ML20076K063

Confirms Understandings Re Supplementation by Cajun of Certain Discovery Requests Propounded by Gsu.No Motions to Compel to Be Submitted by Gsu.Related Correspondence

ML20076K063
Person / Time
Site:	River Bend
Issue date:	10/14/1994
From:	Wetterhahn M GULF STATES UTILITIES CO., WINSTON & STRAWN
To:	Rudebusch T DUNCAN, WEINBERG, MILLER & PEMBROKE, P.C. (FORMERLY
References
CON-#494-15818 OLA, NUDOCS 9410270141
Download: ML20076K063 (2)

Text

_. . _ _ . . . . _ _ - ._ . ._ .- . _ _ _ . _

i

' / 587f TGATED CORRESPONDENM WINSTON & STP"MMETED

, USNRC FREDERICK H WINSTON 0853-1886) 1400 L STREET. N W. cmcae,o n,pice SILAS H STRAWN (18911946 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005 3502 35 WEST WACKER DRIVE 34 OCT 17 P4 :03 ";,,rr;"""

NEW YORK OFFICE FACSIMILE (202) 371-5950 _cng qr npp [' ]V in WATER STREET writer # OtRECT DIAL NUMBER L 'd

• l,"",^ r r NEW WRK. NY 10038-4961 00CKE1ING s o ,, ,,,, ,,uso, 202/371-5703 gjigy j 1

) I October 14, 1994 l ,

l 1

VIA FACSIMILE I

1 Thomas L. Rudebusch, Esq.

Duncan, Weinberg, Miller & Pembroke Suite 800 1615 M Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20036 In the Matter of Gulf States Utilities Company (River Bend Station, Unit 1)

Docket No. 50-458-OLA

Dear Mr. Rudebusch:

This letter confirms our understandings related to supplementation by Cajun Electric Power Cooperative (" Cajun") of certain discovery requests propounded by Gulf States Utilities (GSU). During the October 4, 1994 prehearing conference, the  :

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board ordered that all motions to compel regarding outstanding GSU discovery requests be submitted by l Friday, October 14, 1994 (Tr. 57-58).

In its response to GSU Interrogatory 9 transmitted by j your letter of September 30, 1994, Cajun described a Comprehensive l Monitoring Program "for review by Cajun or its consultants of safety matters arising at River Bend." In response to the same  !

interrogatory, you also made available an undated document titled

" Cajun Electric Power Cooperative Inc, Comprehensive Monitoring Program River Bend."

Interrogatory 9 had requested specific information regarding any systematic plan or procedure for review of safety matters at River Bend. The interrogatory requested identification of the author of the document, the names of'anyone reviewing or concurring in such document, when it was prepared, the dates of any amendments thereto, the dates on which it was implemented, and any safety matters evaluated, discovered or dispositioned in accordance i

9410270141 941014 8 DR ADOCK 0500 _)Sb 3

i l

, TVINSTOC< d: STRA3V?s l I

l l Thomas L. Rudebusch, Esq.

October 14, 1994 Page 2 l

with such procedure or plan. This information was not provided as part of your response. You have agreed to supplement your original response to provide such information.

I In addition, Cajun's response to Interrogatory 17 ,

l indicates that additional review was still underway. You stated I that you would complete such review and provide any additional information by early next week.

Based on these understandings, no motion to compel on these matters will be submitted by GSU. 1 i

Sincerelyj j l

Mark J. Wetterhahn  ;

1 MJW:sdd l cc: Service List