|
|
| Line 18: |
Line 18: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 March 10, 2015 LICENSEE: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. | | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 |
| FACILITY: Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3 | | -0001 March 10, 2015 LICENSEE: |
| | Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. |
| | |
| | FACILITY: |
| | Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3 |
|
| |
|
| ==SUBJECT:== | | ==SUBJECT:== |
| SUMMARY OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON FEBRUARY 12, 2015, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC. CONCERNING THE REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NOS. 2 AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (TAC NOS. MD5411 AND MD5412) The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff and representatives of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., (Entergy) held a telephone conference call on February 12, 2015, to discuss and clarify the NRC staff's request for additional information (RAI) concerning the Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3 license renewal application environmental review. provides a listing of the participants and Enclosure 2 contains a listing of the RAIs discussed with Entergy, including a brief description of the status. | | SUMMARY OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON FEBRUARY 12, 2015, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC. CONCERNING THE REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NOS. 2 AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (TAC NOS. MD5411 AND MD5412) |
| Entergy had an opportunity to comment on this summary. /RA/ Michael Wentzel, Project Manager Projects Branch 2 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 | | The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff and representative s of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., (Entergy) held a telephone conference call on February 12, 2015 |
| | , to discuss and clarify the NRC staff's request for additional information (RAI) concerning the Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3 license renewal application environmental review |
| | . provides a listing of the participants and Enclosure 2 contains a listing of the RAIs discussed with Entergy, including a brief description of the status. |
| | |
| | Entergy had an opportunity to comment on this summary. |
| | /RA/ Michael Wentzel, Project Manager Projects Branch 2 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50 |
| | -247 and 50 |
| | -286 |
|
| |
|
| ==Enclosure:== | | ==Enclosure:== |
| As stated cc w/encl: Listserv | | As stated cc w/encl: Listserv |
|
| |
|
| ML15051A502 *concurrence via e-mail OFFICE LA:DLR PM:RPB2:DLR BC:RPB2:DLR PM:RPB2:DLR NAME IBetts MWentzel BWittick (LJames for) MWentzel DATE 3/3/2015 3/9/15 3/10/15 9/10/15 | | ML15051A502 |
| | *concurrence via e |
| | -mail OFFICE LA:DLR PM:RPB2:DLR BC:RPB2:DLR PM:RPB2:DLR NAME IBetts MWentzel BWittick (LJames for) |
| | MWentzel DATE 3/3/2015 3/9/15 3/10/15 9/10/15 |
|
| |
|
| ==SUBJECT:== | | ==SUBJECT:== |
| SUMMARY OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON FEBRUARY 12, 2015, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC. CONCERNING THE REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NOS. 2 AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (TAC NOS. MD5411 AND MD5412) | | SUMMARY OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON FEBRUARY 12 |
| DISTRIBUTION: HARD COPY: DLR RF E-MAIL: PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RidsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource RidsNrrDlrRapb Resource RidsNrrDlrRerb Resource RidsNrrDlrRsrg Resource RidsOgcMailCenter Resource ------------- MWentzel MGray, RI DLogan ABurritt, RI BWittick DonaldJackson, RI DWrona GMeyer, RI DPickett MModes, RI STurk, OGC NSheehan, RI OPA BMizuno, OGC DScrenci, RI OPA DRoth, OGC DTifft, RI BHarris, OGC NMcNamara, RI SBurnell, OPA GNewman, RI DMcIntyre, OPA JSStewart, RI JWeil, OCA AmiPatel, RI ENCLOSURE 1 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NOS. 2 AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS FEBRUARY 12, 2015 PARTICIPANTS: AFFILIATIONS: Dennis Logan U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Michael Wentzel NRC Valerie Cullinan Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Larry Barnthouse Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy) Dara Gray Entergy Doug Heimbuch Entergy Mark Mattson Entergy John Young Entergy ENCLOSURE 2 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NOS. 2 AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FEBRUARY 12, 2015 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff and representatives of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy), held a telephone conference call on February 12, 2015, to discuss and clarify the following requests for additional information (RAIs) concerning the license renewal application environmental review. Request for Additional Information (RAI) 1 Basis: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff is in the process of performing an independent verification of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.'s (Entergy's) February 19, 2014, submission by using the data from Entergy's October 27, 2014 response to RAIs. The results indicate that the Entergy's "Format 1" data set submitted in October 2014 differs from the data set used in the February 2014 submission. In order to conduct its independent verification, the NRC staff must understand how and why the data sets appear to differ. Request: Provide a clear written explanation of how and why the "Format 1" data in Entergy's October 2014 response to RAIs differ from the data set used in Entergy's February 2014 submission, and if the data differ, provide the "Format 1" data used for the February 2014 analysis. Support the explanation of the difference with selected SAS code used to create both data sets. Pay particular attention to the calculation of catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE) and density in the two submissions. Also, SAS and other statistical software provide several methods to calculate percentiles, and these can return different results when applied to the same data. | | , 2015, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC. CONCERNING THE REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NOS. 2 AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (TAC NOS. MD5411 AND MD5412) |
| Provide the method and cite the software used to determine the 75th percentile of the data. Discussion: Entergy indicated that the question is clear. RAI 2 Basis: As part of the NRC staff's independent verification of Entergy's February 2014 submission, the NRC staff needs to refer to information from the Hudson River Sampling Program. Request: Provide electronic copies of the Hudson River Year Class Reports for years 2006 through 2011. Entergy has already provided electronic copies for previous years. Discussion: Entergy indicated that the question is clear. | | |
| RAI 3 Basis: Entergy's October 2014 submission includes a letter to Ms. Dara Gray informing her of the quality assurance methodology employed on the October 2014 data submission. The letter states that the intermediate results of analyses were not identical to the results presented in tables supplied with Entergy's February 2014 submission Request: Provide the intermediate tables comparing models, assessment of potential impacts, strength of connection analysis parameters and results, and the weight of evidence conclusion tables from the October 2014 submission. Discussion: Entergy indicated that the question is clear. | | DISTRIBUTION |
| RAI 4 Basis: Entergy's October 2014 submission includes a letter to Ms. Dara Gray informing her of an adjustment to the assignment of data associated with a given week, i.e., selected Sunday samples were assigned to the following work week instead of the prior week. The letter also states that this adjustment was made to the data submission provided to the NRC staff from Entergy by letter dated March 7, 2008. The October 2014 letter states that "sampling occurred on a Sunday because a holiday occurred within the work week; however, the standard algorithm used to assign a week based upon date resulted in the Sunday samples being assigned to the prior week." As part of NRC staff's review of the data received in October 2014 with that received prior to preparation of the June 2013 supplement to the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3, NRC staff found that the week number assigned to the samples was not always consistent between the two data sets. Request: Provide a comparative key to the 2008 and 2014 week number assignments and delineate which weeks were adjusted for Sunday sampling events in the February and October 2014 submissions. Discussion: Based on discussion with Entergy, the NRC staff modified the draft request, as follows, to make clear the information that the NRC staff is requesting: Provide a comparative key to the 2008 and 2014 week number assignments. RAI 5 Basis: As part of NRC staff's review of the data received in October 2014, the NRC staff found that those data were apparently inconsistent with data received from Entergy by letter dated March 7, 2008. For example, those data for striped bass sample size and volume in the Fall Shoals Survey, River Segment 4 sample for week 41, 1994. | | : HARD COPY |
| Request: Please: (1) identify differences (for example in week number, number of samples, volume of samples, number of young-of-year caught, and total number of fish caught) between the October 2014 and those data received in the March 7, 2008 and the December 2007 data disks (labeled IPEC License Renewal - Environmental, Letter NL-07-156, 12/20/07, Enclosures, Disc 1 of 2 data submittal); (2) provide reasons for the differences and rational for the differences, if any; and (3) provide the corrected version, as appropriate. | | : DLR RF E-MAIL: PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RidsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource RidsNrrDlrRapb Resource RidsNrrDlrRerb Resource RidsNrrDlrRsrg Resource RidsOgcMailCenter Resource |
| Discussion: Entergy indicated that the question is clear.}} | | ------------- |
| | MWentzel MGray, RI DLogan ABurritt, RI BWittick DonaldJackson, RI DWrona GMeyer, RI DPickett MModes, RI STurk, OGC NSheehan, RI OPA BMizuno, OGC DScrenci, RI OPA DRoth, OGC DTifft, RI BHarris, OGC NMcNamara, RI SBurnell, OPA GNewman, RI DMcIntyre, OPA JSStewart, RI JWeil, OCA AmiPatel, RI |
| | |
| | ENCLOSURE 1 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT N OS. 2 AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS FEBRUARY 12, 2015 PARTICIPANTS |
| | : AFFILIATIONS |
| | : Dennis Logan U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) |
| | Michael Wentzel NRC Valerie Cullinan Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Larry Barnthouse Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy) |
| | Dara Gray Entergy Doug Heimbuch Entergy Mark Mattson Entergy John Young Entergy ENCLOSURE 2 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NOS. 2 AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FEBRUARY 12, 2015 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff and representatives of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy) |
| | , held a telephone conference call on February 12, 2015 |
| | , to discuss and clarify the following request s for additional information (RAI s) concerning the license renewal application environmental review. |
| | Request for Additional Information (RAI) 1 Basis: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff is in the process of performing an independent verification of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.'s (Entergy's) February 19, 2014, submission by using the data from Entergy's October 27, 2014 response to RAIs. The results indicate that the Entergy's "Format 1" data set submitted in October 2014 differs from the data set used in the February 2014 submission. In order to conduct its independent verification, the NRC staff must understand how and why the data sets appear to differ. |
| | Request: Provide a clear written explanation of how and why the "Format 1" data in Entergy's October 2014 response to RAIs differ from the data set used in Entergy's February 2014 submission, and if the data differ, provide the "Format 1" data used for the February 2014 analysis. Support the explanation of the difference with selected SAS code used to create both data sets. Pay particular attention to the calculation of catch |
| | -per-unit-effort (CPUE) and density in the two submissions. Also, SAS and other statistical software provide several methods to calculate percentiles, and these can return different results when applied to the same data. |
| | Provide the method and cite the software used to determine the 75 th percentile of the data. Discussion: |
| | Entergy indicated that the question is clear. |
| | RAI 2 Basis: As part of the NRC staff's independent verification of Entergy's February 2014 submission, the NRC staff needs to refer to information from the Hudson River Sampling Program. Request: Provide electronic copies of the Hudson River Year Class Reports for years 2006 through 2011. Entergy has already provided electronic copies for previous years. |
| | Discussion: |
| | Entergy indicated that the question is clear. |
| | |
| | RAI 3 Basis: Entergy's October 2014 submission includes a letter to Ms. Dara Gray informing her of the quality assurance methodology employed on the October 2014 data submission. The letter states that the intermediate results of analyses were not identical to the results presented in tables supplied with Entergy's February 2014 submission Request: Provide the intermediate tables comparing models, assessment of potential impacts, strength of connection analysis parameters and results, and the weight of evidence conclusion tables from the October 2014 submission. |
| | Discussion: |
| | Entergy indicated that the question is clear. |
| | |
| | RAI 4 Basis: Entergy's October 2014 submission includes a letter to Ms. Dara Gray informing her of an adjustment to the assignment of data associated with a given week, i.e., selected Sunday samples were assigned to the following work week instead of the prior week. |
| | The letter also states that this adjustment was made to the data submission provided to the NRC staff from Entergy by letter dated March 7, 2008. The October 2014 letter states that "sampling occurred on a Sunday because a holiday occurred within the work week; however, the standard algorithm used to assign a week based upon date resulted in the Sunday samples being assigned to the prior week." As part of NRC staff's review of the data received in October 2014 with that received prior to preparation of the June 2013 supplement to the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3, NRC staff found that the week number assigned to the samples was not always consistent between the two data sets. |
| | Request: Provide a comparative key to the 2008 and 2014 week number assignments and delineate which weeks were adjusted for Sunday sampling events in the February and October 2014 submissions. |
| | Discussion: |
| | Based on discussion with Entergy, the NRC staff modified the draft request, as follows, to make clear the information that the NRC staff is requesting: |
| | Provide a comparative key to the 2008 and 2014 week number assignments. |
| | RAI 5 Basis: As part of NRC staff's review of the data received in October 2014, the NRC staff found that those data were apparently inconsistent with data received from Entergy by letter dated March 7, 2008. For example, those data for striped bass sample size and volume in the Fall Shoals Survey, River Segment 4 sample for week 41, 1994. |
| | Request: Please: (1) identify differences (for example in week number, number of samples, volume of samples, number of young |
| | -of-year caught, and total number of fish caught) between the October 2014 and those data received in the March 7, 2008 and the December 2007 data disks (labeled IPEC License Renewal |
| | - Environmental, Letter NL 156, 12/20/07, Enclosures, Disc 1 of 2 data submittal); (2) provide reasons for the differences and rational for the differences, if any; and (3) provide the corrected version, as appropriate. |
| | |
| | Discussion: |
| | Entergy indicated that the question is clear.}} |
Letter Sequence RAI |
|---|
|
Initiation
- Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request
- Acceptance, Acceptance
- Supplement
Results
Other: ML071210530, ML071840939, ML072830629, ML083540614, ML090790176, ML090790187, ML090820316, ML090820317, ML090820318, ML090820319, ML092860253, ML102930012, ML103060210, ML110200539, ML110350022, ML110550751, ML11187A054, ML11187A055, ML11200A052, ML11276A008, ML11286A140, ML11290A232, ML11305A021, ML12055A234, ML12055A254, ML12157A287, ML12165A684, ML13014A633, ML13161A389, ML13162A604, ML13162A616, ML14136A005, ML14192B395, ML14220A317, ML15114A080, ML15114A081, ML15114A082, ML15114A083, ML15114A084, ML15114A085, ML15166A070, NL-08-023, Entrainment and Impingement at IP2 and IP3: a Biological Impact Assessment, NL-11-024, Letter from Fred Dacimo to Andrew Stuyvenberg Regarding Endangered Species Act Consultation for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 & 3, NL-11-078, License Renewal Thermal Study Documents, NL-11-081, Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification Waiver
|
MONTHYEARML0712105302007-04-23023 April 2007
License Renewal Application. Appendix E, Applicant'S Environment Report
Project stage: Other
ML0719900932007-06-26026 June 2007
Ltr. Michael Kaplowitz Re Incompleteness and Inaccurate License Renewal Application for Indian Point Energy Center, Units 2 and 3
Project stage: Request
ML0718409392007-08-0606 August 2007
Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement and Conduct Scoping Process for License Renewal for the Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3 (TAC MD5411 and MD 5412)
Project stage: Other
ML0728902092007-09-19019 September 2007
Transcript of Indian Point License Renewal Public Meeting: Evening Session, September 19, 2007, Pages 1-126
Project stage: Meeting
ML0728901992007-09-19019 September 2007
Transcript of Indian Point License Renewal Public Meeting: Afternoon Session, September 19, 2007, Pages 1-105
Project stage: Meeting
ML0728306132007-09-19019 September 2007
License Renewal Application, Environmental Scoping Meeting - September 19, 2007, Written Submittals from Audience - 7:00 Pm
Project stage: Meeting
ML0728306292007-09-19019 September 2007
License Renewal Application Environmental Scoping Mtg., Written Submittals from Audience - 1:30
Project stage: Other
ML0728508952007-10-11011 October 2007
License Renewal Environmental Scoping Meeting
Project stage: Meeting
ML0728510792007-10-24024 October 2007
09/19/2007 Summary of Public Environmental Scoping Meetings Related to the Review of the Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3, License Renewal Application (TAC Nos. MD5411 and MD5412)
Project stage: Meeting
ML0731009852007-10-25025 October 2007
Revised Fuse Comments on Scope of Environmental Impact Statement and Scoping Process Indian Point Energy Center Unit 2 and Unit 3
Project stage: Request
ML0733309312007-12-0505 December 2007
Request for Additional Information Regarding Environmental Review for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3 License Renewal (TAC Nos. MD5411 and MD5412)
Project stage: RAI
ML0731104472007-12-0707 December 2007
Request for Additional Information Regarding Severe Accident Mitigation Alternatives for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3 License Renewal
Project stage: RAI
ML0803800962008-01-30030 January 2008
Supplemental Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Environmental Review for License Renewal Application
Project stage: Response to RAI
NL-08-023, Entrainment and Impingement at IP2 and IP3: a Biological Impact Assessment2008-01-31031 January 2008
Entrainment and Impingement at IP2 and IP3: a Biological Impact Assessment
Project stage: Other
NL-08-028, Official Exhibit - ENT000460-00-BD01 - NL-08-028, Letter from Fred Dacimo, Entergy, to NRC Reply to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Renewal Application - Severe Accident Mitigation Alternatives Analysis (Feb. 5, 2008)2008-02-0505 February 2008
Official Exhibit - ENT000460-00-BD01 - NL-08-028, Letter from Fred Dacimo, Entergy, to NRC Reply to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Renewal Application - Severe Accident Mitigation Alternatives Analysis (Feb. 5, 2008)
Project stage: Response to RAI
ML0809904032008-02-28028 February 2008
Essential Fish Habitat Information Request for Docket 50-247 and 50-286; Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3 License Renewal, at the Village of Buchanan, Town of Cortlandt, Westchester County, Ny
Project stage: Request
ML0807704572008-03-0707 March 2008
Document Request for Additional Information Regarding Environmental Review for License Renewal Application - Hudson River Fisheries Program Data (Year Class Report)
Project stage: Request
ML0809209832008-04-0909 April 2008
03/18/2008-Summary of Telephone Conference Call Between NRC and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Pertaining to the Indian Point Units 2 & 3, License Renewal Application - Environmental Request for Additional Information
Project stage: RAI
ML0808801042008-04-0909 April 2008
Request for Additional Information, Review of License Renewal Application
Project stage: RAI
ML0809404082008-04-14014 April 2008
Request for Additional Information Regarding the Review of the License Renewal Application for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 & 3 (TAC Nos. MD5411 and MD5412)
Project stage: RAI
NL-08-061, Reply to Document Request for Additional Information Regarding Site Audit Review of License Renewal Application2008-04-23023 April 2008
Reply to Document Request for Additional Information Regarding Site Audit Review of License Renewal Application
Project stage: Request
ML0810004412008-04-23023 April 2008
Revision of Schedule for the Review of the Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3 License Renewal Application
Project stage: Approval
ML0833805912008-04-30030 April 2008
SEIS Reference - Assessment of United Water New York Supply by Rockland County Department of Health
Project stage: Request
NL-08-083, Reply to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Renewal Application - Refurbishment2008-05-14014 May 2008
Reply to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Renewal Application - Refurbishment
Project stage: Response to RAI
ML0833805612008-05-21021 May 2008
SEIS Reference - Chemicals in Sportfish and Game: 2007-2008 Health Advisories by Nydoh
Project stage: Request
NL-08-086, Supplemental Reply to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Renewal Application - Severe Accident Mitigation Alternatives Analysis2008-05-22022 May 2008
Supplemental Reply to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Renewal Application - Severe Accident Mitigation Alternatives Analysis
Project stage: Response to RAI
ML0833900172008-07-17017 July 2008
SEIS Reference - Online Conservation Guide for Glyptemys Muhlenbergii
Project stage: Request
ML0835405942008-12-0101 December 2008
NUREG-1437, Suppl. 38, Vol. 1, Dfc, Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supplement 38, Regarding Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit Nos. 2 and 3, Main Report
Project stage: Acceptance Review
ML0835406142008-12-0101 December 2008
NUREG-1437, Suppl. 38, Vol. 2, Dfc, Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supplement 38, Regarding Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit Nos. 2 and 3, Appendices
Project stage: Other
ML0833900342008-12-0202 December 2008
SEIS Reference - Significant Habitats and Habitat Complexes of the New York Bight Watershed by Fws
Project stage: Request
ML0833900322008-12-0202 December 2008
SEIS Reference - Westchester County Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Species and Candidate Species by Fws
Project stage: Request
ML0833900302008-12-0202 December 2008
SEIS Reference - Cynoscion Regalis Gray Weakfish
Project stage: Request
ML0833900252008-12-0202 December 2008
SEIS Reference - Native Plant Database by Npin
Project stage: Request
ML0833900232008-12-0202 December 2008
SEIS Reference - Maryland Fish Facts: American Gizzard Shad by Mdnr
Project stage: Request
ML0833806672008-12-0303 December 2008
SEIS Reference - Trinectes Maculates Fasciatus: Hogchoker
Project stage: Request
ML0833805702008-12-0303 December 2008
SEIS Reference - Plant Fact Sheets by Ncsu
Project stage: Request
ML0833805722008-12-0303 December 2008
SEIS Reference - Shortnose Sturgeon (Acipenser Brevirostrum) by Opr
Project stage: Request
ML0833805752008-12-0303 December 2008
SEIS Reference - Butterflies and Moths of North America
Project stage: Request
ML0833805402008-12-0303 December 2008
SEIS Reference - Peregrine Falcon Fact Sheet by NYSDEC
Project stage: Request
ML0833806192008-12-0303 December 2008
SEIS Reference - Status of Fishery Resources Off the Northeastern U.S.: Atlantic and Shortnose Sturgeons
Project stage: Request
ML0833806232008-12-0303 December 2008
SEIS Reference - Zebra Mussels and the Hudson River
Project stage: Request
ML0833806272008-12-0303 December 2008
SEIS Reference - Comprehensive Master Plan, Town of Cortlandt, July 2004
Project stage: Request
ML0833806292008-12-0303 December 2008
SEIS Reference - Town Profile
Project stage: Request
ML0833806612008-12-0303 December 2008
SEIS Reference - Annual Drinking Water Quality Report for 2005 by Wjww
Project stage: Request
ML0833805532008-12-0303 December 2008
SEIS Reference - New York State Amphibian and Reptile Atlas Project by NYSDEC, Species of Turtles Found in New York
Project stage: Request
ML0833805452008-12-0303 December 2008
SEIS Reference - Bog Turtle Fact Sheet by NYSDEC
Project stage: Request
ML0833805422008-12-0303 December 2008
SEIS Reference - Peregrine Falcon by NYSDEC
Project stage: Request
ML0833806332008-12-0303 December 2008
SEIS Reference - Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2: Pennsylvania County Level Data
Project stage: Request
ML0833805312008-12-0303 December 2008
SEIS Reference - Bald Eagle Fact Sheet by NYSDEC
Project stage: Request
ML0833806592008-12-0303 December 2008
SEIS Reference - Westchester County Databook: History, Geography, and Land Use
Project stage: Request
2008-12-02
[Table View] |
|
|---|
Category:Meeting Summary
MONTHYEARML22309A0062022-12-12012 December 2022
Public Non-Sensitive Meeting Summary on Clarification Call with Holtec Regarding Request for Additional Information for Indian Point Unit 2 Master Decommissioning Trust Agreement as Per Indian Point Nuclear Generating Facility Unit 1 and 2
ML21342A1402021-12-0909 December 2021
Summary of Public Meeting in Tarrytown, Ny, to Discuss Indian Point Units 1, 2, and 3 (IPEC) Post-shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML21055A9122021-02-24024 February 2021
(E-mail Dated 2/24/2021) Summary of Feb 8, 2021, Pre-submittal Meeting for Relief Request No. IP3-ISI-RR-16, Code Case N-513-4 Periodic Inspection Frequency Extension
ML20321A0002020-11-17017 November 2020
Summary of 9/30/20 Pre-Submittal Meeting with Entergy to Discuss Proposed One-Time Exemption Request - Biennial Emergency Preparedness Onsite Evaluated Exercise Requirements
ML20289A7322020-10-15015 October 2020
2020 Annual Assessment Meeting for Indian Point - Meeting Summary
ML20083F5962020-03-23023 March 2020
Summary of Teleconference with the National Marine Fisheries Service for Indian Point Biological Opinion
ML20059P1292020-03-0303 March 2020
Summary of Partially Closed Pre-submittal Public Meeting with Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. to Discuss the Proposed License Amendment Request to Replace the Indian Point Unit No. 3 Crane with a New Holtec High-Lift Crane (EPID L:2019-LRM
ML19330F5182019-11-29029 November 2019
Summary of Public Meeting Between the NRC and Entergy Regarding Pre-Submittal of a License Transfer Application to Holtec International for Indian Point Energy Center
ML19319A0242019-10-0202 October 2019
NEIMA Meeting - Courtney Williams Comments
ML19319A0282019-10-0202 October 2019
NEIMA Meeting - Marilyn Elie Comments
ML19319A0272019-10-0202 October 2019
NEIMA Meeting - Linda Puglisi Comments
ML19319A0252019-10-0202 October 2019
NEIMA Meeting - Jenean Eichenholtz Comments
ML19198A2392019-07-17017 July 2019
Annual Assessment Meeting for Indian Point Energy Center - Meeting Summary
ML18200A2722018-07-19019 July 2018
Summary of Annual Assessment Meeting for Indian Point Energy Center
ML18131A0572018-05-11011 May 2018
Summary of 04/12/2018 Meeting with the State of New York Regarding the Indian Point Generating Unit No. 2 Reactor Pressure Vessel Head Penetration Alternative Weld Repair
ML18117A3162018-04-30030 April 2018
Summary of 04/03/2018 Meeting with Entergy on Planned Submittal of Propose Alternative for Reactor Pressure Vessel Head Nozzle Weld Repair
ML18107A4972018-04-27027 April 2018
April 10, 2017, Summary of Public Meeting with Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. Regarding Upcoming License Amendment Request to Add Setpoint Verification Requirement to Technical Specification Surveillance Requirements
ML18099A0712018-04-16016 April 2018
March 20, 2018, Summary of Meeting with the Nuclear Energy Institute and Other Industry Representatives Regarding the Surveillance Frequency Control Program
ML18002A2562018-01-30030 January 2018
11/30/2017 and 12/19/2017 Summary Telephone Conference Calls with Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Concerning Request for Additional Information Pertaining to the Indian Point License Renewal Application
ML17256A2862017-09-25025 September 2017
Summary of Telephone Call on 09/06/17, Between NRC and Entergy Concerning Next Steps from the Site Audit on 08/1-3/17
ML17180A5032017-09-21021 September 2017
04/19/2017 Summary of Teleconference with Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Concerning Request for Additional Information Pertaining to the Indian Point Unit Nos. 2 and 3 License Renewal Application
ML17237A2132017-08-25025 August 2017
Memo E-mail to File -Summary of July 26, 2017, Meeting with Entergy to Discuss Proposed License Amendment Request, New Criticality Safety Analysis
ML17173A7672017-07-28028 July 2017
Summary of 6/20/2017 Meeting with Entergy to Discuss Plan for Decommissioning Licensing Actions of Palisades, Pilgrim, Indian Point, Units 2 and 3, and Vermont Yankee
ML17160A1652017-06-27027 June 2017
Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held on May 31,2017, Between the NRC and Entergy Nuclear Operations Inc. Concerning Requests for Additional Information Pertaining to the Indian Point, License Renewal Application (TAC Nos. MD5407/MD5408
ML17172A1972017-06-20020 June 2017
Summary of Annual Assessment Meeting for Indian Point Units 2 and 3
ML17157B5422017-06-20020 June 2017
Conference Call on 2nd Round RAIs - Final
ML17082A3112017-04-11011 April 2017
Summary of Clarification Call with Entergy Regarding Follow-Up RAIs on ISG-2012-02
ML16281A2162016-10-25025 October 2016
10/04/2016,Summary of Public Meeting with Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. Regarding Proposed Changes to the Service Water Integrity Program for the Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Units 2 and 3 (IP2 and IP3) License Renewal Application (LRA)
ML16209A3712016-08-17017 August 2016
July 21, 2016, Summary of Conference Call Held Between NRC and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. Concerning the Draft RAI for the Review of the Indian Point, Units 2 & 3, License Renewal Application, Set 2016-01 (TAC Nos. MD5407 & MD5408)
ML16188A0202016-07-0505 July 2016
Summary of Annual Assessment Meeting for Indian Point Units 2 and 3
ML16133A4992016-06-21021 June 2016
Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held Between NRC and Entergy Concerning the Indian Point LRA Safety Review
ML16035A4802016-02-12012 February 2016
Jsc Meeting Summary Attachment
ML15351A2032015-12-30030 December 2015
Summary of Conference Call Held on December 9, 2015, Between the NRC and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. Concerning the Draft Audit Plan for the Service Water Integrity and Fire Water System Aging Management Programs
ML15190A2912015-07-22022 July 2015
070115, Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held Between NRC and Entergy Concerning the RAIs Pertaining to the Indian Point LRA Safety Review
ML15152A0762015-05-29029 May 2015
Summary of Annual Assessment Meeting for Indian Point Units 2 and 3 on 5/20/2015
ML15120A6442015-05-0606 May 2015
Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held Between NRC and Entergy Concerning the RAIs Pertaining to the Indian Point LRA Safety Review
ML15107A1752015-04-28028 April 2015
041615, Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held Between NRC and Entergy Concerning the RAIs Pertaining to the Indian Point LRA Environmental Review
ML15093A5052015-04-14014 April 2015
Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held Between NRC and Entergy Concerning the Indian Point LRA Environmental Review
ML15051A5022015-03-10010 March 2015
Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held Between NRC and Entergy Concerning the RAIs Pertaining to the Indian Point LRA Environmental Review
ML15022A1602015-02-11011 February 2015
and 01/13/15, Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held Between NRC and Entergy Concerning the RAIs Pertaining to the Indian Point LRA Environmental Review
ML14197A5832014-09-18018 September 2014
Summary of the June 19, 2014, Category 1 Public Meeting with Entergy to Discuss Seismic Hazard Reevaluations Associated with Implementation of Japan Lessons-Learned Near-Tear Task Force Recommendation 2.1
ML14260A4312014-09-17017 September 2014
Revised Summary of Annual Assessment Meeting for Indian Point Energy Center on 6/4/2014
ML14238A7262014-09-10010 September 2014
Summary of Conference Call Held on July 30, 2014, Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Entergy Nuclear Operations Inc., Regarding a Draft Request for Additional Information on Removal of Certain Aging Management Review Items
ML14219A6742014-08-14014 August 2014
July 15, 2014 Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held Between U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Concerning the Environmental Review of the Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3, License R
ML14206B1282014-08-0101 August 2014
June 19, 2014 & July 16, 2014 Summary of Conference Calls Held Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Regarding Entergy Response to a Request for Additional Information
ML14178A8682014-06-25025 June 2014
Summary of Annual Assessment Meeting for Indian Point Energy Center on 6/4/2014
ML14136A0052014-05-27027 May 2014
Summary of Phone Call Between New York State Department of State and U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission on May 7, 2014, Regarding the Coastal Zone Management Act Consistency Review
ML14105A3542014-04-24024 April 2014
Summary of Conference Call Held on March 26, 2014, Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Concerning a Draft Request for Additional Information on the Reactor Vessel Internals Program
ML14078A3992014-03-21021 March 2014
Summary of Conference Call Held on February 20, 2014, Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Concerning a Draft Request for Additional Information on LR-ISG-2012-02 and Draft LR-ISG-2013-01
ML13256A0862013-09-24024 September 2013
Summary of Meeting with Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. and Netco on Indian Point Unit 2 Spent Fuel Pool Management
2022-12-12
[Table view] |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555
-0001 March 10, 2015 LICENSEE:
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
FACILITY:
Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON FEBRUARY 12, 2015, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC. CONCERNING THE REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NOS. 2 AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (TAC NOS. MD5411 AND MD5412)
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff and representative s of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., (Entergy) held a telephone conference call on February 12, 2015
, to discuss and clarify the NRC staff's request for additional information (RAI) concerning the Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3 license renewal application environmental review
. provides a listing of the participants and Enclosure 2 contains a listing of the RAIs discussed with Entergy, including a brief description of the status.
Entergy had an opportunity to comment on this summary.
/RA/ Michael Wentzel, Project Manager Projects Branch 2 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50
-247 and 50
-286
Enclosure:
As stated cc w/encl: Listserv
ML15051A502
-mail OFFICE LA:DLR PM:RPB2:DLR BC:RPB2:DLR PM:RPB2:DLR NAME IBetts MWentzel BWittick (LJames for)
MWentzel DATE 3/3/2015 3/9/15 3/10/15 9/10/15
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON FEBRUARY 12
, 2015, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC. CONCERNING THE REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NOS. 2 AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (TAC NOS. MD5411 AND MD5412)
DISTRIBUTION
- HARD COPY
- DLR RF E-MAIL: PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RidsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource RidsNrrDlrRapb Resource RidsNrrDlrRerb Resource RidsNrrDlrRsrg Resource RidsOgcMailCenter Resource
MWentzel MGray, RI DLogan ABurritt, RI BWittick DonaldJackson, RI DWrona GMeyer, RI DPickett MModes, RI STurk, OGC NSheehan, RI OPA BMizuno, OGC DScrenci, RI OPA DRoth, OGC DTifft, RI BHarris, OGC NMcNamara, RI SBurnell, OPA GNewman, RI DMcIntyre, OPA JSStewart, RI JWeil, OCA AmiPatel, RI
ENCLOSURE 1 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT N OS. 2 AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS FEBRUARY 12, 2015 PARTICIPANTS
- AFFILIATIONS
- Dennis Logan U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
Michael Wentzel NRC Valerie Cullinan Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Larry Barnthouse Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy)
Dara Gray Entergy Doug Heimbuch Entergy Mark Mattson Entergy John Young Entergy ENCLOSURE 2 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NOS. 2 AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FEBRUARY 12, 2015 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff and representatives of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy)
, held a telephone conference call on February 12, 2015
, to discuss and clarify the following request s for additional information (RAI s) concerning the license renewal application environmental review.
Request for Additional Information (RAI) 1 Basis: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff is in the process of performing an independent verification of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.'s (Entergy's) February 19, 2014, submission by using the data from Entergy's October 27, 2014 response to RAIs. The results indicate that the Entergy's "Format 1" data set submitted in October 2014 differs from the data set used in the February 2014 submission. In order to conduct its independent verification, the NRC staff must understand how and why the data sets appear to differ.
Request: Provide a clear written explanation of how and why the "Format 1" data in Entergy's October 2014 response to RAIs differ from the data set used in Entergy's February 2014 submission, and if the data differ, provide the "Format 1" data used for the February 2014 analysis. Support the explanation of the difference with selected SAS code used to create both data sets. Pay particular attention to the calculation of catch
-per-unit-effort (CPUE) and density in the two submissions. Also, SAS and other statistical software provide several methods to calculate percentiles, and these can return different results when applied to the same data.
Provide the method and cite the software used to determine the 75 th percentile of the data. Discussion:
Entergy indicated that the question is clear.
RAI 2 Basis: As part of the NRC staff's independent verification of Entergy's February 2014 submission, the NRC staff needs to refer to information from the Hudson River Sampling Program. Request: Provide electronic copies of the Hudson River Year Class Reports for years 2006 through 2011. Entergy has already provided electronic copies for previous years.
Discussion:
Entergy indicated that the question is clear.
RAI 3 Basis: Entergy's October 2014 submission includes a letter to Ms. Dara Gray informing her of the quality assurance methodology employed on the October 2014 data submission. The letter states that the intermediate results of analyses were not identical to the results presented in tables supplied with Entergy's February 2014 submission Request: Provide the intermediate tables comparing models, assessment of potential impacts, strength of connection analysis parameters and results, and the weight of evidence conclusion tables from the October 2014 submission.
Discussion:
Entergy indicated that the question is clear.
RAI 4 Basis: Entergy's October 2014 submission includes a letter to Ms. Dara Gray informing her of an adjustment to the assignment of data associated with a given week, i.e., selected Sunday samples were assigned to the following work week instead of the prior week.
The letter also states that this adjustment was made to the data submission provided to the NRC staff from Entergy by letter dated March 7, 2008. The October 2014 letter states that "sampling occurred on a Sunday because a holiday occurred within the work week; however, the standard algorithm used to assign a week based upon date resulted in the Sunday samples being assigned to the prior week." As part of NRC staff's review of the data received in October 2014 with that received prior to preparation of the June 2013 supplement to the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3, NRC staff found that the week number assigned to the samples was not always consistent between the two data sets.
Request: Provide a comparative key to the 2008 and 2014 week number assignments and delineate which weeks were adjusted for Sunday sampling events in the February and October 2014 submissions.
Discussion:
Based on discussion with Entergy, the NRC staff modified the draft request, as follows, to make clear the information that the NRC staff is requesting:
Provide a comparative key to the 2008 and 2014 week number assignments.
RAI 5 Basis: As part of NRC staff's review of the data received in October 2014, the NRC staff found that those data were apparently inconsistent with data received from Entergy by letter dated March 7, 2008. For example, those data for striped bass sample size and volume in the Fall Shoals Survey, River Segment 4 sample for week 41, 1994.
Request: Please: (1) identify differences (for example in week number, number of samples, volume of samples, number of young
-of-year caught, and total number of fish caught) between the October 2014 and those data received in the March 7, 2008 and the December 2007 data disks (labeled IPEC License Renewal
- Environmental, Letter NL 156, 12/20/07, Enclosures, Disc 1 of 2 data submittal); (2) provide reasons for the differences and rational for the differences, if any; and (3) provide the corrected version, as appropriate.
Discussion:
Entergy indicated that the question is clear.
