ML20094D322

From kanterella
Revision as of 06:53, 3 May 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 5 to Chapter 13.0 of Operations QA Plan,Deficiency Control
ML20094D322
Person / Time
Site: South Texas  STP Nuclear Operating Company icon.png
Issue date: 12/20/1991
From:
HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20094D290 List:
References
NUDOCS 9112200171
Download: ML20094D322 (6)


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:~- _. - -. - . ~ . - - -. .- -. . - 8 .,.

  .,      u                                                                                              :

SP 724 (02/9b)- SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ELECTRIC GENERATING-STAT 10N Chapter 13.0 5 OPERATIONS QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN DEFICIENCY CONTROL EFFEC m t DAE 12-20-91

                                                           -4
1. 0 - PURFOSE ,

1.1 The purpcse of this chapter ir, to establish > requirements and responsibill, ties for the ' identification, documentation, evaluation, resolution, control.and reporting of deficiencies. 2.0 SCOPE. >

                           - 2.1   -This chapter applisa to deficiencien discovered in-items,: services and activities under the scope of the Operations Quality'Assuviance Plan and the-reporti79 of items to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in accordance with Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations.

3.0 DEFINITIONS ' 3.1 None 4.0 1REFERENCRS 4.1 10CFR50, Appendix B 4.2; 10CFR21, Reporting of Defects and Noncompliance , , 4.3 10CFR50.72,:Immediats; Notification Requirements for Operating Nuclear Power. Reactors 4.4 10CFR50.73, Licensee Event = Report System

                           -4.5     South Texas Project Electric Generating Station (STPEGS): Technical ~ Specifications 4.6    'OQAP Chapter 14.0, Records Control 5.0         REQUIREMENTS
  • 5.1 All personnel working under the jurisdiction of the operations Quality Assurance Plan are responsible for-reporting identified deficiencies to appropriate management for resolution in accordance with approved procedures.

5.2 Procedures shall be developed for the control of items, services or activities which do not conform to 9112200171 Y11213 PDR ADOCK 05000498

       ,                 P                         PDR

(0 f . 0 STP 724 (02/90)-- SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION "*" E i- Chaptor 13.0 5 OPERATIONS QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN Pact 2 0F 4 DEFICIENCY CONTROL trnctivt DATE 12-20-91 _ established requirements. These procedures shall , _ provide for the following: 5.2.1 Identification and documentation of the deficient condition. 5.2.2 Identification.of the requirements, source, or reference information being violated, 5.2.3 Notification-of responsiblu management. 5.2.4 Control of the deficient item or activity by tagging, segregation, administrative controls, or other appropriate means to prevent inadvertent installation, use, or continuation of the deficient activity and removal of such controls when the item is returnnd to service or availability. 5.2.5 Resolution and/or disposition approved by ' authorized personnel ~ prior to closing out the nonconformance documentation and restoring the item'to normal service. . 5.2.S.1 Material nonconformance disposition categories are: o "Use-as-is" o "Eeject" o "Reveri" in accordLnce with doctuaanted procedures o " Repair" in accordance with documented procedures 5.2.5.2_ " Lea-as-is" and " repair" dispouition-of nonconforming items shall be approved and. justified in writing by Engineering.

   =

5.2.5.3 Evaluations shall be performed to ascertain recurrence control measures, t v

eo s sw m (oveo) _ _ . . . SOUTH TEXA8 PROKCT ELFeTRIC GENERATING GTAT10N 7 _Cf} Ant _e r 13. 0 5 l OPERATIONS QUnLITY ASSURANCE PIAN pg y , 3 4 , DEFICIENCY CCNN.E micwt ' l " 1.h2.tEl  ! 5.2.3 Doc'anntation of the corrective acticn taken. ' 5.2.7 Review nnd/or verification of the corrective action by Nuclear Assurance, as appropriate. 5.2.8 Reinspection of repaired and reworked items shall be to criteria as stringent as those applieA to the original work. Reinspection results are documented on inspection reports or other work process control documents. 5.2.9 Installation of nonconforning material, parts,  ; and components may be performed after the ' effect of their installation has bean evaluated and the installation approved by plant  !

                                                     -Management and Engineering. Nonconforming c                                                        items which may not be installed are those                                                           '

which, because of their makeup and intended > use, cannot be repaired or reworked after being installed and those which, if installed and w later removed, would degrade that system, structure, or component. Once installed, nonconforming items are not energige?, used, or l*8 4 pinced in service until-the action required by the disposition, including reinspectiri, has been completed or an engineering evaluation han been prepared to justify the intended use of  ; the nonconforming item. . t 4 5.2.10 Nonconformances identified on installed items ' will be evaluated for operability.. $ g 5.2.11 Disputes over corrective action are normally resolved by Plant Management. Should this

  • resolution not be satisfactory, the parties may elevate the matter to higher management for resolution.

5.3 Procedures shall provide the following administrative -, controls of deficiencies: ' 5.3.1 Unique identification and numbering of deficiencies. - 5.3.2 Preparing and maintaining status reporting of i deficiencies. ' E . - _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ .. _ , . _ ___ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _

.~..w .

                        $TP 724 (02/90)

SOUTH TEXA8 PROJECT ELECTRIC GENkRATING STATION "" 7

  • _ Charter _13.0 5 OPERATIONS QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN Pact or 4 4 DEFICIENCY CONTROL trrte m t DMI 12-20-91 __

5.3.3 Actions to be taken to assure timely corrective action on deficiencies. i S.4 Procedures which identify and track deficiencies shall require management review of each raport to determine i if the condition is significant. For significant conditions adverse to quality, the cause of the  ; condition and the corrective action taken to preclude repetition shall be documented and reported to appropriate levels of management. 3 5.5 Measures shall be established for review and evaluation of deficiencies for reportability to the + NRC as required by Reference 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, and 4.4, as appropriate. 5.6 The authority to stop work has been assigned to the General Manager, Nuclear Assurance for any activity being performed by company personnel or contractors which do not conform to established requirements. 5.7 Heasures shall be established for the evaluation and tranding of plant deficiencies. The results of these reviews and analyses are reported to the affected organization and executive management, and are audited by the QA organiration on a biannual basis. Significant adverse trends shall be handled in accordance with this. chapter.  :

                       -6.O          DOCUMENTATLyli 6.1           Procedures which are genere.ted as required by this chapter shall identify the records which are required to implement and-document those activities. The records shall be controlled in accordance with Reference 4.6.                                                                                             ,

7.0- ATTACHMENTS 7.1 None '

sm n4 (on/eo) ' GOUTH TEXA8 PROJECT ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION " 7 l Chapter 15.0 4 l OPERATIONS QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN PA00 0F QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDIT 6 7 AND SURVEILLANCE uncwt  ! DAE 12-21-90  ! I results of these assesscents will be transmitted to

l. the Group Vice President, Nuclear.

5.8 Procedures shall be developed to control Nuclear ' Assurance site surveillance activities. Site i surveillances shall be used to observe and verify that quality-related activities are accomplished in accordance with prescribed procedures. 5.9 A surveillance schedule shall be developed to ensure adequate coverage ~of quality-related activities. 5.9.1 The frequency of site surveillances is based upon the complexity of the activity, importance of the activity, and magnitude oi' discrepancies noted during previous audits or surveillances.  ! 5.9.2 Unscheduled site surveillances may be performed to accommodate changes in plant conditions or , systems. 5.10 Scheduled site surveillances are performed using a , sr.rveillance checklist. The surveillance checklist shall be prepared using applicable procedures, specifications, codes, and regulatory requirements for , source requirements. ' 5.11 Site surveillance results are documented, and a  ; summary of surveillances and evaluation of surveillance findings shall be prepared and transmitted to responsible management. i 5.12 Nonconforming-equipment, components, parts, materials, i activities or documentation identified during an audit or site surveillance shall be documented in accordance-with Reference 4.4. l 5.13 Personnel performing surveillances shall be trained and qualified in accordance with Reference 4.2. l

v

1
       ~gt r*

o ,',-

                  $TP 724 (02/90)

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION wuam gp Chapter 15.0 4 OPERATIONS QUALITY ASSURhNCE PLAN QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDIT PACE 7 0F 7 AND SURVEILLANCE EntcTivt DAE 12-21-90 6.O Dgv'TLtiTJLTAT'101(

                                                                                                 -{

t 6.1 Procedures which are generated as required by this chapter shall identify the records which are required to implement and document those activities. The records shall aeference 4.5.be controlled in accordance with I l

                  .7. 0 ATTACHMENTS 7 .1 -   None L

L l l l f - _ . .}}