ML17276B073: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:REGULATO INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION TEM (BIDS)'OCEy~oION NBR: 8202180375 DOC-, DATE:-82/02/10 NOTAR ZZED: NO DOCKET FACIL:50-000 Generic Docke,t 05000000 50-397 NPPSS Nuclear:Pr ojecti Unit 2F washington
'Public Powe 05000397 50"522"Skagit Nuclear Power Projecti Unit 1F Puget Sound,Pow 05000522 50-523 Skagit Nuclear Power ProjectF Unit?F Puget'Sound-'Pow 05000523 STN-50<<509 4PPSS Nuclear Project<Uni;t 5F washington IPublic 05000509 50-513 KPPSS Nuclear ProjectF Unit 4i Kashington Public Powe'05000513 AUTH'AME AUTHOR AFFILIATION BURI ISONFJ.S.Battelle Memorial InstituteF Paci.fic Northwest Laboratory IRBC I'P~NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION NORRIS F J.NRC-No Detailed Affiliation Given SUBJEGT: Comments op const of two power reactors by Ska'git/Hanford<
Nuclear Project at Hanfor d.Purchasing 8.,finishing tterminated NPPSS plants at Hanford-8,'Satsop should be considered as one alternative tto proposed action.1 DISTRIBUTION;CODE:
8001S~COPIES)RECEIVED:LTR,J ENCL~SIZE:-~TITLE: PSAR/FSAR AMDTS and Related Correspondence NOTES:2 copies all matl:PM'tandardized
'Plant.05000397 05000509 ACTIONS RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME A/D LICENSNG LIC BR 02 BC LIC BR 03 BC LIC BR 44 LA AULUCKFR~01 IIHEELERFL
~01 ICOPIES LTTR ENCL 1~1 1 1 1'RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME A/D LICNENSG LIC BR P0 BC LIC BR P2 LA LIC BR P3 LA MALLORYzg~01 HERNANgR~01 COPIES L'PTR ENCL INTERNAL: ELD IE/DEP/EPDB 35 MPA NRR/DE/EQB 13 NRR/DE/HGEB'0 NRR/DE/MTEB 17 NRR/DE/SAB 2<i NRR/DHFS/HFEBPO NRR/DHFS/OLB 3A NRR/DS I/AEB"26 NRR/DSI/OP 8 10 NRR/DSI/ETSB 12 NRR/DSI/PSB 19 NRR/D/RSB'23 04-EXTERNAL:
ACRS 41 FEMA REP D I V 39 NRC PDR 02 NTIS 1 1 1"-3.2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 16 1 1 1 1 IE 06 IE/DEP/EPLB 36 NRR/DE/CE5 li NRR/DE/GB 28 NRR/DE/MEB 18 NRR/DE/QAB 21 NRR/DE/SEB 25 NRR/DHFS/LQB 32 NRR/DHFS/PTRB20 NRR/DS I/ASS?7 NRR/DS I/CSB 09 NRR/DS I/ICSB 16 NRR/DS I/RAB 22 NRR/DST/LGB 33 BNL(AMDTS ONLY)LPDR 03 NSIC 05 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0!TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: L>TTR Pf ENCL
%r~l~1 I Tj'f February 10, 1982 Mr.Jan Norris Nuclear Regula.Story Commission Room AR-5008 4550 Montgomery Avenue Bethesda, MD 20014
 
==Dear Mr.Norris:==
q-o-3 f'3":".".'.Baielle pacific Northwest Laboratories s P.O.Box 999 g~g j$Richland, Washington U.S.A.99352 Telephone (509)Telex 15-2874 co QQlf&p j troa9~gg~g'fb8NR~gg~itt~g 9 fg I have only one comment.regarding the construction of two power reactors by the Skagit/Hanford Nuclear Project (S/HNP)at Hanford.Purchasing and finishing the terminated Supply Systempplants at Hanford and Satsop should be considered as one alternative to the proposed action.Finishing the Supply System plants would have less environmental and eco-nomic impact on the region than construction of two new plants.The Tri-Cities area is extremely sensitive to.the boom-bus%phenomenon.
It is going through such a phase right now.Resuming work on llNP k'4 would cer-tainly take the edge off the present economic downturn.I imagine that the same situation is true for WNP II5 at Satsop.Both of these plants are valuable assets.Both communities have suffered as a result of their termination.
In my mind, it makes sense to consider recovering these plants rather than build two new plants.Thank-you, , John S.Burlison Env onmental and Risk Assessment Section lb/file qf7LP j S le 8202180378 820210 PDR ADOCKa 05000397 A PDR J t 1 E}}

Revision as of 07:23, 12 July 2018

Comments on Const of Two Power Reactors by Skagit/Hanford Nuclear Project at Hanford.Purchasing & Finishing Terminated Wppss Plants at Hanford & Satsop Should Be Considered as One Alternative to Proposed Action
ML17276B073
Person / Time
Site: Columbia, 05000000, Washington Public Power Supply System, Satsop, Skagit
Issue date: 02/10/1982
From: BURLINGTON J S, BURLISON J S
Battelle Memorial Institute, PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATION
To: NORRIS J
NRC
References
NUDOCS 8202180375
Download: ML17276B073 (4)


Text

REGULATO INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION TEM (BIDS)'OCEy~oION NBR: 8202180375 DOC-, DATE:-82/02/10 NOTAR ZZED: NO DOCKET FACIL:50-000 Generic Docke,t 05000000 50-397 NPPSS Nuclear:Pr ojecti Unit 2F washington

'Public Powe 05000397 50"522"Skagit Nuclear Power Projecti Unit 1F Puget Sound,Pow 05000522 50-523 Skagit Nuclear Power ProjectF Unit?F Puget'Sound-'Pow 05000523 STN-50<<509 4PPSS Nuclear Project<Uni;t 5F washington IPublic 05000509 50-513 KPPSS Nuclear ProjectF Unit 4i Kashington Public Powe'05000513 AUTH'AME AUTHOR AFFILIATION BURI ISONFJ.S.Battelle Memorial InstituteF Paci.fic Northwest Laboratory IRBC I'P~NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION NORRIS F J.NRC-No Detailed Affiliation Given SUBJEGT: Comments op const of two power reactors by Ska'git/Hanford<

Nuclear Project at Hanfor d.Purchasing 8.,finishing tterminated NPPSS plants at Hanford-8,'Satsop should be considered as one alternative tto proposed action.1 DISTRIBUTION;CODE:

8001S~COPIES)RECEIVED:LTR,J ENCL~SIZE:-~TITLE: PSAR/FSAR AMDTS and Related Correspondence NOTES:2 copies all matl:PM'tandardized

'Plant.05000397 05000509 ACTIONS RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME A/D LICENSNG LIC BR 02 BC LIC BR 03 BC LIC BR 44 LA AULUCKFR~01 IIHEELERFL

~01 ICOPIES LTTR ENCL 1~1 1 1 1'RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME A/D LICNENSG LIC BR P0 BC LIC BR P2 LA LIC BR P3 LA MALLORYzg~01 HERNANgR~01 COPIES L'PTR ENCL INTERNAL: ELD IE/DEP/EPDB 35 MPA NRR/DE/EQB 13 NRR/DE/HGEB'0 NRR/DE/MTEB 17 NRR/DE/SAB 2TTR Pf ENCL

%r~l~1 I Tj'f February 10, 1982 Mr.Jan Norris Nuclear Regula.Story Commission Room AR-5008 4550 Montgomery Avenue Bethesda, MD 20014

Dear Mr.Norris:

q-o-3 f'3":".".'.Baielle pacific Northwest Laboratories s P.O.Box 999 g~g j$Richland, Washington U.S.A.99352 Telephone (509)Telex 15-2874 co QQlf&p j troa9~gg~g'fb8NR~gg~itt~g 9 fg I have only one comment.regarding the construction of two power reactors by the Skagit/Hanford Nuclear Project (S/HNP)at Hanford.Purchasing and finishing the terminated Supply Systempplants at Hanford and Satsop should be considered as one alternative to the proposed action.Finishing the Supply System plants would have less environmental and eco-nomic impact on the region than construction of two new plants.The Tri-Cities area is extremely sensitive to.the boom-bus%phenomenon.

It is going through such a phase right now.Resuming work on llNP k'4 would cer-tainly take the edge off the present economic downturn.I imagine that the same situation is true for WNP II5 at Satsop.Both of these plants are valuable assets.Both communities have suffered as a result of their termination.

In my mind, it makes sense to consider recovering these plants rather than build two new plants.Thank-you, , John S.Burlison Env onmental and Risk Assessment Section lb/file qf7LP j S le 8202180378 820210 PDR ADOCKa 05000397 A PDR J t 1 E