closed.. Based on the review,.
- y.
' the following open items are -administrative 1y closed: iq a.
409/85007-01: Open Item'- Incorporate' Changes Made in;the' Emergency; j E t Plan Table E-1 of EAL's' into the EAL Table ~ Contained in: EPP-1.
j , , . [' q b.
409/85007-05: Open. Item - Procedure, Technique,'and Hardware;for:the.
K Laboratory Portion oflthe PASS Sample Must:be Reviewed and: Upgraded.
" lc
- )
, ,, d c.
409/86008-02: 0 pen Item - Establish Periodicity for: Follow-up Status! ' ^ Reports.
)j s y % ',y d.
409/86008-04: Open Item - Emergency' Preparedness Training Records.
' C ' J1 Must be Complete and Current,'Especially-for Key Personnel.Such as-ECD, ERD and LSO.' '
- !
, l $ l.
1,(V i , .i i L
- e.
409/86011-03: Open Item - Shielded PASS Sample Transport Cask Came ' Open During Transport ~' \\ ' l .f 409/86011-05: Open Item - Inadequate Consideration'of Evacuation:, 'i l,, Time Estimates Must Include Procedural Guidance in EPP's to Consider.
,, . l' Evacuation Times as PartLof Dose' Assessment.
[ ') .t . , " (l ,0thr items reviewed during this period are'as, follows: ' , [ . t ., g f.
! I, g. N (Closed) Open Item 409/85007-04: Inventory lists of kits and.: - Li t ' supplies should be :includediin' the plan and should.specify the-i
-p quantity of the. items'in. the kits; Inventory-lists have been-up-fated with the addition'of several: items.and'the quantity of: items}istedineachkit.
'
L a ,
y), e t s
1 /- , 'b ' j .\\
,
1 . .
[' /' .i',' ... ' _ [_ _ _____L _ _ _ .: _ .. - - - -. - --- - -- - - - - s
__
t . .e h.
(Closed) Open. Item 409/85008-02: - Initia1 notification to offsite
~ agencies for site area emergencies did not state whether a release ' was in progress or required by emergency plan.
Emergency Plan Procedure, EPP-2, Organization and Operations During Emergencies,- has been revised and Appendix H now has the required notifications- - for the action levels with check-offs for the agency called and for verification calls.
i.
(Closed) Violation 409/86008-03: Emergency. Equipment'and Supplies Must be Properly Inventoried.
On October 30, 1986, new inventory _ sheets were generated for both the La Crosse Lutheran and Vernon.- Memorial hospitals and added to Emergency Preparedness Procedure, EPP-11.
The sheets include minimum quantity of items and a sign-off blank for the person performing the inventory with approval of the Health and Safety Supervisor and the Emergency Preparedness 'i Coordinator.
4.
Operational Safety Verification , The inspector observed control room operations, reviewed aoplicable logs , ! and conducted discussions with control room-operators.
The inspector l verified the operability of selected emergency systems, reviewed tagout ' l records and verified proper return to service of affected components.
Tours of the crib house, reactor building, and turbine building were conducted to observe plant equipment conditions, including potential fire , hazards, and fluid leaks, and to verify that maintenance requests had.- l been initiated for equipment in need of maintenance.
By observation and [ j direct interview the inspector verified that the physical security plan ' was being implemented in accordance with the station security. plan.
The inspector observed plant housekeeping / cleanliness con'ditions and ! verified implementation of radiation protection controls.
Tne ' i r specto r-
walked down the accessible portions of the High Pressure Service Water-System, and Fire Protection System to verify operability.
'I No violations were identified.
-l l S.
Monthly Maintenance Observation .! I i Station maintenance activities of selected systems and components were ! ' observed / reviewed to ascertain that they were conducted in accordance with approved procedures, regulatory guides and industry codes or j l standards and in conformance with technical specifications.
The following items were considered during this review: approvals were obtained prior to initiating the work; activities were accomplished using I approved procedures and were inspected as applicable; functional testing ) and/or calibrations were performed prior to returning components or i systems to service; quality control records were maintained; activities
were accomplished by qualified personnel; parts'and materials used were { properly certified; radiological controls were implemented; and, fire l prevention controls were implemented.
j . ' !
4
i l ! l - - - _
s q !
- l
' , Work requests were reviewed to determine status of outstanding.iobs.'and to assure that priority was assigned to the maintenance of SAF M R equipment which could affect system performance.
No violations were identified, l 6.
Monthly Surveillance Observation j The inspector reviewed the licensees surveillance program-to assure that TS required surveillance were in their program, that the surveillance ~- ! had been. performed, and test records were available.
I u The licensee has reviewed the surveillance program in light of their- -] current SAFSTOR status and has proposed removing those tests not needed
- j in Operating Condition 4, i.e., -for systems such as the Control Rods and
Safety System, the Emergency Service Water Supply System, Reactor d Pressure and Power Instrumentation, High Pressure Core Spray and Boron j ' Systems, Alternate Core Spray (not including the backup fire protection i portion). These changes were reviewed and approved by the Operations l Review Committee and the Safety Review Committee and have been submitted as a proposed TS amendment.
j $ No violations were identified.
7.
Licensee Event Follow-up j )
Through direct observations, discussion with licensee personnel, and ) review of records, the following event report was reviewed to determine { that deportability requirements were fulfilled, immediate corrective i actions were accomplished, and corrective actions to prevent recurrence j had been accomplished in accordance with technical specifications.. ' ] (Closed)LER87-06: Containment Ventilation Isolation Due to a ' Containment Building Delayed Particulate Monitor Spurious Trip. Cause of.
the trip was not determined.
Isolation.of the containment building has no safety significance as the LACRWR containment is continuously vented i and short periods of isolation have negligible effects.
8.
TMI Open Items The following TMI Open Items are no longer of concern at LACBWR due to the permanent shutdown and are administratively closed: 1.C.1.2.8 Revise Short-Term Accident Procedure I.C.1.3.B Revise Transient and Accident Procedure.
I.D.2.2 Plant Safety - Parameter Display Console Installed I.D.2.3 Plant Safety - Parameter Display Console Implemented II.B.2.3 Plant Shielding - Equipment Qualification III.A Final ERF Approval'
. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
. - - - _ - l I '
w II.F.1.2 B.2 Implementation.of Accident-Monitoring 9.
Organization and Administration The licensee has reduced the manpower at LACBWR by about fifty percent (40 persons). A proposed license amendment will be submitted to reduce TS manpower requirements but for now the licensee maintains the manpower ' l requirements for Operational Condition 4, Cold Shutdown with one supervisor (SRO), one licensed operator and one auxiliary operator per shift.
Shiftwise health physics coverage.is also being maintained and security forces meet' Security Plan requirements.
No violations were identified.
10.
Review and Audits .On September 21, 1987, the inspector attended the Safety Review Committee (SRC) meeting..The inspector verified that provisions of technical specifications dealing with membership,. review process, frequency, and qualifications were met'. The inspector also verified, - that decisions made were reflected'in the meeting minutes and that corrective actions proposed were taken.
The SRC reviewed audits performed since the last inspection, the - proposed security and emergency plans, and proposed TS changes for the SAFSTOR - mode. The proposed Decommissioning Plan is scheduled for review at the next SRC meeting on December 1, 1987.. No violations were identified.
i 11.
Exit Interview ' The inspector met with licensee' representatives (denoted in Paragraph 1) throughout the inspection period and at the conclusion of the inspection-and summarized the scope and findings of the inspection activities.
The licensee acknowledged the findings as reported herein and did not identify such documents or processes as proprietary.
j , .) ! l ,
l --.-- - , }}