IR 05000334/1980008
| ML19318B777 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Beaver Valley |
| Issue date: | 05/07/1980 |
| From: | Belke W, Greenman E, Napuda G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I), Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19318B774 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-334-80-08, 50-334-80-8, NUDOCS 8006300043 | |
| Download: ML19318B777 (11) | |
Text
.
.
.
$
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSr5CTION AND ENFORCEMENT Megion I Report No. 80/08
Docket No. 50-334 j
License No. DPR-66 Priority Category C
--
Licensee:
Duquesne Light Company
,
435 Sixth Street Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219 Facility Name:
Beaver Valley Power Station - Unit 1 Inspection at:
Shippingport, PA and Corporate Offices, Pittsburgh, PA Inspection conducted:
March 24-28,1980 8/8/[d Inspectors:
ty G /Na uda, Reactor Inspector
/ date signed dh 0<
S $fh
/
/ date signed h.g)Belke,NRR-QAB
.
date signed Approved by:
8. 0. S U.b i b fl'J I8 0 E. G. Greenman, Chief Nuclear date signed Support Section No. 2, RO&NS Branch Inspection Summarv:
Inspection on March 24-28, 1980 (Report No. 50-334/80-08)
Areas Inspected:
Routine announced irenection by one region-based ins and one headquarters-based Engineer (c the Quality Assurance Program (pector QAP)
implementation including: QA Program Review; QA/QC Administration; Desi Change / Modification Controls; Offsite Support Staff (including Training)gn
Document Control; Test and Measurement; and followup on previously identified items.
The inspection involved 60 inspector-hours onsite and 15 inspection-hours at the corporate offices by a region based inspector and an NRC headquarters based Engineer (NRR-QAB).
Results: Of the five areas inspected, no items of noncompliance were identified.
Region I Form 12-(Rev. April 77)
8006300 & 3
.
.
.-
i
.
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted J. F. Ankney, Project Engineer-EED
.
- R. F. Balcerek, Nuclear Engineering and Refueling Supervisor
- G. L. Beatty, QA Engineer
- R. F. Burski, Senior Compliance Engineer
- J. J. Carey, Director of Nuclear Operations
- S. C. Fenner, NSQC Supervisor M. Gebhardt, Project Manager
- W. H. Glidden, QA Engineer
- R. L. Hanser, Station Maintenance Supervisor E. Humder, Senior Construction Specialist
- L.
K. Hutchinson, Station Audit Coordinator G. Ingraham, Chief Site Engineer
- F. J. Lipchick, Compliance Engineer
- A. T. Lonnet, Associate Engineer R.Musselman,SeniorProjectEngineer(NSC)
E. Schnell, Radiation Control Supervisor
- R. J. Swiderski, Superintendant of Construction
- H. W. Thomas, Supervisor (0EG)
- P. J. Valenti, Engineering Supervisor
- H. P. Williams, Chief Engineer
- M. G. Ziemba, Construction Engineer (ECI)
Other Accompanying NRC Personnel
- D. Beckman, Senior Resident Inspector
- Denotes those present at the exit interview.
The inspectors also held discussions with and interviewed other members of the Power Station and Duquesne Light Company technical and administrative
'
staf.-
.
2.
Followup on Previous 1v Ident*fied Inspector Findings (Closed) Unresolved Item (78-26-04):
Resolve conflict between EMP 5.4 and 0AP 018-1.8 and establish uniform method of drawing status identification including drawings affected but not yet revised by DPCs.
Inspector verified that there is now a unifonn method of drawing status identification.
This item is resolved.
(Closed)UnresolvedItem-(78-26-06):
Licensee to assign QA categories and QC levels to procured services for calibration services.
The inspector
,
reviewed Procedures NSOC 4.1, Revision 5 and 4.2, Revision 5 (in final review) and verified that vendors utilized for calibration services must now be on the approved vendors listing.
This item is resolved.
(Closed)UnresolvedItem(79-18-01):
Licensee to develop procedure to define the mechanism for reviewing DPCs.
The inspector verified that Procedure NSOC 3.1, Revision 0. addresses the subject.
This item is resolved.
(Closed) Unresolved Item (79-18-02):
Licensee to develop procedure defining how to do surveillance of contractor's QC. The inspector verified that Procedure NSQC 10.4, Revision 0, now addresses the subject.
This item is resolved.
(Closed) Unresolved Item (79-18-03):
EMPs to be revised to require periodic review of these procedures. The inspector verified that EMP 4.1, Revision 3 now requires biennial review of these procedures.
This item is resolved.
(Closed) Infraction (79-18-04):
The basis for 10 CFR 50.59 reviews to be documented in the OSC meeting minutes.
During this inspection, the design change / modification area was examined and the inspector verified that the basis of the safety evaluations are now included in OSC meeting minutes.
This item is closed.
(0 pen) Infraction (79-18-05):
Station not maintaining as-built drawings showing most recent modifications. The inspector examined C,cawings RM-29A and 35A, RE-9AY, RP-19J and 3BG and verified that they were up-to-date.
Further, the licensee representative stated that all completed Category I DPCs were reviewed to determine what drawings needed updating and that 31 hand revised drawings were provided to the station with an additional 8 to be completed prior to startup. Pending further review of this activity area, this item remains ope *
.
~
.
.
(Closed) Infraction (79-18-06):
T.S. and station procedure ISI 5.0 not updated to reflect SI-HSS-337 (original report had typographically mis-identified this snubber). The inspector verified that ISI 5.0, Revision 3 includes the subject snubber in the surveillance schedule.
Further, the licensee representative stated that a T.S. change is in the process of being submitted to the NRC. Therefore this item is closed.
(Closed) Infraction (79-18-07):
Station engineering performed Category I engineering activities contrary to licensee policy.
During this inspection the inspector verified (on a sample of modification) that the recently established onsite corporate engineering group, corporate based engineers and A/E personnel (when contracted) perform Category I related engineering wo.rk.
Further, a number of revised procedures specifically describe the conduct of this activity. Therefore this item is clased.
(0 pen) Deviation (79-18-08):
Failure of licensee to implement commitments contained in letter C. N. Dunn to B. H. Grier dated November 29, 1978. The inspector verified that station engineering is no longer performing Category I design work (see preceding item) but did not review the status of design change package transmittals.
Pending this review, this item remains open.
(Closed) Unresolved Item (79-18-09):
Documentation of annual review of station office procedures.
The cognizant individual provided the inspector with documentation that indicated the reviews had been accomplished.
This item is resolved.
(0 pen) Deficiency (79-18-10):
Records storage not in accordance with ANSI N45.2.9.
During this inspection the inspector noted that the single copy records that had been stored in the ordinary office environment have been removed to a more suitable area. The target date-for completion of corrective action is not yet due. Therefore, this item remains open.
'
(Closed) Unresolved Item (79-18-11):
DLC engineers not fully aware of their responsibilities as delineated in the EMPs.
During this inspection the inspector interviewed a number of engineers and reviewed their training records (reference Paragraph 6). The inspector had no further questions.
'
This item is resolved.
l
.
__
_
__
_
__
.
.
-3.
Quality Assurance Program Review The inspectors reviewed, on a sampling basis, the changes made to the below listed Quality Assurance Program implementing procedures since the NRC QA inspection in August, 1979.. The revisions were reviewed for consistency with the licensee's accepted Quality Assurance plan.
These procedures also served as the basis for inspection in the areas discussed within this report.
During the conduct of the inspection, discussions were held with licensee personnel which indicated that they were aware of and were implementing the procedural changes.
The procedures reviewed were:
~
OP-3, Administrative Controls, Revision 5
--
OP-5, Procurement Control, Revision 3
--
OP-6, Material Control, Revision 4
--
Appendix A, Glossary of terms for the Operations Quality
--
Assurance Program, Revision 1 The inspectors verif,ied by direct discussions during portions of the inspection documented elsewhere in this Report that those individuals responsible for implementation of the changes were both aware of the differences and implementing the new program requirements.
No items of noncompliance were identified.
4.
QA/QC Administration a.
References OP-1, Operations Quality Assurance Program, Revision 4
--
OP-2, Organization and Responsibilities, Revision 4
--
OP-10, Maintenance and Modification, Revision 3
--
OP-14, Indoctrination and Training, Revision 3
--
0F-12, Audits, Revision 3
--
NSOC 2.0, NSQC Organization, Revision 1
--
b.-
Program Review The documents referenced above were reviewed on a sampling basis to determine that administrative controls for QA/QC. administration have been established in accordance with the requirements described in the submitted FSAR, Appendix A, amendment 20. The subject review determined that administrative controls have been established for:
..
__
..
,
.
.
Defining those structures, systems, components, documents and
--
activities to which the QA Program applies The revision of documents to which the QA Program applies
--
Administrative control of QA/QC department procedures
--
The overall review of the effectiveness of the QA Program
--
Personnel and orga11zations who perform activities for which the
--
QA Program applies No items of noncomplia;1ce were identified.
5.
Design Changes / Modification Control a.
References OP-4, Station Design Control, Revision 6
--
OP-10, Maintenance and Modification Planning, Revision 3
--
OP-11, Control of Maintenance and Modification, Revision 3
--
OP-13, Control of Nonconforming Items, Revision 4
--
Appendix B, Category I Structures, Systems and Ccmponents, Revision
--
EMP 2.2, Technical Review Responsibility Assignment and the
--
Master List, Revision 1 EMP 2.3, Technical Review Reports, Revision 3
-,
EMP 2.5, Change Requests for Safety Analysis Reports, Revision 5
--
EMP 2.6, Classification of Safety Related Structures, Systems and
--
Components, Revision 2 EMP 2.7, Request for Station Modifications, Revision 0
--
EMP 2.8, Handling of Design Change Packages, Revision 3
--
EMP 2.10, Design and Procurement Specifications, Revision 0
--
EMP 2.11, Construction and Insulation Specifications, Revision 2
-
--
EMP 2.13, Design Drawings, Revision 2
---
.
.
EMP 2.17, Design Analysis, Revision 0
--
EMP 2.18 Design Verification Control, Revision 0
--
EMP 2.19, Design Review Verification, Revision 0
--
EMP 2.20, Alternate Calculation Verification, Revision 0
--
EMP 2.21, Qualification Testing, Revision 0
--
EMP 2.22, Engineering Memoranda, Revision 0
--
EMP 2.23, Engineering Change Notice, Revision 0
--
NSQC 3.1, Design Change Control, Revision 0
--
NSQC 4.1, Assignment of Quality Requirements to Spare Parts,
--
Material and Equipment, Revision 4.
NSQC 4.2, NSQC Processing of Stock Item Requests and Purchase
--
Requisitions, Revision 4 b.
Program Review The documents listed above were reviewed to determine whether admin-istrative controls for design changes / modifications have incorporated the requirements as described in the Beaver Valley Quality Assurance
'
Program.
This review determined that administrative controls have been established which verify the following:
' procedures for control of design changes / modifications have been
--
developed design document control has.been established
--
channels of communications between the design organization and
--
the individual responsible for implementation exist design change / modification packages are being converted into
--
plant records methods exist for identifying and reporting those design changes /
--
modifications which are within the scope of 10 CFR 50.59 procedural controls exist for temporary modifications, lifted
--
leads and jumpers responsibilities have been delineated in writing to assure the-
--
implementation of the above.
No items of noncompliance were identified.
.
.
c.
Implementation Review The inspector reviewed the following design change packages (DCs) of modification work in progress.
DC 0130, Auxiliary Feed Pump Recirculation Piping Modification
--
DC 0142, Change Emergency D.G. Alarms per NRC Response
--
DC 0189, ORS Pennanent NPSH Fix
--
DC 0253, Modifications as a result of pipe analysis (work done)
--
The modifications listed.above were reviewed to verify that tk.e following requirements have been implemented.
10 CFR 50.59 reviews were performed and documented
--
design changes / modifications were accomplished in accordance with
--
,
written procedures acceptance testing was specified where necessary
--
procedures and drawings required to be changed or generated as a
--
result of the design change / modification were identified the design change /mo'dification package contained the necessary
--
instructions / records, etc., with respect to the status of work The inspector stated that he did not complete.this portion of his inspection at this time.
The licensee acknowledged the inspector's statement.
No items of noncompliance were identified.
6.
Offsite Support Staff a.
References OP-14, Indoctrination and Training, Revision 3
--
EMP 1.5, Project Team Organization and Charter, Revision 2
--
EMP 1.6, Personnel Training. Revision 4
--
b.
Program Review A review of the offsite support staff was conducted by the inspectors which included procedure reviews, reviews of personnel qualifications, personnel interviews, procedure implementation and support staff training records to verify the following:
__
._.
-
__
._.
l
.
.
Administrative controls which describe the responsibilities, i
--
authorities and lines of communications have been developed and
-
.are readily available The applicable procedures referenced in subparagraphs a of other
--
paragraphs in this report are in conformance with the requirements
~ f 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, and the licensee's approved QA Program o
The managers, group leaders and support staff members are aware
--
of their responsibilities and authorities as defined by the
-
applicable referenced procedures
- -
The personnel which comprise the offsite support staff are qualified
--
to execute the responsibilities defined by the applicable referenced procedures All discipline engineers have received the appropriate Engineering
--
Management Procedures (EMPs) training.
!
No items of noncompliance were identified.
!
'
7.
Document Control a.
Refererces OP-8, Document Control, Revision 0
--
OP-9, Technical Procedure Control for Operations and Maintenance,
--
.
Revision 2 i
EMP 4.1 Engineering Management Procedures, Revision 3
--
EMP 5.4, Issue of Controlled Documents, Revision 3
--
b.
Program Review The documents referenced above were reviewed on a sampling basis'to determine that administrative controls for document contrn1 have been established in accordance with the requirements described in the submitted FSAR. Appendix A, Amendment 20, the subject review determined that administrative controls have been established for:
>
The control.of new drawings and obsolete drawings.
--
' Master indices for drawings, manuals, tech. specs., the FSAR and
--
Procedures which implement-the QA Program.
Distribution of documents referenced above.
--
Assigning responsibilities.for accomplishing / performing the
--
above,
'
i No items of noncomplianceL were identified.
, --
. -.,.
.
... -
.
.
...,
.
.
.
-
.
.
.
,
8.
Calibration Control
.
The inspector examined the control and storage conditions of measuring and test equipment in the. Calibration Lab and selected several instruments to-verify that they were within the calibration cycle.
The -inspector noted and discussed the following discrepancies with licensee representatives:
certain instances where the office history card calibration dates did
--
not agree with the computer print.out dates
.
certain instances where the lab file calibration due dates did not
--
agree with the computer print out dates
!
inability to locate certain instruments at the location designated by
--
the lab file were' a number of poorly stored pressure gauges used for safety related
--
activities
'
~
were all' measuring and test equipment included on the computer print
'
--
out Subsequent to this inspection, the licensee advised the senior resident inspector that a portion of the instrument shop files were erroneously presented as current documents / records during this inspection when in reality they were noncurrent historical data.- The licensee attributed this
'
!
error to the unfamiliarity of the involved employee (escort assigned to the inspector) with this portion of the calibration system.
'
,
~
The resident inspector advised the licensee that this area would be reexamined during a subsequent inspection and the apparent discrepancies would be
given specific attention. The licensee acknowledged the inspector's statement.
,
This item is unresolved pending further review of the calibration and control of measuring and test equipment (50-334/30-08-01).
9.
Plant Tour
,
.
The inspectors toured the Calibration Office and Calibration Lab at the station and ~the engineering offices at both the station and corporate headquarters.
The inspectors observed general conditions and work in-progress.
J
'
No items of noncompliance were identified, however an unresolved item is
'
discussed in Paragraph 8.
10. Unresolved Items Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required in
,
-
order to ascertain whether they are acceptable items, items of noncompliance
.
or deviations. An unresolved item is discussed in Paragraph 8.
,
<
i
. _ _,
'
.
-.
11.
Presentation of Preliminiary Findings The inspectors met with licensee representatives (denoted in Paragraph 1).
A suninary of inspector findings was provided to the senior licensee representative onsite at the conclusion of the inspection. The licensee acknowledged the inspectors' findings.
<
a i
1