ML19316A103

From kanterella
Revision as of 19:07, 21 February 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Submits Addl Info on Corrective Actions for Review of safety-related Procedures & Administrative Procedures for Incidents Requiring Safety Review Commission Action,Per IE Insp Rept 50-269/74-10,50-270/74-08 & 50-287/74-11
ML19316A103
Person / Time
Site: Oconee  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 01/28/1975
From: Thies A
DUKE POWER CO.
To: Moseley N
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML19316A101 List:
References
NUDOCS 7911280626
Download: ML19316A103 (2)


Text

. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ - _ _ _ - - . _ - _ - _

i DUKE POWER COMPANY

, j Powen Dust.orxo V 422 SouTu Cuuncri STncri, Cr:AntmTE, N. C necot 4 A. C. Tu r es s<.<. v<< a cs u =, P. O. Box 2 7e p u .<,. ...t.....

  • o.

January 28, 1975 l

4 I

Mr. Nor=an C. Moseley, Director

Region II Office of Inspection and Enforcement l

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission i

Suite 818 230 Peachtree Street, Northwest Atlanta, Georgia 30303 1

4 Re: Inspection Report j 50-269/74-10 .

50-270/74-8 50-287/74-11 (i

Dear Mr. Moseley:

l The above referenced inspection report was discussed in my letters of December 19, 1974 and January 17, 1975. Submitted herewith is

! additional information supplementing our response to Item I.A.l.c:

(1) To provide additional assurance that safety-related procedures i

are reviewed by the Station Review Committee (SRC), and that documentary evidence cf such is available, particularly to the user of a procedure, documentation of SRC review of each pro-cedure will be included on each procedure as issued. Such documentation will be in addition to the approval signature of -

  • the station Manager currently appearing on each procedure.

i

(2) An Oconee Nuclear Station Administrative Procedure will be i prepared to address the review of operating records for incidents which require SRC review per Technical Specification 6.1.2.1.d.

! In addition to requiring that such review be performed, the j procedure will r2 quire the review to be documented.

i 4

4 I.

7911280 h b

r- u- .

Mr. Nornan C. Moseley Page 2 January 28, 1975 As a part of routine procedure, the Quality Assurance Department has been transmitted a copy of this letter to provide an opportunity for review for the purpose of identifying future appropriate audit functions.

Very truly yours,

[t M "8h'~. c/ E'.

A. C. Thies ACT:vr

. ~ , , .,