ML20128E348

Forwards Dcrdr Summary Rept for Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant. Rept Provides List of Human Engineering Discrepancies Identified,Mods Planned to Address Discrepancies & Schedule for Implementation of Mods

ML20128E348
Person / Time
Site:	Vermont Yankee
Issue date:	07/01/1985
From:	Murphy W VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER CORP.
To:	Vassallo D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20128E354	List: ML20128E348 ML20128E413
References
RTR-NUREG-0737, RTR-NUREG-737 FVY-85-61, GL-82-33, NUDOCS 8507050321
Download: ML20128E348 (2)

Text

T VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR ' POWER CORPORATION FVY 85-61

.- RD 5. Box 169. Ferry Road, Brattleboro, VT 05301 REPLY TO ENGINEERING OFFICE

f. g

_- 1671 WORCESTER ROAD FRAMINGHAM. MASS ACHUSETTS 01701

. TELEPHO*eE 677-472 8100 July 1, 1985 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Attention: Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Mr. Domenic B. Vassallo, Chief Operating Reactors Branch No. 2 ,

Division of Licensing

Reference:

a) License No. DPR-28 (Docket No. 50-271) b) Letter, USNRC to All Operating Reactors, Generic Letter 82-33, Supplement 1 to NUREO 0737 - Requirements for Emergency Response Capability, dated 12/17/82 c) Letter, VYNPC to USNRC, FVY 83-85, dated 8/4/83 d) Letter, USNRC to VYNPC, NVY 84-128, dated 6/12/04 e) Letter, VYNPC to USNRC, FVY 84-64, dated 6/19.84 f) Letter, USNRC to VYNPC, NVY 84-223, dated 1D/11/84 g) Letter, USNRC to VYNPC, NVY 85-124, dated 6/7/85

Subject:

Vermont Yankee Detailed Control Room Design Review Summary Report (DCRDR)

By letter dated October 11, 1984 (Reference f)), Vermont Yankee was required to submit a summary report for the Detailed Control Room Design Review (DCRDR), in accordance with the Drder Confirming Licensee Commitments on Emergency Response Capability, dated June 12, 1984 (Reference d)]. The Vermont Yankee Detailed Control Room Design Review Summary Report is herein provided as Enclosure 1 to this letter. This report provides a list of the Human Engineering Discrepancies (HED's) identified, the modifications planned to address these discrepancies and the schedule for implementation of those modifi-cations. In addition, it describes any variations in the conduct of the DCRDR from the program plan provided in our transmittal of June 19, 1984 [ Reference e)].

The report of your staff's /pril 1-4, 1985 In-Progress Audit of Vermont Yankee's DCRDR (Reference g)] was not received in time to be incorporated in the enclosed summary report. The In-Progress Audit results are currently under review. We do note that the task analysis enhancement effort discussed during g7050321850702 00 F ADOCK 05000271 \ ;0 PDR O

s VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWEH COMPORATION U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission July 1, 1985 Page 2 i

the audit exit interview has been initiated by our contractors, General Physics, with completion scheduled for the end of the year. These efforts will be fac-tored into the schedules provided in the summary report. A supplemental submit-tal addressing these enhanced and revised schedules will be provided by September 1985.

We trust that the enclosed summary report is deemed acceptable; however, should you have any questions or require additional information concerning this subject, please contact us.

Very truly yours, VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER CORPORATION Ai n  ?

Warren P. urphy (/

Vice President and Manager of Operations

/dm i