Text

Submittal of 2009 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report
	ML101250489
Person / Time
Site:	Crystal River
Issue date:	04/29/2010
From:	Holt J; Florida Power Corp, Progress Energy Florida
To:	; Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
	3F0410-06
	Download: ML101250489 (83)
	v • d • e

Progress Energy Crystal River Nuclear Plant Docket No. 50-302 Operating License No. DPR-72 Ref: ITS 5.7.1.1(b)

April 29, 2010 3F0410-06 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001

Subject:

Crystal River Unit 3 -2009 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report

Dear Sir:

Florida Power Corporation (FPC), doing business as Progress Energy Florida, Inc., hereby submits the 2009 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for Crystal River Unit 3 (CR-3) in accordance with the CR-3 Improved Technical Specifications, Section 5.7.1.1(b) and Section 6.6 of the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM). The data provided in the attached report is consistent with the objectives outlined in the ODCM, and includes all radiological environmental samples taken during the report period from January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009.This letter establishes no new regulatory commitments.

If you have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact Mr. Dan Westcott, Superintendent, Licensing and Regulatory Programs at (352) 563-4796.S cerely, J mes W. Holt P ant General Manager JWH/ff Attachment xc: NRR Project Manager Regional Administrator, Region II Senior Resident Inspector 4cca Progress Energy Florida, Inc.Crystal River Nuclear Plant 15760 W. Powerline Street Crystal River, FL 34428 PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC.CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NUMBER 50-302 / LICENSE NUMBER DPR-72 ATTACHMENT 2009 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT 2009-P ir a ! a W PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC.CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 Prepared By: Rudy Pinner 2/25/2010 Sr. Nuclear Plant Chemistry Specialist TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction

.......................................................................................................

ii Summary Description of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program ............................................................................................

1 II. Land-Use Census ...........................................................................................

11 Ill. Interlaboratory Comparison Program .............................................................

12 IV. Analytical Results ...........................................................................................

14 A. Airborne Pathway ....................................................................................

14 Statistical Sum m ary ..................................................................................

15 B. Direct Radiation

.........................................................................................

26 Statistical Sum mary ..................................................................................

27 C. W aterborne Pathway ...............................................................................

30 1. Seawater ............................................................................................

30 Statistical Sum m ary ...........................................................................

32 2. Ground W ater .....................................................................................

30 Statistical Sum m ary ...........................................................................

36 3. Site G round W ater .............................................................................

30 Statistical Sum m ary ..........................................................................

39 4. Site G round W ater Non-REM P ..........................................................

31 Statistical Sum m ary ..........................................................................

55 5. Drinking W ater ........................................................................................

31 Statistical Sum m ary ..........................................................................

60 6. Shoreline Sedim ent ...........................................................................

31 Statistical Sum mary ..........................................................................

63 D. Ingestion Pathway ....................................................................................

66 1. Carnivorous Fish ...............................................................................

66 Statistical Sum m ary ...........................................................................

67 2. Oysters ..............................................................................................

66 Statistical Sum mary ..........................................................................

70 3. Broad Leaf Vegetation

......................................................................

66 Statistical Sum mary ..........................................................................

73 4. W atermelon and Citrus ......................................................................

66 Statistical Sum mary ..........................................................................

77 INTRODUCTION This report is submitted as required by Technical Specification 5.7.1.1(b) to the Crystal River Facility Operating License No. DPR-72, and Section 6.6 of the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual.The following information is required to be included in this report:-Data Summaries-Interpretations

-Unachievable LLDs-An analysis of trends-An assessment of any observed impact of plant operation on the environment NOTE: If harmful effects or evidence of irreversible damage are detected by the monitoring, the report shall provide an analysis of the problem and a planned course of action to correct it.-Summarized and tabulated results of all radiological environmental samples taken during the report period, in the format of Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position, Revision 1, November, 1979.NOTE: If some results are not available for inclusion, the report shall note and explain the reason for the missing results. The missing results shall be submitted as soon as possible in a supplementary report.-A summary description of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program.-A map of all sampling locations keyed to a table giving distances and directions from the reactor.-Land-use census results.-Interlaboratory Comparison Program results.-A discussion of airborne sample station availability.

-Results of any unplanned release or spill of radioactive material that could have the potential to contaminate the groundwater as reported to maintain compliance with the groundwater protection initiative (NEI 07-07).ii I.

SUMMARY

DESCRIPTION OF THE RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM The analytical results of the Crystal River Unit 3 (CR-3) operational Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) for 2009 are contained in this report. The operational program began on January 1, 1977 just prior to initial criticality, which was achieved on January 14, 1977.Sampling of the facility environs is performed by the State of Florida Department of Health, Bureau of Radiation Control. The State also performs the required analyses, participates in the Interlaboratory Comparison Program, and performs the annual land-use census. Prior to 1990, the program was split between the Department of Health and the University of Florida. The transition to the State performing all of the program's sampling and analyses in 1990 is evident in several of the trend graphs, most notably oysters and carnivorous fish, and is due to the State using less sensitive measurement techniques for several of the pathways which were formerly evaluated by the University of Florida.Sample station locations are given in Table I-1 and Figures 1-2, 1-3, 1-4, and 1-5. Sample frequency and analysis type may be determined from Table 1-2. Figure I-1 illustrates the relevant exposure pathways.Regarding waterborne pathways, the groundwater area of the Crystal River site is too saline to be used as a source of drinking water, hence there is no credible drinking water uptake pathway. Additionally, the Florida aquifer groundwater flows in a west-southwest direction across the site toward the Gulf of Mexico and since the locale of the site is along the coast, there is no downstream public impact regarding groundwater.

Except for air sample gross beta results and direct radiation measurements, most of the analytical results are below the lower limit of detection (LLD) of the sample. Sample LLDs are generally much lower than the required "a priori" LLD. When measurable results are reported, the values are also usually less than the required "a priori" LLD.The results of the 2009 REMP have been compared to previous years' results. This comparison, in part-illustrated by the trend graphs of Section IV, shows no evidence of consistent long-term increasing trends in any of the sample media. However, radioactive material is routinely quantified in sediment samples which are taken in the discharge canal near the liquid release discharge point. In general, these results verify the effectiveness of in-plant measures for controlling radioactive releases.Trend graphs illustrate the mean measured concentration of a particular radionuclide for the year. When measurable results are not obtained, the highest sample LLD is plotted. LLD and measured values are plotted on the same line to best illustrate any trend. As shown on each graph's legend, any measured value is noted by a text box, unless all values trended are measured values for that particular parameter.

Statistical summary pages are provided for each medium or pathway. Measured values are reported in terms of a mean and range. In addition, the number of measured values versus samples obtained is reported.

For example, in the following entry;15 (249/256)(4-35)the "All Indicator Locations" column would be interpreted as indicating a mean measured value of 15, with measured values ranging from 4 to 35. (249/256) means that out of 256 samples, 249 were measured values.I

.TABLE I-1 PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. -CR3 -2009 SAMPLE STATION LOCATIONS SAMPLE MEDIA STATION ID DIRECTION APPROX. DISTANCE (Miles)TLD -on-site C60 C61 C62 C63 C64 C65 C66 C67 C68 C69 C41 C70 C71 C72 C73 C27 TLD -off-site C18 C03 C04 C74 C75 C76 C08 C77 C09 C78 C14G C01 C79 C47-Control N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW WNW NW NNW W N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S WSW W NW NNW ESE ESE E N 0.88 0.92 1.17 0.87 0.80 0.33 0.36 0.33 0.27 0.31 0.43 0.74 0.58 0.30 0.74 0.41 5.3 4.89 5.95 5.13 3.99 5.61 5.66 3.39 3.23 4.59 2.53 4.8 4.97 78 7.67 3.48 0.37 C07*C40*C46**TLDs not required by ODCM. Deployed at air sample locations.

2 TABLE I-1 (CONT'D)PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. -CR3 -2009 SAMPLE STATION LOCATIONS SAMPLE MEDIA STATION ID DIRECTION DISTANCE (Miles)AIR SEAWATER GROUND WATER SITE GROUND WATER DRINKING WATER SHORELINE SEDIMENT FISH & OYSTERS BROAD LEAF VEGETATION WATERMELON CITRUS C07 C18 C40 C41 C46 C47-Control C14H C14G C13-Control C40-Control CR3-2 CR3-4 CR3-5 CR3-6S CR3-6D CR3-7 CR3-8 CR3-9 CR3-10 C07-Control C10-Control C18-Control C09-Control C14H C14M C14G C29 C30-Control C48A C48B C47-Control C04 C19 ESE N E SW N ESE NW W WSW E E SSE SSW W W WNW WNW.NW NNE ESE ESE N S NW W W W WSW N NNE ESE NE ENE 7.7 5.3 3.5 0.4 0.4 78 0.1 2.5 4.6 3.6 0.1 0.086 0.051 0.038 0.038 0.060 0.073 0.1 0.1 7.4 6.0 5.3 3.2 0.1 1.2 2.5 2.5 3.4 0.4 0.9 78 13 9.6 3 TABLE 1-2 PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. -CR3 -2009 SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM SAMPLE MEDIA # OF STATIONS FREQUENCY ANALYSIS LLD 1 TLD 33* Quarterly y Dose ---Air Iodine 6 6 Weekly Weekly Quarterly 1-131 Air Particulate Gross II y Spec: Cs-1 34 Cs-137 Seawater 3 Monthly Monthly Tritium y Spec: 0.0 7 g pCi/m 3 0.01 0.05e 0.06e 2 0 0 0 b pCi/L 15 30 15 15 30 15c Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Zr-Nb-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-1 37 15 18 Ba-La-140 15c Ground Water Site Ground Water 6 1 9 Semiannual Semiannual Quarterly Quarterly Quarterly Quarterly Semiannual Tritium y Spec: Tritium y Spec: Tritium ySpec: y Spec: 2 2 2000 b pCi/L 2 2000b pCi/L 2 2000b pCi/L 2 150 pCi/kg 180 Drinking Water Shoreline Sediment 3 2 4 Cs-134 Cs-137*Includes 3 stations which are not required by the ODCM'The maximum "a priori" LLD 2 Same as Seawater y Spec 6 Additional 2 stations reported that are not required by the ODCM bLLD for drinking water. If no drinking water pathway exists, a value of 3000 pCi/L may be used CThe specified LLD is for an equilibrium mixture of parent and daughter nuclides which contain 15 pCi/L of the parent nuclide eLLDs apply only to quarterly composite gamma spectral analysis, not to analyses of single particulate filters fLLD for drinking water. If no drinking water pathway exists, the LLD of the gamma isotopic analysis may be used gLLD for 1-131 applies to a single weekly filter 4 TABLE 1-2 (Cont'd)PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. -CR3 -2009 SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM SAMPLE MEDIA # OF STATIONS FREQUENCY ANALYSIS LLD 1 Carnivorous Fish 2 Quarterly y Spec: Mn-54 130 pCi/kg and Oysters Fe-59 260 Co-58 130 Co-60 130 Zn-65 260 Cs-134 130 Cs-137 150 Broad Leaf 3 Monthly 3 ySpec: 1-131 60 pCi/kg Vegetation Cs-134 60 Cs-137 80 Watermelon 1 Annual 4 y Spec: Citrus 1 Annual 4 y Spec: 'The maximum "a priori" LLD 3 When available 4During harvest 5 Same as broad leaf vegetation 5

Airbomn Releases LiauidReleases I Air External Radiation Seawater Ground Water Sediments Drinking Water -Aquatic Animals Food Crops Man FIGURE I-1: Environmental Media and Exposure Pathways 6 Cis LAKE ROUSSEAU C04 US 19 C19 C48A C48B PE PROPERTY LINE C13 C30 CRYSTAL RIVER C09 KING'S BAY FIGURE 1-2: Environmental Monitoring Sample Stations (non-TLDs) 7 C60 C62 CIRCULATING WATER INTAKE PUMP STRUCTURE C732 CHEMICAL FEED BLDG.ASH STORAGE AREA ,-I 0 (.0 0 HELPER COOLING TOWERS-C63 MAIN P C64 C70 RUNOFF C69 8 C18 C03 LAKE ROUSSEAU CO1 C04 CROSS FLORIDA BARGE CANAL 19 C74 C75 C76 CRYSTAL RIVER C07 C09 C08 KING'S BAY FIGURE 1-4: Environmental Monitoring TLD Locations (off site)9 Figure 1-5: CR3 Groundwater Monitoring Well Locations Deep Wells Are Also Installed at #'s 1, 3, 6 Wells # 1 & 3 are not routinely sampled by the REMP 10 II. LAND-USE CENSUS A land-use census was conducted during June through August. The purpose of this census is to identify the nearest residences, vegetable gardens, and potential milk-producing animals within a five mile radius of the nuclear plant. The distance in miles and bearing in degrees for each receptor type in each of the sixteen sectors is summarized below.SECTO NEAREST NEAREST NEAREST R RESIDENCE GARDEN (A) MILK ANIMAL N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NW NNW 4.46 @ 20 3.95 @ 150 3.84 @ 540 3.43 @ 600 2.40 @ 920 4.24 @ 1020 4.90 @ 1330 3.53 @ 1490 4.77 @ 3230 4.90 @ 3210 4.60 @ 3390 4.1 @ 930 4.7 @ 103°*"*(A) -Only gardens with an estimated total area of 500 square feet, or more, and producing green leafy vegetables are considered.

No suitable sites were located within 5 miles.I1 Ill. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH -INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM DATA The EPA crosscheck program ceased operation at the end of 1998. To meet the requirements for a crosscheck program, the Florida Department of Health participates in the Department of Energy's Mixed-Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP). The following units are used for each of the four media: Air Filters: Bq/sample Soil: Bq/Kg Vegetation:

Bq/sample Water: Bq/L Analytical performance is based on historical analytical capabilities for individual analyte/matrix pairs.Acceptable performance is designated by an "A".Acceptable with warning is designated by a "W".Performance which is not acceptable is designated by an "N".Results for February 2009: Media Nuclide Result % Bias Acceptance Range Flag Air Co-57 1.15 -11.5 0.91 -1.69 A Air Co-60 1.14 -6.6 0.85-1.59 A Air Cs-134 2.88 -1.7 2.05-3.81 A Air Cs-137 1.45 -4.6 1.06-1.98 A Air Zn-65 1.34 -1.5 0.95-1.77 A Air Gross Beta 0.335 20.1 0.140 -0.419 A Soil Mn-54 347.54 13.2 215-399 A Soil Zn-65 278.17 14.9 169-315 A Soil Cs-134 452.51 -3.1 327-607 A Soil Cs-1 37 660.6 9.2 424 -787 A Soil U-238 163.1 5.2 109-202 A Vegetation Co-57 2.27 -3.8 1.65 -3.07 A Vegetation Zn-65 1.33 -1.8 0.948 -1.76 A Vegetation Cs-1 34 3.25 -4.4 2.38 -4.42 A Vegetation Cs-1 37 0.99 -3.2 0.65 -1.21 A Vegetation Mn-54 2.19 -4.8 1.61 -2.99 A Water H-3 344.72 4.2 231.6 -430.2 A Water Mn-54 15.43 5.3 10.26 -19.06 A Water Co-60 17.13 -0.5 12.05 -22.37 A Water Co-57 18.04 -4.6 13.2-24.6 A Water Cs-134 21.18 -5.9 15.8-29.3 A Water Zn-65 14.7 8.1 9.5-17.7 A 12 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH -INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM DATA, cont'd Results for August 2009: Media Nuclide Air Air Air Air Air Air Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Mn-54 Co-57 Co-60 Cs-1 37 Zn-65 Gross Beta Vegetation Vegetation Vegetation Vegetation Water Water Water Water Water Water Mn-54 Co-60 Cs-1 37 Co-57 Zn-65 Mn-54 Co-60 Cs-1 37 Co-57 H-3 Co-57 Co-60 Cs-1 34 Cs-1 37 Zn-65 Result 6.31 6.12 1.05 1.55 4.69 1.484 873.6 343.7 712.12 632.79 1354.41 7.10 2.33 2.09 7.39 508.91 34.53 15.28 29.44 41.88 29.79% Bias 14.9-5.6 1.9 10.7 19.3 12.4 9.7 5.1 6.4 8.0 15.0-10.1-9.3-14.0-7.6-19.7-5.7-0.8-8.6 1.7 10.7 Acceptance Range 3.84-7.14 4.54 -8.42 0.72-1.34 0.98 -1.82 2.75-5.11 0.66-1.98 557-1035 229-425 468 -870 410- 762 825-1531 5.5-10.3 1.80-3.34 1.70-3.16 5.6-10.4 443.9 -824.3 25.6 -47.6 10.8-20.0 22.5-41.9 28.8-53.6 18.8 -35.0 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A Flag 13 IV-A. AIRBORNE PATHWAY Air samples are taken at five locations in the vicinity of the plant. The control location is 78 miles ESE of the plant, at the Department of Health, State Bureau of Radiation Control in Orlando.Table IV-A.1 provides a statistical summary of the analytical results for 312 gross beta samples and 312 iodine samples.Tables IV-A.2 and IV-A.3 provide the. results for each weekly air sample.Three hundred twelve particulate samples were analyzed.for gross beta activity, all of which had measurable activity except 8 samples. The average indicator concentration was 17 pCi/1 000 m 3 with a range of 8 to 34 pCi/1000 M 3 .The average indicator concentration since 1996 was in the range of 14 to 19 pCi/1 000 M 3.The control location concentration for 2009 averaged 16 pCi/1000 M 3 , with a range of 5 to 27 pCi/1 000 M 3.Three hundred twelve samples were analyzed for iodine activity, with none having measurable activity.

The highest iodine LLD was 0.09 pCi/m 3.This LLD value was influenced by a partial (minimal) sample run due to a power outage at the sample station. On all other samples that ran the normal amount of time, the highest iodine LLD was 0.03 pCi/m 3.Quarterly composite data are summarized in Table IV-A.4. Measurable quantities of cesium were not identified in any particulate filter sample. The highest cesium LLD was 3.6 pCi/1000 m 3 for cesium 134.There were no instances of non-collected airborne samples for the year 2009, but there were several instances of air sampler partial run times as follows: 1. In February station C-40 was down for 125.4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months due to a faulty ground fault interrupter (GFI)duplex outlet.2. In May station C-46 ran intermittently during a period of time between 5-12-09 and 5-26-09 due to an underground power supply line that shorted out and had to be replaced.

During this period of time the monitor was down for 384.8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months .3. In June station C-40 was down for 142.75 hours8.680556e-4 days 0.0208 hours 1.240079e-4 weeks 2.85375e-5 months due to the power being disconnected by fossil maintenance to install a power transfer switch in the power feed circuit that supplies both a groundwater well pump and the air sample station. Fossil maintenance did not realize at the time that this maintenance was affecting operation of this air sampler. This circuit breaker panel has since been added to the fossil/nuclear interface agreement to prevent reoccurrence.

4. In September station C-40 was down for 123.6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months due to a lightning strike that hit a groundwater well pump which affected the power supply to the air sample station.The remaining 4 sample stations were in service 100% of the time, with exception of filter changes and air pump/gas meter replacements.

The percentages of down times for the 2 stations are as follows: C40 4.47%C46 4.39%The air sample station's down times are documented in the plant Corrective Action Program (CAP) under NCRs 320964, 335746, 341334, and 353293.14 TABLE IV-A.1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 2009 MEDIUM OR ANALYSIS AND NUMBER OF PATHWAY TOTAL NUMBER LOWER LIMIT ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE SAMPLED OF ANALYSES OF DETECTION MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN REPORTED (UNITS) PERFORMED (LLD)1 RANGE DISTANCE & BEARING RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS AIRBORNE 7 Spec 312 IODINE (pCi/m 3) 1-131 0.03 <LLD <LLD 0 AIRBORNE Gross I 312 7.0 17 (304/312)

C18 20(50/52) 16(50/52) 0 PARTICULATES (8-34) 5.2 @ 0° (8-29) (5-27)(pCi/1000m 3 for y Spec 24 Gross R, pCi/1000m 3 for Cs-134 3.6 <LLD <LLD 0 , Spec)Cs-137 2.9 <LLD <LLD 0 1 The "a priori" LLD which meetsor exceeds the requirements of Table 2-9 of the CR-3 ODCM.15 TABLE IV-A.2 PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. -CR3 -2009 pCi/m 3 IODINE -131 IN AIR SAMPLE SITE Collection Date 06-Jan-09 13-Jan-09 20-Jan-09 26-Jan-09 03-Feb-09 10-Feb-09 17-Feb-09 24-Feb-09 03-Mar-09 10-Mar-09 16-Mar-09 24-Mar-09 31-Mar-09 C07<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.02<0.01<0.01<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02 C18 C40<0.02 <0.02<0.02 <0.02<0.02 <0.02<0.02 <0.02<0.01 <0.01<0.02 <0.02<0.01 <0.02(A)<0.01 <0.01<0.03 <0.03<0.02 <0.02<0.03 <0.03<0.02 <0.02<0.02 <0.02 C41<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.02<0.01<0.01<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02 C46<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02 C47<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.02<0.01<0.02<0.01<0.01<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02 (A) GFI outlet tripped; pump not running at time of collection.

GFI reset. Estimated run time 39.1 out of 164.5 hours5.787037e-5 days 0.00139 hours 8.267196e-6 weeks 1.9025e-6 months .16 TABLE IV-A.2 (Cont'd)PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. -CR3 -2009 pCi/m 3 IODINE -131 IN AIR SAMPLE SITE Collection Date 07-Apr-09 14-Apr-09 21-Apr-09 28-Apr-09 05-May-09 12-May-09 19-May-09 26-May-09 01-Jun-09 09-Jun-09 16-Jun-09 24-Jun-09 30-Jun-09 C07<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.01<0.01<0.02 C18<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.01<0.01<0.03 C40<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.02<0.03<0.03<0.05(D)<0.01<0.02 C41<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.02<0.03<0.03<0.01<0.01<0.02 C46<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.09(A)<0.06(B)<0.03(C)<0.03<0.03<0.01<0.01<0.02 C47<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.01<0.01<0.02 (A) At time of collection vacuum pump not running; able to restart pump. Estimated run time 11.4 out of 166.8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months .(B) No power to hut. Estimated run time 14.2 out of 172.3 hours3.472222e-5 days 8.333333e-4 hours 4.960317e-6 weeks 1.1415e-6 months .(C) Power restored on 5/22/09 at 1100. Estimated run time 95.4 out of 162.6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months .(D) No power to hut. Estimated run time 23.5 out of 166.3 hours3.472222e-5 days 8.333333e-4 hours 4.960317e-6 weeks 1.1415e-6 months . Power restored on 6/17/09 at 1700.17 TABLE IV-A.2 (Cont'd)PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. -CR3 -2009 pCi/m 3 IODINE -131 IN AIR Collection Date 07-Jul-09 14-Jul-09 21-Jul-09 28-Jul-09 04-Aug-09 11-Aug-09 18-Aug-09 26-Aug-09 01-Sep-09 08-Sep-09 14-Sep-09 21 -Sep-09 29-Sep-09 C07 C18<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.03<0.02<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.03<0.02<0.01<0.03<0.02 SAMPLE SITE C40<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.03(A)<0.02<0.01<0.01<0.03<0.02 C41<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.03<0.02 C46<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.02<0.01<0.01<0.03<0.02 C47<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.03<0.02<0.01<0.02<0.01<0.01<0.03<0.02 (A) Estimated run time 69.9 out of 193.5 hours5.787037e-5 days 0.00139 hours 8.267196e-6 weeks 1.9025e-6 months ; unknown reason for lower run time.18 TABLE IV-A.2 (Cont'd)PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. -CR3 -2009 pCi/m 3 IODINE -131 IN AIR SAMPLE SITE Collection Date 05-Oct-09 13-Oct-09 20-Oct-09 27-Oct-09 03-Nov-09 09-Nov-09 16-Nov-09 24-Nov-09 01-Dec-09 08-Dec-09 14-Dec-09 21 -Dec-09 29-Dec-09 C07 C18 C40<0.02 <0.02 <0.02<0.02 <0.02 <0.02<0.02 <0.02 <0.02<0.03 <0.03 <0.03<0.01 <0.02 <0.01<0.03 <0.02 <0.03<0.02 <0.02 <0.02<0.02 <0.02 <0.02<0.02 <0.02 <0.02<0.02 <0.02 <0.02<0.03 <0.03 <0.03<0.01 <0.01 <0.01<0.02 <0.02 <0.02 C41 C46 C47<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.01<0.02 19 TABLE IV-A.3 PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. -CR3 -2009 pCi/100Om 3 GROSS If IN AIR Collection Date 06-Jan-09 13-Jan-09 20-Jan-09 26-Jan-09 03-Feb-09 10-Feb-09 17-Feb-09 24-Feb-09 03-Mar-09 10-Mar-09 16-Mar-09 24-Mar-09 31-Mar-09 Average: C07 21 13 20 19 12 21 19 21 24 20 15 11 17 18 C18 15 23 20 24 18 28 22 24 17 26 19 16 13 20 SAMPLE SITE C40 C41 17 21 13 12 22 12 27 18 15 18 23 21 20(A) 19 22 17 16 23<7 26 6 20 11 16 15 16 C46 24 11 24 24 16.23 16 26 23 22 22 13 12 20 C47 21 15 22 15 22 18 19 24 18 21 14 15 5 18 17 18 (A) GFI outlet tripped; pump not running at time of collection.

GFI reset. Estimated run time 39.1 out of 164.5 hours5.787037e-5 days 0.00139 hours 8.267196e-6 weeks 1.9025e-6 months .20 TABLE IV-A.3 (Cont'd)PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. -CR3 -2009 pCi/1000m 3 GROSS I1 IN AIR Collection Date 07-Apr-09 14-Apr-09 21-Apr-09 28-Apr-09 05-May-09 12-May-09 19-May-09 26-May-09 01-Jun-09 09-Jun-09 16-Jun-09 24-Jun-09 30-Jun-09 Average: C07 12 21 11 21 18 13 6 4 18 13 23 30 11 15 C18 13 16 14 25 29 15 8 8 20 16 25 22 11 17 SAMPLE SITE C40 12 23<6 10 18 16 9 6 18 23 26(D)29 11 C41 11 21<7 6 4 12 8 4 16 14 27 23 18 C46 11 18 17 24 23<99(A)<70(B)<11(C)19 25 21 31 15 20 C47<7 20 12 6 8 19 8<7 19 20 24 17 10 15 17 14 (A) At time of collection vacuum pump not running; able to restart pump. Estimated run time 11.4 out of 166.8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months .(B) No power to hut. Estimated run time 14.2 out of 172.3 hours3.472222e-5 days 8.333333e-4 hours 4.960317e-6 weeks 1.1415e-6 months .(C) Power restored on 5/22/09 at 1100. Estimated run time 95.4 out of 162.6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months .(D) No power to hut. Estimated run time 23.5 out of 166.3 hours3.472222e-5 days 8.333333e-4 hours 4.960317e-6 weeks 1.1415e-6 months . Power restored on 6/17/09 at 1700.21 TABLE IV-A.3 (Cont'd)PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. -CR3 -2009 pCill000m 3 GROSS IB IN AIR SAMPLE SITE Collection Date 07-Jul-09 14-Jul-09 21-Jul-09 28-Jul-09 04-Aug-09 11-Aug-09 18-Aug-09 26-Aug-09 01-Sep-09 08-Sep-09 14-Sep-09 21-Sep-09 29-Sep-09 Average: C07 C18 20 15 13 16 15 22 17 23 12 10 12 12 13 21 14 15 9 19 8 9 16 9 21 22 7 13 14 16 C40 C41 C46 18 15 19 10 17 14 21 15 22 15 23 17 11 10 11 14 13 14 15 20 18 8(A) 14 17 14 17 14 C47 18 17 16 18 11 13 12 12 16 10 16 21 14 14 10 16 24 10 16 10 15 21 11 16 10 10 22 8 14 (A) Estimated run time 69.9 out of 193.5 hours5.787037e-5 days 0.00139 hours 8.267196e-6 weeks 1.9025e-6 months ; due to lightning strike.22 TABLE IV-A.3 (Cont'd)PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. -CR3 -2009 pCi/1000m 3 GROSS fl IN AIR Collection Date 05-Oct-09 13-Oct-09 20-Oct-09 27-Oct-09 03-Nov-09 09-Nov-09 16-Nov-09 24-Nov-09 01-Dec-09 08-Dec-09 14-Dec-09 21-Dec-09 29-Dec-09 Average: C07 20 10 10 11 13 23 12 24 18 15 14 16 15 15 C18 24 13 14 21 16 25 11 23 20 14 9 18 17 17 SAMPLE SITE C40 C41 26 24 15 11 12 13 16 16 16 16 34 34 15 19 28 21 24 21 15 14 19 12 13 16 20 19 20 19 C46 20 14 12 15 15 32 12 24 19 15 20 16 19 19 C47 25 11 12 16 16 21 9 22 27 15 18 15 18 18 23 TABLE IV-A.4 PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. -CR3 -2009 pCi/1000m 3 y EMITTERS IN QUARTERLY COMPOSITES OF AIR PARTICULATES STATION NUCLIDE FIRST QUARTER SECOND QUARTER THIRD QUARTER FOURTH QUARTER C07 C18 C40 C41 C46 C47 Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 CS-137 Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 259<19<1.1<1.0 219<23<2.0<1.6 183<6.4<0.6<0.5 268<19<1.6<0.8 205<19<1.8<1.6 233<6.2<0.4<0.3 137<34<2.1<1.4 112<30<2.1<1.5 117<42<3.5<2.9 132<31<2.6<2.3 112<35<3.0<2.6 127<35<2.5<1.3 112<39<1.9<1.8 115<19<2.0<1.6 111<25<3.4<2.6 135<35<1.8<1.6 135<29<2.1<1.8 104<33<2.5<1.8 107<30<2.1<1.7 131<30<2.1<1.4 119<36<3.6<2.4 124<33<2.9<2.6 115<34<2.0<1.4 152<28<2.0<1.0 24 Airborne (highest values plotted)0.1* ". ' -,.A E 0.01 1 Measured 0.001 -------;*-0.0001 ,- -, ----- -............. a -1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 1 --- *--- 1-131 LLD ---U--- Cs-137 LLD 25 IV-B. DIRECT RADIATION Direct radiation measurements (using TLDs) were taken at seventeen locations (stations C60 through C73 and station C27) within one mile of the plant, at fifteen locations ranging from 2.8 to 6.3 miles from the plant, and at one control location 78 miles from the site. One-hundred and thirty-two TLDS were collected during 2009.Table IV-B provides a statistical summary of the analytical results for 132 TLDs sampled throughout the year.Table IV-B.1 provides the results of the individual TLD measurements.

The highest on-site dose was 98 mrem/yr at station C71 (WNW at 3600 feet). Station C71 was relocated in 1992 due to construction of the helper cooling towers on the former site. The new location has a higher background radiation level due to being closer to the storage pond for Units 4 & 5 fly ash, which produces a higher external radiation component than normal levels of natural background., The second highest on-site dose was 63 mrem/yr at station C27 (W at 2112 feet). This is a change from the previous year 2 nd highest location (C65 ESE at 1740 feet)due to nearby construction activities in the area of C27 to install a new cooling tower. New limestone fill. is being applied to this area for the tower foundation.

Additionally, the settling ponds in this area that receive effluents from the near-by fossil units were de-mucked which also exposed limestone that was previously covered.The highest off-site dose was 57 mrem/yr at station C40 (east at 3.5 miles). The control station (C47) dose was 52 mrem/yr. The average for all stations (except control) was 51 mrem/yr for 2009, 59 mrem/yr for 2008, and 54 mrem/yr for 2007. Direct radiation results are similar to previous years and show no change of significance.

There were no missing or unanalyzed TLDs during this evaluation period.26 TABLE IV-B RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 2009 MEDIUM OR ANALYSIS AND NUMBER OF PATHWAY TOTAL NUMBER LOWER LIMIT ALL INDICATOR LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL NONROUTINE SAMPLED OF ANALYSES OF DETECTION LOCATIONS MEAN NAME MEAN LOCATION REPORTED (UNITS) PERFORMED (LLD) RANGE DISTANCE & BEARING RANGE MEAN MEASUREMENTS RANGE DIRECT RADIATION (mrem/yr)7 DOSE, 132 15 51 (128/128)(36- 103)C71 0.6 @ 2960 98 (4/4)(91 -103)52 (4/4)(47 -55)0 27 TABLE IV-B.1 PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. -CR-3 -2009 mrem/yr y Dose TLD STATION Quarter 1 2 3 4 Col 40 36 41 38 C03 42 39 43 36 C04 39 38 41 37 C07* 40 37 42 38 C08 41 38 39 38 C09 41 38 40 37 C14G 45 48 50 46 C18 44 46 47 42 C27 59 60 61 74 C40* 57 60 55 55 C41 50 54 54 52 C46* 50 52 53 51 C47 (CONTROL) 50 47 55 55 C60 48 50 53 50 C61 53 54 59 53 C62 58 55 64 56 C63 60 56 57 54 C64 52 49 54 50 C65 60 62 66 61 C66 53 51 55 54 C67 54 51 54 51 C68 55 53 59 53 C69 58 56 60 56 C70 52 56 59 57 C71 98 100 103 91 C72 55 52 58 55 C73 49 48 53 49 C74 39 38 39 39 C75 49 51 52 50 C76 47 44 48 47 C77 48 45 46 46 C78 42 39 43 40 C79 45 44 48 44*TLDs not required by the ODCM.Quarterly values are multiplied by 4 to obtain an equivalent yearly dose.28 Direct Radiation 100 E.-E I I I I I I I I I I I III 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009-B-TLD Average of All Stations 10 29 IV-C. WATERBORNE PATHWAY To evaluate the waterborne pathway, samples are taken of seawater, ground water, drinking water, and shoreline sediment.1. Monthly seawater grab samples are taken at two locations in the discharge canal (C14G and C14H) and at one control location (C13) near the mouth of the intake canal. Of twenty-four indicator samples, sixteen had measurable tritium at an average concentration of 2990 pCi/L, as compared to six measurable samples containing tritium with an average of 103 pCi/L in 2008. The sample with the highest concentration of tritium, 26091 pCi/L, was obtained in November at station C14H near the head of the discharge canal. The seawater tritium activity is consistent with the concentration of tritium in the liquid waste stream and the release times of waste tanks. CR-3 was in Refuel 16 outage at the time of sampling with reduced dilution due to no circulating water pumps running. Plant raw water pumps were providing the dilution flow. This resulted in the concentration of tritium in the discharge canal being elevated.

Six control station samples contained tritium at an average concentration of 219 pCi/L. The 2008 control station results averaged 91 pCi/L.Gamma spectral analysis was performed on thirty-six samples, none of which showed measurable amounts of the gamma emitters of interest.Table IV-C.1 provides a statistical summary of the seawater tritium and gamma spectroscopy results.Table IV-C.1.a provides the results of the monthly samples.2. Semiannual ground water samples are taken at one location, station C40, located approximately 3.5 miles east of CR-3. Gamma spectral and tritium analyses are performed on both samples. All results were less than the detection limits. Since plant startup, all results, except for the results of one 1985 tritium analysis, have been less than LLD. The required sensitivity for measuring tritium in ground water is 2000 pCi/L.Analysis of ground water in the vicinity of CR-3 is done at a sensitivity of approximately 150 pCi/L for tritium and less than 10 pCi/L for select gamma emitters.Table IV-C.2 provides a statistical summary of the groundwater tritium and gamma spectroscopy results.Table IV-C.2.a provides the results of the semi-annual samples.3. Quarterly site ground water samples are taken at nine locations surrounding the perimeter of the CR-3 protected area. Presently five of these ground water wells have shown indications of very low levels of tritium on the west-southwest side of the plant. It is believed that this tritium is the result of a leak in the Station Drain Tank (SDT-1) to the settling pond discharge line that occurred many years ago. This discharge line has recently been leak tested and it is leak free. There are no other know leaking plant components.

The five wells that have shown measurable amounts of tritium range from 82 to 1967 pCi/L.These five wells have been sampled additionally on a monthly basis to develop trend data. This information is shown as supplemental data. Along with these wells, two other wells that are not presently part of the REMP have been sampled that are on either side of the plant settling ponds (percolation ponds). These two wells are showing measurable amounts of tritium in the range of 86 to 611 pCi/L, which are a result of plant discharges from the SDT-1. These discharges are being minimized through operational focus. The tritium values are below the reporting criteria of the ODCM or the NEI 07-07 Ground Water Protection Initiative Guidelines.

There have been no measurable amounts of gamma emitting radionuclides in any of these wells. There have been no measurable amounts of hard-to-detect (HTD) radionuclides in any of these wells with exception of trace levels of gross alpha, which is expected, given the naturally occurring limestone strata that surrounds the Florida aquifier.

It should be noted that site ground water flows in a west-southwest direction toward the Gulf of Mexico. This flow was re-verified in 2006 with a new ground water flow study performed by a certified hydro-geologist as part of the NEI Ground Water Protection Initiative.

Additionally, the ground water at the CR-3 site is too saline for use as a potable water source.Table IV-C.2.b provides a statistical summary of the groundwater tritium and gamma spectroscopy results.Table IV-C.2.b.1 provides the results of the quarterly samples.Table IV-C.2.b.2 provides the results of the monthly supplemental samples.30 IV-C. WATERBORNE PATHWAY Cont'd 4. Monthly non-REMP required well samples were collected as discussed in item #3 above. Two wells were sampled. These two wells are located on either side of the site percolation ponds. The information is discussed above. Both of these wells showed no measurable amounts of any radionuclide of interest.

The tritium concentration in these wells have decreased significantly due to a focused reduction in the number of discharges from the station drain tank (SDT-1) to the site percolation ponds.Table IV-C.2.c provides a statistical summary of the groundwater tritium and gamma spectroscopy results.Table IV-C.2.c.1 provides the results of the monthly supplemental non-REMP required samples.5. Quarterly drinking water samples are drawn from three locations:

the Crystal River City Hall (C07), the Days Inn Motel (C10), and the Yankeetown City Well (C18). All samples were collected and analyzed for gamma emitters and tritium. None of the samples yielded measurable activities of tritium or the required gamma emitters.

The measurement sensitivity for drinking water samples are the same as those for ground water samples.Table IV-C.3 provides a statistical summary of the drinking water tritium and gamma spectroscopy results.Table IV-C.3.a provides the results of the quarterly samples.6. Semiannual shoreline sediment samples are taken at three indicator locations in the discharge canal (C14H, CU4M, C14G) and one control location (C09) at Fort Island Gulf Beach. The plant discharge canal is the primary liquid effluent release pathway from CR-3. Of the six indicator samples, four had measurable amounts of cesium-137 and three had measurable amounts of cobalt-60.

In 2008 there were no measurable amounts of cobalt-60.

The average cobalt-60 concentration at the indicator locations ranged from 30 to 389 pCi/L from 1998 through 2007. In 2008 the average cesium-1 37 concentration at the indicator locations was 25 pCi/L. The average cesium-1 37 concentration in 2007 was 23 pCi/L. The 2009 results are similar to previous years' results. None of the samples taken at Fort Island Gulf Beach, the control location station C09, indicated measurable amounts of cobalt or cesium.Table IV-C.4 provides a statistical summary of the shoreline sediment gamma spectroscopy results.Table IV-C.4.a provides the results of the semi-annual samples.7. There were no unmonitored spills or releases of radioactive material in 2009 that could have the potential to contaminate the ground water per the guidelines of the Nuclear Energy Institute Ground Water Protection Initiative

-Final Guidance Document 07-07. As such, there were no communiques issued to state, local, or regulatory agencies.31 TABLE IV-C.1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 2009 MEDIUM OR ANALYSIS AND PATHWAY TOTAL NUMBER OF SAMPLED ANALYSES (UNITS) PERFORMED SEAWATER Tritium, 36 (pCi/L)y Spec, 36 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Zr-Nb-95 1-131 Cs-1 34 Cs-1 37 Ba-La-1 40 LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION (LLD)1 139 5 11 6 7 12 6 8 6 7 15 ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS MEAN RANGE 2990 (16/24)(94-26091)

LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN NAME MEAN DISTANCE & BEARING RANGE C14H 4092 (9/12)0.1 @ 00 (94-26091)

NUMBER OF CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE MEAN REPORTED RANGE MEASUREMENTS 219 (6/12) 0 (83-395)<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD 1 The "a priori" LLD which meets or exceeds the requirements of Table 2-9 of the CR-3 ODCM.32 TABLE IV-C.1.a PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. -CR3 -2009 pCi/L -EMITTERS AND TRITIUM IN SEAWATER STATION MONTH H-3 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Zr-Nb-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-La-140 C13 JAN 146+/-27 377+/-31 <3 <4 <9 <4 <8 <7 <5 <5 <4 <8 FEB <142 277+/-32 <3 <2 <7 <3 <5 <5 <5 <3 <3 <4 MAR 395+/-50 190+/-68 <3 <3 <6 <4 <8 <5 <4 <3 <3 <8 APR <139 309+/-42 <4 <4 <9 <6 <9 <7 <5 <5 <5 <9 MAY <154 303+/-16 <2 <1 <3 <2 <4 <3 <2 <2 <2 <3 JUN 147+/-45 227+/-32 <4 <4 <9 <5 <8 <6 <5 <4 <4 <10 JUL <143 246+/-10 <1 <1 <3 <2 <3 <2 <2 <1 <2 <4 AUG <159 278+/-31 <3 <4 <7 <3 <7 <7 <4 <4 <4 <13 SEP 394+/-62 286+/-32 <4 <4 <8 <4 <8 <8 <6 <4 <4 <5 OCT <165 339+/-20 <2 <2 <5 <3 <5 <4 <3 <3 <3 <4 NOV 151+/-48 223+/-18 <3 <3 <7 <4 <7 <5 <4 <3 <3 <12 DEC 83+/-26 336+/-33 <4 <4 <9 <4 <8 <7 <5 <5 <4 <13 C14G JAN <143 301+/-44 <4 <4 <10 <7 <12 <8 <5 <6 <7 <10 FEB <142 251+/-31 <2 <2 <5 <3 <6 <4 <3 <3 <3 <8 MAR 562+/-54 283+/-32 <3 <3 <7 <4 <7 <6 <4 <4 <3 <7 APR <139 321+/-32 <3 <3 <8 <4 <8 <6 <5 <4 <4 <8 MAY 8928+/-157 249+/-28 <3 <3 <6 <4 <8 <6 <5 <4 <5 <6 JUN 128+/-45 203+/-18 <3 <3 <6 <4 <9 <5 <4 <4 <4 <8 JUL <143 207+/-18 <3 <3 <6 <3 <7 <6 <4 <4 <3 <9 AUG <159 198+/-17 <3 <3 <6 <3 <8 <6 <4 <4 <3 <11 SEP 882+/-73 275+/-45 <4 <5 <11 <7 <12 <9 <7 <6 <6 <9 OCT 133+/-53 281+/-36 <4 <3 <8 <4 <7 <7 <6 <4 <3 <4 NOV 285+/-51 282+/-22 <3 <3 <7 <3 <6 <5 <4 <3 <3 <11 DEC 98+/-26 229+/-31 <4 <4 <9 <4 <9 <8 <4 <4 <4 <15 33 TABLE IV-C.la (CONT'D)PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. -CR3 -2009 pCi/L y EMITTERS AND TRITIUM IN SEAWATER STATION MONTH H-3 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Zr-Nb-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-La-140 C14H JAN <143 199+/-44 FEB 94+/-26 310+/-30 MAR 474+/-52 222+/-18 APR <139 211+/-18 MAY 155+/-51 297+/-25 JUN 212+/-47 251+/-20 JUL <143 224+/-18 AUG 9421+/-171 212+/-18 SEP 119+/-31 283+/-40 OCT 158+/-54 250+/-11 NOV 26091+/-257 235+/-19 DEC 108+/-445 267+/-30<5 <5 <9 <6<3 <3 <7 <4<1 <1 <3 <2<4 <3 <7 <4<3 <2 <5 <3<3 <3 <7 <4<4 <3 <7 <4<3 <3 <6 <4<5 <6 <10 <6<1 <1 <3 <2<3 <3 <7 <4<4 <3 <7 <4<12<8<3<9<6<8<8<9<11<3<8<10<8<5<2<6<5<6<5<6<9<2<5<7<5<4<2<4<4<4<4<3<8<2<4<5<5<3<1<4<3<4<3<3<6<1<4<4<6<4<2<3<3<3<4<3<4<2<3<4<10<10<4<8<4<9<7<11<8<2<13<4 34 Seawater 10000 1000 Zi 100 CLýme ýaquredal Ivalues 10 10 -"J" ..... ..1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 INH 3 -- --C _3 L D --. -C -3 L D 35 TABLE IV-C.2 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 2009 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY SAMPLED (UNITS)GROUND WATER (pCi/L)ANALYSIS AND TOTAL NUMBER OF ANALYSES PERFORMED Tritium, 2-y Spec, 2 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Zr-Nb-95 1-131 Cs-1 34 Cs-1 37 Ba-La-140 LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION (LLD)1 159 ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS MEAN RANGE<LLD LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN NAME MEAN DISTANCE & BEARING RANGE NUMBER OF CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE MEAN REPORTED RANGE MEASUREMENTS

<LLD 0 3 6 3 3 7 4 3 3 3 7<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1The "a priori" LLD which meets or exceeds the requirements of Table 2-9 of the CR-3 ODCM.36 TABLE IV-C.2.a PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. -CR3 -2009 pCi/L -EMITTERS AND TRITIUM IN GROUND WATER STATION NUCLIDE FIRST HALF SECOND HALF C40 H-3 <138 <159 Mn-54 <3 <2 Fe-59 <6 <3 Co-58 <3 <2 Co-60 <3 <2 Zn-65 <7 <4 Zr-Nb-95 <4 <3 1-131 <3 <2 Cs-134 <3 <2 Cs-137 <3 <2 Ba-La-1 40 <7 <5 K-40 <32 <29 37 G rou n d Water 1000 100-I a.K * * ~ *

U ~10 1 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009-H-3 LLD ---U--- Cs-137 LLD 38 TABLE IV-C.2.b RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 2009 MEDIUM OR ANALYSIS AND NUMBER OF PATHWAY TOTAL (NUMBER)2 LOWER LIMIT ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE SAMPLED (UNITS) OF ANALYSES OF DETECTION MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN REPORTED PERFORMED (LLD)1 RANGE DISTANCE & BEARING RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS CR3 SITE Tritium 76 165 504(47/76)

C3-5 1490(12/12)

C3-2 0 GROUND WATER (82-1967) 0.051 mi.@225° (327-1967) 86(1/4)(pCi/L) -y Spec 76 (86-150)Mn-54 6 <LLD --<LLD 0 Fe-59 13 <LLD --<LLD 0 Co-58 7 <LLD --<LLD 0 Co-60 8 <LLD --<LLD 0 Zn-65 19 <LLD --<LLD 0 Zr-Nb-95 11 <LLD --<LLD 0 1-131 13 <LLD --<LLD 0 Cs-134 8 <LLD --<LLD 0 Cs-137 7 <LLD --<LLD 0 Ba-La-140 15 <LLD --<LLD 0 1 The "a priori" LLD which meets or exceeds the requirements of Table 2-9 of the CR-3 ODCM.2 Includes extra samples collected for data trending.39 TABLE IV-C.2.b.1 PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. -CR3 -2009 pCi/L y EMITTERS AND TRITIUM IN CR3 SITE GROUND WATER STATION DATE H-3 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Zn-Nb-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-La-140 C3-2 01-06 <143 <52 <4 <4 <10 <5 <9 <7 <6 <5 <5 <8 04-07 <139 <71 <5 <5 <10 <5 <10 <9 <7 <6 <6 <10 07-07 <143 <31 <2 <2 <4 <2 <5 <4 <3 <3 <2 <7 10-13 86+/-27 <36 <3 <3 <6 <3 <9 <5 <5 <3 <3 <5 C3-4 01-06 <143 <41 <3 <3 <7 <4 <11 <5- <4 <4 <4 <7 04-07 <139 <69 <4 <4 <7 <4 <10 <8 <6 <5 <5 <10 07-07 <143 <69 <4 <5 <8 <5 <9 <9 <6 <6 <4 <14 10-13 <150 <46 <3 <3 <5 <3 <6 <6 <6 <3 <3 <15 C3-5 01-06 327+/-51 <80 <4 <5 <10 <6 <9 <7 <5 <5 <6 <10 04-07 1843+/-78 71+/-14 <3 <2 <5 <3 <5 <5 <4 <3 <3 <5 07-07 1670+/-77 40+/-16 <4 <4 <8 <4 <8 <7 <6 <4 <4 <7 10-05 1454+/-80 58+/-5 <2 <2 <3 <2 <5 <3 <2 <2 <2 <3 40 TABLE IV-C.2.b.l(cont'd)

PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. -CR3 -2009 pCi/L y EMITTERS AND TRITIUM IN CR3 SITE GROUND WATER STATION DATE H-3 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Zn-Nb-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-La-140 C3-6S 01-06 90+/-26 <73 <5 <5 <9 <7 <12 <7 <6 <6 <6 <14 04-07 <139 40+/-13 <2 <2 <3 <2 <4 <3 <3 <2 <2 <3 07-07 137+/-47 40+/-11 <2 <2 <3 <2 <3 <3 <3 <2 <2 <2 10-05 <165 24+/-8 <4 <4 <7 <3 <13 <6 <5 <4 <4 <7 C3-6D 01-06 143 <67 <5 <5 <9 <5 <10 <7 <6 <6 <6 <14 04-07 139 35+/-11 <4 <5 <9 <6 <10 <8 <5 <5 <5 <8 07-07 143 223+/-18 <3 <3 <6 <4 <8 <5 <5 <4 <5 <8 10-13 108+/-28 <81 <2 <2 <6 <3 <5 <4 <4 <3 <2 <11 C3-7 01-06 <143 <46 <4 <4 <8 <4 <16 <7 <5 <4 <4 <7 04-07 156+/-47 16+/-4 <13 <2 <2 <4 <2 <6 <3 <3 <2 <2 07-07 518+/-57 37+/-9 <18 <3 <4 <7 <4 <14 <6 <4 <4 <4 10-05 193+/-55 72+/-13 <21 <2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <4 <3 <2 <2 41 TABLE IV-C.2.b.l(cont'd)

PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. -CR3 -2009 pCi/L y EMITTERS AND TRITIUM IN CR3 SITE GROUND WATER STATION DATE H-3 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Zn-Nb-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-La-140 C3-8 01-06 115+/-46 <74 <3 <3 <7 <4 <7 <7 <5 <5 <4 <9 04-07 155+/-46 44+/-13 <2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <4 <3 <2 <2 <5 07-07 142+/-47 27+/-8 <4 <4 <8 <4 <16 <7 <5 <4 <5 <8 10-05 157+/-23 <81 <5 <4 <10 <5 <9 <9 <7 <5 <5 <8 C3-9 01-06 <143 <47 <3 <3 <6 <3 <9 <5 <4 <3 <4 <7 04-07 <147 <52 <4 <4 <8 <4 <15 <7 <5 <4 <4 <10 07-07 82+/-28 <45 <4 <4 <7 <4 <12 <6 <5 <4 <4 <7 10-05 <165 79+/-27 <4 <4 <7 <5 <9 <7 <6 <4 <4 <7 C3-10 01-06 <143 <39 <3 <3 <6 <4 <7 <6 <4 <3 <3 <6 04-07 <139 10+/-4 <3 <3 <5 <2 <9 <4 <3 <3 <3 <4 07-07 <143 <68 <5 <5 <9 <5 <10 <8 <7 <6 <5 <11 10-13 <150 11+/-3 <2 <2 <3 <2 <6 <3 <3 <2 <2 <3 42 TABLE IV-C.2.b.2 PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. -CR3 -2009 pCi/L y EMITTERS AND TRITIUM IN CR3 SITE GROUND WATER (SUPPLEMENTAL DATA)STATION DATE H-3 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Zn-Nb-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-La-140 C3-5 02-05 1364+/-72 91+/-16 <4 <4 <9 <5 <8 <6 <7 <5 <4 <6 03-03 1683+/-76 113+/-23 <5 <4 <8 <4 <9 <8 <5 <5 <5 <10 05-05 1967+/-84 71+/-20 <3 <5 <9 <4 <10 <8 <6 <6 <4 <13 06-01 1622+/-76 <79 <4 <4 <10 <5 <9 <8 <6 <5 <4 <11 08-04 1892+/-88 33+/-9 <4 <4 <8 <4 <16 <7 <4 <5 <5 <13 09-01 1389+/-79 101+/-23 <4 <4 <7 <5 <9 <8 <7 <5 <4 <10 11-02 1392+/-73 72+/-18 <2 <2 <6 <3 <6 <5 <3 <3 <3 <5 12-01 1275+/-69 39+/-8 <4 <4 <7 <4 <13 <5 <4 <4 <4 <14 C3-6S 02-05 <142 <44 <3 <3 <5 <3 <6 <5 <3 <3 <3 <6 03-03 173+/-44 <63 <3 <4 <6 <5 <9 <7 <6 <5 <4 <9 05-05 188+/-52 <70 <4 <5 <7 <4 <7 <6 <5 <6 <4 <11 06-01 180+/-46 <49 <4 <4 <8 <4 <15 <7 <5 <5 <4 <9 08-04 103+/-51 30+/-4 <2 <2 <4 <2 <7 <3 <2 <2 <2 <5 09-01 <165 <74 <4 <5 <9 <4 <11 <7 <7 <5 <5 <13 11-02 117+/-47 24+/-8 <1 <1 <3 <1 <6 <2 <1 <1 <1 <5 12-01 127+/-45 160+/-16 <3 <3 <7 <4 <8 <6 <4 <4 <4 <13 43 TABLE IV-C.2.b.2(cont'd)

PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. -CR3 -2009 pCi/L y EMITTERS AND TRITIUM IN CR3 SITE GROUND WATER (SUPPLEMENTAL DATA)STATION DATE H-3 K40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Zn-Nb-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-La-140 C3-7 02-05 210+/-27 <100 <6 <7 <12 <8 <11 <11 <8 <8 <7 <9 03-03 301+/-51 <45 <4 <4 <8 <3 <12 <6 <4 <4 <4 <8 05-05 145+/-50 <50 <3 <4 <8 <4 <14 <6 <5 <4 <4 <8 06-01 279+/-49 22+/-8 <4 <4 <8 <4 <13 <6 <5 <4 <4 <9 08-04 243+/-55 <73 <4 <4 <8 <4 <9 <7 <5 <5 <4 <13 09-01 208+/-56 <36 <2 <2. <4 <2 <3 <3 <3 <2 <2 <5 11-02 239+/-50 <48 <4 <4 <8 <4 <13 <6 <5 <4 <4 <15 12-01 311+/-50 <46 <4 <4 <8 <4 <13 <6 <5 <4 <4 <15 C3-8 02-05 222+/-49 <113 <6 <6 <13 <7 <13 <9 <10 <7 <8 <12 03-03 129+/-47 <61 <4 <4 <7 <3 <8 <7 <6 <5 <5 <7 05-05 <154 23+/-8 <4 <4 <8 <4 <17 <7 <5 <4 <5 <9 06-01 200+/-47 <53 <4 <4 <9 <5 <17 <7 <5 <5 <5 <9 08-04 157+/-53 28+/-9 <4 <4 <8 <5 <19 <7 <5 <5 <5 <11 09-01 170+/-55 <38 <2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <4 <4 <2 <2 <5 11-02 112+/-47 10+/-3 <2 <2 <3 <1 <6 <2 <2 <2 <1 <5 12-01 147+/-46 <50 <4 <4 <7 <4 <15 <7 <5 <4 <4 <15 44 TABLE IV-C.2.b.2(cont'd)

PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. -CR3 -2009 pCi/L y EMITTERS AND TRITIUM IN CR3 SITE GROUND WATER (SUPPLEMENTAL DATA)STATION DATE H-3 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Zn-Nb-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-La-140 C3-9 02-05 <138 <71 <4 <4 <8 <4 <9 <7 <6 <4 <4 <7 03-03 <144 32+/-3 <1 <1 <3 <1 <2 <2 <13 <1 <1 <5 05-05 <154 <52 <3 <4 <7 <4 <8 <6 <6 <4 <4 <10 06-01 <136 69+/-22 <4 <4 <8 <5 <8 <8 <6 <5 <4 <8 08-04 151+/-52 32+/-9 <4 <4 <8 <4 <13 <7 <5 <4 <4 <9 09-01 <165 <40 <2 <2 <4 <3 <5 <4 <3 <2 <2 <7 11-02 <145 12+/-3 <1 <1 <3 <1 <5 <2 <1 <1 <1 <5 12-01 90+/-36 <64 <4 <4 <8 <3 <7 <5 <5 <4 <4 <15 45 Tritium Measurement GW Well # CR3-2 All results are < LLD unless noted a-180 =160 -140 -120 -100 60 20 10110/06 4128/07 11114/07 6/1/08 12118108 7/6/09 1/22110 46 Tritium Measurement GW Well # CR3-4 All results are < LLD unless noted 180 160 140 $120 100 -v+ Measurement 80 60 40 20 0 10110106 4/28107 11/14/07 611/08 12/18/08 7/6/09 1/22/10 47 Tritium Measurement GW Well # CR3-5 2500 2000 1500 C.)1000 500 10/10106 04128107 11114107 06101108 12/18/08 07106109 01/22/10 48 Tritium Measurement GW Well # CR3-6S All results are < LLD unless noted 200 180 160 140 120 Y=.100 80 60 40 20 0++ measurement

+ / meaureen 10/10/06 04/28/07 11114/07 06/01/08 12/18108 07/06/09 01f22/10 49 160 140 120 100 80 CL 60 40 20 Tritium Measurements GW Well # CR3-6D All results are < LLD unless noted 0 10/10/06 4128107 11/14/07 6/1t08 12/18/08 7/6/09 1/22/10 50 Tritium Measurements GW Well # CR3-7 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 A A n 4 4 4 4 4 4 10110106 04128107 11114107 06101108 12/18/08 07/06/09 01/22/10 51 Tritium Measurements GW Well # CR3-8 250 200 150 I C.100 0 -10110/06 04128107 11114/07 06/01108 12/18/08 07/06/09 01/22110 52 Tritium Measurements GW Well # CR3-9 AU results are < LLD unless noted 200 180 160 140 120"=0 0-80 60 40 20 0 10/10106 04/28107 11114/07 06101108 12118108 07/06109 01/22110 53 Tritium Measurements GW Well # CR3-10 All results are < LLD unless noted C.)180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 n P-1/--A too-4 10110106 4128107 11114107 6/1108 12/18108 716109 1122110 54 TABLE IV-C.2.c RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 2009 MEDIUM OR ANALYSIS AND NUMBER OF PATHWAY TOTAL NUMBER OF LOWER LIMIT ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL NONROUTINE SAMPLED ANALYSES OF DETECTION MEAN NAME MEAN LOCATION REPORTED (UNITS) PERFORMED (LLD)1 RANGE DISTANCE & BEARING RANGE MEAN MEASUREMENTS RANGE*CR3 SITE Tritium 24 159 217(21/24)

M27 232(9/12)

CR3-2 0 GROUND WATER (86-611) 0.42 mi.@285° (104-611) 86(1/4)(pCi/L)

Spec 24 (86-150)Mn-54 6 <LLD -<LLD 0 Fe-59 15 <LLD -" <LLD 0 Co-58 6 <LLD -" <LLD 0 Co-60 9 <LLD --<LLD 0 Zn-65 17 <LLD --<LLD 0 Zr-Nb-95 11 <LLD " " <LLD 0 1-131 8 <LLD " -<LLD 0 Cs-1 34 7 <LLD -<LLD 0 Cs-137 6 <LLD -<LLD 0 Ba-La-140 14 <LLD <LLD 0 1 The "a priori" LLD which meets or exceeds the requirements of Table 2-9 of the CR-3 ODCM.*Non-REMP required samples 55 TABLE IV-C.2.c.1 PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. -CR3 -2009 pCi/L y EMITTERS AND TRITIUM IN CR3 SITE GROUND WATER (SUPPLEMENTAL DATA)STATION DATE H-3 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Zn-Nb-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-La-140 MWC-27* 01-06 139+/-27 <45 <4 <4 <7 <4 <14 <6 <5 <4 <4 <8 02-05 <138 <92 <6 <6 <15 <9 <16 <11 <8 <7 <6 <10 03-03 134+/-47 <43 <4 <4 <6 <4 <12 <6 <4 <4 <4 <6 04-07 104+/-45 <12 <2 <2 <4 <2 <8 <3 <2 <2 <2 <4 05-05 109+/-50 <64 <5 <4 <9 <4 <11 <7 <6 <5 <5 <10 06-01 <146 <69 <4 <5 <7 <5 <9 <7 <6 <5 <5 <8 07-07 134+/-47 <45 <4 <4 <8 <4 <13 <6 <5 <4 <4 <7 08-04 <159 <48 <4 <3 <6 <4 <7 <6 <4 <4 <4 <13 09-01 156+/-54 96+/-16 <4 <4 <7 <3 <8 <7 <6 <5 <4 <11 10-05 611+/-36 <46 <4 <4 <8 <4 <15 <7 <6 <4 <4 <6 11-02 469+/-55 <41 <3 <3 <6 <3 <6 <5 <5 <3 <3 <13 12-01 236+/-48 27+/-10 <2 <1 <3 <2 <3 <3 <2 <2 <2 <3*= These wells are not officially included in the REMP and are located on either side of the site percolation ponds.56 TABLE IV-C.2.c.l(cont'd)

PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. -CR3 -2009 pCi/L y EMITTERS AND TRITIUM IN CR3 SITE GROUND WATER (SUPPLEMENTAL DATA)STATION DATE H-3 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Zn-Nb-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-La-140 MWC-IF2* 01-06 02-05 03-03 04-07 05-05 06-01 07-07 08-04 09-01 10-05 11-02 12-01 81+/-26 <41 191+/-48 <39 243+/-50 <46 179+/-47 <39 253+/-53 <34 218+/-50 13+/-3 259+/-50 12+/-3 194+/-54 <46 238+/-56 <28 198+/-55 <45 202+/-49 <3 205+/-47 61+/-13<4<3<4<3<3<2<2<4<2<4<1<3<4<3<4<3<3<2<2<4<2<4<1<3<7<6<8<6<6<3<3<8<4<7<1<6<3<3<4<3<3<2<2<4<2<4<1<4<13<6<17<8<11<6<5<15<3<13<2<7<7<4<7<5<5<3<3<6<4<6<1<7<4<4<5<5<4<2<2<4<3<5<1<5<4<3<5<3<3<2<2<4<2<4<1<4<4<3<4<3<3<2<2<4<2<4<1<3<8<4<12<5<6<4<3<9<5<6<2.<14*= These wells are not officially included in the REMP and are located on either side of the site percolation ponds.57 Tritium Measurements GW Well # MWC-27 1400 1200 1000 1 800 -CL 600 400 -<L 200 0 10/10/06 04/28/07 11/14/07 06101108 12/18/08 07/06/09 01/22/10 58 Tritium Measurements GW Well # MWC-IF2 600 500 400 CL 200 100 kw 0 10110106 04128107 11/14/07 06/01108 12/18/08 07/06/09 01/22/10 59 TABLE IV-C.3 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 2009 MEDIUM OR ANALYSIS AND NUMBER OF PATHWAY TOTAL NUMBER OF LOWER LIMIT ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE SAMPLED ANALYSES OF DETECTION MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN REPORTED (UNITS) PERFORMED (LLD)1 RANGE DISTANCE & BEARING RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS DRINKING Tritium 12 145 <LLD --<LLD 0 WATER (pCi/L) I Spec 12 Mn-54 5 <LLD --<LLD 0 Fe-59 8 <LLD --<LLD 0 Co-58 4 <LLD --<LLD 0 Co-60 5 <LLD --<LLD 0 Zn-65 9 <LLD --<LLD 0 Zr-Nb-95 7 <LLD --<LLD 0 1-131 6 <LLD --<LLD 0 Cs-134 5 <LLD --<LLD 0 Cs-137 6 <LLD --<LLD 0 Ba-La-140 15 <LLD --<LLD 0 The "a priori" LLD which meets or exceeds the requirements of Table 2-9 of the CR-3 ODCM.60 TABLE IV-C.3.a PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. -CR3 -2009 pCi/L y EMITTERS AND TRITIUM IN DRINKING WATER STATION DATE H-3 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Zn-Nb-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-La-140 C07 01-13 <143 <31 <2 <2 <4 <3 <5 <3 <2 <3 <3 <6 04-07 <139 <71 <4 <4 <8 <5 <9 <7 <5 <5 <6 <12 07-07 <143 <40 <3 <3 <6 <3 <9 <5 <4 <3 <3 <9 10-13 <150 <45 <3 <3 <7 <3 <6 <5 <6 <3 <2 <15 C10 01-13 <143 <8 <1 <1 <2 <1 <2 <2 <1 <1 <1 <3 04-07 <139 <43 <3 <3 <7 <4 <9 <6 <4 <4 <3 <7 07-07 <14 <59 <4 <4 <7 <3 <9 <7 <4 <3 <3 <14 10-13 <150 <32 <3 <3 <7 <3 <7 <5 <5 <3 <3 <5 C18 01-13 <143 <15 <1 <1 <2 <2 <3 <2 <2 <2 <1 <4 04-07 <139 <51 <4 <3 <7 <3 <8 <6 <5 <4 <4 <8 07-07 <143 <69 <4 <4 <6 <3 <9 <6 <6 <4 <4 <7 10-13 <164 <80 <5 <4 <8 <5 <9 <6 <4 <5 <4 <14 61 Drinking Water 1000 100 I .... .........................

0..1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009--H-3 LLD --- *--- Cs-137LLD 62 TABLE IV-C.4 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 2009 MEDIUM OR ANALYSIS AND NUMBER OF PATHWAY TOTAL NUMBER OF LOWER LIMIT ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE SAMPLED ANALYSES OF DETECTION MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN REPORTED (UNITS) PERFORMED (LLD)1 RANGE DISTANCE & BEARING RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS SHORELINE

' Spec 8 SEDIMENT (pCi/kg) Cs-134 15 <LLD --<LLD 0 Cs-1 37 13 24 (4/6) C14H 29 (2/2) <LLD 0 (17-30) 0.1 @ 0° (28-30)1 The "a priori" LLD which meets or exceeds the requirements of Table 2-9 of the CR-3 ODCM.63 TABLE IV-C.4.a PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. -CR3 -2009 pCi/kg y EMITTERS IN SHORELINE SEDIMENT STATION PERIOD Co-58 Co-60 Cs-1 34 Cs-1 37 K-40 Ra-226 C09 First Half <9 <10 <14 <11 354+/-55 408+150 Second Half <8 <8 <10 <9 456+52 1062+/-126 C14H First Half <14 9+/-1 <15 30+/-3 1608+76 1464+193 Second Half <14 <15 <15 28+/-3 1657+77 655+220 C14M First Half <12 24+/-4 <15 21+/-6 631+93 1342+155 Second Half <11 21+/-2 <12 17+/-2 672+42 763+201 C14G First Half <10 <12 <14 <13 250+/-59 905+163 Second Half <11 <11 <12 <13 322+30 1056+155 C09 is the control station at Ft. Island Beach. C14H, C14M, & C14G are discharge canal stations.64 Shoreline Sediment 1000 100 S- -...... _.-0 it.. ."--0 /- \ .10 1 * -p I I I I I I I I I I I I 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 1 0-Cs-134LLD

--- a--- Cs-137 I I 65 IV-D. INGESTION PATHWAY To evaluate the ingestion pathway, samples are taken of fish, oysters, broad leaf vegetation, citrus, and watermelon.

1. Quarterly carnivorous fish samples were taken at two locations:

C29 at the end of the discharge canal, and C30, the control location, near the mouth of the intake canal. None of the required radionuclides were found in measurable quantities.

The highest cesium-137 LLD for station C29 was 32 pCi/kg. Naturally occurring potassium-40 was quantified in all eight samples at an average concentration of 2449 pCi/kg.Table IV-D. 1 provides a statistical summary of the carnivorous fish gamma spectroscopy results.Table IV-D.1 .a provides the results of the quarterly samples.2. Quarterly oyster samples were taken at the same locations as fish samples, C29 and C30. Of the isotopes required to be evaluated, none indicated measurable amounts of radioactivity.

In 2009, silver-110m was quantified in one sample at location C29 near the end of the discharge canal, at a concentration of 20 pCi/kg. Silver-110m was not quantified in any oyster samples collected in 2008. In 2007, silver-110m was quantified in three samples at C29 with an average concentration of 85 pCi/kg and a range of 58 to 118 pCi/kg. In 2006, silver-1 1i m was quantified in four samples at C29 and one sample at C30 with an average concentration of 350 pCi/kg and a range of 38 to 845 pCi/kg.Table IV-D.2 provides a statistical summary of the oyster gamma spectroscopy results.Table IV-D.2.a provides the results of the quarterly samples.3. Monthly broad leaf vegetation samples were taken at two indicator locations, C48A and C48B, and one control location, C47. Nine of twenty-four indicator samples had measurable amounts of cesium-1 37 with an average concentration of 14 pCi/kg and a range of 5 to 27 pCi/kg. This is lower than the levels found in 2007 and 2008, and also is lower than the previous four years. It is believed the 2007 and 2008 spike was due to possible collection of wire grass mixed into the sample, which has a greater uptake rate of cesium as compared to other broad-leafed media. In 2009, six of twelve control station samples had measurable amounts of cesium-137 with an average concentration of 40 pCi/kg and a range of 7 to 106 pCi/kg. During 2009 due to construction activities at the Crystal River Unit 4 & 5 site, the area where broad leaf vegetation was being collected at station C48A was removed. A new location in the same north sector was located near the air sample station C46.Table IV-D.3 provides a statistical summary of the broad leaf vegetation gamma spectroscopy results.Table IV-D.3.a provides the results of the monthly samples.4. Citrus samples are taken at station C19. In 2008 and again in 2009, there were no watermelon samples available at station C04. Due to crop rotation there were no locally grown watermelons found in any areas nearby the facility and no local commercial harvest performed.

None of the required radionuclides were found in measurable quantities in the citrus samples with exception of Cs-137 at a concentration ofi 3 pCi/kg.Table IV-D.4 provides a statistical summary of the watermelon and citrus gamma spectroscopy results.Table IV-D.4.a provides the results of the semi-annual samples.66 TABLE IV-D.1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 2009 MEDIUM OR ANALYSIS AND NUMBER OF PATHWAY TOTAL NUMBER OF LOWER LIMIT ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE SAMPLED ANALYSES OF DETECTION MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN REPORTED (UNITS) PERFORMED (LLD)1 RANGE DISTANCE & BEARING RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS CARNIVOROUS y Spec 8 FISH (pCi/kg) Mn-54 25 <LLD -<LLD 0 Fe-59 52 <LLD <LLD 0 Co-58 25 <LLD <LLD 0 Co-60 30 <LLD <LLD 0 Zn-65 65 <LLD <LLD 0 Cs-134 32 <LLD <LLD 0 Cs-137 32 <LLD <LLD 0 1 The "a priori" LLD which meets or exceeds the requirements of Table 2-9 of the CR-3 ODCM.67 TABLE IV-D.1.a PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. -CR3 -2009 pCi/kg y EMITTERS IN CARNIVOROUS FISH STATION QUARTER Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 K-40 C29 1 <25 <25 <52 <30 <65 <32 <28 1579+/-682 2 <24 <24 <50 <30 <56 <29 <32 2582+/-185 3 <23 <21 <43 <20 <50 <24 <23 2489+/-215 4 <14 <17 <37 <14 <34 <16 <13 2600+/-137 C30 1 <19 <17 <41 <23 <40 <21 <20 3146+/-207 2 <21 <20 <41 <24 <48 <24 <21 1953+/-413 3 <20 <18 <36 <26 <53 <27 <19 2704+/-211 4 <13 <15 <35 <13 <33 <15 <13 2542+/-99 68 Carnivorous Fish valuues, o100"I 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2.008 2009-.Cs-134 LLD ---U---- Cs-137 LLD 69 TABLE IV-D.2 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 2009 MEDIUM OR ANALYSIS AND NUMBER OF PATHWAY TOTAL NUMBER OF LOWER LIMIT ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE SAMPLED ANALYSES OF DETECTION MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN REPORTED (UNITS) PERFORMED (LLD)1 RANGE DISTANCE & BEARING RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS OYSTERS 7 Spec 8 (pCi/kg)Mn-54 24 <LLD --<LLD 0 Fe-59 59 <LLD --<LLD 0 Co-58 23 <LLD --<LLD 0 Co-60 22 <LLD --<LLD 0 Zn-65 39 <LLD --<LLD 0 Cs-134 27 <LLD --<LLD 0 Cs-137 24 <LLD --<LLD 0 1 The "a priori" LLD which meets or exceeds the requirements of Table 2-9 of the CR-3 ODCM.70 TABLE IV-D.2.a PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. -CR3 -2009 pCi/kg y EMITTERS IN OYSTERS STATION QUARTER Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 K-40 C29 1 <9 <9 <17 <10 <20 <11 <11 1181+/-98 2 <15 <15 <32 <16 <38 <21 <16 1300+/-136 3 <18 <18 <35 <17 <38 <21 <19 434+/-59 4 <24 <23 <55 <22 <52 <27 <24 1223+/-110 C30 1 <17 <14 <36 <21 <33 <19 <18 1467+/-150 2 <15 <16 <35 <17 <39 <19 <17 1354+/-87 3 <9 <10 <21 <10 <23 <11 <10 779+/-95 4 <22 <23 <59 <22 <55 <26 <23 956+/-99 71 Oysters 1000 E.2 100 k 10. ......1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 1 --w- Cs-137 LLD --Cs-134LLDI 72 TABLE IV-D.3 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 2009 MEDIUM OR ANALYSIS AND NUMBER OF PATHWAY TOTAL NUMBER LOWER LIMIT ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE SAMPLED (UNITS) OF ANALYSES OF DETECTION MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN REPORTED PERFORMED (LLD)1 RANGE DISTANCE & BEARING RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS BROAD LEAF VEGETATION y Spec 36 (pCi/kg)1-131 27 <LLD <LLD 0 Cs-134 29 <LLD <LLD 0 Cs-137 27 14 (9/24) C48B 18 (5/12) 40(6/12) 0 (5-27) 0.9 @ 450 (5-29) (7-106)'The "a priori" LLD which meets or exceeds the requirements of Table 2-9 of the CR-3 ODCM.73 TABLE IV-D.3.a PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. -CR3 -2009 pCi/kg OF y EMITTERS IN BROAD LEAF VEGETATION STATION MONTH 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 K-40 C47 C48A JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC<25<15<14<4<16<10<12<14<13<27<17<17<5<15<19<15<17<11<16<11<12<17<19<11<15<19<16<5<19<11<12<12<14<24<18<19<5<20<29<22<18<13<16<11<11<17<16<10 27+/-7 64+/-9 106+/-8 13+/-1<24 7+/-2 22+/-6<15<14<20<18<22 6+/-2<20<25<19<25<13<16 8+/-2 9+/-2 18+/-5<14<10 3877+/-162 2614+/-170 3303+/-179 3191+/-109 3477+/-211 3582+/-144 4325+/-154 3613+/-152 3181+/-142 4044+/-212 2665+/-162 3595+/-212 3676+/-135 6714+/-214 6977+/-285 5609+/-241 6583+/-251 5564+/-208 7298+/-214 3427+/-137 3549+/-153 2288+/-175 1963+/-169 2040+/-97 74 TABLE IV-D.3.a (CONT'D)PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. -CR3 -2009 pCi/kg OF y EMITTERS IN BROAD LEAF VEGETATION STATION MONTH 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 K-40 C48B JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC<24<15<15<10<9<12<10<11<17<20<20<16<13<20<16<13<10<15<13<13<13<19<21<17<16 29+/-7<19<15 13+/-5<14 14+/-2 5+/-2<16<21<21 27+/-7 3099+/-153 4429+/-234 4120+/-201 4396+/-159 6917+/-133 7079+/-205 4956+/-183 5545+/-201 5763+/-196 5902+/-241 4643+/-235 5857+/-257 75 Broad Leaf Vegetation 100 E 0 0 10 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 1 1-- 13-LLD --- C -13 F C-134L=LD 76 TABLE IV-D.4 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 2009 MEDIUM OR ANALYSIS AND NUMBER OF PATHWAY TOTAL NUMBER OF LOWER LIMIT ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE SAMPLED ANALYSES OF DETECTION MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN REPORTED (UNITS) PERFORMED (LLD)1 RANGE DISTANCE & BEARING RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS (WATERMELON)2 y Spec 0 (pCi/kg)1-131 5 -None 0 Cs-134 4 -None 0 Cs-137 8 -None 0 CITRUS 7 Spec 1 (pCi/kg)1-131 6 <LLD -None 0 Cs-134 4 <LLD -None 0 Cs-137 9 13(1/1) -None 0 1 The "a priori" LLD which meets or exceeds the requirements of Table 2-9 of the CR-3 0DCM.2 Watermelon, no harvest during the year-samples not available due to crop rotation in the area.77 TABLE IV-D.4.a PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. -CR3 -2009 pCi/kg OF y EMITTERS IN WATERMELON AND CITRUS STATION MONTH 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 K-40 C04 -(Watermelon) 1 June ---C19 -Citrus January <6 <4 13+/-3 1655 + 48 1 Watermelon, no harvest during the year-samples not available due to crop rotation in the area.78

ML101250489

Contents

Text

Subject:

Dear Sir:

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

ML101250489

Text

Subject:

Dear Sir:

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search