ML20138L431

From kanterella
Revision as of 08:47, 22 July 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests Extension of 30 Days to Respond to Util Response to Gap 2.206 Petition Re Reinsp,Review,Mgt Audit & Monitoring of Plant.Meeting W/Site Employees Requested
ML20138L431
Person / Time
Site: Catawba, 05000000
Issue date: 02/08/1984
From: Garde B
GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT
To: Deyoung R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
Shared Package
ML20138L353 List:
References
FOIA-85-584 NUDOCS 8512190269
Download: ML20138L431 (1)


Text

, GOVERNMENT ACCOONT{LITYPROJECT

. , {' '..,,,

. Instituts for PolicyStudi:s '

1901 Que Street. N.W.. Washington. D.C. 20009 (202)234-936:

February 8,1984 b- .

5 YY -

9 0 E

W /g o Q-Mr. Richard C. DeYoung

  • Director of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. tiuclear Regulatory Commission -

Washington, D.C. 20555 Nar Mr. D'eYou6g: "'

c ~

On January 5,1984, Duke Power Company (Duke) submitted a response to the Government' -

Accountability Project's (GAP) 2.206 Petition filed September 14, 1983, with the Commission. That petition requested a 100 percent reinspection of the safety- '

related areas of the plant, a review of the design deficiencies and the breakdown in the design change control system, and a review of the implementation of the QA/QC.-

program. We also requested a management audit of Duke's Catawba management, an Office of Investigations investigation, and monitoring of the Office of Inspecto'r and Auditor investigation. -= .

. In our recent meeting regcrding Midland, I informed you that I wanted .the opportunity o

' to respond to Duke's response which was, according to Mr. Steve Burns of the Execu-

' h tive Legal Director's Office (ELD),; requested by the itRC.,

To do so most accuratel' y , I' have forwarded copies of Duke's response to a group' of-

' site quality control inspectors who have agreed to assist GAP in an attempt to '

explain to you the results of the procedural quality assurance breakdown. In order to allow enough time for their review, I request an extension of 30-days to respond,  ?

in writing. If e shorter time period is necessary, I would like to arrange for a j meeting of Catawba coployees to explain the concerns they have about the as-built condition of the plant.

I look forward to your response. '~

~

Yours truly.

(

. Billie Pirner Garde '

Citizens Clinic Director .

BPG:me .

l .

' 8512190269 851210 PDR FOIA CARR85-584 PDR ,

wu y (h