ML20127K789
| ML20127K789 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 01/19/1993 |
| From: | William Cahill TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC) |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20127K787 | List: |
| References | |
| TXX-93023, NUDOCS 9301260216 | |
| Download: ML20127K789 (24) | |
Text
._ _ - _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . ____
$5 Log # TXX-93023 File # 10010
__ .- 909.5 c
= --
7UELECTRIC January 19, 1993 Wii!!am J. Cahm. Jr.
an m rusa U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555
SUBJECT:
COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION (CPSES) - UNIT 2 DOCKET NO. 50-446 THERMO-LAG LABORATORY TEST RESULTS REPORTS AND RESPONSES TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR CPSES UNIT 2 REF: TV Electric letter logged TXX-92626 from Mr. William J. Cahill, Jr. to the USNRC dated December 23, 1992 Gentlemen:
TU Electric is t.ereby docketing copies of tne laboratory test reports which document the results of fire endurance testing described in TU Electric Engineering Report, " Evaluation of Thermo-1.ag Fire Barrier Systems,"
ER-ME-067. Revision 2, interim report dated December 23, 1992 which support the Thermo-Lag installations for CPSES Unit 2. The Engineering Report was submitted to the NRC via the referenced letter. The test reports being docketed are listed in Attachment (1) and were hand delivered to (
Mr. B. E. Holian of the NRC Staff, and are also available for your review at CPSES. The testing documented in these test reports was conducted under the autpices of Omega Point Laboratories at San Antonio, Texas an industry recognized testing laboratory. The testirg was conducted with TV Electric's cooperation and was independent of the Thermo-Lag vendor (i.e., Thermal Science Inc.). These test reports confirmed the conclusions provided in the Engineering Report ER-ME-067, Revision 2 (Reference 1). By this letter TU Electric confirms that ER-ME-067, Revision 2, is no longer an interim report and additional confirmation is not required nor warranted. As a g result of these tests, TV Electric has concluded:
Thermo-Lag, when procured with the procurement controls established by TU Electric, and installed and inspected in accordance with the requirements of T" Electric's engineering specifications and installation procedures, performs its design functions. Hence, it can be stated that Thermo-Lag performs its intended functions when properly configured. Proper configuration means installed per TU Electric's installations specification and procedures. These TU Electric installation specifications and procedures incorporate the 8/ y l upgrades, demonstrated by the June, August and November / December 1992 g g testing, as follows:
3 220057 v# 1\
1892 ${ ,shbp* _ ., n. _ _ ' W M %t b g@y#
- - - - N
l TXX-93023 Page 2 of 4 o Thermo-Lag installations for conduit 2 inches diameter and smaller have been upgraded by the addition of a 1/4 inch thick overlay.
o Thermo-Lag installations for cable trays hs oeen upgraded by the reinforcement of unsupported bottort t joints and vert ical joints by stitching and/or additio..s . stress skin.
o Thermo-Lag configurations for LBD boxes, junction boxes, etc., have been reinforced with additional stress skin.
The TV Electric procedural controls utilized to fabricate and to demonstrate these upgrades via laboratory testing at Omega Point Laboratory were the same procedures and controls used to install Thermo-Lag in Unit 2.
Regarding Thermo-Lag functionality, TU Electric has concluded that Thermo-Lag is functional and cipable of performing its design function immediately after completion of the installation and inspection. A detailed discussion of Thermo-Lag operability is provided in Attachment 3.
Any as-built o siations from the tested fire configurations were evaluated per the requirements of NRC generic letter 86-10. These evaluations have concluded that the tests have established the acceptability of these configurations. The technical discussion which supports this conclusion is provided in Engineering Report ER-ME-082, revision 0 dated January 19, 1993.
TV Electric, therefore, has determined that Unit 2 Thermo-Lag Fire Barrier Systems are considered operable upon completion of installation.
During their review of ER-ME-067, the NRC staff posed some specific questions, and requested additional clarifications /information. The requested information follows:
- 1. Attacnment 2 provides responses to the questions posed by the NRC Staff during their reviews.
- 2. Attachment 3 provides a discussion concerning when Therco-Lcg may be declared operable (i.e., capable of performing its design function).
- 3. The following clarifications of the Engineering Report, ER-ME-067, Revision 2 were requested by the NRC staff,
- a. Conclusions, Section 9.0, page 35 of 94, states that Thermo-Lag performs its design function when properly configured. Various upgrade techniques are described in items 2 through 5 of Section 9.0. These upgrade techniques have been utilized to construct Unit 2 of CPSES through installation specification, CPES M-2032 (Reference 10.14.2), Thermo-Lag Typical Details, CPSES Unit 2 Drawing No. M2-1701 (Reference 10.15.4), installation proi.edure, CQP-CV-107, " Application of Fire Barrier and Fireproofing I
TXX-93023 Page 3 of 4 Materials" (Reference 10.18.2), and Quality Control Procedure NQA 3.09-1.07, " Inspection of Fire Protection to Cable Raceway and Structural Steel".
- b. Open Item Number 1 Section 8.0, Page 34 of 94, is " Evaluation of Unit 1". This will be included in a future revision of the Engineering Report.
- c. Open Item Number 2, Section 8.0, Dage 34 of 94, is " Combustibility of Thermo-Lag". A detailed disce:Q9 of Thermo-1 y combustibility is provided in attachment 4. Further clarification will be provided on this item as generic resolutions are developed,
- d. Open Item Number 3, Section 8.0, Page 34 of 94, is " Review of Finalized Omega Point Laboratories Test Reports". The test reports in attachment I have been reviewed and they confirm the conclusion in the Engineering Report.
- e. Open Item Number 4, Section 8.0, Page 34 of 94, is " Finalization of Ampacity Derating Analysis". The basis for the ampacity derating analysis arid design of Unit 2 is contained in Section 6.0, Ampacity Derating Factors. 1his open item exists to address Ampacity Derating Tests that are planned for the future. Refer to section 6.7, Page 31 & 32 of the Engineering Report.
f) Engineering Report ER-ME-067 did not reference test scheme 9-3.
However, this scheme has been utilized to evaluate some configuration deviations addressed in Engineering Report ER-ME-082 " Evaluation of Unit 2 Thermo-Lag Configurations" and has been provided to the NPC.
I
P b
TXX-93023 Page 4 of 4
- 4. Attachment 5 provides Engineering Report ER-ME-082, Revision 0, dated January 19, 1993, " Evaluation of Unit 2 Thermo-Lag Configurations".
Sincerely, WilliamJ.Cahill,N.
OB/tg Attachments: 1. List of Test Reports
- 2. NRC Questions on ER-ME-067
- 3. Thermo-Lag Operability
- 4. Combustibility of Thermo-Lag
- 5. Evaluation of Unit 2 Thermo-Lag Configurations c- Mr. J. L. Milhoan, Region IV ResidentInspectors,CPSES(2)
Mr. T. A. Bergman, NRR Mr. B. E. Holian, NRR
Attachment 1 to TXX-93023 Page 1 of 1 LIST OF TEST REPORTS Eg Scheme # [onfiauration
/1) Scheme 1-2 Fire Endurance Test of a Thermo-Lag 330-1 Fire Protective Envelope: 36" Tray with Tee
'2) Scheme 9-1 Fire Endurance Test of a Thermo-Lag 330-1 Fire Protective Envelope: 3/4 in., 3 in & 5 in.
Conduits with Radial Bends
/ 3) Scheme 9-3 Fire Endurance Test of a Thermo-Lag 330-1 Fire Protective Envelope: 3/4 in.,1-1/2 in. & 2 in.
Conduits v 4) Scheme 10-1 Fire Endurance Test of a Thermo-Lag 330-1 Fire Protective Envelope: Two 3 in. Conduits with Junction Boxes
- 5) Scheme 10-2 Fire Endurance Test of a Thermo-Lag 330-1 Fire Protective Envelope: Two 3 in. Conduits with Junction Boxes
- i 6) Scheme 11-1 Fire Endurance Test of a Thermo-Lag 330-1 Fire Protective Envelope
- 24 in. Tray with Air Drops
,, 7 ) Scheme 12-1 Fire Endurance Test of a Thermo-Lag 330-1 Fire Protective Envelope _: 30 iri. ieay t 8) Scheme 12-2 Fire Endurance Test or a Thermo-lag 330-1 Fire Protective Envelope: 24 in. Tray with Tee
, 9)
Scheme 13-1 Fire Endurance Test of a Thermo-Lag 330-1 Fire Protective Envelope: 12 in. Tray s10) Scheme 14-1 Fire Endurance Test of a Thermo-Lag 330-1 Fire Protective Envelooe: 30 in. Tray with Tee
Attachment 2 to TXX-93023 Page 1 of 14
@ESTIONS AND RESPONSES PERTAINING TO TU ENGINEERING REPORT ER-ME-057 REV. 2 Question 1. Identify where cable overfill conditions exist and what is the technical basis for determining the increase in the height of the Thermo-Lag panels to preclude cables contacting the stress skin side of the Thermo-Lag material (see Report Section 4.5.4). Please provide engineering evaluation documentation if evailable on this subject.
Response 1. CPSES Electrical specifications prohibit installation of cables above the cable tray rails. If a situation exists where cables are above the rails it is considered a deviation from the specification. A design change authorization is issued to accept this deviation. To issue a DCA, TV Electric ,
provides an engineering justification. These justifications are on a case by case basis. Example DCA's were made available to the NRC Staff.
Question 2. When will multiple raceways and other commodities in common fire barrier enclosures be evaluated for acceptability (See Report Section 5.2)?
Response 2. Multiple raceways and other commodities in common fire barrier enclosures that deviate from the typical details for Thermo-Lag installations have been evaluated on a case by cas6 basis through the design change program as required. At the I date of this letter, the installation of the Thermo-Lag barrier system is not complete for Unit 2. Attachment 5 provides an evaluation of these configurations installed or anticipated to be required. If any new evaluations are necessary the engineering report will be amended accordingly.
Question 3. The Licensee states that variations in configuration in the field that differ from the approved guidelines (for cable ampacity derating) are documented in the Design Change
/,
documents. Please provide a copy of the applicable section of DCA-87040 Rev. I which disclosed the engineering basis that I the ampacity derating was not impacted by the configuration '
variation.
Response 3. Variations in configuration in the plant that differ from the approved engineering details for the installation 0.'
Thermo-Lag are authorized by Engineering and controlled through the design change control program. Each of these '
design changes is reviewed by the Electrical Engineering Group to assess potential impact on ampacity derating due to the configuration of the proposed Thermo-Lag installation. A copy of DCA-87040, Rev. 1, has been provided to the staff.
ll 1
Attachment 2 to TXX-93023 Page 2 of 14 Question 4. Please identify the draft IEEE standard on "Ampacity Derating of Fire Protected Cables" cited in Report Section 6.1. A copy of this standard has been provided.
Response 4. The draft IEEE standard TV Electric will be utilizing is IEEE P848/011, " Procedure for the Determination of the Ampacity Derating of Fire Protective Cables," Draft 11, April 6, 1992.
Question 5. Please provide a copy of the analysis of the thermal resistance of Thermo-Lag as determined in an ambient test environment of 40*C versus the normal plant ambient environment of 50*C (See Report Section 6.3).
Response S. As the temperature of an insulating ma0erial increases-the thermal conductivity increases. Therefore, since the resistivity is inversely proportional to the conductivity as the thermal conductivity of Thermo-Lag increases its thermal resistance will decrease. The therma. n listance of Thermo-Lag will be greater at 40*C than at CP. 's plant ambient of 50*C . With a higher thermal resistance, the cable derate factors will be higher. Therefore, the CPSES utilization of cable derate factors derived from tests conducted at 40*C ambient instead of 50'C is conservative.
Question 6. Please make available test report documentation and drawings for the test articles for EELB review (i.e., Section 10.2 Omega Point Laboratories Final Report XXXXX-XXXXXX Scheme X).
l Note that the SPLB reviewer has expressed similar review needs.
l Response 6. The Omega Point Test Reports have been provided to the staff, and are listed in Attachment 1 of this letter, l
l Question 7. Licensee stated in Report Appendix A Section AZ.7 Comments l
(where Z=8 through 14) that " Cable temperatures were enveloped by the CPSES LOCA temperature qualifications". What is technical basis for assertion and does that assertion include the assumption stated in the October 29, 1992, NRC letter that
! "the LOCA temperatures bound the fire temperature profile by including cable operating temperatures."
Response 7. The low-level signals carried by instrument cable do not cause cable operating temperatures to elevate above ambient.
Therefore, an instrument cable qualified to a temperature profile higher than the temperature profile experienced in the Thermo-Lag fire endurance test should be capable of performing its intended function during a fire. A review of the data for i cable qualification (LOCA and EQ) determined that the minimum peak qualification temperature is 340'F for instrument cable qualification. These qualifying tests were conducted at the
Attachment 2 to TXX-93023 Page 3 of 14 cable rated voltage and current. The cables were exposed to qualification temperature (e.g., 340'F) for a duration of 3 hours3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> and the temperature was then ramped down to ambient temperature.
The worst fire endurance test temperatures were a peak cable temperature of 336*F and an average cable temperature of 244 F. Therefore CPSES instrumentation cable qualification bound the fire test temperature and duration. Due to the volume of qualification test data, this data is not being transmitted, but is available on site for inspection.
Question 8. Please provide the references cited below:
10.16.3 CPSES Units 1 and 2 Calculation 16345/6-EE(B)-004
/ Rev. 0, " Cable Ampacity Derat )g Factors for Conduits Boxed in with Thermo-Lag (TSI Product)"
t/10.16.4 CPSES Units 1 and 2 Calculation 16345-EE(B)-140 Rev. 1 "Ampacity of Power Cable Wrapped with Thermo-Lag 330-660 Installed as Free Air Drop" Response 8. Copies of the requested calculations were mt'a availabla to the NRC Staff.
, Question 9. Appendix C of the subject report references as the derating factor method 40% Calculation / Testing ITL Report 82-335-F-1 for cable trays. Please verify whether reference is an editorial error to be corrected in the final Engineering Report.
Response 9. Ih6 dsrating factor of 40% is correct as stated in Appendix C of ER-ME-067. Refer to Section 6.0 of ER-ME-067 for detailed information.
Question 10. TV Electric refers to test 1 and test 3 several times (including in the matrix), which were done to original criteria. What portion of test 1 and test 3, does TU Electric take credit for that is not covered by Test Configurations 14.1 and 13.1 (respectively).
Response 10. Tests 1 and 3 were performed in June, 1992. Test 3 is not i
used as a basis for qualification of Thermo-Lag installed in Unit 2. Fire Endurance Tests 14-1 and 13-1 were performed on December 1, 1992, and November 12, 1992, respectively. The g acceptance criteria for these tests was the letter dated 1 October 29, 1992, entitled "Thermo-Lag Acceptance Methodology for Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station - Unit 2". Please refer to page 71 of 94 and 73 of 94 in TU Electric Engineering Report, Evaluation of Thermo-Lag Fire Barrier Systems, 1
Attachment 2 to TXX-93023 l Page 4 of 14 ER-ME-067, Revision 2, dated December 23, 1992.
Test 1-2 along with test 12 . is being utilized as a bases for qualification testing of a 36" wide cable tray assembly installed in Unit 2. Although differences exists between the acceptance criteria used in test 1-2 (June, 1992) and the NRC staff letter of October 29, 1992. The following conclusions can be made; a) protected supports for test 1-2 have no influence on test results cable and; b) trayside rail temperatures were sufficiently below acceptance values of October 29, 1992 letter: c) no post hose stream (1 1/2" playpipe) fire barrier inspection was performed, but use of fog nozzle for hose stream test on similar tray test resulted in no adverse effect on the fire barrier.
Upgrade techniques for test 1-2 (36 in. cable tray) are consistent with the techniques proved with test 12-1 (30 in.
cable tray). Therefore, use of test results for scheme 1-2 for qualification of Unit 2 Thermo-Lag configurations with 36 in, wide cable tray and upgrade techniques tested in 30 in.
(test 12-1) are justified.
Question 11. What does the word independent mean, with respect to Omega Point?
Response 11. Within the TU Electric Engineering Report (ER-ME-067) the word independent in reference to the testing program for Thermo-Lag means that Omega Point Laboratories is an industry recognized independent testing company. The tests were conducted under the laboratories auspices in cooperation with
! TU Electric but the independent of Thermo-Lag vendor.
Question 12. The October 29, 1992 criteria letter states that all ccbles are IEEE-383 and are thermoset. Either reconfirm or provide reference.
Response 12. TU Electric reconfirms that bulk cable procurement for CPSES power and instrumentation circuits installation in raceways is Class 1E. These cables are IEEE 383 qualified and have Thermosetting Insulation. The cables utilized in fire endurance test were from plant inventory.
Question 13. In the October 29, 1992 letter, item 4 states that in determining the insulation levels an assessment of 1 meg ohm on functionality is required. TU Electric's report does not specifically address this issue. Provide statements that do so or provide the reference.
l to TXX-93023 Page 5 of 14 Response 13. The statement in item 4 of the October 29, 1992 letter refers to the acceptability of 1 meg ohm insulation resistance for nuclear instrumentation cables. Nuclear instrumentation at CPSES consists of the Nuclear Instrumentation System (NIS) and the neutron flux monitoring (NI6) system. Both systems are capable of monitoring the full range of reactor power. CPSES does not utilize NIS for fire safe shutdown capability and has no HIS installations which are Thermo-Lagged. Therefore, an assessment of 1 meg ohm on functionality is not required.
Instead, the neutron flux monitoring system is used to assess reactor power in a fire scenario. Neutron flux signals are carried over mineral-insulated cables which are qualified to perform their intended function during a LOCA. One of two redundant neutron flux monitoring channels is routed in 3" conduit and Thermo-Lagged. The worst fire endurance test temperature for this configuration is less than the minimum LOCA test qualification temperature for these mineral-insulated cables. Furthermore, the LOCA test was conducted over a longer period than the fire endurance test.
Based on the above, we have concluded that the neutron flux monitoring cables will retain their insulating properties and perform their intended function during a fire.
Question 14 On page 18. TV Electric states that test 3 passed the hose stream test. Clarify what these words mean. Explain how the test was performed and explain the acceptance criteria used to determine it passed (This applies to the testing prior to the ,
October 29,1992).
Response 14. The 12" tray test, Scheme 3, was tested prior to the acceptance criteria of October 29, 1992, letter. This test was performed using the ANI Acceptance Criteria that circuit integrity be maintained. The hose stream test utilized a 2 1/2" diameter solid stream playpipe at 30 psi and 20 feet away from the test assembly. Scheme 13-1 confirmed the results of this test with the revised October 29, 1992 .
acceptance criteria.
Question 15. Where does the flame spread rating come from? Does it include top coat?
Response 15. The flame spread of 5 for Thermo-Lag listed on page 5 of 94 in the Engineering Report (Reference 1) is based on an ASTM E-84 Test performed by Underwriters Laboratories, reference UL File i No. R6076, dated June 16, 1981. This test was for Thermo-Lag I, 330-1 Subliming Compound without top coat. Thermo-Lag 330-1 )
Top Coat was also tested by UL (reference UL File No. R60768), 1 dated June 16, 1981, which yielded a flame spread of 5.
)
I
Attachment 2 to TXX-93023 Page 6 of 14 Question 16. Test Report 11-1 needs to include words to address the blistering (why it is there and why it is OK)?
Response 16. The test report addresses this item.
The following questions pertain to the following references previously provided to the NRC staff.
References:
A. TU response to NRC RAI, TXX-92589 dated 12-15-92.
, B. TU Calculation No. 0218-CO-0429 (Rev. 3).
'C. TU Calculation No. 0218-CO-0271 (Rev. 3).
D. TU Evaluation of Thermo-Lag Fire Barrier Systems, ER-ME-067, Rev. 2 dated 12-23-92.
Question 17. Enclosure B (Ref. A) indicates the maximum density of Thermo-Lag material as .073 lbs./cu. in,. P. 25 (Ref. 0) indicates that the maximum weights of Thermo-Lag components are used in the validation. However, the calculations on p. 9 to p. 20 (Ref. B) indicates the use of Thermo-Lag material density of
.0487 lbs.cu. in.. Provide expianations for this discrepancy.
Response 17. The weight of Thermo-Lag on cable trays and conduits (raceway) is based upon the maximum weight of the pre %bricated Thermo-Lag pieces allowed by specification 232 -38H. These pieces constitute the majority of the weight added to raceway systems by the fire barrier system. They are weighed upon receipt and rejected if their weight exceedes the weights allowed by the specification.
This method uses maximum actual material weights and back calculates densities for analysis purposes only. Enclosure B (Ref. A) indicates the maximum weight of a Thermo-Lag panel to be 5.25 lb/sq. ft. Assuming a 1/2 inch thick panel, a density of 0.073 lbs/cu. in. is calculated. Ref. B also uses the maximum weight of a Thermo-Lag panel of 5.25 lb/sq. ft.
However, Ref. B assumes a panel thickness of 3/4 inch and obtains a Thermo-Lag material density of 0.0487/lbs/cu in.
While the above two approaches yield different values of i Thermo-Lag material density, the total Thermo-Lag weights !
calculated for both cases will be identical. In fact, the 3/4 i, inch thick panel will provide a slightly longer segment than lI the 1/2 inch thick panel and will result in a slightly higher total weight for the Thermo-Lag.
{'
Attachment 2 to TXX-93023 1 Page 7 of 14 ;
The attached figure 1 and Table 1 and 2 provide an example of the methodology used for the determination of the weight of raceway which has been covered with Thermo-Lag fire barrier material. The example has individually addressed all of the components which contribute to the overall tray weigM. As shown in the example the major contributors to the i 9t used in the raceway analysis and qualification are the cable ' ay hardware, the cables, and the initial Thermo-Lag weight. 't should be noted again that the initial Therme-Lag weight is based on the maximum weight of the prefabricated panels allowed by the specification (2323-MS-38H) and verified on receipt. The Thermo-Lag upgrade which consists of the stress skin and trowei grade is much smaller contributor to the total I weight. As a result the total weight of the raceway covered with Thermo-Lag fire barrier material is not particularly sensitive to the weight components of the Thermo-Lag upgrade.
For example a 20% difference in the weight of the trowel grade m terial would result in a 1.5% difference in the total analysis weight. As also shown in the example, this change '
would be more than offset by conservatism in other weight components. This is particularly true since the bounding weights are used for the prefabricated panels used.in the initial Thermo-Lag application. Receipt inspections show that these panels rarely approach these maximum weignts.
Question 18. A Review of Ref. C indicates that the design validation has been performed for the supports of conduit runs. Provide ,
justification for not assessing the adequacy of conduits, i cable-trays and cable-tray supports for additional weight consideration.
Response 18. The purpose of reference C as stated on page 6 is "to design validate six Train A and B conduits and their associated supports to Seismic Category I Criteria." Each conduit that is within the scope of this calculation is addressed in a separate appendix. The supports and conduit stresses are addressed in each appendix. This calculation is the design i validation basis for only these six conduits. Other conduits and cable tray systems requiring fire protection are not within the scope of this calculation and are evaluated in other calculations. For conduit attachments to cable trays, footprint loads were sent to the cable tray group and the attachment approval is included with the' calculation.
Question 19. P. 9 of Ref. B indicates a variation in the conduit material density with the conduit size. Provide explanation for this !
variation.
Response 19. The conduit density as noted on Page 9 of Reference B is
/obtainedfromProcedure21M-5.02-CNDRevision2(PCN-01)Page L
Attachment 2 to TXX-93023 Page 8 of 14
- 45. The density is the input required by the analysis to determine each element mass. The conduit densities shown include the cable weight and that is why a different density is used for different diameter conduits.
Question 20. Provide a sum.1)ary of the procedure used in arriving at seismic
, loads (in three directions) on conduits, cable-tray and their supports; accounting for the total weight of the vibratory systems.
Response 20. Conduit systems are design validated per Procedure 21M-5.02-CND. Conduits are modeled using the computer program P-Delta STRUDL. The mass of the conduit, cables and Thermo-Lag material is accounted for by calculating an equivalent density (Reference B Page 9). The mass and dynamic properties of the STRUDL model, in combination with the input response spectra are used by the program to determine the seismic loadings.
Question 21. P. 10 (of 13) of Ref. C indicates that six trains of conduit are evaluated under the validation program. Most of them are located in the Safeguards Building. Provide explanation for not evaluating the conduit trains in other structures.
Response 21. As a result of the Fire Safe Shutdown Analysis (FSSA) for Unit 2, several areas have been identified in drawing M2-1700 (Thermo-Lag and RES schedule) as requiring fire protection.
All conduit systems requiring fire protection material have been design validated. To expedite the release of conduit systems to construction for Thermo-Lag installation, several
, calculations were generated to design validate the conduit i systems. Reference C is the design validation basis for only three conduits requiring Thermo-Lag. The remaining conduits are validated in other calculations.
Question 22. P.10(of39),AppendixA,Ref.C. The table indicates that a number of supports do not meet the acceptance criteria.
Provide details of the process used to qualify them (i.e.,
fine tune the analysis, change acceptance criteria).
Response 22. Unit 2 conduit systems are designed in accordance with the
/S2-0910 series of generic drawings. These drawings include a set of standard supports that have support capacities listed for them. These capacities are very conservative and assume .
worst case conditions. However, when the actual conduit load i exceeds these generic support capacities a more detailed analysis is performed as allowed in procedure 21M-5.02-CND Revision 2. In Appendix A of deference C, the support frames are each modeled individually using STRUDL. The conduit loads 1
1 l
Attachment 2 to TXX-93023 l Page 9 of 14 '
and actual 'g' values are taken from the conduit RSM analysis.
The computer run made for the support has a coc'e check feature that checks the stresses of the support members. The frequency of the support is then obtained from the support run to ensure that the assumed support frequency used in the conduit RSM analysis is acceptable. The remaining items of the support (welds, baseplate, anchor bolts, punching shear, etc.) are then checked individually as required, When possible, conservative hand calculations are used to determine support reactions, support frequency and support member stresses. Thus, although the conduit load may exceed the generic support allowable as shown in the S2-0910 drawings, a more detailed analysis shows that the supporting structures are adequate.
Question 23. Provide a summary of hardware changes (modifications, additions) implemented (or planned) as a result of the validation program.
Response 23. In general there were three types of hardware modification which were required:
TYPE 1 In some cases, supports were added to the conduit system to alleviate over stress of conduit. This usually occurred on overhang spans that exceeded 1 foot in length. It is estimated that this type of modification was required to 6 to 8 conduits; TYPE 2 The second major type of modification was the addition of a bracing member to an existing conduit support to relieve support cverload. It is estimated that this type of modification was required for 12 to 14 conduit supports; and lYPE 3 The other modification used was to cut the overhang span and increase the flexible conduit to the maximum allowed length.
This resulted in a shorter overhang span and reduced the conduit stresses to acceptable levels. It is estimated that this type of modification was used in only 1 instance.
Listed below are some specific examples of modifications required due to the addition of Thermo-Lag and the Unit 2 Thermo-Lag upgrade:
Attachment 2 to TXX-93023 Page 10 of 14
. Conduit Calculation Description 3/4" C24040032 0218-CO-0437 Two supports were added to reduce overhang length to eliminate over stress of the conduit.
1" C23040029 0218-C0-0437 One support was added to reduce the overhang length to eliminate over stre::s of the conduit, 1" C22005857 0218-CO-0437 One support was added to reduce the overhang length to eliminate over stress of the conduit,
~
1" C22006500 0218-CO-0421 One support is added to reduce the span length to eliminate over stress of the conduit.
1" C23G40037 0218-CO-0437 A brace is added to support
'C23G08953-05 to alleviate support overload.
1" C22005804 0218-CO-0368 A brace is added to support -05 and
-12 to alleviate support overload.
Question 24: What seismic damping levels have been used for the design of ,
CPSES Unit 2 conduits which require the installation of i Thermo-Lag fire barrier mat.erial?
Response 24: All Unit 2 Safety Related conduits have been validated using 2% OBE and 3% SSE seismic floor response spectra. This includes all conduits which require Theroo-Lag and the Urit 2 Thermo-Lag upgrade.
Question 25: What are the peak seismic spectral accelerations used for the validation of conduits and cable trays which require the .
installation of Thermo-Leg fire barrier material?
Response 25: The highest peak spectral accelerations for each building containing conduits and cable trays requiring Thermo-Lag is provided in Table 3. These are the maximum accelerations for these buildings. The cable trays and conduits which require Thermo-Lag are designed based on the spectral accelerations at the building elevations at which they are located. These accelerations may be somewhat lower than those provided in l Table 3 I
- hment 2 to TXX-93023 Page 11 of 14 CONSIDERATION OF TiuddiOLAG WEIGHT IN THE CABLE TRAYS DESIGN VALIDATION 7 " ( TYP) _
TROWEL GUOf
_ 5 ^ iTYP) _ '
stmess swiN ~
l
\ /
/ / / / / / / / ,
su////,
/ / f /l?
@ vnn;f l
/
r/
, ,,/ii
$,bo
//,,, ,/////iiii!/iii:V /
$ / hi J/ / / /_/ / / /,/ / /_ d /,/) t D
E 1
l CABLE TRAY CROSS-SECTION
~
@ CABLE TJ'.Y (4 HI6H) h CABLES
@ INITIAL THERMCLAG i
@ THERMOLAG UPGRADE (TROWEL GRADE)
@ STRESS SKIN Figure 1 l
-l
l l
IN WC l
e DETEl'MINATION OF TIIERMOLAG WEIGIIT FOR RACEWAY QUALIFICATION ]
2m G
= h COMPONENT MATERIAL BASIS FOR WEIGHT MINIMUM MAXIMUM ANALYSIS E WEIGHT WEIGHT WEIGHT 8 5' C INITIAL 1/2 inch nominal Specification 3.0 5.25 5.25 TilERMOLAG thickness Thermolag Ib/sq.ft lb/sq.ft Ib/sq.ft panels TIIERMOLAG Stress skin upg sde - Scaled from 1.0 1.92 1.92 UPGRADE used equivalent 1/4 inch Specification Ib/sq.ft Ib/sq.ft Ib/sq.ft thick Thermolag panel J
TABLE 1
EXAMPLE OF CONSIDERNFION OF TIIERMOLAG WEIGIIT IN TIIE CAIILE TRAY IIANGERS DESIGN VALIDATION a
'8 g '
Cii o$
COMPONENT DESCRIPTION ANALYSIS % ACTUAL 1k WEIGHT REIGHT WEIGHT WEIGHT 7 (1bs/ft) (1bs/ft) _
E A CABLE TRAY llARDWARE 20 28.57 20 30.97 B CABLES 17.77 25.39 12.34 ** 19.11 y C INITIAL THERMOLAG 26 37.14 26 40.27 U D TROWEL GRADS 5.28 7.54 * ***
(UPGRADE)
E STRESS SKIN 0.95 1.36 * ***
(UPGRADE)
D+E THERMOLAG UPGRADE 6.23 6.23 9.65 i WEIGIIT C+D+E TOTAL WEIGHT OF 32.23 32.23 THEPMOLAG TOTAL 70 100 64.57 100 (A+B+C+D+E) ,
- Total thermolag upgrade weight for 24X4 cable tray:
3.25 ft (Perimeter) X 1.92 lbs/sq.ft = 6.23 lbs/ft
- Based on total actual cable weight for Raceway No. T-23G04918 (T23GCCD67 - T23GCCD68)
- Weight of thermolag upgrade as a percentage of total actual weight:
TABLE 2
Attachment 2 to TXX-93023 Page 14 of 14
- i SUILDING ' SAF OUARD ELEV. 896.5 ELFCTR? CAL ELEV. 873.33 AUXIUARY ELEV. 899.5 FUEL HANDllNO ELEV. 918.0 HORtZ VERTICAL HORIZ VkRTICAL HORt2 VER TICAL HORIZ VERTICAL PEAK"G* OBE 2% 3.29 2.18 2.54 1.93 3.78 2.72 3.56 1.47 PEAK *O* OBE 4% 2.28 1.6 1.79 1.32 2.66 1.71 2.30 0.9s PEAK"O" SSE 3% 4.25 2.35 3.09 2.90 4.57 3.89 4.52 2.13 PEAK "G* SSE 7% 2.45 2.01 1.85 1.77 2.72 2.11 2.70 1.29 TABLE 3
Attachment 3 to TXX-93023 Page 1 of 2 THERMO-LAG OPERABILITY During the independent fire endurance qualification testing which TU Liectric performed at Omega Point Laboratories in San Antonio, Texas, test assemblies were cured for 30 days prior to testing. The 30 day cure period was included into the test program after discussions with the NRC Staff.
During these discussions NRC staff was concerned that the additional moisture in the Thermo-Lag before the 30 day curing period would give non-conservative results. To address this concern TU Electric took this measure to assure that the tested assembly had cured (dried oct) prior to the fire test which assured that moisture present in the material prior to drying ous would not aid in the performance of the material during a fire endurance test. Having material installed in the plant that has not received a 30 day cure or drying out period would only enhance the performance of the material in the event of a fire during the first 30 days after installation of the Thermo-Lag.
Notwithstanding the above, TV Electric procures prefabricated panels and shapes of Thermo-Lag. TFe Thermo-Lag vendor applies top coat to the prefabricated panels and shapes. Additionally, conversations with the vendor confirms that there is no requirement for 30 day cure time, and that upon receipt by the customer the prefabricated material is capable of performing its design function. There are also no vendor guidelinet which require that the trowel grade Thermo-Lag 330-1 material to be cured for 30 days. TU Electric applies top coat only at joints, seams and trowel graded naterial. TV Electric specifications require that top-coat should be applied over Thermo-Lag material af ter allowing a minimum of 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> cure time, or obtaining a reading less than 100 using a Delmhorst Model DP moisture meter with a scale of 0-100. The cure times stated in the specification (CPES M-2032) are to allow the material (trowel grade 330-1)
! to dry before applying Top Coat to ensure that the Top Coat adheres l properly.
1 l Top coat is a paint used to provide an envirdnmental (e.g., water,, dirt) protective finish for the Thermo-Lag. The top coat is not required for fire l
barrier operability. This is based on past testing which was done at U. L.
testing laboratories and Gulf State Utilities fire testing program where top l coat on Thermo-Lag was not applied.
l Based on the above discussion TV Electric concludes that Thermo-Lag is functional, capable of performing its design function, immediately after completion of the installation and inspection. A Thermo-Lag installation consists of prefabricated board or conduit sections that are supplied by the manufacturer in a ready for service condition, trowel grade material that is i used to pre-butter joints, stainless steel wire and banding material, [
stiples, and stress skin. The tie wires, staples, and stress skin provide a l 1
Attachment 3 to TXX-93023 Page 2 of 2 mechanical reinforcement of the joints. After these materials are assembled and inspected the installation is operable. The top coat is not required for the Thermo-Lag to be operable and is applied to prevent degradation from environmental effects of moisture and dirt over the life of the plant, i
t i
I l
Attachment 4 to TXX-93023 "
Page 1 of 1 COMBUSTIBILITY OF TilEB110-LAJ Information Notice 92-82, "Results of Thermo-Lag 330-1 Combustibility Testing", en ed 12/15/92, was issued to convey the results of Thermo-Lag 330-1 combustibility tests conducted by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). TV Electric believes that this notice alerts addressees of two potential uses of Thermo-Lag 330-1 for which combustibility may pose a concern.
Issue 1. Some Licensees use Thermo-Lag fire barrier material to enclose intervening combustibles to achieve 6.1 meters (20 feet) of separation free of intervening combustibles between redundant safe shutdown trains.
Response 1. At CPSES, Unit 2 Thermo-Lag is not used to enclose intervening combustibles to achieve 20 feet separation free of intervening combustibles, between fire safe shutdown trains.
Issue 2. Some Licensees use Thermo-Lag to construct radiant energy heat shields inside containment.
Response 2. At CPSES, Unit 2 Thermo-Lag is not used as a radiant energy shield inside containment.
l l
I F
r .
MEMORANDUM T0: Jim McKnight FROM: Donna Skay, Project Engineer Project Directorate IV-2 Division of Reactor Proje::ts III/IV/V
SUBJECT:
DOCKETING 0F INFORMATION PROVIDED BY TV ELECTRIC By letter dated January 19, 1993, TV Electric responded to questions from the staff. This letter referred to test reports, calculations, drawings, and design changes authorizations which, because of the volume of material, were hand delivered to the project manager. We would like to have them entered in the document control system as attachments to the January 19 letter. These attachments are as follows:-
_ Fire Endurance Test of a Thermo-Lag 330-1 Fire Protective Envelope: 36" Tray with Tee. Scheme 1-2 Fire Endurance Test of a Thermo-Lag 330-1 Fire Protective Envelope: 3/4 inch, 3 inch, and 5 inch conduits with Radial Bend. Scheme 9-1 Fire Endurance Test of a Thermo-Lag 330-1 Fire Protective Envelope: 3/4 inch, 1-1/2 inch, and 2 inch conduits. Scheme 9-3 Fire Endurance Test of a Thermo-Lag 330-1 Fire Protective Envelope: Two 3 inch conduits with junction boxes. Scheme 10-1 Fire Endurance Test of a Thermo-Lag 330-1 Fire Protective Envelope: Two 3 inch conduits with junction boxes. Scheme 10-2 Fire Endurance Test of a Thermo-Lag 330-1 Fire Protective Envelope: 24 inch Tray with Air Drops. Scheme 11-1 Fire Endurance Test of a Thermo-Lag 330-1 Fire Protective Envelope: 30 inch
-Tray. Scheme 12-1 Fire Endurance Test of a Thermo-Lag 330-1 Fire Protective Envelope: 24 inch Tray with Tee. Scheme 12-2 Fire Endurance Test of a Thermo-Lag 330-1 Fire Protective Envelope: 12 inch Tray. Scheme 13-1 Fire Endurance Test of a lhermo-Lag 330-1 Fire Protective Envelope: 30 inch Tray with Tee. Scheme'14-1 Comanche Peak Procedure 21M-5.02-CND " Conduit and Conduit Support Design"
.CPSES Calculation no. 0218-C0-0429 " Calculation of Weights Due to Fire Protection Material" "CPSES Calculation no. 0218-CO-0271 " Design Validation of Conduits with Thermo-Lag" Q C)@(} l,
CPSES Calculation no. 1634516-EE(B)-004 " Cable Ampacity Derating Factors for Conduits Boxed in With Thermo-Lag" CPSES Design Change Authorization no. 94446 CPSES Design Change Authorization no. 96043 CPSES Calculation no.16345-EE(B)-140 "Ampacity of Power Cable Wrapped With 330-660 Installed as Free Air Drop" IEEE Procedure For 'he Determination of the Ampacity Derating of Fire Protected Cables -P848/Dll CPSES Design Change Authorization no. 87040 I have also enclosed a copy of the January 19, 1993, letter with its distribution sheet. Please distribute these attachments to the public l document room but it is not necessary to send these documents to those on the l internal distribution list,
')
M .. "2 Mz
ER ME-082, REV, O PAGE 1 OF 8 TU ELECTRIC STEAM ELECTRIC STATION ENGINEERING REPORT EVALUATION OF UNIT 2 THERMO _ LAG CONFIGURATIONS ER-ME-082 REVISION 0 JANUARY 19,1993 4
PREPARED BY: blID C V' REVIEWED BY: ._ Ag_
APPROVED BY: k i
ER ME-082, REV. O PAGE 2 OF 8 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE 1.0 PURPOSE 3
2.0 BACKGROUND
3 3.0 METHODOLOGY 4 4.0 EVALUATION 6
5.0 CONCLUSION
7
6.0 REFERENCES
7 ATTACHMENT A TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS Al-A24 ATTACHMENT B UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS B1 P55 ATTACHMENT C MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY Cl-C24 DEVIATIONS ATTACHMENT D PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM Dl-D30 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS ATTACHMENT E STRUCTURAL STEEL DEVIATIONS El Ell A1TACHMENT F AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS F1-F27 l
> c ER ME-082, REV. O PAGE 3 OF 8 1:0 PURPOSE The purpose of this evaluation is to provide reasonable assurance that Thermo-Lag 330-1 Fire Barrier System configurations installed to protect Unit 2 electrical raceways and cables will provide a 1-hour fire endurance rating (Ref. 6.1) in accordance with the CPSES design and licensing basis (Ref, 6.2, 6.3, 6.4) for assuring at least one train of equipment, components and raceways necessary to achieve safe shutdown will be free from fire damage (Ref. 6.5).
Additionally, where Thermo-lag 330-1 Fire Barrier System configurations are utilized as part of a fire rated plant structural assembly, this evaluation provides reasonable assurance that these configurations will provide a fire endurance rating commensurate with that of the barrier (Ref. 6.6)in accordance with the CPSES design and licensing basis (Ref. 6.3,6.4,6.7).
2.0 BACKGROUND
The applicable CPSES Unit 2 Thermo-12g installation specification (Ref. 6.8) and typical detail design drawings (Ref. 6.9) provide the technical requirements for installing Thermo-Lag material on required commodities. For cable and raceway barrier configurations, these technical requirements such as material thickness, sealing and reinforcements of joints, etc., are based on methods used to construct test assemblies during TU Electric's 1-hour Thermo-Lag fire endurance qualification test program recently completed at Omega Point Laboratories (Ref. 6.10). For structural steel configurations, technical requirements are based on Underwriter's Laboratories tested designs (Ref. 6.11). For a detailed description of the TU Electric Thermo-Lag test
- program including commodities and configurations tested, test results, structural steel applications, etc., refer to ER-ME-067, " Evaluation of Thermo-Lag Fire Barrier Systems" (Ref. 6.12).
The installation requirements and construction details for applying The mo-Lag to most plant commodities and configurations thereof such as cable trays, conduits, junction boxes, etc., are enveloped by the typical detail design drawings and installation specification. Accordingly, most of these commodity configurations and techniques for Thermo-Lag installation are qualified directly by specific tests. However, it is recognized that due to specific field conditiens and limitations such as interferees, clearances between commodities, etc., creation of unique design configurations and acceptance of minor deviations from specified technical requirements (where appropriately justified) are inevitable. It is also recognized that due to the number and variation of these special instances it is not feasible to qualify all aspects of each unique configuration or minor deviations through specific fire endurance testing. In fact, in some instances limitations of industry test apparatus may preclude such testing.
, o ER ME-082, REY. O PAGE 4 OF 8 Instead, the goal of a qualification test program is to qualify the critical attributes of the fire barrier system, such as material thickness, joint reinforcement techniques, interfaces between different materials, etc., for the range of commodity sizes anticipated in plant configurat:ons. Based on the qualification of these critical attributes, specific plant conditions requiring unique configuration designs and minor deviations can be reasonably resolved. The NRC staff has recognized this concept through the provisions of Generic 1.etter 86-10 (Ref. 6.13) which enables licensees to evaluate field installations which vary from configurations qualified via fire endurance tests using criteria provided therein.
In accordance with the CPSES design control program, where due to field conditions, the techniques or configurations for installing Thermo-Lag on required commodities are not bounded by the installation specification or typical details, Construction Department personnel are required to identify the condition for resolution by Engin:ering via initiation of Design Change Authorizations (DCAs)(Ref. 6.14). Additionally, DCAs are initiated to identify specific instances where obstructing commodities (piping, ductwork, raceway, etc.) serve to interfest with the protective envelope such that specified requirements cannot readly be achieved. Resolution of these specific field conditions is provided by Engineering via the DCA approval process. Resolution of these issues is based on methods and techniques qualified through test, experience and familiarity with the proper uses and limitations of Thermo-Lag materials gained through the qualification test program and. conservative engineering practices. Accordingly, this evaluation serves to correlate Unit 2 Thermo-Lag configurations to the applicable qualification test (" scheme"), or portions thereof and hence provide a basis for acceptance in accordance with the provisions of NRC Generic Letter 86-10. This process will be utilized for all typical details approved for generic use via the design drawings (Ref. 6.9) and such unique configurations and minor deviations described above as bounded by the applicable DCAs.
3.0 METHODOLOGY 3.1 Copies of all design drawings containing typical details (including DCAs issued, but not yet incorporated into the drawings) were obtained from the Document Control Center.
Additionally, copies of all LCAs posted against the design drawings and the installation specification (Ref. 6.8) that identified approved deviations from specified requiremeats were similarly obtained. The effective date for all DCAs reviewed is January 19,1993.
The "Affected Document Update Reports" (ADURs) provided in Attachment F provide the complete listing of all DCAs reviewed within the scope of this report.
_ - .______ _--- - _ _ . - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - . - - . _ . _ . . _ - . _ _ - - . - - - - - - . - - - - - _ _ - - _ _ _ _ - - - - - . - - _ . _ - - - _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ - . - . - - _ _ - - - . _ --_s
v i ER ME-082, REV. O PAGE 5 OF 8 3.2 It is recognized that Thermo Lag installation on raceways in plant areas common to both
, units (Auxiliary /E&C Buildings) is still in process. Thermo-Lag installation on raceway and structural steel in Unit 2 (Safeguards Building) is complete. The total Thermo Lag installation effort on Unit 2 commodities is 93% complete at this time, with completion targeted for January 29,1993. To account for the few remaining DCAs which may be generated prior to completion, Construction has performed detailed pre installation walkdowns to survey any potential areas requiring a design change document and it,itiated DCAs accordingly. These documents were reviewed and included within the scope of this report. Therefore, with few exceptions, this evaluation included the entire Unit 2 Thermo-Lag configuration work scope. Review of any outstanding DCAs requited to support Thermo Lag completion will be performed in a subsequent revision of this document.
3.3 Once copies of all approved design changes to Unit 2 Thermo Lag design documents were obtained, they wcre categorized into live (5) general catego ies based on the relative significance level of tne design change implemented by the DCA. Accordingly, the
' " typical details" are viewed as the most significant since these configurations are generally approved for use on a generic basis. The unique design configurations are viewed as the next most significant category followed by any deviations from specified requirements associated with the actual raceway, component or cabling requiring s protection. Deviations from specified coverage on items protruding from or interfering with the commodity requiring protection (such as raceway supports) were grouped as the fourth category. Lastly, any deviations to Thermo-Lag configurations on structural steel were compiled. This is based on the minor amount of structural steel requiring protection in the plant (support steel for 2-hour rated gypsum stairwell walls and on support frames for fire and tornado dampers in these walls). Also, since Thermo Lag panels are secured to structural steel with screw farteners, and few protruding / interfering commodities are located in these areas, these et afigurations are much less prone to installation deviations.
3.4 Next, a detailed review was performed for each
- typical detall" and unique design configuration to correlate the plant configuration to a test configuration " scheme" or applicable portions thereof. Where the plant design configuration rt; quired evaluation to correlate it to a tested configuration or if a tested configuration was not applicable, the NRC staff guidance provided in Generic letter 86-10 (restated below) was utilized as
" General Criteria" to " baseline" the evaluation. Similarly, the same process war utilized to evaluate the DCAs which identify specific configurations which deviate from specified requirements.
j
ER ME-082, REV. O PAGE 6 0F 8 f
4 e General Criteria
- 1. Continuity of the materialis consistent with tested configurations.
- 2. Effective thickness of the material is consistent with tested configurations.
- 3. The nature and effectiveness of the support assembly (if applicable) is consistent with tested configurations, j
^
- 4. The application or end . se of the material is consistent with tested l configurations. '
- 5. The configuration was reviewed by a qualified fire protection engineer and determined to provide an equivalent level of protection.
. 3.5 Each typical design detail and all DCAs were then compiled into a matrix format witt corresponding supporting test configuration (" scheme") references. Where evaluation was utilized in the acceptance basis for a configuration, the " General Criteria" above or other criteria and justification listed under the " Basis / Notes' heading was used as described in the matrix. Complete descriptions of test configurations and results are provided by ER ME-067, (Ref. 6.12) and the associated Omega Point Laboratories Test Reports (Ref. 6.10) and are not reiterated in this report.
3.6 Any Thermo-Lag configuration determined by evaluation not to provide an equivalent level of protection to that of a tested configuration or for which a reasonable correlation j
to a tested configuration cannot be demonstrated are identified by issuance of a ONE Form in accordance with STA-421 (Ref. 6.15).
4.0 EVALUATIQN -
Refer to Attachments A through E to this report for the acceptance basis associated with each Thermo-Lag configuration reviewed within the scope of this evaluation as follows:
Attachment A: Typical Design Details Attachment B: Unique Configurations Attachment C: Minor Protected Commodity Deviations Attachment D: Protruding / Interfering Item Coverige Deviations Attach'a mt E: Structural Steel Deviations
y o 1
ER ME 082, REV. O PAGE 7 OF 8
5.0 CONCLUSION
As detailed in Attachments A through E, all Thermo Lag configurations evaluated within the scope of this report are either effectively bounded by the critical attributes of tested i
configurations or have been demonstrated by evaluation to provide an equivalent level of protection to that afforded by tested configurations with the following exceptions:
Nt[achment B: DCA 101320, REV. 2 DCA 102932, REV. 5 DCA 104011, REV. O DCA 104174, REV. O DCA 104246, REV. 0 Attachment C: DCA 102780, REV. O These configurations have all utilized Thermo Lag 330-660 "Flexi Blanket" material on the protected commodity (rigid conduit, junction boxes or cable trays) in areas where interferences exist such that Thermo-Lag 3301 panel or prefabricated conduit section material could not be readily installed. As described in Section 3.6, ONE Form 93-184 has been issued to identify these field conditions. The disposition of this ONE Form will result in configurations which are either bounded by test or can be demonstrated to provide an equivalent level of protection to that of a tested configuration.
4
6.0 REFERENCES
- 6.1 ASTM E119 88, " Standard Methods of Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials".
4 6.2 CPSES Design Basis Document DBD ME-020, Rev. 2, " Fire Safe Shutdown Analysis".
6.3 CPSES Fire Protection, Report (FPR), Rev. 6, Sec. II.
6.4 CPSES Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR), Sec. 9.5.1.
6.5 10CFR50, Appendix R.
6.6 CPSES Unit 2 Fire Hazards Analysis (FHA) Drawings, M2 1921 through M2-1942, Rev.
, CP-1.
z.
6.7 CPSES Design Basis Document DBD-ME-063, Rev.1 " Fire Barriers".
4 e
,.-_y. _
._ - w. +
i e ER ME-082, REV. O PAGE 8 OF 8 6.8 Specification CPES M 2032, Rev. O, " Installation of Fire Barrier and Fireproofing l Materials".
6.9 Drawing M21701, Shts. 01 15, Rev. CP 1. "Thermo Lag Typical Detalls".
l 6.10 TU Electric Contract B 0046494-001 including "One Hour Fire Endurance Tests of Articles Protected with the Thermo Lag Fire Barrier System", Rev.10 (Test Plan) and the following test reports:
- a. Project No. 12340-935436, Scheme 12
- b. Project No. 12340 94367a, Scheme 91
- c. Project No. 12340-94367c, Scheme 10-1
- d. Project No. 12340-94367d, Scheme 10 2
- e. Project No. 12340-94367e, Scheme 11-1
- f. Project No. 12340-943671, Scheme 121
- g. Project No. 12340-94367h, Scheme 12 2
- h. Project No. 12340-943671, Scheme 13-1
- 1. Project No. 12340-94367m, Scheme 141 J. Project No. 12340-94367j, Scheme 9 6.11 Underwriters 1.aboratories " Fire Resistance Directory", Designs X-003 and X 611.
6.12 CPSES Engineering Report ER ME-067, Rev. 2, " Evaluation of Thermo-Lag Fire Barrier Systems".
6.13 USNRC Generic 1.etter 8610 dated April 25,1986.
l 6.14 CPSES Unit 2 Procedure 2PP 5.01, " Design Change Authorizations".
6.15 CPSES Procedure STA-421, " Operations Notification and Evaluation (ONE) Form".
6.16 Calculation 2-FP-0080, Rev. O, " Unit 2 Maximum Permissible Fire Loading /Non- Rated Feature Analysis".
6.17 CPSES Unit I and 2 Calculation No. ME-CA-0000-0965, Rev. O, "Thermo-Lag Primary Protruding Member Installation Requirements".
6.18 CPSES Unit I and 2 Calcult' ion No. ME-CA-0000 2062, Rev. O, " Heat Transfer Analysis of Cable Tray Supports to Determine Thermo Lag Requirements".
k .
T Y
P I
C A A T L T !
D A E
S G I
I M
G N E N
D T
._ E A T
A I
L S
O ,2 F
R AE 2V 4
O
v ATTACHMENT A ER-ME-082, REY. O TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE A2 OF A24 J ,
TYPICAL DETAIL NO.' DCA NO.IREV DESCRIPTION ' SUPPORT TEST SCliEMES - '
BASIS / NOTES (PAGE A14-A24) 1-LI N/A COVERAGE OF ANGLE IRON PROTRUDING ITEM l-2,9-1,10-1, 10-2, 11-1, 1-5 Wm1330-1 THERMO-LAG PANELS. 12-I.12-2,13-1,14-1 & 9-3 I-I.2 N/A COVERAGE OF ANGLE IRON PRORUDING ITEM I-2,9-1,10-1,10-2,11-1, 1-5,1I Wmi 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET. 12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1 & 9-3 I-2.1 N/A COVERAGE OF ANGLE IRON PROTRUDING ITEM 10-1, 10-2 N/A ,
Wmi 330-1 THERMO-LAG PANE 13. THIS DETAll WAS TESTED.
I-2.2 N/A
' COVERAGE OF TUBE STLL PROTRUDING ITEM 10-1, 10-2 N/A Wml 330-1 TIIERMO-LAG PANE 13. Tills WAS .i TESTED.
i-3.1 103953/0 COVERAGE OF *C* CHANNEL PROTRUDING ITEM I-2,9-1,10-1,10-2,11-1, N/A 3
WITH 330-1111ERMO-LAG PANEL. THIS WAS 12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1 & 9-3 s
TESTED.
l-3.2 N/A COVERAGE OF *C CHANNEL PROTRUDING ITEM I-2,9-1,10-1,10-2,1 I-I, I-5, II Wmi 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET. 12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1 & 9-3 I I-3.3 10412U0 Tills DETAllSilOWS TIIE TIE WIRE I-2, II-I,12-1,12-2,13-1 1 4, 73-i INSTALLATION ON THE TIIERMO-IAG 330-1 & 14-1 PANELS COVERINO A CABLE HAY SUPPORT.
THIS DETAIL SHOWS THE TIE WIRE BEING 4
, INSTAI I Fn T11ROUGli TifE BOTTOM TRAY PANELS THAT BUTT UP TO THE TRAY SUPPORT.
?
I-8.1 N/A COVERAGE OF *I* BEAM PROTRUDING ITEM l-2,9-1,10-1,10-2, II-I, I-5 l
Wmi 330-1 THERMO-LAG PANEL 12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1 & 9-3 1-4.2 N/A COVERAGE OF *I* BEAM PROTRUDING ITEM 330- 1-2,9-I,10-I,10-2,II-1, I-5 II 660 FLEXI-BLANKET. 12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1 & 9-3 I-5 10372U0 HILTI BOLT DETAIL FOR ATTACHING TilERMO- 1-2,9-I,10-1,10-2,11-I, 1 4, 12 -
.__ LAG TO A CONCRETE STRUCIURE. 12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1 & 9-3 l I-5.I 1039 1 "
THIS IS A SQUARE WASHER DETAIL WHICH IS TO N/A N/A 1034 - i BE USED ON DETAIL I-5 AND REQUIRES NO
- . - . , - ~. -
ADDTI1ONAL JUSTIFICATION.
l ATTACHMENT A ER-ME-062 REV, O TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS s, PAGE A3 OF A24 i
TYPICAL DETAIL NO. DCA NOJREV DESCRIFUON - SUPPORT TEST SCHEMES ~
1 BASIS / NOTES (PAGE A14--
A24) i 1-6 1012u/I Tills DETAIL PROVIDES A METHOD OF COVERING 10-1, 10-2 1-5, 15 j A WEEP HOLE IN A TUBE-STEEL PROTRUDING ITEM WITH THERMO-LAG.
j 1-7 104015/0 THIS DETAIL SHOWS COVERAGE OF RADIAX II-I l-5,74 CABLE AND ITS SUPPORT AS A PROTRUDING ITEM. THE COVERAGE INCLUDES 330-1 PANELS ON Tile SUPPORT AND 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET ON Tile RADIAX.
1 2-2 100820/0 TIIIS DETAIL IS FOR FIRE STOPPING NON 1-2,11-I,12-1 AND I4-1 1-5, 17
- 10392110 ESSENTIAL CONDUITS AT JUNCTION BOXES USING.EITiiER 330-1 OR 45B SILICONE l ELASTOMER.
2-3 103020/3 Tills IS Tile STANDARD DETAIL FOR INSTALLING 10-1 1-5, 19 103634/2 TilERMO-LAG ON JUNCTION BOXES. IT ALSO i GIVES AN ALTERNATIVE DESIGN TO INSTALLING BANDS ON THE OUTER LAYER.
j 2-3.1 N/A Tills IS A DETAIL SHOWING BANDING ON 1-2,9-1,10-I,10-2,11-1, 1-5 1
' TilERMO-LAG COVERAGE ON UNISTRtJT WillCH 12-I,12-2,13-1,14-1 & 9-3 SUPPORTS THE JUNCTION BOX AND PROTRUDES OUT OF THE THERMO-LAG PACKAGE.
2-3.2 N/A Tills IS A DETAIL SHOWING INSTALLATION OF 1-2,9-I,10-1,10-2,11-1, 1-5 1 TilERMO-LAG ON A JUNCTION BOX SUPPORT. 12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1 & 9-3
) 2-3.3 103020/3
- TlilS IS A DETAIL SIIOWING STRESS SKIN AND 10-1 N/A TROWEL GRADE INSTALLED AT JUNCTION BOX JOINTS.
2-3.5 104060/0 Tills IS A DETAIL WIIICH ALLOWS JUNCTION 10-1, 10-2 1-5,40 BOX 2nd LAYER *V* RIB PANEL TO BE EXTENDED TO COVER ANGLE IRON USED TO SUPPORT TIIE BOX.
2-3.6 104060/0 Tills DETAIL SHOWS TIIE INSTALLATION OF 10-1, 10-2 1-5,43 t
THERMO-LAG ON AN ESSENTIAL FLEXIBLE CONDUIT EXITING A JUNCTION BOX ENCLOSURE.
? a
P J
ATTACHMENT A ER-ME-082, REV. O TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS i PAGE A4 OF A24 t
"!YPICAL DETAIL NO. DCA NOJREV DESCRilTION SUPPORTTEST SCHEMES BASIS / NOTES (PAGE AI4-A24) 3-1 & 3-1.1 N/A THIS IS A DETAIL WHICH SHOWS A 330-1 1-2,11-I,12-I,12-2,13-1 & 1-5,20 THERMO-LAG BOX, FIRE STOPPED WHERE AN I4-1 AIR DROP ENTERS A CABLE TRAY.
3-1.2 N/A THIS IS A DETAIL WHICH SHOWS A 330-1 1-2,I1-2,I2-I 12-2,13-1 & I-5, 17, 20 & 22 TiiERMO-LAG BOX SIMILAR TO DETAILS 3-1 & 3- I4-1 I.I BtTT THE AIR DROP COMES OUT OF A ,
CONDUIT WHICH IS FIRE STOPPED INSTEAD OF AT THE 330-1 BOX AND 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET COVERS THE AIR DROP FROM THE CONDUIT TO i THE TRAY.
, 3-2 & 3-2.1 100820/0 ! t l THESE DETAILS EllOW TiiE PROTECTION OF AIR Il-1 I-5, 26 DROP CABLES WITH 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET FROM A TRAY TO A THROUGH WALL SLEEVE (TWS). TiiE POINT OF ATTACHMENT ATTHE
)
TRAY IS TO THERMO-LAG 330-1 HALF ROUNDS AND DIRECTLY TO THE SLEEVES AT THE TWS.
3-3 N/A THIS DETAIL SHOWS AN AIR DROP BETWEEN II-I l-5,20,28
)
j CABLE TRAYS WITH A COMBINATION OF 330-1 J
PANELS AND 1/2 ROUNDS AT THE ATTACHMENT TO THE TRAYS AND 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET ON THE AIR DROP CABLES BETWEEN THE TRAYS.
3-4 (OPTION I) 103020/3 THIS IS TIIE STANDARD AIR DROP 1I-I i 102933/0 N/A CONFIGURATION FOR CABLES AIR DROPPING 100820!O INTO A CABLE TRAY. Tills CONFIGURATION 1
WAS TESTED.
3-4 (OPTION 2) 103020/3 Tills IS TIIE STANDARD TESTED AIR DROP 102933/0 II-I I-5.31 CONFIGURATION EXCEPT TilAT STRESS SKIN 100820/0 WITH TROWEL GRADE IS UTILIZED ON TOP OF Ti!E TRAY INSTEAD OF 330-1 PANELS.
3-4.3 103020/3 TIIIS PROVIDES SPECIFIC DETA!!S WHICII IS TO II-I N/A BE USED IN CONNECTION WITH THE STANDARD AIR DROP DETAIL (3-4 OPTION I). THIS 13 A TEs a tu CONFIGURATION.
- , , - - - - - - . . - . . w -,y-.-
,. ,,w-c . . ~ i _+ y.-- , ._-w -, - - , s .,-4 y , -, . -,,., . -.4. , , - , , , ..,
ATTACHMENT A ER-M E-082, CEV. O TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE A5 OF A24 TYPICAL DETAIL NO. DCA NO.lREV DESCRIPTION ~
i SUPPORTTESTSCHEMES BASIS / NOTES (PAGE A14- l A24) 3-4.4 & 3-4.5 103020/3 t I!ESE ARE SPECIFIC DETAILS WHERE STRESS 11-1 1-5,31 h
SKIN WITH TROWEL GRADE IS UTILIZED ON TOP i3 OF THE TRAY INSTEAD OF 330-1 PANELS THESE DETAILS ARE ENCOMPASSED BY 3-4 (OFTION 2).
. 3-5 103020l3 THIS IS THE STANDARD DETAIL FOR 11-1 N/A'
) OVERLAPPING 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET ONTO 330-
]
)
I THERMO-LAG I/2 ROUNDS ON RIGID CONDUlT l
FOR 3" & LARGER CONDUITS. THIS IS A TESTED l j CONFIGURATION.
I 3-5.1 103020/3 5
THIS IS THE STANDARD DETAIL FOR 11-1 N/A 1 OVERLAPPING 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET ONTO 330-1 THERMO-LAG 1/2 ROUNDS ON RIGID CONDUIT
] FOR 2" & SMALLER CONDUITS. THIS IS A j
1 TESTED CONFIGURATION.
j 3-5.2 103020!3 THIS IS A STANDARD DETAIL FOR OVERLAPPING 11-1 1-5, 34
'{ 104121/0 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET ONTO 330-1 THERMO-LAG ON EITHER CONDUITS OR CABLE TRAYS. THIS IS A TESTED CONFIGURATION FOR INSTALLATION ON CONDUITS.
3-5.2.s 103020/3 THIS IS A STANDARD DETAIL FOR OVERLAPPING 11-1 1-5,34, 35 104121/0 330460 /LEXI-BLANKET ONTO 330-1 THERMO-LAG '
4 ON EIThER CONDUITS OR CABLE TRAYS THE SAME AS DETAIL 3-5.2 EXCEPT THAT IT DEALS WITH SITUATIONS WHERE SPACE LIMITATIONS DO NOT ALLOW OVERLAP DISTANCES OF FLEXI-BLANKET ONTO 330-1 AS INDICATED ON 3-5.2.
34 104121/0 i THIS DETAIL PROVIDES INSTALLATION I-2,9-1,10-1,10-2,11-I. 1-5,37 REQUIREMENTS FOR COVERING A SINGLE FIRE 12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1 & 9-3 ZONE R CABLE AS A PROTRUDING ITEM FROM A THERMO-LAGGED COMMODITY.
34.1 10412110 'DilS DETAIL PROVIDES INSTALLATION 11-1 1-5, 39 REQUIREMENTS FOR COVERING MULTIPLE FIRE
' ZONE R CABLES AS A PROTRUDING ITEM FROM A THERMO-LAGGED CDMMODITY.
i 1
.m. _ -
. - . . .__-..m . _ . . . . - _- . . . _ _ , . , _ . . -
W 4
ATTACHMENT A E2-ME-082, REV. O TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE A6 OF A24 TYPIC / ' DETAIL NO. DCA NO.lREV !DESCRIPI1ONi .
SUPPORT 1EST SCHEMES ' BdSIShNOTES (PAGE d14-'
A24) 4-1 10302013 THIS DETAIL SHOWS STANDARD COVERAGE OF 9-1,10-1 & 10-2 N/A j
3* AND LARGER CONDUIT WITH 330-1 Half ROUNDS. THIS IS A TESTED CONFIGURATION.
4-1.1 103020/3
! THIS DETAIL SHOWS STANDARD COVERAGE OF 9-1, 10-1 & 10-2 N/A 4 2* AND SMAI J FR CONDUIT WITH 330-1 HALF ROUNDS. THIS IS A TESTED CONFIGURATION.
4-2 & 4-2.1 103020/3 THESE DETAILS SHOW STANDARD COVERAGE OF 11-1 1-5, 45 CABLE BUNDL.ES AND FLEX CONDUlT WITH 330-660 FIM-BLANKET. .
4-3 & 4-3.1 103020/3 THESE DETAILS SHOW COVERAGE ON CONDUITS 9-1, 10-1, 10-2 & 9-3 1-5,46
' WITH 330-1 HALF ROUNDS AT CONCRETE SURFACES WHERE THE CONCRETE SURFACE PREVENTS COMPLETE COVERAGE OF THE CONDUIT WITH 330-1 THERMO-LAG IN ACCORDANCE WITH STANDARD DETAILS.
4-4 N/A 1 THIS DETAIL SHOWS THE TYP: CAL FIRE l-2, 11-1, 12-1 & 14-1 1-5, 17 STOPPING OF CONDUITS.
4-S N/A
! TIIIS DETAIL SHOWS CONDUIT PROTECTED WITH 9-1, 10-1. 10-2 & 9-3 1-5,50 330-1 Half ROUNDS PENETRATING THROUGH A BLOCKOUT.-
44,44.l.4-7.4-7.1 103020/3 THESE DETAILS ARE THE SAME AS DETAILS 4-1, I-2,9-1,10-1,10-2,11-1, I-5, 46, 52 4-1.1,4-3 AND 4-3.I RESPECTIVELY FOR 12-1,12-2,l3-1,14-1 & 9-3 COVERING CONDUITS %TTH 330-I HALF ROUNDS EXCEPT THESE DETAILS USE LARGER SIZED 330-1 HALF ROUNDS WHICH HAVE BEEN MODIFIED TO COVER THE SMAt t rR CONDUIT.
1 4-8 103076/1 THIS DETAIL PROVIDES COVERAGE ON FLEXIBLE II.I l 5,53 CONDUITS WHERE CONDUIT SUPPORT INTERFACES WITH THE STANDARD COVERAGE
{ ON THE FLEXIBLE CONDUIT.
l I
I
I ATTACHMENT A ER-ME-082, REV. O TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE A7 OF A24 l
i TYPICAL DETAIL NO. DCA NOJREV . DESCRIPTION SUPPORTTEST SCHEMES Bh. SIS / NOTES (PAGE A14-
" ., . A24) 4-9 103423/0 Tills DETAIL Sif0WS HOW TO COMPENSATE FOR 9-1, 10-1, 10-2 & 9-3 1-5, 54 A GAP BETWEEN THE 2 SECTIONS OF A I/4*
OVERLAY ON A 2* CONDU!T BY INSTALLING TROWEL GRADE AND STRESS GRADE IN TIIE GAP-l 51,5-1.1&5-1.2 103020/3 THESE DETAILS SHOW STANDARD l-2, 11-1, 12-1, 12-1, 13-1 N/A CONFIGURATIONS FOR COVERING CABLE TRAYS & 14-I WITH 330-1 PANELS AND INSTALLING STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE ATJOINTS. THESE ARE TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.
5-3 & 5-3.1 NIA THESE DETAILS SHOW FIRE STOPS IN CABLE I-2, 11-1, 12-2 & 14-1 1-5,55 TRAY USING BOTH 330-1 AND CABLE TRAY FIRE STOPS INSTALLED PER CPES-M-1061. THE CABLE TRAY FIRE STOP INSTALLED PER CPES-M-1061 HAS BEEN TESTED.
5-2 N/A
{
TIIIS DETAIL SIIOWS THE INSTALL.ATION OF TIE l-2, Il-1,12-1,12-2 & 13-1 1-5,56!
WIRES TO ATTACH BOTTOM THERMO-LAG 330-1
! PANELS TO TiiE RIJNGS ON LADDER BACK TRAYS.
5-3.1 SEC. 2-2 (VAR.) 104235/2 THIS DETAIL PROVIDES A METHOD OF 1-2, 9-1, 10-1, 10-2, 11-1, 1-5, 57 UPGRADING NEW AND EXISTING FIRE STOPS BY 12-1, 12-2, 13-1, 14-1 & 9-3 j INSTALLATION BAR STEEL AROUND THE END OF TIIE TRAY IN ORDE2 TO HOLD THE BOTTOM 4
PANEL IN PLACE.
5-4 N/A THIS DETAIL SilOWS A CABLE TRAY PROTECTED l-2, 11-1, 12-1, 12-2, 13-1 1-5, 59 WITH 330-1 PANELS WHICH PENETRATES & 14-I TilROUGH A BLOCKOUT FILLED WTTH PENSEAL 1
MATERIAL 5-5 (OPTION 2) N/A THIS DETAIL SHOWS THE THERMO-LAG I-2, 9-1, 10-1, 10-2, 11-1 1-6, 12 COVERAGE ON A RACEWAY BUTTING UP TO A 12-1, 12-2, 13-1, 14-1 & 9-3
' BLOCKOUT IN A CONCRETE STRUCTURE THEN FLARING OUT ALONG THE STRUCTURE So THAT .l THE PANEL EXTENDS TO THE CONCRETE WHERE IT IS IIILTI BOLTED INTO THE CONCRETE.
.i a g
~
e ATTACHMENT A ER-M E-082, R"V. 0 TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAG'i AS OF A24 TYPICAL DETAIL NO. DCA NOJREV ' -
^
- DESCRIPIlON) ' SUPPORTTEST SCHEMUS BASIS, NOTES (PAGE A14-?
'A24) 5-5 (OPTION 3) 100820/0 THIS DETAIL SHOWS THE THERMO-LAG ON A l-1, 12 1, 12-2, 13-1 & 14-1 1-6, 61 RACEWAY BITI*ITNG UP TO THE M-BOARD ON A PENSEALED BLOCKOUT WITI{ A THERMO-LAG TROWEL GRADE FILIET WHERE THE THERMO-LAG MEETS THE M-BOARD.
5-5.1 104121/0 THIS DETAIL SiiOWS A METHOD FOR INSTALLING 11-1 1-5, 77 FLEXI-BLANKET ON THE AIR DROP FROM A CABLE TRAY TO A CABLE AT A BLOCKOUT. THE FLEXI-BLANKER OVERLAPS ONTO 330-1 COVERAGE ON BOTH TRAYS, IS MECHANICALLY FASTENED INTO THE 330-1 AND IS SEALED AT Ti!E FORM SEAIJM-BOARD WITH A TROWEL GRADE.
5-5.2 104121/0 THIS SHOWS A METHOD FOR INSTALLING 330-1 1-2, Il-1, 12-1, 12-2, 13-1, I-5, 78 PANELS ON THE AIR DROP FROM A CABLE TRAY I4-1 TO A CABLE TRAY AT A BLOCKOUT. TiiE JO!NTS ARE SCORE AND FOLD OR ST1TCHED AND THE I REQUIREMENTS FOR STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE ATJOINTS APPLIES.
5-6,54A AND 54B 103020/3 THESE DETAILS SHOW THE SCORE AND FOLD I-2, Il-1,12-1,12-2,13-1 1-5, 63 METHOD ON RADIAL BENDS ON TRAYS AND AT & 14-1 THE CORNERS ON STRAIGHT TRAY RUNS.
5-7 AND 5-2 103020/3 TIIESE DETAILS FHOW CROSSBANDING AND TIE l-2, Il-1,12-1,12-2,13-1 N/A WIRE INSTALLATION FOR LONGITUDINAL JOINT & 14-1 STRESS SKIN BOTH AT CABLE TRAY TEES TIIESE ARE TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.
5-9 103020/3 TIIIS DETAIL SHOWS THE INSTALLATION OF THE l-2, 12-2 & 14-1 N/A BOTTOM PANEL AT A CABLE TRAY TEE. IT DEMONSTRATES BUTT JO!NT TIE WIRES AND TIE WIRES OVER TRAY RUNGS. ALL BUT THE TIE WIRES OVER THE RUNGS ARE TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. SINCE THE TlE WIRES OVER THE RUNGS WOULD BE AN ENHANCEMENT TO TiiE TESTED CONFIGURATION TT IS ALSO ACCEPTABLE.
i ATTACHMENT A ER-ME-082, REV. O 1 TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS i .
PAGE A9 OF A24 i
j TYPICAL DETAIL NO. DCA NOJREV DESCR!!" TION SUPPORTTEST SCHEMES
' BASIS /NdTES (PAGE A14--
A24) 5-10. '-11 & 5-14 103020/3 t TilESE DETAILS SHOW STANDARD l-2, 11-1, 12-1, 12-2, 13-1
- N/A i j CONFIGURATIONS FOR PROVIDING STRESS SKIN & 14-1 '
i ON LONGITUDINALJOINTS ATTRAY TEES, I STITCHING OF BUTT JOINTS VilTH TIE WIRES AND COVERAGE OF SPLICE PLATES WITH 330-I THERMO-LAG PANEL AND STRESS SKIN AND l
j TROWEL GRADE. THESE DETAILS ARE TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.
t i 5-12 103020/3 THIS DETAIL SHOWS HOW TO INSTALL 330-660 11-1 1-5, 34 l 104121/0 4 FLEXI-BLANKET OVER THE END OF A CABLE 1 TRAY COVERED WITH 330-1 PANELS.
I 5-13 ,
' 103020/3 i THIS DETAIL SHOWS THE UPGRADE UTILIZING 11-1, 12-1, 12-2, 13-1 & 1-5, 68 STRESS SKIN AND TIE WIRES WHEN THE PANEL I4-1
', ON THE BO7 TOM OF A TRAY AT A TRAY 4 SUPPORT IS NOT SUPPORTED BY THE THERMO-LAG INSTAI I FD ON THE SUPPORT.
5-13.1 & 5-16 103507/0 Tills DETAll SHOWS HOW TO INSTALL I-2, 11-1, 12-1, 12-2, 13 1-5,71 LONGITUDINAL STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL & 14-1 GRADE ON TRAYS WHERE AIR DROP COVERAGE INTERFERES WITil STANDARD COVERAGE.
5-15, 5-15.1 & 5-15.2 10082010 THESE DETAILS SilOW STANDARD BANDING FOR l-2, 11-1, 12-1, 12-2, 13 NIA 104121/0 CABLE TRAYS. THIS IS A TESTED & 14-I 1 CONFIGURATION.
i 5-17 10383310 I THIS DETAIL SHOWS THE INSTALLATION OF 1-2, 11-1, 12-1, 12-2, 13-1 1-5, 65
} LONGITUDINALSTRESS SKIN ON CABLE TRAYS & 14-1 WilERE A GROUND CABLE PROTRUDES FROM Tile SIDE OF THE TRAY.
6-I SECTION AA IG3020/3 CONDUIT LATERAL BENDS.
9-1, 10-1, 10-2 N/A 6-2,6-3.1 SECTION 3-3 103020/3 SURFACE MOUNTED SUPPORTS FOR CONDUIT 2: 9-1,10-I,10-2, !!-I,12-1, I-5, 72 SECTION 1-I SECTION 3* DIAMETER.
- 2-2,6-3.2 SECTION 3-1 12-2, 13-1 & 14-1 l
SECTION 2-2 l
- 7-I 103020/3 i
FLEXI-BLANKET AT THROUGH-WALL SLEEVE Il-1, 1-2, 12-1, 12-2, 13-1 1-5, 60, 62 104121/0 INTERFACE. & 14 1
,__,-._-,.--,._,----._.---.-..,..---,.-_.,-_.r.--r, . - . , , - . , - - _ .. . - - - . _ , -______ _-__-_____-_-.m
- --- - -- . _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ - _ - _ - - _ + -
. 2 ATTACHMENT A ER-ME-082, REV. O i
TYPICAL DESICN DETAILS ,
PAGE A13OF A24 i ap TYPICAL DETAIL NO. DCA NO./REV DESCRIPTION SUPPORTTETT SCHEMES' BASIS / NOTES (PAGE A14 -
A24); -
7-2, 7-2.1 103020/3 RIGID CONDUIT TO FLEX CONDUIT. Il-1 1 4, 64 l
7-2.2 102759/1 THIS DETAIL SHOWS FLEXI-BLANKET INSTALLED 11-1 1-5, 45, 75 ON A FLEX CONDUIT V.HERE IT BITITS TO A j CONCRETE WALL. THE COVERAGE IS INSTAI I Ffi ON THE FLEX CONDUIT TO THt! '
REQUIRED THICKNESS THEN ALL VOIDS ARE FILLED WITH TROWEL GRADE AND A FILLET IS l PROVIDED AT THE FLEXI-BLANKET CONCRETE INTERFACE.
7-3 VIEW 3 104121/0 CONTAINMENTPENETRATION ASSEMBLIES. 11-1 1-5, 60, 62, 66.
7-4 VIEW 4 104121/0 SUPPOdT FRAME FOR CONTAINMENT Il-1 1-5,60, 62
) PENETRATION ASSEMBLIES AND THROUGH WALL St FEVES.
4 7-5 N/A i
THERMO-LAG COVERAGE OF FIRE DETECTOR *S I-2 Il-1,12-1,12-2,13-1 1-5, 67 AS PROTRUDING ITEMS. & 14-1 74 N."A THERMO-LAG 330-1 INSTALLATION ON FLEX 11-1 I4,69 CONDUITTHEOUGH A BLOCKOUT.
7-7, 7-7.1 N/A 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET DETAIL WHERE DUE TO 11-1 14,70 SPARE CONSIDERATIONS. TWO INDIVIDUAL COMPLETE BUNDLES CANNOT BE ACHIEVED.
8-2, OPTION 1 SEC. N/A CABLE BUNDLE WRAPPING OF SPLITS II-I l-5, $1 AA 8-2 (OPIlON 2) N/A WRAPPING CABLE BUNDLE SPLITS. Il-1 L'IA 8-3 101918/0 CABLE TRAY FLAT PANEL TRANSITION. 1-2, 12-1, 12-2, 10-2, 13-1 1-5,5C
~
& 14-1
, 8-4 SECT. AA 103486/0 ESSENTIAL FLEXIBLE CONDUITS WITillN A 11-1 1-5,51 COMMON ENVELOPE.
0-1 N/A TYPICAL THERMO-LAG COVERAGE DETAIL FOR 9-1, 11-1, 12-1, 12-2, 13-1,' I4,47 SWAY STRUTS 14-1 & I-2 9-2,9-2 SEC.1-1,9-2 103490/0 TYPICAL DETAIL FOR VERTICAL CABLE TRAY TO I-2, 11-1, 12-1, 12-2, 13-1 14,48 SEC. 2-2 CONCRETE & 14-1
i ATTACitMENT A !
ER-ME-082, REV. O TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS , PAGE All OF A24 j i i TYPICAL DETAIL NO. DCA NOJREV DESCRIPTION SUPPORTTEST SCHEMES ' BASIS / NOTES (PAGE A14- I
- i A24) f 9-3 NIA
- TYPICAL DETAIL USING FLEXI-BLANKET TO N/A !j 49 CORRECT AN INTERFERENCE.
k9-4 '
100820/0 V GROOVE / SCORING THERMO-LAG FOR I-2, 11-1, 12-1, 12-2, 13-1 N/A RACEWAY BENDS & 14-1 j 10-3 102522/1 SHIMMING DETAIL 11-1,12-1,12-2,13-I,14-1 & 1 4, 44 4 1-1 104, 10-5, 104 102522/1 SHIMMING DETAIL !!-1,12-I 12-2,13-1 & 14-1 1 4, 44 11-1 N/A THERMO-LAG PANELS ON CABLE TRAY T-LAG /M-B INTERFACE - 1-7 1 INTERFACE WITH M-BOARD AT PENETRATION NONE CABLE TRAY T-i SEAL.' LAG l-2,12-1,12-2,13-1
! & 14-1 i i1-2 103020/3 THERMO-LAG PREFAB HALF-ROUNDS WHERE 9-1,9-3 14,8
, CLEARANCE BETWEEN CONDUITS IS (2 1/2" BUT
< 1*) INADEQUATE TO FIT HALF ROUND ON BOTH CONDUITS - HALF ROUND ON ONE OR OTHER IS TRIMMED BACK AND SEALED BETWEEN THE TWO CONDUITS AS REQUIRED FOR JOINTS.
11-2.1 103020/3 SAME AS 11-2 EXCE/T DISTANCE BETWEEN 9-1, 9-3 14,8 CONDUITS IS < 1/2*.
I l-3,11-3.1 N/A TYPICAL DETAIL OF BOTTOM TRAY BOARD AND 12-1, 12-2, 13-1, 14-1 & 1-2 N/A SIDE RAIL BOARD INTERFACE.
11-4, 11-4.1 NIA TYPICAL DETAIL OF BOTTOM TRAY BOARD AND 12-1, 12-2, 13-1, 14-1 & 1-2 14,9 SIDE RAll BOARD INTERFACE USING SCORE AND FOLD TECHNIQUE.
I j 11-5 N/A TYPICAL LADDER TRAY BARRIER ASSEM5LY 12-1, 12-2, 13-1, 14-1 & 1-2 i 4, 9 11 4 N/A TRAY PROTECTION WilERE TMY SIDE RAIL IS 12-1, 12-2, 13-1, 14-1 & 1-2 1 4, 10 TOO CLOSE TO CONCFJ7 AmD Ti!EREFORE MUST LNTERFACE AGA2 LT CONCRETE WAT 1.
- I l-7 N/A i TROWEL GRADE FILLET WHERE CLEARANCE 12-1, 12-2, 13-1, 14-1 & 1-2 1-7, 10, 12
! WILL NOT ALLOW FOR TdERMO-LAG PANEL
( FLARE-OUT.
i
- m. .-._,...._,,..,.,--._-.m,
, - - - - , ,,m _ - , , . , _ . . , , -- -, , , ,
AFACHMENT A , ER-M E-082, REV. O TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE A12 OF A24 J
TYPICAL DETAIL NO. DCA NOJREV DESCRIlmON SUPPORTTEST SCHEMES BASIS / NOTES (PAGE A!4.
_2 A24) 11-7.1 104121/0 '
FLEXI-BLANKETTO M-BOARD / CONCRETE 11-1 1-5,51 INTERFACE WITH FII I CT.
11-8 102957/0 r THIS DETAIL SHOWS THE INSTALLATION OF 1-2, 11-1, 12-1, 12-2, 13-1, 1-5,76 i
- STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE AT STEEL I4-1 INTERFERENCES BY EXTENDING THE STRESS !
SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE OUT ONTO THE STEEL INTERFERENCE.
12-1, 12-1.1 103063/0 RACEWAY SUPPORT TO EMBEDDED PLATE. 10-1, 10-2 1 4, 13
$ 12-2 103844/0 CONDUIT PENETRATING CABLE TRAY. Il-1,1-2,12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1 14,29
. & 10 2 '
12-2 1 103844/0 i THIS CONFIGURATION IS A MINOR DERIVATIVE l-2, 10-2, s1-1, 12-1, 12-2, I-5,79 OF DETAIL 12-2 EXCEPT THAT THE CONDUIT 13-1,14-1 ENTERING THE BOX EXTENSION OF A HORIZONTALTRAY ENVELOPE IS FLEX IN LIEU OF RIGID. THE USE OF 330460 ENTERING A HORIZONTAL TRAY ENVELOPE HAS QUALIFIED VIA SCHEME 11-1. THE UPGRADE TECHNIQUES UTILIZED TO REINFORCE THE INTERFACE BETNEEN 330-1 PANELS AND FLEXI-BLANKET DURING Ti!E TEST (330460 COLLAR FLARED OUT ON THE 330-1 PANEL)IS REQUIRED BY THE DETAIL. ALL OTHER ASPECTS OF DETAIL 12-2 ARE CONSISTENT, INCLUDING REINFORCEMENT OF 330-1 PANEL J6INTS WITH QUALIFIED
- TECHNIQUES (STITCHING / STRESS SKIN). THE INCREASED AIR VOLUME WITHIN THE ENVELOPE BENEFITS THE THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF TIIE CONFIGURATION. THEREFORE,THE !
CONFIGURATION WILL PROVIDE AN EQUIVALENT l-HOUR RATING.
12-3 N/A S!L-TEMP COVERAGE. 12-2 I N/A 13-1 N/A TRAY CONCRETE BEAM INTERFERENCE. 1-1,12-1,12-2,13-1 & 14-1 1 4, 14 13-2 104121/0 CABLE TRAY TRANSITION INTO BANK OF 1-2,12-1,12-2,13-I 14-1 & !
1 4, 16 SLEEVES WITH PROTRUDING AIR DROPS AND Il-1 EXISTING CONDUIT ENTERING ENVELOPE.
- ATTACIIMENT A ER-ME482 REV. O TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE A13 OF A24 I
- TYPICAL DETAIL NO. DCA NOJREV i DESCRIPTION SUPPORTTEST SCHEMES BASIS / NOTES (PAGE AN- i A24)" !
13-3 N/A THERMO-1AG COVERAGE FOR TYPICAL i 9-1,1-2,12-I,12-2,13-1 & - I-6, 18 INTERFERENCES. 14-1 I i 3
- 13-4 N/A i TYPICAL INIhKFERENCE. 1-2,12-1,12-2,13-1,14-I & 14,2I Il-1 13-5 N/A HVAC INTERFERENCE WITH CABLE TRAY. Il-1 1-5, 23
- 13 4 103548/0 PROTECTED AND NOM PROTECTED TRAY. 1-2,12-1,12-2,13-I,14-1 & 1-5, 24 11-1 4 14-1 N/A THERMO-LAG 5* RULE. 1-2,12-I,12-2,13-I,14-1 & 1-5, 25 11-1
- 14-2 NIA TYPICAL BOX DETAIL FOR ITEMS ENTERING l-2,12-1,12-2,10-2,13-1,14-1 1-5, 27 i
RACEWAY. & 11-1 14-3, SEC. 1-1 NIA TYPICAL CON'sUIT/PITE AND TRAY 9-l.10-2,12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1 I-5, 30 INTERFERENCE. A II-I 14-4 104121/0 TYPICAL THROUGH WALL SLEEVE THERMO-LAG. 1-2,12-1,12-2,13-1,14-1 & I-5, h2 1
i1-1 15-1 N/A TYPICAL BOX DETAIL TRAYfrRAY. I-2,12-I,I2-2,13-1,14-1 & I-5,33 Il-I 15-2 104121/0 TYPICAL BOX DETAIL TRAY / CONDUIT. I-2,12-I,12-2,13-1,14-1,11-1 1-5,32
! & 9-I l 15-1 N/A ATTACHMENTTO sTRUCTIJRAL STm N/A 5, 36 i 152 N/A
! ATTACHMENT TO STRUCTURAL STEEL. N/A 5,36 1
15-3 N/A TUBE STEEL WELDED TO EMBEDDED PLATE. 10-1,10-2 5,36,38 IM N/A ANGLE BRACE PLATE. N/A 5,36
! 145,16-5.1 N/A CAPS FOR 110I f_OW MEMBERS. 10-1, 10-2 5,36,41 i' 15 4, 16-7 N/A TYPICAL SHEL PROTECTION DETAIL WITH 9-I,I-2,11-1,12-1,12-2,13-1 5,36,42 CONDUIT INTERFERENCE. A 14-1 i
. , , , . - - _ _- , --,,-_,-,m,.....o . .-_.--,--.,----,.-.--,-m,.- ..,_--,_.--.yy ,,,-,--.y, ,r--. _- ,3-,. _ . , , ,..w s .- , ,, _ . , , - - . , - , _ - . - - - - -- y %
i ATTACIIMENT A ER-MEG 2, REV. O '
TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS . PAGE A14 OF A24 a
NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES 1 DCA/REV I
- 1. CONTINUITY OF TIIE MATERIAL IS CONSISTENs' WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.
1 GENERIC
- 2. EFFECTIVE THICKNESS OF TIIE MATERIAL IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. GENERIC
~
3 THE NATURE AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THE SUPPORT ASSEMBLY (IF APPUCABLE)IS CONSISTENT WTTH TESTED GENERIC CONFIGURATIONS.
- 4. Tile APPLICATION OR END USE OF Tile MATERIAL IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. GENERIC
- 5. THE CONFIGURATION WAS REVIEWED BY A QUAUFIED FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER AND DETERMINED TO PROVIDE AN i
GENERIC EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF PROTECTION.
- 6. SPECIFIC AND UNIQUE DIFFERENCES FROM TESTED CONFIGURATION EXIST FOR THE PLAr(T CONFIGURATION WHICH WOULD tstiNERIC ENHANCE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF Tile PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE (E.G., SPACIAL ORIENTATION, SURFACES NOT DIRECTLY EXPOSED TO A POTENTIAL FIRE DUE TO StilELDING EFFECIS TORTUROUS PATH, ETC.).
i
- 7. Ti!E USE OF 330-1 V-GROOVE PANELS ON CABLE TRAYS OF VARIOUS SIZES HAS BEEN QUALIFIED BY SCHEMES 1-2, 12-1, 12-2, 13-1,14-I. ALL CABLE TRAY JOLNTS (INCLUDING THOSE TO CONSTRUCT FLARE OUT) AdE REINFORCED WITH TECHNIQUES QUALIFIED BY LISTED TESTS. THE 330-1 TROWEL GRADE BETWEEN M-BOARD AND FLATE-OUT OR FILLET WHERE THERE IS NO FLARE OUT, PROVIDES A POSITIVE SEAL FOR THE TRAY ENVELOPE AGAIF3T THE M-BOARD. IN ADDITION PER DCA 104121, REV. O. DETAIL S-5.2 STICK PINS Tl! ROUGH THE SEAL TO SECURE THE THER' 40-LAG FLARE OUT TO THE M-BOARD WILL BE PROVIDED AS REQUIRED. Tile CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE FOR THET. MAL CONSIDERATIONS SINCE THE TRAY BOX CUT a AND FOAM SEAL ARE BOTil QUALIFIED FOR A MINIMUM OF 1 HOUR FIRE EXPOSURE, AND THE FOAM SEAL WITH M-BOARD WILL ACT AS A IIEATSINK.
- 8. WITH INTERFACE BEDVEEN THE TWO CONDUITS TREATED AS A JOINT, ADEQUATE THICKNESS IS PROVIDED TO MAINTAIN 103020/3 l EQUIVALENT PROTECTION AS QUAUFIED BY FIRE TEST 9-1,9-3. NOTE 6 WOULD APPLY.
- 9. AS LONG AS EXTERNAL STRESS SKIN UPGRADES ARE APPLIED TO TRAY RAILS, THIS SCORE AND FOLD TECilNIQUE WOULD PROVIDE A BETTER LEVEL OF PROTECTION THAN TESTED CONFIGURAT10N DUE TO THE CONTlhUOUS STRESS SKIN ASSISTING IN IIOLDING THE JOINT TOGETHER WHILE MAINTAINING I/2" TIIICKNESS. NOTE 6 WOULD APPLY.
- 10. TIIE USE OF 330-1 V-GROOVE PANELS ON CABLE TRAYS OF VARIOUS SIZES HAS BEEN QUAUFIED BY SCHEMES 1-2,12-!,12-2, 13-1 AND I4-I. ALL CABLE TRAY JOINTS (INCLUDING THOSE TO CONSTRUCT TiiE FLAREOUT) ARE REINFORCED WITH TECIIN! QUES QUAUFIED BY PREVICUS LISTED TESTS. THE DO-1 TROWEL GRADE BETWEEN CONCRETE AND FLARE-OUT OR
, FILLET WilERE THERE IS NO FLAREOUT, PROVIDES A POSITIVE SEAL FOR THE TRAY ENVELOPE AGAINST TiiE CONCRETE. !N ADDITION PER TYPICAL DETAIL I-5 Ti!E ENCLOSURE IS SECURED TO THE WALL VIA MECHANICAL FASTENERS (HILTI BOLTS).
THE CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE FOR THERMAL CONSIDERATIONS SINCE ONE COMPLETE SIDE OF THE TRAY ENVELOPE I !$ EXTENDED TO TiiE CONCRETE WALL AND WILL NOT BE DIRECTLY EXPOSED TO A FIRE. ALSO THE CONCRETE WALL ACTS
! AS A HEAT SINK. THEREFORE THIS CONFIGURATION IS EQUIVALENT OR BETTER THAN TEsatu.
i
-,m - - - , - _ e----- - - - -- -m w _=,,.s a -w, ,-w.me --- +_
1 ATTACHMENT A ER-ME-082. REV. O TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS *i PAGE AIS OF A24 ,
t
! NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV i
- 11. ,
Tile COVERAGE OF TiiE PROTEUDING u et.L WITH THERMO-LAG IS ACCEPTABLE BECAUSE IT IS CONSISTEN
- METilODS UTIUZED TO COVER THE AIR DROPS IN TEST SCHEME 11-1. THE OVERLAPS OF THE FLEXI-BLANIGT '
BANDING ARE IDENTICAL ALSO TEST SCHEME 11-1 HAD FLEXI-BLANKETINSTAf f rn DIRECILY ON THE ESSE Wi!EREAS Tills DETAIL HAS FLEXI-BLANKET INSTA1 i rn ON A PROTRUDING ITEM NOT ON AN ESSENTIAL CO 12.
THE USE OF HILTI BOLTS TO PROVIDE A POSmVE MECHANICAL ATTACHMENT TO THE CONCRETE 103921/0 PRO
- AT Tl!!S POINT WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH IF NOT BETTER THAN THE THERMO-LAG JOINTS WHICH HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFULLY TESTED IN ALL OF Tile TEST ASSEMBUES. IN ADDITION, THE CONCRIsrE STRUCTURES WILL ACT AS A IIEAT SINK WlilCll WILL PROVIDE ADDmONAL PROTECTION AGAINST HEAT BEING DRIVEN INTO THE PROTECTED j 13.
1 THIS CONFIGURATION IS JUSTIFIED BY EXISTING TEST OF JUNCTION BOX WITH TUBE STEEL SUPPORTS 103063/0 PR l ONLY. ALTHO ~.'GH Tile PROTRUDING ITEM IN Tills CASE IS A TUBE STEEL SUPPORT MOUNTED TO AN EMBEDDED PLATE, ,
THE TUBE STEEL AND EMBEDDED PLATE IS COVERED FOR 9' AND PROVIDES A BEITER HEAT SINK TO RE THE P.ACEWAY TilAN Tile TESTED CONFIGURATION. ,
i 14.
Tile USE OF 330-1 V-GROOVED PANELS ON CABLE TRAYS OF VARIOUS SIZES. HAS BEEN QUAUFIED BY LISTED 1
BUTTING THE PROTECTI'!E ENVELOPE TO THE CONCRETE BEAM, THE BEAM WILL UMIT EXPOSURE FROM THAT SIDE AND
! ACT AS A IIEAT SINK. ALL CABLE TRAY JOINTS (INCLUDING T110SE THAT BOX TO THE BEAM) ARE REINFORCE TECilNIQUES QUAUFIED BY USTED TESTS.
- 15. !
- Tills TYPICAL DETAIL IS FOR COVERING WEEP llOLES IN TUBE STEEL WITH THERMO-LAG WHICH, 102222/1 ARE LOCAT
! Tile 9 -l!* THERMO-LAG PROTRUDING ITEM COVERAGE IN ORDER TO PRECLUDE HEAT FORM BEING DRIVEN
! STEEL TilROUGli THE IlOLE. Tile ADHESION OF Tile PANEL TO THE STEEL USING TROWEL GRADE AND BAN J
Tile IiOLE IN A MANNER CONSISTENT WITH THE TESTED CONFIGURATIONS FOR PROTRUDING ITEM COV ;
f 16.
i Tile USE OF 330-1 V-GROOVED PANEL 3 ON CABLE TRAYS OF VARJOUS SIZES HAS BEEN QUALIFIED 104121/9 BY US j CABLE TRAY JOINTS (INCLUDINC TiiOSE TO BOX AROUND SLEEVE BANK) ARE REINFORCED WITH TECHN "
l LISTED TEST. THE BASE PLATE AND THERMO-LAG PANEL INTERFACE BEING COVERED WITH TROWEL GRAD POSITIVE SEAL PROTRUDING ITEM PROTECTION FOR AIR DROPS AND CONDUITS ARE QUAUFIED BY SCHEM CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE FOR THERMAL CONSIDERAT10NS SINCE THE CONCRETE AND BASE PLATE IIEAT SINK AND REDUCE THE EXPOSURE OF !! EAT INTO TIIE PROTECTED ENVEI OPE.
4 17.
Tile USE OF 330-1 TROWEL GRADE AO A FIRE STOP WAS TESTED IN SCHEME 11-1. TliE USE OF PENETRATION 100820/0 IIAS BEEN TESTED AND DOCUMENTED IN THE PENETRATION SEAL PROGRAM. AISO ELASTOMER WAS 103921/0TESTE STOP ON TRAY CONFIGURATIONS IN SCHLMES l-2.12-2 AND I4-1.
18.
Tile USE OF 330-1 V-GROOVED PANELS ON CABLE TRAYS AND HALF-ROUND PRE-SHAPED PIECES FOR CONDUITS l QUAUFIED BY LISTED TEST. ALL CABLE TRAY JOINTS (INCLUDING WilERE HALF-ROUND PIECES ARGUND TYPIC i INTERFERENCES CREATE LONGITUDINALJOLNTS) ARE REINFORCED wm1 TECHNIQUES QUALIFIED BY US CRmCAL PARAMETERS OF MATERlALTHICKNESS AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ARE EQUIVALENT TO QUAUFIED TESTS, THIS
! 15 AN ACCEPTABLE CONFIGURATION.
1 l
i 4
ATTACllMENT A E2-ME-082, REV. O TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE A16 OF A24 i 1
[-.NOTE ACCEn ANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV 19 THE JUNCTION BOX INSTALLATION IS THE STANDARD CONFIGURATION WHICH WAS TESTED IN SCHEME 103020/0101. T i ANGLE IRON OR CUPS MOUNTED TO Tile STRUCTURE TO SERVE AS ATTACHMENT POINTS FOR THE BANDING 103634/2 IS A ACCEPTABLE DEVIATION FROM SAME FUNCTION IN SECURING Tile OUTER PANFf M THE STANDARD (TESTED) CONFIGURATION SINCE THE METHOD OF ATTACHM J
! 20.
Tills DETAIL IS NOT THE STANDARD TESTED CONFIGURATION FOR AIR DROPS iNTO A CABLE TRAY BUT IT t PANELS. IT USES TIE WIRES AT THE JOINTS AS WAS TESTED IN SCIIEMES 1-2,12-1,12-2, AND I3-I AND THERMO-LAG TROWEL j GRADE UTIUZED AS A FIRE STOP AS TESTED IN SCHEME 11-1. THE ASSEMBLY IS BANDED TOGETHER AN j TRAY. THIS CONFIGURATION PROVIDES COVERAGE WHICH IS CONSISYENT WITH THE COVERAGE PROVI CONFIGURATION.
1 21.
l CABLE TRAYS OF VARIOUS SIZES USING V-GROOVED FLAT BOARD HAVE BEEN QUAUFIED BY LISTED TESTS.
i TRAY JOINTS ARE REINFORCED Wml TECilNIQUES (PJ.IFIED BY llSTED TESTS. FOR THERMAL CONSIDERATIONS, THE l
CORNER OR SIDE OF THE TRAY WHERE Tile INTERFERENCE IS LOCATED HAS BOTH EXTERNAL 330-660 FL i I TROWEL GRADE MATERIAL AND 330-1 FLAT PANELS ON THE INSIDE OF THE CABLE TRAY SIDE RAIL THE C i TitESE TWO PROVIDE ENHANCED PROTECTION IN THE AREA WHERE THE OUTER V-GROOVED BOARD TH
] IN ADDmON THE INTERFERENCES V'lLL PROVIDE SHIELDING AND AN ADDmONAL HEAT SINK IN THE AREA THE COMBINATION OF THESE FEATURES ALONG WITH TIE WIRES AND BANDING AS SHOWN WILL PROVIDE BETTER PROTECTION OF TiiE ENVELOPE THAN TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.
I 22.
1 THE BOX DESIGN ON THE TRAY IS THE SAME AS FOR DETAILS 3-I AND 3-1.1 THE FIRE STOP IS THE SAME AS TH USED FOR PROTRUDING CONDUlTS ON JUNCTLON BOXES. THE FLEXI-BLANKET ON THE AIR DROP IS THE SAME TESTED IN SCllEME 11-1 EXCEPT WHERE IT OVERLAPS ONTO THE CONDUIT AND THE BOX ON THE TRAY. S
! is ONLY TO BE USED WilEN TiiE CONDUIT IS TOO CLosE TO THE TRAY TO USE DETAIL 3-1 AND 3-1.1, THE AMOUNT OF FLEXI-BLANKET IS MINOR (4*-S*) SO Ti!E ATTACHMENT TO TilR CONDUIT AND TiiE BOX IS ACCEPTABLE.
i", 23.
TWO LAYERS OF FLEXI-BLANKET IS CONSISTFNT WITH QLIALIFIED PROTECTION FOR LARGE AIR DROPS. IN T
< TRAY PROVIDES MORE THERMAL MASS AND /. GREATER AIR SPACE THAN AIR DROPS. IN ADDmON THE HVAC
{ INTERFERENCE PROVIDES SOME DEGRa'iR OF Sli1F1 DING AND !! EAT SINK TO ONE SIDE OF THE PROTEC APPUCATION IS EQUIVALENT TO FLEXI-ilLAPQAPPUCATIONS QUAUFIED IN SCIIEME Il-1.
24.
fHis CONFIGURATION IS JUSTIFIED BY EXISTIN^l TEsj OF CABLE TRAYS Wml SUPPORTS PROTECTLD FOR 9" ONLY.
10354810 1 ALTHOUGH THE PROTRUDING ITEM IN THIS CASF d A TRAY SUPPORT AND A NON-ESSENTLM. TRAY, THE COVERAGE PROVIDED ONTO CONDUCTIVE EXPOSED Hr.AT PATil. TRAY SURFACES (SIDA PARTIALTOP AND BOTTOM) PROVIDE ADEQUATE PROTEC110N FO'l 25.
EXISTING LISTFD TESTS JUSTIFY CABLE TRA"5 11 SUPPORIS PROTECTED FOR 9*. IN Tills CASE PROTECTION OF THE j SUPPCRTS IS ONLY PROVIDED FOR S* MINIMUM. TlilS IS JUSTIFIED BY FMGINEERING CALCULATION ME-ALLO % USE OF TIIE S INC51 RULE' WilERE CONFIGURATIONS MEET ESTABLISHED MINIMUM CRTTERIA S PERCENT ENVELOPE. TRAY FILL TO ESTABLGH EQUIV/.12NT PROTECTION TO REDUCE HEAT PROPAGATION INTO THE PROT
i
)
' ATTACHMENT A E3-ME.082, REV. 0 TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS I
PAGE A17 OF A24 I
NOTE ACttrs ANCE BASIS / NOTES '
DCA/REV 26.
l ALL ASPECTS OF THIS AIR DROP CONFIGURATION HAVE BEEN TESTED IN SCHEME 11-1 EXCEPT 100820Al F l
- Tile 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET TO THE TWS. THE INTERFACE OF THE 330460 AROUND EMBEDDED WITH BANDING AROUND THE EMBEDDED SLEEVES FOR MECHANICAL ATTACHMENT AND LARGE *
{ TROWEL BEEN BOUNDEN GRADE BY TEST.330460 MATERIAL FOR THERMAL PROTECTION. THE MATERIALTHICKNESSES AND A 27.
- Tile USE W 3361 V4ROOVED PANELS TO PROTECT VARIOUS SIZES OF CABLE TRAYS HAS BEEN i
Tile USE OF 330-1 FLAT BOARD BOX CONFIGURATIONS AROUND t.BD FTITINGS AND JUNCTION B LISTED TESTS. WIT *1 THE USE OF JOINT REINFORCEMENTTECHNIQUES FORTHE CABLE TRAY AND BO l QUAUFIED IN LISTED TESTS. Tile CRmCAL ATTRIBUTES OF MATERIALTHICKNESS AND STRUCTURAL INT EQUIVALENT TO TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. BOX ELEVATION IS SUCH THAT CABLES IN THE TRAY D BACK OF THERMO-LAG PANEL IN ADDITION, ITEMS SUCH AS A PIPE HANGER WOULD PROVIDE SOME DEGREE OF SHIELDI AND HEAT SINK. THEREFORE THIS DETAIL IS ACCEPTABLE.
i 28.
l Tile COVElkAGE OF THE AIR DROP CABLES WITH FLEXI-BLANKETHAS BEEN TEsatu IN S THE TRAY INTERFACES ARE SIMILAR TO THE BOXES IN DETAILS 3-1 A 3-1.1. THE FIRE STOPPING OF T CABLE WITilIN Tile BOX STRUCTURE IS CONSISTENT WITH DETAILS 3-1 & 3-3.1 AND THE OVERLAP OF TH BLANKET ONTO THE CONDUlT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE TESTED CONFIGURATION. THIS CONFIGURATION COVERAGE WillCH IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COVERAGE PROVIDED BY TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.
4 29.
, THE USE OF 330-1 V-GROOVED PANELS TO PROTECT VARIOUS SIZES OF CABLE TRAYS HAS BEEN 10384410 l Tile USE OF 330-1 FLAT BO.iRD BOX CONFIGURATIONS AROUND LBD FITTINGS AND JUNCTION BOXES EXISTING TESTS. PROTECTION OF A PROTRUDING ITEM SUCH AS CONDUIT IS ALSO QUALIFIED BY
! USE OF JO!NT REINFORCEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR THE CABLE TRAY AND BOX DETAIL AS QUAISIED IN
. CRITICAL ATTRIBUTES OF TilERM AL MASS AND STRUCTURAL INTEGLTY ARE EQUIVALENT TO TESTED C
{ BOX DIMENSION DETAllIS ACCEPTABLE.ARE SIZED SUCil TilAT CABLES DO NOT TOUCH THE BACK OF THERMO-LAG PANELS. THE '?
, 30.
8 Tile USE OF 330-1 FLAT BOARD BOX CONFIGURATIONS ARE QUALIFIED BY EXISTING LISTED TESTS. Tile U l IIALF ROUND PREFABRICATED PIECES ARE ALSO QUAUFIED BY L'STED TESTS. Tile USE OF SHIMS ADDS A i i MATERIAL AND AIR VOLUME BENEFITS INSIDE Tile ENCLOSURE. %7TH THE USE OF JOINT REINFORCEM '
QUAUFIED BY EXISTING TESTS Tile PROTECTION OF CONDUIT / PIPE INTERFERENCES WITH CONDUIT HALF ROUN i PREFABRICATED PIECES AND FLAT BOARDS WITH SHI?tS CONSTITUTE EQUIVALENT OR BETTER PROTE ATTRIBUTES OF CONFIGURATIONS. TilERMAL MASS AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ARE EQUIVALENT OR BETTER THAN TESTED 31.
I Tills IS Tile TESTED CONFIGURATION EXCEPT THAT INSTEAD OF INSTALLING 330-I PANELS AND BUTTING 303020/3 I DROP STRESS SKIN; TROWEL GRADE BUILD UP IS INSTAt I rn Tills IS THE SAME CONFIGURATION USED FOR STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL BUILD UP ATJOINTS THAT WAS TESTED IN SCHEMES 1-2,9-1,10-1,10-2,11-1,12-1,12-2,13-1 AND 14-1. THIS CONFIGURATION PROVIDES COVERAGE WHICH IS CDNSISTENT WTTH Tile COVERAGE PROVIDED BY TE
? .
i j
e,
~
i ATTACHMENT A E':-ME-082 REV. O i
TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE AIS OF A24 i ,
NOTE ACrenANCE BASIS / NOTES ' '
DCA/REV 1 32.
THE USE OF 330-1 V-GROOVED PANELS ON CABLE TRAYS OF VARIOUS SIZES HAS BEEN QUAUFIED BY EXISTING 104I21/0 LI TESTS. ALL CABLE TRAY JOINTS (INCLUDING THOSE WHIO* 14ANSITION FROM THE END OF THE TRAY TO I REINFORCED Wml TEGINIQUES QUAUFIED BY USTED TESTS. THE CONCREfE WAI.L AND THERMO-LAG PANEL I :
j HAVING A TROWEL GRADE FILLET PROVIDES A POSmVE SEALTO THE PROTECTED ENVELOPE. BANDS TO SUP TRANSmON PANElJ5 WILL ADD STRUCTURAL SUPPORTTO THE ENVELOPE. THE CONCRETE WALL WILL ACT TO HELP REDUCE EXPOSURETO THE WAL11 PANEL INTERFACE. SINCE CRmCAL PARAMETERS OF THERMAL AND
< STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ARE EQUIVALENT TO TESTED CONFIGURATIONS, THIS DETAllIS AM3" TABLE.
i 33.
1 THE USE OF 330-1 V-GROOVED PANELS ON CABLE TRAYS OF VARIOUS SIZES HAS BEEN QUAUFIED BY TESTS AS I
THE MATRIX. ALL JOINTS ON THIS CONFIGURATION (INCLUDING THE BOX TRANSmON FROM TRAY TO TR REINFORCED wml TEGINIQUES QUAUFIED BY USTED TESTS. STRUCTURALLY, THE TRAY TO TRAY TRANSmON CREATES NO GREATER STRUCTURAL CHALLENGE THAN LARGE *T* CONFIGURATIONS ALREADY QUALIFIED. THEREFORE PARAMETERS OF STRUCT11RAL INTEGRITY, MATERIALTHICKNESS AND THERMAL CONSIDERATIONS ARE EQUIVALENT TO QUAUFIED TESTS.
34.
Tile COVERAGE OF 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET ONTO CONDUITS IS A TEs a to CONFIGURATION. "IllE OVERLAP 103020/3 OF 3 CABLE TRAYS UTluZES THE SAME INSTALLATION TECHNIQUES (STAPLING, OVERLAP DISTANCE, ETC) USED FOR CONDUITS 104121/0 AND JUST MODIFIES TIIEM TO ALLOW FOR THE CONFIGURATION DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CONDUITS AND CAB i
35.
THE COVERAGE OF 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET ONTO CONDUITS AND CABLE TRAYS IS THE SAME EXCEPT THE OVERL 103020/3 REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN REDUCED TO ALLOW FOR CONGESTED AREAS WHERE SPACE DOES NOT PERMITTHE 104I2110 US DETAIL 3-S.2. THE MINIMUM OVERLAP ALLOWED ON THIS DETAIL, ALTHOUGH NOT IDEAL, IS STILL SUFFICIENT WHEN COUPLED WITil THE STAPLING AND TROWEL GRADE BETWEEN TliE FLEXI-BLANKET LAYERS TO ENSURE THAT THE CONFIGURATION WILL PROVIDE ACCEPTABLE MECHANICAL ATTAdiMENT TO THE 330-1 MATERIAL WHICH MAKES
' ARRANGEMENT CONSISTENT Wmi THE TESTED CONFIGURATION. '
a
- 36. i THIS DETAIL IS SUPPORTED BY ENGINEERING EVALUATION, ER-ME-067. REV. 2 PG. 94.
37.
THIS DETAIL HAS Tile OPTION OF COVERING T11E METAL JACKETED FIRE ZONE R CABLE AS A PROTRUDING 104I21/0 I
- RULE WilICH WAS FIRE TEsa tu IN ALL OF THE SCHEMES OR FIRE STOPPED AS IN DETAIL .r-4 'VillCH IVAS FIRE TES SCHEME II-1. Tills CONFIGURATION IS CONSISTENT %TTH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.
38.
APPUCATION OF TilERMO-LAG ON TUBE STEEL AND OVER STEEL PLATE IS QUAUFIED ON SCHiME 9-1 TO ESTAB RULE. Tile ABluTY OF TlilS CONFIGURATION TO MmGATE HEAT PROPAGATION INTO THE rROTECTED ENVELOPE MAINTAINING STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY SUPPORTS THE APPUCATION OF T}{ERMO-LAG TO PROTECT STRUCTURA
! 39.
J THIS DETAIL PROVIDES COVERAGE FOR FIRE ZONE R CABLES WillCH PROTRUDE FROM A THERMO-LAGGED 10412I10 COM '
- WillOf 15 IDENTICAL TO THE REQUIREMENTS FOR COVERING PROTRUDING CABLES IN DETAIL 3-4. THIS CONF CONSISTENT Wmt THE TESTED CONFIGURATION.
i i .
i.
m- - vw e. we- g- y p. .--m - -
ww -m---w a m e -m ---p-- -
t* . -ey -i.-- 1----n--.-im.,-.% -, =v-mW- ----_ -- ---- _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . __--._______m --- __ - .- - ------ - - _ - - - - - - _ - - - . - - - - - - _ - -
a l ATTACllMENT A ER-ME-082, REV. O TYPICAL DESIGN DETAl!3 t PAGE A19 OF A24 NOTE
.l ACLitrrANCE BASIS / NOTES ' i I
DCA/REV 40.
i THE DETAll ALLOWS THE tea to JUNCTION BOX CONFIGURATION TO BE MODIFIED BY EXTENDIN 104060/0 i
, COVER ANGLE IRON USED TO SUPPORT THE JUNCTION BOX. THE CONFIGURATION HAS MORE EN A TYPICAL J-BOX ENVELOPE WHICH WILL RESULT IN LOWER INTERNAL TEMPERATURES. THEREFO INTEGRTTY AND THERMAL CONCERNS ARE ADDRESSED THE CONFIGURATION IS ACUtnABLE. I 41.
THIS TYPICAL DETAIL IS FOR COVERING THE OPEN END OF TUBE STEEL WilEN IT IS IECATED OUTS RULE
- TO MmGATE HEAT FROM BEING DRIVEN INTO THE TUBE STEEL. THE STRUCTURAL INTEG j FOLD THERMO-LAG FLAT PANEL.S Wm! TROWEL GRADE 330-1 AND S.S. BANDING IS EQUIVALENT THERMO-LAG TO MEET THE 9* RULE ON SCHEME 10-1 AND 10-2. i 42.
THE USE OF 330-1 FLAT PANELS WITH PARTIAL PREFABRICATED CONDUIT HALF ROUNDS AND TROW 43.
MAINTAINS CONSISTENCY TO THE CRITICAL ATTRIBUTE OF MATFRLALTHICKNESS WITH PROTECIE -
THIS DETAIL ADDRESSES COVERING FLEXIBLE CONDUlT EXmNG A JUNCTION BOX WITH 330-1 THERM 104060/0 TO 8" OUT FROM BOX. Tills MAKES IT POSSIBLE FOR 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET TO BE INSTALLEE :')NTO
, ACCORDANCE Wml THE TESTED CONFIGURATION (SCHEME I1 1). THE INSTALLATION OF 330-1 HALF l JUNCTION "OX IS IN ACCORDANCF %TTH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS SCHEMES 10-1 AND 10-2. THE RESULTIN CONFIGURATION IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.
44.
THE CABLE TRAY QUALIFICATION SCHEMES LISTED DID NOT USE SHIMS. IlOWEVER, ADDmONALTHERMO-LAG MATERIAL 102S2211 INSIDE THE ENVELOPE AND INCREASED AIR VOLUME BENEFITS THE ENCLOSURE EFFECTIVENESS. TES REINFORCEMENT HAVE BEEN EFFECTIVELY IMPLEMENTED TO ENSURE INTEGRITY OF THE ENVELOPE.
! 4S.
4 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET ON CABLE BUNDLES HAS BEEN SUCCESSFULLY FIRE TESTED IN SCHEME 11-1. F 103020/3 FLEX CONDUIT IIAS NOT BEEN TESTED SPECIFICALLY. HOWEVER,THE FLEX CONDUIT HAS THE ADVANTAGE OF AN ~
INSULATING CONDUIT JACKET AND A LARG2R AIR VOLUME INSIDE THAN IS PRESENT IN A FLEXI-BLANK BUNCLE. THIS WILL PROVIDE ADDmONAL PROTECTION FOR THE CABLES INTEGRITY THEREFORE. THE C 1 ACCEPTABLE. '
46.
, Ti!E CONDUITS ARE COVERED Wml 330-1 THERMO-LAG HALF ROUNDS TO THE EXTENT ALLOWED BY THE I 103020/3 STRUCTURE THEN A FILLET OF 330-1 TROWEL GRADE IS PROVIDED AT THE JUNCTION OF THE CONDUIT
{ THE CONCRETE WALL. THE FILLET OF 330-1 WILL PROVIDE A GOOD SEAL BEIWEEN THE THERMO-LAG AND
! MAINTAIN THE PROTECTED ENVELOPE. ALSO THE CONCRETE WILL ACT AS A HEAT SINK AND ENHANCE T 1
THE THERMO-LAG ENVELOPE. THE RESULTING CONFIGURATION IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONF!GURATIO
{ 47.
l THE CRmCAL ATTRIBUTES OF MN)DtlAL THICKNESS AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ARE EQUIVALENT TO T OF SUPPORTS FOR THE 9" RULE WHICH MmGATED HEAT BEING CONDUCTED INTO THE PROTECTED E CONCRETE SWAY STRUTS. WILL PROVIDE AN ADDmONAL HEAT SINK. THEREFORE THF CONFIGURATION IS ADEQUATE 8
- to
w A'ITACilMENT A ER-ME-082, REV. O TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS
, PAGE A20 OF A24 NOTE ACu.rrANCE BASIS / NOTES I
- 48. DCA/REV TlHS CONFIGURATION IS JUSTIFIED BY EXISTING TESTS OF CABLE TRAYS103490/0 . Wmi S ALTHOUGli TiiE PROTRUDING ITEM IN Tills CASE IS A TRAY SUPPORT ATTACHED TO A BA
. VIE COVERAGE PROVIDED OATO THE BASE PLATE AND WALL PROVIDE ADEQUATE TifE CONCRETE WALL ACTS AS A HEAT SINK TO HELP MmGATE EXPOSURE .OF IN ADDmONPROTECTION HEAT.
49 THIS CONFIGURATION 15 NOT USED IN UNIT 2 UNLESS MODIFIED -ANY APPLICATIONS BACKFIT DETAIL 3-4. TO IIAVE FIRE S 50.
Tills CONFIGURATION IS SIMILAR TO THE CONFIGURATION TESTED IN SCHEMES 9-1,10-1,10-2 AND HAD TIIE THERMO-LAG IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH TiiE PEN SEAL MATERIAL WH Tile SilEET Wml SLEEVE METAL TROWEL SLEEVES DOES GRADE NOTFILLING DETRACTTHE FROM GAP. THE TROWEL THE TESTED CONFIGURATIONGRADE
. THE TROWEL GRADE AS A FIRE STOP AND IN THE S 51.
MATERIAL THE RESULTING CONFIGURATION IS CONSISTEN .
LAYERS OF FLEXi-BLANKET CONFIGURATIONS. IN FIRE TEST SCllEME330460 Il-1,PROTECTING ALL Tile USE OF 330460 BUNDLED TROWEL GRADE LEGS OF THIS Wml BANDING 104121/0 DET PROVE 103486/0 STRUCTURALLY SOUND WITII EXCELLENT BONDING OF SEAMS TilROUGliOUT THE FIR .
TilEREFORE TIIE USE OF 330460 TROWEL GRADE Wml BANDING TO STRUCTUR LEG AND SEAL LONGITUDINAL SEAMS IS ACCEPTABLE. THIS DETAIL iS EQUIVALE
- 52. CRmCAL TIIERMAL AND STRUCTURAL ASPECTS AS DESCRIBED ABOVE AND IS TilEREFORE .
Tile METilOD UTILIZED TO REDUCE Tile SIZE OF TiiE 330-1 CONDUIT HALF 103020/S ROUND WILL CONFORM TO THE SMALLER SilAPE THEN FILLING THE SCOREDSAME . AREAS Wmi 33 METHOD UTILIZED IN FITTING 330-1 PANELS TO CABLE TRAY RADIAL ,12-I, 12-2,13-1 AND I4-I. TIIEREFORE THE SCORING OF THE CONDUIT HALF ROUNDS WILL NOT DETRACT FROM
, BENDS WlilCH INTEGRITY OF TilESE CONDUITSECTIONS. SINCE DETAILS 4.6 AND 4-6.1 ARE THE TESTED IN SCHEMES 9-1,10-1 AND 10-2 THEY ARE CONSIDERED TO BE TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. D Tile SAME AS DETAILS 4-3 AND 4-3.1 AND TiiE HAVE BEEN ANALY7m IN NOTE 46.
53.
FLEXI-BLANKET ON FLEX CONDUIT HAS NOT BEEN TESTED SPECIFICALLY. IlOWEVER, THE 103076/I - FACT TilAT CONFIGURATION HAS BEEN TESTED IN SCHEME 11-I Aa4D THE FLEX CONDUIT HAS AND TiiE AIR VOLUME INSIDE THE CONDUIT WHICil IS NOT PRESENT IN A CABLE BUNDLE ,
PROTECTION FOR THE CABLES AND RESULT IN LOWER INTERNAL TEMPERATURE SUPPORT IS COMPENSATED FOR BY TIIE ADDmON THERMO-LAG ON 'sHE SUPPORT.
TIIERMO-LAG ON THE SUPPORT AND THE CONDUIT PLUS Tile TROWEL GRADE IN AN INTERFACE CONSISTENT WITli A BETWEEN Tile TilERMO-LAG ON THE CONDUIT AND Tile SUPPO4T RESULT TESTED CONFIGURATION.
1 2
ATTACitMENT A ER-ME-082, REV. O 1 TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS i.
PAGE A21 OF A24 l
1 Nule
' ACUtt'rANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV 6
, 54.
j Tills DETAIL DEPICTS S ANDARD COVERAGE FOR 2" CONDUIT EXCEPT FOR A GAP NOT EXCEE 103423/0 ROUNDS MEET. TROWEL GRADE OVER STRESS SKIN IS APPUED TO THE AREA TO ACHIEVE TH
} AREA. Tile COMBINATION OF RESULTING CONFIGURATION PROVIDING THICKNESS AND MATE I
WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS AND THE FACT THAT SCllEME 9-3 TESTED 2* CONDUTTS WIl CONDUIT IIALF ROUNDS RESULTS IN Tills CONFIGURATION BEING ACCEPTABLE.
^
55.
FIRE STOPS UTluZING 330-1 THERMO-LAG WERE TESTED IN SCHEME I-2. IT WAS ALSO TEST STOP WAS NOT BREACHED. THIS CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE.
i 56.
l ALTilOUGil THEREFORE IT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. TEST ASCHEMES TEsa to CONFIGURATION IT IS A DEFINITE ENHANCEMENT TO TESTED C 1-2,11-1,12-1,12-2 AND 13-1 HAVE ESTABLISHED THE ENHANCEMENTS OBTAINED
.i
. 57.
BY USING TIE WIRES TO
- STITCH
- TO EITilEP. PANELS AND Tills DETAIL IS CONSisterff WITH THAT ,
! Tills DETAIL PROVIDES A METilOD FOR A POSmVE MECHANICAL MEANS TO SUPPORT UNDER 104715/2 l STOP IN A CABLE TRAY. Tile BAR ST8EL AND ALTERED ROD.USED FOR THIS PURPOSE ARE SUBST WmlSTAND A DESIGN BASIS FIRE. Tile BAR STEEL IS COMPARABLE TO THE EXPOSED STEEL SCHEMES. THE ALL TIIREAD ROD WOULD HAVE ELONGATE TO FAIL AND THAT IS NOT A CONCERN.
58.
Tile USE OF 330-1 TilERMO-LAG FLAT PANELS, SINGLE LAYER, WAS QUALIFIED ON SCHEME 10-2 FOR JUNCHON BOXES. I 10191810 THIS DETAIL Tile TIIERMAL EXPOSURE OF FLAT PANELS IS LESS CHALLENGING THAN THE E OVERLAPS OF MATERIAL AND JOINT REINFORCEMENT TECIINIQUES ALONG WITH THE USE OF QUALIFIED BY LISTED TESTS. IN ADDITION,THE REQUIREMENT FOR PRE-BANDING BELOW FLAT PANELS, NO MA" ITER T TRAY SIZE, WILL PROVIDE STRUCTURAL SUPPORT AGAINST SAGGING CONSISTENT wml THE USE OF V-GROOVED BOAR BASED ON Tile ABOVE, THIS DETAIL IS EQUIVALENTTO TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.
51 THIS CONFIGURATION IS S!MILAR TO TEs s to CONFIGURATIONS IN SCHEMES 1-2,11-1.12-1,12-2,13-1 AND 14-1 EXCEPT TilESE
- TESTS IIAD Tile TilERMO-IAG IN DIRECT CONTACT Wml THE PENSEAL MATERIAL WHEREAS THIS METAL SLEEVE WITH TROWEL GRADE FILLING Tile GAP. Tile TROWEL GRADE IN THE SPACE BETW Tile TRAY COVERAGE AND THE SilEET METAL SLEEVE DOES NOT DETRACT FROM Tile TESTED CONF TROWEL GRADE AS A FIRE STOP HAS BEEN TESTED IN SCHEME 11-1 AND THE SHEET METAL SLEEVE BETWEEN TROWEL GRADE AND PENSEAL MATERIAL. THE RESULTING CONFIGURATION IS CONSIS CONFIGURATIONS.
1 60.
T11E USE OF 330460 TIIERMO-LAG FLEXI-BLANKET ON CABLE BUNDLES OF VARIOUS SIZES HAS BE 103020/3
- 11-1. TiiE USE OF 330460 TROWEL GRADE TO BOND 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET JOINT! WAS ALSO . QUALIF 104121/0 TIIE USE OF A 330460 TROWEL FILLET AT THE TRANSmON BETWEEN 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET AND WILL PROVIDE A POSmVE SEAL TO THE PROTECTED ENVELOPE AT THIS TRANSITION. FOR THER ,
CONCRETE ENVELOPE. BASEDATONTIIE THE TRANSmON ABOVE, Tills CONFIGURATION WILL PROVIDE A HEAT SINK AND REDUCED llEAT EXPOSURE TO THE IS ACCEPTABLE.
I l
i -
ATTACHMENT A ER-ME-082, REV. O TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS PAGE A22 OF A24 i
NOTE """1 ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV '
61.
TIIE FILLET PROVIDES A POSmVE SEAL FOR TIIE TRAY ENVELOPE AGAINST TIIE M-BOARD nND 15 SEALED TO BOTH THE 100820/0 PENSEAL AND Tile CONCRETE %TTH CAULK AND STICK PINS ARE USED AS REQUIRED. TIIE CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE FOR TiiERM AL CONSIDERATIONS SINCE THE TRAY CONFIGURATION AND TIIE PENSEAL ARE BOTH QUALIFIED f OR A MINIMUM OF 1 IIOUR FIRE EXPOSURE.
62.
IN ADDmON TO TriE DISCUSSION ON NOTE 60 FOR T11E M-BC ARD/ CONCRETE TO FLEXI-BLANKET TRANSmON, THE FLEXI- 1030206 BLANKET IS ATTACHED IN ACCORDANCE WITil DETAIL 3-5.2 TO THE RACEWAY. Tills MECilANICAL MEANS OF ATTACllMENT 104I21/0 TO THE RACEWAY WAS TESTED IN SCliEME 11-1. FOR TIIE CRmCAL T11ERMAL AND STRUCTURAL CONSIDERATIONS, TIIIS ASSEMBLY IS EQUIVALENT TO TESTED CONFIGURATIONS AND Ti!EREFORE ACCEPTABLE.
61 TIIE SCORE AND FOLD METHOD ifAS BEEN SUCCESSFULLY TESTED ON RADIAL BENDS FOR CABLE TRAYS IN TESTS I-2,11-1 103020/3 12-1,12-213-I AND I4-1. THE M!sillOD USED TO SCORE AND FOLD ON TRAY RUNS IS THE SAME AS TRAY RADIAL BENDS PLUS THE TRAY JOINTS WILL RECElVE STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE BUILD UP. TiiEREFORE THE SCORE AND FOLD METIIOD FOR TRAY RUN CORNERS IS ACCEPTABLE.
64.
Tills DETAI VAS QUALIFIED IN SCIIEME 11-1. ONLY FOR AIR DROPS. TiiE DIFFERENCE OF HAVING FLEX-CONDUIT AS 103020/3 COMPAREL i AN AIR DROP ADDS TiiERMAL MASS AND STRUCTURAL STABILITY TO Tile ALEMBLY AND IS TIIEREFORE IS BETTER TH .4 TIIE TESTED CONFIGURATION.
61 Tills IS A MINOR DEV!ATION FROM NORMAL STRESS SKIN INSTALLATION ON LONGITUDINAL JOINTS AND HAS NO IMPACT ON 103833/0 TIIE ABILITY OF TIIE STRESS SKIN TO PERFORM IT'S INTENDED FUNCTION SINCE THE STRESF SKIN IS CUT OIJT AROUND TIIE GROUND CABLE TIIEN BROUGIIT BACK TOGETIIER WilERE IT LAPS TIIE JOINT. THIS IS AN ACCEPTABLE CONFIGURATION.
66.
PROTECTION OF PROTRUDING ITEM FROM LNTERFACE IS CONSISTENT wml TliOSE TESTED IN SCliEME 11-1 AND IS 104121/0 TilEREFORE ACCEPTABLE.
67.
Tills CONFIGURATION IS JUSTIFIED BY EXISTING TESTS AND CABLE TRAYS Wm1 SUPPORTS PROTECTED FOR 9" ONLY.
ALTHOUGli THE PROTRUDING ITEM IN Tills CASE IS A DETECTOR BASE AND CONDUIT. TiiE COVERAGE PROVIDED ONTO EXPOSED RACEWAY SURFACES PROVIDES ADEQUATE PROTECTION FOR CONDUCTIVE HEAT PATil.
68.
Tills DETAIL UTILIZES CIRCUMFERENTIAL WRAP ON STRESS SKIN WITH TROWEL GRADE FOR 330-1 PANELS ON THE BOTTOM 103020/3 PANELS ON A CABLE TRAY W11ERE IT BUTTS TO Tile TRAY SUPPORT THERMO-LAG. CIRCUMFERENTIAL WRAP ON BUTT JOINTS WITil STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE !!AS BEEN TESTED IN SCHEMES II-I. 12-1,12-2,13-1 AND 14-1. IN ADDmON THE STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE IIAS BEEN STAPLED TO TiiE VERTICAL 330-1 PANEL ON THE SUPPORT WlilCH WILL FURTHER EN!!ANCE Tile MECilANICAL ATTACliMENT OF THE STRESS SKJN.
09 Ti!E USE OF 330460 TilERMO-LAG FLEXI-BLANKET ON CABLE BUNDLES OF VARIOUS SIZES AND Tile MECHANICAL ATTACHMENT OF 3304e4 FLEXI-BLANKET TO PRE-SIIAPED CONDUIT HALF-ROUNDS ON BOTli AIR DROPS AND CONDUITS IS QUALIFIED BY TEST SC11EME 11-1. BY EMBEDDING Tile IIALF-ROUI,D stATERIAL INTO TIIE M-BOARD 1/2* AND SEALING WITH A I/2* BEAD OF 330-1 TROWEL GRADE, A POSITIVE MECHANICAL CONNECTION AND SEAL IS CREATED AT Tills TRANSmON.
Tills CONFIGURATION IS EQUAL TO OR BETTER THAN CONFIGURATION TESTED IN SCIIEME 11-1.
l
1 ATTACilMENT A ER-ME-082, REV. O j ,
TYPICAL DESIGN DETAILS ,
PAGE A23 OF A24 i
f
- NOTE [
ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES !
DCA/REV '
! 70.
Tile USE OF 330460TilERMO-LAG FLEXI-BLANKET ON CABLE BUNDLES OF VARIOUS SIZES HAS BEEN QUALI; Il-1. Tile USE OF 330460 TROWEL GRADE TO BOND 330460 FLEXI-BLANKETJOINTS WAS ALSO QUALIFIED BY SC THERMALLY, THE TillCKNESS AND AMOUNT OF LAYERS PROTECTING BUNDLES ARE EQUIVALENT TO OR BETTER THAN THE '
l TESTED CONFIGURATION. STRUCTURA' LY 330460 TROWEL GRADE WITH SS BANDING HAS BEEN SHOWN T ;
I BOND SEAMS WITH Tile 1WO BUNDLES SHIELDING EACH OTHER AND HAVING GREATER MASS THAN A SINGLE BUNDLE, THIS '
CONFIGURATION llAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE A LESS SEVERE EXPOSURE TilAN THE TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. FINALLY, CONDUITS, AS OPPOSED TO AIR DROPS USED IN TifE TEST, ADD TilERMAL MASS AND STRUCTURAL STABILITY TO THE
{ CONFIGURATION. TilEREFORE THIS CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE.
}' 71. ;
j Tills DEVIATION AFFECTS ONLY A SMALL PORTION OF Tile STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE ON Tile LON 103507/0 ,
{
AND LIMITS Tile AMOUNT OF DEVIATIONS IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO EACl! OTilER SO TilAN OVERALL MECIIANICAL INTEGRITY OF Tile JOINT IS NOT COMPROMISED. tills IS AN ACCEPTABLE CONFIGURATION. ,
l 72.
- . PROTECTION OF SURFACE MOUNTED SUPPORTS ARE CONSISTENT Wm{ OTIIER TESTED CONFIGURATIO 103020/3 TillCKNESS AND JOINTS, TIE-WIRES, ETC.J. Tile LEVEL OF PROTECTION IS EQUIVALENT TO TESTED CONFIGURATION.
f 73.
! Tills IS A TEmo CONFIGURATION WillCH WAS USED IN ALL OF THE CABLE TRAY TEST CONFIGURATIONS 10412110EXCE ,
! DETAll HAS Tile ENilANCEMENT OF INSTALLING TiiE TIE WIRES THROUGH TIIE BOTTOM PANELS ON Tile CABLE T !
COVERAGE TilAT BUTTS TO Tile SUPPORT. SINCE Tills IS AN ENIIANCEMENT TO A TESTED CONFIGURATION, IT IS i ACCEL' TABLE.
j 74. !
i j TIIE COVERAGE ON Tile RADIAX CABLE WITil FLEXI-BLANKET IS SIMILAR TO COVERAGE ON PROTRUDING CONDUI 104015/0 l 4 SCHEME 11-1. THE AIR GAPS INSIDE CONSISTENT Wmi TES'ED CONFIGURATIONS.
TIIE FLEXI-BLANKET WRAP ARE FILLED WITl! TROWEL GRADE. Tills CONFIG l 4
! 75.
! Tile FLEX CONDUITS ARE COVERED WITH FLEXI-BLANKET TO THE EXTENT ALLOWED BY THE INTERFERING 102759/1 STR
} TilEN A FILLET OF 330-1 TROWEL GRADE IS PROVIDED AT lilE JUNCilON OF Tile CONDUIT HALF ROUNDS AND THE CONCRETE WALL. Tile FILLET OF 330-1 WILL PROVIDE A GOOD SEAL BETWEEN Tif E TiiERMO-LAG AND TIIE CONCR i M AINTAIN Tile PROTECTED ENVELOPE. ALSO Tile CONCRETE WILL ACT AS A IIEAT SINK AND ENHANCE Ti1E INT ;
Tile TiiERMO-LAG ENVELOPE. Tile RESULTING CONFIGURATION IS CONSISTENT wml TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. '
i 76.
Tile STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE COVERAGE IS EXTENDED OUT ONTO TIIE STEEL THEREFORE TYING 102957/0IT INTO F
i J STRESS SKIN ON Tile JOINT. Tills PROVIDES COVSRAGE WlilCH WAS EQUIVALENT TO THE TESTED CONFIGURATION.
- 77.
$ FLEXI-BLANKET WAS TESTED IN SCllEME II-I. TiiE COVERAGE OF 330460 FLEXI. BLANKET ONTO CONDUIT 104I21/0 HALF 3 TESTED CONFIGURATION. Ti!E OVERLAP OF 330460 ONTO CABLE TRAYS UTILIZES Tile SAME INSTALLATI I (STAPLING, OVERLAP DISTANCE, ITIC) USED FOR CONDUIT AND JUST MODIFIES TilEM TO ALLOW FOR TiiE CONFIGURATION 4
DIFFERENCES Tile BETWEENISCONDUITS RESULTING CONFIGURATION ACCEPTABLE.AND CABLE TRAYS. THE FILLET PROVIDES A POSITIVE SFAL FOR Tile T i - 71L Tile INSTALLATION METilODS USED ON TiiE DETAIL FOR Tile 330-1 BOX IIAVE ALL BEEN TESTED (SCORE AND FOLD, 104I21/0 STITCillNG AND STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE ON JOINTS). Tile FILLET PROVIDES A POSITIVE SEAL FOR ENVELOPE. Ti!E RESULTING CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE. t i
t .
i
ATTACHMENT A E3-MEM REV. O TYPICAL DESIGN DETAIIS PAGE A24 OF A24 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES [' DCAIREV - )
79.
THIS CONFIGURATION IS A MINOR DERIVATIVE OF DETAIL 12-2 EXCEPT THAT THE CONDUIT ENTERING103844M THE BOX OF A HORIZONTALTRAY ENVELOPE IS FLEX IN LIEU OF RIGID. THE USE OF 330460 ENTERING A HORIZONTALTRAY ,
ENVELOPE HAS QUALIFIED VIA SCHEME II-1. THE UPGRADE TECHNIQUES UTIIJ7Fn TO REINFORCE THE INTERFACE j BETWEEN 330-1 PANELS AND FLEXI-BLANKET DURING THE TEST (330460 COL.LAR FIARED OUT ON THE 33 !
REQUIRED BY THE DETAIL ALL OTHER ASPECTS OF DETAIL 12-2 ARE CONSISTENT, INCLUDLNG REINFORCEMENT OF 330-1 PANEL JOINTS WITH QUALIFIED TECHNIQUES (STITCHING / STRESS SKIN). THE INCREASED AIR VOLUME WITHIN T ENVELOPE BENEFITS Tile THERM AL PERFORMANCE OF THE CONFIGURATIOh. THEREFORE. THE CONFIGURAT PROVIDE AN EQUIVALENT I-HOUR RATING.
E
ER-ME-082, REY. 0 PAGE BI ')F B55 n
NITACIIMENT B.
UN!QUE CONFIGURATIONS 0
, , , . . _ _.. . _ , , , - ,. . - - - - - - - ~ ~ --
- s. . .-
?
i 4 5 ATTACHMENT B ER-ME482, REV. O a
UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS , PAGE B2 OF BS5
- e 1
l DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEY ROOM. FIRE f '
- SUPP. DET.' DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN ' '
/ RESOLUTION . SUPPORT 3 BASIS / NOTES
, AREA / (YlN): (Y/N)j -
TEST;t (PAGES B37 -
y,1.~ +" '
3-FIRE 7 ;~ *
< e. , , SCHEMES BSS);
- l zong ~ '
y, .-
' ~
L'
_ _ . [* 7 4 102471/3 AB 790' X-174 AAl2ia N Y ISSUE: 18* AND 24' WIDE CABLE TRAYS RUN X-180 AA/21a Y Y PARALLEL BUT ARE TOO CLOSE FOR SEPARATE ENVELOPES.
3 RESOLUTION:- CONSTRUCT COMMON TRAY . 1-2, 12-1, I-5, 7 -
ENVELOPE " PARTITIONED" BETWEEN THE - 14-1 TRAYS. . PREBAND THE TWO TRAYS TO -
101282/I SO 832' 2-096 2SE/!6 Y Y ISSUE: . CONSTRUCTION REQUIRES DETAILS
- FOR CONSTRUCTION OF REMOVABLE COVER -
3 JUNCTION BOX ASSEMBLY.
i RESOLITTION: UTILIZE 2 LAYERS OF FLAT . 10-1; 14,8
- PANEL M ATERIAL AROUND THE J-BOX SIDES -
AND FOR THE L!P SUPPORTING THE SEPARATE COVER ASSEMBLY. THEN ADD A LAYER OF V-j RGBED MATERIAL CONSi1UCT THE COVER WTTH 2 LAYERS OF FLAT PANELO WirH A'4* -
j (MIN.) OVERIAP INTO THE LIP. ' MAXIMUM OAP.
BETWEEN COVER AND LIP IS 3/32*. ALL JOINTS i TO BE SECURED WITH THE TIE WIRE --
3 31TTCHING AND STRESS SKIN. TURNBUCKLES SHALL BE USED FOR SECURING,THE COVER INj q PLACE.
- 102160/0 SG 810' 2-082 - 2SB/8 Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION
- FOR ENCLOSING CABLE AIR DROPS FROM ONE HORIZONTALTRAY TO ANOTHER HORIZONTAL'-
TRAY.
' RESOLUTION: EYTEND THE TRAY ENVELOPE l-2,12-1, I-5, 9 l FROM THE TRAY ABOVE DOWN ONTO THE . 12-2, 13-1, j-LOWT.R TRAY TO FORM A
- BOX * ' I4-1 CONFIGURATION FOR ENCLOSURE OF THE AIR ,
DROP CABLES. a 6
_. - I ,
'r e ym2 --ato--9^6&iNu'Wh"N*ewm emw e'e 9m me+ ew-Num u-*.ee+ee-um =teMPm e-e 4esewmewet--S m+-+1=+-*hePA*=wewi es gire Me -'iw em-ds'--@11*st- t w w> w-.maem-.m--4*a-*ateve'e't s m = 1r e Y+-se--mNw'-? e- g g .hv- N 4*-em-mm* -4v==.sei& emTee--w' %2-9W-
ATTACliMENT B . . ER-ME-082, REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS 4i PAGE B3 OF B55 DCA NOJREV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIFITON/ ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION AREA / SUPPORT. BASIS / NOTES (YIN) (YIN); >
TEST FIRE ' '
(PAGES B37-ZONE '
SCHEMES B55) -
103013/6 SG 810' 2-082 2SB/B Y Y ISSUE: CABLE AIR DROPS FROM A BANK OF EMBEDDED SLEEVES ENTER 3 HORIZONTAL CABLE TRAY SEGMENTS ABOVE 2 SW PIPING RUNS. THE CABLES TliEN EXIT TIIESE TRAY SEGMENTS AND AIR DROP DOWN INTO A HORIZONTAL CABLE TRAY RUN BELOW Tile SW PIPING. FINALLY, PROTRUDING NON-ESSENTIAL CABLES AIR DROP OUT OF TiiE END OF THE BOTTOM TRAY. ENGINEERING
', DIRECTION IS REQUIRED FOR TIIIS CONFIGURATION.
RESOLUTION: WRAP TIIE CABLE AIR DROPS I-2, II-I, 1-6, 10 FROM Tile EMBEDDED SLEEVES TO THE CABLE 12-1, 12-1, TRAY SEGMENTS WITli 330460 FLEXI- 13-1, 14-1 BLANKET. INSTALL 330-1 PANELS ON Tile TRAY SEGMENTS PER SPEC. REQUIREMENTS.
CONSTRUCF A 12" WIDE BY 43* LONO BY 6*
HIGli " CURB
- VERTICAL EXTENSION OF THE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE ON Tile LOWER ELEVATION TRAY. WRAP THE AIR DROP CABLE BUNDLES BETWEEN THE UPPER ELEVATION TRAY SEGMENTS WITil 330460 AND EMBED Wrfli!N THE CURB EXTENSION OF THE TRAY ENVELOPE WITli 330460 TROWEL GRADE. WRAP THE PROTRUDING CABLES AT TIIE TRAY END WITil 330460.
! u ATTACHMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. 0 i
UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B4 OF B55 DCA NO./REV - BLDO ELEV ROOM FIREi SUPP. - - DET.Y DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONOERN/ RESOLUTION SUPPORT-I liASIS/ NOTES AREA /
(YIN)' (YIN)> - ~ '
TEST,. [
FIRE '
~'
" . (PAOC B37-l SCHEMES 1 'B5S) .
ZONE
_ T. [
~
t
'[ . ,
'103409/5 SO 852' 2-100F 2SK/17A Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR INSTALLATION OF REMOVABLE COVER ASSEMBLY FOR PRESSURE TRANSMRTER.
RESOLUTION: CONSTRUCT A STEEL 10-1,Il-1 14,1I FRAMEWORK AROUND THE PT AS SHOWN USING 1 1/2* X X 1/2* X I/4* ANGLE IRON.
PROVIDE 2 LAYERS OF FLAT 330-1 PANELS l AROUND THE FRAMEWORK AND SECURE WITH 1 TIE WIRES. ' ALL JOINTS SHALL BE STITCHED s
AND REINFORCED WITH STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE BUILDUP. THE
- BOX
- ENCLOSURE SHALL BE FUTED WITH A DOUBLE LAYER LIP ASSEMBLY TO RECEIVE AND HOLD THE COVER ASSEMBLY IN PLACE.' THE COVER SHALL ALSO BE FABRICATED WITH 2 LAYERS
, OF PANELS. THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE GAP ':
BEDVEEN COVER AND LIP SHALL BE 3/32*.
- SECURE THE COVER WITH TURNBUCKLE ASSEMBLIES.
103472/1 AB 810' X-207 AA/21b Y Y 103489/1 ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR MULTIPLE CABLE AIR DROPS THROUGH EMBEDDED CONDUITS (SLEEVES) WHICH ENTER HORIZONTALLY STACKED CABLE TRAYS ROUTED IMMEDIATELY IN FRONT OF !
THE SLEEVES.
RESOLUTION: CONSTRUCT THERMO-LAG 330-1 1-2, 12-1, 1 4, 12 PANEL
- BOX
- ENCLOSURES TO ENVELOPE THE ' 12-2, 13-1, EMBEDDED SLEEVE BANK, ALL CABLE AIR 14-1 l DROPS AND THE PORTIONS OF THE STACKED CABLE TRAYS IMMEDIATELY IN FROPTT OF THE SLEEVE BANK.
l
__ . _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - - _ =
'[
ATTACHMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. 0 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS -
' PAGE B5 OF B55 DCA NO./REV BLDO ELEV. . ROOM ~ FIRE S SUPP2 DET.i DESCRIPTIONASSUB OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION * , B$ SIS / NOTES
' +
'(YIN); -(YIN):', ' ' SUProitT}
AREA /.4
<M 3
' FIRE .;
4 . z. -
[f , Mp ,., ;
- , 8 cry g[ TEST, g y. (PAGES B371
,qf ?;. ; , SCHEMES l.;
, ZONEL. 9' - -
%-%."* a ? "P i 1,!s y e B51 J.: u,
; 103634/2 SG 810' 2-083 ' Y.
g 2SD/9 N ISSUE: EXISTING CONFIGURATION OF 2 LARGE . ! ADJACENTJ-BOXES DOES NOT ALLOW BANDING TO BE WRAPPED CIRCUMFEREN11 ALLY AROUND BOXES FOR -! i ADDITION OF SECOND I>. YER OF 330-1 PANELS. RESOLUTION: = ATTACH BANDING TO STEEL 10-1,' 1-2, 14'13 i ANGLE WHICH SHALL BE BOLTED TO THE 14-1 ' i WALL ABOVE AND BELOW THE J-BOXES. 104222/1 AB 790' X-180 AA/21s '4- Y. Y. ISSUE: CABLE AIR DROPS BUNDLED WITH 330-h s 660 MAY EXCEED HEIGHT OF CABLE i SIDERAILS. ALSO, A PIPE SUPPORTIS WITHIN
-i 4* OF THE CABLE TRAY SUPPORT AND THUS CREATES A SECONDARY INTERFERENCE OF 9*
RULE COVERAGE ON THE SUPPORT.
- 4 RESOLUTION
- UTILIZE SHIM BLOCKS TO RAISE l-2,It-1, 1 4, 14
! TRAY ENVELOPE ABOVE SIDE RAILS. SECURE 12-1, 12-2, 330460 BUNDLES TO CABLE TRAY RUNGS WITH 13-1, 14-1
- BANDING. UTIUZE 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET AND TROWEL GRADE TO FIRESTOP TRAY COVERAGE. INSTALL DOUBLE LAYER OF 330-1 FLAT PANELS ON 11tAY SUPPORT FOR PROTRUDING ITEM COVERAGE. '
f i l I to t
.4
....,.m,.,s_.,4._,,..,m
, .y. ....r..,..,-.,_. . ,. .,y.,.,.,, -,..,w,3 _,.c ._,,,,,,y ,-,,w.,,,..m,m. .,.,-....~,r-, ,w_, nn..v.,-,__~,.,-, , _ , . . . . , , . . . - .- , ,
ATTACHMENT B ER-ME482, REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B6 OF BS5 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. - DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION : SUPPURT- BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (YIN) FIRE 4 TEST _ (PAOES B37-ZONE SCHEMES B55) : 104'74/0 AB 790* X-180 AA/21a ! Y Y ISSUE: DUE TO MULTIPLE INTERFEPENCES, TIIE TIIERMO-LAG Et"/ ELOPE ON A 30' WIDE I CABLE TRAY CANNOT BE CONSTRUCTED PER SPEC. AND TYPICAL DETAILS. RESOt.UTION: CONSTRUCT ENVELOPE USINO 2 Il-1,12-1 43 LAYERS OF 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET UNDER CABLES AND 330-1 FLAT PANELS INSIDE OF TRAY SIDERAILS FOR MINOR DISTANCE TO CLEAR INTERFERENCE. OVERLAP FLEXI-BLANKET AND FLAT PANELS FOR DISTANCE OF 9*-11" WITH V-RIBBED PANELS ON OUTSIDE OFTRAY. 104087/0 AB 810' X-207 AAt21b Y Y ISSUE: DUE TO CONDUIT SUPPORT AND PIPINO INTERFERENCE. THERMO-IAO ENVELOPE ON A 12* WIDE CABLE TRAY CANNOT BE I CONSTRUCTED PER SPEC. AND TYPICAL DETAILS. RESOLUTION: INSTALL 330-1 FLAT PANEL 13-1 1 4, 16 PIECE ON TRAY SIDERAIL AND EXTEND COVERAOE ONTO CONDUIT SUPPORT. AIJO, EXTEND TRAY ENVELOPE TO ENCLOSE INTERFERING PIPING FOR A DISTANCE OF 4* MIN. ON BOTil SIDES OF TRAY. 104060/0 EC 778* X-IISB AA/154 Y Y ISSUE: INTERFERENCE CREATED BY INSTALLATION OF TilERMO-LAG ON A CONDUIT PREVENTS IN5TALLATION OF 330-1 PANEL MATERIAL ON A J-BOX PER SPEC. AND TYPICAL DETAILS. RESOLUTION: UTILIZE STRESS SKIN SECURED 10-2 1 4, 17 TO 330-1 PANE 13 ON THE J-BOX AND TROWEL GRAD BUILDUP TO IN LOCALIZED AREA OF INTERFERENCE.
ATTACIIMENT B ER.ME-082, REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B7 OF BS5 DCA NO.lREV BLDG ELEV ROOMi FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN /RESOLITTION ' SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREAL' (Y/N) (YIN)y TEST., (PAGES B37-FIRE . ZONE- SCHEMES - BS$) 104078/0 AB 810' X-207 AA121b Y Y ISSUE 1: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS ONE TIME ! DEVIATION FROM TYPICAL DETAIL 8-3 TO UTILIZE FLAT 330-1 ON BOTTOM ON 12' WIDE CABLE TRAY FOR MAXIMUM LENGTII OF 24*. ISSUE 2: WlilLE USING DETAIL 8-3 TO INSTALL 9-1, 10-2 1 4, 20 FLAT 330-1 PANEL ON TliE BOTTOM OF A SEPARATE TRAY, ONE END OF TiiE PANEL BUTTS AGAINST A TRAY SUPPORT, CONSTRUCTION REQUEST DIRECTION. iI RESOLUTION 1: thSTALL FLAT PANELS TO MAX. LENGTII OF 24* TO CLEAR 24" DIA. PIPE. RESOLUTION 2: PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PIECE OF FLAT PANEL (2* IIIGH) TO BUILD UP n TIIICKNESS AT SUPPORT AND SECURE IN PLACE TiiE TIE WIRE. 104011/0 AB 810' X-207 AA121b Y Y ISSUE: INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE BETWEEN CONDUIT SUPPORTS AND 12* WIDE CABLE TRAY SIDE RAIL TO PERMIT INSTALLATION OF V-RIBBED PANELS OVER SIDE RAIIJ. RESOLUTION: AT LOCALIZED AREA OF t 1-1,13-1 43 INTERFERENCE, CREATE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE INSIDE TIIE TRAY USING 2 LAYERS OF 330460 FLEXI-BIANKET UNDER TiiE CABLES AND 330-1 FLAT PANELS INSIDE OF TRAY SIDE RAIIE. INSTALL V-RIBBED PANELS ON TOP OF TIIE ENVELOPE. 4 3 .-,. ,, -. . . - , _ .
ATTACllMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS , PAGE B8 OF B55 r DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT, BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (YlN) TEST (PAGES B37-FIRE: SCHEMES ZONE B55) 102932/5 SG 810* 2-082 2SB/8 Y Y ISSUE 1: INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE BETWEEN 30- WIDE CABLE TRAY BOTTOM AND INSULATED 2* DIA. PIPE TO INSTALL PANELS IN LOCALIZED AREA OF TRAY BOTTOM. ISSUE 2: REQUEST DIRECTION FOR i PROTECTINO CABLE AIR DROPS BETWEEN ! VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL 30* WIDE TRAYS ; WIIICII BOTH REQUIRE PROTECTION. RESOLUTION 1: INTERRUPT 330-1 RIBBED I I-1,12-1 43 PANEL COVERAGE ON TRAY BOTTOM IMMEDIATELY AT PIPING INTERFERENCE AND INSTALL 2 LAYERS OF 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET UNDER CABLES. OVEF. LAP 330-1 PANEL COVERAGE ON TRAY BOTTOM BY 9*-11*. WRAP PIPING WITH 4-l/2* THICK LAYERS OF 330-70 CONFORMABLE BLANKET WIT 11 STAINLESS STEEL JACKET. FINALLY, WRAP 2 LAYERS OF 330460 AROUND THE STAINLESS STEEL JACKET AND SECURE TO TIIE 330-1 PANELS ON TRAY UNDERSIDE. RESOLUTION 2: INSTALL A BOX 12-1 43 CONFIGURATION SECURED EACH TO TRAY TO ENVELOPE TiiE CABLE AIR DROPS. ALL JOINTS TO BE REINFORCED PER SPEC. 103912/0 SG 810* 2-082 25B/8 Y Y ISSUE: INSTALLATION OF 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET AROUND INSULATED PIPE PER DCA 102932/5 DOES NOT ENABLE INSULATION AROUND 2* PIPE BELOW. RESOLUTION: MINOR REMOVAL OF 330460 11-1,12-1 I4,21 FLEXI-BLANKETIN IMMEDIATE AREA OF PIPE INSULATION IS ACCEPTABLE, PROVIDED EXPOSED EDGES ARE SEALED WITII 330460 TROWEL GRADE.
ATTACllMENT D ER-ME4)82, REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS 'i PAGE B9 OF BS5 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION /ISSUB OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION . SUPPORT HASIS/ NOTES AREA / (Y/N)' (YIN) TEST (PAGES B37 . FIRE . ZONE SCIIEMES _ B55) 103533/0 AB 790' X-174 AAl21a N Y ISSUE 1: UPPER CABLE TRAY INTERFExES WITH INSTALLATION OF AIR DROP ENVELOPE FROM LOWER CABLE TRAY TO CONDUIT. ISSUE 2: INSTRUMENT TUBING TRAY INTERFERES WITH CONDUIT SUPPORT TIIERMO-LAG INSTALLATION FOR 9" RULE (i.e.,
< 7/16* CLEARANCE BETWEEN BOTTOM OF SUPPORT AND TOP OF INSTRUMENT TUBING g TRAY - TIIICKNESS DEVIATION).
RESOLITilON 1: f(ODIFY UPPER CABLE TRAY 10-1, 14-1 1-5, 25 PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE BY REMOVING 8-l/2" i TO II-l/2" LENGTil OF PANEL ACROSS ENTIRE BOTTOM WIDTil OF ENCLOSURE. INSTALL PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE ON CONDUIT. SillM SOffrilERN MOST PORTION OF CABLE TRAY ENCLOSURE = 3/4* TO I-l/4* PAST END OF CONDUIT ENCLOSURE. BOX IN AIR DROP BETWEEN UPPER AND LOWER CABLE TRAY. BOX COMMUNICATES UPPER AND LOWER CABLE TRAY VIA 8-1/2" TO Il-1/2* OPENING. RESOLITTION 2: INSTALL STANDARD TIIERMO- 9-1, 9-2 1-5, 26 LAG COVERAGE EXCEPT DOUBLE LAYER 330-1 PANELS ON BOTTOM OF SUPPORT. 144226/0 EC 788* X-IISB Y Y ISSUE: AIR DROP BETWEEN CONDUIT AND TilROUGH WALL SLEEv'E tTWS) WAS PREVIOUSLY PROTECTED AS PROTRUDING ITEM BUTIS ACTUALLY ESSENTIAL RESOLITTION: INSTALL 330-1 PANEL BOX 11-1 1-S, 29 AROUND TWS AND BUILD STRESS
- SKINTIROWEL ORADE COLLAR AT AIR DROP / BOX INTERFACE.
ATTACHMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B13 OF B55 o DCA NO.IREVL BLDO ELEV ROOM FIRE :- SUPP.: DET.' DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN /RESOLtITIONf SUPPORTA BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N); (YIN) .; ;
~, , TEST ,. (PAGES B37 .
f' FIRE -' P. >-
~
^ SCHEMES ' B55)
ZONE. # '" ; aT - g 103935/0 AB 810* X-207 AA121b Y Y ISSUE: CABLE TRAY PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE CANNOT BE INSTALLED PER TYPICAL DETAIL DUE TO FLEX CONDUITINTERFERENCE. IN ADDITION, FLEXI-BLANKET AIR DROP ENCLOSURE PER DETAIL 5-12 CANNOT BE INSTALLED DUE TO INTERFERENCE. 1 RESOLUTION: INSTALL 330-1 FLAT BOARD ON 1-5, 30 SIDE RAIL OF CABLE TRAY WHERE INTERFERENCE OCCURS. EXTEND 330-1 PANEL !. PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE 2" TO 4' PAST END OF CABLE TRAY TO ALLOW INSTALLATION OF AIR DROP FLEXI-BLANKET. 104M E/0 EC 778' X-115B AA1154 Y Y- ISSUE: STRESS SKIN / TROWEL GRADE COLLAR IS REQUIRED AT AIR DROP / CABLE TRAY PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE INTERFACE. RESOLUTION: INSTALL STRESS SKIN / TROWEL Il-1 1-S, 29 ORADE COLLAR AT INTERFACE; WHERE STRESS SKIN CANNOT BE INSTALLFD FLUSH - WITH FLEXI-PLANKETINSTALL 1I/16* WFT. BUILDUP OF 330-660 TROWEL GRADE.
?
4
.t A1TACHMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. 0 - l UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE Bil OF BS5; I DCA NO./REV! BLDO ELEV. ROOM l FIRE E' ' SUPP) DEf.' :
~
DESCRIP110N/ISSi1E OF CONCERN /RESOLU110N SUPPOlttU B$ SIS / NOTES ! AREA / .(YIN)? (YIN)I LF ' D N . . ;' ; *
,, - ' '~
l
'^;
TEST . - (PAGES B37-- ; j 3-FIRE ' ZONE "
&J M+ - d4 '
.) ni SCHEMES ? B55)" l
,- ~#
@w l :i.;
' S if J <
A 104217/1 AB 790* X-180 AA/21a Y j Y. ISSUE I: DUE TO CABIE Fill, AIR DROPS BE1 WEEN TRAYS (PERPENDICULAR TO ONE J .- ANOTHER) CANNOT BE PROTECTED PER ' ' STANDARD INSTALLAllON DETAIL. i !< ISSUE 2:' INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE EXISTING ' BEIWEEN WALL AND PROTECTED CONDUIT. .; i PREVENTS PROPER INSTALLATION OF AIR
- .L DROP PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE.
i ' RESOLUTION 1: BOX IN AIR DROPS BETWEEN z ' t-5, 9 ' TRAYS AND INCLUDE AIR DROPS AS PART OF . i ,'i COMMON PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE AT TRAY , JUNCTION. RESOLITTION 2: INSTAIL FIRST LAYER OF o' FLEXI-BLANKET COMPIETELY AROUND '. 1-5, 28 CONDUIT PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE. REMAINING i-TWO LAYERS WILL BE MODIFIED TO BUTT UP AGAINST WALL UNTIL ADEQUATE CLEARANCE EXISTS TO ALLOW FULLWRAP. ALL SEAMS, i AS WELL AS THE FLEXI-BIANKET/ WALL'- e INTERFACE, SHALL HAVE A BUILDUP OF 11/16* 1 WFT 330-6601 ROWEL GRADE MATERIAL 6 : I ! , I t I r 7 l
ATTACHMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B12 OF B55 DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEY ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION
/ ISSUE OF CONCERN* /RESGI UTION > SUPPdRTL BASIS / NOTES '-
AREAL FIRE (YIN). (Y/N) f ' TEST -. (PAGES B37-SCHEMES - B55) ZONE - 103550/1 AB 790' X-180 AA/21a Y Y ISSUE 1: CONSTRUCTION REQUIRED - DIRECTION ON THE COVD: AGE OF AIR DROP ; WHICH INCLUDES 3 TRAYS. ' ISSUE 2: PIPE INTERFERES WITH PROPER INSTALLATION 01- PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE FOR CABLE TRAY. RESOLUTION I & 2: AIR DROPS BETWEEN Il-1 27 1 ESSENTIAL TRAYS ARE WRAPPED WITH FLEXI-BLANKET, INSTALLED IN FIRESTOP MATrRIAL WIT!!!N CABLE TRAY, WTTH 330-1 PANEL CAP INSTALLED IN END OF CABLE TRAYS. CABLE TR AY PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE IN VICINITY OF PIPE INTERFERENCE IS MODIFIED BY INSTALLING 330-1 PANELS INSIDE CABLE TRAY 3 IN ACCORDANCE WITH UPORADE REQUIREMENTS. 103574/O AB 790' X-180 AA/2;s Y Y ISSUE: PIPE SUPPORTS INTERFERE WITH Il-1,13-1 I-5, 15 THERMO-IAO INSTALLATION SEVERAL CABLE TRAYS. RESOLUTION: INSTALL 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET PANELS UNDER THE CABLES IN Tile AREA OF INTERFERENCE THE FULL WIDTH OF CABLE TRAY. 103582/0 AB 790' X-ISO AA/2ta Y Y ISSUE: TWO SPRINKLER IIEADS PREVENT l-5, 31 PROPER INSTALIATION OF BOTTOM PANEL FOR CABLE TRAY PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE. i RESOLUTION: INSTALL 330-1 FLAT BOARD ON
; BOTTOM OF CABLE TRAY AND INSIDE CAbLi:,
TRAY. CIIAM FOR BOTTOM BOARD TO ALLOW INSTALLATION OF FLAT BOARD.
ATTACIIMENT D ER-ME482, REY. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B13 OF B55 DCA NO./REV BIEO ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN /RESOLITTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN)'- (YlN) ' FIRE TEST _ _ (PAGES B37-SCilEMES , BSS) ZONE 103847/0 SG 832' 2-094 2SB15 Y Y ISSUE: AFTER INSTAL 1ATION OF 330-1 FLAT BOARD ON JUNCTION BOXES, INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE EXISTS BETWEEN JUNCTION BOXES FOR INSTALLATION OF 330-1 B-RIBBED PANElJ!i. RESOLUTION: INSTALL COMMON ENVELOPE 10-2 1-5, 32 FOR BOTil JUNCTION BOXES. 103680/0 AB 810' X-207 AA/21b Y Y ISSUE 1: INSUFFICIENTCLEARANCE BETWEEN i WALL SLEEVES AND BOTTOM OF JUNCTION BOX PREVENTS INSTALLATION OF PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE IN ACCORDANCE WITil STANDARD l DETAILS. ISSUE 2: OVER FILL OF CABLES AT END OF i TRN( FROM TliROUGli WALL SLEEVES (TWS) PREVENT INSTAL 1ATION OF PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE IN ACCORDANCE WITII STANDARD DETAILS. RESOLUTION I & 2: PROTECT CABLE TRAY, 1-5, 34 TWS, AND JUNCTION BOXES AS COMMON ENCLOSURE. 103792/0 AB 852' X-241 AA/2If Y Y ISSUE: GROUND CLAMP AND GROUND CABLE INSTALLED ON RADIAL BEN OF 4" CONDUIT INTERFERES WITil STRESS SKINfrROWEL GRADE UPGRADE. RESOLUTION: INSTALL STRESS SKIN / TROWEL 9-1,9-2 1-5, 33 GRADE BUILDUP ON RADIAL BEND TO Tile EXTEND POSSIBLE. WRAP STRESS SKIN ON 1 GRAND CABLE, FLARE OUT ON RADIAL BEND, AND STAPLE / TROWEL GRADE BUILDUP STRESS SKIN.
ATTACilMENT B ER-ME-OS20 REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS i PAGE BI4 OF BS5 DCA NO./REV BLDO ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION /ISSUd OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION L SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) TEST . (PAGES B37-FIRE SCHEMES B55) ZONE-103624/2 AB 790' X-IBO AA/2In Y Y ISSUE 1: INSUFFICIENT CMARANCE EXISTS - BETWEEN AIR DROP AND CABLE TRAY TO l INSTALL FLEXI-BIANKET ENCLOSURE. 1 i ISSUE 2: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE INSTALLATION FOR THROUGli WALL SLEEVE (TWS). 6 ISSUE 3: REVISE PR.OTECTIVE ENVELOPE AROUND FIRE PROTECTION IIANGER. RESOLUTION I,2 & 3: ENCLOSE AIR DROP, CABLE TRAY, AND 'IWS IN COMMON ENCLOSURE. REVISE ENCLOSURE DETAIL FOR I-5, 35 , TWS TO TRANSITION OVER IIANGER. 103874/I SO 810' 2-079 2SB/8 Y N ISSUE 1: DUE TO A TUBE STEEL SUPPORT 22 INTERFERENCE, STANDARD JUNCTION BOX SEAM UPORADE CANNOT BE ACCOMPLISilED. ISSUE 2: DUE TO AIR DROPS ENTERING A CABLE TRAY, STANDARD CABLE TRAY SEAM UPORADE CANNOT BE ACCOMPLISilED. RESOLtTTION I: CUT STRESS SKIN TO FIT l AROUND INTERFERING SUPPORT. INCREASE l STRESS SKIN DIMENSIONS TO ACCOMPLISII 9-1, 9-2 BANDING. RESOLUTION 2: INSTALL FLEXI-BLANKET COLLAR AND TROWEL GRADE / STRESS SKIN BUILDUP. Il-I,
9 r ATTACHMENT B ER-MEm2, REV. 0 , 4 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS .i PAGE BI5 OF B55
,, .. s ..r
,,g . . . ,
DCA NO./REV BLDO' 7 ELEV ROOM u FIRE } 4 SUPP. . DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION : SUPPORT 4 BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N)i 7^ TEST m ,
' y , .1 -
(PAGES B37 - a; ~ ' , FIRE . - SCHEMES! ZONE , ,< ,ff 'W .
^
);"
BS5) .7 i' 103884/1 AB 810' X-207 AAl21b Y.- N ISSUE: JB2A-301B AND ' CONDUIT C-24B41951 j 832' X-226 AA/23d . ARE IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO A NON-ESSENTIALTRAY AND VARIOUS OTHER COMMODITIES. RESOLUTION: BOX IN CONDUIT AND TRAY l-2,9-1,: 1 4, 23 TOGETHER AND COVER ALL OTHER 10-1, 12-1,,. PROTRUDING COMMODITIES FOR A DISTANCE - 12-2,13-1,. OF 9*. 14-1 103575/0 AB 832' X-226 AAhld Y N- ISSUE 1: THERMO-LAG COVERAGE IS REQUIRED ON CABLES AIR DROPPING FROM CABLE TRAY T240ADA79 TO T240AF003. ISSUE 2: A NON-ESSENTIAL TRAY IS LOCATED WITHIN A 9" DISTANCE OF ESSENTIAL TRAY T 1 - 240ADA78. ? RESOLUTION 1: CONSTRUCT A BOX FROM 1-2,'I2-1,. 1 4, 24 - ' TRAY T240ADA79 TO T240AF003 ENCOMPASSING 12-2, 13-1, i THE CABLE AIR DROPS. INSTALL A FIRE STOP 14-1 AT THE END OF TRAY T240AF003 TO PROVIDE A 4 SEALED ENCLOSURE. RESOLUTION 2: INSTALL THERMO-LAG IN ACCORDANCE WITH TYPICAL DETAIL I4-I. i-i-
~
g
-4 d+-._,.- -...,+..-.,m., .___m,. .....--.,__,.....m ..-. _,...._ . . . ~,,...-. --...-_..- - .._, ________-___ ___......_,..._-.-..._.__..__.%..,.. -m.
O ATTACIIMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B16 OF B55
=
DCA NO./REV BLDO ELEV' ROOM FIRE SUPP, DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN /RESOLIITION ' SUPNORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (YlN) - TEST,.. (PAGES B37-FIRE SCHEMES - BSS) ZONE j. I 103487/0 AB 810' X-207 AA/21B Y Y ISSUE: A VERTICAL CABLE TRAY IS INSTALLED 3* FROM THE WALL. TWO CABLE BUNDLES EXIT THE TRAY AND ENTER 2 SLEEVES EMBEDDED IN THE CEILINO, REQUEST DIRECTION FOR COVERAGE. AU50, i AN INSTRUMENT LINE CROSSES UNDER TiiE I TRY WITH A I/2* CLEARANCE UNDER TiiE TRAY SIDE RAILS. RESOLUTION: COVER TiiE TRAY PER TYPICAL I-2, 12-1, 1-6, 37 DETAIL 13-2 SECURED TO TriE WALL WITil 12-2, 13-1, HILTI BOLTS PER DETAIL I-5. COVER TiiE 14-1 INSTRUMENT LINE AND TUBE TRACK FOR 9* DISTANCE (MIN.) AS PROTRUDING ITEM. ALL JOINTS OF TiiE BOX CONFIGURATION AND FLARE OUT (FOR HILTI ATTACIIMENT) SHALL BE REINFORCED WITH TIE WIRES (TliROUGil STRESS SKIN) AND OVERLAPPED WITH EXTERNAL STRESS SKIN / TROWEL GRADE BUILDUP. 101320/2 EC 778* X-113 EA/43 Y Y THIS DOCUMENT IS CURRENTLY BEING - 43 REVISED AND WILL BE EVALUATED AFTER ISSUE. l 103551/1 AB 790' X-180 AA/21a Y Y THIS DOCUMENT IS CURRENTLY BEING - - REVISED AND WILL BE EVALUATED AFTER ISSUE. 101986/1 SG 810' 2483 2SD/9 Y Y ISSUE: ALL CABLES AIR DROPS FROM TWO 12-2 1-5, 36 103034/1 CABLE TRAYS TO TilROUGli WALL SLEEVES 104124/0 (TWS), AS WELL AS TIIE CABLE TRAYS, REQUIRE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE. RESOLITTION: PROTECT ALL COMMODITIES WITH A COMMON ENCLOSURE.
ATTACllMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE BI7 OF B55 DCA NO./REV BLDO ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPPL DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION I . SUPPORT. BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) TEST , (PAGES B37-FIRE SCHEMES B55) ZONE 103184/1 SO 832' b 2488 2SB/144 Y Y 103192/1 ! ISSUE 1: DCA 103184/I. CONGESTION AT 11-1 38 103681/1 JUNCTION BOX JB2S53120 AND CONDUITS DUE TO FIRE ZONE *R* CABLES AND OTHER PROTRUDING ITEMS INTERFERES WirII PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE INSTALLATION. (NOTE: THC DCA WAS SUPERSEDED BY DCA 103681) ISSUE 2: DCA 103192/1. CLOSE PROXIMITY OF Il-1 FIRE ZONE *R* CABLES TO CONDUIT ENTRANCE TO JUNGON BOX JB2S53860 INTERFERES WITli PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE INSTALLATION. (NOTE: TIIIS DCA WAS SUPEltSEDED BY DCA 103681) ISSUE 3: CHARANCE BETWEEN JUNCTION 10-1, 10-2 BOXES iB2S53120 AND JB2S53860 (SEE ISSUED I AND 2 ABOVE) DOES NOT ALLOW INSTALLATION OF 330-1 V-RIBBED PANELS OVER 330-1 FLAT PANEL RESOLUTION I,2 & 3: FIRE STOP Tile FIRE ZONE *R* CABLE AT BOTH JUNCTION BOXES IN COMMON ENCLOSURE. PROTECT BOTil JUNCTION BOXES WITH COMMON ENCLOSURE. 101499/O AB 790' X-165 AA/21e N Y lSSUE: PARALLEL CONDUITS HAVE 10-1, 10-2, I-5. 41 INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE AT LBDs TO 9-1, 9-2 INDIVIDUALLY PROTECT EACil COMMODi'Y. RESOLUTION: INSTALL BOX ENCLOSURE AROUND BOTil LBD FITTINGS. O
.._ _ , . . - - . _ . . . _ _ . _ _ __ _s_
ATTACHMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE Bit OF BS5 DCA NO./REV BLDO- ELEY ROOM FIRE - SUPP.' DET.- DESCRIPI10N/ ISSUE OE CONCERN / RESOLUTION i
~ SUPPORTI BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YlN)' (Y/N)i
#7 TEST _, (PAGES D37-FIRE : -
C ** ZONE: ,, - o NES ? B5S 7 10272610 SG 832' 2-094 2SB/IS Y Y ISSUE: PROTECTED CONDUIT LED INTERFERES 10-1, 10-2, 1-5, 42 , WITH ESSENTIAL CONDUIT LBD THAT 9-1, 9-2 f REQUIRED PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE. RESOLUTION: BOX-IN LBD IN ACCORDANCE WITH DETAIL 6-1 AND MODIFY DESIGN AT INTERFACE OF INTERFERENCE. 103001/0 SG 885* 2-1098 2SK17C Y Y ISSUE: INSUFFICIENT Cf EARANCE EXISTS 11-1 I-5, 23 BETWEEN 330-1 PRESHAPE CONDUIT SECTIONS (I/4*,1/2*) AND WALL, PREVENTING PROPER INSTALLATION OF FLEXI-BLANKET OVERLAP AT RIGID CONDUIT / FLEX CONDUIT INTERFACE. RESOLUTION: INSTALL FLEXI-BLANKET WRAP WHERE POSSIBLE. BUTT FLEXI-BLANKET AGAINST WALL AND TROWEL GRADE SEAMS,- 3 3 j BUTT. 4 i i 1 . 4 3 t
, m m - , - ~ , , m . . - . . _
. - ._,-,.,_-,_r ,..--,m..--,_,,. m..-~,_-v. ~--.__.v--_,_e_
. _ - _ . - _ < _ _ _ _ . _ _ - -- .-..d-.
ATTACHMENT B ER-ME482, REV. @ - UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B19 OF B55-- DCA NOJREV BLDO ELEY ROOM? FIRE ' SUPP.i DET[- DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORTIn : BASIS / NOTES AREAL (YtN)$ (YlN); 2 ' 1 s 4 j9 J fjf' MM}", ,. as7 JH ' TEST M' (PAGES B37 ; flRE ! ',
"[.
c', in .; ZONE , SCHEMES ' .B55)::
.' w ,f "en d- @ _" Ii '
I 104246/0 AB 790* X-ISO ' AA/21a Y Y ISSUE I & 2: HVAC HANGER INTERFERES WITH PROTECIlVE ENVELOPE INSTALLATION ON ' CABLE TRAY AND COVERAGE OF PROTRUDING ITEM.- !., ISSUE 3: TRAPEZE HANGER INTERFERES WITH COVERAGE OF HANGER SUPPORT. RESOLUTION 1: CONSTRUCT ENVELOPE USING Il-1,12-1 14,43 l 2 LAYERS OF 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET UNDER { CABLES AND 330-1 FLAT PANELS INSIDE OF TRAY SIDERAILS FOR MINOR DISTANCE TO '
- CLEAR INTERFERENCE. OVERLAP FL3XI--
BLANKET AND FLAT PANELS FOR DISTANCE OF 9*-11* Will{ V-RIBBED PANELS ON OUTSIDE s OF TRAY. I , i ' RESOLUTION 2: TRIM FLAT BOARD AT. 1 4, 47 HANGER /SPLK d PLATE INTERFERENCE. i i RESOLifTION 3: COVER BOTTOM OF TRAY AND- 14,47 DIAGONAL TRAY SUPPORT UP TO ' - INTERFERENCE, ADD I EXTRA FLAT PANEL [- I THAT IS 3* WIDE AND RUN THE WIDTH OF INTERFERENCE. DO NOT SEAL PANELS TO - TRAPEZE SUPPORT.
- 102101/0 EC 792' X-122 Y
< EA154 Y ISSUE: CABLE AIR DROP FROM THROUGH i WALL SLEEVES (TWS) TO CABLE TRAY DO NOT: 2 ALLOW THE USE OF STANDARD DETAILS. i RESOLUTION: BOX THERMO-LAG 'V* RIB . 14 I-5, 50-i 1 PANELS AROUND TWS AND CABLE TRAY. . i i
% _,, -,. _ -.-...,.~_,_, ___., . _ . _._ _ -._ -,....__ .._.-. .~.__-m-- . --_ . - . _ - . - -
A'ITACllMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS , PAGE B20 OF BS5 DCA NO./REV BLDO ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIpiiON/ ISSUE .OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION f Si3PPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (Y/N): TEST .. (PAGES B37-- FIRE . SCHEMES ~ 855) ZONE- ' ' 101498/l EC 778* X-l!5B AA154 Y Y ISSUE: THE ARRANGEMENTOF ESSENTIAL CABLE 1 RAYS AND CONDUITS WITHIN, PRECLUDE TIIE INSTALIATION OF STANDARD g RUN CABLE TRAY PROTECI1ON. RESOLUTION: INSTALL TYPICAL DETAIL 5-1 1-2, 12-1, I-5, 49 ; FOR STANDARD CABLE TRAY PROTECTION 12-2, 13-1, i WiiERE SPACE AND ARRANGEMENT ALLOWS. 14-I, Il-1 Wi!ERE CABLES EXTEND ABOVE TIIE TRAY
; SIDES SillM TIIE TOP PANEL UP PER DETAIL 10-
- 3. WHERE CABLES AIR DROP FROM TIIE VERTICAL TO HORIZONTAL TRAY, ENCLOSE THE CABLES IN A THERMO-LAG BOX.
102882/0 AB 823' Xr226 AA/2id Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR THERMO-LAG PROTECTION OF ESSENTIAL J-BOX JB2A-2990 AND ESSENTIAL AIR DROP CABLES WHICII EXTT CABLE TRAY BEFORE Tile END OF Tile RACEWAY. PRECLUDING USE OF TYPICAL DETAILS. RESOLITI1ON: DIRECTION IS PROVIDED FOR 11-1,12-1, I-5, 19 INSTALLING A
- BOX
- EXTENSION TO TIIE 12-2 CABLE TRAY ENVELOPE, WITH 330-1 PANELS FLARED TO ENCLOSE CABLE AIR DROPS WTTliOUTTOUClilNO TilEM. ALLJOINTS ARE TO BE MADE USING Tile SCORE AND FOLD METilOD, AND PANELS B(ITTED TO TIIE J. BOX PklOR TO COVERING Tile J-BOX PER TYPICAL DETAILS.
ATTACHM7T B f i ER-ME-082, REV. 0 ' q . UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS .,- PAGE B21 OF B55 ' ) :j
'DCA NO./REV BLDO EIEV . ROOMi FIRE W . _ . - . _SUPP.1 DEri . ,..o. s, -
,, s AREA / ^DESCRI193ON#5 SUE Oi' CONCERN /RE80LU110N SUPPORT; : BASIS / NOTES i (YIN)j. - - (Y/N)E - 4 ;.
.a
[. ' o %g. ;M_ ]L . O .. TEST, ii?. (PAGES 837-u p
. ZONE ,.
^ M"~**
. , ,5 x .m ,/% ;t'~~t"=. w +
r;c:,ury. :::m.
~
. :;x W"
...... 1 a l,o 4
101357/1 AB 790' ' ISO . 'AA/21s ' Y Y-
. ISSUE: PIPE SUPPORTINTERFERES WrrH THE - '
INSTALLATION OF 330-1 PANEIJ ON ESSENTIAL
- i. CABLE TRAY. i 4
I RESOLITTION: STOP STANDARD TRAY. 11-1,I-2, 1-5, is . COVERAGE ABOUT 4' ON EfrHER SIDE OF THE 12-1, 12-2, , PIPE SUPPORT. INSTALL 330460 FIEXI- . 13-1, 14-1 . BLANKET ON THE CABLES AND EXTEND ACROSS THE 8' SPACE AND EXTEND INTO THE .
' TRAY COVERAGE ON BOTH ENDS. INSTALL AN i ELASTOMER FIRE STOP IN THE ENDS OF THE - '
i TRAY COVERAGE. FLEXI-BLANKETSHALL - i i EXTEND THROUGH THE FIRE S1DP INTO THE TRAY COVERAGE. ' ' I l'
'h i
s;- 1 I 4 4 i- 1 l j,
.. , - . . _ . . , - - . _ . , . . - . . . , _ _ . . . . . . , - . . . . _ _ _ . _ , . , . . . _ . _ . _ , . _ _ _ , . , . . . _ . . . _ . . . _ _ _ _ . - _ . , _ _ _ - . _ . - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ - . _ _ _ _ _ . - - _ _ _ _ - - _ - - _ ._...m.--.._-_e. ____ _ - , , - - - . _ . 2._
ATTACHMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. O i UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS . PAGE B22 OF B55 } - - DCA NO.lREV BLDG ELEV .' ROOM 2. FIRE ' SUPP. DET2 { DESCRIPHON/ ISSUE OF CONCERN /RBSOLUTION SUPPORT BASISINOTES AREA / (YIN). (YIN) i
.u .
" 'I fX, TEST _ (PAGES B37-1 FIRE r -
~
^
. . . . , i P: ? '
SCHEMES f [}# g1 ?
., +
. ZONE' -
M'
"'855)":
103046/2 SG S10' 2-082 2SBS Y Y ISSUE: THE NON-ESSENTIAL AIR DROPS FROM i AN ESSENTIAL TRAY CANNOT BE COVERED WITH THERMO-LAG IN ACCORDANCE WITH i TYPICAL DETAILS BECAUSE THE AIR DROPS i
- RUN PARAIIFL ALONG THE TOP OF THE TRAY PREVENTING THE COMPLETE WRAPPING OF j THE AIR DROP WITH 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET j, BECAUSE OF THE INTERFERENCE BY THE 330 y ,
PANELS ON TOP OF THE TRAY. AIJSO STRESS B SKIN CANNOT BE INSTAI I En BECAUSE THERE - ARE 3 AIR DROPS TOO CIESE TOGETHER AND TOO NEAR THE EDGE OF THE TRAY. I i RESOLUTION: WRAP THE CABLE BUNDLES TO II-I l-5,45 THE EXTENT POSSIBLE BUTTING THE FLET.I-l BLANKET 10 THE 330-1 PANEL ON TOP OF THE ~ 1 TRAY BANDING THE BUNDLES IN PLACE AND TO THE TRAY. ' TROWEL GRADE BUtIDUP SHALL BE INSTALLED AT DIE FLEXI-BLANKET ' 330-I INTERFACE. THE INSTALLATION OF - l i STRESS SKIN AND TIE WIRES FOR THE
- LONGITUMNAWOINIS SHAU, BE WSTAMED
{ TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE. DHS AFFECTS 4 ' ABOUT 2' LONG AREA ON TOP THE TRAY AND - y STILL MAINTAINS AT LEAST l-1/2* OVERLAP OF
- THE JOINT AND A MAXIMUM TIE WIRE SPACING OF 10*.
i 103486/0 EC 778' X-1158 AA/154 Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS TYPICAL l-5, 39-DETAllE FOR ADJACENT FLEX CONDUITS WITH i, INADEQUATE SEPARATION.
- a RESOLUTION: DEVELOP TYPICAL DETAILS 8-4.
4 I 4,m,-,,-.p.m, g--.,y+y--w m wWP**W"'*** * ' ^ ~ " * * * " * " "
i ATTACHMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B23 OF B55 DCA NO./REV BLDO ELEV: ROOM. FIRE SUPP.E DET.i AREA / DESCRIPTION / ISSUE'OFOONCERNIRESOLUTION ) SdPPONTI' ' BASIS / NOTES (YIN)> '(YIN)} TEST .,.
'l; FIRE '
(PAGES B37-SCHEMES'- B55).
, ^f ZONE 103061/1 SG 832* 2-094 2SB/15 Y g Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUEST INSTALLATION DETAIL FOR ADJACENT CONDUIT PRESHAPE /FLEXI-BLANKET '
INTERFACE WITH INADEQUATE SEPARATION. RESOLUTION: DEVEIDP TYPICAL DETAILS 7-7, I-5, 40 7-7.1. 102058/0 SG 810' 2-079 2SB/8 Y Y ISSUE: CONDUTT AND LBD REQUIPES PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE. ADJOINING CONDUIT /LBD IS TO CLOSE TO INSTALL STANDARD DETAIL RESOLUTION: INSTALL BOX ENCLOSURE 10-1, 10-2, 1-S, 4i AROUND BOTH LBD FITTINGS. 9-1, 9-2 10386210 AB 810' X-207 AAl21b Y Y ISSUE: RADIAX CABLE INTERFERES WITH BOTTOM PANEL THERMO-LAG INSTALLATION ON CABLE TRAY T230AC070, AND A-COMPONENT COOLING WATER LINE INTERFERES WITH SIDE RAIL COVERAGE ON CABLE TRAY T230ACG61. RESOLITTION: INSTALL A SIEITED PANEL ON I-2,9-1 I-5. 46 THE BOTTOM OF TRAY T230AC070 TO 12-I, 12-2, ACCOMMODATE THE RADIAX CABLE. INSTALL 13-1, 14-1 330-1 PANEL ON TRAY BOTTOM OF TRAY OVER SLOT TO BLOCK ANY HEAT PAT 11. INSTALL ' NOTCHED SIDE PANEL TO ACCOMMODATE 6-CC-24)7-152-3. INSTALL 3301 PANELS ON INSIDE OF TRAY ON SIDE RAIL O
- - . , , , - . . , , . , , ,, -m. . . , , . - , , _ . . , , , , , , , , . , . , . . . , , . . . , - . . , ,s.. .- . _ , _ - _ _ , . . . , -
I' , o. ATTACHMENT B ER-MEM, REV. 0 l UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B24 OF B55 i {_
- ~ .
DCA NO./REV
~ ..
m m . BLDO ELEVi ROOM? FIRE)[ SUPh. DErh DESCRIFnON/ ISSUE OF CONCERN /RESOLITTION, SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES
'QW;sSl ~ ",jp4-gggg " Oh 6 ' d AREA / (Y/N) -: .(Y/N)l T <TliST, "
(PAOF3837- l FIRE f '
*N %'"f MER M.
zong 1' x , , , y qqg@g ggg%n;p ', M g ', z- :; + 7 w. 103277/I- SG 832' 96 SE16 Y. Y 'I ISSUE: THE SUPPORT FRAME TO PROVIDE - COVERAGE OF ESSEN11AL CABGS FROM 'IWO
- CONTAINMENT PENETRATIONS TO A JUNCTION
- - BOX CANNOT BE INSTALL.ED PER TYPICAL DETAIL 7-4 DUE TO THE UNIQUE ' ..
s CONFIGURATION AND THE LACK OF ' ADEQUATE ATTACHMENT POINT AT THE -
, JUNCHON BOX.
RESOLUTION: FABRICATE TWO METAL'.- 11-1 ' l-5, 44 1 SLEEVES WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THE JUNCTION BOX WHICH WILL ALLOW THE'- e SUPPORT FRAMING TO BE INSTAIIsn PER s t TYPICAL DETAIL 7-4. THEN THE THERMO-LAO . , CAN BE INSTALLED FOR PER TYPICAL DETAIL -
- - 7-3.
4 102679/I EC 778* X-IISB AAI54 Y Y ISSUE: CABM TRAY T220CBD15-22 iS AN 4 ESSENTIALTRAY WTTH SEVERAL DiTERFERENCE AND PROTRUDING HEM Il PROBLEMS. 1 . 1 RESOLUTION: INSTALL FLAT PANELS IN LIEU I-2,I-6,- -- 48 4 OF V-RIB IN ORDER TO AVOID AN - 9-1,Il-1, j. INTERFERENCE WITH A PROTECTED CONDUTT. 12-1, 12-2, l INSTALL HALF ROUNDS ON THE ESSEN11AL 13-1
) CONDUIT, REDUCING THE MATERIAL 4
THICKNESS WHERE IT INTERFERES WITH TRAY - THERMO-LAO. ' AIR DROPS SHALL BE lf i ENCLOSED IN A THERMO-LAG BOX WHEN
- STANDARD DETAIL FLEXI-BLANKET CANNOT- i BE INSTALLED. COVER PROTRUDING ITEMS
] PER TYPICAL DETAILS TO A DISTANCE OF 9'
- MINIMUM,11" MAXIMUM.
y _-.m
ATTACHMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. O ! UNIQUE COhflGURATIONS PAGE B25 OF B55 P DCA NO./REV BLDOL ELEV ROOM FIRE i SUPP. DET. DESCRIPT16N/ ISSUE'OF CONCERN / RESOLUTIONSUPPORT'
~ I BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N)' (Y/N)j ' 1 "'. , TEST (PAGES B37 '
- FIRE ;
-Y,*'" SCHEMES; B55); i ZONE: ,
? -t
~
103670/0 AB 810' 207- AAl21b Y Y ISSUE: THE HVAC OVER THE ESSENTIALTRAY WAS TOO CLOSE TO ALLOW THE INSTALLATION OF THERMO-LAG ON 'lilE TRAY. RESOLUTION: THE HVAC WAS TRIMMED l-2,Il-l, 1-5, 51-SUFFICIENTLY TO ALLOW STANDARD 12-1,12-2, COVERAGE BY 330-1 PANELS ON THE TRAY. 13-1, 14-1 WHERE THIS COULD. BE DONE AT THE HVAC SUPPORT THE TRAY WAS NOTCHED.' THE ' RESULT WAS THAT A 4' LONG AREA REQUIRED t UNIQUE COVERAGE.. FLAT PANELS WERE USED IN THE AREA WITH ALL JOINTS EITHER - SCORE AND FOLD OR STITCHED WITH TIE WIRE. THERE IS NOT SUFFICIENT ROOM TO INSTALL STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL ORADE ON THE LONOITUDINALJOINTS. A130 IN THE I AREA WHERE THE TRAY IS NOTCHED THE CABLES ARE NEAR THE THERMO-LAG 330-1 : PANEL COVERAGE SO A 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET 15 INSTALLED BETWEEN THE PANEL ' AND THE CABLES TO ENSURE THAT THERE IS SEPARATION. 103567/1 SB 790' 2-070 2SB4 Y Y ISSUE: PROVIDE PROTECTION FOR CA9LE AIR ' DROP FROM CABLE TRAY T230SCE01 TO THE - WALL PENETRATION. RESOLUTION: INSTALL 330-1 *V" RIB PANEL 11-1 14,52 l ON CABLE TRAY T230SCE01 AND ON THE CABLE TRAY PROTRUDING FROM THE WALL PENETRATION AT COLUMN 9-A. WRAP THE CABLE AIR DROP IN TWO LAYERS OF 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET PER DETAIL 5-12. 4
-..,-.,e .. - , - - . . . , , - . . _ , . - , , , , , , . , . _ . , _ ~ . . - . . . , _ . , _ . . , , . . , ,m. . . , .
a a ATTACHMENT R ER-MEm2, REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS , PAGE B26 OF B55 t DCA NO.lREV BLDO ELEV~ ROOM FIRE. SUPP. DET. L ~DESURIPTION/ ISSUE OF CONCERN /RESOLITTION SUPPORTn' BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N)' (YIN)1 - FIRE'
" -' i
' TEST. '(PAGES B37-
,. 4 . , ; y SCHEMES? 853).
ZONE..s ^ .
._ a ;;;- J -
2 *n 103600/2 SB 810' 2-083 2SD/9 Y Y ISSUE: PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE INSTALLATION FOR VERTICAL CABLE TRAY AND AIR DROPS AT CEluNG IS NOT COMPLETE DUE TO RECESSED SPARE EMBEDDED SLEEVE. RESOLIJTION: FILL RECESS OF SPARE SLEEVE l-6, 53 WITH 330-1 TROWEL GRADE FLUSH WITH BARRIER SURFACE. EXTEND THERMO-LAG OVER AIR DROP TO BARRIER. UPORADE ALL
, JOIN'rS WITH FTRESS SKIN, STAPLES AND .
STrrCHING, FLANGE THERMO-LAG TO WALL OR CEIUNG USING SCORE AND FOLD METHOD AND HILTI BOLT PER DETAIL I-5. THE BARRIER THAT IS NOT HILTI BOLTED OR MAY BE BUTTED TO 111B BARRIER WITH DETAIL 11-7. 102931/0 AB 790' X-180 AA/21b Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR THERMO-LAG COVERAGE OF AN ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY WHERE A 4* VD UNE PREVENTS FULLTHICKNESS 330-1 PANEL INSTALLATION ON TOP OF THE TRAY. RESOLITTION: INSTALL 330-1 FLAT PANEL ON 11-1, 12-1 I-S, 54 TOP OF TRIM, WirH THICKNE::S REDUCED AS 12-2, 13-I, REQUIRED TO AVOID THE VD UNE. A SECOND 14-I THICKNESS OF 330-1 FLAT PANEL IS TO BE USED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA OF THE INTERFERENCE, INSTALLED BENEATH THE REDUCED POR110N AND ATTACHED.
,w-- -e.. , , ,,,..,-y n p .-+-g -
y 4-rs ,,,-r,---, %. .n..,..,-.,,- me- .w y ,---. 3-%m..--,--,,,~$ - , - - ,,% m.-, s , -
4 ; 1 ATTACHMENT B _ ER-ME-082, REV. 0 - 1 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS i 1 PAGE B27. OF B55 J -{ , i !
) .DCA NO.lREV-.- BLDO- ELEY; ROOMi FIRE 1 SUPP.
DET.- DESCRIFTION/ISSUB OF. CONCERN / RESOLUTION 1 9 AREAL SUPPORT : ' BASIS / NOTES (Y/N)e (YIN) .gy Gi!n
, FIRE: -W ~
b .; gr 1 ' c.. c' f %t$n . -/ . ?fiar i TEST ...:,7 (PAGES B37e l E %ji J ~ '?Ol.'d
' $CHEMESi ! B55))-
~.
, ~~
l ZONE: v . ....., - - '
-'-.Sw # * ' '
+
ss 4
- ns.:: .n .> ., %u Nv. . + < x - ~ s l y
10 M08/l AB 810' X-207 AAl21b Y' Y- ISSUE I: DUE TO PROTRUDING AIR DROP FROM : TRAY THE BOX FOR ESSENTIAL CONDUfT ' CANNOT BE INSTALED. i l 1 ISSUE 2: DUE TO PROXIMITY OF CONDUlTS
'AND TRAY, CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS TO
- j INSTALL DIFFERENT BOX.
I RESOLUTION I & 2: INSTALL BOX PER DETAIL - I-5,55 f 12-2. ' 6 4 i f i i i I i i-4
- ~ ~ , . _ _ _ _ ..,-=--.m~.4. _ _ . - , . - _ _ . _ . _ _ ~ . . . _ - . - . . . - . _ _ . - , , - - - . ~ . _ _ . , _ - - - - - - ~ _ _ . - _ _ _ _ _ , _ _ _ _ ~ _ , _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ - - - . . . - . . - - - _ _ _ _ - - - - _ - - - - . . _ .--
. ATTACHMENT B . . ER-ME482, REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS ' ~ PAGE B28 OF B55 l -
i DCA NO.IREV - BLDO EIEV ROOMl. FIRE f SUPP.; DET;.- DESCRIPTION /ISINE'dF CONGRN/ RESOLUTION 3 . SUPPORTh BASIS / NOTES - AREAL (YIN)j '(Y/N)L
., .,[ -
,<g" -
TEST ,. 3 (PAGES B37-L.
!"J yw, *, 3 6"'
FIRE 5a 4 j " - s SCHsmasa E55) f 7
.: ZONE' wC , (.m x i.
d d h[f ? W D: % _ 5C# 'yLc , 103892/0 AB 852' X-241 AA/21f . Y Y ISSUE: INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE EXISTS FOR I. ? THERMO-LAG INSTALLATION DUE TO HVAC . DUCTS AND SUPPORTS, A TOTAL OF 12 i ! 1 INmtFERENCES. 1 RESOLUTION: INTERFERENCE 1,2,9 AND 11 11-1 56 - REQUIRED THE INSTALIATION OF 3301 PLAT - BOARD TRIMMED TO ALLOW INSTAU.ATION - ! BETWEEN THE CABLE TRAY AND HANGER AND s THE HVAC DUCT. . ADD AN ADDITIONAL
- LAYER OF 330-1 PANELS FROM THE AREA THAT 4
THE FIRST REQUIRES MODIFYING. INTERFERENCE 3 REQUIRES DIE ' j . INSTALLATION OF 330-1 V-RIB PANELS ON THE L SIDE OF THE TRAY WITH A 330-1 FLAT PANEL ' i, INSTAII Fn TO SPAN WIE SPtJCE PLATE.
- i INTERFERENCE 4 REQUIRES THE :
4
'NSTAll.ATION OF 330-1 ON THE SIDE OF THE TRAY IN THE VICINTTY OF THE HVAC HANGER.
INTERFERENCE 5A REQUIRES THE PROTECT 1VE i ENVELOPE TO BE MODIFIED AT THE CABLE l- TRAY HANGER CROSS CHANNEL REQUIRING NOTCHING OF DIE BOITOM PANEL.L
- INTERFERENCE 5 REQUIRES THE CABIE TRAY '
- i. HANGER TO BE WRAPPED AS A PROTRUDING
! ITEM WHERE THE 2 X 2 ANOIE SUPPORT ! INTERFERES WT!1f THE TOP COVER OF TRAY } PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE. INTERFERENCE 6L REQUIRES THE 330-1 PANEL ON THE BOTTOM - i, OF THE TRAY TO BE TRIMMED TO ALLOW FOR HVACINTERFERENCE. WHERE THE PANEL ' i l! HAS BEEN TRIMMED ADD A SECOND 330-1 ~ FLAT PANEL TIE WERED TO FIRST. ' INTERFERENCE 8 REQUIRES INSTALLATION OF
- 330-1 FLAT PANEL AT FP PIPE SUPPORT.
j: INTERFERENCE 10 REQUIRES COVERAGE OF j THE HVAC SUPPORT AS A PROTRUDING ITEM. ' INTERFERENCE 11 REQUIRES THE SAME 1
.,..-,,.m~. .. -,..-..m...,.--.------~...-.~..._.-------+,-~~-.--..,-...me,,-.-+-.-~.-_ . - . ~ . + . ,.%.~m, - - . . . , . . -....%.. . _ . . . . , - . . - - . . . . . . . - . , .
ATTACHMENT D ER-ME-082, REV. @ UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B29 OF B55 6 DCA NOJREV ELDO ELEY ROOM FIRE SUPP.' PET. .. DESCRIPI1ON/ ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPOitT . BASIS / NOTES AREAf (Y/N)' (//N)' ' ' 1 ~~ TEST (PAGES B37-FIRE _ l ZONE .. - SCHEMES B55) , i tl- _r.a _
; 103892.0 t j CONT'D MODIFICATION AS INTERFERENCE 3.
103476tl SB 810* 2-082 2SBit Y Y ISSUE I: CONSTRUCITON REQUEST ORIENTATION OF V-KlasS. j ISSUE 2: 2* CONDUrr IS ESSENTIAL RACEWAY 1 ENGINEERING DIRECHON llEQUIRED TO ; ;
! COMPLETE. ! ;
ISSUE 3: LACK OF CLEAR / dCE AT BAIUUER PREVENTS TOTAL INSTALLATION OF 1/4* OVERLAY. RESOLUTION 1: THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT AS TO DIRECTIONAL ORIENTATION OF V-RIBS. l RESOLUTION 2: DISPOSITIONED PER DCA 103423. RESOLUTION 3: MODIFY 1/4* CONDUrr 9-1, 9-2 . 1-5, 57 OVERLAY TO ALIOW BLTITING TO WALL AND j INSTALL Fit f L'T. t i d
=
t k
. _ _ _ _ u_
o ATTACHMENT D ER-ME-082, REY. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B30 OF B55 DCA NOJREV BLDO ELEY ROOM FIRE ~ SUPP. DET. AREA / DESCRIPTION 11SSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT ' BASIS /NUTES ., (YlN) (YIN) ;- TEST (PAGES B37-ZONE -
-t c _ t SCH m mt RSS) 103406/1 SB 352* 103 2SE18 Y Y ISSUE: THIS IS A STIUA110N WHERE TH8!
ARRANGEMENT DOES NOT allow FOR THE COVERAGE OF AN AIR DROP FROM A CONTAINMENT PENETRATION TO A CABLE TRAY IN ACCORDANCE WITH TYPICAL 4 DETAILS. RESOLUTION: A SLEEVE IS INSTAT I Fn IN THE II-I I-5, 44 END OF THE TRAY SO THATTHE SUPPORT FRAME CAN BE INSTAU.ED IN A MANNER CONSISTENT WITH DETAIL 7-4. AN ELASTOME1 FIRE SEAL IS INSTAT I Fn . BElWEEN THE SLEEVE AND TRAY TO HOLD
.! THE SLEEVE IN PLACS AND PROVIDE A POINT FOR ATTACHMENT. THE FRAMING IS THEN COVERED WITH FLEXI-BLANKET CONSISTENT I
WITH THE SPECIFICATION AND DETAIL 7 3. i i' s t 1 I i i i i i 1
.,_y._,c, - . , _ - - . . , - + - - - - - - - , ,. ---v-,,., -- v-, , - - , , - , , - , , , , , . , ,. , - -,
ATTACHMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B31 OF B55 DCA NOJREV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIFHON/ ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION AREA / SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES (YIN) (YlN)' FIRE TEST (PAGES B37-ZONE SCHEMES B55) 103740/1 AB 790' 180 AA12Ia Y Y ISSUE: THERE ARE 4 DIFFERENT OBSTRUCTIONS TO STANDARD COVERAGE ON AN ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY. TilERE IS AN HVAC FLANGE AND A FLANGE ON A FIRE i PROTECTION PIPE WHICH EXTEND INTO THE TRAY. THERE IS AN HVAC SUPPORT TOO CIESE TO THE TOP OF THE TRAY TO ALLOW COVERAGE AND TilERE IS AN HVAC FLANGE l WHICH INTERFERES WITH SPLICE PLATE COVERAGE. i RESOLUTION- WIIERE THE FIRE PROTECTION 1-2, 9-1, I-5,58 PIPE FLANGE EXTENDS BELOW Tile TOP OF 9-3, 10-1 THE TRAY THE V-RIB BOARD IS CUT OUT 10-2, Il-1, AROUND THE FLANGE, FLAT PANEL IS 12-1, 12-2, INSTAR i Fn BELOW TIIE V-RIB PANEL, 13-1,;14-1 OVERLAPPING THE V-RIB PANEL AND SHIMS ARE INSTAf I Fn BETWEEN THE V-RIB AND FLAT PANELS IF REQUIRED TO CLEAR TIIE FLANGE. AILJOINTS ARE STITCHED WIT 11 TIE WIRE AND UPGRADED WTIH STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE. PREBANDS ARE MODIFIED TO SUPPORT PANEL ARRANGEMENT. WHERE THE HVAC SUPPORT SPANS THE TRAY JUST ABOVE THE SIDE RAILS. AT THE SIDE RAILS WHERE THICKNESS OF COVERAGE CANNOT BE ATTAINED TROWEL GRADE IS APPLJED TIIEN i 330-1 PANELS ARE INSTALLED ON Tile INSIDE OF THE TRAY AND OLTT IN ALL DIRECTIONS SO THE METAL TRAY IS COVERED PER Tile 9* RULE. IN EETWEEN Tile TRAY RAILS. A 330-1
; PANEL WAS INSTAT I Fn BELOW Tile TOP OF THE TRAY AND BELOW TIIE ANGLE IRON AND STITCllED TO Tile PANEL COVERING TiiE TOP OF THE TRAY THATIS BUTTED TO TIIE SUPPORT. WHERE THE IIVAC ANGLE EXTENDS INTO THE TRAY, FLAT PANEL IS INSTALLED BELOW THE V-RI3 TOP PANEL USING Tile
_ ,, . _ . . . . _ . . ~_ - . - _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
o ATTAOIMENT D ER-ME-082, REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS , PAGE B32 OF B55 DCA NO IREV BLDO ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRWTIONIISSUE OF CONCERN /RESOLIJTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (YIN) FIRE TEST , 7 AGES B37-SCHEMES B55) ZONE 103740/1 CONT D SAME METliODOLOGY USED AT THE FIRE PROTECTION FLANGE. WHERE THE HVAC INTE.RFERES WITH THE SP!JCE PLATE COVERAGE THE COVERAGE WAS AOIIEVED BY COVERINO TIIE SIDE Wmi FLAT PANEL NGTOIING TIIE PANEL AND PLACING A PANEL BLOCK INSIDE THE COVERAGE AT Tile NOTCII TO MAINTAIN THICKNESS _ 103589/0 AUX 831'4* X-219 AA/21D Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION IS UNABLE TO INSTALL THERMO-LAG ON 24* WIDE CABLE TRAY PER SPEC. DUE TO KELLUM GRIPS INSTALLED ON CABLES. RESOLUTION: ENCLOSETRAY AREA AND 12-2 1-5, 9 KELLUM GRIPS WilICH EXTEND ABOVE SIDE RAILS. 104204/0 AUX 790*4
- X-l BO AA121A Y Y ISSUE: NEED ENGINEERING DIRECTION FOR THERMO-LAO COVERAGE AT TRANSITION ;
POINT BETWEEN 2 TPAYS (30* AND 24*). RESOLUTION: ADD AN ADDI110NALSUPPORT l-2 I4-1 I-5,59 MEMBER TO PROVIDE SUPPORT FOR TifERMO-LAO FLAT PANEL UNDERNEATH CABLES. UTIIJZE 3301 FLAT PANEIS TO PROVIDE A TIIERMG-LAG ENVEIAPE ACROSS Ti!E AIR OAP BETWEEN THE TWO TRAYS AND ENCLOSE CABLES. PROVIDE 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET SHIMS ON THE BOTTOM PANELTO PREVENT CABLES FROM CONTACTING BOTTOM PANEL BACK SIDE. INSTALL BANDING BETWEEN EACH TRAY TO THE GUIDE INSTALLED ON TIIE NEW SUPPORT. THESE BANDS WILL SERVE AS , AN INTERNAL FRAME WORK TO SUPPORT THE SIDE PIECES OF THE ENr tmURE.
_ ,, . J l 4 ATTACHMENT D ER-ME-082, REV. 0 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS . PAGE B33 OF B55 DCA NOJREV BLDO ELEY ROOM FIRE . SUPP. DET. AREA / DESCRIPTIONIISSUE OF CONGRN/mpdirTION SUPfbRT; ' (Y/N) (YIN)- ^ BASIS / NOTES FIRE TEST ., (PAGES B37-
., ZONE ,
SCHEMES RSS)f
" , s.
101627/1 EAC 778* 4* _ . _ . l X-115B AA1154 Y Y - ISSUE: 3 CONDUITS ANDJUNCTION BOX ALL REQUIRING PROTECTION SHARE A COMMON 4' , 4 X 4* TUBE STEEL SUPPORT. CONSTRUCHON ' REQUESTS TO
- BOX-IN' ALL COMMODITIES FOR A 5 FT. DISTANCE.
1 ! RESOLUTION: BOXING IN THE CONDUITS IS 9-I,10-I 60 NOT ACCEPTABLE. INSTALL STANDARD 330-1
- l , CONDUIT SECDON MATERIAL OVER REQUIRED 1
CONDUITS. SINCE SO MUCH OF THE TURE STEEL SURFACE WILL BE COVERED WHEN THE CONDUITS ARE PROTECTED, INSTALL 330-I l 1 PANELS ON THE SUPPORT FIRST FOR HEAT PATH (9* RULE). THEN INSTALL MATERIAL ON CONDUITS. 1 I i 1
ATTACHMENT D ER-ME-OS2, REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B34 OF BSS 1 DCA NO.IREV BLDO ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. AREAL DESCRIFr!ON/ ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPMORT BASIS / NOTES (YIN) (YIN) " FIRE TEST , . . (PAGES B37-3 ZONE SCHEMES BSS)
.l.
10305611 SB 132* 2494 l 25815 Y Y 4 ISSUE: FEX CONDUTT HAS NUMEROUS I OBSTRUCDONS WHERE IT PENETRATES i THROUGH A BLOCKOUT WHICH PREVENTS THE INSTAU.ADON OF 3M460 FLEXI-BLANKET ONTO THE CONDUIT. " RESOLUTION: A BOX WAS BUILT AROUND THE 11-1, 1-2 1-6,61 FLEX CONDUIT AT THE WALL AND EXTENDED ' .! OUT PAST THE INTERFERENCES 30 THAT i ' . THERMO4.AG CAN BE INSTAI.I Fn ON THE FEX CONDUIT. THE BOX WAS CONSTRUCTED l OF 330-1 PANELS AND Fit I Fn WITH TROWEL GRADE SO THERE IS A MINIMUM OF 3/4* OF . COVERAGE ON THE 2* DIA. FLEX CONDUIT. , WHERE THE FEX CONDUITS EXTT THE BOX, CONDUITHALF ROUNDS ARE INaTAf T Fn, 4 THEN A COMBINATION OF HALF ROUNDS AND FLEXI-BLANKET. THE 2* DIA. FLEX CONDUTT , AT THE COMCRETE WALL IS PROVIDED WITH 3 LAYERS OF FLEXI-BLANKET TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE,THEN BUTTED TO THE ALL WITH TROWEL GRADE IN AIR GAPS AND AT FEXI-BLANKET TO WALL INTERFACES. i 103305/1 SB 832* 2494 2SB115 Y Y ISSUE: AIR DROP CABLE RADIUS IS TO TIGHT TO WRAP WITH FEXI-BLANKET. i RESOLUTION: CONSTRUCT BOX ON CABLE 10-1,11-1 15,62 ! TRAY AND CONSTRUCTTEE SECTION AT CONDUIT. THEN WRAP FLEXI-BLANKET. 1
, y .-__ - . - , . _ . , _ . . , , , -
_ . . , , _ . , _ . . _,,,_.y_ . _ , _ _ , , . , . , , _ _ , _ _ .., _ , . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , . _ _ _ . _ _ _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , . . _ , , _ . , . _ _ , _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . , _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ , _
l l ATTACHMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. 0 UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS - PAGE B35 OF B55 .I DCA NO.lREV BLDO ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP$ 'DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPOhtT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YtN) (Y/N) ]j FIRE
.- f TEST ., (PAGES B37 .
7 SCHEMES _ B5S) s ZONE d*
~
1 j; i 10419410 AR 300* 4 X-LOO AAl21a Y Y ISSUE 1: AIR DROPS FROM THROUGH WAIL 4
- SLEEVES (TWS) TO CABLE TRAY REQUIRE PROrECTxw.
$ ISSUE 2: INSUFFICIENT SPACE EXIST FOR AIR j 1 DROPS INTO TRAY. CANNOT INSTALL DETAIL 3-4. ' J ISSUE 3: PIPE WILL HAVE 0* CLEARANCE '
- l AFTER PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE IS INSTAI I Fn. I
- l ,
RESOLUTION 1 & 2: BOX IN TWS WITH TRAY 10-1 II-I 63 l ) PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE. I RESOLITTION 3: STRESS SKIN MAY NOT BE ABLE TO BE INSTAT I Fn DUE TO PIPE DrTERFERENCE. $ l 102900/0 AB 790' X-180 AA/21s Y Y ISSUE: AIR DROP FROM TRAY TO WALL DOES j NOT HAVE CONDUIT SLEEVE. RESOLUTION: BOX AIR DROP AT WAIL AND 10-I. II-I I-5, 64 i FORM COMMON ENCLOSURE WITH CABLE i TRAY. j 102265/0 AB R32' X-219 AAl214 Y Y i ISSUE: CABLE ORIP STRUCIURE IS NOT J ADDRESSED AS PART OF ENCLOSURE. i RESOLIJTION: INSTALL SCORED V-RIBBED SIDE II-I l-5,9 AND TOP PANELS SIMILAR TO STANDARD DETAIL 5-5. , 4 I
)
I O
, O ATTACHMENT D ER-ME-082, REY. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B36 OF B55 e
DCA NOJREV BLDO ELEY ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET.
! DESCRIFTION/ ISSUE OF CONCERN /RESOUJTION SUPPdRT BASIS / NOTES AREAI (YIN) (YlN) 7 '" "
- TEST . (PAGES 837e FIRE -: -
..~ SCHEMES L B55)
ZONE '
.c ,
102889/0 AB 790* X-174 AA121a N Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECHON FOR COVERING TWO ESSENTIAL CONDUIT LBD
] FITTINGS, BETWEEN WHICH THE GAP IS 1/4*.
1, RESOLUTION: ENCLOSE BOTH 1.LDs IN A 9-1, 10-1, 1-5,41 COMMON THERMO-LAG 330-1 BOX 10-2 CONFIGURATION. USETYPICALDETAIL6-1 FOR DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES.
; 103a55/1 SB IL32' % 2SE16 Y Y ISSUE: THERE IS AN INTERFERENCE FROM A TUBE STEEL SUPPORT WHICH PREVENTS COVERAGE OF THE AIR DROP FROM THE ] CONTAINMENT PENETRATION TO THE CABLE TRAY IN ACCORDANCE WITH STANDARD q
DETAILS 7-3 AND 7-4. I RESOLUTION: PROVIDE SLEEVES AT BOTH THE II-I I-5, 44 CONTAINMENT PENETRATION AND ATTHE 4 CABLE TRAY SO THAT THERMO-LAG CAN BE INSTAI I Fn IN ACCORDANCE WITH TYPICAL DETAILS 7-3 AND 74. l 4 as l
ATTACHMENT B E"-ME-082, L.EV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B37 OF B5S NOTE ACutriANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV } 1. CONTINUITY OF THE MATERIAL IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. GENERIC 2. tertCTIVE THICKNESS OF TiiE MATERIAL IS CONSISTENT WITil TEs a tu CONFIGURATIONS. GENERIC 3. Tile NATURE AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THE SUPPORT ASSEMBLY (IF APPLICABIE)IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. GENERIC 4. THE APPLICATION OR END USE OF THE MATFRfAL IS CONSISTENT WITli TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. GENERIC 5. THE CONFIGURATION WAS REVIEWED BY A QUALIFIED FIRE PROTEGION ENGINEER AND DETERMINED EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF PROTECTION. TO PROVI GENERIC 6. SPECIFIC AND UNIQUE DIFFERENCES FROM TESTED CONFIGURATIONS EXI5T FOR TIIE PLANT CONFIGURATIO GENERIC WOULD ENilANCE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE PROTECTIVE ENVEI.DPE (E.G., SPACIAL ORIENTATION, SURFACES NOT DIRECTLY EXPOSED TO A POTENTIAL FIRE DUE TO SHIELDING EFFECTS, TORTUROUS PATH, ETC.). 7. Ti!E EFFECTIVE WIDTil OF THE 2 TRAYS ACT AS A SINGLE 30* OR 36* WIDE TRAY WHICH HAVE BEEN TESTED (12,121,14-102471/3 I). ALL JOINTS ARE REINFORCED BY TESTED METHODS. THE BOTTOM PANEL IS SECURED TO EVERY OTHER RUNG EACH TRAY. ADDITIONAL MATERIAL INSIDE THE ENVELOPE (AT THE SIDERAILS BETWEEN THE TRAYS) AIDS 1 STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY AND THERMAL PROTECTION. 8. TiiE EFFECnVENESS OF 2 LAYERS OF 330-1 PANEIS ON A JUNCTION BOX HAS BEEN DEMONSTRATED I VIA SC 101282/1 J-BOX IS MOUNTED TO A STRUCTURAL COLUMN WHICH REDUCES POTENTIAL EXPOSURE SURFACES AND WIL ' HEAT SINK. ALL JOINTS IIAVE BEEN REINFORCED WITH QUALJFIED TECHNIQUES (STITCHINO AND STRESS ADDITIONALTIE WIRES WERE USED TO SECURE PIECES TOGETHER FOR THE COVER ASSEMBLY. T11E COV NORM ALTEMPERATURES (3/32* MAX. GAP) AND DUE TO EXPANSION OF THE MATERIAL DURING SUBLIMATION LAYER FORMATION AT ELEVATED TEMPERATURES, WILL COMPETELY SEAL THE CONFIGURATION HAS MORE ENCLOSED AIR VOLUME THAN A TYPICAL J-BOX ENVELOPE WHICl! WILL RESULT IN LOWER INTERNAL TEMPERATURES. THEREFORE, SINCE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY AND THERMAL CONCERNS ARE ADDRESSED THE CONFIGURATION IS AO trrABLE. C. ALL JOINTS UTILIZED IN THE
- BOX
- CONFIGURATION ITTILIZE EITHER TIIE SCORE AND FOLD METHODS %TTH T 102160/0 GRADE BUILDUP OR HAVE BEEN REINFORCED WITH TESTED METHODS (TIE WIRES / STRESS SKIN). 104217/1 AIR THE NOT CONTACT T11ERMO-LAG PANEL BACK SIDE SURFACES AND ARE WRAPPED WITH SILTEMP. THE LARGE 10358910 VOLUME AND THERMAL MASS OF THE CABLES IN CONJUNCIlON WITH THE DEMONSTRATED PERFORMANCE 102265/0 LAG 330-1 PANELS ON CABLE TRAYS Will MAINTAIN SUFFICIENTLY LOW CABG TEMPERATURES. THEREFORE, THE THERMAL AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRIIY ASPECTS OF THE CONFIGURATION HAVE BEEN ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED
9 ATTACHMENT B E 1-ME-082, REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGU2ATIONS . PAGE C38 OF C55 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOES DCA/REV l 10. THE USE OF 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET ON CABG AIR DROPS OF VARJOUS SIZES (FROM A SINGE CABM 103013/6 ; BUNDLE HAS BEEN QUALIFIED VIA SCHEME 11-1. THE INTERFACE BETWEEN CABLE BUNDLES ENTER TRAY ENVELOPE WAS ALSO QUAUFIED VIA SCHEME Il-1. ALL CABLE TRAY JOINTS (INCLUDING THO THE CURS EXTENSION) ARE REINFORCED WITH TECHNIQUES QUAUFIED BY TEST. THE INTERFACE ' EMBEDDED SLEEVES HAS BEEN SECURED WITH BANDING AROUND THE EMBEDDED SLEEVES FOR MECHA ATTACllMENT AND LARGE
- FILLET WELD
- BUILDUP OF TROWEL GRADE 330460 MATERIAL FOR THER THE MATERIALTHICKMESSES AND APPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN BOUNDED BY TEST. LARGE ARE LESS THERMALLY DEMANDING (DUE TO CABLE BUNDLE MASS) THAN THOSE TETTED. ADDITIOj WALL UMITS POTENTIAL EXPOSURE SURFACES AND HAS HEAT SINK EFFECTS AT EMBEDDED SLEEVE ~
THEREFORE, ADDRESSED. THE STRUCTURAL INTEGR!TY AND THERMAL ASPECTS OF THE CONFIGURATION HAVE stiN ADEQUAT I 1. PROTECTION OF THE FLEX CONDUIT ASSOCIATED WITH THE PT HAS BEEN QUAUFIED VIA SCHEM 103409/5 LAYERS OF 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET YO PROTECT A SINGE CABLE AIR DROP. THIS PT CONFIGU REMOVABLE COVER J-BOX ENCLOSURE DESCRIBED IN NOTE 8. "lWO SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES EXIST. ONE, IS THA J-BOX IS A SYMMETRICAL COMPONENT,1WO, IS THAT THE PT ENCLOSURE HAS A PROTRUDING STAINLESS STEEL l INSTRUMENT TUBE (FOR PT TEST PROPOSES). THE FIRST ASPECT WAS ADDRESSED BY CONSTRU FRAMEWORK ASSEMBLY AROUND THE PT TO ENABLE SECURE ATTACHMENT OF THE THERMO-LAG SECOND ASPECT WAS ADDRESSED BY ENCLOSING THE PROTRUDING INSTRUMENT TUBING WITH 1* CONDUlT SECUONS (1/2* NOMINALTHICKNESS). THIS CREATED A THERMO-IAG
- SLEEVE
- WHICH THERMO-LAG 330-70 CONFORM ABG CERAMIC BULK FIBER MATERIAL FOR A DEPTH OF 4* (MIN.). THI PROVIDES AN ACCEPTABLE LEVEL OF CONDUCTIVE HEAT PATH PROTECTION INTO THE ENCIDSURE. AL THERMAL AND STRUCTURAL ATTRIBUTES OF THE DESIGN ARE ADDRESSED BY NOTE S.
12. DUE TO THE LARGE AIR VOLUME AND ENCLOSED THERMAL MASS OF THE PROTECTED COMMODmES 103472/1 (P PORTIONS OF Tile EMBEDDED SLEEVES, CABLE BUNDLE MASS AND THE MASS OF THE CABLE TRAYS) THE THERMAL 10349911 PROTECTION AFFORDED BY THE
- BOX
- DESIGN IS ADEQUATE. IN ADDTTION,THE LARGEST SURFACE OF THE PROTEC ENVELOPES IS ACRIALLY THE CONCRETE WALL WHICH PREVENTS EXPOSURE FROM THAT SIDE AND SINK. THEREFORE THE CRmCAL ATTRIBIJTE OF THESE DESIGNS IS THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY BEEN CONSERVATIVELY ADDRESSED VIA MECHANICAU.Y ATTACHING THE ENCLOSURES TO THE C HILTI BOLT FASTENERS. ADDITIONAL 1Y, SINCE THE ENCLOSURE ASSOCIATED WITH DCA 103472 INVOLVED ENVELOPMENT OF A LARGE BANK OF SLEEVES (40) THE OVERALL LENGTH OF THE ENCLOSURE IS APPROXIMATELY 5*- 6*.
COMPENSATE FOR THIS LARGE SPAN, UNISTRUT MEMBERS WERE WELDED ACROSS TWO JUPPORTS FOR THE MIDDLE TR IN THE STACK OF THREE TRAYS. THE UN! STRUT SPANS THE ENTIRE LENGni OF THE SIDE OF T FROM Tile WALL AND IS USED TO SUPPORT THE PANELS WITH TIE WIRES. THE THERMO-LAG PANE THE CABLE TRAY ON THE BOTTOM OF BOTH BOX CONFIGURATIONS VIA TIE WIRES ATTACHED TO T (CABLE STITCluNG* TRAYS ALLJOINTS AND STRESS ASSOCIATED SKIN REINFORCEMENT). WITH DUE THEREFORE, THESE ENCLOSURES TO THESE CONSERVATIVE HAVE MECHANICAL BEEN REINFOR ATTACHMENT TECHNIQUES, THE ENCLOSURES ADEQUATELY ACCOUNT FOR THE STRUCIURALINIT:GRTTY UMITATION THERMO-LAG MATERIAL AT ELEVATED TEMPERATURES.
ATTACHMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS 6 PAGE B39 OF BSS NOTE - ACCE!TANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV 13. THIS CONFIGURATION CONSISTS OF 2 LARGE ADJACENT J-BOXES. ONE MEASURES 44* HIGH 10M34/2 X 20* WID OTilER MEASURES 50* lilGH X 20* WIDE X 24* DEEP. BOTl! ARE WALL MOUNTED. EAOI HAS TWO 5* 104245 DIA. COND ENTERING FROM THE BOTTOM AND EXITING FROM TIIE TOP. EACH IS ENCLOSED SEPARATELY WITH ll2 PANELS. IlOWEVER, Dl!E TO LACK OF CLEARANCE BETWEEN Tile J-BOXES WITH FLAT PANEIJ!i INSTALLED, THE SECOND LAYER (330-1 V-RIBBED PANELS) ENVELOPS BOTH BOX ENCLOSURES. THE SPEOFIC DETAILS OF THE DCA INSTALLATION OF THE BANDING ON THIS OUTER LAYER OF 330-1 PANEIA THE USE OF ANGLE IRON MOUNT STRUCIllRE TO SERVE AS ATTAOIMENT POINTS FOR THE BANDING IS AN ACCEPTABLE DEVIATION FROM (TESTED) CONFIGURATION SINCE THE METHOD OF ATTACHMENT SERVES THE SAME FUNCTION IN SEC - PANELS. ALL JOINTS ASSOCIATED WITil THE OUTER LAYER EITHER UTILIZE TIIE SCORE AND FOLD TEC ! STRESS SKIN REINFORCEMENT OR ARE STITOIED WTTH TIE WIRES. TIIE CONDUlT INTERFACES WITH THE HAVE ALL BEEN REINFORCED WITH STRESS SKIN QUALIFIED BY SCHEME 10-I. THE SCALING ISSUE ASS CONFIGURATION (SOIEME 10-1 QUALIFIED 2 LAYERS ON 18* X 12* X 6" J-BOXES) IS READlLY JUSTIFIED DUE TO INCREASED TiiERMAL MASS OF Ti}E BOXES AND THE FACT THAT ONE ENTIRE SURFACE OF THE
- ENCLOSU CONCRETE WALL Tills PREVENTS EXPOSURE ON THAT SIDE AND ACTS AS A HEAT SINK. THE USE OF A C OF V-RIBBED PANELS IS ACCEPTABLE BASED ON LARGE CABLE TRAY TESTS WHICH QUAIJFIED STITQi ON llORIZONTAL BUTT JOINTS FOR A 36' CABLE TRAY WTTH TEE SECTION (SGIEME I-2) AND STRESS S ON A 30 WIDE TRAY WITil TEE SECTION. THEREFORE, BOTH THERMAL AND STRUCTURAL ASPECTS OF THE CONFIGURATION HAVE BEEN ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED. DCA 104245 IDENTIFIED LVTERFERENCES WlilOi P BAND SPAGNG SPAGNG FROM BEING OBTAINED. ADDITIONAL ANGLES AND BANDING WAS INSTALLED TO OBTAIN/ME REQUIREMENTS.
14 THE USE OF 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET TO PROTECT CABLE AIR DROPS OF VARIOUS SIZES (UP 104222/1 TO 6* DIA. QUALIFIED VIA SQlEME 11-1. LARGER CABLE BUNDLES ARE ACCEPTABLE DUE TO INCREASED THERMA SECURING THE FLEXI-BLANKET BUNDLES TO THE TRAY RUNGS (INSIDE THE TRAY ENVELOPE) WITH POSITIVE MECHANICAL ATTACllMENT. THE USE OF SHIM BIACKS ON THE TRAY ENVELOPE PROVIDES M MATERIAL AND ENIIANCEE ENCLOSURE EFFECTIVENESS (ALSO PROVIDES MORE ENCLOSED AIR VOLUME). , ATTAQlMENT DETAIL USING 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET AROUND TIIE END OF THE CABLE TRAYS TO FORM ' Tile 330460 (TROWEL GRADE) FIRESTOP IIAS BEEN QUAIJFIED VIA SQlEME Il-1 AND IS MEGIANICALLY AT 9/16* STAPLES. FOR THE 9' RULE DEVIATION IS ACCEPTABLE BASED ON TIIE USE OF DOUBLE LAYER 330-1 PANELS ON TIIE TRAY SUPPORT AND THE IIEAT SINK EFFECT OF Tile ADJACENT 18" DIA. PIPE. j 1 k
W ATTACHMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B40 OF B55 NOTE AccryrANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV 15. TlHS CONFIGURATION REPRESENTS A DEVIATION FROM STANDARD CABLE TRAY PROTECHON IN10357410 THAT INTE PREVENT INSTALLATION OF V-RIBBED PANEIS ON TRAY BOTTOM OR SIDE RAIL SURFACES IN IgZED AREAS (i.e.,6* 104245/0 LONG AREAS ON SIDE RAILS OR ACROSS CABLE TRAY BOTTOMS). THE METHOD USED TO PROTECT THE CABLES PROVIDE 2 LAYERS OF 330460 FUXI-BLANKET UNDER THE CABLES AND TO INSTALL 330-1 PANEL 3 INSIDE TH RAILS. THE TOP PORTION OF THE ENVELOPE IS CONSTRUCTED OF V-RIBBED PANEL MATERIAL. THIS RESULTS EXTERIOR SURFACES BEING EXPOSED OR GAPS IN PANEL COVERAGE UNDER THE CABES FOR A 6* DIST SIDE OF THE EXPOSED SIDE RAIL PORTION. V-RIB PANELS OVERLAP BOTH THE 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET INST THE CABLES AND THE FLAT PANEL PIECES INSTAI I Fn INSIDE THE TRAY BY 9*-11* FOR CONDUCTIVE IIEAT PATH PROTECTION. THIS CONFIGURATION ITTIUZES ASPECTS OF SCHEME 11-1 FOR QUAUFICATION OF 2 LAYERS OF BLANKET AND THE CABLE TRAY TEST SCHEMES USTED FOR 330-1 PANEL THICKNESS AND 9* RULE QUAUFIC StilELDING EFFECT OF THE INTERFERING COMMODITY (e.g., UNISTRtTT) AND THE LOCAUZED AREA OF EXPOSED STEEL CREATE A TORTUROUS PATli FOR HEAT INTRUSION WTHIOUT COMPROMISING STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE TRAY. SINCE THE EFFECTIVE THICKNESS OF MATERIAL LTTII IZFn HAS BEEN QUAUFIED FOR PROTECTION OF C AND AUTOMATICSUPPRESSION AND DETECTION SYSTEM COVERAGE IS PROVIDED IN THE AREA, THIS CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE. 16. TlHS CONFIGURATION REPRESENTS A DEVIATION FROM STANDARD CABLE TRAY PROTECDON IN THAT INTERF 104087/0 i PREVFNT MINOR INSTALLATION OF V-RIBBED 330-1 PANELS ON ONE SIDERAIL AND ON THE BUITOM OF A RADIAL BEND FO (< 6*) DISTANCES. IN EACH CASE THE TRAY ENVELOPE WAS EXTENDED USING 330-1 FLAT PANEL TO ENCLOSE THE INTERFERENCE FOR CONDUCTIVE HEAT PATH PROTECTION. THERMO-IAG 330-70 CONFORMABLE CERAMIC FIB I ' INSULATION MATERIAL IS LTUUZED TO FILL CAVITY AREAS WITHIN THE TRAY ENVELOPE EXTENSION AND HENCE A TORTUROUS PATH TO PREVENT SIGNIFICANT HEAT INTRUSION INTO THE TRAY. THIS METHOD PROVIDES AN EQUIVALENT EVEL OF PROTECTION TO THAT PROVIDED BY 330-1 PANEL MATERLM. INSTALED FOR A 9" DISTANCE A QUALIFIED BY TEST. JOINTS ARE REINFORCED VIA QUAUFIED TECHNIQUES (i.e "HE WIRE
- STITCHING
- AND STRES OVERLAP). THEREFORE.TIIERMAL AND STRUCT11RAL INTEGRITY CONSIDERATIONS HAVE BEEN ADEQUATELY ADD BY THIS CONFIGURATION.
17. THIS CONFIGURATION REPRESENTS A DEVIATION FROM STANDARD J-BOX COVERAGE DETAILS. TO COMPENSATE 104060/0 FOR LOCALIZED AREA ON THE J-BOX UNDERSIDE WHERE AN LNTERFERING CONDUIT (WHICH IS ALSO THERMO-L PREVENT COMPGTE INSTALLATION OF PANELS, A STRESS SKIN AND 330-1 TROWEL GRADE BUILDUP WAS LTUUZED. THE 330-1 PREFAB MATERIAL ON THE INTERFERING CONDUIT WAS THEREFORE EFFECHVELY INCORPORATED INTO THE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE FOR THE J-BOX. THE THERMO-LAG INSTALLED ON THE CONDUIT IN CONIUNCHON WTUI Tile ' TROWEL GRADE BUILDUP IN TIIE INTERFERENCE AREA PROVIDE AN EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF PROTECHON TO THAT QUAUFIED ON J-BOXES VIA SCHEME 10-2. THE USE OF STRESS SKIN REINFORCEMENTIN THE AREA OF INTERFERENCE ENSURES THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRH Y OF THE MATERIAL
ATTAGIMENT B ER-ME-OR2, REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B41 OF B55 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES I DCAIREV 18. THE PROTECTION ALTilOUGli TiiE Ti: OF TiiE CABLES WITH FLEXI-BLANKET AND THE ELASTOMER FIRE SEALS HAVE BEEN TEu w. 101357/0 M w CONFIGURATION FOR THERMO-LAG EXTENDING THROUGH A FIRE STOP WAS 330-1 1 1/2 ROUNDS. TIIE USE OF 330460 FLEXI-BLANKETTHROUGH THE FIRE STOP WILL PROVIDE AN ACCEPTABLE INSTALLAT CONSISTENT WITH Tile TESTED CONFIGURATION. THE FLEXI-BLANKET BUNIiLES RESTING ON THE EXPOSED CABLE TRAY, ALTilOUGil NOT SPEOFICALLY FIRE TESTED, IS NOT SIGNIFICANTLY AFFECTED BY DIE EXPOSED VtAY BECAUSE THE 8* LIMIT ON THE EXPOSED PORTION MEANS THAT THERE IS ONLY A MINOR AMOUNT OF EXPOSED TRAY AN BLANTET ONLY COMES IN CONTACT WITH A SINGLE EXPOSED TRAY RUNO. THE RESULTING CONFIGURATION ACCEPTABLE BECAUSE IT IS BASICALLY CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS AND WHERE IT DEVI THESE CONFIGURATIONS THE DIFFERENCES ARE MINOR AND DO NOT SIGNIFICANTLY IMPACT THE COR TESTED CONFIGURATION. Tile MATERIAL CONTLNUITY AND THICKNESS IS MAINTAINED. 19. ALL JOINTS UTILIZED IN THE TRAY EX n.NSION
- BOX
- CONFIGURATION UTILIZE THE SCORE AND FOLD M 102882/0 TROWEL GRADE BUILDUP AND HAVE BEEN REINFORCED USING TESTED METHODS (UE WIRES /STP.E !
TRAY (ABOVE) AND THE J-BOX (BELOW) LEND STRUCTURAL STABILITY TO THE OVERALL ENVELOPE C AIR DROP CABLES DO NOT CONTACT THERMO-LAG PANEL BACK SIDE SURFACES. THE LARGE ENCLOSE THERM AL MASS OF THE CABLES IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE DEMONSTRATED PERFORMANCE OF THE PANE 13 ON CABLE TRAYS WILL MAINTAIN SUFFICIENTLY LOW CABLE TEMPERATURES.11{EREFORE, THE TiiERMAL AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ASPECTS OF THE CONFIGURATION llAVE BEEN ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED. 20. DETAIL S-3 ALLOWS USE OF A 330-1 FLAT PANEL ON CABG TRAY BOTTOMS FOR A MAXIMUM LENGTH 104078/0OF 12 CONFIGURATION DEVIATES FROM THE 12* (MAX.) LENGril DUE TO PRESENCE OF A 24* DIA. PIPE WITH INSUF CLEARANCE FOR V-RIBBED PANEL. FLAT PANELS WERE INSTAII FI) AS DESCRIBED TO SPAN THE INTERFER Tile USE OF A SINGLE LAYER OF FLAT PANELS ON 18* C 12* C 6* J-BOXES WAS QUALJFIED VIA SQ!EME 13-2. ADDITIONALLY, SINGLE LAYER OF FLAT PANELS ON LARGE LATERAL BEND FTITING".,(5* DIA. CONDUIT) WAS QUAllFIED VIA SOIEME 9-I. TilEREFORE, DUE TO DEMONSI?ATED PE.tFORMANCE OF SINGLE FLAT PAdEL LAYERS AND SHIELD / HEAT SINK EFFECTS OF Tile LARGE PIPE, TlitS CONFIGURATIONIS ACCEPTABLE. THE ADDITION OF TiiE SMALL PIECE OF FLAT PANEL MATERIALTO BUILD UP TH:CKNESS AT A SUPPORT (NOT ASSOCIATED WITH THE TRAY ABOVE) I METIIOD OF PROVIDING PROTRUDING TIEM PROTECTION FOR CONDUCTIVE HEAT PATIL REQUIRED TillCKNE MAINTAINED AND THE PIECE IS SECURL IN PLACE %Tril TIE WIRES.
a . t ATTACHMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. O UN!QUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B42 OF B55 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BAS'.5/ NOTES . . DCA/REV .
- 21. IS';UE 1: THIS CONFIGURATION DEVIATED FROM STANDARD CABLE TR AY MATERIAL INSTALLATION SINCE THE 3301 10391210 PANEL COVERAGE ON THE TRAY BOTTOM 15 INTERRUPTED AND 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET MATERIAL USED TO ENCLOSE AN INTERFERING P1PE WITHIN Tile TRAY PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE. THIS CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE SINCE 2 LAYERS OF 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET (QUALIFIED VIA SCHEME II-1) IS PROVIDED UNDER THE 4 LAYERS (1/2" THICK EA. BEFORE COMPRESSION) OF 330-70 CONFORMABLE CERAMIC FIBER INSULATING MATERIAL AND STAINLESS STEEL JACKETING. THE THERMAL PROTECTION IS FURTHER ENHANCED BY WRAPPING 2 LAYERS OF 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET AROUND THE STAINLESS STEEL JACKETING. THE MINOR CAVITY AREA BETWEEN THE 330-1 PANELS ON THE TRAY UNDERSIDE IS COMPLETELY FILLED %TTH 330-1 TROWEL GRADE MATERIAL. THE 330460 LAYERS AROUND THE LNTERFERING PIPE ARE SECURED TO TIIE ADJACENT 330-1 PANELS %TTH STAPLES AND TROWEL GRADE BUILDUP. TO ENABLE INSULATION TO BE INSTALLED ON ANOTHER 2* DIA. PIPE DIRECTLY BEIDW THE INTERFERING PIPE DESCRIBED ABOVE, DCA 10391210 ;
PERM!TTED A MINOR AREA OF T11E OUTER 330460 MATERIAL (INSTAI I Fn AROUND TIIE STAINLESS STEEL JACKETING) TO BE
- NOTCHED
- AND THE AREA FILLED IN %TTH 330460 TROWEL GRADE. THE OVERALL LENGTH OF THE CABLE TRAY +
Er!VELOPE WITHOLTT 330-1 PANELS UNDERNEATH THE TRAY IS LESS THAN 6*. BASED ON THE CONSERVATIVE USE OF 330 660 FLEXI-BLANKET BOTH INSIDE Tile TRAY (UNDER THE' CABLES) AND AROUND THE INTERFERING PIPE (AS MODIFIED ABOVE). SilIELDING EFFECTS AND TORTURO:JS PAT 11 CREATED BY THE 2 INSULATED PIPES AND MINOR AREA INVOLVED, THE CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE. ISSUE 2: TIIE BOX CONFIGURATION ENCLOSING THE CABLES WlHCH DP.OP FROM A VERTICAL 30* TRAY (MOUNTED AGAINST A WALL) INTO A IIORIZONTAL 30* TRAY IS CONSTRUCTED USING JOINT UPGRADE TECHNIQUES QUALIFIED BY TEST 12-I. THE VERTICAL PORTION OF Tile ENCLOSURE IS SECURED TO STRUCTURE WIDI SCREWS FOR POSITIVE
- MECliANICAL ATTACHMENT. SHIMS ARE PROVIDED ON THE BOTTOM (HORIZONTAL) TRAY TO PREVENT CABLES FROM CONTACTING TIIE PANEL BACKSIDE WHICH SPANS BETWEEN THE 2 TRAYS. THE SHIMS ALSO SUPPORT THIS PANEL TO PREVENT POTENTIAL SAG. THE CABLES ARE WRAPPED WTTH SILTEMP TO PRECLUDE DAMAGE FROM STRESS SKIN DURING INSTALLATION. THE ADDITIONAL 330-1 PANEL MATERIAL INSTALLED AS SHIM.f. THE WALL MOUNTED CONFIGURATION OF Tile VERTICAL TRAY AND THE INCREASED AIR VOLUME WITHIN THE
- BOX
- ENCIDSURE ALL ENHANCE THE THERMAL PERFORMA .'CE CHARACTERIST1CS OF T!!E ENCLOSURE. THEREFORE. BASED ON CONSERVATIVE STRUCTURAL MOUNTING AND PROVEN JOINT REINFORCEMENT IN CONJUNCTION WITH OBVIOUS THERMAL BENEFTTS, TiiE CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE.
- 22. TIIE LBD ENCLOSURE RESOLITTION EMPLOYS A ONE PIECE STRESS SKIN CAP DESIGN BASED ON TYPICAL DETAIL 61. 103874/1 WiiERE THE CONDUIT SUPPORT INTERFERES WTTH THE LBD BOX / CONDUIT REINFORCEMENT, TIIE APPLICATION OF STRESS SKIN WAS NOTCHED IN Tile AREA OF SUPPORT BUT EXTENDED BEYOND THE SUI' PORT TO ALLOW BANDING. THE AIR DROP ENTERING THE PROTECTED CABLE TRAY IS INSTAT.I Fn IN ACCORDANCE WITH TYPICAL DETAILS 3-4 OPTION 2 AND 3-4.4.
ATTAOIMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B43 OF B55 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES - DCA/REN . ! 23. ON Tile 810* ELEVATION, WO LAYERS OF 330-1 PANELS IIAVE BEEN INEAI.I Fn ON A JUNCTION BOX. THIS ARRANGEMENT 103884/I HAS BEEN TESTED AND FOUND ADEQUATE VIA TEST SGIEME 10-1. THE J-BOX 15 MOUNTED TO 10300110 STRUCTU REDUCES POTENTIAL EXPOSURE SURFACES AND WILL ACT AS A HEAT SINK. AU., JOINTS UTluZED IN THE BOX CONFIGURATION HAVF BEEN INSTAt I rn USING THE SCORE AND FOLD METHOD WTD{ TROWEL GRADE B BEEN REINFORCED WITH TESED METHODS (TIE WIRES / STRESS SKIN). TIIE ESSENTIAL CABLES ARE E AND DO NOT CONTACT THERMO-LAG PANEIS. THE LARGE ENCLOSED AIR VOLUME AND THERMAL MAS COMMODITIES WILL MAINTAIN SUFFICIENTLY LOW CABLE TEMPERATURES. ON Ti!E 832' ELEVATION TH EXTENDS FROM THE PENETRATION SEAL TO A FIRE STOP IN TRAY T24BAEG24. ESSENTIAL CONDUIT FROM THE SIDE OF THE BOX. THERMO-IAG TO FIRE STOP INTERFACE WAS TESTED IN SCHEME l-2. TH INTERFACE WAS UP GRADED AS PROVIDED FOR JUNCTION BOAES PER DETAIL 2-3 AND PER TEST SCHEME 9-24 ALL SEAMS AND JOINTS OF THE BOX DESIGN IIAVE BEEN INSTAI I Fn USING THE SCORE AND 103S75/0FOLD M GRADE BUILD-UP OR HAVE BEEN REINFORCED USING THE WIRES. THE AIR DROP CABLES DO NOT C LAG PANELS, AS TilEY ARE PROTECTED WITil SILTEMP BLANKET. THE lARGE ENCLOSED AIR VOLUME AND THERMAL MASS OF Tile CABLES IN CONJUNCTION WITil THE DEMONSTRATED PERFORMANCE OF THERMO-LAG 330-I CAELE TRAYS WILL M AINTAIN SUFFICIENTLY LOW CABLE TEMPERATURES. TIIE FIRE STOP INSTA T I F WILL ADEQUATELY DEMONSTRATED SEAL THE IN TEST SCHEME l-2. ENCLOSURE. TIIE EFFECnVENESS OF THERMO-IAO AND FIRE STOP ASSEMB 25.
; THE BOXED-IN DESIGN AND CABLE TRAY SIIIMS PRESENTIN DCA 103533/0 HAVE NOT SPECIFICALLY 103533/0 B PART OF TESTED CONFIGURATION. THE CABLE TRAY SIDE RAIL SHIMS HOWEVER, ARE NO DIFFERENT THAN MULTIPLE LAYERS OF 330-1 PANEIS WHICH HAS BEEN TESTED IN TEST SCHEME 10-1 (i.e., JUNCTION BOX-2 LAYERS) THE MULTIPLE 1AYERS OF 330-1 PANELS PROVIDE FOR A GREATER DEPTH /QUANIT1Y OF MATERIAL AVAILABLE FOli S LOCAUZED REDUCTION OF INSIDE TEMPERATURES WTH11N THE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE AT THE SHIM BOXED-IN DESIGN HAS BEEN INSTAI r Fn UTIUZING TESTED UPGRADE JOINTING METHODS AS WELL AS T FOLD TECHNIQUE. Tile SCORE AND FOLD TECHNIQUE ENSURES THAT THE STRESS SKIN (INSIDE) RE CRITICAL JOINT LOCATIONS, AND IN CONJUNCTION WITH UPGRADED JOINT METHODS ENSURES INTEGRITY OF THE JOINT DURING FIRE CONDITIONS. Tile OVERALL WIDTH OF Ti!E BOX REPRESENTS NO GREATER UNSUPPORTED WOULD NORMALLY BE ENCOUNTERED IN A STANDARD TESTED 36* CABLE TRAY PROTECTIVE ENCLOS ALTIIOUGH THE BOXED-IN DESIGN COMMUNICATES TWO SEPARATE LEVEL 2 AND LEVEL 3 CABLE TRAYS, THJ 510X DOES NOT COMPROMISE TIIE SAFE SHUIDOWN CAPAB1UTY OF THE PLANT. IN CONCLUSION, THIS INSTALLATION IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH BASIS / NOTES 1-5 AND IS ACCEPTABLE AS-IS.
A
=
ATTACHMENT B E2-ME-082, REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS , PAGE B44 OF B55 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV 26. THE INSTALLATION DESCRIBED ON DCA 10353310 REPRESENTS A THICKNESS DEVIATION FORM THE STANDARD103533/0 REQUIREMENTS FOR PROTECTLNG SUPPORTS FOR ESSENEAL RACEWAYS. ALTHOUGH THE MINIMUM THICKNESS OF 1/2 WAS NOT MAINTAINED,THE HORTZONTAL BOTTOM OF THE SUPPORT WAS COVERED %TTH = 1/4* THICK 330-1 PANEL. IN ADDITION ONE ADDITIONAL LAYER OF 330-1 PANEL WAS INSTAt 1 Fn TO VERTICALLY ENCLOSE THE BOTTOM 7/16 SUPPORT. EVEN TilOUGH THE REQUIRED I/2* THICKNESS IS NOT MAINTAINED, THE 1/4" THICK PANEL WILL PROVIDE A DEGREE OF PROTECTION MINIMIZING THE HEAT TRANSFER INTO VIE SUPPORT. THE TORTUROUS HEAT PATH TH SUPPORT ARRANGEMENT PRESENTS ALSO MINIMIZES HEAT TRANSFER LNTO THE ESSENTIAL COMMODITY. ' IRE INSTRUMENT TUBINO INSTALLED BEIDW Tile SUPPORT WILL FUNCTION AS SHIELDING TO MINIMIZE RADIANT HEAT TRANSFER LNTO THE BOTTOM OF THE SUPPORT. THE CONDUIT SUPPORT IS PHYSICALLY ATTACHED TO THE CON WALL WilIQI ACTS AS A LARGE HEAT SINK. TliE 1/4* THICK 330-1 PANEL, ALTHOUGH NOT SPEGFICALLY A TESTED CONFIGURATION,IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH BASIS / NOTES 1,3,4. AND 5. AND IS ACCEPTABLE AS-IS. 27. Tills CONFIGURADON CONSISTS OF TWO ESSENTIA" CABLE TRAYS PROTECTED BY 330-1 PANELS WITH 103550/1ESSENT AIR DROPS COMMUNICATING BETWEEN Tile TWO TRAYS, PROTECTED BY 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET WRAP. NON ESSENTIAL
- CABLE AIR DROPS BETWEEN ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY AND NON ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAYS ARE ALSO PROTECTED ELANKET WHERE THE CABLE AIR DROP EXITS THE ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY. THERE IS NO Tem t.e CONVIGURATI FLEXI-BLANKET INSTA11 rn THROUGH THE FIRE STOP MATERIAL. HOWEVER, FLEXI-BLANKET INSTALLATION THROUGII THE 330-1 PANEL (END CAP) DOES RESEMBLE TEST SGIEME !!1 1. THE FLEXI-BLANKET /330-1 PANEL END CAP IN !
SEALED WTTH 330460 TROWEL GRADE MATERIAL. 330-1 TROWEL GRADE HAS BEEN INSTAt I Fn ALL AROUND Tile FIR STOP. TO ENSURE A COMPLETE FIRE BARRIER EXISTS WTTH NO OPENINGS OR VOIDS. ALTHOUGH THE AIR DROP PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE /330-1 PANEL INTERFACE DOES NOT EXACTLY REPLICATE TEST SGIEME II-1. TiiE INSTALLA MEETS Ti!E REQUIREMENTS OF BASIS / NOTES l-S AND IS ACCEPTABLE AS-IS. THE ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY PROTECnVE ENVELOPE HAS BEEN MODIFIED TO AVOID THE P!PE INTERFER LOCATED ABOVE THE CABLE TRAY). THIS MODIFICATION CONSISTS OF 3301 FLAT PANELS MOUNTED INSIDE TRAY (IN THE AREA OF THE INTFRFERENCE) AND INSTAt i FD VIA TIE WIRES AND ST RESS SKIN / TROWEL GRA PER BCTTOM JOINT REQUIREMENTS. ALUlOUGH THE CABLE TRAY PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE DOES NOT EXACILY REPLICATE TEST SCIEME I1-1.THE INSTALLATION MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF BASIS / NOTES 1-5 AND IS ACC AS-IS. 23. THE AIR DROP PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE RESEMBLES TEST SOIEME Il-1, %TTH EXCEPTION OF THE FLEXI-BLANKET POINT 104217/1 OF ATTAGIMENT AT Tile CONDUTT/ WALL INTERFACE (- 3* TO 4* IN LENGTH). SINCE THE SECOND AND THIRD LAYE FLEXI-BLANKET COULD NOT BE COMPLETELY WRAPPED AROUND THE CONDUIT THE FLEXI-BLANKET WAS M BUTTING EDGES OF THE FLEXI-BLANKET TO THE CONCRETE WALL. THESE EDGES / SEAMS WEME TiiEN FILL TROWEL GRADE MATERIAL WITH A FINAL I1/I6* WFT BUILDUP AT THE TillRD (OUTER) LAYER / WALL INTERFAC ACCEPTABILITY OF THIS INSTALLATION IS BASED ON THE FOLIEWING ATTRIBLTTES: THE FIRST LAYER AROUND T CONDUIT PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE iS CONTINUOUS; THE SECOND AND Til!RD LAYERS OF FLEXI-BLANKET ARE BUTTED TO THE CONCRETE WALL (HEAT SINK) WITH A TROWEL GRADE BUILDUP; THE INSTALLATION RESEMBLES TYPICAL DETA113 4-3.1. AND 4-7.1. AND THE AREA IS PROTECTED BY AUTOMATIC SUPPRESSION AND DETECTION.
l ATTACHMENT B ER-ME-032, REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS
- PAGE B45 OF B55 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV
- 29. THE BOX DESIGN HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY ADDRESSED BY ATTACHMENT A. THE AIR DROP /FLEXI-BLANKET CONFIGURATION 104226/0 PENETRATING THE BOX DESIGN RESEMBES TEST SCllEME 11 1 WITH EXCEPTION OF Tile COLLAR DESIGN. THE STRESS 104048JU SKIN AND I1/16* TROWEL GRADE BUILDUP AT Tile AIR DROP / BOX INTERFACE ENSURES CONTINUITY OF MATERIAL.
TillCKNESS OF MATERIAL, AND EQUIVALENTSTRUCIURALINTEGRITY ANDIS ACCEPTABE AS AN ALTERNATIVETO THE STAPilNG/ FLARE OUT DESIGN PRESENTED IN TEST SCHEME 11-1.
- 30. FLEXI-BLANKET AIR DROP INSTALLA110N BETWEEN CABLE TRAYS AS SHOWN ON DETAIL 5-12 HAS BEEN EVALUATED 103935/0 SEPARATELY BY ATTACHMENT A. THE INSTALLATION OF A RELATIVELY SHORT LENGTH OF 330-1 FLAT BOARD ON THE CABLE TRAY $!DE RAIL (VERSUS 330-1 V-RIBBED BOARD) AND THE 2* TO 4" OVERLAP OF THE END OF THE CABLE TRAY IS ACCEPTABLE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING: THE FLAT BOARD PROVIDES THE SAME EQUIVAENT THICKNESS AS A 330-1 V- ; i RIBBED PANEL; TIIERE IS NO DISCONTINUITY OF MATERIAL.; ALL JOINTS ARE UPGRADED PER TESTED CONFIGURATIONS, AND THE INSTALLATION EXHIBITS NO IMPACT ON STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE.
FURTilERMORE,330-1 FLAT BOARD HAS BEEN SUCCESSFULLY TESTED IN TEST SCHEME 10-2 FOR JUNCTION BOX PROTECTION WillCH IS REPRESENT' A TIVE OF THE SMALL LENGTH OF 330-1 FLAT BOARD USED FOR THIS INSTALLATION. AUTOMATIC SL'PPRESSION AND DETECTION IS PROVIDED IN THE AREA.
- 31. THIS CONFIGURATION REPRESENTS A DEVIADON FROM STANDARD CABLE TRAY PROTECHON IN THAT SPRINKLER llEAD 103582/D INTERFERENCES PREVENT INSTALLATION OF THE BOTTOM PANEL FOR AN APPROXIMATE 12* LENGTH ACROSS TifE CABLE TRAY. TiiE MEHiOD USED TO PROTECT DIE CABLES WAS TO INSTALL 330-1 FLAT BOARD TIE WIRED TO Tile CABLE TRAY RUNGS THROUGH THE AREA OF THE SPRINKLER HEAD INTERFERENCE. THE FLAT BOARD WAS CHAMFERED, AS REQUIRED, TO PROVIDE = I/8* CEARANCE ABOVE THE SPRINKLER HEAD. 330-1 FLAT BOARD WAS ALSO INSTAt J Fn INSIDE T11E CABLE TRAY (BELOW Tile CABLES) INSIDE THE SIDE RAILS AND BELOW THE TOP (OLTTER) 330-1 V-RIBBED PANEL. ALL SPACE BETWEEN RUNGS WAS FILLED WITH 330-1 TROWEL GRADE MATERIAL AS WELL AS TiiE SPACE BETWEEN THE OUTER TOP PANEL AND INNER TOP PANEL ALTHOUGH THIS CONFIGURATION DOES NOT REPLICATE ANY TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. THE PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE IN THE AREA OF INTERFERENCE MAINTAINS THE MINIMUM TEs ttu THICKNESS THE FIRE BARRIER MATERIALIS CONTINUOUS. TifE METHOD OF SUPPORT DOES NOT SIGNIFICANTLY DEVIATE FROM THE TESTED CONFIGURATION, JD THERE IS AUTOMATIC SUPPRESSION AND DETECHON IN THE nREA. THE FACT THAT THE INTERFERENCE IS A SPRINKLER HEAD PROVIDES ADDITIONAL CREDENCE AS TO THE ACCEPTABILITY OF TIIE l DESIGN, IN THAT Tile SPRINKLER HEAD WILL ACTUATE MINIMIZING llEAT INPUT TO Tills SECTION.
- 32. THE INSTALLATION OF ONE LAYER OF 330-1 FIAT BOARD PROVIDES ADEQUATE I-HOUR PROTECHON AS DOCUMENTED IN 103847/0 TEST SCllEME 10-2. THE ADDITION OF ONE LAYER OF 330-1 V-RIBBED PANEL ENHANCES THE OVERALL DESIGN BY PROVIDING ADDITIONAL MATERIAL FOR SUBL! MING. FURTifERMORE.TIIE COMMON ENCLOSURE INSTALLATION TECHNIQUE WILL NOT IMPACT OR DEGRADE THE OVERALL DESIGN. TIIIS INSTALLATION IS ACCEPTABLE.
33. WTTil TiiE INSTALLATION OF STRESS SKIN ONTO THE GROUND CABLE AND GROUNDING C12MP THE TROWEL 103792/D GRADE / STRESS SKIN UPGRADE ON THE 4* CONDUIT CLOSELY RESEMBLES TEST SCHEMES 9-1 AND 9-2. TiiE SMALL AREA OCCUPIED BY THE GROUNDING CLAMP / GROUND CABLE, THE FACT TIIAT TIIE REMAINDER OF Tile RADIAL BEND IIAS BEEN SUCCESSFULLY UPGRADED, AND THE FACT TilAT THE AREA IS PROVIDED %TTH ALTTOMATIC SUPPRESSION AND DETECTION SUPPORTTHE ACCEPTABILHY OF Tills tNSTALLAllON. b$. k
n - .. .. . ATTACHMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B46 OF B55 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES _ DCA/REV
- 34. DUE TO THE LARGE AIR VOLUME AND ENCLOSED THERMAL MASS OF THE PROTECTED COMMODfTIES (PRUTRUDING 10M80MI PORTIONS OF THE EMBEDDED SLEEVES, CARG BUNDLE MASS, JUNCHON BOX, AND THE MASS OF lrHE CASE TRAYS) THE THERMAL PROTECTION AFFORDED BY THE
- BOX
- DESIGN IS ADEQUATE. IN ADDITION,THE 1ARGEST SURFACE OF THE '
PROTECTIVE ENVELOPES IS ACTUALLY THE CONCRETE WALL WHICH PREVENTS EXPOSURE FROM THAT SIDE AND ACTS AS A HEAT SINK. THEREFORE, THE CRITICAL ATTRIBUTE OF THESE DESIGNS 15 THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE
- box *.
ADDITIONALLY,SINCE THE ENCLOSURE ASSOCIATED WITH DCA 10M80 INVOLVED ENVELOPMENT OF MULTIPLE COMMODITIES. THE OVERALL WIDTH OF TriE ENCLOSURE IS APPROXIMATELY S*- 2*. TO COMPENSATE FOR THIS LARGE
, SPAN A STRUCTURAL FRAME HAS BEEN ATTACHED TO CABLE TRAY HANGERS AND LOCATED ABOVE THE TOP OF THE CABLE TRAY OF CONCERN. HOWEVER,THE OVERALL WEIGHT OF THE BOX ASSEMBLY IS SHARED BETWEEN THE JUNCTION -
BOX AND CABLE TRAY AS WELL AS THE MODIFIED STRUCTURAL STEEL THE THERMO LAG PANEIJ ARE SECURED TO THE CABLE TRAY ON THE BOTTOM CF THE BOX CONFIGURATIONS VIA TIE WIRES ATTACHED TO THE RUNOS OF THE CABLE TRAYS. ALLJOINTS ASSOCIATED WITH THESE ENCLOSURES HAVE BEEN REINFORCED WITH QUALIFIED TECHNIQUES (* STITCHING
- AND STRESS SKIN REINFORCEMENT). THEREFORE, DUE TO THESE CONSERVK! VE MECHANICAL ATTACHMENT TECHNIQUES, THE ENCLOSURES ADEQUATELY ACCOUNT FOR THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY llMITATIONS OF THERMO-LAG MATERIAL AT ELEVATED TEMPERATURES.
- 35. DUE TO THE LARGE AIR VOLUME AND ENCLOSED THERMAL MASS OF THE PROTECTED COMMODfHES (PROTRUDING 10M24/2 PORTIONS OF THE EMBEDDED SLEEVES, CABLE BUNDLE MASS CONDUTT, AND THE MASS OF THE CABLE TRAYS) THE THERMAL PROTECDON AFFORDED BY THE
- BOX
- DESIGN IS ADEQUATE. IN ADDITION, ONE SURFACE OF THE PROTECHVE ENVELOPE IS ACTUALLY THE CONCRETE WALL WHICH PREVENTS EXPOSURE FROM THAT SIDE AND ACTS AS A HEAT SINK.
THEREFORE, THE CIUTICAL ATTRIBUTE OF THESE DESIGNS IS THE STRUCTURAL INTEORITY OF THE
- BOX *. THIS HAS BEEN ADDRESSED BY ATTACHING THE ENCIDSURES TO THE CONCRETE Wall.VIA AN ANOM FRAME ARRANGEMENT AND STANDARD DETAIL 11-7. THE OVERALL WEIGHT OF THE COMMON ENCLOSURE IS SHARED BY THE ANGLE IRON, CABLE TRAY AND CONDUIT. THE THERMO-IAG PANELS ARE SECURED TO THE CABLE TRAY ON THE BOTTOM OF THE BOX CONFIGURATIONS VIA TIE WIRES ATTACHED TO THE RUNGS OF THE CABLE TRAYS. AIL JOINTS ASSOC 1ATED WTTH THESE ENCLOSURES HAVE BEEN REINFORCED WHR QUAIlFIED TECHNIQUES (*STITCHINO* ANO STRESS SKIN REINFORCEMENT).
THEREFORE, DUE TO THESE CONSERVATIVE MECHANICAL ATTACHMENT TECHNIQUES, THE ENCLOSURES ADEQUATELY ACCOUNT FOR THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY IlMITATIONS OF THERMO-LAG MATERIAL AT EEVATED TEMPERATURES. s .i
ATTACHMENT C ER-ME-082, REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B47 OF B55 NOTE ACCEPTANT BASISINOTES I 36. DCAIREV l DUE TO THE LARGE AIR VOLUME AND ENCLOSED THERMAL MASS OF THE PROTECTED COMMODITIES (PROT 101986/1 PORTIONS OF Tile EMBEDDED SEEVES, CABLE BUNDLE MASS AND THE MASS OF THE CABLE TRAYS) THE THERMAL 103034/1 PROTECTION AFFORDED BY THE
- BOX
- DESIGN IS ADEQUATE. IN ADDITION,THE LARGEST SURFACE OF THE PROTECTIVE 10412410 ENVELOPES IS ACTUALLY THE CONCRETE WALL WHICH PREVENTS EXPOSURE FROM THAT SIDE AND AC SINK. THEREFORE, THE CRITICAL ATTRIBUTE OF THESE DESIGNS IS THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE
- BOX *. THIS HAS BEEN CONSERVATIVELY ADDRESSED VIA MEO{ANICALLY ATTACHING THE ENCLOSURES TO THE CONCRE HILTI BOLT FASTENERS AND TO EMBED PLATE VIA I/4" SELF TAPPING SCREWS. ADDITIONALLY, SINCE THE ENCLOSURE ASSOOATED %TTH THE DCA(S) INVOLVED ENVELOPMENT OF SEVERAL SLEEVES. THE OVERALL LE OF THE ENCLOSURE IS APPROXIMATELY 7'- 6*. THE THERMO-LAG PANELS ARE SECURED TO THE CABLE TR FRONT OF THE BOX CONFIGURATIONS VIA BANDING ATTACHED TO THE BACK OF THE CABLE TRAYS. THE B PORTION OF111E ENCLOSURE IS SUPPORTED VIA HORIZONTAL (THROUGH BACK OF CABLE TRAYS) BA B4 WDiNG (AROUND CONDUITS ATTAOIED TO WALL). ALL JOINTS ASSOCATED WTTH THESE ENCIDSURES HAV REINFORCED WITH QUALIFIED TEGINIQUES (*STITallNG* AND STRESS SELN REINFORCEMENT). HOWEVER, THE STRESS SKIN WAS NOT TIE WIRED TOGETHER. THEREFORE, DUE TO THESE CGNSFRVAllVE MECHANICAL ATTACHMENT.
TEGIN! QUES. THE ENCLOSURES ADEQUATELY ACCOUNT FOR THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY LIMITATIONS j MATERIAL AT EEVATED TEMPERATURES. AUTOMATIC SUPPRESSION AND DETECTION ARE PROVIDED IN AREA. 37. THIS CONFIGURATION IS ACTUALLY A COMBINATION OF TWO TYP! CAL DETAILS (1-5 AND 13 2) WIUCH ARE EVAL 103487/0 SEPARATELY IN ATTAQiMENT A. THE USE OF HILTI BOLTS TO SECURE PORTIONS OF THE PROTECTIVE ENVEL OUT ONTO T11E CONCRETE WALL PROVIDES POSITIVE MEO{ANICAL ATTACHMENT AND IS AN ENHANCEMENT UPGRADE TESTS FOR ALL CABLE TRAYS AS WELL AS QUALIFICATION OF THE 9" CONDUCTIVE HEAT PAlli PRO BOUNDED BY THE TEST SO! EMES INDICATED. ADDITIONALLY THE CONCRETE WALL PREVENTS EXPOSURE THE TWO LARGEST SURFACES AND HAS HEAT SINK EFFECTS. THEREFORE, BASED ON THE THERMAL AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ASPECTS DISCUSSED ABOVE, THIS CONFIGURATION IS ANTABLE. O
M d>M -4, M .~M %d ed.4 -4 %aA 8f 4 Ad m r- S "O A=h4*OEMa MA h A 4-%Ad e' '--"'.3MWMM MM eMW ' " **WJT4 =O E A 4 4 4 b-en--Mh 4 - > *-+Ch-- e=a4. A h4J^.s-a-=41-BEM=45=-r==dh M 4 0- A--4F---J
,
- 0 1
6 4 e 0 4 i l 5 1 5
+
4 i f a i f +. 3 E J t
+
4 i o 1 T 1
. 1 s
f 2 5 L i J k l e 4 i 1 i . h I _ F } 1, - e i 1 1 4 h 1 a e 1 - a 5 d
- s
^'. -
t i 4 1 p b i 4-l, 4
? v&s- i w 4y4 x, .w e - aa% z L
j. 1* - 3 .. .k f . r I l,_ .c h b g*ztWW*-e*f'#** M &W M44ey
ATTACHMENT B ER-ME-082 REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B48 OF B55 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES 4
, DCA/REV
- 38. DCA 103184/1 AND DCA 103192/1 HAVE BEEN SUPERSEDED BY DCA 103681/t. HOWEVER, DETA!LS CONTAINED ON DCA 103184/I 103184/1 (COMMON ENCLOSURE AT FLOOR SLEEVES) WERE NOT TRAhSFERRED TO DCA 103681/1. SINCE THE COMMON 103192/1 ENCLOSURE AT THE FLOOR SLEEVES HAS BEEN INSTAI I Fn, THE INSTALLATION DETAILS /REQUIkEMENTS OF DCA 103184/1 103681/1 WILL BE REVIEWED IIEREIN UNTIL SUCH TIME TIIAT DCA 103681/1 IS REVISED. THIS CONFIGURATION CONSISTS OF 2 LARGE ADJACENT J-BOXES (JB-2S$312G AND JB-2S$384G) MOUNTED BACK TO BACK ON A COMMON 3* TUBE STEEL SUPPORT. BOTH ARE WALL MOUNTED. EACH HAS CONDUITS AND FIRE ZONE *R* CABLE EXmMG FROM THE SIDE. THE SIDE EXIT FOR BOTH JUNCTION BOXES HAVE BEEN PROTECTED BY ADDING A 4* FIRE STOP CONSTRUCTED OF 330-1 FLAT PANELS AND TROWEL GRADE. THIS FIRE STOP llAS BEEN SUBKTANTIALLY REINFORCED WITH BANDS AND TIE WIRES.
EACII JUNCTION BOX IS ENCLOSED SEPARATELY WITH 1/2* THICK 330-1 FIAT PANELS BANDED IN PIACE. HOWEVER, DUE ! TO LACK OF CLEARANCE BETWEEN THE J-BOXFS (Wml FLAT PANELS INSTA!I FD), THE SECOND IAYER (330-1 V-RIBBED PANELS) WAS REQUIRED TO ENVELOP BOTlf LOX ENCLOSURES. ALL JOINTS ASSOCIATED Wmi THE OtJTER LAYER EITHER UTILIZE THE SCORE AND FOLD TECIINIQUE WfiH STRESS SKIN REINFORCEMENT OR ARE STITCHED Wml TIE WIRES. TiiE CONDUIT INTERFACES Wml THE ENCLOSURE HAVE ALL BEEN REINFORCED WITH STRESS SKIN QUAUFIED BY SCHEME 10-1. THE SCAUNG ISSUE ASSOCIATED Wml THIS CONFIGURAllON (SCHEME 10-1 QUAUFIED 2 LAYERS ON 18* X 12* X 6* J-BOXES) IS READILY JUSTIFIED DUE 10 THE INCREASED THERMAL MASS OF THE BOXES. THE USE OF COMMON LAYER OF V-RJBBED PANFLS IS ACCFFTABLE BASED ON LARGE CABLE TRAY TESTS WHICil QUAUFIED STITCHING REINFORCEMENT ON HORIZONTAL BITIT JOIN 1S FOR A %* CABLE TRAY Wml TEE SECHON (SCHEME l-2) AND STRESS SKIN REINFORCEMENT ON A 30 WIDE TRAY %TTH TEE SECTION. THEREFORE, BOTH THERMAL AND STRUCTURAL ASPECTS OF THE CONFIGU,RA f!ON HAVF BEEN ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED. Ti!E CONDUIT SLEEVE COMMON ENCLOSURE (BOX)IS SHOWN ON DCA 103184/I, PAGE 5. Tills COMMON ENCLOSURE IS INSTALLED AROUND (5) CONDUtrSLEEVES, UP TO AND INCLUDING Tl!E EXISTING ELASTOMER FIRE STOP IN TRAY T23GSCN80, AND INCLUDES THE ESSENTIAL CONDUTT FROM JUNCTION BOX JB2353120. THE , COMMON ENCLOSURE FOR THE CONDUIT SLEEVES HAS BEEN REINFORCED %TTH TIE WIRE STTTCHING. THE ESSENTIAL i l CONDUIT EXmNG JUNCTION BOX 2B2S$312G HAS BEEN PROTECTED Wmf FLEXI-BLANKET FROM THE JUNCTION BOX TO l THE CONDUIT SLEEVE COMMON ENCLOSURE. THE OVERALL LENGTH OF THIS CONDUIT IS < 2 FT. Tile FLEXI-BLANKET MAS BEEN INSTAI I Fn ON THE CONDUITIN ACCORDANCE %TTH AIR DROP REQUIREMFNTS OF TEST SCHEME 11-1. GIVEN TIIE METilODS USED IN INSTALLATION MAINTAINING FIRE BARRIER THICKNESS, CONTINUITY AND SUPPORT, THIS INSTALLATION IS ACCEPTABLE.
- 39. TYPICAL DETAIL 8-4 HAS BEEN EVALUATED IN ATTACHMENT A, BASIS / NOTE NO. 51 AND IS ACCEPTABLE. If3486/0
- 40. TYPICAL DETAIL 7-7 AND 7-7.1 HAS BEEN EVALUATED IN ATTACHMENT A, BASIS / NOTE NO. 70 AND IS ACCEPTABLE. 103061/1 m_.._ --
ATTACHMENT D ER-ME-082. REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGUOATIONS PAGE B49 OF B5S NOTE ACccrrANCE BASIS /NUTES DCA/REV 41. LBDs HAVE BEEN PROTEu w USING STANDARD DETAIL 6-1, EXPANDED TO ENCAPSULATE BOUI LEDs. STANDARD DETAIL 10205810 6-1 HAS BEEN EVALUATED IN ATTACHMENT A. THE BOX DESIGN USED TO PROTECT THESE LBDe101499/0 CLOSELY SAMETECHNIQUES USED TO PROVIDE PROTECHON FOR JUNCHON BOXES AS WAS TESTED IN TEST SCHEM 102889/0 THE BOXING OF THE TWO LBDs PRESENT3 A GREATER THERMAL MASS (WHEN COMPARED TO A SINGLE LB RESULTS IN LOWER OVERALLINSIDETEMPERATURE. ROOI4 2-079 IS PROTECTED BY AITTOMATIC SUPPRESSIO DETECTION WHEREAS ROOM X-165 IS PROVIDED WITH DETECTION SYSTEMS ONLY. THE RESULTLNG PROTECT ENVELOPE MAINTAINS Tile MINIMUM MATERIAL THICKNESS. THE MATERIAL IS CONTINUOUS, AND THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY IS AND ACCEPTABLE. END USE OF THE FIRE BARRIER IS CONSISTFNT WTTH THE TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. THIS ; I 42. THE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE FOR THE ESSENTIAL CONDUIT LBD HAS BEEN INSTA' I Fn IN ACCORDANCE WTTH 10272610 l DETAIL 6-1 %TTH EXCEPTION OF ONE CORNER WHICH HAS BEEN MODIFIED DUE TO AN EXISTING LBD THERMO-L COVERAGE. AT THE INTERFACE A SMALL PIECE OF 330-1 PANEL AND BANDS HAVE BEEN INSTAt I rn/ ATTACHED TO EXISTING LBD ENVELOPE WITH A !!4* THICKNESS OF 330-1. THE REMAINDER OF TifE LBD HAS BEEN PROTECTED AS REQUIRED BY DETAIL 6-1 INCLUDI;JG BANDING AND JOINT UPGRADES. ALTHOUGH THE INSTAI I Fn DETAIL SLIGIITLY DEVIATED FORM Tile STANDARD DETAILiTEsIw CONFIGURA110N THE INSTALLATION IS ACCEPTABLE SINCE THER DEVIATION IN MATERIAL Di!CKNESS. THE MATERIAL!S CONTINUOUS, AND THE SUPPORT ASSEMBLY AND END USE IS CONSISTENT WITH THE TESHED CONFIGURATIONS. 43. REVIEW INDICATED THAT THIS INSTALLATION CANNOT BE EVALUATED AGAINST DIE TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.; ONE 104174/D FORM 93-184 HAS BEEN WRITTEN TO DOCUMENT THIS SITUATION AND PROVIDE A MECHANISM TO BRING THIS 104011/0 INSTALLATION INTO CONFORMANCE %TTH TEsa w CONFIGURATIONS. THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION INVOLVES 102932/5 USI TROWEL GRADE AND PREFORMED SECTIONS / PANEL TO PROVIDE ADDTHONAL MATERIAL IN THE AREA OF THE INTERFERENCE. 101320/2 104246/0 44. ONCE THE SLEEVES HAVE BEEN INSTA t i Fn, THE SUPPORT FRAME CAN BE INSTAf I Fn SO D{AT THERMO-LAG CAN BE 103277/1 INSTAL 1 Fn PER TYPICAL DETAIL 7-3. THE CHANGES MADE IN Tile SUPPORT FRAME DO NOT AFFECT ITS FUNCTIONA AND TilEREFORE THE ACCEPTANCE BASIS FOR DETAILS 7-3 AND 7-4 IN ATTACHMENT A APPLY TO THIS CONFIGURATION THIS CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE. 45. THE METIIOD USED WAS WRAPPING THE AIR DROP BY COVERING IT WTTH FLEXI-BLANKET PER REQUIRED THICKNE 103046/2 BANDING AND TROWEL GRADING IT TO THE TOP OF THE 330-1 PANEL ON TOP OF THE TRAY. THIS WILL RESULT IN THE CABLES BEING COVERED WITH THE REQUIRED 1AYERS OF FLEXI-BLANKET AND FIRE STOPPED. Tile RESULTING CONFIGURATION CLOSELY RESEMBLES THE TESTED CONFIGURATION. THE ELIMINATION OF A MINOR AMOUNT OF STRE SKIN ON THE LONGITUDINALJOINT DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT !MPACT ON TifE MECHANICAL INTEGRITY OF TiiE JOINT.
j ATTACHMENT B ER-ME462, REV. 0 l UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS i PAGE B50 OF BS5 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV
- 46. THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THERMO-LAG 330-1 PANELS ON 24* CABLE TRAYS HAS BEEN DEMONSTRATED VIA TEST SCHEME 12- 103862/0
- 2. CO:.lPENSATION HAS BEEN MADE FOR THE SMALL SLOT Ctfr IN THE THERMO-LAG BOTTOM PANEL BY INSTALLING AN ADDITIONAL LAYER OF 330-1 PANEL ON THE BOTTOM INSIDE OF THE TRAY. ALL GAPS AND VOIDS ARE FILLED WITH TROWEL GRADE TO ELIMINATE THE CHANCE OF HEAT PROPAGATION INTO THE PROTECTED SPACE. THE SUGHT REDUCTION IN MATERIALTHICKNESS IN THE AREA OF THE CC UNE IS COMPENSATED FOR BY INSTALLING A FULL 1/2*
NOMINAL PANEL INSIDE THE CABLE ABOVE, OVERLAPPING THE INSIDE AND OLTTSIDE PANELS BY 9* (MIN) PROVIDES NOT ONLY 1/2* THERMO-LAG PROTECTION, BUT ALSO PROTECTS THE CABLES FROM HEAT BEING CONDUCTED ALONG THE METAL TRAY AND INTO THE PROTECTED ENVELOPE.
- 47. THE REDUCTION OF THE PANEL AT THE HVAC INTERFERENCE WILL NOT COMPROMISE THE INTEGRTTY OF THE 104246/0 PROTRUDING ITEM COVERAGE SINCE THE REDUCTION IS ONLY I/8* AT THE INTERFERENCE. ALTHOUGH THIS REPRESENTS A REDUCED THICKNESS FROM THE TESTED CONFIGURATION, THE REMAINING ATTRIBUTES FOR PROTRUDING ITEM PROTECTION ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH TESTED CONFIGURADONS. THE LOCATION WHERE THE TRAPEZE HANGER CROSSES THE ANGLE SUPPORT AMOUNTS TO 1/2* X 2* IN AREA / DIMENSIONS. EXTRA 330-1 PANELS HAVE BEEN INSTALLED TO CREATE A TORTUROUS PATH FOR HEAT AS WELL AS THE SHIELDING AFFECTS PROVIDED BY THE ANGLE / HANGER.
- 48. THE INSTALLAT10N OF 330-1 PANELS ON 24" WIDE CABE TRAY IS QUALIFIED THROUGH TEST SCHEME 12-2, FLAT PANEL IO2679/I SUBSTITUTION FOR *V* R!B PANELS HAS BEEN DEEMED ACCEPTABLE PRE-BANDING EVERY 6*. WHERE THE CABLE TRAY TIIERMO-LAG COVERAGE AND ESSENTIAL CONDUIT THERMO-LAG COVERAGE INTERFACE, INSTAL!ATION IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH TYPICAL DETAIL I4-3. ALL JOINTS AND SEAMS ASSOCIATED WITH THE CABLE TRAY COVERAGE AS WELL AS THE AIR DROP
- BOX
- ENCLOSURE SHALL BE UPGRADING STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE AND/OR REINFORCED
%Tril TESTED METHODS (TIE WIRE STITCHING). ALL PROTRUDING ITEMS ARE PROTECTED FOR A DISTANCE OF 9* AS PER TESTED CONFIGURATIONS, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE HVAC SUPPORTS. THESE SUPPORTS ARE COVERED FOR THEIR FULL LENGTH FROM THE ESSENTIAL TRAY TO THE HVAC INSULATION (APPROX. 7-1/2* OF COVERAGE). TrtIS HAS BEEN DEEMED ACCEPTABLE BASED ON THE LARGE SURFACE AREA (HEAT SINK) OF THE INSU!ATED HVAC DUCT. INTERFERING ITEMS WHICH INHIBITTHE INSTALLATION OF STRESS SKIN ON CABLE TRAY T220CBD22 ARE RESOLVED THROUGH DETAIL S-16.
- 49. THE MAJORITY OF TilERMO-LAG INSTA I rn PETt THIS DCA IS QUALIFIED BY STANDARD TEST SCHEMES INVOLVING CABLE 101498/l TRAY COVERAGE. IN SEVERAL AREAS THE STANDARD CABLE TRAY TOP PANEL HAS BEEN RAISED BY THE USE OF THERMO-LAG SIIIMS WHICH INCREASES TO INTERNAL VOLUME, LOWERING INTERNAL TEMPERATURES. JOINTS AND SEAMS ASSOCIATED WITH THE
- BOX
- DESIGNS HAVE BEEN INSTALLED UTIUZING THE SCORE AND FOLD METHOD OR HAVE BEEN REINFORCED USING QUALIFIED TECHNIQUES (TIE WIRE STITCHING AND STRESS SKIN).
- 50. THE BOX DESIGN FOR THE CABLE AIR DROPS FROM THE TWS TO THE CABLE TRAY HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED BY PRE-l 102103/0 BANDING THE BOX AT THE WALL AND AT 12* CENTERS BACK TO THE POINT WHERE THE TOP PANEL IS FLUSH WITH THE TRAY. THE 330-I PANELS BUTT TO THE WALL, FLARE OUT, AND ARE MECHANICALLY ATTACHED TO THE WALL WTTH HILTI KWIK-BOLTS. ALL JOINTS HAVE BEEN UPGRADED WITH STRESS SKIN, STAPLES, AND TROWEL GRADE. ALTHOUGH THE INSTALLATION DOES NOT MEET A TESTED CONFIGURATION,IT DOES RESEMBLE TEST SCHEME I4-1 WHICH TESTED A 5 30* CABLE TRAY PROTECTIVE ENCLDSURE. THE INSTALLATION IS CONTINUOUS, MATERIAL THICKNESS IS MAINTAINED, STRUCTURAL INTEGRTTY AND END USE IS CONSISTENT WITH TEST SCHEME I4-1 AND IS TIIEREFORE ACCEPTABLE.
. -. -- ~
ATTACliMENT D ER4GOS2, REV. O UN1QUE CONFIGURATIONS , PfsGE B5I OF B55 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASISfNOTES ~
- DCA/REV
- 51. FOR ALL BUT A 4' LONG AREA, THE THERMO-LAG ON THE TRAY IS INSTAT I Fn IN ACCORDANCE WTTH TESTED 103670/0 CONFIGURATIONS. IN 111E 4' AREA AROUND Ti1E HVAC SUPPORT WHERE FIAT PANELS WERE INSTALLED, ALLJOINT3 .
WERE STITCHED AND LONGITUDINALSTRESS SKIN WAS NOT COMPLETE. THE USE OF 330-1 THERMO-LAG FLAT PANELS WAS QUAIJFIED IN SCHEME 10-2 FOR JUNCTION BOXES. PREBAND SPAGNG WAS REDUCED AND ALL JOINTS ARE BANDED TO COMPENSATE FOR TIIE FLAT PANELS. THE USE OF STTTCHING IN LIEU OF STRESS SKIN ON JOINTS WAS TESTED IN -l SCHEME I.2. THE USE OF THE FLEXI-BLANKET BETWEEN THE 330-1 PANEL AND THE CABLES KEEPS THE CABLES AWAY FROM TiiE PROJECTED ENVELOPE. Tile RESULTING CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE. 52. 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET MATERIAL WAS INSTAI I Fn ON CABLE AIR DROPS BETWEE*! 330-1 MATERIAL THE LARGEST CABLE 103567/1 l BUNDLE TESTED WAS 3* O FROM A CEILING PENETRATION TO 3* CONDUIT SECT sMS PROTRUDING A TilERMO-IAG j PROTECTED CABLE TRAY. TiiE FIELD INSTAI f FD CONF'GURATION IS COMPRISED OF FLEXI-BIANKET MATERIAL WRAPPED l AROUND THE CABLE TRAY TIIERMO-LAG PANELS. TO COMPENSATE FOR TIIE INCREASED SIZE OF THE CABLE BUNDLE AND j l AREA OF OVERLAP, FLEXI-BLANKET MATERIAL WAS PREBIITTERED AND ATTAGIED WITH 1* LONG STAPLES ANCHORED I INTO TiiE 330-1 MATERIAL EVERY 3* (APPROX.). l
- 53. STANDARD DETAILS 9-2,1-5 AND II-7 HAVE BEEN EVALUATED IN ATTAOIMENT A. FIL11NG THE RECESS OF THE SPARE I 103600/2 l SLEEVES PROVIDES A FLUSH SURFACE FOR INSTALLATION OF PANEL AT THE CEILING. TiiE FLANGE DETAILS HAVE BEEN ENHANCED BY THE ADDITION OF A 2* WIDE 330-1 FLAT BOARD TO SECURE TIE WIRE TO STRESS SKIN. THERE IS A DEVIATION HOWEVER, REGARDING THE 5' OVERLAP OF THE LONGITUDINAL JOINTS. THIS IS ACCEPTABLE $1NCE AT LEAST 4* CAN BE AGilEVED, AND THE FACT THAT ALL STAPLING REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN ADHERED TO. THE FACT THAT THE M'.TERIAL IS CONTINUOUS. MATERIAL THICKNESS IS MAINTAINED, STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY AND END USE IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED DETAILS, MAKES Tills INSTALLATION ACCEPTABLE.
54. THIS CONFIGURATION DEVIATES FROM TESTED CABLE TRAY PROTECTION SOIEMES BECAUSE TWO LAYERS OF 330-1 FLAT 102931/0 I PANEL ARE USED TO PROVIDE ADDITIONA'.M ATERIAL IN THE AREA OF THE INTERFERENCE (WHERE TOP PANEL TIIICKNESS IS REDUCED). PANEL ATTACHMENT AND JOINT REINFORCEMENT METHODS USED AT TiiE DEVIATION (330-1 TROWEL GRADE PREBUTTERING AND FILLETS, STRESS SKIN APP 13CATsON, STAPLING,1EROUGH-PANELTIE WIRING, STTTCIIING OF LONGITUDINAL JOINTS AND PRE-BANDING BENEATH PANELS) IN CONJUNCTION WTTl! THE USE OF TYPICAL DETAIL 8-3 FOR TIIE V. RIB TO FLAT PANEL TRANSITION PROVIDE THE ENVELOPE WITil STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY EQUIVALENT TO THAT OF THE TESTED DESIGNS. TIIE USE OF SECOND FULLTHICKNESS 330-1 FIAT PANEL PROVIDES TiiE REQUIRED THERMAL IMPROVEMENT TO THE DESIGN. 55. STANDARD DETAll 12-2 HAS BEEN EVALUATED IN ATTACHMENT A. THESE INSTALIATIONS ARE ACCEPTABLE. 103408/l m 5
ATTACHMENT B ER-ME482, REV. C UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B52 OF B55 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES ' DCA/REV
- 56. INTERFERENCE 1:
THE REDUCTION IN THICKNESS OF THE 330-1 PANEL AT THE INTERFERENCE IS ACCEPTABLE BASED 10389210 THE AMOUNT OF 330-1 PANEL INSTAR i rn AT THE DEVIATION AND THE ADDITIONAL 330-1 PANELS!ADDE AREA OF DEVIATION. THIS DOUBUNG OF THE PANELS Will PROVIDE NOT ONLY TWICE THE MATE 2IALTO DI SUBLIME, IT ALSO PROVIDES A MORE TORTUROUS PATH THAT ANY HEAT TRANSFER INTO THE ENVELOPE. WE ADDITIONAL WEIGHT IS LESS THAN 6 POUNDS AND TiiEREFORE IS ACCEPTABG BECAUSE IT WILL NOT AFFE SUPPORT'S ABl!JTY TO FULFILL IT'S DESIGN FUNCTION. INTERFERENCE 2: SEE INTERFERENG 1. INTERFERENCE 3: Tile DEVIATION TO SPUCE PLATE COVERAGE IS ACCEPTABLE BASED ON THE JOINTS WHERE THE 3 FLAT PANEL Will. BUTT TO THE 330-1 V-RIB PANELS. Tile JOINTS ARE STITCHED TOGETHER WITH AND APPR SECURING METilOD, Tile FACT THAT 330-1 TROWEL GRADE MATERIAL WIll. FILL ALL AIR GAPS BEHIND Tile 330-1 FLAT PANEL AND Tile LARGE PERCENTAGE OF Tile SPUCE PLATE COVER WHICH Will. RECEIVE STRESS S NEXT DEVIATION). THE OTilER DEVIATION CONCERNS THE INABillTY TO ACIIIEVE STRESS SKIN UPGRADE liANGER. Tit!S IS ACCEPTABE BASED ON THE MINOR LENGTH OF THE DEVIATION WlIICH WILL HAVE A NEGUGtBLE, THEREFORE ACCEPTABLE, AFFECT ON THE JOLNT STRENGTH OF TIIE SPUCE PLATE COVER. INTERFERENG 4: 2 Tile INABluTY TO INSTALL THE STRESS SKIN UPGRADE ON TliR LONGITUDINAL JOINTS IS ACGPTABLE DUE TO Tile MINOR LENGTil OF THE DEVIATION WIIICH WILL IIAVE A NEGUGIBLE, THEREFORE ACCEPTABLE, AFFECT ON THE JOINT STRENGTit INTERFERENCE SA: Tile INABIUTY TO INSTALL THE STRESS SKIN UPGRADE ON THE LONGITUDINALJOINTS G ACCEPT ; DUE TO Tile TIE WIRING OF THE TOP, SIDE, AND BOTTOM PANELS TOGETHER WITH APPROVED SECURING MECilANIC i WIRES EVERY 3*11/2*). A130. THE COVERAGE FOR Tile CHANNEL AS A PROTRUDING ITEM, ALTIIOUGH NOT TO THE TYPICAL DETAII3, WILL PROVIDE A SECURE ONE-IIOUR BARRIER AROUND THE PROTRUDING frEM. ! LNTERFERENCE SB: ALL DETA113 OF THis DESIGN CONFORM TO TIIE DESIGN DETAll3 AND ARE THEREFORE ACCEPTA LNTERFERENCE 6: SEE INTEREERENG 1. LNTERFERENG 7: SEE LVTERFERENCE 5B. INTERFERENCE 8: SEE INTERFERENCE I. INTERFERENCE 9: SEE INTERFERENCE I. 9 L
I ATTAOIMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. O i UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B53 OF BS5 l-NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES ' DCA/REV
- 56. INTERFERENCE 10:
CONT'D THE DEVIATION CONCERNS THE INABILITY TO INSTALL COMPLETE 330-1 PANEL COVERAGE ON THE TRAY DUE TO THE HVAC SUPPORT INTERFERENCE. THIS IS ACCEPTABLE DUE TO THE FACT THAT T i A 1116* TO 1132* GAP BETWEEN IT AND THE TRAY RAIL SIDE THEREBY MAKING THIS AN INTERFERENCE. T i OF THE HVAC HANGER AS A PROTRUDING ITEM WILL ENSURE THE REQUIRED AMOUNT OF FIRE BARRIE I THIS POSSIBLE HEAT PATH TO KEEP THE CABLES FUNCTIONING IN DIE EVENT OF A FIRE. INTERFERENCE II: SEE INTERFERENCE I. i INTERFERENCE 12: SEE INTERFERENCE I AND 3. i a j 57. THE I/4* OVERLAY AND STRESS SKIN WAS INSTAI i Fn WITH A TIGHT FIT AGAINST THE EXISTING TROWEL GRADE 103476/1 FILL 1/2* STAPLES WERE USED TO SECURE THE STRESS SKIN. A FILLET WAS INSTAI I Fn AT THE I/4* OVERLAY INTERFACE. ALTHOUGH THIS INSTALLATION WAS NOT SPECIFICALLY INCLUDED AS PART OF A THE INSTALLATION DOES RESEMBLE STANDARD DETAIL 4.3 AND 4.3-1 WHICH HAS BEEN EVALUATED THE FACT THAT INSTALLATION THE CONDUlT IS ROUTED AGAINST THE CONCRETE WALL THUS PROVIDES A GREAT IS ACCEPTABLE. 58. WHILE h0NE OF THESE UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS HAVE BEEN FIRE TESTED, THE METHODS USED TO ATTACH103740/1 THE PANEL i TOGETHER BY OVERLAPPING THEM AND TIE WIRING THEM TOGETHER DIEN APPLYING STRESS SKIN i ARE TESTED CONCEPTS. WHERE THESE METHODS ARE USED TO MAINTAIN MATERIAL CONTINUITY AND THICKNESS IS MAINTAINED.THEN 13ESE CONFIGURATIONS ARE ACCEPTABLE. WHERE MATERIAL ' s MAINTAINED AT THE SIDE RAILS THIS IS COMPENSATED FOR BY EXTENDINC COVERAGE OUT ALONG T i
) ACCORDANCE WITH THE 9' RULE. THIS WILL CREATE A TORTUROUS PATH FOR FIRE TO ENTER THE PROTE ENVELOPE. THE COVERAGE OF PROTRUDING ITEMS PER THE 9" RULE HAS BEEN FIRE TESTED IN A .
59. CONFIGURATIONS. THE COMBINED EFFECT OF ALL OF THE ABOVE RESULTS IN THE CONFIGUR , ]' THIS IS A UNIQUE CONFIGURATION IN WHICH A 3 FT. LONG THERMO-LAG FLAT PANEL ENCLOSURE 10420410 B SEGMENTS %TTil AIR DROP CABLES ENCLOSED WITHIN THE ENVELOPE.
' THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE ENCLOSURE ilAS BEEN ADDRESSED BY THE ADDITION OF A SUPPORT MID-SPAN BETWEEN THE TRAY SEGMEN I HAS STEEL PLATE GUIDES WELDED ON WHICH SERVE AS ATTACHMENT POINTS FOR BANDING W i TRAY SEGMENT. THE BANDS FORM A FRAMEWORK FOR PANEL PIECES INSTAT I Fn ON THE EN '
BLANKET INSTAI I Fn ON THE INSIDE OF THE BOTTOM PANEL PREVENT CABLES CONTACTING TH j ALSO PROVIDE ADDITIONALTHERMAL PROTECTION. ALLJOINTS ARE REINFORCED BY QUALIFIE .
~
MATERIAL THICKNESS IS MAINTAINED ALBEIT WITH FIAT PANELS. THEREFORE THE THERMAL AND ST ' INTEGRITY ASPECTS MAVE BEEN ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED AND THE CONFIGURATION PROVI RATING. 60.
} THIS CONFIGURATION REPRESENTS A MINOR DEVIATION TO SPEC. REQUIREMENTS ONLY 101627/1 IN A l WAS SPECIFIED FOR COVERAGE PRIOR TO INSTAI 1 Fn ON THE CONDUITS FIRST. ALL CRITICAL
- MAINTAINED FOR PROTECTION OF THE CONDUITS. THICKNESS CONTINUTTY, ETC. THER*1 FORE THIS CONFIGURATI PROVIDE THE REQUIRED l-HOUR RATING.
i
ATTACitMENT B ER-ME-082, REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE B54 OF B55 NOTE ACctri ANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV 61. THIS CONFIGURATION IS UNIQUE IN THAT A 330-1 BOX CONFIGURATION IS CONSTRUCTED AT103056/1 CG SUPP COVERAGE FOR A MINOR PORTION OF A 2* DIA. FLEX CONDUTT AT A FOAM BLOCKOUT. WHERE THE FMX ENTERS Tile BOX,330-1 CONDUIT SECTIONS ARE INSTAI T 1:n WITH STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE BUILD UP. THE BOX IS FILLED WITil 330-1 TROWEL GRADE AND ALL JOINTS REINFORCED WITH TECHNIQUES QUALIFIED BY LBD ENCLOSURES. THE INTERFACE WITH Tile FOAM BLOCKOUT IS PROVIDED WITH M-BOARD FOR A SEPARATION (FOAM AND 330-1 TROWEL GRADE) AND TO PROVIDE THERMAL PROTECTION. THE MINOR A OUTER 2* DIAM FLEX CONDUIT WHERE 3 COMPLETE LAYERS OF 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET CANNOT BE INSTAL ACCEPTABLE SINCE IT BITITS DIRECTLY TO Tile CONCRETE SURFACE WHICH SHIELDS IT AND ACTS AS A AREA OF INCOMPLETE 3 I.AYERS IS VERY MINOR AND EFFECTIVELY ESTABLISHES A TORTUROUS PAT L TIIE PROVIDES FOR ADEQUATE MATERIALTHICKNESS (330-1 TROWEL GRADE AND CONDUIT SECHONS) FOR T AT Tile BLOCKOUT PLUS EFFECTS OF FOAM SEAL AND M-BOARD MATERIAL AND PROVIDES FOR STRUC OF THE BOX CONFIGURA'.10N (STITClllNG AND STRESS SKIN). THE EFFECTIVE MATERIAL THICKNESS FLEX CONDUIT AT THE WALL IS ADEQUATE TO PROVIDE AN EQUIVAMNT l-HOUR RATINO. 62. Tile BOXED-!N DESIGN AND CABLE TRAY SHIMS PRESENT IN DCA 103305/0 IIAVE NOT SPECIFICALLY BEEN INCLUDED AS 103305/1 PART OF TESTED CONFIGURATION. Tile BOXED IN DESIGN LTTILIZES STANDARD DETAIL 12-2 WHICH HAS IN ATTACliMENT A. THE CABLE TRAY SIDE RAIL SHIMS HOWEVER, ARE NO DIFFERENTTHAN MULTIPLE LAYERS OF 330-1 PANELS WHICll liAS BEEN TESTED F TEST SCHEME 10-1 (i.e.,JUNCTtON BOX-2 LAYERS) THE MULTIPLE LAYERS OP 330-1 PANELS PROVIDE FOR A GREATER DEFril/ QUANTITY OF MATERIAL AVAILABLE FOR SUBLIMING AND THUS L REDUCTION OF INSIDE TEMPERATURES WITHIN TliE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE AT THE SHIM (S) LOCATION. TH DESIGN liAS BEEN INSTAT 1 rn ITU*."ING ~itM tu UPGRADE JOINTING MEDIODS As WELL AS THE SCORE AND FOLD TECHNIQUE. Tile SCORE AND FOLD TECHNIQUE ENSURES THAT TiiE STRESS SKIN (INSIDE) REMAINS CONTIN CRITICAL JOINT LOCATIONS, AND IN CONJUNCTION WITH UPGRADED JOINT METiiODS ENSIIRES INTEGRTTY OF THE JOINT DURING FIRE CONDITIONS. TIIE OVERALL WIDTH OF TIIE BOX REPRESENTS NO GREATER UNSUPPORTED ARE WOULD NORMALLY BE ENCOUNTERED IN A STANDARD TESTED 36* CABLE TRAY PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE I THE CABLE AIR DROP PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE IS A UNIQUE DESIGN IN THAT AT THE CONDUIT A TEE SECHON W FABRICATED FORM PRESilAPED CONDUIT SECTIONS WITH THE OPEN END OF *iHE TEE SECHON COVERED B BOARD. ALL JOINTS WERE UPGRADE WITil STRESS SKIN AND SITTCHING. THE REMAINDER OF AIR DROP 15 FLDG-BLANKET UP TO THE BOX AT THE CACLE TRAY. ALTHOUGH TIIIS CONFIGURATION IS NOT TESTED IT DOES RESEMBLE TEST SCHEME 11-1. THE FACT THAT TIIE MATERIALTillCKNESS IS MAINTAINED, Tile FIRE BARRIER IS CONTINUOUS, STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY AND END USE IS CONSISTENT WITH THE TESTED CONFIGURATION, Tile INSTALLATION IS ACCEPTABLE. IN CONCLUSION, Tills INSTALLATION IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH BASIS / NOTES 1-5 AND IS l ACCEPTABLE AS-IS. e
ATTACHMENT D ER-ME-082, REV. O UNIQUE CONFIGURATIONS PAGE BSS OF B55 NOTE ACurrANCE BASIS / NOTES
.DCA/REV '
63. Tile BOXED-IN DESIGN AND CABLE TRAY SHIMS PRESEPT IN DCA 104194/0 HAVE NOT 104194/0 SPECIFIC
- PART OF TESTED CONFIGURATION. THE CABG TRAY SIDE RAIL SHIMS HOWEVER, ARE NO DiFFERENT THAN MU I
LAYERS OF 330-1 PANELS WHICH HAS BEEN TESTED IN TEST SCHEME 10-1 (i.e., JUNCTION BOX-2 LAYERS) THE M LAYERS OF 330-1 PANELS PROVIDE FOR A GREATER DEPTH / QUANTITY OF MATERIAL AVA LOCALIZED REDUCTION OF INSIDE TEMPERARJRES WITHIN THE PROTECTIVS ENVELOPEl < BOXED-IN DESIGN HAS BEEN INSTAI I Fn imLIZING TESTED UPGRADE JOINTING METHODS AS ' FOLD TECHNIQUE. THE SCORE AND FOLD TECHNIQUE ENSURES THAT THE STRESS SKIN (IN CRmCAL 10 TNT LOCATIONS, AND IN CONJUNCTION WITH UPGRADED JOLNT METHODS ENSURES INTEGRITY OF THE JO DURING FIRE CONDITIONS. THE OVERALL WIDTH OF THE BOX REPRESENTS NO GREATER UNS WOULD NORMALLY BE ENCOUNTERED IN A STANDARD TESTED 36* CABLE 'DtAY PR0ffECTIVE . ONE DEVIATION WAS IDENTIFIED WHERE TIE WIRES WERE DELETED ON THE STRESS SKIN UPGR JOINTS WERE STITCHED WHERE THE PANELS INTERFACE.11 TOWEL GRADE AND STRESS SKIN JOINTS'WITH THE STRESS SKIN STAPLES. THIS DESIGN PROVIDES AN EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF P CONFIGURATION. ANOTHER DEVIATION OCCURS ATTHE SPUCE PLATE COVER. THE DESIGN US 1 FLAT PANEL TO FIT BETWEEN 330-1 V-RIB PANELS ON THE SIDE RAILS. THE FLAT PANEL #AS STIT BOTTOM, ENSURING THE INTEGRITY OF THE FIRE BARRIER. IN CONCLUSION, THIS INSTALLATION IS IN ACCORDANCE
! BASIS / NOTES I-5 AND IS ACCEPTABLE AS-IS.
64. THE BOXED-IN DESIGN AND CABLE TRAY SHIMS PRESENT IN DCA 102900/0 HAVE NOT SPECIFICALLY BEEN INCLUDED AS
, 102800/1
! PART OF TEmu CONFIGURATION. THE BOXED-IN DESIGN HAS BEEN INSTAT I FI) UTHJZING TESTED UP l METHODS AS WELL AS Tile SCORE AND FOLD TECHNIQUE. THE SCORE AND FOLD TECHNIOUE ENSURE SKIN (INSIDE) REMAINS CONTINUOUS AT CRmCAL JOINT LOCATIONS, AND IN CONJUNCTION WTTH UPGRADED JOINT METHODS ENSURES INTEGRTTY OF THE JOINT DURING FIRE CONDmONS. THE OVERALL WIDTH F T NO GREATER UNSUPPORTED AREA THAN WOULD NORMAll.Y BE ENCOUNTERED IN A STANDARD T
, PROTECIP!E ENCLOSURE INSTALLATION. POSmVE MECHANICAL ATTACHMENT IS PROVIDED AT THE 1 PANEL FLANGE AND HILTI BOLT ARRANGEMENT AND
- STICK-PINNED
- THROUGH THE SILICONE FOA IN CONCLUSION, THIS INSTALLATION IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH BASIS / NOTES t-S AND IS ACCElTABLE AS-13.
I 1 I l
.1. t . - ER-ME-082 REV. 0 ' , PAGE CI OF C24 . 1. 4 . t a. lI i J i 1..'
'i
~ i i 3 ..
< t f.
v 4 f 4 1 ATTACHMENT C MINOR PROTECTED COMMODnY DEVIATIONS-t. d i 4 4 I 4 j P'
- i. .
I w k 5 ..I 4 1 . 4
- -, ,,--.n..___,y.,,,...,,-.,-,,y...,..-,negy. _,,. , , . . _ , , ,_ . . _ ,, , , , , .y,y, ,,v,,,,,,,gmm.,,..,,,.-.y,, ,-,m.,=,%..,,,,,g-1,..,,._,,-_.4,,,,,,,,,,,.m. . . . . 4 .o w-m. , , , . , , , , __,m,, . E,2 .- ,, o y -
ATTACIIMENT C ER-ME-082g REV. 0 MINOR PROTECTED COMMDDITY DEVIATION 9 n PAGE C2 OF C24 DCA NO./REV BLDO ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET.' AREA / DESCRIPTION /ISSUi!"OF CONCERN /RESOLUTidN SUNORT[ [ BASIS / NOTES . (Y/N) . '(Y/N) 1EST...,_ FIRE
~
(PAGE C20-C24) ' _, .> . SCHEMES M . 1' . N ^ 102330/1 AB 852 X-241 AA/26 2 Y Y ISSUE 1: TL ON TRAY INTERFERES WITH TL j i INSTALLATION ON CONDUIT. j ISSUE 2: CONSTRUCTION CANNOT INSTALL STRESS SKIN OVER RADIAL BEND DUE TO INTERFERENCE. RESOLUTION I: INSTALL PREFORMED CONDUIT 9-I I4,9 SECTIONS AGAINST TOP T1. PANEL OF TRAY AND SEAL. ff RESOLITI1ON 2: COVER EXPOSED PORTION OF 9-1 14,9 RADIAL BEND WITH STRESS SKIN AND STAPLE. 102478/1 AB 810 X-207 AA/21b Y Y ISSUE: EXISTING TL ON TRAY INTERFERES WITH INSTALLATION OF TL ON ANOTHER TRAY. RESOLUT80N: COVER SPLICE PLATE ON SIDE l-2,12-I, 1 4, 9, 10 RAIL WITh FLAT BOARD BUTT JOINED TO V- 12-2 RIB BOARD. STRESS SKIN UPGRADE IS OMITTED IN AREA OF INTERFERENCE. 102725!0 SG 832 2-094 2SB/15 Y Y ISSUE: PIPE INTERFERES WITil 2 (:s 2* DIA) RIGID CONDUITS SUCH THAT COMPLETE COVERAGE WITH I!4' OVERIAYS IS NOT POSSIBLE. RESOLUTION: t/2* TIIICK MATERIAL, STRESS 9-3,Il-1 1-6, 7, 15 SKIN AND 330460 FOR 180: PROVIDE 1/2* TIIICK 330-1 CONDUIT MATERIAL W/l/4* OVERLAY FOR 180' ANDI/2* THICK 330-1 CONDUIT MATERIAL WITH I/4" OVERIAY AND STRESS SKIN BUTTED TO PIPE.
, - , - + , , w.,,~ , , , , - , - , , --e .- ,nr-, <e,- -, -n-.., , , - + . . - - , ., , . - . - - v - - -
ATTACllMENT C ER-ME-082, REV. O MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVFAllONS PAGE C3 OF C24 DCA NO./REV BLDO ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUEPORT BASIS /NorTES AREAI
~
(Y/N)- (YIN) FIRE TEST'. . (PAGE C20-C24) ZONE SCHEMES - 102758/0 SG 832 2-094 2SB/I5 Y Y ISSUE: FULL COVERAGE ON CONDUIT SUPPORT (PR0rTRUDING ITEM) CANNOT BE ACIIIEVED DUE TO INTERFERENCE WTTH DUCT. RESOLUTION: SEAL TL PANELS ON SUPPORT TO 9-1, 10-1 1 4, 13 SIDE OF DUCT Wmf TROWEL GRADE 330460. GAP BEDVEEN SUPPORT END PLATE AND DUCT IS FILLED Wmi TROWEL GRADE 330460 PRIOR TO COMPLETING Tile SEALINO OF Tile PANELS. 102780/0 EC 778 X-113 EA/43 Y Y ISSUE: FLOOR DRA!N PIPE INTERFERES WITII INSTALLATION OF TL ON CONDUIT. RESOLUTION: WRAP I LAYER OF FLEXI- 9-1,Il-1 30 BLANKET AROUND CONDUIT AND BEDVEEN CONDUIT AND PIPE. WRAP SECOND LAYER OF FLEXI-BLANKET AROUND CONDUIT AND BUTT TO PIPE AT INTERFERENCE WillCil PROTECTS SINGLE LAYER FROM DIRECT EXPOSURE TO FIRE. 102837/0 SG 832 2-094 2SB/15 Y Y ISSUE I: PIPE INTERFERES Wmi 4 (:s; 2* DIA) RIGID CONDUITS SUCil TIIAT COMPLETE COVERAGE Wml I/4* OVERLAYS IS NOT POSSIBLE. ISSUE 2: CABLE TRAY AND SUPPORT INTERFERE Wml CONDUIT ENVELOPE. RESOLUTION I: I/2* Til!CK MATERIAL, STRESS 9-3, 11-1 1 4, 7, 15 SKIN AND 330460 FOR 180: PROVIDE 1/2" TillCK 330-1 CONDUIT MATERIAL W/l/4* OVERLAY FOR 180* AND I/2* TillCK 350-1 CONDUIT MATERIAL Wml 1/4* OVERLAY AND STRESS SKIN BUTTED TO PIPE. RESOLUTION 2: EXTEND ENVELOPE ONTO 9-3 14, 7, is SUPPORT VIA 330-1 TROWEL GRADE.
,,- - w
\ ~ ATTACHMENT C ER-ME-OS2, REV. O MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C4 OF C24 DCA NOJREV BLDO ELEY ROOM' FIRE. SUPP.' DET. DESCRIPTION /iSSOE'UF CUNCERN/ RESOLUTION SUPEORT { BASIS / NOTES AREA / .(Y/N). (Y/N) ;
" TEST. (PAGE C20-C24)
FIRE ~ SCHEMES ZONE ~ , 102858/0 AB 790 X-174 AAl2ta N Y ISSUE: INTERFERENCE BETWEEN ~IWO ISD'S. RESOLUTION: REMOVE ONE EAR FROM LBD. 9-1 1 4, 9, 16 SPLICE 2 PIECES OF FLAT PANEL TOGETHER TO REST ON SIDE OF LBD AND REMAINING EAR. INSTALL STRESS SKIN UPGRADE WHERE POSSIBLE. 102861/0 AB 790 X-174 AA/21s N Y ISSUE: PIPE INTERFERES WITH INSTALLATION OF TL ON CONDUIT. RESOLUTION: WRAP 1 L.AYER OF FLEXI- 9-1,Il-1. 1 4, i1, 14 BLANKET AROUND CONDUIT AND BEIWEEN CONDUIT AND PIPE. WRAP SECOND LAYER OF FLEXI-BLANKET AROUND CONDUIT AND BUTT TO PIPE AT INTERFERENCE WHICH PROTECTS SINGLE LAYER FROM DIRECT EXPOSURE TO q FIRE. i 102563/I SG 852 2-103 2 Sell 8 Y Y ISSUE: FLOOR CURB INTERFERES WITH TL ON CONDUIT AND CONDUIT UNION. RESOLUTION: TRIM OVERSIZED CONDUIT 9-1, 9-3 I 4, 7, 17 SECTION TO FIT BETWEEN CONDUIT FITTING AND CURB PLATE. INSTALL 1/4 OVERLAY ON (7NDUIT WHERE POSSIBLE. APPLY 1/2" 1 ROWEL GRADE WilERE PREFORMED SECTIONS TOUCH OUTSIDE OF CURB WHERE TL TOUCliES ON INSIDE. 103C07/1 SG 852 2-1008 2SK/17a Y Y ISSUE: OAS LINE (NJ INTERFERES WITH TL INSTAL 1ATION ON CONDUIT. RESOLUTION: APPLY 330-1 MATERIAL LEAVING 9-1,Il-I 1 4, 9, 18 OAP FOR STRESS SKIN BUILD UP. ADD EXTRA TROWEL GRADE MATERIALIN THE AREA AROUND TiiE DEVIATION.
ATTACHMENT C ER-ME-082, REV. O MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C5 OF C24 - l DCA NOJREV Bil)G ELEV ROOM FIRE ' SUPP.'~ DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE'OF CONCERN / RESOLUTIONSdPPORT L AREA / ', BASIS / NOTES (YIN) (YIN) TEST " , ' FIRE (PAGE C20-C25) ZONE SCHEMES 3- . 103037/0 AB 790 X-180 AA/21s Y Y ISSUE: TL ON SUPPORT IPRERFERES WITH . -!
- 4. STRESS SKIN UPGRADE.
- RESOLUTION
- OMIT STRESS SKIN ON TIIE SIDE 12-2 1-6,9 RAIL OF TRAY NEXT TO THE INTERFERING TL
<- ON TUBE STEEL - - 103050/0 SG 832 2-094 2SB/15 Y Y ISSUE: PIPE INTERFERES WITH INSTALLATION a OF TL ON CONDUIT (I-l/2*). . j RESOLUTION: INSTALL I/2* CONDUIT SECTIONS 9-1, 9-3 1-6, 7, 18 TRIMMING TO FIT BETWEEN CONDUIT AND 1 PIPE. INSTALL 1/4* OVERLA.* SECTION AND BUTT AGAINST PIPE AND ADD TROWEL GRADE.- 103076/1 SG 873 2-109B 2SK/17c Y Y ISSUE 1: NEED DETAILS FOR CONDUIT MOUNTED ON TUBE STEEL ISSUE 2: FULL THICKNESS CANNOT BE INSTALLED ON SMALL AREA OF SUPPORT. BETWEEN BACK OF SUPPORT AND WALL, DUE - 4 TO INTERFERENCE WITH GRATING SUPPORT. RESOLUTION 1: TYPICAL DETAILS PROVIDED . 9-1, II-I - l -6, 19 ' ] (4-8). RESOLUTION 2: INSTALL REDUCED THICKNESS I l-1 1-6, 19 TL PANEL ON BACK OF SUPPORT AT INTERFERENCE. INSTALL DOUBLE LAYERS ON EACII SIDE OF SUPPORT TO WALL AT INTERFERENCE TO PROTECT TiiE REDUCED TillCKNESS SECTION FROM ANY EXTERNAL FIRE EXPOSURE. I
l . s
- 2. .
. ATTACHMENT C . . ER-ME42, REV. 0. -
MINOR FROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIA110NS . PAGE C6 OF C24 - 4
- 4 DCA NOJREV BLDG" EIEV ROOMi FIRE $UPP."
* " DET/. DESCRIP'!10N/ ISSUE bF CdNCERN/ RESOLUTION ^ SUPPORI;
~
AREA / + IBASIS/ NOTES (YIN) (Y/N) , i ~ .n '
'. FIRE - '" g 7. 7 n TEST t t.. (PAGE C20-C24) ,
hk 1 ~ 1
'1'
- +<
- SCHEMES J i
5
. ZONE ,
f -
.
- W ' ' 43 I >
W
-103157/0 SG 873- 2-1098 2SK/I7c ' Y Y ISSUE: INSTRUMENT TUBING INTERFERES WITH 'f i I/4* OVERLAY ON CONDUIT. "
4 q {' RESOLUTION: FIT I/4* OVERLAY AROUND THE - 9-1 :14,20 1 CONDUIT EXCEPT ATTHE TUBING l . ! INTERFERENCE. SEAL I/4* OVERLAY TO WALL . ON EACH SIDE OF TUBING WITH TROWEll GRADE. j 103158/0 SG 873 2109B ' 2SK/I7c Y-i :Y ISSUE I A3: INSTRUMENT TUBING INTERFERES - WITH 1/4* OVERLAY ON CONDUIT. 4 { ISSUE 2: UNISTRUT INTERFERES WITH I/4* !
- . OVERLAY ON CGNDUIT.
i~ ! ISSUE 4: PIPE INTERFERES WITH 1/4* OVERLAY - -' O N C O N D ult.. *
; 1- 3
!' RESOLUTION IA3: FIT 1/4* OVERLAY AROUND 9-1, 10 14, 18,20, 21 THE CONDUIT EXCEPT AT THE TUBING . IlfTERFERENCE. ' SEAL I/4* OVERLAY TO WALL-j- ON EACH SIDE OF TUBING WITH TROWEL : ! ' GRADE.
- t i RESOLUTION 2: FIT 1/4* OVERLAY UP TO EDGE 9.I,'10-1 1 4, 18, 20, 21 OF INTERFERING UNISTRUT. SEAL UNISTRUT I TO OVERLAY WITH I/2* OF TROWEL GRADB '
l OUT FROM CONDUrr AND ON EACH SIDE OF i UNISTRUT. 1 RESOLUTION 4: TRIM I/4* OVERLAY SFG10NS 9-1,10-t 14 [18, 20, 21: TO CLEAR INTERFERING PfPE. APPLY " xOWEL . l GRADE BUILD UP AROUND DEVIATION AREA. ,< i i'
-.,_.m..,.m..m. -
ATTACllMENT C ER-ME-082, REV. O MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C7 OF C24 DCA NO./REV BLDO ELEV ROOM FIRE . SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCENN/RESOLtTTION SUPPORT ' BASIS /NUTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N) TEST . (PAGE C20 C24) FIRE SC11 EMES ZONE' 103375/0 SO 810 2-082 2SB/8 Y Y ISSUE: TIIE WIRE AND STRESS SKIN REQUIREMENTS CANNOT BE MET. RESOLUTION: FIT STRESS SKIN AND TIE WIRES 12-1,14-1 1-5,9 AROUND AIR DROP INTO TRAY. OMIT STRESS SKIN AT INTERFERENCE BETWEEN IIORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL TRAYS. 103414/1 SG 810 2-082 2SB/8 Y Y ISSUE 1: STRESS SKIN CANNOT BE INSTALLED PER REQUIREMENTS. ISSUE 2: STITCillNG CANNOT BE INSTALLED PER REQUIREMENTS. ISSUE 3: STRESS SKIN CANNOT BE INSTALLED PER REQUIREMENTS. RESOLUTION 1: INSTALL STRESS SKIN PER 12-1,14-I I4,9 SPECIFIC DIRECTIONS. MIN; MAL DEVIATION FROM SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. RESOLUTION 2: INSTALL STRESS SKIN, STAPLES 12-1,14-I 14,9 AND TIE WIRES AS DIRECTED, OMIT STITCllING. . RESOLUTION 3: OMIT MINOR AMOUNTS OF 12-1, 14-I 14,9 LONOITUDINAL STRESS SKIN ON ONE SIDE OF TRAY. 103599/0 AB 873 X-245 AA/38 N Y ISSUE: CANNOT INSTALL FULL Til!CKNESS OF TIIERMO-LAG ON PROTRUDINO CONDUIT SUPPORT AT INTERFERENCE WITil INSTRUMENT TRACK. l RESOLUTION: INSTALL REDUCED THICKNESS 9-1, 9-3 1 4, 31 PANEL AT INTERFERENCE. ADD SECOND LAYER OF PANEL AROUND INTERFERENCE AND SEAL TO FIRST LAYER.
4 ~ ATTACHMENT C ER-ME-082, REY. O MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS ,, PAGE C8 OF C24 DCA NO./REV BLDO ELEV ROOM FIRE ? - SUPP. DET.; DESCRIPTION /Isf NOF CONCERN /RESOLIJTION : SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) .' (Y/N) - FIRE TEST . . *. . '(PAGE C20-C24) SCHEMES ZONE: , 103602/0 AB 790 X-180 AAl21a Y Y ISSUE 1: THREADED ROD INTERFERES WITH TL ON TRAY. ISSUE 2: STRUCTURAL STEEL AND GROUND CABLE INTERFERES WITH TL ON TRAY. 3 RESOLUTION I: INSTALL FLAT BOARD ON SIDE II-I I-6, 9, 22 OF TRAY AND FIT BETWEEN ROD AND TRAY. MAKE SMALL DEVIATION FROM STRESS SKIN REQUIREMENTS. RESOLUTION 2: GRGUND CABLE II-I 14,9,22 INTERFERENCE WAS REMOVED. INSTALL FLAT BOARD ON BOTTOM OF TRAY, NOTCHING IF NECESSARY. TO FIT BEIWEEN STEEL ANGLE AND TRAY. COVER TIIE ANGLE WITH 1/2" FLAT
- BOARD AND TROWEL GRADE & BAND IN PLACE. MOVE GROUND CABLE.
103609/0 SG 810 2482 2SB/8 Y Y ISSUE: CONDUIT INTERFERES WrI11 STRESS SKIN UPGRADE ON LONGITUDINALJOINT OF. BOX OUT. RESOLUTION: STRESS SKIN UP TO BOTli SIDES 9 1, 10-1 14,9 OF THE INTERFERENCES. 103631/0 GEN. GEN. GEN. GEN. VARI Y ISSUE: TO ALLOW FOR FIELD CONDITIONS, E." CONSTRUCTION REQUES'IS OFTIONS FOR, GENERIC MODIFICATIONS IN 11E WIRE DETAILS USED TO IIELP SECURE STRESS SKIN OVER CABLE TRAY LONGITUDINAL JOINTS. RESOLUTION: OF Tile 3 PROPOSED OPTIONS, A I,12-1,12- I-5, 9, 9a - AND B ARE ACCEPTABLE FOR GENERIC USE. 2, 13 1, 14 OfTION C IS ACCEPTABLE FOR USE ONLY I,11-I WHERE PREVIOUSLY INSTAf f FD.
ATTACliMENT C EI'.-ME-082, REV. O MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C9 OF C24 DCA NO.IREV BLDO ELEV ROOM. FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTIdN/ ISSUE OF CdNCERN/ RESOLUTION' SUPPORT - BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (YIN)L FIRE TEST. (PA0E C20-C24) SCIIEMES MNE 103633/0 SG 790 2-071 2SB/4 Y Y ISSUE: UNABLE TO INSTALL STRESS SKIN UPGRADE ON TRAY PER REQUIREMENTS DUE TO INTERFERENCES. RESOLIT!10N: INSTALL STRESS SKIN UPGRADES II-l,12-2 14,9 FOR LONGITUDINALJOINTS AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE TO INTERFERENCES. USE EXTRA STAPLING AS DIRECTED. 103636/0 SG 832 2-096 2 Sell 6 Y Y ISSUE: TUBE STEEL INTERFERES WITil INSTALLATION OF Il4* TL OVERLAY ON CONDUIT. i RESOLUTION: BUTT 1/4" TL OVERLAY TO TUBE 9-1 1 4, 23 STEEL AND SEAL WITli TROWEL GRADE. COVER Tile SIDES OF TiiE SUPPORT TOUCit!NG TiiE TL ON TIIE CONDUIT FOR 2* ABOVE AND BELOW TIIE CONDUIT. 103650!O SG 832 2 094 2SB/15 Y Y ISSUE: CONDUIT PROTECTED WITII FLEXI-BIANKET INTERFERES WITli INSTALLING FLEXI-BLANKET ON ANOTIIER CONDUIT. RESOLUTION: BUTT EACli LAYER OF FLEXI- 11-1 1 4 ,'24 BLANKET UP AGAINST TIIE EXISTINO FLEXI-BLANKET ON TiiE FIRST CONDUIT. SEAL EACil LAYER WITil TROWEL GRADE. 103706/1 EC 778 X-1ISB AAll54 Y Y ISSUE: NUMEROUS INTERFERENCES WITli SECOND LAYER UPGRADE ON JB. RESOLUTION: REINFORCE ALL JOINTS AND 10-2 14,a SEAMS ON FIRST LAYER AS IF TIIEY WERE SECOND LAYER. 9 y __. _
ATTACIIMENT C ER-ME-082, REV. O MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE CIO OF C24 1 DCA NO.lREV BLDO ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION' AREA / SUPPORT- BASIS / NOTES (YIN) (Y/N) TEST' _ FIRE (PAGE C20-C24) SCllEMES ZONE 103718/I SG 873 2-109B 2SKil7c Y Y ISSUE I: INTERFERENCE BETWEEN JB D LBD 4 WlHCII BOTII REQUIRE TL PROTECTION. ISSUE 2: INSTRUMENT TUBING INTERFERES WITli I/4* OVERLAY ON CONDUIT. t ISSUE 3: PIPE INTERFERES WITil I/4* OVERLAY ON CONDUIT. ISSUE 4: CANNOT INSTALL JOINT UPGRADE PER REQUIREMENTS. RESOLITTION !&4: INSTALL TL ON JB. BUTT TL 9-1, 10-1 1 4, 9, 18, 20 FOR LBD AGAINST JB AND JO!N USING STRESS SKIN UPGRADE REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFIC DIRECTIONS GIVEN. RESO,LUTION 2: FIT I/4* OVERLAY AROUND 9-I,10-I I 4, 9, 18, 20 THE CONDUIT EXCElrr AT Tile TUBING INTERFERENCE. SEAL 1/4* OVERLAY TO WALL ON EACH SIDE OF TUBING WITII TROWEL GRADE. RESOLtTTION 3: TRIM I/4' OVERLAY SECTION 9-1, 10-1 1 4, 9, 18, 20 TO CLEAR INTERFERING PIPE. APPLY TROWEL GRADE BUILD UP AROUND DEVIATION AREA. 103721/1 SG 832 2-094 2SB/15 Y Y ISSUE: DUE TO BEND RADIUS, CANNOT INSTALL FLEXI-BLANKET ON FLEX CONDUIT. RESOLIITION: INSTALL PREFORMED CONDUrr 9-1, 11-1 1 4, 12 SECTION MITERED TO FIT TI{E BEND. 103730/0 SG 832 2-094 2SB/15 Y Y ISSUE: FLEXI-BLANKET CANNOT BE INSTALLED ON 2 FLEX CONDUTTS DUE TO PROXIMITY. RESOLUTION: INSTALL PREFORMED CONDUIT 9-1, 11-1 1 4, 12 SECTIONS, MITERED AS NECESSARY. TO FIT.
ATTACllMENT C ER-ME482, REV. O MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE Cil OF C24 DCA No./REV BLDO ELEV ROOM FIRE . SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION [ ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION - AREA / SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES (Y/N) (YIN) FIRE - TEST) f (PAGE C20-C24) ! ZONE SCHEMES ' 103741/0 SG 852 2-103 2SE/18 Y Y ISSUE: CANNOT INSTALL 1/4* OVERLAY ON 2* CONDUIT DUE TO INTERFERENCE WITil SUPPORT. RESOLUTION: BUTT I/4* OVERLAY UP TO 9-1, 9-3 I-6, 7 SUPPORT AND APPLY TROWEL GRADE TO JOINT. ADD FLAT PLATE ON SUPPORT AROUND INTERFERENCE. 103770/0 AB 852 X-241 AA/21f Y Y ISSUE: CANNOT INSTALL 1/4" OVERLAY ON 2* CONDUIT DUE TO INTERFERENCE WITil DUCT. RESOLtfrION: TRIM TiiE I/4" OVERLAY TO FIT 9-1, 9-3 1-6,7 IN BETWEEN Tile CONDUIT AND DUCT. ADD TROWEL GRADE INSIDE 1/4* SECTION PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 103780/0 AB ES2 X-241 AA/2t f Y Y ISSUE: CONDUIT AND CABLE INTERFERE WITil STRESS SKIN UPGRADE ON TWO CONDUITS WITH RADIAL BENDS. RESOLUTION: INSTALL STRESS SKIN UPGRADE 9-I, 9-3 1-5,9 EXCEPT AT TIIE POINTS OF INTERFERENCE. 103782/0 SG 832 2-096 2SE/I6 Y Y ISSUE: PilYSICAL ARRANGEMENTINTERFERES WITil TRANSITION OF FLEXI-BLANKET TO RIGID CONDUIT SECTION. RESOLUTION: OVERLAP FLEXI-BLANKET 6* 9-I,9-3, 1 4, 16 ONTO RIGID CONDUIT TO ALLOW BEITER !!-l DISTRIBUTION OF LOAD ON TIIE JOINT. e
- - - - - _ _ _ m ._ -_ _
._m
ATTACHMENT C ER-ME482, REV. O MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE Cl2 OF C24 - G . .. . . v. DCA NO./REV
,. e BLDO EIEV ; . . .
ROOM. i FIRE s SUPP. DET.: DESCRIPTION 4SSUE OF CONCERN /RESOLLrilON .SUPPORTO BAS!S/ NOTES ,
'y AREAL (YIN)' (YlN) * '
~
'V' em "IllST, f/ (PAGE C20-C24)
' ' FIRE 1 N, 'l + % d.f $CHEMES2 ZONEi > ' t.c - Ni , '
--C m-, 'h- '
103816/0 SGL 810 2-083 2SD/9 Y < Y ISSUE: STRESS SKIN CANNGT BE INSTALLED - PER UPORADE REQUIREMENTS DUE TO INTERFERENCES. 1 RESOLtTTION: INSTALL STRESS SKIN WHERE 9-1, 9-3, - 14,9 THERE ARE NO INTERFERENCES FIRST. THEN - 10-1, 10-2 5 INSTALL AT INTERFERENCE STAPLING TO ADJACENT COUPLING. ADD TIE WIRE TO ON3 SPECIFIC STRESS SKIN INTERFERENCE. 103864/0 SG 810 2-079 2SB/8 Y Y ISSUE: CANNOT INSTALL 1/4' OVERLAY ON : iCONDUIT DUE TO INTERFERENCE WITH
' SUPPORT..
RESOLUTION: BUTT II4' TL OVERLAY TO EACH 9-1,10 1 14,25 SIDE OF THE STEEL ANGIE. COVER THE . ANGLE (BOTH LEGS) FOR THE WIDTH OF THE . -, 4 CONDUIT WTTH FLAT BOARD SEALED TO THE 'I CONDUTT SECTION WTTH TROWEL GRADE. 103947/0 AB 810 X-208 AAl2Ic N Y ISSUE: PREFORMED CONDUIT SECTIONS WERE INSTALLED ON 2 FLEX CONDUITS.' . RESOLUTION: ACCEPTABLE. 9- 1, 9 l-5, 12 103959/0 EC 778 X Il5B AA/I54 - Y Y ISSUE: CANNOT INSTALL 3rd LAYER OF FLEXI- - BLANKET ON CONDUIT AT JUNCTION WITH 1 MOTOR HOUSING. i 4 RESOLUTION: INSTALL 3ni LAYER AROUND . 11-1' I 4, 26 i CONDUIT AND BUTT EACH EDGE TO THE SIDE - OF THE MOTOR HOUSING AND SEAL ' ) l i I ' 4
'i e .,-_...J,, ,-....,...___,...~........-.m,,..__~.....,_.-..._....--.__.,,_-__--.-._.,...___~____..._______-,~-_% -
ATTACHMENT C ER-ME482, REY. O I MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE Cl3 OF C24 i , DCA NOJREV BLDO ELEY- ROOM.
- FIRE) SUPP.. NET > DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF ODNCERN/RESOLUTid~N AREA / (YIN); ~ SUPPORTi) BASIS / NOTES i i ' ' ' (YIN)~ Y ' M ., '
TEST .,,l FIRE 4 i * (PAGE.C20 C24) a:
! 46 7;
'" SCHEMES L
. ZONE? *
.x .m [h c.t F - '
103988/0 AB X-810 ' 207- AA121b Y Y ISSUE: STRESS SKIN UPORADE CANNOT BE ' INSTALLED ON CONDUIT BEND DUE TO IffrERFERENCE WITH PIPE. RESOLUTION: INSTALL UPGRADE ON EACH . 9-1, 10 14,9' SIDE OF INTERFERENCE LEAVING CLEARANCE FOR PIPE. b 103991/0 EC 778 X-IISB AAll54 Y Y j ISSUE: CANNOT INSTALL 3ni LAYER OF FLEXI- ~ BLANKET ON CONDUIT AT JUNCTION WITH MOTOR HOUSING. } j RESOLUTION: INSTALL 3nt LAYER AROUND ' 11-1 1 4, 26 CONDUIT AND BUTT EACH EDGE TO THE SIDE i OF THE MOTOR HOUSING AND SEAL. 104013/0 AB 810 X-207 - AA/21b Y Y-T ISSUE: CANNOT INSTALL SECOND LAY. ER OF TL 1' ON CORNER OF JB DUE TO INTERFERENCE. RESOLUTION: UPGRADE FIRST LAYER JOINTS '10-1,'10-2 14,8' i IN AREA OF DEVIATION AND THEN INSTALL - i SECOND LAYER OF BOARD AROUND - INTERFERENCE. 104017/0 AB 790 X-174 AA/21a N Y ISSUE: CANNOT INSTALL I/4* OVERLAY ON 1-1/2* CONDUIT DUE TO INTERFERENCE WITH SUPPORT. RESOLUTION: COVER SUPPORT AS 9-1, 9-3 14,7 i PROTRUDING ITEM. 8
- 104026/1 EC 778 X-Il5h AA/!54 Y Y ISSUE: CANNOT INSTALL SECOND LAYER OF TL ON 3B DUE TO INTERFERENCE.
RESOLUTION: INSTALL SECOND LAYER OF TL ' 10-1, 10-2 14,8 t .S
! AROUND INTERFERING CONDUIT.
l ... j --
4 ATTACHMENT C ER-ME4820REY. 0 : MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIGNS ... . PAGE Cl4 OF C24 [ . . i DCA NO.IREV BLDO ELEV ROOM FIREi SUPP. DET2,
. . . . - - . . .. . . , , _ ,,m m -
1 ' DESCRIPTION / ISSUE,OF CONCERN /RESOLLTTION ? AREA / $UPPORT) BASIS / NOTES wf,sjf:
;m ; ^
- (Y/N)* (Y/N) '
'tg w TEST ,.,
i pgg; ' g , 3.g -4 3- - -SCHEMES ~ (PAOE C21K24) ZONE.. . ,. , . w , - -.[#g.dhi./ m riSR / M if 104027/0 EC 778 X-IISB AAll54 Y YL ISSUE: TL ON RIGID CONDUIT INTERFERES - WITH "INIRD LAYER OF FIEXI-BLANKET ON - 3, . FLEX CONDUIT. i RF *)LUTION:INSTALLTHIRD LAYER OF 9-1,9-3,- 14.I6 ' FLEXI-BLANKET AROUND FLEX CONDUIT AND 11-1: RIGID CONDUIT. 104047/0 EC - 778- 1158 ' AAll54 - Y Y' ISSUE: FLEXI-BLANKET COLLAR ON AIR DROP CANNOT BE INSTALLED PER TYPICAL DETAILS I! BECAUSE IT ENTERS TRAY AT SHARP ANGLE. RESOLUTION: INSTALL FLEXI-BLANKET IN TWO 11-1 . 'l 5, 16 PIECES AS SHOWN. BAND AROUND TRAY. - STAPLE FLEXI-BLANKET AND STRESS SKIN PER - REQUIREMENTS. l. 104057/0 EC 778 X-Il3 EA/43 . Y Y- ISSUE: CANNOT APPLY I/4* OVERLAY ON 2* ' CONDUIT DUE TO INTERFERENCE WITH SUPPORT.. i i ' RESOLUTION: TRIM 1/4" OVERLAY TO CLEAR 9-1,9-3 14,7~ SUPPORT. 104075/0 AB. 810 X-207 AA/21b Y Y ISSUE: CONDUITINTERFERES WITH INSTALLATION OF SECOND LAYER OF BOARD ON ONE SIDE OF JB. t. RECOLUTION: UPGRADE THE JOINTS OF THE - 10-1, 10-2 14,B i FIRST LAYER OF TL ON THE JB OMIT THE SECOND LAYER OF TL ON THE SIDE WITH THE INTERFERENCE. i
+
1 [ l 1
- .r .,I,.-..-.,.,,.-.'-,..%. ..-.,.-,,.%_.-........,+,....-.....,-,....-m -.,.w--...._~.,u, .-_#-__v_._..m.~4 ,..,.r...es ,..,,...-,.-d, ,, , , . - . , . - .
ATTACilMENT C ER-ME-082, REY. O MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE CIS OF C24 DCA NO./REV . , BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION /ISSdB OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION ;I AREA /
'$dPPORT' BASIS / NOTES (YIN) (Y/N)~ TEST., , (PAGE C20CZ4)
FIRE ZONE SCHEMES 104107/0 AB 832 X-226 AA/21d Y Y ISSUE: CANNOT INSTALL TIIIRD LAYER OF t FLEXI-BLANKET ON FLEX CONDUIT AT INTERFERENCE WITil METAL SHIELD AND rONDUIT. RESOLUTION: INSTALL THIRD LAYER OF 11-1 1-6, 27 FLEXI-BLANKET AROUND CONDUIT BUTTING AGAINST Sil! ELD AND CONDUIT. INSTALL FOURTil LAYER OF FLEXI-BLANKET AT TiiE INTERFERENCES SEALED TO Tile TlilRD LAYER WITil TROWEL GRADE. 104115/0 AB 832 X-226 AA/21d Y Y ISSUE: CANNOT INSTALL 1/4* OVERLAY ON 2* CONDUIT AT INTERFERENCE WITil SUPPORTS. RESOLUTION: INSTALL I/4" OVERLAY BtTITED 9-1, 9-3 1-6,7 UP AGAINST EITilER SIDE OF EACli SUPPORT ANGLE ADD AN EXTRA LAYER OF 1/4* OVERLAY ON TOP OF AND SEALED TO EXISTING OVERLAY ON BOTil SIDES OF TiiE SUPPORTS. 104151/0 AB 790 X-180 AA/2ta Y Y ISSUE: DUE TO PROXIMITY TO CEILING, INSTALLATION OF STRESS SKIN UPGRADES ON LONGITUDINALJOINTS ARE NOT FEASIBLE. RESOLUTION: Tile WIRE LONG8TUDINAL 12-1,14-1 1-5, 9 JOINTS IN LIEU OF STRESS SKIN. STAPLE TiiE CIRCUMFIRENTIAL BUTT JOINT STRESS SKIN ON TIIE TRAY BOTTOM AND AT LEAST ONE SIDE.
-. s s , -= w -
s- . _ m .-- - -- . , _
A'!TACilMENT C ER-ME-082, REV. O MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITi DEVIATIONS PAGE C16 OF C24 G DCA NO.lREV ' BLDO' ELEV' ROOM FIRE ~ SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN /RESOLUTidN SUsPORT~ AREA / (YtN) (YIN) BASIS / NOTES . l FIRE TEST., .. (PAOB C20-C24) l SCHEMES ZONE IM152/0 AB 810 X-207 AAl21b Y Y ISSUE: PliYSICAL ARRANGEMENT POSE [ t PROBLEM WITH INSTALLATION OF SECOND 1AYER OF PANEL ON JB. RESOLUTION: APPLY SINGLE LAYER OF TL ON 10-1, 10-2 I-5,8 SIDE OF 'd. SillM INTERNALLY TO AClilEVE A STABli CONFIGURATION. APPLY STRESS SKIN AND F;ANDINO PER REQUIREMENTS. 104180/0 SG 810 2-032 2SB/8 Y Y ISSUE: FLEXI-BLANKET COLLARS ON TIIREE AIR DROPS CANNOT BE INSTALLED PER TYPICAL DETAILS BECAUSE OF PilYSICAL C0NSIDERATIONS. RESOLUTION: INSTALL FLEXI-BLANKET IN Il-1 1-5, 16 PIECES AND SECURE AS DIRECTED, INSTALL STRESS SKIN AND STAPLE AS DIRECTED. 104186/0 SG 832 2-096 2 Sell 6 Y Y ISSUE: INSTRUMENT LINE PROTRUDES THROUGH AIR DROP INTERFERING WITil 4*-5* FLEXI-BLANKET COLLAR. RESOLUTION: CUT OUT COLLAR AND FIT 11-1 1-5, 16 AROUND INSTRUMENT LINE. SEAL WITil
' TROWEL GRADE 330460. INSTRUMENT LINE IS ALREADY COVERED AS A PROTRUDING LINE.
[ I M I97/0 AB 790 X-180 AA/21s Y Y ISSUE: PIPE INTERFERES WITil INSTALLATION OF TL ON TRAY AT SPLICE PLATE. RESOLIITION: COVER SPllCE PLATE ON sir.,E 11 1, 12-2, I-5 !O 3 RAll WITII FLAT BOARD BUTT JOINED TO V- 13-1 RIB BOARD. INSTALL JOINTS PER REQUIREMENTS.
.f . . - .
ATTACHMENT C ' ER-ME482, REY.- 0 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE Cl7 OF C24 DCA NOJREV BLDO ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION ' ' SUPPdRT' BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N)5 (YIN)' TEST.S. (PAGE C20-C24) FIRE , SCHEMES ZONE ~ 104205/0 AB 873 X-245 AA/38 N Y ISSUE: CANNOT INSTALL 1/4" OVERLAY ON CONDUfr AT INTERFERENCE WITil BASEPLATE. RESOLUTION: INSTALL I/4* OVERLAY AND 9-1 14,28 TRIM TO CLEAR BASEPLATE. ADD AN . ADDITIONAL 1/4' OVERLAY BUTTED UP TO TiiE INTERFERENCE. SEAL WITH TROWEL GRADE. 104211/0 SG 810 2-083 2SD/9 Y Y ISSUE: THIRD LAYER OF FLEXI-BLANKET HAS INTERFERENCE WITH GROUND CABLE. RESOLUTION: GROUND CABLE IS ALREADY 9-1. Il-1 I-5, I6 COVERED WITH TL CUT OUT FLEXI-BLANKET AND BUIT TO GROUND CABLE TL APPLY 330- - 660 TROWEL GRADE AROUND JOINT. 104223/0 SG e r2 2494 2SB/IS Y Y ISSUE: FI.EXI-BLANKET COLLAR CANNOT BE INSTALLED ON AIR DROP PER TYPICAL-DETAILS BECAUSE OF PHYSICAL CONSIDERATIONS. RESOLUTION: INSTALL FLEXI-BLANKET IN TWO Il i I-5, 16 OVERLAPPING PIECES AS DIRECTED. BAND AND SECURE JOINTS PER REQUIREMENTS. 104234/0 AB 790 X-173 AA/2ta N Y ISSUE: CONDUIT INTERFERFS WITH INSTALLATION OF SECOND LAYER OF BOARD ON J8. RESOLUTION: OMIT COVERAGE OF SECOND 10-1, 10-2 I4, 8 PANEL IN AREA ADJACENT TO IFRERFERENCE. SEAL EDGE OF SECOND LAYER. 104237/0 EC 792 X-122 EA/54 Y Y ISSUE: JB INTERFERES WITII INSTALLATION OF ' I/4* OVERLAY ON 2* CONDUIT. RESOLUTION: BUTT I/4" OVERLAY UP TO SIDES 9-1, 9-3 14.7 OF JB.
A7TACHMENT C ER-ME482, REY. O MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE Cl8 OF C24 DCA NOJREV BLDO ELEV ROOM FIRE- SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION i SUPPORT BAS!S/ NOTES AREA / (YIN) (1r/N) TES7 (PAGE C20C4) FIRE . ui"M SCHEMES ZONE _ i 104238/0 AB 790 X-174 AA/21a N Y ISSUE: JB INTERFERES WITH INSTALLATION OF i 1/4* OVERLAY ON I-1/2" CONDUIT. l l RESOLUTION: BMT I/4* OVERLAY UP TO SIDES 9-1, 9-3 14,7 OFJB. 14,7 IN 239/0 AB 790 X-172 AA/21s N Y ISSUE: PIPE INTERFERES WITH BOX OUT INSTALLATION ON CONDUIT LBD. RESOLUTION: NOTCII ONE SIDE PANEL TO 9-1, 10-1 1 4, 9, 16 CLEAR EARS ON LBD. INSTALL A SECOND PANEL OVER THE NOTCIIES AND BEVELED AT THE INTERFERING PIPE. STITCH JOINTS ON 3* CENTERS WHERE STRESS SKIN CANNOT BE INSTAI I Fn AT THE INTERFERENCE. IN 241/0 AB 790 X-174 AA/21a N Y ISSUE: INTERFERENCES EXIST WITH SECOND LAYER OF TL ON JB. ;; RESOLUTION: OMIT COVERAGE OF SECOND 10-1, 10-2 14,8 PANEL IN AREAS OF INTERFERENCE. SEAL EXPOSED EDGES OF SECOND LAYER WITH TROWEL GRADE. o l i
ATTACHMENT C ER-ME482, REV. O MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE Cl9 OF C24 , DCA NOJREV BLDO ELEV ROOM FraE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION -' SUPPDRT > ! AREA / BASIS / NOTES , (Y/N) (YIN)- TEST , .. . FIRE.
~
~
~
(PAOE C20-C24) SCHEMES ;
. ZONE-104242/0 EC- 778 X-113 EA/43 Y !
Y ISSUE 1: PIPE INTERFERES WITH TL ON TWO CONDUITS. i ISSUE 2; PIPE INTERFERES WITH TL ON SUPPORT (PROTRUDING). RESOLUTION 1: INSTALL 1/2* PREFORMED, 9-1 1-6, 29 TRIMMED AS NECESSARY, TO CLEAR INTERFERENCE. IF I/2" SECTION IS TRIMMED, INSTALL SECOND SECTION OVER FIRST AND SEAL IN THE AREA OF TiiE INTERFERENCE. RESOLUTION 2: INSTALL I/2* FIAT BOARD ON - 1-2,Il-1, 1-6, 29 THE SUPPORT, TRIMMED AS NECESSARY AT 12-1 THE INTERFERENCE. TO CLEAR THE PIPE. INSTALL SECOND PANEL SEALED TO FIRST IN THE AREA OF Tile INTERFERENCE. 104243/0 AB 810 X-207 AA/21b Y Y ISSUE: SUPPORT INTERFERES WITH 1/4* OVERIAY ON 2* CONDUIT. RESOLUTION: TRIM THE 1/4* OVERLAY 9-1, 9-3 14,7' SECTIONS TO CLEAR THE INTERFERENCES AND
. SEAL TO FIRST LAYER.
q M
~ m w -w ,-e = - - - <-w- ,-e-m-*. _m .-w, .= . - - - - - = =
- _ _ . - - --- ---_--_-_2_---- ---.u-_-- ----___ - * - - - - _ . - - _ - - - - - - - - - - ___- -___
ATTACHMENT C ER-ME-082. REV. O
- MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS ,, PAGE C20 OF C24 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES Y~ ~
, ... my I.
CONTINUITY OF TIIE MATERIAL IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. GENERIC 2. EFFECTIVE THICKNESS OF THE MATERIAL IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. GENERIC 3. THE NATURE AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THE SUPPORT ASSEMBLY (IF APPLICABLE) IS CONSISTENT WITH CONFIGURATIONS. TESTE GENERIC 4. THE APPLICATION OR END USE OF TIIE MATERIAL IS CONSISTENT WITli TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. GENERIC S. TIIE CONFIGURATION WAS REVIEWED BY A QUALIFIED FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER AND DETERMINED EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF PROTECTION. GENERICTO P 6. SPECIFIC AND UNIQUE DIFFERENCES FROM TESTED CONFIGURATRNS EXIST FOR THE PLAIR CONFIGURAT GENERIC ENHANCE Tile EFFECTIVENESS OF Tile PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE (E.G., SPACIAL ORIENTATION, SURFACES NOT DIRECTLY EXPOSED TO A POTENTIAL FIRE DUE TO SHIELDING EFFECTS, MOUNTED TO STRUCTURE, TORTUROUS PATH, ETC.). 7. TEST SCIIEME 9-3 DEMONSTRATED TiiE EFFECTIVENESS OF 1/2* THICK PREFORMED CONDUIT SECTIONS 103741/0 ON DIAMETER CONDUlTS AND IS CREDITED WiiERE LOCALIZED INTERFERENCES PRECLUDE THE INSTALLATIO 103770/0 OVERLAY. A THIS DEVIATION FROM SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS STILL PROVIDES AN INSTALLATION TESTED CONFIGURATION. 104017/0 IN 104057/0 104115/0 104237/0 104238/0 102863/I 103050/0 102725/0 102837/0 104243/0 8. TEST SCllEME 10-2 DEMONSTRATED THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A SINGLE LAYER OF I/2* TL FLAT BOARD103706/1 ON JUNCTI AND IS CREDITED WilERE INTERFERENCES PRECLUDE THE INSTALLATION OF THE SECOND LAYER. THIS DEVIATIO 104013/0 SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS STILL PROVIDES AN INSTALLATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH A TESTED CONFIGURAT 104026/1 104075/0 104152/0 104205/u 104234/0 104241/0 y n -
, , , , , ,,,n - , , , ,e .,
e-c ~,v,, , - , , , , . , - - , - , ~ _ - . - . - - , . . - ,. , , ,, a
i ATTACHt'5.NT C ER.ME-082 REV. 0 + MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C21 OF C24 NOTE ~ ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES n DCA/ REY. ' , 9. DUE TO THE SPECIFIC PLANT CONFIGURATION. DEVIATION (S) FROM STRESS SKIN, TIE WIRING, STAPLING OR OTHER JOINT 1023A/I ENHANCEMENT REQUIREMENTS ARE REQUIRED. THESE DEVIATION (S) ARE A SMALL PART OF THE MECHA 102478/l THIS INSTALL ATION AND INDIVIDUAL LOCAL DEVIA110N(S). THEY DO NOT COMPROMISE THE MECHANICAL 102858/0 ! I TIIE JOINT (S) AS A WHOLE OR THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE FIRE BARRIER. 103007/1 103037/0 103375/0 ! 103414/I ! 103602/0 j 103609/0 103631/0 103633/0 , 103718/l 103780/0 103816/0 103988/0 104151/0 104239/0 91 4 THE CABLE TRAY QUALIFICATION TEeTS LISTED USES STRESS SKIN OVERLAP ON LONGITUDINAL JOINTS. 103631/0 Tile WAS SECURED TO THE 3301 PANELS V.Til STAPLES AND TIE WIRES. ALL 3 ONIONS SHOWN AISO USE BOTH METHODS, HOWEVER THE DETAILS FOR TIE WIRE INSTALLATION VARY SLIGHTLY FOR TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. OIrTI
- ARE EQUIVALENT TO Tile TESTED METHOD AND ARE ACCEPTABLE FOR GENERIC USE. OPTION C DOES NOT PR SAME DEGREE OF TIGilTNESS AS OPTIONS A AND B, AND SHALL NOT BE USED GENERICALLY. ' OPTION C METHOD IS
, ACCEfrTABLE WilERE INSTALLED SINCE STRESS SKIN IS STAPLED AND TROWEL GRADE APPLIED OVER BOTH
! STAPLES. THE TIE WIRES SAG DURING TEST AND ALTHOUGH NOT TESTED WITl!OUT, THEIR INHERENT EFFECTIVENESS IN SECURI 330-1 Tl L 0{. ,TESS GRADE. SKIN ON LONGITUDINALJOINTS IS DEFINITELY SECONDARY TO THAT OF THE STAPLES COVERED j 10.
., TIIE ALTERNATIVE CONFIGURATION FOR COVERAGE OF THE TRAY SPLICE PLATE WITH FLAT BOARD PROVID 102478/l i TillCKNESS OF ENSURE INTEGRITY OF Tile ENVELOPE. MATERIAL METHCCS OF JOINT REINFORCEMENT HAVE BEEN TESTED AND EFFECTIVELY 104197/0IMPLE II. THE USE OF FLEXI-BLANKET FOR COVERAGE ON RIGID CONDUlT IS NOT A TESTED CONFIGURATION. HOWEVERI 102861/0 CRITICAL PARAMETERS OF MATERIAL TIIICKNESS AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ARE EQUIVALENT TO TESTED CONFIGURATIONS, THE INSTALLATION IS ACCEPTABLE. 12. TIIE USE OF BtITERED PREFORMED CONDUIT SECTIONS FOR COVERAGE OF FLEX CONDUlT IS 103721/1 NOT A TEST HOWEVER, SINCE TIIE CRITICAL PARAMETERS OF MATERIAL TillCKNESS AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ARE EQUIVALENT TO 103730/0 TESTED CONFIGURATIONS, THE INSTALLATION IS ACCEL' TABLE. 103947/0 D
+, _ - -- - _-.m . . , . _ - - - - - - , - . . _ , , -
~,-%- . , ,...w, . ,m,m-s := . . . .2 - - ,-- -. w ,-s. - . ., s,.,,, --
ATTACIIMENT C ER-MR-082, REY. 0 MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C22 OF C24 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES - i DCA/REV j 13. TIIE CONFIGURATION. AS !NSTALLED, DOES NOT ACHIEVE TIIE FULL REQUIRED MATERIAL TIIICKNESS AT TIIE END OF THE 802758/0 i CONDUlT SUPPORT. THE PRIMARY RACEWAY ENVELOPE IS NOT AFFECTED. THE SEALING OF TIIE SUPPOR ' INTERFERING PATH DUCT FOR CONDUCTIVE PROTECTS IIEAT TRANSFER. THE END OF Tile SUPPORT FROM DIRECT EXPOSURE TO FIRE AND PROVID 14. Tile CONFIGURATION, AS INSTALLED, DOES NOT ACHIEVE TIIE FULL REQUIRED MATERIAL T1HCKNESS BETWE 102861/0 CONDUlT AND INTERFERING PIPE. FULL COVERAGE OF TIIE CONDUIT WITil THE FIRST LAYER OF FLEXI-BLA INSTALLED. BUTTING Tile SECOND LAYER OF FLEXI-BLANKET DIRECTLY AGAINST TiiE PIPE PROTECTS T SINGLE LAYER OF FLEXI-BLANKET FROM DIRECT EXPOSURE TO TIIE FIRE AND PROVIDES A TORTUROUS PA CONDUCTIVE IIEAT TRANSFER. ALSO, COMBUSTIBLE LOADING IN TIIE AREA IS LOW. IS. FOR THE 1* DIA. CONDUIT, Tile MINOR AREA OF REDUCED COVERAGE (< 3* LONG ON ONE SIDE ONLY) AND SIIIELDING 102725/0 EFFECTS OF THE PIPE AND CONDUIT BELOW ARE CREDITED. SCliEME 11-1 DEMONSTRATED Tile EFFECT 102837/0 FLEXI-BLANKET OVER 330-1 CONDUlT SECTIONS. EXTENSION OF CDNDUIT ENVELOPE VIA TROWEL GRADE PROVIDES ADEQUATE PROTtiCTION FOR CONDUCTIVE IIEAT PATil. [6. Tile CRITICAL PARAMETERS FOR 'll!!S INSTALLATION ARE MATERIAL TillCKNESS AND STRUCTURAL102858/0 INTEGRAT INSTALLATION USES MATERIALTillCKNESS AND STRUCTURAL DETAILS EQUIVALENT TO TESTED CONFIGURA 103782/0 104027/0 104047/0 104180/0 104iB6/0 104211/D 104223/0 104239/0 17. TiiE CONFIGURATION, AS INSTALLED, DOES NOT ACillEVE TIIE FULL MATERIAL TIIICKNESS WIIERE Tile CONDUIT FITTING 102863/l INTERFERES WITil Ti!E CURB. BUTTING Tile TL AGAINST Tile CURB AND COVERING TIIE BACK SIDE OF Tile CU THE SM ALL AREA OF Til1N TL FROM DIRECT EXPOSURE TO TiiE FIRE AND PROVIDES A TORTUROUS PATH FOR ilEAT TRANSFER. ADDITIONALLY Tile CONFIGURATION IS LOCATED RIGHT ABOVE A SEALED FLOOR PENETRATION PRECLUDING FIRE APPROACilING FROM BELOW OR THE SIDES. 18. THE CONFIGURATION, AS INSTALLED, DOES NOT AClilEVE Tile FULL MATERIAL TIIICKNESS IN A SMALL AREA AROUND TIIE 103007/l PIPE INTERFERENCE. Tile PIPE PROTECTS Tile DEVIATION AREA FROM DIRECT EXPOSURE TO TiiE FIRE. TiiE 103050/0 GRADE MATERIAL PROVIDES EXTRA PROTECTIVE FOR llEAT TRANSFER. COMBUSTIBLE LOADING IN TiiE AREA IS LOW. MATERIAL IN Tile AREA AROUND TIIE DEVIATION AND A TO 103158/0 10371811 19. THE CONFIGURATION DOES NOT GET Tile FULL TillCKNESS OF TL ON A SMALL AREA ON TIIE BACK SIDE OF A CON 103076/I SUPPORT AWAY FROM Tile CONDUIT. THE TL IS INSTALLED BETWEEN THE SUPPORT AND Ti!E WALL. DOUBLE L TIIE TL ARE INSTALLED ON EACH SIDE OF TiiE SUPPORT AND BUTTED TO THE WALL. THERE IS NO FIRE BACK SIDE THROUGli OF TiiE Tile SIDES. SUPPORT AND TiiE DOUBLE LAYERS ON TiiE SIDES PROVIDE EXTRA RESISTANCE TO CONDU
ATTACilMENT C ER-ME-082, REV. O MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS PAGE C23 OF C24 NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES j; DCA/REV
- 20. TIIE SUBJECT CONDUIT IS RUN PARALLEL TO TIIE WALL TiiE INSTRUMENT TUBING IS ALSO RUN PARALLEL TO TIIE WALL 103157/0 CROSSING TIIE CONDUIT BEDVEEN TIIE CONDUIT AND THE WALL. SEALING BETWEEN THE WALL AND TIIE CONDUITS ON 103158/0 EITilER SIDE OF Tile TUBING PROVIDES EXTRA MATERIAL AROUND THE SMALL AREA OF DEVIATION PROTECTS TIIE 103718/I DEVIATION FROM DIRECT FIRE IMPINGI: MENT AND PROVIDES A TORTURCUS PATII FOR llEAT11tANSFER.
- 21. PROVIDING TROWEL GRADE TO SEAL AROUND Tile UNISTRITT PROTECTS TIIE DEVIATION FROM DIRECT FIRE EFFECTS AND 103158/0 PROVIDES EXTRA RESISTANCE TO 11 EAT TRANSFER.
- 22. Tills INSTALLATION POTENTIALLY FAILS TO ACil!SVE FULL MATERIAL TillCKNESS BETWEEN Tile STEEL ANGLE AND THE 103602/0 TRAY BOTTOM. TIIE ANGLE SillELDS TIIE POTENTIAL DEVIATION FROM ANY DIRECT FIRE EXPOSURE AND TiiE PANELS OVER TIIE ANGLE PROVIDE EXTRA RESISTANCE TO IIEAT TRANSFER ALONG WITli ENSURING A VERY TORTUROUS PATil TO TiiE AREA OF TiiE DEVIATION. ADDITIONALLY, TiiERE IS LOW COMBUSTIBLE LOADING IN THE AREA.
- 23. Tills CONFIGURATION, AS INSTALLED, FAILS TO ACIIIEVE TiiE REQUIRED 1/4" OVERLAY BETWEEN TIIE CONDUIT AND Tile 103636/0 l TUBE STEEL BUTTING TiiE OVERLAY AGAINST TiiE TUBE STEEL AND SEALING WITH TROWEL GRADE PROTECTS Tile AREA FROM ANY DIRECT EXPOSURE TO A FIRE. INSTALLING FLAT BOARD ON TliREE SIDES PROVIDES EXTRA MATERIAL FOR llEAT TRANSFER RESISTANCE AND ADDS EXTRA PROTECTION AROUND TiiE DEVIATION FROM ANY TYPE OF EXPOSURE.
- 24. TIIE CRITICAL PARAMETERS IN Tills CONFIGURATION ARE MATERIAL TillCKNESS AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY. TIIE 103650/0 INSTALLED CONFIGURATION HAS MATERIAL TillCKNESS AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY EQUIVALENT TO TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. NOT INSTALLING FULL LAYER (S) OF TL AT TIIE INTERFERENCE IS ACCEPTABLE BECAUSE TiiE ;
INTERFERENCE IS TIIE REQUIRED TillCKNESS OF TL
- 25. Tills CONFIGURATION, AS INSTALLED, Fall 3 TO ACillEVE Tile REQUIRED I/4* OVERLAY BEDVEEN TifE CONDUIT AND 103864/0 STRUCTURAL STEEL SUPPORT. BUITING Tile OVERLAY AGAINST BOTil SIDES OF TIIE LEG OF Tile ANGLE AND SEALING WITli TROWEL GRADE PROTECTS TiiE SMALL AREA OF DEVIATION FROM ANY DIRECT EXPOSURE TO FIRE. INSTALLING FLAT BOARD ON BOTil LEGS OF TIIE ANGLE PROVIDES EXTRA MATERIAL FOR llEAT TRANSFER RESISTANCE AND EXTRA PROTECTION AROUND TiiE DEVIATION.
- 26. LOCALIZED OMISSION OF Til!RD LAYER OF FLEXI-BLANKET NEXT TO TIIE MOTOR llOUSING IS ACCEPTABLE BECAUSE TiiE 103959/0 CONDUIT TERMINATES AT TiiE MOTOR, Tile TL IS APPLIED TO SUPPORT OPERABILITY OF Tile MOTOR AND A FIRE AT TIIE 103991/0 POIN T OF INTERFERENCE WOULD RENDER Tile MOTOR INOPERABLE AND Tile TL UNNECESSARY.
27. THIS CONFIGURATION AS INSTALLED COULD NOT ACHIEVE Tile TIIIRD FULL LAYER OF FLEXI-BLANKET AT INTERFERENCES 104107/0 WITH A STEEL SillELD AND A CONDUIT. T!!E TIIIRD LAYER WAS INSTALLED BUTTED UP AGAINST Tile INTERFERENCES A FOURTli LAYER WAS INSTALLED SEALED TO TIIE TillRD AND AROUND Tile AREA OF TIIE DEVIATION TO PROTECT TiiE DEVIATION FROM DIRECT EXPOSURE TO TIIE FIRE AND TO PROVIDE ETTRA MATERIAL FOR INCREASED RESISTANCE TO IIEAT TRANSFER.
- 28. Tills CONFIGURATION, AS INSTALLED, Fall 3 TO AClilEVE Tile REQUIRED I/4" OVERLAY ON Tile CONDUIT AT TIIE 104205/0 BASEPLATE. BUTTING TIIE OVERLAY AGAINST TIIE STEEL AhD ADDING EXTRA MATERIAL AT T1IE INTERFERENCE PROTECTS Tile AREA FORM ANY DIRECT EXPOSURE TO FIRE. IT ALSO PROVIDES EXTRA MATERIAL FOR IIEAT TRANSFER RESISTANCE TO PROVIDE MORE PROTECTION AT TIIE DEVIATION.
M
ATTACHMENT C ER-ME-082, REV; O MINOR PROTECTED COMMODITY DEVIATIONS: PAGE C24 OF C24 NOTE
, h ACCEFTANCE BASIS /NUTES ..u... .'f ;*.E . ,s . s. .; . , - _ DCA/ ret !:
- 29. THIS CONFIGURATION, AS INSTAI I Fn, FAllJE TO ACHIEVE THE REQUIRED THICKNESS AT THE INTERFERENCES. 10424210 ADDING EXTRA MATERIAL AT THE INTERFERENCE PROTECTS THE AREA FORM ANY DIRECT EXPOSURE TO FIRE. 'TT ALSO PROVIDES EXTRA MATERIAL FOR HEAT TRANSFER RESISTANCE TO PROVIDE MORE PROTECflON AT THE DEVIATION.' '
- 30. REVIEW INDICATES THAT THIS INSTALLATION CANNOT BE EVALUATED AGAINST THE TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.. ONE FORM : . 102780M 93-184 HAS BEEN WRTITEN TO DOCUMENTTHIS SITUATION AND PROVIDE A MECHANISM TO BRING THIS INSTALLATION INTO -
CONFORMANCE WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS.~ THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION INVOLVES USING 330-1 TROWEL GRADE AND PREFORMED SECTIONS /PANELTO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL MATERIALIN THE AREA OF THE INTERFERENCE.
- 31. THE CONFIGURATION, AS INSTALLED, DOES NOT ACHIEVE THE FULL REQUIRED MATERIAL THICKNESS ON A PROTRUDING 103599M ,
ITEM AT AN INTERFERENCE. THE PARIMARY RACEWAY ENVELOPE IS NOT AFFECTED,' THE EXTRA LAYER OF PANEL : PROTECTS THE INTERFERENCE FROM DIRECT EXPOSURE TO A FIRE AND PROVIDES EXTRA MATERIAL FOR RESISTANCE TO . I! EAT TRANSFER. ' : 11 I i l I 4 .1
e ER-ME-082, REV. O PAGE DI OF D30 ~ ATTACHMENT D PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM COVERAGE DEVIATIONS
ATTACllMENT D ER-ME-082, REY. 0 PROTRUDING / INTERFERING frEM . , PAGE D2 OF D30 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS DCA NO./REV BLDO ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. . DESCRIPTION / ISSUE'OF CONCERN!RESOLITrlON , g SUPPORT. BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YlN) (YlN)' FIRE TEST . (PAGE D26-ZONE SCHEMES D30) 101397/0 AB 810 T.-207 AAl21b Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR INSTALLING itIERMO-LAG ON ESSENTIAL TRAY STRUCTURAL STEEL SUPPORT IN THE AREA OF AN INTERFERING 2" RIBE STEEL SUPPORT. RESOLUTION: INSTALL TiiERMO-I.AG ON TIIE Il-1,12-1, 14,7 CABLE TRAY SUPPORT FOR A DISTANCE OF 9* 12-2, 13-1 FROM TIIE PRIMARY ENVELOPE WIIERE Tile & 14-1 g 2* TUBE STEEL SUPPORT INTERFERES WITil i I , TiiERMO-LAG INSTALLATION, EXTEND Tile PROTECTION ONTO TIIE PIPE SUPPORT TO A TOTAL DISTANCE OF 9" FROM TiiE CABLE TRAY. OMIT TiiERMO-LAG PROTECTION OF TIIE INSIDE FACE OF TIIE PIPE SUPPORT TUBE STEEL. I 102221/1 EC 778 X-IISB AAll54 Y Y ISSUE: NON-E35ENTIALTRAY SIIARES SUPPORT WITII ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY, BOTil ITEMS REQUIRED 9* RULE THERMO-LAG PROTECTION AS PROTRUDING TTEMS (MULTIPLE LOCATIONS, SAME TRAY RUN). SPACING BETWEEN SPilCE PLATE BOLTS AND A BEND IN ONE TRAY REPRESENT ADDITIONAL INSTALLATION PROBLEMS. CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION. RESOLUTION: COVER PROTRUDING TRAY AND II-1,12-1, 1-S, 17, 34 SUPPORT USihG DCA DIRECTIONS (TYPICAL 12-2,13-I DETAIL 134). COMPLETELY COVER WALL A 14-I SUPPORT WITII TilERMO-LAG 330-1 PANEL, AND USE A COMMON ENCLOSURE FOR SPLICE PLATE BOLTS WIIERE SPACE PROIIIBITS STANDARD INSTALLATION. 4
, . - _m _ . - . - - . -____m__-._m.__.._._____ _ __.______. _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . . _ m ________.__.____..___________.____m
4 ATTACHMENT D ER-ME-082, REY. O PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM PAGE D3 OF D30 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS 4 DCA NOJREV BLDO ELEY- ROOM 4 FIRE i SUPPh 'DET. DESCRIPDONASSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION ' SUPPORT 3 BASIS / NOTES
- AREAL (Y/N)] (Y/N)l 'm
~
t ,
' TEST, y s .(PAGE D26 :{ -
i
. FIRE 1
. ZONE.'
14'
~
n " ' @' W MW I W N,Nf D~ % j. '... NUSCHEMES N, ..~OW ~ ,- < ~. gf 14 NDM 3s , "< ' - 7
.Oib i 281
. a - . . - -*. s 2
10223'110 EC . 778- X-Il3 EA/43 Y Y~ ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION RBQUESTS DIRECTION i FOR IN!rTALLING THERMO-LAG ON A NON-ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY WHICH SHARES A ' SUPPORT WITH A PROTECTED TRAY. . THE j : 1 NON-ESSENTIALTRAY IS WITHIN THE 9' .j l DISTANCE FOR CONDUCTIVE HEAT PATH PROrECnON. 4 RESOLLTTION: PROTECT THE PROTRUDING -I l-1,12-1, I-5, 17 i TRAY USING M2-1701 DETAIL 134. ENCLOSE 12-2, 13-1 ) TRAY SPUCE PLATES AND BOLTING FOR BOTH & 14-1 1 IN A COMMON 330-1 BOX TO SIMPLIFY ! INSTALLATION. 102266/0 AB 790 X-174 - AA/21a N' Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCHON RIiQUESTS DIRECTION FOR INSTALLING THERMO4.AO ON A STRUCTURAL FIEEL SUPPORT FOR AN . } ESSENTIALTRAY. THE SUPPORT IS ALSO USED ) AS A PIPE SUPPORT AND 'plE UNPROTECTED LINE IS WITHIN THE 9* DISTANCE FOR 4 CONDUCnVE HEAT PATH PROTECTION. ( RESOLITTION: INSTALL THERMO-LAG ON THE .- Il-1,12-I, 14,8 STRUCTURAL TUBE STEEL SUPPORT FOR A- 12-2, 13-1
- DISTANCE OF 9' FROM THE ESSENHAL TRAY & 14-1
}' EXCEPT WHERE INTERFERED WITH BY THE - UNPROTECTED LINE. i ? 4 4 b.
,-w.sey,..,,w,,,--m.,,,,.--...,.w.w.m-w.%.m..,e..m.,m.,,,,.m..m.,+, .._ __.._..mm%..,-. _,_,....,,m. ......o.-.m--.~,*v.,m-y-.-#,-mm,-,.v---,,,.--,-e-%.>., ., 3 r -
--w-- -
-e ,
ATTACllMENT D ER-ME-082, REV. O PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM PAGE D4 OF D30 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS DCA NO./REV BLDO ELEV ROOM- FIRE ' SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT' BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (YIN) TEST f
. (PAGE D26
- FIRE .
SCHEMES - D30) ZONE ll-102312/0 : AD 790 X-174 AA/21a N Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR INSTALLING TIIERMO-LAG ON A NON-ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY AND SUPPORTS WlilCH ARE SHARED WITH A PROTECTED TRAY. TiiE NON-ESSENTIAL TRAY IS WITHIN THE 9" DISTANCE FOR CONDUCTIVE HEAT PATil PROTECTION. l RESOLUTION: WRAP ADJACENTTRAY AND N/A SEE l 4 SHARED SUPPORT MEMBERS WITil TilERMO- ATTACliMMT ) LAG 330-1 PANEL AT THE REQUIRED A FOR LOCATIONS PER M2-1701, DETAIL 134. ACCEPTANCE
' {
NOTE: TIIE PANEL ATTACilMENT DIRECTIONS BASIS FOR INCLUDED IN TIIIS DCA ARE NOW PART OF DETAIL 13-6 Tile TYPICAL DETAIL ITSELF. 102479/0 AB E32 X-226 AA/21d Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR PROVIDING COVERAGE ON NON-ESSENTIAL FREE AIR CABLES PROTRUDING FROM ESSENTIAL J-BOX JB2A-628. RESOLUTION: NO PROTECTION IS TO BE ADDED 10-1, 10-2 1-5,36 FOR CABLES, SINCE THEY ARE SEALED INTTIRNALLY IN THE J-BOX, USING A 6" DEITH OF ELASTOMER 45B. 102524/0 EC 790 X-122 EA/54 Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR TIIERMO-LAG COVERAGE OF SUPPORT STEEL AND CABLE TRAY WillCil INTERFERE WITil THERMO-LAG COVERAGE OF A 2*4 ESSENTIAL CONDUIT. RESOLIITION: COVER SUPPORT STEEL AND 9-1, 10-1 I-5,9 ADJACENT TRAYS AS PROTRUDING ITEMS PER Tile 9" RULE, USING DCA DIRECTIONS FOR ATTACilMENT OF PANEL TO TRAYS, w
- i
! i S 1 g a s r g i a g
' ! I
! l lill si a
. g .6: 0
" I a
lll!l'1llll'13ll1 l*;;lald !ltljlj!! lll i! Il
!l linl;jj!!ll-lp l 1 l1 lilliesila i, iip3- llH s
in i i :
,a pisi,i
- le il.i, salt
, l .
ff. ! hj
!p!.
.I :
. g!
'glr -
ATTACHMENT D ER-ME-082, REV. O PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM PAGE D6 OF D30 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS DCA NO./REV ELDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET.- DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN* / RESOLUTION : SUPPORT-:: BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (YlN) TEST (PAGE D26- :. FIRE _
, SCIEMES . D30) .
ZONE I. 102789/1 AB 790 X-180 AAl21s Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCDON REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR INSTALLING THERMO-LAG ON ESSENTIAL TRAY STRUCTURAL STEEL SUPPORT IN THE AREA OF AN INTERFERING 12*( CONDENSATE PIPE (2 LOCATIONS). RESOLIJTION: INSTA11THERMO-LAG Oh THE 11-1. I2-1, 1-6, 10 CABLE TRAY SUPPORT FOR A DISTANCE OF 9* 12-2, 13-1 i FROM THE PRIMARY ENVELOPE. WHERE THE & I4-1 12*4 PIPE INTERFERES WITH THERMO-LAG
! INSTAI1ATION, TRIM 330-1 PANEL AROUND PIPE TO ALLOW 1/8* AIR GAP BETWEEN PIPE AND THERMO-LAG. ADD A SECOND THICKNESS OF 330-1 PANEL AT AREA OF TIIE INTERFERENCE, EXTENDING 9* IN BOTli DIRECTIONS AIDNG THE SUPPORT. ,
S
ATTACHMENT D ER-MEM, REV. O PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM PAGE D7 OF D30 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS DCA NOJREV BLDO ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIFI1ONilSSUE OF CONCERN /RESOLITTION SUINORT - l 34 SIS / NOTE AREA / (YIN) (YIN) "IT.ST , (PAGE D26.: FI'tE . SCHEMES - D30) ZONE ' 102821/1 SG 821 2-082 2SRF Y Y ISSUE 1: SERVICE WATER UNE INTERFERES WITH THERMO-LAG 330-1 INSTAL 1ATION AT SPLICE PLATE AREA OF AN ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY. ISSUE 2: TWO CHIII WATER UNES INTERFERE
%TTH STRESS SKIN INSTALLATION ON AN ESSENTIAL CABG TRAY DUE TO ZERO CGARANCE.
ISSUE 3: NON-ESSENTIAL AIR DROP BETWEEN i ADJACENT NON-ESSENTIAL CABG TRAYS INTERFERES WTTH THERMO-IAO 333-1 INSTAU ATION ON AN ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY. RESOLITTION 1: TRIM SPUCE PLATE SCREWS 11-1. 12-1, I-5, 28-FLUSH WITH NITTS TO ALLOW FLAT PANEL 12-2, 13-1 INSTALLATION. TRANSFER FROM FLAT BOARD & 14-1 TO "V" RIB BOARD PER M2-1701 TYPICAL DETAIL 8-3 CRTIERIA (FROM DCA 101918). s t
I ATTACHMENT D ER-ME-Os2, REV. O PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM q PAGE D8 OF D30 1 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS i DCA NOJREV BLDG ELEY ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTIONIISSUE OF CONCERNIRESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES l AREAL (YIN) (YIN) FIRE-TEST . (PAGE D26-SCHEMES D30) ZONE I 10212111 RESOLUTION 2: REMOVE EXISilNG THERMO- Il-1,12-1, 1-5, 29
- CONT'D j
LAG FROM TRAY IN THE AREA OF THE 2 P1 PES. 12-2, 13-1 j p ADD INSULATION TO PIPES. CONSTRUCT 330-1 & 14-1 i PANEL BOXFS AROUND PIPES, ATTACHED TO 4 THE PRIMARY TRAY ENVELOPE. USE 2 LAYERS 330460 FLEXI-BLANKET TO WRAP EACH PIPE i , ABOVE AND BELOW THE LEVEL OF THE TRAY, ! USING 330-1 TROWEL GRADE, STRESS SKIN, , AND STAPLES TO ATTACH AND REINFORCE CONFIGURATION. RESOLUTION 3: USE FLAT PANEL 3.10-1 AT THE II-1,12-1, I-5, 28, 30 AREA OF AIR DROP INTERFERENCE, 12-2, 13-1 INSTALLING PER M2-1701 TYPICAL DETAIL 8-3. A 14-1 ) 22* MAXIMUM FLAT PANEL WIDTH WILL BE USED, DEVIATING FROM 12* MAXIMUM ; ALLOWED BY THE DETAIL 10215910 EC 790* X-115B AA/IS4 Y Y ISSUE: IACTUBING ANDTRAYINTERFERE WITH THERMO-LAG COVERAGE OF ESSENTIAL CONDUIT. OPEN-ENDED TURE STEEL SUPPORY MEMBER AND ADJACENTNON-ESSENTIAL CONDUlT ARE SECONDARY INTERFERENCES. CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECI1ON. { RESOLUTION: COVER ALL PRIMARY AND i SECONDARY INTERFERENCES PER THE 9* RULE 9-1, 10-1 14,38 AS PROTRUDING ITEMS. COVER BOTH OPEN l ENDS OF THE PIPE SUPPORT TUBE STEEL WTTH THERMO-LAG CAPS PER DETAIL 16-5. _ . . _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ . ~ .
, _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ - _ _ _ . _ . - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . - _
ATTACllMENT D ER-ME-082, REY. O PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM PAGE D9 OF D30 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS DCA NOJREV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPHON/ ISSUE OF CONCERN /RESOllinON SUPPORT BASIS /NOTFS AREAf (yin) (YIN) TEST (PAGE D26-FIRE SCHEMES D30) ZONE -
.m.=
102S844) AB 831 X-226 AA/21d Y Y ISSUE: FLOOR GRATING AND 3* ANGLE IRON INTERFERE WITH STANDARD THERMO-LAG l INSTALLATION ON ESSENHAL CABLE TRAY. l RESOLIJDON: MODIFY FLOOR GRATING TO 11-I,12-I. 14,20 ALLOW PROPER THERMO-LAG INSTALLATION. 12-2, 13-1 WRAP THE 3* ANGLE WITH THE ESSENTIAL & I4-1 TRAY WHERE IT INTERFERES WITH 1/2* THICKNESS INSTAL 1ATION, AND COVER Tile 3* ANGE FOR S* BEYOND THE TRAY LN BOTH DIRECTIONS, BtJITING PANELS TO ADJACENT WALL AND USING 330'I TROWEL GRADE AND SCREWS TO ATTACH PANELS. 103002.0 SG 892 2-109B 25K/17e Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR COVERAGE OF EMBEDDED SPARE CAPPED CONDUIT SLEEVE, WHICH IS LOCATED %7 THIN THE THERMO-IAG ENVELOPE REQUIRED FOR A i WALL MOUNTED KTEEL SUPPORT ON WHICH JUNCHON BOX 3825-1114Y IS MOUNTED. RESOLITHON: COVER THE END OF THE SPARE 10 1, 10-2 14.I1 SLEEVE WITIE THERMO-IAO 330-1 TROWEL GRADE MATERIAL, FILLING THE 1/8* DEEP RECESS UNTILITIS FLUSH WTTH THE WALL SURFACE. COVER SUPPORT STEEL WITH THERMO-LAO.
~a
$1 ATTACHMENT D l ER-ME-OS2, REY. 0 ~ PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM ' PAGE DIO OF D30 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS DCA NO.IREV BLDG ELEY ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION 'SUPPORTJ BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (YlN) - FIRE TEST . (PAGE D26 . SCHEMES-ZONE D30) l {} 103051/1 SG 810 262 2SB/S Y i Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR PROTECTION OF FSSA FIEX CONDUITS WHICH PROTRUDE FROM ESSENTIALJ-BOX JB25-53830. DIRECTION IS ALSO NEEDED FOR COVERAGE OF AN ESSENTIAL CONDUTT WHERE SPACE IS LIMITED, AND FOR FASTENING 330-1 PANEL TO STEEL LINER WALLS. RESOLUTION: WRAP 2 FSSA CABLES AS 10-1, 10-2 1-5,37 4 PROTRUDING ITEMS IN A COMMON THERMO-LAG 330460 ENCLOSURE / FIRE STOP PER
'IYPICAL DETAIL 3-3A METHODS. INSTALL COVERAGE ON THE ESSENTIAL CONDUIT USING DETAIL 3-3A, BUTTING 330-1 PRESHAPED SECflONS TO J-BOX AND ADDING 330460 I FLEXI-BLANKET WITH THE REQUIRED
{ OVERLAP. INSTALL 330-1 PANEL TO STEEL UNER WALL USING SELF-TAPPING METAL Y. SCREWS FOR 9* RULE PROTECTION TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE. ADD 330-70 CERAMIC BLANK IN THE GAP BETWEEN THE J-BOX AND THE STFFT LINER. T S
ATTACHMENT D ER-ME-es2, REY. O - PROTRUDING /INTERFERINGITEM . PAGE Dil OF D30 . , COVERAGE DEVIA'110NS s DCA NO.1 REY MDO ELEY RON FIRE - SUPP.- DET.s Instrem W mserv trm, M, BASISJNGIES l .-; AREAI (YlN)- (Y201 f FRE. O f- , 4 TliST/ f (PAGE D35- ~ .l _ .o ' , ,y ' +
, p -- w y g'- SCHEMES '
m _ ;- O - vu j3 ; D30) : 3: 10300sJO SG B32 2494 2S3/15 Y Y i ISSUE I: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRIiCI1ON ! FOR INSTAllJNG THERMO LAG ON EiSSENTIAL fi CONDUTT TURE STEEL SUPPORT IN THE AREA I OF AN INTERFERING 1 IM*4 PIPE. ISSUE 2: CONSTRUCI1ON REQUESTS DIRECIlON FOR BerrALUNG THERMM.AG ON ESSENTIAL CONDUIT TUDE S1EliL SUPPORT IN THE AREA OF AN INTIiRFERING I S/S*d PIPE RESTRAINT. . R898W f fTION I: INSTALL.THERMO4.AG ON - 9-1,10-1. 1 4, 12 'i CONDUIT SUPPORT POR A DISTANCE OF 9* j FROM THE PRIMARY IiNVEitDPE. ON THE SIDE [ OF THE TuSE STEEL WHERE THE IM* DEA. PIPE -t DITERFERES WITH INSTAL 1.ATION, INSTALL ! 330-1 PANEiL TO THE IiXTIINT Pnment F . AND ADD A tarvuqD 330-I PANEL. TRIM TNE . ! PANELS TO AllDer AN AIR OAP AT THE I t14- ! DIA. PIPE. NOTCH PANEL ON THE OPPOSTIE /. : SIDE OF THE SUPPORT AS NEiCEiSSARY TO FIT ' : FLUSH TO Rite ST1iliL. ! REeru ifTION 2: INSTALL THIiRMO4.AG ON 9-1,10-1 1 4, 12 'l CONDUIT SUPPORT FOR A DISTANCE OF 9* l FROM THE PRIMARY ENVEIDPE. INSTALL 2nd . .. LAYER OF 330-1 PANEL ON THE TUDE STEEL AT THE PIPE RESTRAINT NTERFERENCE, ll EXTENEMNG 9* FROM THE INTERFERENCE. TRAM PANELS AT THE PIPE RESTRAINT TO MAINTAIN AN AIROAP. INrrALLTHERMO-LAG 'I ON ADIACENT CONDUIT C23K3 TIS 2 WHERE IT INTERFERES WITH THERMO-LAG l INSTALLATION ON THE TUSE STEEL SUPPORT. J! f
,l
ATTACHMENT D ER-ME482, REV. O PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM PAGE D12 OF D30 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS DCA NO.lREV BLDO ELEY ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTIONilSSUE OF CONCERN /RESOLtJTION SUPPORT ~ BASIS / NOTES J AREAL (YIN)' (YIN)-
- FIRE *- TEST . (PAOli D26- ';
ZONE . SCHEMES ' D30) ! . .:. F - _: i 103143m SG E32 2494 2SB11S Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECrlON FOR COVERING ESSENTIAL CONDUIT TUBE STEEL SUPPORTIN THE AREA OF A 2* DIA. FF PIPE. RESOLUIlON: INSTALL THERMO-IAG 330-1 9-1, 10-1 1 4, 12 !, PANEL ON 111E TUBE STEEL SUPPORT TO THE ' 3 EXTENT POSSIBLE. ADD A SECOND THICKNESS ' OF 330-1 PANEL TO THE TWO SIDES OF Tile , SUPPORT ADJACENT TO THE INTERFERING
! PIPE. TRIM 3301 PANELS AT THE AREA OF THE :
INTERFERENCETO MAINTAIN AN AIR GAP. 1 l II n .i e 1 i t l 1 r I 9 _..m., , , ., .. , - _ _ - , - _ - - - . , . -. - , _ - - , - , , - - . . . . , ,. . - - , , - - , , ~ . - - - , . _ . - , ~ - , - , , - .. . - - - -
- ATTACHMENT D ER-ME482, REV. O PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM PAGE D13 OF D30 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS DCA NOJREV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION - SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (YlN) TEST (PAGE D26-FIRE SciEMES D30)
ZONE 103476/1 50 810 2452 2SB/8 Y Y ISSUE 1: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION ON THERMO-LAG 3301 'V* RIB PANEL ORIENTATION FOR OUTER LAYER COVERAGE FOR J-BOX JB25-53830. ISSUE 2A: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION ON INSTALUNG 1/4* THERMO-LAG OVERIAY ON 2* DIA. CONDUTT WHERE DIAMETER OF THE FIRST 1AYER OF 330-1 IS , OVERLY IARGE. ISSUE 2B: CONSTRUCliCN REQUESTS DIRECTION ON THERMO-LAG COVERAGE OF STEEL LINER WALL, WiiICH PROTRUDES CONDUTT OVERIAY PROTEC110N. ISSUE 3: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION ON 1/4" THERMO-LAG 330-1 OVERLAY INSTALLATION WHERE BARRIER IS AN INTERFERENCE. RESOLUTION 1: NO DIRECTIONAL 10-2 1-6, 13 ORIENTATION REQUIREMENT APPLIES FOR J-BOX OUTER LAYER COVERAGE. ENSURE AT LEAST 2 RIBS ON EACH PANEL ARE IN CONTACT WITH THE PROTECTION SURFACE. RESOLITTTON 2A: INSTALL OVERIAY PER DCA N/A SEE ATT. A 103423 DIRECTION (M2-1701 TYPICAL DETAIL 4- FOR ACCEPT. 9). BASIS OF DET. 4-9 resol 1JTION 28: INSTALL 330-1 PANEL TO 9-1, 10-1 ! I-5,33 STEEL LINER WALL TO PROTECT CONDUIT SUPPORT TO SATISFY THE 9* RULE. USE SCREW TYPE FASTENERS IN LIEU OF HILTI BOLTS.
ATTACHMENT D ER-ME482, CEV. O PROTRUD'NG/LNTERFERING ITEM ,. PAGE Dl4 OF D30 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS DCA NO.lREV BLDO ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPHON11SSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION AREAL SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES (YtN) (YIN) TEST FIRE (PAGE D26-ZONE SGIEMES D30) 103476/1 CONT *D RESOLUTION 3: INSTALL 1/4 THICK CONDUIT 9-3 1-5, 27 OVERLAYS ON ESSENTIAL CONDUIT TO THE EXTENT POSS'BLE. WHERE BARRIER INTERFERES WITH OVERLAY INSTALLATION, BUTT COVERAGE TO BARRIER AND ADD 330-1 TROWEL ORADE FILt.ET PER PROVIDED DIRECHONS. 103484/1 AB 810 X-207 AA121b Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECHON
FOR INSTALI.lNO THERMO-IAO 3?0-1 ON ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY WHERE C6 CHANNELS INTERFERE VIITri COVERAGE ON TOP OF THE TRAY.
RESOLUTION: COVER C6 CHANNEIJS AND II-1,12-1, 1-5,32 CABLE TRAY A30VE GIANNELS AS 12-2, 13-1 PROTRUDINO ITEMS PER THE 9* RULE. & 14-1 DIRECDONS ARE PROVIDED FOR ENCLOSLNG ALLTHREE CHANNELS IN A COMMON THERMO-IAO BOX BETWEEN THE TWO CAFLE TRAYS. 10348810 AB 810 X-207 AAl21b Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECHON FOR THERMO-LAG INSTALLATION ON ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY WHERE 7/8" PIPE SUPPORT ROD INTERFERES WITH STANDARD INSTAL!ATION. RESOLITTION: INSTALL 330-1 PANEL ON TRAY 11-1, 12-1, 1-5, 21 UP TO THE AREA OF INTERFERENCE. WRAP 12-2,13-1 SUPPORT ROD WITH 2 LAYERS 330-660 FLEXI- & 14-1 BLANKET PER THE 9* RULE. CONSTRUCT FLAT PANEL BOX AROUND SUPPORT ROD, ATTACH TO TRAY. FILL BOX WITH 330-70 CERAMIC LNSUIATOR. SEAL BOX WITH THERMO-1AO 330460 BULK ORADE AT TOP AND BOTTOM
, - --- - - - . - , - , , - , - _ = . . . . m -.e
ATTACHMENT D ER-ME482, REV. O PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM PAGE D15 OF D30 - COVERAGE DEVIATIONS DCA NOJREV BIEG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREAL (YIN) (YIN) TEST. (PAGE D26-FIRE SCHEMES D30)
, 2ONE 103508/0 50 810 2482 2SBIS Y Y ISSUE 1: ADJACENT NON-ESSENTIAL CABE TRAY AND SHARED SUPPORT PROTRUDE ESSENTIAL CABG TRAY THERMO-LAG ENVELOPE (4 LOCATIONS).
ISSUE 2: 2* DIA. P!PE STRUT AND 6* TUBE STEEL MEMBER INTERFERE WITH 9* RULE PROTECTION OF STRUCTURAL STEEL SUPPORT FOR ESSENTIAL CABG TRAY. ISSUE 3: ADJACENT P!PE SUPPORT MEMBER INTERFERES WITH 9* RULE PROTECTION OF 2* x 4* TUBE STEEL SUPPORT FOR ESSENTIAL CABG TRAY. RESOLUTION 1: WRAP ADJACENT TRAY AND N/A SEE ATT. A PROTRUDING STEEL SUPPORT WITH THERMO- FOR LAG 330-1 PANEL AT EACH OF 4 LOCATIONS ACCEPTANCE PER M2-1701, DETAIL 134. BASIS FOR DETAIL 134. RESOLITTION 2: WRAP STRUCTURAL STEEL Il-1. 12-1, 1 4, 10 SUPPORT WITH 330-1 PANEL, NOTCHING PANEL 12-2, 13-1 AROUND 2* DIA. PIPE STRUT TO MAINTAIN AIR & 14-1 GAP. ADD A 2nd IAYER 330-1 PANEL IN THE VICINITY OF P!PE STRUT LNTERFERENCE AND 6* TUBE STEEL INTERFERENCE, MAINTAINING AN AIR GAP AT BOTH INTERFERENCES. RESOLUTION 3: WRAP CABLE TRAY SUPPORT Il-1,12-1, 14, 10 WITH 330-1 PANEL, USING REDUCED 12-2, 13-1 THICKNESS PANELS WHERE THE ADJACENT & 14-1 PIPE SUPPORT MEMBER INTERFERES. ADD A 2nd LAYER 330-1 PANEL TO THE HORIZONTAL MEMBER OF THE TRAY SUPPORT WEST OF THE PRIMARY TRAY ENVFIAPE.
4 ATTACHMENT D , ER-ME-082, REV. C PROTRUDING /INTERFERINGITEM * [ PAGE D16 OF D30 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS s DCA NO./REV BLDO ELEY ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIFI1ON/ ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION : AREAI SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES (YIN) (YlN)' TEST FIRE (PAGE D26-ZONE SCHEMES D30) ; ll1 i 103597/0 : AB S10 X-207 AA/21a Y Y l ISSUE 1: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION ' FOR COVERING A NON-ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY AS A PROTRUSION INTO AN ESSENTIAL TRAY THERMO-IAO PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE. r ISSUE 2: A PIPE SUPPORT MEMBER INTERFERES l WITH PROTECTION OF AN ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY.
, ISSUE 3: A 2*d PIPE LVTERFERES Wri1{
PROTECTION OF AN ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY. RESOLUTION 1: COVER THE NON-ESSENTIAL II-1,12-1, 1-5. 39
; TRAY AS A PROTRUDING TTEM PER THE 9* 12-2, 13-1, RULE IN ACCORDANCE WITH TYPICAL DETAIL- 14-1 134 (DEVELOPED BY DCA 103548).
u RESOLUTION 2: COVER THE SUPPORT l-5,8 j INTERFERENCE PER THE 9* RULE TO THE I l-1,12-1, EXTENT POSSIBLE, AS DIRECTED IN THE 12-2, 13-1, ! DISPOSITION OF DCA 102266. 14-1 4 4 RESOLU110N 3; INSTALL A 6* WIDE 330-1 FLAT I-5, 40 j PANEL SECTION TO THE BOTTOM OF THE 11-1, 12-1, i TRAY, PERFORMING ANY MINIMALSANDING 12-2, 13-1, REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN AN AIR OAP 14-1 1 1 CLEARANCE AT THE PIPE (IllE EXISTING OAP 15 5/8*). USE TYPICAL DETAIL 8 3 FOR TRANSITION FROM *V* RIB TO FLAT PANEL 1 i 1 .l i e
--.r . , , , , , , , . , , - . - -, w, ,ne - . , - - .-e . -- ,--e -- - . - - - - - - - - - - - - -, - - . - - - - - - - - - -
ATTACIIMENT D ER-ME482, REV. 0 PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM PAGE D17 OF D30 ~, COVERAGE DEVIATIONS DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEY ROOM FIRE SUPP; DET,- DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN /RESOLIJTION i SUPPdRI- BASIS / NOTES AREAL (Y/N) (Y/N) TEST (PAGE D26-FIRE . SCHEMES : D30) ZONE 103613/0 AB 790 X-180 AA!21s Y Y ISSUE: ADJACENT PIPE SUPPORT MEMstER INTERFERES WITH 9* RULE PROTECTION OF STRUCTURAL STEEL SUPPORT FOR ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY. RESOLUTION: INSTALL TIIERMO-LAG 330-1 11-1, 12-1, I-6, 14 PANEL ON CABLE TRAY SUPPORT TO TIIE 12-2, 13-1 EXTEhT POSSIBLE %TTHOUT INSTALLING & 14-1 PANEL ON THE INTERFERENCE. 103799/0 SG 832 2494 2SB/15 Y Y ISSUE 1: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION FOR COVERING CEIUNG UNER AS A PROTRUSION WIIERE TT INTERFERES WITH I/4* - OVERLAY ON 2* DIA. CONDUIT. ISSUE 2: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECilON FOR COVERING 3* X 3* RJBE STEEL SUPPORT AND CEILING UNER WHERE UMITED ACCESS PREVENTS USE OF FASTENERS. RESOLUTION 1: DIRECTIONS ARE PROVIDED 9-3 1-5, 27 FOR FASTENER SPACING AND PANEL INSTALLATION TO AClilEVE 9* RULE PROTECTION. RESOLUTION 2: INSTALL 2 UNERS OF 330-1 9-l 10-1 I-5, 12 PANEL ON TUBE STEEL. SUPPORT EXTENDING FROM 2 CONDUITS UP TO THE STEEL PLATE, WHICII IS TO BE COVERED WITH 330-1 PANEL (I LAYER) USING INDICATED SCREW SPACING.
ATTACilMENT D ER-ME-OS2, REV. O PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM PAGE Dit OF D30 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS DCA NO.IREV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. ' 1 AREAL DESCRIPTIONilSSUE 0F W/RESOLtJTION ' SdPPORT - BASISINOTES (YIN) (YIN) ' H ST ,. FIRE - (PAGE D26-l SCHEMES D30) ZONE _. d. , 103809/0 AB 310 X-207 AAl21b Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION i FOR COVERING 3 FIRE ZONE R CABLES WHICH ' PROTRUDE ESSENTIAL J-BOX JR2A-5M3. RESOLUTION: INSTALL.330-1 CONDUIT 10-1, 10-2, I-5,35 SECTIONS ON FIRE ZONE R CABLES, EXTEND 4* 2-1 MIN TO 5* MAX FROM J-BOX 'IllERMO-LAG COVERAGE AND FILL WITH 330-1 TROWEL GRADE TO FORM A FIRE STOP. ENCLOSE TWO OF THE CABLES IN A COMMON ENVELOPE. 103846/0 AB 852 241 AAl21f Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCTION REQUEXTS DIRECTION FOR THERMO-LAG COVERAGE OF ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY SUPPORT STEEL WHERE ADJACENT HVAC DUCT FLANGE LVTERFERES WITH FULL PANELTHICKNESS INSTALLATION PER 9* RULE (3 LOCATIONS). ' 13 l RESOLUTION: COVER SUPPORT STEEL WITH II-1.12-1 1 4, 10
! FULLTHICKNESS 330-1 TO THE EXTENT 12-2,13-1
- POSSIBLE PER THE 9* RULE. WHERE .. A I4-1 INTERFERENCES NECESSITATE REDUCED PANEL THICKNESS, MAINTAIN AN AIR GAP AND ADD A 2nd LAYER OF PANELTO THE SUPPORT STEEL IN THE VICINITY OF THE INTERFERENCE. '
4 3 i w f d _ ,,. _ - _ _ - , . - - . - - - . . - - _ . - - ~ - , . . . - . _ . . . - . , , . . .- - - - . . . - . . _ - - - . _ - - _ - - _ - - . _ _ _ . . .- - _ - - . .
AlTACllMENT D ER-ME-082, REV. O PROTRUDING /INTE"FE"ING ITEM PAGE DI9 OF D30 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS DCA NOJREV BIDO ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPIlON/ ISSUE OF CONCERN /RESOLUT10N SUPPORT BASIS, NOTES AREAL (YIN) (YIN) FIRE , TEST _ _ (PAGE D26-SCHEMES D30) ZONE 103917/0 AB 790 X-180 AAl21a Y Y ITSUE 1: 4* DIA. PIPE IS WITHIN 1/8* OF A CABLE TRAY SUPPORT FOR AN ESSENTIAL TRAY, INTERFERING Wmi 9* RULE PROTECT!DN OF THE SUPPORT. ISSUE 2: 4* DIA. PIPE IS %1 THIN APPROXIMATELY 1/16* OF A CABLE TRAY SUPPORT FOR AN ESSENTIAL TRAY, INTERFERING WITH 9* RUM PROTECTION OF Tile SUPPORT. RESOLIJTION 1: INSTALL 111ERMO-LAG 3301 11-1, 12-1, 1-5, 10 PANEL ON THE CABLE TRAY SUPPORT TO THE 12-2, 13-1 EXTENT POSSIBM, TRIMMING PANEL AT THE & 14-1 LOCATION OF THE INTERFERENCE AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAI'd AN AIR OAP. ADD A 2nd LAYER OF 330-1 PANEL TO THE TOP AND SIDE SURFACES OF THE TRAY SUPPORT, ALSO TRIMMING THESE PANELS TO ACIIIEVE A MINIMAL AIR OAP AT THE IDCATION OF TIIE PIPE IN17.RFERENCE RESOLUT10N 2: INSTALL TifERMO-LAG 330-1 11-1, 12-1, 1-5, 10 PANEL ON 111E CABM TRAY SUPPORT TO Tile 12-2, 13-1 EXTENT POSSIBLE, TRIMMING PANEL AT THE & 14-1 LOCATION OF THE INTERFERENCE AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN AN AIR OAP. ADD A SECOND LAYER OF 330-1 PANEL TO TIIE TOP SURFACE OF TIIE TRAY SUPPORT ON BOTH SIDES OF TiiE INTERFERING PIPE, ALSO TRIMMING THESE PANELS TO ACillEVE A MINIMAL AIR OAP AT Tile PIPE INTERFERENCE.
I { ATTACllMENT D ER-ME-082, REV. O PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM i PAGE D20 OF D30 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS DCA NO.tREV BLDO ELEY ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTIONIISSUE OF CONCERN!RESOLITTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREAL (YIN) (YIN) FIRE TEST (PAGE D26-ZONE SCHEMES . D30) ' 103924XI AB 810 X-207 AAl2th Y Y ISSUE: HVAC DUCT 15 WTTHIN 3/8" OF A CABLE
- TRAY SUPPORT FOR AN ESSENTIAL TRAY, INTERFERING WITH 9* RULE PAOTECTION OF THE SUPPORT.
RESOLITTION: INSTALL MODIFIED 9* RULE I l-1,12-1, 1 4. 10 ' THERMO-LAG PROTECTION ATTHE AREA OF 12-2, 13-1 i THE DUCT FLANGE INTERFERENCE, USLNG A & 14-1 REDUCED THICKNESS 330-1 PANEL AND g MAINTAINING A MINIMAL AIR GAP. INSTALL 3 THICKNESSES 330-1 PANEL TO THE TRAY SUPPORT MEMBER ON BOTH SIDES OF THE
- REDUCED PANEL USE 330-1 TROWEL GRADE AND TIE WIRE OR BANDING TO HOLD THE PANELS IN PLACE.
104001/0 AB 810 X-207 AA121b Y Y ISSUE: ADJACENT UNISTRUTSUPPORT MEMBER IS WITHIN 1/4* OF A *C* CHANNEL CABLE TRAY SUPPORT MEMBER FOR AN ESSENTIAL ' TRAY, INTERFERING WITH 9" RULE PROTECTION OF THE SUPPORT. RESOLUTION: INSTALL. 9* RUIJi PROTECTION 11-1,12-1, 1 4, 10 TO *C* CHANNEL USING 330-1 PANEL, 12-2, 13-1 . TRIMMINO PANEL AS NECESSARY TO AVOID & 14-1 t ' THE INTERFERING SUPPORT MEMBER. i INSTALL A 2nd LAYER OF 330-1 PANEL INSIDE ' THE *C* CllANNEL AND TIE WIRE TO THE i TRIMMED PANEL TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL i l MATERIALTillCKNESS ATTHE AREA OF THE l l INTERFERENCE. i l
._. , - . _ . . , .,_m - ,, .,_ , , -- , , . . .
. - , , , , , _ v ,- - , _ - . ----.,,,..._-,.,m__ m____-m _ .. - . . . _ _ _ - - - -
- _
ATTACHMENT D ER-ME4E2, REV. O PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM PAGE D21 OF D30
. COVERAGE DEVIATIONS f
DCA NO./REV Bl.DO ELEY ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIFI1ON/ ISSUE OF CONCERN /RESOLIIIlON SUPPORT - BASIS / NOTES ; AREA / (Y/N) (YIN)
' ~
TEST (PAGE D26 . i FIRE SCH W F.t i ZONE D30) s Gli, n,;D _
. - SjQ i ; 104079/1 AB 310 X-207 AA/21b Y Y ISSUE: 2 CONDUITS INTERFERE PARTIALLY ..
WITH INSTALLA110N OF 2nd IAYER OF 330-1 PANEL ON J-BOX. ALSO, ANGG IRON SUPPORT INTERFERES PARTIALLY WITH Im LAYER OF 3301 PANEL ON J-BOL RESOLITTION: INTIALL 2nd IAYER 330-1 PANEL 10-2 1-5, 24 TO THE EXTENT POSSIBM AROUND CONDUIT , INTERFERENCES COMPETELY COVER ANGLE ' IRON SUPPORT WITH 330-1 FIAT PANEL AND !l 330-1 TROWEL GRADE MATERIAL TRIMMING A 1 1/2* THICK 333-1 PANELTO FIT SNUGLY , BETWEEN THE ANGLE IRON AND THE J-BOL - l 4 104114/C AB 804 X-180 AA/2ta Y Y l ISSUE: CONTTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION ' FOR INSTALLATION OF THERMO-LAG ON I 1/2* ESSENTIAL CONDUIT AT A RADIAL BEND. AivD ON A PROTRUDING SUPPORT BRACE WHICH IS WITHIN 1/2* OF AN ADJACENT 'A'G TRAY. 1 RESOLUTION: INSTALL RADIAL BEND 1/2* 9-1, 10-1 & I-6, 12 SECTIONS AND 114* OVERLAY SECTIONS, 9-3 INCLUDING S11tESS SKIN UPGRADE. WRAP { PROTRUDING SUPPORT PER TIIE 9* RUG TO j THE EXTENT POSSIBG, ADDING A SECOND j i LAYER OF 330-1 PANEL AROUND THE SUPPORT ' BRACE ALONG THE LENGT11 OF ANY PANELS l WHERE THICKNESS IS REDUCED. I l 1 _ _ _ _ . . _ , _ _ _ _ , _ _ _ . . _ _ _ - _ _ . . . . , . . , _ , _ . _~ . . _ . . - , . _ _ . _ . . . . _ . . . . _. - . _ _ . . . _ , - . . . . _ _
ATTACHMENT D ER-ME482, REV. O PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM ' PAGE D22 OF D30 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS DCA NO.tREV BLDO ELEY ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION - SUPPORT- BASIS / NOTES AREAI (YlN) (YIN) FIRE TEST _ (PAGE D26-ZONE SCHEMES D30) ll IM il7/1 i AB 790 X-180 AA/21s Y Y ISSUE: CONSTRUCDON REQUESTS DIRECTION ON INSTALLING 330460 AND STRESS SKIN UPGRADE ON PROTRUDING AIR DROP BUNDLES IN CONGESTED AREA. RESOLUI70N: INSTALL 330460 COLLAR AND 11-1 1-5, 25 STRESS SKIN A_MD iMCWEL GRADE BUILDUP N; A COMMG ENCIDSURf AROUND 3 ADJACENT AIR DROP BUNDLES. INSTALL COLLAR AND STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE BUILDUP AS A SINGG AIR DROP ENClaSING ON THE NORTH MOST BUNDG. IM173/0 SG 810 2482 2SB/8 Y Y ISSUE 1: ENGINEEkiNG DIRECHON REQUESTED ! WHERE PROTRU)ING CABLE AIR DROPS g REQUIRE 330460
- COLLAR
- BACKFIT.
ISSUE 2: ENGINEERING DIRECTION REQUESTED WilERE PROTRUDING CABG AIR DROPS REQUIRE 330460
- COLLAR
- BACKFIT.
CONSTRUCTION REQUEST 3 PERMISSION TO USE A COMMON BUNDLE FOR TWO ADJACENT AIR DROPS. RESOLUTION 1: WRAP AIR DROP BUNDLES PER Il-I l-5, 25 M2-1701 DETAIL 3-4 WHERE POSSIBG. USE 2 PIECE COLLAR VARIATION WHERE FIELD CONDITION: PROlllBIT USE OF STANDARD DETAIL RESOLUTION 2: ENCLOSE AIR DROPS 2 & 3 IN A 11-1 1-5, 25 COMMON BUNDLE. USE DETAIL 3-4 FOR OTHER BUNDLE, OR 2 PIECE VARIATION { WHERE FIELD CONDITIONS PROHIBir USE OF
. STANDARD DETA'L.
l .
I ATTACHMENT D ER-ME4M2, REY. O PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM PAGE D23 OF D30
. COVERAGE DEVIATIONS DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOM' FIRE SUPP. DET.
DESCRIl410N/ ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPOT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (Y/N) (Y/N)'
^
TEST
; FIRE
. (P/AE D26-SCHEMES D30)
ZONE- - _ 104189/0 SG 832 24M4 25B/15 Y Y ISSUE: ESSENT1AL CABLE TRAYS HAVE OPEN- - END 4* X 6* TUBE STEEL SUPPORT MEMBERS WHICH REQUIRE THERMO-LAG CAPS, BUT LIMTTED SPACE MAKES INSTALLATION .. IMPRACTICABLE. CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION. RESOLtrTION: COVER THE BOTTOM END OF N/A 26 THE TUBE STEEL MEMBERS PER M2-1701, DETAIL 16-5. LEAVE THE TOP OPENINGS WITHOLTT COVERS. 104206 AB 810 X-207 AAl21b Y Y ISSUE: SUPPORT BASE PLATE IS WITHIN 3/8" OF i 2* DIA. CONDUIT WHICH IS BEING PROTECIED PER T1iE 9* RULE AS AN INTERFERENCE TO ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY THERMO-IAG PROTECTION. l RESOLUTION: INSTALL THERMO-LAG 330-1 11-1, 12-1, I-5, 15 PANEL ON THE 2* DIA. CONDUTT TO THE 12-2, 13-1 EXTENT POSSIBLE PER THE 9* RULE. WHERE & 14-1 SUPPORT PLATE PREVENTS COMPLETE CIRCUMFERENTIAL WRAP, BUTT CONDUTT HALF-ROUNDS UP TO THE PLATE AND INSTALL A 330-1 TROWEL GRADE FilJ.ET (1Ill6* WET FILM THICKNESS) AT THE THERMO-LAG / BASEPLATE INTER / ACE. 1 l
i ATTACHMENT D Ek-MEM, REV. O PROTRUDINGilNTERFERING ITEM , PAGE D24 OF D30 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS DCA NO.IREV ELDO ELEY ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. AREAf DESCRIPHON!!SSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION SUPPORT. BASIS / NOTES (YIN) (Y!N) FIRE TEST (PAGE D26-SCHEMES D30) .' I M 221/0 AB 790 X-180 AAl21a Y Y ISSUE 1: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION F9R INSTALLATION ON HVAC DUCT AND
' ASSOCIATED SUPPORT, milch INTERFERE
*VITH ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY PROTECTION.
3 ISSUE 2: CONSTRUCTION REQUESTS DIRECTION j FOR COVERAGE OF PIPE SUPPORT BASE PLATE 1, WHICH IS A SECONDARY INTERFERENCE TO
- COVERAGE OF AN ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAY i
SUPPORT. I i RESOLUTION 1: INSTAIL THERMO-LAG 330-1 Il-1,12-1 1-S, 22 i PANEL ON HVAC SUPPORT MEMBERS 12-2, 13-1
- VERTICALLY PER THE 9* RULE AND & 14-1 i HORIZONTAL 1Y OUT TO THE HVAC DUCT INSULATION. i; RESOLUTION 2
- APPLY 3301 TROWEL GRADE Il-1,12-1, 1-S 23 BET #EEN BASE PLATE AND CABLE TRAY 12-2, 13-1 SUPPORT. INSTALL 330-1 PANEL TO TRAY & 14-1 SUPPORT, BUTTING UP TO BASE PLATE AND ADDING 330-1 TROWEL GRADE FILLET AT PANEURASEPLATE INTERFACE. ;
IM224/0 AB 790 X-174 AAI21a N Y l ISSUE: 4* DIA. PIPE IS WITHIN 7/16' OF A CABLE TRAY SUPPORT MEMBER FOR AN ESSENTIAL TRAY. INTERFERING WITH 9* RULE I, PROTECTION OF THE SUPPORT. i 3 RESOLUTION: INSTAIL THERMO-LAG 330-1 Il-12,12-1 1 4, 10 PANEL ON THE CABLE TRAY SUPPORT TO THE 12-2, 13-1
, EXTENT POSSIBLE, TRIMMING PANEL AT THE & 14-1 j LOCATION OF THE INTERFERENCE AS )
NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN AN AIR GAP. COVER THE SUPPORT WITH A SECOND LAYER OF 330-1 PANEL NEAR THE IhTERFERENCE, ) ALSO TRIMMING THE PANELS TO ACHIEVE A 1 MINIMAL AIR GAP. ; i ,
i
' ATTACHMENT D ER-ME4820 REY. 0 PROTRUDING /INTERFERINGITEM PAGE D25 OF D30 i ^ COVERAGE DEVIATIONS DCA NO.IREV RLDO ELEV ROOM. FIRE - SUPP.
DET. .
. - 4 .
DESCRIFUONASSUE OF CONCERN /mustw IrDON SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA /., (YlN). (YtN) TEST ' ! FIRE . ' - *. , _
" - 3 SCH m F*
(PAGE D26- - ZONE' N * "^ D30) 4
." # ~
4 l
; 104227/0 AB SIO X-207
- AA/21e ' Y Y ,
ISSUE: ADIACENT PIPE SUPPORTIS WITHIN 1/2* OF A CABLE TRAY SUPPORT MEMBER FOR AN i i ESSENTIAL TRAY. INTERFERING WITH 9* RULE , PROTECTION OF THE SUPPORT. ~ 3 RESOLUTION: INTIALL THERMO-LAG 330 1 11-1, 12-1 I-5, 16 PANEL ON THE CABLE TRAY SUPPORT *C* - 12-2, 13-1 j CHANNEL MEMBER TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE. & 14-1 ATTHE AREA OF THE PIPE SUPPORT INTERFERENCEINSTALL330-1 AROUNDTHE OUTSIDE SURFACES OF THE CHANNEL FILL THE INSIDE AREA OF THE CHANNEL WITH A BUILDUP OF 330-1 PANELS PRE-BUT'5JtED i WITH 330-1 TROWEL ORADE. THERMO-LAG IS I OMrITED FROM THE END OF THE *C* CHANNEL LEGS AT THE PIPE SUPPORT INTERFERENCE. 1 i i i J i l
ATTAcitMENT D ER-ME-082, REV. O PROTRUDING /lffTERFERING ITEM ' PAGE D26 OF D30 COVERAGE DEVIATIONS NOTE ACL tiq ANCE BASISINOTES DCA/REV 1. CONTINUITY OF Tile MATERIAL IS CONSISTENT %TTH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. GENERIC j 2. EFFECTIVE TillCKNESS OF THE MATERIAL IS CONSISTENT %Tril TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. GENERIC 3. Tl!E NATURE AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THE SUPPORT ASSEMBLY (IF APPUCABLE) IS CONSISTENT WITH CONFIGURATIONS. TEs a tu GENERIC 4. Tile APPUCATION OR END USE OF Tile MATERIAL IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. GENERIC 5. Tile CONFIGURATION EQGWALENT LEVEL OF PROTECTION. WAS REVIEWED BY A QUAUFIED FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER AND DETERMINED GENERIC TO ' 6. SPECIFIC AND UNIQUE DIFFERENCES FROM TESTED CONFIGURATIONS EXIST FOR TIIE PLANT GENERIC CONFIGUR ENHANCE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF Tile PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE (E.G., SPACIAL ORIENTATION, SURFACES NOT DIRECTLY EXPOSED TO A POTENTIAL FIRE DUE 'TO SillELDING EFFECTS, TORTUROUS PATil, ETC.). 7. EACH OF Tile CABLE TRAY QUALIFICATION SCHEMES USTED WERE PERFORMED WITH SUPPORTS101397/0 PROTECTE DISTANCE (ONLY) FROM THE PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE. Ti!IS FIELD CONFIGURATION USES A REDUCED TIII T1tERMO-LAG WilERE Tile TUBE STEEL INTERFERES. THE PRIMARY (CABLE TRAY) ENVELOPE IS NOT AFFECTE ADDITIONALLY, THERMO-LAG IS PROVIDED ON Tile SECONDARY LNTERFERENCE, INSTAM Fn TO COMPENSATE Tile TRAY SUPPORT REDUCED THICKNESS. 8. l EACH OF THE CABLE TRAY QUAUFICATION SCllEMES USTED WERE PERFORMED WITH SUPPORTS PROTECTED 102266/0 { DISTANCE (ONLY) FROM Tile PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE. Til!S FIELD CONFIGURATION USED REDUCED 103597/0 COV STEEL SUPPORT WilERE Tile PIPING LINE PASSES TilROUGH. TIIE PRIMARY (CABLE TRAY) ENVELOPE IS N ADDITIONALLY, DUE TO Tile TIGHT SPACES INVOLVED BEDVEEN TO INSIDE FACES OF THE TUBE STEEL AND Tile INTERFERING PIPE, A " TORTUROUS PATH" FOR HEAT TRANSFER IS ESTABUSilED. 9. Tile CONDUIT QUAUFICATION TESTS L!s a to WERE PERFORMED %TTH SUPPORTS PROTECTED THE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE. ALTHOUGli THE
- PROTRUDING
- ITEMS INCLUDE NON-ESSENTIAL CABLE TRAYS, TIIE 102524/0 FO 1 COVERAGE ON EXPOSED TRAY SURFACES PROVIDES ADEQUATE PROTECTION FOR CONDUCTIVE IIEAT l PANEL ATTACilMENTTO TRAYS ARE JUSTIFIED IN ATTAC!! MENT A ArmTANCE BASIS FOR M21701 DETAIL 134.
l 10. I EACH OF Tile CABLE TRAY QUAUFICATION SCHEMES USTED WERE PREFORMED WITH SUPPORTS PROTECTED 102789/I DISTANCE (ONLY) FROM THE PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE. THIS FIELD CONFIGURATION USES A REDUCED 103508/0 Ti THERMO-LAG AT Tile AREA OF INTERFERENCES (S). THE PRIMARY (CABLE TRAY) ENVELOPE IS NOT AFFECT 103917/0 ADDITIONALLY, DUE TO THE EXTRA THICKNESS OF 330-1 PANEL IN TIIE VICINITY OF THE INTERFERFNCE(S) AND Tile 103924/0 MINIMAL ESTABUSHED. AIR GAP BETWEEN TIIE TilERMO-LAG AND Tile INTERFERENCE (S), A
- TORTUROUS PATH *
- OR llEAT TRANSFER 104001/0 15 104224/0
, 11.
J-BOX TEss tD CONFIGURATIONS RECEIVED HEAT EXPOSURE FROM ALL SIDES. Tile WALL MOUNTED 103002/0 ] REDUCES POTENTIAL EXPOSURE SURFACES AND WILL ACT AS A IIEAT SINK. COVERING Tile ADJAC WILL FURTHER ENSURE TilAT THERE IS NO CONDUCTIVE HEAT PATil INTO TIIE J. BOX ENVELOPE.
, , ._,--.__._m _ _-- , . - _ _ _ _ - , _ , , , - ,_m,- ,_,,---,- - - , - _ . , - - - - ,
_ , ,,_____m.,,,-, , , .- ,,. . . ,A
ATTAGIMENT D ER-ME-082 REV. O PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM PAGE D27 OF D30
' COVERAGE DEVIATIONS NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV 12.
Tile CONDUIT QUAUFICATION TESTS USTED WERE PERFORMED %Tni SUPPORTS PROTECTED 103088/0 FOR 9 THE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE. THIS FIELD CONFIGURATION USES A REDUCED TillCKNESS OF TIIERMO-LAG 103476/1 INTERFERENCES. THE PRIMARY (CONDUTI) ENVELOPE IS NOT AFFECTED. ADDITIONALLY, DUE TO THE EXTRA THICKNESS 104II4/0 OF 330-1 PANEL IN Ti!E VICINTTY OF INTERFERENCES AND THE MINIMAL AIR GAP BEIWEEN Tile THERMO-LAG LNTERFERENCES, A
- TORTUROUS PATH
- FOR llEAT TRANSFER IS ESTABLISHED.
103799/0 AN 103143/0 13. TEST SCHEME 10-2 QUAUFIED TiiERMO-LAG PROTECTION ON J-BOXES (18* X 12* X 6-) USING A SINGLE 103476/1 LA THE ADDITIONAL PROTECTION THE TESTED CONFIGURATION. PROVIDED BY Tile OUTER LAYER OF 330-1 IN THIS CONFIGURATION IS AN 14. EACil OF TiiE CABLE TRAY QUAUFICATION SGIEMES USTED WERE PERFORMED %TTH SUPPORTS PROTECTED 103613/0 DISTANCE (ONLY) FROM Tile PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE. Tills FIELD CONFIGURATION USES REDUCED COVERA STEEL SUPPORT AT Tile INTERFERENCE. THE PRIMARY (CABM TRAY) ENVELOPE IS NOT AFFECTED. ADDITIONALLY, DUE TO Ti!E IIEAT SillELDING EFFECT OF THE INTERFERING MEMBER AT Tile LOCATION OF REDUCED 330-1 PANEL TiflCKNESS, A
- TORTUROUS PATil* FOR HEAT TRANSFER IS ESTABUSi!ED.
IS. EAGI OF Tile CABLE TRAY QUAUFICATION SOIEMES USTED WERE PERFORMED WITH SUPPORT' PROTECTED 10420tJD F DISTANCE (ONLY) FROM Tile PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE. THIS FIELD CONFIGURATION INVOLVES PROTECTION O INTERFERING ITEM (FOR 9* DISTANCE FROM Tile PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE) AS A PROTRUDING ITEM, EXCEPT AT Tile LOCATION OF A SECONDARY INTERFERENCE. THIS IS ACCEPTABLE BECAUSE THE SECONDARY INTERFER MOUNTED STEEL SUPPORT BASE PLATE. Tile WALL AND PLATE TOGETHER IIAVE HEAT SINK CAPABlUTIES, AND WILL EFFECTIVELY INHIBIT CONDUCTIVE HEAT PATH INTO THE PRIMARY ENVELOPE. 16. THE CABLE TRAY QUAUFICATION SOIEMES USTED WERE ALL PERFORMED WITH SUPPORTS 104227/0 PROTECT (ONLY) FROM Tile PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE. Tills FIELD CONFIGURATION OMITS COVERAGE ON THE EXTR TRAY SUPPORT AT 2 LOCATIONS APPROXIMATELY l-1/2* IN LENGTH, BUT UTIUZES MULTIPLE MATERIAL TillCKNESSES FOR
'nlE ADJACENT SUPPORT SURFACES. THE PRIM ARY (CABLE TRAY) ENVELOPE IS NUT AFFECTED.
17. REFERENCE ATTACllMENT A OF THIS REPORT FOR TYP! CAL DETAIL 134 ACCEPTANCE BASIS. 102231/0 ALTilOU SUGIIT DEVIATION FROM Tile TYP! CAL DETAIL, ENCLOSING ADJACENT TRAY SPUCE PLATES AND BOLTING IN COMMON 102221/1 TIIERMO-I.AG BOXES IS ACCEPTABLE BECAUSE IT USES MATERIAL Tl!!CKNESS, ATTAOIMENT METHODS, AND JOINT INTEGRITY COMMENSURATE WITII TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. 18. Tile CONDUIT QUAUFICATION TESTS IN WERE PERFORMED WITH SUPPORTS PROTECTED FOR 102525/0 9* DIS Tile PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE. ALTIfOUGH Tite
- PROTRUDING
- ITEM IN THIS CASE IS A NON-ESSENTIALTRAY, TiiE COVERAGE ON EXPOSED TRAY SURFACES PROVIDES ADEQUATE PROTECTION FOR CONDUCnVE HEAT PATIL 19.
REFERENCE APPENDIX A OF THIS REPORT FOR TYPICAL DETAIL 8 3 ACCEPTANCE BASIS. Tile USTED 102750/0 TEST SO QUALIFIED 1/2" TIIICKNESS OF THERMO-LAG 330-1 ON CABLE TRAYS. TlHS FIELD CONFIGURATION USED A S REDUCED TillCKNESS OF THERMO-LAG AT THE AREA OF TIIE INTERFERENCE. ADDITION OF 330-1 FLAT P INTERFERING PATH. TRAY SUPPORT IN Ti!E AREA OF THE DEVIATION PROVIDES ADEQUATE PROTECTION F
1 1 ATTACHMENT D ER-ME-082, REV. 0 PROTRUDING / INTERFERING ITEM PAGE D28 OF D30 COVERAGE DEVIAT!ONS NOTE ACttn ANCE BASIS / NOTES i - DCA/REV { < 20. > THIS FIELD CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE BECAUSE IT REPRESENTS AN ENilANCED VERSION 102854/0OF M 14-I (REFERENCE ATTACllMENT A FOR ACCE3TANCE BASIS FOR DETAIL 14-1). Tile ANGE IS AN INTERFEREN THAN A PROTRUSION, AND THEREFORE PRO'/ IDES NO DIRECT CONDUCTIVE HEAT PATH INTO TIIE PRIMARY ENVpr nPE.
; 21.
1 REDUCED THICKNESS OF THE PRIMARY TRAY ENVELOPE AT Tile INTERFERENCE IS ACCEFTABLE 1034B8/0 DU j SUPPORT ROD AS A PROTRUDING ITEM. THE BOX CONFIGLRATION MAINTAINS MATERIALTHICKNESS (USING STRESS SKIN, STITCHING AND 330-1 TROWEL GRADE) COMMENSURATE WITil TESTED TRAY CONFIGURATIONS .THE FLEXI-BLANKET BLANKET TEST SCIIEME PIPE (Il-1).WRAPS MAINTAIN REQUIRED OVERLAP AND BAND SPACING COMMENSURATE WTT 22. EACil OF Tile CABLE TRAY QUAUFICATION SCHEMES USTED WERE PERFORMED WITH SUPPORTS104221I3 PROTECT DISTANCE (ONLY1 FROM Tile PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE. Tills FIELD CONFIGURATION USES REDUCED
, STEEL SUPPORT WilERE THE IIVAC DUCT INTERFERES WTTil COMPMTE 9* RULE PROTECTION Tile DEVIATI COMPLETE 9' RULE PROTECDON IS ACCEPTABLE DUE TO THE HEAT SINK CAPABluTIES OF THE LARGE DUCT Ti!E PRIMARY (CABLE TRAY) ENVELOPE IS NOT AFFECTED. , 23.
EACil OF THE CABLE TRAY QUAUFICATION SCllEMES USTED WERE PERFORMED WITH SUPPORTS10422110 PROTECT DISTANCE (ONLY) FROM Tile PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE. THIS FIELD CONFIGURATION USES A REDUCED THIC THERMO-LAG WilERE Tile SUPPORT RATE INTERFERES. THE PRIMARY (CABLE TRAY) ENVELOPE IS NOT AF ADDITIONALLY,TilERMO-LAG iS BUTTED AND ATTACilED TO Tile SECONDARY INTERFERENCE, WillCil PROVIDES IIEAT SINK CAPABluTIES. 24. TEST SCllEME 10-2 QUAUFIED TilERMO-LAG PROTECTION ON J-BOXES (18* X 12* X 6-) USING A104079/1 SINGLE L I Tills FIELD CONFIGURATION USES 2 LAYERS 330-1 EXCEPT AT THE CONDUIT INTERFERENCES, WHERE ONE FULL PANEL ! TilICKNESS EXISTS, AND AT Tile ANGLE 1RON SUPPORT. tills CONFIGURATION IS ACCEPTABLE BECAUSE Tile ENTIRE ANGLE IRON PIECE IS PROTECTED BY l LAYER OF 330-1 PANEL, EXCEPT WHERE IT INTERFACES WTTH Tile WALL. Tile WALL ACTS AS A IIEAT SINK AND PROVIDES NO HLAT PATil INTO THE ENVELOPE. 25. REFERENCE ATTACllMENT A OF T}lls REPORT FOR TYPICAL DETAIL 3-4,3-4.4 AND 3-4.5 ACCEPTANCE BASIS. THESE FIELD 104173/0
- CONFIGURATIONS REPRESENT ACCEPTABLE DEVIA'HONS FROM Tile TYPICAL DETAILS BECAUSE Tile REQ 104117/0 330-660 FLEXI-BLANKET IS MAINTAINED, ALL GAPS ARE FILLED %TTH 330-660 BULK MATERIAL, AND ATTACilMENT AND REINFORCEMENT METilODS ARE COMMENSURATE %THI Tile TESTED CONFIGURATION.
j 26 REFERENCE ATTACHMENT A OF Tills REPORT FOR TYPICAL DETAIL 16-5 ACCEPTANCE BASIS. IT IS ACCEPTA 104189/0 i END CAPS AT Tilt TOPS OF T}lE TUBE STEEL MEMBERS BECAUSE Tile OPEN ENDS ARE FLUSil WITil A CONC ONE SIDE,5* FROM A LARGE IIVAC DUCT ON Tile OPPOSITE SIDE, AND 12* FROM THE CONCRETE CEluNO ABOVE. TilESE I SURFACES WILL ALL ACT AS IIEAT SINKS AND ALSO TO BLOCK THE HEAT PATil INTO THE OPEN END. ADDITIONALLY, Tile TOP ENDS OF TIIE MEMBERS ARE APPROXIMATELY 7" FROM Tile ESSENTIAL TRAY LOCATIONS. 27 i TEST SCllEME 9-3 DEMONSTRA tu Ti!E EFFECTIVENESS OF I/2* TillCK PREFORMED CONDUTT SECTIONS 103799/0 ON 1 i DIAMETER CONDUITS AND IS CREDITED WilERE LOCAUZED INTERFERENCES PRECLUDE THE INSTALLATION 103476/I O i OVERLAY. A TESTED CONFIGURAT10N. Tills DEVIATION FROM SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS STILL PROVIDES AN INSTALLATION IN A
,r-, 3 - --- - - - - , - - , , . - - - . - , , - . - . - - - -- , , _ . , , , .-
, - - - . _ ~ . ,.- - - _ _ _ _ . , _ m .___. ~,-
ATTACHMENT D ER-ME-082, REV. O PROTRUDING /INTERFE'ING ITEM PAGE D19 OF D30
. COVERAGE DEVIATIONS NOTE ACurrANCE BASIS / NOTES h DCA/REV l<
28. REFERENCE ATTAOIMENT A OF THIS REPORT FOR TYPICAL DETAIL 8-3 ACCEFTANCE BASIS. 102884!0 102821/1 29. Tile ENCLOSURE USED ON THE OllLL WATER PIPES EFFECTIVELY PROTECTS THEM AS PROTRUDING 102821/1 ITEM TRAY ENVELOPE. Tile BOX CONFIGURATION MAINTAINS MATERIAL THICKNESS AND JOINT INTEGRITY (USING .TTRESS SKIN, STITOllNG AND 330-1 TROWEL GRADE) COMMENSURATE WITH TESTED TRAY CONFIGURATIONS. THE FLE WRAPS (11-l). MAINTAIN REQUIRED OVERLAP. AND BAND SPACING COMMENSURATE WTril Tl!E TESTED FLEXI-BLAN 30. IT IS ACCEPTABLE TO USE A 22* MAXIMUM WIDTH FLAT PANEL, BECAUSE ALL OTHER ATTRIBITTES OF THE TYPICAL DETAIL102821/1 WILL BE MAINTAINED, INCLUDING MATERIAL OVERLAY, BANDING REQUIREMENTS, AND STRESS SKIN AND TROWEL GRADE REINFORCEMENT OF JOLNTS. l
)
31. EACil OF Tile CABLE TRAY QUALIFICATION SCHEMES LISTED WERE PREFORMED WTTH SUPPORTS PRUTECTED 103846/0 F DISTANCE (ONLY) FROM THE PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE. THIS FIELD CONFIGURATION USES A REDUCED T}llCKNE ; TilERMO-LAG AT Tile AREA OF INTERFERENCES (S). Tile PRIMARY (CABLE TRAY) ENVElhPE IS NOT AFFECTED. i ADDITIONA11Y, DUE TO THE EXTRA TillCKNESS OF 330-1 PANEL IN THE VIGNITY OF THE INTERFERENCE (S) AND THE MINIMAL AIR GAP BETWEEN THE TilERMO-LAG AND THE INTERFERENCE (S), A
- TORTUROUS PATH
- FOR llEAT TRANSFER IS ESTABLISHED.
32. EACH OF THE CABLE TRAY QUALIFICATION SOlEMES LISTED WERE PERFORMED WTTH SUPPORTS PROTECTED 103484/1 FO DISTANCE (ONLY) FROM Tile PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE. THis FIELD CONFIGURATION USES A REDUCED TlHCKNESS OF TilERMO-LAG ON TOP OF THE ESSENTIAL TRAY, BUT COVERS THE INTERFERING C6 OIANNELS AND THE ABOVE NON-ESSENTIAL TRAY AS PROTRUDING ITEMS. THE TilERMO-LAG 330-1 BOX USED TO ENCLOSE THE CHANNELS MAINTA MATERIALTHICKNESS AND JOINT INTEGRITY COMMENSURATE WTTH TETTED CABLE TRAY CONFIGURATIONS, AND Tile C6 CilANNELS PROVIDE OVERALL STABILITY TO TIIE STRUCTURE. 33. Tile CONDUIT QUALIFICATION TESTS LISTED WEP.E PERFORMED WITH SUPPORTS PROTECTED FOR 9* DIST 103476/I THE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE. IN THIS CONFIGURATION, TIIE ONLY DEVIATION IS FROM THE TESTED METHOD OF PANEL ATTACHMENT (SELF-TAPPING SCREWS IN LIEU OF HILTI KWIK-BOLTS), AND IS CONSIDERED INSIGNIFICANT IN TERMS OF ATTACliMENT ADEQUACY. 34. COVERAGE OF THE ENTIRE WALL SUPPORT IS MORE CONSERVATIVE THAN 9* RULE PROTECTION. OTilER MINOR 10222til DEVI FROM DETAIL ENDURANCE. 134 ATTAQlMENT METHODS ARE NOT CONSIDERED $1GNIFICANTTO CONFIGURATION STABILITY OR FIRE 35. THE FIRE STOPS PROVIDED ON THE ZONE R C 21ES ARE ACCEPTABLE FOR USE ON ITEMS PROTRUDING FROM THERMO- 103809/0 LAGGED J-BOXES. BASED ON TYP! CAL DETAIL 3-4 (SEE ATTACHMENT A OF THIS REPORT FOR ACCEPTANCE BASI COMBINING TWO OF Tile CABLES IN A COMMON ENVELOPE IS ACCEPTABLE BECAUSE REQUIRED MATERIALTHICK MAINTAINED, AND REINFORCEMENT IS PROVIDED USING 330-1 TROWEL GRADE. STAINLESS STEEL BANDING AND STRESS SKIN.
4 l t ;
- ATTACHMEN'T D ER-ME 082, REY. O PROTRUDING / INTERFERING TTEM PAGE D30 OF D30 j -
COVERAGE DEVIATIONS
? \
i ~' l NOTE ACCEFTANCE BASIS / NOTES DCA/REV . 'l j 36. ; THE METHOD OF SEALING THE CABLES INTERNALLY USING 6" OF 45B EIASTOMER IS EQUIVAIENT 102479M TO j PP.ESCRIBED IN TYPICAL DETAIL 2-2. REFERENCE ATTACHMENT A TO THIS REPORT FOR DETAIL 2-2 A
' -i 37.
WRAPPING OF NON-ESSENTIAL CABLES AND ESSENTIAL CONDUIT PER DETAIL 3-3A METHODS 15 AC 103081/1 i DEVIATION (WRAPPING 2 CABLES IN A COMMON BUNDLE)IS MINOR IN NATURE. THE USE OF SELF-TAP i FOR 330-1 PANEL ATTACHMENT TO THE STEEL LINER WALL 15 PER TYPICAL DETAIL I-5. REFcRENCE , l REPORT FOR TYPICAL DETAIL ACCEPTANCE BASIS. THE MINOR DEVIATION FROM THE 9* RULE COVl a LINER PLATING IS CONSIDERED INSIGNIFICANT BECAUSE OF THE ADDillON OF 330-70 BLANKET AMD i' ACTUAL CONDUCTIVE HEAT PATH TO THE 3-BOX FROM THE ADJALENT SUPPORT IS APPROXIMATELY I1*. 38. THE CONDUIT QUALIFICATION TESTS LISTED WERE PERFORMED WTTH SUPPORTS PROTECTED 102859MFOR 9 i PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE. COVERING ALL PRIMARY AND SECONDARY INTERFERENCES AS PROTRUDING , CONFIGURATION EXPECTED TO PERFORM AT LEAST AS WELL AS THE TESTED DESIGN, BECAUSE THERE IS NO DIRECT
- CONDUCTIVE HEAT PATH INTO THE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE AND OVERALL MATERIAL THICKNEp IS MAINTAINED. !
REFERE!4tE ATTACHMENT A OF THIS REPORT FOR AMPTANCE BASIS OF DETAIL 16-3.
- 39. .
REFERENCE ATTACHMENT A OF THIS REPORT FOR THE TYPICAL DETAIL 13-4 ACCEPTANCE 103597M BASIS. THE ALL QUALIFIED 9* RULE PROTECTION OF PROTRUDING SUPPORT STEEL.
- 40. 1
- REFERENCE ATTACHMENT A OF THIS REPORT FOR THE TYPICAL DETAIL S-3 ACCEPTANCE BASIS.' THE THE 103597M PROVIDED BY THIS DESIGN IS EXPECTED TO BE EQUIVALENT TO THAT OF THE LISTED TEST SCHEMES, BECAUSE THE BOTTOM PANEL THICKNESS REDUCTION, IF REQUIRED, WILL BE MINIMAL.
a
}
I 4 4 i i 1 1 f
- _ _ . _ _ . - _ - - _ . - _ . --_ ____ - _ . , _ . . - _ _ - ~ _ _ - _ _ . . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . -
6 0 I 6 I. - > RI 3_ l
- m. -
u . jf . 9 ..
^
ATTACHMENT E ER-ME-082, REV. O STRUCTURAL STEEL DEVIATIONS , PAGE E2 OF El1 DCA NOJREV BLDG ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET. DESCRWTION/ ISSUE OF CONCERN /RESOLITTION SUPPORT BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (YIN) TEST (PAGES E9-ElI) FIRE ZONE SCHEMES 101434!O SG 831'4
- 2@)6 2.iEll6 Y Y ISSUE 1: TIIERMO-LAG INSTALLATION DETAILS 2-096B 2SM1157 N N AT TiiE SECURITY BARRIERS DEVIATE FROM SPEC CPES-M-2032 BY NOT BEING SECURED AT THE CENTERLINE OF THE COMPONENT.
RESOLimON: THE DESIGN P4VIDES FOR UL X4II I-5, 7, 8 ADDITIONAL SCREWS TO BE INSTAI J FD ON AND X-003 ErrHER SIDE OF THE SECUidTY BARS ASSURING THAT THE THERMO-LAG WILL REMAIN IN PLACE. ISSUE 2: INSTAILATION DETAIIS DEVIATE FROM SCREW SPACING CRITERIA FOR THE FIRST LAYER OF TilERMO-LAG PANELS. RESOlimON: THE DEVIATION IS UL X411 1-5,7,8 CONSERVATIVE IN THAT SCREW SPACING IS AND X-003 . REDUCED FROM 4* TO 3* FROM TIIE EDGE OF l THE PANEIS AND TIIOSE PLACED ATTilE CENTER OF THE THERMO-LAG PANEIS IN LIEU OF THE CENTERLINE OF Ti!E COMMODITY. ISSUE 3: THERMO-LAG INSTALLATION METHODS DO NOT PROVIDE FOR INSTALLING THERMO-LAG AT SECURITY BARRIER ATTACIIMENT LOCATIONS NEXT TO FLOOR. l RESOLUTION: PROVIDE INSTALLATION UL X41I l-5,7,8 DETAILS WilERE INTERFERENCES ARE CLOSE AND X 003 TO FLOOR, TIIIS DETAIL IS Li ACCORDANCE WITil TIIE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPECIFICATION AND ONLY CLARIFIES EXISTING REQUIREMENTS. O
ATTACIIMENT E ER-ME-082, REV. 0 ETRUCTURAL STEEL DEVIATIONS PAGE E3 OF Ell DCA NOJREY BLDO I El4V- ROOM ~ FI SUPP.i- DET.i- DESCRIPriON/ ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION !-SUPPORT - 5 ASIS / NOTES ; .
^~
AREAI (YIN)-
~ ~
(Y/N) '
"E.m4 -
TESTin... -(PAGES E9-El1) ' ' ' [aV # FIRE :-a SCHEMES i ZONE _ MY, m . 101435/0 SG 831*4
- 2496 2 Sell 6 Y Y ISSUE: ' INTERFERENCE PREVENI3 INSTkLLING 2 0968 2SM/157 N N- THERMO-LAG IN ACCORDANCE WTTH I SPECIFICATION ON A TUBE STEEL COLUMN FOR A DISTANCE OF I4 FT. AS FOLLOWS; A - BOTTOM PANEL OF FIRST LAYER HAS NO SCREWS DRILLED INTO THE COLUMN.
B - BOTTOM PANEL OF THE SECOND LAYER l DOES NOT MEET 111E MINIMUM SPACING I REQUIREMENTFROM THE TOP EDGE. RESOLITTION: A -111E FIRST LAYER WILL BE UL X-6t I I-5,7,9 PREBtTITERED WITH TROWEL GRADE TO AND X-00'l ADHERE IT TO THE STRUCTURAL STEEL WITH TIIE PIECE SCORED AND FOLDED AROUND THE j TUBE STEEL THE SECOND LAYER Will HAVE , A HNEW THROUGH IT ANCHORING WITH BOTH slues OF THE PANEL AND IS PREBLTTTERED TO THE FIRST LAYER. B -THE BOARD THAT COVERS THE REST OF l THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE SECOND LAYER in I AFFIXED TO THE STEEL MEMBER BY THE PANEL (SCORE AND FOLD METHOD) ON TiiE WEST SIDE. THE 9' HIGH PIECE IS PREBtfrTERED AND SECURED IN PLACE WITH ONE SCREW.' l
ATTACliMENT E ER-ME-082, REV. O STRUCTURAL STEEL DEVIATIONS i PAGE E4 OF Elf DCA NO.lREV BLDO ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP; DET.. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION , SUPPORE - AREA /- BASIS / NOTES . !
-(YIN)- (YIN)
FIRE TEST l[.. (PAGES E9-Bil)
. SCHEMES -
ZONE 101707/0 50 831'4 " 2-096 2 Sell 6 Y Y ISSUE: DUE TO O'3STRUCTION, TiiERMO-LAG
- 2MB 2SM/157 N N COVERAGE ON THE ANGLE PLATE BElIIND THE TUBE STEEL INSIDE TiiE STAIRWELL IS
[ REDUCED. 4 RESOLUTION: COVER ANGLE CLIP UP TO THE U X411 1 4, 7, 19 TUBE STEEL, SIIAVE A PIECE OF TifERMO-LAG AND X-003 PANEL TO FIT BETWEEN Tl!E TUBE STEEL AND TiiE ANGIE. THE STAIRWELL SUPPORT BELOW j TIIE GRATINO, WHICH IS NOT ATTACHED TO THE PROTECTED TUBE STEEL MEMBER DOES I NOT REQUIRE TiiERMO-LAG PROTECTION. 101708/0 SG 831'4
- 2 094 2SB/15 Y Y ISSUE: THE PIPE PROTRUDING TIIROUGli TiiE 2-096A 250/3 N Y STAIRWELL PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE REQUIRES TIIERMO-LAG FOR HEAT PATli.
RESOLITTION: "IllE PIPING IS ENCAPSULATED UL X4Ii 1 4, 7, 10 IN TiiERMO-LAG TO MEET TiiE 2 IIOUR AND X@3 REQUIREMENTS OF Tile SPEC. Tile DCA ONLY PROVIDES INSTALLATION DETAIIA REQUIRED TO MEET THE SPEC. TIIEREFORE, TilIS IS NOT A DEVIATION FROM DESIGN. O
I ATTACHMENT E - ER-ME482, REV. O i i , , STRUCTURAL KTEEL DEVIATIONS PAGE E5 OF Ell l a 1: DCA NOJREV' BIEO EGV ROOM- FIREl -SUPP. DET. 5
. ~..~ , . , . .
DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERN / RESOLUTION ; SUPPORT
- ~4 .-
.l
;i : BASIS / NOTES
- p. ~ -
A AREA / (Y/N)I a (Y/N)l g7dni TESTjp[li (PAGES E9-Ell) AW Gi ..; i ' hjh W K 3 s 51RhhMPiM
+ * #
.2 W-
~ '
t FIRE!: e LM ~ ' " *2 w-n gggy' lV - W w @y;; -,. smw '
~JPW u MES! ;_ - .
' \**
,w u4%. , A.
~
%- . :s c , m. -
1-101884/0 30 790*4* 2470 _ 2SB/4 Y Y 4 ISSUE: REDUCTION OF THERMO-LAO 2-074A 230/3 N Y: i THICKNESS ON THE STRUCTURAL STEEL 101885/0- AROUND FIRE A TORNADO DAMPERS TO 1 i, SO 310'4
- 24S2 2SB/8 Y. Y i
f ALLOW FOR THE DAMPER BLADES 2485B 25 0/3 N~ Y UNOBSTRUCTED FUNCMON. j' r- 101886/0 30 831'4
- 094 258/15 Y. ' Y. RESOLUTION: WHERE TWO FULL LAYERS OF - N/A 14,111 2-096A 230/3 N- Y 1
THFNO-LAG WOULD OBSTRUCT THE DAMPER LEVER MECHANISM, A SINO2 IAYER IS'- 101887/0 SO' 810'4 ' 2-083 ~ 2SD/9 Y: Y INSTALLED WITH X)Dfl3 AND SEAMS FILLED 1 2-085C 2SMll57 N. N [ WITH 330-1 TROWEL ORADE. WHERE SINGLE - THICKNESS OF THERMO-LAG PANELS CREATE j 101888/0 SO 831*4
- 2496. 2 Sell 6 Y Y AN INTERFERENCE TOP COAT AND MATERIAL
{. 2-0968 2SMll57 N N i IS REMOVED BY SANDING AND ORINDING AND - THE TOP COAT REAPPtJED. ' 101891/0 SO 451'4
- 2-103' 2 Sell 8 Y Y '
2-105B 2SMll57 - N N i , 'i
- j. 102300/0 OEN GEN GEN GEN N/A N/A 4
ISSUE: STRUCTURALSTEELCEILING AND }' WALL PIATES WTDI ANCHORS PREVENT + t, INSTALIATION OF SECOND LAYER SCREW ,! [ ! k
+
3- 'f 4-RESOLUTION: PRIOR TO SECOND IAYER UL X411' 1 4, 7, 12 INSTALIATION ON ANCHOR BOLTS, THE BACK AND X-003 {- OF THE PLATES ARE TO BE PREDITITERED. DETAILS FOR SCREW PiACEMD 3 ARE : . i APPROVED IN THIS DCA. . e 3
-i k -
r-1
+
1 .[ I i .,__.a.._~._.,_......c._..a_._..,_..... ___.._._.......__.__...___._..___._.._.._....a.,.__., . _ , - - , . . _ . . . . _
ATTACllMENT E ER-ME-082, REv. O STRUCTURAL STEEL DEVIATIONS PAGE E6 OF Ell DCA NO./REV BLDO ELEV- ROOM. FIRE - SUPP. DbT. DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OF CONCERNIRESOLUTION3 SUPPORTL BASIS / NOTES AREA / (YIN) (YIN)( TEST . (PAGES E9-Ell) FIRE - SCHEMES . ZONE' , s e 102465/0 SO 852'4" 2-103 2 Sell 8 Y Y ISSUE: INSUFFICIENT ROOM INSIDE 2-105B 2SM/157 N N STAIRWELL, PREVENTS FASTENING THE SECOND LAYER OF TilERMO-LAG TO TiiE STRUCTURAL STEEL AND APPLICATION OF TOP COATTO ALLTHE JOINTS AND SEAMS. RESOLUTION: FIRST LAYER WAS UL X41I
~
1 4, 7, 13 PREBUTTERED, FOLDED AROUND TIIE DAMPER AND X@3 ' STEEL FRAMING AND FASTENED TO THE STRUCTURAL STEEL WITH SCREWS TiiE SECOND LAYER IS INSTALLED IN TWO PIECES l WITH TIIE FIRST PIECE BEING PREBUTTERED AND CLAMPED, CUT AND FOLDED AROUND - THE DAMPER FRAME. FOAM SEAL MATERIAL WAS INSTALLED BEDVEEN TIIE WALL AND TIIE SECOND PIECE TO MOLD Tile PIECE IN PLACE. , 102886/0 SO 821'4 " 2-096 2SE/I6 Y Y ISSUE I: TilERMO-LAG COVERAGE OF 2-096B 2SMll57 N N SECURITY BAR OVERLAPS TiiE COVER PLATE OF TliE MAGNETIC DOOR SWITCII BOX WillCli REQUIRES PERIODIC MAINTENANCE AND ADJUSTMENTS. RESOLUTION 1: TIIERMO-LAG IS SIIAVED BY UL X411 1 4, 7, 14 1/4* FOR A DISTANCE OF 1-1/2" TO ALLOW AND X-003 FREE ACCESS TO TiiE BOX. ISSUE 2: AN IIVAC DUCT PREVENTS INSTALLATION OF Tile SECOND LAYER OF THERMO-LAG ON A SECURITY BAR TO SATISFY Tile 4* RULE. RESOLUTION 2: INSTALL TiiE SECOND LAYER UL X411 1 4 , 7, 14 OF TilERMO-LAG NOTCiiED OUT BUT NOT AND X-003
. CONNECTED TO TIIE IIVAC DUCT.
e-
. , . _ - _m _ . _ - - -
- n. . -
ATTACHMENT E ER-ME 082, REV. 0 l STRUCTURAL STEEL DEVIATIONS ., : PAGE E7 OF Eli . l V DCA NO./REV BLDG ELEV ROOMi FIRE SUPP/ DEri DESCRIPTION /!SSUE OF CONCERN /RESOLU ION . SUPPORTL BASIS / NOTES AREAL, (Y/N); .(Y/N)[ M W f i '~ d " -j J"^H4 TESTn__; (PAGES E9-Ell) .. ! W. t f~ }, FIRE < ( ' 7 SCHEMES 3 - f :. i
,< . *dP T
- T ,3*3
^ '
ZONEL . .< , , *l - 102915/0 SG - 790*4
- 2470 25B/4 Y Y ISSUE: MISSING INSTALLATION DETAILS FOR1 2474A 250/3 'N Y THERMO-LAG ON DOOR FRAME, FIRE )
; DAMPER / TORNADO DAMPER, AND :
l STRUCTURAL STEEL USING , TYPICAL DETAILS. RESOLUTION: PREBUTTER THE BACK OF ALL UL X4tl 1 4, 7, 15 PANELS WITH THERMO-LAG 330-1 TROWEL ' AND X-003 I GRADE.1 ROWEL GRADE IS PIACED IN ALL ')' CITT OUTS FOR BOLT PROTRUSIONS PLUSH WITH TOP OF THERMO-LAG PANELS AFER-
; PANEL INSTALLATION.'
103131/I SG 810*-0* 2-082 2SB/8 Y Y ISSUE: DUE TO THE CONFIGURATION AND 2485B 250/3 N Y~ INTERFERENCE OF THE DOOR FRAME WITH THE ADJOINING DAMPER FRAME, THE CONVENTIONAL SELF TAPPING SCREWS CANNOT BE USED TO ATTACH THE THERMO- - ! IAG (3 ITEMS). , l~ RESOLUTION: DETAllJ HAVE BEEN PROVIDED ' UL X4t l . 1 4, 7, 16 TO INSTALL THERMO-LAG 330-1 FLAT PANELS ' ' AND X403 PREBLTTTERING THE BACK OF THE PANEIJ. SILICONE FOAM SEAL IS EXTENDED TO BUTT TO THE THERMO-LAG PANELS TO SECURE THEM TO THE STRUCI1JRAL STEEL . 103189/2 SG 831'4
- 2496 2 Sell 6 Y 'Y ISSUE: 'DUE TO INTERFERENCE, INSTALLATION 2-096A 250/3 N- Y OF THERMO-LAG FOR THE FIRE D AMPER - .
FRAMING REQUIRES ADDITIONAL DETAILING. PEinL*TTION: INSTALLTHERMO-LAG PANELS N/A 1 4, 7, 1I,'17 WITH ANCHOR BOLTS INSTEAD OF SELF - TAPPING SCREWS, NOTCH PANELS AS REQUIFED, FILL VOlD WITH CERAMIC ' 3 INSULAWR 330-70 AND LEAVE ROOM FOR TORNADO DAMPER LEVER MOVEMENT.
' ATTACliMENT E ER-ME-082, REY. 0 STRUCTURAL STEEL DEVIATIONS i PAGE 33 OF Eli - DCA NO.lREV BLDO, ELEV ROOM FIRE SUPP. DET.- DESCRIPTION / ISSUE OFICONCERN/RESOi.dflON1 SdPh)RT ! AREA / 'BNSIS/ NOTES : (Y/N)= (YIN) TEST ,... FIRE; '~ ~
# (PAGES E9-B11)
SCHEMES ZONE ,
~ '
104185/0 SG 831'-6* 2496 2 Sell 6 Y Y ISSUE: SHIMS ON STEEL ANOIES SUPPORTING UL X-003 1 4, 18 2-082 2SB/8 Y Y HATCH COVER REQUIRE PROTECTION FOR HEAT PATIL RESOLUTION: ATTACH 2 LAYERS OF PANEL MATERIAL ON SliiM BOTTOM SURFACES ONLY USING THE WIRES AND BANDING. t 4 Y s
- -- - - - _ _ , , . ,%.- . , _ _ ,c, ,, -,.m , _ . _. ,,...#.s.,, _ . , ,, ,, - . -
- _ _ . . . _ , _ _ , , , ,r., _.mm ., _ _ _ . . _ _ , _ _ _ _ , , _ ~ . , _ , ,. * , , _
I
- ATTACHMENT E I ER-MEM REV. 0 4
STRUCTURAL STEEL DEVIATIONS N .w PAGE E9 OF Ell - k I NOTE: ~D4 [ 6
- _ %./ J $M 3 -.. .
ACCEMANCE BASIS /NOTIiS a- - ' [ DCA/REVo ..
- 1. .
CONTINUITY OF THE MATERIAL IS CONSIS'IENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. GENERIC . 1-2. ] EFFECTIVE THICKNESS OF THE MATERIAL IS CONSISTEIR WTTH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. -i GENERIC '
- 3.
THE NATURE AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THE SUPPORT ASSEMBLY (IF APPLICABLE) IS CONSISTENT WITli TESTED GENERIC CONFIGURATIONS.- 1 i 4.
- THE APPLICATION OR END USE OF THE MATERIAL IS CONSISTENT WITH TESTED CONFIGURATIONS. ' GENERIC '.
l 5. THE CONFIGURATION WAS REVIEWED BY A QUALIFIED FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER AND DETERMINED TO PROVIDE AM - ' GENERIC {' EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF PROTECTION. )' 6. SPECIFIC AND UNIQUE DIFFERENCES FROM TESTED CONFIGURATIONS EXIST FOR THE PLANT CONFIGURATION WHICH WOULD GENERIC ENHANCE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE PROTECTIVE ENVELOPE (E.G., SPACIAL ORIENTATION, SURFACES NOT DIRECILY EXPOSED TO A POTENTIAL FIRE DUE TO SHIELDING EFFECTS, TOR 11JROUS PATH, ETC.). 7. EVALUATION OF STRUCTURAL STEEL THERMO-LAG CONFIGURATIONS HAS BEEN PROVIDED VIA ER-ME467, APPENDEX D. THE GENERIC EVALUATION PROVIDED THEREIN COMPARES THE PLANT CONFIGURATIONS WITH UL DESIGNS X4Il AND X-003. .! j 8. THE SCREW FASTENER SPACING USED 15 WITHIN THE SPACING DISTANCE USED ON THE COLUMN IN UL X-003 AND THE : 101434/0. EMBEDMEIR IS SUFFICIENT TO E~4SURE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE THERMO-LAG PANE 13 AND THEREFORE THE .-
- STRUCTURAL STEEL s O.
1' < THE PANELS ARE PREBUTTERED WITH TROWEL GRADE MATERIAL AND SCORE AND FOLDED SO 'HIAT THE STRESS SKIN IS 101435/0
- INTACT. UL X411 USES TOWEL APPLIED WERMO-LAG 330-f (ONLY) FOR ADHERENCE TO THE COLUMN.' PREBUTTERING THE BOARDS TO THE STEEL AND THE SECOND LAVER TO lliE FikST LAYER GLUES THE ASSEMBLY TOGETHER. FOLDING THE BOARD WTTH THE STRESS SKIN AT THE CORNEA MEINFORCES THE JOINT AND ADDS STRUCTURAL INTEORITY TO THE THERMO-LAG. THE SCREWS ONLY ADD TO THE STR""m' *.L wrEGRITY OF THE MATERIAL. -THE MINIMUM THICKNESS' 15 ' :I
!- MAINTAINED. THEREFORE SINCE THE THERMAL &~EGRITY (THICKNESS) IS MAINTAINED AND THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY
- l. 15 EQUAL IF NOT GREATER THAN THAT TESTED IN UL X4t l THE STEEL 15 ADEiQUATELY PROTECTED.
! :1 10. THE TUBE STEEL COLUMN WHICH IS THE CGMMODITY PROTECTED IS ADEQUATELY PROTECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CPES - 101707/0 . M-2032. PROTRUDING TTEMS ONLY REQUIRE PROTECTION FOR HEAT PATH." THE THERMO-LAG PROTECTS PROTRUSION SUCH 101708/0 THAT THERE IS NO AREA WHERE A FIRE COULD HAVE FLAME IMPINGEMENTSUCH TO EFFECT11(E BARRIER. THE 4* RULE i: FOR STRUCTURAL STEEL IS BASED ON A 3 HOUR FIRE RATING AND THE PROTECTED ITEM COMPLETELY WITHIN THE l FURNACE. THE TUBE STEEL IS EMBEDDED IN THE WALL SO THAT ONLY ONE SIDE IS EXPOSED WHICH INCREASES THE ' l STEEL'S ABILITY TO ACCER HEAT FROM A PROTRUDING ITEM. THE FIRE RATING OF THE BARRIER 15 FOR ONLY 2 HOURS }- AND NOT 3. BASED ON THE CONFIGURATION AND THE BASIS OF THE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS. THIS CONFIGURATION IS j ADEQUATE TO PROVIDE AN EQUIVALENT 2 HOUR RATING TO THE SiltUCTURAL STEEL. t i i Y_.___.__..___ . _ . _ _ . _ _ . . . , . _ . _ , _ _ _ _ . _ , _ . , _ . , . . _ , . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . , _ _ _ , . . _ . , . . _ _ _.___._,___.2,_;n,_.a..u.____.._._,...-.._,.
ATTACIIMENT E ER-ME-082, REV. O STRUCTURAL STEEL DEVIATIONS PAGE E10 OF Eli NOTE ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES '
, . j .. DCA/REV l I1.
THE STRUCTURAL STEEL IS THE ANGLE IRON USED TO RETAIN THE FIRE DAMPER / TORNADO DAMPER ASSEMBLY. 101884/0 T ARRANGEMENT IS A NON-RATED FEATURE (NRF-012) PER CALCULATION 2-FP41080, REV. O. THE ANGLE IRONS ARE OF HEAVY 101885/0 ' CONSTRUCTION AND ARE LIGHTLY LUADED. THE SMALL PORTION OF THE DAMPER FRAME THAT IS UNPROTECTED 101886/0 LARGE ENOUGH TO CAUSE FAILURE OF THE RETAINING ANGLE AND THEREBY FAILURE OF THE FIRE DAMPER. 101887/0 T TEMPERATURE TEST REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE DAMPER AND THEREFORE THE REDUCTION IN FIREPROOFING 101888/0 WILL CAUSE AN INCREASE IN HEAT TRANSMISSION THROUGH THE FIRE BARRIER. BASED ON TI{E DESIGN OF THE DAMPER 101891/0 INSTALLATION AND THE SMALL REDUCTION IN FIREPROOFING TIIE DESIGN IS ADEQUATE TO PROVIDE A 2 HOUR EQUIVALENT FIRE RATING. 12. TlHS IS A SMALL AREA AND AT LEAST ONE SCREW IS INSTALLED TO FASTEN THE SECOND LAYER TO THE STRUCTU 102300/0 MEMBER. THE SECOND LAYER IS PREBUTTERED WITH TROWEL GRADE MATERIAL WHICH WILL BOND THE SECON Tile FIRST LAYER. THESE ARE SMALL AREAS AND TiiE THERMO-LAG CARRIES NO SIGNIFICANT LOAD. Tile TROWEL MATERIAL ALONG WITH THE SCREW Will HOLD THE THERMO-LAG IN PLACE. SINCE MATERIAL THICKNESS IS MAINTAI AND Tile STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE FIREPROOFING WILL BE MAINTAINED, THE STRUCTURAL STEEL WILL PROVIDE AN EQUIVALENT 2 HOUR RATING. ; 13. THE THERMO-LAG IS BEING USED TO PROTECT TliE STEEL FRAM*! OF THE FIRE DAMPER. THE REQUIRED THICKNESS 102465/0 TilERMO-LAG IS INSTALLED. TIIE FOAM SEAL MATERIAL WHICh IS SANDWICHED BETWEEN THE THERMO-LAG AND THE WALL NOT ONLY PROVIDES SUPPORT OF THE TiiERMO-LAG BITT PREVENTS THE THERMO-LAG FROM BEING DIRECTLY EXPOSED TO A FIRE. SINCE THE THERMO-LAG THICKNESS IS MAINTAINED AND THE TIIERMO-LAG WILL REMAIN IN PLACE, j TiiE DESIGN PROVIDES AN EQUIVALENT 2 HOUR FIRE RATING. I 14. IN BOTH ISSUE I AND 1 OF DCA 10286/0 THE THERMO-LAG IS BEING INSTALLED ON A PROTRUDING ITEM 102886/0 USING THE TIIICKNESS AND DISTANCE IS BASED ON A 3 IIOUR FIRE TEST. THIS FIRE BARRIER IS ONLY A 2 IlOUR FIRE BARRIE IS ONLY A SMALL AMOUNT OF TilERMO. LAG WHICH IS NOT INSTAI r Fn AND THE INTERFERING ITEM SHIELDS THE LOCATIONS WHERE THE THERMO-LAG COVERAGE IS REDUCED. THEREFORE, THE HEAT PATH COVERAGE IS SUFFICIENT TO PREVENT IIOUR AN( SIGNil4 FIRE RATING. CANT INCREASE OF HEAT INTO THE STRUCTURAL STEEL. THE DESIGN PROVIDES AN EQ 15. THE TilERMO-LAG IS BEING USED TO PROTECT THE FIRE DAMPER FRAME AND DOOR FRAME. THE ARRANGEM 102915/0 ALLOW FOR SCREW SPACING REQUIREMENTS TO BE MAINTAINED. THE THERMO-LAG IS PREBUTTERED TO BOND ~IllE TilERMO-LAG TO Tile FRAMES AND Tile LAYERS TOGETilER. IN ORDER TO WORK AROUND BOLT INTERFERENCE, TilREE LAYERS OF TIIERMO-LAG WAS INSTALLED IN MOST CASES. THE DISTANCES WITHOUT PHYSICAL RESTRAINTS ARE BASED ON TIIE CONFIGURATION OF TIIE INSTALLATION ALONG WITH THE TiiERMO-LAG PREBUTTERING, TilERMO-LAG THICKNESS RATING. AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY WILL BE MAINTAINED. THE DESIGN PROVIDES AND EQUIVALENT 2 HOUR FIR 4
- ,- -- , ..,,n - - .- . . - , . vn, v . -. ---., - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <, - -. - , - - - - - -
,. ATTACHMENT E ER-ME482, REV. 0.
STRUCTURAL STEEL DEVIATIONS , PAGE Ell OF Ell
'i t
NOTE
- 1 _
ACCEPTANCE BASIS / NOTES rn W-$ ' h@ " @ W ' % ' o - f@ % DCA/REV , , 16. THE THERMO-LAG THICKNESS IS MAINTAINED IN ALL CASES. : IN TTEM I, THE FIRST LAYER IS BONDED TO THE FRAME USING . 103131/1 , TROWEL ORADE 330-1 AND THEN THE SECOND LAYER IS PREBlJTTERED TO THE FIRST LAYER.1THE PENETRATIO EXTENDED TO REINFORCE (IAMMED IN PLACE) THE THERMO-LAG PANELS AND PROVIDES SOME PROTECTION T0118 THERMO-IAG. IN ITEM 2, ONLY TROWEL GRADE MATERIAL IS USED. SINCE THE DISTANCE IS ONLY 3/4* OF AN INCH AND X411 USES ONLY TROWEL ORADE MATERIALTO PROTECT A COMPLETE STEEL COLUMN. THE SMALL AMOUNT O LAG TROWEL ORADE WILL REMAIN IN PLACE. IN ITEM 3, THE FIRST LAYER IS BONDED TO THE DAMPER FRAMES USING TROWEL GRADE MATERIAL AND SCREWED TO THE TUBE STEEL. THE SCORE AND FOLD METHOD WAS USED STRESS SKIN IS CONTINUOUS. THE FOLDS ADD STRUCTURAL STRENGTH TO THE INSTALLATION. ~ THE SECOND PREBUTTERED TO THE FIRST LAYER AND SCREWED TO THE TUBE STEEL THE SCORE AND FOLD METHOD WAS A ON THIS LAYER. THE VOID SPACE BETWEEN THE TUBE STEEL AND FRAME (e 1 1/2*) IS Fin i sin WITH THERMO-LA PREBUTTERED PANELS. *ll!EREFORE IN ALL CASES STRUCTURAL INTEiGRITY IS MAINTAINED. SINCE THERMO-IAG T AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY 15 MAINTAINED, THE DESIGN PROVIDES AN EQUIVALENT 2 HOUR FIRE RATING. 17. ANCHOR BOLTS EMBEDDED IN lilE CONCRETE PROVIDE THE SAME STRUCTURAL ATTACHMENT AS SELF TAPPIN 103189/2.- THE SPACING OF THE ANCHOR BOLTS EXCEEDS THE SCREW SPACING REQUIRED BY 3* POR IN ULAX403, SPACING . OF 9*. THE FREE SPAN ON THE COLUMN IS GREATER THAN 9*. .TH ORE THE 9* SPACING 15 ACCEPTABLE. THE VOID SPACE IS Fil 1 Fn WITH CERAMIC INSULATOR 330-70 WHICH IS A NON-COMBUSTIBLE MATERIAL AND PROVIDES AN ADDITIONA . THERMAL BARRIER FOR THE STEEL. SINCE THE THERMO LAG THICKNESS AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY 15 MAINTAINED, THE . -' DESIGN PROVIDES AN EQUIVALENT 2 HOUR FIRE RATING. 18. THE STRUCTURAL STEEL SUPTORTING THE HATCH COVER IS A NON-RATED FEATURE WHICH, BASED ON CALCULATION 2-FP- 104185/0 ' 00e0, REV. 0 (NRF-Oll) DOES NOT REQUIRE THERMO-LAG PROTECTION. THEREFORE, PROVISION OF THERMO-LAG ON BOTH THE SUPPORT ANGLE AND SHIM IS AUOMENTARY ONLY. i I i t v -@u'ahesi's. ewes =.Nmw-m--- g-_---s-.--.-m us - h-ew'+.usewe-wwa-- -*m m-A w_-em-hgema-er- Wrsw a w*r_mu m.e --as_% *- _ _ _ _ _ - ._--.___mn_-- A-mm.r.Jan_---mi a. i-- - a '<mm--w'--A11-vs--m4 +4-- wee-v%1em% - e
.3 ER ME-082, REV, O PAGE F1 OF F27
~
ATTACIB1ENT F AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS e
._ .. .. _ - _ __~ . . _ ~ _ - . . . . -
i Ot/19/Y3 ATTACHMEN1 I PAGE: 1
- PART B Ny FIELD DESIGN CHANGE & REVIEW STATUS LOG AFFECTED DDCUMENT UPDATE REPORT DWG: CPES-N-2032 SHEEli REV: O P.0, i
NAINT LVL I DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DOCS RELS D-ST NDDIFCTN# REpoET M[# dote
=============== === ==== ==== ==== =========
^^^
DC' ^?! ^^ C"! O C 1 DC^ ^?C7^' ^^2 C"! O C PC' ^^C7"' ^^C C"I ." C nrm mm ,m. mm, mm, - - ww- w e we r vww wii d W W
^^'
O C .^ ^?C7^^ C"! C C O C .* ^7C7^' ^05 C"! O C nn# noren. an, eu, m e i bbA 09b794 bb7 GR k SDEi(_ DCA DCA 099501 000 NI R A -.-. g p l OCA 100040 0^^ C"! O C j CC^ 1^^Ci^ ^^1 !
, O l'
- DCA 101182 000 NI R A @j i OCA 101202 ^^^
C"! D E j DCA 101282 001 NI R A
" C ." 1^102^ ^^^
C"! O C {3 - CCA 10:020 0^; CN! " C DCA 101320 002 NI R A E3 ' DCA 201397 000 NI R A D l ~ DCA 101399 000 NI R A MO 2EV DCA 101434 000 NI R A , ET DCA 101435 000 NI R A gg CCA :0:::C 000 Cn: 0 C DCA 101498 001 NI -- R A 3 e C.- :0::C7 Oee C"! e C {3 CCA ;01427 ^01 C"! ? C DCA 101707 000 NI R A 4 DCA 101708 000 NI R A DCA 101884 000 NI R A E" DCA 101885 000 NI R A E j DCA 101886 000 NI R A EE DCA 101887 000 NI R A G DCA 101888 000 NI R A I DCA 101891 000 -NI G R A g[
^^^
C C .^ 1^1^Ci C"! O C
.m,m,, mmm -m, - -
bbA kbbb77 . bb[ Nk. k k DCA 102078 000 RUE $b NI R A DCA 202103 000 NI R A II g m-. . , ,m mmm -m, - - {b , bbA- kbb5b0 bbk Nk- R k ($ b I i l I A'ITACHMENT F ER-ME-082, REV. O A ECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F2 OF F27 l t
. e4 . u S Js AVTACHNENT 2 PAGE: .2
, PART B FIELD DESIGN CHANGE 6 REVIEW STATUS LOG AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT i D'W G: CPES-N-2032 SHEET: REV: O P.O.: NAINT LVL DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DOCS RELS D-ST MODIFCTN4 RE@g7 471~/A/07ES , =.............. ... .... .... .... ......... MPA 4 MM' M ww . A. .M .M .M .M . A. A. .A .. .P l DCA 102222 001 NI R A A 102266 NI DCA 000 R A D DCA 102300 000 NI R A EF O C /> 102C?^ ^0^ C"! O C DCA 102330 001 NI R A 'a c, OC' 1^2000 ^^0 C ." ! O E DCA 102385 001 NI R A --- DCA 102465 000 ERR $ NI R A E- }' DCA 102478 001 NI R A (; DCA 102533 000 NI R A i 102563 000 REF5s DCA NI R A OCA 102'77 0^0 0"! O C E3 i DCA 102679 001 NI R A DCA 102709 000 NI- R A - AJO Dq9/ DCA 102728 000 NI DCA 102758 000 NI R A A gg g <
. DCA 102780 000 NI R
R A (;
- OCA 10:70; (,
000 CN! " c DCA 102789 001 NI R A D ! DCA 102800 002 NI R A E$ j DCA 202837 000 NI R A l DCA 102P50 000 NI R A C c.
- DCA 102861 000 NI R A C.
l DCA 102863 001 NI R A C. DCA 202884 000 NI l DCA 102884 000 NI R R A A
])
EE
- DCA 202915 000 NI R A EE I
j OCA 102702 0^0 ONI O C , n. r. 4 n. . n. , ,
. -- A. A. 4 Mu,
- n. e l nNA 5
. A. _M M,_M .M AAM MUT M OCA 102702 ^00 CN! O C
- DCA 102702 000 0"! ~ 0 C DCA 102932 005 NI R A b DCA 102957 000 NI R A- pg OCA
- 0:007 000 CN: O C
{ DCA 103007 001 NI R A. (, _ OCA 100010 000 0" 0 -E- - OCA 100010 001 CN! O C I OCA 100010 ^^2 C"! P C J 4 4 ATTACHMENTI ER-ME-082, REY. 0 AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS . PAGE F3 OF F27 l
04 Iv/y3 AT1ACHnEN1 I RAGE: 3 h . . PART B FIELD DESIGN CHANGE & REVIEW STATUS LOG AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT a DUG CPES-M-2032 SHEET: REV: O P.0, MAINT LVLJ DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DOCS RELS D-ST MODIFCTN# RE pc:st1 ATT/ MOTIF 00^ 10?^1? 00? 9uy 9 g _ DC^ !^?012 0^^ ?"! " S D C .^ 102^*? ^^C S"I D E DCA 103013 006 NI R A DCf ^^^
^2^2' CM! ." S DCA 103037 000 NI R A g,
_M P A 4ASAAf AA4 EMT M O bbA khbb46 bbb Nk R b Eb DCA 103050 000 NI R A O C.^ *^2^C4 ^^^ CN! " C Q DCA 103056 001 NI R A [h DCA 103076 001 NI R A C DCA 103081 001 NI R A [3
- DCA 203088 000 NI R A [)
i -eCf :^20?C i nr. .memmm 000-- C",! me. ,,u n C
-bb7 $bb5b5 Ebb bN5 E 5 DCA 103131 001 NI R A E i DCA 103143 000 NI R A i DCA DCA 103157 103150 000 000 NI NI R
R A A i); , , (_ DCA 103159 000 NI R A DCA 103161 000 NI ETES OCf ^2:07 0^^ C" R A C ggy; n-. .me.on Am. nu, n n bbA kbbkB9 bbb Nk R k 6 DCA 103305 001 NI R A ES DCA 103375 000 NI R A (, DC^ 1^24^2 ^^^ S"I O C 00A 100007 00^ C"! " C
-00 A ^^*
- 100'^7 C"! O C OCA 100'07 002 C"! "
C - OCA 100107 ^00 C"! O C -- - OCf ^O'^^ ^^' S"! D E DCA 103409 005 NI- R A CCf ^ 21 : 4- ^^^ " {g C"! C DCA 103414 001 NI R A C. , DCA 203423 -000 NI R A t 1 OCA 100'74 ^^^ C"I O ? 4 DCA 103476 001 NI R A-3) ATTACHMENT F ER ME482, REV. O AFFECED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F4 OF F27
. U4/19/93 ATTACHMEN1 I PAGE: 4 N PART B FIELD DESIGN CHANGE & REVIEW STATUS LOG AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT DUG: CPES-N-2032 SHEET: REV: O P.O.:
MAINT LVL DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DOCS RELS D-ST MODIFCTN# REPor2.T~ A77"/AleTi?
=============== === ==== ==== ==== =========
DCA 103488 000 NI R A DCA 103507 000 NI R A DCA 103500 000 NI R A J) DCA 103533 000 NI R A . pg DC^ 10?550 000 SM! D C --- DCA __203550 001 NI R A 4C^ 102551 000 CHI
-(dh P C DCA 103551 001 NI R A Eb DCA 103559 000 NI R A Ag CCr 1005'? 000 CN! P C DCA 103567 001 NI R A Eb DCA 103574 000 NI R A [b r DCA 103582 000 NI R A. B
~
DCA 103599 000 NI R A. C, DCA 103600 002 NI A-DCA 103602 000 NI R R A- 43 C. DCA 103609 000 NI R A. DCA 103613 000 NI A c DCA 103631 000 NI R A g DCA 103633 000 NI R R .A c (, eCs :0062: 000 cn! C 4C? 13262' 001 CM! 'O C DCA 103634 002 NI R A ke05 D C,A 103636 000 NI R A C
.$.IIm
.! !. .! ,'.3 .?!.
<L DCA 103706 001 NI R A 0C^ C.
10??!9 000 SMI C C DCA 103718 001 NI R A (, D C .^ 10??21 0 0'; CM! D C DCA 103721 001 NI R A C "I 33^ $33# 3 333 - , , ! $ C-bCA kb374b bbi Nk k k Eh DCA 103741 000 NI A DCA 103770 000 NI R (L R A GL DCA 103780 000 NI R A C, DCA 203792 000 NI R Gk DCA 103799 000 NI R A D DCA 103816 000 NI R A di A*ITACHMENT F ER-ME-082, PEV. O AFFECED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F5 OF F27
J 02 29/93 ATTACHMENT I PAGE: 5 L - c 1 PART B \ FIELD DESIGN CHANGL & REVIEU STATUS LOG AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT l DWG: CPES-N-2032 SHEET: REUs O P.0,:
- MAINT LVL
- DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DOCS RELS D-ST NODIFCTNG (2ETbRT" ATF/tJoTE i
DCA 103824 000 NI R A WO DGN/ DCA 103846 000 NI R A [) DCA 103864 000 NI R A C, DCA 103873 000 NI R A ---- 24P5 nr. .neen, mma ru, a m bbA b3hb4 bbi Nk ik A OI I DCA 103892 000 NI R A 05'* DCA 103912 000 NI R A 8 ! DCA 103917 000 NI R A D i DCA 103924 000 NI R A D DCA 103947 000 NI R A c; i DCA 103959 000 NI R A C , DCA 103988 000 NI R A (, i DCA 103991 000 NI R A (_ ' 104011 DCA 000 NI R A E3 j DCA 204013 000 NI R A (, . , 3. 3. .^ .f4fl? l
???
NI y p (, 104026 DCA 001 NI R- A C. - - DCA 104027 000 NI R A C, l DCA 104057 000 NI R A - l DCA 104060 000 NI R A DCA 104075 000 NI R A <; et :C:07- :CC C": C 104079 001 j DCA DCA 104087 000 NI NI R A A
")
, DCA 104096 000 NI R R A 3 DCA 104107 000 NI ggf3 104114 000 R A (, DCA NI R A DCA 104115 000 NI R A ( DCA 104124 000 NI R A DCA 104151 000 NI R A (, *
- DCA 104152 000 NI R A c_
DCA 104174 000 NI R A G5 l DCA DCA 104188 104194 000 000 NI R A MD M j NI R A IS DCA 104205 000 NI R A C1 DCA 104206 000 NI R A [)
- - , , f)fd.
. N. ,
)
(b i ATTACHMENT F ER ME-082, REY. O AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F6 OF F27 I i 4 no
. . 4*/29/V3 ATTACHMENT 3 PAGE: 6 s
, PART B \ FIELD DESIGN CHANGE & REVIEW STATUS LOG AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT DUG: CPES-N-2032 SHEET: REV: 0 P.O.: MAINT LVL l l DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DOCS RELS D-ST MODIFCTN# , ............... ... .... .... .... ......... RETber AT7-[ AfrJC , DCA 104217 001 NI R A $ _ .~ ,,, --- _. .. - bbA kh4bhh hhh 104224 000 Nk R A b DCA NI R A 1) . DCA 104227 000 NI R A l DCA 104234 000 NI R A l DCA 104237 000 NI R A C.
- DCA 104238 000 NI R A c; i DCA 104239 000 NI R .6 C l DCA 104241 000 NI R A c; 3 DCA 104242 000 NI R A C l
DCA 104243 000 NI R A C, i DCA 104246 000 NI R .A "6 TUE 92-05683 000 NI j TUE 92-05877 000 NI R D A A MO M No ggV
;- TUE 92-06315 000 NI TUE 92-06560 '000 NI D
D A A e@ Ab y
.P.b $, ..~kkb[ kkk ^
l k M5' TUE 92-06590 002 NI D A -
/Jo ZE v' f TUE 9b-0 h13 hhh hk D k MD DEN'
- TUE 92-07065 000 NI _ D A i
MO DE'V' i i I } t i f PREPARED BY: / J_ I REVIEWED BY: // APPROVED BY:
/ J_
e ATTACHMENT F ER-ME.082, REY. O 2 AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F7 OF F27 t
- , _ _, __ _, , __. . . . ~ . - . -
8 01/14/93 ATT ACHMF.N1 I PAGE: 1 A d PART B \' ) FIELD DESIGN CHANGE A-REVIEW STATUS LOC AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT ! DWGi M2-1701 SHEE1: 001 REV: CP1 P.O.: MAINT LVL C2 1 DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DOCS RELS D-ST MDDIFCTN4 REpop.1 A:TT~/rJOTiii" , ............... ... .... .... ...+ ......... ! DCA 101350 000 R A k l DCA DC^ 101524 -000 1C3333 ^^^ , ?HT GR
?
A
?
4 2 DCA 102222 001 R A A
- DCA 102265 000 NI R A 3
! DCA 102466 000 NI R A 1 Alo De/ } DCA 102470 000 NI R A 7 Ato IXN i DCA 102750 000 NI R A 3) DCA 102758 000 NI R A C.
-0CA 102707 ^^^ SMI D ?
i DCA 102789 001 NI R A 3) i DCA 102837 000 NI R A C- ! DCA 102859 000 NI R A D ! -DCA 102886 000 NI R A E f DCA 102894 000 NI R A ido din. l DCA 102915 000 NI R A E SCf :00^^7 ^^0 CMI e C l 00^ 102^2' ^^^ CM! " S kf ffkhk ff - , n h b bbA kb347 bbk- R -k 3D # l DCA 103559 000 NI -R A A DCA 103735 000- NI - R A
- DPM l DDA 103921 000 R A 4 l DCA 103924 000 NI R A
--. . _ , --- m., - - 3_
4 DCA 103953 000 R A A
- DCA 104001 000 NI R A 13 DCA 104015 000 R A DCA 104079 001 NI R A 4
104121 13 DCA 000 R A 4 DCA DCA 104185 104189 000 000 NI NI R A Ai.t-R A 3) EUA *U4221_ ggg NI R g b n bCA kb4hhh bb[ N5 R k 6 x ! DCA 104227 NI 000 R A PREPARED BY: _/_/_ 4
- REVIEWED BY
- / /-
APPROVED BY -- _ / /- h. A1TACHMENT F ER ME 082. REV. O AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F8 OF F27
.. e2 19/93 ATTACHMEN1 3 PAGE: 1 PART B \C i
FIELD DESIGN CHANGE & REVIEW STATUS LOG i AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT 1 DWOi NO-1701 SHEET: 002 REV: CP1 P.0,1 MAINT LUL C2 DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DOCS RELS D-ST MODIFCTNG REPof21~ AT7"[ MON DCA 100820 000 R A .k i DCA 101627 002 NI R A 3 4 DCA 102385 001 NI R A REng DCA 102479 000 NI R A D DCA 103002 000 NI R A
';Jp -
-ece :::::: ::: ON: :
^^:
DC? :^:^:^ CN: : : DCA 103020 003 R A k _m-. . ,,,, ... ~ , , - -
~
lG: DCA 103634 002 R A A ,(3 OC f. 10:'01 ^:^ CN! O C
- OCf * ^ 2 7 ^ .'
^^
CN! O C i DCA 103847 000 NI R A
- A [3
- ::: N: c DCA 103884 001 NI R A 55 DCA 103921 000 R A A DCA 104013 000 NI A
- A [3
-ecA ::::::. ^: :N:
R e e g i DCA 104026 001 NI R A C, DCA 104060 000 R A l DCA 104079 001 NI R A [3 DCA 104245 23 i 000 NI R A S l 4 i i ( _ - l i PREPARED BY: __/__/__ REVIEUED BY:
, __/__/__
APPROVED BY { __/__/__ t. ATTACHMENT F ER-ME-082, REY. O AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F9 OF F27
. .._ ._ __ . . . _ . . _ ~ _ _ . _ . _ __ _ _ _ . . _ . _ _ . . - . ~ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ - _ - .- _
29/93 ATTACHMEN1 3 PAGE: 1 >- e PART B \ FIELD DESIGN CHANGE & REVIEW STATUS LOG
- AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT
, DWG: M2-1701 SHEET 003 REV: CP1 P.O.:
- HAINT LVL
- C2 DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DOCS RECS -D-ST NDDIFCTNg A2t" ATr-/A/07E DCA 100820 000
^^^
R A A 3 CCf ^ *' ! " Cf!! O E , DCA 102679 001 NI R A Q nm .menem an, eur n e w bbh 3bbbbb bbb UNU b b DCA 103020 003 R A M DCA 103489 001 NI R A g-DC^ ^^^ 4 !^?!5^ 95!! O E DCA 103550 001 NI R A G = DCA 103681 001 NI R A 3 DCA 103809 000 NI R A D ! DCA 104047- 000 NI R A C ! DCA 104040 000 NI R A 3 DCA 104121- 000 A l R 4 i i l l
,1 l
i i
~
i 5 I i PREPARED BY: gg_ REVIEWED BY:. gg_ APPROVED BY: gg_ 1 ATTACHMENT F ER-ME-082, REV. O AFFECTED 9OCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F10 OF F27
-_.- ... a . - . - - . -.
, vs 2./93 ATTACHMENT I PAGE: 1 N, PART B FIELD DESIGN CHANGE & REVIEW STATUS LOG AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT dug: M2-1701 SHEET: 003A REV CP1 P.O.:
, MAINT LVL C2 DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DOCS RELS D-ST MODIFCTN# R$TDRT ATT/ DOTE
=============r. === ==== ==== ==== =========
DCA 100820 000 R A A DCA 103020 003 R A 4 DCA 103081 001 NI R A b d I 1 F i PREPARED BY: ,, / / REVIEWED BY: _/ / APPROVED 0YT __ / / ATTACHMENT F ER-ME482, REV. O AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F11 OF F27
..< awn , ATTACHf1ENI I PAGE: 1 A s e PART B 4
h FIELD DESIGN CHANGE & REVIEW STATUS LOG AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT 4 i DUG: H2-170; SHEE1: 003B REV: CP1 P.O.: NAINT LVL C2 DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DOCS RECS 0-ST MODIFCTNG RcDR1~ ATT~/ AjoT'E
=============== === ==== ==== ==== =========
l DCA 100820 000 R A A i DCA 102780 000 NI R A 4 , CCA 102702 ^^0 C N I-- 0 ? OCf
.ne, 102?22 ^^2 CN! O S
- eu, n e
. . . .. m. e. n.-.e , m m_ _,
OCA 102702 " O 00' CN! E l 4 DCA DCA 102932 202933 005 000 NI R R A A 8
- OCe :00020 00: CN: O e 4
l - 0 C .^ :^3^2^ ^^2 SN! 0 ?
-0C A : 00^ ^ . ^^0 cNI O e
, n ., .. n. e . e . e t, , n e
-. -- a m n.
OCA 10010" 001 ONI C S
- OCA 1^2 ^' ^^2 V'? ? O Y OCA ;00;72 000 ON! O C OCA 100:02 001 ON! O C OCA 100172 002 VN! O V OCA 100000 ^O0 ON! O S
, DCA 103305 001 NI R A O-i DCA 103472 001 NI R A g ' m.,m., .mm , , , , ,
.m. .e . . , - . . ... , , , , .m. ..
DCA 103855 103860 001 000 NI R A 6 ! DCA NI R A eJoCEV ! DCA 103912 000 NI R A O DCA 104045 000 R A /( DCA 204117 000 NI R -A *) DCA 104173 000 NI R A
- DCA 104180 000 NI
'b R A g
- 104184 DCA 000 NI R A c,,
1 DCA 104223 000 NI R A 104226 NI C ( DCA 000 R A 3 1 TUE 92-05953 000 NI D A No DW l I I l i l PREPARED BY: / /_ ) REVIEWED DY: //_ APPROVED B l / /- ATTACHMENT F ER ME 081, REV. O AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F12 OF F27 i
)
- 1 1
l m y , . . . l
. _-. .- = .-_ - . - .- - - - . - - -- . - . - - ..
- (Pt /19 /93 ' ATTACHMEN1 I FAGE: 1 PART B %
FIELD DESIGN CHANGE & REVIEU STATUS LOG AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT 4 . dug: M2-1701 SHEE1: 004 REV: CP1 PiO.: j MAINT LVL C2
- DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DOCS RELS D-ST MODIFCTNG E'Ef b E AT T [ d O T E
=============== === ==== ==== ==== =========
l DCA 101775 000 R A A i OCf 10000^ ^^? C t'! P C i DCA 102330 001 NI R A 0 DCA 102725 000 NI R A C DCA n ,, . 102861 000 NI R A C 4 .mem,n man ro, n r f bbA ibb9hb bbb R A b DCA 103001 000 NI R A P OCA 100000 00^ O!?! ? C OCA :0002^ 00: 0:1I --G- = C -- -- ! OCA ;.00020 002 O!?! O C -- I 203020 DCA 003 R A A 3
-oeA 20007. ^^0 Ce?! O C DCA 103076 001 R A C OCA ;00070 000 C??I O C l -D C A -- -- 2000^9 ^^1 'j N I . ---D ..-U. ...._ _.- . _ _ _
DCA 103423 000 R A 4 DCA 203864 000 A NI R A C
~
DCA 103947 000 NI R A g OCA :007:0 000 ct?: P C i _n-. . m e n .- m am. ,,u, n ,, bbA kbkbb7 bbb NE 'R A O
- DCA 104217 001 N I ---
R A 6 I f I 1 i R i 1 1 ! PREPARED BY: _/g _ , REVIEWED BY: .._/_/_ 3 , APPROVED BY _/g_ i i ATTACHMENT F ER-ME482, REV. 0 AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F13 OF F27
, . , . . . , - - - - - - - v
+9/93- ATTACHMENT I PAGEi l' -
PART-~B K. FIELD DESIGN CHANGE-6 REVIEW S1ATUS LOG -l AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT liwis t M2-1701 SHEET: 004A REV: CP1 P.0,1 MAINT LVL C2 DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DOCS RELS D-ST NODIFCTN4 ~ RcWT ATT[ d6
=============== === ==== ==== ==== =========
DCA 101775 000 A D C.^ 203020 ?^2 EN! R
" ?
A OC^ 2.^2^?^ ^^2 EM! D E DCA 203020 003 R A A t l '. j-i 1-i i + PREPARED BY: /___/ REVIEWED-BY: / / ,, APPROVED BY: /_,,,/_ _
~
ATTACHMENT F ER-ME-082, REV. O AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS. PAGE F14 OF F27
- e :4 '93 ATTACHMEN1 I PAGE N 1 s 4
PART B FIELD DESIDN CHANGE & REVIEU STATUS LOG AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT
- dug: M2-1701 SHEEle 005 REVr CP1 P.O.:
MAINT LVL C2 l
- DES-CHNG-NUMBER
===============
REV
===
DOCS
====
RELS
====
D-ST
====
NODIFCTNt
=========
kWE A7T[M DCA 100561 000 NI R A k kU'JI*~nqq)r,e,s} DCA 100820 000 R A A DCA 101357 000 NI R A Ph DCA 101986 001 NI R A
-CCf 102202 ^^^
CN! D E {3 DCf ^2222 ^^1 'JN ! D
; -CCA 102471 000 CN! O P
-DCf ^^2 SM! O E rx 2 0 2 ' ',:4 n
. .n. - o
. n. ,. 2 n. n. , e u. ,.
e DCA 102471 003 NI R A 3
-0 C f ^2'?C ^^^
CM! 0 9 DCA 102478 001 NI R A C DCA 102821 001 NI R A 2 ! -DC ^ !^2??? ^^^ y) EM! D E OCA 100000 ^01 VMI P V
-0 C f ^3^2^ ^^1 EN! D 9 I OCf ;^3^2^ ^^2 SMI O E DCA 103020 003 R A
-C C f 1^2'72 ^^^
CN! P A C DCA 103472 001 NI R A d
-D C ^ 1^?'9' 000 Suy 9 9 $
- DCA 103484 001 NI R A 3) i DCA
_n-. 103488 000 NI R A
.m,e-, man eu, n r I)
! bbA kb3b50 bok Nk R A Eb d DCA 103559 000 NI R A [* DCA 103574 000 NI R A 2h ' DCA 103575 000 NI R A ES DCA 103582 000 NI R A i DCA 103589 000 NI R A lh DCA 103597 000 NI R A g
@Cf 103i2' ^^^
SM!. P S y) DCA 103626 000 R A A DCA 103670 000 NI R A i DCA 103680 -000 NI R A {3
-0C A 10074^ ^O^ cg CMI-- 0 S - - - - - -
DCA 103740 001 NI DCA 103833 000 R R A A 3 DCA 103935 A 000 NI R A { DCr 19?? 2 001 -- uM I - .. . -D .u . . . - - - . EL
)
- i 1
i
- ATTACHMENT F ER ME-082, REV. 0 AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE FIS OF F27 l
- 4 ATTACHMEN1 I PAGE: 2 - m i PART B .s-FIELD DESIGN CHANGE & REVIEW STATUS LOG AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT DWG: M2-1701 SHEE1 005 REV: CP1 P.O.
MAINT LVL C2 i j DCS-CHNG-NUMBER. REV DOCS RELS D-ST N001FCTN4 Rs06(2T ATT[MOE
=====:m========= === mama ==== ==== =========
} DCA 104011 000 NI R A 6 DCA 104087 000 NI R A 6 4 DCA 104121 000 R A - /*
- j. DCA 104197 000 NI R A C
- DCA 104204 000 NI R A g-3 NPA 4 A A 8't8'lM AAA P Lf T h P
! DCA 104222 001 NI R- A .6
^^^
- et^ 2^'22 cN: e c -
00^ 2^'225 ^^1 SN! } C - DCA 104235 002 R A l TUE 92-05971 000 NI D A Alo W l 4 l 1 1 i E i; 6 i , f 1 i i i PREPARED BY: __/_f__ REVIEUED BY: jg_ i APPROVED BY- _/ g_ 1 : ATTACHMENT F ER-ME-082, REV 0 - AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F16 OF F27 1 v e- - - - - - - - , -
g'- . ly/% ATTACHMEN1 I FAGL! j-PART B i
--\
- ~
FIELD DES 2GN CHANGE & REVIliU STATUS LOG AFFECTED DOCUMENT: UPDATE REPORT- ' G
- DWG
- M2-1701 SHEET: 005A REV CP1 P.O.: I i
MAINT LVLt C2 i * ! DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DOCS RELS D-ST N00fFCTN#: RETbRT ATT[eJD7E
- ammmmmmmmmmmmma .ama sama samm mama mammmamma i- DCA 100820 000 R A- A l -BCA - - W 2020 000 CN! - = &- S l OC :^ 10?000 001 SNI --0-- -- S
- ccA :0:000 00: ENI- 9- - s
! DCA 103020 003 R A A l DCA DCA
._ 103507 -000 104121 000 R A 4 j A 0
R A-l 4 l-i i i i L i t i g-i i i. J L s PREPARED BY:' .//-. I ~ REVIEWED BY: l i _/ /-- i i , APPROVED BVT / /_ ATTACHMENT F ; ER-ME-082, REY. O AFFECI'ED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F17 OF F27 - i _ . - _ _ m = - - , , , - - - - 4 r- y , -,-w..-mp--y.-
..t J i. / 9 3 ATTACHMEN1 I PAGE: 2 ' "
PART B FIELD DESIGN CHANGE & REVIEU STATUS LOG AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT DUG: M2-1701 SHEEl: 006 REV: CP1 P.O.: MAINT LVL: C2 DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DOCS RELS D-ST MODIFCTNG REPof1T ATT/tdoT OCA 101499 000 NI R A 3 DCA 202058 000 NI R A } DCA 102726 000 NI R A b DCA 102858 000 NI R A C DCA 102889 000 NI R A F) n t _^ --10?020 000 S F!! P C
-PC^ 10?020 001 SF!! O F D C .^ -102020 002 SF!! P P DCA 103020 003 R A A DCA 103507 000 R A 4 DCf 1^2071 ^^^
Ct'! C 0 - DCA 103874 001 NI R A b PREPARED BY: g _/ _ REVIEUED BY: _/ g _ APPROVED BY: _/_/_ ATTACIIMENT F ER-ME-082, REY. O AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE FIS OF F27 \-- -- - - - - _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ . _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - . _ - - . _ _-.--___.______________ ___ _____ _ _ _____ _ _ _ _ _
l- b -G ATTACHMEN1 I e4GE: 1 'N 1 PART B , FIELD DESIGN CHANGE & REVIEW STATUS LOG , AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATC REPORT OWb h2-1701 SHEE1: 007 REV: CPI P.O. j MAINT LVL C2 i DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DOCS RELS D-ST MODIFCTN* RENG21' ArTT/ MON f DCA 202729 000 R A /L i I n :02n^ 000 Ct:: r C 102759 001 DCA f3C / :^200^ 0^^ O!!! R C A 4
^ C .^ :^20^^ ^^2 CP'! P P
^^^ "
i
^C' ^ 2 0 f. ^ Cf!! C
. DCA 102933 000 R A 4 j DCf !^3^2^ ^01 S'!! P E 4 OC^ !^?^2^ ^^2 SF'? O E DCA 103020 003 R A A n ,, m -
, m_ e_ m_ _, ,.
. m_ m_ m. m..,,.
_ .m .
- DCA 103061 001 R A Eh 1 m e. . ,. m. e m. m. ,.. m., -
--. . m. m. m. .. . .m. -
W ^ 2 2" ^^^ Ce?! " C ! DCA 103277 001 NI R .A R 1 cce : e2 e ^4 e^^ en: e c - DCA 103406 001 NI . w+ : ==: re :::: R _ A c
- DCA 103721 001 NI R- A C t
DCA 103730 000 NI R A C. DCA 103782 000 NI R A i 2 a, 10:c5: ^^c c:!: 0 -c C-4 Me 103855 001 NI _. R A b i DCA 103929 000 NI R A MDCEh/ . i DCA 104121 000 R A c.
-A I.
l 4 a . 4 i e i 4 5 i PREPARED BY: _/ /- REVIEUED BY: / /- APPROVED BY / /_ d ATTACHMENT F : ER-ME482, REV. 0 AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F19 OF F27~ e
, , ...,_s. ., .. _ .
iv
- ys AT1ACHMEN1 I PAGL 2 D ,*
PART B \ ) FIELD DESIGN CHANGE & REVIEW STATllS LOG j AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATC REPORT l t a 1 DWO MO-1701 SHEET: 000 RCV: CP1 P.0,a 2 NAINT LVL C2 . DEB-CHNO-NUMBER REV DOCS RELS D-0T ^ NODIFCTN* RETbrer ATvf 401Y
- ====esamme====r === ==== ==== ===m ========= -
j DCA 100020 000 R A A OCA 101918 000 R A A DCA 102933 000 _R A 4 i er '- seen: 000 eN! e r , j DCu -103401 00.1 NI R A h5 3 I j DC# 103486 000 R A i _--n m, .*,;%
. . . . . . m. a. eus n
e O ; DCA. 203624 002 -N2 R A 104078
- I DCA 000 NI R A .-
j i } i i } s i I l i I a e _ . PREPARED BY: - ~ / / REVIEWED 8Y: / / APPROVED BY: / /- 1 I 4-i ' ~ ATTACHMCW F ' ER.ME482. REY. O AFFECTED DOCUMENT UrDATE REPORTS ' PAGE F20 OF F27 't
+,,-c- -w4, .,c= --- -- er
e A y /8/ .) ATTACHMEN1 3 PAGE: 3 s 1 PAR? 8 l 2 FIELD DESIGN CHANGE a REVIEW STATUS LOG j AFFECTED DOCUMEN1 UFDATL REPORT Dub n?-1701 SHEE1: 009 KEV: CP1 P.O.s MAINT LVL C2 -i
\
DCD-CHNO-NUMBER REV 00C0 RELD D-GT NODIFCTNe REPor2T ATT'/dD7E ;
- ............... ... ==.. .... .... ......... '
DCA 100820 000 R A A
- DCA 203490 - 000 R A 4 GG;, ;00400 000 CN!
C 4 - I e t .^ 100100 001 CP! :' C 103600 002 UCA NI R A A3 ) i
- i i
1 + 4 1 l 1 t i i i i i 1 i f i l i 4 9 PREPARED BY: _ /_/_ , REVIEWED BYa' - .
//
I APPROVED BY _ /_/- i i A1TACHMENT F - ER ME 082, REY. 0 ' AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F210F F27-l 4
-..-.,.ey....-r-.- , , ....w.g. ~ . - ,.~e,v.,-,y,,'y%,, ym , a m-,,..,r., - . . - - - . . . .- ,- ,,,wam,3,m,.m#--_w.w,.2. . - - - - - - ,.~v- , .y
15'9J ATTACHhEN1 1 PAGL; ) - < PART B FIELD DESIGN CHANGE A RFVIEW STATUG LOG AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATC REPORT DWO: M ?- 1 */ 01 SHEET: 010 REV CP1 P.O.i MAINT LVL C2 DCi>-CHNG-NUMBER REV DOCS RELS D-fit MDDIFC1Ni Rewer Arr/t/org
^^^
4HW. 10752." C"I P E OCA 102522 001 R A 4
.t?C A 10??05 000 ""3 P r DCA 103305 001 NI R A D nrx . n a , ., , nnn ro, n n D bbA kb4bbb bb1 NE R A 6 DCA 104233 000 NI R A go y PREPARED BY _/ /_
REVIEWED DY: _/ / APPROVED BY . _/_/- ATTACllMENT F ER ME-082, REY. O AFFECTED DOCUMENT UrDATE REPORTS PAGE F22 OF F27
l 3
. O AT1ACNNEU1 I PAGEi 3 ]. PART D \
l FIELD DES 10N CHANGE A REVIEW STATUS LOG l AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT DWU2 N?-1701 SHEE1 011 REV CP1 P.O.: NAINT LVL1 C2 i j DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DOCD RELS D-DT NODIFCTNG RETbc1" ATT[ MOT 6 weerremansumamm uma name amam suma saammaman l DCA 101625 000 GR A A i DCA 101775 000 R A A DCA 1079511 000 NI R A DCA 1'. 000 R A & - C C ,^ A- 00^ CfJI -G - C l -DCf v ..t .. d ^0! CN! !' E i SCt :L 0?^ CC: Ct I C C j DCA 103020 003 R A A DCA 103407 000 NI R A 6 DCA 104123 000 R A A i i I ) 3-i . 1 - 1 . l ' i i i l 4 i k' p 4 l PREPARED BY / /_ i REVIEWED BY: ,
/_/-
l APPROVED BYt . / /-
. i ATTACHMENT F . .
ER ME 082, REY. 0 i.. AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F23 OF F27 ? ,e .
, . . . , = , - . - - = , , . , , , _ _ , . - , _ .. . _ _ . . _ _ _ _ . . _ . _ . - _ . . _ . . , - - . . . . _ . . , -
4 ~ "i 3 ATTACHME.N1 I PAGE: a N<- PART 0 i j FIELD DESIGN CHANGE & REVIEW STATUS LOG
- }
J AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATT REPORT i 5 DWii H2-1761 SHEE1: 012 REV: CPI P.O. i 1 MAINT LVL: C2 l DCS-CHNO-NUMBER REV Dut,3 RELS D-ST NODIFCTN4 Ript>T2T"A'7~h0GT j =============== === =ana ==== ==== =========
- DCA 103063 000 R A i -DCA - 00005 000 - -4NI - -D ~+S---- 4 j DCA 103305 001 NI i -DCf 003'.00 0^0 CN!
R I' C A DCA 103400 001 NI R A 6 ! DCA --203844 000 R A i
-A i
4 4 t l , l I . . 1 l 1 i i l i l !~ i I l PREPARED BY: /_ /_ REVIEUED BY: /_ / APPROVED 8 l l
/ - /-
t l t . l ATTACHMENT F - - ER ME482. REY. 0 AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F24 OF F27 l l- _ l -
-mg- ,q-r,s.-_m--r-+,-e-~m-~w-,-----o--- na-r~g.,-m- y -,,-p--+,-me ----~+,esg,m., gy,e~ .---n-, -n-g ~,-,,,,v-er ~-vyw-,n ,wn-
.. Av/93 ATTACHMEN1 2 PAGE: 3 N PART B FIELD DESIGN CHANGE & REVIEU STATUS LOG AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT DWG: M2-1701 SHEE1 013 REV CP1 P.O.
MAINT LVLi C2 DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DOCS RELS D-ST NODIFCTNe
===. ........... === ==== ==== ==== =========
REiPOW ATT[do7F
^^^
0 0." :^222 Cf'! D E DCA 102221 001 NI R A D DCA 102231 000 NI R A D DCA 102312 000 NI R A D DCA 102524 000 NI R A D DCA 102525 000 NI R A .D - CCe : ^ 2!.7^ ec^ CN ? C DCA 102679 001 NI R A f3 n~ . ,,mm .. m,. - - bbA 55278h 555 N5 k A A DCA 102882 000 NI R A 3 DCA 102933 000 R A -A _gCA ,g340{ 1 ggg , , NI , R A g DCA 103548 001 R A A DCA 103862 000 NI DCA 104121 000 R R A A S DCA 104124 000 NI R A 4 3 PREPARED BY
/ /_
~ REVIEWED BY J /_
APPROVED BY
/ /-
ATTACHMENT F ER ME.082. REY. O AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F25 OF F27
- - - _ - - - - - - - - - - --a w -
1 1 P1 4+'c3 A1TACHMEN1 2 PART S PAGE: 1 g* 1 FIELD DESIGN CHANGE & REVIEW STATUB LOG j AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT 4 ! Dub: M2-1701 SHEET: 034 REV1 CP3 P.O.: i NAINT LUL: C2 ) i l DES-CHNO-NUMBER REV 0005 REL'S 0-81 MODIFCTN4- RGTbf2T' ATI'/dDT6
- =======........ ... .... .... .... .........
l DCA : 0 0 ' ?.* 000 "e? ! O S DCA 203472 001 NI-ru, R A 3
, , - . .. ,,,a, . , . n e l DCA 103489 001 NI R A 6 l ,
i l 4 i a i i i } 1 i e i , i ! + t . lt _. l 4 1 I + 1 i i f f .] i
. PREPARED BY: gg_
t REVIEWED BY: / /- APPROVED BY: g_f_ W 4 ATTACHMENT F ER ME-082, REY. O AFFECTED DOCUMEPG UPDATE REPORTS PAGE F26 OF F27
, , , - , - , . , . ..n A w , -
._- .. ,,- e m -,,,,
,n,, ,....,Nre u----. w ., ,,_,,;.e., w_, , ur ,,ye,,,
1 h/15/93 ATTACHNENT 3 PAGE: 1 j PART B FIELD DESIGN CHANGE A REVIEW STATUS LOG l AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORT DWG: NO-1701 SHEE1: 015 REV CP1 P.O.1
}
MAINT LVLs C2 I i DES-CHNG-NUMBER REV DOCS RELS D-ST HDDIFCTN4 ) ............... ... .... .... .... ......... RET 202.7ATTh0N DCA 102600 000 a l 3
^"^
!^212' ^^! Sf!!
R P r A 5 DCA 103624 002 NI R A ES j DCA 103644 000 GR A 1 DCA 104121 000 R A A j DCA _104226 _000 NI R A 4 i .g i*. l 1 4 } i l 4 i 6 i . . i . j. I i - I _ i i i i 1 PREPARED BYf
/ /-
REVIEWED-- BY i- -
//
APPROVED BYi- _/ /- - ' : ATTACHMENT F ER.ME 082, REV. 0
- AFFECTED DOCUMENT UPDATE REPORTS PAGE P27 OF F27
' =, .- - - -. - - - . - - -- ...-.- . . - - . . . . . - . - . . -}}