ML20024F617

Rev 3 to Engineering Program Plan Project Instruction P1-3201-009 Midland Independent Design & Const Verification Program.

ML20024F617
Person / Time
Site:	Midland
Issue date:	07/15/1983
From:	TERA CORP.
To:
Shared Package
ML19292B413	List: ML20024F606 ML20024F611 ML20024F617
References
FOIA-84-293 PROC-830715-01, NUDOCS 8309090524
Download: ML20024F617 (50)

Text

. _ _ _ _ _ _

O ENGINEERING PROGRAM PLAN PROECT INSTRUCTION PI-3201-009 MIDLAND INDEPEf0ENT DESIGN Am CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM PROJECT 3201 O

jut _Y 15,1983 Ab REVISION: 3 COPY NO.

fl 8309090524 830906 PDR ADOCK 05000329 A PDR ,

l t

'"3 TERA CORPORATION

/

OUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM, Midland Ind& pendent Design and Construction Verification Program Engineering Program Plan -

3201-009 DOCUtAENT REVISION RECORD DATE DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES REV Pg. 1 - Update status of NRC approval of TERA Corporation:

deleted "and approved by the NRC",

. 1 2/9/83 replaced with, " subject to NRC approval" Pg. 24- Update reference to P&lD M439:

added, " revision 9" after 3A and changed rev. 9 to rev. 10 after 3B

/ Pg. 25- Add System Selection Boundary for HVAC:

V add, "AFW pump room fan coolers and associated ductwork and supports" Modified to reflect the addition of the Standby Electric Power (SEP) system and the Control Room Heating, Ventilating and Air 2 5/18/83 Conditioning (HVAC) system to the scope of the Midland 10CV program.

Changes reflect changes in the Project Organization and clarifi-3 7/15/83 cation of the scope of selected review topics.

A

=

~ -- __ . _ .

I TERA CORPORATION OUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM Midland Independent Design and Construction Verification Program DATE: 7/15/83 EPP REV: 3 PAGE REV!SION RECORD PAGE REV PAGE REV PAGE REV PAGE REV PAGE REV PAGE REV Cover 3 Figt.2-7 3 42 2 71 3 100 2 129 2 1 3 15 3 43 3 72 2 101 2 130 2 11 2 16 2 44 2 73 2 102 2 131 2 til 2 17 3 45 2 74 2 103 2 132 2 Iv 2 Fig 2.1-1 3 46 2 75 3 104 2 133 2 v 2 47 2 76 3 105 2 134 2 19 3 i vi 2 20 3 48 2 77 3 106 2 135 2 2 2 107 3 136 2 vil 2 20a 3 49 78 Os vill 2 21 2 50 2 79 2 108 2 137 2 ix 2 22 2 51 2 80 2 109 2 138 2 x 2 23 2 52 3 81 3 110 2 Fig 5.2-1 2 xi 2 24 2 53 2 82 3 til 2 140 3 2 2 54 83 2 112 2 141 2 l xit 25 3 x111 2 26 3 55 2 84 3 113 2 142 2 j

1 2 27 2 56 2 85 3 114 2 143 2 2 28 2 57 2 86 3 115 2 144 3 t 2 2 2 87 2 116 2 145 2 3 3 29 l 58 4 2 2 88 2 117 2 3 30 59 ha 2 60 3 89 2 118 2 3 31 119 2 Figl-2-1 3 32 2 61 3 90 2 120 2 Figl.2-2 n3 33 2 62 3 91 2 2 121 2 Figt.2-2 )3 34 2 63 2 92 F i g 1. 2'-3 2 64 2 93 2 122 2 3 35 123 2 Figl.2-4 i3 36 2 65 3 94 2 _

Figl.2-4 ) 3 2 66 2 95 2 124 2 37 96 2 125 2 s Figl.2-5 3 38 3 67 3 Figt.2-6 s3 2 68 2 97 2 126 2 39 127 2 Figl.2-6 )3 40 2 69 .2 98 2 2 2 99 2 128 2 41 70

4 O

J TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE GEfERAL l 1.0 I

1.1 BACKGROUND

AND PURPOSE l.2 OVERVIEW OF IDCV SCOPE 3 1.3 SYSTEMS SELECTION CRITERIA ha INDEPENDENCE REQUIREMENTS 15 1.4 17 2.0 ORGANIZATION AfO CONTROL 17 2.1 PROJECT ORGANIZATION 19 2.2 AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY 21 2.3 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL

~

21 3.0 ENGINEERING PROGRAM PLAN METHODOLOGY

, O 22 lV l

3.1 !NDEPENDENT DESIGN VERIFICATION METHODOLOGY 3.1.1 CATEGORIES OF REVIEW: THE DESIGN 24 CHAIN 3.1.1.1 Review of Design Criteria cnd 25 Commitments 3.l.1.2 Review of implementing 25 l

l Documents 3.1.l.3 Check of Calculations and 26 Evoluotions-3.l.l.4 Confirmatory Calculations or 27 Evoluotions 3.1.l.5 Check of Drawings and 28 Specifications 3.1.2 BASES FOR SAMPLE SELECTION , 28 3.l.3 DEFINITION OF REVIEW SCOPE FOR THE' 30 AFW SYSTEM l

3.1.3.1 AFW Systern Performance Criteria 33 l

3.l.3.1.1 System Operating 33 Limits - Topic 1.l-1  ;,'

3.1.3.1.2 Accident Analysis 33 Considerations -

Topic l.2-1 l '

3.1.3.l.3 Single Foilure - 34 i I'

Topic l.3-1 3.1.3.1.4 Technical Specifico- 34 tions - Topic l.4-1 l-DC-82-13 i

'w

r

s. N s

i\ \

• Nr Yl PROJECT INSTRUCTION x PI 3201.. c09

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland Independent Design and REV.: 3 CATE: 7/15/83 Construction Verification Program A

PAGE 3 4 145 PREPARED BY:

a M r.

AFPROVED BY:

wh y

1.2 OVERVIEW OF IDCV SCOPE The Midland IDCV consists of two major components: the independent Design Verification (IDV) Program and the Independent Construction Verification (ICV)

Program. The Unit 2 Auxiliary Feedwater (AFW) system, the Standby Electric Power (SEP) system and the Control Room Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning (CR-HVAC) system related to control room habitability have been selected as applicable somptes of the design engineering and construction efforts of the Midland plant. The AFW system was selected by TERA based upon the system selection criterio discussed in Section 1.3 of this Plan. The SEP and control room HVAC systems selected by the CPC and NRC have o sufficiently high profile for each of these criteria to justify their selection.

The scope of review corresponds directly to the design and construction chains, oddressing major-octivities and outputs of the various contributing engineering and construction disciplines. Accordingly, the products of the design and constisction process, from concept to installotion, hydros, functional and preoperational testing and turnover will be evoluoted. Interfaces between CPC, Bobcock and Wilcox (B&W), the nuclear steam system supplier (NSSS) vendor, Bechtel, the orchitect-engineer (A-E), and other contractors will be identified and evoluoted relative to such items os the proper transfer and interpretation of design or construction information.

~

. Figure 1.2-l' shows the inter-relationship between the Midland design and a construction process and the Midland IDCV program.

O

(),

DC-82-13

)j n. . .

.a .,

i

's.

• f ~ - ll

~

t ,,4 J) s '

PROJECT INSTRUCTION

,('

%f oli .~, 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan i ,

Midland Independent Design and

,j, RWs '3; DATE: 7/15/83 Construction Verification Program I'/

~,3

. 4,g _/

4- of 145 PREPARED BY:

1

/ ~f

-v

. APPROVED B

,', ) : b, . '

, i The following figures present the IDCV scope for the AFW, SEP and CR-HVAC f

systems in the form of matrices which identify the initici leveal of review and

- ~ evaluation in each design or construction creo respectively:

4 ..

Figures Design Construction System Verification Verification AFW l.2-20, 2b I.2-3 SEP l.2-4o,4b l.2-5 CR-HVAC l.2-6o, 6b l.2-7 s')

g -s it should be noted that the scope of technical review is dynamic and subject to change os mere emphasis will be - given to specific review creas that meet prescribed criterio. These criteria are documented in Section 3.1.2 of this Plon.

Accordingly, the review matrices generally represent the initial IDCV "somple".

On April 13,1983, o change of the AFW system initial sompte was effected. This change is noted on Figures I.2-20,1.2-2b and 1.2-3.

t l

l l

t N))

l l DC-82-13 ,

C' v PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland Independent Design and REV.: 3 DATE: 7/15/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY PAGE ha of 145 3

The topic numbers used in the motrices have the following formot:

X Y Z i o A h $ Construction Topic identifier C = Construction Topic blank = Design Topic System Number I = AFW System 2 = Standby Electric Power System 3 = Control Room HVAC Topic Numbers Where identical design crecs apply to each system, the number is the same. For exampie, f

x topic I for each system is " System Operating Limits" ond 23 is "Follure Modes and Effects".

Unique topics (e.g. fuel oil system) are given numbers (e.g. 27) which apply to only one system.

Design or Construction Review Areo I = System Performance Requirements 2 = System Protection Features 3 = Structures Housing the System 1.3 SYSTEMS SELECTION CRITERI A The selection of the auxiliary feedwater system was based upon the following six criteria:

e importance to Safet - The system should have o relo-tively high level of importance to the overall safety of

- the Midland Plant.

e inclusion of Design and Construction Interfoces - The system should be one which involves multiple interfoces O among engineering and construction disciplines os well os V design and construction organizations, such as the NSSS vendor, orchitect engineer, constructor, and subtier con-troctors. The system should also be one where design or construction changes have occurred and thus provide the ability to test the effectiveness of the design and con-struction process exercised by principal internal and external orgonizations or disciplines in orcos of design or ,

I construction chang. J

\

%J INTER-RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE MIDLAND DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PROCESS Ato T1-E MIDLAPO IDCV PROGRAM ii l 40 CFR 50. APPErcix A l

. sRP k

e Reg Cuiers FSAR AT CTrER Review Or DESIGN e Wer  ; LfflLITY CRiTERI A A'O Steerds COMMIT MENT 5 CCMwit wENTS e N555 Crwie 1I l DESIGN PPE5 l jr REvite or A.E.N551 VDOOR IM*LEwENTINC I ENCNEIR NG -

IM*LE ME NT NG DOCUMENTS

$7 #O ARDS, DOCUwENin PROCEDURE 5 4, If DESIGN PROCE55 e Desi Centrol - e Ergiwirs e GA/ Evelse** C4CK Or C0er:RM Atony e Calculatiers CALCULATIONS A@ C ALCUL ATION5 OR EVALUATIONS E VA.UATION5 l DE51GN CMANCE5 l 1I lDy m I DESCN OUTPUTS

C*ECK Or a Dee..nss DRAwlNC5 A@

I , S8ECIFIC ATIONS

\ e sencifiest w 4 d.

l 4 ,r CWCK Or FA9RICATm a((g"g lCV WulFR DOCUMENTATION I I i .

if _

SITE CONSTRutT10N ACTMTIES e Caretruct.en

• W"N Centret C *IT, M

• REV'E* "

m Review Or STORACE CONSTRCM, e GA/0C e Erection, kutel. UC MAfNTENANCE "

DWMENTATION yf,'T W e ,8evien.

OE etc.

l 1f l FIELD CMANGE5 l 1f ii ii VEmir CAT;ON/ INST ALLED STRUCTURES, OVER-NWTCTION

? SY5TEMS APO VERIFICATION OF r ACTiv1 TIES COMM>d.NTS PHYSICAL l COPFICupATION jy g Review Or

' VERIFIC ATiON yyRNOVER FOR ACTivlTIES O FUNCTIONAL

. TESTNG i,

JP

?l OPERATION 5 l l m '

I DESIGN Ato CONSTRUCTION PROCESS MIDLAPO IOCV PROGRAM (v) 1 FIGURE I.2-1 l

l

O INITIAL SAMPLE REVIEW MATRIX FOR THE AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM I

MIDLAND INDEPENDENT DESIGN VERIFICATION PROCRAM SCOPE OF REVIEW r

y g i

2 2

DE5lCN AREA t c y 5 ~,

%, 8&

I$

5 ff 68 8 68 88

• j 82 8 j'2 e l' g[s O 8

ArW SYSTEM PERFORM ANCE REQUIREMENTS l.l 1 X X X SYSTEM OPERATING LIMITS X e l.21 ACCIDENT ANALYSIS CONSIDERATIONS X X X e 1.3-1 SINGLE FAILURE 1.41 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS X X l.5-1 SYSTEM ALIGNMENT /SwlTCHOVER X X l.6-1 REMOTE OPERATlON AND SHUTDOWN X l.7-l SYSTEM ISOLATION / INTERLOCKS X X X e e e l 3.3-l OVERPRESSURE PROTECTION X X X X 1.9-1 COMPONENT FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS f X X X e l 1.10-1 SY5 TEM HYDRAULIC DESIGN X X X e 1.11-1 SYSTEM PEAT REMOVAL CAPABILITY 1.12-1 COOLING REQUIREMENTS X l.13-1 WATER SUPPLIES X X l.14-1 PRESERVICE TESTING / CAPABILITY FOR X e e OPERATIONAL TESTING X X e i

1.15-1 POWER SUPPLIES X e e 1.16-1 ELECTRICAL CHARACTERISTICS X X X 1.17-1 PROTECTIVE DEVICES / SETTINGS X X X X l.18-l INSTRUMENTATION X X X e l

I.lf I ,

CONTROL SYSTEMS X e l.20-1 ACTUATION 5YSTEMS X e e 1.21 1 POE COMMITMENTS MATERIAL 5 SELECTION X X 1.22 1 e e e v 1.23-1 FAILURE MODES AND EFFECTS NOTE M

• • I 1. INITIAL SAMPLE DOCUMENTED IN REV. O AND I OF THIS PLAN HA5 BEEN MODIFIED EFFECTIVE h DELETED SCOPE OF REVIEW 4/13/83 e . ADDED SCOPE OF REVIEW FIGURE I.2-2a

l 1

INITIAL SAMPLE REVIEW MATRIX FOR Tlf AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM MIDLAND INDEPENDENT DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM (CONTINUED)

SCOPE OF REVIEW i e; Ie DE5lCN AREA g 3 f

si B!

f

• by 8

i 12 gi $ 89 yT s!'JE y8

&y y & u u AFW SYSTEM PROTECTION FEATURES X

11. 1 - 1 SEISMIC DESIGN X X X X X l1.2 1 e PRESSURE BOUNDARY X X X X X

11. 3 - 1 e PlPE/EQUlPMENT SUPPORT X X X X

11. 4 1 e EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION X

II.5-1 HIGH ENERGY LINE BREAK ACCIDENTS X

O. 11. 6 - 1

11. 7 I e PIPE WHIP e JET IMPINCEMENT X

X X X ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION X llAl X X X X X

11. 9 1 e ENVIRONMENT AL ENVELOPES X X X X 11.10-1 e EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION

11. 1 1 - 1 e HVAC DESIGN X X X X ll.12 1 FIRE PROTECTION 11.1 3 - 1 MISSILE PROTECTION X X X X

11. 1 4 - 1 SYSTEMS INTERACTION STRUCTURES THAT HOUSE THE AFW SYSTEM X X X X ll!.1-1 SEISMIC DESIGN / INPUT TO EQUIPMENT 111. 2 - 1 WIND & TORNADO DESIGN / MISSILE PROTECTION X 111. 3 1 FLOOD PROTECTION X 111. 4 - 1 HELBA LOADS X 111. 5 - 1 CivlL/ STRUCTURAL DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS X X X X lil.6' l e FOUPOATIONS X X X X 111. 7 - 1 e CONCRETE / STEEL DESIGN lilAl e TAPES @ @ @

o b g NOTE X -INITIAL SCOPE OF REVIEW l. INITIAL SAMPLE DOCUMENTED kN REV. O AND I OF THIS PLAN HAS BEEN MODIFIED EFFECTIVE h DELETED SCOPE OF REVIEW "#I3#83 e . ADDED SCOPE OF REVIEW FIGURE I.2-2b

INITIAi. SAMPLE REVIEW MATRIX FOR TW AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM I

MIDLAW lNDEPENDENT CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM SCOPE OF REVICW h

• • M T a

e ,J gy e 4.

j SYSTEM / COMPONENT (a- kT dv

1. • 8

• u[ $

ff 81 ;bh $51 f*

v e 'l i;

1. 4 FJ a fb 2'

g I E MECHANICAL X X X X X 1.1-lc o EQUIPMENT X X X X I.2-Ic e PIPING X X X X l.3-Ic e PIPE SUPPORTS O ELECTRICAL X X X X X ll.l-Ic e EQUIPMENT *

• X X

f II.2-le e TRAYS AND SUPPORTS

• X X

• ll.3-le o CONDUli AND $UPPORTS X X X X X ll.4 Ic e CABLE INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL X X X X X lit.l-Ic e INSTRUMENTS X X lil.2 lc e PIPING / TUBING X *

• X

!!I.3-Ic e CABLE HVAC X X X X X IV.1-Ic e EQUIPMENT X X IV.2 lc e DUCTS AND SUPPORT 5 STRUCTURAL l

X X

,V.1-lc e FOutOATIONS X X X VJ le o CONCRETE '

X X X V.3-lc e STRUCTURAL STEEL e

VI.1-le NDE/MATERI AL TESTING PROGRAM O~ M NOTE X - NTIAL SCOPE OF REVIEW l. INITI AL SAMPLE DOCUMENTED IN REV. O AND I OF THis PLAN HAS BEEN !.<ODIFIED EFFECTIVE h DELETED SCOPE OF REVIEW 4/13/8 3 e . ADDED SCOPE OF REVIEW FIGURE I.2-3

INITIAL SAMPLE REVIEW MATRIX FOR T}E STAtOBY ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM i

MIDLAto INDEPENDENT DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM l

f SCOPE OF REVIEW r g i y 4t' DE51GN AREA f sh 8 [YI 8 .

1 l' / l'{! lsf ST ANDBY ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS r

1.I-2 SYSTEM OPERATING LIMITS - DG X X X l.22 X X ACCIDENT ANALYSIS CONSIDERATIONS

- DG, AC, DC SINGLE FAILURE - DC, PDS, AC, DC X X X X l.3-2 l.42 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS - DC, DC X X X

O l.6-2 LOCAL OPERATION - DG l.72 SYSTEM INTERLOCKS - DG l.92 COMPONENT FUNL? TONAL REQUIREMENTS X

X X

X X X

- DC, PDS, AC, DC X X X l.12-2 COOLING / HEATING REQUIREMENTS - DG X X X X l.14-2 PRESERVICE TESTINC/ CAPABILITY FOR OPERATIONAL TESTING - DC X X X X l.16-2 ELECTRICAL CHARACTERISTICS - DC, PDS, AC, DC .

PROTECTIVE DEVICES / SETTINGS - DC, PDS X X X 1.17 2 X X X X l.18-2 INSTRUMENTATION-DC, AC,DC X X X X l.19 2 CONTROL SYSTEMS - DC X X X X l.20-2 ACTUATION SYSTEMS - DC X X X l.23-2 FAILURE MODES AND EFFECTS - DC, PDS, AC,DC X X X X l.24-2 ELECTRICAL LOAD CAPACITY - DC, PDS, AC, DC ELECTRICAL LOADS SEQUENCING - DG, PDS X X X X 1.25-2 ELECTRICAL LOAD SEDDING - DC, PDS X X X l.26-2 FUEL OIL SYSTEM -DG X X X l.27 2 LUBE OIL SYSTEM -DG X X l.28-2 X X X X l.29-2 START!NG MECHANISM APO AIR SUPPLY SYSTEM - DG COMBUSTION AIR SUPPLY-DC X X X l.30-2 INDEPENDENCE - DC, PD5, AC, DC X X X l.31-2 X X X X X l.32-2 CABLE SIZING / ROUTING / SEPARATION- PD5 KEY O DG DGB -

PDS -

- DIESEL GEERATOR DIESEL GENERATOR BUILDING POWER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AC - PREFERRED 120V AC POWER SYSTEM SERVICING AFW SYSTEM DC - 12SV DC POWER SYSTEM SERVICING AFW SYSTEM FIGURE l.2-Aa

1 O

INITIAL SAMPLE REVIEW MATRIX FOR TW STAPOBY ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM MIDLAto INDEPEtOENT DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM (CONTINUED)

SCOPE OF REVIEW i i  !

e

/

DESIGN AREA h+s,4h*e!

2

!/ ## #

4- x 1

STANDBY ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM l! I l'f I PROTECTION FE ATURES

11. 1 - 2 SEISMIC DESIGN X

!!.2-2 e PRESSURE BOUtOARY - DG X X X

11. 3 - 2 o PIPE / EQUIPMENT SUPPORT - DC, PDS X X X X X 11.4 2 e EQUIPMENT GUAllFICATION - DC, PDS X X X X 11.5-2 HIGH ENERGY LINE BREAK ACCIDENTS X 11.6-2 e PIPE WHIP - PDS, AC, DC X 11.7-2 e JET IMPlNCEMENT - PDS, AC, DC X 11.8-2 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION X

!!.9-2 e ENVIRONMENTAL ENVELOPES - DC, PDS X 11.1 0 - 2 e EQUlPMENT QUALIFICATION - DG, PDS X X X X 11.11 2 e HVAC DESIGN - DG X 11.1 2 - 2 FIRE PROTECTION - DG X X X

11. 1 3 - 2 MISSILE PROTECTION - DG X

11. 1 4 - 2 SYSTEMS INTERACTION - DC, PDS, AC, DC X X STRUCTURES THAT HOUSE THE STAFOBY RECTRIC POWER SYSTEM lli.1-2 SEISMIC DESIGN /lNPUT TO EQUIPMENT - DGB X X X X 111. 2 - 2 WIND & TORNADO DESIGN / MISSILE PROTECTION X X X X

- DG8 111. 3 - 2 FLOOD PROTECTlON - DGB X X X 111. 4 - 2 PELBA LOADS - DG8 X 111. 5 - 2 CIVIL / STRUCTURAL DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS Ill.6-2 e FOUPOATIONS - DG8 X X X 111. 1 - 2 e CONCRETE / STEEL DESIGN - DGB X X X X 111.8-2 e TAtES X X X X X (d KEY DG -

DGB-DIESEL GENERATOR DIESEL GENER ATOR BUILDING PDS - POWER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AC - PREFERRED 120V AC POWER SYSTEM SERVICING AFW SYSTEM DC - 125V DC POWER SYSTEM SERViCNG AFW SYSTEM FIGURE I.2 lb i

INITIAL SAMPLE REVIEW MATRIX FOR THE STAPOBY ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM MIDLAW lNDEPENDENT CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM SCOPE OF REVIEW II

!z la g 992 T

SYSTEM /COMPOPENT

' '8' x 9' 81 ; ll

• f th'a *

• z! esh I E s

cu MECHANICAL X X X X X l.l.2e o EQUIPMENT - DC X X X f.2 2c e PIPING - DG X X X l.3-2c e PIPE SUPPORTS - DG l ELECTRICAL o EQUIPMENT - DG, PDS, AC, DC X X X X X (f.I-2e X X X X II.2-2c e TRAYS AND SUPPORTS-PDS X X X X ll.3-2c e CONDUlT AND SUPPORTS-PDS X X X X X ll.4 2c e CABLE - PDS INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL X X X X X lli.1-2c e INSTRUMENTS - DC X X X lil.2 2e e PIPING / TUBING -DG X X X X X lil.3 2c e CABLE - DC, PDS HVAC X X IV.l.2e o EQUIPMENT - DC X X IV.2 2c e DUCTS APO SUPPORTS - DG STRUCTURAL e FOUPOATIONS - DG X X V.1-2c e CONCRETE - DG X X Y.2 2e V.3-2c e STRUCTURAL STEEL- DC X X O -

DG .

DGB -

DIESEL CEPERATOR DIESEL GEtERATOR BUILDING PDS - POWER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AC . PREFERRED 120V AC POWER SYSTEM ,

SERVICING AFW SYSTEM DC - 125V DC POWER SYSTEM SERVICNG AFW SYSTEM FIGURE I.2-5

O INITIAL SAMPLE REVIEW MATRIX FOR TE CONTROL ROOM HVAC SYSTEM MIDLAND INDEPEMXINT DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM f SCOPE OF REVIEW i 2  !  !

DESIGN AREA es f

%g h4,eg!s *PO '-

l tt49d i l' / I'f I{t CONTROL ROOM HVAC SYSTEM PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS l.1-3 SYSTEM OPERATING LIMITS X X X 1.23 ACCIDENT ANALYSIS CONSIDERATIONS X X l.3-3 SINGLE FAILURE X X X l.43 TECINICAL SPECIFICATIONS X X l.5-3 SYSTEM ALIGNMENT /SWITCHOYER X X l.7-3 SYSTEM ISCLATION/ INTERLOCKS X X X X l.93 COMPOlENT FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS X X X X l.10 3 SYSTEM PlfUMATIC DESIGN X X X X X l.12 3 COOLING / MATING REQUIREMENTS X X X l.14-3 PRESERVICE TESTING / CAPABILITY FOR X X OPERATIONAL TESTING l.lS-3 POWER SUPPLIES X X l.18 3 INSTRUMENTATION / DETECTION X X X X l.19-3 CONTROL SYSTEMS X X X 1.20-3 ACTUATION SYSTEMS X X X X l.21 3 POE COMMITMENTS X X X l.22 3 MATERIALS SELECTION l.23 3 FAILURE MODES Ato EFFECTS X

X X

X X

X X

/

l.33-3 FILTRATH3N X X X X l.343 PRESSURIZATION X X X X l.35-3 VENTILATION X X X X X O

FIGURE I.2-6a i

O INITIAL SAMPLE REVIEW MATRIX FOR T}E CONTROL ROOM HVAC SYSTEM MIDLAto INDEPEtOENT DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM (CONTINUED) f SCOPE OF REVIEW i a  !

ocs'c~ ^"t' 8

L1tg 5g is q j u!

l 8 189  ?! ll sf f /!I l'f f

, _ CONTROL ROOM HVAC SYSTEM PROTE ? TION FEATURES

!!.l-3 SEISMIC DESIGN X 11.2-3 e PRESSURE BOUPOARY X X X 11.3-3 e DUCT / PIPE / EQUIPMENT SUPPORT X X X X

11. 4 - 3 e EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION X X X X 11.5-3 HICH ErERCY LINE BREAK ACCIDENTS X 11.6-3 e PIPE WHIP X 11.7 - 3 o KT IMPlNCEMENT X 11.8-3 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION X

11. 9 - 3 e ENVIRONMENTAL ENVELOPES X X X X X 11.1 0 - 3 e EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION X X X X 11.12-3 FIRE PROTECTION X X 11.1 3 - 3 MISSILE PROTECTION X

11. 1 4 - 3 SYSTEMS INTERACTIONS X STRUCTURES THAT HOUSE THE CONTFtOL ROOM HVAC SYSTEM 111. 1 - 3 SEISMIC DESIGN / INPUT TO EQUIPMENT X X X 111. 5 - 3 CIVIL / STRUCTURAL DESlCN CONSIDERATIONS X lit.7-1 e CONCRETE / STEEL DESiCN X X 111. 9 - 3 e LEAK TICHTW.S$ X X X O

FIGURE I.2-6b

.-_,_ . _ ~ _ . . _ ., _ . _ . . . _ . _ _ . . _ _ _ . _ - _ - _ _ _ _ . . . _ _ . . . _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ . _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _

i l

l O

INITIAL SAMPLE REVIEW MATRIX FOR TE CONTROL ROOM HVAC SYSTEM MIDLAW INDEPEFOENT CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM .

SCOPE OF REVIEW

'd "

SYSTEM /COMPOPENT a-

. - i ., a

• h f .1 ;

/ d .

% v5

/'f i 2 MECHANICAL 1.1-3c e EQUIPMENT X X X X X l.2-3c e PIPING X X X l.3-3c e PIPE SUPPORTS X X X ELECTRICAL ll.l-3e e EQUlPMENT X X X X ll.2-3c e TRAYS AND SUPPORTS X X X ll.3-3c e CONDUIT AND SUPPORTS X X X II.4-3c e CABLE X X X INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL lli.l-3c e INSTRUMENTS / DETECTORS X X X X X lll.2-3c e PIPING / TUBING X X X i:i:i:i:

lit.3-3c e CABLE X X X HVAC X X X X IV.2-3c e DUCTS Ato SUPPORTS STRUCTURAL e CONCRETE X X X V.2-3e V.3-3c e STRUCTURAL STEEL X X X VI.1-3c NDE/MATERI ALS TESTING PROGRAM X FIGURE I.2-7

p" PROJECT INSTRUCTION

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Fi 320) . 009 Midland independent Design and ,

REV.: 3 DATE:7/15/83 Copstruction Verifico+ ion Program PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY PAGE 15 of 145 l

1.3 SYSTEMS SELECTION CRITERI A (Continued)

Ability to Extrapolote Results The system should be e

sufficiently representative of other safety systems such that the design criteria, design and construction control and change processes are similar so that extrapolation of findings to other systems con be undertaken with confi-dence.

e Diverse in Content - The major engineering and con-struction disciplines should all have input to the design of the system.

Sensitive to Previous Experience The system should be s e one which includes design or construction disciplines or interfaces which have previously exhibited problems and thus o test of the system should be indicative of any generic condition.

e Ability to Test As-Built installotion - The system con-figuration should be sufficiently completed that the os-built configuration con be verified against design.

of other The AFW system was selected after consideration of a number condidate systems. The Midland Plant probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) was utilized as o tool to assess the relative importance to safety of plant systems on the bosis of their contribution to overall plant risk. The profile for this criterion as well os each of the other five criteria is sufficiently high for the AFW, SEP ond CR-HVAC systems to justify their selection.

l.4 INDEPENDENCE REQUIREMENTS The Midland IDCV program will be conducted in occordance with the

" independence" criterio documented in a letter from Nunzio J. Pollodino, p Chairmon, NRC, to the Honorable John D. Dingell, Chairman, Committee on O

Energy and Commerce, United States House of Representatives, dated February 1,1982. This letter was originally written as opplicable to Pacific Gas DC-82-13 .

O PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 009__

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland independent Design and REW ; DATE: 7/15/B3 Corstruction Verification Program PREPARED BY: APPROVED B PAGE ' 17 of 145 1

, ..J The individuals taking part in the Midland IDCV program meet the preceding criterio and have signed a statement attesting to this fact.

TERA Corporation is under contract to CPC to provide the engineering services necessary to complete the Midland IDCV program. Prior to this contract, TERA hos never been under contract to CPC.

The contract requires TERA to maintain on auditable record to document the process leading to Findings os well as meetings to discuss Findings. Section 4.0 of this Plan oddresses documentation and protocol requirements governing external communications which have been developed to meet obligations of the contract and NRC requirements. The protocol will be conducted in occordance with the requirements documented in a letter from James G. Keppler, Administrator, NRC Region ill to James W. Cook, Vice President, CPC dated March 28,1983, as further defined in Project Instruction PI-3201-010. f Section 5.0 of this Plan oddresses the report generation process, during the IDCV program to report Findings and at its conclusion as a final report. TERA will maintain on ouditable record of all comments on the draf t final report.

2.0 ORGANIZATION abo CONTROL 2.1 PROJECT ORGANIZATION The project organization is oddressed in Section 2.1 of the Project Quality Assurance Plan (PGAP), Midland Independent Design and Construction Verifico-O tion Program, Project 3201. Figure 2.1-1 provides the project organization chart.

Technical and administrative personnel (not shown) receive assignments directly from the Project Monoger (PM). The PM serves os the principal point of contact DC-82-13

NUCLEAR RECULATORY CONSUMERS POWER COMMISSION COMPANY I I u_._____ ___ __a Lmts or commtsacAtoo SENIOR REVIEW TEAM M moACT NcTM PRINCIPAL.lN-CHARGE Danoid Davis, Chrrn.

a*****

g m ggN

• John Beck W I or mozen I

PROKCT QA ,,,,,

PROECT MANAGER Mark Polit howed Levin I

I MANAER, CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION MANAGER, DESIGN VERIFICATION

~

Donald Tulodieski Frank Dougherty MANAMR, AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SUPPLIER DOCUMENTATION - SYSTEM REVIEW Donald Tuladieskl, LTR Richard Snoider O STORAGE & MAINTENANCE DOCUMENTATION o 88ECHANICAL & SYSTEMS Richerd Snoider, LTR Robert Snyder, LTR e ELECTRICAL, l&C Lionel Bates, LTR e CIVIL / STRUCTURAL Joseph Martare, LTR MANAER, SITE ACTIVITIES --

" Martin Jones MANAMR, CONTROL ROOM HVAC

- SYSTEM REVIEW Doug Witt CONSTRUCTION / INSTALLATION

- DOCUMENTATION Fred Pellerin, LTR e MECHANICAL & SYSTEMS Doug Witt, LTR e ELECTRICAL, f&C VERIFICATION ACTIVITIES Lionel Bates, LTR Redy Cleled, LTR e CIVIL / STRUCTURAL Joseph Mwtare, LTR VERIFICATION OF PHYSICAL MANAGER, STAPOBY ELECTRIC

._ COPFIGURATION

- POWER SYSTEM REVIEW g

Carold Setko U l FIGURE 2.1-1 e MECHANICAL & SYSTEMS Ricterd Snoider, LTR PROECT ORGANIZATION e ELECTRICAL, I&C Lionel Botes, LTR MitXfM) ROEPEFOENT DESIGN AFD CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM e CIVIL / STRUCTURAL Christian Mortgot, LTR

0 PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland Independent Design and KEV.: 3 CATE: 7/15/83 Constipetion Ver Gr a':an Program PAGE 19 of 145 PREPARED BY /

- -7 APPROVEDV BY:% i 1

s w with CPC. The Project Ouolity Assurance Engineers report directly to the Executive Vice President, TERA. They will identify internal quality assurance deficiencies, work with the PMi in providing clarification relative to identified deficiencies and any recommendations mode by them for resolution.

l 2.2 AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY l

l The project authority and responsibility is addressed in Section 2.2 of the PGAP, n Project 3201, os ougmented by various project instructions and engineering control procedures which are referenced in the PGAP.

The Principol-in-Charge (PIC) is responsible for helping establish the general philosophy of review, setting forth guidance to the Project Manager and the 3 Managers, Design and Construction Verification, ossisting as on interf ace with l the Senior Review Team (SRT), NRC and CPC and reviewing / concurring in reports issued to CPC, NRC and other outside porties.

The Project Manager is responsible for overall planning and direct supervision of all in-house octivities undertaken to fulfill the contract requirements. All documentation, correspondence, reports, calculations, etc., issued to CPC, NRC and other outside parties are to be issued under his signature or otherwise receive his approval as required by the opplicable Engineering Control Procedure or Project Instruction.

The Project Monoger is responsible for overall picaning and monogement of all n outside octivities performed by subcontractors or Associates, but may delegote responsibility for supervision to other individuals within the project.

DC-82-13

r l l

l n

U PROJECT INSTRUCTION pl 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland independent Design and REW 3 DAE 7/15/83 Constr,uction Verification Program _

pg 20 g 145 PREPARED BY  ; APPROVED BY Documentation may be issued to the subcontractor or Associate under the signature of the designated individual.

3 The Managers of Design Verification and Construction Verification are responsible for overall planning, management and supervision of all activities within the IDV and ICV portions of the Midland IDCV respectively, and coordination between each other to assure that IDV and ICV interfaces are odequately oddressed. These individuals report directly to the Project Manager.

The Managers of the AFW, SEP and CR-HVAC Reviews are responsible for O) management and implementation of design review octivities necessary to complete on integrated review of their respective systems, coordination of octivities between LTRs under their super rision and coordination with the ICV progrom LTRs. These individuals report to the Monoger, Design Verification.

The Manager, Site Activities is responsible for planning, management and supervision of all Midland site related octivities and the Construction / Installation Documentation, Verification Activities and Verification of Physical Configuration categories of review. He reports directly to the Monoger, Construction Verification.

The Senior Review Team (SRT) is responsible for the review of Open, Confirmed or Resolved (OCR) ltem Reports, as requested by the PIC, Finding Reports, Finding Resolution Reports, os well as interim Technical Reports and Finot Reports. The SRT may of any time recommend to the PIC that the PM expand the scope of review, provide clorification or reassess elements of the review to O

V DC-82-13

O PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201 . 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland Independent Design and REV.: 3 DATE: 7/15/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY APPROVED BY PAGE 20a of 145

, a s y assess the technical validity and significance of project team conclusions and the proper classification of OCRs and Findings. (These reports are defined in Section 5.0 of this Plan). The SRT is also responsible for the review of Monthly Status Reports, OCRs as directed by the SRT Chairman, and any Draft Interim Technical Reports to maintain current awareness and assure a high level of technical quality. They will also provide recommendations to resolve differing technical views which may arise among project team membes. The SRT Chairman is responsible for coordination and direction of SRT octivities.

n V The Lead Technical Reviewers (LTR) are responsible for implementation of o!! 3 review octivities within their discipline of review, including technical supervision of individuals on the project and outside octivities performed by Associates. The 3 IDV LTRs report to the Managers of the AFW, SEP and CR-HVAC System Reviews. The ICV LTRs report to either the Manager, Construction Verification 7

or the Manager, Site Activities os shown on Figure 2.1-1. The LTRs are responsible for the classification of OCRs and Findings, the preparation of Finding Reports and Finding Resolution Reports.

The Project Quality Assurance Engineer is responsible for verification of the implementation of the PGAP and will perform audits evoluoting the implementation of applicable procedures and instructions in occordance with Section 6.3 and ECP-5.6.

I a

r

( PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201 ,009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Pian Midland Independent Design and )

REV.: 3 DATE 7/15/33 Construction Verification Program PAGE 26 of _L3- PREPARED BY:

/

~~

APPROVED BY:

yQ JJ v t

1 l

which are subsequently used to produce design outputs. it is important that design inputs are properly interpreted and documented in implementing docu-ments. Therefore, the objective of the review is to determine the existence and general reasonableness of the documentation and whether the documentation correctly reflects the design inputs. Design outputs are defined as documents such as drawings, specifications, and similar materials defining technical requirements for the fabrication, installation, or construction of the system.

The design output documents are reviewed for the application of the design criteria and commitments os part of the check of drawings and specifications.

O 3.l.l.3 Check of Calculations and Evoluotions 1

When specified, o detailed check of calculations and evoluotions is mode (i.e.

Inputs, assumptions, methodology, outputs, etc.). This octivity follows the review of design criterio and commitments and the review of implementing oocuments. The check may take several forms, ranging from o number-by-number detailed mothematical check to o review and evoluotion of outputs for reasonobleness. The overall presentation of the sampled calcuiations and evoluotions will also be reviewed to verify that all steps are clearly presented and consistent throughout. The IDV reviewer may, at his discretion, choose to conduct on alternative calculation as o means of confirming his judgment on the adequacy of the design calculation or evoluotion. Where computer programs 3 were used in on analysis selected for review, the reviewer will selectively verify that oppropriate inputs have been used in the calculation, and that the oppropriate outputs have been identified. Additionally, it will be necessary to determine that the computer programs used have been verified in occordance with oppropriate verification procedures.

DC-82-13

PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland Independent Design and REW 3 DATE:7/15/83 Con $truction Verification Program PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY pg 38 d 145

, u 3.l.3.1.14 Preservice Testing and Capability for Operational Testing -

Topic l.14-1 A determination will be made of the design criteria and commitments which exist for preservice testing and the copobility for operational testing, including a review of implementing documents and associated evoluotions that support the testing programs. The results of this review will be used in the ICV portion of the IDCV, which will verify that the system has been constructed such that it 3 p con function in accordance with its design criteria and commitments. The implementation of the identified criteria will be evoluoted through a review of selected documentation.

3.1.3.1.15 Power Supplies - Topic l.15-1 The opplicable design criterio for AFW power supplies will be identified from NSSS vendor, regulatory and industry requirements. The documents implementing the design criteria will be checked to verify the proper consideration of the applicable criterio determined from the criterio review.

l The AFW logic system and schematic diagrams will be reviewed to ensure that requirements relative to the quality of power supplies (diversity and redundoney) are met. in porticular the review will include the assurance that the AFW system will meet design criterio including the loss of offsite power and station

, blockout.

3.1.3.1.16 Electrical Chorocteristics - Topic l.16-1 A

b The AFW system electrical chorocteristics os determined by design criterio and commitments will be reviewed to verify that all required commitments and DC-82-13

r V(a PROJECT INSTRUCTION Pp 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland Independent Design and REW 3 DATE: 7/15/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED B j APPROVED BY.

PAGE 43 of 145 v

v 3.1.3.2.2 Seismic Design--Pressure Boundary - Topic II.2-1 This activity will include o review of the commitments, implementing docu- 3 ments, calculations, drawings, and specifications (including the design specification required by the ASME Code) associated with the seismic design of a selected portion of the AFW piping system. The utilization of the proper design input, such as response spectro, piping and component weights, and other piping chorocteristics, will be verified. The ASME code evoluotions will be reviewed to verify that pertinent acceptance criteria are met. Drawings and specifications will be reviewed for consistency with design calculations. Included will be on O independent confirmatory seismic analysis of a selected portion of the piping system based upon independently verified os-built dimensions utilizing a verified To computer program. Pipe stresses and support loods will be calculated.

preserve the " blind" nature of the confirmatory coiculation, the individuals who perform the calculation will not have prior benefit or knowledge of the specific calculational approach followed by the original onelysts. Upon completion, o comparison will be mode between the original design and IDV calculated forces 3 and stresses at key locations. Any significant discrepancies will be identified and their cause determined.

3.l.3.2.3 Seismic Design--Pipe / Equipment Support - Topic 11.3-1 A review of a selected portion of the AFW system will be conducted to verify that selected pipe supports have been designed and specified in occordance with criterio and commitments. Included will be the review of design loods, load combinations, and the methods of analysis utilized. The essociated design j

drawings and specifications will be reviewed for consistency. The support loods l (^3

' calculated during the confirmotory piping onalysis of Topic II.2-1 will be l

l DC-82-13

( - - _ ,

(] PI 3201.,009 PROJECT INSTRUCTION

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midiond independent Design and REV.: 3 DATE: 7/15/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY APPROVED BY:

PAGE 52 of I45 p

" r 3.1.4 DEFINITION OF REVIEW SCOPE FOR THE STANDBY ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM The categories of review identified in section 3.1.1 are also applicable to the review of the Standby Electric Power (SEP) system. Similorly, the criterio discussed in sections 1.3 and 3.1.2 were incorporated to develop the initial design verification matrix shown on Figures 1.2-4o and 1.2-46. The design areas (or topics) of the IDV review matrix for the SEP system are somewhat different from those for the AFW system, consistent with the differences in the functions and physical configuration of these systems. The review philosophy, matrix g 3

( concepts and organization remain the same. In this regard the diesel-generator vendor is reviewed on the some basis os other vendors. That is the IDV in general will not review the process by which the vendor developed dato supplied to Bechtel but will review the interface dato for consistency and reasonableness.

The design areas for the SEP system review matrix are divided into three major divisions: SEP System Performance Requirements, SEP System Protection Features, and Structures that House the SEP System. The design creas addressed within each of these major divisions are discussed in sections 3.1.4.1, 3.1.4.2 and 3.1.4.3 of this Plon, respectively. As previously mentioned, the identified initial review scope is subject to change depending upon whether the criterio documented in section 3.1.2 have beer' met.

Because the SEP system sompte selection interfoces with other systems, it is necessary to define boundaries for items within the scope of the IDCV.

The SEP system os defined in the IDCV program includes four major elements:

the diesel generator (DG) c.nd its support systems; the power distribution system g

(PDS); the preferred 120V oc power system (AC) and the 12SV de power system

() (DC). Continuity with the AFW system review is emphasized by drawing the boundaries of evoluotion for the PDS and the two low voltage AC and DC The PDS boundaries are drawn at gys;9s they service the AFW system.

l _ _ _ _ _ _ -. . __

O PROJECT INSTRUCTION Engineering Progrom Plan PI 3201 . 009 SUBJECI:

Midiond Independent Design and REV.: 3 DATE: 7/15/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE 54 of 145 PREPARED BY:

m dvd / APPROVED BY'ML L l

. .s r Interfocing System interf acing Point Class IE Loads For foods other than AFW, DG, and CR-HVAC, the ,

review will be limited to confirming that all l Class IE loods have been included in establishing l the system design electrical loads.

DG Fuel Oil Storage System (FSAR Figure 9.S-25) is included. Interface and Transfer System with Demineralized Water Supply is at DeLoval l3 interface.

DG Cooling Water System System integral to diesel is included (FSAR Figure 9.S-26). Service Water boundary is of DeLoval l3 interface.

') System (FSAR Figure 9.S-27) is included.

'V DG Storting System DG Lubrication System System (FSAR Figure 9.S-28) is included.

DG Combustion Air intake System (FSAR Figure 1.2-27)is included.

and Exhaust System Structures DG building and foundations, and foundation for fuel oil storage tank.

The following sections discuss the initial scope of review for each of tne design areas.

I 3.1.4.1 SEP System Performance Requirements I The SEP system will be reviewed to assess its capability to perform os required I by the design criteria and commitments, included in the scope of this portion of review are design orcos such as system operating requirements, single failure, component functional requirements, diesel electrical load sequencing / shedding, diesel storting mechanism, independence, cable sizing, routing and separation.

(~}

V DC-82-13

c d PROJECT INSTRUCTION Pl 3201.,009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland independent Design and REW 3 DAE 7/15/83 Construction Verification Program j

PAGE 60 of M5 PREPARED BY.

/gg APPROVED BY:gh g

l The design criteria compilation will include o consideration of codes and stondords, regulatory requirements, NSSS vendor input and industry experience.

Control system logic diagrams and schematic diagrams will be reviewed to ensure that design requirements are met in issued design drawings.

3.l.4.1.14 Actuation Systems (DG) - Topic l.20-2 The diesel gererefor octuation system and hardware is port of the Engineered Safety Feature Actuation System (ESFAS) which is partially reviewed during the A

AFW Actuation System (AFWAS) review. The octuation system design, including Q inputs, logic and octuation devices, will be reviewed ogainst IEEE Standard-279 3

and Regulatory Guide 1.9 criteria os a continuation of the review made for the AFW system. Actuation system logic diagrams and applicable schematic diagrams will be reviewed against design commitments. The ESFAS procurement specification will be reviewed for compliance with design commitments.

3.1.4.1.15 Foilure Modes and Effects (DG, PDS, AC, DC)- Topic l.23-2 The various modes of failure, and the effects of such failures, will be reviewed, using as a basis the analyses presented in summary form in the FSAR. The objective of this review will be to determine if there is any potential failure that hos been previously unonalyzed or that might be common-mode, thus offecting both trains of emergency power. It is presently envisioned that the review will

. stop of the component level and will not entail a review of failure modes and effects of subcomponents (e.g. resistors, switches, etc. that make up specific electrical devices).

[vT DC-82-13

A L) PROJECT INSTRUCTION Pi 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan REY.: Midland independent Design and 3 DATL 7/15/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE 61 of 145 PREPARED BY. APPROVED BY:

f .

gf vs - uR4 g

3.l.4.1.16 Electrical Load Capacity (DG, PDS, AC, DC) - Topic l.24-2 Diesel generator, 4160 Voc bus,120 Voc preferred power and 125 vde battery loods will be independently tabulated for design basis conditions to determine steady state and transient SEP system loads. The loads will be reviewed against design criterio and commitments. The diesel generator loading will reflect the load sequence information from Topic l.25-2. The battery lood cycle will be determined for loss of offsite power and station blockout conditions. The l

resulting battery capacity requirements will be reviewed against regulatory

,- 3 sizing criteria. Diesel generator 4160 Voc bus foods will be compared to design V rotings and preoperational test dato (Topic l.14-2) to determine the suitability of the selected hcrdware.

3.1.4.1.17 Electrical Load Sequencing (DG, PDS)- Topic l.25-2 A review of design criterio and commitments will be performed for electrical food sequencing provisions for the diesel generator and its associated 4160 Voe bus. Sequence logic will be reviewed against design commitments os will the schematic diograms implementing sequencing logic. The verified loading sequence will be used as input to the food copocity review (Topic l.24-2) and the preservice testing review (Topic l.14-2).

3.1.4.1.I8 Electrical Load Shedding (DG, PDS) - Topic 1.26-2 Electrical lood shedding design criteria and commitments, implementing documents and logic diograms will be reviewed ogainst regulatory requirements and industry codes and standards. The review will be performed for the 4160 Voc DC-82-13 i

O PROJECT INSTRUCTION Pi 3201 .,009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland Independent Design and REY.: 3 DATE: 7/15/83 Cor}struction Verification Program I/ APPROVED BY PAGE 62 of 145 PREPARED BY:

r-p .

NL

+v r bus and will include those design provisions for load shedding coordination with lood sequencing (Topic 1.25-2) and interlocks /permissives (Topic l.7-2) associated with load shedding.

I 3.l.4.1.19 Fuel Oil System (DG) - Topic l.27-2 l The Fuel Oil System provides storage and transfer of oil for seven days of l Engineered Safety Feature (ESF) load. Criteria for system design will be reviewed against industry standards, FSAR commitments, and sound engineering practice based on operating plant experience. The review will further examine the documents whien implement the criterio, including a review of portions of calculations which implement the criterio. Technical arcos to be evoluoted include: pump performance, fuel consumption vs. tank copocity, control logic, buried tank flooding, piping design (including vibration considerations), and unique fire protection considerations.

3.l.4.1.20 Lube Oil System (DG)- Topic 1.28-2 The performance criterio and implementation for lubrication and lubrication oil cooling will be reviewed with particular ottention to the interface requirements established by the engine manufacturer. The key issue is to examine the design and maintenance requirements necessitated by engine design, and to review the documents used to implement such requirements.

3.I.4.1.21 Storting Mechanism and Air Supply System (DG)- Topic l.29-2 p The storting system includes both the pressurized air supply and distribution system, and the electric outomatic stort provisions. Criterio for the design will be reviewed ogainst industry standards, FSAR commitments, and typical design DC-82-13

- PROJECT INSTRUCTION

, pg_ 3201 ,,009

SUBJECT:

Engineering "rogram Plan Midiond independent Design and REV.: 3 DATE: 7/15/B3 , Construction Verification Program i PAGE 65 of 145 s REPARED BY:

- p/i f I

APPROVED BY@-h ,

i v -

g *%

. s

. ~ , ._ ,

Seismic Design -- Pressuie Boundary (DC) - Topic 11.2-2 3.1.4.2.2 This activity ~ will include o review of the con,mitments, i nplementing documents, calculations, drawings and specifications associated with seismic design of a seleued portion of the diesel generator fuel oil piping system. The utilization of the proper design input,.such cs response spectro, piping and component weights, and other piping chorocteristics, will be verified. The ASME code evoluotions will be reviewed to verify that pertinent occeptance criterio O cre met. Drawings and specifications will be reviewed for consistency with O design calculations. This activity will be coordinated with the comparable 3

octivity in the AFW review. 4 3.1.4.2.3 Seismic Design -- Pipe / Equipment Support (DG, PDS) - Topic II.3-2 A review of a selected portion of the diesel genero$or' fuel oil system will be conducted to verify that selected supports have been designed and specified in accordance with criteria and commitments. Included will be the review of design loods, load combinations, and the methods of analysis utilized. The associated design drawings and specifications will be reviewed for consistency.

Several support types will then be sampled, and on independent confirmatory analysis will be mode to verify the capability of the original design organization to properly design and size these supports given the design loods, in addition, the design calculations, drawings and specifications ossociated with the anchoroge

' and support of a diesel generator and selected other SEP system equipment will be reviewed for conformance to requirements.' This octivity will be coordinated p with the comparable octivity in the AFW review.

O l

DC-82-I3

e PROJECT INSTRUCTION Engineering Program Plan Pp 3201.,009

SUBJECT:

Midland Independent Design and ,

REV.: 3 DAE 7/15/83 Cor struction Verification Progrom PREPARED BY: ./ APPROVED BY PAGg _ 67 of_ 145

-, a 3.1.4.2.8 Environmental Protection - Topic 11.8-2 The criterio review conducted for the AFW system will be extended to include considerations unique to the SEP system. Particular emphasis will be given to electrical circuit components, e.g., breakers.

3.1.4.2.9 Environmental Envelopes (DG, PDS) - Topic 11.9-2 The criteria review conducted for the AFW system will form o basis for the

( ')

/

review of the SEP system. Concerns unique to this system will be included in the review. A check will be made to ensure that this system is included in the scope 3

V of the criteria for the environmental envelopes evoluoted with the AFW system.

3.1.4.2.10 Environmental / Equipment Qualification (DG, PDS) - Topic 11.10-2 Equipment qualification requirements will be reviewed to determine whether the correct environmental envelopes were specified and, given these envelopes, whether the qualification methods used were adequate to demonstrate that the l3 component would meet its functional requirements. The review will include the following types of equipment of representative complexity: electrical insulation, connectors, transmitters, and circuit breakers. Documents reviewed include technical specifications which are part of the procurement package, and vendor 3

qualification reports or test reports. This review will be coordinated with the corresponding review in the AFW system.

3 .I.4 . 2 .11 HVAC Design (DG) - Topic 11.11-2 n i V Requirements imposed upon specific portions of the HVAC systems ihot limit environmental conditions for the SEP system equipment will be reviewed. This DC-82-13

a l

I(3 5 i V

PROJECT INSTRUCTION pg_3201.,009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland Independent Design and REV.: 3 DATE: 7/15/83 Copstructic, Verification Program PAGE 71 ~of 145 PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY r wo 3.1.4.3.4 HELBA Loads (DGB) - Topic 111.4-2 3

A review will be made to determine if there are high energy pipes in the diesel generator building. If high energy piping is located in the diesel generator building, the following additional tasks will be performed. Criteria and commitments for high energy line break occident loads in the diesel generator building will be reviewed to verify that the proper basis is established for the design process. Included will be the review of the criteria for jet impingement p and pipe whip loading on structures and components related to the SEP system.

The review will oddress loading combinations, methodologies of analysis, associated allowable stresses or conditions, and other related criteria. T he results of this review will be considered in evoluotion of Topic 111.7-2, Concrete and Steel Design.

3.1.4.3.5 Civil /Structurul Design Considerations - Topic lll.5-2 Civil / structural design criteria and associated commitments related to the diesel generator building will be reviewed, and the establishment of the proper basis for the associated design process will be confirmed. Included will be the review of design parameters and the methodologies utilized in the design process for structures and offected systems and components associated with the SEP system. l 3.1.4.3.6 Foundations (DGB) - Topic lll.6-2 Included ir; this octivity will be the review of criterio, implementing documents, p and calculations associated with the design of selected foundations of the diesel b generator building. The review will cddress design criterio, methodologies of analysis and calculations associated with each type of foundation loading including dead, live, wind and seismic loadings.

DC-82-13

O G \

PROJECT INSTRUCTION pl_ 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Pion Midland independent Design and 1 REY.: 3 DATE: 7/15/83 Coristruction Verification Program l PREPARED BY: APDROVED BY PAGE 75 og 145 The following sections discuss the initial scope of review for each of the design areas.

3.1.5.1 CR-HVAC System Performance Requirements 1

The CR-HVAC system will be reviewed to ossess its copobility to perform os required by the design criteria and commitments. !ncluded in the scope of this j portion of review cre design areas such as system operating requirements, singie failure, component functional requirements, instrumentation, detection, failure modes and effects, filtration, and ventilation.

3.1.5.1.1 System Operating Limits - Topic 1.1-13 This topic will involve review of available documentation to extract various system porometers and their volves. These will include temperature to be maintained, assumed leakage rates, system flow rates, required control room pressure, etc. Results of this review involving key components and their parameters will be reviewed further in related mechanical and electrical topics.

Ancillory systems such as Safeguards Chilled Water and Essential Service Water will be reviewed only from the standpoint of ascertaining that parameters dependent on their operobility con indeed be met.

3.l.5.l.2 Accident Analysis Considerations - Topic 1.1-3 l FSAR Safety Analyses will be reviewed to determine oc %ent and post-occident b operability requirements involving the control room F/AC system (smoke from on external fire, chemical release, radiological occident, and main steam line break). This will include a review of detection systems and assumptions regarding their copobilities.

DC-82-13

fh

%_.J' PROJECT INSTRUCTION pp.3201 . 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland independent Desian and REV.: 3 DATE: 7/15/83 ponstruction Verification Program PREPARED BY j APPROVED BY.

PAGE 76 d 145 "

i -

j 3.1.5.I.3 Single Failure - Topic l.3-3 Single-failure-proof design ospects of the system will be reviewed, commencing with information in the FSAR and proceeding to o check of calculations and evoluotions, if ovailable.

3.1.5.l.4 Technical Specifications - Topic l.4-3 The Technical Specifications will be reviewed against existing regulatory V criterio to assure that important operating limits are oppropriately and occurately specified. An effort will also be made to assess whether additional specifications might be necessary, based upon knowledge gained from the detailed review of the system.

3. l.5.l.5 System Alignment /Switchover - Topie 1.5-3 This review will encompass such diverse topics os the local hand switches for the various fans, the interlocks ossociated with these switches and fans, the required octions of the Control Room isolation System (CRiS), the requirements for post-occident operation resulting from the various external initiating events, and any assumptions regarding required manual operation of the system.

3.l.5.l.6 System isolation / interlocks - Topic l.7-3 The interlocks of the control room HVAC system will be reviewed to determine 73 their odequacy in implementing system performance requirements. This will

) include any interlocks associated with CRIS, fan and isolation damper interlocks, pressurization system interlocks, etc.

DC-82-13

l

'") PROJECT INSTRUCTION pg_3201. 009 SUEUECT: Engineering Program Plan Midlant Independent Design and REV.: 3 DATE: 7/15/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY: APPROVED B pg 77 og 145

~-

3.1.5.l.7 Component Functional Requirements - Topic l.9-3 Functional requirements for selected components will be reviewed against requirements imposed directly by licensing commitments and industry codes and standards. Additionally, system design imposes performance requirements. The development of such requirements will be traced from their source to statement in system design criterio, and the validated component functional requirements will be compared to technical specifications in the procurement documents.

Component functional requirements include fan curve dato, volve/domper leak n rates, load rating, instrument sensor detection threshold, and similar

(

chorocteristics. Equipment seismic and environmental qualifications will be considered separately.

3.1.5.l.8 System Pneumatic Design - Topic 1.10-3 l The calculations of system pressure drop through ducts, dampers, filters, etc.,

for safety-related modes will be checked against design criteria. A confirmatory calculation for o critical system olignment will be performed to establish functional requirements which will be compared to those specified.

3.I.5.l.9 Cooling / Heating Requirements - Topic l.12-3 System heating and cooling foods for tne control room will be reviewed if they

, are safety related. The review will examine stability of control room temperature in on occeptable range under isolated conditions.

O% ,]

DC-82-13

O PROJECT INSTRUCTION pg 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland independent Design and REW 3 DATE: 7/15/83 Construction Verification Program 81 PREPARED BY: APPROVED B pg .d 145 t w

• chorocteristics validated in the pneumatic design review and the fan curves will be used to check global pressure differential. Local effects and relevant meteorological assumptions will be reviewed. The calculations for sizing of the bottled air supply will be checked. Analyses considering the copobility of the self-contained breathing opporatus will be evoluoted.

3.1.5.1.20 Ventilation - Topic !.35-3 The overall HVAC ventilation system design will be reviewed to determine its O copobility to maintain control room habitability parameters, i.e., temperature, Q) oxygen content, toxic gas levels, and airborne radiation. Criteria for occeptable levels will be checked against licensing commitments and industry standards for both survival and minimal conditions under which reasonable decision making is expected. Cciculations to predict equilibrium temperature, oxygen level, and airborne contamination will be checked in critical modes. Synergistic effects of 3

toxic gases will otso be considered. A confirmatory calculation of selected control room habitability parameters will be performed for one critical mode of operation.

3.1.5.2 CR-HVAC System Protection Features in addition to the review of the capability of the CR-HVAC system to perform its required functions, o review will be made of external factors which could

- offect the capability of the system to achieve these functions. Included in the scope of this portion of the review are factors such as seismic design, high energy line break occidents (HELBA), environmental protection, fire protection,

/_\

( ) missile protection, and systems interaction. The following sections address these

8. s and other design arcos related to system protection.

DC-82-13

U( PROJECT INSTRUCTION pl_ 3201 . 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland Independent Design and REV.: 3 DATE: 7/15/83 Cor struction Verification Program PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY pg 82 .d i45 -

, v

3. l .5.2.1 Seismic Design - Topic 11.1-3 The seismic design criteria and associated commitments related to the CR-HVAC system will be reviewed to ensure that on adequate basis for the design process is established. The review will include seismic design parameters and methodologies specified for the design of ductwork and supports, equipment and components associated with the CR-HVAC system.

3.1.5.2.2 Seismic Design - Pressure Boundary - Topic 11.2-3 O

C This activity will include o review of the commitments, implementing documents, calculations and evoluotions ossociated with seismic design of the pressure boundary of a selected portion of the CR-HVAC system. The utilization of the proper design input, such as response spectro, ductwork and component weights, and other ductwork chorocteristics, will be verified. The calculations and evoluotions will be reviewed to verify that pertinent acceptance criteria are met.

3.1.5.2.3 Seismic Design - Duct / Pipe / Equipment Support - Topic 11.3-3 A review of a selected portion of the CR-HVAC system will be conducted to verify that selected supports have been designed and specified in occordance with criterio and commitments included will be the review of design loads, load combinations, and the methods of analysis utilized. The ossociated design drawings and specifications will be reviewed for consistency. The review will i encompass representative supports associated with the selected portion of the l3 system. In addition, the design calculations, drowings

[]

v DC-82-13

i Q

PROJECT INSTRUCTION pg_ 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland Independent Design and REY.: 3 DATE: 7/15/83 Cor struction Verification Program PREPARED BY: APPROVED B pg 84 g 145 3.l.5.2.7 HELBA/ Jet Impingement 3

A review will be made to determine the criterio applicable to protective l measures taken to assure acceptable consequences due to postulated jets that may impact CR-HVAC components important to the functioning of this system.

This topic will be reviewed in conjunction with Topic II.6-3, Pipe Whip.

3.1.5.2.8 Environmental Protection - Topic II.8-3

('h C The criterio review conducted for the AFW and SEP systems will be extended to include considerations unique to the CR-HVAC system.

3.1.5.2.9 Environmental Envelopes - Topic 11.9-3 All major equipment and representative electrical components in the system will be reviewed to verify that they con perform their required function under the most severe conditions resulting from the pipe breaks postulated in accordance with the HELBA criterio. Implementation of criteria to select break locations will be reviewed. The calculations to determine sub-compartment temperatures and pressures will be reviewed to troce the opplication of criterio and the validity of the technical approach. Volidated conditions will be compared with the specifications in procurement documents for the equipment. One environmental envelope opplicable to the CR-HVAC system will be subject to o i3

• confirmatory calculation, if the envelope appropriate for qualification of the l HVAC equipment is different from that used to qualify AFW components.

C\

U DC-82-13

f O eaoasciisstauctios pg 3201 . 009 SUEUECT: Engineering Program Plan Midland independent Design and REV.: 3 DATE: 7/15/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY: -

APPROVED BY:

PAGE 85 og 145 / ,' y gb c-v i 3.l.5.2.10 Environmental Equipment Qualification - Topic 11.10-3 Based on the environmental envelope review, equipment and components will be selected to examine their qualification for the most severe environment.

Various types of equipment will be reviewed including volve operators, dompers, l instrumentation, and fan motors. The review will focus on two separate aspects:

the vendor calculations and testing, and CPC's program for technically confirming vendor compliance to procurement specifications. The depth of l

l 3 l review will be determine based on on ossessment of the comprehensiveness of

/7 the CPC's program and the results of the environmental equipment qualification review conducted for the AFW system.

3 .1. 5 . 2 .11 Fire Protection - Topic 11.12-3 The CR-HVAC system will be reviewed to determine its ability to control smoke due to small fires in the control room, smoke from fires outside the building, and smoke from fires in creas odjacent to the control room. This review incle. des on evoluotion of criteria and implementing documents. The potential f'r interaction between the control room and the remote shutdown panel area with regard to smoke control and fire suppression will be reviewed.

3.1.5.2.12 Missile Protection - Topic II.13-3 The criteria for postulating events which result in internal missile generation will be reviewed ogainst current licensing practice and operating experience.

Criteria for ossessing demoge due to postulated missiles will be reviewed as on O

V extension of the AFW and SEP review.

DC-82-13

J PROJECT INSTRUCTION pg 3201. 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland independent Design and REV.: 3 DATE: 7/15/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE 86 of 145 PREPARED BY:]' ,

/ 3 e-.

APPROVED BY:

mh

,. r 3.l.5.2.13 Systems Interaction - Topic 11.14-3 The potential for systems interoction and means for prevention thereof will be 3

reviewed in conjunction with the AFW system review. The review will include on examination of criteria utilized to analyze potential physical or spatial interactions. The procedures for, and results of, the Midland systems interaction walkdowns will be reviewed and, if possible, ongoing walkdowns will be observed.

3.l.5.3 Structures that House the CR-HVAC System O

V i The auxiliary / control building structure supports the functioning of the CR-l HVAC system. The overall criterio and commitments applicable to the design of this structure will be reviewed and evoluoted in conjunction with the AFW system evoluotion. To the extent possible this ps tion of the CR-HVAC review will be considered on extension of the AFW review. Selected odditional features from this st ucture will be isolated for more in-depth review in the following topics if the results of the AFW review indicate that this is oppropriate. 3 3.1.5.3.1 Seismic Design / Input to Equipment - Topic 111.1-3 This activity will include the review of commitments, implementing documents, calculations and evoluotions related to the development of seismic design input for the CR-HVAC system and associated components in the auxiliary building.

. Included will be o review of seismic input parameters such as seismic design spectro, domping, material properties, and boundary conditions, including soil-structure interaction. The methodology utilized for the location of the mass Q points and the computation of masses and equivalent member properties will be reviewed. Porometer variation studies will also be reviewed to verify that the variance of important input parameters and modeling assumptions has been DC-82-13

i d PROJECT INSTRUCTION .

pg_ 3201 ,,009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan Midland independent Design and j REV.: 3 DATE: 7/15/83 Construction Verification Program of 145 PREPARED BY:

g .

/jp - APPROVED BY:

yLj ,  ;

i. PAGE 307 , m -

3.2.3.4.1 HVAC Equipment - Topic IV.1-Ic A review of the complete construction chain including verification of the -

physical configuration will be conducted for the AFW room coolers. The l3 .

fabrication documentation review will encompnss major supplier documentation, including functional requirement and environmental and seismic qualification  !

documents. Included will be the review of the stresses in equipment and supports, including onchorages, as applicable. Storage / maintenance and construction / installation documentation will be reviewed and, where possible, selected associated octivities will be observed. Verification documentation -

k' associated with major preservice equipment and related system testing programs  ;

will be reviewed and, where possible, verification octivities including actual -

tests will be observed. The physical configuration review will include verification of equipment identity, principal features, nome plate dato, location, orientation, and support chorocteristics, as applicable. Conformance with r design documents (including P&lD's and equipment location drawings), supplier documents and associated installation requirements will be verified.

3.2.3.4.2 HVAC Ducts and Supports - Topic IV.2-Ic This octivity will include o review of major fabrication documentation and the ,

3 physical configuration of a selected portion of the supports ossociated with the AFW room cooler. Vendor drawings, material cerifications, and other opplicable 2 documentation will be reviewed. A field survey of the selected portion will be i conducted to verify (to tape mecsure <r. curacy) routing, duct chorocteristics, and 3 I

support location and configuration. Conformance with applicable design, 3 supplier and other installation requirements will be confirmed.

/]

U DC-82-13

' PROJECT INSTRUCTION (G PI 3201 . 009

SUBJECT:

Engineering Program Plan ,

Midland Independent Design and REV.: 3 DATE: 7/15/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY PAGE I40 of 145 i

Upon documenting his determination, the IDCV reviewer forwards a preliminary OCR Report or Potential Open item Report to his Lead Technical Reviewer (LTR) who reviews it with the project team (see Project Instruction PI-3201-008 '3 F

for a definition). If the project team concurs with the reviewer's determination, the Potential Open item becomes on Open item which is formo!!y contro!!ed.

The project team may resolve the Potential Open Item, thus requiring reclassification of the item os o Resolved Item and modification of the OCR Report reflecting this change. Both the Resolved item Report and superceded Potential Open item Report are then formally controlled. Alternatively, the LTR or project team may judge the identified deficiency as not being 3 (m) sufficiently serious to warrant classification as on OCR, yet it should be

^

reviewed and corrected by CPC during the completion of the Midland Project.

Accordingly, the item will be resolved by classification as on Observation and processed in accordance with Project Instruction PI-3201-005, Documentation of Observations.

Open items will be reviewed further by the review team until such a point that available information has been depleted. At this time, the IDCV reviewer will prepare o Resolved item Report or o Confirmed item Report which documents his determination offer further review. A Confirmed item is judged to be on apparent finding by the review team and requires further oction to provide documentation that may not have been available to the IDCV review team. His recommendation is forwarded to his LTR who reviews the classification and makes a recommendation to the project teorr.. The project team may agree with

- the LTR's recommendation at which point the Re;olved item Report or Con-firmed item Report becomes final. Alternatively, the project team may review the classification and require further work by the IDCV reviewers. All final OCR Reports oe forwarded to the Principol-in-Charge (PIC) for his (a)

DC-82-13

n U PROJECT INSTRUCTION j PI 3201. 009 SUBJECI: Engineering Progrom Plan Midiond independent Design and l Rl:C 3 DATE: 7/15/83 Construction Verification Program j PAGE 144 of - 145 t

h-

~a bJh v

1 6.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE 6.1 APPLICABLE REGUIREMENTS The Midland IDCV shall be performed in occordance with applicable quality assurance requirements of the NRC's regulation 10 CFR 50, Appendix B.

Furthermore, the IDCV will comply with:

o NRC Regulatory Guide 1.28 (6/7/72) including Sections I, 2,3,5,7,17, and 18 of ANSI N45.2-1971 o NRC Regulatory Guide 1.64 (Revision I, 2/75) including Sections I,2, and 6 of ANSI N45.2.11-1974 These requirements are implemented by the TERA Corporate Quality Assurance Plan (OAP), Revision 3 (January 1,1980) and the Midland IDCV Project Quality Assurance Plan (PGAP), Revision 4 (July 15,1983). 3 6.2 VERIFICATION OF COMPUTER CODES All computer codes utilized by IDCV onalysts shall be verified as follows:

o Program Verification - The quality of the code should be determined from o comparison of the code generated solutions with known solutions of selected problems.

o Focility Verification - Given that the generic quality of the code has been determined, the capability to reproduce known results utilizing hardware and software available to TERA must be determined.

O v

DC-82-13

- _. _ ._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ._ _ _ . _ . . _ _ . _ _ . . _ _ _ _.