ML20236J615

From kanterella
Revision as of 15:59, 21 February 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Summary of 870630 Onsite Mgt Meeting Re Corrective Actions Being Taken to Reduce High Reactor Trip Rate & to Address Other Programmatic Problems.Followup Meeting Scheduled for Early Sept to Monitor Progress.Agenda & Viewgraphs Encl
ML20236J615
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 07/29/1987
From: Grace J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To: James O'Reilly
GEORGIA POWER CO.
References
NUDOCS 8708060220
Download: ML20236J615 (60)
v • d • e


Text

. n ~ $$

. h JUL 2 91987 Docket No. 50-424 License No. NPF-68 Georgia Power Company Or1TN: Mr. James P. O'Reilly I Senior Vice President-Nuclear Operations P. O. Box 4545 Atlanta, GA 30302 Gentlemen:

SUBJECT:

MEETING

SUMMARY

- V0GTLE ELECTRIC GENERATING PLANT - DOCKET NO. 50-424 This letter refers to the meeting conducted at the Vogtle site on June 30, 1987. This meeting was held to discuss the corrective actions being taken to reduce the high reactor trip rate and address other programmatic problems.

Our concerns regarding identification of root cause and achieving effective corrective action, learning from other utility experience and improving the teamwork of your staff expressed to you at the meeting and your positive response to our concerns is appreciated.

Currently, a followup meeting is being scheduled for early September to monitor your progress.

It is our opinion that this meeting was beneficial and has provided for a better mutual understanding of the inspection findings and enforcement issues.

We also found your description of the findings and your corrective actions to be beneficial in our evaluation of the issues. In accordance with Section 2.790 of NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and the enclosures will be placed in NRC's Public Document Room.

Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact this office.

Sincerely, hryye'ncel W*

A L .6nsf/f J. Nelson Grace Regional Administrator

Enclosures:

(See page 2) 8708060220 870729 PDR ADOCK 05000424

& PDR Ik

.z E f

.o .

JUL 2 9 1587 Georgia Power Company -

2

Enclosures:

1. Attendance List
2. GPC Meeting Slides - Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Energy from Excellence and Efficiency, NRC Management Meeting June 30, 1987 cc,w/encis:
f. D. Rice, Vice President, Project Director p W. Hayes, Vogtle Quality Assurance Manager dK Bockhold, Jr., General Manager, Nuclear Operations til Gucwa, Manager, Nuclear Safety and Licensing y A. Bailey, Project Licensing Manager t)( W. Churchill, Esq., Shaw,

. fittman, Potts and Trowbridge W. E. Joiner, Troutman, Sanders, Lockerman and Ashmore M Kirkland, III, Counsel, Office of the Consumer's Utility Council la' Feig, Georgians Against

)luclear Energy M. B. Margulies, Esq. , Chaiman, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board fanel L0r. O. H. Paris, Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel d A. Linenberger, Jr., Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel bec w/encls:

(4. Reis. 0GC LMfMiller,NRR M. Sinkule, RII LRifC Resident Inspector Document Control Desk State of Georgia RII RII RII RII EChristnot:jw MSinkule VLBrownlee LReyes W 7p87 7/ /87 7/ /8/

nst 7/ M/87

ews, a m I Ig ggc GENg gD/

4V &'4 r 4 (

  1. $7 ._

L f EXERGY FROM $

EXCELLEXCE l AND EFFICIENCY E~

%* +

/

4 GEPAEMT

/

JUNE 30,1987 L

1

~

AGENDA

'NRC MANAGEMENT MEETING PLANT VOGTLE JUNE 30,1987 TIME TOPIC SPEAKER 1:00 INTRODUCTIONS & OPENING REMARKS JP O'REILLY 1:15 NRC OPENING REMARKS NRC 1:30 DISCUSSION OF OPERATING EVENTS G.BOCKHOLD o PRE- COMMERCIAL EVENTS o POST-COMMERCIAL EVENTS o VOGTLE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1:50 DISCUSSION OF PLANT CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAMS o' ROOT CAUSE EVALUATIONS & TV GREENE POSITIVE VALVE PROGRAM l o TRAINING REVIEWS & IMPROVEMENTS PD RUSHTON o RELIABILITY ENHANCEMENT & MA GRIFFIS MAINTENANCE TRENDS o ISEG PROGRAMS AND TRIP CC ECKERT REDUCTION ASSESSMENT PROGRAM o ORGAN'lZATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS G BOCKHOLD 3:15 CORPORATE IMPROVEMENT & MONITORING JP O'RElLLY a LESSONS LEARNED / ANALYSIS OF DG SMITH OPERATING EVENTS o NUCLEAR SECURITY EM HOWARD o ENGINEERING PROGRAM JP KANE o MAINTENANCE PROGRAM BK McLEOD o NUCLEAR SAFETY & LICENSING LT GUCWA 3:45 NRC OBSERVATIONS AND FINDINGS NRC 4:15 GPC CONCLUDING REMARKS JP O'REILLY 4:25 EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT OVERVIEW HG BAKER 4:35 NRC

SUMMARY

NRC l emd

t REACTOR TRIP STATUS ePRE- COMMERCIAL

l gb1/RTS

l

~

STEAM GENERATOR LEVEL TRIPS e PRE-COMMERCIAL 4 DURING SECONDARY PLANT INITIAL TUNING 3 EQUIPMENT 1 MAIN FEEDWATER CHECK VALVE FAILURE 1 FEEDWATER REGULATING VALVE FAILURE 1 HOTWELL LEVEL CONTROLLER 4 OTHER 1 FOLLOWING LOAD SWING TEST 1 MSIV CLOSURE 1 BFRV MANUAL ISOLATION VALVE CLOSED 1 FOLLOWING MAIN GENERATOR TRIP 11 gb2/SGLT

BTEAM @EMERAT@R NARR@W RAN@E @ PAN

@@MPARD@@M@

1 l

l 144" MODEL 51 MODEL F 128-

\ /

MODELS D2/03/D4 HAVE 233" SPAN D

{ .

a .

PRE-COMMERCIAL '

ESF ACTUATIONS c 12 FEEDWATER ISOLATIONS 1

25 INSTRUMENT FAILURES e21 CONTROL ROOM ISOLATIONS 14 CHLORINE DETECTOR l

7 RADIATION MONITORS (PERMS) .

04 CONTAINMENT VENTILATION ISOLATION ACTUATIONS I

l 2 LOSS OF POWER l

2 FAULTY CIRCUIT BOARD 1

1 FUEL HANDLING BUILDING ISOLATION l

9 NO ECCS INJ3CTIONS -

gb3/PRECESFA

- x

_r. .

y P U

R A

T E Y

R A

T S

o:

t s

D 1

g

- - g4'^!- '

U-z  : 1 s

,M%m~ u5; a:.dm sEn;.

E n::my~ s L

2 N.H.U7' a$. ;

g M5aA 2

. . Fm. .
:mp'd5Ns.s;5..w+m.yh f.,a

?g.*&y T*

Ee s p T G

. -. s. 0 g .9i:E w$}';,@$^:gg^ m,.9;. 2#d3

' - b:,.p5 p

~

V

# @ gg*.

-3: 3a 4w j;jt.; .!nmq :;

- i.9,4.f: mqh -

t4 S - -

R - -

O -

T -

M I

- ' ,.3xe.v c.- ,,. -

.: 3 E

N -

'...a-wyy%O5xwcMg:e, x

3 C;; % ;- , q y

c E ,s.c E - -

- c. f .:

O G

i T

' :unaC5n.;sj. qss n.rm 1

'bt p t

S_

E A - -

.Fnn:39 w{fn;smxigtmug

. - I?;-

trrs g

t l l .

, an S hauot I

T -  ;:

M P S

.Zt~~.9Mt:.-

3 .

I -

R -

1 F

L A L -

T E -

O T D - -

, ,e s. - K O - - 6

.p:s . :-.t E

<, .w-s..m- (M ~

N -

y' sy

~

E

e-I - -

- s~ s , ..-

R H - -

C I

W

,:. .g  :  ?.2 :.::c

. +; : ;

5-

s. ;.

2 z. ,

F

t::

-:1. ;; O^z 5 31-9.n:: L S

2.pwc:3s.nm.,2En',::~.nw-

{ m x 34- p
-
s.dc:i e Lo
c : ::

O W

_ T N

A - -

_ L -

P

.<p,x;;r- c.-....'

~ ~ . e. .t yI . .' 3-s

~ . : .j i.' ., < .

s.

tp i- ,, Y A

.s 4.. '

a- J

. 4x; 4 x s-.-p;,w -

W A

p L

= L y:- a.r:ar y A y- Y.#" ~

C S m, ~

P - -

I -

R T

5 0 5 0 5 O 2 7 1 1 4

b g

COMMERCIAL OPERATIONS UNPLAXXED AUTOMATIC REACTOR TRIPS l

eSOURCE RANGE HI FLUX eGENERATOR LEVEL CONTROL

  • HIGH EXCITATION ON TURBINE GENE'RATOR
  • TURBINE TRIP-LIGHTNING
  1. FEED PUMP CHECK VALVE OFEED PUMP SPEED CONTROL gb5/COUART

x , e . . - .

j

~g,.

s e <3 s.

' (a ,e e -

+

, ) '

i p j t

y 9, " 1 f

t; (' l4'. b[ N "s.

% ,l ,,

l' 3 ..'(

PLANT ' V0GTLE IMP 140VEMEXY PROGRAM

\i s.

s  % -

1 .

o, .

~

OPOSITIVE Vd'LVE PROGRAM i 3,'SSR00T CAUSE EVALUATIONS s

~

3 o .

.OTRAINING REVIEWS / IMPROVEMENTS RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM [ MAINTENAN '

TRENDS s s

OISEG PROGRAMS / TRIP REDUCTIONS j 00 ORGANIZATIONAL  ; +

IMPROVEMENTS  !

y- -

.. , 2,

' .. w s

y g .

/ -

b

.c  % < ,

[,\- i. ', ;.3 i g I }.

s

, s

\

't , ,

4 , t

s. ,

y .

4 gb6/PUIP  !

J u.

t ,

'L _ _

g l

l

~

ROOT lCAUSE IMPROVEMENTS 1

OEXISTING PROGRAMS i

oIMPROVED METHODS 7 BASIC CATEGORIES 16 ROOT CAUSES I

tvg1/RCI

~ _

BASIC ROOT CAUSES ePROCEDURES

  • NOT USED e ERROR IN FOLLOWING
  • PROCEDURE WRONG /LTA eDESIGN eTRAINING
  • METHODS LTA e COMMUNICATIONS
  • MISUNDERSTOOD VERBAL COMM.
  • MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
  • STANDARDS, POLICIES, OR ADMIN CONTROLS (SPAC) LTA
  • SPAC NOT USED
  • AUDITS / EVALUATIONS
  • CORRECTIVE ACTION
  • HUMAN FACTORS
  • MAN-MACHINE INTERFACE
  • WORK ENVIRONMENT

'

  • COMPLEX SYSTEM
  • NON-FAULT TOLERANT SYSTEM eIMMEDIATE SUPERVISION
  • PREPARATION
  • SUPERVISION DURING WORK

~

SBRC

] ,

a_

SEVEN Basic ROOT CAUSES

, 19( / TRAINING '

N:t Used Error in Following Pro odure Wrong /LTA design specs Methods LTA

- no procedum - format confusing - typo LTA not available or incomplete

- > 1 action / step - sequence wrong - design not inconvenient to spect training

- multi. area references - facts wrong far use - no checkoff - incomplete / situation - problem tot facWties proc:dum A space provided - not covered anticipa 5d difficult to use - checklist misused - wrong revision used -

design review

~

"P'IIIIO" l

- data / computations -

independent _

wrong or incomplete review LTA '

- continuing

= - graphics LTA - -

fabrication

- equip identification LTA error training LTA!

- ambiguous instructions - vendor

- limits LTA shop

[ CopeWNICAT!k /

/ ENEEISY$

Misunderstood Standards. SPAC Audits / Corrective Verbal Cossi. Policies, or Not Used Evaluations Action Admin Controls

- standard LSPAC) LTA - cosmi. of infrequent

- terminology corr.

SPAC LTA - lack of action not used - no SPAC -

recently depth LTA

- long message - not strict changed -

not - torr.

- noisy environment enough enforcement independent action

- no methc1 - confusing LTA not yet available or incomplete - no way to implement

- late -

technical implement communication error - accountability

- shift turnover - drawings / LTA LTA prints LTA i 1

)

&ACrons/. i, , .

On-Machine Work Cosplex 49tvsuNS4 InterfIce Environment System Non-Faul t Tolerant System Preparation Supervision

~j During Work

- labels LTA - housdeeping - knowledge- - errors not - no preparation i

erg:ncaics poor based decistoi detectable - job plan LTA ~

"O J' po:r -

hot / cold required -

supe nis

- errors not instructions to b instrument / - bad lights recoverable operators LTA supenis displays -

noisy - monitoring > 3 LTA

- welk-thru LTA controls LTA - high radiation items at once - clearance LTA p monitoring - complex - scheduling LTA )

I alsrtness LTA controls - worker selection LTA a area f

differ:nces

,[M f

EVENT CRITIQUES ORECENT IMPROVEMENTS k O ASSIGNS A PERSON IN CHARGE OF CRIT

{

OSCHEDULED MEETINGS OISEG, QA, NSAC OCORRECTIVE ACTIONS / LESSONS LEARNED OPROCEDURALIZED ODOCUMENTED OFOLLOW-UP THROUGH NSAC OPEN ITEMS l

tvg2/EVENTCRI

\<

l l

RESPONSE TO PLANT OUTAGES i

i

{

O ADDITIONAL MANAGEMENT RESPONSE PROCEDURALIZED AND IMPLEMENTED j

O ASSIGNS SPECIFIC RESPONSIBILITIES f DUTY ENGINEERING SUPERVISOR .

DUTY MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR.

DUTY SCHEDULER DUTY OFFICER l l

CATEGORIZES OUTAGES TO DICTATE RESPONSE

)

l 1

tvg3/RTPO j

e 1

HUMAN PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM l HPES

~

  1. NON-PUNITIVE: IDENTIFY AND CORRECT l INAPPROPRIATE ACTION
  • COORDINATOR ASSIGNED APRIL 87
  • TRAINING COMPLETED MAY 87 )

ePOLICY AND INSTRUCTIONS IN REVIEW i I

eKICK-OFF COMPAIGN MANAGEMENT SUPPORT I

< QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS BROCHURES GENERAL EMPLOYEE TRAINING 4 1

tyg3/HPES l

_j

_. . - x =-- .

i SCMMARY OCHANGED METHODOLOGY OCOMMITTED ADDITIONAL RESOURCES OMANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT ENHANCES TEAMWORK OINVOLVES ALL ORGANIZATIONS O ADDITIONAL MANAGEMENT CONTACT WITH PLANT PERSONNEL ,

l 1

l f

)

1 I

tvg4/SUMM

._____.______________________a

-_g

)

PLAXT V0GTLE l UXIT 1 l

' POSITIVE VALVE PROGRAM' i

l tvg6/ PUP

% ~

)

l BACKGROUXD

{

COMPREHENSIVE INITIAL TEST PROGRAM oEXTENSIVE VALVE LINEUPS AND CHANGES o25,000 VALVES INITIALLY POSITIONED ONRC ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE l

BACKGRO

i uw

SUMMARY

OF VALVE CONTROL 1

ENHANCEMENTS OVALVE REVIEW TASKFORCE RECOMMENDATIONS {

t I

ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS OSYSTEM ENGINEER /PE0 VALVE LINEUP WALKDOWNS OOPERATOR TRAINING IMPROVEMENTS tvg7/SOUCE

POSITIVE VALVE PROGRAM OSYSTEM WALKDOWN BY OPERATORS WITH SYSTEM ENGINEER TO VERIFY LINEUP, PROPER OPERATION AND MATERIAL CONDITION OF EQUIPMENT ODEFINE DEMARCATION BETWEEN RWO/PE0/SS j OLETTER TO DEPT. HEADS ON SYSTEM OPERATION RESPON-SIBILITIES OWRITTEN INSTRUCTION PROGRAM FOR OFF-NORMAL, SHORT-TERM LINEUPS NOT COVERED BY PROCEDURES O EXPAND QUIDELINES FOR " RETURN TO SERVICE" - POST MAINTENANCE O ADD CHECKLIST IN 12006-1: IDENTIFY SYSTEMS IN OPERATIONS /STBY POST-TRIPS OMODIFY 1900-1 TO GO TO APPLICABLE PROCEDURE WITH SS CONCURRENCE i OIMPLEMENT A " PACKAGE CONCEPT" FOR UOPs AND HIGH-LIGHT IN UOPs WHEN OTHER DOCUMENTS ARE GENERATED OPROVIDE INSTRUCTIONS ON INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION AND MISPOSITIONED VALVES

> OINCLUDE ECCS CHECKLIST IN CONTROL ROOM OPERATIONS /

SIMULATOR TRAINING ODELETE USE OF MASTER KEYS FOR LOCKED VALVES OINCLUDE SPECIFIC LOCKED VALVE LOCATIONS ON LOCKED VALVE LIST AND PERFORM SEMI-ANNUAL STATUS VERIFI- l CATION QUARTERLY tvg6/ PUP

k POSITIVE VALVE PROGRAM CONT'D OIDENTIFY "AT VALVE LOCKED STATUS" FOR REMOTELY OPERATED VALVES OMORE DETAIL ON TURNOVER CHECKLIST AND NARRATIVE LOGS; INCLUDE ECCS CHECKLIST. MAINTAIN AT STATION FOR 5 DAYS OIDENTIFY RESPONSIBLE INDIVIDUAL FOR ABNORMAL EVOLUTIONS l

l tvg6/PUPC

o. ."

)

I

~ ~

I TRAINING REVIEWS AND IMPROVEMENTS l

  • SIMULATOR CHANGES

\

  • TRAINING PROGRAM ITEMS
  • WHOOPS PROGRAM
  1. LICENSE EXAM RESULTS

+

pdel/TRAI

-.g a .

    • mEGm =mme -

SIMULATOR CHROX0 LOGY i

1979 - ORDER PLACED WITH SINGER-LINK COMPA i

1982 - DELIVERY AND IMPLEMENTATION IN TRAINING PROGRAMS 1984 1985 - OUTAGES FOR COMPLETE REPLACEMENT O PANELS - INCORPORATION OF EXTENSIVE DESIGN CHANGES 1986 - CONSTRUCTION OF REMOTE SHUTDOWN BEGIN COMPREHENSIVE PERFORMANCE TESTING 3 1987 - COMPUTER SYSTEM UPGRADE / REPLACE TO ACHIEVE ADDITIONAL CAPACITY j

pdr2/ sit 1CHR

I

-_  ; ...- ._m i

L SIMUL-ATOR FIDELITY CHECKING l-l ACTIVITY STATUS 9 ANSI 3.5 TESTING PROGRAM

- MALFUNCTION VERIFICATION COMPLETE

- PANEL PHYSICAL COMPARISON 50% - 8/10/87

- PERFORMANCE TESTING COMPLETE

- DATA EVALUATION AND CORRECTION UNDER REVIEW 0F DEFICIENCIES SSTARTUP TEST PROGRAM l

- DATA COLLECTION CURRENT l

- EVALUATION 5% - 1/88

- IMPLEMENTATION 5% - 1/88 90PERATIONS EXPERIENCE FEEDBACK )

- REACTOR TRIP REPORTS PRIORITY l

- OBSERVATION AND FEEDBACK PRIORITY l 1

pdr3/ sit 1FC

9 1

SIMELATOR IMPROVEMENTS e SPRAY AND HEATER EFFECTS ON PRESSURIZER e COMPLETED 1 l

PRESSURE e SOURCE RANGE NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTATION e COMPLETED NOISE e HIGH REACTIVITY ROD WORTH MALFUNCTION

  • COMPLETED e LEAKY BYPASS FEEDWATER REGULATING VALVE e COMPLETED 4 MALFUNCTION I e SLIGHTY DIFFERENT CHARACTERISTICS FOR e COMPLETED EACH S/G e TURBINE CONTROLS l

- THRUST BEARING WEAR DETECTOR TRIPS e COMPLETED DURING TESTING I

- BANK OPERATION OF CIV's e COMPLETED

- DELETED STAGE PRESSURE FEEDBACK e UNDER EVALUATION l

- LOAD LIMITER OPERATION

  • UNDER EVALUATION O VALVE STROKE TIMES (EXTENSIVE LIST) *8/1 O NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTATION INPUT TO BFRV e8/1 CONTROLLER o FEED FLOW / STEAM FLOW METERS AT LOW e IN PROGRESS POWER I O WIDE RANGE WATER LEVEL INDICATION
  • UNDER EVALUATION o SHRINK AND SWELL EFFECTS WHEN ADDING e UNDER EVALUATION i FEEDWATER AT LOW POWER LEVELS pdr4/SIMIMP

TRAINING PROGRAM ITEMS l

  1. VALVE OPERATIONS AND CONTROL
  1. SPECIAL BRIEFINGS ON SHIFT TURNOVERS l 0 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS ePROCEDURE CHANGES l
  1. STEAM GENERATOR WATER LEVEL CONTROL GON SHIFT TRAINING BY OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT .

9 TURBINE GENERATOR CONTROLS AND OPERATION l

GROD CONTROL SYSTEM pdr5/TPI

VOGTLE gWHOOPSg" BLOCKED" COMMUNICATION

The Operations Supervisor initiated an emergency work order to repair the valve. The MSIV contains a high pressure volume of nitrogen which forces the valve toward the closed position. Two equivalent hydraulic operator systems hold

-he valve open against this pressure. l The operations Supervisor told the Maintenance Foreman to  !

{

" block" the valve operator before proceeding. To the

{

Operations Supervisor this meant to isolate, or block, the hydraulic fluid path. To the Maintenance Foreman it meant something else. To " block" the valve he placed lengths of 3" pipe to prevent mechanical closure of the MSIV. He had done this previously during system flushing evolutions. The faulty solenoid valve was first isolated then replaced in the fluid pathway. To connect the electrical wiring, Operations wrote a clearance and a fuse was pulled. This I removed power to both hydraulic operator systems. The unisolated system allowed the Nitrogen pressure (not presen*

during flushing test) to close the valve, bending the pipe.

The plant tripped when steam generator shrink resulted in a Lo-lo level signal.

l l

l l

_ . . . . . ...o

5/15/87 Vogt'e Whoopies TURBINE CONTROL VALVE PROBLEM LOCATION OF SCENERIO Control Room EVENTS LEADING TO POTENTIAL PROBLEM j Technicians were troubleshooting electro-hydraulic control cabinet. An input signal was generated into the

/* '

throttle pressure limiter which generated a signal to close the turbine control valves.

RESULTING SITUATION I Control valves began to close and generator output dropped to 80 MWe, RESPONSE TAKEN The B0P operator quickly recognized the problem and immediately switched over to standby turbine control.

RESULTING ACTION Due to this quick response, generator output was stabilized and transient was halted, restored to 500 MWe.

WHAT COULD HAVE HAPPENED?

During transient, the steam generator levels rapidly decreased to less than the 40% level which could have led to a reactor trip if prompt action had not been taken.

1 h

Thanks! Wel Done

NUCLE AR OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT PLANT AND NUCLEAR EXPERIENCE  ;

EXPERIENCE (YRS) AVG EXPERIENCE (YRS)

ENGINEERING - ,

ENGINEERING 772 11.95 l NUCLEAR 622 9.2 i CHEMISTRY TECHNICAL 283 9.0 I NUCLEAR 96 3.6 l HEALTH PHYSICS TECHNICAL 265 6.6 i NUCLEAR 167 6.3 MAINTENANCE CRAFT 1596 9.2 NUCLEAR 556 5.3 QUALITY CONTROL INSPECTION 155 6.6 NUCLEAR 141 7.35 NSAC POWER PLANT 165 12.4 NUCLEAR 144 10.2 TRAINING TECHNICAL 227 10.3 NUCLEAR 204 6.6 OPERATIONS POWER PLANT 466 7.1 NUCLEAR 466 7.1 l

____.__._._____---_-_a_--____

l NUCLEAR OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DEGREES / AWARDS DEPARTMENT GRADUATE 4 YR 2 YR PE/EIT OPERATIONS 4 43 3 3 l

ENGINEERING iS 89 5 6 CHEMISTRY 3 16 4 HEALTH PHYSICS 8 16 6 l

MAINTENANCE 1 11 57 QUALITY CONTROL 1 3 5 6 NDT LVL III 3 AWS/CWI NSAC 11 2 1 TRAINING 4 11 3 i

LICENSE EXAM RESULTS GROUP I

~

PASS TOTAL  %

R0 2 10 - - -

SRO 11 19 .

TOTAL 13 29 45 GROUP II AND III -

PASS TOTAL  %

RO 21 22 SRO 27 29 >

IC 1 1 TOTAL 49 52 94 CURRENT STATUS R0 23-SRO 38-TOTAL 61 18 ADDITIONAL CANDIDATES IN TRAINING l

LER

V0GTLE MAIXTEXAXCE PROGRAM PROVEN MAINTENANCE PROGRAMS, INCORPORATING IMPROVEMENTS BASED ON OUR EXPERIENCE AT BOTH HATCH AND V0GTLE, HAVE BEEN IMPLEMENTED.

ORIG 0ROUS PERSONNEL SCREENING, TESTING AND SELECTION OTOP QUALITY TRAINING PROGRAMS OPROVEN MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM (NPMIS)

OPROVEN MWO PROCESS OINDUSTRY RECOGNIZED PREDICTIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM OEXTENSIVE PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM OCONSISTENT ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE OPROVEN 24 HOUR MAINTENANCE COVERAGE ESTABLISHED OUTAGE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT l PROCESSES OROUTINE PERFORMANCE AND MATERIAL CONDITION REVIEW BY MANAGEMENT Vt1P

l 1

V0GTLE MAINTENANCE TRENDS I

MAINTENANCE PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION IS PRODUCING IMPROVING RESULTS 1 eDECREASING MWO BACKLOG l 1 0 DECREASING NUMBER OF 0FF-NORMAL CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS eIMPROVING PLANT MATERIAL CONDITION j eIMPROVING WOR:K PACKAGE QUALITY I

eIMPROVING MWO COMPLETION RATE I l

1 i

VMT )

i

=

m___. ,

v INNTM Petf .

RELATB l- TRIP TRIP RSUBTIN - -

. RNIN :.

P900AM -

. TIM -

1 4

y $# A v'6 EYN!w x S, a y .

..e l

.a s

. nw -

em ,%www.

...s..~..n. . ., .ews

..r :ru M p?Ih...... ..w w u wmWM25A.

AQ,,

.j,e,

.w

, +: , n.m:,.

j ~ g<;<x> is x ?g4 ..-Us9?g-Bfs,%gs2iGii%3A@Q,.

aspw ,

. . . . . . . . . . , , , g., ; g, .

. .- sc .  ;< . a..

et  ?.m .  ;:x:::y.,

,,..;a.$. +a .he

. . Wc,:

. , , M.

. . p,.'x.-:w d'. I. 'td !,, c .....,V,'.., P w a---^e4.'.,h.

c qteammswsmMm p ga a w e v~>re.**ec 3Mow w- a -m -4=eme#,. .egm b

's.ihamse n wgMM

. - . .- , , .........L

.......c.. - ~-

  • s

'u 7. . . : . .

W' y?E::..iI - t, nisscepqx '

"CM 24 .9 ;'Ith eZgq5:eg3EEtpSgfjdfn;sagh:q 25Jm:f - \

-4 i 2

h i%cc: w m eb L x :a:mt '

--MgdniM+9.psefM

..4wu x.

,c..w. g,,s 4 .c,j,;m . . e. . .

'^'s M :d >'

r SINLE FAILF,E IMUSTM ggg EXPERIEtt!

REVIN -

ARALYt!$ %.. u 1

l l

l 1

I l

l 1

i l

'C05

t .._,

l ',. c r,

+

,1 1

s POST TRIP REVIEWS l i

OMANAGEMENT SUPPORT (

OTEAM CONCEPT PLANT MANAGER / TECHNICAL ASSISTANT OPERATIONS ENGINEERING SUPERVISOR NSAC ISEG QX 9 IMPLEMENTS KT, MORT, AND HPES r

OKEY ELEMENTS cco4/POSTTR

_ . _ _ _ . . __ _ __- _ _ O

- s I

l TREND PROGRAM

  1. SETUP PER LER CAUSE CATEGORIES
  • MEETS REQUIREMENTS
  • 0RIENTED ON DEFICIENCY CARD ,

ENHANCEMENTS

  • TRENDS EVENTS SEPARATELY TRIPS, ESF ACTUATIONS
  • TRENDS SOR's SEPARATELY
  • CONTINUE DEFICIENCY CARD TRENDING RESULTS OF RECENT TRENDS cce6/TRENDPRG w - _ -_ _ _ _ A

.: s

. > >  : ,pg, -

'r

,~

.',3 6:

i . l k4 .4U. ;i y ,.

h) . ' b , , I %;'i

$ . g, s 'k -

~

',.,,/t4 .y. -- ,

S'_ >

z.,

-e,  ;

  • y 't. , Y, I ie :F 't,,

' ' ,, g' ,

2 ' h'

, 'v t g.

41 s

.. ,3

,'\

l)

- D
  • g ,. .

TRIPS ,:

1 7- g

.a '

%, .I I. '

c

. R0 1  : <

ss

. 2 si 3 L , .

c

' RO - 2 ., ..

4

,' t ,.

RO 3 '

s, s 1

\

'R0 4 .\ - ,

\;\ s' ' 1 8

RO 5 1 i

I ,a RO 6 '

% 1  !

\ q

. 1 RO 7

\

1 y

"g

,)

,1. ;

RO 8 , 4 1  !

4

\

RO 9 4 .. 1 R 0 10 1 PUSH-PULL PROGRAM 7{'cce7/ TRIPS

. , 'f s s .

i a

5,

I

SEG RELAT:ONSESS 1~

SR VICE PRESIDENT NUCLEAR OPERATIONS i I i VICE PRESIDENT NR GENERAL MANAGER NUCLEAR PERFORMANCE -

PLANT HATCH AND ANALYSIS V0GTLE  ;

)

i NUCLEAR SAFETY AND ENGINEERING MANAGER I

l APPROPRIATE LEVELS 9

ISE8 RPERVIN E 7 h ISE8 55 9 VISOR onen Ious i l

J

- man ISEG OMANAGEMENT SUPPORT QUALIFICATIONS TECHNICAL EXPERIENCE: 13.8 YEARS AVG NUCLEAR EXPERIENCE: 12.7 YEARS AVG 2 MASTERS DEGREES 3 MORT QUALIFIED 2 SRO LICENSES- 1 CURRENT 1 REACTOR ENGINEER OFIVE DEDICATED ON-SITE ENGINEERS i

1

)

cce2/ISEG 1

_______-_d

i ISEG CONTRIBUTIONS I I

l i

i SIGNIFICANT EVENT REVIEWS

.OVALVE ALIGNMENT REVIEW TEAM LEADER INDEPENDENTLY REVIEW INDUSTRY EXPERIENCE DATA OLER REVIEW OMONITOR PLANT ACTIVITIES FOR PLANT MANAGER l

cco3ASEGCON I

-f i

ORGANIZATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS I

OSPECIAL STARTUP DETAIL '

VERY BEST/ EXPERIENCED PEOPLE SUBCRITICAL TO POWER OPERATION I I & C CHECKOUT OF FEED CONTROLS l REACTOR ENGINEER ECP & CRITICALITY BEST RO'S ON S/G LEVEL OPERATIONS SUPERINTENDENT IN CHARGE OSHIFT MANAGER CONCEPT FORMALIZED KEY SUPERVISORS WORK SAME SHIFT INTERFACE DUTIES BETTER DEFINED COLLECTIVE KNOWLEDGE FOCUSED OPERABILITY i DEPORTABILITY CLEAR COMMUNICATIONS EMPHASIZED PLANT PROBLEMS '

PRE-EVOLUTION BRIEFINGS DEFICIENCY CARDS LOGS l

I ORGENH

-g ORGAXIZATIOXAL EXHAXCEMENTS l

(CONT'D 5

  1. BACKSHIFT MANAGEMENT DUTY OFFICER ESTABLISHED ePLANT MANAGER PERSONNALLY STRESSES PROFESSIONALISM TO EACH SHIFT
  1. ADDITIONAL INDUSTRY EXPERTS WESTINGHOUSE GE l

SCS eHPES

  • MANAGEMENT ATTENTION PRIORITY ENGINEERING WORK PRIORITY MWO'S DEPARTMENT PROBLEM LISTS IMPROVED POD ORGENHC l

l

SCMMARY 1/M PLOTS FOR ALL STARTUPS ECP's BY Rx ENGINEERING  !

t DUTY OFFICER / MANAGEMENT-DUTY OFFICER ,

MORE USE OF NSSS VENDOR AND AE MANAGEMENT OBSERVATION PROGRAM RESPONSE TEAM POSITIVE DISCIPLINE CRITIQUES ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS VALVE LOCKS ADDITIONAL VALVE TRAINING TRIP REDUCTION PROGRAM 1

SG LEVEL CONTROL TRAINING l

SHIFT AUGMENTATION FOR STARTUPS l

WATER KING POSITIVE VALVE CONTROL l GBSUMM

_____-_.____----__--a

y i

SEE-IX I

i SIGNIFICANT  !

EVEXT I i

EVALUATION ,

1 IXFORMATIOX NETWORK SEEIN

i SEE-IX RECENT INITIATIVES i

  • SHIFTED RESPONSIBILITY i
  • IMPLEMENTED ADDITIONAL INP0 GOOD PRACTICES
  1. AUGMENTING SITE STAFF
  • CONSOLIDATED DATA FILE
  • ENHANCED SELF-AUDIT l

i SEEINRI

{

IXPO EVALUATION 1986 74 % OF RED TAB RECOMMENDATIONS (NTOL AVERAGE: 65 %)

65 % OF YELLOW / GREEN TAB RECOMMENDATIONS (NTOL AVERAGE: 50 %)

INP01986

(

)

1 l

t u

i l

JUNE 1987 <

l 84 % OF RED TAB RECOMMENDATIONS ,

CLOSED (NTOL AVERAGE: 66 %) f 74 % OF YELLOW / GREEN TAB RECOMMENDATIONS I CLOSED (NTOL AVERAGE: 52 %) j 1

1 1

INP01987 l 1- __--_____ _ _________ _ _ O

f TRAINING ENHANCEMENTS i

eBETTER CRITIQUES 1

eSIMULATOR IMPROVEMENTS 1 1

.i

  • TRAINING EFFECTIVENESS i

eWHOOPS  !

3 i

l l

TRAINENH

1 SELECTED i SOER i i

i RECOMMENDATIONS {

  • INPO IDENTIFIED 82 1 i

VERIFICATION PROGRAM INITIATED

  1. 45 REVIEWED TO DATE 1

{

l e43 SATISFACTORY

)

  1. 2 BEING REEVALUATED i

)

837 SCHEDULED FOR EVALUATION l

l SSR 1 l l

> 0 0

1 S

T S NP I ER T , 0 V -

5 EO TR DA C OE E R A

0 6 4 2 0 8 6 4 2 0 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 8 6 4 2 0

  • e

{ r= - E 8Eky l ji

0 1

S T

NT S E NE . 0 VV E 5 E L DT OA O T E

A

' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 gzM = 3 nog

KECETIRll"Yf l

o ORGANIZATION AND STAFFING o LTARDWARE o SOFTWARE o PERSONNEL i

1 ENGINEERING l OCORPORATE ENGINEERING CHARTERED TO MANAGE  ;

ON SITE AND OFF SITE DESIGN ENGINEERING SUPPORT c 0F PLANT V0GTLE AND PLANT HATCH - SCS/BECHTEL SIGNIFICANT, EXPERIENCED RESOURCES AVAILABLE TO SUPPORT PLANT V0GTLE UNIT 1

- STRONG ON SITE ENGINEERING STAFF (PFE-0)

- GPC ENGINEERING

- SCS

- BECHTEL WESTINGHOUSE

- EXPERTISE IN EVERY AREA 0F PLANT ,

OCORPORATE ENGINEERING INVOLVEMENT AT PLANTS V0GTLE AND HATCH OMANAGER, V0GTLE ENGINEERING & PROJECTS - FULL TIME AT SITE FOR NEXT MONTH OPROJECT MANAGERS ASSIGNED TO MAJOR PROGRAMS l

ENGR

ENGINEERING L eIMPROVING COORDINATION BETWEEN PLANT, l

CORPORATE AND A/E's IMPLEMENTING CORPORATE ENGINEERING POLICIES

- DCR CONTROL I

- R E A's

- DCR REVIEW COMMITTEE 1

OIMPROVING. COMMUNICATIONS O AGGRESSIVE INVOLVEMENT WITH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS OF OTHER UTILITIES

- BRUNSWICK

- FARLEY

- SUSQUEHANNA -

- OCONEE

- ST. LUCIE OQUARTERLY ENGINEERING REVIEW AND STATUS MEETINGS l

- BECHTEL

- SCS

- WESTINGHOUSE

- GE

- IMPROVED ENGINEERING PLANNING

- PROACTIVE ENGR 1

ENGINEERING !

OGOAL - SUPPORT V0GTLE OPERATIONS

- IMPLEMENT EXISTING EXCELLENT ENGINEERING PROGRAMS 1

-ENGR 2

l

)

CORPORATE MAINTENANCE ROLE OMANAGEMENT REVIEW OF PLANT PROGRAMS AND RESULTS

- ONSITE OBSERVATION / EVALUATION / PARTICIPATION

- PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

- LER'S AND OTHER OCCURRENCES l

OCORPORATE INVOLVEMENT IN PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION l

- PERSONNEL SELECTION

- VENDOR / CONTRACTOR SELECTION  ;

- MAJOR WORKSCOPE DEFINITION '

- PROBLEM RESOLUTION i

O AUGMENTATION OF PLANT RESOURCES I

- CORPORATE AND PLANT HATCH PERSONNEL l

- CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL I

- VENDOR TECHNICAL SUPPORT

- MAJOR CONTRACT PLACEMENT OTRANSFER OF TECHNOLOGY AND LESSONS LEARNED

- INDUSTRY GROUP PARTICIPATION

- ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE

- VENDOR / CONTRACTOR CONTROLS

- OUTAGE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

- MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT /0UTAGE MANAGEMENT MEETINGS

- VISITS / EXCHANGES WITH OTHER UTILITIES

- TECHNOLOGY IMPROVEMENT EVALUATION OINTEGRATED PLANNING AND OUTAGE MANAGEMENT SUPPORT

- INTEGRATED OUTAGE SCHEDULE

- SUPPORT RESOURCE EVALUATION OOFFSITE SUPPORT PROGRAM MANAGEMENT

- EQUIPMENT REPAIR / REFURBISHMENT

- CLASS 1E EQ MOTOR REWIND

- EQUIPMENT DEVELOPMENT bkml/CORPt1R

I NUCLEAR SAFETY AND LICEXSING i

{

OCORPORATE PROGRAMS

- NUCLEAR OPERATIONS POLICIES AND INSTRUCTIONS

- OVERVIEW BOARDS'

- SAFETY REVIEW BOARD  !

- FITNESS FOR DUTY -l

- QUALITY CONCERNS i OINDUSTRY STANDARDS AND SURVEYS

- OWNERS GROUPS

- INDUSTRY INITIATIVES

- NSSS/AE SUPPORT OINTER-PLANT COORDINATION AND FEEDBACK  ;

- WEEKLY CONFERENCE CALL '

- BIWEEKLY MEETINGS

- REPORTING SEMINAR

- ACTION PLANS ltg/NSL

- _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20236J615&oldid=3177789"