ML20028C920

Forwards Univ List of Opposing Citations for Statements of Matl Fact Attached to Committee to Bridge the Gap Motions for Summary Disposition of Contentions XIII & Xvii.Related Correspondence

ML20028C920
Person / Time
Site:	05000142
Issue date:	01/07/1983
From:	Cormier W CALIFORNIA, UNIV. OF, LOS ANGELES, CA
To:	Frye J, Luebke E, Paris O Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
NUDOCS 8301140310
Download: ML20028C920 (3)

Text

l ggp W UNIVEllSITY OF CALIFOllNIA, LOS ANGELES UCLA G

g:.%.,%,

C D. :. Y.E. :E!

7 h t'hE t 11.). I)44 !% + IM ig 6.

• BassANs,t.lj.s. Mit t.pstlig.

s 4 N f M F t.o

%4% t H 4%t ru n i.'

%4N14m4pn4ns s 4%TA 8.R( Z

< k.a.u

'83 JAN 13 All:04 D

OFFICE OF TIIE Cll ANCE!.t.OR LOS ANCELES, CAI.IFOHNIA *Juu24 Mi[c{.1" January 7, 1983 John H. Frye, III, Chairman Dr. Emmeth A. Luebke Administrative Judge Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Board U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Commission Washington, D.C.

20555 Washington,.D.C.

20555 Dr. Oscar H. Paris Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Washington, D.C.

20555 In the Matter of THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA (UCLA Research Reactor)

Docket No. 50-142 (Proposed Renewal of Facility License)

Dear Administrative Judges:

Enclosed is University's list of opposing citations to those statements of material fact attached to CBG's motions for summary disposition of Contentions XIII and XVII, which CBG asserts are factdal' statements not in discute.

In accordance w'ith the procedures adop'ted by the Board in its Orders of October 22 and November 10, 1982, University is reserving all evidentiary objections to the second step of the procedures.

~.. M2If,=

' '~^

=

~~

=

t D

William H. Cormier UCLA Representative l

Enclosure l

cc:

Service List l

l 8301140310 830107 l

PDR ADOCK 05000142 l

0 PDR CD363

,3-

-y-y;

~,, ;,

4 UNIVERSITY ' S -LISTJOF, OPPOSING CITATIOt:S ETO :

p

CBG'S! STATEMENTS OF MATERIAL: FACTS REGARDINGj

-CONTENTIONS ~XIII:AND XVII AS-TO'WHICl! CBG

~

~ ALLEGES NO GEMUINE DISPUTE EXISTS-CONTENTION XIII Statement Number'l 1.

The full information as tx) equipment 1and_procedurec desicned to prevent, mitigate,-detect, and respond tx) criticality; accidents required by 10 'CFR -70.22 (a) (7): and (a);(8) and 170.24 (a) (1) (2),c and (3) has not.been provided in the Application.-

Opposing Citations 1.

UCLA Application, Appendix III, generally;-in particular, pp. III/1-1,-3,-5, III/4-1,-7, III/5-1 to 5-15, III/6-2 to 6-5, and III/8-7 to 8-13.

2.

UCLA Application, Appendix IV (Energency Response; Plan), generally;.

in particular, pp. IV/7-1 to 8-2, 3.

UCLA Application, Appendix V (Technical Specifications), generally; in particular, pp. V/3-4 to 3-9,-13, V/4-1,-2, -and V/5-li to 5-6.-

Statement Number 11 and 15

11. Reduced enrichment fuels are curre'ntly available on'which the-UCLA reactor can run.

15. Advanced reduced enrichment fuels of higher Uranium loading will soon be available on which all but the highest research reactors can run.

Opposing _ Citations 1.

"Use of High-Enriched Uranium (HEU) in Research Reactors; Policy Statement" 47 Fed. Reg. 37007 (CBG Exhibit I), paragraphs 5, 6, 10.

2.

IAEA - TECDOC - 233 (CBG Exhibit U), pp. 9-10'and 13.

3.

11. Bernard affidavit concerning Contention XIII, para. 8 (attached

~

to NRC Staff's September 1, 1982 motion of summary disposition).

4.

CBG's Exhibit A, para.

7.

m.,

c, n

,r. g P

a

, 4 '.

,e

,.f.

. CONTENTION' XVII 4

. Statements NumberL2, 3, and76-

/

~

2..

The'UCLA: reactor is [ sic, the:words,"may be"' appeared)in CBG's November:8, 19821: list of citations] L in the. path of at~~1 east'one~

active earthquake fault.

3 3.

The UCLA reactor is within'two miles of.the'-Newport.- Inglewood fault.-

t 6.

The current-probability of' occurrence of'a:7.5 magnitu.de earth-

~ quake along~the Newport-Inglewood Fault'is at least l%-annually, or:a one in fifty chance during the proposed-twenty-year license-

' period.

Opposing Citations i

The documents. cited.by CBG do'not support the. precise statements being asserted by CBG.

Statement Number 8 8.

The Santa Monica Fault Zone is - capable of a' 7';57magsitude earthquake.

s Opposing Citation 1.

CBG's Exhibit C,.p.-16.

9 b

- i f

-l I

92

.,__. _ j

-