ML19209A731: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:'.-.t e''DtrdET'.Po. wen COMPANY 4--.Powzu Burt.nswo 422 Sourn Cnuncu SrazzT, CIMHLOTTz, N. C. 2e24a.l .'rl9 'O : 5t wi w a m o. pa a nc a.s a.
{{#Wiki_filter:'
August 31, 1979 Vice Persiotwv T t t t omou t:Anta7C4 S T E Ame PRODUCTK. N 373-4003..Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Director U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Con.Jiission Region II 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Re: RII:FJ 50-269/79-18 50-270/79-16 50-287/79-18
  .-   .
t e
          '
    '
DtrdET'.Po. wen COMPANY 4-
                                                          -
        .
Powzu Burt.nswo 422 Sourn Cnuncu SrazzT, CIMHLOTTz, N. C. 2e24a
                                                  .l .'   rl  9 'O : 5t wi w a m o. pa a nc a.s a.                 August 31, 1979 Vice Persiotwv                                                           T t t t omou t:Anta7C4 S T E Ame PRODUCTK. N                                                                   373-4003
                                                                                  .       .
Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Director U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Con.Jiission Region II 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Re: RII:FJ 50-269/79-18 50-270/79-16 50-287/79-18


==Dear Mr. O'Reilly:==
==Dear Mr. O'Reilly:==
Line 24: Line 34:
With regard to Mr. R. C. Lewis' letter dated August 9,1979, which tran;;:litted IE Inspection Report 50-269/79-18, 50-270/79-16, and 50-287/79-18, Duke Power Company does not consider the report to be proprietary.
With regard to Mr. R. C. Lewis' letter dated August 9,1979, which tran;;:litted IE Inspection Report 50-269/79-18, 50-270/79-16, and 50-287/79-18, Duke Power Company does not consider the report to be proprietary.
Please find attached a response to the cited item of noncompliance.
Please find attached a response to the cited item of noncompliance.
Ver truly yours,}.W O Ld.-William O. Parker, Jr.
Ver truly yours,
RLG:scs Attachment a m-e me O 1108-084 7 910050 2 N vlo978  
                    .
.*.(~*DUKE POWER COMPANY OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION Response to IE Inspection Report 50-269/79-18, 50-270/79-16, 50-287/79-18
                                              }
.Item As required by 10 CFR 50 Appendix B, Criterion V states in part that activities affecting quality . . . shall be accomplished in accordance with .
W O Ld.                       -
instruc-. .tions, procedures or drawings .
William O. Parker, Jr.
The licensee accepted Quality Assurance. . .Program, Duke Power Company Topical Report, Duke 1A, Section 17.2.5 states in part that the basic written instructions and procedures for operational activi-ties affecting quality are contained in the Steam Production Departments'" Administrative Policy Manual for Nuclear Stations" Paragraph 2.1.3.2.2(a) states in part that a master file of drawings .
RLG:scs Attachment a
shall be established and maintained. .The drawing .
m-     e me O 1108-084 7 910050 2 N vlo978
shall represent as accurately as possible the stations , . . .. .structures, systems and components. Furthermore Paragraph 2.1.3.2.2(b) states in part that adequate working files of d:crings shall be established and maintained. . . .Contrary to the above, activitiee affecting quality were not accomplished in accordance with instructions, procedures or drawings in that five of six work-ing file drawings of safety related systems inspected on July 4-9, 1979 did not accurately reflect the as built conditions.
 
Response The following actions have been or are being taken to correct deficiencies in working file drawings of safety -alated systems:
    .
1.All deficiencie.s identified by the inspector have either been or are in the process of being corrected. All changes to drawings have either been completed or initiated. The procedural deficiency will be resolved prior to the restart of Oconee 3.
* .
2.All Oconee 3 safety related systema in inaccessible areas have been physically verified against the piping drawings. Discrepancies were noted and are in the process of being corrected.
        ~
3.The accessible safety-related systems pf Oconee and all safety-related systems of Oconee 1, 2 will be physically verified by the end of the next Oconee 2 refueling outage. Discrepancies identified as the result of these icapections will be corrected.
(
_ _ _ ._,}}
* DUKE POWER COMPANY OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION Response to IE Inspection Report 50-269/79-18, 50-270/79-16, 50-287/79-18
                                                                                .
Item As required by 10 CFR 50 Appendix B, Criterion V states in part that activities affecting quality . . . shall be accomplished in accordance with . . . instruc-tions, procedures or drawings . . . .      The licensee accepted Quality Assurance Program, Duke Power Company Topical Report, Duke 1A, Section 17.2.5 states in part that the basic written instructions and procedures for operational activi-ties affecting quality are contained in the Steam Production Departments'
          " Administrative Policy Manual for Nuclear Stations" Paragraph 2.1.3.2.2(a) states in part that a master file of drawings . . . shall be established and maintained
          , . . .      The drawing . . . shall represent as accurately as possible the stations structures, systems and components. Furthermore Paragraph 2.1.3.2.2(b) states in part that adequate working files of d:crings shall be established and maintained
          . . . .
Contrary to the above, activitiee affecting quality were not accomplished in accordance with instructions, procedures or drawings in that five of six work-ing file drawings of safety related systems inspected on July 4-9, 1979 did not accurately reflect the as built conditions.
 
===Response===
The following actions have been or are being taken to correct deficiencies in working file drawings of safety -alated systems:
: 1. All deficiencie.s identified by the inspector have either been or are in the process of being corrected. All changes to drawings have either been completed or initiated. The procedural deficiency will be resolved prior to the restart of Oconee 3.
: 2. All Oconee 3 safety related systema in inaccessible areas have been physically verified against the piping drawings. Discrepancies were noted and are in the process of being corrected.
: 3. The accessible safety-related systems pf Oconee and all safety-related systems of Oconee 1, 2 will be physically verified by the end of the next Oconee 2 refueling outage. Discrepancies identified as the result of these icapections will be corrected.
_ _ _ .                                                           _,}}

Revision as of 13:55, 19 October 2019

Responds to NRC 790809 Ltr Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-269/79-18,50-270/79-16 & 50-287/79-18.Corrective Actions:All safety-related Sys in Inaccessible Areas Physically Verified Vs Piping Drawings
ML19209A731
Person / Time
Site: Oconee  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/31/1979
From: Parker W
DUKE POWER CO.
To: James O'Reilly
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML19209A728 List:
References
NUDOCS 7910050294
Download: ML19209A731 (2)


Text

'

.- .

t e

'

'

DtrdET'.Po. wen COMPANY 4-

-

.

Powzu Burt.nswo 422 Sourn Cnuncu SrazzT, CIMHLOTTz, N. C. 2e24a

.l .' rl 9 'O : 5t wi w a m o. pa a nc a.s a. August 31, 1979 Vice Persiotwv T t t t omou t:Anta7C4 S T E Ame PRODUCTK. N 373-4003

. .

Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Director U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Con.Jiission Region II 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Re: RII:FJ 50-269/79-18 50-270/79-16 50-287/79-18

Dear Mr. O'Reilly:

With regard to Mr. R. C. Lewis' letter dated August 9,1979, which tran;;:litted IE Inspection Report 50-269/79-18, 50-270/79-16, and 50-287/79-18, Duke Power Company does not consider the report to be proprietary.

Please find attached a response to the cited item of noncompliance.

Ver truly yours,

.

}

W O Ld. -

William O. Parker, Jr.

RLG:scs Attachment a

m- e me O 1108-084 7 910050 2 N vlo978

.

  • .

~

(

  • DUKE POWER COMPANY OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION Response to IE Inspection Report 50-269/79-18, 50-270/79-16, 50-287/79-18

.

Item As required by 10 CFR 50 Appendix B, Criterion V states in part that activities affecting quality . . . shall be accomplished in accordance with . . . instruc-tions, procedures or drawings . . . . The licensee accepted Quality Assurance Program, Duke Power Company Topical Report, Duke 1A, Section 17.2.5 states in part that the basic written instructions and procedures for operational activi-ties affecting quality are contained in the Steam Production Departments'

" Administrative Policy Manual for Nuclear Stations" Paragraph 2.1.3.2.2(a) states in part that a master file of drawings . . . shall be established and maintained

, . . . The drawing . . . shall represent as accurately as possible the stations structures, systems and components. Furthermore Paragraph 2.1.3.2.2(b) states in part that adequate working files of d:crings shall be established and maintained

. . . .

Contrary to the above, activitiee affecting quality were not accomplished in accordance with instructions, procedures or drawings in that five of six work-ing file drawings of safety related systems inspected on July 4-9, 1979 did not accurately reflect the as built conditions.

Response

The following actions have been or are being taken to correct deficiencies in working file drawings of safety -alated systems:

1. All deficiencie.s identified by the inspector have either been or are in the process of being corrected. All changes to drawings have either been completed or initiated. The procedural deficiency will be resolved prior to the restart of Oconee 3.
2. All Oconee 3 safety related systema in inaccessible areas have been physically verified against the piping drawings. Discrepancies were noted and are in the process of being corrected.
3. The accessible safety-related systems pf Oconee and all safety-related systems of Oconee 1, 2 will be physically verified by the end of the next Oconee 2 refueling outage. Discrepancies identified as the result of these icapections will be corrected.

_ _ _ . _,