ML20058M945

Summary of 930908-09 Meeting W/Util in Rockville,Md Re Status of Current Licensing Activities for Plants

ML20058M945
Person / Time
Site:	Hatch, Vogtle
Issue date:	09/29/1993
From:	Carpenter C Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 9310070180
Download: ML20058M945 (28)

Text

.)

• '/,fuug?t UNITED STATES j ' ' "' j

• ' 'f NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20f/40001 0,

f

%, # September 29, 1993 Docket Nos. 50-424, 50-425 and 50-321, 50-366 LICENSEE: Georgia Power Company, et al.

FACILITIES: Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2 Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant, Units I and 2

SUMMARY

OF SEPTEMBER 8 AND 9, 1993, MEETINGS WITH GEORGIA POWER ,

COMPANY ON LICENSING ISSUES - HATCH AND V0GTLE NUCLEAR PLANTS Representatives from Georgia Power Company (GPC or the licensee) met with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff on September 8 and 9, 1993, at the NRC offices in Rockville, Maryland, to discuss the status of current licens'ing activities for the Hatch and Vogtle plants. The attendees at the meetings are listed in Enclosure 1, a copy of the slides presented at the September 9, 1993, meeting by the licensee are given in Enclosure 2, and a copy of the slides presented by the staff are given in Enclosure 3. The September 9, 1993, meeting was comprised of the morning session, during which the status of '

the facilities was discussed by the licensee, and an afternoon session, during which the staff made presentations on Cost Beneficial Licensing Actions'and the revised SALP process.

After brief introductory remarks by NRC and GPC regarding the objectives of the meeting, Mr. K. McCoy, GPC Vice President, Vogtle, discussed the status of Vogtle Electric Generating Plant (Vogtle), Units 1 and 2. He stated that Vogtle Unit I was maintaining 100% rated power without any major problems and that the plant had been on-line for 43 days. Vogtle Unit 2 had been coasting down to a refueling outage that was scheduled to begin on Friday, September 10, 1993. However, the plant had tripped on Wednesday, September 8, 1993, due to an inadvertent low flow trip signal in a single loop. The licensee suspects that the signal was' caused by electrical components being jarred during an inspection of electrical fures. Mr. McCoy also discussed organizational changes at Vogtle, including personnel down-sizing through attrition.

Mr. W. Kitchens, Assistant General Manager, Plant Support, Vogtle, then presented an overview of Vogtle Unit 2 refueling outage, which is planned to be completed in 36 days, 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />. He discussed the major scope of the outage and risk management during the outage.

Mr. J. Beckham, GPC Vice President, Hatch, discussed the status of Edwin I.

Hatch Nuclear Plant, (Hatch) Units 1 and 2. He stated that Hatch Unit I was maintaining 100% rated power without any major problems. Hatch Unit 2 was at 85% rated power due to a leaking fuel pin. Five control rods were inserted and ocactivated around that assembly to limit the power generated by the fuel Qij(b 93100701BO 930929 PDR ADOCK 05000321 p PDR

assembly containing the leaking pin and, as a result, its offgas activity is stable. The licensee is monitoring drywell floor drains.inleakage for unidentified leakage; the licensee suspects that a safety relief valve may be

" simmering", through tail pipe drains. He also discussed the Hatch Unit 2 refueling outage, completed March 16, 1993, and the major upcoming activities planned for the Hatch Unit 1 outage in the Spring of 1994.

Mr. S. Bethay, Manager of Licensing, Hatch, then discussed the Regulatory l Requirements Review Program at Hatch, including the program's scope,  !

objectives, activities in progress, the change process, and the schtdule. His slides are included in Enclosure 2.  ;

The afternnon session began with Mr. L. Marsh of the NRC presenting a summary of the status of Cost Beneficial Licensing Actions. The licensee discussed with the staff concerns that the licensing actions, which were of marginal safety significance but notable cost savings to the licensee, would be i assigned a low review priority and, hence, would not be acted upon for a long ,

time. Mr. Marsh's slides are included in Enclosure 3.  :

Mr. C. Holden of the NRC briefly discussed the revised SALP process. The licensee discussed with the staff the need to educate the local and state government officials on the meaning of the SALP report.

The meeting was concluded with an agreement to meet next at Vogtle in the spring 1994 timeframe.

Original signed by '

C. E. Carpenter, Acting Project Manager  ;

Project Directorate II-3 Division of Reactor Projects - I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Enclosures:

1. List of Attendees .

2. Slides Presented by the Licensee

3. Slides Presented by the NRC -

cc w/ enclosures:

See next page

• s DISTRIBUTION:

See next page OFFICE LA:PDII-3k PM:PDII-3 PM:PDII-3 PM:PDII-3 _

D:PDII-3 y #f NAME LGBerryk CECarpente [ IDSHood.PY KNJabbour DBMatthewdl' DATE- O /fd h93 [//8/93 7 /2 I /93 9/t'7/93 ') / M/93 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY DOCUMENT HAME: G:\V0GTLE\GPC-0909.MTS .

3 l

' Edwin I~ Hatch Nuclear Plant

. i Georgia Power Company Vogtle Electric Generating Plant j l

-i

-CC' '

Mr.. Ernest L. Blake, Jr. Mr. Alan R. Herdt, Chief - 1 Shaw, Pittman,-Potts and Trowbridge Project Branch #3 i 2300 N Street, NW. U. S.- Nuclear Regulatory Comission i Washington, DC 20037 101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite 2900 l Atlanta, Georgia 30323 i Mr. J. T. Beckham, Jr.  !

Vice President - Plant Hatch Mr. Dan H. Smith, Vice President j Georgia Power Company Power Supply Operations l P. O. Box 1295 Oglethorpe Power Corporation. .

Birmingham, Alabama 35201 2100 East Exchange Place  !

Turker, Georgia 30085-1349 1 Mr..S. J. Bethay .

Manager. Licensing - Hatch Charles A. Patrizia,- Esquire  :

Georgia Power Company Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker ,

P. O. Box 1295 12th Floor Birmingham, Alabama 35201 1050 Connecticut Avenue, NW.

Washington, DC 20036 ll Mr. L. Sumner  :

General Manager, Nuclear Plant  !

Georgia Power Company i Route 1, Box 439 I Baxley, Georgia 31513 ]

Resident. Inspector  !

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission l Route 1, Box 725 i Baxley, Georgia- 31513 l

Regional Administrator, Region II I U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission 101 Marietta Street, NW. Suite 2900 ,

Atlanta, Georgia 30323 -(

)

Mr. Charles H. Badger i Office of Planning and Budget l Room 610 }

270 Washington Street, SW.  !

Atlanta, Georgia 30334 i Harold Reheis, Director  ;

Department of Natural-Resources  !

- 205 Butler Street, SE., Suite 1252  !

Atlanta, Georgia 30334 L i

Chairman l Appling; County Comissioners ,

County Courthouse Baxley, Georgia 31513 -

t

[

I

=

[

Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant Georgia Power Company Vogtle Electric Generating Plant CC:

Mr. J. A. Bailey Office of the County Commissioner Manager - Licensing Burke County Commission Georgia Power Company Waynesboro, Georgia 30830 P. O. Box 1295 Birmingham, Alabama 35201 Resident Inspector U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mr. J. B. Beasley P. O. Box 572 General Manager, Vogtle Electric Waynesboro, Georgia 30830 Generating Plant .

P. O. Box 1600 Mr. J. D. Woodard Waynesboro, Georgia 30830 Senior Vice President -

Nuclear Operations Office of Planning and Budget Georgia Power Company Room 615B P. O. Box 1295 ,

270 Washington Street, SW. Birmingham, Alabama 35201 Atlanta, Georgia 30334

??. C. K. McCoy Attorney General Vice President - Nuclear Law Department Vogtle Project 132 Judicial Building Georgia Power Company Atlanta, Georgia 30334 P. O. Box 1295 Birmingham, Alabama 35201 Arthur H. Domby, Esquire Troutman Sanders NationsBank Plaza 600 Peachtree Street, NE.

Suite 5200 Atlanta, Georgia 30308-2216 F

ENCLOSURE 1 ATTENDEES SEPTEMBER 9. 1993 NAME ORGANIZATION Darl S. Hood NRR/PD2-3 Alan R. Herdt NRC/ Region II/DRP Branch Chief David B. Matthews NRC/PDII-3/HQ Gus Lainas NRC/ADRII ,

J. T. Beckham GPC/ Hatch Jim Bailey SNC/Vogtle Ken McCoy GPC/Vogtle Skip Kitchens GPC/Vogtle J. D. Heidt SNC/ Hatch Project ,

S. B. Tipps GPC/ Hatch Mehdi Sheibani GPC/Vogtle Jack Woodard GPC C. E. Carpenter NRC/NRR/PD2-3 J. Starefos- NRC/NRR/PD2-3 J. N. Donohew NRC/P.P.R/CBLA Task Force S. J. Bethay SNC/ Hatch B. R. Bonser NRC/ SRI-Vogtle L. D. Wert NRC/ SRI-Hatch P. H. Skinner NRC/RII/DRP Section Chief 3B K. N. Jabbour NRC/NRR

^

a V

~

SEPTEMBER 1993 SOUTHERN SYSTEM NUCLEAR PLANT ORGANIZATION -

t GPC Preoident/CEO SNC CEO/Chapmart i .

I SNC President / COO GPC Executive Vim Prooklont s Vice President Vice Preesdent SNC h , h Nt Diredor Administrative Todinical Services GPC Senior Vice President Secretary Altairs Services l

I I I sNCh Fredded sNC Vkm Fredenre r CW whe re.edere s arms Trummse, GrC Woe Frendere orc Wion Presteed FW W etement=s Vogte rr$ms i i l i i i i I I g

sNC Gewd bemnage temrager SNC Gered teenage teenager Osnard teenager teenager orc oun-m et=ame= se GPcoun neemame= se > ~ sepet se paneser separt >-*== s epart i i I j s w etaus _ me,as and seemtseus [ _ su petaus swomesus sepaisame u

Corporate t i.

................................. ............................ .................- ............................ ................... ........................ ...t.'...............

i Site

, orComnewne==gn orc omnem temuse o wenamnas= rn Nunamar rise eeucesar rise  ;-

passmer rime r-

, i l 1 == O

'l (n

See i suo she C-WC Ptme aims WC rise M g Ptereshd gg n

, iw

- >=imar Operating Company Note: All paminano are SNC unless otherwise noted.

Power Company manSNC ann t.h- swe. ,

]

, , - - - . , -t-w-.%w,.., .- +--ww ,.6,,..--aw-,-..-.., .,_--r,=,e.--, w. * .- -w,..w- m- ..w.e- ..e ww.* v-e, t- ,, i...w--+. * ,--4 -

tv..wm .._,-.--...,..--u*-.m.,-m+a-,.-=,--[- +- _.--- o'- - _ . - - .'

v s -

p -

u jfd ,.

la uip - - . _ yijjj3 -

e iSlih c

ns aeP l

y r

a m =

inc F vr A.

i t

re ox n m la t g

n r e sr do t

S eD c i SreD.

- c int r u

n s

ir e

etr ie t

s op is Mpf u#

- hc poh e no m ip .S r o Te pC R. g r i

t

. G np u

_ inE e u Pt e ,S EuB,S , ni A.

S m r g

H.

S r L.

r.a gM M .

m. M g m-W M&

lfa i w M .

ll!

m w rt gr s y

r Mp on e .

. p h t

a re nu cit ek eS r

c a l

- Gtn K -

S eW t sl

.a F. .

oW m r .

A sP W i .

nG S

e e. m a.

m_.

r e g &p g n n grea n 4

jl aj$} ak t oi raa ny c ni t aa ps r

nP m

- u l r

i ny r .

eM H Pt e ica o

,i s n

- l c n -

r e

g y -

1a m

uty N iru G.

r .nt gm S i i

_ TeD r

,rg d s -

a nl e cD Md P. r . e E.

a s MaBe eein nek ay p y S

e A . C .

ME gmR m.

l

- LpH oo o l r

a _

a t om .

- a r .

o r t u ne B. pE D.

n

. c n o a ' , y e:.7 ,f;'; i m

e J ~ I J S ca

~

G

~. _

m r

in oV e

S 1

,s r.n go Miat t .

. r n ne ep c a GO aV

.t t

sslna AP _

t r _

n e _

l a 9 s

s e kc e gg e d

l

&y n d _

P 0 n e ci r n e an w a .

0 om P..sr g i t r _

n 1

/

8 I ly jj1

.i lo r

. ad ge nr e

- t unz r i G i

t a

4 2

rt gaH Ont a a Hme _

r 0 Mre . Mtm F ,

rP w.

l ,e L rh e 1 p R. -

g& S gC L.

n e O K Ma R. .

M R e .

G . M l

G a sbs no n s E.

u inmet a.

o w gto _- J c t c p l r

lolu aino a i

r A o _

t c

e3d

/

o CoDiM .E c

. I[1g[ j '

g? ,

l 9 e z C . .

E9i . A.

S. C. A. D. M_. T r

e1 o C R. G B lt eh gnt R ouu VJA _ _

1 <

1 REFUELING OUTAGE 2R3 OVERVIEW

. SCHEDULED 36 DAYS, 6 HOURS -

. OPTIMUM SCHEDULING CONCEPT SIMILAR TO 45 DAY UNIT 1 OUTAGE (WITHOUT ILRT)

. MAJOR EFFORT IN OUTAGE LESSONS LEARNED

. DOSE MINIMIZATION EMPHASIS i

. FOCUS ON RISK REDUCTION i

.g .

I 2R3 MAJOR SCOPE i 1

. 1300 MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS I

. STEAM GENERATOR INSPECTIONS f

. RCP MOTOR INSPECTIONS REACTOR VESSEL N0ZZLE INSERVICE INSPECTION

. TURBINE INSPECTIONS l

. 38 DESIGN CHANGES 1

RHR PUMP SPLIT COUPLING TEST IN BYPASS CHARGING PUMP ALTERNATE MINIFLOW I

i

__ __ _m a___ _ _

I, OUTAGE RISK MANAGEMENT  !

SCHEDULE WITH RISK REDUCTION IN MIND

. ELIMINATE OR AVOID RISK ,

NO FUELED MIDLOOP

. REDUCE AND MANAGE RISK MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT CONTINGENCY PLANS  :

TRAINING AND PRACTICE DESIGN IMPROVEMENTS '

INDEPENDENT REVIEW 0F SCHEDULE & PLANS 5

l I

I l

l

.-...~.,n,------- _.

PLANT HATCH  ;

OPERATIONAL l OVERVIEW i i

. i NRC INTERFACE MEETING b

i i

September 9,1993 )

i PLANT STATUS i Unit 1: l

. Operating at 100% RTP  !

l

. No Major Problems  !

i i

Unit 2:  ;

. Operating at 85% RTP due  !

to fuel. problems  !

5 Gontrol rods inserted and de-activated

. Offgas activity levels stable

. Continuing to monitor -

drywell floor drain inleakage Plant Hatch Operational Overview

i PLANT HATCH UNIT 2 ~

DRtWE11 R00R DRAN 24 HR LEAKAGE 3.0 2.8 2.6  ;

~

2'4 2.2 F) i g /

2.0 ,

\

! ^ I 1.8

/ 'h f

! ll,' / \ lt , /

1.2

/ Y

\ -

/ ,

1.0 0.8

/

0.6

/ ,

0.4 r~

/ ,

0.2 i

0.0 08/02 08/05: /10 08/14 08/18 08/22 08/26 08/30.09/03 .

08/04 08/08 08/12 08/16 08/20 08/24 08/28 09/01 09/05 D8.TE NOTE: LIMIT IS 5 GPM UNIDENTIFIED LEAKAGE i

N e

i PLANT HATCH UNIT 2 .

DFWELL F1.00R DRNN 8 HR LEVXE 3.0 l '

l 2.8 2.6 2.4 ,- -

2.0 -

ph/ \q ,

1.8 j 0 A vy

N \

f "

{ .y f l

1.2 1 \, J 1.0 0.8 0.6

[

0.4 jv

)

0.2 0.0 --'

08/02 08/06 08/10 08/14 08/18 08/22 08/26 08/30 09/03 C8/04 08/08 08/12 08/16 08/20 08/24 08/28 09/01 09/05 DATE NOTE: LIMIT IS 5 GPM UNIDENTIFIED LEAKAGE e

OUTAGE

SUMMARY

UNIT TWO Refuel (Full Core Off-load) .

. Fuel Sipping & Inspection

. Shroud Access Hole Cover .

Replacement

. Alternate Decay Heat Removal System

. Fuel Pool Cooling Decon Taps

. VOTES Testing

. LLRT Program -

. ISI Program .

. Rx Recire Pump Seal Changeout Plant Hatch Operational Overview

OUTAGE

SUMMARY

UNIT TWO

. Rotate HPCI Pump Discharge Valve

. Replace RHRSW Discharge .

Valves

. RWCU Heat Exchanger Omega Seal

. EHC Two-out-of-Three  ;

Logic Modification

. 2A & 2C D/G Liner  !

Changeouts & PM's

. Surveillance Testing Plant Hatch Operational Overview

MAJOR ACTIVITIES l 1

i

. 30 Day Refueling Outage j

. NRC Bulletin 93-03 Level  ;

Indication Actions -  !

. Hatch Improved Technical ~

Specifications Project l

. Preparation for INPO l Evaluation  ;

. Regulatory Commitment ,

Review  ;

i

. "Re-engineering" the Work  :

Control Process i

1 i

l l

l l

i Plant Hatch Operational Overview  !

l

e 7

t

i i

EDWIN I. HATCII NUCLEAR PLANT -

REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS REVIEW PROGRAM j h

Pronam Scope .]

. Activities Marginal to Safety

. Cost-Beneficial License Actions

- . Cost Effective Resolution ofIssues -

. Commitments to Generic Correspondence and Bulletins

. SelfImposed Commitments -

n h

t I

t

-i I

i

1

-i ,

P EDWIN L IIATCH NUCLEAR PLANT REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS REVIEW PROGRAM Objective.

l

.- Ensure Safety is Maintained j i

. Ensme Changes to License Conditions are Implemented Appropriately ,

l

. Ensure Resources are Expended in a Cost-Effective Manner -!

Activities in Proaress

. MSIV Leakage Control System Removal .i

. Deletion of Response Time Testing  :

. Revision to NUREG 0619 Commitments i Fire Protection (BTP 9.5-1 Commitments) i

i

. Review of Generic Correspondence i

-i

. , , y . > - . -

EDWIN I. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT l REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS REVIEW PROGRAM j I

Regulatory Reauirement Chance Process

. Technical Specifications .

Amendment Request Process for Revising Most Commitments is Well Established  ;

. LERs and Violations -

~t a

10 CFR 50.59 Evaluation -

. Security and Emergency Plans -

10 CFR 50.54 i

. Fire Protection CFR 50.59 or Exemption Request Process is " Gray" for Certain Requirements Such as Those Embodied in an '

NRC Staff SER l

.j

~

i EDWIN I. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT l REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS REVIEW PROGRAM i

Schedule j

. Review will be ongoing

. Implementation of TS!{P will preclude Tecimical Specification amendment -

request

. Current efforts MSIV Leakage Control System 1

i l

l

Cost Beneficial Licensing Actions

• BACKGROUND Continued rise in Industry O&M costs Licensees have expressed concern that some regulatory commitments or requirements provide little or no safety payoff, but require significant resource expenditure.

Amendment requests to provide relief would normally receive low priority (Priority 3 or 4), and may take a LONG TIME to process.

Pilot program (Task Force) to give special consideration to amendment or exemption requests with high cost but low safety benefits.

Focus on VEPCO, FPC and NEU programs Significant discussion / description of the Task Force at the R.I.C. (Chm. Selin, Dr. Murley, and F. Gillespie) 5 a

g..

L. B. Marsh, Project Director, NRC 8/93

Cost Beneficial Licensing Actions I

• PREMISES Fixed NRC Resources for addressing CBLAs '

Relaxations / Reliefs granted by NRC will result in more efficient resource expenditure by industry, and SAFER nuclear plants.

CBLAs should not involve ecy significant SAFETY issue LOW cost or HIGH SAFETY items shouldn't be handled via CBLA Solution will involve PROCESS improvements by both NRC and INDUSTRY.

- This is a WINDOW of OPPORTUNITY for licensees and may not last forever. "

Cost savings considerations will be considered for work PRIORITIZATION purposes, not as the BASES for the ultimate disposition on the issue.

Embarking on a CBLA PROGRAM should be carefully considered within the overall NRC/ Licensee agenda L. B. Marsh, Project Director, NRC - 8/03  !

Cost Beneficial Licensing Actions QUESTIONS FOR NRC and INDUSTRY CBLA = A licensing action with HIGH cost value to the licensee but with LOW safety significance, and with a LOW NRR review priority. Can be overcommitment, marginal requirement  ;

or change in licensing basis needing NRC review.

Do licensees have other def'n for actions of this sort?

How many CBLAs in NRC system now? What's their nature?

- Are there any problems associated w/ these CBLAs? (Late?

Large # in the queue? Working low cost items ahead of high

cost items?)

- Are licensees NOT SUBMITTING CBLAs? Why not?

Will there be a flood of NEW SUBMITTALS? -

How complicated will they be?

Could the " Integrated Living Schedule" solve the CBLA issue?

- Are licensees CLEARLY identifying CBLAs to the NRC?

For those CBLAs that are commitment changes, can the licensees change their commitments w/o NRC review / approval?

.L. B. Marsh, Project Director, NRC 8/93

1 Cost Beneficial Licensing Actions

• OBSERVATIONS Many task forces within NRC and industry. Need for coordination and communication to avoid problems.

- VEPCO program began large - now FOCUS LIST

- VEPCO items being worked well by staff. On schedule.

4

- Initial VEPCO items not difficult / controversial.

- FPC items aren't really a CBLA program, per se, yet-

- ENTERGY program - new, significant, major $ implications

- When a licensee can change a commitment w/o NRC approval varies among licensees, issues, and time

- Not clear Integrated Living Schedule would help CBLAs get processed. Licensees are reluctant.

L -

Licensees sometimes request UNNECESSARY or CONTINGENCY. type-u NRC reviews.

- Industry has been very much in favor or RRG. efforts and wants

i. the to continue. Call for NRC point.of contact

- Other licensees are starting CBLA programs:

• CECO, TVA, FPL, PG&E-

• Need for.' industry coordination -

, L. B. Marsh, Project Director, NRC 8/93

Cost Beneficial Licensing Actions '

NRC TASK FORCES /. GROUPS (related to CBLAs).

Regulatory Review Group (Gillespie - NRR)

Marginal to Safety (Dey - RES)  :

Licensee Commitments / CLB (Leeds - NRR)

Tech Spec improvement Program (Grimes - NRR)

NRR Priority / Ranking system (Slosson - NRR) ,

Amendment Screening Panel (Peterson - NRR)

Computer Support Development l'Wiggington - NRR/lRM)

• REGULATORY REVIEW GROUP Draft report issued 5/28 Comment period ends 7/28 Final report 8/20/93 Commission meeting in October, '93 L. B. Marsh, Project Director, NRC 8/93

Cost Beneficial Licensing Actions POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS / ENHANCEMENTS

- Modify NRR Priority System to include costs - sliding scale

- Formally PRIORITIZE all jobs being sent to Tech Staff Industry perform generic assessments / submittals Licensees NUMERICALLY PRIORITIZE all incoming work Utilize " Integrated Living Schedule"

- Look for GENERIC RELIEFS that can be undertaken by NRC

- NRC articulate characteristics of HIGH QUALITY submittals Enhance current AMENDMENT SCREENING process

- Enhance electronic tracking / sorting of past SERs

- Clearly articulate what licensees can and can't do on their own w/o NRC review ,

- Better control (rejections) of licensee's request for UNNECESSARY or CONTINGENCY reviews

- Public list of CBLAs - update periodically Issue GUIDANCE to Licensees and Staff Licensees provide SUPPORT / PRODDING to submittals

- No trivial CBLAs

- NRC Point of Contact -

L. B. Marsh, Project Director, NRC 8/93

/

_.. 1, DISTRIBUTION:

' Docket *Eile NRC/ Local PDRs PDII-3 R/F T. Murley/F. Miraglia,12G18 .

J. Partlow, 12G18 S. Varga G. Lainas D. Matthews C. E. Carpenter D. Hood K. Jabbour L. Berry OGC, 15B18 E. Jordan, MNBB3701 ACRS (10), P-315 L. Plisco, EDO,17G21 E. Merschoff, RII AHerdt, RII JStarefos JDonchew, llD23 BBonser, Ril LWert, RII PSkinner, RII 05})030 DFo l'

\\I - .