ML20083P938
| ML20083P938 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Catawba  |
| Issue date: | 04/17/1984 |
| From: | DUKE POWER CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20083P937 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8404200271 | |
| Download: ML20083P938 (600) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:- _ - _ _ - _ . . _ _ _ . . . _ _ . - _ . _ . . _ . _ . . _ _.. .. .- _. ,_.__.._-.m.- __ , l I , t-l i'
\
l ! DUKE POWER COMPANY i 1 l DESIGN ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 4 1 t 4 i i SQRT AUDIT RESOLUTIONS ' ) CATAWBA UNIT 1 FOR i j SQRT AUDIT CONDUCTED i ! MARCH 13-16,1984 i. i t 1 1 RESOLUTION SUBMITTAL DATE 1 i APRIL 17,1984 i i j . . I i l 4 i i ; i 'l
- 1. .I
- i i
a l i. khk A o 'P 4
, - - , . . . ~ , , - - - . , , - , - , , , - . . , - - - - , . . ~~~--s.,-. . , ,...--,--,.,,-.-.---,,.,,-+,--.,--,,--,,-,,v.~~ , , , , . - , , - . . , - . - ..- , -
= :: :- = . - - . ' :: :: -
- 1 1
i ( SQRT AUDIT RESOLUTION SUBMITTAL CONTENTS 1 A. Introduction B. Generic Item Resolutions
- 1. Mild Environment Equipment Surveilance and Maintenance Program I
- 2. Valve Qualification Acceleration Levels 4
{_ 3. Traceability of Change in Seismic Specification , i l 4-6. (Generic Items 4-6 Are Resolved in the Equipment Specific Item l Resolutions) , i j C. Equipment Specific Item Resolutions j 1. NSSS-UHI Isolation Valve
- 2. NSSS-Boric Acid Transfer Pump / Motor i
- 3. NSSS-Engineering Safeguards Test Cabinet
- 4. NSSS-Thermal Regenerative Deminerizer Tank
! 5. NSSS-Charging Safety / Injection Pump i i 6. !!SSS-Solid State Protection System
- 7. NSSS-RHR Pump /Motcr i
j 8. BOP-Control Room AHU Fan / Motor
- 9. B0P-Aux Feedwater Pump Turbine -
1 l 10. 80P-4',' Stainless Steel Gate Valve ,
- 11. B00-Feedwater Isolation Valve
- 12. B0P-Pressurizer PORY ,
- 13. BOP-Containment Isolation Butterfly Valve '
i
- 14. B0P-4160 Essential Switchgear f
- 15. BOP-600 V.MCC
- 16. . B0P-120VAC Essential Panel Board Transformer -
l 17. B0P-Main Control Boards
- 18. B0P-Damper Operators
~
t f - ._ . _ _ __ . - _ . . . _ . . . . _ _ _ _ _ ._ _. ..a _._ _ . . _ _.
O% CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATION SEISMIC QUALIFICATION OF SAFETY-RELATED ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT RESOLUTION OF SQRT AUDIT ITEMS On March 13-16, 1984, the NRC conducted a Seismic Qua'ification Review Team (SQRT)auditatCatawba. The purpose of this submittal is to provide resolutions to the items identified by the NRC during the audit. The format of this submittal provides resolutions to the generic items followed by the resolutions to the equipinent specific items. It should be noted that the SQRT audit forms (revised as necessary) are included in the equip-ment specific resolutions. O O
GENERIC ITEM O - : GENERIC ITEM #1 - Duke is to provide a written description of the surveillance and maintenance program for equipment in a mild environment. RESOLUTION
SUMMARY
- The Catawba surveillance and preventative mainte-nance program that includes qualification mandated equipment and component replacement requirements for safety-related electrical equipment conforms to the guidance contained in ANS 3.2/ ANSI-N18.7-1976,
" Administrative Controls and Quality Assurance for the Operational Phase of Nuclear Power Plants". The program is based on Technical Specifica-tion requirements, manufacturer's information, qualification program results, and Duke operating experience and is developed by station personnel. Implementation of this program is through station procedures.
Various activities are included in this program such as channel calibration, channel checks, equipment performance tests,' valve lineup l tests, ESF actuation tests, equipment lubrication and maintenance, and equipment mechanical vibration studies. This program also facilitates ongoing reviews of equipment performance, and as such, the surveillance and preventative maintenance procedures can be continually updated based on experience. In addition to the station specific program described above, Duke has implemented an Operating Experience Evaluation Program that monitors safety significant issues including equipment performance. This program consideres not only the operating experience from seven Duke ! nuclear units, but also overall nuclear industry experience via ' information mechanisms such as NRC IE Bulletins and Information Notices 1 and INPO SERs and SOERs. j v
- .- - - . - . . - . -.- . . . . ~ . - . _ . . _ . _ , . . _ _ _ _ , .
1 i GENERIC ITEM !' GENERIC ITEM #2 ' Provide confirmation for acceleration g levels used in valve qualification in relation to as-built piping analysis. 1 1. RESOLUTION
SUMMARY
- Duke Power Company Quality Assurance procedures ,
require as-built piping analysis to assure that as-built piping l accelerations are within.the specified limits of all Catawba safety-related valves. i k i 3 i l i I l I-L i l l I l' .
a i' GENERIC ITEM 4 GENERIC ITEM #3 Complete qualifiction documentation packages by including purchase and design specifications. Traceability of change of seismic specification, and its potential impact to both old and new equipment items. RESOLUTION SU R RY: For the Catawba Nuclear Station, determination of seismic response spectra is organizationally the responsibility of the i Civil / Environmental Division. The plant specific response s;actra are ' generated and controlled under the Duke Quality Assurance Program with the individual response spectra identified by title and revision number. Changes to the spectra are evaluated for potential impact on existing equipment via a closed loop method such that the reviews and action items, if any, are documented. For equipment purchased following a ' change in the Catawba' response spectra, the pertinent purchase document / method would reflect the revised response spectra. In sumary, design mechanisms are provided to assure that changes in
, floor response spectra are properly evaluated for existing equipment , implemented in the purchase of new equipment.
O 4 I
GENERIC ITEM
-l l
GENERIC ITEM #4 Some deficiencies in equipment mountings have been identified in the Control Room. RESOLUTION SU W RY: See resolutions to specific items number (.s) 3, . 6, and 17-4. GENERIC ITEM #5 SQRT forms need to be revised, especially for BOP Scope Equipment.. RESOLUTION SUt94ARY: SQRT forms have been revised and attached as part of the specific item resolutions. O' GENERIC ITEM #6 In various cases, the qualification reports were found to need revision. RESOLUTION
SUMMARY
- In cases where deficiencies in qualification reports were found, these will be revised.
i l l
~
O l l
..___-=_.__.-_;..;.1...
i- ) i 4-1 k)F A SPECIFIC ITEM #1 UHI ISOLATION VALVE t i PART 1: SQRT form to be revised in two places. STATUS: This item is resolved. i
~
RESOLUTION
SUMMARY
- The revised SQRT form follows this page. ;
- i i
i r
-l l
i i 9 N i i O
l ATTACHMENT B-1 3/28/84 l . 1/9 i .. Seismic and Dynamic Qualifit:stion Sunnarv of Ecuicment 1 1 \ I. P1 ant Name: Catawba Unit 1 g: 1 _
- 1. Utility: Duke Pce r C m oany pyg 4_ygge
- 2. NSSS: Westin*asse gyg
- 3. A/E
- Duke Peer Cmoany Other 4
i II. Ccmoonent Name: ASME Class 2 Hydraulic Operated Gate Valve T.ccations 9902A, B & i
\
- 1. Scope: [x ] NSSS [ ] BOP -
[ ]Other . l 2. Model Number: 12c1500 Quantity: 4 1 . j
! 3. Size or Range: 12Dt78sm l . 4. Vendor: Anchor Darlim .
i -
- 5. If the component is a cabinet or panel,. name and model number of. the devices l l included: N/A I i
( 6.- Physical
Description:
j
.I.-. .
l
- a. Appearance: Hvd.9n111c/ Motor Ooerated Gate V'lve a I t
- b. Dimensions: 44.62" End to End: 169':25" hich a
j c. Weight: 6400 lb. l i l i 7. Location: Suilding: Outside Contalment - Auxiliary sidg. l Elevation. 552' 3-1/8" f
- 8. Field Mounting Conditions: l Bolt (No. , Size )
Wald (Lang _tn )
; X, Butt Welded into Piceline
! 9. Mounting Orientation (e.g., on floor, cantilevered, suspended. etc.] Butt welded into cieeline with stem in vertical orientation 10 . a. System in which located: Upoer head injection systen l . , b. Functional
Description:
UHI Isolation Valve 4 c. Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby, [ ]ColdShutdown
- [ ]8eth [ ]Neither [X ] Other Uccer Head Iniection i
1
O
.UHI VALVE QUALIFICATION The qualification of the UHI valve can best be described by discussing the qualification of each component of the valve configuration.
A. The Anchor Darling Co. (valve vendor) first qualified the valve by analytical stress analysis and also performed a static deflection test to demonstrate operability. (MED-PVE-218)(EPS-82 Rev. B) B. Westinghouse performed a supplemental stress analysis to demonstrate the ability of valve to withstand higher loads. In addition, Westinghouse also performed a natural frequency calculation to detemine resonances. (E-5750 Rev. D) (WCAP-9369) C. Solenoid qualification was gotten by test on the two different types of solenoids used on the valves. (EL:346)(EL:2226) O D. Limit switch qualification was gotten by test on the type of limit swit.ches used on the valve. (F-C3879) O O
/'s vAI.vE acAurICman SumAar A. Cauponent: - Upper Head Injection Isolation Valve 9002A, B and 9003A, B B. Qualification Approach:
2 e upper head injection isolation valves are designed in accordance with the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Sectior III, NC-3500. St. h integrity is detenstrated by designing the valve body in such a' manner that the valve is not the limiting factor in the fluid system design. We section modulus and area of the body crotch is at least 110% of those for.the connecting pipe after being corrected for the allowable stresses for the valve body versus the pipe. A wiee analysis of the valve assembly is perfonned to show that stresses incurred are at a level within the elastic range of the material. In addition to the seismic analysis en the valve assenbly, testing has been perfo=ned en the limit switctes and active solenoids. U C. Stmenry of Ioad Confo= nance: Se actual acceleraticns are detezmined by the piping analysis. Following are the accelerations: Accelerations OBE SSE Valve Icc. Node
- Gx Gy G G x.
Gy Gg 9902A (245A) E 0.610 0.102 0.978 1.144 0.191 1.834 F 0.970 0.102 1.406 1.819 0.191 2.636 G 1.274 0.102 1.786 2.389 0.191 3.349 9902B (244B) E 0.824 0.102 1.490 1.545 0.191 2.794 F 1.321 0.102 2.147 2.477 0.191 4.026 G 1.740 0.102 2.743 3.252 0.191 5.143 9903A (243A) E 0.627 0.103 0.822 1.176 0.193 1.541 F 0.993 0.103 1.163 1.862 0.193 2.181 O G 1.309 0.103 1.471 2.454 0.193 2.758 2.361 9903B (242B) E 1.015 0.106 1.259 1.903- 0.199 F 1.628 0.106 1.802 3.052- 0.199 3.379 G 2.151 0.106 2.296 ' 4.033 0.199 4.305 .
*see Figure 1 for node location
.- +
Se seismic analysis was performed using a horizontal SSE acceleration of 2 i 6.lg's, (Gx2,gg )h and a vertical acceleration of 2.0g's which is greater than the horizontal acceleration of 6.09g's on all cross-sections on valve 9902B (worst case accelerations) %t those listed below. S e below sections were analyzed using accelerations which are greater than those at the node points near the center of gravity of the section analyzed. Analyzed Acceleration Actual Acceleration
- G G, G G G3 Section Analyzed Node x y x y Iower Ycke-BuiL.au E 4.7 2.0 5.2 1.545 0.199 2 ~34 Section A-A Icwer Ycke-Top F 4.1 2.1 4.1 2.477 0.199 4.026 Section B-B
*For valve locatien 90023 OBE qualification levels are 8/15 SSE levels O Qualification of the Teledyne Rep +14r- Solenoid M:xial 21110-0303-5200 and Kepsel check valve Model 1337 was performed at ccrsined horizontal SSE acceleration of 3.0 g's. We horizontal accelerations on valves 9902A and 9903A are 2.16g's and 1.938g's (Nede E) respectively Miich is less ! than the qualification level.
l Qualification of the Teledyne Republic Solenoid Madel 21110-7303-5200 and l Kepsel Check valve Model 1337 was performed at 4.24/4.24/4.24 g's. S e accelerations on valve 9002E and 9003B are 1.545/.191/2.794 and 1.903/
- .199/2.361 g's respectively (Node E) which is less than the qualification level.
Statis rianactions test was performed at a ccat)ined horizontal acceleration of 4.54 g's at the valve actuator assettly center of gravity which is greater than 3.193 g's (Node E) for valve. U w--
l - get . . r c: y&\i . l .
-- .= ,3 -
e--- .;p G - gLs P. . zt.o . L.am a r - g,, ,.e g . >.v a .. n. - ~~ -
. _.-s _
-r '
~
hT. N . . , . .
. . 4 L.12.5
{ l i . w r . s .
.']
g . r,i . .
,)]b.'.
\ .2 f.. \ 7.5 . .
/ ,t Glena.d - a , ,
, &, -(
- O
~. .
1 n/ -
\ .
. . tt,.2r - -
( -[- i 0 .b . y -- L
. ., 6 . I c,
.C} .il@m
. n .. 6 i .. . ..r....,,
g .ev , j,.- iii EE-C 2 . 2--21 e .
. j< ..
24 7r ,
). .
i.' . ... . . ( - A ~
~ '
3' . Qo) - - - _./ ( Fuu 1 . . 1
t 1 i j i i e k i j b. 4 1 1 4 1 4 i STRESS ANALYSIS AND STATIC DEFLECTION i O 1 e i 1 } 4 J , p - e
2/S 11.- Pcrtinent Referenca Design Specifications for Qualifiestion Requirements: General Soecification 952304 Rev. 1 i O. a. Seismic Input d. Service Conditions 1 See Item v.5 Per Design Specification
- b. Hydrodynamic Ldad Input e. Qualified Life
- Limited by Nozzle Loads (Note 1) 40 years
- c. Fatigue Considerations See Item V.6 III. Is Eauicment Available for Inscection in the Plant:
[X ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Partial or limited avai1W2ility i, IV. Ecuicment Qualifiestion Method: ! [ ] Test [ ] Analysis [ X] Combination of Test and Analysis -
< Qualification Report:* MED-PVE-2318 3/2/84 .EPS-82 Rev. B sa4 =ic Qualification of . .
Static Seismic Testing (No., Title and Date): tur Tsolatien vahm Camoany that Prepared Report: Westinchcuse anchor /%r1 %c f Ccmpany that Reviewed Report: WestN6 house Westinanouse O Where Recort is filed or availabl's:- Westinohouse ancnor/0ar: 1ng or Westinanouse Applicable Codes and/or Standards: ' Specification 952304 Rev.1 and ASME Code Section III,1971 Edition Winter 72 Addenda V. Vibration.Incut:
- 1. Loads considered: a. [x 3 Seismic only 1
! b. [ ]Hydrodynamiconly ! c. [ ] Vibration from nomal operation. i d. [ ] Cambination of (a), (b), bd (c) - 2. Method of Ccabining RRS: Not applicable - as specified [ ]AbsoluteSun [ ]SRSS [X ] bv oioina analvsis , (otner, spec 11y) Not applicable - controlled-Required Response Spectra ** (attach the graphs): by analvsis of oicino syste-3. l Note: ! *If more than one report' complete itaar IV thru VII for each report.
**If o*.her than RR5 is used, describe method.
l Note 1: LOCA loads are transmitted to the valves through the piping. Allowable nozzle loads on the valve are specified to limit loads ( . transmitted through the piping to the valve. L
3/5
- 4. Damping Corresponding to RRS: OBE t!/A SSE N/A
- 5. Required Acceleration in Each Direction:
[ ] ZPA [ X ] Other As determined by piping analysis (spec 1fy) OBE S/S = *> F/B =
- V=
- l SSE S/S = F/B = V=
- 6. Were fatigue effects considered? .
[XX]Yes [.]No If yes, describe how they were treated in overall qualification pregram: Per ASME Code Section III. NB-3550 l VI. If Qualification bY Iest. then c=nolete: Static Deflection Test
- 1. [ l Single Frequency [ . 3 Multi-Frequency: [; randcm
. I sine beat f, X ' Static Deflection
~
- 2. l ; Single Axis [
, Independent Axis [~;'MultilAxis-
. In-phase motions
~
- 3. Number of Qualifications Tests: ,
N/A SSE I Other OBE (specify) J N/A
- 4. Frequency Range:
l 5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side. Front /Back, Vertical): See Item VII.2
- S/5 = F/8 = V= . .
- 6. Method of Ostensining Natural Frequencies:
[ ]LabTest [ ] In-Situ Test ( X ] Analysis See Section VII , 7. TRS enveloping RR5 using Multi-Frequency Test N/A [ ;Yes.(AttachTRS&RASgraphs) i [ No ' 4 l
* - See /.ttach.,ent T for accelerations of each valve.
I 3 1
4/5
- 8. Maximum Input g-level Test:
i O , OBE S/S = N/A F/B = N/A y= N/A SSE S/S = 3.21 **/2.794 p/S = 3.21'**/1.545 y= 2.0/0.191
- 9. Laboratory Mounting:
l 2 A. [ ] Bolt (No. . Size 1 [ ]Wald(Langth ) [ X] Rn1+=d/Waid9d B. Orientation and Fixturing: Stam ver+4 cal 3
- 10. Functional operability verified:
[ X3 Yes [ ]No [ ]NotApplicable l 11.. Test Results including modifications made: None 'i 12., Other tests perfomed (such as aging or fragility test, including results): b0 h.
- 13. Failure Modes (if 4,,,..v,,itate . NI'A -
)
i ! 14. Margins Available: [']InputiSpectrue [ ] Fragility Margin on accelerations - l VII. If Qualification by Analysis, then ecnolete:
- 1. Method of Analysis:
[ ] Equivalent Static Analysis [ X] Static Analysis , l
- [ ] Dynamic Analysis: [. ] Tim > History [ ]ResponseSpectrum )
I i l 2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side. Front /Back. Vertical): , S/S = F/8 = V= See Item VIIe
- 3. Model Type: [Xx] 3D [ ]2D [ ] 1D
[ ] Finite Element [ X ] Beam i
- [ ] Closed Fom Solution [ ] Other i
l ** Combined effect is 4.54 g's ! l t l i
._,,---w- ..u,-, <a ,,,,,+.,,,--,.--,-__,.._..,..,_.r.,_ -
e.,_, -,_,-w. .-,--,w.,-,m-e,e ,y-
i
. . 5/5
[X ] Computer Codes: l 4. WECAN (frecuency) (NCAP 8929 currently under NRC review) Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: 1 to 1,266 H::,12 Mcde [X ] Hand Calculations Seismic Analysis l S. . Method of Combi.ning Dynamic Responses from Seismic and other Dynamic Loads: [x]AbsoluteSus [ ] SRSS [ ]Other: (specify)
- 6. Damping OBE N/A SSE N/A Basis for damping used:
l 7. Support Considerations in the model: Welded into pipe i 8. Critical Structural Elements: Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress i A. Identifiestion Lecstien Ccanination S tress Stress A11cwable Ice.r Yoke Seismic & Operating 26278 31500 i Lower Yoke Stud 37245 50000 i S. .T. 1 Max. Critical s Maximum Allowable Deflection
! Deflection M '
to Assure Functional Operability
.t.
See operability test
- 9. Failure Modes:
- 10. Margins Available: [ ]InputSpectrum [x 3 Stress or Deflection l
As identified in Itsu 8.A above, margins betwen actual and allowable stresses are available. Additionally, Table I provides a cmoarison of generic quali-
! fication and specific plant g values. As noted, there is margin in th:se values.
O O
.. 5 ..
,,,w--e-,- -w- wee-,..g ,,,,,,.4.-.-4,,,a wi.im*--a.-- ,.%,.ap ,,
,, ,.,--w.- p-.+ - . - - , , - _ - , - , , ~ , , - ,,.9 ,g,., %
2/5
- 11. Pertinent Referenca Design Specifications for Qualification Requirements: l
. 1
- a. Seismic Input d. Service Canditions l b. Hydrodynamic Ldad Input e. Qualified Life
- c. Fatigue Considerations
! l I:I. Is Ecuicment Available for Insoection in the Plant: ; i ( ]Yes [ ] No [ ] Partial or limited availability l IV. Ecuicment Qualifiestion Method: [ ] Test [X] Analysis [ ] Ccabination of Test and Analysis Qualification Report:* E-575C Rev. D 4/2/75 12"-15005 Hycraulic Operated (No., Title and Date): Gate valve nesien r31c.,13enn Cemaany that Prepared Report: Anchor /Dariine C=cany that Reviewed Report: Wes((nQhouse nnenar/varting or j O Where Recort is filed or availabi'e:- Westinanouse i Applicshle Codes and/or Standards: Specification 952304 Rev.1 and ASME Ccde
. Section III,1971 Edition Winter 72 Addenda V. Vibration. Inout:
i
- 1. Loads considered
- a. C ] Seismic only
- b. [ jHydrodynamiconly
- c. [ ] Vibration from nonial operation-l d. [ ] Cabination of (a), (b), and (c)
- 2. Method of Comnining RRS: ~
[ ]AbsoluteSun [ ]SRSS [ ] . (otner. .<peelfy) l
- 3. Required Response Spectra ** (attach the graphs):
Note: O
*If more than one report complete items IV thru VII for each report.
**If other than RAS is used. describe method.. -
-r--- ,- - . - - , - - - , - - -,-.,..,,-w,, -
- - , - - , , . - + . . - - , - , - , - , , <,w-._.~ .,w+=-- ..- + - -, w,--- , , , - -.-y
_.._ _ _ . ._.-.m__ .._... . _ _ _ . l l i 1 e 4 1 1 i 4 i ! i f i i 4 F NATURAL FREQUENCY CALCULATION I 1 4 r J I ! l l 1 I l 1 1 l t
-e- w -- ----w-g yy-, ,.y--, ,,,,y-wm.,, --9n -g-.-9mw, ,,p,,. 3m,,,y 9m*q,..,_y._,% -%.m. ,,,,q-_.-,9-.-y,_ y .. ,qw e 9, , - ,_ ,.w,,y.,,,9,,,, ,,.w_m---
- 11. Pertin nt Refer;nce 0; sign Sp;cificaticns for Qualification Rtquirements:
- a. Seismic Input d. Service Conditions
- b. Hydrodynamic Load Input e. Qualified Life
- c. Fatigue Considerations III. Is Equipment Available for Inspection in the Plant:
[ ]Yes [ ]No [ ] Partial or limited availability IV. Eouioment Qualification Method: [ ] Test [X ] Analysis [ ] Combination of Test and Analysis Qualification Report:* WCAP-9369 (Natural. Frecuency) (No., Title and Date): Experimental and Analytical Study of UHI Valve f Company that Prepared Report: Westinghouse Ccmpany that Reviewed Report: Westinghouse Where Report is filed or available: Westinghouse Applicable Codes and/or Standards: Specification 952304 Rev. 1 i V. Vibration Input: (Notapplicable)
- 1. Loads considered: a. - [ ]Seismiconly
{ b. [ ]Hydrodynamiconly -
- c. [ ] Vibration from normal operation i~
- d. [ ] Combination of (a), (b), and (c)
- 2. Method of Combining RRS:
[ ]AbsoluteSum [ ]SRSS [ ] (other, specify)
- 3. Required Response Spectra ** (attach the graphs):
Note: - O *If more than one report complete items IV thru VII for each report. i b **If other' than RRS is used, describe method. l l I
~
2 ! i
. 3/5
- 4. Damoing Corresponding to RRS: OBE SSE
- 5. Required Acceleration in Each Direction:
[ ] ZPA [ ] Other l
- (specify) l OBE S/S = F/B = y=
SSE S/S = F/B = y=
- 6. Were fatigue effects considered?
- C 3 Yes [.]No l If yes, describe how they were treated in overall qualification program
i i j l i VI. If Qualification by Test. then er.rolete: N/A l
- 1. [ l Single Frequency [ 3 Multi-Frequency: ; rand::n sine beat
~.
- 2. ]SingleAxis ] Nulti iAxis
! j[. J Independent Axis [.,J.,In-phase entions _
~
- 3. Ntauber of Qualifications Tests: ,- ,
08E SSE Other (spec 1fy)
- 4. Frequency. Range:
l 5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side Front /Back Vertical): S/S = F/B = _ V= , ,,
- 6. Method of Deter 1lrining Natural Frequencies:
l [ ]LabTest [ ] In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis I
- 7. TR$ enveloping RR5 using Multi-Frequency Test
[ ;Yes(AttachTRS&RR5 graphs) * [ . No
l [ ... 4/5 l 8. Maximum Input g-level Test: l OBE S/S = F/B = V= SSE S/S = F/B = V=
- 9. Laboratory Mounting:
A. [ ] Bolt (No. . Size ) [ ] Weld (Length ) [ ] B. Orientation and Fixturing: '
- 10. Functional operability verified:
[ ]Yes [ ] No [ ]NotApplicable 11.. Test Results including modifications made:
- 12. Other tests perfomed (such as aging or fragility tast, including results):
Failure Modes (if appropriata-
- 13. )
- 14. Margins Available: [ '] InpuM3pectrtas [ ] Fragility VII. If Oualification by Analysis, then casolete:
- 1. Method of Analysis: '
[ ] Static Analysis [ ]EquivalentStaticAnalysis - [XX]DynamicAnalysis: [. ] Time-History [ ]ResponseSpectrum
- 2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side. Front /Back. Vertical):
S/5 = 9.55 F/B . 8.5 y. >33 -
- 3. Model Type: [X ] 3D [ ]2D [ ] 10
[ ] Finite Element [ X ] Beam , [ } Closed Fom Solution [ ]Other
--w- -uw - - m, a 4A e __mn. om.a+anwa -M-A + -.m mmmA +s, , -.41- m --~m,~e-mmua 1w-.es me4-en,,,ew.mA,wnc.m uma. g,,n,,_m4_r__mmaA+--.ob ' Wsww,k A,,a-,.Mn.
I i
! e i '
I f 1 i l 9 i 4 , i b i ) ' i ; l i
! I t ' l t i h
f, i d !
\ t I
SOLEN 0ID QUALIFICATION j (TEST) [ t ; 1 . i e I i 4 i 1 b 1 I i . , 1 I i 4 r j 1 i ' f '
. I i !
i i i' : i i< l l ' l 1 i I l 4 e
----,e.,,vnwm-,,.w _ _ , , _ - m
e 2/
- 11. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications for Qualification Requirements:
O .
- a. Seismic Input d. Service Conditions
- b. Hydrodynamic Ldad Input e. Qualified Life
- c. Fatigue Considerations III. Is Ecuiement Available for Inspection in the Plant:
[ ]Yes [ ] No [ ] Partial 11 mitt *a11 ability Solenoid Valvo 21110-0303-5200 IV. Ecui:: ment Qualifiestion Method: Kepsel check valvo tedel-1337 [x ] Test [ ] Analysis [ ] Ccabination of Test and Analysis Qua11ficatien Report:* EL:346 - Acril 1974 . (flo. . Title and Data): sei=.ic Test cf to centrol valves Ccapany that Prepared Report: Westirchcuso Electric ccm. Ccapany that Reviewed Report: WesN*2cusaElectriccorp. Where Report is filed or availab1'et . Westinchauso Electric corp. - Applicsble Codes and/or Standards: . IIIE 344-1971 and Spec. G-952304, Pav. 1 V. Vibration. Input:
- 1. Loads considered: a. [X ] Seismic only
- b. ( ]Hydrodynamiconly
- c. [ ] Vibration from normal operation-
- d. [ ] Ccanination of (a), (b), and (c)
- 2. Method of Ccanining RAS:
. tbt applicable-tent dena to
( ] Absolute Sun [ ]SR13 (x ] na~ rte W.In (otner, specify) tbt applicabler cont. rolled
- 3. by analvnia of otoim svnt Required Response Spectra", (attsch the graphs):
(n) Note:
*!f more than one report complete itans IV thru V!! for esca report.
"If other than RA5 is used, describe method.
l 3/9 l 4 Daseing Corresponding to ARS: N/A N/A 08E $$g
- 5. Required Acceleration in Each Direction:
- ( )ZPA (X ] Other As detemined by eiolm analysis j j (spec 1fy) , ;
! 08E 5/5 = ~ F/5 =
~
y=
~
SSS S/S = '3.0/,y,1 pjg , *3.0/g, 1 y, j
- 6. Were fatigue effects ' considered?
j ( ]Yes (x.]No I If yes, describe how they were treated in overall qualification program: i i 1 l 1 I ) VI. If Qualification hv Test. than eensleta:
- 1. CX1SingleFrequency ( 3 Multi-Frequency: ;randon I
,, sine best
~
~,1 ,
- l. 2. "X ] Single Asis E MultiaAsia -
{ I, J Independent Asis [ . ,l. to pnose motions !
\
I 3. Naher of Qas11fications Tests: - l j - W
. 0 SSE 1 Other l 1 (specify) l
) -
- 4. Fmquency Aanges 1-50 Hz
- 5. Natural Frequencies fn Each 01restion (5fde/Sfde. Front / lack. Vertical):
J US e > 30 Hz F/3 e > 50 Hz ya > $0 ,
- 4. Method of DeteruHning Natural Frequensies: ;
(x]LabTest ( ) In-Situ Test ( ) Analysis I ) I j 7. TRS enveleping RR$ using Multi-Frequency Test N/A l Yes (Attsch TRS & RAS graphs)
.(
[, ' No O
- Test ws cerat.icted in endi direction independently, therefore, Cst j acceleration cannot exceed 3.0 g by SM55 in the horizontal direction j l
3 l
4/5
- 8. Maximum Input g-level Test:
OBE S/S = - F/B = -
- y. -
SSE S/S . 3.0 F/B . 3.0 - y. - 9 .' Laboratory Mounting: A. C X] Belt (No. , Size ) ( 3 Weld (Length ) [ ]
- 5. Orientation and Fixturing: As installed T0. Functional operability verified:
~
(x]Yes ( ]No ( ) Not Applicable
- 11. Test Results including modifications made: runctiened suceossfully with no nvidenen of derradatien '
- 12. Otner tests performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):
N/A O -
- 13. Failure Medes (if appropriata- ' '
)
- 14. Mergins Available: (']Inputspostrus ( ) Fragility Margins as provided by cranparison of genas.ic qualifiestion VII. If Qualification hv AnalNisYN NIsta:
- 1. Method of Analysis:
( ] Static Analysis ( ) Equivelant Static Analysis . C ] Dynamic Analysis: (. ] Tim > History ( )ResponseSpectrun
- 2. NaturalFrequenciesintochDirection(5tde/5fde. Front / Sack, Vertical): ,
5/3 = F/l = V=
- 3. Medal Type: []2 ( ) 2D C ] 10
( ) Finito Element ( ) Seas ( } Closed Fom Solution [ ]Other l
-M e ata .e 4 ei as ,w -
_ mig, .-;
11. 2/5 i Pertinent Reference Design Specifications for Qualir1 cation Requirements:
- a. Seismic Input d. Service Conditions
- b. Hydrodynamic Ldad Input e. Qualified Life i c. Fatigue Considerations i
III. Is Ecuioment Available for Insoecticn in the Plant: [ ]Yes [ ]No [ ] Partial or limited availability Solenoid valve 21110-7303-5200 IV. Ecuicment Qualification Method: Kepsel check valve Model-1337 [X] Test [ ] Analysis [ ] Ccabination of Test and Analysis Qualification Report:e EL:2226 DRAFT (No., Title and Date): seismic Test of w o Hydraulic control valves Ccmpany that Prepared Report: Westirdeuse Electric cero. ) O Cm anx that Re 4eeed Re ort: ese s ,x=es e1ecc=1c corm. iihere Report is filed or availabl'e:- Westinchause Electric Coro. Applicable Codes and/or Standards: IEEE 344-1971 and Sme. G-952304, Pa. l' V. Vibration. Inout:
- 1. Loads considered: a. [X]Seismiconly
- b. [ ]Hydrodynamiconly '
- c. [ .] Vibration from nonnal operation -
- d. [ ] Ccabination of (a), (b), and (c)
- 2. Method of Combining RRS:
Not applicable test done [ ]AbsoluteSun [ ]SRSS [ x] to generic levels f' (otner, spec 1fy) Not applicable-Controlled b
- 3. Required Response Spectra ** (attach the graphs)
- analysis of cioinc svstem' y
!O Note:
*If more than one report completa items IV thru VII for each report.
**If other than RR5 is used, describe method.
m l
1 Damoing Corresponding to RRS: N/A OBE SI: N/A
- 5. Required Acceleration in Eaca Direction:
1 [ ] Z.oA [ x] Other As determined by the pioing analysis (spec 1fy) SEE SEE SEE OBE S/S = 2 4/ AWACH 1 F/B = 3.4/ ATTACH 1 y , 3.4/ ATTACH 1 ' SEE dch SEE SSE S/S = _4.24/ ATTACH 1 F/B = 4.24/ ATTACH 1 y = 4.24/ ATTACH 1
- 5. Were fatigue effects considered?
[x ] Yes [.]No If yes, describe how they were treated in overall qualific: ten pregra=: vibration acina. VI. IfOualificationbyTest. then ecmolete:
! 1. [ X} Single Frequency [ ] Multi-Frequency: [ ; ranc=
~
, sine .aat
; ~.: -
- 2. [ll Single Axis [x; Mult11A xis
[ . Independent Axis L .. In-phase motions
- 3. Number of Qualifications Tests: -
~
OBE 5 SSE 17 ;0ther tspec1fy)
- 4. Frequency Range: 1 to 33 Ez ~
- 5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side, Front /Ba::. Vertical):
S/S = > 33 F/B = } 33 V= 5 33
- 6. Method of Detamining Natural Frequencies:
[x 3 Lab Test [ ]In-SituTest [ ] Anal;.s:s
- 7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test N/A
[ ; L . NoYes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs) O 3
=
- 4/5 l 8. Maximum Input g-level Test:
l O OBE S/S = 3.4 F/B = ,s y= 3.4 4.24 4.~24 y, SSE S/S = F/B = 4.24
- 9. Laboratory Mounting:
A. [ X] Bolt (No. . Size ) [ ] Weld (Length ) [ ]
- 3. Orientation and Fixturing: As mounced on the actuator
- 10. Functional operability verified:
[x ] Yes . [ ]No [ ]NotApplicable
- 11. Test Results including modifications made: Functiened successfu nv with no evidence of decradation
- 12. Other tests performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):
Vibraticn aging. O - w Failure Modes (if appropriata-
- 13. )
- 14. Margins Available: [x']InpuMShectrum [ ] Fragility
- VII. If Qualification by Analysis. the9 ccmolete
- 1. Method of Analysis:
[ ] Static Analysis [ ] Equivalent Static Analysis [ ] Dynamic Analysis: [. ] Time-History [ ]ResponseSpectrum
- 2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side. Front /BLck, Vertical):
; S/S = F/S = y=
- 3. Model Type: [ ]3D [ ] 2D [-]10
[ ].Finita Element [ ] Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution [ ]Other l l
~
~ . . - . .. . . . .
.,.-~,_.,,,v , .-.. -- -
.e c,-. ,.~.,--,c. ,,.~c... . . , . .- .. , .n.. ~ - - , , ,
_ ~. . . .. -. - - _ - . - - . _ . .. . _ -. _ _ __ _. _ . _ s b e F i l
, 1 1
1 I e LIMIT SWITCH QUALIFICATION (TEST) i 4 9 l 7 l I i l 4
- *w---- . ,, ,
d
- ~- - - - - - .- . m.. . , _ . , . , , _ , _ _ m._ , , , , _,, , , _
- 11. Pertintnt Refertnce 01 sign Spicifications for Qualification Requirements:
- a. Seismic Input d. Service Cor.ditions
- b. Hydrodynamic Load Input e. Qualified Life
- c. Fatigue Considerations III. Is Ecuicment Available for Insoection in the Plant:
[ '] Yes [ ]No [ ] Partial or limited availability IV. Ecuicment Oualification Method: Limit Switch - EA-170 [x] Test [ ] Analysis [ ] Comeination of Test and Analysis Qualification Report:* F-C3879"- 9/74 (No., Title and Date): Seismic Qualification Test of Limit centrol Switches Company that Prepared Report: The Franklin Institute REsearch Iab. Company that Reviewed Report: !WKD Where Report is filed or available: Westinchouse Applicable Codes and/or Standarcs: IEEE-344-71 i . V. Vibration Inout:
- 1. Loads considered: a. [ X] Seismic only
- b. [ ]Hydrodynamiconly i
- c. [ ] Vibration from nonnal operation ,
- d. [ ] Combination of (a) -(b), and (c)
- 2. Method of Combining RRS:
Not applicable-test done [ ]AbsoluteSum [ ]SRSS [X] to aeneric levels (other, specify) Not applicable-controlled
- 3.
- Required Response Soectra** (attach the graphs):by analysis of piping system Note:
*If more than one report complete items IV thru VII for each report.
**If other than RRS is used, describe method. .
2
- 4. Damping Corresponding to RRS: OBE N/A $$g N/A
- 5. Required Acceleration in Each Direction:
[ ] IPA [ X] Other As detezmined by piping analysis (specify) OBE S/S = - F/B = V= - SSE S/S = 5.2* F/B = 5.2* y= 5.2* l
- 6. Were fatigue effects considered?
[X]Yes [ ]No ' If yes, describe how they were treated in overall qualification program: Vibration Testi m. i VI. If Oualification by Test, then comolete:
- 1. [x] Single Frequency [ ] Multi-Frequency: l; [randem sine beat L, .
< 2. [ ;SingleAxis [x " Multi-Axis
[ . Independent Axis [ . In-phase motions
- 3. Number of Qualifications Tests:
OBE o SSE 4 Other (specify)
- 4. Frequency Range: 1-35 Hz
- 5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side, Front /Back, Vertical):
S/S = > 33 F/B = > 33 V= >33
- 6. Method, of Detennining Natural Frequencies:
, [X ] Lab Test [ ]In-SituTest [ ] Analysis
- 7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test N/A
- [ ; NoYes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs)
. L .
l ,
- Canbined horizontal acceleration '
l-3 l . 1 . l . - - . - . - . , , , - . - - - , , - , .- .,
4/5
- 8. . Maximum Input g-leval Test: See attached carve OBE S/S = -
F/B = - V= - SSE S/S = F/B = V=
- 9. Laboratory Mounting:
A. [ ] Bolt (No. 4 , Size h I * [ ] Weld (Length ) [ ] B. Orientation and Fixturing: vertical switches Motmted
- 10. Functional operability verified:
[ X] Yes [ ] No [ ]NotApplicable
- 11. Test Results including modifications made: "
- 12. Other tests performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):
N/A
- 13. Failure Modes (if appropriate Ibe )
14 Margins Available: [ ]InputSpectrum [ ] Fragility , See Attachment 1 II. If Qualification by Analysis. then ecmolete:
- 1. Method of Analysis: .
[ ] Static Analysis [ ] Equivalent Static Analysis [ ]DynamicAnalysis: [ ] Time-History [ ]ResponseSpectrum-
- 2. ' Natural Frequencies 'in Each Direction (Side / Side, Front /Back, Vertical):
S/S = F/B = V=
- 3. Mcdel Type: [ ]3D [ ] 2D [ ] 1D
[ ] Finite Element [ ] Beam [ ] Closed Fom Solution [ ] Other O 9 4 e -
' )
l l N l l
- i C A 3e:C .e3* 9 *:hCH 2 *:/ ' ? ::.a.. en; .C'.;52-': - - .
- INO :W.M
@ n -- m ., _
, k l. l 6
0 0 <3 x e e e e 4SuO Z CC E m" , 4 Z e-uz
- tna-.
<3 Y .
-Q 2:
e j ta C
/ . N u E I
- WCI wo uN T
j ( ,/ < -~ g l I *** C y
/l s
c= 2 uO a 8
\ cwu - -p g j s a A O
no em $
\ 2 O ,e C \
Ns
\
C. C -* E Y-c Z
-m
~
"- u M
5
- 0 z =
C A d -
-' W o e
5 m g(/ - = . IE M
\
m% m h
\ i 5" c c2 x -e s 4
l - c y
\ - a
\ c
\ _ , -
. \ O
\ . a l c
\ -
CC - . M a.
'\ l o
I
\ - PJ
\\
\
l
- s a \
l '
.i . . . .
h, ~ _ p a n a w * <a - ($ 1 N0tivaG83 JC Sis? *4 C' ? 2Co u 'o n'- 'ACo .7 -I 1 ?
. se - - - r .
m e p- a,
+- - - - ,
yn-w ,py
Attachment 1
~
4 (N 3 Page 1 of 8 V
- SSE ACCELERATION!
ANALYZED ACTUAL Valve-9902A Gx Gy Gz Gc Gx Gy Gz Gc VALVE AfJEMBLY
- a. Body-Bonnet Studs
- 2.0
- 6.1 1.144 . 191 t.834 2.16
~
- b. Upper Cytinder Studs
- 2.0
- 6.1 2.389 . 191 3.349 4.11-
- c. Lower Cylinder Studs
- 2.0
- 6.1 1.819 . 191 2'.636 3.20
- a. Lower Yoke Stec
- 2.0
- 6.1 1.819 . 191 2.606 3.20
- e. Lower Yoke (Sec.A-A) 4.7 2.0 5.2 1.144 . 191 1.834 2.ic
- f. Lower Yoks (Cec.B-B) 4.i 2.0 4.1 ---
1.319 . i*h 2.636 3.29
. Up oei- Yoke
- 2.0
- 6.1 2.3d9 . 19i 3.349 *
. t i'
- n. Bonnet
- 2.0 ,
- 6.1 1.'144 . i ci- 1.834 2.tr
. 50LhN'0IDJ
~
- a. 21110-0303-5200
- 2.0
- 3.0 1.144 . 191 1.834 2.16
- b. 21110-7603-5200 I. LIMIT SWITCHEI ** .
a . EA170-31302 ,
- 5.2
- 7.3 2.389 . 191 -3.349 4.ji
*
- 7.3
- b. EA170-3 2302 5.2 2.389 . 191 3.349 4.11
*Gc = (Gx + Gz )
2
**G c
=
(Gx 2+Gy-2+Gz )h
- (
l l I
/ \
k
---4 '
m w - -
- q , s w -
m- - e-" A
l I
. Attachment 1 f
Page 2 of SSE ACCELERATIONS ANAL'lIEL ALTUAL Valve-9902B Gr Gv Gz Gc Gx Gv Gz Gc
. VALV2 A2SEMBLY
- a. Body-Bonnet Studs
- 2.0
- 6.1 1.545 ,17i 2.794 3.1
- n. Upper CvLinder Studs"
- 2.0
- 6.1 3.262 .iV1 5.143 4.0
- c. Lowei- Cviinner Stud.s
- 2.0 + o.i .' 4 ;' t .191 4.G26 4.2
- d. Lower Yoke Stud
- 2.0 x 6.i ,
2.4?? 171 4 . 0 ~.o 4.7 2 Lowe i- foke (Sac.A-A> 4.7 2.0 5.0 -- 1.545 . lyt .:.774 3.1
- f. Lower icke (Cec.3-B's 4.1 0.0 4.1 - - - -
2.477 .191 4.GCo 4.7
- o. U.' o e n- (oke 4 2.0 * .. 1 3..a.; .;?t '.;4;
, 2.0
- h. Bonnet
- 2.0
- 4.t t.545 .171 .: . T'< 4 .t I. JOLENGILS
- a. 2ti13-0303-5200 --
- b. 21110-7303-5200 4.24 4.24 4.24 i.545 .171 2.774 3.f II. lit 1IT SWITCHEC **
.i . EA t ?O-31302
- 5.2
- 7.3 3.263 1?1 5.143 6.c
- b. EA170-3 2302 *
- 7.3 3.263 .191 5.143 6 .' C 5.2 2 4 2 i
*Gc = (Gx Gz s 2 -
**G c
=
(Gx 2+Gy 2+Gz) 1 i O 1.f
Attachment 1 Page 3 of 8 SSE ACCELERATIONS 1 ANALYZED r.0TUAL Vatve-9903A i Gx Gy Gz Ge Gx Gy Gz Gc V6L'.E A lCEiiBLY
- a. _ .... v - D o n n e t Studs
- 2.0
- 6.1 1.176 . 193 1.541 1.94 i
- c. Upper CvLinder Studs
- 2.0 m 4.1 2.454 . 193 2.75G 3.69
- c. Low-c Cytincer Stud
- 2.0
- 6.i 1.6u0 . 1 " :- 2.10- 2.2"
- 1. 1. a .4 e .- (oxe Stud
- 2.0
- 6.1 1.342 . 193 2.131 2.81
- m. Lowei roke (Sec.A-A) 4.7 2.0 5.2 ---
1.176 . 193 1.541 t.9
- f. Lower Yoke (Sec.D-B) 4.1 2.0 4.1 ---
1.362 . 193 2.181 2.8; l! 9 Upper Yoke
- 2.0
- 6.1 2.454 . 193 2.758 3 . 6 '.
1
- h. Bonnet
- 2.0
- 6.1 1.176 . 193 1.541 1. 9a l . 10LEN0 IDS-
- a. 21110-0303-5200
- 2.0
- 3.0 1.176 . 193 1.541 1. 9 <
- b. 21110-7303-5200
. I. LIMIT SWITCHES **
- a. EA170-31302
- 5.2
- 7.3 2.454 . 193 2.750 3. 6'
- b. EA t 70-3 2302
- 5.2
- 7.3 2.454 . 193 2.7"8 3.6-2
*Gc = (Gx + Gr2) 1 I 2 !
= (Gx 2+Gy 2+Gz) i
**G c
o e * . , - . - , - - -. . , - .e c m
Attachment 1 Page 4 of 8 SSE ACCELERATIONS
! ANALYZED ACTUAL Valve-9903D Gx Gv Gr Gc Gx Gv Gz Gc
. VALVE AtlCEMBLY
- a. Body-Bonnet Studr
- 2.0
- 6.1 1.903 .199 2.361 3.0
- b. Upoer Cylinder Stitd5
- 2.0
- 6.1 4.033 .199 4.305 5.9
- c. Lower Cylinder Studs
- 2.0
- 6.1 3.052 .199 3.379 4.5
- d. Lower Yoke Stud
- 2.0
- 6.1 3.052 .199 3.379 4.5
- e. Lower Yoke (Sec.A-A) 4.7 2.0 5.2 ---
1.903 .199 2.361 3.0
- r. Lower Yoke (Sec.B-8) 4.1 2.0 4.1 ---
3.052 .199 3.379 4.5 3 Upper foke
- 2.0
- 6.1 4.033 .199 4.305 5.9
- h. Bonnet
- 2.0
- 6.1 1.903 .199 2.341 3.4 1
7
'I. SOLENOIDS -
- a. 21110-030.3-5000 i ,
- b. 21iiG-7303-5200 4.24 4.24' 4.24 - -
i.903 .199 2.3c: CII. LIMIT SWITCHES ** 1,
*
- 4.305 ~ 5.t a . EA170-31302 5.2 7.3 4.033 .i??
- 5.2
- 4.033 4.303 5.9
. b. EA170-3 2302 7.3 .199 2 2 i
*Gc = (Gx + Gr )
= (G, + G, +G,
**G c
. wm#. , , , , , ,,
. . Attachment 1
() Page 6 of 8 OBE
, ACCELERATIONS j ANALY2ED ACTUAL Valve-9902D i
Gx Gy Gz Gc Gx Gy Gz Ge
. VALVE AS2EMBLY
- a. Body-Bonnet Studs
- 2.0
- 6.1 0.824 .102 1.490 1. 7-
- b. Upper Cylinder Studs
- 2.0
- 6.1 1.740 .102 2.743 3.2
- c. Lower Cylinder Studs
- 2.0
- 6.1 1.321- .102 2.147 2.5
- d. Lower Yoke Stud
- 2.0
- 4.1 1.321 .102 2.147 2.5
- e. Lcwer Yoke (Sec.A-A) 2.51 1.07 2.77 0.824 .102 1.490 1. 7-
'f. Lower Yoke (Sec.B-B) 2.19 1.07 2.15 1.321 .iO2 2.147 2.5 9 Upper Yoke
- 2.0
- 6.t 1.740 .102 2.743 3.2
- h. Bonnet
- 2.0 ,
- 6.1 0.824 .102 1.490 1.7 I. SOLENOIDS ,
- a. 21110-0303-5200
- 6. 21110-7303-5200 34 34 14 ~~
0.824 .102 1. 490 1.7 II. LIMIT SWITCHES ** I
*
- 7.3
- a. EA t 70-31302 5.2 1.740 .102 2.743 3.$
- b. EAi 70-3 2302
- 5.2
- 7.3 1.740 .t02 2.743 3.9
*Gc = (Gx + Gz )
**G = (G X 2+G y2 + G'2)
Z C l l l i
= _m.
T T
.-\
i Attachment 1 t. ( Page 7 of S t t i i t OBE > ACCELERATIONS , 5 ANALYZED ACTUAL Valve-9903A Gx Gy Gr Gc Gx Gy Gr Gc-
. VALVE ASSEMBLY ,
1 a. Boav-Oonnet Studs
- 2.0 * ~6.1 0.627 .t03 0.822 -1.03 i
- b. Upoer Cylinder Studs
- 2.0 *- 6.1 1.309 .103 - 1.471 1.96
- c. Lower Cylinder Studs
- 2.0
- 6.1 0.993 .103 1.163 1.5:
6.1 0.933 .103- 1.163 1.5: ()'.Louer Yoke Stud
- 2.0 *
- e. Lower Yoke (Sec.A-A) 2.51 1.07 2.77 ---
O.627 .103 0.822 1.0: l l f. Lower Yoke (Sec.B-B) 2.19 1.07 2.19 0.993 .103' 1.163 1 .52 9 Upper Yoke
- 2.0 -
- 6.1 14309 .103 1.471 t . 9,
- 2.0
- 6.1 0.627 .103: 0.822 1.0;
- h. Donnet I. SOLENOIDS .
- a. 21110-0303-5200
- 2.0
- 3.0 0.627 .1 03., 0.822 1. 0'
- b. 21110-7303-5200-
} I .II. LIMIT SWITCHES ** i i a. EAi ?O-31302
- 5.2
- 7.3 1.309 .103- 1.471 1. 9.
- b. EA170-3 2302
- 5.2-
- 7.3 1.307 .103 1.471 1 . 'I
*Gc = (G x 2 + gz 23: 1
~
i **G c = (Gx 2+G y +Gz) S
, , a, -e., .
n- - . . - ,v. r.n,. ,, a w , .,.
1 > Attachment 1
' Page 8 offf s
OBE ' ACCELERATIONS i ANALYZED ACTUAL Valve-9903D Gx Gy Gz Gc Gx Gy Gr Gc . . VALVE ACCEMBLY
- a. Body-Bonnet Studs
- 2.0
- 6.1 1.015 .106 1.259 1.91-
- b. Upper Cylinder Studs
- 2.0
- 6.1 2.151 .106 2.296 3.13 4
- c. Lower Cylinder Studi
- 2.0
- 6.1 1.628 .106- 1.802 2.43 1
- d. Lower Yoke Stud
- 2.0
- 6.1 1.628 .106 1.002' 2.43
- e. Lower Yoke (Sec.A-A) 2.51 1.07 2.77 --- 1.015 .106 1.259 1.91
- f. l.ower Yoke (Sec.B-B) 2.19 1.07 2.19 ---
1.62G .106 1.800 2.43
- p. Upper Yoke
- 2.0
- 6.1 2.151 .106 2.296 3.1%
- h. Sonnet
- 2.0
- 6.1 1.015 .106 1.259 1.91
[. SOLEI 401DS .
- a. 21110-0303-5200 l b. 21110-7303-5200 3.4 3.4 3.4 -- .1.015 .106 1.259 1 .91 i II . LIMIT SWITCHES **
- a. EAi70-li302
- 5.2
- 7.3 2.151 .106 2.296 3.ij
, b. EA170-3 2302
- 5.2
- 7.3 2.151 .106 2.296 3 .1 '
l 1
*Gc = (Gx 2+ Gr 2)i l
**G = (G X +G +G )
1 C y 2 i I l N h n,
() SPECIFIC ITEM #2 BORIC ACID TRANSFER PUMP PART 1: Direction of deflection assumed in the analysis for frequency is incorrect. Westinghouse is to supplement the report and provide a summary of stresses. STATUS: This item is resolved. RESOLUTION
SUMMARY
- A summary of stresses has been . included as.an addendum to the seismic stress analysis, MED-PVE-2340. The nethod for determining deflections used in the Rayleigh frequency analysis has been corrected. The new shaft / rotor / impeller frequency has been calculated at 290 Hz. This is a decrease from the previously determined 801 Hz, but is still significantly greater than 33 Hz and also the running speed. The seismic shock analysis, report A-16799, which includes deflections and frequency determinations, has been revised to revision 3 to include the corrections. This report is filed and maintained by Westinghouse in the engineering files for the Catawba plant.
d O I J 4 l 1 1
.___m
Seismic and Dynamic Qualification Simnary of Ecuioment I. Plant Name: Catawba Unit 1 g: *
- 1. Utility: Duke Power Co. pwg 4 Looo
- 2. NSSS: Westinghouse BWR
- 3. A/E: Duke Power Co. Other i
! II. Component Name: Boric Acid Transfer Pumo
- 1. Scope: [x]NSSS [ ] BOP [ ]Other
- 2. Model Number: GVH-10K Quantity: 2 oer olant
- 3. Size or Range: 75 gom
- 4. Vendor: Chempumo 1
- 5. If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model number of the devices included: N/A
- 6.
- Physical
Description:
- a. Appearance: Canned pumo with intecral rotor
- b. Dimensions: Lenoth = 27", width = 13.75". heiaht = 20.0625"
- c. Weight: 2954
- 7. Location: Building: Auxiliary Buildina Elevation: 560 feet
- 8. Field. Mounting Conditions: ; x; Bolt (No. 4 , Size _1f,2a)
Wald (Length ,
)
- 9. Mouiiting Orientation [e.g., on floor, cantilevered, suspended, etc.)
i Base plate mounted on floor 10 . '.a. System in which located: Boric acid system
- b. Functional
Description:
Fill boric acid tanks
- c. Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby, [ ] Cold Shutdown
, .[x]Both [ ]Neither [ ]Other l
,-. w.- ~ , . , , . .y
_v -,-,,..-,.,:y ,,-,,s- y, , , ,
.. --,v-,.- -,,,,,_e.e ,r ,-. ,-v-- .7-,--.,.we -w-- N--,,-e --e - - - -
SEISMIC QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
+
A. Component: Boric Acid Transfer Pump _ The Catawba Boric Acid Transfer Pumps were designed based upon the criteria of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III for Class 3 pumps. The assembly consists of a single stage centrifugal pump and an integral 10 horsepower motor. B. Qualification Approach: The program developed to assure seismic qualification of pump assemblies within the Westinghouse NSSS scope of supply is discussed in Sections 3.7 and 3.9.3.2 of the Catawba FSAR. These pumps are designed for the worst case loading combinations resulting from internal pressure, operating, deadweight, seismic and nozzle loads. The qualification program consists of:
- 1. ASME code design'
- 2. Natural frequency.and deflection analysis
- 3. Static seismic analysis.
Qualification is perfortsed using plant specific nozzle loads and SSE accelerations of .26/.26/.173g. Margin exists between actual results and the allewables. a O -
-. ~ . . - _ - . - - . _ _ _ - . . - . - . . _
1 . 2/5
- 11. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications for Qualification Requirements:
C , ( E-Soec 678910 Rev.1. E-Soec. 952343 Rev. O
~
- a. Seismic Input d. Service Conditions
- b. HyYr ynamic Load Input e. ualified"L((e See Note 1 40 years
- c. Fatigue Considerations See Item V.6 III. Is Equipment Available for Inspection in the Plant:
[ x ] Yes [ ]No [ ] Partial or limited availability IV. Equioment Qualification Method: Natural Frequency and Deflection Analysis [ ] Test [ x] Analysis [, J Combination of Test and Analysis Qualification Report:* A-16799' Addendum II - Natural Frequency (No., Title and Date): Analysis 1/6/75 Company that Prepared Report: Chemoumo I Company that Reviewed Report: Westinghouse Chemcumo/ Westinghouse
, Where Report is filed or available:
Applicable Codes and/or Standards: . E-Soecs oer Item II.11 V. Vibration Input:
- 1. Loads considered: a. [x ] Seismic only J b. [ ]Hydrodynamiconly 9
- c. [ ] Vibration from normal operation
- d. [ ]Combinationof(a),(b),and(c)'
- 2. Method of Combining RRS:
- l
[ ]AbsoluteSum- [ x ] SRSS [ ] (other, specify; !
- 3. * ' Required Response Spectra ** (attach the graphs): See attached Note:
'If more than one report complete items IV thru VII for each report.
"If other than RRS is used, describe method.
Note 1: The Boric Acid Transfer Pump is located outside containment and is not subject to hydrodynamic loads such as LOCA. l 2
- . , . . - - ,- , _ . . - . . ._,y., - - y ,, y. ~ ,-
l l 1 : *
?/5
- 4. Damping Corresponding to RRS: OBE N/A SSE N/A (For natural frequency analysis:
O. 5. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: N/A see stress results) [ ]ZPA [ ]Other
. (specify)
~08E S/S = F/B = V=
SSE S/S = F/B = V=
- 6. Were fatigue effects considered?
4 [ ]Yes [ x] No Not required by the ASME code. If yes, describe how they were treated in overall qualification program: VI. If Qualification by Test, then complete: N/A
- 1. [ ]SingleFrequency [ ] Multi-Frequency: [ ; random
, , sine beat 2.' ; ;SingleAxis ;; Multi-Axis .
, ,, Independent Axis , .
In-phase motions 1 .
- 3. Number of Qualifications Tests:
OBE SSE Other (specify)
- 4. Frequency Range:
- 5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side Front /Back, Vertical):
, S/S = F/B = V=
- 6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies:
[ ]LabTest [ ]In-SituTest [ ] Analysis f j
- 7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test
; ;Yes(AttachTRS&RASgraphs)
No s . !O 3
. . - - - _ .. - . .-- - . . - _ - . . . . . . =-.
~
. e 4/5 l 8. Maximum Input g-level Test:
08E S/S = F/8 = V= SSE S/S = F/8 = V=
- 9. Laboratory Mounting:
1 A. [ ] Bolt (No. . Size ) [ ] Weld (Length ) [ ]
- 8. Orientation and Fixturing:
- 10. Functional operability verified:
[ ]Yes [ ] No [ ]NotApplicable
- 11. Test Results including modifications made
- ,
- 12. Other tests performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):
4
~
- 13. Failure Modes (if appropriate )
j 14. Margins Available: [ ]InputSpectrum [ ] Fragility i VII. If Qualification by Analysis, then complete:
- 1. Method of Analysis:
[ ] Static Analysis [ ] Equivalent Static Analysis j [x]DynamicAnalysis: [ ] Time-History [ ]ResponseSpectrum I fi. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side, Front / Sack, Vertical): S/S = > 35 Hz F/B = > 35 Hz V= > 35 Hz
- 3. Model Type: [x]3D [ ]2D [ ] 10
[ ] Finite Element [ x ] Beam
- [ ] Closed Fors Solution [ ]Other s
t O . 4 l
, 5/5 . 4. [ ]ComputerCodes: N/A Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: N/A
[x ] Hand Calculations to detemine frequency
- 5. Method of Combining Dynamic Responses from Seismic and other Dynamic Loads:
[ ]AbsoluteSum [ ]SRSS [ ]Other: N/A - (specify) ! 6. Damping N/A OBE SSE Basis for damping used:
- 7. Support Considerations in the model: Rigidly attached to floor - same as 8.
actual installation. Critical Structural Elements:
. Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location Combination Stress Stress Allowabl e Natural Frequency 53 Hz > 33 Hz
~
Max. Critical . Maximum Allowable Deflection Deflection Location to Assure Functional Ocerability
.0159" Impeller .0195" operability will not
. be impaired.
- 9. Failure Modes: None
- 10. Margins Available: [ ]InputSpectrum [ ] Stress or Deflection Fn 133 Hz Note margin between actual deflection and allowable.
} l 5
/
. __ I
. 2/5 l'1. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications for Qualification Requirements:
- a. Seismic Input ,
- d. Service Conditions
- b. Hydrodynamic Load Input e. Qualified Life
- c. Fatigue Considerations III. Is Ecuipment Available for Inspection in the Plant:
[ ]Yes [ ]No [ ] Partial or limited availability IV. Ecuipment Qualification Method: Structural and Seismic Analysis [ ] Test [x ] Analysis [ ] Combination of Test and Analysis Qualification Report:* MED-PYE-2340 - (No., Title and Date): Seismic Analysis 3/9/84 Company that Prepared Report: Westinghouse Company that Reviewed Report: Westinghouse Where Report is filed or available: Westinghouse Applicable Codes and/or Standards: E-Specs per Item II-ll; ASME Code Section i II V. Vibration Input: 2
- 1. Loads considered: a. [x ] Seismic only
- b. [ ]Hydrodynamiconly l c. [ ] Vibration from normal operation
- d. [ ]Combinationof(a),(b),and(c)
- 2. Method of Combining RRS:
[ ]AbsoluteSum [X]SRSS [ ] (otner, specify)
- Required Response Spectra ** (attach the graphs): See attached 3.
l Note: -
*If more than one report complete items IV thru VII for each report.
**If other than RRS is used, describe method, t
I 2
~. ---- - -. - .. . ,.. ,
. - , _ . - , - - - - _ _ . m -r ---- , - .,--- v_. ,m,- e . -
3/5
- 4. Damping Corresponding to RRS: OBE 2% SSE 2 ",
- 5. Required Acceleration in Each Direction:
[ x] ZPA [ ]Other (specify) Note 2 08E S/S . N/A F/8 N/A y. N/A SSE S/S . .269 F/8 .269 y. .173g Qualified to actual plant accelerations
- 6. Vere fatigue effects considered?
[ ]Yes [x ] No Not required by the ASME code If yes, describe how they were treated in overall qualification program: VI. If Qualification by Test. then complete: N/A
- 1. [ ]SingleFrequency [ ] Multi-Frequency: I; ; random
, , sine beat
- 2. ' Single Axis Multi-Axis O
- ll Independent Axis ll In-phase motions
- 3. Number of Qualifications Tests:
OBE ' SSE Other (spectfy)
- 4. Frequency ! .
- 5. Natural F- Each Direction (Side / Side. Front /Back, Vertical):
S/S = _, J= V=
- 6. Method of I. nninine iatural Frequencies:
[ ]LabTest [ ]In-SituTest [ ] Analysis
- 7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test
; ;Yes(AttachTRS&RRSgraphs)
No Note 2: Faulted condition results are shown to meet normal allowables,
- therefore, addressing the OBE condition is not necessary.
O 3 e
. , . ~ . . - - - - _ y-. . . - . - - - - - ----- ,
~
4/5
- 8. Maximum Input g-level Test:
OBE S/S = F/B = V= SSE S/S = F/8 = V=
- 9. Laboratory Mounting: )
A. [ ]Solt(No. . Size )
- 1
[ ] W 1d (Length ) [ ] l B. Orientation and Fixturing:
- 10. Functional operability verified:
[ ]Yes [ ] No [ ]NotApplicable l 11. Test Results including modifications made:
- 12. Other tests performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):
- 13. ~ Failure Modes (if appropriate i
- 14. Margins Available: [ ]InputSpectrui [ ] Fragility i
VII. If Qualification by Analysis, then complete:
- 1. Method of Analysis:
[x ] Static Analysis [ ] Equivalent Static Analysis [ ]DynamicAnalysis: [ ] Time-History [ ] Response 3pectrum ,
- 2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side. Front / Sack, Vertical):
h 35 Hz A 35 Hz S/S = 35 Hz F/B = V=
- 3. Model Type: [ x ] 3D [ ]2D [ ] 10
[ ]FiniteElement [ x) Beam [ ] Closed Fom Solution [ ]Other I O . t 4 0 9
. . _ - -. ~.- -- , - - . , . . . - - , . , .--- , , - . ,
i ._ -_ _ __ _ _ _. _ __ - _ 5/5 4'. [ ]ComputerCodes: N/A Freq'uency Range and No. of modes considered: N/A } j [x ] Hand Calculations for stress detemination
- 5. Method of Combining Dynamic Responses from Seismic and other Dynamic Loads:
) [x ] Absolute Sun [ ]SR$5 [ ]Other:
- i l (specify) j 6. Damping N/A j
08E $5E Sasis for damping used:
- 7. Support Considerations in the model: Ricidiv attached to floor - same as
- 8. Critical Structural Elements: a'ctual installation.
l
, Governing Load , or Response 5eismic Total Stress
- A. Identification Location Combination Stress Stress Allowable
) - Front Cradle Leg SSE + OW + 6135 psi 21,750 nsi operating
- j. Cradle to Base Bolts SSE + OW + 9398 osi 60,000 psi
' 8. operating Max. Critical Maximum Allowable Deflection . Deflection Location to Assure Functional Coerability ; Previously reported under. frequency / deflection results
- 9. Failure Modes: None
- 10. Margins Available: [ ] Input Spectrum [x ]; stress or Deflection
) l 'l See Item VII.8 above l 1 t i 3 l j !O s
4 i
. i i
4- - l . ,. O ; I
- .g-=..--!,..***.*. .
s.* 3%
- t ' -* , ? t. , s.q'** Q * *,='t >. ,:: .a. :, == -m.l 7 ;,
. . . .: -.:.. . ......,,. p s. .:.. :. y .,
. s..
- .. e .. .,. . .
. , . . . .. . . ..: . . . s. . .... .. ; . ,.,. ..n . . - .
'c';.y'.:.:.:::q~h'Q,;pp+,, , .::::. : ; ':
i .
;. .. .. ;.. ':.,:. '. : 2..:.:: .i,. .
so .,t,.#.... . . . . . , .
. . , .. . 7
. . - ..; g .. .. .3 . . y m m.,s. mg g %,g. .. . . .. .. ,. . . .
. , . . .... .. z.
c. 4 j
. . .. . c.. j.,
i .y :
. ..,c... s.. .
1 i . W vr
# J. . x .
e D, ' Og N .
/
U. .,
. i t
__ o. a...... n ' -
- e, .
,o .
- e ,., .
. w z. -
m
. ., s' .... .
pg _
/s., -
E _C Y, m .. Q ' T ' N.. . ], s !E . .i ww s: . dcT umw r- se- s e. cA a I i, s2 5 . s, w ,m =x , - .
.. r 1 ox ,
l c- g 4 ora E I t., J ee ! ., 2.
- e. . .i.
- C y.gc., . ,
i { gXwC _
-Y ', I i t c W (D \ .
i [C WW \ k l E K g . gC w xc m 4- . , J. .. C, in
- --- m x e ,
,f 2 i
y, ,o ,c 1 'I %N .
- .. - g t, l i y . .
CwJ l gg y, '
- Ucw
. . os*o on's evo o ne's st' so*o so'#"
- i t8 O NI *WS 'N9!1WW31330W 3tH.JS3M v' .
e m s. c.sans res. m .
.S
% Full 'ML ,
] y, W . net ,5 W gg- . T.*, ytvrog =
% HoAser>ru.c *
. I
. * .3 - t
! .., t
. .- .e
. . .e4 .
~.t . 12 . ., .
...' e. ..
.' 1 l
t i . g I .. . . I l i. t i t r~.-r-~=wss.r,-~-
.i ~
,.-,=
.. ee- w~ .
b .~ a.:m=~... - . m -~.- I
, . .. . a: .. f. , ' , c . 3 . 5*o., ' . . ., ," 4 i . ': *( *' '
' 'I
. 1 . *- '
, . .W . ~ . . . ~ . ,
g.
. s. - . . . ,
. + *
... g ; .. . .u
.. . . . , * :s...
a
. - . . r. .. . . . .. :
/, , .- :,
- '. '.
- s
,. ... . s
.o l
. . . .e * *
- t. . . ..
4 ,r 4 i i
- 4
) i i f
=
\ t'
- y I i I (
- 1 I l- l // .8. t en t UJ I
- g I
M , , c e *
= a, e-e ,
Ce e ' ; Mo .' , e . C u 8 t CC ' - I vu 2~ . ) m gg. C_. Is 8
/ . -
1 M.'. y** -. ..e
,-g .
- e. Q ,
g .,
. .. v
}
h ,,,, a l ! [ r i e* kJ DC
- l 't I #
)i o 5 *, I I F7 f
I li { E KO--
% I U l f r-- -
j I .I i
/ ~ A
*og3 .
hU I,! M . . . . . I
% z m >n -
pg h zu m ; E oz , .. 7 . . - o~~ ,. . s - t r. cW J g hdkc s o uc 3 i C A
*XwQ
! + 3 l
. . f. *; l I C U C:3 Q.u,
%gQW g 5 '
2 xs Oc wo s.
~ -
- L) ==
o i gp i t s NN
- 6 * **
gcc , s i
! Y' - t e
>- c. > -
my l l' l - Y\ \
.. . . cuwc w, l '
l ;- **---
!sl '
ss o sn o on's p o;- O NI *WS
*! o st o ' ' to o I NCf1WJ37220W 3SNCJS2W s i. e ,. c A. t gicoT . i u- , .
"TpC'<. C.uCC JCE. CWW. s &f{,awIIn '*
ie .s., m % m ,.-w Nri.SNAL 7 ..Qb WIMN* ' 2e1*d~ d di I
~! .
)
r ' I 5 a =.
%, 3,
.. ks
;.a: ,-
e
. . . . . . . . . ..... .s. a v.4-. :. 4...,.s,st
.p e
'a,..a :...eps,i O nt r e
_______d
Boric Acid Transfer Pumo Item 1 The direction of deflection assumed in the analysis for frequency is incorrect. Westinghouse is to supplement the report and provide a sumary of stresses.
; Response: A summary of stresses has been included as an addendum to the seismic stress analysis, ED-PVE-2340. The method for determining
' deflections used in the Rayleigh frequency analysis has been i corrected. The new shaft / rotor / impeller frequency has been calculated at 290 Hz. This is a decrease from the previously determined 801 Hz, but is still significantly greater than 33 Hz and also the running speed. The seismic shock analysis, report A-16799, which includes deflections and frequency determinations, l has been revised to revision 3 to include the corrections. This report is filed and maintained by Westinghouse in the engineering files for the Catawba plant.
6 l 4 e I e O . i . I 5858Q: 1D/040284
__ _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ . ._ m . _ . _ - _. _ _ _ . . _ . . _ _ _. . _.__ l , SPECIFIC ITEM #3 ENGINEERING SAFEGUARDS TEST CABINET
- PART 1
- Shim is required at bottom of cabinet to provide continuous
! contact. i-j, STATUS: Field was notified. l- RESOLUTION
SUMMARY
- The Unit 1 Engineering Safeguards Test Cabinet
; will be inspected and, if necessary, shims will be installed to provide continuous contact prior to fuel load.
F I i LO 1 i 1 J-l 1 I l !O i e a i-t
'_ - . 3/12/84 1/5 ta a U it DCP)
. f
. Plant Name:
Duke Power Co.- PWR x
- 1. Utility:
- 2. Nsss: Westinchouse BWR
- 3. A/E: Duke Power Co. Other i
Component Name: Safeauards- Te'st Cabinet Tao No.: lESFA,1ESFB II.
- 1. Scope: [ x ] NSSS [ ]80P [ ]Other
- 2. Model Number: 1060E22 Quantity: 2 units (Train A.& B}
- 3. Size or Range: -
Westinghouse (WID)
- 4. Vendor:
- 5. If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model neber of the devices included: Reference drasina 1060E22 Rev. A. 6065D41 Rev. D l ~ 6. Physical Descript%n:
- a. Appearance: Sinole - Bay Vertical Cabinet l b. Dimensions: 30" wide x 30" doen x 91.31" hioh .
- c. Weight: Aporoximately 15001bs.
Location: Building: Auxiliary Buildina 7. 1 Elevation: 594 ft.
;x; Bolt (No. 4 , Size 54g") A325
- 8. Field Mounting Conditions:
,x, Wald (Length 16") 1/4" Fillet Weld Mounting Orientation [e.g., on floor, cantilevered, suspended, etc.] !
9. ' j Ficor Mounted 1 System in which located: Reactor Protection System 10 . .a. i Functional
Description:
Provide test caoability (9 oower) b. s c. Is the equipment required for [ ]HotStandby,[ ]ColdShutdown I
.[X]Both [ ]Neither [ ]Other e
- - , --__ v- . - - - - - - , - , _ - - , , - - ,,,------e-..,.., ,-.y , , , . ~ , , , - - - . -.--n%-ww ,y---
r
' 2/5
- 11. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications for Qualification Requirements:
i P.O. # 209036 E-Spec. 952512 Rev.1
- a. Seismic Input d. Service Conditions See Section VI.1 Controlled Environment I b. Hydrodynamic Load Input e. Qualified Life l
N/A 5 years
- c. Fatigue Considerations N/A III. Is Ecuipment Available for-Inspection in the Plant:
! [x3Yes [ ]No [ ] Partial or limited' availability , IV. Ecuioment Qualification Method: [x] Test [ ] Analysis [.]CombinationofTestandAnalysis Qualification Report:. WCAP 7817 " Seismic Testing of Electrical & Control Ecuioment", nev. u, vecenmer, lu i . (No., Title and Date): WCAP 7817 Supplement 7 " Seismic Testing of Electri::a1 & control Equipment for Low 5etsmic Plants", Rev. O, Septemoer 19 1 Company that Prepared Report: Westinghouse NTD Company that Reviewed Report: Westingho'use NTD Where Report is fi. led or available: Westinghouse NTD/NRC/DP Applicable Codes and/or Standards:
- IEEE 344-1971 V. Vibration Inout: .
- 1. Loads considered: a. [x ] Seismic only
- b. [ ]Hydrodynamiconly .
i
- c. [ ] Vibration from normal operation
- d. [ ]Combinationof(a),(b),and(c)
- 2. Method of Combining RRS:
[ ]AbsoluteSum [x]SRSS [ ] (other, spectfy) See attached Figures 1, 2, an$
- 3.
- Required Response Spectra ** (attach the graphs):
o
,Ncjig,:
*If more than one report complete items IV thru VII' for each report.
O "'If other than RRS is used, describe method. l 2 1
1 3/5
~
;- 4. Deeping Corresponding to lutS: 08E N/A SSE 5%
Required Acceleration in Each Direction: Not Applicable (N/A) l 6 5. [ ]ZPA [ - ] Other (specify) . 08E S/S = N/A F/B = N/A V= N/A - - l SSE S/S = N/A F/3 = .N/A y= N/A
- 6. Were fatigue effects considered?
[ ]Yes [x]No If yes, describe how they were treated in overall qualification program: 2 a VI. If Qualification by Test. then completa: i 1. [ x] Single Frequency [ ] Multi-Frequency: ; random 5 beats
, x, sine beat (10 cob)
, , 9 each test fewouen~Cy
,i . ,
, x,' Single Axis
- 2. '
- O . .
Inde,endant A is E,Mult.i-Axis Ie-,
.. Front-to-Back e t4ons 1 3. Number of Qualifications Tests: Side-to-Side Vertical ; 08E SSE 3 Other
~ (specify) l l 4. Frequency Range: 1 Hz to 35 Hz ,
! 5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side, Front /8ack, Vertical):
S/S = 9.5 - 13 Hz F/8 = 19 - 20 Hz y = ') 33 Hz
- 6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies:
[x]LabTest [ ]In-SituTest [ ] Analysis )
- 7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test l ' x' Yes (Attach No TRS TRS RRS envelopes & RRS graphs) using s ingle frequency sine best testing (Figures 4 and 5) 4 . .
- O 3 I
a de t--A ^-------a - - - - -4 a- - h -- "-J -*-J - --
*
- 4/5
- 8. inum Input g-level Test: See attached Figures 4 and 5 SSE S/S = F/8 = V=
- 9. Laboratory Mounting:
A. [x ] Bolt (No. d. Size 3/4"1 A307 ! [ ]Wald(Length ) [] B. Orientation and Fixturing: Test unit was mounted in-line with the test inout. l j 10. Functional operability verified: [ x] Yes [ ]No [ ]NotApplicable I 11. Test Results including modifications made: Test results were acceptable. > No modifications were made to the' equipment.
- 12. Other tests performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):
'~
I None -- -
^~
- 13. ' Failure Modes-(if appropriate b d
- 14. Margins Available': [x ] input Spectrum .[ ] Fragility See attached Figures 4 and 5 VII. If Qualification by Analysis, then complete: N/A t
- 1. Method of Analysis:
[ ] Static Analysis [ ]EquivalentStaticAnalysis .
] Dynamic Analysis: [ ] Time-History [ ] Response Spectrum l ..[
- 2. NaturalFrequenciesinEachDirection(Side / Side' Front /Back. Vertical):
l s/5 = F/8 = V=
- 3. Model Type
- [ ]3D [ ]2D [ ]10
[ ] Finite Element [ ]Been [ ] Closed Foru Solution [ ]0'ther :
\
O . < 4 I s j .
.----.---.-.--.---..--.~..-.:l
5/5
!I
- 4. [ ,] Computer Codes: N/A . . i l Frequency Range and No. of modes considered:
[ ] Hand Calculations
- 5. Method of Combining Dynamic Responses from Seismic and other Dynamic Loads:
[ ]AbsoluteSiss [ ] 3R15 [ ]Other: * (specify)
- 6. Damping I 08E 33E ' Basis for damping usedi
- 7. Support Considerations in the model:
- 8. Critical Structural Elements:
i . t Governing Load
.or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location C*ination Stress Stress Allowable 4
i I. Max. Critical Maxima Allowable Deflection Deflection jggig, to Assure Functional coerability
- 9. Failure Modes:
- 10. Margins Available: [ ]InputSpectrum [ ] Stress or Deflection I
1 i ! s - lO .
~
5 l
l F O O O.-- si ..a ,
, .i
.t l
l CRTRHBR AUX BLDG NOR-SOU (X) EARTHOURKE l! l l RESPONSE RCCELERATION SPECTRR ORHPING= 0.050 , l ELEVRTION 594+00 LINE Y= -1.5 -
- I
- R "7
- - i i,
I i CATAWBA IluCLEAR STATIoll i CNS-Il08.00-00-0002 l g ,
\(.
\r Figure llo.G-3 i 1 ',
S S E w I. 6 7 5 X 0 8 6 . l " 8 ', Il0TES:
. i j g l g
- 1. Results are f See Figure 5 i
- 2. or lacetten ,
I j key Ian E I 3. See hable 4 for addittenal ! l informatten 2! !
- i. 24 j j '( ~ '4. Design envelope indicated by ] l l Sd -
g dislied l ine d ' t g l yy a
-l D Ei l -
5 /f A y, t:s v s i , -- , r l . E f ,
\ Y ,;
W. zM
%t' yo s.. - '
i o- y v , - gM t -
. A \ E, .~
! w g
- e -
% = 3
! - E l 8
% W l
l 'b.es e.se e.re e.se i.ee a.se s.se a p.ee i ! PERIOD IN SECONOS . .) *
- j M0$RONTRt. Szos To StDE ,
. _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ aca? - - ____ _ - _ _ - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
?
' ' 'O f O b O.. i i ! CRTRHBR RUX BLDG ERS-WES (Y) ERRTHOURKE - i RESPONSE RCCELERATION SPECTRR. DRHPING= 0.050 g ELEVRTION 59tl+00 LINE X= -221.5 - i o CATAWBA IIUCt. EAR STAT 10ll i > 3l I - 7 C115-1108.00-00-0002 8 Figure llo.G-12 l 3 l , o I I II0iES: 65E.=1.67sXOBE. ,i o f r ' l zS 1. 2. Results are (pr See Figure 3 or location jI' j '
.=
- key plar . i
- 3. See Table 4 for addttional 2 .
$ j!
j k . inforantion W , j 4. Design envelope indicated by 2 * > ! .z) j j ; dashed lino m ) 04 c g, , ! E i F{
- 2. - .
s c # % *
- en l I k8 f E- '
l id$ I \
~
3 D - g V i
- ti" e / .
(3 l w / . e e-
& w
; %o g.
i
=
=*
h , 4- _= 1 4 A - G l ' %., E 4 i t
' I
. %.os o.no o.ro o.so 1.oo a.oo s.oo i s.co ,
ll- . PERIOD IN SECONOS ;c . 1 l - - - - - _ _ - - _ - _ - - - ___H_ _obroHTAt-__1 Rour To 1Nict'. . _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ - _
,mm.g u. %.. e*w-=-.. sus.*-e eemen. m.e.. a m% >ee.-e.. . ,
s o r; <n^>wse nwmmse i R. .- x m b? ~ , _x' io x m .
')4^,N
/ /a / x + s w -. ,
wit ~ v il
~ , - , . +
s e mw
\\W 8 /// fy A /s
/vN % NX t i VN X / Ci^ / V N'
. N /x wwxvovi xeu t/x ix 6b W/ M# Y' / M 3
-NyJgcd'N N ng -
x x ex.x un < mi vg 4 KWWM6X N ";n'":sLh,.182 1, :
?
j 3 X3D$66 W/X.XYhNsX D^>9 M X//NX
, m cmwe XMNhXi /
I* WYM M .d %M(mms, 3 M<M/hM6826 X />C>S586 .
\
N ,.
' =.S!I xNN m v/ \ '//x / x lAxNX NN
- v w / / A/ A i e' j ,g .
\ W // V \ N/ /V A A Y \\bN ' / \ /V/ / Yi AN VVhM X/ N VX A X N WN X ll .X/VY V X v'
,e 7s F# ANN ///Y/v' ^ A VN3 % W A' / V V K
.5 Y'Is'M$<//>I X /\ X Y8EN d^X' X #'
/ ' 'E # N 4-3 y
y y v . w ,c 8 n c s s s w
/)</fYiXNXNW A r v p DESIGN RESPONSE SPECTRt.'M, j j h! * * .go .089 O M
< <r, ) . ^ .op 5sE = i.s75x oss
//
' r / ,
,8 8, CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATION CNS-1108.00-00-0002
/// . /
e.,
' W Figure No. 2
,l / / %'4 , sm,~1 s. x ,,m.n .. ~ ... m to O' 5 7 ' 2 0.3 Undornped Period (Sec.)
0.5 0.7 2.0 3.0
\]6Wl(.A L Figure 3
%'p$ g OH: dLE VMTICM G'\W Col.4MN LJNG DD-5'S
i O FIGURE 4
- 700.028e e
CURVE ZPA 6 5 CATAWBA N-S .36
.39
$ CATAWBA E-W g ... . -- .-
1.75 HZ TEST .7 1 2.5, 5 HZ TESTS .8 2 k8 HH :11 v ,-+- 4' ENVELOPE OF PEAX TE T
* ' '- RESPONSE SPECTRA 10.0 m 5% DAMPING e
r ,,
; , l ;
s '
~_
Os i ; ' '
;' \_
R ,1 ,N 11 1 CATAWBA t
- . -x
, l 's - Nr 1 , N :, sa c' m AUX BUILDING RP.S i
; J 's! 'b' V 71 T'1 ELEV. 594' :
1 A N . , ' s'm\ COL. LINE 00 ' ' / ' '"2
\! - SSE - 5% DAMPING -~
)
- f' :
I , 1 1 a NT 'F3 7 h HORZ (N-5)
- N . . a m w t t- t f f f S i a i I I I sa I
1 1
\%-A i i i 3 i i f f ts / 1 I
{ a g: . f CATAWBA AUX BUILDING RP.S z
~~'
ELEV. 594' 2 '
/ COL. LINE 00-55 v' '
SSE - 5% DAMPING'
' HORZ (E-W)
[ I i 1 3 4 8 8 7 8 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 to 2 FREOUENCY (HI) SAFEGUARDS TEST CABINET (STC) TRS FOR SINGLE FREQUENCY SINGLE c AXIS HORIZONTAL TESTS COMPARED TO OCP HORIZONTAL RESPONSE SPECTRA ' FOR AUXILIARY BUILDING, ELEVATION 594' (COL LINE 00-55).
l e, FIGURE 5 100.0to9 .
*)
, CURVE ZPA j ,
s '! CATAWBA .23 =- e4 : I VERT E: ; 1.75 HZ TEST .49
.c i 2.5 HZ TEST .52 52.5 3.5 HZ TEST a .52 ,
y -
.6 d ' "" " " " " " ' ' ' ' ' " " '~ " ^
E [30HZTEST
.0 HZ TEST .6 3 ENVELOPE OF VERT. PEAK 10.0i h: 5 TEST RESPONSE SPECTPA s
AT 55' DAMPING
- .=
=
S ? _ b( .
< ; .:._ -3
- m
.. i
. i 8 N, 11
; 'j, L i j
it. ip H i'y t
'( L N i s if f \. t l \ I1 1 \.
10
' ' f M. ' \; ,I ' . I
- k. \(
- 1,. ., L. n, x n a . . . . . ... . .. . ~
;/ N y--'
~
l,. /: / _
[
~ , ,
f s CATA C. . AUX .'ILDING RRS ,, , ELEV. Sod' '
. / '~
t r-COL. LINE 00-55
~-
SSE - 5% DANPING .- , 2 VERTICAL _ .~ 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 910 2 .3 4 $ 6 7 8 910 2 3 4 3 4 7 8 1 2 1.0 10.0 100 , FREOUENCY (HZ) I SAFEGUARDS TEST CABINET (STC) TRS FOR SINGLE FREQUENCY SINGLE RESPONSE SPECTR AXIS FOR VERTICAL AUXILIARY BUILDING, TESTS ELEVATION COMPARED 594' TO OCP VERTICAL .
l SPECIFIC ITEM #4 THERMAL REGENERATIVE DEMINERALIZER TANK PART 1: At the upper level of the demineralizer tank, the tank i ,' surface is in contact with the flex conduit terminator of an '
- adjacent limit switch. Does this limit switch have a safety-related function?
, STATUS: This item has been resolved. RESOLUTION SUt91ARY: The limit switch in question is on a non-safety ! 3" Tufline plug valve. The plug valve is a Class E valve which only 1 serves as a pressure boundary. For this case, the limit switch has no safety-related function. Therefore, failure of the switch poses no
- safety concern.
a 1 j 4 O l t i, l i i 4
?
+
4 i i
, . , _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ . . _ - . _ . . . - - . . , -, , , , _ , _ . . . . . ., .__-_._._ . , _ _ _ , .. , . _ _ , ~ . - _ , _ , - _ _ . - _ . ,
,r 3/12/84 1/5 Seismic and Dynanic Qualification Susunary of Eauioment I. Plant Nane: Catawba Units 1 and 2 (DCP/DDP) g:
! 1. Utility: Duke Power Company pm _ X l
- 2. N555: Westinghouse sm _
- 3. A/E: Duke' Pwer Company Other
! . l II. Camponent Name: NIltS Domineralizer h
- 1. Scope: [x]M555 ( 3 BOP [ ]Other
- 2. Model Number: n/a ' Quantity: five/nl ant j 3. Size or Range: h. Item 6 ,
1 j 4. Vendor: L7:p inAn.tries Inc. \ i 5. If the component is a eMinot or Awaloname_and model number of the devices
- included
- n/a _
L j 6. Pttysical
Description:
, 'l.J. .
- a. Appearance: vertical. W t on four leg suppbrts -
j b. Dimensions: height = 123.88"; shell 00 = 48" .
- c. Weight. 3825# (empty); 9400f (flooded)
I Building: auxiliary
- 7. Location:
i Elevation: saa'
- 8. Field Mounting Conditions: X Salt (No Si 1
~
Wald (g.16*bze 1-1/d' *from design ! 1
- 9. Mounting Orientation (e.g., on floor, cantilevered, suspended. r. '.]
i i i floor mounted _._ _ _ _ _ . i l 10 . a. Systen in which located: m%,nn eh.m 1 v. .. enh v.e-Remove boron from the process fluid and store
- b. Functional
Description:
4t in th. v.<4n ennem4n.d thar.4n i O c. 1. ,,e e,.1,.ent , ired ,or c 3 ,et ..en . ,. c 3 C.id s,.tdo.n i ( )seen Cx) neither C ] Other 1
O Seismic Qualification Sumary . I A. Component: Boron Thennal Regenerative System Domineralizers The domineralizers used in the Boron Thermal Regenerative System at Catawba were designed and built to the ASME Boiler and Pressure I Vessel Code, Section III. The assembly consists of a tank with an j internal resin bed an'd is supported by four legs. B. Qualification Approach: ! The program developed to assure seismic qualification of the tanks 4 and desineralizers within the Westinghouse NSSS scope of supply is i discussed in Sections 3.7 and 3.9.3 of the Catawba FSAR. These domineralizers are designed for the worst case loading combinations ! resulting from internal pressure, deadweight seismic and nozzle loads. The qualification program consists of the following: i l O .
- 1. ASME code design calculations
, 2. Dynamic frequency analysis 1 b *
- 3. Static seismic and structural analysis Generic qualification is perfonned to SSE acceleration levels of I 1.069/1.06g/1.0g. Actual plant SSE accelerations are .26g/.26g/.179 Thus significant margin exists.
i k a i I O 8 y i I
,,,-,.--,--.-,-----.wy -.,.--c..-, .--,.,.r, .,,,,.y.----,.
,,- ,e-- ,. - + 3,---.-em e..m-w.~-- -
c., -.., y----.w. , - . - , + - + w-w---- -,---
,' i
- 11. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications for Qualification Requirements:
i
^
. E-Soec 679066. Rev. 2: EDS-IN-001. Rev. 3 .
- a. Se.ismic Input d. Service Conditions See Item V.5 See E-Spec and referenced spec.
1
- b. Hydrodynamic Ldad Input e, Qualified Life See Note 1 .
40 years l
- c. Fatigue Considerations 4 See Item V.6 III_ Is Ecuinment Available for Insegon in the Plant:
- 6t3.Yes [ ]No [ ]Partialorlimitedavailability l
IV. Ecuinment Qualificatie_Mathmi: . [ ] Test (x] Analysis [ ] Cambination of Test and Analysis Dvn =ic Analysis Qualification Reprt:* Design Report ! C54813, Rev. 5 Summary Sheet (No.,TitleandDate): Stress Cales (6/26/751 Nos. 49-11-0 8 49-11-6 Imaco westinghouse Company that Prepared Report: - Company that Reviewed Report: Mtinghr=i=e westinghouse [W NrD' W NrD Where Report is filed or availabile: d ASME B4W Code 1971 Ed 5 AMaA= through Summer Applicabie Codes amid/or Standards: V. Vibration Inout: .
- 1. Loads considered: ' a'.- (x ] SeissWc only
- b. [ ] 4, ,.4,-_-ic only
- c. [ ] Vibration from nomal operation -
l
- d. [ ]Castinationof(a),(b),and(c)
- 2. Method of Combining RRS:
(>]AbsoluteSe (X]3RSS [ ] (ocner,specify) 1 Duke 1tr Oi-77M-6 (1/27/771
- 3. Required Response Spectra ** (attach the graphs):
O gg: I l
*!f.more than one report' complete itses IV thru VII for each report.
l "If other than RAS is used, describe method. Note 1: The BTRS Dominieralizer is located on a Class 3 System in the Auxiliary ~ Building and is not subjectcc to any hydrodynamic loads such as LOCA.
1 .
- 4. Damping Corresponding to RRS: OBE 1.0% SSE 2.0%
- 5. Required Acceleration in Each Direction:
[ ]ZPA [ x3 other % ,v. m ms. so.etra l (specify) Note 5
- 08E 5/5 = 0. 53 g/0.14r F/R = .53a/.14e y = 0.5g/0.09g *
!
- SSE 5/5 =1.06g/0.26g F/B = 1.069/.26g y = 1.0g/0.17g
- Generic / Plant speculc l 6. Were fatigue effects considered?.
Not required per ASME Code for i [ 3Yes [ X] No Class 3 components. If yes, describe how they were trested in overall qualification program: t l l J ; VI. If Qualification by Test. then enanlata: N/A
- 1. [ 1SingleFrequency [ .] hiti-Frequency: [ ]randon
- .,, sine best
* ' '~
- h ., .
t
- 2. [ 7Italti' Amis l j] Single Axis Axis Independent [, . , . In-phase motions l
j 3. Number of Qualifications Tests: .- 1 l' OBE 55E Other (specify)
- 4. Fmquency Range:
- 5. Natural Frequencies in tach Direction (Side / Side. Front /Back, Vertical):
! 5/5 = F/g = V=
j -
- 6. Method of Determining Natural Fmquencies:
[ ]LabTest [ ] In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis
- 7. Tits enveloping RR5 using hiti-Frequency Test !
*Yes
* (Attach Tits & RR$ graphs)
)
Q I 9 4 3
- . _ _ - - . - . - - - . . . ~ . _ , . . - _ - - , . - . . - .
a .
. 4/5 I
- 8. Maximum Input g-level Test:
OBE S/S = F/8 = V= SSE S/S = F/8 = V= I
- 9. Laboratory Mounting: l A. [ ] Bolt (No. . Siza )
- 3
[ ] Weld (Length ) [ ]
- 8. Orientation and Fixturing:
4
- 10. Functional operability verified:
- [ ]Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable .
- 11. Test Results including modifications made:
- 12. Other tests performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):
- 13. " Failure Modes (if appropriate I
- 14. Margins Available: [ ]InputSpectrta [ ] Fragility VII. If Qualification by Analysis, then complete:
- 1. Method of Analysis:
[ ] Static Analysis [ x] Equivalent Static Analysis Note 3. [ ] Dynamic Analysis: [ ] Time-History [ ]ResponseSpectrum
- 2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side Front / Sack, Vertical):
$/5 = 23 Hz F/8 = 23 Hz V= 33 Hz .
- 3. Model Type: [_]3D [ x] 2D [ ] 10 Note 2
[ x] Finite Element [ ] Beam j I [ ] Closed Fom Solution [ ]Other Note 2: The BTRS domineralizer was qualified to SSE accelerations of 1.5gH/1.0gv and OBE accelerations of .75gH/.50gV. Per WCAP 8230, these accelerations are equivalent to 1.06gH/1.06gH/1.0gV for SSE and .539H/.53gM/.50ay for OBE for 3D comparisons. ! Note 3: Westinghouse does perfom a dynamfc analysis. only to obtain natural ! frequencies. These natural frequencies are used to find plant specific acceleration levels which are then comp'ared to generic levels. -
5/5
- 4. [X ] Computer Codes: WESIMN (for natural frequency only)
Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: 1.0 - 40.0 Hz/15 modes 1 i [ X](Hand forstresses) Calculations
- 5. Method of Combining Dynamic Responses from Seismic and other Dynamic Loads:
[X]AbsoluteSun [ ] SRSS [ ]Other: (specify) (
- 6. Damping 1.0 2.0 Basis for damping used: Regulatory Guide 14i ;
l, OBE SSE
, 7. Support Considerations in the model: 1. . fw.a to fmmantiem oer as 1nstalled configuration 4
- 8. Critical Structural Elements:
4 Governing Load Note 5 or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Idantification Location Cabination Stress Stress Allowable I Supports , faulted 0.49 1.0 (ratio)
- (ratio) Note 4
! Baseplate , faulted 18.88 ksi 31.6 ksi ! B. Anchor Bolts '
\ , faulted 17.19 ksi 28.26 ksi Max. Critical 3- Maximus Allowable Deflection Jgggig-Deflection _ to Assure Functional Goerebility n/a -
Domineralizer is a passive piece i,5
- of equipment. Therefore, opera-bility is not applicable.
- 9. Failure Modes: - None ' ' '
- 10. Margins Available: [ ] Input Spectrum (X] Stress or Deflection See Item VII.8(A)
- l j
Note 4: This is a combined bearing and comoression ratio allowable. The in.dividual stresses and their respective allowables are: Bendina - fb = 9357 ps.1 < Fb = 31,600 psi Compression - fa = 6463 psi < Fa = 27,142 psi Note 5:As noted in V.5, there is margin between plant specific and generic l qualification levels. Addit'ionally, as noted in VII.8, there is l considerable margin between the actual stresses which are based on generic loads and allowable stresses. l 1 l
,- : ; . g.., - n =. .
l .)
.* tj -
, s
- . . 1 - -
2
. . . .s. . ,
i i v CRTAWDR AUX DLOG NOR-SOU }X) EARTHOUAKE i
, . . 3,
. s RESPONSE ACCELERATION SPECTRA. OfdPING= 0.010 .,, .
, , i.
!
- ELEVAT10t ~ SGDTDD't1H F =. -1.5 ,
j 1
=.
. A .
.. . . - , .4 ,
i f - s ,
. r .*
.N . I, i . l I
g " i I ar, q_ _ __ _.
.1 o j ,
h . - o , - q
... . 1 ,
q
.1 ;
Et j l I
. .. S ,
j t _p .- a
.e l
I 1
)s - - - - - -
e, i i s : = () \ ~ ... . . r. i ! s . . . k -
.;g 3 . :
, l -
's- :*.
- 4 - - -
> a g
y 5 i a
. . - s
. g-
. . ... . . n, ; J l .
l
, ac l . . .,
e . . .
)
,t w s i [- g r . . . . . < -
, ~g - - i, -
. s . . .. .
t
. =
u .
",s :l
, f . ..
, . . .1 .,
,t
- 88
.., I j . . - - e g \. -
.3, Ed-I. - ~ ~ , .
- 5-3; )/ \. * ' "
1 r ( ll* g .s
.n cs.un r.ecev enuwo n.v on wo.a.c. a...
i i
= N s a
ac
-u en. -- - w 4- - - - -
- m- ,*.k c....,4.. . c..
.N .
um.
.v :
f \- , ii'i 3 - k '
* ~
1 -
; U .,3,,. P-d
. 4,es e.se o.as e.se i.ee a.es s.es . -
1 : (
.- _ i i;ee t; .(, $
PERIOS IN SECON05 .- .4
- i. . =
t
<1 -
g
- . 1
. . . . . - .1 t:
_ . .L .i * -
. . . r -
i , . - 3
;,,, _. - '. - b f ==* .. -
1 i , i i i
e s, s F. . i P *. 1 ** i
. t l19 % . h ;. -:-- * -,*
.. , ? ./ -=v =.v--rse.r, rw= q ==? (?a .-== == p.ma . : ' -" . --.. I
... *: :s, . ,. : *; ...' ' c '.
3., . . .
. . .'. ..s.. .. . ..,...i. . ,;.s
.c- t-
, s*
I .
. 1, . e
*o...~,_ *= .
\
I .. L * *
, . .. ; g.
e " . G
- s )* .'e4 .,.e.b...
. ., *6*.*.*
- e,* . ' ../..'- -
I
....,,.=g 3 .
t e.; * ,
,g.,.
- g .. .,'
. < . . . . .. . .* - t l., . .. . .
..I
.a . . * .. .* . . . .e .
t. s - ... ~ -.
- g. '
a** *- 2 . t
* , i .
.
- 3 i
' l t'. - 6
, 3,
- t. 1 I .y
! :l l .' I l $ .
1 l // s,,, :
. . , e a
} . -
.. UJ .
- I. M l l
;- c c '
/
3N :
. CO *
- f n I*.
- . i i
&g -
j c -- -- 1 A . a; w, i A - i sgLLJ 2 l &_.,l- . sl ,.,
>; .}
S, ,
. l T e
- LJ e6 !
e/3
- 1 M' C mW@. , 5( e E !
1 k$ C *T CM" ' 3!S .. I i
- g zEI=t' -a / P
. - ~5m :
\
2w ;7
$ C2 ;
- Om =
g .
= .J cJ >E I
' 2 te ea.g , ay .
e- - - '
*. X y c A . .
e ] I m u u3 4 j w 4 g u g in . . 1
%g e . % 2 **v .
- DC WC m
G3 to ==. w # *
, , ~,,, g . 3 .
GEE pL>In
, i n,- .
. t l
W l .
' *'*G '
i
; . . . .. . yCgg., w ay .
I l \ ) - --l ,
- 3. * .
- gg*g
- 3h 0 ll' ' ' C2 '
i i O NJGh*0'WS 'ft'0NCI1WW25 9,*W ,
. i.f3SN3JS2W.
4 A.O t y PO '
- #= e t
34 I, s
>34 ?
;(54 f .
. % { { .1,8,,
1 L e; i 6 Plagl .s -
/ .'
f . .
'l 0 3:.:
, -, -.,r-, . , , .---,-.---,-,----,.n,-,.
,, ----.-.m,, ,,-_-n-e.,--,,-,,--~, - - , , - - , - - - . - - - , - , . .,-n.,. .._---,-.+-n-.,.
. i
'.-me.-.s s-.r. ..g. . ...e.,:v.v. wy =n.
. (:". 6.. .@ .' -' . . ' -nrar't-
, QM' W!C7',TTT' , -A'< 'i
'.s.' .~ ,. . .. '.. .... n
. . . o. .
.r. . .
. . .e . .- .
1 .
.r. .. ., ... . . :
..n. . . ; *:n. . ....,...?,... . . .. n :-
W t
, . l .. .
. . .n
,t . . .
.' ', y,n'?.'..i . .. ..'.M,. .f.M,. " .t','<'. . ,.'. 4. .a:.*9.L. . s' . \ . . , . ' u. . .
i
.. r.. .i .r. . . . . , ...
. + .. .. . ... .. . ...... ..c.. '.; ;...s. .s. . q . e l. . . . . s.
. . .n. ...
6
. .. . . . . 1 . ,:, , . . ,..o ... ,.
. . .. , w 5 .
. .. i . .
.+ ..
..?...... . . <. .
. 7 ,.. . ,. . ..
..or:...m . ,...
.: . .. :.. :. ......e~o p.. ~
....s.-. . ,. , . : . ., n. v .~.:p w
,. . r
.;: r 9.: ~ *,. c.:.. :.i . .:.
g . ;. . , 2~... w-.. s ,..y:e ..; y . ,. ,....;. , yvr.g.5;.'.;. .; g. 7.:,,t w. 1
.... _ s. . . , . .i...
5 ri:.b b,:',.'>- , . .
. ,; a., } . .
. . . . . - . i
=.:. . . , , . , . . .. .:1
. :..: . ..? . . .
. < - _ . . . .s.
... . 9. . . . .'.. ..p; i, ,
~.. - ,
. . . . :...v . ..,
,=., .
. . .. v
- s. <.s,... ..,.
. . d l .-:.:{ .s - l~. ';.;.'*. ,
. ~ g . ., . , . . f
.. . r.. -
w- .
.~. ..
- p. . :-
t._ g .,. , u.... .r. . , : .,
.. - e ... .
e o
. . ... . ...... . .. . . , . r.2. . 4 3 ::s . .
s a . s, :..... .$ . >
.: e..
- . .-e .3.. ..
w c. ,.
- e. =.
. ()'.
ce wz ..e.,_... .. .. _- .' j- .. : . s.aS.-r.. .. -
. ~ " .i.
'= cc. .. ..
.#^
.:e. $ =*.d
. , - g c 1 e e ;* '. . ,s. .- 4
"r
. . . -.;
- i (f1 . . x *....
- w C (O 6 M-k? * . .*. .'
3: ,c to . i
. : O .
4 .e. e , .. . I f.J 4 m t.r1 w I ' -
- g. .
j c a. n .
- .w .;.
a. w tti I* a z sD
.ef
.. . :l . . , f....I .
)
. C3 Q---.==
2 n t.', :..?. .. . . .... 4 :. g;ll - .
. r. . . . .
i e .u . . . y - (.
. . .i..'s. . .
_,, c I , , c Clt jC *
~
=5.- ,
s j
.. ..... -e
.pg, w o , -
- g. .. ....
! 6, ,. * . -
j .cwa m. i
.. g.q;.g.y.
j g3 tri .-. - - - -
-u.__ ".
i .a . 1 gca s-. I ^W_ _ _ - I . ' :'n /,,*: , , ., .' *. , l== IL. > . m :.e....,:.. .. . . .
- c w .y: ggg s
1{' l
'$. ...,. ; .- g -
() C W tt*O 83 's ,00*/ ~'r; .',.I .
....-- m ,g=.a . %.2 %,. asmsu e
.s. . ,
. . . . .. . .....~
l .
.x. ....
. . . . .e. - .
- g . .
i ... . . .,. .. ... ..
- p. soe,
.g.
a, w. e
.s.y
,' , . .. .g * .
. . .. ' .. .. [. . ' g t
Amas. . m _1. _.m_ .. -> p . _ ._ _ - L. .1, T .
. e.,,; s I r,t g .-v.. -1 = i i.
i
. g
- - - . . .,--,.....n. -
. , , . . - - - - - , - - - - - - - . . . - - - . - - , ,,--+.~,------,,.-,-,----,.-~,m.-.,-n-- ,..,,r-n.- -,,,,------n,-.--e- n--,a .,-- - - -
i I
. 2
, . ....,..f.;..,-
, . .- - . -- . . c. -. 3. ,f, .t , ? ~. .i,,. s.e;-*. . y 7 .q:(42.a. . , *t- -eair W : .'"' "* ** ;
s;
.. ? :.
f q. 3..:.. .::..: .
*. . . ;p.f:.
, w .- . . . .* . , ... .. ... , . ., .
- y. . , -, . . . .. : . ..
.. w = .<. s. .. . :q. .. ., .,,.
.: .e......;. .....;
.. . . . . . < ,3 .i f , . ,....
... ,,,q,, , . ;. , ,, . ;
*: .. : < :.. - ;.,. . .:.v y. . .. c. .,s : 7 :.,..;. ..,p.= yy,.,l',.y. ;g+ ,. ' .,.:. .. . . .
i l \ ,. .
- - . snm. ;,,.y , . . .. . . . . .
. :. :.. . ..;.....,.y... .; .
. . .. m m an,,.,,,, . . , . . . . ...,.;
~.
.......t 1
.. . i ,
s . , ;.:.
?. -
I s - >1 m ,- ,. . . . , x . .. .
- . C .
.,r.
m, e ,mo . i
- z. -
l k. . . a.... n,a ., .. as. w= ,
. . ,j ,,..
, r ':
i
-k.
ta x=8 I
. y c F M ., . ,
4 a t cn . . / 3 1 i sw e= -- y =. . e j ;g e i mt;T r-:;- - - a* . t " E lt' . - iP s,5 j
! ww s xw ax l L,
.?
7 - cz . , .
; c== l'i ! crG
- R se 9,, J cc
' = g .. -
] E WC I C , .. . . i gxWe J . t- Q .
%*~
D U (C \ . t g uc ut \ sd 1 . . .
-3 s g -
I CW 4 l , , _ i , w
, - --- ,- m , .,#;
)m%cc 22*
c'* 8 8 pg m =c I " ' INN i y . I, CWJ ~ l l \\ l 4 c) c w so's ao'/
. osas en*o evo at*o at*o it'I4.J s2W t . 3 Nr *Ws 'Not1WW3%33W 3t:
Y
- . ? -
4 .; . .
) ; ., . . .. .
*l.I . *
- 6. .
i e . .
- - . . ,--.--,-,-,,-c-ne- . - - - - - . - - - , - , , - , , _ - - . - - - , .--.--------,,re--+-,---------,,------.-r..,-,,-----,,--,,---..-,,,.-.-an---+-.. - - - . - -
1 l l O SPECIFIC ITEM #5 CHARGING SAFETY INJECTION PUMP { PART 1: Bearing pressure calculations are for the static case for the pump only. Bearing pressures for the operating mode (with seismic) are to be calculated and justification for stresses are to be provided , for the pump, motor, and reduction gear. j STATUS: This item has been resolved. RESOLUTION SUPNARY: Ananalysis(CALC #MED-PVE-2388, Dated 3/30/84) has been completed which indicates that the Charging /SI Pump, motor and reduction gear bearing stresses due to hydrodynamic operational
! and seismic loads are well within the allowable limits as shown in Attachment C-1 which is the sununary sheet of the analysis. The analysis is. retained in the Westinghouse engineering file.
PART 2: Calculations of the natural critical circular frequency of
! the turning gear and pump shaft are to be provided, and the concern i regarding potential resonance at the critical speed and operational I speed must be addressed.
l STATUS: This item has been resolved. RESOLUTION
SUMMARY
- Review of the Westinghouse engineering files 3
revealed that these calculations are available in a 1971 report. This report (Ref. Number B46617) was prepared by Pacific Pump Division. It j clearly shows, through critical speed calculations that the critical I speeds of the pump and motor shafts do not coincide with their running speeds of 4849 and 1800 rpm. The Pacific Pump report will be retained in the Westinghouse engineering files. l 4 I L t O J
l l 3/9/84 Seismic and Dynamic Oua11fication Sumnary of E<tuioment I. Plant Nase: Catawba Unit 1 g.
- 1. Utility: Duke Power Co. pg 4 toon
- 2. MSSS: Westinghouse gg
- 3. A/E: Duke Power Co. oger II. Conconent Name: Charging / Safety Injection Pump A
- 1. Scope: [x]MS35 [ 80P [ ]Other
' Pump: 21/2 .IJ.11 Stage
- 2. Model Number: Motor- uns.s quar'ity: 2 eer olant
- 3. Size or' Range: 150 com (desien)
- 4. Vendor: Paciffe Pumo
- 5. If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model number of the devices included: N/A Q 6. Physical
Description:
',.J a.. Appearance grizontal' pump / gear / motor assembly
- b. DimensionsT Overall length = 226". width = 52.75". height = 80.94" ideight: Total Weight = 20.210 lbs.
c. Auxiliary
- 7. Location: Building:
543 feet Elevation:
- 8. Field Mounting Conditions: Xf . Sizel 1/8')
)ield Bolt (No.16 (Langth 1
- 9. Mounting Orientation (e.g. on floor, cantilevered. suspended, etc.]
Base olate mounted to floor 10 . a. System in which located; Chemical Volume and Controll Safety Injection 1
- b. Functional
Description:
Charging and Safety Injection Flow 1 O c. Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby. [ ] Cold Shutdown () t J Neither t ) omer cx]sota O
1 . .
?. _
SE!3MIC QUALIFICATION S W RY 9 E A. Componeht: (lherging/ Safety Injection Pump A
~~
-The Catawba Charging / Safety Injection Pumps were designed based upon the criterir. of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section !!! for C1' ass 2 pumps. The asse dly consists of a
-. multistagu'centrifr. gal pump, a speed increaser (gear) and a motor.
S. ,Qualifiestion'.4pproech , - Iha program developed to assure soismic qualification of pump erJoelies "within the Westi5ghouse NS$$ scope of sucoly is discussed'in Sections 3.; and 3.g.3.2 of the Catawba FSAR. 1hese pumps s'e designed fo'r,tre' worst case loadino codinations O resulting from'tnternal pressure.~nperating, dea &might, seismic
~
'and no2:10 (addt,' The e.wnliftht1w progras consists of the '
foll'owiny: ,
- 1. Resonance search testing pedormed on the entire assedly.
- 2. ASMC code design calculations. ,
/ s..
, e
- 3. Independent static seismic analyses of, the, pune, gear and motor. Although components are analyxad seoarately, interfacine loads are considered.
/, .,.
Generic qc"alificationitilmrformed to $$t acceleration levels of 2.1/2.1/2.1 'g. Actial. plant $$t accelers'tions are .13/.13/.13 c. Thus, signiftsan.t'seisode margin exists.
.}
, , .? ,
,* < i, /
c * .
, 6
. 4 9
[ . .a l
, . ,'. l t ,
, _ ,Ji
i l' 1 2/5 I
- 11. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications for Qualification Requirements:
l
- r See page 2a a ., seismic Input d. Service conditions j See Item V.5 See Design Specifications .*
- b. Hy d yr.asic.Lind. Input. e. Qualified Life ,
l Pump - 40 years I See Note 1
- c. Fat 1<paa Considerations Motor - 5 years
. See ; tem V.6 Continuous operation 1 year ! post accident i j III. Is tauinment Available for In.nection in the Plant: [XX]. Yes [ ] No [ I Partial or limited availability ( 4 i l IV. touinment Qualificatiarr Method: pap (xx]CatinationofTestandAnalysis 1 .
-[ ] Test C 1 Analysis Nuclear Service Pumo Design Calculations Qualification Report:*
X-318-1 Rev. 5 9/25/78 f (No.. Title and Date): i Pteffic Pumps Company that % red Report. l . ,. CM that.Ravigued Rgert Wet tGa haus.' I Where Report is filed or availahtisti Pacifie ome< /W < ti na hnut. j App 1,1 cable codes and/or Standardar * ' ASME section fit and E-so.es an paa. 21 L i j i V. Vibration Innut: f 1. Loads considered: a. (xx]Seismiconly l l
- b. [ ] "y @ _-is only f
i
- s. [ l Vihretion from normal operation J
- d. C ] Cassination-of (a) (b), and (c) *
, 2. Method of Cambining RRS: . C ] Abse1ute sus txtsR$s t] (other,specify) \ ta. ***>r w l 3. Required Response Spostra** (attach the graphs): I f 3R: .
*!f more than one report emplom items !V thru VII for each report.
' **1f other taan ARS is used., describe mothed.
- Note 1
- The charging /51 pump is located in a class 2 system in the Auxiliary Building and is not subject to any hydrodynamic loads such as LOCA.
I
l 2a/5 l O 11. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications for Qualification Requirements Pump E-Spec 678815 Rev. 2 .
- General Class 2 Pumps E-Spec 952494 Rev. 0 -
DCP/DDP Addendum to 678815 Rev. 2 Motor E-Spec 677474 Rev. 0 - Auxiliary Pump Motors . E-Spec 952456 Rev. 0 - DCP/DDP Addendum to 677470 Rev. 0 l e l
/
l l O . I 1
~ . - - - ,- h w - - --~, , , w w me , - y
l
- 11. Pertinent Reference Daign Specifications for Qualification Requirements:
1
- a. Seismic Input d. Service Conditions
- b. Hydrodynamic Load Input e. QJalified Life
- c. Fatigue Considerations 1
III. Is Ecuipment Available for Inspection in the Plant: 1 [ ]Yes [ ]No [ ] Fartial or limited availability IV. Ecuiement Qualification Method: [x 3 Test [ ] Analysis' [. ] Combination of Test and Analysis Qualification Report:. Natural Frequency Test (No., Title and Date): Pacific Pumps Natural Fr'equency Test, 12/10/76 Pacific Pumps Comosny that Prepared Report: Westinghouse NTD Company that Reviewed Report: Whers Report is filed or available: Westinghouse NTD/ Pacific Pumps i E-Specs pg. 2a AccIlicaole Codes and/or Standards:. V. Vibration Inout:
- 1. Loads considered: a. [X]Seismiconly
- b. [ ]Hydrodynamiconly
' c. [ ] Vibration from nonnal operation
- d. [ ] Combination of (a) (b), and (c)
- 2. Method of Combining RRS: .
[ ]AbsoluteSum [ ]SRSS [ ] NA (otner, spec 1fy)
' Required Response Spectra ** (attach the graphs): NA 3.
Note:
'If more than one report complete items IV thru VII for each report.
**If other than RR5 is used, describe method.
~
O ' l 2
, - . . , _ _ . _._ . _ , _ ,, y
4 .-
~
NA SSE I%
- 4. Damping Corresponding to RAS: OBE
- 5. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: ,
l CXX] ZPA' [']Other (specify) Note 2 08E S/S - N/A F/8 = N/A y= N/A Note 3 SSE* S/S = 2.lg/.13g F/8 = 2.1g/.13g y. 2.1g/.13g l
- 6. Wer*e"YatYgue"k b1dered?
[ ] Yes [XX] No Not required by ASME Code for Class 2 components. If yes, describe how they were treated in overall qualification program: I VI. If Qualification by Test. then complete: _. Testing was only performed to determine ' - assembly natural frequency.
- 1. [ X1 Single Frequency [ .1 Multi-Frequency: [ ; random sine beat O '
. % . ?
.,e
;.;'Mult1Mxis!
2'. [ X; Singler Axis- -
, .. Independent Axis ...In-phase; motions 1
- 3. Ntaber of Qualifications Tests: ,
08E. NA SSE NA Other NA (specify)
- 4. Frequency Range: 1-35 Hz
- 5. Natural Frequencies- in Eacfr Directiorr (Side / Side. Front /Back, Vertical): ~
95Hz y, y,35Hz l 235Hz F/B = S/S' - ,
- 6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies: l
[XX] Lab Test [ ] In-Situ. Test [ ] Analysis
- 7. TRE enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test Not applicable
[. ; Yes (Attacit TRS. & RRE graphs)
. . No-Note 2: The SSE case was analyzed with results being compared to normal allowables. Therefore. OBE analysis was not required.
Note 3: The floor response spectra used are at 1% dam ~ ping rather than the 4% comonly associated with SSE. Since OBE analysis.was not performed I damping is not applicable. . u 3 ~
. 1 1
- 4/5
- 8. Maximue Input g-level Test:
i OBE S/S = NA F/B = NA V= NA' i SSE S/S = NA F/B = NA V= NA
- 9. Laboratory Mounting- -
A. [ X4 Bolt (No.16 , Sizel 1/8) Same as in-plant mounting configuration. [ ]We'id(Length ) [ ]
- 8. Orientation and Ffxturing: Field mounting simulated
- 10. Functional operability verified:.
[ ] Yes [.INo [X ] Not Applicable 11.. Test Results including modifications made: All frequencies are greater than or equal to 35 Hz. The motor conduit box required bracing.
- 12. Other tests performed (such as. aging or fragility test, including resul'.:s):
N/A ,
~~.
Failure Modes (if .,,,,.o,..-inte- 'kone ) 13
- 14. Margins Available:- [ ] Input Spectrur [ l Fragility Not applicable
~
VII. If Qualification by Analy".fr. then complete: The infomation provided below is applicable to the pump.
- 1. Method. of Analysis:. .
[xx] Static Analysis [ l Equivalent Static Analysis [ ] Dynamic Analysis: [ l Time-History [ ]ResponseSpectrum
- 2. Natural Frequencies in F.actr Direction (Side / Side. Front /Back Vertical):
- 95. Hz pjg , 95 HI y. 95 Hz 5/S =
- 3. Model. Type: []M C XI E [ ] 10 Note 4
[ l Finite Element- , [x ] sean [ I Closesi Fonr Solution [ ]Other-Note 4: The pumps were qualified to 3g horizontal and 2g vertical. Per WCAP-8230, these accelerations are equivalent to 2.lg/2.lg/2.ig. { l . 4 l _.. _ . _ - ___ _ _ _ _ . - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . - _ _ _
l
- - - 5/5 NA
[ ] Computer Codes: 4. Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: NA [XX] Hand Calculations ,
- 5. Method of Combining Dynamic Responses from Seismic and other Dynamic Loads:
[XX]AbsolutaSun [ ] SRSS [ ] Other: (specify) i
- 6. Damping N/A OBE N/A SSE N/A Basis for damping used:
- 7. Support Considerations in the model: Rigidly mounted to building per as-instaisea concition.
- 8. Critical Structural Elements:
Governing. Load or Response- Seismic Total Stress A. Identification location Combination Stress Stress Allowable Suction Hozzle Stress Oper. + SSE 15,935 psi 16,600 psi Flange Bolting Stress Oper. 27,140 psi, 31,400 psi Foundation Bolts Oper. + SSE 22,457 psi 36,000 psi (actuals based on generic S.
-- rather. than plant specific b.
Max. Criticar .y Maximus Allowable Deflection Deflection Locatios-
~
to Assure Functional Operability See motor results for shaft' deflection.
- 9. Failure Modes: None
- 10. Margins Xvailable: [ IInput Spectriz [X] Stress or Deflectiert See Note 5 Note 5: As identified in Item 8.A above,. margins between actual and allowable stresses are available. Additionally, Item V.5 provides a comparison between generic and specific plant values. As noted, there is con-siderable margin in these values.
O . 5 .
2/5 O 11. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications for Qualification Requirements:
- a. Seismic Input d. Service Conditions
- b. Hydrodynesic Ldad Input es Qualified Life
- c. Fatigue Consideratio'ns 1
III. Is Eoui'=mt Available for 18ss i. ion in the Plant: [ ]Yes [ ]No [ ] Partial or limited availability IV. Eoui'=mt Qualification Method: Motor [ ] Test [ J' Analysis IXXX] Cambination of Test and Analysis Qualification Report:* seismic Analysis Raoort fnr the ocp/nno charn oc/ (No,, Titie and Date): Safetv In.iection Pumo Motors - Mn30501 on ? /a1 Company that Prepared Report:. Westinchouse NTD O Company that Reviewed Report: Wesfjnohouse NTD hestinghouse NTD. Where Report is filed or availabie::.' .
"IEEE 344-1975 and E-Soecs on pace 2a.
Applicable Coder and/or Standards: V. Vibration.Inout:
- 1. Loads considered: a. CXx] Seiseric only
- h. [ ] ">. .ti. 1c only .
- c. [ ] Vibration from nomal operation i
- d. [ ] Combination of (a), (b), and (c) 2.- Method of Combining RRS:
[ ]AbsolutaSur [XX] SRSS [ ] (otiter,specify) Required Response- Swi.r.** (attach the graphs): See attached. 3. gg: -
*If more than one report complete items IV thru VII for ear.h pm I.
**!f other than RR5 is used , describe method.
3/5' ! NA SSE , l '* l
- 4. Damping Corresponding to RRS: OBE
- 5. Required Acceleration in Each Direction:
~
[XX ] ZPA [ lOther
.(specify)
N/A N/A y, N/A Note 2 08E S/S = F/B = Note 3 SSE* S/S = 2.la/.13a F/B = 2. la/ .13e V= 2.lo/.13o
- Generic / Plant Specific
- 6. Were fatigue effects considered?
[ IYes [X]No If yes, describe how they were treated in overall qualification program: Testing was'only perfomed to determine VI. If Qualification by Test. then complete: assembly natural frequency. Information
- 1. [ 1SingleFrequency [ ,3 Multi-Frequency:orovided ,
randomin [" Pump" sectio sine beat O , , , 7..- .,
',~;'Mult1Wis
- 2. .,_ ,
Single Axis .
... Independent Axis .~..In-phasa-motions -
Number of Qualifications- Tests:
- 3. ,
OBE SSE ,,, Other- , (specify) l
- 4. Frequency Range: ;
5.- Natural Frequencies- in Each Direction (Side / Side, Front /Back, Vertical): S/S = F/8 = V =-
~
1 6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies: [ ]1.ahTest [ ] In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis
- 7. TRS enveloping RR$ using Multi-Frequency Test
[ l Yes (Attack TRS & RR$ graphs) M - O 3 l
l 8. Maximum Input g-level Test: OBE. S/S = F/8 = V =- SSE S/S = F/8 = V=
- 9. Laboratory Mounting: -
A. [ ] Bolt (No. . Size ) [ ] nid (Langth -) [ ]
- 8. Orientatiert and Fixturing:
- 10. Functional operability verified:
[ lyes [ ]No [ ]NotApplicable 11.. Test Resultr including modifications made:
- 12. Other testr perfomed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):
- h. ,
~
)
13 Fa11urt Modes (if Ew.witate-
- 14. Margins Available: [ 'I Input Spectrus [ l Fragility VII. If Oualificatiort by Analysis, then complete: The information provided below is ap li able to the motor.
T. hM#WW
~
[xx] Static Analysis [ I Equivalent Static Analysis - [ lDynamicAnalysis: [ l Time-History [ ]ResponseSpectrum
- 2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side, Front /Back, Vertical): ,
S/S = 135 Hz pjg , 235.Hz y, 135 Hz
- 3. Model Type: [X ] 3D [I3 [ ] 10
[X] Finite ETament [X]8eam [ j [ I Closed Fo m Solution [ X ] Other combination G
. 4
- 4. [X ] Computer Codes. WECAN (motor shaft and rotor)
Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: N/A [X ] Hand Calculations Some stress cal'culations
- 5. Method of Combining Dynamic Responses from seismic. and other Dynamic Loads:
EX 1 Absoluta sus t I SRss t ] Other: (specify)
- 6. Damping N/A OBE N/A ssg N/A Basis for damping used: '
Assumed rigidly bolted to pump
- 7. Support Considerations in the model:
assembly per installed condition.
- 8. Critical Structural Elements: -
Governing Load or Response- Seismic Total Stress A Identification tmtion '**ination Stress Stress Allowable Shaft shear stress 10,037 psi 14,400 psi l Anchor bolt shear stress. 8,353 pis 21,700 psi (Actuals based on generic rathee O Max. Critical - kl"sh*bENN* ebon-to Assun Functional Goerability M Deflection
.00285" RotoNShaft .0255" - No adverse effect
~
- on operability None l
- 9. Failure Modes: l
- 10. Margins Available: [ ] Input Spectrum (XX] Stress or Deflection l See Note 6. l l
~
Note 6: As identified in Item 8.A above, margins between actual and allowable stresses are available. Additionally, Item V.5 provides a comparions between generic and specific plant values. As noted, there is con-siderable margin in these values.
)
i e O 5-
l 2/5, j 11. Pertinent Reference Design Specifict.tions for Qualification Requirements:
- a. Seismic Input d. Service Conditions
- b. Hydrodynamic Ldad.4nput e, Qualified Life
- c. Fatigue Consideratio'ns III. Is Eouionent Available for Inscection in the Plant:
) [ 1.Yes [ ]No ( } Partial or limited availability IV. Ecuinment Qualification Method: Gear [ '] Test [ ] Analysis [X ] Combination of Test and Analysis Gear Seismte Analysis for Model SU1023-8X5 l Qualification Report:*
~~ (No., Title and Date): 3/17/76
. Westinghouse M&G Company that P N ared Repo m ~
Campany that Reviewed @ t: Welf_f nahouse NTD Where Report is filed. or availab1e:f . hstina' house'NTD Applicable codes and/or Standards [ . E-Specs on Page 2a. V. Vibration Inout: I T. Loads considered: a. [X 1 Seismic. only
- b. [ ]Hydrodynamiconly
- c. ( l Vibratiotr from normal operation
- d. [ ] Caebination of (a), (b), and (c)
- 2. , Method of Combining RRS:
[ ] Absolute Sun [X]SR55 [] (other, spec 1fy) See attached
- 3. Required Response Specte (attach the graph's):
h:
*!f more than one report complete- itans IV thru VII for each roi,.ct. .
"If other than RR5 is used, descrfbe enthod.
I . 9
l ! 3/5 1% SSE 1% l 4. Damping Corresponding to RRS: OBE l S. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: ( X] ZPA [ ]Other (specify) ; 08E" S/S = 1.05g/.13g F/B . 1.05g/.13g y. 1.059/.139 -
}
Note 7 SSf S/S a 2.19/.1'3g pfg . 2.lg/.13g y, 2.1g/.139
- Generic / Plant Specific -
l 6. Wera fatigue effects considered? [ ]Yes [ .X] No If yes, describe how they were treated in overall qualification program: i l Testing was only performed to determine VI. If Qualification by Test. then complete: assembly natural frequency. Information ovided i P tion. j
- 1. [ J.SingleFrequency [ ,3 Multi Erequency:n "i, ump" ransedom sina beat.
O
~,-.~.
- 2. ~; Single Axis [. .l'JealtOAxis!
._ In-phase motions
. .. Independent Axis ..
Number-of Qualifications-Tests:
- 3. ,
08E SSE Other (specify)
- 4. Frequency Range:
- 5. Natural Frequencies. in Each Direction (Side / Side. Front /Back, Vertical):
5/5 = F/B = V= -
- 6. Method of Deter 1 mining Natural Frequencies:
E l Lab Test t 3 In-Situ rest [ ] Analysis
- 7. TR$ enveloping RR$ using Multi-Frequency Test-
[.;Yes(AttachTRSERR$' graphs) No i
' Note 7: The floor response spectra used are at 1% damping rather than 4%
comonly associated with SSE. Note that generic OBE qualification levels are compared to SSE response spectra accelerations. i I \
I 1 l l . 1
** 4/5 l
(
- 8. Maximum Input g-level Test:
OBE S/S = F/B = V= SSE S/S = F/8 = V=
- 9. Laboratory Mounting: i f A. [ ] Soit (No. . Size )
l [ ]Wald(Length- ) [] i S. Orientatiert and Fixturing: -
- 10. Functional operability verified:
[ ]Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable 11.. Test Results. including modifications. made:
)
- 12. Other tests performed (such ar. aging or fragility test, including results):
l
- h. ,
- 13. Failure Modes (if .,, ivy.-iate-
):
- 14. Margins Available: [ 'I Input'Spectrus [ lFregi11ty VII. If Qualification by Analysis then complete: The information provided below is applicable to the gear.
- 1. Method of Analysis
[ XI Static Analysis [ ] Equivalent. Static Analysis ; [ ]DynamieAnalysis: [. 1 Tim > History [ lResponseSpectrum 2'. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side. Front /Back, Vertical): e 135 Hz pjg . 135 Hz y. 135 Hz - 37$ ,
- 3. Model Type: [ ] 3D CXI2D See Note 4
[ ]10
- C 1 Finite Element [X]8een
[ I closed Form Solution [ lOther O . l d
,,ww.m.. .--w.-, , , . , , , - ,,,,.,m, ,e-...--,-w ..-is %
. ..e- .m,-= . - - . .m.-+--- . . . .- -. .
.-em
. . . 5/5
~
- 4. [ ] Computer Codes: NA l
Frequency Range and No of modes considered: [X ] Hand Calculations
~
. 5. Method of Combining Dynamic Responses from Seismic and other Dynamic Loads: [X ] Absolute Sun [ l SRSS [ ]Other: (specify)
- 6. Damping N/A OBE N/A SSE N/A Basis for damping used:
- 7. Support Considerations in the model: Assumed rioidiv mounted to oumo per as-installed configuration.
- 8. Critical Structural Elements:
Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A Identification location C*ination Stress Stress Allowable Bearing Stress Oper. + SSE 233 psi 300 psi LS Shaft Stress Oper. + SSE 20,821 psi 53,500 psi (Actuals based on generic lear rather than plant specific 13 O 3.. Max. Criticai T..
'.?-
Locatiger
. Maximum Allowable Deflection to Assure Functional Operability Deflection
.q.
None
- 9. Failure Modes:
- 10. Margins. Available: [ l Inpur Spectrue [X ] Stress er Deflection See Note 8 Note 8: As identified in Item 8.A above, margins between actual and allowable !
stresses are available. Additionally, Item V.5 provides a comparison t between generic and specific plant values. As noted, there is considerable margin in these values. O . 5 ,
l . . . . . . . . _ . . . - - . - - - . . . . - ._. __,
'~
.' WESTINGHOUSE NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY DIVISION
- l Oq g tiTi.
cai*.i h 9 wsbc, anos u e s :- , ( '_%S* . OATE C. .* 0. S . QATE
- D. . v OATE l
PROJECT AUTMOR WIM u o v bannate sl1r.in: WW AW- SM//? 'r$ onev,
*l'il2' s.O. cauc. ~O. e n.a ~O.
I
~>+ \4cacci trM r
\
A / c #sx vmamm<s w - i ,;,
@$2.OQd$$(/ NOM % '
bS[ Y '/ < s'Neh*M^[YX6X X 'A/> A fx N s acsw A w ,x ~xmw wmv ix s X
; AN)%%Qf wec x u AGP xm "NA W>>bJ'/NNX
. a.
x ws wwu xi ^ 4 X 3d@MFdMA./WXMM)(A) .
^
i t wvx X3$$MM mx M(wM2MM n on xw u>n) O( . I'XMAXNth MMWs'*th 2 klxCG%>M@b6X2NX>M6 8. 1 R l- 0$WO$h50WQ@Ni xxx w.v x // x / A ta x u w .,v . .// a / A . a . g%asxw
/x w/ /V A A VNMN / \ N/ / Y l A /N VNAv x/ /v /x A x x'Asx xrry v A /N
'g b MNN// NN A A NAY3 4 ' ' W i( N Vs/
- 3 -WCG W N X/\ X g( *MWJN X1 /\
/' 14V%'}h }% ^, MM/W /'
( 3 X MSDV UfMdD$tM
'///YXVNsX A X//M X X NANhK D VN -
l / YAY ^$h AWYNW T, (. ? > -- mme co-.-
/y[j g, D
caramma muetsaa svarma asa as as d g C- ,3 / / L %su . tA- .A f. N *AA>% C05 007 OJ ' Q2 Q3 0.5 0.7 LO 2.0 30 undomped Period (Sec.) - Oc .... NO. DATE
..,-.. .... ....O... .... . . . . . . . . .... \
WESTING OuSS 80 mas 3s2130 i
<v ~ _~+w <.,.o- .-- ,4.- _,
lO Charging Pump A Item 1 Bearing pressure calculations are for the static case for the pump only. Bearing pressures for the operating mode (with seismic) are '
! to be calculated and justification for streses are to be provided for the pump, motor, and reduction gear.
l Response: An analysis (CALC #MED-PVE-2388, Dated 3/30/84) has been completed which indicates that the Charging /SI Pump, motor and reduction gear bearing stresses due to hydrodynamic operational and seismic loads are well within the allowable limits as shown in Attachment C-1 which is the summary sheet of the analysis. This analysis is retained in the Westinghouse engineering file. Item 2 Calculations of the natural critical circular frequency of the turning gear and pump shaft are to be provided, and the concern regarding potential resonance at the critical speed and operational
; speed must be addres.ied.
Response: Review of the Westinghouse engineering files revealed that these i calculations are available in a 1971 report. This report (Ref. j Number B46617) was prepared by Pacific Pump Division. It clearly shows, through critical speed calculations that the critical speeds of the pump and motor shafts do not coincide with their running speeds of 4849 and 1800 rpm. The Pacific Pump report will be
- retained _in the Westinghouse engineering files.
i '1 4 l -
- O
. 5858Q:1D/040284
WESTINGHOUSE, NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY DIVISION ATTACHMENT C-1 PAGE l CH TITLE lST MA oN KU 7% Adh GD h e A%& kJM N93 t L/ Or /W ; PROJkCT R DATE CH K'D.SY ATE CH K'O. 8 Y DATE ; bcp/ bb P dllTH% 'h iss' 3R% %lW S.C . CA LC. NO. g P1 LE WO. GROUP o T HEh-/NC- 23 27/ dos'// 970 97/T
/ '
WC SUUMAdY oP STRESSES OftCulA7Cb Allou)Ad L6 YAwc VAllAC BASIS /AT[ffdE
- l. fyMP 6fMid6 Maytuod 200 fSL d90f5L SToric. Au.omte
/LissueC fct gEf I 2.Marag Arxa,Ma' iusu 275pu Boofsi nu.wnetc put fxczac Ref. x
- 3. Arbocria Gent Has n m /}s_ss a c s g,n; pug piu<
- a. Loa secen GMpst' M,9pst' raicoess of
- b. Ilow seers 459pu 5Sopa o. 00o15 i~
I 1 l l 9v R EV. REV. . AUTHOR OATE CH K'O. S Y- QATE CH K'O. S Y DATE NO. DATE WESTINGHOUSE PORM SS2130
0 WESTINGHOUSE NUCLEAR TECHNOLOG DIVISION TITL PAGE [ UMM DM , /4 Af D k M/M[r AJ4Lc/3 / 3 / }Or /M ' P RCJECT AU1 HOR OATE CH K'O. SY OATE CH K'L SY DATE 1MPl hbp W S' m b o lo / 9] R1 4 S /x b S.O. CALC. NO. FILEQiOj.
/ G it O UP
/
9OS t1&b -PV2*-). 5 7g .205/M7097/5" P{C .
&aO kEFE4EdLES
- 1. Fuaric. Puo far k'- 518- t . Rev. s , 9Ias/7e D. (dESnaMousE HoroK SEisw c deyaer- MO 3 O5 o I, 9ll;-l83
- 3. Gsu Scisme. Anrvsis fae Ma>ct su ioa3 -exs , .5/i7/rc N. MECHA+JICAL, hJ&liuSEdiM bC316M " , htGL,69 65/GAJ o A MwiMIurev3 ", [4/455 N . _ -
R E V. REV. AUTHOR OATE CH K'O. S Y DATE CH K*0. S V OATE NO. DATE WESTINGHOUSE FORM 552130 -
. SPECIFIC ITEM #6 SOLID STATE PROTECTION SYSTEM (SSPS) CABINET PART 1: There was no indication that this equipment was tested beyond 25 Hz. Westinghouse is to confirm that it was tested beyond 25 Hz or provide justification for this position. STATUS: This item is resolved. RESOLUTION
SUMMARY
- At the time the seismic tests were performed and the WCAP 7817 written, 25 Hz was considered the upper frequency limit for testing (as noted in WCAP 7817 " Basis of Criteria," Page B-4).
However, as a precaution against having to perform additional tests at higher frequencies at a later date, seismic tests were performed to an upper frequency limit of 35 Hz. During these added tests from 25 Hz to 35 Hz, no resonance frequencies were found and the sine beat acceleration was held constant at 0.2 9. No mechanical changes in any equipment was observed and all electrical functions were normal during these additional tests. A record of the 35 Hz testing is in the Westinghouse detailed test data file.
'l 1
O
4
- O)
\s. SPECIFIC ITEM #6 SOLID STATE PROTECTION SYSTEM CABINET PART 2: Westinghouse is requested to identify the mounting in the test configuration.
STATUS: This item is resolved. RESOLUTION
SUMMARY
- As noted on the SQRT f' orm, twelve (12) three-quarter inch (3/4") bolts (A307) represent the mounting configuration for the SSPS testing documented in WCAP-7817. Although this mounting configuration is not specifically identified in the WCAP, its i
acceptability has been demonstrated in other testing of SSPS units by Westinghouse. As noted during the audit, Duke Power demonstrated the acceptability of the specific plant mounting configuration. O 1 i i i i
O O SPECIFIC ITEM #6 SOLID STATE PROTECTION SYSTEM CABINET 4 PART 3: Provide an auditable link for qualification documents (i.e., qualified vs. installed). STATUS: This item is resolved. RESOLUTION
SUMMARY
- A review of the SSPS furnished by Westinghouse was made with the view of selecting a standard SSPS for testing to establish criteria as stated in Section 1 of WCAP 7817. As a result, the SSPS tested was chosen as being representative of the SSPS supplied to Duke Power Company for the Catawba plant. Therefore, since this identified equipment was subjected to type tests under simulated seismic accelerations which envelope the Catawba specific seismic requirements, the Catawba equipment is qualified based on WCAP 7817 and the test data cited in Part 1 of this response. This response confirms the applica-bility of the testing in WCAP 7817 to the. specific SSPS for Catawba, consistent with the requirements of IEEE-34-1971.
i b y l l O
O
SPECIFIC ITEM #6' SSPS CABINET MOUNTING (ELECTRICAL ISOLATION)
PART 4: Provide justification for using insulating washers in field while solid contact was made in test. STATUS: Analysis has oeen performed and is in calculation file i CNC-1381.05-00-0060 RESOLUTION
SUMMARY
- The bolting configuration for the.SSPS cabinet has been investigated for adverse effects due to the inclusion of the-electrical isolating materials. An examination of the bolt assembly indicated that the connection, which uses high-strength bolts with pretension, is a friction-type connection with no slippage between the various materials. This is based on the maximum possible seismic i inertial forces (static equivalent) in conjunction with the minimum coefficients of friction. A friction-type bolted connection allows i no slippage giving rigid, solid contact between the base channel and the SSPS cabinet enclosure.
,1 e i i I l 1 4 4
J .i A V SPECIFIC ITEM #6 SOLID STATE PROTECTION SYSTEM PART 5: In field mounting the glastic filler plate is not secured. STATUS: Field was notified. I RESOLUTION
SUMMARY
- Because Unit 1 SSPS cabinet was energized and i under test, the NRC auditors were shown the Unit 2 SSPS cabinet.
i The Unit 2 cabinet had not been turned over from construction and system work was not completed. Therefore, the glastic filler plate was not secured on the Unit 2 cabinet. The Unit 1 SSPS cabinet will be inspected and, if necessary, the glastic filler plate will be secured prior to fuel load. Additionally, the field has been notified and Unit 2 SSPS cabinet
! glastic filler plate will be secured prior to turnover.
d J i l I t I
l
.e _ . . _ . . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . . _ . _ _ _ .._. _. _ _ ._l 3/12/84 1/5
' Seismic and Dynamic Qualification Sismary of tauioment )
O, Plant Name: Catawba Unit 1 (DCP) g. I. X Utility: Duke Power Co. PWR 1. Westinchouse BWR
- 2. NSSS: ,
Duke Power Co. Other
- 3. A/E:
Component Name: Solid State Protection System . Tao Mo ISSPSA. ISSPSB II. i 1. Scope: [x ] NSSS , [ ] BOP [ ]Other 1059E44 Quantity: ? uni +< (Train A&B)
- 2. Model Number:
- 3. Size or Range:
- 4. Vendor: Westinghouse (WID) i
- 5. If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model number of the devices l
included: Reference drawino 1059E44 Rev. E and 5656D86 Rev. 8 l l 6. . Physical
Description:
Three-Bay Vertical Cabinet
- a. Appearance:
l 90" wide x 30" deep x 91.31" high
- b. Dimensions:
Weight: Approximately 2300 lbs. c. Location: Building: Auxiliary Building 7. Elevation: 594 ft.
- 8. Field Mounting Conditions: x Solt(No. 12 , Size 1 " ) A325 ' '
';xl, Weld (Length 16 ) 1/ liet welds
- 9. Mounting Orientation [e.g. , on floor, cantilevered, suspended, etc.]
Floor mounted Reactor Protection System 10 . .a. System in which located:
- b. Functional
Description:
Provides reactor trio function and safeouards actuation s c. Istheequipmentrequiredfor[ ]HotStandby,[ ]ColdShutdown )
.[x 3 Both [ ]Neithen [ ]Other ,
-l l
l I 1 l
2/5 ' i- 11. ppipeggerence Design Specifications for Qualification Requirements:
- E-Spec. 952512 Rev.1, EQDP-ESE-16 O a. Seismic Input d. Service Conditions Controlled Environment See Section VI.1
- b. Hydrodynamic Load Input e. Qualified Life N/A 5 years
- c. Fatigue Considerations N/A III. Is Eouioment Available'for Inspection in the Plant:
[ x] Yes [ ]No [ ] Partial or limited' availability IV. Ecufoment Qualification Method: Combination of Test:and Analysis [ X] Test [ ]AnalysisWCAP-781,7 "Seis[mic] Testing of Electrical and Co Qualification Report:* war-/ut/, Equipment," Rev. O. December 1971 _ supplement z, " seismic Testing of Electrical and Control Equipment (Low Seismic Plants)," Rev. O, December 197% (No., Title and Date): Westinghouse NTD i Company that Prepared Report: Company that Reviewed Report: Westinchouse NTD Where Report is filed or available: Westinghouse NTD/NRC/DP ' TEEE M-1971 Applicable Codes and/or Standards: , V. Vibration Input:
- 1. Loads considered: a. [x3Seismiconly i
- b. [ ]Hydrodynamiconly
- c. [ ] Vibration from norinal operatiion
- d. [ ]Combinationof(a),(b),and(c)
- 2. Method of Combining RRS:
[ ]AbsoluteSum [ x] SRSS [ ] , g See attached Fiaures 1. 2 an@ 3.I ' Required Response Spectra" (attach the graphs): I Note:
*If more than one report complete items IV thru VII for each report.
"If other than RRS is used, describe method. .
2
. , - . _ - - - y, .y- r --v
N/A 55
,- 4. Damping Corresponding to IUtS: OBE SSE
. 5.- Required Acceleration in Each Direction: NotApolicable(N/A)
[ ]ZPA [ ]Other (specify) . 08E S/S . 'N/A y/g . N/A y. N/A l SSE S/S = N/A pfg . N/A y. N/A i
- 6. Were fatigue effects considered?
4 [ ]Yes [ x 3 No
' If yes, describe how they were treated in overall qualification program:
VI. If Qualification by Test. then complete: [x]SingleFrequency [ ] Multi-Frequency: ';. l random 5 beats 1.
,x, sine beat (10 cpb) 9 each test frequency I
f 2. ' x
- Single Axis
' ' [ Multi-Axis Independent Axis [ ,]J;. InFront-to-Back chase motions iO
- 3. Side-to-Side Number of Qualifications Testsi. Vertical 08E SSE 3 Other (specify)
- 4. Frequency Range: 1 - 5 Hz
- 5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side, Front /Back, Vertical): .
F/B = 8.5 - 10.5 y. > 33 Hz i S/S . 8.0 - 9.5
- 6. Method of Deterisining Natural Frequencies:
j [ ]In-SituTest [ ] Analysis [ x] Lab Test
- 7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test
; lYes(AttachTRS&RRSgraphs)
.x. No TRS envelopes RRS usi.ng single-frequency sine beat testina (Figures 4 and 5)
,O 3 f
l 2/5 i ,~
- 11. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications fcr Qualification Requirements:
P.O. #209036
- E-spec 952512 Rev.1. EQDP-ESE-16
- a. Seismic Input d. Service' Conditions See Section VI. 1 Controlled Environment
- b. Hydrodynamic Load Input e. Qualified Life N/A 5 years
- c. Fatigue Considerations N/A ,
! III. Is Eauipment Available for Inspection in the Plant:
[ x] Yes [ ]No [ ] Partial or limited ' availability
- l IV. Eauioment Qualification Method: )
[ x] Test [ ] Analysis [ ] Combination of Test and Analysis i WCAP-7817 "Sei~sinic Testing of Electrical and Control
- Qualification Report:* Equipment " Rev. O, December 1971 i WGAP-7517, Supplemental 3. "5etsm1C Test 1no of Electr1 cal (No., Title and Date): and Control Equipment (WSSPS) Low Seismic Plants "*Rev. O, j q
j December,1 j Company that Prepared Report: Westinchouse NTD Campany that Reviewed Report: Westinghouse NTD j Where Report is filed or available: Westinchouse NTD/NRC/DP Applicable Codes and/or Standards:. IEEE 344-1971 l V. Vibration Inout:
- 1. Loads considered: a. [ x 3 Seismic only J
- b. [ ]Hydrodynamiconly t
- c. [ ] Vibration from norsal operation -
(
- d. [ ]Cambinationof(a),(b),and(c) 4 2. Method of Combining RRS: .
[ ]AbsoluteSum [x3SRSS [ ] l (otner,specify) l
- 3. ' ' Required Response Spectra" (attach the graphs): See attached Fiaures 1. 2. a I
Note: l
*If more than one report complete items IV thru VII for each report. *
"If other than RRS is used, describe method.
O 2 l
.. . l 4
~ _ . . - _..__ - --. - - --.- - - __ _ _ _ _ .
e * * ""'" ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~-~ ,- e 5% M 4 DampingCorrespondingtsNAS: CE N/A SSE Required Acceleration in Each Direction: Not a'pplicable (N/A) 5. O' l [ ]ZPA [ ] Otter - i (specify) . y=- N/A j I 08E 3/5 = N/A - __ F/3 = [ N/A
- N/A ._F/B .- N/A '. 'y .. N/A SSE $/S =
- 6. Were fatigue effects considered? - -
[ ]Yes [x ] No If yes, describe how they were treated ~in overali_ qualification program: 4 VI. If Qualification by Test. then complete: '..
/
; ; ,random
- 1. [x ] Single Frequency [ ] Multi-Frequency: 5 beats
- ~ ~ -
, x, sine beat (10cpb)
, .;,g each test frecuency
> 2. ;x; Single Axis ; ] Multi-Axis
~
Inde. pendent Axis , ] In-phase actions
- Front-to-Dack -
- 3. N eber of Qualifications Testi: Side-to-Side . '~ '
Vertical ? 08E $3E ? Other (specify)
-25 &
- 4. Frequency Range:
i 5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side, Front /Back, Vertical): 1 S/S = 8.0 - 9.5 F/B = 8.5 - 10.'i Va h 33 Mr i
- 6. Methed of Determining Natural Frequencier':
[ ] In-Situ Test >[-) Analysis 'l [x ] toab Test
- 7. TRS enveloping RRS using tiulti-Frequency Test i
Yes Attach TR$ & RR5 graphs)
'x' ho T S envelopes RRS using single-frequency sine beat testing (Figures 4 and 5)'
i e
)
3 I i e *
- e o ee e
________.____.__-..,_r_ -- ._,.n.._ , , . _ . & __ ,.,.,,y - , , _. . . , _ . _ - _ . , . . , _
- 4/5
- 8. Maximum Input g-level Test: See attached Figures 4 and 5 08E S/S = F/8 = _V=
SSE S/S = F/8 = V=
- 9. Laboratory Mounting:
A. [ x] Solt (No.12 . Size 3/4") A307 [-]Wald(Langth ) [' ]
- 8. Orientation and Fixturing: Test unit was mounted in-tine with the test inout
- 10. Functional operability verified:
[ x] Yes [ ]No [ ] Not Applicable
- 11. Test Results including modifications made: Test results were accentable.
- Number of bolts used to fasten the three-rai:k structure to the rack base was increased from 17 tn ?a.
- 12. Other tests performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):
None i . O is ~ ' 4' r a 4 = (4< aar a 4 *-
- 14. Margins Available: [x ]'Inpid Spectrum [ ] Fragility See attached Figures 4 and 5 VII. If Qualification by Analysi:4. then complete: N/A
- 1. Method of Analysis:
[ ]StaticAnalysis [ ] Equivalent Static Analysis [ ]DynamicAnalysis: [ ] Time-History [ ]ResponseSpectrue , l
- 2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side. Front /Back. Vertical):
S/S = F/8 = V= l
- 3. Model Type: [ ]30 [ ]2D [ ]1D
[ ] Finite Element [ ]Seen
. [ ] Closed Foru Solution [ ]Other s
O . l 4
. - ~ _ .=_ _
i . . . _ _ . _ . . . . . .
- N/A
- 4. [ ] Computer Codes:
l Freqvency Range and No. of modes considered: _ [ ]HandCalculations
- 5. Method of Combining Dynamic Responses from Seismic and other Dynamic Loads:
[ ]AbsoluteSun [ ]SRSS [ ]Other: (specify)
- 6. Damping DBE SSE Basis for damping used:
- 7. Support Considerations in the model:
- 8. Critical Structural Elements: ,
Governing Load
.or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location Combination Stress Stress Allowable
- 8. -
Max. Critical Maximim Allowable Deflection
'o 4'4=-
O o <' *4 -
- e. * * ' *4
- 9. Failure Modes:
- 10. Margins Available: [ 3 Input Spectrum [ ] Stress or Deflection l .
k o - 5 l . e
O O O. . .. I i A ..A .. i
.I-I CRTRHBR AUX BLDG NOR-SOU (X) EARTHOURKE RESPONSE RCCELERATION SPECTRR, ORHPING= 0.050 ll!
ELEVRTION 5911+00 LINE Y= -1.5 .! '
# r- I .
o l
- I CATAllBA pluCLEAR STAT 10ll '
I CnS-lios.co-co-coor ' g 1 Figure No.G-3
. . t
- i i $ $ E * /. 8 7 5 X 0 8 6 . l
8
' 100TES: j i 2 ! 1. Results are
~2
- t. -
- 2. See Figure location ~ ,
" key Ian 8
j - l E I '
- 3. See able 4 for additional i
- k information 3! !
- z'S j J '( ~ 4. Design envelope indicated by 1i
. Ed -
g dished line 2.' g ,
\
( gg - i R f b D V
?
1 - f . L l W~
= ,, %<- i yt.
V E" V ]s l
- = \ .,-
! c e
\s '
.5
-a i
d ' % G i N - 8 i ! 8 % . 5.es o.no o.ro e.se i.oo a.no s.oo .se i l PERIDO IN SECONOS McA10MTAL 5xpe To Sims ,
l l l
! .li. ;l;,lliiiI l.i :' ; !
.' ' ,' I l' ,;l: .i1 .! i
,6 l ,'
T E' 2 m
- o. \
g1i e. g2"
~ *< g 3 h- m g8
/
0 ~ 0 3
' 1 n y o b 6
8 i t l a d e a n 0 c o t a o i _ x 86 l r t i d d i d c n 0 5 0 N O I f@01 r a r i e % E' T A2 T0 M (pD I f o p o K R 0 S0 R 0 2 = e re 4 nee ei ni ovn l s% U5 A0 E0-L - 1 65 ar unlt el sgaba O0 C0G til amnd H . T 0 U N 0. o. A0 8N 6 lFseyef u pTss r oih eeeenea
- RSkSiDd g e %
0 0 2 R = 81 e W1 r S E RG A TSg
- u T EN ANi CCF O ..
N12 3 4 (
)
I P \
\ 0 S
O W H s 0 N T oA O Y ( R <
'\ 1 C
n O5 E
- n S -r S . 1 - v N E R2 R2 I -
r W T -
' 0 D .
- C 5 O .
SE = RPX v 0 I R - E t n h P E S E NN ~ : OI - d GI L - r OT L R0 A h
- m 0 2
o B E0 L +1 0 n-e XE1 \ UC9 \ 1 1 R RC5 i lj .{ 0 1 N g aii REO - h 0 BSI ,
/! l' HNT < 'f R OR PV 7lj l T SE 5 REL e 0
CRE
,9o od Rd ts = a= o 3a =%
i."o;= j 8a '" cmW 0f 3 3 c d'"
~
~'
l id@D
~~ ~
$@ , N [
o ' k;<Nm sg%cmsm 10
? \
'2< Nxf ; >X iY e mm Sk
'//r%^i^f w / x vvwsmw,wwvum
'A'/ 2 M / s W 6b YM M# D !N X. vu ww ' vvi v48 3 -NX'QC<A'N N X/K 4 KBMW /58X A 5:0f":s1k.'E1k
? 3 X365!30$@^y^>6' , _
w cwwe ii '/WX X'#3NM M X//NX XWWi / 5" N Y Y,2 N E .d @h[d(Y MN 6e l i k3<M/d>WMMX />MM\ o; [, ffQf!%%{.Q Qf s
~'
xw mw x -//x / x ^xxx wr v w//A/ Wie N //YiAA y ,g N W// t/f \ N/ NA/xA A x Y \\MN xwwix/vyvxv A\
. vv/M L x/N g N/M//h( N AA ^ ^V2W4N/V V%
T I)UN N<X / / >I X / \ X #
.5 N$MW/N b^', XNM X hE'DA7M*'I\/'N 4-3 y g y y /..werv m evv
'/)<AYIvXNXNNX A
< DESIGN RESPONSE SPECTRUM, 9
/ , Y y 0
s3 '089 O M 2/
/ //
C /
). ,
'8 e
# a 8,
,of $ S G = I. s 7 5 x o s s .
CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATION CNS-1108.00-00-0002 [// / 5 9'.
**o, W
Figure No. 2
., / / f. *a& , n..~ . .~ n .. ~ .. a 005 0.07 0.1 02 0.3 0.5 0.7 1.0 2.0 .$.C Undomped Period (Sec.)
\/E W ir.A L Figure 3 Column L/NG DD-55
%'?$ ptOH : dLE VMTIOM G94 '
1 . ( FIGURE 4 100.0 to9 e
- CURVE ZPA 6
s CATAWBA N-S .36
.39
@ CATAWBA E-W z
9 r 1.75 HZ TEST .7
,1 5 HZ TESTS .8 2 2.5,HF E8 .-
- li , , ,
u ; m
", - d o ENVELOPE OF PEAK TEST RESPO!!SE SPECTRA =
10.0to 5% DA!iPING = 8 7 i i
$ .~ _
- u x_
; o 1 1 m .
2 .
. u 1 . .
CATAWBA . I 's: . x' . s ,
- l 's r e 's-AUX BUILDING RRS
; l- il ,
N li I 's ELEV. 594' l ' 1 N . N f s 'a COL. LINE 00-55 I*go' N! W 7 W. - SSE - 5% DAMPIN@
, N _f='i C v h
_<m
~ HOR,I (N-5,) - .... , ,
Wr
~
, l l l-.-' r " 7 ", , ,
7 ! i a f w / J I / 1_ A] - 4 6 s .__ _
-,-j 4 - '
4 / / /' / / CATAWBA
.f
--- AUX BUILDING RRS ELEV. 594'
~
.-~
COL. LINE 00-55
~'
2 '
/
SSE - 5% DAMPING
,/ i HORZ (E-W) l
. i 4 5 6 7 8 9 te 2 3 4 5 6 7 2 3 g 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 to 1.0 10.0 1k FRE00ENCY (HZ)
SOLID STATE PROTECTION SYSTEM (SSPS) TRS FOR SINGLE FREOUENCY SI?!GLE AXIS HORIZONTAL TESTS COMPARED TO DCP HORIZONTAL RESP 0f!SE SPECTRA FOR AUXILIARY BUILDING, ELEVATION 594' (COL LINE DD-55).j
- I l
FIGURE 5 i l 100.0 to
',j CURVE ZPA
,
- E CATAWBA .23 l '
, i YERT e4 :
E, i 1.75 HZ TEST .49
- E 2.5 HZ TEST .52
- g :
$2 w .
j 3.5 HZ TEST .52
.6 o.. . . . . . ... .... . ....i........
,8: 5.0. HZ TEST 7*0 HZ H R
- *6
- ENVELOPE OF VERT. PEAK 10*o to* 5 TEST RESPONSE SPECTPA s
i AT 5%~ DAMPING l , ; ! e = l s l 4 _ _-- , 2 . . ,, . . . s . h,: fi. \ 'a \ \
,! , u 1 ; . . < x 1.r ta, . .
. ,. , m. .
,. m m m
; . l l l
h N NW 4 - EEEEE EEE EEIE EEE EH !EEiiEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEE s ~ CATA W. ~
~ ~
~
- AUX P'JILDING RRS ELEv. 59A' ' ' ' '
8 COL. LINE 00-55 - - 1 S'SE - 5% DAMPING i VERTICAL -- _ - ~ - ---~ 4 I l . l 1 i 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 to 3 3 4 5 6 7 8 910 3 3 a s s 7 0 3 3 10.0 100, 1.0 ) FRE00ENCY (HZ) ! SOLID STATE PROTECTION SYSTEM (SSPS) TRS FOR SINGLE FRE0VENCY SINGLE
- RESPONSE SPECTR AXISFOR VERTICAL AUXILIARY BUILDING, TESTS COMPARED ELEVATION 594' TO DCP VERTICAL .
2 i
.m., ._.-..,,,-,,--.-.,,m,.,,_.-_
I FIGURE 1 100.0 2e 9 1 ! 7 j > j e
- A
> m i
"g4 I
B C b a INPUT A INPUT C
$ 55 DAMPING 55 DAMPING
- W PRINCIPAL AXIS "
PRINCIPAL AXIS 1 '; .;;l :::: ,, , , : 10.0 to* N c _=
' f, - l; ,' ', ,
i l _. I 4 .
.=_- -
- 3 4
- 2 IN '8 '
55 DAMPING PRINCIPAL AXIS 1 , 1 010' ' 8 I 1 9 a i j 8 . I ' ' l ,
' i j i 1 6I i
a 1 4 $ 6 7 8 9 to 3 3 4 8 6 7 8 i * ; 3 3 4 S 4 7 8 910 2 3 10R, 10 10.0 l FREOUENCY (HZ) I VERITRAK PRESSURE TRANSMITTERS I TEST REQUIRED RESPONSE SPECTRA I I e 3
~' ~ ~ ~-~ ' ~ ~
~_.~~
_ _ _ _fi r 1.' ~ + s Solid State Protection System l l i
- Item 1 There was no indication that this equipment was tested beyond j 25 Hz. Westinghouse is to confirm that it was tested beyond 25 Hz j or provide justification for this position. Westinghouse is also l requested to identify the mounting in the test configuration and provide an auditable ifnk for qualification documents (i.e.,
l qualified vs. installed). l Response: At the time the seismic tests were performed and the WCAP 7817 written, 25 Hz was considered the upper frequency limit for testing i (as noted in WCAP 7817 " Basis of Criteria," Page B-4). However, as
- a precaution against having to perform additional tests at higher ,
frequencies at a later date, seismic tests were performed to an
- upper frequency limit of 35 Hz. During these added tests from 25 Hz to 35 Hz, no resonance frequencies were found and the sine i O beat acceleration was held constant at 0.2g. No mechanical changes l in any equipment was observed and all electrical functions were l normal during these additional tests. A record of the 35 Hz testing is in the Westinghouse detailed test data file.
As noted on the SQRT form, twelve (12) three-quarter inch (3/4") bolts (A307) represent the mounting configuration for the SSPS i testing documented in WCAP-7817. Although this mounting j configuration is not specifically identified in the WCAP, its
- acceptability has been demonstrated in other testing of SSPS units j by Westinghouse. As noted during the audit, Duke Power ,
demonstrated the acceptability of the specific plant mounting configuration. i A review of the SSPS furnished by Westinghouse was made with the i
- view of selecting a standard SSPS for testing to established criteria as stated in Section 1 of WCAP 7817. As a result, the 5858Q
- ID/040284 .
_ . _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ ~ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . . _ _ _ , - . _ .
SSPS tested was chosen as being representative of the SSPS supplied
/' to Duke Power Company for the Catawba plant. Therefore, since this identified equipment was subjected to type tests under simulated seismic accelerations which envelope the Catawba specific seismic requirements, the Catawba equipment is qualified based on WCAP-7817 and the test data' cited in the first paragraph of this response.
This response c~onfirms the applicability of the testing in WCAP 7817 to the specific SSPS for Catawba, consistent with the requirements of IEEE-34-1971. i t t i !O i t i r i . I l 4 i O I 5858Q:1D/040284 __ _ _ _ ~ _ _ _ _ . _____ , _ , - _ . _ _ , . . . _ _ _ _ . - _ _ .
* =uw 4
l SPECIFIC ITEM #7 RHR PUMP / MOTOR PART 1: A summary of the stress calculations at the nozzle to casing interfaces (for both suction and discharge nozzles) is required. 1 STATUS: This item has been resolved. RESOLUTION
SUMMARY
- Combined stress intensities for the pump casing in' the regions of nozzle attachments have been clearly identified on pages 4 14 and 15 of the pump seismic report, ME-174. The combined stress
;- intensities have been determined using a Bijlaard analysis and the guide-lines of Welding Research Council Bulletin 107. A comparison between 4 the results and the allowables have been added to the Summary of Results table, page 3 of ME-174. As shown, the allowable stresses are greater than the actual stresses. - PART 2: Improved stress calculations in elements 90 and 92 are required as well as a comparison with allowable stresses.
STATUS: This item has been resolved. RESOLUTION
SUMMARY
- The finite element model generated for determining pump casing and cover stresses due to operating pressure and gasket seating loads is judged to be adequate as indicated in "RHR Pump Cover Evaluation". All stresses in the regions of concern are acceptable.
This evaluation will be placed in the Westinghouse equipment qualification
-e file which will be maintained for the life of the plant.
PART 3: A calculation of the critical circular frequency and a check against operational speed is required. The concern of resonance should be addressed. STATUS: This item has been resolved. RESOLUTION
SUMMARY
- A critical speed determination has been performed for the shaf t/ rotor / impeller assembly. The critical speed was found'to be 2760 rpm. This is 55% higher than the running speed of 1777 rpm.
Thus, no response problems will occur. This analysis has been included in revision 1 of the motor seismic report, M010201. This report will be kept in the Westinghouse engineering files.. A 4
. L- -)
I i 1
~ ._ . __
3/9/84~ i O Seismic and Dynamic Qualification Stannary of Eouioment 1/5 I. Plant Name: Catawba Unit 1 Tgg,: ,
- 1. Utility: Duke Power Co. PWR 4 Loco
- 2. MSSS: Westinghouse BWR
- 3. A/E: Duke Power Co. Other II. Component Name: Residual Heat Removal Pump A
- 1. Scope: [X]NSSS [ ] BOP [ ]Other
- 2. Model Ntaber: 8x20 WDF Quantity: 2 oer olant
- 3. Size or Range: ' 3500 com (desion) .
- 4. Vendor: Inoerso11-Rand
- 5. If the component is a c hinet or panel, name and model msnber of the devices included: N/A O 6. ' Physical Descriptfon: -
- a. Appearance: Vertical Pumo/ Motor Assembly
- b. Dimensions: Overall Lenoth = 44". Width = 51.6". Heicht = 07.65"
- c. Weight: Total Assembly = 9542 lbs.
Location:' Building:. Auxiliary Buildina l , 7.
' Elevation: 522 feet -
- 8. - Field Mounting Conditions: '; x ; Solt (No i . Size 1.,Z/g Wald (Longti )
l
- 9. Mounting Orientation [e.g. on floor, cantilevered, suspended, etc.]
> Mounted on rigid structure on floor in vertical position i . Residual Heat Removal; Safety Infection 10 . ".a. System in which located: Residual Heat Removal: Low Head Safety Infection !
- b. Functional
Description:
O-1 tae <ui, ent reauired <or t 2 act st nd><. t 2 Coid s* te n
.[X]Both [ ]Neither [ ]Other P
}
O . l . SEISMIC QUALIFICATION SlM ERY \ i A. Component: Residual Heat Removal Puup i i The Catawba Residual Heat Removal Pumps 'were designed based upon the criteria of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III for Class 2 pumps. The assembly consists of a single stage. centrifugal pump and a 400 horsepower motor. B. Qualification Approach: The program developed to assure seismic qualification of pump assemblies within the Westinghouse MSSS scope of supply is discussed i in Sections 3.7 and 3.9.3.2 of the Catawba FSAR. These pumps are
; designed for the worst case loading combinations resulting from internal pressure, operatings deadweight, seismic and nozzle i loads. The qualification 'pr6 gram consists of:
- 1. ASME Code design calculations
, 2. Resonance search testing perfomed on the meter
. 3. Independent static seismic analyses on the pump and motor.
- Although components are analyzed separately., interfacing l loads are considered.
Generic qualification is performed to SSE accelerations of , 2.1/2.1/2.1 g. Actual plant SSE accelerations are .26/.26/.173 g. Thus, significant seismic margin exists. O i
; 2/5
- 11. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications for Qualification Requirements:
See page 2a !
- a. Seismic Input d. Service Conditions 5
See Design Soecification
- b. See Hydrodynam Item V.ic Load Input e. Qualified Life See Note 1 Pump - 40 years
- c. Fatigue Considerations Motor - 5 years See Itam V.6 Continuous operation 1 year cost accident III. Is Ecuia= ant Available for Inspection in the Plan't:
[x ] Yas [-]No [ ] Partial or limited availability IV. Ecutoment Qualification Method: [ ] Test [ x 3 Analysis (, ] Combination of Test and Analysis Qualification Report:* Pump Siismic Motor Seismic l Structural Integrity & Operability Seismic Analysis (No., Title and Date): Analysis ME-174 Reoort M010201 Company that Prepared Report: Mcdonald Eng. Analysis Co. $TD Ingersoll Rand / l WNTD Company that Reviewed Report: Westinchouse NTD . Where Report is filed or available: W NTD LM aant. sec. III and IEEE 3a4-1975 and Applicable Codes and/or Standards: . ? E-Soecs on oo. 2a r.<n.n no en n s . V. Vibration Input: , , ,
- 1. Loads considered: a. [x ] Seismic only
- b. [ ]Hydrodynamiconly i
- c. [ ] Vibration from norinal operation
- d. [ ] Combination of (a). (b) and (c)
- 2. Method of Combining RRS:
- i l
[ ]AbsoluteSum [x ] SRSS [ ] i (other, specify) See attached i 3. ' Required Response Spectra ** (attach the graphs):
- 1
!!g.13,:
(
' *If more than one report complete items IV thru VII for each report.
**If other than RRS is used, describe method.
i 1 Note 1: The RHR pump is located in a Class 2 system in the auxiliary building - ! and, therefore, is not' subject to any hydrodynamic loads such as LOCA. l !, 2
, m . , . , , , . . - . . , . . - - . , . -
-.v_,.- - , . , . _ _ _ , . , . - .--...,y. -. , . - . . ~ - , , . . . . . . , , ., l) . . . , . . . . , , . , ,.,, -
- l
^
l , 2a/5 l 1 I
- 11. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications for Qualification Requirements
=
E-Spec 678815 Rev. 2 - General Class 2 Pumps l l E-Spec 952494 Rev. 1 - DCP/DDP Addendum to 678815 Rev. 2 j E-Spec 952495 Rev. 0 - DCP/DDP RHR Pumps t } ' i Motor E-Spec 677474 Rev. 0 - Auxiliary Pump Motors ! E-Spec 952456 Rev. 0 - DCP/DDP Addendum to 677470 Rev. O I !O i .
. .?. . ! .~.
1 O e i l i l l 1 i I
. . _ . - - _ , _ . . _ . . ._. . _. _ _ _ _. . . , _ _ - . _ _ . ~ _ _ _ . . _ . , . _ . _ .a . _ _ _ _ _ _ , . _ _ . . . . _ _ _ _ . _ , _ _ _ . , _ _ _ , - . _ _ _ . . _ . _ , . _ . . __
i . I # I 3/5
- 4. Damping Corresponding to Rits: OBE 21 SSE 2%
- 5. Required Acceleration in Each Di-oction:
[x3ZPA [ ]Other (specify) . Note 2 OBE,*S/S 1.05g/.149 p/3 1.059/.149 y . 1.05g/.093g I 2.1g/.269 2.1g/.26g y . 2.1g/.1739 sst *s/s . F/s =
- Generic / Plant Specific .
i 6. idere fatigue effects considered? [ ] Yes [x ] No Not required per ASME Code' for Class 2 components. If yes, describe how they were treated in overall qualification program: l VI. If Qualification hv' Test. than eleta: Not Applicable
- 1. [ 1singleFrequency (,3 Multi-Frequency: random O
- t.,
sine best
%~- : . .
i 2~. " ] Single Axis
- MitattiaAxis!
! ..' J Independent Axis 'c.G D> phase moetont
~- .
3 NuuherofQualificationsTests?. - i SSE Other-j -Ost (specify);
\
l 4. Fmquency Ranger
- 5. - Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side /$fde. Front /Back. Vertical):
j 3/3 = F/5 = ,, V= ,
- 6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies:
~
[ ll.ab Test [ ] In-Situ Test ( ) Analysis l
- 7. TRS enveloping RRE using Multi-Frequency Test Not Applicable i
i r 1 Yes (Attacit TRS & RRS graphs). ' ! [ ] No. . Note 2: Floor response spectra were not generated for Elevation 522' of the Auxiliary Building. The spectra at Elevation 560' are used. Also, since curves at 4% damping are not evailable. 2% damping is used for SSE. i l - . 1 ,
t 1 4/5
~
l 8. Maximum Input g-level Test: . s OBE S/S = NA F/B = NA V= NA SSE S/S = NA F/B = NA V= NA
- 9. Laboratory Mounting:
A. [ ] Solt (No. . S12e ,
)
l [ ]Wald(Length ) [ ] , Orientation and Fixturing: Same as field mounting B.
- 10. Functional operability verified:
[ ]Yes [ ] No [x ] Not Applicable . I 11. Test Results including modifications made: 2 l 12. Other tests perfomed (such as aging or fragility t'est, including results): 1 O '
- 13. ' Failure Modes (if appropriate
. )
4 l 14. ' Margins Available: .[ ]Inputhectrum [ ] Fragility VII. IfQualificationbyAnalysis,thenci$elete: I
- 1. Me'thod of Analysis:
[ x ] Static Analysis '[ ] Equivalent Static Analysis [ ] Time-History [ ]ResponseSpectrum [ ]DynamicAnalysis: i, 2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side Front / Sack, Vertical):
>35 Hz 535 Hz y. 335 Hz l s/s . F/B .
See Note 3
- 3. Model Type: [ ]30 [x 3 2D [ ] 10 Note 4
[ ] Beam
. [ ] Finite Element
[ ] Closed Form Solution [ ] Other O Note 3: The natural frequency of the motor was verified by test to have a natural frequency >37 Hz in all directions. Note 4: The pumps were qualified ,to 3g horizontal and 2g vertical. Per WCAP 8230, these accelerations are equivalent to 2.lg/2.lg/2.lg for 3D comparisons. 4
WECAN (sotor shaft and rotor)' 5/5 l - ICES-STRUDL(frequency)
- 4. [X]ComputerCodes: NASTRAM (finite element of oinnn ca<ina) l
. Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: 21 degrees of freedom over 1 appropriate frequency rance ~
[ x] Hand Calculations - Some stress calculations
- 5. Method of Combining Dynamic Responses from Seismic and other Dynamic Loads:
[ x3 Absolute Sun [ ]SRSS [ ] Other: (specify) i
- 6. Damping N/A 08E N/A SSE N/A Basis for damping used:
- 7. Support Considerations in the model: Acce=a rioid attachment to fniindatinn per as-1nstalled configuration
- 8. Critical Structural.. Elements: ,
1 Governing Load i
.or Response Seismic Total Stress l A. Identification Location C=hination Stress Stress Allowable ;
- Shaft stress Oper. & SSE 13,059 psi 14,400 psi (basedongenericrathed than plant specific loads)
- O .
8. Max. Critical - Maximus Allowable Deflection to Assure Functional Operability M
~
! Deflection l
.00226" rotohsh' aft- .022.." - No adverse effect on operability
~
. y 1
- 9. Failure Modes: None j
[ ]InputSpectrue
- 10. Margins Available: [x 3 Stress or Deflection See Note 5 Note 5: As identified in Item 8.a above, margins between actual and allowable stresses are available. Additionally, Item V.5 provides a comoarison between generic and specific plant values. As noted, there is considerable margin in these values.
i
~ .
! 5
~,--,-,,----,>en-,--e-,------
I WESTINGHOUSE NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY DIVISION TITLs , PAos tot ,hwe Mome And,tWe 15 op 89 1 Paomc7 awrwon onre maru emsco, ev oats I
~ u -~ .ime m m- n,tw n '? ov - dYellE kro. l
. . c. no. m. eso. enov, l i
'2ct. MotNa t MeQ I
(' , , 1
'i fasassetryer so S sr dm.ww d , .
t , , CATAW8A AUX 8 LOG NOR-SOU (X) EARTHQUAKE , RESPONSC ACCELERATION SPECTRA. DSMPING= 0.020 ( ,ei.evAri.N s.o.oD u Ne 1. -i.s e.. , 3 I e \ N o bb k n \.\ l ( yrT W' 1 i , g i . . g h % i i
- h / h s
! ( .
f'
) \, . . .
I
,i .
~
% ~
/ '
,Y m
- i fS C ,
l ' Q%.m Q l
! e.ie e.m . e.se e.m I. . n.se
,. a
* .pgggg gg sm ' . s.se . * .a l h -
C ; i
- m. = = :
l 4, .a = .36 3 .
% .w. -
175g o,,, ,,,,, T.e pre .or ., urs co.., re 80 0 . GATE IBGS?teeGeeGUSS PG#te 188
l ,, 1 i
. j
=
I l s WESTINGHOUSE NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY DIVISION i ? . } (
- TITLS
-n no - ~
#A.E
- u. es
- PM. JECT AWTM.R DATE we g sv OATS elm -wp/w w he WM W.SV h/@DATs j . . p,. .
l m wo - us2 k mar rwa *e $ of e*= rr==4 . C CRTRW8R RUX BLOG ERS-WE5 m ERRTHOURKE l
- nesronst acctLtuTION SPECTM. OpnPING= 0.020 j
( EttynTioN soo+0c LINE x= -tss.o . OBE
! I -
9 o .. 1 l$
' iV a , k l 1 ys ,
- . g ,
i g"
. J' V ) ,
- Q <
( . f:- -
)
~
l'
. l . ( .
- c -
i ..
- 1
%m .. .
n - . . .
- se - * % 14. . a se . *e e esse we s.or . .. a.se , . . . I Me *
.s f ,'s. *. P .' .e s ..
}.
. .'.'.' . . ./. PERim IN MMW,
? . ifG4.
- 5 OtE.
f ! - spp vtst, sas *
! . .q , . a .y i
( W . %m j b.x ! . l'FS - L . awT m sa--- _ . --- . sv safu ema's. sv safs i new. Aav. 88 8 . Safe teOS?l8ess.G U SS PG mas M M
Q RHR Pump A ! Item 1 A summary of the stress calculations at the nozzle to casing interfaces (for both suction and discharge nozzles) is required. Response: Combined stress intensities for the pump casing in th,e regions of nozzle attachments have been clearly identified on pages 14 and 15 of the pump seismic report, ME-174. The combined stress intensities have been determined using a Bijlaard analysti and the guidelines of Welding Research Council Bulletin 107. A comparison between the results and the allowables have been added to the Summary of Results table, page 3 of ME-174 (Attachment A-1). As shown, the allowable stresses are greater than the actual stresses. Item 2 Improved stress calculations in elements 90 and 92 are required as well as a comparison with allowable stresses. Response: The finite element model generated for determining pump casing and cover stresses due to operating pressure and gasket seating loads is judged to be adequate as indicated in Attachment A-2, "RHR Pump Cover Evaluation." All stresses in the regions of co'ncern are acceptable. Attachment A-2 will be placed in the Westinghouse equipment qualification file which will be maintained for the life of the plant.
~ Item 3 A calculation of the critical circular frequency and a check against operational speed is required. The concern of resonance should be addressed.
Response: A critical speed determination has been performed for the shaft / rotor / impeller assembly. The critical speed was found to be 2760 rpm. This is 55% higher than 'the running speed of 1777 rpm. Thus, no response problems will occur. This analysis has been
,5858Q:1D/040284
.__ . . . - - . . . ~ . .
j included in revision 1 of the motor seismic report, M010201. A l copy of the report cover sheet is enclosed as Attachment A-3. This report will be kept in the Westinghouse engineering files. i t i 1 .i . , f 1 i J 4 l 1 I i f i i i i 1 1 i l i 5858Q:10/040284
ATTACHMENT A-1 O I 2. SUM!ARY OF RESULTS A sumary of the results of the detailed calculations is presented for both the OBE and SSE loads. 2.1 Normal + SSE + Maximum Nozzle Loads ACTUAL ALLOWABLE Pump Hold Down Bolts (tensile) 22,671 psi 38,940 psi (shear) 10,969 psi 17,556 psi Support Bracket Stress 26,343 psi 29.160 Support Weld Stress 20,651 psi 28,800 Casing Stress at Support 24,059 psi 48,600 Cooler Bracket Stress 9,875 24,960 (~'} Cooler Bracket Bolt (tensile) 3,043 24,000 Supporting Head Channels 6,164 24,960 Motor Hold Down Bolts (tensile) 16,816 22,838 (shear) 5,605 12,000 Pump Flange Bolts (tensile) 21,518 24,360 Pump Casing Stress 20,067 29,160 Rotor-Stator Clearance .008 in. .051 in. Motor Bearing (upper) 1850 lbs. 9000 lbs. (lower) 3265 13900 Impeller Contact Stress 818 psi 19,440 psi Shaft Stress 10.534 psi 18,000 g F b e e4e. m E N N1t 4 W l;4W (s.i 46,4co p*s
. %cm etzsc mees MtustW 5 775 ps. 48, sco ps' /~'; ,
( < x_. A
m. l ATTACHMENT A-2 l . WESTINGHOUSE NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY DIVISION TITLE PAGE E%4f CLA M4 N N P' VAL 11ET)OM l OF k . PROJECT AUTHOR DATE CH K' . DATE CH K'D. 8 v QATE 5.0. whe w %c. um CALC.NO. 4 9e (I L% N O. n alsh GROUP
- 1 2
Toc e:a +T-cQT- 764 tCT i I j l DEW. 7444. CQAESE CS "THE SF#tt, QtAALtF LCA*T104 kVIEW* Tir. M AGAb6T h M CATAMM CtTE , SOME CCWCEM WE RE cA1:e.b w e. m aEe m.y es x vaunu Emum setet.
"DE.4ELov4.D FoC %ETT.T.MtWtWG STtEcLE:*., 'IluE TO tuTCC.uAL PWMCE I
Ab C9 T se AmuG t.oAbt vca. Tuc sh4e. psrMPS , tw Motx.L I cF rue MtMP coggf. tu Tus. Acr% cp Twi stuwsgG tox. wAt. cLAtuo To 'tE of Too coAELCC A ME:5R TO ACCaCA TEN'T j D e C:'.R TEE tw E EFEct5 CF Tue. GEOMETbC 'btScouTidtatiT, "TME l CE::tAs. tS Foc. W.LCMEWt1 90 Attb 92 AEE sd Q d E LT\Ct.1. a l i "ThE MCbCL s5 AwAS$mc12tc, cousTgAc.TW.D W \T4 MA1,TtA4.1 \Soe'BakmCT-tc. ELEMEw"TS . RAbiA4 g CtacavT\FungMTUM ) AWM Aub SAE.AC. STREN ACE. "DETEtthnutb A"T FtME PDieJTL su EAc.ar4 E M E4Tj j AT E A 4a4 BC "t%C Rum ccCuaLT.1 Aub AT T)M". n.EMOLT
- comu:n. . iT is Acs:weatstsen ry AT sTecres AT csc m u uctet 1
, AEC. GOiuds "TO M luF* t**F@ 'IM h@C. D40GOMTIMLAt'nC ,
1 A"t "Tbirti:LE "bttccuisutAiTitS, mE STcc1S FiE1.DS wiLL werT TC m o Gcu echtt, rw s is m.: tuucecnT FeTues es: FigiTE l 1Es.CMGMT' AuAa.Ntis Aub WLLL ut0T MC MA11EC. 404 WiuE
; A Met.A \% uCtt) .
M4 @Jd AT A MM
- TWAT gS COMMed TC .%.h EVEMgett0 CALL %E. f.4ASCM All,bV PCEbiCTED 1!K M E.T.AG t M G "TV E EE'at:TS CF ntatt woter F2cM Ocd Et.Em E4T". 9'oc. CAMA.E ,
"Ikt. STCECS AT WC'DC 17.C wunc.4 15 CDMuou TO Es.ce,M 42., 9.5 Aub QS Aut un0C AT A McowTintALTM , CAM
%4'. 'DE',TeteAtN ED AS 90LLDLOL i l
I i p g y, pg y, AUTHOR Daft CMn'O. e v OATE CM n'O. s v OATE NO. DATE WESTINOMOUSS PORM 968130 0 4
. WESTINGHOUSE NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY DIVISION TITLE .
PAGE PROJECT C it_ % kA4 cC\ld. EslA1_L1 MOM AUTHOR OATE CHK' .Y DATE CH n'O. S Y Z OP h DATE S.C. bcp/ rep r_w w uc Maldare 0,, 21tala CA LC. NO. '
FI LE NO. GROUP 20e, ec +T-e r -7 s 4 eat FEom %E C-n OF SECmic, Etibe.T ME -G4 CCmE rHE" '
E
- S m .7 5 voc cote. i25 tlND4 cut 42.
9.Ab i AL
- 32,63 S gi CiccaMFccOATW.* 20,419 PSL MiAL =t4,459 ni S cwe - 14 S 3 m ELCmERT C3 EKbi A
- 16;D4 h PS L C tG C a m F E DE D a m pd.
15,29"I PS 4. Am AL
- 7033 M C WckC.
- S( 9 % F5 d l
EtemeuT 95 EA% AL. * \ I 7.o+ psi 1 c.th64 stab 4Ts A' 1E,45l 95L A%4 AL
- 12,070 1"G Set.AR ' - B ~li"2. PSI.
AxcstA4.in Twc sc.uctr., %W'. CADS AL ' zt(43 3 Mi cie.4umFee.EunAts 1(,, SSI. Mi AuAL
- 11 2T4 P5; 3 s a cNe. * - 5 m(, ml O
REV. R E V. AUTHOR DATE CHn'O. 5 V OATE CHE'O. s v OATE NO. DATE ' WESTINGMOUSE FORM SS2130 i
, - - - - .n. . - _ -
-h A WESTINGHOUSE NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY DIVISION TITLE PAGE t en pum4 colee. Evh Anoa J5 Os 9 PROJECT AUTMOR DATE CMetD BY DATE C M E* D. e f DATE S.0.
trp/dBP wed V.amec. skelse-CALC. NO. w06 TILE NO. Iz.s/sv GROUP ZCL EC .T- EDT
- 709 E'tTT THE M Av tMu M ~ Fe.iuc.iFAd., sree53 EQuA7scna t S *.
Ci.-6tt\2. Tg = Gitz,@- + l b 2 ',) +T. 2 N 3 2t AG3 + R2' 4 4 ::1 f.9 5 - u 2M- 7-
& (5%G)2-a g '
7 N.) U's
- 22,SG R,i BELAuSC CF M "Discou r iMuiTM A TCCTICu CS "TUC W 65 A Pr W c4 SEccubN19 Orte:S , TwC. PECf.CMGE 15 Vu240W G , WCWEucP , EVO.1 "Tud VAtus, t0 LtL*. ~TVh1 nty
; Pcimprf.H mCmtcMC. M Pe mAe4 Ecubi4 Au.owAELE cf leS S * (.J.S bG,2co) # 24,'500 95i , Foh Sgt.co.CAC.4 CM1EO j ! Twf ALLf.uAELE. \t, 5.05 = 49,foco PS L . =
1 ENCu *Tw:uGu tyc VAcuc of Cg: 2."A,$5 2. P!is. 15 A CEDfCcwAELC P 2 4r b ic.Ti o 4 , 1T 4 CESThiu ~1kett ~@gmALTC OSTAgunEb F2cM A l MORC DCMSCW )Atr.,4<3) Moth.t,. Woutb LLCT EA.CCEb "TVE. 5.0 S k.LcwAT.LE ,
*n*C ST124*J NT uC&C 42 0 3 MgCt4 45 COMMDM 'TO MELO4 tuts Cil , 90 Aub Q2 3 WiLL ALso gc sNALL(AM Stuci, si u n g Ay A bitc ouTigu s Ty ,
Et.Emo4T AI CA% AL. e go 12. RK 9 CiRCumFC9EMT)AL.* 4CC P5i Av.iAL.= 2c(.2. Pr.i sM4. : '51s 6 95C ggy, p g y, AUTHOR DATE CM E'O. S V DATE CME'D.SV DATE NO. DATE WEtilNOMOUSS PORM SS3:30
.. - -__ ...__.. ~ . . - - - _ . . . _ . - _ _ _ _ - , _ _. -_ .--- . _ . - .. __ . . . _ _ - . - . . . .
. _ . . _ . . _ _ . .~ ~
I 4 - WESTINGHOUSE NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY DIVISION j I i TITLE PAGE l T.M Nmd CDW OS- 1%tM A n C>=L 4 08 9 PROJECT AuTMom DATE CMK D y DATE CHK D.ev OATE M P[h @ ' w d_ idhME%ALL ibm ~M I 2A 4 , 5.0. CALC.NO. 4MT.E No. ' GROUP j Tor, OT-s. rat 799 t%%T I l LW AD l l SAbi AL * "$ g 1S fTd l { 1 CtScum FoccuTn At 5 - W5o gc j A%i AL * - 4 9. P'd s w = -sies esJ
- r s
- ELEMem&T' W l 1RA% Ai ' -t 1,450 P50 .
( csscumece.cun m - % w, esi A%i As * -l3,4 11 95i i 5p gaat. * % 4 v%s t j A9 f EA64WG n+C CeGA% Mi(t."DS '. t j .. RA.b A L.,, *
- (. S IGI PS n' f CiEcumFG44EuTtNL. * - 4412. P5i.
l Awa An " -(.SS8 El woe. = - 4 M J
\
~
I
- W\b (m & ,
- s i
i
~(OWS h 1
l M id "N n' Mkk.LAE. Ib Y80 bCO M "fM. 9DMAWON IYlEM6CAN j N A: P a w need^l 1L c 4 b t u f. AAAM.c 0F ' t.E C
- 24,300 PSI ,
l REv. ne v. AufMom OAft CMr0.ev OATS CHKo.sv oatt .1 NO. DATE WESTINOMOWSE POmW 582130
~e e g- r -imm.-eei - - = .-w. .,
wp-<w -=w---+-- w -,y,e,s. . - . g- 2.- - 4 - . y-,-.- y y , --.y r e- y +i-
.. - ~. . -.
WESTINGHOUSE NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY DIVISION TITLE PAGE CM. %AM@ C DV Ct!! ENL "Mt0W 5 os 9 s PROJECT AUTHOR DAT5 cpr.*0 sy O A T E'CH K'O. a v DATE 5.0. b pinee - m , = n e/s4 CALC.NO. w.00. w . WILE No. alts/se I GROUP Tot, cl+T -eat naq EGtT AG Atu .OuC S@nt.b K.E E P s W. N\ tub T+E APPLtCABLE UDAbsuc. Ccubitio4. ms FN),M(3 cCMCC. 15 Cu8dec.T it oubM t uTe:.a.i A L. pecy.tAuuE. Aub GA%CT SezenUG LOADS, ME LOANS Acc. tTAnc tu NortwcE, twts ucT of A, 4tGe 1 CVCLic. MAmACE . twE. VDu.AJIMG \5. Th4DA FCC W T)+E \9 H AsmE EDb6 , SEtT\CM 3r , ,W1b- 32 lT,. \ , I "IN"Wid. ST1Ec5S \t tirdT suCA W. CF tTCESS WMLCh4 l st AbbiTWC tc 'TrW FAmAAf- NG- SucesJbA4' Cnacssc5 2H CEAScu oC t.CCM thTsutAs TnE S CC. local Twe.auau tTec:.S guct.unuaG rwe EFFcc.TS cf
? Tee 55 ccucO4T1t.AT10MS, m42. 'tbAStc. cmTg/ tsmc.
i C G A. FICA <- STec5S d Tw* t \T ht 9tsT CAUSE I . MM NOTICEASA.E. btS10ETnO4 ,NuD \* C?.4E.r204 A't.Ull' C ut >( AS A- p c E St 2,s E W R C E o G A 'FA tsG.tAE. cCM.4 cc. EC.ivtLG. FCA4 Tt42.E', "' T tt. LCAbtMG CCUD n~ Tit >l s'a g\. LOT N'h-NE 'to FATY,v.c cit. BCn'fbE NnLA*C. Er.#.9 Fdmen' F.AAtJtt. TED '10 A SqdcCTt\nc, 7t'LT- A t-i SO '/. Cf "btCLGaJ P S.t",C tA d C . WEVC8- WE AM'f FArtudE1
~
of RLme Covec.0 Eco.1 E440C404c. rib, me H tEPf$ CF Su Cr.t:SS P.AL CPasAmcu A c t ' A s.1 0 &fRW.mVC cF- tye
'VA2 neh MtGd ?.cu6 t'Nrcd 6TC .
R E V. MEV. Auf t909 CA)E GHn'O. B Y DATE CME'D.gv DATE i NO. DATE l
.E.1 N o ou.E ,.. .. m o
e -- p 9 A +h s e WESTINGHOUSE NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY DIVISION 1 TITLE PAGE EM MS fotrEDd EV ALu hTceJ P RoJECT AUTMom OATE CMn* G oP 9 OATE CMn'O. e v DATE bcWDDP uW tecusc.? helm 77.un _ _h Gl28l%9 s.o. CALC. No. TOLE mo. I onouP 2 e C. EO+T- sani 704 t"Il-T
\LL Summa. nod , ng mmTE cucmW otoben GcuexATk..p FC C DL"'.NDLM LN (k16 TMM4 CAOtuG M Ccn/tDP M6-a 4 buE. % OVCLMnWG PEECLuCC Aub GA54CT seu:nMG LoAbS 15 JubCCb % 1!.C AbWQAMC , YE4mercM meM6cW TN.a!.
F%mM9 T,CubiuG R.at *Mii.cg>Stad.N sticEss tcTecmgMCb AT s.caTuaJS of GECMEDf.4C. bt!,COMTwiunTV AOC. YouMD TC
%C LES"ntMS A l.G E ALLO 4ASLE t!N cM "TMo46. e4 A
~6 O S A.t.LO W A % L2. \S Ju!.B F t A15LC . A modtr bc4E. Mt.C4 Ndoutb CusN "iBrr WAddAuTCb FOR WA1.AAnuG chc cc.
M r.m ah. to A b su G Coutenou% .
; SuMbd M MG.ed hm MN CE TkC TNA wie cbJ r.4 ,
i d i I 4 i O R E V. R E V. AUTHOm DATE CMn*D. s v DATE CM n'D. s v DATE NO. DATE wtSTINOMOUSE PORM SS2130
I ( _ __ _ _ _ . - . _ . . . __-- -- - - . - WESTINGHOUSE NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY DIVISION l l TITLE PAGE b f_ NEAN CfN M EVarLL4 AN PROJE CT AUTHOR DATE CH K"D. BY 7 OF h OATE CH K*D. S V DATE S.O. wine w~ -- sin CA LC. NO. 92R alalev mMLE NO.
~
GROUP 2cL EQvT-Emrr- 799 W 101 102 g acL7 CIMCL C l19 l100
/,, l,.
/,, l ,6
. . 103 88 90 12 93 14 69 70 75 76 78 83 04 68 71 71 77 7 85 89 31
,2*' 00 86 ,
4 65' ,
/ 66 61 62 61 '
\ 60 h 39 C1 \58 l 57 N6l 55 h 56 Sk 52
\51 \ 50k Figure 3 - FiLite Element Computer Model
\is\ . \
\.7\.6\
\'\ \ .
y>\>\ . i NNN y, x 3. A M/ n\ i3 @yL5 ' Ny 3, n 2 .. ia _ N 26 23 As I? 19 16 I$
\'/ 13 52 .
11 10 m s e i
. J l
, 3 *%
p/j s_ 1 . R E V. R E V. AUTHOR DATE CH K' D. S Y DATE CH K'D. S V DATE NO. DATE-WESTINGHOUSE FORM 582130 < s
-s 4
WESTINGHOUSE NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY DIVISION TITLE PAGE M PtA %40 COWED. ENilt 11 ATObj . OF 9 PROJECT AUTHOR OATE CHK'O y DATE CH K'D. S V OATE kP/ CDP vi*f OswcwC 'hel1B+ / 4am_ d[24/8/ S.O. CALC. NO. TILE NO. ' GROUP 2 0C. Ef2+T- E QT '7 d EZ77 e,
@t M,@ @
9
's 5 N N 1 . e 1
i i
@ e
\l 9- e 9 - I
@ E l .= . ,
=
. . =. .
i - 1 I i 1 - N R E V. REV. AUTHOR OATE CHK*D. S V DATE CH K* D. B Y DATE NO. DATE WESTINGHOUSE FORM 882130
. -m._ --
i WESTINGHOUSE NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY DIVISION TIT LE PAGE CM Drtt1@ CINM tan _y_ amtsj PROJE CT AUTHOR OATE CH K'O. av 0 TE CH K'O. S Y 9 Op 9 DATE DP[bbP MAf( @evucutC. M 2 S.O. CALC.NO. TIL E'N O. GROUP , za. coer . car 799 ERT C-17 2
. 32.. .. . 2. .. 3 .... .... ... .. 2. 2.... .... ..... .... .3 .3 2 ....
13 .
. 3.:3:2
.. - ~ . : ."**
- 88. .I.22 =
~.
3:3.:7 * :** =.=I..gr. 3~.~.. J -. . ... I.:ssI
=.==z.=
. 1~ . . ..
. ~ . . . .. -.. $. . . .~ ... .... 3~~-.. . . ~ . -..
~ 3
. .~
~
.~
~
. . E.... ...
e e. ---e
..... .. ~ . ~. . .~ .. ~.~.
v. e ! E .
=
. m
=
. 2..X .. .. .....
. .. ...~. ..
.~ .
~~
. . .~ . ..... ..
... . . 2 ... ...
- 3. 3 . .
e.3 3.~ ~.. t .. .
~ 2 3~....
\ .
.. ...-~. 3. . ~ ~ . . ~
g . ... g.... . ... . . . .
.~ ......
.g~.....~..
.~.
A 3 . g , i
*: . 33
. . .. . 3....
.... ... -- .$. .. er. 3 . ...$. ... . . .$... ... ....
~.Y ..
3.... . e....
...S....
.3...
,~~2t.e~ S.
.3
. .~
3 ~ ~.
.E- .e.t.. .s..-
. . E.. .......... .....
.~.. . 3. ... .. .. -.
. ....* .~....
. ... .. . .. 3. 32
~. . .
.. .... .... . . . . . . . ~ . ...
5 . r . y *
- ...K.
..ee. 3 ... ..... ... ....~ . -
8 . ** 12 373** *Tk7. 3 *S*$ ;. .* 5. . ;. 3 * . 3 3 : 31 53.:**
. . ~. 3... ...=.~ . ~ . . . ,
..-~ ~.F,.~ . . ..
~. . K.
- a. .t k a.
- 3. .....2... .... ..... ..... ..-. .-. ..
. e....
.-~ . -,... . ... .. . .. .. ..
.,... 8 . -
. . . . . ~ . ~ . . ..S.,.. . . ... . ,
.=.=- . -. .... . .... .
.. .=~
4 I .
. .e g gg .*a.. ....e -~ ee ==... ..... . ... ..... . ...
.e .
l 1 I e I- E $ $ l . .
$ 3
( M E V. M E V. AUTMOR OATE CM E'O. B y . DATE CM K'O. B y DATE i NO. DATE l wesTINGTOUSE FORM SS2130 I l g T t , 9
-m . - . - -
4 ,.Q- ,,- m - , . . .
ATTACHEMNT A-3 WESTINGHOUSE NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY DIVISION TsTLE Pact WC CuuP MCTtC AuALH*al 1 OF O S. PROJE CT AUTMOR DATE CM K'O. 8 Y DATE CMK*D 8V OATE G AE.lGt.E" 'DCP/t:C@ WCL <uAmsc. 1219122 5.0. CALC.NO. FILE NO. GROUP M nosc2ci meO 1!E5 BELT dC. Moto2Ci 1!!E4. I S.G.CMAC, AS4ALMEC WERHP T W TVE. Gee /GGE-D.P/bte GLAR WMP MC7CAS v1 C NC,0Cu".E. E\.gWtc. Ccf P. O 9.O. 1!c% tc.6 P AC4 4 , TW, iS230 see.necc. w : 1 h & H e .1 or h as=
\ % I hNkh smyss.d w ". 1ff' v' 'd."'. d 3!-
/
O V REV REV AUTHOR OATE "O. Y OATE CM K*0. S Y DATE . NO. [ 0 TE 6 % MC k2bf94 y
, h
- g3gg4 WESTINGMouSE FORM ESJ130 l
SPECIFIC ITEM #8 CONTROL ROOM AH UNIT FAN / MOTOR PART 1: SQRT form should be revised to show correct model number. STATUS: This item is complete. RESOLUTION
SUMMARY
- The correct model number is shown on the SQRT form which follows this page.
a PART 2: SQRT form should be revised to show the correct bolt size. STATUS: This item is complete. RESOLUTION
SUMMARY
- The correct bolt size is shown on the SQRT form which follows this page.
j PART 3: A letter is needed from Reliance Electric which clarifies l the motor seismic test report with regard to the method of calculating critical speed and the units used in a data table. i STATUS: This item has been completed by Reliance Electric. RESOLUTION
SUMMARY
- See attached letter from Thomas L. Gruber of Reliance Electric to Joseph Voglewede of Duke Power Company dated
. March 16, 1984. O l
l RELIANCE ELECTRIC S i General Offices 24701 Euclid Avenue Cleveland. Ohio 44117 March 16, 1984 216-266-7000 Duke Power Company P.O. Box 33109 Charlotte, North Carolina 28242 Attn: Mr. Joseph Voglewede
Subject:
Reliance Seismic Analysis #81-b-A-26 and phone conversation of 3-15-84.
Dear Joe,
The following should answer the questions which the NRC auditor posed concerning the subject seismic analysis.
- 1. The critical speed calculation is based on the Mycklestad-Prohl method.
/%
( 2. In this report loads are measured in pounds, critical N- speed in rpm, and linear dimensions are in inches.
- 3. The figures which represent the rotating element of the motor are generic. However, each individual seismic report has the stations (length, diameter and weight) identified with values appropriate to each specific motor design and
. application. Note: the computer assumes'that the rotating assembly is of steel construction and includes this data automatically. Any additional masses such as motor rotor or interface sheave must be added as input values.
- 4. Dc!t effect shaft loads or other external loads applied to the motor are input parameters to the program. The program then calculates seismic stresses and adds them to any operat:nq stresses which area result of the motor application to determine the final stress levels.
The subject seismic report is typical of all seismic reports for NEMA sire motors. As a result, the above comments will apply generically to all similar reports. Should you have any Further questions please feel free to contact me. _ Very truly yo trs,
%J' /
- homas L. Gru er Product Manager, Utilities CC
- John Early - RGO l l
Buster Youngs - RCR l
1 e l Seismic and Dynamic Qualification Summary of Equipment MDSS I. Plant Name: Catawba TYPE:
- 1. Utility: Duke Power Co PWR: J i 2. NSSS: Westinghouse BWR:
- 3. A/E: N/A Other II. Component Name: Control Room Air Handling Unit Fan
- 1. Scope: [ ] NSSS [))B0P [ ] Other
- 2. Model Number: 39ED39 Quantity: 2
- 3. Size or Range: 26,000 CFM
- 4. Vendor: Carrier Corp
~
- 5. If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model Number of the j devices included: ASME III Code Case 1607-1, ASME III Subsection NF (No Date)
() 6. Physical
Description:
- a. Appearance: Air Handling Unit i
- b. Dimensions: 11'-9 " x 9'-11" x 5'-5 "
- c. Weight: Operating Weight -'7810 lbs 1
- 7. Location: Building: Aux Bldg.
Elevation: Elev. 594'-0"
- 8. Field Mounting Conditions [ X ] Bolt (No. 16 5/8" )
[ ]' Weld (Leng F , Size ) 3 [ ] - -
- 9. Mounting Orientation [e.g. , on floor, cantilevered, suspended, etc.]
Floor Mounted
- 10. a. System is which located: VC
- b. Functional
Description:
Maintains Control Room Temperature
- c. Is the equipment required for-[ ] Hot Standby [. ] Cold Shutdown O [. ] Both [- ] Neither [ X ] Other All Conditions EL40115D/1- ,
g e.- w e-e- + w- y 3 ,a .,- + - - -
1
\
l
- 11. Pertinent Reference / Design Specifications for Qualification
- Requirements
- CNS-1211.00-9 Seismic Input d. Service Co'nditions
- b. Hydrodynamic l.oad Input e. Qualified Life
- c. Fatigue Considerations
, III. Is Equipment Available for Inspection in the Plant: [ ] ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Partial or limited availability
- IV. Equipment Qualification Method
[ ] Test [ / ] Analysis [ ] Combination of Test and Analysis Qualification Report *: CNM 1211.00-423
- (No', Title and Date)
- Seismic Qualification Report of Control Room Area AHU's for CNS l Company that Prepared Report: Corporate Consulting & Development Co.
l Company that Reviewed Report: Duke Power Company i Where Report is filed or available: Duke Power Co. Design Engineering . Applicable Codes And/0r Standards: N/A. V. Vibration Input:
- 1. Loads considered: a. [ ] Seismic only l
- b. [ ] Hydrodynamic only
- c. [ ] Vibration from. normal operation
- d. [ ] ] Combination of (a), (b), and (if)~
- 2. Method of Combining RRS:
[ ] Absolute Sum [ ] ] SRSS -[ ] , (other,.specify)
- 3. Required Response. Spectra ** (attach the graphs): See Attachment
\
NOTE: 7 f more thsn one report complete items IV thru VII for each report. i **If other than RRS is used, describe method. t EL401150/2
--=.- -
() 4. 5. Damping Corresponding to RRS: Required' Acceleration in Each Direct: OBE 2% -SSE 2% i [-J ] ZPA [ ] Other (specify) OBE N/S = 0.33G E/W = 0.325G V= 0.13G 2 SSE S/S = 0.62G F/B = 0.62G V= 0.244G
- 6. Were fatigue effects considered:
[ ] Yes [ J ] No If yes, describe how they were treated in overall qualification program: VI. If Qualification by Test, then Complete: N/A
- 1. [ ] Single Frequency [ ] Multi-Frequency [ ] random
! [ ] sine beat (::) ' 3
; 2. [ ] Single Axis [ .] Multi-Frequency
[ ] Independent Axis [ ] In phase motions
- 3. Number of Qualifications Tests:
j OBE SSE Other. (specify)
- 4. Frequency Range:
- 5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction-(Side / Side, Front /Back, Vertical):
i S/S = F/B = V =-
- 6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies
[ ] Lab Test [ .] In-Situ' Test- [ ~ L]~ Analysis
- 7. TRS_ enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test.
I- [. ] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs)-
- [ -] No-EL401150/3
,,- n , -
nn e - e
- 8. Maximum Input g Level Test:
V= OBE S/S = F/B = i i
- SSE S/S = .F/B = V=
- 9. Laboratory Mounting:
i A. [ ] Bolt (No. , Size ) [ .] Weld (Length ) [ ]
- B. Orientation and Fixturing:
- 10. Functional Operability verified:
[ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable
- 11. Test Results including modifications made:
4
- 12. Other tests performed (such as aging or fragility test, including i
results): !O 13. Failure Modes (If appropriate ) , 14. Margins Available: [ ] Input Spectrum [ ] Fragility VII. If Qualification by Analysis, then complete:
- 1. Method of Analysis:
] Static Analysis
[ [ ] Equivalent Static Analysis [ ] ] Dynamic Analysis: [ ] Time-History [ ] Response Spectrum-f 2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side,-Front /Back, Vertical):
- Fundamental Mode has a natural frequency of 16 Hz.
S/S = F/B = V= [
- 3. Model Type: [- -] 3D ] 2D . [l -]-10. .
i [ ] ] Finite Element '[ '] Beam , [. -] Closed Form Solution [ J ] Other Modal Analysis [- . I O EL401150/4 -
.1 I
l l ()'
- 4. [ J ] Computer Codes: STARDYNE Frequency Range and No. of modes 1 to 29 Hz, 4
[ ] ] Hand Calculations
- 5. Method of Combining Dynamic Responses from Seismic and Other Dynamic Loads:
[ J ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS [ ] Other: (specify)
- 6. Damping:
OBE 2% SSE 2% Basis for the damping used: Spec
- 7. Support Considerations in the model: Unit Anchor Bolt.s e
- 8. Critical Structural Elements:
Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location Combination Stress Stress Allowable Unit Anchor Bottom Tensile -- 3,065 psi 20,000 psi Bolts of unit- Shear --- 5,863 psi 10,000 psi B. Maximum Critical Maximum Allowable Deflection ' i Deflection Location to Assure Functional Operability N/A N/A
- 9. Failure Modes: N/A 4
- 10. Margins Available: [ ] Input Spectrum [ J ] Stress or Deflection t
6 . O) R., ( , 1 l' EL401150/5 t- l l
.)
\
1
_ , _ _ _ , _ , , _ _ . . _ - - . . - - - - - - - - - ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ g ... . = is . . t l~ ' c o'
.d
.d - -
2 - .. i 6 : .'.
.c . n ..
ca 3 3.*
.s
% n ..*
Io -; LIJ :a 2=. [ - v- e ' .: 320n - C o . G :: . ,, 0=
** e :-
. . / ..
--) OI %
e 24: .
/
- 3 %.? -! c f.f.t.!
. ~
- Oo n4;3
..k I .
2 . **e 21*.i . HO t :5 . a 'l : . - o
, cc 5 3
- ee:
IES 9 5.5505 - I 9-si - exe yC _a
- ::::: :.e .:::-
, n .u. .a.a a. :a a.s .a
. : * *$ o ,.
n .C,l. - e - / ~ y -- - -.. . en l a
~ C p
. ao a
l o tn
. .A .7 o
~~ t a
@ .- I Ld tij C N [ j
-, rr N 7.
\
l[ ~ h. s (f) La 11 [' " anx > 'o -] to W - r/ = LO ' ta ZZ l c. o *~
) * ,
C . -. __J - O l- . < . ll[ . J (} a - CO tu o
. R
] +. .
/ -o X Lu f .
/, - ~
O U O) .
. c- U l.fr .
/
/
z .k : r . _ .: . _ ' c to o ,= . CD en .-.
-- 2 p w_ .
.g Q - - - -. - - =}. _ N d c c_. >C
' "1 W in td l
C td I % u e tu l
\-
-} m-l Oh*! 02*! 00*t . 00'0 09'0 s
s , ; . s. 0 NI ' US *NOI1.UUJ13336 3SN0dS3U O li'O 02*0 00 @ E . . "- p . MN-SAG-Des ign Cri terii-78-6.2 V
't '
APPENDIX A .- i
. Page 2
- 1 .
t . 6 e l i "
, ~
.*p
, +# e
.* e
- 4 v- n - , -- w -- w - , - - - . . , - -
,r . .
W o
. tt .
2 .O .
} { ~
. . J. . I ,,
=D . . .
E3 S. ;
- ;n: t u.:: .
-> u e -
.a--- 3::1 - } .;). -
- 8 ,= _- . ,, u w : 5. 3B cd?"
J- " M - .S.- -e- a. t:r: . _ C *
- Si t; ..:;. -
- o -
ll 2.". .i.' a{. -*. . /
-) N
;;:;- g 3,.
/-
t3 o r . 1 I y sq .g.ra5;; q / H U =
. 3 5 3~
- t.33, i U.
CC . :* 3 ::::-- 4 . C a, r 5 3023 :n ;, 3 d e. WZ o o o _.
-a ; .
*Im Q_
h.
/ n us ca
- . / u =
.x. a. o I f -= ,1 i)
C.J l $
/ - '8 as D a m tn -
t I / en G ,.* - / (. 5 m ,/9 *' fC - n, I ui_ -
.': la, -
I to u-o n_ li - / y
./ j z t.n > '
I
-= to o z-(d o - .-.
C' t l. y
)C .
/ N.
U1 $, $
._ + . / -
X tu -r '/ .~ _> u cn 1 o en - - - - - - "
'- d, .u
~ ,
c1 2 --
. o tut a_ -
l_ _ _ ~ _ -' ~ ~ ~ ~ _ __ 3 ,. g co n .--
!: 2_ T j i
,c R.s- t:- --t
. c g .io u wtx w c_w T. n -.
is !' Ort ch L oz t O HIco i,US ,co o c9 o on o og o ca./ ' e"..
. . NOI1UU31333U 3SN0dS3U
. I I '.
. MN-SA G-De s i gn'. C r i te r17-78-6.2
.A PPEND IX 'A- .
O *
. . Pa ge .3
- f. .r. . . . . ..
9 .
. . . s t .
I
.e. . .. ,,
l .
.( /\
l~ 7 \ s
.QQ . , .,.. ' l.\ . qd xh' .l .a S r'.s L.{ t"Ig. . .y y '
.h,s.-s.f.*le. ./\- . ,.[. .
- i. , /N j
- s. 4 w. _
'N /' ' y/
,e /
'/ l/N 'J /
; (f -
\[
./ ,
s,k , s/ \ ,s IN i '\ 1) sj\'. 7 lQ 7 i ..
. 'o ??? '
. X' /L ' ^
%i l N'o / \ 1[/ ./Nf i/N \lV k \j
- - /. ' L -~ v. l ' Wi , . . / - ,.*.'
\ h'\s.'6~} i- IN 25 1jdIN5NG3
l' t 5 V I /- i % ,,,' -
*'"~ 24/V /~Of~~
Ih.4.2.'.EL. i R M.'..L'bY N /DAx T'/2 YN, N. 'W'V e
- M-.->
I") .\ .2 f ': \
.1 d}
x--4u/ -
'.;.44./ & . .% , , . ,
j. i x x i x_. 1. V x. zu
. .d.
/hfI/t
~' .
' Ground Response Spectra applicabic to O
* \ Y 'N .
three-di rection s imul taneous scismic j 3 .. , / s'.}f/-a. j /.'_D - U , J'.$. .
' ./' \ _s- s excitation (constructed in accordance
, ../. . - #
with Reg. Guide 1.60, Revision l) N
\
2 \
'O N/ s
$/[
4
' N S
i
'l Jr, ' 9h_ ,l
_/ N. ' w.s N- -b+q t.- r . N( ! p[ d.x A(isy)\ / !Q .[>' '.f f . ' Y / I k ' p ,, /t ,:. .c n's.> s /s,..:s . 1 ay . o" \7 / L r . t .,N '? '
/, i
. \..
'r ..nT ' \h/ '// [/ X
< k %.? ' J
/, h;~QqX.. :
$ '8 .. 1 } '2/,I. . [N N L. '
s_\ f '<j'l/i I X/h// l'\/ /h /NJ Y \ %,7_/ M'[/ /[/ ., hIY
!,'h (~~ /
N YYl'^[\/ I/ X l/\ IX, Y\ 'h'i'.!_1/ l/'l ' Nil \ X / P )" 'j b i j / 'N
.6 - !bb YDY. "'W 5f}l-.:
Ly
'h'/i'b.UX/rx' X /\lX Y'Qgli99p 'g[>qVikO Z 's .
\ '-
,~ '
o % l_ i _. i *o / ' hh /. y ! ,' _ 1._
. _ _ , 'N h ,. .
h
.2 7-- - , o<
, 3, y' '
_ 8 k / , 4 ' # g/ q,::.:ar.w!! s
.s:~m rtwdu.rm:,,:. .w, .:t:r . s w, .v.o*
?,9
)
/' / /0 LAW ENGINEERING TEST;NG COL
- PAN'r b !
fN 'Co., b ,rM . j/ #o '
,i
/ y lh'lgj j/ pdh, CATAWDA NUCt. EAR STATION
,.,, s o, v l,- gg) m .l _ A t 2
/
i.
;%, g
.. .L',/. o A . .' Na..-n.s r. .-;n =,,M. r .,. =
Figure 2E . 2C
.o. .=.
A i n.= . .; n. ..; , ' U 0.050.07 0.1 0.2 0.3 A.: - 4s,si i ' 0.5 0.7 : 1.0 2.0 3.0 Undamped Period (Sec.) ria MN-5AG-Des Appendix A ign Critgage-{8-6.2 sc-
i Seismic and Dynamic Qualification Summary of Equipment . I. Plant Name: Catawba TYPE:
- 1. Utility: Duke Power PWR: J
- 2. NSSS: Westinghouse BWR:
i
- 3. A/E: Duke Power Other II. Component Name: Control Room Air Handling Unit Fan Motor
- 1. Scope: [ ] NSSS [ ] ] B0P [ ] Other
! 2. Model Number: 326T Quantity: 1 per unit 2 l
- 3. Size or Range: 50 HP
- 4. Vendor
- Reliance
- 5. If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model Number of the devices included:
1 N/A
- 6. Physical
Description:
- a. Appearance
- Fan Motor - horizontally mounted
- b. Dimensions: 27.5" long X 15.5" wide X 16.25" high
! c. Weight: 500 lb
- 7. Location: Building: Auxiliary Elevation: 594
-8. Field Mounting Conditions [ ] ] Bolt (No. 4 ,' Size .625)
[ ] Weld (Length- ) q [ -] t
- 9. Mounting Orientation [e.g., on floor, cantilevered, suspended, etc.]-
Mounted on fan base , 10. a. System is which located: Aux. Building Ventilation (VA)
- b. Functional
Description:
Emergency Exhaust of ESG Area
- c. Is the equipment required for [
] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdown:
I [ ] Both [ ] Neither- '[ ] ] Other'LOCA EL40114W/1 0
---,r ~ -------,-r--,n..,-,,
, - .--,. ,,-. ,- - , - + . ,,
i i
- 11. Pertinent Reference / Design Specifications for Qualification 1 Requirements
- CNS 1393.00-1, CNS1320.53-6
- a. Seismic Input d. Service Conditions
- b. Hydrodynamic Load Input e. Qualified Life
- c. Fatigue Considerations III. Is Equipment Available for Inspection in the Plant:
[ J ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Partial or limited availability -
- IV. Equipment Qualification Method:
[ ] Test [ J ] Analysis- [ ] Combination of Test and Analysis Qualification Report *: yes (No., Title and Date): 8 lb-A-26 Summary Report Seisman Analysis of Horizontal, Foot Mounted Electric Motor 10/20/81 Company that Prepared Report: Reliance Company that Reviewed Report: Duke Power Where Report is filed or available: 'DE File # CNM1320.53-0042 l Applicable Codes And/0r Standards: IEEE344-1975 1 V. Vibration Input:
- 1. Loads considered: a. [ ] ] Seismic only 4 b. [ ] Hydrodynamic only
- c. [ ] Vibration from normal operation
'd. [ ] Combination of (a), (b), and'(c) l
- 2. Method of Combining RRS:
l [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS [))N/A
; (other, specify) l 3. Required Response Spectra ** (attach the graphs): See Attached
~
NOTE: 7f more than one report complete items IV- thru VII for each report.
**If other than RRS is used,. describe method.
EL40114W/2
~ , , . , .
l
- 4. Damping Corresponding to RRS: OBE 1% SSE 1%
- 5. Required Acceleration in Each Direct:
[ / ] ZPA [ ] Other . (specify) OBE S/S = .5 F/B = .5 V= .33 SSE S/S = .94 F/B = .94 V= .63
- 6. Were fatigue effects considered: -
[ ] Yes [ J ] No If yes, describe how they were treated in overall i qualification program: i VI. If Qualification by Test, then Complete:
- 1. [ ] Single Frequency [ ] Multi-Frequency [ ] random i
[ ] sine beat [ ]
- 2. [ ] Single Axis- [ ] Multi-Frequency
[ ] Independent Axis [ ] In pnase motions
- 3. Number of Qualifications Testa OBE SSE Other
, (specify)
- 4. . Frequency Range:
f
- 5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side, Front /Back, Vertical):
S/S = F/B = V=
- 6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies
[ ] Lab Test [ ] In-Situ Test [ ~ -] Analysis-
- 7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test
[ ] Yes (Attach TRS &.RRS graphs) [ ] No LO
.EL40114W/3 I
, , _ _. - - ~ . . . . - , ,_ . _ , . . . . , , . ~ . , - . . . , _ .,_, _. , - y..
l 8. Maximum Input g Level Test: OBE S/S =' F/B = V= SSE S/S = F/B = V= . 9. Laboratory Mounting:
- A. [ ] Bolt (No. , Size )
l: [ ] Weld (Length ) [ ] 1 B. Orientation and Fixturing: 4 i 10. Functional Operability verified: [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable
- 11. Test Results including modifications made:
i a
- 12. Other tests performed (such as aging or fragility test, including i results):
O 13. Failure Modes (If appropriate ) L
- 14. Margins Available: [ ] Input Spectrum [ ] Fragility VII. If Qualification by Analysis, then complete:
- 1. Method of Analysis:
[ ] Static Analysis [ ] Equivalent Static Analysis
; [ J ] Dynamic Analysis: [ ] Time-History [ ] Response Spectrum l- ,
- 2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side, Front /Back, . Vertical):
No natural frequencies below 20 hz. (See report 816-A-26, page 2) i j S/S = F/B = V=
- 3. Model Type: [- ] 3D. [ ] 2D ' ['/ ] 10
-[ ] Finite Element -[ ] Beam l [ ] Closed Form Solution [- ] Other
!O d EL40114W/4
*- s-r . % ,s.%. . - . .
w .~ - , + -w--- . ,,.m-.. -
,v- yw <w ,.r ---r.
g __ . I I f- 4. [ / ] Computer Codes: Reliance program #706 I^ Frequency Range and No. of modes
'[ ] Hand Calculations
! 5. Method of Combining Dynamic Responses from Seismic and Other Dynamic Loads: , [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] ] SRSS [ ] Other: i (specify) ,
, 6. Damping:
- t OBE 1% SSE 1% Basis for the damping used: specification f
- 7. Support Considerations in'the model: Hold-Down Bolts i
I 8 .~ Critical Structural Elements: i i Governing Load i or Response Seismic Total _ Stress ) A. Identification Location Combination' Stress Stress Allowable l' Hold-down- See attached Seismic, -- 6387 PSI 13717 PSI 1 Bolts Dwg. dead weight, CNM132.53-41 Shear
- B. Maximum Critical Maximum Allowable Deflection
{ Deflection Location to Assure Functional Operability j .0016 inch Bearing .0070 4 Housing B.E. 2
- 9. Failure Modes: N/A
- 10. Margins Available
- [ ] Input Spectrum [-/ ] Stress or Deflection -
4 4 {- o . i - L t a-
'EL40114W/5 f
~ 1
, - . - . . . _ .-. . . _ - _ . - - - , _.-,._...,s . -- , . , _ . . . _ , - . - J. ; _ - _ , , , - - , . .
^
--.,-_.-,..--L
t
*1
*2 c!' s s 5 os 0 b.uei 2z $ ._
t o-T r es, s- oT 2h
. Am 2 E %b"5u W y
s m~e. o, 0o.0o
- g4 g0 A 5 0
- <3 W4 n%
N Be M r u la C iel G I l vl U da I J itMR n ic E g oG o
. nu &
si s r C o 1 ie A n T 7 A b6W
\ o7B
& t A h(
1 aO
\ NnB o.
2 0 x - dE S ae% b1 n l doc N\ E ')mp Wao d di wo ns P E
%~ i r Ce e a c tR t
f t o. s ~ t ae i o b ws m~ l o o s n ao n
. 5s .
i 9e U]R 1 I.
~
' \\ ~
n 4 A u T x ac i nt { p o ~ , l dr a
- c. o i a b E yr pef c or w
o ~ ) N O S 2
.0 0
i%
-5
- _
0 0 % ' ,
,' s. b 1
m ~ fs
, e hn e' .
s* e
*ec ru ir hv 8
0 bae s'e vs
-0 a .n ra e
0 t ef so t r o ) . f . t h . e
.u 2s # r -
0
., po e
i r
.n e C et
?
l O c-1
^-
(v~'> 3 E. Installation 1. Power Knockout. Fan Motor - Panels on drive side of fan section are provided with fan motor power viring knockouts. Refer to certified drawings for location and size of knockouts.
- 2. Fan Motor - Motors are supplied and installed by Duke Power. Use
]g3 j=g e.
i . smallest slots in motor counting base which will accomodate cotor.* ' (,g i j 3. Sheave alterrent and Belt Tension - Refer to pages 25 and 26 of 6 v ._
'M J O ceG 39E-7SI for proper sheave align =ent and belt tension.
~
h oy @ hb 4. o7 Chilled L'ater coils - Coils are shipped assembled in the units. o~ <c c. o
$6 h For location and size of coil connections and vents / drains, refer so .
OJ to certified drawings. Coils are shipped with a 10 psig of dry nitrogen. Before removing blank coil for connecting piping, release pressure from each coil thru valves under the protective caps. The chilled water coils have removeable headers on both ends, and have air baffles installed on the air entering and leaving sides of the coils. A On the blind end of the coil, two rows of screws must be recoved from the coil tube sheet prior to operation in order to allow for proper ther=al expansion of the coil core. .
*ljotor Bolting Information Unit Item flo. Min. Bolt Grade Torque Use Dia (in.) (S.A.E. ) (it-susj ISGR-AHU-l Motor hold-down bolts 0.5 ISGP,-AHU-2 " " " "
5 31-92 0.5 5 31-92 ISGR-AHU-3 " 0.5
" " 5 31-92 ISGR-AHU-4 " "
0.5 2SGR-AHU-l " " " " 5' 31-92 0.5 5 31-92 2SGR-AHU-2 " 0.5
" " " " 5 31-92 2SGR-AHU-3 0.5 5 31-92
.)
2SGR-AHU-4 " 0.5
" " " 5 31-92 ICR-AHU-l "
0.625 g 2CR-AHU-l " " " " 0.625 5 5 63-185 63-185 QA CONDITD1 L NUD GR SAFETY RB AED -
. . . - . ~ - . - . - . . . . - . _ - - . - . = . - . -. .- --
4 SPECIFIC ITEM #9 AUX. FEEDWATER PUMP TURBINE PART 1: Spring valve latch failed in test. Verify that the specification is revised to call for a stiffer spring. i
- STATUS: This item has be n resolved.
RESOLUTION
SUMMARY
- The correct latch spring was install per Duke requirements. Response from Terry Corporation has been inserted in turbine seismic report.
1u ! PART 2: Revision of SQRT form is necessary. 3 STATUS: The item has been resolved. j RESOLUTION
SUMMARY
- The revised SQRT form follows this page.
i I !O J j l i l l O l t
r---- ~ Seismic and Dynamic Qualification Summary of Eauioment
\
I. Plant Name: Catawba TYPE:
- 1. Utility: Duke Power PWR: J
- 2. NSSS: Westinghouse BWR:
- 3. A/E: N/A Other II. Component Name: Auxiliary Feedwater Pumo Turbine
- 1. Scope: [
] NSSS [ ] B0P [ ] Other
- 2. Model Number: GS-2N Quantity: 1
- 3. Size or Range:
j
- 4. Vendor: Terry steam Turbine company 5.
If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model Number of the devices included:
- 6. Physical
Description:
( a. Appearance: See Duke drawing CNM-1201.05-143
- b. Dimensions: See Duke drawing CNM-1201.05-143
- c. Weight: 3400 lbs.
- 7. Location: Building: Auxiliary Buildina Elevation: 543'
- 8. Field Mounting Conditions [ J ] Bolt (No. 2 , Size 1" )
[. ] Weld (Length ) [ ] ] Bolt (No. 4. Size 3/4")
- 9. l Mounting Orientation [e.g. , on floor, cantilevered, suspended, 'etc. ]-
on floor with baseplate & pedastals
- 10. a. System is which located: SA
- b. Functional
Description:
Auxiliary Feedwater Pumo drive c. Is the equipment required for [ T ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdown [ ] Both [ ] Neither [ ] Other EL401151/1 ' b .- . .. -
S [ L/
') 11. Pertinent Reference / Design Specifications for Qualification Requirements: CNS-1201.05-00-0005 \
Q Seismic Input Service Conditions
- b. Hydrodynamic Load Input h Qualified Life
- c. Fatigue Considerations III. Is Equipment Available for Inspection in the Plant:
[ ] ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Partial or limited availability IV. Equipment Qualification Method: [ ] Test [ ] Analysis [ ] ] Combination of Test and Analysis Qualification Report *: CNM-1201.05-276 (No., Title and Date): GS-2N Qualification Report for Duke Power Company F-40096 A & B (11-7-77) Company that Prepared Report: Terry Steam Turbine Company (; Company that Reviewed Report: EDS Nuclear, Inc. (Impell) ( (/ Where Report is filed or available: Duke Power (General Services) See Duke Specification Applicable Codes And/0r Standards: CNS-1201.05-00-0005 Paragraph 4.4 V. Vibration Inout: Reg'd.
- 1. Loads considered: a. [ ] ] Seismic only
- b. [ ] Hydrodynamic only
- c. [ ] ] Vibration from normal operation
- d. [ ] Combination of (a), (b), and (c)
- 2. Method of Combining RRS:
[ ] Absolute Sum [ ] ] SRSS [ ] (other, specify)
- 3. Required Response Spectra ** (attach the graphs): Attached NOTE:
^If more than one report complete items IV thru VII for each report.
**If other than RRS is used, describe method. '
EL401151/2
s
- 4. Damping Corresponding to RRS: OBE 2% SSE 2%
t 5. Required Acceleration in Each Direct: [ ] ZPA [ ] ] Other SLF (specify) Plant OBE S/S = 0.43 F/B = 0.43 V= 0.27 Specific Values SSE S/S = 0.8g F/B = 0.8g V= 0.5g
- 6. Were fatigue effects considered:
[ ] Yes [ J ] No If yes, describe how they were treated in overall qualification program: VI. If Qualification by Test, then Compiete:
- 1. [ ] Single Frequency [ ] ] Multi-Frequency [ ] ] random
[ ] ] sine beat [ ]
- 2. [ ] Single Axis [ ] Multi-Frequency
[ ] Independent Axis [ ] In phase motions
- 3. Number of Qualifications Tests: ,
OBE 14 SSE 16 Other (specify)
- 4. Frequency Range: 1 to 100 Hz 5.
Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side, Front /Back, Vertical): S/S = 15, 21, & 27 Hz F/B = 15, 23, & 34 Hz V = 22 & 32 Hz See attached tables for accelerometer
- 6. locations Method of Determining Natural Frequencies
[ ] ] Lab Test- [ ] In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis
- 7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test
[ ] ] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs) [ . ] No EL401151/3-
_ - . . . . . ~ b $() 8. Maximum Input g Level Test: g, OBE S/S = lla F/B = 9a V= 20g SSE S/S = 15g F/B = 13a V= 21g
- 9. Laboratory Mounting:
A. [ ] ] Bolt (No. 6 , Size 1" ) 1 [ ] Weld (Length- ) [ ] B. Orientation and Fixturing:
- 10. Functional Operability verified:
7, [ ] ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable
- 11. Test Results including modifications made:
I
- 12. Other tests performed (such as aging or fragility test, including a
results):
\m 13. Failure Modes (If. appropriate )
- 14. Margins Available: [ ] ] Input; Spectrum [ ] Fragility VII. If Qualification by Analysis, then complete:
- 1. Method of Analysis
1 [ ] ] Static Analysis [ J ] Equivalent Static Analysis- [ ] Dynamic Analysis: [ ]' Time-History [. '] Response Spectrum
- 2. Natural _ Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side, Front /Back, Vertical):
.'i. S/S = F/B = V= i
- 3. Model Type: [ ] 3D- [ ] 2D [ ] 10-
- [ -] Finite Element [ .] Beam 1
[ ] Closed Form Solution -[ -] 0ther
- l l
l' EL40115I/4 l
l
- 4. [ ] Computer Codes:
[V)' , ( Frequency Range and No. of modes [ ] ] Hand Calculations
- 5. Method of Ccmbining Dynamic Responses from Seismic and Other Dynamic Loads:
[ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS [ ] Other: N/A (specify)
- 6. Damping: N/A OBE ' SSE
_ Basis for the damping used:
- 7. Support Considerations in the model: N/A
- 8. Critical Structurdi Elements:
Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. . Identification Location Combination Stress Stress Allowable
' Coupling End Hold Down Bolts 14,670 psi 94,500 psi Governor End Hold Down Bolts 3,982 psi 94,500 psi
() (/ Taper Pins Guide Blocks 48,121 psi 87,000 psi 6,208 psi 22,400 psi ( B. Maximum Critical Maxieum Allowable Deflection Deflection Location to Assure Functional Operability 0.004" shaft 0.020"
- 9. Failure Modes.; N/A
- 10. Margins Ava.ilable: [ ] ] Input Spectruin [ ] ] Stress or Deflection See Above and Attachment r
EL401151/5 l
- J
WYL.E LASGRATCRIED e g Report No. 58038 Page No. 8 Ct;$TOMER 7~8#W coa' p i Test Tides Tw? M.* T.T e. o ya'sfse se_ pansm [O\ $pedmen GT-2 Tuoksn> f lok No. 58028
$/N ICC 'R 2crP Fort No. S#6 A E e h ?! Date "* 9* M T s4 B l. s 3 .
acesseemeren gouarius.s ayo:nks.s oeftwrtwe a cc S.6 4 c u & T G st. . _L o c A ft o.A): ___. i . _. ; _ _ . . . N baSc.1/o D aume& e. ! ! . g k'-Y 5-V t I h '0 4 d o o 'rA l. C o q rA o L_.___. . _ . . , _ _ _ _ __. E .. Ydt*'*/ c AL.CouTSoc . ... . . . . . . . . _ . . .. b--.. .C / M o*Co & P d . 4 4 & f/ T o s. ... . ._... .. ... Y 5 4 ' f"StA.TOL66/ofA. . . - _ . . . . . _ . . . . . .. . Y. Y 3 . . . 7's.1s*.s 1* M a v rt f _ ear V f. 4 o a k' .. . .. Y. Y
- O . GovdA% son..VALv6 46vfd. A/VoT $~uMexT* Y E
. 7 _ _ . 64Ec.rtice.c . Juncrson a.cx_. , . __ X 2
- 0. ..-_. QLt-ft).1616 S. ... ~ . ... __ ...... __ . .X.. .. E 9._._ d*GK Acrup.roA _ _ __
- g. Y 10 GcuG ACpot. Gus 36A&u4 . Css . _ . . ..
X Y
// .. .d6 M @RG l... X_ Y
/2 - Couwsc,hn..aemms Ge. .. . _ . _ X. . Y
/f QLL_Yoac e 't Y. 2
}
/V CEuT6os. or der 6 Af.A 76 2_ ?L
. ...._i ! i. __. . . _ . _ . , .. _
._ V' No.TG euew& . AErauwcF. SEAscN6.5. AL. sscEL64apC 76't s-
/M. f.tAsf- .kMfH eitfCIAcu- 9P' fXOTA Ts.oA -
3 4xIS._L. PAR 4.LLEL_.Io. TWLSI M# sHAEr - H8RI EcAl TA L
) .E_A xis L_P.EEREM DICRLAR ru . ; up a l N EL._. 9KFT - .Hoffl EO N TA L
...__. 8 A4 5 .: VERILCAL - . . .
] ..
. _ ..- . ._-- ....= . . _ _.- . .
. ._ __ . . . . _ _ ._. . _ . g y.. . .c ,e,.
u ,-c -
-l
. l 1
SPECIFICATION: CNS-12c'.05-00-0005 l Addendum No. 7 l
,[\ October 29, 1982 C?
DUKE POWER COMPANY Catawba Nuclear Station Units 1 & 2
, Auxiliary Feedwr.ter Pump Turbines Addendum #7
- 1. Turbine control panels shall be located in an area subject to the following environments:
Normal ambient temperature: 120F Normal relative humidity: 10-90% Maximum ambient temperature (DBE): 145F @ 100% RH (single occurence, duration of 3 days) Water spray: 1 occurence, duration of 30 minutes (sprinkler system), water at ambient temperature Radiation dosage: 400 rads (total integrated dosage over 40 years).
- 2. The manufacturer shall consider the"above environments for purposes of IEEE 323 aging and operability qualifitation tests.
/"'\ 3. The attached response spectrum, Figure 1-B, shall be used for IEEE 344 seismic testing of the control panels and associated devices O. (panel-mounted). The solid line represents the required _ response for the OBE test in two orthogoral horizontal directions. Vertical accelerations shall be taken as .2/3 of the horizontal values. SSE response accelerations are to be obtained by multiplying the OBE values by 15/8.
1 s m. p)1 m Db ee . ><*
. :l rr : ip,
g Q 'Q [' ,X [ ( [ K'N $ , 6 E
.- f 67s ' y 'NS '
- s. A .s \
[ / - O? p/l,'Kf g's g yyg.c g1^';ts^ygt; s N' \ ,
V ' '
N I Ny
, .c \ '
d *
. h/j w'
h X SNi yN'og N v / A \
/ ^ /AN^ y . .
' N' 1
N N Nfs i i i\ /V / / / A / ! fv^. 'A\ Revision 3: July 1, 1982 b s Tsi.Nh) l 'is ~~V \ / t/ }Xl V\/X $ '
'Y 6
5 MN ~ MbN
~ '
s s 4 . i D'02$sf '2^>
; 3 >m&d9 mvm % $r$ m wmx M^>['M x'ex T' n i X,(pQ/]sfN>ps'>'$ .s M sJz M N 2 Q ,-
2 i k'XR>^>Fx>'#522R'K/'s)M'60% oI -r!c/ s x w N v) \[v v'r X',
'a' ' ' ..'
h [; s
* 'N N i/ / A / X (A x N A N N .l v s. ' / / ^ / ^
2 I XNN: P/ V I1\
/ /h'/ / Y:/h /\
3" *g \ N \4 /r l/I \ // / F\/ /K A) Yi\ h %)
. N^M.b/1 1 X/ VV V X V\ LXs A b^tNX1 I .X/V'V V ^ VN
.MYM Y/ N /V A /N M Wiy%I/'b/ !/1 [
g b'
- b Y
5
/~'/ M'/N/NL X p'N /\ /N^M&'SK'Di'vfNk
/\ V o, VX AN/ t< Y\ tx\ Lc' N VN /
,/b / /
IX/Y X'sNx'hX VN otsien ats;0nst seccTaua,
.089 I
y/
//X/- A
\X\//
x^p X 'ofQ a o, e OBE RESPONSE
/ /x ,x #s I
/ #
/[ /
/ p . ~oo#
o, CATAWBA NUC1. EAR STATION CNS-1108.00-00-0002 ngure so.1e
,j/ ,/ o, s
; A
/
/
/
- ca/
L/
)/
. X. . . . v s . . ,x , , n
...,s.., ...,s 0.05 0.07 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 1.0 2.0 3.0 Undamped Period (Sec.)
,. ?,
Specification No.
,O # %/
DUKE POWER COMPAN'( SEISMIC DESIGN REQUIRiihENTS CATAWl3A 1 & 2 AUXILIARY FEEDWATER PUhJP TURl31NE 1.0 Seismic Desien Manual The turbine add all auxiliary equipment supplied under this specifica-tion shall be qualified to meet the seismic design requirements of this speci-fication in accordance with the procedures and guidelines of the Duke Power Company Scismic Design Manual. The M:nual is intended to be utill:cd only as a refer'ence to this section and not to he used alone. The sections of the Manual pertaining to particular portions of this specification are noted below. Hoviever, those sections should not he u n:d directly witheu the background information provided in the remainder of the Manual. 2.0 Operatincc Conditions n I T 2.1 Modes of Operation b/ Two modes of operation shall be considered (M:: mal Scction 4.1. 3) . Tne upset :r. ode includes the effects of the Operational Bat,is Earthquake (03E), and the faultad mode includes the effects of the Safe Shutdown Earthquake (SSE). The seismic lecds shall be const-i dered in combination 9/ith all other concurrent Icedings on the turbine (Manual Section 4.1.3). The criteria for these loads are specified below. . 2.2 Seismic Inout Criteria For the SSE, _a Seismic Load Factor (SLF) of 0.8g shall be applied in each of two orthogonal horizontal directions in combination . with' an SLF of 0.5g in the ve' r tical direction, all acting simultaneously (Manual Section 4.1.1.1). The SLF values for the Ol3E shall be taken - as 8/15'of the respective values for. the SSE. 2.3 Concurrent Loadina Conditions - Other concurrent loadings to be considered are described in Man-
~
uan Section 4.1.3. = Any additional considerations are specified hclow, t . i
\. s l
[ ~
2.3.1 Nozzle Loads 7 The following represent the maximum design loads due to the attached piping on the turbine. These shall be applied at each nozzle location acting simultaneously. The values given represent the component of the load to be ap-plied in each of three orthogonal directions. [ - (moments) M = 14000 Dt (ft-lbs)- (forces) F = 11600 Dt (Ibs) where D = nozzle pipe ou: side diameter (in)- t = nozzle thickness (in) These values represent the nozzle loads for the OBE conditions. For the corresponding SSE levels, multiply these by 1.5.
- 3.0 Seismic Qualification
, 3.1 Procedure One of the following procedures may be utill cd for the seismic qualification:
- 3.1.1 Equivalent Static Analysis An analysis shall be performed in accordance with Manual Section 4.2. The results shall be demonstrated to fulfill the acceptance criteria of Manual Section 6.0.-
3.1.2 Testing' l A testing program s' hall be performed in accordance ! with' Manual Section 5.0. Test procedures 5.2.1 to 5.2. 8 - shall be perform _ed. . It is to ba noted that a preliminary report shall be submitted prior to any test (Manual Section 5.0). 3.1.3' Combined Testine and Analysis i-A testing program may be selected.to satisfy only a
, portion of the seismic requirements. The remainder of the equipment shall be qualified by analysis. ' Complete documen- /~T
- O. ~
i
.$-- +
+
-.j
av n,- 4 (7 tation shall be presented demonstrating the correlation be-V tween the analysis and the test results (Manual Section 5.0). 3.2 Orientation ' I The equipment shall be considered in the worst possible orientation (highest stress / deformation level in each pump com-ponent) with respect to the total combined loading condition.
- 3.3 Interaction and Support Conditions The foundation loads due to tl$e combined concurrent loading 4
conditions shall be presented and shown to be acceptable. Complete . design information, due to the effects of all components being sup-plied, is required for the attachment to a common foundation plate supporting both the pump and the turbine. 13 citing loads, sizes and materials _shall be provided by the turbine supplier for this purpose.
' If applicable, anchorage data shall also be provided for all other components forming the interface with Duke's facilities. Weights and centers of gravity of all compenents shall also be included. The shaft coupling to the pump sluft shall be analyzed and any interaction effects, such as coupling rotations and displacements, shall be pre-sented and shown to be acceptable.
v' 3.4 Nozzles The adequacy of the pipe nozzle attachments themselces, as well as the remainder of the equipment, due to the nozzle loadings shall be demonstrated. 3.5 Rigidity
. All components shall be designed such that there are no natural frequencies less than 33Hz. This shall be demonstrated -
either via testing (Manual Section 5.2.4, Exploratory Scanning Test) or by analysis (Manual Section 4.2.1.2). 3.6 - Internal Components /Auxiliarp Equipment -
. The effects 'of the combineri loading conditions on all internal components shall be analyzed by the above methods. Eash shall be shown to meet the appilcable acceptance criteria, Indicating, in par-ticular, that no stress or deformation levels in any component, such -
as shaft bearings,' valves, linLages, turbine wheels, will impair the (p j
.overall functional capability of the turbine and thus the entire pump assembly. .
2, l
+
#9 8
< , - y-
s.. - O- Auxiliary electrical equipment essential to turbine operation shall be quallfled independently to ensure there is no loss cf contact. The correlation of these results with the remainder of the equipment qualifications shall be presented. '
- 3. 7 Shaft Deflections
- The turbine shaft shall be statically qualified to demonstrare that deflections tuider an SSE loading of 0. 8 g horizontally and 0.5 g vertically, in addition to all other operating conditions, shall be less than available clearances. This can be done either by an equivalent static analysis (Manual Section 4.1) or by a static deflec-tion test (Manual Section 5.2.9). It shall be demonstrated that no op-erational Interference occurs during or after the seismic disturbance.
- 4. 0 General Considerationii 4.1 In addition to these seismic criteria, requirements equivalent to ASME 111 for Class 3 pumps shall be met for the turbine assembly.
- 5. 0 Reporting Requirements A fully documented report on the seismic qualification shall be sub-(m'
" mitted in accordance with Sections 7.0 and 8.0 of the Seismic Design Manual.
This report must be approved by Duke Power Company prior to shipment of any items of equipment. t l 6 OO
, - . = . _ = - - _
4
'-* ~~ -
ACCELEYl.r105 (g)
, cn co c. 'm'" o-o, t
- I I
_. ._._ _ _ _ .__.._8___.I .
.., ..t.. i
- 1.; .* l .__ .
l
..4
_ _ . ._ __.I __. __ .___. . . . . 0 .l l p B .4 . ..._ .. g 4.. . ..
. _ . ; -- g ,y
. . = - __ -
3
. . . . ._ t..._.__
, _a _t_.;1 . ._. _
. . . _ ___1__._____.__,_.__.__._.
__:. . _ _.._..._.._....._.i.....___4 _ . _ . . . . _. . . . . . . . _ . _ .. .._._.. _. _. _. .n._3. _. _ _._.. _.- 1 = =: = f =- . L . . , _. .,,
.}
=e -+ :t = i =_.l- ., _.,..__. _- -
_--t , = = = = = = = = t : : _r_: _.:
= :_. . : .ug=- _ .= l== j==j==l. ==}==l::-- L=_ l. ;.;--.l =:--l.=
_. ._ r_=g==r. __._- _.
= 1:-- -
- rr .=l==g=- : l=: -l=u . :-._
- = g._==:==g . . _
~
?:- W:ih -ilEH- ' ++iI:Mi:=.ii:=':il;=M ==.==1-iF.5:li91fii'l =il?"-I!~~!5=I+ii~ i -~. ~~Fi:~Ii@'i=d=~ i .
. _ _; . _ ; i* . ,l .
._~.... _.3__. . . . . . _ . _ . , . _ _ . ; __ , . _ . _ _ _ _ .
. , _ . _ l __. _
i _ __3
.-__,_.c__._q..._.
o .__ ..._. _..t._. __a._. s a. . -
,_._.e..-i.__r__,_
__ t ____r_.._
)_.._*-= ._. - 111 -.
._......t._.
vi r__._ _ _ _._ t=.}.=t-t- 1. .. . i_ _4_1. ._.__. __.t _. .it.__t=I _ I r.__r --.
= : -= l :. i___.1 ..b.__.f = l =_ 1 _
- -- *r- +
- S .!
. :.- - -= t . -- .f r -*. --t et
--~ ! =. - .l --!.-- -
~ _ ___:- t=f=_. .-~ __;.fl .:-t= :.nl _: . . .=.._=_!=_*-- .. .i -- --l _ nn ! =:2. [= ..'t ={ .. _ = ;u
== = l ==. _ ..}:=. ._ ..t.r.. _=....=4 . _ _.=._
_. L. _.=_=_ j =.. . { =._ l =. = l. =. . .=l .l=. . t.=.=. _ : ._1; J := ._ l .. . _ e . , . .
.._ . .s. . . ] . . . l _. . l . . . l _. l .__ . l ._ . . = . .
3 l$ . f.r-i ._ i- - p ::.i ni.il =:4I=il -1:- it.::-' .%. i a i. " . _ i ._. ,
; i _~_ p ._-i-(
.-- 1: .-hl: -h :l. --l . :) : :li- j:_.: : : .. i e . - t :::im l '.:h i ; _:.4-= j _.= t g
e
, >j. :
a r t: : $ .. N : .4 - . p.. :p.. : t L::j p:2 4 = i :.: : l:-:.4 == .4. : l hu ; - :1:.-:( --::! I f . ". h i iI T. ! : N-% t.
. ., , i .
o , ,
*f ii. .i. \. ,
9: .
. ~ _ -
l.
=
i N
' N 4 4 t 2.i 1
- $ !C 3_ .
i p N. .
. .t.. . .
' ' ' ' ' r _ ;- _ l Pt n
_7 l l , l > .
- ; _ .1 > >
_ -. , , , :=- r-l , 1 I ..__..__. L_,_._._. . _-__J l _4'.__' _. .f_ . _ _ _ . _ _ . _ ,_._.___.__a_.
- .-6_-, .
r.--,- - -. g t=t := r. -- _;7 -* 4={=:.1= wc-:: n -- -
. c.rc -
.A :- _t :-
%__s 4 .. _ 4 I
?
._. r- =
,9 . .___ .___ ,_._.,__..._m I =. -! = t _ i . _ _,...,_.., =_ m _ . __,_;_ _ , .. ___
__.. g- --l =; .
. =.==,--- .= _ _ _ % _..h_- ;__1;_.,_ q__.
. . _ ._ . __ : : = -i _. _ .t-y Ng l
E
' ' l --f --I I l
._ l I l l i I ! i i i i i i i r i m E
-; . z. -, .
. . liL__ _, f' O _i '
'~.'
-=
g E
; --i
___.-.A I.u.M s_ =_ 4__4. 4__a _ _ . 4_'
. . ... . - . , _.. . . _ _ _ . . g m
....__._.=.:s_..L--*k
^
* ~$ _ . _._s._... _.._s .
. _ . .,_,:__.._..;,.;,_...=l_s a-~ ..-i.__1_
- - *-b_*
_s _. f -i_,..-.._:-T_.. I--""1 7-f
.-.;..q_-..5.;n."-i;_.-_.____.-..,
.11
- I _. ._ .E - .. ::" - =f..-
- 6
.- ---7--
3
-'-*~-- -~~~~~'
--5* - -I'-M- 21 ' L 2* -1 24 T--38
- ~"' 55M- ?~l ~ ~~ N N
~
.,-*M!~~~*~~C4~~'~~~~~
~ -
i
.... v , , .
,,,, r
' 6 O .. . . ., , 3
. ., . .i
+
./ .' I i
, f e-t i f I t i
.pr .
t
-p f I
a
; .- +
; i ;
- -f i -- ; ,
I 1
'1**
~
J J I I - l' 1 I I
. _ . - - 4__5
_ - _ . __- /'.. __, _i___i_ _.. .-- .- 4 _: --i = L__ _' _i. . . .r
. s_ ,_
. :7_. --+-- 4 :_ - L._. i __!-' *t ::. l l= = l. i ___ L.__. _i .
=L: .
__ _; q _ , _ __ __, _g_=. i =.____t a . l . _ e
= e-t--
_ __f,l y .._i__.i..._l _q._ _ i _. _.
..... r = =___l i= ,= = _ _ 1_:, =. ._.....:=
i,
= 4 _._ ..
. . l . . . l . _ k_=_ t ==l r= +_-._._ . . =. ._ -- . . =_. l. _ , ._=f =. . .. i=
l .._l =.I:=.i. 4=. l = l= i._..E__.t =
== . == = =- i :i:. t :_ . l=.== -i =J t
__.1_
...._....__.___j.___....._1__.______
. _ . .a __.,__; ;
_e a_.__.__.4__... .__i___.i..
.i . _.
, _._. . ...._._ _. .._i____.
. _ _ . . . . - . . . . . . . . . s
_ l. ._._.1 __, __ i ._ , . . ._ _ ;__. _.. .... _
. _ .i _ .._ . . . _ _ .
. __ l ~.-....._..._.t._.,_l._._._.._._._.______...._t.___.__.l__._... .. .j. ._..
o sili Ul :l+l :l: 1.-l:5}@ilS ' :Wf'linil= l=i=l#l "-lI;lN-lE5!h4=#slhli.4l3 . . .j = -im p . i
;l=-l
- - D -1 iini % .h l. t .[ l =-l:=. l - - 4 4. .- t :p l ..l' .l.. . .J r j . ,4 8
=; . 6 .i q :p..ji = l. t + *~:n i .l .t- . .;.:. t - mt ..i. -t * .
8 i =iu j w a .p. + . p-u p- 4 .! m- %-4 .o .t. . n .. p = p m. i . .4: ..a 6 ::. g i c' a
.w-- -r-w w- * -v--7---- . m 'r ---.! m- p.-m
5
. e .
- O N b @ W .o N A L L - w = A A .
- V .* Abe I
.t.e.e t
'*l 4'
_. , _ , _ . . ' _ .... -_t 6 i
.66 u
-i. -- - - - - - -
.. _ . _ . . . . .I .. .
l
.24 U 1. . -. - ._. - . :.. ._ _ .. - --
f==t . T a. a,.
. .-F _ i _.
_ _ .... . . . . _ _ }_._ j - j .
. . . . - - - _ l_ _ ..._ . _. _l-
.-.-4 t
_ 4._ - _ _ . _ . _.. _{ .. e . ._ ,
.s
.p_ ._ p .
. . . . .._ _ . . . _ .. . _ . . . . . . ._ , . _ g
. _ . . . _ ...s. ...,
s_
. . . . .. .. - -. _ k._ . _ . , . .. .. .. .. . . . .
.i _ _: _g -
..-4
,. . _.... 1 . _. _
. . . . .. _. .. _ ._ . _ ._. .l.-
. . . , .. n...
t
. _ _ . . _ _ _ _ __4. 6... .. . .. ._...._...}.. . - _
1
. - =. _--~t.___ . .._--
3
=-_ . .
..m -: .r- .
; .. . t =r _.: . _ . i _ _ . . . -- " - - - : : .. . . _ : = t _: r- : =
. En Ws K- .!l5 W - W :1 5 1 "-l W.-i#:I "l-W :riEl1-lGl@li~ _ Z "5:H "-- F Z
.,t
.= --
. ;- g._ .-.__4_ ..p._ _-
. o ,
. . . = -
w u . . . . . . .~ t.__..,_.._;.___._._._..._....,
. _.. . . 6_.
t 9
. .. .. .. . ..3... .-4_..._.44.._,_4.._ ._ . 5 - _ . _... . ..3....& . . . a
. _ . . . . . _ . . . . . . . _ , _ _ .t =a
- -- . t =-----.__; . _ . . r: ---i - - t . n- : 1 _. : .._- . _.- . - - - _. _ _-. _.: ._.__._i
..._.......__.t am I . . ._. . . ._
w d.
. . ::.::s. =.=:. _ . .= :. = : n f : _ _ . . .=. . :. :=. .. =. :. t. . . ~ .
(= ~.: :- :._. ==..=._d_.3._.__=._. =.w
-w _ = . _.......:-- .= _ u.:. . . .-=
a
..1 . , . . . - - _ . . . . C .
g ;j. 2 f la.h.\ -l . N.-j :- 4=ijpO.a:l-L1-i-- ..:l .: .: l .5._ b. h. - h 3.- l - - 6:+ -: i+--- ~ i --J ' '=l :-@::4 8 j , g_ ml
.\ 1 .ri- - h-i-=q =4C l 4p4 =. :- : p c d -- q W . .--j -u - . t u l :._rt .f i s - tr.m t . -: : == t
[a j:$ I 4- . , i . l .g. C .i , . , . .o -
) *SE g 4 I s . 'l f rj
; PO
.X_ A
.o ..
n i i .g g N. , i i i e
= .3 ; _ _
-- -- l - . ;, i
- i l ig l
n I 1 e
\r -
1 I -1 I .1 I I I _e I n,.
.o g
4' 8 -; ! > l 1 l - - . l l ! E.~M , w
- I
._I- T .
p' m . .. 1 - _,1 1 -- _.
. i._._- . e .: . .
,...____i_.__-...i .__.a- .x_._. i . . . _ .. _ a v s -
. .- __ -. ..-._,_... _. . _ . . . _ t
~_,-4,._,
_ .a
%_. ____ , __,_ _j __ _ . . . . - _ _ . - - - - - _ . . _ . . _ , ~ _____t___ ,_ .. . . _ . . . . _
__==4_-
..._ -e ._-t q -- ' - -
_ . . . = . - p. _.cs _::.:.:-. ._ m =_ . _;_.._A t,:= t ru _:=_.u :3. . 2:.=_j _=_.p =.=.=. ;j =_ _; c . __._ p: :, . _ _ _ . _--- . j :.: f. 5_ __ I i T i I >f
- i I
i I i E i i I i i I i ny
-t---
I 7,'.': E.-- a i i I
' ' ' ;.w. .
u > > r i i ___ - i j e _,__-,_; o.c . py-t- p., ,
, S
- O - _g._ -4. C_. ar_. _ ...
_- - p i ._...- _-i g
._.. _ . e. __ . _ . _ _ _m.._l.__,._a
__m .__. _ _. _ _4__. ., _.._i.. ._ ._, .,__a , I
, 15:El_WEMh _i --- -
5.S 5 d M l _..- -E. =i -~'~~ -P-3 I- ~~~- 5 W- E - 4 """ ~ ~ --4 :51
- ama= " -- s 4 =i =- =.u _-at_._p_ ==E
' , - i . =t == ~ > == it s%2= #-Wm = 2- ;=+=r-=n=-4 ,
C 6. / i
@ < I
, ,e : . ... . . ., ., .
+
o ?
,/ .,
a .
/*
/ 1 1
, e I i
/ .
j _ _ i i i _ q , , __-t ; ,
-j , - - - - , 1 ;._ 3~
g , 1 I I & I g 1 1 '1 ' . , - f 2 I I I
. 4.i.i _ 3 I '
a
;-i t - -*- t ----t - - - + - .
; -f. --
, . . 1
_ L_ i _ .1. s
---i -f . :-- h- : _--- t-"* " . '
_! - s - r t _ ._ i _ . .s, . *- t n ._ , - _ _..-"f-*-- ' * - i E
. -- ._. _. . .- _- - _ __ __ ... __.. . - - t-
- i. .
. _ _ . ._ . _ - .. . . ..1. . . . . .. -
i
- u. ,.:- :;-- /; .--
...: . m.. =...:..=..=:.t.=.. : :.:
.._ . -_=.: - ... .=. .:- =.... .....-
... l:...l .: ..--": :..: .., ':=..:h....
_ t : .. :--- .
- . - . .t. :.-*. ; : * : :.11:
..-_g._ I-
_ h._ _4___ p--p i __ _ - _. _6._..._ . .. _ 3 i .ta . . . .
. . . . - -..... _ . - . 6_h _. .. -
._.4. ...
1
.. ..... ._. ,_.,---, ......~l s_ .._..a._t_ .
. . . . . ... . , __ . -, - .- ........_......._.4
_eo. i ...
..s...- .~ .= m s .. .
. .. . . .._. ....t.. ...,._.. .
l
- t l -t - -l . d . = n: @ r. l . . . ..- l : t._l- . :. , --
=l . i .. j t :l . -
8 , i . 6 . . ) : .m . .> p+ .I4 l , l- .
.;. l- ml. ,
s t us. .& .p:n l:: . ) . ti rn: -l t q :{. :th;s..l- )
+:e .e.g. ::S.) t . . .) m + am:
, i et* 4 4.- m ,n..,-. ~e ,.e--. - . ,n .. , -_n + . - , , .,, , . . , ,
-9, ~ , ,
k SPECIFIC ITEM #10 4" STAINLESS STEEL GATE VALVE PART 1: Confirm that hanger on operator will be permanent. If hangers are not permanent, confirm the acceptability of the acceleration levels of the operator. STATUS: This item has been resolved. RESOLUTION
SUMMARY
- The hangers are not permanent. The accelerations 4 have been verified to be acceptable.
i PART 2: Address the concern of the small amount of clearance between the operator and a nearby pipe, i STATUS: This item has been resolved. RESOLUTION
SUMMARY
- The valve operator was rotated to eliminate potential
. interference. i 4 4 1 i i I i 1 4 3
... .~ -_ .- - - . . . . ..- .- - --- -. . - ;. I Seismic and Dynamic Qualification Summary of Equipment
! I. Plant Name: Catawba Nuclear Station ' TYPE:
- 1. Utility: Duke Power Co. PWR: J I
j- 2. NSSS: Westinghouse BWR-l ! 3. A/E: Duke Power Company Other i-j; II. Component.Name: Centrifugal Charging Pump to Cold Leg discharge Isolation l
- 1. Scope: [ ] NSSS [ / ] BOP -[ ] Other i 2. Model Number: 70460-1 Quantity: 9
- 3. Size or Range: 4" 1500 lb Stainless Steel Emo Gate Valve i 4. Vendor: Borg-Warner Corporation t
! 5. If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and'model Number of the j devices included: l 1
- 6. Physical
Description:
- a. Appearance
- 4" SS Emo Gate Valve T
i b. Dimensions: L = 16" H = 50" W = 37"
- c. Weight: 647 lbs j 7. Location: Building: Auxiliary Building -
1 j Elevation: 570 Col. JJ-KK 51-52 l
- 8. Field Mounting Conditions [ ] Bolt (No. ,) Size -)
[ ] Weld (Length ) l [))Weldedinpipe f Mounting Orientation [e.g., on floor, cantilevered, suspended,'etc.]: 2
- 9. ,
i- Pipe mounted
- 10. a. System is which-located
- Safety Injection-i
! b. Functional
Description:
Isolates'CCP from cold legs-I
- c. Is the' equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ?]. Cold. Shutdown
- [ -].Both [- ] Neither ['l ] Other Emergency-
!s Core Cooling . l EL40115N/1 r _ _. 2 2 : ***~ ~ -- - T": _ , , _ _ . . . _ _ _ , , , . . _ , . _ ,_.,._..-_,m . . , . . _ . _ . . _ , , ,
l
- 11. Pertinent Reference / Design Specifications for Qualification Requirements: CNS-1205.00-00-0005 1
I h Seismic Input @ Service Conditions
- b. Hydrodynamic Load Input h Qualified Life
- c. Fatigue Considerations III. Is Equipment Available for Inspection in the Plant:
[ J ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Partial or limited availability IV. Equipment Qualification Method: [ ] Test [ J ] Analysis [ ] Combination of Test and Analysis
*** Qualification Report *: NSR 70460-1 Design Report of 4" (No., Title and Date): 1500 lb SS Gate Valve W/Fmo 2/7/84 Company that Prepared Report: Borg-Warner Corp /Anamet Laboratories Company that Reviewed Report: Duke Power Comoany i T
\ ,/ Where Report is filed or available: Manufacturer's Drawing File Applicable Codes And/0r Standards: ASME Section III, 1971 Edition through Summer 1973 addenda V. Vibration Input:
- 1. Loads considered: a. [ ] ] Seismic only
- b. [ ] Hydrodynamic only
- c. [ ] Vibration from normal operation
- d. [ ] Combination of (a), (b), and (c)
- 2. Method of Combining RRS:
[ ] Absolute Sum [ / ] SRSS [ ] (other, specify)
- 3. Required Response Spectra ** (attach the graphs): See V-5 NOTE:
^ If more than one report complete items IV thru VII for each report.
** If other than RRS is used, describe method.
*** Static deflection test is part of design report.
EL40115N/2
O V
- 4. Damping Corresponding to RRS: OBE SSE
- 5. Required Acceleration in Each Direct:
[ ] ZPA [ ] ] Other Seismic load Factor , (specify) Plant OBE S/S = .356 g F/B = .24 g V= .108 g Specific Values SSE S/S = .668 G F/B = .45 g V= .203 a
- 6. Were fatigue effects considered:
[ ] Yes [ ] ] No If yes, describe how they were treated in overall qualification program: VI. If Qualification by Test, then Complete:
- 1. [ ] Single Frequency [ ] Multi-Frequency [ ] random
[ ] sine beat-
- 2. [ ] Single Axis [ ] Multi-Frequency
[ ] Independent Axis [ ] In phase motions
- 3. Number of Qualifications Tests:
j OBE SSE Other _ (specify) , 4. Frequency Range:
- 5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side, Front /Back, Vertical):
S/S = F/B = V=
- 6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies
[ ] Lab Test [ '] In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis
- 7. .TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test
[ ] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs) [ ] No O EL40115N/3 i
"~~~~~~':*.
J' .- -, - ...
- 8. Maximum Input g Level Test:
! OBE S/S = F/B = V= SSE S/S = F/B = V=
- 9. Laboratory Mounting:
A. [ ] Bolt (No. , Size ) [ ] Weld (Length ) [ ]
- 8. Orientation and Fixturing:
- 10. Functional Operability verified:
[ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable
- 11. Test Results including modifications made:
- 12. Other tests performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):
,r' ,
i '
)
- 13. Failure Modes (If appropriate )
- 14. Margins Available: [ ] Input Spectrum [ ] Fragility VII. If Qualification by Analysis, then complete:
- 1. Method of Analysis:
[ ] Static Analysis [ J ] Equivalent Static Analysis [ ] Dynamic Analysis: [ ] Time-History [ ] Response Spectrum
- 2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side, Front /Back, Vertical):
S/S = F/B = Y = Lowest fn = 74 Hz (yoke)*
- 3. Model Type: [ ] 3D [ ] 2D [ ] ] 10
[ ] Finite Element [ J ] Beam
- See Frequency Report for natural frequency used in piping analysis.
[ ] Closed Form Solution [ ] Other s EL40115N/4
.J
e l-3a. Input g load used in analysis: 8 8 8 l OBE S/S = E (3) .F/B = E (3) .V = E (2) i SSE S/S = 3 F/B = 3 V= 2 l
- 4. [ ] Computer Codes:
^
Frequency Range and No. of modes i < [))HandCalculations
- 5. Method of Combining Dynamic Responses from Seismic and Other Dynamic loads:
) ; [ ] Absolute Sum- [ / ] SRSS [ ] Other:
(specify) Damping: N/A j 6. i OBE SSE Basis for the damping used: a j
- 7. Support Considerations in the model: Valve ends
- 8. Critical Structural Elements:
Governing Load i or Response Seismic Total Stress ) A. Idertification Location Combination Stress Stress Allowable-
, Valve Body Combination 1.78 30.62 j Yoke of normal pipe 49.8 (ksi) .
25.63 32.4 [ { Yoke Clamp and seismic 13.22 21.6 Body to Bonnet 11.83 24.9 i 1 1 B. Maximum Critical . Maximum Allowable Deflection l Deflection location to Assure Functional Operability-i
; A= .009 in- yoke Assurance of operability done j ^ = .004 in by test.
i j 9. Failure Modes: ,
. 10. . Margins Available: [))InputSpectrum-[ ] Stress or. Deflection 4
j See VIII - 3a.- I
^ - .
6
- EL40115N/5 4
l- ..
, IV. Equipment Qualification Method:
[ ] Test [ ] ] Analysis [ ] Combination of Test and Analysis Qualification Report *: Frequency Analysis for Item 9J-202 (No., Title and Date): EDJ Letter No 0930220-253 10/27/78 Company that Prepared Report: EDS Nuclear Company that Reviewed Report: Duke Power Company Where Report is filed or available: Duke drawing file: CNM-1205.00-574 Applicable Codes And/Or Standards: ASME Section III, 1971 Edition through Summer 1973 Addenaa V. Vibration Input:
- 1. Loads considered: a. [ ] ] Seismic only
- b. [ ] Hydrodynamic only
- c. [ ] Vibration from normal operation p,
- d. [ ] Combination of (a), (b), and (c)
() 2. Method of Combining RRS: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS [ ] (other, specify)
- 3. Required Response Spectra ** (attach the graphs):
NOTE:
^If more than one report complete items IV thru VII for each report.
**If other than RRS is used, describe method.
- 4. Damping Corresponding to RRS: OBE SSE
- 5. Required Acceleration in Each Direct:
[ ] ZPA [ ] Other (specity) OBE S/S = F/B = V= SSE S/S = F/B = V=
,-a EL40115M/1 .
- 6. Were fatigue effects considered:
[ ] Y&s [ ] No If yes, describe how they were treated in overall qualification program: VI. If Qualification by Test, then Comolete:
- 1. [ ] Single Frequency [ ] Multi-Frequency [ ] random
[ ] sine beat [ ]
- 2. [ ] Single Axis [ ] Multi-Frequency
[ ] Independent Axis [ ] In phase motions
- 3. Number of Qualifications Tests:
OBE SSE Other (specify)
,. 4. Frequency Range:
i (.,) 5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side, Front /Back, Vertical): S/S = F/B = V=
- 6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies
[ ] Lab Test [ ] In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis
- 7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test
[ ] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs) [ ] No
- 8. Maximum Input g Level Test:
OBE S/S = F/B = V= SSE S/S = F/B = V=
- 9. Laboratory Mounting:
A. [ ] Bolt (No. , Size ) 7_, [ ] Weld (Length ) [ ]
)
EL40115M/2
. - - - ~ - . . .
I
- r. B. Orientation and Fixturing:
l 10. Functional Operability. verified: [ ] Yes [ -] No [ ] Not Applicable
- 11. Test Results including modifications made:
- 12. Other tests performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):
- 13. Failure Modes'(If appropriate- )
- 14. Margins Available
- [ ] Input Spectrum [ ] Fragility VII. If Qualification by Analysis, then complete:
- 1. Method of Analysis:
[ ] Static Analysis [ ] Equivalent Static Analysis [ / ] Dynamic Analysis: [ ] Time-History [ ] Response Spectrum
- 2. Natural Frequencies in~ Each Direction (Side / Side, Front /Back, Vertical):
S/S = See below* F/B = V=
- 3. Model Type: [ 4 ] 3D- [ ] 2D [ ]'1D
~[ / ] Finite Element [ ] Beam
[ ] Closed Form Solution [ ] Other Combined natural frequency 32.2 Hz. This frequency is used for piping analysis.
- 4. [ J ] Computer Codes: '
, Frequency Range and No. of modes- 1~to 75 Hz 3 modes i [ ] Hand Calculations'
- 5. Method of Combining Dynamic Responses from Seismic and Other Dynamic Loads:
[- ] Absolute Sum -[ ] SRSS [ -] Other:
-(specify)
O . EL40115M/3 '
, 6. Damping:
OBE SSE Basis for the damping used:
- 7. Support Considerations in the model:
- 8. Critical Structural Elements:
Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location Combination Stress Stress Allowable B. Maximum Critical Maximum Allowable Deflection Deflection Location to Assure Functional Operability
- 9. Failure Modes:
- 10. Margins Available: [ ] Input Spectrum [ ] Stress or Deflection r
</ - N x.s EL40115M/4 _ _ _ _ - . . _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ - . - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - ^ - __
. - -_ =. . . . . - . - . . . . . ~ . . . -- . . _ - - -
5 t i (} SPECIFIC ITEM #11 FEEDWATER ISOLATION VALVE The effects of dynamic loading due to sudden closure of isolation valves are to be addressed with relation to valve operability and ! j structural integrity. STATUS: This item has been resolved. RESOLUTION
SUMMARY
- Dynamic loads on the valve due to water hammer during closure are not appreciable. Impell Corporation has verified .
that the valve is qualified for dynamic loading with considerable ! margin. Documentation has been inserted in the valve seismic report. ] , I i i i i l t i; f !O I i i i i b i i l J
T Seismic and Dynamic Qualification Summary of Equioment ([j I. Plant Name: Catawba Nuclear Station TYPE:
- 1. Utility: Duke Power Co. PWR: X
- 2. NSSS: Westinghouse Corp. BWR:
- 3. A/E: Duke Power / Design Engr Dept Other II. Component Name: Feedwater Isolation Valves
- 1. Scope: [ ] NSSS [ X ] B0P [ ] Other
- 2. Model Number: 74040 Quantity: 4/ Unit 4
- 3. Size or Range: 18"
- 4. Vendor: Borg-Warner
- 5. If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model Number of the devices included: N/A q 6. Physical
Description:
- a. Appearance: Gate Valve / Operator
- b. Dimensions: 39 1/8" x 42" x 8.3'
- c. Weight: 5441 lbs
- 7. Location: Building: 0,oghouse Elevation: 577 + 00
- 8. Field Mounting Conditions [ ] Bolt (No. ,) Size )
[ X ] Weld (Length ) [ ]
- 9. Mounting Orientation [e.g., on floor, cantilevered, suspended, etc.]
Suspended in pipeline
- 10. a. System is which located: Feedwater (CF)
- b. Functional
Description:
Isolation Valve for Main Feedwater
- c. Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdown I r$ [ X ] Both [ ] Neither [ ] Other EL40115J/1
l l p d
- 11. Pertinent Reference / Design Specifications for Qualification Requirements: Duke Design Specification CNS-1205.12-1
{ dated April 15. 1975 including Addendums 1 thru 4.
@ Seismic Input Service Conditions
- b. Hydrodynamic Load Input Qualified Life
; c. Fatigue Considerations j III. Is Equipment Available for Inspection in the Plant:
[ X ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Partial or limited availability IV. Equipment Qualification Method:
; [ ] Test [ ] Analysis [ X ] Combination of Test and Analysis Qualification Report *: Seismic Report (No., Title and Date): NSR 74040; Seismic Report for 18" FIV: 8/25/78 Company that Prepared Report: Borg-Warner NVD Company that Reviewed Report: EDS Nuclear, Inc.
O Q Where Report is filed or available: Duke Power Co. (Ref. CNM-1205.12-8) 1 Applicable Codes And/0r Standards: ASME Section III. Class 2, 1974 Ed.
- V. Vibration Input
- 1. Loads considered: a. [ X ] Seismic
- b. [ ] Hydrodynamic only
- c. [ X ] Vibration from normal operation
- d. [ ] Combination of (a), (b), and (c)
- 2. Method of Combining RRS:
i I [ ] Absolute Sum [ X ] SRSS [ ] (other, specify)
- 3. Required Response Spectra ** (attach the graphs): See Attachment 1.
NOTE: 7f more than one report complete items IV thru VII for each report.
**If other than RRS is used, describe method.
EL40115J/2
f a f\ V
- 4. Damping Corresponding to RRS: OBE 1%,3%.5% SSE 1%,3%,5%
- 5. Required Acceleration in Each Direct:
[ ] ZPA [ X ] Other Seismic Load Factors (SLF) (specify)
*0BE S/S = 1.60/0.479 F/B = 1.6a/0.969 V = 1.06g/0.265
; (x) (z) (y) 4
*SSE S/S = 3a/0.898 F/B = 3g/1.817 V = 2g/0.497 i (x) (z) (y)
- Qualified Acceleration / Plant Specific Acceleration I 6. Were fatigue effects considered:
[ ] Yes [ X ] No
- If yes, describe how they were treated in overall i
qualification program: N/A 4 i VI. If Qualification by Test, then Complete:
- 1. [ ] Single Frequency [ X ] Multi-Frequency [ X ] random i
[ ] sine beat [ ]
- 2. [ ] Single Axis [ X ] Multi-Frequency
- [ X ] Independent Axis [ ] In phase motions *
- 3. Number of Qualifications Tests:
OBE 5 SSE 5 Other I
- (specify) i
- 4. Frequency Range: 1-35 Hz
- 5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side, Front /Back, Vertical)
S/S = 28 Hz F/B = 28 Hz V= 69 Hz
- 6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies
[ X ] Lab Test [ ] In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis
- 7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test
[ X ] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs) See Attachment 2 for OBE & SSE Runs [ ] No : EL40115J/3
' ' ~ ' '
(7, 8. Maximum Input g Level Test: LJ ' OBE S/S = 1.250's F/B = 1.25g's V= 1.25g's SSE S/S = 2.5g's F/B = 2.5g's V= 2.50's
- 9. Laboratory Mounting:
A. [ X ] Bolt (No. . Size ) [ ] Weld (Length ) [ ] B. Orientation and Fixturing: Valve operator axis vertical & upricht
- 10. Functional Operability verified:
[ X ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable
- 11. Test Results including modifications made: Operator performed as required before, during and after seismic event.
- 12. Other tests performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):
Design Basis Accident (LOCA)-Operation performed its safety related function (close) during tests. D]r
- 13. Failure Modes (If appropriate N/A )
- 14. Margins Available: [ X ] Input Spectrum [ ] Fragility VII. If Qualification by Analysis, then complete:
- 1. Method of Analysis:
[ ] Static Analysis [ X ] Equivalent Static Analysis [ ] Dynamic Analysis: [ ] Time-History [ ] Response Spectrum
- 2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side, Front /Back, Vertical):
S/S = 164.8 (torsional) F/B = V= 1744.9 (translational)
- 3. Model Type: -[ ] 30 [ ] 20 [ X ] 10
[ ] Finite Element [ ] Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution [ ] Other rt EL40115J/4 L
- 4. [ X ] Computer Codes: N/A Frequency Range and No. of modes N/A
[ X ] Hand Calculations S. Method of Combining Dynamic Responses from Seismic and Other Dynamic Loads: [ X ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS [ ] Other: (specify)
- 6. Damping: N/A OBE SSE Basis for the damping used:
- 7. Support Considerations in the model: Simple support at valve ends
- 8. Critical Structural Elements:
Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location Combination Stress Stress Allowable l (See Attachment 3) B. Maximum Critical Maximum Allowable Deflection Deflection Location to Assure Functional Operability (See Attachment 4) l
- 9. Failure Modes: None
- 10. Margins Available: [ ] Input Spectrum [ X ] Stress or Deflection EL4011SJ/5
, .. \
= =
= * --
i b.C eS Ntf /N I REPORT NO. 1736 Nw: lear Valve Division 888 *
= seusement PAGE 29 sorg.wamer comoration -
3 T M Tyrorie Aw., Van Nuys. Califomia 91409 . i
~ ' '
l FIG;2Z l DOCUMENr ' I CONTROL DATE
'scaz::cr:n m vrancu ,
I. arsecusz serc s-x MAY2 91981 '
- , 56 w g
} DUKE POWER COMPANY
" AESPCNSE SPECTRA L DESIGN ENGINEERING
/QO , . . . . . . ... , , . . . . . . . . , , . . ..c...,,
i 7 i . 4 4 3 i , 1 .x g* Ii .x t , I l' I l \_ i f' t l 1 , ! _ ... . ...., . .' m . , ... 1 1 I. ' l 7 1
. x x
'xx I g
[
==
- i. '
~
l.
} _
j
.( MI j /,p '
r:
- n ,
i
- : :.n ,,
1, 1 i . 1 i . e meme==ames mese - ., 1 1 4 f 1 ' i s J 7--' 7 -- -'; _ .. _. 7._. 41 U. ' m i.
. i .
, i.,-,i i . . ,.
- i. ,
! I I I I i- = i i ev s. in m. i.1 l
k /-\ C.b Me ^) k 1 WYLE LABORATORIES Report No.
\/2.V --
p& ' CUSTOMER N U O d d M k YAUd. Job No. 6753o rage no. 22 Full Scale /00 s Ace.1. no. contrei cf> Response c> Operator M E E W AA/ Specimen M Vd R A blC_ d4 @C OES2.f 7DE Data 2- Damping b% Axis of Test _ . HoKit. El
~
g cgg RESPONSE SPECTRUM . V Eit.T* a
/_cc . . . . . . . . . . , ,
0
^ ~
" ' -^
1 r _~ _ 1 2 8 1 -
,n ,
<; a a y i3 - __. m. -
s o __
~~
4 4 4 S a i
^
$N:
u_. -zt: n _ _ % , Il' 4. ~1 u I!\. ,": x i
*I .
i i m' L8 I VI ! _.I i I y / .i .- . 9us! . s; N. . . ..... n e t , a i l l , i h l ji j f It
) - -
~
S
- i. -
vo -
< 1 r
x '[ s [_ f
* ' ~ ~ ~ ~ "
i s ms is
-, x,,
%- . .- p p _- s O g . .
- r. ~
% --_- _ - - a g
y *
* * *
- M4m e- w__,_,,_
x-.___._ o_. --- 4 1 -
)
,[
Y i WE ff 1 I i. g ~ h! g h
- 8
- . g g ,
I T f n" -7r = :- _-m.-mw=lT n Aqb _u _ __ _ . - i::; -
- . . - w . _ . .7~ 5.
l [ r
~
\
, -- - - 7 __ , _ - . + ,
_ - - . _ __m_ _ .w ___ _.n __. _ _ _. _ g. ._ %. ,- - m . . _ .cg;,ggy
. -.m n . _ _ _
m
.'--. am" -a.._ ._
~.__ -- * ;,- :
,, 4=;
I *" " " * =
- m-
? .
.. qui.
i ons - I E if
~
~l 6 6I ( i .i- i f { 'f I I
' I I
= io l l m-an = = .
s
1 2.k WYLE LABORATORIES Report No. 5 "2 0 CDSTCY.E1 k{dLN$ :All ll N E. _ Job so. E7530 rage uo. 23 b , 1 r Full Scale /OO g Accel. No. Control G) M Response ( ) Operator M E 9' W M Spect=eu M VdkMbl C., U 4 M .C OEEE 4-M 2 -Il 2 6 " Date Damping *3 : Axis of Test E. .' QY .
~
F77 O . g gg . NOR.il. C - RESPONSE SPECTRUM t/Elt.T' E2
/cc_ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . ......,,
4
* '1 ,
------g
.e .
.v. .
.. r
__-,.,& . ir m ,
.-+;_ __.. a
,_+ g -y- --- .
-g _ _. 's
_ __ s T ..
,[u\\;N, 1 . . .
[, - s ,
, ,.-_ v .,. , '. _ . m' m _ , '_' ,.' m- .." .'
Inn , iiix m- , ,
;/ om ,.4> i rs ,*
. . . y . ., , .s .,
, : 1 i
, ,m . ,s - y~
\ / --
, i._ .
. . . ~
~e
^l _ l Y i, y
x o
, - - - - - = . _- . -
. - ~
_ h . ' . -'M%x , _
.ia .- .
8 m - g ,/ i
- g ; -% -
g y . - - 3 __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____A__.____..___ _ _ . . _ . _ . _ s 3 g - y . . _ _ _ s
,!. .- 2
~ ' * ~ ' '
-n
,y I .I L.'~l I
' ~
, i. i i ! ! 6 '
o > _>
- ,i ..
l .i.
. . . ,__ l. ,
'i. ,;, l ,
,g e
.s-:
% ---l- -- :_ p _ k'~_-[ . . .l '
_ _ l ., .1_ _ l__ _ _ _ . _i _ _ ' [ l 1 q ~* h
--t.. e--~~-
;__ m _4 -
]~ _._.. g 4 _ , {*- * - - -
-1 : **"+ y5 .5
, y- _ , , _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ , _ _
s 3 - - - - . - - - - _ .e r 2_- . _ , . . _ _
.- a-- : . - t ,__ .
w __ v ~F -- = w-L - - -
-.---.._.1. _
Ce
, LL + L, - ;d-{ ;
6 i I- ! I ,
- ' .i m.e ?
E
~
- f-- _l i'
I I l
' 2 io l l l m e . cv s2 = == iooo
. - _ . _ . , . , . - ~ . - . .
y
0'Uf j 57530
, WYLE LABORATORIES Report No.
CUSTCMER dudLEAL VAL t/E aos so. 5753 O page no. 24
)
J Full Scale /OO g Accel. No. , Control M Response ( ) Operator MEEl44M Spec 1=en M V b i A LIC. l/A L V6 OPC2.ATD E Date 2. /A ?8 Damping $ % Axis of Test 3 t1
< S S E i,,a H o Ris. 5 ~
i* RESPONSE SPECTRUM
/00 : . . . , . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . .,....,,
7 8 e e
~~
t W ~7 ~ f 4 a s
. - f
- r i :7 ei 4
_ . . x
.x:. 3
_y l:
/__
8 , ,
.,, ? \ b L l // i ,
. . . ,I l'.I
.. . I*I.., sss .n , ,i e e j
4 I :
\
C[s g Y a
~
N 1 / r 11
?
i i ii X_x , , f
'/ .--w-- 0 g m_4 _'?--
p ~; '- ' a r a.- 0
- ; - me g -*+- --
s 5 .___ _ _ _ . __ 0 v
~
4 i 3 JJ f F
- i. .. '
/*
Ii , T'*"*"**" P** i,. 'I
. .i'i- *'* T*'!;
i 7
,i . '
.. I I- '
f, 1 __ I
;-- - - _ ._ . a . , 2 ,-.; ;
i
; m ..,
- - - - + - .. ._
- . . . _ _ . ~ _. , ,
C* ~* , _
. - - - =. &
a -
-_~,_..____n-
~
~ . - - - 6
; = -i '
"'"F""i M C-dE'i- ;'
~
ZE_-. ...-*. --- e 1 : ~l--; i g g N '" ' - ' -_ _ :r '*.._,.
. ' ' y' . g--- _ l r_.
. .u . _ . _ _ . _ - - _ _ _ _ . _ . . _._..... _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
s 3 " Q _
,,,9--;, =i ,_
.~t ,
t
, 3,
_P a , , L ;.- u m m . . @_ 1 _,,, _,_ ,,,, 3, -- :_.-- wr ._. ;, ,__ ,j_ , _
*j ; ; ;.
j - l ' - -
. r i > > !
! g I
' l l 2 io l l me.c a = = ,,,,
WYLE LABORATORIES Wzy Report No. =~: 1n m._ CUSTOMER NUdb64k Y$bYb Job No._$ 7 b 3 O Page No. 25
)r Full Scale /OO g Accel. No. Control (,\#) Response ( )
Operator M E_E MAM Speci=en M VDI. Al !C val.V6 O E*E 7 E E Date 7.* /M8 Damping b % Axis of Test -
, N RIE O '
ssa " VL R.T. El RESPONSE SPECTRUM
/pLo , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . .
___ 8 1
. 1 8 j 1
m - Ls
' ,~a _m_ - -
m_
-y IR f
% L I
, n jj ~ '~
i af , . I \ T MV / l 6 if 2 [ . . 3 i
/__ . .
f
,I
.I ..t.,\V s.
i1 ~[ '
. s . ,!.
. ! 1 !I >
- f 3 Q
. . i
. . .t .. . ,
- . , ,. _ / N
. , . . . ; ~'
= ,
. _~ s.. -
so . g / x
$ng /2 .
3 me y :
^
; ~_
'T^ - 9 I< ,
[_m' "^ -- r2 " Y ' 'f $ 1A I-
/,p ' r1 . i i
4 a LA L ) _ . . . m
> fW 2 W
.m
( m -; '.h 1) _ -A } l\.4 i ..
- w s u.1 t h i n,w,-u :ss , .
,-a w .
_ _. _ _ _!_. e v I i
, I r i ir i h ' ** i e
. _.._a.
_r m. . . ._ a - - __ .:; u _ __w_ ;_,' _ . 3
= ._,- '
x A. . . q5 ' -
-m.
w w ;.;_ e ~ - _._._
~ . - . -
y_._ r,
,a_,.._.,
a--a-.-h-+-+-.-.i
.p.._.
_ ,... - - ,g f_ y __,_ W "T "a'-9' - NN" s#w r-2 , _. n ._ _ e _es_e.,,_m m.
, : _ ._ w _ _ w s . _._ e--
w - _s
= -
h l . A 4 f I I I I I i 2 to I l l l regotgecy Hg 100 30 1000 s l ev---
a 6/ty WhLE LABORATORIES Report No. *~:30 i Ur CUSTOMER NUd.d4b YN d Job No. 5753 o rase No. 26 l A Tull Scale /OO g Accel. No. Control M Response ( ) Operator M E E M A M Speci=en N V DE.A l lC I/ril. V6 OEUAW E Date 2* IM 6 Daup hg b : Axis of Test -7 U A X- Y O -
]Q l- O C. b RESPONSE SPECTRUM
\/ E R T. D
/O_O . . . , . . . . . . . . . , . . . . .
'a
, ,.. ?
s 6 4 1 1 ______...______.__.,. _____.,_ _ ___. ___a
,-_,,- = _
t 1 1 - ' i1^^ _- ^t r'
=m
^
7 --.c
> - s.
x m.
. ~ :-
r i1 -~~. _ f I 2-vr#1 1 1 r y y 3 jj n +
/_[
g
, i s +
ft\e p.- ri , 1 , % ms ji- ,1 i . .
%. wp .n. , ,
y ;j - x - s i_i i s,. e _./l f I .s , hi -
-#- gt---_'---.~..
1 J ~I
, 3 6
g i X y_,______.___._,, j i i i M~ g '
~-
.= x ^
s e _ _ _
?
g f. --
--.-m__,_____.__..._....._.__ ._
s
= . i ---
Qq -i ~
- _ __ '.~
2 1 1 1 , ,
-.4
y ;; 51g. __ _ ;- _1 - m ,.2 # : - - + - -
- 2. 2 : - _1
-[ _ ,
T '"
/. 0 //: t . ..;. !
'" ' ~ "
2-..l r 4-
+
_,,,,7-11 4i-o-- A, _- ~ l l ;- l ; O l'21 ^ -v 7 - - ; . 9%
.= .-.p. _. _.__ , , _. ._.. . + _
- - - " . _ . . . . . . ._ s
_. .. _- re:.d --+--- _r, R _
- - - - - n . a ._ H : i ,
"i w n %-
_--,--; ~~y ,- . >pd. ft-Q . - .. - ! r _
; -* = 4 * * - - 1 , i^i 7 AT.'r 'i d ^-^ - - b w
_ . . . _ _ . , k g hd(.55[- a
,3 _
__.== v - ---
-~
----n--- _ . - -._-t-o r-- !=7 1 1 w n, .
g_q -- 1 -: 3 ,
,;_ a )
j
^
.I 1
l -e 1 a i. 1 4 i j .~ l 6 i , l l I
- i
- io I l l meme n i= = i.o !
l
..
- l
0/ 2 Y WY'.E LABORATORIES Report No. 57 " O 3 CUSTCMER NUd.OAb hbl/b Job No. 5753 o r.ge No. J" Full Scale /OO g Accel. No. Control (,D Response ( ) Operator M EE4Atd Spec 1=en M VDR. A( IC val V6 6 PIE? A*TD 2. Date 1* "' 7 6 Da= ping $
- X- v 0
% Axis of Test -;7 6> A
~
g c pas HoRi%. O
~
- u. --
t* RE3."ONSE SPECTRUM
/D._$
. = = . . . , . . . . : . . . . , . . . . . . . . . , .
'F 8
4 1
+-
A w
, x _-' _
-_ 3 +
~
nu' L I/ I 1 g
,A . %([-,
,(
r t i i _ s-- , , I I -
.,','# !' 3
\: I I i
_-_ . . . . - . . .. 1,
- s. . ,1 , s . . .
j3 e ( J~ 1
.e r W
r
'-d M,
t---+.
i i i, ,x3 f
p - , - a
~44 'O g .:
. . _ _ . _ _ .- _ a
- 1~3a, 3-4 --
^^ U -
. .4 .
p--
~
1 ..h"#Y 1 1 7 _8_. *IUI* /2
,I'-_ _ _
4 4 . ,, .
.. ) e
'8
-..._--_n. #.
.--: 4,
-~~-
> i i i i ;_ , ,
r==.~
; , .t ,
.~.
_. _ .:: w ,. : ---, . S
- -: 7_ -h 5 **: ^ ~
i--- 4
- _ y,,
_ - -- - ;~ ,
, s
__g LJ * * " " " * * *:~ p..g: - - - - - 1'" k __ _ g- _ _' f ** *_ *-f-" ,. ._ g_q-- - Qg j -.1-,-t-c ,, I I I
' 2 I i io me ev az = = 1
,.o e
. 1 c) Y WYLE LABORATORIES Report No. 57530 _
N' CUSTCMER NU0l6R YlWE Job No. $ l 5 5 0 Page No. 20 i A Full Scale /OO g Accel. No. Control (N') Response ( ) Operator M El4AM Speci=en M U DP A l lC V4l V6 0E62 A7'0 2-Date 78M8 Damping $ % Axis of Test F 47 X- Y P71 O
~% Q Q 20
~
Y h ' RESPONSE SPECTRUM VERT.O
/O_O e . . . . , . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . ,
. . e, ,
8
?
- - - - - - . 8 E I I
-e--- - + - - -
._._a.%.W-4,A. g-.
e- = _ _ _ _ m 9
- m. ,i
_M
a 11 .- -
I m- '_ . , N I I! I ^'#' [
,,e .- _m 1 i
1 A N1 li f1L , M. Vf
.' . .I 1 IJ /" I f- 7 ' i' I \\ 1 _/
a h 1 'f 3 1U
.I l
a
-i % ( A w
,I j..U
. s _1J .m -
,!/ ,1i, ,
..m
- i. . . .
1 _-_._ ,
,.,-- a ,
Q 1
, . .I L ha 1
1 1 1 s, '4 V'f w h 3
- .of 4 %
X r i I _ _ _ . . . _ _ _ _ _ g e
.= s S __
4 5 h -._=4 --,
.--_.__-._y___, . _ _ _ . _ _ , _ _ .
, ,- _ _ _ _ , I
.e v %
4 . . _ , s [ t {
--+ -.a.- -
3
. 1 I 7 i
/_, __g .m . m .
- i
.4
= -.. __
w-.umn.r,y,iio , r
-- -== _, _ _ _ _ , ,..-
-s' ,,
... n.% . 4
[ I i m,._-, , __}",..._. I'3I
, [
- ft-- - - _-+ --__. j..,
'l
.,._3
-...r =
3 .44. 4 m, _ . -4 . t'_O M
- 7 ""*=* -*{l {. { ;
- ty ' y_,.
- . - . m-
. _ . ' . dg{ . . _ . . . .
-I
~
+
-- t - _ g .. g ~4 :- _6.+ . . - . . .
.I*. f *
- 4-r~ " * ~+ _ti
_.+.
.~
I
.-..-,__~ _
- emi o e *==> N . . I -- --__
' m _. . r=_ - n -,---. 1 -_,_ i "*pl $ 'w$ l x i e,
,g : 2 --
[_- Il p-l ; _ - a ,-) VM q-{ fj: ;_ i
... .2 l ', ,
I i , 8 I i 2 to 1 l rusotaecv Hz 100 20 loco ! l
.. .. 1
_ . . _ - - 1
$lY WYLE LA80RATORIES Report No. 57530 g CUSTOMER NU8 b6Ab NNdE. Job No. b 7 b 3 O Page No. 9 f
r ) A Full Scale /OO g Accel. No. Control (d') Response ( ) Operator MEE MAM Spec 1=en M VDR.MIC I/4 LV6 O M M P. Date 1 ei M Damping b % Axis of Test -
?u ssE t. H RIG O RESPONSE SPECTRUM \/t R.T. G1
/@ . . . , . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . .
a r , r-- r a m _ _"2_." ~ t _m-
- . 1 1 'r A- m 1 \ f
;M ]2I I Y Ni 'V 1 1- 8 n
< . < . , , ,i ia i i N e
_ i
,'- .. . s. . .
t e? f n
.}}