ML20214M838

From kanterella
Revision as of 13:54, 4 May 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-269/85-25,50-270/85-23 & 50-287/85-25.Requests That NRC Review Util 860502 Supplemental Response
ML20214M838
Person / Time
Site: Oconee  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/29/1986
From: Tucker H
DUKE POWER CO.
To: Grace J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
References
NUDOCS 8609110317
Download: ML20214M838 (1)


Text

_

M6 DUKE POWER GOMPANY P.O. BOX 33189 CHARLOTTE, N.C. 28242 HALH. TUCKER TELEPHONE

<>o4) ora-4.ai 86 SEP 8. P 1 . 55 August 29, 1986 Dr. J. Nelson Grace, Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323

Subject:

Oconee Nuclear Station IE Inspection Report Nos. 50-269/85-25 50-270/85-23 50-287/85-25

Dear Dr. Grace:

By letter dated September 19, 1985, NRC/ Region II transmitted the subject inspection report which enclosed a Notice of Violation. Duke provided a response by a letter dated October 14, 1985. By letter dated April 3, 1986, the NRC/ Region II requested Duke to submital supplemental response. In response to the April 3, 1986 NRC letter, a supplemental response was submitted by Duke in a letter dated May 2, 1986.

Recently by letter dated July 31, 1986, NRC/ Region II again requested a

. supplemental response to the Notice of Violation identified within the subject inspection report be submitted. However, within the July 31, 1986 NRC letter, Duke's May 2,1986 response was not referenced as having been reviewed. As such, Duke requests that the NRC review the response provided by the May 2,1986 letter.

Very truly yours, Hal B. Tucker n

'PFG/15/slb xc: Mr. J. C. Bryant NRC Resident Inspector Oconee Nuclear Station 8609110317 860829

\\0 DR ADOCK0500g9 Qf