IR 05000334/1980018
| ML19338E507 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Beaver Valley |
| Issue date: | 07/24/1980 |
| From: | Devlin J, Galen Smith NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19338E503 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-334-80-18, NUDOCS 8010030126 | |
| Download: ML19338E507 (2) | |
Text
__ _.
_
_
_
.
_ _
_ _ _
w
.
.
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULAIORY COMMISSION OEEICE DE INSPECIION AND ENE02CEMENI
REGION I
Report No.
50-334/80-18 Docket No.
50-334 License No.
DPR-66 Safeguards Group IV Licensee:
Duquesne Light Company 435 Sixth Avenue Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219 Eacility Name:
Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit 1 Inspection At:
Shippingport, Pennsylvania Inspection Conducted:
June 16-20, 1980 Date of Last Physical Security Inspection:
December 14, 1980 Iype of Inspedtic 1 Routine, Unannounced, Physical Security Inspectors:
L
&
rb sco
,
ti. c. 5mith, enysical becurity inspector
/ date date 7/
fo Approved b
%4M A--
7/ W. Devlin, Unlet, security and investigation
' dat.e
,
j/ Section, Safeguards Branch Inspection Summary:
Houtine, inspection on June 16-20,1980(ReportNumber 50-334/80-18)
Areas Ins)ected:
becurity UJan; decurity Program Audit; becurity Organization; PhysicaJ Sarriers (Protected Area) (Vital Areas); Lighting; Access Control (Identification Authorization and Badging)
(Search);
Escortin AlarmStations;,DetectionAids;Assessmentkids;Commun(ications;g);(VitalAreas)
tenance; Compensatory Measures; Power Supply; Response; Locks, Keys and Combinations and Records and Reports.
Ihe inspection involved 34 inspector-hours onsite by one NRC regional based inspector.
Ihe inspection was initiated during regular hours; 6 inspection hours were accomplished during off-shift periods.
Region I Eorm 167 (August 1979)
8010030 gQ4
__
_
_ _ _. _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _. -
_. _ - _
_.
.
.
o
O
.
Results:
The licensee was found to be in noncompliance with NRC requirements in six (6) of the twenty (20) areas examined.
Security Plan (Failure to notify the Commission prior to initiating changes that decrease the effectiveness of the Sec.urity Plan). Lighting (Failure to meet the.2 footcandle lighting requirement in all exterior areas of the protected area).
Security Program Audit (Failure to have the Security Program Audit conducted by independent auditors).
Compensatory Measures (Failure to implement required compensatory measures). Access Controls (Failure to wear identification badge. Protected area physical barriers (Failure tu maintain clear isolation zones).
l