IR 05000285/2015004: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION IV 1600 E. LAMAR BLV ARLINGTON, TX 76011-4511 January 8, 2016 Lou Cortopassi
[[Issue date::January 8, 2016]]
, Site Vice President Omaha Public Power District Fort Calhoun S tation P.O. Box 550 Fort Calhoun, NE 68023
-0550


Lou Cortopassi, Site Vice President Omaha Public Power District Fort Calhoun Station P.O. Box 550 Fort Calhoun, NE 68023-0550
SUBJECT: FORT CALHOUN STATION - NRC INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT NUMBERS 05000285/2015004 AND 07200054/2015001 Dear Mr. Cortopassi
: On December 31, 2015, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed inspection s at your Fort Calhoun Station (FCS). On January 7, 2016, NRC inspectors discussed the results of these inspection s with you and other members of your staf Inspectors documented the results of these inspection s in the enclosed inspection repor In this report
, NRC inspectors documented three licensee-identified violations, which were determined to be of very low safety significance (Green) or Severity Level I The NRC is treating these violation s as non-cited violation s (NCVs) consistent with Section 2.3.2.a. of the NRC Enforcement Polic In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, "Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC's Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRC
's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading
-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).


SUBJECT: FORT CALHOUN STATION - NRC INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT NUMBERS 05000285/2015004 AND 07200054/2015001
Sincerely,/RA/ Geoffrey Miller, Chief Project Branch D Division of Reactor Projects Docket: 50-285; 72-054 License:
 
DPR-40 L. Cortopossi  
==Dear Mr. Cortopassi:==
On December 31, 2015, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed inspections at your Fort Calhoun Station (FCS). On January 7, 2016, NRC inspectors discussed the results of these inspections with you and other members of your staff. Inspectors documented the results of these inspections in the enclosed inspection report. In this report, NRC inspectors documented three licensee-identified violations, which were determined to be of very low safety significance (Green) or Severity Level IV. The NRC is treating these violations as non-cited violations (NCVs) consistent with Section 2.3.2.a. of the NRC Enforcement Policy.
 
In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, "Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC's Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
 
Sincerely,/RA/ Geoffrey Miller, Chief Project Branch D Division of Reactor Projects Docket: 50-285; 72-054 License: DPR-40 L. Cortopossi - 2 -


===Enclosure:===
===Enclosure:===
NRC Inspection Reports 05000285/2015004 and 07200054/2015001  
NRC Inspection Reports 05000285/2015004 and 07200054/2015001


===w/Attachment:===
===w/Attachment:===
Supplemental Information Electronic Distribution to Fort Calhoun Station  
Supplemental Information Electronic Distribution to Fort Calhoun Station


===Enclosure:===
===Enclosure:===
NRC Inspection Reports 05000285/2015004 and 07200054/2015001  
NRC Inspection Reports 05000285/2015004 and 07200054/2015001


===w/Attachment:===
===w/Attachment:===
Supplemental Information  
Supplemental Information
 
ML16008A820 SUNSI Review By: BHagar ADAMS Yes No Non-Sensitive Sensitive Publicly Available Non-Publicly Available Keyword: NRC-002 OFFICE SRI:DRP RI:DRP SPE:DRP C:DRS C:DRS C:DRS C:DRS NAME MSchneider BCummings BHagar HGepford TFarnholtz GWerner VGaddy SIGNATURE E - GBM E - GBM /RA/ /RA/ /RA/ /GAP for/
/RA/ DATE 1/8/16 1/8/16 1/7/16 1/8/16 1/7/16 1/8/16 1/8/16 OFFICE C:DNMS C:DRP NAME RKellar GMiller SIGNATURE
/RSB for/ /RA/ DATE 1/8/16 1/8/16 L. Cortopossi Letter to Lou Cortopossi from Geoffrey Miller dated January 8, 2016


ML16008A820 SUNSI Review By: BHagar ADAMS Yes No Non-Sensitive Sensitive Publicly Available Non-Publicly Available Keyword: NRC-002 OFFICE SRI:DRP RI:DRP SPE:DRP C:DRS C:DRS C:DRS C:DRS NAME MSchneider BCummings BHagar HGepford TFarnholtz GWerner VGaddy SIGNATURE E - GBM E - GBM /RA/ /RA/ /RA/ /GAP for/ /RA/ DATE 1/8/16 1/8/16 1/7/16 1/8/16 1/7/16 1/8/16 1/8/16 OFFICE C:DNMS C:DRP NAME RKellar GMiller SIGNATURE /RSB for/ /RA/ DATE 1/8/16 1/8/16 L. Cortopossi - 3 - Letter to Lou Cortopossi from Geoffrey Miller dated January 8, 2016
SUBJECT: FORT CALHOUN STATION - NRC INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT NUMBERs 05000285/2015004 AND 07200054/2015001


SUBJECT: FORT CALHOUN STATION - NRC INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT NUMBERs 05000285/2015004 AND 07200054/2015001 DISTRIBUTION: Regional Administrator (Marc.Dapas@nrc.gov) Deputy Regional Administrator (Kriss.Kennedy@nrc.gov) DRP Director (Troy.Pruett@nrc.gov) DRP Deputy Director (Ryan.Lantz@nrc.gov) DRS Director (Anton.Vegel@nrc.gov) DRS Deputy Director (Jeff.Clark@nrc.gov) DNMS Director (Mark.Shaffer@nrc.gov) DNMS Deputy Director (Linda.Howell@nrc.gov) DNMS Technical Assistant (Vivian.Campbell@nrc.gov) RSFS Branch Chief (Ray.Kellar@nrc.gov) RSFS Senior Inspector (Lee.Brookhart@nrc.gov) RSFS Inspector (Eric.Simpson@nrc.gov) Project Manager, DSFM (William.Allen@nrc.gov) Spent Fuel Licensing BC, DSFM (Michele.Sampson@nrc.gov) RIV Branch Chief, DRP/D (Geoffrey.Miller@nrc.gov) Senior Resident Inspector (Max.Schneider@nrc.gov) Resident Inspector (Brian.Cummings@nrc.gov) Senior Project Engineer, DRP/D (Bob.Hagar@nrc.gov) Project Engineer, DRP/D (Jim.Melfi@nrc.gov) Project Engineer, DRP/D (Jan.Tice@nrc.gov) FCS Administrative Assistant (Janise.Schwee@nrc.gov) Acting Team leader, DRS/TSS (Eric.Ruesch@nrc.gov) RIV Public Affairs Officer (Victor.Dricks@nrc.gov) RIV Public Affairs Officer (Lara.Uselding@nrc.gov) NRR Project Manager (Fred.Lyon@nrc.gov) RIV RITS Coordinator (Marisa.Herrera@nrc.gov) RIV Regional Counsel (Karla.Fuller@nrc.gov) Congressional Affairs Officer (Jenny.Weil@nrc.gov) RIV Congressional Affairs Officer (Angel.Moreno@nrc.gov) OEWEB Resource@nrc.gov OEWEB Resource (Sue.Bogle@nrc.gov) Technical Support Assistant (Loretta.Williams@nrc.gov) RIV/ETA: OEDO (Cindy.Rosales-Cooper@nrc.gov) RIV RSLO (Bill.Maier@nrc.gov) ACES (R4Enforcement.Resource@nrc.gov) ROPreports Enclosure U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION IV Docket: 50-285 & 72-054 License: DPR-40 Report: 05000285/2015004 & 07200054/2015001 Licensee: Omaha Public Power District Facility: Fort Calhoun Station Location: 9610 Power Lane Blair, NE 68008 Dates: October 1 through December 31, 2015 Inspectors: S. Schneider, Senior Resident Inspector B. Cummings, Resident Inspector L. Carson II, Senior Health Physicist M. Chambers, Physical Security Inspector J. Kirkland, Senior Operations Engineer J. Melfi, Project Engineer J. O'Donnell, CHP, Health Physicist P. Jayroe, Reactor Inspector L. Brookhart, Senior ISFSI inspector E. Simpson, ISFSI Inspector Approved By: Geoffrey Miller, Chief, Project Branch D Division of Reactor Projects  
DISTRIBUTION
: Regional Administrator (Marc.Dapas@nrc.gov)
Deputy Regional Administrator (Kriss.Kennedy@nrc.gov)
DRP Director (Troy.Pruett@nrc.gov)
DRP Deputy Director (Ryan.Lantz@nrc.gov)
DRS Director (Anton.Vegel@nrc.gov)
DRS Deputy Director (Jeff.Clark@nrc.gov)
DNMS Director (Mark.Shaffer@nrc.gov
) DNMS Deputy Director (Linda.Howell@nrc.gov
) DNMS Technical Assistant (Vivian.Campbell@nrc.gov
) RSFS Branch Chief (Ray.Kellar@nrc.gov
) RSFS Senior Inspector (Lee.Brookhart@nrc.gov
) RSFS Inspector (Eric.Simpson@nrc.gov
) Project Manager, DSFM (William.Allen@nrc.gov
) Spent Fuel Licensing BC, DSFM (Michele.Sampson@nrc.gov
) RIV Branch Chief, DRP/D (Geoffrey.Miller@nrc.gov)
Senior Resident Inspector (Max.Schneider@nrc.gov)
Resident Inspector (Brian.Cummings@nrc.gov)
Senior Project Engineer, DRP/D (Bob.Hagar@nrc.gov) Project Engineer, DRP/D (Jim.Melfi@nrc.gov)
Project Engineer, DRP/D (Jan.Tice@nrc.gov)
FCS Administrative Assistant (Janise.Schwee@nrc.gov)
Acting Team leader, DRS/TSS (Eric.Ruesch@nrc.gov)
RIV Public Affairs Officer (Victor.Dricks@nrc.gov)
RIV Public Affairs Officer (Lara.Uselding@nrc.gov)
NRR Project Manager (Fred.Lyon@nrc.gov)
RIV RITS Coordinator (Marisa.Herrera@nrc.gov)
RIV Regional Counsel (Karla.Fuller@nrc.gov)
Congressional Affairs Officer (Jenny.Weil@nrc.gov)
RIV Congressional Affairs Officer (Angel.Moreno@nrc.gov)
OEWEB Resource@nrc.gov OEWEB Resource (Sue.Bogle@nrc.gov)
Technical Support Assistant (Loretta.Williams@nrc.gov)
RIV/ETA:
OEDO (Cindy.Rosales
-Cooper@nrc.gov)
RIV RSLO (Bill.Maier@nrc.gov)
ACES (R4Enforcement.Resource@nrc.gov)
ROPreports Enclosure U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION IV Docket: 50-285 & 72-054 License: DPR-40 Report: 05000285/2015004 & 07200054/2015001 Licensee:
Omaha Public Power District Facility:
Fort Calhoun Station Location:
9610 Power Lane Blair, NE 68008 Dates: October 1 through December 31, 2015 Inspectors:
S. Schneider, Senior Resident Inspector B. Cummings, Resident Inspector L. Carson II, Senior Health Physicist M. Chambers, Physical Security Inspector J. Kirkland, Senior Operations Engineer J. Melfi, Project Engineer J. O'Donnell, CHP, Health Physicist P. Jayroe, Reactor Inspector L. Brookhart, Senior ISFSI inspector E. Simpson, ISFSI Inspector Approved By:
Geoffrey Miller, Chief, Project Branch D Division of Reactor Projects  


=SUMMARY=
=SUMMARY=
IR 05000285/2015004; 10/01/2015 - 12/31/2015; Fort Calhoun Station; Integrated Inspection Report  The inspection activities described in this report were performed between October 1 and December 31, 2015, by the resident inspectors at Fort Calhoun Station and inspectors from the NRC's Region IV office. NRC inspectors documented in this report three licensee-identified violations of very low safety significance. The significance of inspection findings is indicated by their color (Green, White, Yellow, or Red), which is determined using Inspection Manual Chapter 0609, "Significance Determination Process."  Their cross-cutting aspects are determined using Inspection Manual Chapter 0310, "Aspects within the Cross-Cutting Areas."  Violations of NRC requirements are dispositioned in accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy. The NRC's program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, "Reactor Oversight Process."
IR 05000285/2015004; 10/01/2015  
 
- 12/31/2015
; Fort Calhoun Station
; Integrated Inspection Report  The inspection activities described in this report were performed between October 1 and December 31, 2015, by the resident inspectors at Fort Calhoun Station and inspectors from the NRC's Region IV office
. NRC inspectors documented in this report three licensee-identified violation s of very low safety significance. The significance of inspection findings is indicated by their color (Green, White, Yellow, or Red), which is determined using Inspection Manual Chapter 0609, "Significance Determination Process."  Their cross-cutting aspects are determined using Inspection Manual Chapter 0310, "Aspects within the Cross-Cutting Areas."  Violations of NRC requirements are dispositioned in accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy. The NRC's program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG
-1649, "Reactor Oversight Process."
 
===
Licensee-Identified Violations===


=== Licensee-Identified Violations===
Three violation s of very low safety significance that were identified by the licensee ha ve been reviewed by the inspectors.


Three violations of very low safety significance that were identified by the licensee have been reviewed by the inspectors. Corrective actions taken or planned by the licensee have been entered into the licensee's corrective action program. These violations and associated corrective action tracking numbers are listed in Section 4OA7 of this report.
Corrective actions taken or planned by the licensee have been entered into the licensee's corrective action program. These violation s and associated corrective action tracking numbers are listed in Section 4OA7 of this report.


==PLANT STATUS==
==PLANT STATUS==
Line 70: Line 123:
On November 24, 2015, the inspectors completed an inspection of the station's readiness for seasonal extreme weather conditions. The inspectors reviewed the licensee's adverse weather procedures for cold weather operations and evaluated the licensee's implementation of these procedures. The inspectors verified that prior to the onset of cold weather, the licensee had corrected weather-related equipment deficiencies identified during the previous winter.
On November 24, 2015, the inspectors completed an inspection of the station's readiness for seasonal extreme weather conditions. The inspectors reviewed the licensee's adverse weather procedures for cold weather operations and evaluated the licensee's implementation of these procedures. The inspectors verified that prior to the onset of cold weather, the licensee had corrected weather-related equipment deficiencies identified during the previous winter.


The inspectors selected two risk-significant systems that were required to be protected from cold weather:   Emergency Diesel Generator Auxiliary Feedwater The inspectors reviewed the licensee's procedures and design information to ensure the systems would remain functional when challenged by cold weather. The inspectors verified that operator actions described in the licensee's procedures were adequate to maintain readiness of these systems. The inspectors walked down portions of these systems to verify the physical condition of cold weather protection features.
The inspectors selected two risk-significant systems that were required to be protected from cold weather:
Emergency Diesel Generator Auxiliary Feedwater The inspectors reviewed the licensee's procedures and design information to ensure the systems would remain functional when challenged by cold weather. The inspectors verified that operator actions described in the licensee's procedures were adequate to maintain readiness of these systems. The inspectors walked down portions of these systems to verify the physical condition of cold weather protection features.


These activities constituted one sample of readiness for seasonal adverse weather, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.01.
These activities constitute d one sample of readiness for seasonal adverse weather
, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.01.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
Line 82: Line 137:
On November 20, 2015, and November 29, 2015, the inspectors completed an inspection of the station's readiness for impending adverse weather conditions. The inspectors reviewed plant design features, the licensee's procedures to respond to high winds, freezing conditions, and snow accumulation, and the licensee's implementation of these procedures. The inspectors evaluated operator staffing and accessibility of controls and indications for those systems required to control the plant.
On November 20, 2015, and November 29, 2015, the inspectors completed an inspection of the station's readiness for impending adverse weather conditions. The inspectors reviewed plant design features, the licensee's procedures to respond to high winds, freezing conditions, and snow accumulation, and the licensee's implementation of these procedures. The inspectors evaluated operator staffing and accessibility of controls and indications for those systems required to control the plant.


These activities constituted two samples of readiness for impending adverse weather conditions, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.01.
These activities constituted two samples of readiness for impending ad verse weather conditions, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.01.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
No findings were identified.
No findings were identifi ed.
{{a|1R04}}
{{a|1R04}}
==1R04 Equipment Alignment==
==1R04 Equipment Alignment==
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71111.04}}
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71111.04}}
===.1 Partial Walkdown===
===.1 Partial Walk===
 
down


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors performed partial system walk-downs of the following risk-significant systems:  October 27, 2015, raw water system with component cooling water heat exchanger C out of service for maintenance November 19, 2015, steam driven auxiliary feedwater pump following surveillance testing November 25, 2015, emergency diesel generator number 2 following maintenance December 9, 2015, containment spray train B when containment spray train A was taken out of service for maintenance The inspectors reviewed the licensee's procedures and system design information to determine the correct lineup for the systems. They visually verified that critical portions of the systems were correctly aligned for the existing plant configuration. These activities constituted four partial system walk-down samples as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.04.
The inspectors performed partial system walk
-downs of the following risk
-significant systems:  October 27, 2015, raw water system with component cooling water heat exchanger C out of service for maintenance November 19, 2015, steam driven auxiliary feedwater pump following surveillance testing November 25, 2015, emergency diesel generator number 2 following maintenance December 9, 2015, containment spray train B when containment spray train A was taken out of service for maintenance The inspectors reviewed the licensee's procedures and system design information to determine the correct lineup for the systems. They visually verified that critical portions of the systems were correctly aligned for the existing plant configuration
. These activities constitute d four partial system walk
-down sample s as defined i n Inspection Procedure 71111.04.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
Line 100: Line 161:


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
On October 15, 2015, the inspectors performed a complete system walk-down inspection of number 1 emergency diesel generator. The inspectors reviewed the licensee's procedures and system design information to determine the correct emergency diesel generator lineup for the existing plant configuration. The inspectors also reviewed outstanding work orders, open condition reports, and other open items tracked by the licensee's operations and engineering departments. The inspectors then visually verified that the system was correctly aligned for the existing plant configuration.
On October 15, 2015, the inspectors performed a complete system walk-down inspection of number 1 emergency diesel generator
. The inspectors reviewed the licensee's procedures and system design information to determine the correct emergency diesel generato r lineup for the existing plant configuration. The inspectors also reviewed outstanding work orders, open condition reports, and other open items tracked by the licensee's operations and engineering departments
. The inspectors then visually verified that the system was correctly aligned for the existing plant configuration.


These activities constituted one complete system walk-down sample, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.04.
These activities constitute d one complete system walk
-down sample
, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.04.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
Line 112: Line 177:


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors evaluated the licensee's fire protection program for operational status and material condition. The inspectors focused their inspection on five plant areas important to safety:  October 29, 2015, basement and personnel corridor area, fire area 6-3  November 8, 2015, diesel generator room 1, fire area 35A  November 19, 2015, main control room, fire area 41  December 10, 2015, health physics corridor, fire area 19  December 10, 2015, east personnel corridor and personal air lock area, fire area 20-1  For each area, the inspectors evaluated the fire plan against defined hazards and defense-in-depth features in the licensee's fire protection program. The inspectors evaluated control of transient combustibles and ignition sources, fire detection and suppression systems, manual firefighting equipment and capability, passive fire protection features, and compensatory measures for degraded conditions. These activities constituted five quarterly inspection samples, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.05.
The inspectors evaluated the licensee's fire protection program for operational status and material condition. The inspectors focused their inspection on five plant areas important to safety
:  October 29, 2015, basement and personnel corridor area, fire area 6-3  November 8, 2015, diesel generator room 1, fire area 35A  November 19, 2015, main control room, fire area December 10, 2015, health physics corridor, fire area December 10, 2015, east personnel corridor and personal air lock area, fire area 20-1  For each area, the inspectors evaluated the fire plan against defined hazards and defense-in-depth features in the licensee's fire protection program. The inspectors evaluated control of transient combustibles and ignition sources, fire detection and suppression systems, manual firefighting equipment and capability, passive fire protection features, and compensatory measures for degraded conditions.
 
These activities constitute d five quarterly inspection sample s, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.05.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
Line 121: Line 189:


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
On December 4, 2015, the inspectors completed an inspection of underground bunkers susceptible to flooding. The inspectors selected two underground bunkers that contained risk-significant or multiple-train cables whose failure could disable risk-significant equipment:  Manhole 5A Manhole 31 The inspectors observed the material condition of the cables and splices contained in the bunkers and looked for evidence of cable degradation due to water intrusion. The inspectors verified that the cables and vaults met design requirements.
On December 4, 2015, the inspectors completed an inspection of underground bunkers susceptible to flooding. The inspectors selected two underground bunkers that contained risk
-significant or multiple
-train cables whose failure could disable risk
-significant equipment
:  Manhole 5A Manhole 31 The inspectors observed the material condition of the cables and splices contained in the bunkers and looked for evidence of cable degradation due to water intrusion.
 
The inspectors verified that the cables and vaults met design requirements.


These activities constitute completion of one bunker/manhole sample, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.06.
These activities constitute completion of one bunker/manhole sample, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.06.
Line 146: Line 220:


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
On November 13, 2015, the inspectors observed simulator training for an operating crew in response to an Auxiliary Feedwater Actuation System malfunction and an Armed Attack. The inspectors assessed the performance of the operators and the evaluators' critique of their performance. The inspectors also assessed the modeling and performance of the simulator during the training. These activities constitute completion of one quarterly licensed operator requalification program sample, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.11.
On November 13, 2015, the inspectors observed simulator training for an operating crew in response to an Au xiliary Feedwater Actuation System malfunction and an Armed Attack. The inspectors assessed the performance of the operators and the evaluators' critique of their performance. The inspectors also assessed the modeling and performance of the simulator during the training.
 
These activities constitute completion of one quarterly licensed operator requalification program sample
, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.11.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
Line 154: Line 231:


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
On October 2, 2015, the inspectors observed the performance of on-shift licensed operators in the plant's main control room. At the time of the observations, the plant was in a period of heightened activity due to the declaration of a Notification of Unusual Event due to a suspicious device found in a security vehicle. The inspectors observed the operators' performance related to adherence of abnormal operating procedures, evaluation of plant risk, and assessment of Emergency Action Level criteria. These activities constitute completion of one quarterly licensed operator performance sample as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.11.
On October 2, 2015, the inspectors observed the performance of on
-shift licensed operators in the plant's main control room. At the time of the observations, the plant was in a period of heightened activity due to the declaration of a Notification of Unusual Event due to a suspicious device found in a security vehicle. The inspectors observed the operators' performance related to adherence of abnormal operating procedures, evaluation of plant risk, and assessment of Emergency Action Level criteria.
 
These activities constitute completion of one quarterly licensed operator performance sample as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.11.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
Line 162: Line 242:


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors conducted an in-office review of the annual requalification training program to determine the results of this program.
The inspector s conducted an in
-office review of the annual requalification training program to determine the results of this program.
 
On December 9, 2015, the licensee informed the inspector s of the Fort Calhoun Station operating test results:
7 of 7 crews passed the simulator portion of the operating test 31 of 33 licensed operators passed the simulator portion of the operating test


On December 9, 2015, the licensee informed the inspectors of the Fort Calhoun Station operating test results:  7 of 7 crews passed the simulator portion of the operating test 31 of 33 licensed operators passed the simulator portion of the operating test 31 of 33 licensed operators passed the job performance measure portion of the operating test No remediation was performed for the Fort Calhoun Station operating tests. Two licensed operators who did not pass the simulator or job performance measure portions of the operating test were unavailable for personal reasons and will meet the requalification exam requirements in 2016.
31 of 33 licensed operators passed the job performance measure portion of the operating test No remediation was performed for the Fort Calhoun Station operating tests. Two licensed operators who did not pass the simulator or job performance measure portions of the operating test were unavailable for personal reasons and will meet the requalification exam requirements in 2016.


The inspectors completed one inspection sample of the annual licensed operator requalification program.
The inspectors completed one inspection sample of the annual licensed operator requalification program.
Line 175: Line 259:


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors reviewed three instances of degraded performance or condition of safety-related structures, systems, and components (SSCs):  November 10, 2015, inadvertent cross-connecting of the main feedwater system with the auxiliary feedwater system   November 23, 2015, identification of cracked pressurizer heater cables   December 7, 2015, inadvertent closure of shutdown cooling isolation valves   The inspectors reviewed the extent of condition of possible common cause SSC failures and evaluated the adequacy of the licensee's corrective actions. The inspectors reviewed the licensee's work practices to evaluate whether these may have played a role in the degradation of the SSCs. The inspectors assessed the licensee's characterization of the degradation in accordance with 10 CFR 50.65 (the Maintenance Rule), and verified that the licensee was appropriately tracking degraded performance and conditions in accordance with the Maintenance Rule.
The inspectors reviewed three instances of degraded performance or condition of safety
-related structures, systems, and components (SSCs):  November 10, 2015, inadvertent cross
-connecting of the main feedwater system with the auxiliary feedwater system November 23, 2015, identification of cracked pressurizer heater cables December 7, 2015, inadvertent closure of shutdown cooling isolation valves The inspectors reviewed the extent of condition of possible common cause SSC failures and evaluated the adequacy of the licensee's corrective actions. The inspectors reviewed the licensee's work practices to evaluate whether these may have played a role in the degradation of the SSCs. The inspectors assessed the licensee's characterization of the degradation in accordance with 10 CFR 50.65 (the Maintenance Rule), and verified that the licensee was appropriately tracking degraded performance and conditions in accordance with the Maintenance Rule.


These activities constituted completion of three maintenance effectiveness samples, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.12.
These activities constitute d completion of three maintenance effectiveness sample s, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.12.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
Line 186: Line 272:


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors reviewed four risk assessments performed by the licensee prior to changes in plant configuration and the risk management actions taken by the licensee in response to elevated risk:   October 28, 2015, planned yellow risk during number 2 emergency diesel generator testing November 2, 2015, planned yellow risk during west raw water header maintenance outage   November 5, 2015, planned yellow risk during diesel driven auxiliary feedwater pump operability verification   November 23, 2015, planned yellow risk during number 2 emergency diesel generator maintenance The inspectors verified that these risk assessment were performed timely and in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.65 (the Maintenance Rule) and plant procedures. The inspectors reviewed the accuracy and completeness of the licensee's risk assessments and verified that the licensee implemented appropriate risk management actions based on the result of the assessments.
The inspectors reviewed four risk assessments performed by the licensee prior to changes in plant configuration and the risk management actions taken by the licensee in response to elevated risk:
October 28, 2015, planned yellow risk during number 2 emergency diesel generator testing
 
November 2, 2015, planned yellow risk during west raw water header maintenance outage November 5, 2015, planned yellow risk during diesel drive n auxiliary feedwater pump operability verification November 23, 2015, planned yellow risk during number 2 emergency diesel generator maintenance The inspectors verified that these risk assessment were performed timely and in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.65 (the Maintenance Rule) and plant procedures. The inspectors reviewed the accuracy and completeness of the licensee's risk assessment s and verified that the licensee implemented appropriate risk management actions based on the result of the assessment s.


These activities constitute completion of four maintenance risk assessments, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.13.
These activities constitute completion of four maintenance risk assessments, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.13.
Line 193: Line 282:
No findings were identified.
No findings were identified.
{{a|1R15}}
{{a|1R15}}
==1R15 Operability Determinations and Functionality Assessments==
==1R15 Operability Determinations==
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71111.15}}
 
and Functionality Assessments (71111.15)


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors reviewed six operability determinations and functionality assessments that the licensee performed for degraded or nonconforming structures, systems, or components (SSCs):   October 21, 2015, operability determination of blowdown isolation valve non-conservative component specifications   October 22, 2015, operability determination of pressurizer heater bank number 4 due to hot short potential circuit failure following discovery of an unanalyzed condition October 26, 2015, operability determination of instrument air accumulator leak on component cooling water valve HCV-401C  October 29, 2015, operability determination of containment spray discovery of non-conformances with design   November 4, 2015, functionality determination of raw water flow instrumentation following discovery of a degraded condition  December 8, 2015, assessment of operator work arounds The inspectors reviewed the timeliness and technical adequacy of the licensee's evaluations. Where the licensee determined the degraded SSC to be operable or functional, the inspectors verified that the licensee's compensatory measures were appropriate to provide reasonable assurance of operability or functionality. The inspectors verified that the licensee had considered the effect of other degraded conditions on the operability or functionality of the degraded SSC. The inspectors reviewed operator actions taken or planned to compensate for degraded or nonconforming conditions. The inspectors verified that the licensee effectively managed these operator workarounds to prevent adverse effects on the function of mitigating systems and to minimize their impact on the operators' ability to implement abnormal and emergency operating procedures. These activities constitute completion of six operability review samples, which included one operator work-around sample, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.15.
The inspectors reviewed six operability determinations and functionality assessments that the licensee performed for degraded or nonconforming structures, systems, or components (SSCs):
October 21, 2015, operability determination of blowdown isolation valve non
-conservative component specifications October 22, 2015, operability determination of pressurizer heater bank number 4 due to hot short potential circuit failure following discovery of an unanalyzed condition October 26, 2015, operability determination of instrument air accumulator leak on component cooling water valve HCV
-401C  October 29, 2015, operability determination of containment spray discovery of non-conformances with design November 4, 2015, functionality determination of raw water flow instrumentation
 
following discovery of a degraded condition  December 8, 2015, assessment of operator work arounds The inspectors reviewed the timeliness and technical adequacy of the licensee's evaluations. Where the licensee determined the degraded SSC to be operable or functional, the inspectors verified that the licensee's compensatory measures were appropriate to provide reasonable assurance of operability or functionality. The inspectors verified that the licensee had considered the effect of other degraded conditions on the operability or functionality of the degraded SSC
. The inspectors reviewed operator actions taken or planned to compensate for degraded or nonconforming conditions.
 
The inspectors verified that the licensee effectively managed these operator workarounds to prevent adverse effects on the function of mitigating systems and to minimize their impact on the operators' ability to implement abnormal and emergency operating procedures.
 
These activities constitute completion of six operability review samples, which included one operator work
-around sample, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.15.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
Line 208: Line 309:
On October 29, 2015, the inspectors reviewed one permanent plant modification to the containment spray ring riser piping and rings to restore operability. The inspectors reviewed the design and implementation of the modification. The inspectors verified that work activities involved in implementing the modification did not adversely impact operator actions that may be required in response to an emergency or other unplanned event.
On October 29, 2015, the inspectors reviewed one permanent plant modification to the containment spray ring riser piping and rings to restore operability. The inspectors reviewed the design and implementation of the modification. The inspectors verified that work activities involved in implementing the modification did not adversely impact operator actions that may be required in response to an emergency or other unplanned event.


These activities constitute completion of one sample of permanent modifications, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.18.
These activities constitute completion of one sample of permanent modifications
, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.18.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
No findings were identified.
No findings were identified.
{{a|1R19}}
{{a|1R19}}
==1R19 Post-Maintenance Testing==
==1R19 Post-Maintenance==
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71111.19}}
 
Testing (71111.19)


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors reviewed four post-maintenance testing activities that affected risk-significant structures, systems, or components (SSCs):   October 27, 2015, replace control relay for containment air cooling fan VA-7D  November 5, 2015, charging pump CH-1B discharge drain valve weld repair November 16, 2015, charging pump CH-1A rebuild December 15, 2015, emergency diesel generator damper actuator replacement The inspectors reviewed licensing- and design-basis documents for the SSCs and the maintenance and post-maintenance test procedures. The inspectors reviewed the post-maintenance tests to verify that the licensee performed the tests in accordance with approved procedures, satisfied the established acceptance criteria, and restored the operability of the affected SSCs. These activities constitute completion of four post-maintenance testing inspection samples, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.19.
The inspectors reviewed four post-maintenance testing activities that affected risk
-significant structures, systems, or components (SSCs):
October 27, 2015, replace control relay for containment air cooling fan VA-7D  November 5, 2015, charging pump CH-1B discharge drain valve weld repair November 16, 2015, charging pump CH-1A rebuild December 15, 2015, emergency diesel generator damper actuator replacement The inspectors reviewed licensing- and design
-basis documents for the SSCs and the maintenance and post-maintenance test procedures.
 
The inspectors reviewed the post-maintenance tests to verify that the licensee performed the tests in accordance with approved procedures, satisfied the established acceptance criteria, and restored the operability of the affected SSCs.
 
These activities constitute completion of four post-maintenance testing inspection samples, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.19.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
Line 226: Line 336:


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors observed four risk-significant surveillance tests and reviewed test results to verify that these tests adequately demonstrated that the structures, systems, and components (SSCs) were capable of performing their safety functions: Containment isolation valve surveillance tests:  October 26, 2015, Component Cooling Category A and B Valve Exercise Test Other surveillance tests:   October 16, 2015, automatic load sequencer test November 19, 2015 steam driven auxiliary feedwater flow verification December 9, 2015, number 1 emergency diesel generator surveillance test The inspectors verified that these tests met technical specification requirements, that the licensee performed the tests in accordance with their procedures, and that the results of the test satisfied appropriate acceptance criteria. The inspectors verified that the licensee restored the operability of the affected SSCs following testing.
The inspectors observed four risk-significant surveillance tests and reviewed test results to verify that these tests adequately demonstrated that the structures, systems, and components (SSCs) were capable of performing their safety functions:
Containment isolation valve surveillance tests:  October 26, 2015, Component Cooling Category A and B Valve Exercise Test Other surveillance tests:
October 16, 2015, automatic load sequencer test November 19, 2015 steam driven auxiliary feedwater flow verification December 9, 2015, number 1 emergency diesel generator surveillance test The inspectors verified that these test s met technical specification requirements, that the licensee performed the tests in accordance with their procedures, and that the results of the test satisfied appropriate acceptance criteria. The inspectors verified that the licensee restored the operability of the affected SSCs following testing.


These activities constitute completion of four surveillance testing inspection samples, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.22.
These activities constitute completion of four surveillance testing inspection sample s, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.22.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
Line 234: Line 346:


==RADIATION SAFETY==
==RADIATION SAFETY==
Cornerstones: Public Radiation Safety and Occupational Radiation Safety
Cornerstones:
Public Radiation Safety and Occupational Radiation Safety
{{a|2RS2}}
{{a|2RS2}}
==2RS2 Occupational ALARA Planning and Controls==
==2RS2 Occupational ALARA Planning and Controls==
Line 240: Line 353:


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors assessed licensee performance with respect to maintaining occupational individual and collective radiation exposures as low as is reasonably achievable (ALARA). During the inspection, the inspectors interviewed licensee personnel and reviewed licensee performance in the following areas:   Site-specific ALARA procedures and collective exposure history, including the current 3-year rolling average, site-specific trends in collective exposures, and source-term measurements   ALARA work activity evaluations/post-job reviews, exposure estimates, and exposure mitigation requirements   The methodology for estimating work activity exposures, the intended dose outcome, the accuracy of dose rate and man-hour estimates, and intended versus actual work activity doses and the reasons for any inconsistencies     Records detailing the historical trends and current status of tracked plant source terms and contingency plans for expected changes in the source term due to changes in plant fuel performance issues or changes in plant primary chemistry   Radiation worker and radiation protection technician performance during work activities in radiation areas, airborne radioactivity areas, or high radiation areas   Audits, self-assessments, and corrective action documents related to ALARA planning and controls since the last inspection These activities constitute completion of one sample of occupational ALARA planning and controls as defined in Inspection Procedure 71124.02.
The inspectors assessed licensee performance with respect to maintaining occupational individual and collective radiation exposures as low as is reasonably achievable (ALARA). During the inspection, the inspectors interviewed licensee personnel and reviewed licensee performance in the following areas:
Site-specific ALARA procedures and collective exposure history, including the current 3
-year rolling average, site
-specific trends in collective exposures, and source-term measurements ALARA work activity evaluations/post
-job reviews, exposure estimates, and exposure mitigation requirements The methodology for estimating work activity exposures, the intended dose outcome, the accuracy of dose rate and man
-hour estimates, and intended versus actual work activity doses and the reasons for any inconsistencies Records detailing the historical trends and current status of tracked plant source terms and contingency plans for expected changes in the source term due to changes in plant fuel performance issues or changes in plant primary chemistry Radiation worker and radiation protection technician performance during work activities in radiation areas, airborne radioactivity areas, or high radiation areas Audits, self
-assessments, and corrective action documents related to ALARA planning and controls since the last inspection These activities constitute completion of one sample of occupational ALARA planning and controls as defined in Inspection Procedure 71124.02.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
Line 249: Line 368:


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors evaluated the accuracy and operability of the licensee's personnel monitoring equipment, verified the accuracy and effectiveness of the licensee's methods for determining total effective dose equivalent, and verified that the licensee was appropriately monitoring occupational dose. The inspectors interviewed licensee personnel, walked down various portions of the plant, and reviewed licensee performance in the following areas:   External dosimetry accreditation, storage, issue, use, and processing of active and passive dosimeters   The technical competency and adequacy of the licensee's internal dosimetry program    Adequacy of the dosimetry program for special dosimetry situations such as declared pregnant workers, multiple dosimetry placement, and neutron dose assessment   Audits, self-assessments, and corrective action documents related to dose assessment since the last inspection These activities constitute completion of one sample of occupational dose assessment as defined in Inspection Procedure 71124.04.
The inspectors evaluated the accuracy and operability of the licensee's personnel monitoring equipment, verified the accuracy and effectiveness of the licensee's methods for determining total effective dose equivalent, and verified that the licensee was appropriately monitoring occupational dose.
 
The inspectors interviewed licensee personnel, walked down various portions of the plant, and reviewed licensee performance in the following areas:
External dosimetry accreditation, storage, issue, use, and processing of active and passive dosimeters The technical competency and adequacy of the licensee's internal dosimetry program    Adequacy of the dosimetry program for special dosimetry situations such as declared pregnant workers, multiple dosimetry placement, and neutron dose assessment Audits, self
-assessments, and corrective action documents related to dose assessment since the last inspection These activities constitute completion of one sample of occupational dose assessment as defined in Inspection Procedure 71124.04.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
Line 260: Line 383:
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71151}}
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71151}}
===.1 Mitigating Systems Performance Index:===
===.1 Mitigating Systems Performance Index:===
Emergency AC Power Systems (MS06)
 
Emergency AC Power System s (MS06)


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
Line 270: Line 394:
No findings were identified.
No findings were identified.


===.2 Mitigating Systems Performance Index:===
===.2 Mitigating Systems Performance Index===
Residual Heat Removal Systems (MS09)
Residual Heat Removal System s (MS09)


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
Line 282: Line 406:


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors reviewed the licensee's reactor coolant system chemistry sample analyses for the period of October 1, 2014 through September 30, 2015 to verify the accuracy and completeness of the reported data. The inspectors used definitions and guidance contained in Nuclear Energy Institute Document 99-02, "Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline," Revision 7, to determine the accuracy of the reported data. These activities constituted verification of the reactor coolant system specific activity performance indicator, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71151.
The inspectors reviewed the licensee's reactor coolant system chemistry sample analyses for the period of October 1, 2014 through September 30, 2015 to verify the accuracy and completeness of the reported data.
 
The inspectors used definitions and guidance contained in Nuclear Energy Institute Document 99-02, "Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline," Revision 7, to determine the accuracy of the reported data.
 
These activities constituted verification of the reactor coolant system specific activity performance indicator, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71151.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
No findings were identified.
No findings were identified.
{{a|4OA2}}
{{a|4OA2}}
==4OA2 Problem Identification and Resolution==
==4OA2 Problem Identification and Resolution==
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71152}}
 
(71152)
 
===.1 Routine Review===
===.1 Routine Review===


Line 300: Line 431:


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors reviewed the licensee's corrective action program, performance indicators, system health reports, and other documentation to identify trends that might indicate the existence of a more significant safety issue. The inspectors verified that the licensee was taking corrective actions to address identified adverse trends.
The inspectors reviewed the licensee's corrective action program, performance indicators, system health reports
, and other documentation to identify trends that might indicate the existence of a more significant safety issue. The inspectors verified that the licensee was taking corrective actions to address identified adverse trends.


These activities constitute completion of one semiannual trend review sample, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71152.
These activities constitute completion of one semiannual trend review sample, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71152.


====b. Findings and Observations====
====b. Findings and Observations====
No findings were identified. Equipment Reliability In NRC Inspection Report 05000285/2015002, the inspectors identified a continuing adverse trend in equipment reliability at Fort Calhoun Station. The inspectors reviewed equipment reliability challenges from 2014 and 2015 through completion of the refueling outage in June, 2015. These challenges resulted in equipment unavailability, unplanned technical specification entries, operator burdens, and in some cases, plant transients. Of more recent concern were a number of equipment reliability issues during the refueling outage that affected safety system availability and plant performance. The licensee took specific actions to correct the individual equipment performance issues during the observed timeframe. In addition, the licensee conducted a start-up challenge review of the events that occurred during the outage prior to plant start-up. Finally, the licensee senior leadership team had implemented engineering department excellence plans, equipment reliability improvement activities with engineering in partnership with the maintenance and operating departments, focused on operating experience, self-assessment activities and benchmarking, and utilized a plant health committee Top 10 list to improve critical system health. Since that time, the licensee has continued to reduce backlogs in open operability determinations and temporary configuration changes. In addition, the licensee's plant health committee continues to focus on their Top 10 equipment list to resolve those critical items. The licensee engineering leadership team is also committed to the continuing improvement of the boric acid corrosion control and maintenance rule programs.
No findings were identified.
 
Equipment Reliability In NRC Inspection Report 05000285/201500 2, the inspectors identified a continuing adverse trend in equipment reliability at Fort Calhoun Station. The inspectors reviewed equipment reliability challenges from 2014 and 2015 through completion of the refueling outage in June, 2015. These challenges resulted in equipment unavailability, unplanned technical specification entries, operator burdens, and in some cases, plant transients. Of more recent concern wer e a number of equipment reliability issues during the refueling outage that affected safety system availability and plant performance. The licensee took specific actions to correct the individual equipment performance issues during the observed timeframe.
 
In addition, the licensee conducted a start
-up challenge review of the events that occurred during the outage prior to plant start
-up. Finally, the licensee senior leadership team had implemented engineering department excellence plans, equipment reliability improvement activities with engineering in partnership with the maintenance and operating departments, focus ed on operating experience
, self-assessment activities and benchmarking, and utilized a plant health committee T op 10 list to improve critical system health.
 
Since that time, the licensee has continued to reduce backlogs in open operability determinations and temporary configuration changes. In addition, the licensee's plant health committee continues to focus on their Top 10 equipment list to resolve those critical items. The licensee engineering leadership team is also committed to the continuing improvement of the boric acid corrosion control and maintenance rule programs.
 
The inspectors monitored equipment reliability over the past two quarters. Although some improvement has been note d, such as the apparent resolution of air voids in the component cooling water system and a reduction in the number of long term operability evaluations, the inspectors continue to observe equipment reliability issues at Fort Calhoun Station. Examples include:  control room air conditioning failures, continuing safety injection tank (SIT) check valve leakage requiring frequent SIT drain and refills, reactor coolant pump RC
-3A seal performance and vibration issues, and a pressurizer level charging pump control circuit failure. The inspectors have determined that additional monitoring of the licensee's progress in improving equipment reliability at the Fort Calhoun Station is warranted and will be evaluated with the results documented in the next semiannual trend review.


The inspectors monitored equipment reliability over the past two quarters. Although some improvement has been noted, such as the apparent resolution of air voids in the component cooling water system and a reduction in the number of long term operability evaluations, the inspectors continue to observe equipment reliability issues at Fort Calhoun Station. Examples include:  control room air conditioning failures, continuing safety injection tank (SIT) check valve leakage requiring frequent SIT drain and refills, reactor coolant pump RC-3A seal performance and vibration issues, and a pressurizer level charging pump control circuit failure. The inspectors have determined that additional monitoring of the licensee's progress in improving equipment reliability at the Fort Calhoun Station is warranted and will be evaluated with the results documented in the next semiannual trend review.
===.3 Annual Follow===


===.3 Annual Follow-up of Selected Issues===
-up of Selected Issues


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors selected one issue for an in-depth follow-up:  On November 30, 2015, gas voiding in the component cooling water system The inspectors assessed the licensee's problem identification threshold, cause analyses, extent of condition reviews and compensatory actions. The inspectors verified that the licensee appropriately prioritized the planned corrective actions and that these actions were adequate to minimize the likelihood of voids developing in the component cooling water system. These activities constitute completion of one annual follow-up sample as defined in Inspection Procedure 71152.
The inspectors selected one issue for an in
-depth follow
-up:  On November 30, 2015, gas voiding in the component cooling water system The inspectors assessed the licensee's problem identification threshold, cause analyses, extent of condition reviews and compensatory actions. The inspectors verified that the licensee appropriately prioritized the planned corrective actions and that these actions were adequate to minimize the likelihood of voids developing in the component cooling water system.
 
These activities constitute completion of one annual follow
-up sample as defined in Inspection Procedure 71152.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
Line 322: Line 471:


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
For the plant events listed below, the inspectors reviewed and observed plant parameters, reviewed personnel performance, and evaluated performance of mitigating systems as applicable. The inspectors communicated the plant events to appropriate regional personnel, and compared the event details with criteria contained in Inspection Manual Chapter 0309, "Reactive Inspection Decision Basis for Reactors," for consideration of potential reactive inspection activities. As applicable, the inspectors verified that the licensee made appropriate emergency classification assessments and properly reported the event in accordance with 10 CFR Parts 50.72 and 50.73. The inspectors reviewed the licensee's follow-up actions related to the event to assure that the licensee implemented appropriate corrective actions commensurate with their safety significance.
For the plant events listed below, the inspectors reviewed and observed plant parameters, reviewed personnel performance, and evaluated performance of mitigating systems as applicable. The inspectors communicated the plant events to appropriate regional personnel, and compared the event det ails with criteria contained in Ins pection Manual Chapter 0309, "Reactive Inspection Decision Basis for Reactors," for consideration of potential reactive inspection activities. As applicable, the inspectors verified that the licensee made appropriate emergency classification assessmen ts and properly re ported the event in accordance wit h 10 CFR Parts 50.72 and 50.73. The inspectors reviewed the licensee's follow
-up actions related to the event to assure that the licensee implemented a ppropriate corrective actions commensurate with their safety significance.


Operator response to the declaration of an unusual event due to a security condition on October 2, 2015  Operator response to an unanalyzed condition due to inadequate electrical isolation between the main control room and local operation of pressurizer heater bank 4, on October 21, 2015
Operator response to the declaration of an unusual event due to a security condition on October 2, 2015  Operator response to an unanalyzed condition due to inadequate electrical isolation between the main control room and local operation of pressurizer heater bank 4, on October 21, 2015
Line 329: Line 479:
No findings were identified.
No findings were identified.


===.2 (Closed) Licensee Event Report (LER) 05000285/2015-001-0. "Inadequate Design of High Energy Line Break Barriers"===
===.2 (Closed) Licensee Event Report (LER) 05000285/2015===
 
===0. "Inadequate Design of High Energy Line Break Barriers"===
 
The licensee submitted this report after they discovered that an inadequate High Energy Line Break (HELB) barrier had not been reported when it was originally discovered on September 30, 2013. The degraded barrier has been repaired and this LER was issued to document the original unanalyzed condition. The inspectors considered the licensee's previous actions to repair the HELB barrier and the documentation of this issue in the LER to be adequate and appropriate. The failure to report this condition in a timely manner is considered a minor violation in accordance with Section 2.3.1 of the Enforcement Policy. This failure to comply with the 10 CFR 50.73 reporting requirements in a timely manner constitutes a minor violation that is not subject to enforcement action in accordance with the NRC's Enforcement Policy. Therefore, this LER is closed. Documents reviewed are listed in the attachments.
The licensee submitted this report after they discovered that an inadequate High Energy Line Break (HELB) barrier had not been reported when it was originally discovered on September 30, 2013. The degraded barrier has been repaired and this LER was issued to document the original unanalyzed condition. The inspectors considered the licensee's previous actions to repair the HELB barrier and the documentation of this issue in the LER to be adequate and appropriate. The failure to report this condition in a timely manner is considered a minor violation in accordance with Section 2.3.1 of the Enforcement Policy. This failure to comply with the 10 CFR 50.73 reporting requirements in a timely manner constitutes a minor violation that is not subject to enforcement action in accordance with the NRC's Enforcement Policy. Therefore, this LER is closed. Documents reviewed are listed in the attachments.


===.3 (Closed) Licensee Event Report (LER) 05000285/2015-002-0. "Inoperable Auxiliary Feedwater System Due to Inadequate Procedure Change"===
===.3 (Closed) Licensee Event Report (LER) 05000285/2015===
The licensee submitted this report after they discovered that a procedure momentarily cross-tied Main Feedwater (MFW) with Auxiliary Feedwater (AFW) during system restoration steps. The failure to maintain qualified boundaries between these two systems resulted in the inoperability of the AFW system. The licensee causal analysis determined that procedure reviewers did not understand piping class separation requirements. To address this condition, the licensee conducted an extent of condition review and identified that additional AFW system procedures were affected. These AFW procedures were administratively restricted for use until they were subsequently revised to correct the lineups. No system procedures other than AFW were found to have similar cross connecting issues. In addition, the licensee has submitted a Training Request Form to address operators understanding of the operability impact of cross-tying class and non-class piping systems.
 
===0. "Inoperable Auxiliary Feedwater System Due to Inadequate Procedure Change===
 
The licensee submitted this report after they discovered that a procedure momentarily cross-tied Main Feed water (MFW) with Auxiliary Feedwater (AFW) during system restoration steps. The failure to maintain qualified boundaries between these two systems resulted in the inoperability of the AFW system. The licensee causal analysis determined that procedure reviewers did not understand piping class separation requirements. To address this condition, the licensee conducted an extent of condition review and identified that additional AFW system procedures were affected. T hese AFW procedures were administratively restricted for use until they were subsequently revised to correct the lineups. No system procedures other than AFW were found to have similar cross connecting issues. In addition, the licensee has submitted a Training Request Form to address operators understanding of the operability impact of cross
-tying class and non
-class piping systems.
 
NRC inspectors reviewed the details of this condition including corrective action documents, procedure revisions, and training documentation. Based on a review of the condition, the inspectors determined that during the period that the MFW and AFW systems were cross
-tied that the licensee was in violation of Technical Specification 2.5(1) which requires two AFW trains to be operable when cold leg temperature is above 300F. This violation was identified by the licensee and is discussed in further detail in section


NRC inspectors reviewed the details of this condition including corrective action documents, procedure revisions, and training documentation. Based on a review of the condition, the inspectors determined that during the period that the MFW and AFW systems were cross-tied that the licensee was in violation of Technical Specification 2.5(1) which requires two AFW trains to be operable when cold leg temperature is above 300F. This violation was identified by the licensee and is discussed in further detail in section
{{a|4OA7}}
{{a|4OA7}}
==4OA7 of this report.==
==4OA7 of this report.==
Therefore, this LER is closed. Documents are listed in the attachment.
Therefore, this LER is closed. Documents are listed in the attachment.


===.4 (Closed) Licensee Event Report (LER) 05000285/2015-003-00, "Containment Spray Inoperable due to Original Design Error"===
===.4 (Closed) Licensee Event Report (LER) 05000285/2015===
On April 16, 2015, during a refueling outage the licensee identified that because the original design of the plant failed to consider the thermal effects of a main steam line break or loss of coolant accident on containment spray piping, modifications were necessary to ensure the operability of the containment spray system during one of these postulated events. This condition existed because the original design of the plant did not account for the rise in the temperature of the dry containment spray piping inside containment. During a main steam line break or loss of coolant accident this piping would heat up more rapidly than piping that contains water and could reach temperatures of up to 290 degrees Fahrenheit. This rise in temperature would impose previously unaccounted for thermal stresses on the piping which in turn would transmit those stresses to the containment liner via certain pipe supports. The licensee corrected the problem by performing modifications to the containment spray pipe supports to ensure that stress limits would not be exceeded in the event of the aforementioned condition. The licensee also performed calculations and determined that prior to the modifications, if the postulated event were to occur, the containment spray piping and supports would have been able to deliver adequate flow despite exceeding ASME Section III Appendix F stress limits for one pipe support. NRC inspectors reviewed the details of this condition including pertinent calculations, corrective action documents, procedures, and completed work documentation associated with the modifications to the containment spray pipe supports. Based on a review of the condition inspectors determined that during the period prior to the modifications of the containment spray supports the licensee was in violation of Technical Specification 2.4(1)a.iv which requires all piping associated with the containment spray pumps to be operable while the reactor is in operation. This violation was identified by the licensee and is discussed in further detail in section
 
00, "Containment Spray Inoperable due to Original Design Error" On April 16, 2015, during a refueling outage the licensee identified that because the original design of the plant failed to consider the thermal effects of a main steam line break or loss of coolant accident on containment spray piping, modifications were necessary to ensure the operability of the containment spray system during one of these postulated events. This condition existed because the original design of the plant did not account for the rise in the temperature of the dry containment spray piping inside containment. During a main steam line break or loss of coolant accident this piping would heat up more rapidly than piping that contains water and could reach temperatures of up to 290 degrees Fahrenheit. This rise in temperature would impose previously unaccounted for thermal stresses on the piping which in turn would transmit those stresses to the containment liner via certain pipe supports. The licensee corrected the problem by performing modifications to the containment spray pipe supports to ensure that stress limits would not be exceeded in the event of the aforementioned condition. The licensee also performed calculations and determined that prior to the modifications, if the postulated event were to occur, the containment spray piping and supports would have been able to deliver adequate flow despite exceeding ASME Section III Appendix F stress limits for one pipe support.
 
NRC inspectors reviewed the details of this condition including pertinent calculations, corrective action documents, procedures, and completed work documentation associated with the modifications to the containment spray pipe supports. Based on a review of the condition inspectors determined that during the period prior to the modifications of the containment spray supports the licensee was in violation of Technical Specification 2.4(1)a.iv which requires all piping associated with the containment spray pumps to be operable while the reactor is in operation. This violation was identified by the licensee and is discussed in further detail in section
 
{{a|4OA7}}
{{a|4OA7}}
==4OA7 of this report.==
==4OA7 of this report.==
Therefore, this LER is closed. Documents are listed in the attachment. These activities constitute completion of five event follow-up samples, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71153.
Therefore, this LER is closed. Documents are listed in the attachment
. These activities constitute completion of five event follow
-up sample s, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71153.


{{a|4OA5}}
{{a|4OA5}}
Line 351: Line 517:


===.1 Operation of an Independent Spent Fuel Storage Facility Installation (ISFSI) at Operating Plants (60855.1)===
===.1 Operation of an Independent Spent Fuel Storage Facility Installation (ISFSI) at Operating Plants (60855.1)===
a. Operation of an ISFSI  Inspection Scope  A routine ISFSI inspection was conducted of the Fort Calhoun Station (FCS) ISFSI on September 21-24, 2015, by Region IV Division of Nuclear Material Safety inspectors. The inspectors observed and evaluated select licensee loading, processing, and heavy load procedures associated with the licensee's ISFSI program. Inspectors performed a review of the dry fuel storage records for the casks loaded at the ISFSI to verify that the licensee had loaded fuel in accordance with the Technical Specifications (TS) for approved contents. A document review of routine ISFSI activities since the last NRC ISFSI inspection (April 2013) was performed by the inspectors. The licensee had not loaded any new canisters since the last NRC routine ISFSI inspection. The inspectors requested documentation related to maintenance of the fuel building cask handling crane. Documents were provided that demonstrated the fuel building cask handling crane was inspected on an annual basis in accordance with the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) B30.2 safety requirements.


The inspectors reviewed the radiological conditions at the FCS ISFSI through a document review of the most recent radiological survey and three years of thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) monitoring data from around the ISFSI. A dry-cask-loading supervisor and one radiation protection (RP) technician accompanied the NRC inspectors during a walk-down of the ISFSI pad. A radiological survey was performed by one RP technician to record gamma exposure rates. The measurements taken by the RP technician and independently confirmed by the NRC inspectors were consistent with measurements recorded on the most recent ISFSI site survey. The radiological conditions in and around the ISFSI were as expected for the age, heat-load, and number of casks currently loaded at the ISFSI. The inspectors reviewed Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Reports for the FCS site for the last three years. The reports documented the dose equivalent to any real individual located beyond the site controlled area had been well below the 10 CFR 72.104(a)(2) requirement of less than 25 mrem per year.
a. Operation of an ISFSI Inspection Scope A routine ISFSI inspection was conducted of the Fort Calhoun Station (FCS) ISFSI on September 21
-24, 2015, by Region IV Division of Nuclear Material Safety inspectors. The inspectors observed and evaluated select licensee loading, processing, and heavy load procedures associated with the licensee's ISFSI program. Inspectors performed a review of the dry fuel storage records for the casks loaded at the ISFSI to verify that the licensee had loaded fuel in accordance with the Technical Specifications (TS) for approved contents.
 
A document review of routine ISFSI activities since the last NRC ISFSI inspection (April 2013) was performed by the inspectors. The licensee had not loaded any new canisters since the last NRC routine ISFSI inspection.
 
The inspectors requested documentation related to maintenance of the fuel building cask handling crane. Documents were provided that demonstrated the fuel building cask handling crane was inspected on an annual basis in accordance with the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) B30.2 safety requirements.
 
The inspectors reviewed the r adiological conditions at the FCS ISFSI through a document review of the most recent radiological survey and three years of thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) monitoring data from around the ISFSI. A dry
-cask-loading supervisor and one radiation protection (RP) technician accompanied the NRC inspector s during a walk
-down of the ISFSI pad. A radiological survey was performed by one RP technician to record gamma exposure rates. The measurements taken by the RP technician and independently confirmed by the NRC inspector s were consistent with measurements recorded on the most recent ISFSI site survey. The radiological conditions in and around the ISFSI were as expected for the age, heat
-load, and number of casks currently loaded at the ISFSI. The inspectors reviewed Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Reports for the FCS site for the last three years. The reports documented the dose equivalent to any real individual located beyond the site controlled area had been well below the 10 CFR 72.104(a)(2) requirement of less than 25 mrem per year.


The NRC inspectors reviewed the Corrective Action Program (CAP) associated with the ISFSI. A list of condition reports issued since the last NRC inspection conducted in April 2013, was provided by the licensee for the cask handling crane and ISFSI operations.
The NRC inspectors reviewed the Corrective Action Program (CAP) associated with the ISFSI. A list of condition reports issued since the last NRC inspection conducted in April 2013, was provided by the licensee for the cask handling crane and ISFSI operations.
Line 359: Line 534:
Of the list of Condition Reports (CRs) provided relating to the ISFSI and the cask handling cranes, the inspectors selected 37 for further review. The CRs were related to a variety of issues. The condition reports reviewed were well documented and properly categorized based on the safety significance of the issue. The corrective actions taken were appropriate for the situations.
Of the list of Condition Reports (CRs) provided relating to the ISFSI and the cask handling cranes, the inspectors selected 37 for further review. The CRs were related to a variety of issues. The condition reports reviewed were well documented and properly categorized based on the safety significance of the issue. The corrective actions taken were appropriate for the situations.


The inspectors reviewed the licensee's 10 CFR 72.48 screenings and evaluations for ISFSI program changes since the last NRC routine ISFSI inspection. Of the list of screenings provided by the licensee, the inspectors selected five for further review. Fort Calhoun Station had not performed any full 72.48 evaluations since the last NRC ISFSI inspection. The inspectors determined that the licensee had adequately evaluated the screenings reviewed.
The inspectors reviewed the licensee's 10 CFR 72.48 screenings and evaluations for ISFSI program changes since the last NRC routine ISFSI inspection. Of the list of screenings provided by the licensee, the inspectors selected five for further review.
 
Fort Calhoun Station had not performed any full 72.48 evaluations since the last NRC ISFSI inspection. The inspectors determined that the licensee had adequately evaluated the screenings reviewed.


The inspectors performed an on-site review of the Quality Assurance (QA) audits and QA surveillance reports related to dry cask storage activities at the FCS ISFSI. The QA audit reports and surveillances resulted in several condition reports. The inspectors reviewed the corrective actions resulting from the CRs to ensure that the identified deficiencies were properly categorized based on its safety significance and were properly resolved.
The inspectors performed an on-site review of the Quality Assurance (QA) audits and QA surveillance reports related to dry cask storage activities at the FCS ISFSI. The QA audit reports and surveillances resulted in several condition reports. The inspectors reviewed the corrective actions resulting from the CRs to ensure that the identified deficiencies were properly categorized based on its safety significance and were properly resolved.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
Adequate Analysis that Documents Protection of the ISFSI from Fires and Explosions  
Adequate Analysis that Documents Protection of the ISFSI from Fires and Explosions Introduction
 
. The inspectors identified an unresolved issue associated with the licensee's ISFSI Fire and Explosion Hazard
=====Introduction.=====
The inspectors identified an unresolved issue associated with the licensee's ISFSI Fire and Explosion Hazard


=====Analysis.=====
=====Analysis.=====
Federal Regulations 10 CFR 72.212(b)(3) required general licensees to ensure that each cask used conforms to the terms, conditions, and specifications of the Certificate of Compliance. During a review of FCS Updated Fire Hazards Analysis (UFHA) EA97-001 Appendix D "ISFSI Fire and Explosion Hazards Review," further information was required to determine if FCS was in compliance with the analysis.
Federal Regulations 10 CFR 72.212(b)(3) required general licensees to ensure that each cask used conforms to the terms, conditions, and specifications of the Certificate of Compliance. During a review of FCS Updated Fire Hazards Analysis (UFHA) EA97
-001 Appendix D "ISFSI Fire and Explosion Hazards Review," further information was required to determine if FCS was in compliance with the analysis.


=====Description.=====
Description
The FCS UFHA EA97-001 Appendix D was dated March 28, 2006. Section 3.3.2 of the Appendix documented that the analysis was based on a walk-down of the station that took place in June of 2005. Many examples were found during the review of the UFHA such that the NRC was unable to substantiate whether or not the licensee's analysis bounded the current operations and site configuration around the ISFSI.
. The FCS UFHA EA97
-001 Appendix D was dated March 28, 2006. Section 3.3.2 of the Appendix documented that the analysis was based on a walk
-down of the station that took place in June of 2005. Many examples were found during the review of the UFHA such that the NRC was unable to substantiate whether or not the licensee's analysis bounded the current operations and site configuration around the ISFSI.


Many referenced analyses and sections in the UFHA referred to use of the light-weight transfer cask and not the heavier OS197 Transfer Cask that is currently used by the licensee. A walk down of the storage yard to the south of the ISFSI identified a few office trailers and other miscellaneous combustible equipment that was not discussed in the UFHA. In 2007, Engineering Change 29295 replaced the main transformer. It was undetermined if this transformer was the same transformer that was analyzed in Section 3.3.2 of the ISFSI Fire and Explosion Hazards Review.
Many referenced analyses and sections in the UFHA referred to use of the light
-weight transfer cask and not the heavier OS197 Transfer Cask that is currently used by the licensee. A walk down of the storage yard to the south of the ISFSI identified a few office trailers and other miscellaneous combustible equipment that was not discussed in the UFHA. In 2007, Engineering Change 29295 replaced the main transformer. It was undetermined if this transformer was the same transformer that was analyzed in Section 3.3.2 of the ISFSI Fire and Explosion Hazards Review.


The licensee's review of this issue will be tracked as an Unresolved Item (URI) until the NRC is provided sufficient information to determine if ISFSI operations are bounded by the site's UFHA.  (URI 07200054/5015004-01, "Adequate Analysis that Documents Protection of the ISFSI from Fires and Explosions").  
The licensee's review of this issue will be tracked as an Unresolved Item (URI) until the NRC is provided sufficient information to determine if ISFSI operations are bounded by the site's UFHA.  (URI 07200054/5015004
-01, "Adequate Analysis that Documents Protection of the ISFSI from Fires and Explosions
").  
{{a|4OA6}}
{{a|4OA6}}
==4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit==
==4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit==
On September 24, 2015, the inspectors debriefed Mr. S. Dean, Plant Manager, and other members of the licensee's staff of the results of the ISFSI inspection documented in Section 4OA5.


On October 23, 2015, and after the Regional staff received consultation from NRC Headquarters Division of Spent Fuel Management's Spent Fuel Licensing Branch, regarding the Licensee identified violation discussed in Section 4OA7.1, the inspectors conducted a telephonic exit with Mr. S. Dean, Plant Manager, and other staff members. The inspectors presented the inspection results to members of the licensee management and staff. Licensee personnel acknowledged the information presented. The inspectors asked the licensee whether any materials examined during the inspection should be considered propriety. No propriety information was identified. On November 19, 2015, the inspectors presented the inspection results to Mr. L. Cortopassi, Site Vice President, and other members of the licensee staff. The licensee acknowledged the issues presented. The licensee confirmed that any proprietary information reviewed by the inspectors had been returned or destroyed. On December 9, 2015, the inspectors obtained the final annual cycle results and exited with Mr. B. Blessie, Operator Training Instructor. The inspectors did not review any proprietary information during this inspection.
On September 24, 2015
, the inspectors debriefed Mr. S. Dean, Plant Manager, and other members of the licensee's staff of the results of the ISFSI inspection documented in Section 4OA5.
 
On October 23, 2015, and after the Regional staff received consultation from NRC Headquarters Division of Spent Fuel Management's Spent Fuel Licensing Branch, regarding the Licensee identified violation discussed in Section 4OA7.1, the inspectors conducted a telephonic exit with Mr. S. Dean, Plant Manager, and other staff members. The inspectors presented the inspection results to members of the licensee management and staff. Licensee personnel acknowledged the information presented. The inspectors asked the licensee whether any materials examined during the inspection should be considered propriety. No propriety information was identified.
 
On November 19, 2015, the inspectors presented the inspection results to Mr. L. Cortopassi, Site Vice President, and other members of the licensee staff. The licensee acknowledged the issues presented. The licensee confirmed that any proprietary information reviewed by the inspectors had been returned or destroyed.
 
On December 9, 2015, the inspector s obtained the final annual cycle results and exited with Mr. B. Blessie, Operator Training Instructor. The inspector s did not review any proprietary information during this inspection.


On January 7, 2016, the inspectors presented the inspection results to Mr. L. Cortopassi, Site Vice President, and other members of the licensee staff. The licensee acknowledged the issues presented. The licensee confirmed that any proprietary information reviewed by the inspectors had been returned or destroyed.
On January 7, 2016, the inspectors presented the inspection results to Mr. L. Cortopassi, Site Vice President, and other members of the licensee staff. The licensee acknowledged the issues presented. The licensee confirmed that any proprietary information reviewed by the inspectors had been returned or destroyed.


{{a|4OA7}}
{{a|4OA7}}
==4OA7 Licensee-Identified Violations The following violations of very low safety significance (Green) were identified by the licensee and were violations of NRC requirements which meet the criteria of the NRC Enforcement Policy for being dispositioned as non-cited violations.==
==4OA7 Licensee-Identified Violations==
 
The following violation s of very low safety significance (Green) were identified by the licensee and were violation s of NRC requirements which meet the criteria of the NRC Enforcement Policy for being dispositioned as non-cited violations.


===.1 Title 10 CFR 72.174 requires that each licensee maintain sufficient records to furnish evidence of activities affecting quality.===
===.1 Title 10 CFR 72.174 requires that each licensee maintain sufficient records to furnish evidence of activities affecting quality.===
Records pertaining to the design, fabrication, erection, testing, maintenance, and use of structures, systems, and components important to safety must be maintained by or under the control of the licensee until the NRC terminates the license. Contrary to the above, as of June 21, 2013, Fort Calhoun failed to maintain sufficient records to furnish evidence of activities affecting quality. Specifically, the licensee did not maintain records for loading activities associated with DFS-HSM-06 that was placed on the ISFSI pad in July of 2009. This violation was identified by FCS and placed in their corrective action program (CR 2013-12884). The fuel assembly data was reconstituted based on records from the Reactor Engineering group, and the canister helium leak-test data was reconstituted based on the helium leak-test technician's field notes. The remaining canister records associated with the canister processing, sealing, and transportation to the ISFSI, including several TS requirements, were not found. Fort Calhoun reconstituted the fuel and helium leak test data and conducted interviews with cask loading personnel to conclude that there was no evidence to suggest that loading activities did not comply with the licensee's procedures and the licensed Technical Specifications. This violation did not have any safety impact because all fuel assemblies met the requirements for burn-up, decay heat, and cooling time and the licensee demonstrated that the canister integrity was intact based on the reconstituted helium leak test records. All the fuel inside the canister and the cask remain in a safe condition. This finding was reviewed by NRC Headquarters Division of Spent Fuel Management's Spent Fuel Licensing Branch. Based on the reconstituted records and interviews with the dry fuel loading staff, the NRC found no evidence to demonstrate that the canister did not meet the required license conditions and as such, found the canister acceptable for continued storage under FCS's general Part 72 license. However, though the canister is acceptable for storage, the licensee must track this issue to identify that further analyses may be required for this canister to meet all applicable Part 71 requirements to be acceptable for transportation.
Records pertaining to the design, fabrication, erection, testing, maintenance, and use of structures, systems, and components important to safety must be maintained by or under the control of the licensee until the NRC terminates the license. Contrary to the above, as of June 21, 2013, Fort Calhoun failed to maintain sufficient records to furnish evidence of activities affecting quality. Specifically, the licensee did not maintain records for loading activities associated with DFS
-HSM-06 that was placed on the ISFSI pad in July of 2009. This violation was identified by FC S and placed in their corrective action program (CR 2013
-12884). The fuel assembly data was reconstituted based on records from the Reactor Engineering group
, and the canister helium leak
-test data was reconstituted based on the helium leak
-test technician's field notes. The remaining canister records associated with the canister processing, sealing, and transpor tation to the ISFSI, including several TS requirements, were not found. Fort Calhoun reconstituted the fuel and helium leak test data and conducted interviews with cask loading personnel to conclude that there was no evidence to suggest that loading activities did not comply with the licensee's procedures and the licensed Technical Specifications. This violation did not have any safety impact because all fuel assemblies met the requirements for burn
-up, decay heat, and cooling time and the licensee demonstrated that the canister integrity was intact based on the reconstituted helium leak test records. All the fuel inside the canister and the cask remain in a safe condition. This finding was reviewed by NRC Headquarters Division of Spent Fuel Management's Spent Fuel Licensing Branch. Based on the reconstituted records and interviews with the dry fuel loading staff, the NRC found no evidence to demonstrate that the canister did not meet the required license conditions and as such, found the canister acceptable for continued storage under FCS's general Part 72 license. However, though the canister is acceptable for storage, the licensee must track this issue to identify that further analyses may be required for this canister to meet all applicable Part 71 requirements to be acceptable for transportation.
 
In accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy Section 2.2 and IMC 0612 Section 03.23, Part 72 ISFSI inspection findings follow the traditional enforcement process and are not disposition ed through the Reactor Oversight Process or the Significance Determination Process. The violation screened as having very low safety significance, Severity Level IV, and is being treated as a non
-cited violation, consistent with Section 2.3.2.a. of the Enforcement Policy.
 
The violation was determined to be more than minor since the licensee failed to establish, maintain, or implement adequate controls over procurement, construction, examination, or testing processes that are important to safety. The violation was entered into the licensee's corrective action program as CR 2013-12884. Following identification of the issue the licensee performed an assessment that showed the cask would continue to perform its design function. Corrective actions for this issue included performing an extent of condition review, performing an apparent cause analysis report, reconstitution of the missing documents, conducting interviews with the dry cask loading personnel, providing training to the staff involved, and changing processes and responsibilities within FCS Records Management Group.


In accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy Section 2.2 and IMC 0612 Section 03.23, Part 72 ISFSI inspection findings follow the traditional enforcement process and are not dispositioned through the Reactor Oversight Process or the Significance Determination Process. The violation screened as having very low safety significance, Severity Level IV, and is being treated as a non-cited violation, consistent with Section 2.3.2.a. of the Enforcement Policy. The violation was determined to be more than minor since the licensee failed to establish, maintain, or implement adequate controls over procurement, construction, examination, or testing processes that are important to safety. The violation was entered into the licensee's corrective action program as CR 2013-12884. Following identification of the issue the licensee performed an assessment that showed the cask would continue to perform its design function. Corrective actions for this issue included performing an extent of condition review, performing an apparent cause analysis report, reconstitution of the missing documents, conducting interviews with the dry cask loading personnel, providing training to the staff involved, and changing processes and responsibilities within FCS Records Management Group.
===.2 Technical Specification (TS)===


===.2 Technical Specification (TS) 2.4(1)a.iv requires that all valves, piping, and interlocks associated with the components of the containment cooling system required to function during accident conditions be operable.===
2.4(1)a.iv requires that all valves, piping, and interlocks associated with the components of the containment cooling system required to function during accident conditions be operable
In the event that any of these components, required to function during accident conditions become inoperable, the reactor shall be placed in a hot shutdown condition within 12 hours. The containment spray pumps and the associated piping are part of the containment cooling system. Prior to making modifications to containment spray piping in 2015, the operability of this piping would have been challenged by a main steam line break or a loss of coolant accident due to thermal stresses induced in the piping after a rise in containment temperature after the postulated event. Operation prior to the implementation of the modifications was a violation of the technical specification requirements to maintain operability of containment cooling systems.
. In the event that any of these components
, required to function during accident conditions become inoperable, the reactor shall be placed in a hot shutdown condition within 12 hours. The containment spray pumps and the associated piping are part of the containment cooling system. Prior to making modifications to containment spray piping in 2015, the operability of this piping would have been challenged by a main steam line break or a loss of coolant accident due to thermal stresses induced in the piping after a rise in containment temperature after the postulated event. Operation prior to the implementation of the modifications was a violation of the technical specification requirements to maintain operability of containment cooling systems.


The violation is more than minor because it is associated with the design control attribute of the mitigating systems cornerstone because the failure to anticipate the rise in containment spray piping temperature dates back to the original design of the plant. This adversely affects the cornerstone objective to ensure the availability, reliability, and capability of systems that respond to initiating events to prevent undesirable consequences. The violation was of very low safety significance because although the subject piping was inoperable due to exceeding code specified stress limits, analysis showed that the piping would have been able to perform its safety function to deliver adequate containment spray flow in the event of an accident. The licensee entered the issue into their corrective action program as Condition Report 2015-04578.
The violation is more than minor because it is associated with the design control attribute of the mitigating systems cornerstone because the failure to anticipate the rise in containment spray piping temperature dates back to the original design of the plant. This adversely affects the cornerstone objective to ensure the availability, reliability, and capability of systems that respond to initiating events to prevent undesirable consequences. The violation was of very low safety significance because although the subject piping was inoperable due to exceeding code specified stress limits, analysis showed that the piping would have been able to perform its safety function to deliver adequate containment spray flow in the event of an accident. The licensee entered the issue into their corrective action program as Condition Report 2015-04578.


===.3 Technical Specification (TS) 2.5(1) requires two trains of auxiliary feedwater (AFW) to be operable when cold leg temperature is above 300F.===
===.3 Technical Specification (TS)===
In the event that both trains become inoperable, immediate action is required to restore one AFW train to operable status. Technical Specification 2.0.1 and all TS actions requiring mode changes are suspended until one AFW train is restored to operable status. Operation with the main and auxiliary feedwater cross-tied was a violation of the technical specification requirements to maintain operability of AFW systems. The violation is more than minor because it is associated with the configuration control attribute of the mitigating systems cornerstone because the failure to prevent cross-tying these systems resulted in unrecognized inoperability of both trains of AFW. This adversely affects the cornerstone objective to ensure the availability, reliability, and capability of systems that respond to initiating events to prevent undesirable consequences. The violation was of very low safety significance because although MFW and AFW were momentarily cross-tied, this condition existed for only a brief period of time as operators restored system line-ups following system testing. In addition, a Senior Reactor Analyst evaluated the postulated main feedwater line break frequency and exposure time of the condition and determined the likelihood of this event during the exposure time is less than the Green/White threshold and of very low safety significance. The licensee entered the issue into their corrective action program as Condition Report 2015 03698.
 
2.5(1) requires two trains of auxiliary feedwater (AFW) to be operable when cold leg temperature is above 300F. In the event that both trains become inoperable, immediate action is required to restore one AFW train to operable status. Technical Specification 2.0.1 and all TS actions requiring mode changes are suspended until one AFW train is restored to operable status. Operation with the main and auxiliary feedwater cross-tied was a violation of the technical specification requirements to maintain operability of AFW systems. The violation is more than minor because it is associated with the configuration control attribute of the mitigating systems cornerstone because the failure to prevent cross
-tying these systems resulted in unrecognized inoperability of both trains of AFW. This adversely affects the cornerstone objective to ensure the availability, reliability, and capability of systems that respond to initiating events to prevent undesirable consequences. The violation was of very low safety significance because although MFW and AFW were momentarily cross
-tied, this condition existed for only a brief period of time as operators restored system line
-ups following system testing
. In addition, a Senior Reactor Analyst evaluated the postulated main feedwater line break frequency and exposure time of the condition and determined the likelihood of this event during the exposure time is less than the Green/White threshold and of very low safety significance. The licensee entered the issue into their corrective action program as Condition Report 2015 03698.


=SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION=
=SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION=
Line 407: Line 613:


===Licensee Personnel===
===Licensee Personnel===
: [[contact::R. Beck]], Manager, Chemistry, Environmental, and Radwaste  
: [[contact::R. Beck]], Manager, Chemistry, Environmental, and Radwaste
: [[contact::B. Blome]], Manager, Regulatory Assurance  
: [[contact::B. Blome]], Manager, Regulatory Assurance
: [[contact::D. Brehm]], Supervisor, Radiation Protection  
: [[contact::D. Brehm]], Supervisor, Radiation Protection
: [[contact::C. Cameron]], Principal, Regulatory Specialist  
: [[contact::C. Cameron]], Principal, Regulatory Specialist
: [[contact::H. Childs]], Manager, Security  
: [[contact::H. Childs]], Manager, Security
: [[contact::L. Cortopassi]], Site Vice President  
: [[contact::L. Cortopassi]], Site Vice President
: [[contact::S. Dean]], Plant Manager  
: [[contact::S. Dean]], Plan
: [[contact::A. Dudas]], Radiation Health Specialist, Radiation Protection  
t Manager  
: [[contact::L. Eaton]], Licensed Operator  
: [[contact::A. Dudas]], Radiation Health Specialist, Radiation Protection
: [[contact::S. Fatora]], Director, Site Work Management  
: [[contact::L. Eaton]], Licensed Operator
: [[contact::H. Goodman]], Director, Site Engineering  
: [[contact::S. Fatora]], Director, Site Work Management
: [[contact::M. Holaway]], Licensed Operator  
: [[contact::H. Goodman]], Director, Site Engineering
: [[contact::R. Hugenroth]], Manager, Nuclear Oversight  
: [[contact::M. Holaway]], Licensed Operator
: [[contact::T. Jantzi]], Unit Supervisor  
: [[contact::R. Hugenroth]], Manager, Nuclear Oversight
: [[contact::D. Little]], Health Physicist, Radiation Protection  
: [[contact::T. Jantzi]], Unit Supervisor
: [[contact::T. Maine]], Manager, Radiation Protection
: [[contact::D. Little]], Health Physicist, Radiation Protection
: [[contact::E. Matzke]], Senior Licensing Engineer  
: [[contact::T. Maine]], Manager, Radiation Protectio
: [[contact::D. Ortiz]], Shift Technical Advisor  
n
: [[contact::A. Pallas]], Shift Manager  
: [[contact::E. Matzke]], Senior Licensing Engineer
: [[contact::T. Parent]], Engineering  
: [[contact::D. Ortiz]], Shift Technical Advisor
: [[contact::M. Peak]], Operator Burdens Coordinator  
: [[contact::A. Pallas]], Shift Manager
: [[contact::B. Pearson]], Supervisor, Radiation Protection  
: [[contact::T. Parent]], Engineering
: [[contact::E. Plautz]], Manager, Emergency Planning  
: [[contact::M. Peak]], Operator Burdens Coordinator
: [[contact::C. Scofield]], Design Engineering  
: [[contact::B. Pearson]], Supervisor, Radiation Protection
: [[contact::S. Swanson]], Director, Operations  
: [[contact::E. Plautz]], Manager, Emergency Planning
: [[contact::R. Swerczek II]], Engineering  
: [[contact::C. Scofield]], Design Engineering
: [[contact::P. Turner]], ISFSI Manager  
: [[contact::S. Swanson]], Director, Operations
: [[contact::T. Uehling]], Manager, Training  
: [[contact::R. Swerczek II]], Engineering
: [[contact::P. Turner]], ISFSI Manager
: [[contact::T. Uehling]], Manager, Training
 
===NRC Personnel===
===NRC Personnel===
: [[contact::M. Sampson]], Division of Spent Fuel Management
: [[contact::M. Sampson]], Division of Spent Fuel Management


==LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED==
==LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED==
Opened 07200054/2015001-01 URI Adequate Analysis that Documents Protection of the ISFSI from Fires and Explosions (Section 4OA5)   
 
Opened 07200054/2015001
-01 URI Adequate Analysis that Documents Protection of the ISFSI from Fires and Explosions
(Section 4OA5)   
===Closed===
===Closed===
: [[Closes LER::05000285/LER-2015-001]]-00 LER Inadequate Design of High Energy Line Break Barriers (Section 4OA3)
: [[Closes LER::05000285/LER-2015-001]]-00 LER Inadequate Design of High Energy Line Break Barriers
: [[Closes LER::05000285/LER-2015-002]]-00 LER Inoperable Auxiliary Feedwater System Due to Inadequate Procedure Change (Section 4OA3)
(Section 4OA3)
: [[Closes LER::05000285/LER-2015-003]]-00 LER Containment Spray Inoperable Due to Original Design Error (Section 4OA3)  
: [[Closes LER::05000285/LER-2015-002]]-00 LER Inoperable Auxiliary Feedwater System Due to Inadequate Procedure Change
(Section 4OA3)
: [[Closes LER::05000285/LER-2015-003]]-00 LER Containment Spray Inoperable Due to Original Design Error
(Section 4OA3)
 
==LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED==
==LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED==
==Section 1R01: Adverse Weather Protection==
==Section 1R01: Adverse Weather Protection==
Line 449: Line 665:
===Procedures===
===Procedures===
: Number Title Revision
: Number Title Revision
: OI-EW-1 Extreme Weather 33
: OI-EW-1 Extreme Weather
: SO-G-119 Site Wind Generated Missile Protection Standards 2
: SO-G-119 Site Wind Generated Missile Protection Standards
: OP-AA-108-111-1001 Severe Weather and Natural Disaster Guidelines 12
: OP-AA-108-111-1001 Severe Weather and Natural Disaster Guidelines
: WC-AA-107 Seasonal Readiness 16
: WC-AA-107 Seasonal Readiness
: SA-AA-2114 Winter Safety 3
: SA-AA-2114 Winter Safety 3
: AOP-1 Acts of Nature 45
: AOP-1 Acts of Nature  
===Condition Reports===
===Condition Reports===
(CRs) 2013-0899 2014-14053 2014-14241 2014-14483 2014-14701 2014-15353 2015-0034 2015-0056 2015-0186 2015-0315 2015-3969 2015-11976 2015-11992 2015-13089  
(CRs)
: 2013-0899 2014-14053 2014-14241 2014-14483 2014-14701 2014-15353 2015-0034 2015-0056 2015-0186 2015-0315 2015-3969 2015-11976 2015-11992 2015-13089  
===Miscellaneous Documents===
===Miscellaneous Documents===
: Number Title Revision
: Number Title Revision
: FCS Snow Removal Plan
: FCS Snow Removal Plan
: USAR 9.8 Raw Water System 36
: USAR 9.8 Raw Water System


==Section 1R04: Equipment Alignment==
==Section 1R04: Equipment Alignment==
Line 466: Line 683:
===Procedures===
===Procedures===
: Number Title Revision
: Number Title Revision
: OI-DG-1 Emergency Diesel Generator No. 1 Operating Instruction 64
: OI-DG-1 Emergency Diesel Generator No. 1 Operating Instruction
: OI-CS-1 Containment Spray Normal Operation 51
: OI-CS-1 Containment Spray Normal Operation
: OI-DG-2 Emergency Diesel Generator No. 2 Operating Instruction 70
: OI-DG-2 Emergency Diesel Generator No. 2
: OI-RW-1 Raw Water System Normal Operation 108
: Operating Instruction
: OP-ST-AFW-0004 Auxiliary Feedwater Pump
: OI-RW-1 Raw Water System Normal Operation
: FW-10 Operability
: 108
: 7
: OP-ST-AFW-0004 Auxiliary Feedwater Pump FW
: IC-ST-IA-3009 Operability Test of 1a-YCA-1045-C and Close Stroke Test
-10 Operability
: IC-ST-IA-3009 Operability Test of 1a
-YCA-1045-C and Close Stroke Test
: YCV-1045 7
: YCV-1045 7
: OI-AFW-1 Auxiliary Feedwater Operating Instruction 85
: OI-AFW-1 Auxiliary Feedwater Operating Instruction
: SO-G-123 Protected Equipment Program
: SO-G-123 Protected Equipment Program
: 8
===Condition Reports===
===Condition Reports===
(CRs) 2014-0424 2014-1637 2014-2858 2014-4205 2014-6167 2014-6314 2014-6303 2014-6401 2014-13768 2015-1271 2015-1293 2015-10464 2015-13104 2015-13324  
(CRs)
: 2014-0424 2014-1637 2014-2858 2014-4205 2014-6167 2014-6314 2014-6303 2014-6401 2014-13768 2015-1271 2015-1293 2015-10464 2015-13104 2015-13324  
===Miscellaneous Documents===
===Miscellaneous Documents===
: Number Title Revision USAR 8.4 Emergency Power Sources
: Number Title Revision USAR 8.4 Emergency Power Sources
: 19
: DBD-112 Emergency Diesel Generators Design Basis Document
: DBD-112 Emergency Diesel Generators Design Basis Document 31 USAR 9.8 Raw Water System 35
: USAR 9.8 Raw Water System  
===Drawings===
===Drawings===
: Number Title Revision 11405-M-264 Instrument Air Diagram 66 B120F07001 Starting Air System Schematic for
: Number Title Revision 11405-M-264 Instrument Air Diagram
: DG-1 38 11405-M-262 Fuel Oil Flow Diagram 65 B120F04002 Jacket Water Schematic for
: B120F07001
: DG-1 9 B120F03001 Lube Oil System Schematic for
: Starting Air System Schematic for DG
: DG-1 16 11405-M-100 Raw Water Flow Diagram 105 E23866-210-130 Safety Injection and Containment Spray System Flow Diagram P &
-1 38 11405-M-262 Fuel Oil Flow Diagram
: ID 118   
: B120F04002
: 11405-M-252 Steam P&ID, SH1 116 11405-M-253 Steam Generator Feedwater and Blowdown P&ID, SH4 42 11405-M-264 Instrument Air Diagram 66 B120F07001 Starting Air System Schematic for
: Jacket Water Schematic for DG
: DG-1 38  
-1 9 B120F03001
: Lube Oil System Schematic for DG
-1 16 11405-M-100 Raw Water Flow Diagram
: 105 E23866-210-130 Safety Injection and Containment Spray System Flow Diagram P & ID
: 118   
: 11405-M-252 Steam P&ID, SH1
: 116 11405-M-253 Steam Generator Feedwater and Blowdown P&ID, SH4
: 11405-M-264 Instrument Air Diagram
: B120F07001
: Starting Air System Schematic for DG
-1 38  
===Condition Reports===
===Condition Reports===
(CRs) 2015-13104  
(CRs)
: 2015-13104  
===Work Orders===
===Work Orders===
: 549926-01 549771-01
: 549926-01 549771-01
Line 501: Line 731:
===Procedures===
===Procedures===
: Number Title Revision
: Number Title Revision
: AOP-06-02 Fire Emergency Uncontrolled Areas of Auxiliary Building 6
: AOP-06-02 Fire Emergency Uncontrolled Areas of Auxiliary Building
: AOP-06-03 Fire Emergency Miscellaneous Areas 4
: AOP-06-03 Fire Emergency Miscellaneous Areas
: SO-G-28 Station Fire Plan 89
: SO-G-28 Station Fire Plan
: SO-G-28 FCS Standing Order, Page 20 of 234 90
: SO-G-28 FCS Standing Order, Page 20 of 234
: SO-G-102 Fire Protection Program 21
: SO-G-102 Fire Protection Program
: CC-FC-201 Fire Protection Program 0
: CC-FC-201 Fire Protection Program
: OP-ST-FP-0003 Fire Protection System Diesel Generator Rooms Sprinkler Functional Test 16
: OP-ST-FP-0003 Fire Protection System Diesel Generator Rooms Sprinkler Functional Test  
===Condition Reports===
===Condition Reports===
(CRs) 2013-19962 2014-8637 2014-12418 2015-12528 2015-12538  
(CRs)
: 2013-19962 2014-8637 2014-12418 2015-12528 2015-12538  
===Miscellaneous Documents===
===Miscellaneous Documents===
: Number Title Revision/Date EA97-001 Updated Fire Hazards Analysis 18 USAR 9.11 Fire Protection System 25
: Number Title Revision/Date EA97-001 Updated Fire Hazards Analysis
: Integrated Work Schedule
: USAR 9.11
: October 29, 2015 EA98-005 Fire Barrier Evaluation 8 USAR 9.11
: Fire Protection System Integrated Work Schedule October 29, 2015 EA98-005 Fire Barrier Evaluation
: Auxiliary Systems Fire Protection System 28 FC05814 Combustible Loading Calculation, Pages 1, 38, 39, 130, 131 13  
: USAR 9.11
: Auxiliary Systems Fire Protection System
: FC05814 Combustible Loading Calculation, Pages 1, 38, 39, 130,  
: 131 13  
===Work Orders===
===Work Orders===
: 484903
: 484903
Line 522: Line 756:
===Procedures===
===Procedures===
: Number Title Revision
: Number Title Revision
: EM-FLP-AE-0001 Inspection and Dewatering of Manholes 1
: EM-FLP-AE-0001 Inspection and Dewatering of Manholes  
===Condition Reports===
===Condition Reports===
(CRs) 2009-4216 2012-4997 2015-11980 2015-13218 2015-13256 2015-14367  
(CRs)
: 2009-4216 2012-4997 2015-11980 2015-13218 2015-13256 2015-14367  
===Miscellaneous Documents===
===Miscellaneous Documents===
: Number
: Number
: Title Revision/Date
: Title Revision/Date
: PBD-30 Cables and Connections 2
: PBD-30 Cables and Con nections 2
: EC 56806 Wireless Remote Level Indication for Manholes 0
: EC 56806 Wireless Remote Level Indication for Manholes
: LIC 120041 Reply to Notification of Violation
: LIC 120041
: EA-12-035 April 12, 2012
: Reply to Notification of Violation EA
: ER-AA-300-1 Cable Condition Monitoring Program 0
-12-035 April 12, 2012
: ER-AA-300-1 Cable Condition Monitoring Program


==Section 1R07: Heat Sink Performance==
==Section 1R07: Heat Sink Performance==
Line 538: Line 774:
===Procedures===
===Procedures===
: Number Title Revision
: Number Title Revision
: PE-RR-CCW-0100 Disassembly, Cleaning, and Repair of CCW Heat Exchanger-Raw Water Side 44
: PE-RR-CCW-0100 Disassembly, Cleaning, and Repair of CCW Heat Exchanger
-Raw Water Side  
===Work Orders===
===Work Orders===
: 522251
: 2251
: Title Maintenance Rule Functional Scoping Sheet for
: Title Maintenance Rule Functional Scoping Sheet for AC
: AC-1D EPRI
-1D EPRI
: NP-7552 Heat Exchanger Performance Monitoring Guidelines
: NP-7552 Heat Exchanger Performance Monitoring Guidelines


Line 551: Line 788:
: AOP-37 Section II, Credible Site Specific Threat  
: AOP-37 Section II, Credible Site Specific Threat  
===Miscellaneous Documents===
===Miscellaneous Documents===
: Title Revision/Date Emergency Action Level Criteria
: Title Revision/Date Emergency Action Level Criteria Reactor Plant Notification Worksheets October 2, 2015 Simulator Scenario Guide 82111s, Inadvertent AFAS Control Room Crew in SCBAs 3a Simulator Scenario Guide 82111V
: Reactor Plant Notification Worksheets
-2, Armed Attack
: October 2, 2015 Simulator Scenario Guide 82111s, Inadvertent AFAS Control Room Crew in SCBAs 3a Simulator Scenario Guide 82111V-2, Armed Attack 11


==Section 1R12: Maintenance Effectiveness==
==Section 1R12: Maintenance Effectiveness==
Line 559: Line 795:
===Procedures===
===Procedures===
: Number Title Revision
: Number Title Revision
: ER-AA-310-1004 Maintenance Rule-Performance Monitoring 13
: ER-AA-310-1004 Maintenance Rule
: OI-AFW-4 Auxiliary Feedwater Startup System Operations 89
-Performance Monitoring
: ER-AA-310 Implementation of the Maintenance Rule 9
: OI-AFW-4 Auxiliary Feedwater Startup System Operations
: ER-AA-310-1005 Maintenance Rule-Dispositioning Between (a)(1) and (1)(2) 7
: ER-AA-310 Implementation of the Maintenance Rule
: ER-AA-310-1001 Maintenance Rule-Scoping 4
: ER-AA-310-1005 Maintenance Rule
: ER-AA-310-1002 Maintenance Rule Functions 3
-Dispositioning Between (a)(1) and (1)(2)
: ER-AA-310-1003 Performance Criteria Selection 4
: ER-AA-310-1001 Maintenance Rule
-Scoping 4
: ER-AA-310-1002 Maintenance Rule Functions
: ER-AA-310-1003 Performance Criteria Selection  
===Condition Reports===
===Condition Reports===
(CRs) 2015-10170 2015-10177 2015-3698 2015-11560 2015-12414 2015-12825 2015-12828  
(CRs)
: 2015-10170 2015-10177 2015-3698 2015-11560 2015-12414 2015-12825 2015-12828  
===Miscellaneous Documents===
===Miscellaneous Documents===
: Number Title Revision/Date
: Number Title Revision/Date
: Maintenance Rule In Box Database Disposition of
: Maintenance Rule In Box Database Disposition of CR
: CR 2015-10170
: 2015-10170
: Maintenance Rule Scoping Data Sheet for Pressurizer Heaters
: Maintenance Rule Scoping Data Sheet for Pressurizer Heaters
: LER 2015-002 Inoperable Auxiliary Feedwater System Due to Inadequate Procedure Change 0
: LER 2015-002 Inoperable Auxiliary Feedwater System Due to Inadequate Procedure Change  
===Miscellaneous Documents===
===Miscellaneous Documents===
: Number Title Revision/Date Training Request Form,
: Number Title Revision/Date Training Request Form,
: TQ-FC-221-FO50
: TQ-FC-221-FO50
: Operability Impact of Cross-tying Class and Non-Class Piping Systems
: Operability Impact of Cross
: Maintenance Rule Scoping Document for Auxiliary Feedwater System
-tying Class and Non
: Exelon System Inbox Data Base Entries for
-Class Piping Systems Maintenance Rule Scoping Document for Auxiliary Feedwater System Exelon System Inbox Data Base Entries for CR 2015
: CR 2015-3698
-3698
: Maintenance Rule Expert Technical Meeting Minutes Dated November 19, 2015  (a)(1) Action Plan for
: Maintenance Rule Expert Technical Meeting Minutes Dated November  
: HCV-347/348
: 19, 2015  (a)(1) Action Plan for HCV
: Minutes from Maintenance Rule Expert Technical Panel 1 November 15, 2015 RG 1.160 Monitoring the Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear Power Plants 3 NUMARC 93-01 Industry Guidelines for Monitoring Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear Power Plants 2
-347/348
: Minutes from Maintenance Rule Expert Technical Panel 1 November  
: 15, 2015 RG 1.160 Monitoring the Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear Power Plants
: NUMARC 93
-01 Industry Guidelines for Monitoring Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear Power Plants


==Section 1R13: Maintenance Risk Assessments and Emergent Work Control==
==Section 1R13: Maintenance Risk Assessments and Emergent Work Control==
Line 589: Line 833:
===Procedures===
===Procedures===
: Number Title Revision
: Number Title Revision
: ER-AA-600 Risk Management 7
: ER-AA-600 Risk Management
: ER-AA-600-1011 Risk Management Administrative Guidance 14
: ER-AA-600-1011 Risk Management Administrative Guidance
: ER-AA-600-1042 On-line Risk Management 9
: ER-AA-600-1042 On-line Risk Management
: FCSG-19 Performing Risk Assessments 17
: FCSG-19 Performing Risk Assessments
: SO-G-96 Planned LCO Entry Criteria and Equipment Reliability Control 15
: SO-G-96 Planned LCO Entry Criteria and Equipment Reliability Control 15
: SO-G-123 Protected Equipment Program 8
: SO-G-123 Protected Equipment Program
: WC-AA-101 On-Line Work Control Process 23
: WC-AA-101 On-Line Work Control Process
: WC-AA-104 Integrated Risk Management 21
: WC-AA-104 Integrated Risk Management
: OP-PM-AFW-0004 Third Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Operability Verification 41
: OP-PM-AFW-0004 Third Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Operability Verification
: OP-ST-DG-0002 Emergency Diesel Generator Check 78
: OP-ST-DG-0002 Emergency Diesel Generator Check
: EM-PM-EX-0202
: EM-PM-EX-0202
: AK-2A-25 and
: AK-2A-25 and AK
: AK-7A-25 Circuit Breaker Inspections 41
-7A-25 Circuit Breaker Inspections  
===Condition Reports===
===Condition Reports===
(CRs)
(CRs)
: 2015-2302  
: 2015-2302  
===Work Orders===
===Work Orders===
Line 609: Line 853:
===Miscellaneous Documents===
===Miscellaneous Documents===
: Number Title Revision/Date
: Number Title Revision/Date
: Equipment Out of Service Quantitative Risk Assessment Tool
: Equipment Out of Service Quantitative Risk Assessment Tool Work Schedule of Week October 26, 2015
: Work Schedule of Week October 26, 2015
: Work Schedule of Week November  
: Work Schedule of Week November 2, 2015 RG 1.160 Monitoring the Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear Power Plants 39 NUMARC 93-01 Industry Guidelines for Monitoring Effectiveness of Maintenance Nuclear Power Plants 2
: 2, 2015 RG 1.160 Monitoring the Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear Power Plants
: NUMARC 93
-01 Industry Guidelines for Monitoring Effectiveness of Maintenance Nuclear Power Plants


==Section 1R15: Operability Determinations and Functionality Assessments==
==Section 1R15: Operability Determinations and Functionality Assessments==
Line 617: Line 863:
===Procedures===
===Procedures===
: Number Title Revision
: Number Title Revision
: OP-FC-108-115 Operability Determinations 2
: OP-FC-108-115 Operability Determinations
: QCP-400 Visual Inspections 19
: QCP-400 Visual Inspection
: OP-ST-CCW-3006B Component Cooling Category A and B Valve Exercise Test (for the C and D valves) 0a
s 19
: AOP-17 Loss of Instrument Air 16
: OP-ST-CCW-3006B Component Cooling Category A and B Valve Exercise Test (for the C and D valves)
: 0a
: AOP-17 Loss of Instrument Air
: OP-ST-RW-3031
: OP-ST-RW-3031
: AC-1D Raw Water Pump Quarterly In-service Test 42
: AC-1D Raw Water Pump Quarterly In-service Test 42
: AOP-18 Loss of Raw Water 86
: AOP-18 Loss of Raw Water
: OP-AA-102-103 Operator Work Around Program 4
: OP-AA-102-103 Operator Work Around Program
: OP-AA-102-103-1001 Operator Burdens and Plants Significant Decision Impact Program 6  
: OP-AA-102-103-1001 Operator Burdens and Plants Significant Decision Impact Program 6  
===Drawings===
===Drawings===
: Number Title Revision 11405-M-40 Auxiliary Coolant Component Cooling System Flow Diagram 36
: Number Title Revision 11405-M-40 Auxiliary Coolant Component Cooling System Flow Diagram  
===Condition Reports===
===Condition Reports===
(CRs) 2015-04654 2015-04578 2014-12535 2015-1268 2015-12605 2015-12195 2015-12123 2015-9469 2015-11779 2015-10977 2015-9958 2015-11990  
(CRs)
: 2015-04654 2015-04578 2014-12535 2015-1268 2015-12605 2015-12195 2015-12123 2015-9469 2015-11779 2015-10977 2015-9958 2015-11990  
===Miscellaneous===
===Miscellaneous===
: Number Title Revision/Date FC08434 Calculation:
: Number Title Revision/Date FC08434 Calculation:  
: Operability Evaluation of Containment Spray Piping and Structural System 0 FC08437 Calculation:
: Operability Evaluation of Containment Spray Piping and Structural System
: Containment Spray Pipe Support Stiffness Evaluation 0 ASME BPVC Section III Div 1 Appendix F Rules for Evaluation of Service Loadings With Level D Service Limits 1983
: FC08437 Calculation:  
: Containment Spray Pipe Support Stiffness Evaluation
: ASME BPVC Section III  
: Div 1 Appendix F
: Rules for Evaluation of Service Loadings With Level D Service Limits
: 1983
: PLDBD-ME-10 Plant Level Design Basis Document for Pipe Stress and Supports 17
: PLDBD-ME-10 Plant Level Design Basis Document for Pipe Stress and Supports 17
: FCS-179967-RP01 Containment Spray System Past Operability Report 0 EC66593 Engineering Change:
: FCS-179967-RP01 Containment Spray System Pa st Operability Report
: Containment Spray System Past Operability Report 0 USAR Appendix F Classification of Structures and Equipment and Seismic Criteria 7 FC08436 Calculation:
: EC66593 Engineering Change:
: Evaluation of Stiffness for Containment Spray U-Bolts 0 TS 2.15.3 Alternate Shutdown Panel
: Containment S
: USAR 7.6.8 Alternate Shutdown Capability
pray System Past Operability Report
: EA 11-026 Design Requirements for Back-up systems for Air Operated Valves 1 USAR 4.3.1 Component and System Design and Operation
: USAR Appendix F
: Classification of Structures and Eq uipment and Seismic Criteria 7 FC08436 Calculation:  
: Evaluation of Stiffness for Containment Spray  
: U-Bolts 0 TS 2.15.3
: Alternate Shutdown Panel
: USAR 7.6.8
: Alternate Shutdown Capability
: EA 11-026 Design Requirements for Back
-up systems for Air Operated Valves 1 USAR 4.3.1
: Component and System Design and Operation
: TS 2.1.7 Pressurizer
: TS 2.1.7 Pressurizer
: DBD-116 Feedwater System Design Basis Documents
: DBD-116 Feedwater System Design Basis Documents
: USAR 14.9 Loss of Load Analysis 17 USAR 14.10 Malfunctions of the Feedwater System 27 AU6184 Steel Valve Body-Fisher Type
: USAR 14.9
: FC7863 HELB Mass and Energy Release in the Auxiliary Building 1 TS 2.4 Containment Cooling 249  
: Loss of Load Analysis
: USAR 14.10
: Malfunctions of the Feedwater System
: AU6184 Steel Valve Body
-Fisher Type
: FC7863 HELB Mass and Energy Release in the Auxiliary Building
: TS 2.4 Containment Cooling
: 249  
===Miscellaneous===
===Miscellaneous===
: Number Title Revision/Date TS 3.3 Reactor Coolant and other Components Subject to ASME XI Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code 230 USAR 9.8 Raw Water System 30
: Number Title Revision/Date TS 3.3 Reactor Coolant and other Components Subject to ASME
: XI Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code
: 230 USAR 9.8 Raw Water System
: TDB-111.34
: TDB-111.34
: AC-1D Pump Curve 35 11405-M-100 Raw Water Flow Diagram
: AC-1D Pump Curve 35 11405-M-100 Raw Water Flow Diagram
: 11405-M-253 Steam Generator Feedwater and Blowdown Flow Diagram 99
: 11405-M-253 Steam Generator Feedwater and Blowdown Flow Diagram
: EN 51487 Unanalyzed Condition Affecting the Capability to Transfer Pressurizer Heater Control from the Control Room to the Alternate Shutdown Locations due to the Potential for an External Hot Short from a Fire in the Control Room or Cable Spreading Room
: EN 51487 Unanalyzed Condition Affecting the Capability to Transfer Pressurizer Heater Control from the Control Room to the Alternate Shutdown Locations due to the Potential for an External Hot Short from a Fire in the Control Room or Cable Spreading Room
: TD J072.0080 Instruction Manual for D-251 Pneumatic Piston Damper Actuators 0
: TD J072.0080
: Instruction Manual for D
-251 Pneumatic Piston Damper Actuators  
===Work Orders===
===Work Orders===
: 541720 560432
: 541720 560432
Line 658: Line 932:
===Procedures===
===Procedures===
: Number Title Revision
: Number Title Revision
: OP-FC-108-115 Operability Determinations 2
: OP-FC-108-115 Operability Determinations  
===Condition Reports===
===Condition Reports===
(CRs) 2014-12535 2015-04578 2015-04654  
(CRs)
: 2014-12535 2015-04578 2015-04654  
===Miscellaneous Documents===
===Miscellaneous Documents===
: Number Title Revision/Date FC08434 Calculation:
: Number Title Revision/Date FC08434 Calculation:  
: Operability Evaluation of Containment Spray Piping and Structural System
: Operability Evaluation of Containment Spray Piping and Structural System
: FC08437 Calculation:
: FC08437 Calculation:  
: Containment Spray Pipe Support Stiffness Evaluation
: Containment Spray Pipe Support Stiffness Evaluation
: ASME BPVC Section III Div I Appendix F Rules for Evaluation of Service Loadings with Level D Service Limits 1983  
: ASME BPVC Section III Div I Appendix F
: Rules for Evaluation of Service Loadings with Level D Service Limits
: 1983  
===Miscellaneous Documents===
===Miscellaneous Documents===
: Number Title Revision/Date
: Number Title Revision/Date
: PLDBD-ME-10 Plant Level Design Basis Document for Pipe Stress and Supports 17
: PLDBD-ME-10 Plant Level Design Basis Document for Pipe Stress and Supports 17
: FCS-179967-RP01 Containment Spray System Past Operability Report 0
: FCS-179967-RP01 Containment Spray System Past Operability Report
: EC 66593 Engineering Change:
: EC 66593 Engineering Change:  
: Containment Spray System Past Operability Report 0 EC65926 Engineering Change:
: Containment Spray System Past Operability Report
: Modify Containment Spray Header and Ring Pipe Supports - Comp Measure to Support Operability 14-018 12 USAR Appendix F Classification of Structures and Equipment and Seismic Criteria 7 FC08436 Calculation:
: EC65926 Engineering Change:
: Evaluation of Stiffness for Containment Spray U-Bolts 0
: Modify Containment Spray Header and Ring Pipe Supports  
 
- Comp Measure to Support Operability 14
==Section 1R19: Post-Maintenance Testing==
-018 12 USAR Appendix F
: Classification of Structures and Equipment and Seismic Criteria 7 FC08436 Calculation:  
: Evaluation of Stiffness for Containment Spray  
: U-Bolts 0


==Section 1R19: ==
: Post
-Maintenance Testing
===Procedures===
===Procedures===
: Number Title Revision
: Number Title Revision
: PED-EWP-8 Termination of Cables and Internal Panel Wiring 9
: PED-EWP-8 Termination of Cables and Internal Panel Wiring
: MA-AA-716-012 Post Maintenance Testing 20
: MA-AA-716-012 Post Maintenance Testing
: MM-RR-CH-0001 Inspection and Repair of Charging Pump Hydraulic Sections 11
: MM-RR-CH-0001 Inspection and Repair of Charging Pump Hydraulic Sections
: OP-ST-ESF-0010 Channel B Safety Injection Containment Spray and Recirculation Actuation Signal Test 59
: OP-ST-ESF-0010 Channel B Safety Injection Containment Spray and Recirculation Actuation Signal Test
: OP-ST-CH-3003A Chemical and Volume Control System Pump/Check Valve In-service Test for A Train 5
: OP-ST-CH-3003A Chemical and Volume Control System Pump/Check Valve In-service Test for A Train
: WPS-801 Welding Procedure Specification 14
: WPS-801 Welding Procedure Specification
: PED-GEI-55.7 Documentation for an ASME, Section X1-1998/2000A Repair/Replacement Activity 13
: PED-GEI-55.7 Documentation for an ASME, Section X1
: PED-GEI-7 Specification of Post Modification Test Criteria 15a Condition Reports (CRs) 2012-05218 2015-12512 2015-12544 2015-12390  
-1998/2000A
: Repair/Replacement Activity
: PED-GEI-7 Specification of Post Modification Test Criteria
: 15a Condition Reports (CRs)
: 2012-05218 2015-12512 2015-12544 2015-12390  
===Work Orders===
===Work Orders===
: 531137
: 531137
Line 697: Line 984:
: 568669  
: 568669  
===Drawings===
===Drawings===
: Number Title Revision 161F618 Sh. 9 Panel
: Number Title Revision 161F618 Sh. 9 Panel AI
: AI-30B 24 E-4126 Logic Diagram Panels
-30B 24 E-4126 Logic Diagram Panels AI
: AI-30A & B 6
-30A & B 6
: Number Title
: Number Title
: Weld Data Form
: Weld Data Form Charging Pump Schematic Engineering Change (EC) 64942, Install Rings on Charging Pump CH
: Charging Pump Schematic
-1A,
: Engineering Change (EC) 64942, Install Rings on Charging Pump
: CH-1B, and CH
: CH-1A,
-1C Plungers
: CH-1B, and
: EC 41693 Replace YCV
: CH-1C Plungers
-871DO Actuators on DG
: EC 41693 Replace
-2 Inlet Air Damper YCV
: YCV-871DO Actuators on
-871D
: DG-2 Inlet Air Damper YCV-871D


==Section 1R22: Surveillance Testing==
==Section 1R22: Surveillance Testing==
Line 715: Line 1,001:
===Procedures===
===Procedures===
: Number Title Revision
: Number Title Revision
: OP-ST-ESF-22 Automatic Load Sequencer Test 30
: OP-ST-ESF-22 Automatic Load Sequencer Test
: SO-G-23 Surveillance Test Program
: SO-G-23 Surveillance Test Program
: OP-ST-CCW-3006B Component Cooling Category A and B Valve Exercise Test
: OP-ST-CCW-3006B Component Cooling Category A and B Valve Exercise Test
: OP-ST-AFW-0004 Auxiliary Feedwater Pump
: OP-ST-AFW-0004 Auxiliary Feedwater Pump FW
: FW-10 Operability Test 7
-10 Operability Test
: IC-ST-IA-3009 Operability Test of 1A-YCA-1045-C and Close Stroke Test of
: IC-ST-IA-3009 Operability Test of 1A
-YCA-1045-C and Close Stroke Test of
: YCV-1045 7  
: YCV-1045 7  
===Work Orders===
===Work Orders===
Line 726: Line 1,013:
: 549771-01  
: 549771-01  
===Condition Reports===
===Condition Reports===
(CRs) 2014-8080 2014-8701 2015-12268 2015-13104  
(CRs)
: 2014-8080 2014-8701 2015-12268 2015-13104  
===Miscellaneous Documents===
===Miscellaneous Documents===
: Number Title Revision USAR 8.4 Emergency Power Sources 19
: Number Title Revision USAR 8.4 Emergency Power Sources
: DBD-112 Emergency Diesel Generators Design Basis Document 31 USAR 7.3 Engineered Safeguards Controls 16
: DBD-112 Emergency Diesel Generators Design Basis Document
: USAR 7.3 Engineered Safeguards Controls  
===Miscellaneous Documents===
===Miscellaneous Documents===
: Number Title Revision TS 3.1 Instrumentation and Control Surveillance Requirements 257 TS 2.15 Instrumentation and Control Systems
: Number Title Revision TS 3.1 Instrumentation and Control Surveillance Requirements
: LCO 270 TS 2.4 Containment Cooling 251 EA92-072 Diesel Generator Loading Transient Analysis 8 USAR 4.5.6.5 In-Service Testing 15 USAR 9.7 Component Cooling Water System 16
: 257 TS 2.15 Instrumentation and Control Systems LCO
: 270 TS 2.4 Containment Cooling
: 251 EA92-072 Diesel Generator Loading Transient Analysis
: USAR 4.5.6.5
: In-Service Testing
: USAR 9.7 Component Cooling Water System  
===Drawings===
===Drawings===
: Number Title Revision 11405-M-252 Steam P&ID, SH1 116 11405-M-253 Steam Generator Feedwater and Blowdown P&ID, SH4 42
: Number Title Revision 11405-M-252 Steam P&ID, SH1
: 116 11405-M-253 Steam Generator Feedwater and Blowdown P&ID, SH4


==Section 2RS2: Occupational==
==Section 2RS2: Occupational==
Line 740: Line 1,035:
===Procedures===
===Procedures===
: Number Title Revision
: Number Title Revision
: RP-AA-16 ALARA Program Description 0
: RP-AA-16 ALARA Program Description
: RP-AA-400 ALARA Program 12
: RP-AA-400 ALARA Program
: RP-AA-401 Operational ALARA Planning And Controls 19
: RP-AA-401 Operational ALARA Planning And Controls
: RP-AA-401-1002 Radiological Risk Management 7
: RP-AA-401-1002 Radiological Risk Management
: RP-AA-400-1006 Outage Exposure Estimating and Tracking 4
: RP-AA-400-1006 Outage Exposure Estimating and Tracking
: RP-AA-400-1002 Dose Equalization 1
: RP-AA-400-1002 Dose Equalization
: RP-AA-400-1004 Emergent Dose Control and Authorization 7
: RP-AA-400-1004 Emergent Dose Control and Authorization  
===Condition Reports===
===Condition Reports===
(CRs) 2014-11660 2014-13215 2015-01202 2015-03474 2015-05171 2015-05625 2015-05841 2015-06599 2015-07058 2015-07555 2015-07720 2015-07829 2015-08943 2015-10560
(CRs)
: Audits and Self-Assessments Number Title Date
: 2014-11660 2014-13215 2015-01202 2015-03474 2015-05171 2015-05625 2015-05841 2015-06599 2015-07058 2015-07555 2015-07720 2015-07829 2015-08943 2015-10560
: Audits and Self
-Assessments Number Title Date
: NOSA-FCS-15-06 Radiation Protection Audit Report Fort Calhoun Station July 24, 2015   
: NOSA-FCS-15-06 Radiation Protection Audit Report Fort Calhoun Station July 24, 2015   
: Audits and Self-Assessments Number Title Date
: Audits and Self
: RA 2014-1818 Focused Area Self-Assessment Occupational ALARA Planning and Control/Occupational Dose Assessment October 5, 2015
-Assessments Number Title Date
: Radiation Work Permits (RWPs) Number Title Revision 15-0325 Forced Shutdown 0 15-0605 Containment Building Scaffolds 0 15-0611 Containment Valves 0 15-0613 Reactor Head Disassembly/Reassembly 0 15-0643 Pressurizer Heater Replacement 0 15-0655 Reactor Head Boric Acid Inspection and Recovery 0
: RA 2014-1818 Focused Area Self
: ALARA Planning, In-Progress Reviews, and Post-Job Reviews RWP Number Title Date 15-0605 ALARA Plan February 25, 2015 15-0605 ALARA Post-Job Review June 26, 2015 15-0611 ALARA Post-Job Review June 15, 2015 15-0611 In-Progress Review (80%) April 29, 2015 15-0613 ALARA Plan March 2, 2015 15-0613 ALARA Post-Job Review August 3, 2015 15-0613 In-Progress Review (80%) May 19, 2015 15-0643 ALARA Post-Job Review May 11, 2015 15-0655 ALARA Plan April 30, 2015 15-0655 ALARA Post-Job Review August 1, 2015 15-0655 In-Progress Review (Job Scope Change) May 18, 2015  
-Assessment Occupational ALARA Planning and Control
/Occupational Dose Assessment October 5, 2015
: Radiation Work Permits (RWPs)
: Number Title Revision 15-0325 Forced Shutdown
: 15-0605 Containment Building Scaffolds
: 15-0611 Containment Valves
: 15-0613 Reactor Head Disassembly/Reassembly
: 15-0643 Pressurizer Heater Replacement
: 15-0655 Reactor Head Boric Acid Inspection and Recovery
: ALARA Planning, In
-Progress Reviews, and Post
-Job Reviews
: RWP Number Title Date 15-0605 ALARA Plan February 25, 2015
: 15-0605 ALARA Post
-Job Review June 26, 2015
: 15-0611 ALARA Post
-Job Review June 15, 2015
: 15-0611 In-Progress Review (80%)
: April 29, 2015
: 15-0613 ALARA Plan March 2, 2015
: 15-0613 ALARA Post
-Job Review August 3, 2015
: 15-0613 In-Progress Review (80%)
: May 19, 2015 15-0643 ALARA Post
-Job Review May 11, 2015
: 15-0655 ALARA Plan April 30, 2015
: 15-0655 ALARA Post
-Job Review August 1, 2015
: 15-0655 In-Progress Review (Job Scope Change)
: May 18, 2015  
===Miscellaneous Documents===
===Miscellaneous Documents===
: Number Title Date
: Number Title Date
: 2015-2019 Dose Excellence Plan
: 2015-2019 Dose Excellence Plan
: CR 2015-6726 Root Cause Analysis Report July 1, 2015
: CR 2015-6726 Root Cause Analysis Report July 1, 2015
: FCR 27 Fort Calhoun Station Outage Report 2015
: FCR 27 Fort Calhoun Station Outage Report
: 2015


==Section 2RS4: Occupational Dose Assessment==
==Section 2RS4: Occupational Dose Assessment==
Line 765: Line 1,092:
===Procedures===
===Procedures===
: Number Title Revision
: Number Title Revision
: RP-AA-210 Dosimetry Issue, Usage, and Control 25
: RP-AA-210 Dosimetry Issue, Usage, and Control
: RP-AA-220 Bioassay Program 10
: RP-AA-220 Bioassay Program
: RP-AA-270 Prenatal Radiation Exposure 7
: RP-AA-270 Prenatal Radiation Exposure
: RP-AA-301 Radiological Air Sampling Program 8
: RP-AA-301 Radiological Air Sampling Program
: RP-AA-203-1001 Personnel Exposure Investigation 8
: RP-AA-203-1001 Personnel Exposure Investigation
: RP-AA-700-1302 Operation of Portable Neutron Monitors 1
: RP-AA-700-1302 Operation of Portable Neutron Monitors
: IC-CP-02-0202 Calibration of the Eberline
: IC-CP-02-0202 Calibration of the Eberline ASP
: ASP-2E with Remball NRD 1 Audits and Self-Assessments Number Title Date
-2E with Remball NRD
: Audits and Self
-Assessments Number Title Date
: RA 2014-1818 ALARA/Occupational Dose Assessment September 30, 2015  
: RA 2014-1818 ALARA/Occupational Dose Assessment September 30, 2015  
===Condition Reports===
===Condition Reports===
(CRs) 2012-08108 2014-06027 2014-06253 2015-06197 2015-08905 2015-11674 2015-12568 2015-12568  
(CRs)
: 2012-08108 2014-06027 2014-06253 2015-06197 2015-08905 2015-11674 2015-12568 2015-12568  
===Miscellaneous Documents===
===Miscellaneous Documents===
: Number Title Date
: Number Title Date
Line 786: Line 1,116:
===Procedures===
===Procedures===
: Number Title Revision
: Number Title Revision
: LS-AA-2090 Monthly Data Elements for NRC Reactor Coolant System (RCS) Specific Activity 4
: LS-AA-2090 Monthly Data Elements for NRC R
: LS-AA-2001 Collecting and Reporting of NRC Performance Indicator Data 14
eactor Coolant System (RCS) Specific Activity
: LS-AA-2200 Mitigating System Performance Index Data Acquisitions and Reporting 5
: LS-AA-2001 Collecting and Reporting of NRC Performance Indicator Data
: LS-AA-2200 Mitigating System Performance Index Data Acquisitions and Reporting  
===Procedures===
===Procedures===
: Number Title Revision MSPI Mitigating System Performance Index 0
: Number Title Revision MSPI Mitigating System Performance Index  
===Miscellaneous Documents===
===Miscellaneous Documents===
: Number Title Revision
: Number Title Revision
: Chemistry Logs and Data Sheets
: Chemistry Logs and Data Sheets Control Room Logs
: Control Room Logs
: MSPI Derivation Reports for RHR Unavailability October 2014 through September 2015
: MSPI Derivation Reports for RHR Unavailability October 2014 through September 2015
: MSPI Derivation Reports for RHR Unreliability October 2014 through September 2015
: MSPI Derivation Reports for RHR Unreliability October 2014 through September 2015
: NRC MSPI for FCS Residual Heat Removal through September 2015
: NRC MSPI for FCS Residual Heat Removal through September  
: MSPI Derivation Reports for EDG Unavailability October 2015 through September 2015
: 2015
: MSPI Derivation Reports for EDG Unreliability October 2014 through September 2015
: MSPI Derivation Reports for EDG Unavailability October
: NEI 99-02 Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline 7
: 2015 through September
: NRC MSPI for FCS Emergency AC Power System through 3rd Quarter 2015
: 2015
: MSPI Derivation Reports for EDG Unreliability October
: 2014 through September
: 2015
: NEI 99-02 Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline
: NRC MSPI for FCS Emergency AC Power System through 3
rd Quarter 2015


==Section 4OA2: Problem Identification and Resolution==
==Section 4OA2: Problem Identification and Resolution==


===Condition Reports===
===Condition Reports===
(CRs) 2014-05006 2014-07833 2014-8639 2014-15143 2015-12507 2015-12532 2015-13548 2015-5552  
(CRs)
: 2014-05006 2014-07833 2014-8639 2014-15143 2015-12507 2015-12532 2015-13548 2015-5552  
===Miscellaneous Documents===
===Miscellaneous Documents===
: Number Title Revision
: Number Title Revision
: Apparent Cause Evaluation:
: Apparent Cause Evaluation:  
: Accumulation of Gas in CCW Pump Casing
: Accumulation of Gas in CCW Pump Casing
: OPPD Response to Generic Letter 2008-01 dated October 14, 2008
: OPPD Response to Generic Letter  
: OPPD Closeout of Generic Letter 2008-01 dated August 10, 2010
: 2008-01 dated October 14, 2008
: OPPD Closeout of Generic Letter 2008-01 dated May
: OPPD Closeout of Generic Letter  
: 2008-01 dated August 10, 2010
: OPPD Closeout of Generic Letter  
: 2008-01 dated May
: 23, 2011  
: 23, 2011  
===Miscellaneous Documents===
===Miscellaneous Documents===
: Number Title Revision Enercon Report
: Number Title Revision Enercon Report
: OPP-026-PR-001 Component Cooling Water System Gas Accumulation Evaluation 0
: OPP-026-PR-001 Component Cooling Water System Gas Accumulation Evaluation Adverse Condition Monitoring Plans Maintenance Rule System Performance Indicators System Health Reports Boric Acid Program Work-down Curve Corrective Actions Backlogs Operability Evaluation List Plant Health Committee Documents System Engineering Excellence Plan
: Adverse Condition Monitoring Plans
: Maintenance Rule System Performance Indicators
: System Health Reports
: Boric Acid Program Work-down Curve
: Corrective Actions Backlogs
: Operability Evaluation List
: Plant Health Committee Documents
: System Engineering Excellence Plan
 
==Section 4OA3: Follow-up of Events and Notices of Enforcement Discretion==


==Section 4OA3: ==
: Follow
-up of Events and Notices of Enforcement Discretion
===Condition Reports===
===Condition Reports===
(CRs) 2013-18497 2013-18503 2013-19768 2014-14723 2015-01181 2015-11588 2015-12195 2015-11613  
(CRs)
: 2013-18497 2013-18503 2013-19768 2014-14723 2015-01181 2015-11588 2015-12195 2015-11613  
===Miscellaneous Documents===
===Miscellaneous Documents===
: Number Title Date
: Number Title Date
: Emergency Action Level Criteria
: Emergency Action Level Criteria Reactor Plant Event Notification Worksheets October 2, 2015
: Reactor Plant Event Notification Worksheets
: Notification of Unusual Event Press Release October 2, 2015
: October 2, 2015
: Notification of Unusual Event Press Release
: October 2, 2015
: EN 51439 Fort Calhoun Station Event Notification October 2, 2015
: EN 51439 Fort Calhoun Station Event Notification October 2, 2015
: FCS Event Summary Report October 3, 2015
: FCS Event Summary Report October 3, 2015
: EN 51487 Fort Calhoun Station Event Notification October 27, 2015
: EN 51487 Fort Calhoun Station Event Notification October 27, 2015
: TQ-FC-221-FO50 Operability Impact of Cross-tying Class and Non-class Piping Systems
: TQ-FC-221-FO50 Operability Impact of Cross
: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Operations Center Event Report Number 51439 October 2, 2015   
-tying Class and Non
: Section 4OA5 Other Activities  
-class Piping Systems
: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Operations Center Event Report Number 51439
: October 2, 2015   
: Section 4OA5
: Other Activities  
===Procedures===
===Procedures===
: Number Title Revision
: Number Title Revision
: LS-AA-114-1000 72.48 Resource Manual 0
: LS-AA-114-1000 72.48 Resource Manual
: LS-AA-114 Exelon 72.48 Review Process 1
: LS-AA-114 Exelon 72.48 Review Process
: RE-RR-DFS-0001 Prep for Fuel Loading Operations 7
: RE-RR-DFS-0001 Prep for Fuel Loading Operations
: RE-RR-DFS-0002 Dry Shielded Canister Sealing Operations 11
: RE-RR-DFS-0002 Dry Shielded Canister Sealing Operations
: RE-RR-DFS-0003 Loaded DSC/TC from Auxiliary Building to ISFSI 11
: RE-RR-DFS-0003 Loaded DSC/TC from Auxiliary Building to ISFSI
: RE-RR-DFS-0004 DSC from TC to HSM Transfer Operations 9
: RE-RR-DFS-0004 DSC from TC to HSM Transfer Operations
: RE-RR-DFS-0006
: RE-RR-DFS-0006
: Loaded DSC/TC from ISFSI to Auxiliary Building 7
: Loaded DSC/TC from ISFSI to Auxiliary Building
: OI-DFS-1 Operating Instruction Dry Fuel Storage System 1
: OI-DFS-1 Operating Instruction Dry Fuel Storage System
: OP-ST-SHIFT-001 Operations TS Required Shift Surveillance 121
: OP-ST-SHIFT-001 Operations TS Required Shift Surveillance
: RE-AD-0005 Fuel Selection and DSC Planning
: 21
: 2
: RE-AD-0005 Fuel Selection and DSC Planning
===Condition Reports===
===Condition Reports===
: 2015-02718 2015-04649 2015-04657 2013-08569 2013-11753 2013-12884 2013-12889 2013-12898 2013-14015 2013-14036 2013-21520 2014-12980 2015-04309 2015-09467 2013-04609 2013-04864 2013-06343 2013-13545 2013-22911 2014-14413 2015-08899 2013-12902 2013-14124 2013-15557 2013-21512 2014-12507 2014-12702 2014-12944 2014-12944 2014-13041 2014-13046 2014-13407 2015-01274 2015-02232 2015-02319 2015-02352 2015-02718 2015-04649
: 2015-02718 2015-04649 2015-04657 2013-08569 2013-11753 2013-12884 2013-12889 2013-12898 2013-14015 2013-14036 2013-21520 2014-12980 2015-04309 2015-09467 2013-04609 2013-04864 2013-06343 2013-13545 2013-22911 2014-14413 2015-08899 2013-12902 2013-14124 2013-15557 2013-21512 2014-12507 2014-12702 2014-12944 2014-12944 2014-13041 2014-13046 2014-13407 2015-01274 2015-02232 2015-02319 2015-02352 2015-02718 2015-04649
Line 867: Line 1,202:
: EC 48488  
: EC 48488  
===Other Documents===
===Other Documents===
: Number Title Revision NUH003.0103 UFSAR or the Standardized NUHOMS HSM System 10
: Number Title Revision NUH003.0103
: Certificate of Compliance No. 1004 for NUHIMS System 9
: UFSAR or the Standardized NUHOMS HSM System Certificate of Compliance No. 1004 for NUHIMS System 9
: FCS ISFSI 10
: FCS ISFSI 10
: CFR 72.212 Evaluation Report 1
: CFR 72.212 Evaluation Report
: FCS ISFSI 10
: FCS ISFSI 10
: CFR 72.212 Evaluation Report Att. B 1
: CFR 72.212 Evaluation Report Att. B
: UFHA-EA97-001 Updated Fire Hazards Analysis 19 13-NOS-079 ISFSI Audit Report
: UFHA-EA97-001 Updated Fire Hazards Analysis
: NOSA-FCS-13-78 June 26, 2013
: 13-NOS-079 ISFSI Audit Report NOSA
: AR 62490 ISFSI Audit Report
-FCS-13-78 June 26, 2013
: NOSA-FCS-14-11 October 29, 2014 M-20150717-3 ISFSI Quarterly Survey July 17, 2015
: AR 62490 ISFSI Audit Report NOSA
: RP-AA-214 2015 Area Dosimeter Worksheet 2015
-FCS-14-11 October 29, 2014 M-20150717-3 ISFSI Quarterly Survey July 17, 2015
: RP-AA-214 2014 Area Dosimeter Worksheet 2014
: RP-AA-214 2015 Area Dosimeter Worksheet
: RP-AA-214 2013 Area Dosimeter Worksheet 2013  
: 2015
: RP-AA-214 2014 Area Dosimeter Worksheet
: 2014
: RP-AA-214 2013 Area Dosimeter Worksheet
: 2013  
===Work Orders===
===Work Orders===
: 468478
: 468478
Line 907: Line 1,246:
: 479280  
: 479280  
===Other Documents===
===Other Documents===
: Title Date FCS Corrective Action Program Apparent Cause Analysis
: Title Date FCS Corrective Action Program Apparent Cause Analysis January 15, 2014 Helium Mass Spectrometer Leak Detector Examination June 24, 2014
: January 15, 2014 Helium Mass Spectrometer Leak Detector Examination June 24, 2014
}}
}}

Revision as of 15:29, 30 June 2018

Fort Calhoun Station - NRC Integrated Inspection Report Numbers 05000285/2015004 and 07200054/2015001
ML16008A820
Person / Time
Site: Fort Calhoun  Omaha Public Power District icon.png
Issue date: 01/08/2016
From: Geoffrey Miller
NRC/RGN-IV/DRP/RPB-D
To: Cortopassi L
Omaha Public Power District
Hagar B
References
IR 2015001, IR 2015004
Download: ML16008A820 (46)


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION IV 1600 E. LAMAR BLV ARLINGTON, TX 76011-4511 January 8, 2016 Lou Cortopassi

, Site Vice President Omaha Public Power District Fort Calhoun S tation P.O. Box 550 Fort Calhoun, NE 68023

-0550

SUBJECT: FORT CALHOUN STATION - NRC INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT NUMBERS 05000285/2015004 AND 07200054/2015001 Dear Mr. Cortopassi

On December 31, 2015, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed inspection s at your Fort Calhoun Station (FCS). On January 7, 2016, NRC inspectors discussed the results of these inspection s with you and other members of your staf Inspectors documented the results of these inspection s in the enclosed inspection repor In this report

, NRC inspectors documented three licensee-identified violations, which were determined to be of very low safety significance (Green) or Severity Level I The NRC is treating these violation s as non-cited violation s (NCVs) consistent with Section 2.3.2.a. of the NRC Enforcement Polic In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, "Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC's Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRC

's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading

-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,/RA/ Geoffrey Miller, Chief Project Branch D Division of Reactor Projects Docket: 50-285;72-054 License:

DPR-40 L. Cortopossi

Enclosure:

NRC Inspection Reports 05000285/2015004 and 07200054/2015001

w/Attachment:

Supplemental Information Electronic Distribution to Fort Calhoun Station

Enclosure:

NRC Inspection Reports 05000285/2015004 and 07200054/2015001

w/Attachment:

Supplemental Information

ML16008A820 SUNSI Review By: BHagar ADAMS Yes No Non-Sensitive Sensitive Publicly Available Non-Publicly Available Keyword: NRC-002 OFFICE SRI:DRP RI:DRP SPE:DRP C:DRS C:DRS C:DRS C:DRS NAME MSchneider BCummings BHagar HGepford TFarnholtz GWerner VGaddy SIGNATURE E - GBM E - GBM /RA/ /RA/ /RA/ /GAP for/

/RA/ DATE 1/8/16 1/8/16 1/7/16 1/8/16 1/7/16 1/8/16 1/8/16 OFFICE C:DNMS C:DRP NAME RKellar GMiller SIGNATURE

/RSB for/ /RA/ DATE 1/8/16 1/8/16 L. Cortopossi Letter to Lou Cortopossi from Geoffrey Miller dated January 8, 2016

SUBJECT: FORT CALHOUN STATION - NRC INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT NUMBERs 05000285/2015004 AND 07200054/2015001

DISTRIBUTION

Regional Administrator (Marc.Dapas@nrc.gov)

Deputy Regional Administrator (Kriss.Kennedy@nrc.gov)

DRP Director (Troy.Pruett@nrc.gov)

DRP Deputy Director (Ryan.Lantz@nrc.gov)

DRS Director (Anton.Vegel@nrc.gov)

DRS Deputy Director (Jeff.Clark@nrc.gov)

DNMS Director (Mark.Shaffer@nrc.gov

) DNMS Deputy Director (Linda.Howell@nrc.gov

) DNMS Technical Assistant (Vivian.Campbell@nrc.gov

) RSFS Branch Chief (Ray.Kellar@nrc.gov

) RSFS Senior Inspector (Lee.Brookhart@nrc.gov

) RSFS Inspector (Eric.Simpson@nrc.gov

) Project Manager, DSFM (William.Allen@nrc.gov

) Spent Fuel Licensing BC, DSFM (Michele.Sampson@nrc.gov

) RIV Branch Chief, DRP/D (Geoffrey.Miller@nrc.gov)

Senior Resident Inspector (Max.Schneider@nrc.gov)

Resident Inspector (Brian.Cummings@nrc.gov)

Senior Project Engineer, DRP/D (Bob.Hagar@nrc.gov) Project Engineer, DRP/D (Jim.Melfi@nrc.gov)

Project Engineer, DRP/D (Jan.Tice@nrc.gov)

FCS Administrative Assistant (Janise.Schwee@nrc.gov)

Acting Team leader, DRS/TSS (Eric.Ruesch@nrc.gov)

RIV Public Affairs Officer (Victor.Dricks@nrc.gov)

RIV Public Affairs Officer (Lara.Uselding@nrc.gov)

NRR Project Manager (Fred.Lyon@nrc.gov)

RIV RITS Coordinator (Marisa.Herrera@nrc.gov)

RIV Regional Counsel (Karla.Fuller@nrc.gov)

Congressional Affairs Officer (Jenny.Weil@nrc.gov)

RIV Congressional Affairs Officer (Angel.Moreno@nrc.gov)

OEWEB Resource@nrc.gov OEWEB Resource (Sue.Bogle@nrc.gov)

Technical Support Assistant (Loretta.Williams@nrc.gov)

RIV/ETA:

OEDO (Cindy.Rosales

-Cooper@nrc.gov)

RIV RSLO (Bill.Maier@nrc.gov)

ACES (R4Enforcement.Resource@nrc.gov)

ROPreports Enclosure U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION IV Docket: 50-285 & 72-054 License: DPR-40 Report: 05000285/2015004 & 07200054/2015001 Licensee:

Omaha Public Power District Facility:

Fort Calhoun Station Location:

9610 Power Lane Blair, NE 68008 Dates: October 1 through December 31, 2015 Inspectors:

S. Schneider, Senior Resident Inspector B. Cummings, Resident Inspector L. Carson II, Senior Health Physicist M. Chambers, Physical Security Inspector J. Kirkland, Senior Operations Engineer J. Melfi, Project Engineer J. O'Donnell, CHP, Health Physicist P. Jayroe, Reactor Inspector L. Brookhart, Senior ISFSI inspector E. Simpson, ISFSI Inspector Approved By:

Geoffrey Miller, Chief, Project Branch D Division of Reactor Projects

SUMMARY

IR 05000285/2015004; 10/01/2015

- 12/31/2015

Fort Calhoun Station
Integrated Inspection Report The inspection activities described in this report were performed between October 1 and December 31, 2015, by the resident inspectors at Fort Calhoun Station and inspectors from the NRC's Region IV office

. NRC inspectors documented in this report three licensee-identified violation s of very low safety significance. The significance of inspection findings is indicated by their color (Green, White, Yellow, or Red), which is determined using Inspection Manual Chapter 0609, "Significance Determination Process." Their cross-cutting aspects are determined using Inspection Manual Chapter 0310, "Aspects within the Cross-Cutting Areas." Violations of NRC requirements are dispositioned in accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy. The NRC's program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG

-1649, "Reactor Oversight Process."

=

Licensee-Identified Violations===

Three violation s of very low safety significance that were identified by the licensee ha ve been reviewed by the inspectors.

Corrective actions taken or planned by the licensee have been entered into the licensee's corrective action program. These violation s and associated corrective action tracking numbers are listed in Section 4OA7 of this report.

PLANT STATUS

The unit began and ended the inspection period at approximately 100 percent power.

REPORT DETAILS

REACTOR SAFETY

Cornerstones: Initiating Events, Mitigating Systems, and Barrier Integrity

1R01 Adverse Weather Protection

.1 Readiness for Seasonal Extreme Weather Conditions

a. Inspection Scope

On November 24, 2015, the inspectors completed an inspection of the station's readiness for seasonal extreme weather conditions. The inspectors reviewed the licensee's adverse weather procedures for cold weather operations and evaluated the licensee's implementation of these procedures. The inspectors verified that prior to the onset of cold weather, the licensee had corrected weather-related equipment deficiencies identified during the previous winter.

The inspectors selected two risk-significant systems that were required to be protected from cold weather:

Emergency Diesel Generator Auxiliary Feedwater The inspectors reviewed the licensee's procedures and design information to ensure the systems would remain functional when challenged by cold weather. The inspectors verified that operator actions described in the licensee's procedures were adequate to maintain readiness of these systems. The inspectors walked down portions of these systems to verify the physical condition of cold weather protection features.

These activities constitute d one sample of readiness for seasonal adverse weather

, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.01.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

.2 Readiness for Impending Adverse Weather Conditions

a. Inspection Scope

On November 20, 2015, and November 29, 2015, the inspectors completed an inspection of the station's readiness for impending adverse weather conditions. The inspectors reviewed plant design features, the licensee's procedures to respond to high winds, freezing conditions, and snow accumulation, and the licensee's implementation of these procedures. The inspectors evaluated operator staffing and accessibility of controls and indications for those systems required to control the plant.

These activities constituted two samples of readiness for impending ad verse weather conditions, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.01.

b. Findings

No findings were identifi ed.

1R04 Equipment Alignment

.1 Partial Walk

down

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors performed partial system walk

-downs of the following risk

-significant systems: October 27, 2015, raw water system with component cooling water heat exchanger C out of service for maintenance November 19, 2015, steam driven auxiliary feedwater pump following surveillance testing November 25, 2015, emergency diesel generator number 2 following maintenance December 9, 2015, containment spray train B when containment spray train A was taken out of service for maintenance The inspectors reviewed the licensee's procedures and system design information to determine the correct lineup for the systems. They visually verified that critical portions of the systems were correctly aligned for the existing plant configuration

. These activities constitute d four partial system walk

-down sample s as defined i n Inspection Procedure 71111.04.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

.2 Complete Walkdown

a. Inspection Scope

On October 15, 2015, the inspectors performed a complete system walk-down inspection of number 1 emergency diesel generator

. The inspectors reviewed the licensee's procedures and system design information to determine the correct emergency diesel generato r lineup for the existing plant configuration. The inspectors also reviewed outstanding work orders, open condition reports, and other open items tracked by the licensee's operations and engineering departments

. The inspectors then visually verified that the system was correctly aligned for the existing plant configuration.

These activities constitute d one complete system walk

-down sample

, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.04.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1R05 Fire Protection

.1 Quarterly Inspection

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors evaluated the licensee's fire protection program for operational status and material condition. The inspectors focused their inspection on five plant areas important to safety

October 29, 2015, basement and personnel corridor area, fire area 6-3 November 8, 2015, diesel generator room 1, fire area 35A November 19, 2015, main control room, fire area December 10, 2015, health physics corridor, fire area December 10, 2015, east personnel corridor and personal air lock area, fire area 20-1 For each area, the inspectors evaluated the fire plan against defined hazards and defense-in-depth features in the licensee's fire protection program. The inspectors evaluated control of transient combustibles and ignition sources, fire detection and suppression systems, manual firefighting equipment and capability, passive fire protection features, and compensatory measures for degraded conditions.

These activities constitute d five quarterly inspection sample s, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.05.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1R06 Flood Protection Measures

a. Inspection Scope

On December 4, 2015, the inspectors completed an inspection of underground bunkers susceptible to flooding. The inspectors selected two underground bunkers that contained risk

-significant or multiple

-train cables whose failure could disable risk

-significant equipment

Manhole 5A Manhole 31 The inspectors observed the material condition of the cables and splices contained in the bunkers and looked for evidence of cable degradation due to water intrusion.

The inspectors verified that the cables and vaults met design requirements.

These activities constitute completion of one bunker/manhole sample, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.06.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1R07 Heat Sink Performance

a. Inspection Scope

On December 16, 2015, the inspectors completed an inspection of the readiness and availability of a risk-significant heat exchanger. The inspectors reviewed the data from the performance of Component Cooling Water/Raw Water heat exchanger AC-1D disassembly, cleaning, visual inspection and reassembly activities as outlined in EPRI NP-7552.

Additionally, the inspectors walked down Component Cooling Water/Raw Water Heat Exchanger AC-1D to observe its performance and material condition and verified that the heat exchanger was correctly categorized under the Maintenance Rule and was receiving the required maintenance.

These activities constitute completion of one heat sink performance annual review sample, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.07.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1R11 Licensed Operator Requalification Program and Licensed Operator Performance

.1 Review of Licensed Operator Requalification

a. Inspection Scope

On November 13, 2015, the inspectors observed simulator training for an operating crew in response to an Au xiliary Feedwater Actuation System malfunction and an Armed Attack. The inspectors assessed the performance of the operators and the evaluators' critique of their performance. The inspectors also assessed the modeling and performance of the simulator during the training.

These activities constitute completion of one quarterly licensed operator requalification program sample

, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.11.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

.2 Review of Licensed Operator Performance

a. Inspection Scope

On October 2, 2015, the inspectors observed the performance of on

-shift licensed operators in the plant's main control room. At the time of the observations, the plant was in a period of heightened activity due to the declaration of a Notification of Unusual Event due to a suspicious device found in a security vehicle. The inspectors observed the operators' performance related to adherence of abnormal operating procedures, evaluation of plant risk, and assessment of Emergency Action Level criteria.

These activities constitute completion of one quarterly licensed operator performance sample as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.11.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

.3 Annual Review

a. Inspection Scope

The inspector s conducted an in

-office review of the annual requalification training program to determine the results of this program.

On December 9, 2015, the licensee informed the inspector s of the Fort Calhoun Station operating test results:

7 of 7 crews passed the simulator portion of the operating test 31 of 33 licensed operators passed the simulator portion of the operating test

31 of 33 licensed operators passed the job performance measure portion of the operating test No remediation was performed for the Fort Calhoun Station operating tests. Two licensed operators who did not pass the simulator or job performance measure portions of the operating test were unavailable for personal reasons and will meet the requalification exam requirements in 2016.

The inspectors completed one inspection sample of the annual licensed operator requalification program.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1R12 Maintenance Effectiveness

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed three instances of degraded performance or condition of safety

-related structures, systems, and components (SSCs): November 10, 2015, inadvertent cross

-connecting of the main feedwater system with the auxiliary feedwater system November 23, 2015, identification of cracked pressurizer heater cables December 7, 2015, inadvertent closure of shutdown cooling isolation valves The inspectors reviewed the extent of condition of possible common cause SSC failures and evaluated the adequacy of the licensee's corrective actions. The inspectors reviewed the licensee's work practices to evaluate whether these may have played a role in the degradation of the SSCs. The inspectors assessed the licensee's characterization of the degradation in accordance with 10 CFR 50.65 (the Maintenance Rule), and verified that the licensee was appropriately tracking degraded performance and conditions in accordance with the Maintenance Rule.

These activities constitute d completion of three maintenance effectiveness sample s, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.12.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1R13 Maintenance Risk Assessments and Emergent Work Control

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed four risk assessments performed by the licensee prior to changes in plant configuration and the risk management actions taken by the licensee in response to elevated risk:

October 28, 2015, planned yellow risk during number 2 emergency diesel generator testing

November 2, 2015, planned yellow risk during west raw water header maintenance outage November 5, 2015, planned yellow risk during diesel drive n auxiliary feedwater pump operability verification November 23, 2015, planned yellow risk during number 2 emergency diesel generator maintenance The inspectors verified that these risk assessment were performed timely and in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.65 (the Maintenance Rule) and plant procedures. The inspectors reviewed the accuracy and completeness of the licensee's risk assessment s and verified that the licensee implemented appropriate risk management actions based on the result of the assessment s.

These activities constitute completion of four maintenance risk assessments, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.13.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1R15 Operability Determinations

and Functionality Assessments (71111.15)

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed six operability determinations and functionality assessments that the licensee performed for degraded or nonconforming structures, systems, or components (SSCs):

October 21, 2015, operability determination of blowdown isolation valve non

-conservative component specifications October 22, 2015, operability determination of pressurizer heater bank number 4 due to hot short potential circuit failure following discovery of an unanalyzed condition October 26, 2015, operability determination of instrument air accumulator leak on component cooling water valve HCV

-401C October 29, 2015, operability determination of containment spray discovery of non-conformances with design November 4, 2015, functionality determination of raw water flow instrumentation

following discovery of a degraded condition December 8, 2015, assessment of operator work arounds The inspectors reviewed the timeliness and technical adequacy of the licensee's evaluations. Where the licensee determined the degraded SSC to be operable or functional, the inspectors verified that the licensee's compensatory measures were appropriate to provide reasonable assurance of operability or functionality. The inspectors verified that the licensee had considered the effect of other degraded conditions on the operability or functionality of the degraded SSC

. The inspectors reviewed operator actions taken or planned to compensate for degraded or nonconforming conditions.

The inspectors verified that the licensee effectively managed these operator workarounds to prevent adverse effects on the function of mitigating systems and to minimize their impact on the operators' ability to implement abnormal and emergency operating procedures.

These activities constitute completion of six operability review samples, which included one operator work

-around sample, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.15.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1R18 Plant Modifications

a. Inspection Scope

On October 29, 2015, the inspectors reviewed one permanent plant modification to the containment spray ring riser piping and rings to restore operability. The inspectors reviewed the design and implementation of the modification. The inspectors verified that work activities involved in implementing the modification did not adversely impact operator actions that may be required in response to an emergency or other unplanned event.

These activities constitute completion of one sample of permanent modifications

, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.18.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1R19 Post-Maintenance

Testing (71111.19)

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed four post-maintenance testing activities that affected risk

-significant structures, systems, or components (SSCs):

October 27, 2015, replace control relay for containment air cooling fan VA-7D November 5, 2015, charging pump CH-1B discharge drain valve weld repair November 16, 2015, charging pump CH-1A rebuild December 15, 2015, emergency diesel generator damper actuator replacement The inspectors reviewed licensing- and design

-basis documents for the SSCs and the maintenance and post-maintenance test procedures.

The inspectors reviewed the post-maintenance tests to verify that the licensee performed the tests in accordance with approved procedures, satisfied the established acceptance criteria, and restored the operability of the affected SSCs.

These activities constitute completion of four post-maintenance testing inspection samples, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.19.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1R22 Surveillance Testing

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors observed four risk-significant surveillance tests and reviewed test results to verify that these tests adequately demonstrated that the structures, systems, and components (SSCs) were capable of performing their safety functions:

Containment isolation valve surveillance tests: October 26, 2015, Component Cooling Category A and B Valve Exercise Test Other surveillance tests:

October 16, 2015, automatic load sequencer test November 19, 2015 steam driven auxiliary feedwater flow verification December 9, 2015, number 1 emergency diesel generator surveillance test The inspectors verified that these test s met technical specification requirements, that the licensee performed the tests in accordance with their procedures, and that the results of the test satisfied appropriate acceptance criteria. The inspectors verified that the licensee restored the operability of the affected SSCs following testing.

These activities constitute completion of four surveillance testing inspection sample s, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.22.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

RADIATION SAFETY

Cornerstones:

Public Radiation Safety and Occupational Radiation Safety

2RS2 Occupational ALARA Planning and Controls

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors assessed licensee performance with respect to maintaining occupational individual and collective radiation exposures as low as is reasonably achievable (ALARA). During the inspection, the inspectors interviewed licensee personnel and reviewed licensee performance in the following areas:

Site-specific ALARA procedures and collective exposure history, including the current 3

-year rolling average, site

-specific trends in collective exposures, and source-term measurements ALARA work activity evaluations/post

-job reviews, exposure estimates, and exposure mitigation requirements The methodology for estimating work activity exposures, the intended dose outcome, the accuracy of dose rate and man

-hour estimates, and intended versus actual work activity doses and the reasons for any inconsistencies Records detailing the historical trends and current status of tracked plant source terms and contingency plans for expected changes in the source term due to changes in plant fuel performance issues or changes in plant primary chemistry Radiation worker and radiation protection technician performance during work activities in radiation areas, airborne radioactivity areas, or high radiation areas Audits, self

-assessments, and corrective action documents related to ALARA planning and controls since the last inspection These activities constitute completion of one sample of occupational ALARA planning and controls as defined in Inspection Procedure 71124.02.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

2RS4 Occupational Dose Assessment

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors evaluated the accuracy and operability of the licensee's personnel monitoring equipment, verified the accuracy and effectiveness of the licensee's methods for determining total effective dose equivalent, and verified that the licensee was appropriately monitoring occupational dose.

The inspectors interviewed licensee personnel, walked down various portions of the plant, and reviewed licensee performance in the following areas:

External dosimetry accreditation, storage, issue, use, and processing of active and passive dosimeters The technical competency and adequacy of the licensee's internal dosimetry program Adequacy of the dosimetry program for special dosimetry situations such as declared pregnant workers, multiple dosimetry placement, and neutron dose assessment Audits, self

-assessments, and corrective action documents related to dose assessment since the last inspection These activities constitute completion of one sample of occupational dose assessment as defined in Inspection Procedure 71124.04.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

OTHER ACTIVITIES

Cornerstones: Initiating Events, Mitigating Systems, Barrier Integrity, Emergency Preparedness, Public Radiation Safety, Occupational Radiation Safety, and Security

4OA1 Performance Indicator Verification

.1 Mitigating Systems Performance Index:

Emergency AC Power System s (MS06)

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed the licensee's mitigating system performance index data for the period of October 1, 2014 through September 30, 2015 to verify the accuracy and completeness of the reported data. The inspectors used definitions and guidance contained in Nuclear Energy Institute Document 99-02, "Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline," Revision 7, to determine the accuracy of the reported data.

These activities constituted verification of the mitigating system performance index for emergency ac power systems as defined in Inspection Procedure 71151.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

.2 Mitigating Systems Performance Index

Residual Heat Removal System s (MS09)

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed the licensee's mitigating system performance index data for the period of October 1, 2014 through September 30, 2015 to verify the accuracy and completeness of the reported data. The inspectors used definitions and guidance contained in Nuclear Energy Institute Document 99-02, "Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline," Revision 7, to determine the accuracy of the reported data. These activities constituted verification of the mitigating system performance index for residual heat removal systems as defined in Inspection Procedure 71151.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

.3 Reactor Coolant System Specific Activity (BI01)

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed the licensee's reactor coolant system chemistry sample analyses for the period of October 1, 2014 through September 30, 2015 to verify the accuracy and completeness of the reported data.

The inspectors used definitions and guidance contained in Nuclear Energy Institute Document 99-02, "Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline," Revision 7, to determine the accuracy of the reported data.

These activities constituted verification of the reactor coolant system specific activity performance indicator, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71151.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

4OA2 Problem Identification and Resolution

(71152)

.1 Routine Review

a. Inspection Scope

Throughout the inspection period, the inspectors performed daily reviews of items entered into the licensee's corrective action program and periodically attended the licensee's condition report screening meetings. The inspectors verified that licensee personnel were identifying problems at an appropriate threshold and entering these problems into the corrective action program for resolution. The inspectors verified that the licensee developed and implemented corrective actions commensurate with the significance of the problems identified. The inspectors also reviewed the licensee's problem identification and resolution activities during the performance of the other inspection activities documented in this report.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

.2 Semiannual Trend Review

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed the licensee's corrective action program, performance indicators, system health reports

, and other documentation to identify trends that might indicate the existence of a more significant safety issue. The inspectors verified that the licensee was taking corrective actions to address identified adverse trends.

These activities constitute completion of one semiannual trend review sample, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71152.

b. Findings and Observations

No findings were identified.

Equipment Reliability In NRC Inspection Report 05000285/201500 2, the inspectors identified a continuing adverse trend in equipment reliability at Fort Calhoun Station. The inspectors reviewed equipment reliability challenges from 2014 and 2015 through completion of the refueling outage in June, 2015. These challenges resulted in equipment unavailability, unplanned technical specification entries, operator burdens, and in some cases, plant transients. Of more recent concern wer e a number of equipment reliability issues during the refueling outage that affected safety system availability and plant performance. The licensee took specific actions to correct the individual equipment performance issues during the observed timeframe.

In addition, the licensee conducted a start

-up challenge review of the events that occurred during the outage prior to plant start

-up. Finally, the licensee senior leadership team had implemented engineering department excellence plans, equipment reliability improvement activities with engineering in partnership with the maintenance and operating departments, focus ed on operating experience

, self-assessment activities and benchmarking, and utilized a plant health committee T op 10 list to improve critical system health.

Since that time, the licensee has continued to reduce backlogs in open operability determinations and temporary configuration changes. In addition, the licensee's plant health committee continues to focus on their Top 10 equipment list to resolve those critical items. The licensee engineering leadership team is also committed to the continuing improvement of the boric acid corrosion control and maintenance rule programs.

The inspectors monitored equipment reliability over the past two quarters. Although some improvement has been note d, such as the apparent resolution of air voids in the component cooling water system and a reduction in the number of long term operability evaluations, the inspectors continue to observe equipment reliability issues at Fort Calhoun Station. Examples include: control room air conditioning failures, continuing safety injection tank (SIT) check valve leakage requiring frequent SIT drain and refills, reactor coolant pump RC

-3A seal performance and vibration issues, and a pressurizer level charging pump control circuit failure. The inspectors have determined that additional monitoring of the licensee's progress in improving equipment reliability at the Fort Calhoun Station is warranted and will be evaluated with the results documented in the next semiannual trend review.

.3 Annual Follow

-up of Selected Issues

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors selected one issue for an in

-depth follow

-up: On November 30, 2015, gas voiding in the component cooling water system The inspectors assessed the licensee's problem identification threshold, cause analyses, extent of condition reviews and compensatory actions. The inspectors verified that the licensee appropriately prioritized the planned corrective actions and that these actions were adequate to minimize the likelihood of voids developing in the component cooling water system.

These activities constitute completion of one annual follow

-up sample as defined in Inspection Procedure 71152.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

4OA3 Follow-up of Events and Notices of Enforcement Discretion

.1 Plant Events

a. Inspection Scope

For the plant events listed below, the inspectors reviewed and observed plant parameters, reviewed personnel performance, and evaluated performance of mitigating systems as applicable. The inspectors communicated the plant events to appropriate regional personnel, and compared the event det ails with criteria contained in Ins pection Manual Chapter 0309, "Reactive Inspection Decision Basis for Reactors," for consideration of potential reactive inspection activities. As applicable, the inspectors verified that the licensee made appropriate emergency classification assessmen ts and properly re ported the event in accordance wit h 10 CFR Parts 50.72 and 50.73. The inspectors reviewed the licensee's follow

-up actions related to the event to assure that the licensee implemented a ppropriate corrective actions commensurate with their safety significance.

Operator response to the declaration of an unusual event due to a security condition on October 2, 2015 Operator response to an unanalyzed condition due to inadequate electrical isolation between the main control room and local operation of pressurizer heater bank 4, on October 21, 2015

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

.2 (Closed) Licensee Event Report (LER) 05000285/2015

0. "Inadequate Design of High Energy Line Break Barriers"

The licensee submitted this report after they discovered that an inadequate High Energy Line Break (HELB) barrier had not been reported when it was originally discovered on September 30, 2013. The degraded barrier has been repaired and this LER was issued to document the original unanalyzed condition. The inspectors considered the licensee's previous actions to repair the HELB barrier and the documentation of this issue in the LER to be adequate and appropriate. The failure to report this condition in a timely manner is considered a minor violation in accordance with Section 2.3.1 of the Enforcement Policy. This failure to comply with the 10 CFR 50.73 reporting requirements in a timely manner constitutes a minor violation that is not subject to enforcement action in accordance with the NRC's Enforcement Policy. Therefore, this LER is closed. Documents reviewed are listed in the attachments.

.3 (Closed) Licensee Event Report (LER) 05000285/2015

0. "Inoperable Auxiliary Feedwater System Due to Inadequate Procedure Change

" The licensee submitted this report after they discovered that a procedure momentarily cross-tied Main Feed water (MFW) with Auxiliary Feedwater (AFW) during system restoration steps. The failure to maintain qualified boundaries between these two systems resulted in the inoperability of the AFW system. The licensee causal analysis determined that procedure reviewers did not understand piping class separation requirements. To address this condition, the licensee conducted an extent of condition review and identified that additional AFW system procedures were affected. T hese AFW procedures were administratively restricted for use until they were subsequently revised to correct the lineups. No system procedures other than AFW were found to have similar cross connecting issues. In addition, the licensee has submitted a Training Request Form to address operators understanding of the operability impact of cross

-tying class and non

-class piping systems.

NRC inspectors reviewed the details of this condition including corrective action documents, procedure revisions, and training documentation. Based on a review of the condition, the inspectors determined that during the period that the MFW and AFW systems were cross

-tied that the licensee was in violation of Technical Specification 2.5(1) which requires two AFW trains to be operable when cold leg temperature is above 300F. This violation was identified by the licensee and is discussed in further detail in section

4OA7 of this report.

Therefore, this LER is closed. Documents are listed in the attachment.

.4 (Closed) Licensee Event Report (LER) 05000285/2015

00, "Containment Spray Inoperable due to Original Design Error" On April 16, 2015, during a refueling outage the licensee identified that because the original design of the plant failed to consider the thermal effects of a main steam line break or loss of coolant accident on containment spray piping, modifications were necessary to ensure the operability of the containment spray system during one of these postulated events. This condition existed because the original design of the plant did not account for the rise in the temperature of the dry containment spray piping inside containment. During a main steam line break or loss of coolant accident this piping would heat up more rapidly than piping that contains water and could reach temperatures of up to 290 degrees Fahrenheit. This rise in temperature would impose previously unaccounted for thermal stresses on the piping which in turn would transmit those stresses to the containment liner via certain pipe supports. The licensee corrected the problem by performing modifications to the containment spray pipe supports to ensure that stress limits would not be exceeded in the event of the aforementioned condition. The licensee also performed calculations and determined that prior to the modifications, if the postulated event were to occur, the containment spray piping and supports would have been able to deliver adequate flow despite exceeding ASME Section III Appendix F stress limits for one pipe support.

NRC inspectors reviewed the details of this condition including pertinent calculations, corrective action documents, procedures, and completed work documentation associated with the modifications to the containment spray pipe supports. Based on a review of the condition inspectors determined that during the period prior to the modifications of the containment spray supports the licensee was in violation of Technical Specification 2.4(1)a.iv which requires all piping associated with the containment spray pumps to be operable while the reactor is in operation. This violation was identified by the licensee and is discussed in further detail in section

4OA7 of this report.

Therefore, this LER is closed. Documents are listed in the attachment

. These activities constitute completion of five event follow

-up sample s, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71153.

4OA5

OTHER ACTIVITIES

.1 Operation of an Independent Spent Fuel Storage Facility Installation (ISFSI) at Operating Plants (60855.1)

a. Operation of an ISFSI Inspection Scope A routine ISFSI inspection was conducted of the Fort Calhoun Station (FCS) ISFSI on September 21

-24, 2015, by Region IV Division of Nuclear Material Safety inspectors. The inspectors observed and evaluated select licensee loading, processing, and heavy load procedures associated with the licensee's ISFSI program. Inspectors performed a review of the dry fuel storage records for the casks loaded at the ISFSI to verify that the licensee had loaded fuel in accordance with the Technical Specifications (TS) for approved contents.

A document review of routine ISFSI activities since the last NRC ISFSI inspection (April 2013) was performed by the inspectors. The licensee had not loaded any new canisters since the last NRC routine ISFSI inspection.

The inspectors requested documentation related to maintenance of the fuel building cask handling crane. Documents were provided that demonstrated the fuel building cask handling crane was inspected on an annual basis in accordance with the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) B30.2 safety requirements.

The inspectors reviewed the r adiological conditions at the FCS ISFSI through a document review of the most recent radiological survey and three years of thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) monitoring data from around the ISFSI. A dry

-cask-loading supervisor and one radiation protection (RP) technician accompanied the NRC inspector s during a walk

-down of the ISFSI pad. A radiological survey was performed by one RP technician to record gamma exposure rates. The measurements taken by the RP technician and independently confirmed by the NRC inspector s were consistent with measurements recorded on the most recent ISFSI site survey. The radiological conditions in and around the ISFSI were as expected for the age, heat

-load, and number of casks currently loaded at the ISFSI. The inspectors reviewed Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Reports for the FCS site for the last three years. The reports documented the dose equivalent to any real individual located beyond the site controlled area had been well below the 10 CFR 72.104(a)(2) requirement of less than 25 mrem per year.

The NRC inspectors reviewed the Corrective Action Program (CAP) associated with the ISFSI. A list of condition reports issued since the last NRC inspection conducted in April 2013, was provided by the licensee for the cask handling crane and ISFSI operations.

Of the list of Condition Reports (CRs) provided relating to the ISFSI and the cask handling cranes, the inspectors selected 37 for further review. The CRs were related to a variety of issues. The condition reports reviewed were well documented and properly categorized based on the safety significance of the issue. The corrective actions taken were appropriate for the situations.

The inspectors reviewed the licensee's 10 CFR 72.48 screenings and evaluations for ISFSI program changes since the last NRC routine ISFSI inspection. Of the list of screenings provided by the licensee, the inspectors selected five for further review.

Fort Calhoun Station had not performed any full 72.48 evaluations since the last NRC ISFSI inspection. The inspectors determined that the licensee had adequately evaluated the screenings reviewed.

The inspectors performed an on-site review of the Quality Assurance (QA) audits and QA surveillance reports related to dry cask storage activities at the FCS ISFSI. The QA audit reports and surveillances resulted in several condition reports. The inspectors reviewed the corrective actions resulting from the CRs to ensure that the identified deficiencies were properly categorized based on its safety significance and were properly resolved.

b. Findings

Adequate Analysis that Documents Protection of the ISFSI from Fires and Explosions Introduction

. The inspectors identified an unresolved issue associated with the licensee's ISFSI Fire and Explosion Hazard

Analysis.

Federal Regulations 10 CFR 72.212(b)(3) required general licensees to ensure that each cask used conforms to the terms, conditions, and specifications of the Certificate of Compliance. During a review of FCS Updated Fire Hazards Analysis (UFHA) EA97

-001 Appendix D "ISFSI Fire and Explosion Hazards Review," further information was required to determine if FCS was in compliance with the analysis.

Description

. The FCS UFHA EA97

-001 Appendix D was dated March 28, 2006. Section 3.3.2 of the Appendix documented that the analysis was based on a walk

-down of the station that took place in June of 2005. Many examples were found during the review of the UFHA such that the NRC was unable to substantiate whether or not the licensee's analysis bounded the current operations and site configuration around the ISFSI.

Many referenced analyses and sections in the UFHA referred to use of the light

-weight transfer cask and not the heavier OS197 Transfer Cask that is currently used by the licensee. A walk down of the storage yard to the south of the ISFSI identified a few office trailers and other miscellaneous combustible equipment that was not discussed in the UFHA. In 2007, Engineering Change 29295 replaced the main transformer. It was undetermined if this transformer was the same transformer that was analyzed in Section 3.3.2 of the ISFSI Fire and Explosion Hazards Review.

The licensee's review of this issue will be tracked as an Unresolved Item (URI) until the NRC is provided sufficient information to determine if ISFSI operations are bounded by the site's UFHA. (URI 07200054/5015004

-01, "Adequate Analysis that Documents Protection of the ISFSI from Fires and Explosions

").

4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit

On September 24, 2015

, the inspectors debriefed Mr. S. Dean, Plant Manager, and other members of the licensee's staff of the results of the ISFSI inspection documented in Section 4OA5.

On October 23, 2015, and after the Regional staff received consultation from NRC Headquarters Division of Spent Fuel Management's Spent Fuel Licensing Branch, regarding the Licensee identified violation discussed in Section 4OA7.1, the inspectors conducted a telephonic exit with Mr. S. Dean, Plant Manager, and other staff members. The inspectors presented the inspection results to members of the licensee management and staff. Licensee personnel acknowledged the information presented. The inspectors asked the licensee whether any materials examined during the inspection should be considered propriety. No propriety information was identified.

On November 19, 2015, the inspectors presented the inspection results to Mr. L. Cortopassi, Site Vice President, and other members of the licensee staff. The licensee acknowledged the issues presented. The licensee confirmed that any proprietary information reviewed by the inspectors had been returned or destroyed.

On December 9, 2015, the inspector s obtained the final annual cycle results and exited with Mr. B. Blessie, Operator Training Instructor. The inspector s did not review any proprietary information during this inspection.

On January 7, 2016, the inspectors presented the inspection results to Mr. L. Cortopassi, Site Vice President, and other members of the licensee staff. The licensee acknowledged the issues presented. The licensee confirmed that any proprietary information reviewed by the inspectors had been returned or destroyed.

4OA7 Licensee-Identified Violations

The following violation s of very low safety significance (Green) were identified by the licensee and were violation s of NRC requirements which meet the criteria of the NRC Enforcement Policy for being dispositioned as non-cited violations.

.1 Title 10 CFR 72.174 requires that each licensee maintain sufficient records to furnish evidence of activities affecting quality.

Records pertaining to the design, fabrication, erection, testing, maintenance, and use of structures, systems, and components important to safety must be maintained by or under the control of the licensee until the NRC terminates the license. Contrary to the above, as of June 21, 2013, Fort Calhoun failed to maintain sufficient records to furnish evidence of activities affecting quality. Specifically, the licensee did not maintain records for loading activities associated with DFS

-HSM-06 that was placed on the ISFSI pad in July of 2009. This violation was identified by FC S and placed in their corrective action program (CR 2013

-12884). The fuel assembly data was reconstituted based on records from the Reactor Engineering group

, and the canister helium leak

-test data was reconstituted based on the helium leak

-test technician's field notes. The remaining canister records associated with the canister processing, sealing, and transpor tation to the ISFSI, including several TS requirements, were not found. Fort Calhoun reconstituted the fuel and helium leak test data and conducted interviews with cask loading personnel to conclude that there was no evidence to suggest that loading activities did not comply with the licensee's procedures and the licensed Technical Specifications. This violation did not have any safety impact because all fuel assemblies met the requirements for burn

-up, decay heat, and cooling time and the licensee demonstrated that the canister integrity was intact based on the reconstituted helium leak test records. All the fuel inside the canister and the cask remain in a safe condition. This finding was reviewed by NRC Headquarters Division of Spent Fuel Management's Spent Fuel Licensing Branch. Based on the reconstituted records and interviews with the dry fuel loading staff, the NRC found no evidence to demonstrate that the canister did not meet the required license conditions and as such, found the canister acceptable for continued storage under FCS's general Part 72 license. However, though the canister is acceptable for storage, the licensee must track this issue to identify that further analyses may be required for this canister to meet all applicable Part 71 requirements to be acceptable for transportation.

In accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy Section 2.2 and IMC 0612 Section 03.23, Part 72 ISFSI inspection findings follow the traditional enforcement process and are not disposition ed through the Reactor Oversight Process or the Significance Determination Process. The violation screened as having very low safety significance, Severity Level IV, and is being treated as a non

-cited violation, consistent with Section 2.3.2.a. of the Enforcement Policy.

The violation was determined to be more than minor since the licensee failed to establish, maintain, or implement adequate controls over procurement, construction, examination, or testing processes that are important to safety. The violation was entered into the licensee's corrective action program as CR 2013-12884. Following identification of the issue the licensee performed an assessment that showed the cask would continue to perform its design function. Corrective actions for this issue included performing an extent of condition review, performing an apparent cause analysis report, reconstitution of the missing documents, conducting interviews with the dry cask loading personnel, providing training to the staff involved, and changing processes and responsibilities within FCS Records Management Group.

.2 Technical Specification (TS)

2.4(1)a.iv requires that all valves, piping, and interlocks associated with the components of the containment cooling system required to function during accident conditions be operable

. In the event that any of these components

, required to function during accident conditions become inoperable, the reactor shall be placed in a hot shutdown condition within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />. The containment spray pumps and the associated piping are part of the containment cooling system. Prior to making modifications to containment spray piping in 2015, the operability of this piping would have been challenged by a main steam line break or a loss of coolant accident due to thermal stresses induced in the piping after a rise in containment temperature after the postulated event. Operation prior to the implementation of the modifications was a violation of the technical specification requirements to maintain operability of containment cooling systems.

The violation is more than minor because it is associated with the design control attribute of the mitigating systems cornerstone because the failure to anticipate the rise in containment spray piping temperature dates back to the original design of the plant. This adversely affects the cornerstone objective to ensure the availability, reliability, and capability of systems that respond to initiating events to prevent undesirable consequences. The violation was of very low safety significance because although the subject piping was inoperable due to exceeding code specified stress limits, analysis showed that the piping would have been able to perform its safety function to deliver adequate containment spray flow in the event of an accident. The licensee entered the issue into their corrective action program as Condition Report 2015-04578.

.3 Technical Specification (TS)

2.5(1) requires two trains of auxiliary feedwater (AFW) to be operable when cold leg temperature is above 300F. In the event that both trains become inoperable, immediate action is required to restore one AFW train to operable status. Technical Specification 2.0.1 and all TS actions requiring mode changes are suspended until one AFW train is restored to operable status. Operation with the main and auxiliary feedwater cross-tied was a violation of the technical specification requirements to maintain operability of AFW systems. The violation is more than minor because it is associated with the configuration control attribute of the mitigating systems cornerstone because the failure to prevent cross

-tying these systems resulted in unrecognized inoperability of both trains of AFW. This adversely affects the cornerstone objective to ensure the availability, reliability, and capability of systems that respond to initiating events to prevent undesirable consequences. The violation was of very low safety significance because although MFW and AFW were momentarily cross

-tied, this condition existed for only a brief period of time as operators restored system line

-ups following system testing

. In addition, a Senior Reactor Analyst evaluated the postulated main feedwater line break frequency and exposure time of the condition and determined the likelihood of this event during the exposure time is less than the Green/White threshold and of very low safety significance. The licensee entered the issue into their corrective action program as Condition Report 2015 03698.

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

KEY POINTS OF CONTACT

Licensee Personnel

R. Beck, Manager, Chemistry, Environmental, and Radwaste
B. Blome, Manager, Regulatory Assurance
D. Brehm, Supervisor, Radiation Protection
C. Cameron, Principal, Regulatory Specialist
H. Childs, Manager, Security
L. Cortopassi, Site Vice President
S. Dean, Plan

t Manager

A. Dudas, Radiation Health Specialist, Radiation Protection
L. Eaton, Licensed Operator
S. Fatora, Director, Site Work Management
H. Goodman, Director, Site Engineering
M. Holaway, Licensed Operator
R. Hugenroth, Manager, Nuclear Oversight
T. Jantzi, Unit Supervisor
D. Little, Health Physicist, Radiation Protection
T. Maine, Manager, Radiation Protectio

n

E. Matzke, Senior Licensing Engineer
D. Ortiz, Shift Technical Advisor
A. Pallas, Shift Manager
T. Parent, Engineering
M. Peak, Operator Burdens Coordinator
B. Pearson, Supervisor, Radiation Protection
E. Plautz, Manager, Emergency Planning
C. Scofield, Design Engineering
S. Swanson, Director, Operations
R. Swerczek II, Engineering
P. Turner, ISFSI Manager
T. Uehling, Manager, Training

NRC Personnel

M. Sampson, Division of Spent Fuel Management

LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED

Opened 07200054/2015001

-01 URI Adequate Analysis that Documents Protection of the ISFSI from Fires and Explosions

(Section 4OA5)

Closed

05000285/LER-2015-001-00 LER Inadequate Design of High Energy Line Break Barriers

(Section 4OA3)

05000285/LER-2015-002-00 LER Inoperable Auxiliary Feedwater System Due to Inadequate Procedure Change

(Section 4OA3)

05000285/LER-2015-003-00 LER Containment Spray Inoperable Due to Original Design Error

(Section 4OA3)

LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED

Section 1R01: Adverse Weather Protection

Procedures

Number Title Revision
OI-EW-1 Extreme Weather
SO-G-119 Site Wind Generated Missile Protection Standards
OP-AA-108-111-1001 Severe Weather and Natural Disaster Guidelines
WC-AA-107 Seasonal Readiness
SA-AA-2114 Winter Safety 3
AOP-1 Acts of Nature

Condition Reports

(CRs)

2013-0899 2014-14053 2014-14241 2014-14483 2014-14701 2014-15353 2015-0034 2015-0056 2015-0186 2015-0315 2015-3969 2015-11976 2015-11992 2015-13089

Miscellaneous Documents

Number Title Revision
FCS Snow Removal Plan
USAR 9.8 Raw Water System

Section 1R04: Equipment Alignment

Procedures

Number Title Revision
OI-DG-1 Emergency Diesel Generator No. 1 Operating Instruction
OI-CS-1 Containment Spray Normal Operation
OI-DG-2 Emergency Diesel Generator No. 2
Operating Instruction
OI-RW-1 Raw Water System Normal Operation
108
OP-ST-AFW-0004 Auxiliary Feedwater Pump FW

-10 Operability

IC-ST-IA-3009 Operability Test of 1a

-YCA-1045-C and Close Stroke Test

YCV-1045 7
OI-AFW-1 Auxiliary Feedwater Operating Instruction
SO-G-123 Protected Equipment Program

Condition Reports

(CRs)

2014-0424 2014-1637 2014-2858 2014-4205 2014-6167 2014-6314 2014-6303 2014-6401 2014-13768 2015-1271 2015-1293 2015-10464 2015-13104 2015-13324

Miscellaneous Documents

Number Title Revision USAR 8.4 Emergency Power Sources
DBD-112 Emergency Diesel Generators Design Basis Document
USAR 9.8 Raw Water System

Drawings

Number Title Revision 11405-M-264 Instrument Air Diagram
B120F07001
Starting Air System Schematic for DG

-1 38 11405-M-262 Fuel Oil Flow Diagram

B120F04002
Jacket Water Schematic for DG

-1 9 B120F03001

Lube Oil System Schematic for DG

-1 16 11405-M-100 Raw Water Flow Diagram

105 E23866-210-130 Safety Injection and Containment Spray System Flow Diagram P & ID
118
11405-M-252 Steam P&ID, SH1
116 11405-M-253 Steam Generator Feedwater and Blowdown P&ID, SH4
11405-M-264 Instrument Air Diagram
B120F07001
Starting Air System Schematic for DG

-1 38

Condition Reports

(CRs)

2015-13104

Work Orders

549926-01 549771-01

Section 1R05: Fire Protection

Procedures

Number Title Revision
AOP-06-02 Fire Emergency Uncontrolled Areas of Auxiliary Building
AOP-06-03 Fire Emergency Miscellaneous Areas
SO-G-28 Station Fire Plan
SO-G-28 FCS Standing Order, Page 20 of 234
SO-G-102 Fire Protection Program
CC-FC-201 Fire Protection Program
OP-ST-FP-0003 Fire Protection System Diesel Generator Rooms Sprinkler Functional Test

Condition Reports

(CRs)

2013-19962 2014-8637 2014-12418 2015-12528 2015-12538

Miscellaneous Documents

Number Title Revision/Date EA97-001 Updated Fire Hazards Analysis
USAR 9.11
Fire Protection System Integrated Work Schedule October 29, 2015 EA98-005 Fire Barrier Evaluation
USAR 9.11
Auxiliary Systems Fire Protection System
FC05814 Combustible Loading Calculation, Pages 1, 38, 39, 130,
131 13

Work Orders

484903

Section 1R06: Flood Protection Measures

Procedures

Number Title Revision
EM-FLP-AE-0001 Inspection and Dewatering of Manholes

Condition Reports

(CRs)

2009-4216 2012-4997 2015-11980 2015-13218 2015-13256 2015-14367

Miscellaneous Documents

Number
Title Revision/Date
PBD-30 Cables and Con nections 2
EC 56806 Wireless Remote Level Indication for Manholes
LIC 120041
Reply to Notification of Violation EA

-12-035 April 12, 2012

ER-AA-300-1 Cable Condition Monitoring Program

Section 1R07: Heat Sink Performance

Procedures

Number Title Revision
PE-RR-CCW-0100 Disassembly, Cleaning, and Repair of CCW Heat Exchanger

-Raw Water Side

Work Orders

2251
Title Maintenance Rule Functional Scoping Sheet for AC

-1D EPRI

NP-7552 Heat Exchanger Performance Monitoring Guidelines

Section 1R11: Licensed Operator Requalification Program and Licensed Operator Performance

Procedures

Number Title
AOP-37 Section II, Credible Site Specific Threat

Miscellaneous Documents

Title Revision/Date Emergency Action Level Criteria Reactor Plant Notification Worksheets October 2, 2015 Simulator Scenario Guide 82111s, Inadvertent AFAS Control Room Crew in SCBAs 3a Simulator Scenario Guide 82111V

-2, Armed Attack

Section 1R12: Maintenance Effectiveness

Procedures

Number Title Revision
ER-AA-310-1004 Maintenance Rule

-Performance Monitoring

OI-AFW-4 Auxiliary Feedwater Startup System Operations
ER-AA-310 Implementation of the Maintenance Rule
ER-AA-310-1005 Maintenance Rule

-Dispositioning Between (a)(1) and (1)(2)

ER-AA-310-1001 Maintenance Rule

-Scoping 4

ER-AA-310-1002 Maintenance Rule Functions
ER-AA-310-1003 Performance Criteria Selection

Condition Reports

(CRs)

2015-10170 2015-10177 2015-3698 2015-11560 2015-12414 2015-12825 2015-12828

Miscellaneous Documents

Number Title Revision/Date
Maintenance Rule In Box Database Disposition of CR
2015-10170
Maintenance Rule Scoping Data Sheet for Pressurizer Heaters
LER 2015-002 Inoperable Auxiliary Feedwater System Due to Inadequate Procedure Change

Miscellaneous Documents

Number Title Revision/Date Training Request Form,
TQ-FC-221-FO50
Operability Impact of Cross

-tying Class and Non

-Class Piping Systems Maintenance Rule Scoping Document for Auxiliary Feedwater System Exelon System Inbox Data Base Entries for CR 2015

-3698

Maintenance Rule Expert Technical Meeting Minutes Dated November
19, 2015 (a)(1) Action Plan for HCV

-347/348

Minutes from Maintenance Rule Expert Technical Panel 1 November
15, 2015 RG 1.160 Monitoring the Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear Power Plants
NUMARC 93

-01 Industry Guidelines for Monitoring Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear Power Plants

Section 1R13: Maintenance Risk Assessments and Emergent Work Control

Procedures

Number Title Revision
ER-AA-600 Risk Management
ER-AA-600-1011 Risk Management Administrative Guidance
ER-AA-600-1042 On-line Risk Management
FCSG-19 Performing Risk Assessments
SO-G-96 Planned LCO Entry Criteria and Equipment Reliability Control 15
SO-G-123 Protected Equipment Program
WC-AA-101 On-Line Work Control Process
WC-AA-104 Integrated Risk Management
OP-PM-AFW-0004 Third Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Operability Verification
OP-ST-DG-0002 Emergency Diesel Generator Check
EM-PM-EX-0202
AK-2A-25 and AK

-7A-25 Circuit Breaker Inspections

Condition Reports

(CRs)

2015-2302

Work Orders

543340

Miscellaneous Documents

Number Title Revision/Date
Equipment Out of Service Quantitative Risk Assessment Tool Work Schedule of Week October 26, 2015
Work Schedule of Week November
2, 2015 RG 1.160 Monitoring the Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear Power Plants
NUMARC 93

-01 Industry Guidelines for Monitoring Effectiveness of Maintenance Nuclear Power Plants

Section 1R15: Operability Determinations and Functionality Assessments

Procedures

Number Title Revision
OP-FC-108-115 Operability Determinations
QCP-400 Visual Inspection

s 19

OP-ST-CCW-3006B Component Cooling Category A and B Valve Exercise Test (for the C and D valves)
0a
AOP-17 Loss of Instrument Air
OP-ST-RW-3031
AC-1D Raw Water Pump Quarterly In-service Test 42
AOP-18 Loss of Raw Water
OP-AA-102-103 Operator Work Around Program
OP-AA-102-103-1001 Operator Burdens and Plants Significant Decision Impact Program 6

Drawings

Number Title Revision 11405-M-40 Auxiliary Coolant Component Cooling System Flow Diagram

Condition Reports

(CRs)

2015-04654 2015-04578 2014-12535 2015-1268 2015-12605 2015-12195 2015-12123 2015-9469 2015-11779 2015-10977 2015-9958 2015-11990

Miscellaneous

Number Title Revision/Date FC08434 Calculation:
Operability Evaluation of Containment Spray Piping and Structural System
FC08437 Calculation:
Containment Spray Pipe Support Stiffness Evaluation
ASME BPVC Section III
Div 1 Appendix F
Rules for Evaluation of Service Loadings With Level D Service Limits
1983
PLDBD-ME-10 Plant Level Design Basis Document for Pipe Stress and Supports 17
FCS-179967-RP01 Containment Spray System Pa st Operability Report
EC66593 Engineering Change:
Containment S

pray System Past Operability Report

USAR Appendix F
Classification of Structures and Eq uipment and Seismic Criteria 7 FC08436 Calculation:
Evaluation of Stiffness for Containment Spray
U-Bolts 0 TS 2.15.3
Alternate Shutdown Panel
USAR 7.6.8
Alternate Shutdown Capability
EA 11-026 Design Requirements for Back

-up systems for Air Operated Valves 1 USAR 4.3.1

Component and System Design and Operation
TS 2.1.7 Pressurizer
DBD-116 Feedwater System Design Basis Documents
USAR 14.9
Loss of Load Analysis
USAR 14.10
Malfunctions of the Feedwater System
AU6184 Steel Valve Body

-Fisher Type

FC7863 HELB Mass and Energy Release in the Auxiliary Building
TS 2.4 Containment Cooling
249

Miscellaneous

Number Title Revision/Date TS 3.3 Reactor Coolant and other Components Subject to ASME
XI Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code
230 USAR 9.8 Raw Water System
TDB-111.34
AC-1D Pump Curve 35 11405-M-100 Raw Water Flow Diagram
11405-M-253 Steam Generator Feedwater and Blowdown Flow Diagram
EN 51487 Unanalyzed Condition Affecting the Capability to Transfer Pressurizer Heater Control from the Control Room to the Alternate Shutdown Locations due to the Potential for an External Hot Short from a Fire in the Control Room or Cable Spreading Room
TD J072.0080
Instruction Manual for D

-251 Pneumatic Piston Damper Actuators

Work Orders

541720 560432

Section 1R18: Plant Modifications

Procedures

Number Title Revision
OP-FC-108-115 Operability Determinations

Condition Reports

(CRs)

2014-12535 2015-04578 2015-04654

Miscellaneous Documents

Number Title Revision/Date FC08434 Calculation:
Operability Evaluation of Containment Spray Piping and Structural System
FC08437 Calculation:
Containment Spray Pipe Support Stiffness Evaluation
ASME BPVC Section III Div I Appendix F
Rules for Evaluation of Service Loadings with Level D Service Limits
1983

Miscellaneous Documents

Number Title Revision/Date
PLDBD-ME-10 Plant Level Design Basis Document for Pipe Stress and Supports 17
FCS-179967-RP01 Containment Spray System Past Operability Report
EC 66593 Engineering Change:
Containment Spray System Past Operability Report
EC65926 Engineering Change:
Modify Containment Spray Header and Ring Pipe Supports

- Comp Measure to Support Operability 14

-018 12 USAR Appendix F

Classification of Structures and Equipment and Seismic Criteria 7 FC08436 Calculation:
Evaluation of Stiffness for Containment Spray
U-Bolts 0

Section 1R19:

Post

-Maintenance Testing

Procedures

Number Title Revision
PED-EWP-8 Termination of Cables and Internal Panel Wiring
MA-AA-716-012 Post Maintenance Testing
MM-RR-CH-0001 Inspection and Repair of Charging Pump Hydraulic Sections
OP-ST-ESF-0010 Channel B Safety Injection Containment Spray and Recirculation Actuation Signal Test
OP-ST-CH-3003A Chemical and Volume Control System Pump/Check Valve In-service Test for A Train
WPS-801 Welding Procedure Specification
PED-GEI-55.7 Documentation for an ASME, Section X1

-1998/2000A

Repair/Replacement Activity
PED-GEI-7 Specification of Post Modification Test Criteria
15a Condition Reports (CRs)
2012-05218 2015-12512 2015-12544 2015-12390

Work Orders

531137
546808
546864
552276-01
561530
568072-01
568669

Drawings

Number Title Revision 161F618 Sh. 9 Panel AI

-30B 24 E-4126 Logic Diagram Panels AI

-30A & B 6

Number Title
Weld Data Form Charging Pump Schematic Engineering Change (EC) 64942, Install Rings on Charging Pump CH

-1A,

CH-1B, and CH

-1C Plungers

EC 41693 Replace YCV

-871DO Actuators on DG

-2 Inlet Air Damper YCV

-871D

Section 1R22: Surveillance Testing

Procedures

Number Title Revision
OP-ST-ESF-22 Automatic Load Sequencer Test
SO-G-23 Surveillance Test Program
OP-ST-CCW-3006B Component Cooling Category A and B Valve Exercise Test
OP-ST-AFW-0004 Auxiliary Feedwater Pump FW

-10 Operability Test

IC-ST-IA-3009 Operability Test of 1A

-YCA-1045-C and Close Stroke Test of

YCV-1045 7

Work Orders

549926-01
549771-01

Condition Reports

(CRs)

2014-8080 2014-8701 2015-12268 2015-13104

Miscellaneous Documents

Number Title Revision USAR 8.4 Emergency Power Sources
DBD-112 Emergency Diesel Generators Design Basis Document
USAR 7.3 Engineered Safeguards Controls

Miscellaneous Documents

Number Title Revision TS 3.1 Instrumentation and Control Surveillance Requirements
257 TS 2.15 Instrumentation and Control Systems LCO
270 TS 2.4 Containment Cooling
251 EA92-072 Diesel Generator Loading Transient Analysis
USAR 4.5.6.5
In-Service Testing
USAR 9.7 Component Cooling Water System

Drawings

Number Title Revision 11405-M-252 Steam P&ID, SH1
116 11405-M-253 Steam Generator Feedwater and Blowdown P&ID, SH4

Section 2RS2: Occupational

ALARA Planning and Controls

Procedures

Number Title Revision
RP-AA-16 ALARA Program Description
RP-AA-400 ALARA Program
RP-AA-401 Operational ALARA Planning And Controls
RP-AA-401-1002 Radiological Risk Management
RP-AA-400-1006 Outage Exposure Estimating and Tracking
RP-AA-400-1002 Dose Equalization
RP-AA-400-1004 Emergent Dose Control and Authorization

Condition Reports

(CRs)

2014-11660 2014-13215 2015-01202 2015-03474 2015-05171 2015-05625 2015-05841 2015-06599 2015-07058 2015-07555 2015-07720 2015-07829 2015-08943 2015-10560
Audits and Self

-Assessments Number Title Date

NOSA-FCS-15-06 Radiation Protection Audit Report Fort Calhoun Station July 24, 2015
Audits and Self

-Assessments Number Title Date

RA 2014-1818 Focused Area Self

-Assessment Occupational ALARA Planning and Control

/Occupational Dose Assessment October 5, 2015

Radiation Work Permits (RWPs)
Number Title Revision 15-0325 Forced Shutdown
15-0605 Containment Building Scaffolds
15-0611 Containment Valves
15-0613 Reactor Head Disassembly/Reassembly
15-0643 Pressurizer Heater Replacement
15-0655 Reactor Head Boric Acid Inspection and Recovery
ALARA Planning, In

-Progress Reviews, and Post

-Job Reviews

RWP Number Title Date 15-0605 ALARA Plan February 25, 2015
15-0605 ALARA Post

-Job Review June 26, 2015

15-0611 ALARA Post

-Job Review June 15, 2015

15-0611 In-Progress Review (80%)
April 29, 2015
15-0613 ALARA Plan March 2, 2015
15-0613 ALARA Post

-Job Review August 3, 2015

15-0613 In-Progress Review (80%)
May 19, 2015 15-0643 ALARA Post

-Job Review May 11, 2015

15-0655 ALARA Plan April 30, 2015
15-0655 ALARA Post

-Job Review August 1, 2015

15-0655 In-Progress Review (Job Scope Change)
May 18, 2015

Miscellaneous Documents

Number Title Date
2015-2019 Dose Excellence Plan
CR 2015-6726 Root Cause Analysis Report July 1, 2015
FCR 27 Fort Calhoun Station Outage Report
2015

Section 2RS4: Occupational Dose Assessment

Procedures

Number Title Revision
RP-AA-210 Dosimetry Issue, Usage, and Control
RP-AA-220 Bioassay Program
RP-AA-270 Prenatal Radiation Exposure
RP-AA-301 Radiological Air Sampling Program
RP-AA-203-1001 Personnel Exposure Investigation
RP-AA-700-1302 Operation of Portable Neutron Monitors
IC-CP-02-0202 Calibration of the Eberline ASP

-2E with Remball NRD

Audits and Self

-Assessments Number Title Date

RA 2014-1818 ALARA/Occupational Dose Assessment September 30, 2015

Condition Reports

(CRs)

2012-08108 2014-06027 2014-06253 2015-06197 2015-08905 2015-11674 2015-12568 2015-12568

Miscellaneous Documents

Number Title Date
NCS-14-002 Exelon Neutron & Tissue Equivalent Proportional Counter Equivalent October 28, 2014
Part 61 Waste Streams January 20, 2015
RP-AA-203-1001 Personnel Exposure Investigations April - May 2015

Section 4OA1: Performance Indicator Verification

Procedures

Number Title Revision
LS-AA-2090 Monthly Data Elements for NRC R

eactor Coolant System (RCS) Specific Activity

LS-AA-2001 Collecting and Reporting of NRC Performance Indicator Data
LS-AA-2200 Mitigating System Performance Index Data Acquisitions and Reporting

Procedures

Number Title Revision MSPI Mitigating System Performance Index

Miscellaneous Documents

Number Title Revision
Chemistry Logs and Data Sheets Control Room Logs
MSPI Derivation Reports for RHR Unavailability October 2014 through September 2015
MSPI Derivation Reports for RHR Unreliability October 2014 through September 2015
NRC MSPI for FCS Residual Heat Removal through September
2015
MSPI Derivation Reports for EDG Unavailability October
2015 through September
2015
MSPI Derivation Reports for EDG Unreliability October
2014 through September
2015
NEI 99-02 Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline
NRC MSPI for FCS Emergency AC Power System through 3

rd Quarter 2015

Section 4OA2: Problem Identification and Resolution

Condition Reports

(CRs)

2014-05006 2014-07833 2014-8639 2014-15143 2015-12507 2015-12532 2015-13548 2015-5552

Miscellaneous Documents

Number Title Revision
Apparent Cause Evaluation:
Accumulation of Gas in CCW Pump Casing
OPPD Response to Generic Letter
2008-01 dated October 14, 2008
OPPD Closeout of Generic Letter
2008-01 dated August 10, 2010
OPPD Closeout of Generic Letter
2008-01 dated May
23, 2011

Miscellaneous Documents

Number Title Revision Enercon Report
OPP-026-PR-001 Component Cooling Water System Gas Accumulation Evaluation Adverse Condition Monitoring Plans Maintenance Rule System Performance Indicators System Health Reports Boric Acid Program Work-down Curve Corrective Actions Backlogs Operability Evaluation List Plant Health Committee Documents System Engineering Excellence Plan

Section 4OA3:

Follow

-up of Events and Notices of Enforcement Discretion

Condition Reports

(CRs)

2013-18497 2013-18503 2013-19768 2014-14723 2015-01181 2015-11588 2015-12195 2015-11613

Miscellaneous Documents

Number Title Date
Emergency Action Level Criteria Reactor Plant Event Notification Worksheets October 2, 2015
Notification of Unusual Event Press Release October 2, 2015
EN 51439 Fort Calhoun Station Event Notification October 2, 2015
FCS Event Summary Report October 3, 2015
EN 51487 Fort Calhoun Station Event Notification October 27, 2015
TQ-FC-221-FO50 Operability Impact of Cross

-tying Class and Non

-class Piping Systems

US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Operations Center Event Report Number 51439
October 2, 2015
Section 4OA5
Other Activities

Procedures

Number Title Revision
LS-AA-114-1000 72.48 Resource Manual
LS-AA-114 Exelon 72.48 Review Process
RE-RR-DFS-0001 Prep for Fuel Loading Operations
RE-RR-DFS-0002 Dry Shielded Canister Sealing Operations
RE-RR-DFS-0003 Loaded DSC/TC from Auxiliary Building to ISFSI
RE-RR-DFS-0004 DSC from TC to HSM Transfer Operations
RE-RR-DFS-0006
Loaded DSC/TC from ISFSI to Auxiliary Building
OI-DFS-1 Operating Instruction Dry Fuel Storage System
OP-ST-SHIFT-001 Operations TS Required Shift Surveillance
21
RE-AD-0005 Fuel Selection and DSC Planning

Condition Reports

2015-02718 2015-04649 2015-04657 2013-08569 2013-11753 2013-12884 2013-12889 2013-12898 2013-14015 2013-14036 2013-21520 2014-12980 2015-04309 2015-09467 2013-04609 2013-04864 2013-06343 2013-13545 2013-22911 2014-14413 2015-08899 2013-12902 2013-14124 2013-15557 2013-21512 2014-12507 2014-12702 2014-12944 2014-12944 2014-13041 2014-13046 2014-13407 2015-01274 2015-02232 2015-02319 2015-02352 2015-02718 2015-04649
72.48 Screens/Evaluations
EC 48788
EC 54667
EC 29295
EC 32591
EC 48488

Other Documents

Number Title Revision NUH003.0103
UFSAR or the Standardized NUHOMS HSM System Certificate of Compliance No. 1004 for NUHIMS System 9
FCS ISFSI 10
CFR 72.212 Evaluation Report
FCS ISFSI 10
CFR 72.212 Evaluation Report Att. B
UFHA-EA97-001 Updated Fire Hazards Analysis
13-NOS-079 ISFSI Audit Report NOSA

-FCS-13-78 June 26, 2013

AR 62490 ISFSI Audit Report NOSA

-FCS-14-11 October 29, 2014 M-20150717-3 ISFSI Quarterly Survey July 17, 2015

RP-AA-214 2015 Area Dosimeter Worksheet
2015
RP-AA-214 2014 Area Dosimeter Worksheet
2014
RP-AA-214 2013 Area Dosimeter Worksheet
2013

Work Orders

468478
465905
460009
453580
532688
529760
526783
5211485
520908
512574
491322
488505
479139
475726
472786
516250
447425
512007
478242
468463
460818
451487
519596
515675
479280

Other Documents

Title Date FCS Corrective Action Program Apparent Cause Analysis January 15, 2014 Helium Mass Spectrometer Leak Detector Examination June 24, 2014